Category Archives: Kent and the South East

North Kent’s Cement and Other Industrial Railways – Part 2 – The Medway Estuary and The Hundred of Hoo

The featured image for this article is ex GWR No. 921 pictured at Kingsnorth at Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery and Bitumen Plant on 3rd April 1933. Prior to becoming GWR 921 on absorption in 1924, this locomotive was Powlesland & Mason No.6 (built in 1906 by Brush Electrical, Works No. 314) and operated at Swansea docks. The locomotive arrived at Berry Wiggins from Sugar Beet & Crop Driers Ltd, Eynsham, Oxfordshire in December 1931. It was sold to Leicester Museums and is now (2025) a static exhibit at the Mountsorrel Railway Museum, near Rothley, Leicestershire. This image was shared on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Facebook Group by Roger Gregory on 11th April 2025. [64]

As we noted at the beginning of the first article in this short series, a quick look at the Ordnance Survey maps of the North coast of Kent from the first half of the 20th century show a myriad of standard-gauge and narrow-gauge industrial railways. A similar survey of the Medway valley at the same period in the 20th century shows just how many individual Cement Works and other industries once existed there too. This article inevitably cannot provide a comprehensive look at all industrial railways in the area. Hopefully those covered will be both representative of what was present in the past and hopefully of interest to readers.

The Oakwood Press produced two editions (1973, 1990) of a survey of cement works in Kent. The second edition was an enlarged version of the first edition. Page references are to page numbers in the second edition.

B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner [1] divide the various Cement works into three different geographical areas:

  • The Thames Estuary (working West to East) – this area is covered here; [2]
  • The Medway Estuary
  • The Lower Medway – this are is covered here. [36]

Part 2 – The Medway Estuary

The Medway Estuary as shown by Google Maps. [September 2026]

The Medway Estuary has a rich industrial history rooted in shipbuilding, brickmaking, and cement production, and it now functions as a modern hub for shipping and energy supply.

  • Historic Industries included:
    • Shipbuilding: The Chatham Dockyard served as a primary royal naval shipyard for centuries, driving local employment and heavy engineering. Trenchmanns Wharf on the River Medway has witnessed centuries of maritime activity, from the medieval period through the Industrial Revolution to the present day. [3]
    • Brickfields and Cement Works: During the 19th and early 20th centuries, sites like Horrid Hill and local marshes supported intensive mud-digging, brickmaking, and cement manufacturing. 
    • Traditional Trades: Early uses of the estuary and its banks included grain farming on saltmarsh islands, milling, and paper-making. [5][6]
  • Modern Industry and Economy
    • Energy Supply: The Isle of Grain is home to the UK’s first Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal, operating since 2005. [7]
    • Shipping and Trade: The estuary remains a crucial commercial trading route with active shipping terminals handling diverse raw materials and cargoes. [7]
  • Cultural Sectors:
    • Modern regional regeneration strategies — aligned with the Medway Council — focus heavily on nurturing cultural and creative industries, supported by spaces like the Docking Station at Chatham Historic Dockyard. [8] Balance
    • Conservation: Despite centuries of heavy industrial use, the area supports delicate ecosystems.
    • Designations: The region is protected as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ), with active restoration projects managed by groups like the Medway Swale Estuary Partnership to safeguard vulnerable saltmarshes against erosion. [9][10][11]

This view of circa. 1911-1912 shows the many chimney stacks along the riverside at Frinsbury Peninsula, (see the note about Frindsbury Peninsula Wharves below) Strood’s cement works included Phoenix, Globe, Bridge, Tingeys, Warren, Crown and Beaver Works, © Public Domain. [4]

  • Other wharves on the Medway Estuary included:
    • Cuxton Wharf: Located just downstream from Halling, this wharf served local lime kilns and cement facilities.
    • Frindsbury Peninsula Wharves: The shoreline near Stroud was dominated by a network of wharves feeding the Phoenix, Globe, Bridge, Crown, and Beaver cement works. These are covered in more detail here. [62]
    • Gillingham Riverside Wharves: Positioned further toward the mouth of the river, these wharves handled heavy industrial transport for the Gillingham cement factories.
    • Chatham & Rochester Commercial Wharves which included: Blue Boar Wharf at Rochester Riverside which historically handled heavy freight; Old Gun Wharf in Chatham, dates back to the 17th century when it served as an ordnance depot for the Royal Navy; Sun Wharf & Holborn Wharf which were prominent Chatham wharves located right next to Sun Pier; Bloors Wharf in Rainham which was a heavily utilized commercial shipping point for agricultural and industrial goods.

The list of industries and wharves above are not  intended to be exhaustive, rather they give a strong impression of the industrial nature of the Medway Estuary. Those which follow are also, most probably, not an exhaustive coverage of industrial lines, rather they are examples of industrial sites and their railways/tramways:

The North and West Sides of the Estuary – the Hundred of Hoo and the Isle of Grain

Stoyel & Kidner do not identify any rail-served cement works to the North and West of the Medway Estuary other than those covered in a previous article at Cliffe. [2] There were however other systems, particularly:

103 – Curtis’s and Harvey’s Explosive Factory – Waywell records this industrial site at Lower Hope Point as an explosive’s factory which was opened in 1900 and closed by 1921.

The lines shown purple on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery are all associated with Curtis & Harvey’s Explosive Factory. [14]

As can be seen on the railmaponline.com satellite imagery above, the 2ft-gauge rail network at the site was extensive and the Company employed four 4-wheel battery electric locomotives (or trucks) but their origin and identities are not known. [25: p133]

The majority of the network is picked up on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1908.

An extensive archaeological survey and analysis of the site was undertaken by Rebecca Pullen, Sarah Newsome, Andrew Williams and Wayne D. Cocroft in 2013 for English Heritage. The work extends to two volumes [43][44] and detailed drawings. [46]

The Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway – This railway is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [16]

This railway in its earlier 18″ gauge had a branch between the location of Chattenden Barracks and the village of Hoo. That length of line is covered in the linked article above.

The Chattenden Naval Tramway – this line is covered towards the end of the article about the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway which can also be found on this link. [16]

The Kingsnorth Light Railway – was a 1.75-mile standard-gauge industrial and military line in Kent that connected Sharnal Street Station on the Hundred of Hoo line to a naval airship station and pier on the River Medway. It also served the sites which are shown as power stations on the satellite image below: Damhead Creek Power Station (not a power station at the time) and Kingsnorth Power Station (also not rail served). The full length of the Kingsnorth Light Railway is shown on the railmaponline.com satellite image below. There was also a Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery and Holm & Co.’s Chemical Works at Kingsnorth.

The line shown lilac on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery is the Kingsnorth Light Railway. [14]
At the northern end of the KLR, the line entered a rank of three transfer sidings which sat to the Southeast of the road that became the A228. This extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1909 we can see that the KLR and the transfer sidings were under construction. These sidings were installed as part of the Chattenden Naval Tramway. The Royal Navy permitted shared use with the KLR. Later 6″ and 25″ Ordnance Survey sheets are still in copyright and so are not available on the National Library of Scotland website. [54]
Looking Southeast from the A228 along the Hundred of Hoo Branch. The bridge in the foreground carries the original alignment of the A228. The marshalling sidings and the KLR run parallel to the main line but some distance to the Southwest. The large tree beyond the old road sits on the line of the exchange sidings which extend on to the KLR. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
The blue lines on this extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery mark the Royal Navy lines which also served the KLR. [56]
To the Southeast of Roper’s Green Lane, the  Royal Navy lines feed into the KLR which is shown as a lilac line on railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery. [56]
The blue lines show the Royal Navy lines which also served the KLR. [56]

Looking North along Roper’s Green Lane, the lilac dots are a very approximate indication of the route of the line. [Google Streetview, May 2023]

The next length of the construction site. [55]
A similar length of the line plotted on modern satellite imagery. The road layout in this area is similar to that shown on the map extract above. [56]
Looking back from the old alignment of Stoke Road towards the location of the transfer sidings. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking Southeast from the old alignment of Stoke Road along the line of the KLR. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking back along the line of the old railway from the modern Stoke Road towards the older alignment of Stoke Road which is a short distance beyond the bushes. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking Southeast along the line of the KLR which heads towards the taller trees on the horizon. The structure to the right of the centre of the image is the modern Damhead Creek Power Station. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Almost the full remaining length of the construction site in 1906 appears on this extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906. [55]
A similar length of the KLR as appeared under construction in the map extract above. [56]
Looking back along the line of the old railway from Eshcol Road, which ran to the right of the trees on the horizon. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
The entrance to Damhead Creek Power Station from Eshcol Road. The KLR ran ahead towards the poplar tree. [Google Streetview, May 2023]

Heading South the line of the KLR was remote from highways and headed South to the Medway Estuary. It predated the construction of the Kingsnorth Power Station.

Returning North along the route of the KLR to the location of the Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery ……

The location of Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery seen from the Southwest in 1920. At this time, the area was in use by RNAS Kingsnorth. The location of the refinery is marked on the satellite image above as BCA Kingsnorth. Careful inspection of this photograph will show the site was served by two separate rail connections, that furthest from the camera was a branch off the Southern Railway’s Hundred of Hoo line. That nearest to the camera passes through the near end of the refinery site with two branches. The first runs through the site to connect with the branch from the Hundred of Hoo line. the second, to the right of the image is a short siding. This image can be found on the Britain from Above website, Ref. No. EPW000062, (c) Historic England. [46]
The same site but now in 1935. The view across the site is this time from the West. Close to the camera is the Kingsnorth Light Railway. This view can also be seen on the Britain from Above website (Ref. No. EPW047584) (c) Historic England. [65]
The same site but now in 1952. The view across the site is this time from the Northeast. Closer to the camera is the branch from the Hundred of Hoo line. At the top of the picture, the Kingsnorth Light Railway is visible with the two branches mentioned above. This view can also be seen on the Britain from Above website (Ref. No., EAW032066) (c) Historic England. [47]

RNAS Kingsnorth was a First World War Royal Navy air station for airships, initially operating as an experimental and training station, it later moved on to large scale production of airships. It also provided anti-submarine patrols. A number of experimental and prototype blimps were designed and tested there and until 1916, it was the lead airship training establishment in the Royal Naval Air Service. It should not to be confused with RAF Kingsnorth, a separate airfield near Ashford in southern Kent under RAF control before and during World War II. [49]

Wikipedia tells us that, “In 1912 an airship station was procured by the Admiralty to test and evaluate airships with Kingsnorth farm (later RNAS Kingsnorth) chosen as the location in 1913. Miskin, the landowner agreed to surrender his lease on Kingsnorth Farm so that an airship test hangar could be built. A further 81 and a half acres were later purchased from Miskin (Barton Farm) to allow the unrestricted manoeuvring of airships in the test phase. The air station initially received a German built Parseval PL-18 airship and undertook evaluations, where it received the service designation Naval Airship No. 4 (NA4). Kingsnorth also received an Astra Torres airship. Experiments were carried out including an unsuccessful attempt to launch a fighter aircraft from a non-rigid balloon.” [49]

A HMA 3 Astra-Torres Airship in its shed at RNAS Kingsnorth, this is a painting by by Vereker Hamilton – kept as part of the Imperial War museum collection, (c) Public Domain. [50]

RNAS Kingsnorth was commissioned in April 1914 under the control of the Admiralty, first through the Naval Airship Branch, then through the Royal Naval Air Service when the Royal Navy reformed its air branch in July 1914. The RNAS took over the base’s two huge airship sheds and its development and training functions. The first two airships – Astra Torres No. 3 and Parseval No.4 – were used to escort troopships carrying the British Expeditionary Force to France in the summer of 1914. [49]

“RNAS Kingsnorth was involved in the development and flight testing of non-rigid airships, with the SS-class airship (Submarine Scout) being the first type to operate from there, providing anti-submarine defences to the Thames Estuary and southeast coast.[5] The C-Class airship (Coastal Class) type followed, with aircrews trained at the site until the then-named RNAS Cranwell took over this role mid-war. By the start of 1915, there were less than 100 British airmen who could actually fly an airship. It was then decided that RNAS Kingsnorth would be used as a flying training station. Students who had completed the free ballooning courses and ground instruction at RNAS Wormwood Scrubs, would then be passed on to RNAS Kingsnorth for instruction at an operational airship station.” [49]

Testing of the NS-class airship (North Sea) also took place at RNAS Kingsnorth, with successful flight trials first completed in February 1917. By 914, RNAS Kingsnorth was also home to a newly formed Naval Met Service, which provided weather information to airships operating locally over the North Sea. On 1st April 1918 the Royal Flying Corps and the RNAS combined to form the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the station became known as RAF Kingsnorth before decommissioning in 1921. [49]

Holm & Co. Ltd (Kingsnorth Chemical Works) was established to take over the business of a wood pulp agent, manufacturer, merchant importer & dealer in paper-stock which was carried on by A.A. Holm. Alfred, Amundsen Holm was a Norwegian wood-pulp merchant who acquired part of RAF Kingsnorth. The company negotiated with the Admiralty for the lease of the Sharnal Street to Kingsnorth line, the Kingsnorth Light Railway (KLR) as it became known. A licence for running was obtained by Admiralty Deed on 14th August 1924. Holm & Co applied for a light railway order in November 1925 which was turned down in February 1926; a new application was made which was granted in November 1926. On 21st November 1927, the Kingsnorth Light Railway Order was passed. The order permitted the owners to enter into agreements for the construction of junctions between the railway and the railways of the Southern Railway Company. The Admiralty granted the Kingsnorth Light Railway running powers through their sidings at Sharnal Street so that the KLR had access to the Hundred of Hoo branch. [25: p158]

The traffic of Holm & Co was not to be the staple diet of the railway; another firm of chemical manufacturers set up works just to the north east of Holm & Co. This company was Berry Wiggins, who specialised in heavy duty oil and Bitumen products. Their works are covered below. In the early 1930s there was a dispute over the rates that the Berry Wiggins were to pay for the transport of their products. This resulted in Berry Wiggins constructing an independent connection to the Hundred of Hoo Railway which opened in 1932. [25: p1159]

Waywell tells us that the KLR was operated by No.3. a Kerr Stuart 0-4-0ST (Works No. 4227). “For lighter duties a Hardy Petrol shunter (No.3552) was employed. In addition Holm & Co had its own private works line which was 2ft 6in gauge. This line was worked by “Ferret II” Bagnall No. 1853 of 1908. This was a restricted height saddle tank with a dropped cab and footplate. Its vertical height was probably less than six feet. When it was new it saw service at A.C. Beasley’s works at Ratcliffe, Lancashire.” [1: p159]

The KLR met its fate before World War 2, without the traffic of Berry Wiggins there was little to sustain the railway and operations over it slowly petered out as the Holm & Co works was run down. The track was requisitioned and removed by the Royal Engineers in June 1940 as a war time economy, and was sent to Shoeburyness, Chatham & Leysdown.

Ferret II was bought from Blackwell & Son (Engineers) Ltd. in 1925 and was sold or scrapped after April 1936

No. 3 came from Kerr Stuart in 1929 and was sold to the Royal Arsenal Woolwich.

One Hardy locomotive arrived in 1930, a second in 1936. It appears that both were sold or scrapped by the beginning of WWII.

Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery was constructed in 1931 and was the first oil refinery to be built on the Hoo peninsula. It reused a number of buildings that were formerly part of RNAS Kingsnorth including the jetty via which the crude oil was delivered. This was superseded by Bees Ness Jetty which was opened in 1937 and ran for over 2.5km over Stoke Saltings and Stoke Ooze to the deep channel of the Medway. A third jetty called Oakham Ness Jetty was constructed in 1964 to be jointly used with Kingsnorth Power Station. A pipeline ran between the refinery and a small 19th century wharf on Damhead Creek. The Berry Wiggins refinery continued in use until at least 1978 but has since closed and the majority of the site has been demolished. However, a building through which pipes were directed from both the refinery and Bees Ness jetty could still be seen on aerial photographs taken 2007. Bees Ness jetty also survives although it is in a derelict state as does the later Oakham Ness jetty, presumably still in use by Kingsnorth Power Station. This site was mapped from aerial photographs as part of the English Heritage: Hoo Peninsula Landscape Project. [48]

Waywell tells us that, “The refinery used the Kingsnorth Light Railway until 1932 when an independent rail connection was put in east of Beluncle halt, there was also a branch to a wharf on Damhead Creek. Rail traffic ceased [in March] 1972 and the refinery closed in 1977 and was demolished; the site became that of the Kingsnorth Industrial Estate. Later rail traffic in the 1980s was stone for sea defence work which was unloaded and taken away by road transport, and tank cars for cleaning which were tripped to and from Grain refinery. The rail connection to the Hoo Branch was removed in 2002. Berry Wiggins changed its name on 31st December 1979 to K.C.A. Engineering Ltd. E.J. Aldrich Ltd was formed in 1980 and went into voluntary liquidation on 18th April 1986.” [25: p43]

Berry Wiggins Refinery site as it appears on the Ordnance Survey National Grid mapping of 1961-1971, published in 1971. The junction with the Hundred of Hoo line remains, but the Kingsnorth Light Railway which would have crossed the bottom-left corner of this map extract is no longer present. [53]

The first locomotive listed below was built by Brush Electrical and supplied via Powesland & Mason, arriving on site in 1931. [25: p44][60]

Locomotives used at the Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery are listed by Waywell [25: p44] as:

  • Un-named – an 0-4-0ST with outside cylinders built in 1906 by Brush Electrical (Works No. 314) for Powesland & Mason, which arrived on site from Sugar Beet & Crop Driers Ltd, Eynsham, Oxfordshire in December 1931 (prior to that it was GWR No. 921) The loco was sold on to Leicester Museums, Stoneygate, Leicester on 27th February 1968. [25: p44] [60]
  • No.1 – a 4-wheel petrol-mechanical locomotive built by Motor-Rail Ltd (Works No. 4204, built in 1929). This locomotive was supplied new and remained on site until around 1970.
  • No. 2 – another $-wheel petrol-mechanical Locomotive built by Motor-Rail Ltd. (Works No. 3880). This locomotive arrived on site sometime in 1930 but required an overhaul in 1931. It was rebuilt by Motor-Rail in1931 (Works No. 4217). It remained on site until it was sold to the Worcester Locomotive Society, Moreton-on-Lugg, Herefordshire in January 1973. [25: p44]
  • Titan – an 0-4-0DM, diesel mechanical locomotive built in 1951 by Vulcan Foundries (Works No. D140) and supplied by the Drewry Car Company (their No. 2274). Arriving via Wm Cory & Son Ltd. in early 1965, this locomotive remained on site until it was sold to the Kent & East Sussex Railway by 1985.
  • Un-named – another 0-4-0DM built in 1956 by Vulcan Foundries (Works No. D297) and supplied through the Drewry Car Company (their No. 2583) in 1956 to the SEGB before then passing through the hands of Renwick, Wilton & Dobson Ltd. (dealers), Bristol, arriving on site at Berry Wiggins in circa. 1970. This locomotive was sold to the Purfleet Deep Wharf & Storage Co. Ltd. in February 1979. [25: p44]

Kingsnorth Power Station was a dual-fired coal and oil power station. Construction began in 1963 and the power station went live in 1970, although construction continued through until 1973. The four-unit Hinton Heavies station was operated by energy firm E.ON UK, and had a generating capacity of 2,000 megawatts. It was capable of operating on either coal or oil, though in practice oil was used only as a secondary fuel or for startup. It was also capable of co-firing biofuel, up to a maximum of 10% of the station’s fuel mix. A replacement power station, also coal-fired, was considered by owners E.ON, but plans were abandoned. The proposed replacement attracted substantial public protests and criticism, including the 2008 Camp for Climate Action. [52]

Contractors working at Kingsnorth Power Station were, according to Waywell:

  • Peter Lind & Co. Ltd. – who utilised two Ruston & Hornsby 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical locomotives (Works Nos. 195856 & 237929, built in 1939 & 1946 respectively). Both were supplied by Thomas W. Ward by July 1963 and were sent on to Aveley Plant Depot, West Thurrock when no longer needed. [25: p290]
  • John Mowlem & Co. Ltd. – who constructed a new cable tunnel from Kingsnorth Power Station to Chesney Marshes circa. 1973. Two NEI Mining Equipment Ltd., locomotives were used fir this contract but no details are known. [25: p298]

Damhead Creek is a tidal waterway which transitioned from a rural marshy landscape into a heavily industrialised zone. Following the closure in 1921 of RAF Kingsnorth. Damhead Creek became a centre for industrial wood pulping. When Kingsnorth Power Station was built, Damhead Creek was modified to act as the discharge channel for the station’s cooling water.

In the late 1990s, the American firm Energy began construction of 792 MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power facility. The main station buildings were built directly over a marshy extension of the creek known as Damhead Fleet. Construction concluded at the very end of the century, and the plant formally entered service in February 2001. It had been built by Raytheon Engineers and Constructors and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, who provided the gas turbine equipment. On 2nd June 2004, the plant was bought by Scottish Power for £317 million. Then it was purchased and operated by Drax Generation Enterprise Ltd in 2018 before being sold to Vitol’s VPI Holding in December 2020. The plant is not rail-served. [51]

The Isle of Grain

A fuel depot with an attached port was established on the Isle of Grain in 1928.

By 1953, Kent Oil Refinery was established by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in the south of the Isle of Grain. Over ten million tons of crude oil were processed annually. This led to the building of an oil-fired power station at Grain and dual-fuel-capable power station at Kingsnorth (which, in practice, used coal).

The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company became BP. BP closed the refinery on 27th August 1982. Later, the site was taken over by British Gas plc, which used a small part of the site for the storage of liquefied natural gas. [57]

The Isle of Grain Refinery. [Google Maps, September 2026]
The railways serving the Isle of Grain Refinery are shown on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery in a light peach colour. The lines were all initially under the control of the South Eastern & Chatham Railway, later the Southern Railway.  [14]

From the outset, the refinery could refine 4,000,000 tons of crude oil annually, the majority of which was shipped in from the Middle East. Smaller quantities were also delivered from Libya, Nigeria, Venezuela, and South America. In all, there were twelve jetties for sea vessels: nine of which could accommodate the largest oil tankers of the era (up to 80,000 tons  dead weight). Three jetties served smaller craft of up to 19,000 tons. [58]

The Hoo Peninsula branch provided a passenger service for refinery workers and a single utilitarian prefabricated platform with two faces came into use on 3rd September 1951. Adjacent to the station, David Glasspool tells us, were “four parallel ‘loading’ sidings. Here, pipes were suspended above the tracks on gantries; when tanker wagons were stabled underneath, refined oil could be transferred to them. It would appear likely that these rails were not in use from the outset, instead appearing during the site’s expansion. … The final day of passenger working along the … route, to …  Allhallows-on-Sea and Grain, was on Sunday 3rd December 1961, but the refinery … continued to go from strength to strength. Subsequent expansion between 1956 and 1960 increased the annual refining capacity to …  11,000,000 tons (58 times the capacity of nearby Berry Wiggins).” [58]

By 1983, Grain’s refining apparatus was obsolete. Although refining at the site came to an end, shipments to the site continued, and the site was used for storage. Apparently, the last train carrying oil from the site ran in 1999.

The branch continued to be of value: “container flows had commenced along the route in 1990, with the opening of Thamesport, and the former site of Port Victoria station had become a rail-served gravel works. The future of the western-most section of the branch from Hoo Junction had been secure since 1961; in this year, a spur opened to the Portland Cement Works at Cliffe, this of which itself became a gravel operation from 1969 onwards.” [58]

Locomotives serving at the Isle of Grain Refinery included:

  • Hudswell Clarke 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive ‘Margaret’ (Works No. D1031 – built in 1956) which was delivered new to the refinery in October 1956. It worked on-site until May 1960 before moving on to “Denbigshire to work for Limestone Products. Eight years later the loco made its way to Cheshire to work for W. J. Lee – and then just three years on, in 1971, it was sent to Walsh Transport Services in Darwen, Lancashire, for storage. … In 1987, the loco moved on to Fleetwood Loco Centre, and before its move to [the Ribble Steam Railway], had a significant amount of work carried out to its engine and gearbox.” [59][25: p95]
  • John Fowler & Co. (Leeds) 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive ‘Ormsby’ (Works No. 22077 – built in 1938). Ormsby came to the Kent Refinery from Thurrock Chalk & Whitening Co. Ltd, Essex in December 1951. The locomotive only stayed at the Kent Refinery for a short time, going to Harrisons Limeworks Ltd., Shap, Westmorland by April 1954. [25: p95]
  • Hudswell Clarke – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No.D708 – built in 1951). This locomotive arrived new in 1951 and was sent to M. Lynch & Son Ltd. in April 1971 and from there it went to Wm. Cory & Son Ltd. [25: p95]
  • Hudswell Clarke – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No.D737 – built in 1952). This locomotive arrived new in 1952 and was sent to M. Lynch & Son Ltd. in April 1971 and from there it went to Wm. Cory & Son Ltd. [25: p95]
  • William Bagnall – 0-6-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 3151 – built in 1962). This locomotive came on loan in February 1962 and was sent on to Robert, Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd., Darlington in September of the same year. It was sent later to British Waterways, Sharpness Docks (Marsh 1963). [25: p95]
  • Andrew Barclay – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 412 – built in 1957). It arrived at Kent Oil Refinery from Gavieside Refinery, Midlothian in 1963. It was sent to Ashmores of Dudley Ltd., Commercial Vehicle Dealers in January 1982. [25: p95]
  • Andrew Barclay – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 395 – built in 1956). It arrived at Kent Oil Refinery from Thames Matex Ltd., West Thurrock on hire in 1967. It was returned to Thames Matex Ltd in September 1968. [25: p95]
  • No. 0006 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6971, Built in 1968). It arrived new in 1968 and was sold/scrapped in September 1983.
  • WIN 4820-0007 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6972, Built in 1968). It arrived new in 1968 and was sold/scrapped in September 1983.
  • WIN 4820-0005 – Strachan & Henshaw 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical Road-Rail Locomotive (Works No. 7508 – built in 1967).It arrived new and was sold or scrapped in around 1976.
  • Rolls-Royce Ltd, (Sentinel Works Shrewsbury) 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 10260, built in 1966). This locomotive came on hire from Thomas Hill, Rotherham and was returned there on 9th October 1981.
  • WIN 4820-0007 – Thomas Hill supplied 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive, ‘Man of Kent’ (Supplier No. 294V, built in 1981). This locomotive arrived new in 1981 and was sent to the BP Oil Terminal, Hamble, Hampshire in November 1992.
  • WIN 4820-0009 – Thomas Hill supplied 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive, ‘Kentish Maid’ (Supplier No. 295V, built in 1981). This locomotive arrived new in 1981 and was passed on to the Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal by 7th July 1993.
  • No. 24 F35 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6950, Built in 1967). This lcomotive came from the BP Oil Terminal at Hamble in 1989 and was passed on to the Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal in 1990.

Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal – this terminal occupied part of the Kent Oil Refinery site and used the last two locomotives mentioned above (WIN 4820-0009 and No. 24 F35). Both of these locomotives were passed on to Coryton Bulk Oil Terminal, Essex circa. October 1999. [25: p95]

Brickworks on the Hundred of Hoo included:

  • Hoo St. Werburgh Brickworks which had a short tramway and wharf near West Hoo Creek – advertised for two locomotives at different times – in 1914, for a 2ft 6in gauge locomotive and in 1925, for a 2ft gauge petrol tractor. [25: p159]
The Brickworks at Hoo St. Werburgh as they appear on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1938. [61]

This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery shows the various tramways which from time to time were in use associated with the brickworks. The brickworks were on what is not the site of Hoo Marina Park. [14]

Stores on the Hundred of Hoo included:

  • Belvedere Central Stores Depot, No. 20 which was established on Erith Marsh – It had a standard gauge siding which linked to Cory’s Crabtree sidings and an internal 2ft 6in gauge network. The site operated until 1927 when it was transferred to the West Kent Electric Co. …. Three standard-gauge locomotives were used. The first was ex-LB&SCR No. 642 – built at Brighton Works in 1877 and returned to the LB&SCR in 1919. A second, ‘M/M No.5’, a 4-4-2T, was built in 1885 by Neilson & Co., Glasgow (Works No. 3209), supplied by Ridham Salvage Depot in 1921 and sold on to the East Kent Light Railway on 13th April 1923. The third locomotive was No. 424, also a 4-4-2T Beyer-Peacock locomotive (Works No. 2176, built in 1882) which arrived from W. D. Catterick Camp, North Yorkshire in November 1923 and possibly passed to George Cohen, Sons & Co. Ltd by June 1925. …. Two narrow gauge locomotives were employed on the site: ‘Skylark’ was an 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart locomotive (Works No. 802, built in 1902); and ‘M/M No.7‘ was an 0-6-0T William Bagnall locomotive (Works No.1911, built in 1917). Both of these locomotives had a very short life at the site. They arrived on site in February 1921 from CSD Ridham No. 98 and were removed from site by 15th June 1921, being sent to CSD Neasden No. 31. [25: p188]
  • Ridham Central Stores Depot, No. 98 opened on 24th March 1919 and closed on 24th August 1921. The two 2ft 6in gauge locomotives (Skylark and M/M No. 7) were used at Ridham before being sent to Belvedere. [25: p189]

South of Upnor (on the West Bank of the Medway)

Beyond the southern extremity of the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway were Whitewall Cement Works and a series of Cement Works at Frindsbury. …

  • Whitewall Cement Works – these Works are covered in the third article in this series which can be found here. [36]
  • The Crown & Quarry Works at Frindsbury – these Works, and those which preceded them, are covered in the article above and in more detail here. [62]

The Aveling & Porter Invicta Works – These works were on the banks of the Medway in Strood. Most of the company’s output was steam roller, tractors and traction engines. The company did produce some railway locomotives based essentially on traction engine practice. This is not the place for a history of the company and its works but it is worth noting here that the company was rail-served, despatching much of their output by rail. This company produced some unconventional steam engines for use primarily in industry. More information can be found on Wikipedia on this link. [28]

The South and East Sides of the Estuary

Gillingham Portland Cement Works … Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “A cement works was erected at Danes Hill, Gillingham, in 1874, and was acquired in 1893 by John Bazley White & Bros Ltd, from the Gillingham Portland Cement Co. Ltd. Its tramway is said to have been of 3ft 6 in. gauge. The company was taken over by APCM and closed in 1910. The works was reopened in 1920 under different management, but closed at the end of 1935 for two months, after which an Agreement with the Rugby Portland Cement Co. Ltd allowed it to be opened yet again; Rugby purchased it in 1938 and closed it soon afterwards. At this time it is reported that an engine called Excelsior transferred from Batchelors, Halling was still in the works.” [1: p67]

An extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1896, published in 1898. [17]
An extract showing the clay pit and chalk pit associated with Gillingham Cement Works. [18] These three map extracts cover much of the extent of the Gillingham Cement Works and its Chalk and Clay Pits. The site of the works and tramways straddle three different OS Map Sheets!

This final map extract shows the tramways associated with the Gillingham Cement Works which sat to its East. [19]

Queenborough Cement Works and allied industries …. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “The Queenborough Cement Co. Ltd opened in 1882 and by 1896 had a short tramway down to a wharf and creek leading off the River Swale; a siding to the SECR was laid in 1904. The chalk pit also supplied a ceramics manufacturer, A. Johnson & Sons Ltd, established in 1908, which had a narrow gauge tramway.” [1: p67]

The story of these works and the area immediately around Queenborough is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [12]

British Standard Cement Ltd., Rainham …. These were short-lived works opened in 1912, it was operated by the British Standard Cement Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of E. J. & W. Goldsmith Ltd., making branded ‘Capstan’ cement. It was bought in 1928 by the Red Triangle Group and then in 1931 by APCM, closing 1937. A 2ft gauge tramway linked the Works with its Chalk Pit.

The short tramway of the Rainham Works of British Standard Cement in the 1930s; the wharf was reached through Rainham Creek, and the line at the bottom passed under Gillingham Road into the pit. This extract is taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1934. [13]
The Chalk Pit on the adjacent 25″ OS Sheet – surveyed 1931, published 1933.

Stoyel & Kidner describe three locomotives which worked at the location:

  • Baldwin (Works No. 45142) 4-6-0T (unnamed) built in 1917;
  • Bagnall (Works No. 2149) 0-4-0ST ‘Capstan’ built in 1925; and
  • Bagnall (Works No. 2262) 0-4-0ST ‘Capstan II’ built in 1927.

The Baldwin holds a particular place in industrial railway history. Although a number of 2ft-gauge Baldwins from WW1 were sold to public narrow-gauge lines in Britain, only one was purchased for industrial working. No. 45142 was that locomotive. [15: photo 31]

Stoyel & Kidner say that, “The Baldwin locomotive was acquired in 1918 from the War Dept Light Railways (their No. 560) and was rebuilt by W.G. Bagnall Ltd in 1918 before starting work at Rainham. The other two locomotives were supplied new and in 1933 were transferred to the BPCM Ltd’s works at Beeding, Sussex. The Baldwin locomotive remained derelict at the works for some time afterwards and was then presumably scrapped.” [1: p69]

East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd., Gillingham, Sharps Green Cement Works Co. Ltd … The Gillingham address was probably no more than a mailing address. The company owned a small chalk pit just north of the SECR at a place now known as Lower Twydall.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that a “railway ran northwards [from a chalk pit] under the main road at Sharps Green and on to the narrow peninsular forming the end of Bartlett Creek. Here Mr Alfred Castle had a wharf and barges to take chalk to his works at Queenborough; he also owned the quarry and the railway, but the cement works at Horrid Hill at the tip of the peninsular, known as Sharps Green Cement Works, was owned by C.L. Cary and B.P. Cary. It was opened in 1902, and taken over by APCM in 1910, being closed in February 1913.” [1: p69]

Almost the full length of the tramway appears on the map extracts below. The tramway led to a Wharf on the North side of the ‘island’ called Horrid Hill. The tramway does not appear on the next OS sheet to the North, although the Wharf does.

All these map extracts are taken from the same 25″ OS Sheet which was surveyed in 1906, published in 1909. [14]

Stoyel & Kidner note that two Aveling & Porter locomotives were supplied new to East Kent:

  • ‘Venture’ 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter Works No. 4612, built in 1900.
  • ‘Success’ 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter Works No. 5082 built in 1902.

‘Venture’ had been sold by 1911 to the Sussex Portland Cement Co. Ltd, Beeding, near Shoreham (acquired by BPCM in 1911), and ‘Success’ was later sold to Queenborough Wharf Co. Ltd.

Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd …. Stoyel & Kinder tell us that a Works was set up in 1850 at Sittingbourne on the East bank of Milton Creek close to the village of Murston by George Smeed which mainly produced bricks, but later also lime and cement. The company Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd was formed in 1876. [1: p69]

The company joined the Red Triangle Group when it formed. The Red Triangle Group was the informal but universal name of the Allied Cement Manufacturers Ltd., which operated seven plants in the UK (British Standard, Dunstable, Ellesmere Port, Harbury, Holborough, Rhee Valley and Sittingbourne). The failed Red Triangle Group became part of APCM in 1931. These works closed in 1970.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “a railway of 3ft 7½ in. gauge ran from the East Hall clay pits, just west of Tonge Road, to some sheds and then on under Murston Road to the Smeed Dean complex.” [1: p70]

The tramway network associated with Smeed Dean is covered by these next two map extracts.

The tramway network belonging to Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd and its successors as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1896, published in 1897. The cement works can be seen on the first of these two map extracts at the left edge of the image, immediately below Milton Creek. [20]
The 1896 survey as a transparent overlay on a modern satellite image. The two features which remain are Milton Creek in the top left of this image and what was, in 1896, the London, Chatham and Dover Railway, now often referred to as the North Kent Line. a[21]

According to Stoyel & Kidner, locomotives used on this tramway were supplied new but to different designs. [1: p70] The company did not give them names. They were:

  • 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 656) built in 1900;
  • 0-4-0T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 701) built in 1900;
  • 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 811) built in 1903;

Stoyel & Kidner say that, “The two earlier locomotives were scrapped in 1949 when the railway system was discontinued, but the 1903 one remained in storage in its shed until it was finally broken up in 1957.” [1: p70]

Broom Bank Railway …. Stoyel & Kidner tells that this railway was 4ft 3in-gauge opened in 1933, and ran from just North of Smeed Dean cement works. eastwards to East Hall, then North through Mere Court to clay pits near Little Murston. This seems to be much the same route as followed by the northern arm of the Smeed Dean network from earlier in the century. The later OS Map (surveyed in 1938, published in 1946) [22] shows a very similar alignment to that on the map extracts above.

Stoyel & Kidner note the similarity in alignment between the two networks but emphasise the difference in gauge. They note that two locomotives were employed on this line, both of which must have arrived after deployment elsewhere as both we manufactured well before the Broom. bank Railway opened.

  • Wouldham – an 0-4-0ST built in 1920 by Barclay (Works No. 1679); and
  • Venture – another 0-4-0ST built by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1835).

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “both these locomotives were transferred from the BPCM Works at Wouldham Hall, in 1934 and 1935 respectively, and the rather unusual gauge was no doubt chosen for no better reason than the fact that these locomotives and other rolling stock happened to be available at the time. Venture was scrapped in 1949, but Wouldham lingered on to meet the same fate in 1962. Diesel locomotives were in use by 1956.” [1: p70] They do not provide details of the diesel locomotives used on the line.

APCM Ltd, Highsted, Sittingbourne (Highsted Chalk Pits) …. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “Just North of the hamlet of Highsted, there was a group of pits whose railway was unconnected with any other, supplying chalk to the Smeed Dean works latterly through a large-bore pipeline, mixed with water. A pit to the east of Highsted road was opened first, about 1896, served by a narrow gauge railway. Later a larger pit the other side of the road was opened up. and the two were connected by tunnel. The railway was taken up in World War I and replaced in 1927 by a standard gauge line; this was also out of use in 1942-7. After re-opening, a third pit was opened up south of Tunstall Road, entered by a tunnel at the south-east end of the second pit, electrically worked.” [1: p70]

The Highsted Chalk Pit as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1909. [24]
Highsted Chalk Pits in 1938 as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1946. The network of railways was more substantive than shown on this map extract. [26]

The only locomotive recorded at this site was:

Tay – an 0-4-0ST built in 1924 by Barclay (Works No. 1828) and arrived on site in 1927 once the line had been converted to standard-gauge.

The locomotive was bought from the Avonmouth contract of Sir W. Arrol & Co. “In 1942, it was transferred to the BPCM Ltd’s Works at Greenhithe and was almost immediately re-transferred to the APCM Ltd’s Dunstable Works. It remained there until 1946 when it returned to Greenhithe and went back to Highsted in 1947. It remained in the chalk pit here until it was scrapped in 1962.” [1: p71]

Stoyel & Kidner also note that, “The equipment for the electrical working of the third pit came from the G. & T. Earle, Hope Works in Derbyshire; there was a live centre rail taking 250V power from a motor generator. The three locomotives weighed 15 tons. with two 27 hp motors; two were built by Metropolitan-Vickers in 1927 and one in 1935 by Hawthorn Leslie. Trains of seven wagons took 56 tons of chalk from the pit to the old washeries, from which it was piped as slurry. Electric working started in November 1958 and ceased in 1970 when the works closed down.” [1: p71]

There is some discussion about modern explorations of the tunnels associated with these chalk pits here. [23]

Other Cement Works …. There was an F.C. Barron & Co. cement works on the east side of Otterham Creek but Stoyel & Kidner note that there was no evidence of a railway at that location. They also note other Cement Works in the general area which include, “Crown Quay Cement Works (F. Rosher & Co.) Sittingbourne; Dolphin Cement Works (C. Burley Ltd) on Milton Creek; Elmley Cement Works (later Maclean Levett), established about 1854 on Elmley Isle; there are no details of railways.” [1: p71]

Other Rail-Served Industries located in and to the South of the Medway Estuary

Medway Ports Authority on Hoo Ness Island

Waywell notes that while the present location is under the jurisdiction of Medway Ports Authority it has had a series of different owners – originally the Admiralty, then the Ministry of Public Building & Works, then the Department of the Environment (until 1985). A 2ft 6in-gauge tramway ran round the perimeter of the island – at first this was used for the transport and disposal of mud dredged from Chatham Docks, later, when a pipeline replaced the tramway, the tramway was used only for maintenance. That tramway appears to have been replaced by a 2ft-gauge tramway in 1952. [25: p177]

The 2ft 6in-gauge tramway on Hoo Ness Island was replaced in 1952 by a 2ft-gauge tramway. [25: p15]

In 2ft 6in-gauge days (pre 1952) 9 locomotives are recorded as in use by Waywell, in 2ft-gauge days (post 1952) 4 locomotives are recorded. [25: p177]

The full list of these locomotives can be found in Waywell’s book. [25: p177] It is, however, worth noting here that apart from five 4 wheel petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotives (onje of which was rebuilt) the 2ft 6in-gauge locomotives were:

  • Ascension (an 0-4-0T Avonside Engine locomotive (Works No. 1480) built in 1904 arrived here after service on the Chattenden & Upnor Railway by July 1914. It was set aside or scrapped after 6th June 1928. [25: p177]
  • Nipper & Ness (two 0-4-0ST Barclay locomotives (Works Nos. 1895 & 1947) built respectively in 1909 and 1911 were supplied new from the manufacturer. [25: p177]
  • Sirdar (an 0-4-0T Kerr Stuartlocomotive (Works No.749) built in 1903 came to the site after being used in a number of locations. Waywell lists these as “Henry Lovatt & Sons, contractors, [until] 1914, originally Leek & Manifold Valley Light Railway (1902-1904) contract, Staffordshire; (possibly thence Manchester Ship Canal No.9 Dock, Salford (1902-1905) contract, Lancashire).” [25: p177]

After 1952 – one of the 2ft 6in-gauge 4-wheel petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotives was re-gauged to 2ft. Another petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotive was purchased and the two locomotives served together on the island until 1962 when they were sent to the dealers, George Cohen, Sons & Co. Ltd,

In 1962, two 4-wheel diesel mechanical locomotives were employed, remaining on the island until 27th April 1990 and were then sold into preservation.

Chatham Dockyard

This extract from a CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on ‘The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent’ shows the immediate area around Chatham Dockyard. [25: p15]

All of the sites referenced in the top right of this extract from a CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent [25: p15] are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [27]

Two separate locations outside of the dockyard are highlighted in the image above:

P45 – The Royal Engineer’s Museum – it was established in its present location in 1987. It has standard-gauge and 2ft-gauge exhibits but is not within the scope of this article. [25: p372]

C16a – Ball & Gammon Chatham Contract – Ball & Gammon undertook the construction of a branch line from the London, Chatham & Dover Railway (LC&DR) into Chatham Dockyard between 1875 and 1877. Waywell says that the work cost circa £57,000, opening on 16th February 1877. The contractor’s railway may have been 3ft 6in-gauge. One Aveling & Porter locomotive was used on the work: [25: p272]

  • Burnt Oak – 4 wheel WTG (geared transmission), built in 1868 by Aveling & Porter (Works No. 447) arrived from Aveling &Porter in May 1875 possibly after repairs. [25: p272]

168, 170, 174, 252 – Chatham Dockyard – all are covered in a separate article which is reference above. [27]

C55, C63, C148, C156 – Chatham Dockyard Contracts – all are covered in a separate article which is reference above. [27]

P9, P10, P40 – Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust, Chatham Steam Restoration Co., North Downs Steam Railway – all are preservation activities not strictly relevant to this article, all operate or operated within the Dockyard complex. Please see the separate article about the Dockyard. [27]

Rochester

Three locations South of the River Medway are highlighted in the image below which is also an extract from the CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent. [25: p15]

The River Medway Southwest of the Medway Estuary in Stroud and Rochester. [25: p15]

Three locations are noted by Robin Waywell:

44 – Invicta Works, Aveling & Porter – Most of the company’s output was steam roller, tractors and traction engines. The company did produce some railway locomotives based essentially on traction engine practice. This is not the place for a history of the company and its works but it is worth noting here that the company was rail-served, despatching much of their output by rail. However, the location marked by Waywell [25: p15] appears to be incorrect. The factory was on the Northwest side of the Medway in Strood. More information can be found on Wikipedia on this link. [28]

94 – William Cory’s Coal Wharf – had a travelling crane and extensive railway sidings which were laid in 1909 on land built up with chalk fill. These sidings had a connection to the Rochester-Canterbury line just to the North of Rochester Railway Station. The Wharf closed in 1970 but the site was worked for British Gypsum Ltd (Fridays only) until around 1984.

Cory’s Wharf sits across two 25″Ordnance Survey Sheets as shown here. These extracts are from the 25″ survey of 1932/33, published in 1935. [29][30]

Waywell records a number of standard-gauge locomotives employed at the site: [5: p121-122]

  • Bristol – an 0-6-0ST, built in1901 by Avonside Engine Co. (Works No 1427) arrived new and was sent to Erith Wharf. [5: p121-122]
  • Erith – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1904 by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1638) arrived new and was scrapped or sold by 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Belvedere – a 4-wheel WTG – built by Aveling & Porter (Works No. 3888) in 1897, ex-Erith Wharf in April 1909, sent on to Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • (Jetty) – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1910 by Avonside Engine Co. (Works No. 1578) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex in July 1948 and was sold or scrapped in 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Purfleet – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1919 by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1973) arrived from Erith Wharf in July 1938 and was sent to Purfleet Wharf, Essex by 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Woolwich – 4wVBT – built in 1927 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.8796) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • Charlton – 4wVBT – built in 1933 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.7060) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • Belvedere – 4wVBT – built in 1945 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.9365) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by May 1950 and was sent to Thomas Hill, Rotherham in 1957 and thence to Thomas E. Gray Ltd, Burton Latimer, Northamptonshire in May 1958. [5: p122]
  • Greenwich – 4wVBT – built in 1929 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.7696) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by January 1952 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • R39 – Thalia – an 0-4-0DM – built in 1954 by Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd. (Works No.7816) and supplied via Drewry Car Co. Ltd. (No.2503) in 1954, arrived new and was sent for preservation at the North Downs Steam Railway, Chatham Dockyard on 7th September 1985. [5: p122]
  • Telemon – an 0-4-0DM – built in 1955 by Vulcan Foundry (Works No.D295) and supplied via Drewry Car Co. Ltd. (No.2568) in 1955, arrived new and was sent to Strood Depot in 1973 and thence to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p122][5: p367]

P39 – William Cory & Son Ltd, Cory’s Wharf, Rochester – Waywell separately identifies the preservation activities of the company which, while not strictly relevant here, encompassed the following standard-gauge locomotives: [5: p367]

  • No. 1 – Scottie – an 0-4-0DM, built in1957 by Ruston Hornsby (Works No. 412427) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 13th December 1986 and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 21st December 1987. [5: p367]
  • No. 2 – Burt – an 0-4-0DM, built in1950 by Motor Rail Ltd (Works No. 9019) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 6th December 1986, and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No. 4 – (No. 3) – 0-4-0DH, built in1959 by John Fowler (Leeds) (Works No. 4220008) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 5th May 1987, and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No. 6 – (20287) Princess Margaret – an 0-4-0 DM, built in1948 by Barclays (Works No. 376) arrived from Chatham Dockyard 29th December 1986 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by June 1987.
  • No. 8 – Octane – an 0-4-0DE, built in 1958 by Yorkshire Engine Co. (Works No.2686) arrived from Esso Ltd, Purfleet, Essex on25th April 1987 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No.9 – R40 Telemon – (see Telemon above).
  • No. 3 – North Downs – an 0-6-0DT – built in 1955 by Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd. (Works No.7846) arrived from Chatham Dockyard by June 1987 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]

Along the South Side of the Estuary

Of the Works noted by Robin Waywell an number have already been covered above. These include:

114 – East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd., Gillingham, Sharps Green Cement Works Co. Lt. [5: p140]

41 – British Standard Cement Ltd., Rainham. [5: p73]

Another extract from the CAD drawing provided by Robin Waywell in his book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent. [25: p15]

Works not already covered include:

87/H40 – Rainham Brickfield – Brickfields operated by Joseph Edward Butcher, located on both sides of Otterham Quay Lane with a tramway between the brickfields and clay pits; in operation by 1867 until at least 1882; later taken over by Eastwoods Ltd. Gauge: 3ft 0in. [5: p118] Adjacent were Otterham Quay Brickworks established by A. J. Knight by 1891 with a tramway to a wharf at Otterham Quay. the works closed after 1913, but certainly by 1924. [5: p389] Records have an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0WTG locomotive (Works No. 1574) of 1879 being delivered new to the Brickworks. [5: p118]

Waywell also identifies companies that seem to have operated later in the 20th century on these sites. These are covered separately below – London & Rochester Trading Co. Ltd (Rainham Brickworks), [25: p173-174, but see the notes below] and Redland Bricks Ltd (Otterham Works). [25: p200, but see notes below]

Otterham Quay Brickworks and Rainham Brickworks straddled Otterham Quay Lane. These are shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [31]

Close by were Falcon Cement Works and Overshore Brickworks, established in the 19th century these works operated Operated under various ownerships—including Burge and Barron, F.C. Barron and Co., and Barrons Cement Co.—before being acquired by the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (BPCM/Blue Circle) in 1911 and closing permanently in 1913. As can be seen below the company’s wharf and Overshore Brickworks were rail-served but not more widely connected to the rail network. Typically, this would have been a 2ft-gauge line. [32][25: p382]

Falcon Cement Works and Overshore Brickworks. These are shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [33]

119 – Gore Farm Clay Pit, Upchurch – this clay pit had a 2ft-gauge tramway and a wash mill.

120/121 – Lower Halstow Brickworks and Workshops – it appears that the same 2ft-gauge tramway served these locations as well.

Lower Halstow Brickworks appear to have extended over a relatively large area. Here, and extending onto the next OS Sheet to the South, we see the site to the North of Lower Halstow village. [35]

Here we see the most southerly portion of the works on the North side off Lower Halstow village and the village of Lower Halstow, [34]

The map extract below shows the more southerly area of the brickworks sited to the Southwest of the village of Lower Halstow. [34]

The most southerly element of Lower Halstow Brickworks as show on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [34]

The most southerly length of the tramway which ran through Lower Halstow Brickworks, also runs along side Little Gore Woods to claypits to the Southeast of Gore as show on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [34]

Gore Farm had two 2ft-gauge locos:

A 4wDM built in 1936 by F. C. Hibberd & Co. (Works No. 2009) which, by July 1958, was resident at Lower Halstow Workshops; [5: p144] and a 4wDM built in 1930 by Orenstein & Koppel (Works No. 4105) possibly supplied by Wm. Jones, Greenwich which was sent on to Bobbing Clay Pits in 1955. [5: p144]

Also worthy of note is another Brickworks and tramway network to the Northwest of Lower Halstow, North of Upchurch, close to Frog Farm and Wetham Green which is shown on the map extract below. [35]

The Brickworks at Wetham Green warrant a short note in Waywell’s lists which is reproduced towards the end of this article. This tramway was horse-worked and never employed locomotives. [35]

Between Lower Halstow Brickworks and Workshops,

, Waywell records nine unnamed 4-wheel locos. These are:

  • 4wWE (overhead wire-powered electric locomotive) – built around 1900 by A. Hurst & Son, Dewsbury, Supplier not known, sent to M. Lynch & Son for scrap in around 1920; [5: p144]
  • 4wPM – built in 1933 by F. C. Hibberd (Works No.1828) – ex Hibberd’s possibly on hire, previously at Orb Works Newport, Monmouthshire, returned to Hibberd’s where it was rebuilt as Works No.2004; [5: p144]
  • 4wPM – built in 1935 by F. C. Hibberd (Works No.1905) – ex Hibberd’s, previously at Middle Level Commissioners, March, scrapped on site; [5: p144]
  • 4wDM – built in1939 by Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 198258), arrived from Orton Brickworks, Cambridgeshire by August 1956, scrapped on site; [5: p144 &145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1936 by F.C. Hibberd (Works No. 2009), arrived new at Gore Farm Pits (noted above) and moved to Lower Halstow Brickworks by July 1958, scrapped in 1967; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1935 by F.C. Hibberd (Works No. 1934) arrived from Barrington Cement Works, Cambs. after August 1953, definitely here by11th August 1956, scrapped on site; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built by Orenstein & Koppel (build date and works number not known) may have been supplied by Wm. Jones Ltd., Greenwich – certainly present by 24th August 1964, probably scrapped on site; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1934 by Motor Rail Ltd. (Works No. 5862) arrived from Orchard Farm Clay Pits by April 1966, sent to Allbrook Brickworks, Hampshire by April 1967; [5: p145] and
  • 4wDM – built in 1941 by Motor Rail Ltd. (Works No. 8626) arrived from Orchard Farm Clay Pits by April 1966, scrapped around 1967. [5: p145]

147 – Ibstock Building Products Ltd, Funton Works, Lower Halstow – this brickworks was built in the 1930s. It was used as a War Department Store during WW2. First owned by Newington Bricks Ltd., then by Eastwoods Ltd., then by Redland Bricks Ltd. and then by Ibstock Bricks Ltd. Limited information is available about the locomotives used internally. It seems that there were two different gauges both electrically powered:

3 locos were 4ft-gauge all built locally – 2w-2WE

2 locos were 2ft-gauge, again locally produced, a 4wBE of 1956 and a 2w-2BE of 1979. [5: p162]

Funton Brickworks in the 21st century. [Google Maps, September 2026]

161 – London & Rochester Trading Co. Ltd (Rainham Brickworks) – were a company of barge & ship owners. By 1924 the Company owned 60 sailing barges. By 1930, the Company also operated a brickworks at Otterham Quay. The works had a 2ft-gauge tramway from a pug mill which crossed the Lower Rainham Road to a chalk pit. [25: p173-174]

Whilst I cannot be entirely sure which brickworks Waywell is referencing here, it is possible that he is referring to this short tramway or that shown on the image immediately below. The two tramways and Works are immediately adjacent to each other. [37]

Two separate tramway networks appear on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1946. These appear of the two adjacent extracts from the same OS sheet. [37]

Waywell list three locomotives as having been active at the site. All three were 4-wheel petrol mechanical locomotives built by F. C. Hibberd & Co. Ltd – all were scrapped by April 1948:

  • Works No. 1539 built in 1927
  • Works No. 1598 built in 1928
  • Works No. 1631 built in 1929

194 – Redland Bricks Ltd (Otterham Works) – Alternatively, one of these brickworks may have been operated by Redland Bricks Ltd. Waywell notes a a 2ft-gauge tramway from the Brickfield to Otterham Quay which also had a 2ft-gauge cable operated line. the Site was closed by 1991. two 4-wheel battery electric locomotives built by Redland cam second hand to these works in 1956 (from Fulton) and 1974 (from Warnham). Bother were scrapped by August 1992. [25: p200]

180 – Newington Brickworks – a brickworks located next to the A2 to the West of Sittingbourne. It was listed in directories from 1948 . Initially locomotive worked but superseded by hand-working. [25: p189] Track was 2ft-gauge and the three locomotives were all 4-wheel diesel mechanical locos:

  • Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 182140), built in 1936 and arrived on site from Hoo Brickworks by 22nd July 1948 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe after 2nd August 1954 and by July 1958.
  • Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 222094), built in 1946 and arrived on site from the War Department, Liphook, Hampshire after 28th March 1957 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe after 2nd August 1954 and by July 1958.
  • Hunslett (Works No. 2449), built 1941, originally War Department and arrived on site from Fred Watkins Ltd. dealer by July 1958 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe around 1962. [25: p189,190]
Newington Brickworks & Tramway only appear on the 25″ OS Sheet of 1906, published in 1908. [40][41]

225 – Motney Hill Sewage Works, Rainham – operated by Rochester, Chatham & Gillingham Joint Sewerage Board until 1st April 1974. The original rail system was 20″-gauge and was replaced in 1952 by a 2ft-gauge system. The rail system finally closed in 1978. [25: p 218] The Wastewater Treatment Works is now operated by Southern Water. [38]

Waywell lists three 20″-gauge locomotives as having been active at the site before 1952. All three were 4-wheel petrol mechanical locomotives built by F. C. Hibberd & Co. Ltd.:

  • Works No. 1690 built in 1930
  • Works No. 1806 built in 1932
  • Works No. 2036 built in 1937

All were disposed of after 1952, apparently two were sent to W. Morris, Bromyard & Linton Light Railway, Herefordshire in 1978. [25: p 218-219]

Waywell lists two 2ft-gauge $-wheel diesel mechanical locomotives built by Motor Rail which arrived new in 1952 and which were both sent on to W. Morris,Bromyard & Linton Light Railway, Herefordshire in 1978. [25: p 218-219] The two locomotives were:

  • Works No. 9676 built in 1952
  • Works No. 9677 built in 1952
Motney Hill Sewage Works as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1934. [39]

H62 – Upchurch Brickworks (Wakeley Brothers) – Waywell records these brickworks as being established by 1874 and sat on Poot Lane, Upchurch. The Works had a horse-worked tramway that connected to clay pits near Frog Farm. The Works closed sometime after 1918 and definitely by 1922.

A repeat of an image from earlier in this article: the Upchurch Brickworks at Wetham Green. This tramway was horse-worked and never employed locomotives. [35]

C16 – Ball & Gammon, Gillingham Contract – a contract for construction of a Wharf at Gillingham was let on 15th February 1867 to J. H. Ball & Co., it involved the construction of a wharf at Government expense because expansion of Chatham Dockyard had taken other land adjacent to its site. The contract ran from 1867 to 1872. Two Aveling & Porter locomotives were used on the contract on what were probably 3ft 6In gauge rails: [25: p272]

  • Unnamed – 4-wheel WTG built in 1868 (Works No. 320) came new to the site and was scrapped at the end of the contract.
  • Burnt Oak – 4-wheel WTG built in 1868 (Works No. 447) came new to the site and returned to Aveling & Porter for repairs?

C16a – Ball & Co., Chatham Contract – a contract for the construction of a branch line from the LCDR into Chatham Dockyard. The contract ran from 1875 to 1877 and made used of ‘Burnt Oak‘ after repairs? at Aveling & Porter. [25: p272] This location was noted above when taking a quick look at Chatham Dockyard. [27]

H6 – Darland Brickworks – in operation from 1899, had a narrow gauge tramway which is shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey 1906/1907, published in 1909. No further details are known. [25: p381]

Darland Brickworks Tramway as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906/1907, published in 1909. [63]

H30 – Court Field Brickworks, Gillingham – were established by 1874 and had a tramway to clay and chalk pits which was probably worked by horses. Thew proprietor’s death in 1903 led to then closure of the works soon after, [25: p387]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner; The Cement Railways of Kent; The Oakwood Press (LP70], Headington, Oxford, 1973 & 1990.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/26/kents-cement-and-other-industrial-railways-part-1
  3. https://www.medway-moorings.co.uk/history, accessed on 7th September 2026.
  4. https://apps.medway.gov.uk/apps/medwayimages/details.asp?pga=160&searchtype=&search=strood&pg=28, accessed on 7th September 2026.
  5. https://petesfavouritethings.blog/2016/04/07/river-medway-industrial-legacy, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Medway, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  7. https://msep.org.uk/the-estuary, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  8. https://www.medway.gov.uk/news/article/1703/medways_creative_vision_institutions_unite_to_nurture_socio-economic_and_cultural_growth)Environmental, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  9. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr5j2grpzmqo), accessed on 9th September 2026.
  10. https://msep.org.uk/the-estuary/), accessed on 9th September 2026.
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medway_Estuary_and_Marshes, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/17/queenborough-cement-works-and-associated-industries-at-queenborough
  13. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677350, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677344, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  15. Andrew Neale & David Smith; Industrial Railways of the South East; Middleton Press, Midhurst, West Sussex, 1984.
  16. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/26/the-lodge-hill-upnor-railway-chattenden-upnor-railway-and-the-chattenden-naval-tramway-kent
  17. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677182, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677218, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677317, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.4&lat=51.34755&lon=0.75938&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.4&lat=51.34755&lon=0.75938&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=50, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  22. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101429103, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  23. https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/threads/highsted-chalk-pits-kent-jun-2018.113293, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  24. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101429106, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  25. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103678859, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  27. The article on this blog about Chatham Dockyard. …
  28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aveling_and_Porter, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677167, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677206, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  31. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677389, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  32. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_falcon.html, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  33. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677353, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  34. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677395, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  35. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677359, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  36. The article on this blog about the Industrial Sites alongside the Lower Medway.
  37. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677383, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  38. https://www.wastebook.co.uk/directory/motney-hillwaste-water-treatment-works-southern-water-services-limited/#google_vignette, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  39. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677350, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  40. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677428, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  41. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE16584, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675694, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  43. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7477/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsVolume1, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  44. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7478/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsVolume2, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  45. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7479/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsFullSurveyDrawings, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  46. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW000062, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  47. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EAW032066, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  48. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE100214, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNAS_Kingsnorth, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  50. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vereker_Hamilton_HMA3.jpg, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  51. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damhead_Creek_power_station, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsnorth_power_station, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  53. https://maps.nls.uk/view/189261620, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  54. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676444, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  55. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676462, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  56. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on various dates in September and October 2026.
  57. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Kent_Refinery, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  58. https://kentrail.uk/grain_refinery.htm, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  59. https://ribblesteamrailway.wordpress.com/category/diesel-locos, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  60. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/921-powesland-mason-0-4-0st, accessed on 26th October 2026.
  61. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676417, accessed on 26th October 2026.
  62. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/10/27/crown-and-quarry-cement-works-frindsbury-peninsula/
  63. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677263, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  64. https://www.facebook.com/groups/163976490369879/posts/8942040572563383, accessed on 28th October 2026.
  65. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW047584, accessed on 29th October 2026.

Crown and Quarry Cement Works, Frindsbury Peninsula

The featured image for this article is a photograph taken by F. Jones of ‘Burham’, a Manning Wardle 0-6-0ST built in 1879 (Works No. 730) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1937 and was returned to Burham in 1938 [15: p55], scrapped in September 1952. [6] This photograph was taken at the Crown & Quarry Works and must therefore be dated in 1938. An internet search to check copyright suggests that many of F. Jones photographs are now treated as Public Domain.

Much of this article is based on work undertaken by Chris Down and published in the Industrial Railway Record, Issue 16, published in 1967 and available in the Industrial Railway Society archive. [6]

To the East of the Peninsula were the Whitewall Cement Works. ….

Whitewall Cement Works – South of the southern end of the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway was the Whitewall Cement Works which were owned by the Formby Brothers and which were active between 1862 and 1907. After 1907 two attempts were made to resuscitate these works – Whitewall Portland Cement Co. Led. (1914) and Medway Standard Portland Cement Co. Ltd. (1915). Neither company ever traded. Robin Waywell tells us that “the site occupied an area of about 24 acres with the works divided into two plants, No. 1 plant contained a pair of 130hp compound condensing engines and two Lancashire boilers, driving crushing & grinding machinery and had seven bottle and two chamber kilns. No.2 plant contained a pair of 130hp Tangye engines, two Lancashire boilers, driving crushing & grinding machinery and nine bottle and four chamber kilns. The wash mill, slurry mixer and pumps were powered by a 90hp horizontal tandem engine. There was a wharf with a frontage of 750ft with tramways and three 3ton traveling loco cranes for loading & unloading barges. The Whitewall site was very inaccessible and used solely water transport. After World War 2 the plant was demolished and the site cleared it is now partly waste ground.” [5: p388]

Chris Down wrote in the 1960s that, “Formby’s Whitewall Cement Works (closed 1909; auctioned 23rd July 1909) whose derelict site can still be examined; … never had a tramway and, after a 50ft deep overburden of Thanet Sand proved too much for quarrying, the works had chalk barged down from Halling. It was at this time that [a] proposal was put forward to extend [William] Ball’s quarry lines to Whitewall, via [a] new tunnel.” [6]

Down’s mention of William Ball means that it is worth noting the various arrangements which were made and broken over the supply of chalk to the cement works on the peninsula.

Down said in his article, that, “With so much industry within ⅜ mile of the river front, it might be expected that disputes arose. The few that did, however, were due to the complicated arrangements for chalk supply that existed and plagued the area for much of its life.” [6]

Chalk supplies for the Cement Works

The various Cement Works which developed on the West side of the Frindsbury Peninsula (Limehouse Reach) are listed below the hand-drawn map below.

William Tingey opened the Crown Cement Works in around 1851 and held something of a monopoly on the supply of chalk to the other Cement Works. Down says that, Tingey, who controlled physical access to the works, “specified that the works should obtain their chalk from him. He performed his own quarrying in the area of his works and later, when this was exhausted, took to barging chalk down from his Wouldham Quarries (the Rochester Chalk Co. Ltd.), a few miles up−river. But the lessors of the land (the Ecclesiastical Commissioners) seem to have appointed a common quarrier, doubtless imagining that this would be a more efficient arrangement than for the individual owners to quarry themselves.” [6]

By 1863, John Cole, appointed by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners was quarrying on their land and offering chalk to the nearby works.

It seems that Phoenix Cement Works soon broke the terms of its lease and took chalk from Cole. In 1878, Cole died and was succeeded by William Ball; “on 30th December 1879 the Ecclesiastical Commissioners agreed to rent the land to Ball for an annual rental of £100 plus 5d per ton on the chalk quarried. As other works were put up, the complaints grew in number, both about the restrictions imposed by Tingey … and about the chalk prices charged by Ball. It does seem fairly certain that Ball was trying to some extent to drive the manufacturers out of business. He could then put up his own works and manufacture at a much lower cost. But for the depression of the industry in general, and the formation of A.P.C.M. (1900) Ltd., he might even have succeeded.” [6]

Down wrote that, “Ball supplied Phoenix, Globe, Quarry, Beehive and Beaver exclusively and Bridge probably in part. Tingey supplied himself and Bridge, but these arrangements probably altered according to local animosity at the time. At various times, Ball cut off chalk supplies for a number of reasons that were more or less contrived with the object of demonstration his power; equally often, the manufacturers threatened to obtain chalk from up−river quarries unless Ball reduced his prices. Small wonder that the industry was in such a bad state at the end of the century.” [6]

Crown & Quarry Cement Works were on the western shore of the Frindsbury Peninsula. … The Frindsbury Peninsula was South of Upnor and the Whitewall Works. It was rail-served. The schematic map below was included in the article written by Chris Down in Issue 16 of the Industrial Railway Record in 1967. [6] This map shows the Cement Works and their railways prior to their absorption into

Industrial Premises on the Frindsbury Peninsula prior to 1909. This is one of two images showing the railway routes on the Peninsula provided in Chris Down’s article in the Industrial Railway Record. Both these images can be found here, (c) Chris Down. [6]

A series on seven different cement works were present on the peninsula and all seven became part of the APCM (1900) Ltd.: [5: p54]

  • Crown Works (Established ~1851): Founded by William Tingey & Son, operating long-term before merging into Blue Circle operations that lasted until 1963. [6]
  • Phoenix Works (Started 1877): Established by George Burge, closing by 1907. [6]
  • Globe Works (1880): Established as a cement and whiting facility, later absorbed and closed in 1901.
  • Bridge Works (1886): Operated by TC Hooman & Co. between the Globe and Crown sites. [6]
  • Quarry Works (1889): Established in 1889 by William Tingey’s mineral and chalk mining operations. Independent operations largely ceased around November 1907. [6]
  • Beaver Works (1884): The plant was built around 1884 by Burge (or established in 1885). In 1897, the Beaver Cement Works merged with the neighbouring Beehive Cement Works, driven by an acquisition by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company. It eventually became part of the combined Crown & Quarry works through the 1930s. [8]
  • Beehive Works (1890): In 1897, the Works merged with the Beaver Cement Company Works following the latter’s acquisition by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company. [9]

Dylan Moore provides another map of the peninsula which further clarifies the locations of the different Works which can be found here. [7]

As we have already noted, Chalk for the various works came from pits on land owned by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners and from Crown Works own quarry. Chalk quarrying ceased in December 1962, and Crown Works closed in March 1963. The works was rail connected to the North Kent line adjacent to Strood Dock. … An inventory of 1924 listed 1.25 miles of 4ft 8.5in permanent way, with two geared locomotives and 64, 3 ton, chalk wagons. [5: p54]

The earliest railways on the Peninsula were probably 3ft 6in gauge tramways associated with Phoenix Cement Works. These were short horse-worked tramways owned by Joseph Cole. Down has a drawing of these tramways:

The 3ft 6in gauge tramways at Phoenix Works in 1868. It appears that these lines may well have been traced from the Ordnance Survey Sheet (below). These immediately local tramways were no longer present by the end of the 19th century, (c) Chris Down. [6]

The National Library of Scotland (NLS) does not have the earliest 25″ Ordnance Survey for the Peninsula (that published in 1869) on its website. The first image below is an extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1863-1865, published in 1869. Cole’s tramways appear on this map extract inn association with Frindsbury Lime Works.

The Frindsbury Peninsula in 1863/1865 as shown on the 6″ survey undertaken between this dates and published in 1869. Only one Cement Works is  active at this time. It appears not to be Rail-Served in any form. To its North, Frindsbury Lime Works are shown. There appears to be a series of tramways at that location. It is the location of the Phoenix Cement Works on the later mapping, below. [2]

At the end of 1879, Cole was succeeded by William Ball, whose tenancy was renegotiated on a yearly basis. Ball extended Cole’s tramways a little – “to serve the newly erected Globe Works and Bridge Works (reached by a tunnel carrying 3ft 6in gauge rails under Quarry Terrace Road constructed in 1885, the cost being paid by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners).” [6]

Ball sought greater security of tenure in the form of a longer lease. This was resisted for a number of years by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners refused permission for a number of years.

In 1884, Ball was asked to drive a tunnel under Quarry Terrace Road to accommodate a standard-gauge rail line, so that Ball could quarry on the eastern side of the hill and also to allow him to dump arisings on the marshy areas/saltings to the East. The tunnel was around 700ft long and with an adverse 1 in 75 gradient to eastbound trains, and then dropping them at 1 in 200 down to the saltings. By 20th July 1886, the tunnel was finished except for fencing and Ball was paid £1,575 for doing the job. [6]

Down tell us that, “The tunnel immediately opened up new fields of supply for Ball. Within a few years, the standard gauge was extended south to serve the new quarry, Beehive and Beaver Works. While there was probably a transhipment point whereby chalk was tipped into the 3ft 6in gauge wagons (wooden side-tippers holding 55 cwts) serving Phoenix and Globe. Bridge, via its own tunnel, had 3ft 6in gauge quarry lines of its own.” [6]

Down continues: “Soon after completion of the tunnel in 1886, Ball asked for a long lease to enable increased expenditure on locomotives, wagons and tramways, while in June 1890, a review of Ball’s operations stated that he owned three or four steam engines, wagons, tramways, horses and buildings valued at £7,000. … Quite possibly these steam engines were stationary, for Aveling & Porter, the most likely suppliers of locomotives … have no record of deliveries at this time. (Two locomotives, of unknown gauge however, were delivered to I. Ball (Ball’s predecessor?), one in 1868 and the other (named BURNT OAK) in 1869. These were of six and ten nominal horsepower respectively, and were probably used on a coal wharf at Gillingham but may have been transferred to Frindsbury at a later date.)” [6]

On 25th March 1892, Ball was finally granted a long lease. His first locomotive, named ‘Alderman‘, despatched from Aveling & Porter’s Rochester Works on 23rd October 1893 (Works No. 3277, type TC 10), it was a standard gauge 10hp two-cylinder compound 2−2−0 of the traction engine type. … ; the cylinders were 7in (high pressure) and 11½in (low pressure) bore with a common stroke of 12in. ‘Sabina‘, a larger 2−2−0 compound of 20hp and of type TCG, followed on 21st December 1898 (Works number 4248). It was also a standard-gauge locomotive. [6]

Down tells us that, “A plan dated 4th February 1891, shows the layout of the 3ft 6in gauge lines. One branch served Phoenix and another, running between Phoenix and Globe served the latter. Another line went off to serve Bridge. In 1894, the branch to Phoenix was probably abandoned and the line to Globe extended to serve both works.” [6] These tramways are shown on Down’s hand-drawn map of the railway sup to 1909, above.

The earliest available 25″ Ordnance Survey mapping was surveyed in 1895/1896 and published in 1898. A sequence of extracts from that survey appears below.

The tramway network has, by the end of the 19th century, expanded significantly. Bottom left of this first extract , the North end of Joseph Cole’s Ballast Pier can just be made out. A tramway tunnel under the main access road from Parsonage Road to the various Cement Works, can be made out just to the left of the centre of the extract. A tramway which provides access to Frindsbury Peninsula head Northeast in cutting before swinging round to the South. To the left of the image, tramways run through to Cole’s Pier and South towards Phoenix Cement Works. [1]
The full length of Joseph Cole’s Ballast Pier can be seen in the top-left of this next extract and the tramway serving Phoenix Works and its wharf and pier enters the extract at about the third-point from the left. On the far-right of the extract the tramway giving access to the South of the Peninsula can be seen running North to South. Globe Cement Works seems not to have associated tramways. Bridge Cement Works seems to have a short tramway network to its East. [1]
This next extract shows the tramways associated with Bridge Cement Works running Southwest to the High Water Mark. Crown Cement Works is just called a ‘Cement Works’. It appears to have some tramway line between it and the High Water Mark. [1]
Quarry Cement Works and Beaver Cement Works were at the southern end of the Limehouse Reach on the Frindsbury Peninsula. [1]

Down tells us that, “After the APCM takeover in 1900, Ball seems to have continued quarrying much as usual, although there was not the same demand for chalk due to partial closure of some of the works. In 1905, he widened the tunnel to Bridge Works so as to take the standard gauge track from the eastern line. This was to meet APCM’s chalk requirements and cost £135 0s 6d. … It would seem that by 1905, … the 3ft 6in gauge had ceased to be operative, except perhaps the lines to Cole’s and Phoenix Works’s piers. On 3rd December 1909, it was stated that no cement was being made, and this seems to have been the case for three years. APCM had taken to barging down chalk from Halling when any cement was to be made, and Ball’s quarries were inactive. In November 1915, Ball’s lease expired and APCM took over quarrying rights.” [6]

This next series of map extracts come from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. Significant proportions of the tramway network were converted to standard-gauge. Down shows these on his hand-drawn map of the Cement Works and Quarries for the period up to 1909, which can be found earlier in this article. …

At the North end of the Peninsula, very little change had occurred in the decade since the earlier 25″ Ordnance Survey. [3]
Apart from some construction work associated with each cement works and the confirmation of the name of ‘Crown Cement Works’, the most notable change in this next extract is the tramway which reaches West from the tramway line on the right side of the image and which passes in tunnel under the access road to serve Bridge Cement Works. [3]
Tramways continue to serve Quarry Portland Cement Works and Beehive Cement Works, now named. [3]
This final extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909 shows Beaver Cement Works and the South end of the Peninsula. As already noted Beaver and Beehive Cement Works were operated by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company as a single operation. [4]

We know that at the turn of the 20th century, all of the cement works on the Frindsbury Peninsula came under the control of the APCM (1900) Ltd. Inevitably there was some rationalisation of operations on the Peninsula. A single operation was formed out of the different Works along the West side of the Peninsula and that new entity was called the ‘Crown & Quarry Cement Works’.

The next ‘snapshot’ that we have of the Peninsula and its railways/tramways is that provided by the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1932/1933, published in 1935. …

The tramways across the various cement works and quarry/chalk pit sites have been replace by standard-gauge railway lines. Although dated 1932/1933, this survey does not pick up some of the sidings shown by Chris Down on his hand-drawn map of the site below. the dates provided by Down suggest that the Ordnance Survey of the site took place early in 1932. [10]
In 1932, Crown & Quarry Cement Works incorporated element so of other Cement Works. It was rail-served by a standard-gauge branch line, and had a number of tramways within its site. A travelling crane operated along the water-front. [10]
The remaining length of the water-front and the buildings associated with Crown & Quarry Cement Works transgress on to the adjacent OS Map Sheet to the South. [11]
This hand-drawn map summarises the various changes on the Peninsula, perhaps the most significant change alongside the creation of a single Cement Works was the rationalisation of the railways and the commitment to standard gauge rails. Down highlights the different dates that each length of line was in use. The drawing covers the full period from 1909 to the closure of Crown & Quarry Cement Works in the 1960s, (c) Chris Down. [6]
The tramways and railways on the Frindsbury Peninsula from the various different eras are shown mapped onto modern satellite imagery by railmaponlin.com. The background satellite image shows that the whole of the Peninsula has been redeveloped since the closure of the cement works in the 1960s. There would be little value in attempting to trace these old lines through a significantly altered physical environment. [12]

From 1900, APCM had control of the Peninsula. Waywell provides lists of the locomotives used by APCM on the standard-gauge lines on the peninsula. His list relies on work undertaken by Down. [13: p54-55][6]

Locomotives in use at the Crown & Quarry Works

Earlier in this article we have noted two Aveling & Porter Locomotives (owned by William Ball) that worked on the standard gauge lines on the Frindsbury Peninsula in the later years of the 19th century and the early years of the 20th century. There were:

  • Alderman – an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG locomotive built in 1893 (Works No. 3277)
  • Sabina – a second Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG locomotive built in 1898 (Works No. 4248)

Both of these locomotives spent their whole life on the Frindsbury Peninsula. [6]

After the turn of the 20th century, APCM used a series of locomotives on the Peninsula. These were:

  • Unnamed – an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG built in 1879 (Works No. 1524) came from Booth’s Works Borstal circa. 1928 and scrapped on site in 1930. [13: p54][6]
  • Stuart – No. 7 – an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0ST built in 1890 (Works No. 681). [13: p54-55]
  • Unnamed – a Dick, Kerr 0-4-0ST built in 1890 which came from Hilton, Anderson Brook’s Works in Grays, Essex and which went to the BPCM Hilton Manor Works, circa 1930. [13: p54-55]
  • Leopard – a Falcon Engine Works 0-4-0ST built in 1896 (Works No. 239) came from BPCM Tolhurst’s Works circa. 1921 and was scrapped circa. 1930. [13: p54-55]
  • Kappa – a Chapman & Furneaux 0-4-0ST built in 1898 (Works No. 1164) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford and was sent to to APCM Swanscombe Works, June 1931. [13: p55][6]
  • George – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1899 (Works No. 759) came from Bevan’s Works, Northfleet in 1934 and was scrapped by A. Arnold of Chatham, September 1960. [13: p55][6]
  • J. G. B. – an Avonside 0-4-0ST built in 1821 (Works No. 1874) came from Thos. W. Ward Ltd., Grays, Essex and was scrapped in August 1964. [13: p55][6]
  • Killarney – a Hudswell Clarke 0-6-0ST built in 1902 (Works No. 611) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1934 and was returned in the same year. [13: p55][6]
  • Burham – a Manning Wardle 0-6-0ST built in 1879 (Works No. 730) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1937 and was returned to Burham in 1938 [15: p55], scrapped in September 1952. [6]
  • C. F. S. – a Stephenson Hawthorns 0-4-0ST built in 1952 (Works No. 7742) bought new and sent to Holborough Works on loan in 1954, returned from loan by October 1954, then sent to Alpha Cement Ltd., Shipton-on-Cherwell, Oxon, circa 1963. [13: p55][6]
  • Southfleet – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1928 (Works No. 1746) came from BPCM Johnson’s Branch, Greenhithe, in August 1960 and sent to to Thurrock Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., Essex, in June 1964. [13: p55][6]
  • Stone – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1927 (Works No. 1740) came from BPCM Johnson’s Branch, Greenhithe, in November 1962 and sent to APCM Holborough Works, Snodland, circa 1963. [13: p55][6]
  • Longfield – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1928 (Works No. 1747) came on loan from APCM Holborough Quarry, Snodland, in 1962 and returned later in the same year. [13: p55][6]

Chris Downs concludes in the 1960s: “Crown & Quarry Works was closed and tracklifting in the quarry began on 18th April 1963, the navvies being removed by 10th May. Some locomotives were still in use at this time, though, and there were four locomotives in all at the works. ‘J.G.B.‘ was partly dismantled in a shed near the bagging plant, and had been so for a number of months; officially it had been for repair, but this was never carried out. Of the others, ‘Stone‘ … was somewhat out of favour due to badly worn tyres. ‘Southfleet‘ … was in regular use. ‘C.F.S.‘, … was also a regular worker. … By the summer of 1964, the only locomotive left was ‘J.G.B.‘ In August it was towed out of the shed and cut up. Tracklifting was begun in October, being carried out by two men who professed to be self-employed. By 2nd November, the track had been lifted as far as the level crossing, the rails being burned into short lengths and loaded into a small van. The only remaining piece of railway equipment (within the works, on track embedded in concrete) was a wagon frame and wheels loaded with a crane jib.” [6]

References

  1. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677173, accessed on 27th October 2026
  2. https://maps.nls.uk/view/266663224, accessed on 27th October 2026
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677170, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  4. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677209, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  5. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.
  6. C. G. Down; Frindsbury Cement Works; in The Industrial Railway Record, Issue No. 16, 1967, p132-143 & p156; via https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/16/Frindsbury.htm, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  7. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/images/1907_det.jpg, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  8. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE17074, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  9. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE17076, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677167, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677206, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  12. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  13. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.

Eastbourne Railway Station

The featured image for this article shows a two coach train awaiting departure at Eastbourne Railway Station. It think that the locomotive is an ex-LB&SCR E4 0-6-2T in BR livery. These locomotives were originally numbered 463-503, 507–520, 556–566, and 577-582. The number on the smoke box is not legible in the photograph. The exact locomotive shown in the photograph cannot easily be determined from the image. [21]

When the first railway was projected southwards from London to the Sussex Coast, its promoters had as their objective Brighton, which already was a well-established holiday resort. The eastern extension of this main line served the county town of Lewes, and had reached the western outskirts of St. Leonards by the summer of 1846, but it was not until 14th May 1849, that a 4.5-mile branch was opened from Polegate to serve Eastbourne, which was then little more than a village. The advent of the railway marked the beginning of the growth of Eastbourne as a holiday resort and residential area. At the end of the 1849s, Eastbourne’s population was around 2,500. By 1953, the town was a county borough, with a population of nearly 58,000, and in 2026 the population is around 105,000. [1] It has been suggested that the modern town of Eastbourne “was virtually created by the seventh Duke of Devonshire in the mid-nineteenth century, [but] there is little doubt that the advent of the former London, Brighton & South Coast Railway in 1849 was the influencing factor in promoting,” [3: p723] the growth of the town.

Since the inauguration of the line in 1849, the original modest terminus of the branch was twice superseded by a larger station. The first station was built in 1849, this was rebuilt in 1866 and rebuilt yet again in 1886. [2]

Stones writes: “An Act of 18th June 1846, authorised the London, Brighton & South Coast Railway Company (successors to the Brighton, Lewes & Hastings Railway) to construct two short lines from Polegate, to Eastbourne and Hailsham respectively, and these were completed and officially opened simultaneously on 14th May 1849. Originally, it had been intended that after leaving Polegate, the Eastbourne branch should pass through the village of Willingdon, and terminate in what is today the Old Town of Eastbourne, situated about a mile-and-a-half from the coast. However, because of the undulating nature of this route, and other considerations, it was finally decided to construct the line further to the East, with a terminus at the neighbouring and growing residential hamlet of South-Bourne, half-way between East-Bourne and the sea. As a result the Eastbourne branch, four-and-a-half miles in length, ran south-east from Polegate and traversed the Bourn or Willingdon Level, which forms part of an extensive plain extending to the east from the slopes of the South Downs. Although the terminal station was named ‘Eastbourne’ when the branch was opened in 1849, it was actually in South-Bourne, which was subsequently to disappear in name and become an important part of modern Eastbourne.” [3: p723,725]

Stones tells us that “The first station at Eastbourne was situated to the west of the present terminus; the building was a small modest timber structure measuring 20 ft. by 12 ft. Several years later, the original station and tracks were removed to allow Upperton Road to pass over the site and link up with the main thoroughfare, Terminus Road. The old station building was moved and erected on the west side of the existing goods yard where it was converted into a dwelling house at present known as No. 1, Wharf Road.” [3: p725] In 1953, the building still stood but was over-shadowed by modern buildings.

The original station building in its rebuilt location on Wharf Road, dwarfed by other buildings (Eastbourne Corporation Library) © Public Domain. [3: p724]

Another view of the original station building, this time in its original location close to the end of The Avenue. [4]

The first Eastbourne Station sat close to the end of The Avenue. [5]
The red flag marks the approximate location of the original Eastbourne Station. The road to the Northwest of the flag is ‘The Avenue’, the road junction is with Upperton Road. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Stones tells us that when the line was opened, “two engines were stationed at Eastbourne but one was always kept in reserve. The other worked a shuttle service of local trains between Eastbourne and Hailsham via Polegate, where, at that time, the engine had to run round its train. At the commencement there were few trains, but by 1854 the service had increased to nine trains in each direction on weekdays. Passengers for London, Brighton, and Hastings were obliged to change at Polegate for some years, and this inconvenience proved a constant source of annoyance to Eastbourne residents, who considered that the importance of the town was being relegated by the poor railway facilities provided. This opinion was substantiated by the fact that in Bradshaw’s Monthly Descriptive Railway Guide for June 1857, the timetable did not even mention Eastbourne, and gave Brighton, Newhaven, St. Leonards, and Hastings as the important stations on the coast.” [3: p725]

In 1866, or perhaps as late as 1872, a replacement station was constructed at the corner of Terminus Road and Gildredge Road.

Apparently, the connecting service between Eastbourne and London in 1866 comprised seven trains daily in each direction.

The rebuilt railway station of 1866, photographed from Gildredge Road in 1871 (G & R Lavis), © Public Domain. [3: p724]
The station built in 1866 (or perhaps 1872). as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]
Polegate local train sitting at Eastbourne in 1868, headed by Craven 0-4-2T locomotive No. 230, built at Brighton in 1866 (G.& R. Lavis), © Public Domain. [3: p729]

Improvements to the service to and from London occurred in 1875 when, Stones writes, “several trains running between London and Hastings were provided with through coaches to and from Eastbourne, which were attached or detached at Polegate. At the same time, the 5 pm express from London Bridge to Brighton slipped a portion (first class only at ordinary fare) for Eastbourne at Haywards Heath.” [3: p725-726]

It was not until September 1880 that Eastbourne was finally connected with Tunbridge Wells when a line from Hailsham to Eridge was opened. “On 1st April 1884, a service of two expresses daily in each direction between Charing Cross and Eastbourne was inaugurated. … The new service did not prove a success … and was withdrawn on 31st December 1885” after agreement had been reached between the SER and the LB&SCR for a sharing of traffic receipts. [3: p727]

South Eastern Railway (SER) 2-4-0 locomotive No. 17 on the turntable at Eastbourne shed in 1885 (R. C. Glazebrook), © Public Domain. [3: p726]
Another Craven, this time an 0-6-0 goods locomotive No. 390 on the turntable at Eastbourne shed circa. 1887 (J. Wilks), © Public Domain. [3: p729]
Stroudley “Gladstone” Class 0-4-2 locomotive No. 183, ‘Eastbourne’ built at Brighton in November 1889 sits by the platform at Eastbourne (R. C. Glazebrook), © Public Domain. [3: p730]

By 1904, agreement had finally been reached between the LB&SCR and the LNWR to run through coaches between Liverpool and Brighton and Eastbourne. Stones says, “This popular innovation, which obviated crossing London, soon developed into what was known as the ‘Sunny South Special’, which conveyed through portions from Liverpool (Lime Street), Manchester (London Road) and Birmingham (New Street). Up to the time of grouping this train was composed of LNWR. rolling stock, and included dining-car facilities. The service commenced to run daily (Sundays excepted) in each direction on 23rd July 1904, via Brighton and terminating at Eastbourne.” [3: p728]

At the time Stones was writing in 1953, the service had not been resurrected after the war.

Looking Southwest along the platforms at Eastbourne Station towards the terminus buildings. An EMU units sits on the line between the two platform lines. (H. R. Stones), © Public Domain. [3: p727]
The station seen from the South in 1920, Britain from Above, EPW00075, © Historic England. [15]
A closer view of the passenger facilities and the Goods Shed/Yard in 1920, Britain from Above, EPW000751, © Historic England. [15]

In 1953, Stones described Eastbourne Station: “The present station at Eastbourne consists of two island platforms served by four terminal tracks capable of holding 12-car electric trains. On the east side of the station there is a covered roadway for taxis and other vehicles between platforms 3 and 4, originally known as the arrival side. The platforms lead to a large circulating area around which are located the refreshment and dining rooms, waiting rooms, parcels office, and so on, with the booking hall at the western entrance to the station. During the second world war, the platforms and tracks were severely damaged by bombs on several occasions, and although most of the repairs have been completed, part of the platform awnings are still of a temporary character.” [3: p728]

A 1949 view of Eastbourne Railway Station also taken from Gildredge Road (H. R. Stones), © Public Domain. [3: p724]
This view of the same building was taken from the corner of Terminus Road (Unknown Photographer), © Public Domain. [7]
Passengers queuing for access to the Station platforms along the pavement on Upperton Road (Unknown Photographer), © Public Domain. [7]
The current station building as it appeared on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. This building was completed in 1886. [6]

The present building is essentially that which was built in 1886, designed by F.D. Brick, which had a vaulted canopy and lantern roof, similar to Lewes. “The station had 4 platforms which increased in length over the years. There was also two run around loops between platforms 2 and 3. Over the years one of the runaround loops was lost as platforms 1 and 2 were built wider. On 12th April 1977 platform 4 was shortened from a 12 coach to an 8 coach length to make way for the ring road construction. And was taken out of use and the track lifted during the Eastbourne re-signalling in 1991.” [7]

Eastbourne Station in the 21st century, © Sussex World. [8]

The line into Eastbourne was electrified by July 1935. Stones comments in 1953 that: “the number of trains to and from London (Victoria and London Bridge) has been increased and there is now an hourly service of fast electric trains with Pullman or buffet-car facilities; the journey takes about 1 hour 25 min. The fastest timing maintained during the summer months is by the non-stop all-Pullman train, successor to the former “Eastbourne Sunday Limited” inaugurated by the LB&SCR many years ago. This train, which makes one round trip on Sundays only, covers the down journey in 79 min. With the exception of the steam trains from Eastbourne to Hailsham and Tunbridge Wells, the remaining local passenger services, to and from Brighton and Hastings, are all operated by two- or four-car electric trains.” [3: p728]

The down Eastbourne Pullman passing Polegate (date not known, S. C. Nash), © Public Domain. [3: p729]
Southern Region Class 207 DEMU ‘Thumper’ 1302 seen from Ashford Road, just outside Eastbourne Station when new in 1962. It later became 207002, was then refurbished as 207103, refurbished again as 207203 for Connex, withdrawn and preserved in 2004 but was destroyed in a fire, © Dick Gilbert, and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [12]
Diesel/Electric D6548 at Eastbourne station, 1962
Seen from Ashford Road, just outside Eastbourne station, this is Class 33 Bo-Bo diesel/electric loco D6548. Built in 1961 it was renumbered 33030 in 1973. It survived into preservation. The carriage in the background is interesting. It may be an SECR (or early Southern Railway) car built for boat train services to Dover and Folkestone. These carriages had flat sides, a wooden slatted construction and were “classless” – they were presumably considered comfortable enough to satisfy any class of passenger. When steam was phased out these carriages turned up all over the place, and this one may have been for use on the Heathfield line, © Dick Gilbert and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [12]

Stones continues: “West of the passenger station lie the goods shed and yard, and carriage sidings for both electric and steam rolling stock. A short distance from the terminus on the east side of the line is the coal yard, and, beyond, a siding about a mile in length runs in an easterly direction to serve the local gas and electricity works. This siding was formerly known as the Crumbles Branch as originally the line continued on to that part of the sea-shore called “The Crumbles,” where the LB&SCR installed a shingle ballast plant. Because of the extended use of stone ballast, this was dismantled some years ago and the extension to the coast was taken up. Traffic in and out of the passenger station, goods yard, carriage sidings and locomotive depot is controlled by one signal cabin with a manual frame of 72 levers, which is situated at the entrance to the terminus on the east side of the line.” [3: p728]

Stones writes: “The existing locomotive depot at Eastbourne is located about half a mile from the passenger station on the west side of the line and is connected by a single track running parallel with the up and down main lines. The site on which the depot stands was purchased by the LB&SCR in the early part of the present [20th] century for new carriage and wagon works to replace older and smaller installations at Brighton. However, because of opposition from the local authorities, the scheme was abandoned and the works were eventually constructed at Lancing.” [3: p729-730]

Stones tells us that “The present running shed, which is of the through type, was built in 1911 to replace an earlier and smaller shed of the half-roundhouse type opposite the signal cabin on a site now occupied by the carriage sidings at the station. Since electrification, Eastbourne shed has lost much of its importance and now houses only a few locomotives for goods and shunting services and for the local passenger trains to and from Hailsham and Tunbridge Wells. In recent years, several of the sidings adjoining the shed have been used to stable spare locomotives and those waiting to be broken up. During the war, the shed was severely damaged by air attack.” [3: p730]

In the paragraphs above, Stones has identified a number of interesting features of the station:

  • Goods Shed, Sidings and Coal Yard
  • Carriage Sidings
  • The mile long siding which was once the start of the ‘Crumbles Branch’
  • The Shingles Ballast Plant
  • The history of the engine shed

A. Goods Shed, Sidings and Coal Yard

The following sequence of extracts from 25″ Ordnance Surveys in chronological order, illustrates the changes in the layout of the goods facilities at Eastbourne over time

The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Coal Depot at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]

The Coal depot disappears between 1874 and 1898 and Wharf Road takes its place. The coal wharf might be the original of the name of the road. Holding seems to have been built on the site of the old coal depot. The Goods Shed seems to have been rebuilt a distance from the passenger station and cattle pens have been added to the site.

The rebuilt Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. Note the rebuilt station buildings. [6]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1908, published in 1910. No significant changes appear to have occurred since 1898. [9]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey revised and published in 1925. [10]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings at Eastbourne Station as shown onthe 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published in 1933. [11]

B. Carriage Sidings

In the 21st century, the carriage sidings  provide stabling and overnight parking for Southern Class 377 and Class 442 Electric Multiple Units (EMUs). They include a carriage cleaning road and an engineer’s siding.

The site of the current carriage sidings occupy the historic location of Eastbourne’s early engine sheds (opened in 1849 and later replaced in 1876 and 1911 – see the paragraphs about the engine sheds below). The track layout and sidings were historically controlled by Eastbourne’s Victorian signal box built in 1882. [17]

Eastbourne’s carriage sidings sit at the centre of this map extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/1932, published in 1933. [19]
The carriage sidings in the 21st century: the sidings were extended through what was the site of the old roundhouse engine shed in the middle of the 20th century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Redundant ‘slam door’ electric units in the carriage sidings outside Eastbourne station, © Stephen Craven and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [18]

C. The Crumbles Branch

A separate article covers this line. It can be found here. [16]

D. The Shingles/Crumbles Ballast Plant

The ballast plant on the Shingles (Crumbles) at Eastbourne was served by the Crumbles Branch. The Crumbles was a vast, desolate expanse of coastal shingle and marshland east of Eastbourne. The LB&SCR recognized the immense value of the site’s heavily compacted beach shingle and negotiated the purchase of large quantities of shingle from the local landowner, the Duke of Devonshire. They installed a dedicated shingle ballast plant directly on the shore to extract, process, and load the aggregate. At its height, the operation was removing roughly 250,000 tons of shingle per year. This material was vital for providing the structural foundation (ballast) for railway tracks across the southeast of England and was even shipped to London for projects like the construction of the Thames Embankment. [20]

By the 1920s and early 1930s, the newly formed Southern Railway began phasing out smooth beach shingle in favour of sharper, more durable angular granite chippings. The ballast plant closed in 1932. Please also look at the dedicated article about the Crumbles Branch, here. [16]

E. The Engine Sheds

By 1874 a roundhouse engine shed and turntable sat alongside the line out of Eastbourne Railway Station. That structure was still in place at the time of the 1908 Ordnance Survey, but had gone by the time of the 1925 Ordnance Survey.

The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]
The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. [6]
The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1908, published in 1910. [9]
The location of the roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey revised and published in 1925. [10]
The location of the original roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published in 1933. [11]

The site of the new engine shed at Eastbourne, as it appears on the Ordnance Survey of 1925. It was built to replace the original shed which had sat much closer to the station. This location is to the North of Whitley Road. Note the Crumbles Branch which moves away from the main line and heads North-northeast. [13]

This satellite image is an extract from the ESRI satellite imagery provided by the NLS. The area once occupied by the Engine Shed can be seen with hedges boundaries to the West of the main running lines. The line of the erstwhile Crumbles Branch can also be seen. It is marked by the industrial property boundaries to the East of the main running lines and curving away to the East. [14]

Locomotive Names

Both the LB&SCR. and its successor, the Southern Railway, honoured Eastbourne by allocating several locomotive names directly associated with the town. As early as 1881, William Stroudley gave the name ‘Eastbourne’ to a rebuilt 2-2-2 express locomotive with 6 ft. 6 in. wheels, No. 491. This engine, which was one of six which had been rebuilt and renumbered by Stroudley the same year, was originally designed by J. C. Craven and built by Nasmyth Wilson & Company in 1867, when it was numbered 241. In 1889, three of the famous ‘Gladstone’ class 0-4-2 locomotives Nos. 183 to 185 were named ‘Eastbourne’, ‘Carew D. Gilbert’ (an influential Eastbourne resident and member of a well known local family over part of whose land the railway was constructed), and ‘George A. Wallis’ (the first Mayor of Eastbourne, from 1883 to 1885). These were followed in 1898 by a Stroudley 0-6-2 tank locomotive, No. 469, which was named ‘Beachy Head’. Two of the aforementioned names were subsequently perpetuated by the Southern Railway; a former LB&SCR. Atlantic No. 2424, was named ‘Beachy Head’, and in 1933 ‘Schools’ class 4-4-0 No. 914 received the name ‘Eastbourne’ after the town’s public school.

References

  1. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/unit/10056433/cube/TOT_POP, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastbourne_railway_station, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  3. H. R. Stones; Railway Development at Eastbourne; in The Railway Magazine Volume 99, No. 631, Tothill Press, London, November 1953, p723-730.
  4. https://www.eastbournehistory.org.uk/timeline, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  5. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675456, accessed on 27th August 2026
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675453, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  7. https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC69JC1_sidetracked-eastbourne, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  8. https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/transport/how-to-get-to-airbourne-after-train-derailment-near-lewes-causes-major-disruption-8920816, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675450, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675447, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675444, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  12. https://www.flickr.com/photos/harryclaggers/43482880200/in/photostream, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  13. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675414, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.3&lat=50.78143&lon=0.28531&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  15. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW000751, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  16. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/13/the-crumbles-branch-eastbourne
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastbourne_Carriage_Sidings, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  18. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/231770, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675444, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  20. https://sremg.org.uk/RlyMag/RailwayDevelopmentsAtEastbourne-2.pdf, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  21. https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/heritage-and-retro/retro/eastbourne-looking-back-11-pictures-of-steam-diesel-and-electric-locomotives-through-the-ages-4985228, accessed on 17th October 2026.

The Narrow Gauge Railway Society Journal

I have enjoyed being a member of the Narrow Gauge Society for a number of years. One of the benefits of membership is the regular mailing.

The Narrow Gauge Railway Society sends out a bimonthly mailing in which ‘Narrow Gauge News’ (a full colour A4 update for readers covering what has been happening across a wide range of different narrow gauge lines in both the UK and around the world) is accompanied by one, sometimes two, more detailed studies of contemporary and more historic narrow gauge lines.

In October 2026, the latest mailing included two other A4 ‘bookazines’. The first being a single issue paper recorded as ‘The Narrow Gauge No. 302’ which focusses on various railways at Crystal Palace, written by R. G. Cash. [1]

‘Narrow Gauge No. 302’ – September 2026. [1]

The inside front cover has a map (a public domain image) of the Festival of Empire and Imperial Exhibition of 1911. …

A map of the 1911 Exhibition at Crystal Palace. Cash notes that this image is not entirely accurate, as the Kearney High-Speed Railway and ‘New London’, although shown, did not appear in the Exhibition. Two stations on the ‘All Red Route’ have been omitted – ‘Canada’ and ‘South Africa and Pageant’. The ‘All Red Route’ was curved rather than straight on the approach to ‘South Africa’, © Public Domain. [7][1: p2]

The ‘All Red Route’ was “a somewhat convoluted circuitous route of over a mile with stations near the principal buildings.” [1: p4]

Cash’s paper describes the track and route of the line. 60lb/yard flat-bottomed rail in 30ft lengths was spiked to wooden sleepers on 12″ of ballast. It is believed that it was a 3ft 6in-gauge railway. Trains ran at one-minute intervals in an anti-clockwise direction at a maximum speed of 4mph. Signals were not used.

Cash notes that the builders of the line “were keen to exploit the capabilities of electric traction and confidently laid out the line with gradients steeper than those on the Manx Electric Railway, which may have given the ride something of a ‘roller-coaster’ character, though the low speed would have mitigated this effect. There were also many … scenes and tableaux … which could be seen from the train. … The railway was reported to be ‘Highly successful’ and one of the most interesting features of the Exhibition.” [1: p6]

Rolling Stock – although built as a railway, rolling stock was typical of the electric tramways of the period.

The Royal Train! A decorated train used by George V on his visit to the site, © Public Domain. [1: p5][9]

‘All Red Route’ tramcars at the Newfoundland Station, possibly the India Station, both buildings were close to the stop. Cash notes that the current collectors can be seen. The cars were paired together, a motor car and a trailer, © Public Domain. [1: p7][10]

Current collectors protruded from the sides of the trucks, one at the rear of the leading wheel of the motor car and one just behind the trailing wheel of the trailer.

Apparently, the All Red Route (including it power plant) cost £90,000 to build (that is over £70,000 per mile). Each train (moti car plus trailer) could carry 80 passengers around the route of the line in between 15 and 20 minutes. [1: p8]

Cash goes on to consider the costs of the Exhibition and what happened to the rolling stock before discussing:

  • Other railways that were on use during the Exhibition/Festival;
  • Pneumatic railways on the site (1864);
  • Electric pioneers (1881 & 1882);
  • Hydraulic pioneers (1891);
  • Looping the Loop! – perhaps the first amusement ride in the UK to invert its riders (1902-1907]
  • Miniature Railways – a 15in-gauge line which circled the drained basin of the Grand Fountain (1910 and not renewed for the 1911 exhibition). There were later proposals for similar lines in the park through the years, at least one of which was used (between 1990 & 1996).

The Narrow Gauge – Number 303

The second ‘bookazine’ is the September edition of ‘The Narrow Gauge’ – No. 303. In 2026, the Narrow Gauge Railway Society celebrates 75 years serving the narrow gauge world since 1951. This is reflected on the front cover of ‘The Narrow Gauge No. 303’. [2]

‘The Narrow Gauge’ No. 303  – September 2026. [2]

This second volume includes:

  • Slaggyford Light Rail – Philip Champion (p3-9);
  • Early Petrol-Electric Railcars in Prussia – David Meller (p10-22);
  • The Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad: Part 1 – Jim Stancliffe (p23-33); and
  • A few shorter items.

Slaggyford Light Rail – Philip Champion tells the story of a privately owned 2ft-gauge railway which sat on an ‘island’ in the South Tyne River which was also the location of a caravan site. First in use in 1978, the line was owned by W. G. Horseman. He sold the line in 1981 to Bob Cant who renamed it ‘Slaggyford Lake Railway’. Cant closed the line in 2001 and much later, after his death, his collection was sold by auction (January 2025). Philip Champion includes in his article, information about the various locomotives and rolling stock used on the railway.

Early Petrol-Electric Railcars in Prussia – David Meller provides a survey of various narrow-gauge lines in Prussia before WW1, with some still active up to and beyond WW2.

Meller first introduces us to The Kleinbahn Pogegen–Schmalleningken (Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway), located in the historic Memelland region of East Prussia, which was a pioneer in using petrol-electric (or benzole-electric) railcars.

A sketch of the route of the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway in a 1926 railway atlas, © Public Domain. [3]

Meller points out that details of these first Petrol-Electric Railcars were provided in an article from the 11th February 1909 edition of Elektritechnische-Zeitschrift which is now available online in the Internet Archive. [4]

Illustrations provided by Miller come directly from that article. …

The interior of the driving cab of a Railcar equipped with a Westinghouse engine of the type used on the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway. [2: p10][4: p124]
A Petrol-Electric Railcar of the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway. [2: p12][4: p125]

Meller then turns to the 750mm-gauge Konigsberger Kleinbahn which had three Petrol-Electric Railcars numbered 51, 52 and 53 in its fleet. This line was owned by the same company as the Pogegen-Schmalleningken line (Aktiengesellschaft fur Verkehrswesen – AVG).

In the autumn of 1911, the German electrical giant AEG (Allgemeine Elekricitats-Gesellschaft), the coachbuilder Waggonfabrik L. Steinfurt (based in Königsberg), and the engine manufacturer NAG (Neue Automobil-Gesellschaft) delivered a four-axle prototype railcar to the Königsberger Kleinbahn. Test runs showed that  whole electrical and mechanical equipment performed well, vibration was excessive. This was overcome by moving the power unit away from the passenger accommodation.

The revised vehicle entered service in 1914 and was followed by two more.

This photograph of No. 53 was taken in Königsberg/Königstor, © Public Domain. [5]

Next Meller focusses on the Insterburger Kleinbahn which purchased three of the same design of units used on the Konigsberger Kleinbahn and, interestingly, also numbered the Railcars 51, 52 and 53.

He follows this with a look at the Gleiwitz-Rauden-Ratibor Line which seems to have purchased the final member of a batch of seven Railcars of the type used by the Konigsberger Kleinbahn and Insterburger Kleinbahn. This particular vehicle seems to have travelled around a number of venues before arriving at this line. It appears to have been recorded at the ‘Baltic Exhibition’ in Malmö, Sweden in 1914. Meller believes that it may have been seen at other exhibitions at least including the Weimar Bauhaus international architecture exhibition in 1923 and at Stuttgart in 1924. It was bought by the Gleiwitz line in 1925. But, Meller, says there are particularly concerns about this narrative and it is possible that the story of the seven Railcars is more complex!

The photographs included with the text of Meller’s article can be found along with the original German Schweizerische Bauzeitung article on a German discussion forum, here. [6]

The Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad (C&TSR): Part 1 – Jim Stancliffe writes that this railroad was opened in 1971. It is a tourist line and lays claim to being the longest and highest steam-powered narrow gauge railroad in North America. Stancliffe describes the project to revive the line as “arguably, the most ambitious heritage project of its kind in the world at the time.” [2: p23]

As the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad (D&RGR) network entered terminal decline in the year either side of WW2, many of its narrow gauge routes were abandoned. The main passenger service on the narrow gauge was the ‘San Juan‘ which ran daily each way between Samosa and Durango, but it was withdrawn in 1951. The only remaining passenger service was the ‘Silverton‘, which ran as a mixed train, three times a week, each way between Durango and Silverton. [2: p25]

The D&RGR retained the Silverton Branch as a steam hauled summer tourist attraction until 1980. A buyer was sought and found in 1981. The new owner redeveloped the line as the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SR)

Separately, abandonment of much of the network was pursued by the Railway Company and preservation of a length of the network between Antonio and Chama was considered by New Mexico and then by Colorado. Stancliffe says that, “In July 1970, the states jointly purchased the track and line structures along the 64 mile long route between Antonito and Chama. The purchase included 9 steam locomotives and over 130 freight and works cars. The total cost for the whole package was $547,120. Whilst the purchase included all the yards and buildings at Chama, there were no available facilities at Antonito. These were all still required by the D&RGR.” [2: p27]

Stancliffe goes on to describe the birth of what became the ‘Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad’.

The first train ran on 26th June 1971 but despite the initial air of optimism the deep recession caused by the oil crisis impacted the viability of the Railroad. In parallel there was a need for the two US states to find more effective ways of working together.

Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad train headed by locomotive No. 484, approaching ‘The Narrows’ east of Chama, New Mexico, USA, © Drew Jacksich and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [8]

Various crises followed; the operating company had its contract terminated and another company was appointed. The volunteer organisation which was maintaining stock was removed from the site and eventually a new volunteer organisation was formed – the Friends of the Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad (The Friends).

The new operating company (Kyle Railways) brought about a change in fortune for the C&TSR. In 1987, ridership was a record 38,721 people, and ridership continued to increase throughout the 1990s. In 1995, the total was 59,871. But by the end of the 1996 season, Kyle Railways, gave up their lease. The next lease holders survived in role only until the end of the 1999 season. After the lease was advertised once again, no suitable applicants applied. In February 2000, The Friends made an offer to run the railroad. The friends set up a not-for-profit company: the Rio Grande Railroad Preservation Corporation (RGRPC). This arrangement only lasted until the end of the 2005 season. Further negotiations saw The Friends forming another non-profit to run the day-to-day operations with capital funding for necessary works being the responsibility of the two states. Various factors meant that this new arrangement lasted only until the end of the 2011 season.

No. 484 again in charge of a different consist, © Public Domain. [8]

This seems, throughout Stancliffe’s article, to have been the ongoing experience of those running the railway – periods when reasonable progress was being made with passenger numbers being to rise towards a break even position, and then an incident or problem which set things back.

The late 2010s saw fragile good progress destroyed by COVID and in the 2020s a similar set back saw the restaurant kitchens at the intermediate stop at Osier, and dry weather causing significant damage to water supplies along the line.

C&TSR No. 487 in the Chama Yard, © Wdiehl and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [8]

Stancliffe has set the scene for Part 2 which will follow in a later edition of ‘The Narrow Gauge’.

And finally ….

I hope that this series of notes about the mailing sent out at the end of September 2026 might encourage new interest from non-members in the Narrow Gauge Railway Society.

References

  1. The Narrow Gauge No. 302; the Narrow Gauge Railway Society, September 2026.
  2. The Narrow Gauge No. 303; the Narrow Gauge Railway Society, September 2026.
  3. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleinbahn_Pogegen%E2%80%93Schmalleningken, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  4. https://archive.org/details/elektrotechnisch3019unse/page/123/mode/1up, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  5. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insterburger_Kleinbahnen_51%E2%80%9353#/media/Datei:OEG_VT_53_historische_Aufnahme.png
  6. https://www.drehscheibe-online.de/foren/read.php?17,7259617, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  7. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festival_of_Empire_1911_Map_%28cropped%29.jpg, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbres_and_Toltec_Scenic_Railroad, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  9. https://www.tramwayinfo.com/Tramframe.htm?https://www.tramwayinfo.com/trampostcards/Postc250.htm, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  10. https://jbarchive.co.uk/products/lo-6134-festival-of-empire-all-red-route-railway-crystal-palace, accessed on 5th October 2026.

Queenborough Cement Works and Associated Industries at Queenborough

The featured image for this article is a line drawing of ‘Aveling’ (No. 2) an Aveling & Porter 0-4-0WTG locomotive that served at Queenborough from 1913 to 1945/46.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “The Queenborough Cement Co. Ltd opened in 1882 and by 1896 had a short tramway down to a wharf and creek leading off the River Swale; a siding to the SECR was laid in 1904. The chalk pit also supplied a ceramics manufacturer, A. Johnson & Sons Ltd, established in 1908, which had a narrow gauge tramway.” [1: p67]

In 1895, the Cement Works operated four kilns. The clay for the kilns was excavated from a site nearby, and chalk, the other necessary ingredient, together with coal for firing, were brought in by sea. For this to be done more conveniently, “Chalk Wharf” was built in 1897. [13: p8]

The original Chalk Wharf. [13: p8]

The Cement Company put in sidings from the railway company’s main line, and supplied facilities under agreement for rail traffic to serve the various concerns on the estate, and these form the nucleus of the provision later made by Settle Speakman for the other industrial undertakings on the site. The Cement Company, which at one time had an output of 400 tons per week, was disposed of in 1912, and during the 1914-18 war all the kilns and shafts were pulled down and the bricks and debris sold to the War Department for improving the roads on Sheppey Island. The old cement stores were turned into a hostel which housed and fed about 200. The quarry workings were gradually filled. [13: p9]

Stoyel & Kidner note that, “The Cement Co. did not join APCM in 1900 but had a five-year Agreement; in 1910 it joined BPCM.” [1: p67]

“In 1908 the wharf was taken over by industrialists from Cheshire, mainly for coal imports; they included Philip Speakman from Liverpool and Joel Settle from Alsager, and in 1930 they formed Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. The company’s involvement with cement was purely the transport of chalk from the East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd at Gillingham, and the movement of products to the wharf.” [1: p67]

The extent of the holdings of Settle Speakman in Queenborough. [13: p16-17]

The Rushenden Estate’s area (South of Queenborough) was impressive, and included a valuable promontory that reached into the deeper water of the tidal River Swale. It was this area that Settle & Speakman sought to exploit. (Sheppy Industries archive), (c) Public Domain. [5]
Queenborough Cement Works as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1909. The Works sit on the West side of the South Eastern and Chatham Railway (SE&CR) branch to Sheerness, North of Sittingbourne. In 1906, the Works had an exchange siding alongside the SE&CR and a tramway which led to a Wharf on the River Swale. To the South of the Works a dedicated tramway siding followed the SE&CR South to a Copper Works. To the North of the exchange siding was …… Station on the SE&CR and another tramway curving Northwest from the SE&CR line to a Wharf on the Swale to the North of Queenborough. Immediately to the West of Queenborough in the banks of the River Swale was Sheppey Glue & Chemical Works with its own Wharf on the river. At the top of this map extract, the Queenborough Pier Branch leaves the Sheerness Branch. [12]

The Company bought rails and chairs for their railway in Widnes and Birkenhead and , while there, acquired two locomotives, “Pioneer” and “Leycett.” Contracts for erecting the wharf, pier, etc., were entered into with Robert McAlpine & Sons, and conveying plant was erected by the Queenborough Contracting Company. [13: p10-11]

The Coal Washer and Wharf under construction [13: p10]

The Settle and Speakman built the Coal Washer themselves from plans supplied by Luhrig Coal and Ore Dressing Appliances Ltd. “The Queenborough Washer was the first in the South East of England. The very idea of the washer seemed strange, if not lunatic, to the local inhabitants – ‘Who ever would want to wash coal?’ Kent, in those days was far removed from the industrial north and the Kent coalfields had not then been developed. … The work was completed in little over twelve months and the first ship came alongside on 23rd November 1908. She was the ‘S. S. Britannia’: … The discharge at Queenborough did not get off to a good start; first the ship went aground at West Point, and … as high water rose, a gale blew up and washed away the embankment of the railway leading to the washer, so that the engine and trucks could not approach it. Only after tons of flint from the Chalk Wharf had been brought to fill the gap was it possible to proceed, but it took five days to discharge this first vessel.” [13: p11-12]

The completed Coal Washer Building. [13: p11]

One of the first benefits of the direct import of coal to Sheppey by the opening of the Queenborough Coal Pier and of washing and grading the coal, was an immediate reduction in local prices.

“In the years 1908 to 1910 there began a period of industrial development of the area with the building of the Pottery and the Glass Bottle Works, both of which had their services provided for by the Queenborough Wharf and Cement Companies. Joel Settle bought, during this period, the land upon which the company’s Retail Coal Depot [was to be] situated, and also acquired two plots of land, one on Rushenden Hill to be used as allotments by the company’s employees, and the other near the bottom upon which a row of houses named ‘Alsager Avenue’ (after Alsager, Cheshire, the home of Joel Settle) were built in 1912; many of these were occupied … by workers of the company.” [13: p12]

The adjacent press report comes from the ‘Daily Express on 3rd July 1908. It highlights the intentions of the company to develop a significant industrial site in the area close to Queenborough.

“In October 1911, the undertakings of Philip Speakman & Sons and Joel Settle were incorporated as a private limited company, Settle Speakman & Company Limited, Joel Settle being Chairman, and William Carroll a Director. Both the Queenborough Wharf Company and the washer of Settle Speakman carried on, with varying success, until 1918. Then Captain Jaffray, Lord Queenborough and Mr. W. H. Appleton took over the Washer; a mortgage was arranged and the Queenborough Coal & Washer Company formed. With many of the collieries in France lying derelict in the area covered by the fighting of the 1914-18 war, there was a brisk demand from France for washed coal at good prices, and 2,000 to 3,000 tons a week were shipped very profitably. But with the recovery of the French coal industry this demand ceased after about three years, and the fortunes of the Coal & Washer Company declined.” [13: p13]

The British Window Glass Works (see the notes on Sheet Glass Ltd below) “commenced operations at Queenborough in 1919, and the Contracting Company put in a railway line to the site of the works from the Wharf Company’s line; agreements were made for payments for goods passing over this line. To handle the extra traffic expected at the coal pier, {the Washer Wharf] was extended by 120 feet, this being financed by a loan from the Contracting Company. … Just before Christmas, 1922, the ‘S. S. Gyp’ collided with the Ferry Bridge across the River Swale; this is the sole approach to the island and road and rail traffic to and from the mainland was dislocated for many months. The Wharf Company had a shunting loco-motive, the “Emerald Isle” and this was put at once on to a shuttle service, running as often and as fast as her small driving wheels would take her, with passengers to the site of the bridge. Here the passengers were ferried across in rowing boats, to board a train on the other side to carry them to their destinations. This service had to be maintained for some months until the bridge was repaired and normal communications once more restored.” [13: p14]

For a time, the Coal & Washer Company was in liquidation. “Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. took over all the assets of the Queenborough Coal & Washer Company and in early 1924 again worked the Washer, the Wharf Company continuing to perform the discharge and shunting operations. In 1926, the general strike stopped operations, although some revenue was obtained by working-over the accumulated deposits of tailings from the washer to recover for sale what little coal can have remained in them. Whilst the washer lay idle, slack in the raw coal hopper caught fire by spontaneous combustion, destroying the hopper and the conveyors feeding the washer. They were never rebuilt.” [13: p14]

A process of consolidation followed with many of the activities of the various companies being merged into the control of Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. “It was decided to erect a Plant for screening the discharged coal on a site convenient to the pier and near the old washer, and this was completed in November 1927. At the end of 1928, the Queenborough Wharf Company went into liquidation and was sold to Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd., in 1930. A year later, the working assets of the Queenborough Contracting Company, which included the Chalk Wharf were taken over and Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. thus obtained control over the discharge of ships and barges at both wharves and the transit of wagons. Further purchases of several pieces of land … took place, which served to strengthen the position of the company and to augment its resources.” [13: p18]

The Washer Wharf “was strengthened throughout in 1933 by driving reinforced concrete piles 70 feet in length to support a concrete raft 2 feet 6 inches thick on which the timber and concrete decking was supported. A new Wagon Shop was built (1934) and a concrete wall was erected (1935) for the protection of the Chalk Wharf.” [13: p18]

“In 1938, there occurred a very high tide accompanied by a strong gale. sea-wall near the wharves was breached and the sea poured into the low-lying land beyond, washing away the foundations of the railway in several places leaving the rails and sleepers in mid-air. … Hundreds of tons of material obtained from tips at the Pottery Works and from the adjacent hill were dumped into the gaps. Within three days communication with the wharf was established again.” [13: p18]

War damage during WW2 was surprisingly slight. During the War, “plans were made for post-war development at Queenborough which served as a blue-print for the progress which commenced [after the War]. … These plans permanently shaped Settle Speakman’s interests at Queenborough [Through into the late 1950s]. … Further land was acquired, additional railway sidings constructed and extensions to the Wagon Shop undertaken. The old chimney stack at the Washer Wharf was felled, and a stores and messroom with showers and a washroom, etc., made in the shell of the old washer. The reconstruction and strengthening of the wharf was completed, and a new railway weighbridge and weigh-house erected. A new locomotive ‘Stafford’, [and] a ‘Jones’ and a ‘Jumbo’ mobile crane, and a 5-ton Booth diesel crane were obtained to improve the handling facilities.” [13: p19]

Significantly, two modern Stothert & Pitt 5-ton level luffing cranes [4][5][13: p20] were erected at the Coal Washer Wharf in 1953. [13: p20] The Coal Washer Wharf was the centre of operations for the Company. It was 300 feet long, with two lines of standard gauge railway along the full length. The two Stothert & Pitt electric cranes operated at a maximum and minimum radius of 68 feet and 23 feet, served the wharf, with a smaller crane also available. At the outward berth there was at least 12 feet of water at low water on spring tides, throughout the whole length of the wharf. [13: p23-24] The wharf was capable of handling coal and merchandise direct from a vessel into wagons, or overside into lighter or barge; or vice versa.

Coal Washer Wharf in the late 1950s. Note the two large Stothert & Pitt Cranes. [13: p23]

“Each of the new cranes at the Washer Wharf contains a recording weigher of a very high order of accuracy, complying with the requirements of the Board of Trade. A so-ton standard-gauge railway weighbridge, 16 feet long, is installed at the approach to the Washer Wharf and enables accurate weights to be given for traffic handled by rail. A 30-ton road weigh-bridge is installed adjacent to the retail coal depot, for handling road traffic.” [13: p25]

At Coal Washer Wharf, coal was discharged by grab onto a metal-plate conveyor on the wharf. A rubber-belt conveyor then took the coal to the Screening Plant, which gave a range of sizes. From the screens coal was loaded into railway wagons.

Adjacent to the Retail Coal Depot, the Company had a well-equipped Wagon Repair Shop. Here are carried out repairs not only to the Company’s own wagons, but also work for the British Transport Commission.

Chalk Wharf: was 350 feet long, and had both road and rail connections. The berth is tidal, with a maximum depth of water of 12 feet, enabling vessels of 250 to 300 tons capacity to be accommodated. It handled many of the raw materials for the adjacent factories – amber sand and flint sand from Belgium and felspar for the glass works, china clay and china stone from Cornwall, and boulder flints from France for the pottery works. Fuel oil is also delivered from barges at this wharf, and ballast unloaded. Sheet glass is loaded onto barges for the London River, where it is transhipped for export. [13: p24]

Chalk Wharf in the 1950s. [13: p24]
Unloading at Chalk Wharf. [13: p25]

The next three map extracts come from the 1:2500 Ordnance Survey revised up to 1963 and published in 1964. They demonstrate the industrial developments, up to 1963, around Queenborough and show both the Coal Washer Wharf and Chalk Wharf at that time. …

The heart of Queenborough, its Railway Station and the location of the cement works. The site of the cement works was to the West of the railway line in the bottom-right of this extract from the 1:2500 Ordnance Survey revision of 1963, published in 1964. [14]
Chalk Wharf is on the left of this map extract from the 1:2500 Ordnance Survey revision of 1963, published in 1964. [15]
The Coal Washer Wharf mentioned in the text. This map extract comes from the revised 1:2500 Ordnance Survey revised of 1963, published in 1964. [16]

Locomotives and Rolling Stock

Later, a variety of locomotives worked for Settle Speakman. Examples include:

Stoyel & Kidner note two specific locomotives: ‘Success’ an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter, Works No. 5082 built in 1902; and ‘No. 2’ another 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter, Works No. 7975, built in 1913. [1: p67] Other records suggest that ‘No. 2’ was named ‘Aveling’ [13: p18]

Stoyel & Kidner suggest that ‘Success’ had probably lost its name by the time it arrived from the East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd. ‘No. 2’ was new. The former was scrapped before 1930 and ‘No. 2’ in 1946, [1: p67] or possibly 1945. [13: p18]

‘Aveling’ (‘No. 2’) was new in 1913 and scrapped in 1945, [13: p18] or 1946. [1: p67]

As of 1957, Settle Speakman had 5 locomotives and 220 internal-user wagons working on the private sidings. Locomotives employed by Settle Speakman over the years included:

‘Stafford’ – a Bagnall-built 0-4-0ST which was bought new carried the name ‘Stafford’ because, as well as having a base at Queenborough in Kent, Settle Speakman & Co. was a major coal factoring, shipping, and colliery-owning group based in Stoke-on-Trent, North Staffordshire. Before the nationalization of the UK coal industry in 1947, they owned several pits, operated an extensive fleet of private owner railway wagons, and managed industrial locomotives to shunt coal.

‘Stafford’, an 0-4-0ST built by [13: p27]

No. 3 – a Dick Kerr 0-4-0ST formerly of Cadbury Brothers and named “Maybury.”

No. 3 – ‘Maybury’: a Dick Kerr 0-4-0ST former at Cadbury Brothers. Note the closeness of the cab spectacles – evidence that the locomotive was originally fitted with just a weatherboard, the overall cab being added at a later date. (F. Jones), (c) Public Domain. [2]

In later years, diesel shunters were employed – Two diesel-hydraulic 0-6-0 locomotives were at Queenborough Rolling Mill on 3rd September 2013, both originally built by Andrew Barclay of Kilmarnock for the British Forces in Germany in 1966. In the photograph dated 3rd September 2013, which can be found here, [3] the blue locomotive is “873” and the red one is “871”. The internal use railway wagons are ex-BR. Photograph dated 3rd September 2013. Other photographs of diesel locomotives at work at Queenborough can be seen here, [6] here, [7] and in the wider album here. [8]

D2432 was a Class 6 0-4-0 diesel shunter which was first allocated to Hamilton in February 1960, transferring to Polmadie in May 1960, Ayr in 1966, and to Eastfield in September 1967. It was withdrawn from BR service at Eastfield and sold to R. E. Trem & Company, Finningley, near Doncaster. They in turn sold it to Shipbreaking (Queenborough), Oueenborough, Isle of Kent for further use. Movement from Glasgow to the Isle of Sheppey would appear to have occurred in part or most likely in whole by road. There is a report of it being sighted at Stamford on 20th May 1969 on road transport from where it continued to the Isle of Sheppey. Photographs of the locomotive in transport can be seen here. [9] Sightings of the locomotive were by Brian Henderson at Gosforth High Street (on road transport), 19/05/1969; Stamford (on road transport), 20/05/1969; Medway Services, M2, Kent (on road transport) by Peter Hall (IRS), on 20/05/1969; and at Queenborough by Gordon Edgar, 24/01/1971 and 22/10/1972, Mike Martin, 08/11/1975 and Tom Bartlett, 24/01/1976. [10]

Industries Served by the Railway

Settle Speakman provided the shunting requirements for the local factories, which were thereby connected with the Company’s wharves and with British Railways’ main line at Queenborough Station. All those local factories had strong links with the Company and its predecessors. The original agreements for shunting and handling of goods were still in operation,

The companies serve by Settle Speakman are listed below:

Sheppy Glue & Chemical Works: This works, reputed to have been the oldest chemical works in the country, haf existed at Queenborough from the 16th century. The original works was on the town side of the Creek, but by the 20th century an extensive site to the south east of the Creek was also occupied. The principal products were glue, granular compound fertilizers, super phosphate, organic fertilizers and sulphuric acid. The Queenborough Contracting Company made, in 1916, an agreement to construct a full gauge railway line into the works and to do all the shunting necessary. These arrangements were taken over by Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. [13: p28]

Alfred Johnson & Son Limited: One of the largest UK producers of sanitary ware, Alfred Johnson & Son Ltd., (“Pyramid”  trade mark). The Queenborough Works was established in 1908, and from the earliest days arrangements were in force whereby the various predecessors of Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. constructed and operated railway connections and provided shunting facilities to the works. … A narrow gauge line from the Chalk Wharf operated for many years and conveyed the china clay and other raw materials to the works, but this has been replaced by road transport loaded directly from the ships. [13: p28]

Canning Town Glass Works Limited: Manufacture of glass bottles and jars commenced in 1910, with the establishment of the Queenborough Glass Bottle Works. From the outset arrangements were in force to discharge goods and raw materials for the works at the Chalk Wharf, including the use of an overhead gantry. A rail connection was made to the works in 1920 and an agreement was entered into for shunting services. When the works of the original company were taken over by the Canning Town Glass Works Ltd., in 1926, these arrangements remained in force, and were undertaken by Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. [13: p28-29]

Medway Glass Works Limited: In anticipation of large contracts from a manufacturer of electric lamps, the construction of the Medway Glass Works was commenced in 1919, but labour conditions on the site delayed the completion of the factory, and the opportunity for the contracts was lost. Immediately following came the slump of 1920 and, as a result of these misfortunes, the completed works did not go into production. Agreements, however, were made for the discharge of materials at the wharves and for shunting arrangements. Production commenced in 1921, but prevailing conditions were such that the works soon had to close. … In 1942, the premises were requisitioned by the Admiralty, who retained them until de-requisition in 1947. Later, in 1952, the Admiralty purchased the works and carrried out considerable repairs to the buildings. [13: p29]

Sheet Glass Limited: In 1919, on the site of the old Queenborough Copper Works, a firm – British Window Glass Ltd. commenced to build a factory for the manufacture of sheet glass. Arrangements for discharging of goods and materials at the wharf and for delivery and shunting were entered into. Trading conditions in the 1920’s, however, were not favourable and production stopped in 1924. Another company was formed – Sheet Glass Ltd. and production re-commenced and continued for about two years from 1927. In 1932, the works re-opened having been acquired by Pilkington Bros. Ltd., of St. Helens, and Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd. continued to serve the new owners as had previously been agreed. [13: p29]

W. Lodder: This is an iron foundry which specialises in the making of the cast-iron moulds required for glass-bottle manufacture, a unique enterprise for this part of England. The foundry had an engineering works attached, which undertook general engineering repairs. [13: p29]

Queenborough Rolling Mill: this facility was established on the site of the old cement works. This made use of the industrial railway which ran to exchange sidings with the main line railway and to a jetty on the River Swale. Operations ceased in February 2013 and the physical assets were auctioned in September 2013. The Wharf and the associated industrial railway to Queenborough Station were used by Settle Speakman until the jetty was used by Shipbreakers (Queenborough). The Rolling Mill was then built and rails recovered from defunct railway lines arrived by ship and by rail and were rolled to produce steel bar for use in reinforced concrete. The reinforcement bar was despatched by ship, rail and road. Second-hand industrial railway locomotives and wagons were used for movements between the works and the jetty. The works was taken over by the international steel processing company ISTIL in 1999, which was purchased in 2006 by Estar. In 2010, the mill was operated under the name Invicta Merchant Bar. It is thought the railway to the jetty had ceased to be used by this time. [3] Scenes from around the Rolling Mill can be seen here. [8] The Mill closed in 2013. [17: p164]

A full list of locomotives used on the site by Lacmots 1960-1964, Shipbreaking Queenborough 1964-1972, Queeenborough Rolling Mill, 1972 onwards can be found in Robin Waywell’s book, Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent. [17: p163-168]

Flushing Pier: In about 1875 the old London, Chatham & Dover Railway Company decided to build a pier at the entrance of the River Swale to accommodate cross-Channel traffic. “The situation was a favourable one for trade and passenger crossings to Holland, as it was conveniently near to London, yet sheltered and notably less liable to become fog-bound and more generally useful than the railway company’s site at Dover. The pier was known as the Flushing Pier, as a regular day and night service for mailboats ran between Queenborough and that port. In 1885, the original pier was burned down, and a new one built, which was also destroyed by fire in 1900. The railway company again rebuilt the pier with a pier head structure 650 feet long and an approach pier 300 feet long, all on some 2,500 timber piles, heavily braced. On the pierhead and approach were extensive buildings, platforms and railtracks.” [13: p30]

Flushing Pier was more formally called Queenborough Pier. It sat to the North of Queenborough, close to the mouth of the River Swale. It is shown here at the end of a branch from the London, Chatham and Dover Railway on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1896, published in 1898. [11]
Flushing Pier. [13: p30]

“The pier continued in operation until the outbreak of the 1914-18 war. When the war was over, the Continental route went through Folkestone and Dover and the pier never regained this traffic.
Between the wars the pier was first used as a dismantling jetty, where such famous ships as “H.M.S. Orion” were broken up. In 1928 a company, The Port of Queenborough Ltd., was formed and hired the pier for dealing with merchandise and also proved successful in handling coal from the Kent coalfields. This company was acquired in 1931 by Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd., and re-organised.
In 1936, an approach was made to the railway company to allow the pier to be adapted in order to take road transport, but after investigation the railway engineering department did not consider the structure to be safe for this purpose, so nothing came of it
.” [13: p30-31]

“In November, 1939, the Admiralty gave notice that they required use of the pier forthwith, and within one week most of the Company’s gear, plant, etc., were removed and the pier taken over for use as a Mine Sweeping base. Arrangements were made to carry on the business at the wharves of Settle Speakman & Co. Ltd., and a considerable proportion of the tonnage was maintained. This requisitioning gave rise to long-drawn-out negotiations with the Admiralty and the Railway about compensation and the use of machinery, but eventually all was settled.” [13: p31]

“After the Admiralty vacated the Pier in 1948 attempts were made to resume activities but about 1951 it became evident that the pier was becoming unsafe for further use, and in 1955, it became a real danger to shipping. Demolition was put in hand, and June, 1956, saw the last of this … old pier; it had fought a losing battle against fire, changing trade routes, and the continuous and devastating attack of the teredo worm.” [13: p31]

By the end of its life, Flushing Pier was in a parlous state! [13: p31]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner; The Cement Railways of Kent; The Oakwood Press (LP70], Headington, Oxford, 1973 & 1990.
  2. https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/46/Letters_46.htm, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  3. http://www.railalbum.co.uk/industrial-railways/images/images-qbro/images-qbro-intro-1/qbro-scene-03sep2013-imgp6038.jpg, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stothert_%26_Pitt, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  5. https://queenboroughsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Rushenden-Estate.pdf, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  6. http://www.railalbum.co.uk/industrial-railways/images/images-qbro/images-qbro-intro-1/qbro-loco-29jne1991-film91140-3.jpg, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  7. http://www.railalbum.co.uk/industrial-railways/images/images-qbro/images-qbro-intro-1/qbro-scene-1986-film8660-32.jpg, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  8. http://www.railalbum.co.uk/industrial-railways/queenborough-intro-1.htm, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  9. https://rcts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/diesel-dilemmas/06000-D2432-19690520-Medway-Services-Peter-Hall-IRS-Andrew-Smith-2-300×200.jpg, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  10. https://rcts.org.uk/features/diesel-dilemmas/class-06/d2432, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676531, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428281, accessed on 15th September 2026.
  13. https://queenboroughsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Settle-Speakman-History-1957.pdf, accessed on 15th September 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103203940, accessed on 15th September 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103203937, accessed on 15th September 2026.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/188600758, accessed on 15th September 2026.
  17. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.

The Crumbles Branch, Eastbourne

The featured image for this article shows a typical branch train heading towards Eastbourne. It comprises a number of mineral wagons running empty after delivering coal to the Eastbourne Gas Works, © Public Domain. [38]

The Crumbles Branch (also known as the Ballast Line or Crumbles Railway) was a 3.5-mile standard-gauge industrial branch line constructed in 1862 that ran east from Eastbourne’s railway area out onto the remote shingle beach known as The Crumbles. [5][6][7][8]

The Crumbles Branch ran from Eastbourne Railway Station Northeast roughly parallel to the coast. It is shown in yellow as it was part of the wider network near Eastbourne. A short branch can be seen near Roselands which served the Destructor Works. The Gas Works with its associated sidings, is directly North of the ‘LA’ of Roselands. The Turquoise line runs through, what were until the 1960s, rifle ranges to the Northeast of Eastbourne. It appears on the Ordnance Survey undertaken at the end of the 19th century but not on later surveys, so should not be confused with an electric tramway which was a tourist attraction in the mid-20th century. It may be associated with the Hall & Co. Narrow-Gauge (2ft) Tramway. [24][31]
This image is a scan of the relevant page of a BR SR Route Mileage folder which gives some details of the Crumbles line at Eastbourne. The branch features at the centre of the image. This image was shared on the Disused Railways of Sussex Facebook Group by John Atkinson on 28th January 2021. [36]

The shingle bank/beach was 3⁄4-mile-wide (1.2 km) – shingle collected here was used as ballast for railway lines across the LB&SCR and the wider UK network. [2: plate 27]

This photograph was taken by Andrew Diack at the beginning of July 2025. Looking north-northeast from the Waterfront car park at Sovereign Harbour, the photo shows a fenced-off fragment of land in the form of a bank that is approximately 3⁄4-mile-wide (1.2 km) and is known as the Crumbles, © Andrew Diack and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [6]

Andrew Diack tells us that, “This distinctive area of coastal deposition lying adjacent to the sea underlies modern Sovereign Park and Princes Park and continues towards Sea Houses, near Eastbourne Pier. The irregular surface of ridges and hollows once contained pools of water in places, and a “Cromble Pond” of irregular form is shown on early maps, including John Speed’s map of Sussex of 1611 and Robert Marden’s map of Sussex of 1693, while the Ordnance Survey map of 1813 also shows “Crumble Pond”. In 1845, the Crumbles were partitioned between Lord Burlington, later the 7th Duke of Devonshire, and the Gilbert family; both families had a long association with the town as major landowners, benefactors and developers. The Gilberts and the Cavendish family, who as the Dukes of Devonshire were, in fact, connected by marriage through the Compton family, who were also landowners in Eastbourne and whose estate was managed from their residence at Compton Place, previously Bourne Place. The partition of the Crumbles was said to have been beneficial toward the development of the Seaside suburb to the east of Eastbourne. The railway came to Eastbourne in 1849, and with the expansion of railways so grew the demand for railway ballast and the need for gravel quarries to supply the stone. In 1857-62 the London Brighton & South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) negotiated the purchase of not less than 48,000 cubic yards of shingle from the Duke of Devonshire at 1 penny per cubic yard, to be extracted from the Crumbles.” [6]

Andrew Diack writes: “Due to the buoyant demand for ballast, this was a period of expansion for the gravel pits that produced the product, but it was equally a time when the natural landscape of vegetated shingle ridges suffered greatly by being transformed into a scarred landscape where industrial machines created holes and gashes in the surface of the land. Over a period of a hundred years shingle was removed at the rate of around 250,000 tons per year for railway ballast and building material, and that resulted in the height of the land being reduced by 4 metres within 100 metres of the shore.” [6]

Additional branches were added to the line, including a siding built in 1870 for the Eastbourne Gas Company, which straddled the railway. The gasworks received coal via the rail connection and in return, produced coke, which was taken away. [2: plate 32][3]

“In 1926, a line was laid for the Eastbourne Corporation Electric Works, which transported coal and supplied fuel to the bus garage, as well as taking scrap metal from the refuse destructor works.” [2: plate 29][3][5]

In fact, “as Eastbourne expanded, the branch evolved into an industrial corridor. It served the town’s gasworks (delivering large volumes of coal), brickworks, timber yards, and destructor works.” [6]

Ballast trains ran until 1932, when the LB&SCR’s successor, the Southern Railway, switched to using granite.

Andrew Diack continues: “Although the gravel had a variety of uses, when railways changed to the use of granite chippings in 1930, the business went into terminal decline. (Broken granite chips interlock better than rounded pieces of flint, and they also provide good shock absorption and easier maintenance.) Shingle extraction gradually diminished, and by 1932, the railway was no longer used to transport shingle, though it continued to serve [some] other industrial sidings in addition to the gasworks.” [6]

“The branch ceased steam working in April 1960, after which diesel shunting locomotives took over [2: plate 28] until the line was closed in … 1967.” [2: plate 29][3][5]

Andrew Diack says that “The Crumbles railway continued to serve the gasworks until …  1967, but with gas production ceasing in June 1967, the track fell into disuse, and in the late 1980s it was removed at the time of the Eastbourne re-signalling project.” [6]

A short series of photographs follow below, all taken circa. 1962 by Dick Gilbert.

The line to the Crumbles remained in place until the early 1960s when these pictures were taken.
There is no trace of anything shown in these pictures in the 21st century (Dick Gilbert, around 1962), (CC BY 2.0). [4]
The line across the Crumbles (Dick Gilbert, around 1962), (CC BY 2.0). [4]
The location of this wooden building is what is now the eastern side of the roundabout where the A259 coast road meets Lottbridge Drove (A2290). It is no longer there, but was probably a house for the crossing gates controller as the line crossed the A259 here – the houses on the left are on that road and some are still recognisable. The trackbed out to the Crumbles is on the right (Dick Gilbert, around 1962), (CC BY 2.0). [4]
The redundant rails and sleepers removed from the branch line (Dick Gilbert, around 1962), (CC BY 2.0). [4]
Disused/redundant skip wagons (Dick Gilbert, around 1962), (CC BY 2.0). [4]

The remote shingle beach area of The Crumbles where the line terminated has since been redeveloped and is now home to Sovereign Harbour and retail developments. 

An exploration of this line can be found here on YouTube. [7]

Following the Line

A separate line ran alongside the main line out beyond the location of the Engine House. …

The Crumbles Branch ran beside and to the East of the main line a short stub line turned away to the East from the branch to serve a small yard. The branch continued under the bridge which provided a link between Upper Avenue and Cavendish Place. The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. [8]
The same area as it appears on the modern ESRI satellite imagery provided by the National Library of Scotland. The bridge noted on the map extract above can be seen in the top-right of this image. The road is now named Upper Avenue. [9]
The short stub siding mentioned above is shown here on another extract from the same OS sheet. It passes under the link road and most probably already in place before that road was conceived. The site served by the sliding is marked ‘Smithy’ on a later Ordnance Survey map. [8]
The view South from Upper Avenue bridge towards Eastbourne Station. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Looking North from Upper Avenue bridge towards Whitley Road bridge. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
The next length of the line which covers the length between Upper Avenue bridge and that carrying Whitley Road. The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. [10]
While Upper Avenue appears to be much the same width as on the map extracts, Whitley Road bridge has been significantly widened. [Google Maps, August 2026]
Looking South from Whitley Road bridge towards Upper Avenue bridge. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
Looking North from Whitley Road bridge. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
The line to the North of Whitley Road bridge. Another short branch from the Crumbles Branch serves as a private siding for a Timber Yard. The Crumbles Branch can be seen separating from the main line close to the Pumping Station. Another short siding can also be seen leaving the branch closed to the top of this map extract. This 25″ OS map extract of 1898, published 1899, spans two OS sheets. [10][11]
This extract from the 25″ OS map extract of 1898, published 1899 shows the sliding which appeared at the very top of the last map extract. It is not clear what the site was used for at the turn of 20th century. [11]

This small extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1947, shows a new building on the site, no rail connection, and the site is designated a Glass Works. Careful examination of the map extract shows that, although the sidings within the site and the building they served are now gone, the point on the Crumbles Branch remains. [12]

The Crumbles Branch diverged from the main line. 25″ OS map extract of 1898, published 1899. [11]
The line continued to turn northeastwards. [11]
Now heading Northeast, just at the top-right of this map extract a branch led away to the East. It served the Eastbourne Destructor Works and was in place for a period in the early- to mid-20th century. [11]
The Crumbles Branch begins to turn North, the branch to the Destructor Works does not appear on this next 25″map extract from 1898/99, nor does it appear on later 25″ surveys provided by the NLS. [11]
The 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1947 shows both the short siding/branch and the Destructor Works themselves which were sited to the Southeast of St. Philips Avenue. [12]

The branch serving the Destructor Works. [24]

A short aside is worthwhile here, to provide some information about the Destructor Works. …

The Eastbourne Destructor Works was a late 19th-century municipal waste incinerator and early energy-from-waste facility, producing electricity which was used locally in Eastbourne. Plants like this were built as towns grew and traditional waste disposal became difficult, the site burned household refuse in high-temperature furnaces to reduce volume, produce clinker, and generate steam for electricity. Coal was often required alongside the rubbish to keep the furnaces hot enough. [7][13][14]

By the 1950s and 1960s, shifting environmental standards, modern waste management approaches, led to the closure and demolition of the complex and the lifting of its rail link. [7][14]

The wider industrial footprint stretched across the area of modern-day St Philips Avenue and Bridges Close. The refuse handling section stood roughly where the current recycling site is on St Philips Avenue, while the core furnace operations and rail sidings were nearby towards Bridges Close. Only the recycling centre remains as a hint to the past use of the industrial site. The rest of the land has been redeveloped into housing estates and roads.

Simon Meader shared two photographs (photographer not known) which were taken before the nationalisation of the railways, both focus on the location of the level-crossing on St. Philip’s Avenue.

The level-crossing on St. Philip’s Avenue in the inter-war years of the 20th century. This image was shared on the Disused Railways of Sussex Facebook Group by Simon Meader in comments in 2024, © Public Domain. [15]

The level-crossing on St. Philip’s Avenue after bomb damage to the adjacent property in WW2. This image was shared on the Disused Railways of Sussex Facebook Group by Simon Meader in comments in 2024, © Public Domain. [15]

Looking West-northwest along the line of the old rail link, a short cul-de-sac called ‘The Sidings’ is seen here from St. Philip’s Avenue in August 2024. The waste amenity site is behind the camera to the right. [Google Maps, August 2024]

The Sidings runs West-southwest from St. Philip’s Avenue along the line of the old rail link.

The Sidings is bottom-left in this image, the civic amenity site is centre-right. [Google Maps, August 2026]
Looking along the rail link into the site of the Destructor Works from Roseland Avenue level-crossing. This image was shared by  Matthew Cox on the History of Sussex Facebook Group on 14th November 2025, © Public Domain. [17]
Approximately the same view from Roseland Avenue in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Turning through 180° from the view above, this image looks back along the line of the old railway towards St. Philip’s Avenue. The pedestrian gate is on the approximate line of the railway. [Google Streetview, August 2024]

More about the Destructor Works can be seen on Matthew Cox’s video below:

A video providing details of Eastbourne’s Destructor Works and associated rail link. [14]
The Crumbles Branch continues on towards Eastbourne Gas Works. The watercourse that it bridges twice on this extract is Horsey Sewer [11]
At a reduced scale this extract shows the line continuing Northeast. [11]
Now turning East the branch approached the gas works which straddled the line. [11]
The Crumbles Branch approaching the Gas Works, seen from the West in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039402). [22]
Eastbourne Gas Works as shown by the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. [11]

The same area in the 21st century, the locations of the two gasometers can still be seen alongside a later additional gasometer. [19]

The lines serving the Gas Works. [24]

Eastbourne Gas Works were rail-served by the Crumbles Branch. The three gasometers can be seen in this aerial view of the Works, © Historic England (EPW039401). [16]
A closer view of the gasworks, seen from the West in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039397). [20]
An even closer view of the gasworks, seen from the West in 1932, showing the Crumbles Branch running through the Works, © Historic England (EPW039397). [20]
The sidings on the West side of the Works, seen from the West in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039397). [20]
The sidings on the East side of the Works with a number of Southern Railway coal wagons in evidence, seen from the West in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039397). [20]
The Gas Works, seen from the South in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039398). [21]

The National Archive record for the Works states: “The Eastbourne Gas Company was formed by Deed of Settlement in 1857. The original area of supply was the town and parish of Eastbourne and the parish of Willingdon. The company was dissolved and reincorporated by Act of Parliament in 1868. A new works was built in Willingdon and the original one closed.”

Over the next eighty or so years The area served by the plant grew. At each stage of development an Act of Parliament either extended the area of supply or permitted the company to purchase other gas companies and their areas of supply until nationalisation took place in 1949 when the undertaking became part of the Sussex Divison of South Eastern Gas Board.

The Crumbles Branch left the Gas Works heading Southeast, (one of the Gasometers is on the left of this image), seen from the South in 1932, © Historic England (EPW039398). [21]
A passing loop was provided on the line, to the East of the Gas Works, after bridging a drainage channel the line crossed…. to the Southwest of Crumbles Bridge. [11]
Crumbles Bridge can be seen at the top-centre of this next map extract. The line continues in a generally East-northeast direction, crossing another drainage channel. [11]

The early gravel extraction/ballast workings were to be found at this location and this was for a time the end of the branch as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey below: …

In 1875/76 this 6″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1879 shows the gravel pits which were the end of the line at that time. Crumbles Bridge can be seen just to the North of centre-left of the extract. [25]

The level crossing and Crumbles Bridge. [25]

Crumbles Bridge was built between 1823 and 1827 to serve the local turnpike road network connecting Eastbourne and Hailsham. It crossed a low-lying drainage channel.  The bridge was reconstructed in 1969 as the local road infrastructure changed. The surrounding shingle and marsh landscape has since been heavily redeveloped into residential areas and the Sovereign Harbour marina.

The same area as shown on the map extract immediately above. The location of the level crossing is just to the Southwest of the roundabout. The drainage channel continues to follow its original course with the more modern bridge sitting at the same location as the old Crumbles Bridge. [37]

Looking Southwest along the line of the Crumbles Branch from the location of the old level-crossing on Seaside. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Looking Northeast along the line of the Crumbles Branch from the location of the old level-crossing on Seaside. The line ran towards the poplar trees on the horizon. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
The same location as on the extract from the 1875/76 6″ Ordnance Survey as it appears on railmaponline.com. [24] The turquoise line which appears here may represent a part of a 2ft-gauge network of tramways owned by Hall & Co. Hall & Co. tramways were transient, moving with the area being worked for shingle. [31]

Hall & Co. 2ft-gauge tramway as it was in 1959, this extract is taken from the 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey. [32]

The Crumbles Branch line was extended beyond that shown on the 1875/76 6″ Ordnance Survey above, to access further gravel reserves to the Northeast.

The line curve towards the Northeast and passed the end of a tramway which ran through the rifle ranges. [26]

The military association with the Crumbles began in the early 19th century with the construction of defensive Martello Towers to ward off Napoleonic invasion. By the late 1800s and early 1900s, this desolate, wide-open shingle plain was deemed the perfect location for a military live-firing range.

The main range featured firing points stretching up to 600 yards. Marksmen and local cadet groups (such as the Eastbourne College Cadet Corps) would lie on the dirt to fire live ammunition from .303 Lee-Enfield rifles at large targets. The targets were managed by soldiers or cadets stationed “in the butts”—a protected, sunken trench directly beneath the targets. Their dangerous job was to pull the massive frames up and down via ropes, patch up the bullet holes, and signal the scores back to the firing line.

A red warning flag was flown whenever firing was live, and any stray bullets flew harmlessly out over the English Channel. The ranges remained active through both World Wars for troop training and continued operating well into the 1960s. The range finally closed in the late 1960s, and the area was later completely reshaped to build the Sovereign Harbour marina complex.

The electric tramway of the mid-20th century is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [30]

The line continued out across the shingle bank. [26][27]
The line continued further Northeast. [27]

The end of the line in 1898/99. [27]

Railmaponline.com shows a somewhat greater extent of the various lines which served the shingle quarries/workings at this location. These extensions supported the workings until their closure in the 1930s. [24]

This is the extent of the line as it appears on the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1908, published in 1909. [28]
This is the extent of the line as it appears on the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1925. [29]
E2 Tank No. 100 at the Ballast Pit in the 1920s. This image was shared by Robert Ian on the Disused Railways of Sussex Facebook Group on 15th January 2025. [35]

We have noted in the narrative above the 2ft-gauge Hall & Co. Tramway which was horse and cable-worked. [31][32][34] There were other transient tramways laid on the Crumbles, these were associated with the local brickworks. Just inland of the open shingle beach (approaching St. Anthony’s Hill and the Langney boundary), the 1898 OS maps catch the footprint of Eastbourne’s late-Victorian building boom. Local clay pits and brickfields (such as those that eventually became the South Eastern Brick and Terra Cotta Works) utilized small, lightweight clay tramways to transfer raw materials from excavation pits to the kilns. [33]

References

  1. Vic Mitchell & Keith Smith; Brighton to Eastbourne; Middleton Press, 1985.
  2. Vic Mitchell & Keith Smith; Eastbourne to Hastings; Middleton Press, 1986.
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Coastway_line, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  4. https://www.flickr.com/photos/harryclaggers/43482880200/in/photostream, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  5. https://uktransport.fandom.com/wiki/East_Coastway_Line, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  6. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/8115913, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  7. https://youtu.be/HSSFptGzpPc?is=TGSPLGusqjEehdRd, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.6&lat=50.77259&lon=0.28579&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.6&lat=50.77259&lon=0.28579&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675453, accessed on 29th August 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675420, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101436231, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  13. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/20/a3187820.shtml, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  14. https://youtu.be/9X0YFtsGYzM?is=yWKt8iiJQbE-rt-x, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  15. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18ZS5t6UBz, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  16. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/epw039401, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  17. https://m.facebook.com/groups/sussexhistory/permalink/25602800352636948, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  18. https://www.heritageopendays.org.uk/submission-event/eastbourne-industry-and-commerce.html, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=50.78783&lon=0.30057&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  20. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW039397, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  21. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW039398, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  22. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW039402, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  23. https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/e9fbbd39-8529-47dc-b58f-045c4d7fd34d, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  24. https://railmaponline.com, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  25. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102347779, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675429, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  27. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675393, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  28. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675390, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675387, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  30. The Hall & Co. Narrow-Gauge Tramway was, unlike the main LB&SCR railway branch that took deep shingle out for mainline railway ballast, a localized system dedicated to commercial shingle and gravel extraction. Track was moved dynamically over the years across the Crumbles to reach active digging pits. It was cable-worked and horse-drawn in its earliest iterations. It fed local concrete product works and smaller commercial loading docks rather than servicing the LB&SCR’s need for ballast. See also the OS Map @ reference [32]
  31. https://maps.nls.uk/view/95750294#zoom=4.6&lat=2718&lon=3174&layers=BT, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  32. https://plandocs.tandridge.gov.uk/my-requests/document-viewer?DocNo=25469297, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  33. https://deangoods.co.uk/eastsxng.html, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  34. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GfNXWhYgx, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  35. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GSkYoS75y, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  36. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.6&lat=50.78750&lon=0.30722&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 1st September 2026.
  37. This image is taken from a report written by C. Butler & C Russell; Desk-based Assessment for the Sovereign Harbour Cycle Network Phases 2 and 3, (Ringwood Road to St Anthony’s Hill Roundabout) Eastbourne, East Sussex (updated from the original Desk-based Assessment for Phase 2A); Chris Butler MIfA, Archaeological Services Ltd., 2012; via: https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-969-1/dissemination/pdf/chrisbut1-398965_1.pdf, accessed on 1st September 2026.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Chris Butler and Dr Caroline Russell

Desk-based Assessment for the Sovereign Harbour Cycle Network Phases 2 and 3, (Ringwood Road to St Anthony’s Hill Roundabout) Eastbourne, East Sussex (updated from the original Desk-based Assessment for Phase 2A)

Chris Butler MIfA, Archaeological Services Ltd – Project No. CBAS0176 – October 2012

4.9.11 …The 1st Edition OS map of 1874 (Fig. 16) shows significant changes to have taken place to the landscape surrounding the Phase 2 cycleway route. Although the Horsey Sewer is shown within a field system that broadly reflects that seen on the early maps, a tramway now runs along its length. It crosses the sewer at three places, to run past the Eastbourne Gas Works and on to the Crumbles, with a single track branching off into the gasworks. To the immediate southeast is Horsey Farm, and then further southeast are ‘Rose Lands’ and a brickfields. [p15]

4.9.12 … The tramway served the beach gravel extraction on the Crumbles, and can be seen on the broader OS map to extend onto the beach before dividing into three separate branches; the gravel pits on the beach are recorded as MES7969-MES7971. In 1857-1862, the London Brighton and South East Railway negotiated with the Duke of Devonshire to purchase not less than 48,000 cubic yards of shingle from the Crumbles, at 1 penny per cubic yard. [48] They constructed a railway close to Eastbourne railway station, which ran through open countryside and along the Horsey Sewer, to turn south to cross the turnpike road (Seaside) near the junction with Lottbridge Drove. The railway was 6.4m wide and ran for 5.6km. It was known as the Ballast Line or the Crumbles Railway, and served the gasworks from 1870 onwards. In 1874, the Crumbles were also used for firing practice (firing ranges MES7961 and MES7962).

4.9.13 The Eastbourne Gas Company was formed in 1852, [49] and was incorporated by an Act of Parliament in 1868, [50] whilst the brickworks was in existence by 1866, and was operated by James Peerless, who leased the land from the Devonshire Estate in 1860. [51]

It continued to operate there until 1899. A smaller brickworks was located at Rose Lands, and was operated from 1860 to the 1880’s by the Eastbourne Brick Co. Ltd. [52]

4.9.14 In contrast, little change had taken place by 1875-1880 along the Phase 3 cycleway route (see Fig. 16 for the 1st Edition OS map). A footpath led through the short droveway, having come through the fields to the northwest. Further northeast along the Phase 3 route, two causeways, each in a different field, gave entry to the same field to the southeast. A drainage channel had been excavated beside the Crumble Sewer, to define a small rectangular plot, possibly a holding pen, directly outside the site boundary. At the north end of this new plot, a footbridge now provided access across the sewer and into the field to the northeast. From here, an adjacent causeway, rather than the previous central causeway, led southeast into the narrow field north of St. Anthony’s Hill. The only building nearby was ‘The Lodge’, a public house on the coast road, south of the hill.

4.9.15 The gasworks had expanded eastwards by the 2nd Edition OS map of 1899 (Fig. 17); ESRO holds a plan of the land intended to be acquired for this expansion, which was drawn in 1879 by H.E. Jones, the Engineer for Eastbourne Gas. [53] The main brickworks had migrated northeast, with allotment gardens having been established along the northern edge of the earlier workings. Rose Lands was a nursery by this time, with a refuse destructor works and air compressing station located on its north side. [p16]

4.9.16 The tramway now had additional sidings serving the gasworks. It continued onto the Crumbles, where it ran to the east, while a branch turned southwest before returning westwards to Seaside on an existing earthwork (MES7968) shown on the 1st Edition OS map. Housing development had expanded northeast along the southeast side of Seaside. The tramway also later served the refuse destructor works and air compressing station, the brickworks and a timber yard.

4.9.17 The Phase 3 cycleway route remained unaltered between 1875-1880 and 1899 (see Fig. 17 for the 2nd Edition OS map). The footbridge had gone. The possible animal pen on St Anthony’s Hill now looks to have been defined by a fence line rather than by ditches, and a second larger such enclosure had been erected in the same former field, on the south side of the hill.

4.9.18 The Martello Towers (MES512 and MES513 / MES7994) on this stretch of coastline all disappeared in the late 19th or early 20th century. Tower 71 was demolished after having been used as target practice for the testing of the new rifled Armstrong Guns in 1860. [54]

Tower 72 had been washed away by the sea sometime prior to 1872, [55] as had West Langney Fort. Tower 70 had likewise been undermined by the sea and was abandoned in 1872 along with Tower 69. Tower 67 was demolished in 1922, whilst Tower 68 was knocked down in c.1925 to make way for residential development (however, see para. 4.9.28).

4.9.19 The 3rd Edition OS map of 1909 (Fig. 18) shows little change to the immediate area around the Phase 2 site, although there had been further housing development along Seaside. A long narrow plot of land was now fenced off along one side of a field, to form a passageway presumably for the movement of livestock between two fields, including the narrow field to the east in which the cycleway runs through. The Martello Tower on St. Anthony’s Hill (MES513 / MES7994) is marked on the map, along with its moat and footbridge; its absence from the 1st or 2nd Edition OS map is somewhat odd, although military installations were often omitted from OS maps for security purposes.

4.9.20 During the First World War, a temporary tented camp was set up at Horsey Bank, in the area of the junction of Churchdale Road and Astaire Avenue. [56] The allotment gardens shown on the 2nd and 3rd Edition OS maps (Figs. 17 and 18) were put to good use during these years, although it is recorded that the Eastbourne Gas Company refused a request to plough up land for allotments, but a compulsion order overturned this. [57] [p17]

4.9.21 From December 1911, Eastbourne Aviation Company Ltd had their manufacturing aerodrome (MES7491) at a site directly to the north of Lottbridge Drove. [58]

From about this time, this site also became the school aerodrome for the Eastbourne Aviation School and the Fowler Flying School. A map of the airfield [59] (Fig. 20) shows the middle stretch of the Phase 3 cycleway route to have been located within Fowler’s original 50 acre airfield.

4.9.22 In August 1914, the hangars and buildings of the aerodrome were taken over by the Royal Navy Air Service. [60] The aerodrome at St. Anthony’s was a RNAS flying school from April 1915 to April 1918, when it became a training depot station for the RAF until 1919. In November 1918, the RAF airfield comprised 242 acres, having predominantly expanded northwest across the Levels (Fig. 20). Almost the full route of the Phase 3 cycleway now stood within the airfield, except for the last stretch through the two fields at the northeast end. With the exception of one area, the buildings, which included a large hangar (MES7990) and the engine sheds, were built around the Martello Tower (MES513 / MES7994) and therefore outside the site boundary. The 15 Bessoneaux hangars were erected in three rows, with two rows having stood opposite each other to the northwest of what is now Birch Road, and the third row having stood along the south side of what is now Leeds Avenue, directly south of St. Anthony’s Hill. During the Phase 2A watching brief an identity disc was found. It is engraved R.N.A.S. / TURNER / ERNEST / EDWARD / A M / F364/ CCE. Ernest Edward Turner is recorded as having been born in 1894 in Bangalore, India, and entered the RNAS in 1914; [61] it is presumed that he served at St Anthony’s.

4.9.23 The aerodrome was licensed for civilian use again in April 1920 [62] and finally closed in 1925. The only remaining structure of the aerodrome is a guardroom (MES7991) from the RNAS phase of use, which is now a bungalow on Leeds Avenue. The large hangar (MES7990) stood extant nearby until the storm in 1987; its foundations are still visible today.

4.9.24 A site on the Crumbles, in the region of the present day Sovereign Centre, was used by the Eastbourne Aviation Company as a seaplane factory, and also for the refuelling and servicing of patrolling seaplanes. [63] The hangars on the Crumbles were converted to an aircraft factory, and during the war the Eastbourne Aviation Company built a total of 252 aircraft. [p18]

4.9.25 By the 4th Edition OS map of 1928 (Fig. 19), the tramway has developed to include a branch line to the refuse destructor works and air compressing station, and additional sidings at the gasworks. The return route of the tramway to Seaside from the Crumbles had been dismantled by this time. Some ‘tanks’ are shown adjacent to the Horsey Sewer, north of the gasworks and alongside a footbridge. Major housing development had taken place to the southeast of the Phase 2 cycleway route, along the northwest side of Seaside. Eastbourne Corporation had a licence to place a footbridge over the Horsey Sewer in 1926, [64] and had an agreement for works in the Horsey Sewer in 1937. [65]

4.9.26 The decline of the tramway began in 1920 when the ballast used on the railways changed to granite chippings and there was no further requirement for the shingle. 

Shingle continued to be taken to the Duke of Devonshire’s depots at Eastbourne Station to be used for building purposes until 1931. [66] The shingle beds at the Crumbles were leased to Hall and Co. [67] who then began to use lorries to move the shingle, stopping rail movements completely in 1932. The tramway continued to serve the gasworks and other industrial sidings, taking thousands of tons of coal to the gasworks (Fig. 21). [68]

4.9.27 The land around the Phase 3 cycleway route looked little different in 1925-1930 from what it had done in 1910 (see Fig. 20 and the 4th Edition OS map of Fig. 19 for a comparison), revealing how easily the land had reverted to pasture after its use as an airfield. A number of buildings from the aerodrome still stood, including the engine sheds as well as the guardroom (MES7991) and large hangar (MES7990). A sluice is shown across the Crumble Sewer, south of the former hangar. A crossing across the sewer was now sited where the footbridge once was; it is the location of a bridge today, although it was not identified as such on this OS map. The crossing led into a small enclosure, once part of a larger enclosure, which linked up with the field to the east.

4.9.28 Residential housing had been built on the east side of St. Anthony’s Hill, and below it along Seaside. Both the inner and outer circular roads of The Circus and Rotunda Road had been laid out around the hill, although neither was specifically named as such at this time. The Circus was built around the in-filled moat of Tower 68, [69] whilst Rotunda Road may have traced the boundary of land first purchased by the government in 1795. The single building at the centre of the housing development, within The Circus, may incorporate the base of the Martello Tower (MES513 / MES7994) in its cellar. [70] Allotment gardens had been planted directly south of St. Anthony’s Hill and beside the Phase 3 cycleway route on Lottbridge Drove. [p19]

4.9.29 During the Second World War the coastline was put into a state of defence with anti-tank cubes, walls and ditches (e.g. MES7997), minefields (e.g. MES8007) andscaffolding located on the beach, and other defences such as pillboxes positioned to the rear (e.g. MES7999, MES8017 and MES8018). [71] Unexploded bombs fell in allotments near Lottbridge Drove on 14th September 1940, while the gasworks was attacked on the 19th October, setting alight the Number Three gasholder. [72] On 12th March 1941, eight bombs were dropped to the south of the Phase 2 site around Churchdale and Southbourne Roads, and on the following night bombs were dropped to the north of the gasworks. On the 26th August 1942, a German FW190 fighter-bomber was shot down and crashed into a ditch beside Lottbridge Drove. Further bombs were dropped on open ground near the gasworks as well as on the Crumbles on 6th June 1943. On considering its location in the Levels, further out of town, no bombs are known to have fallen in the area of the Phase 3 cycleway route. [73]

4.9.30 A 1947 aerial photograph (Fig. 22) shows residential development to have extended almost as far north as the Horsey Sewer. By the early 1960’s (modern OS maps are not reproduced), the housing developments had reached the southern edge of the sewer, and the tramway is still shown. In the locality of the Phase 3 cycleway route, further residential development had occurred on and around St. Anthony’s Hill, and hadexpanded out onto the Crumbles along Wallis Road and around the adjacent crescent.

Between 1947 and 1961, the Horsey Sewer was straightened to the north of the gasworks, cutting off the former droveway onto Lottbridge Drove. Three new causeways had been constructed along the course of the Phase 3 cycleway.

4.9.31 The tramway had gone by the time of the 1975 OS map, as it had finally closed in 1966. [74] The 1975 map also shows the commercial developments at the southeast end of Lottbridge Drove. One or two buildings appear to have stood at the northeast end of the Phase 3 cycleway route, facing onto the road north of the roundabout, which had been built by then; these buildings were demolished by 1992. The commercial developments had extended beyond the Horsey Sewer, along both sides of Lottbridge Drove by the 1981 OS map. This map also shows new housing developments along the north side of the Horsey Sewer. [p20]

Relevant References

48. Botha, A. 2006. The Crumbles Story. Eastbourne: ALB Books

49. Wright, J.C. 1902. Bygone Eastbourne. Spottiswood and Co. Ltd.

50. ESRO amsh/AMS5616/2/70

51. Beswick, M. 2001. Brickmaking in Sussex. Middleton Press.

52. Ibid.

53. ESRO QDP/448

54. http://sussexhistoryforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=1669.0;prev_next=next#new

55. http://www.martello-towers.co.uk/south-coast/towers

56. Elliston, R.A. 1999. Eastbourne’s Great War 1914-1918. Seaford: S.B. Publications.

57. Ibid.

58. CCI Gazetteer of Flying Sites

59. McMahon, L. And Partridge, M. 2000. A History of the Eastbourne Aviation Company 1911-1924. Eastbourne Local History Society.

60. CCI Gazetteer of Flying Sites

61. National Archives ADM 188/1175

62. Ibid.

63. McMahon, L. And Partridge, M. 2000. A History of the Eastbourne Aviation Company 1911-1924. Eastbourne Local History Society.

64. ESRO SRA7/15/33

65. ESRO SRA4/6/16

66. Botha, A. 2006. The Crumbles Story. Eastbourne: ALB Books.

67. http://www.cambrianmodels.co.uk/eastsxng.html (Gazetteer of Narrow Gauge Railways in East Sussex)

68. Botha, A. 2006. The Crumbles Story. Eastbourne: ALB Books.

69. Butler, C. 2007. East Sussex Under Attack. Stroud: Tempus Publishing.

70. Ibid.

71. Butler, C. 2007. East Sussex Under Attack. Stroud: Tempus Publishing.

72. Humphrey, G. 1998. Eastbourne at War. Seaford: S.B. Publications.

73. Ibid.

74. Botha, A. 2006. The Crumbles Story. Eastbourne: ALB Books.

Relevant Images (p50 – 56)

Gatwick Railway Station and Airport Through the Years

Gatwick Airport (London) lies close to the town of Crawley, on the Victoria-Brighton main line. The station sits immediately to the East of what is now the South Terminal of the airport. This article was promoted by two aerial images of the site of the Airport and its railway station in the September 1997 issue of Steam World. [6]

The featured image for this article shows a Southern Railway U-1 Class locomotive No. 1906. U and U1 2-6-0s were the everyday locos you would have seen stopping at Gatwick Racecourse on local services prior to the electrification of the London-Brighton line, © Public Domain. [16]

Before the Airport there was Gatwick Racecourse, (c) Historic England, EPW028582, 1929. [1]
Gatwick Railway Station and Racecourse in 1896 as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey. [7]
Gatwick Railway Station and Racecourse as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1912, published in 1913. [8]

The present station, originally known as Gatwick, was built for the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LBSCR). It was closed in 1876 and reopened in 1891 by the LBSCR to serve the Gatwick Racecourse. At that time it was operating only on race days. [14]

Gatwick Racecourse Railway Station, circa. 1910, (c) Public Domain. [17]

The station, however, became obsolete due to the opening of nearby Tinsley Green/Gatwick Airport Station in September 1935. It was closed after the completion of the Beehive airport terminal, which was directly connected to the Gatwick station. [14]

Wikipedia marks significant events for Gatwick Airport and it Railway Station [13] from 1920 to 1945:

Late 1920s: Land adjacent to the racecourse (at Hunts Green Farm, along Tinsley Green Lane) was used as an aerodrome. The Hunts Green farmhouse on the land used for the aerodrome was converted into a clubhouse and terminal.

November 1928: Dominion Aircraft Limited based its Avro 504 G-AACX at Gatwick from November 1928.

October 1929: the Southern Railway “announced plans to electrify the Brighton Main Line on the 660 volts DC third rail system, in addition to the stretch westwards from that town to Worthing, and to Reigate. In the Daily Mirror on Monday 19th January 1931, the cost of the works was stated to be £2,770,660, exclusive of new or converted rolling stock, and covered 52-track miles. Work commenced in that year and the first scheduled electric passenger services started to run as far south as Three Bridges from 17th July 1932. On 5th of the previous month, three-aspect colour light signalling had come into use between Coulsdon North, on the Quarry Line, and Balcombe Tunnel Junction (31¾-miles from London Bridge), and in stages was completed through to Brighton, the last section between the latter and Preston Park coming into use on 16th October 1932. From Coulsdon North to Norwood Junction, and between Coulsdon South and Earlswood, semaphores were retained, and the accelerated electric timetable came into use on the full length of the Brighton Main Line on 1st January 1933. This was the first main line in the country to be electrified and at the time comprised the longest continuous stretch of colour light signalling in the world.” [19]

The story of the electrification can be found here. [20]

1st August 1930: Ronald Waters, manager of Home Counties Aircraft Service (based at Penshurst Airfield in Kent), who had come into possession of Gatwick Aerodrome, got a licence for it. He founded the Surrey Aero Club there.

2nd–3rd August 1930: Flying began with pleasure flights for the local population in Avro 504s of Waters’ Surrey Aero Club.

1932: The Redwing Aircraft Company bought the aerodrome, and operated a flying school; it was also used for pilots flying in for races.

1933: The Air Ministry approved commercial flights from Gatwick.

September 1933: A. M. (Morris) Jackaman, who owned several light aircraft, bought the aerodrome for £13,500. He had bold ideas for its future, such as expanding it to make it suitable to use as a relief aerodrome for London (Croydon) Airport and providing a regular service to Paris using de Havilland DH.84 Dragon aircraft. He overcame resistance from the Air Ministry, which was concerned about the cost of draining the clayey land and diverting the River Mole.

The down “City Limited”, 5 pm. from London Bridge to Brighton, comprising ten coaches and two Pullmans, passing Hassocks in May, 1934, (c) Public Domain. [20]
The all-Pullman electric express, renamed the “Brighton Belle” in 1934, approaching Balcombe. This train, composed of two five-coach sets, completed the return journey between Victoria and Brighton three times on weekdays and twice on Sundays, (c) Public Domain. [20]

1934: Jackaman oversaw Gatwick’s transition to a public aerodrome, licensed for non-private flights, and planned a proper terminal building linked to a new railway station on the adjacent Brighton Main Line. He formed a new airport company, Airports Limited. Hillman’s Airways became Gatwick’s first commercial airline operator, beginning scheduled services from the airport to Belfast and Paris.

January 1935: Hillman’s Airways moved to Gatwick from Stapleford Aerodrome.

1935: A new airline, Allied British Airways, was formed with the merger of Hillman’s Airways, United Airways and Spartan Air Lines. The new carrier, which later shortened its name to British Airways, became Gatwick’s principal operator. Dorking and Horley Rural District Council was concerned about possible compensation claims from local residents and the threat of facing liability for flying accidents, and it “could see no benefit” to allowing further development of the aerodrome.

6th July 1935: The aerodrome closed temporarily for renovations, which included building the “Beehive”, the world’s first circular terminal building.

30th September 1935: Tinsley Green station opened 0.85 mi (1.37 km) south of the present Gatwick station. It was served by two trains per hour on the Victoria-Brighton line.

October 1935: The contracted opening date, was not met, partly because of drainage problems.

17th May 1936: The first scheduled flight departed from the Beehive terminal at 1:30 pm, bound for Paris Le Bourget. Jersey Airways operated this flight with a DH.86 under contract to British Airways Ltd., whose livery the aircraft wore. The airfare was £4 5s (including a first-class rail ticket from London Victoria Station), and there were up to three flights a day. Later the same day, British Airways Ltd. introduced another new scheduled service from Gatwick to Malmö, which was routed via Amsterdam, Hamburg and Copenhagen. Total travelling time between Gatwick and Malmö was six-and-a-half hours.

25th May 1936: British Airways Ltd. and Southern Railway jointly launched scheduled air services between Gatwick and the Isle of Wight.

1st June 1936: Tinsley Green station was renamed “Gatwick Airport”.

6th June 1936: The airport was officially reopened by the Secretary of State for Air, Lord Swinton. It featured four grass landing strips which were linked to the terminal area by two concrete taxiways, one each for arriving and departing aircraft respectively. The Beehive, the new terminal, was officially opened the same day. The Beehive was designed by Frank Hoar and incorporated several novel features, including a subway to the railway station at Tinsley Green which allowed passengers to travel from Victoria Station to the aircraft without stepping outside (with a transfer time from train to plane of as little as 20 minutes). Air Travel Ltd (a company specialising in aircraft and engine overhauls which had relocated to Gatwick from Penshurst) moved into the new airport’s No. 1 hangar.

July 1936: British Airways Ltd. inaugurated regular night mail flights linking Gatwick with Cologne and Hanover.

September and November 1936: Two fatal accidents happened, raising questions about the airport’s safety. The area was foggy, and its clay soil drained poorly; this caused the new subway to flood after rain.

17th February 1937: Gatwick was declared unserviceable due to waterlogging following repeated, heavy rainfalls. Because of this tendency to flood, and because longer landing strips were needed, the pre-war British Airways moved to Croydon Airport. Gatwick returned to private flying, and was used as a Royal Air Force (RAF) flying school.

October 1937: The No. 19 Elementary and Reserve Flying Training School RAF (E&RFTS) began instructing future RAF pilots at Gatwick on de Havilland Tiger Moth and Hawker Hart biplanes. [13]

A rotunda was built to serve as the Airport Terminal. The Station shown here was on a site to the South of the old Gatwick Racecourse Railway Station, The Station was linked to the Beehive Rotunda by and underground walkway, (c) Historic England, EPW053263, 1937. [2]
The layout of Gatwick Airport in the late 1930s and early 1940s. The location of Gatwick Racecourse Railway Station is to the left of this image close to the racecourse. The Beehive Rotunda Airport building is towards the right of this image, (c) Public Domain. [18]

1938: Airwork General Trading Co. moved into the hangar British Airways Ltd. had occupied at Gatwick. This enabled Heston-based Airwork to expand its aircraft manufacturing capacity on behalf of the Civilian Repair Organisation (CRO), which had awarded it a contract to modify Whitley bombers for the RAF. Southern Aircraft (Gatwick) Ltd. was another company working under contract to the CRO at Gatwick at the time. It had been licensed to assemble Stinson Reliants and Beechcraft Expeditors for the Royal Navy and also repaired damaged Beaufighters. [13]

25th June 1938: The first Daily Express Air Display was held at Gatwick. Aircraft participating in the flypast included a Short Empire flying boat, a Lufthansa Focke-Wulf Condor, a Sabena Savoia-Marchetti SM.83, several RAF types and aerobatic aircraft. [13]

1st September 1939: No. 19 E&RFTS ended its activities at Gatwick. [13]

3rd September 1939: Following the declaration of war on Germany, all civilian flying at Gatwick and elsewhere in the UK stopped. As a consequence, civil aircraft maintenance and manufacturing activities at the airport stopped as well. This resulted in the airport being requisitioned by the Air Ministry, and becoming a base for RAF night-fighters and an Army co-operation squadron during World War II (primarily for repairs and maintenance and as an alternative to RAF Kenley in the event that Kenley was rendered inoperable by enemy action). [13]

December 1939: The operations manager of British Airways Ltd., which had begun the process of merging with Imperial Airways to form British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC), inspected Gatwick to assess its suitability as a base for the combined operations of the merged airline. [13]

1940: BOAC maintenance personnel began overhauling Armstrong Whitworth Ensigns and other aircraft types at Gatwick. Horse racing at Gatwick ended and never restarted. [13]

1940 and 1941: RAF units relocated to Gatwick from France. The airport became closely associated with the RAF Army Cooperation Command. As a result, several Army Cooperation Command aircraft were stationed at Gatwick. These included Westland Lysanders, Curtiss Tomahawks and North American Mustangs. [13]

Late 1942: Gatwick began receiving RAF and USAAF bombers that were damaged or running short of fuel. The most common types were Avro Lancasters, Handley Page Halifaxes, Short Stirlings and Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses. [13]

January 1945: Gatwick was taken over by the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force Disarmament Unit. As a result, it received a large number of transport and communications aircraft. [13]

Gatwick Airport and its Railway Station, 1945 to 1975

1950: Despite local opposition, the Cabinet chose Gatwick as an alternative to Heathrow (then known as London Airport). BEA launched a seasonal scheduled service to Alderney in the Channel Islands, which operated for three consecutive summer seasons until 1952. At the time, there were three operational runways. These were aligned South-West–North-East, East–West and South-East–North-West. The first was 4,200 ft (1,300 m) long, 150 ft (46 m) wide and covered in steel mesh; the second was 3,600 ft (1,100 m) long, 150 ft (46 m) wide and covered in steel mesh as well; the third was of the same length and width as the second but was grass-covered. [13]

May 1950: Gatwick’s first charter flight left the airport’s original grass runway for Calvi on Corsica (with a refuelling stop in Nice). Jersey-based UK independent airline Air Transport Charter operated this flight under contract to UK package tour pioneer Vladimir Raitz’s Horizon Holidays with a 32-seat Douglas DC-3 carrying 11 passengers. [13]

1950s: The railway stations had a reversal of fortunes in the 1950s as a result of that government decision to expand and develop the Beehive airport terminal into London’s second airport. Gatwick Racecourse station was rebuilt to serve Gatwick Airport, and was integrated into its terminal. On 27th May 1958, the rebuilt station, which took the name Gatwick Airport, was opened in conjunction with a regular train service; and services serving the former Tinsley Green station were discontinued. [14]

This later image show increasing hangar space and a significant number of aeroplanes, little has changed at the station, (c) Historic England, EAW050735, 1953. [3]
The Airport and Station seen in 1953 from the West. Air travel has still not become what it is in the 21st century. There are no airliners in sight! Careful inspection will see limousines outside the terminal building. Old fighter aircraft litter the apron to the South of the terminal building. The station has a covered footbridge and four platform faces. Its connection to the Airport is no more than a white swing-gate at the end of the station building access path. There appears to be a small gathering of people around a vehicle close to the gate. One wonders at what time of day the photograph was taken as both station and airport seem devoid of passengers, (c) Historic England, EAW050736, 1953. [4]

Between 1953 and 1958 much changed!

Embed from Getty Images
Gatwick Airport saw major reconstruction in 1957 and 58. This image looks from the West towards the railway station in the distance. The image is embedded direct from the Getty image website. [5]

The next aerial image shows Gatwick Airport and Station in 1958.

Gatwick Airport after completion of the rebuild, seen from the North. The station now has six platform faces and a covered footbridge connects to the terminal building. The image was a double-spread in Steam World magazine in September 1997 (hence the distorted nature of the image. The dual carriageway is the A23. [6]

1958: The 1958 refurbishment of the railway station included a parcels’ office beneath the main concourse, lifts and a corridor on the south side of the overbridge, separated from the passenger corridor by a glazed partition. To accommodate trains of up to 12-carriage lengths, the three old Racecourse island platforms were raised by 1 ft (0.30 m) and extended to the north by about 100 ft (30 m), except for the very long westernmost platform, which was reduced from the south. The ticket office on the main concourse of the station was able to handle 670 separate issues of Edmondson tickets from its Bellmatic equipment. [14]

Gatwick Airport and Railway Station seen from the East in 1961, (C) Unknown. [9]

1962: Two additional piers were added to the terminal. [13]

1964: Gatwick’s original, relatively short late-1950s paved runway was extended by 1,200 ft (370 m) to 8,200 ft (2,500 m) due to new noise rules governing the operation of jet aircraft at airports near (or surrounded by) densely populated urban areas. [13]

1965: By now, each of the three piers was nearly 1,000 ft (300 m) long, and the terminal complex had a floor area of 100,000 sq ft (9,300 m2). [13]

Gatwick Airport and Railway Station in 1970, (c) Unknown. [10]

1970: A second 875-foot (267 m) extension of Gatwick’s runway was completed, bringing it to 9,075 ft (2,766 m) and allowing non-stop jet flights to the US east coast with a full payload and full range and payload operations by British United Airways and Caledonian Airways BAC One-Eleven 500s. [13]

1973: The third extension of Gatwick’s runway was completed, bringing it to 10,165 ft (3,098 m) and allowing for non-stop narrow-body operations to the US west coast and commercially viable, long-range wide-body operations. [13]

Gatwick Airport and Railway Station in 1975, (c) Unknown. [11]
Gatwick Airport in 1975, (c) Unknown. [12]

1975 onwards

Late 1970s: Government initiatives supporting Gatwick’s development resulted in steady growth in passenger traffic. Among these were policies seeking to transfer all scheduled services between London and the Iberian Peninsula from Heathrow to Gatwick, banning whole-plane charters at Heathrow and requiring all airlines planning scheduled services to London for the first time to use Gatwick instead of Heathrow. This policy was known as the London [Air] Traffic Distribution Rules. The government also approved a high-frequency helicopter shuttle service linking Gatwick with Heathrow. [13]

Late 1970s and early 1980s: Fully extendible jet bridges were added when the piers were rebuilt and extended. [13]

1980s: In the 1980s, the railway station was refurbished again. It had six platforms immediately beneath the airport’s South Terminal. [14]

1983: As passenger numbers grew, a circular satellite pier was added to the terminal building connected to the main terminal by the UK’s first automated people mover system. (This replaced the original North pier dating from 1962, and the people mover connecting the main terminal with the satellite pier was subsequently replaced with a walkway and travelators). A second terminal was planned, and construction began on the North Terminal on the land earmarked for a second runway in the draft plan of May 1970. This was the largest construction project south of London in the 1980s, costing £200 million. [13]

1984: Gatwick’s new air-traffic control tower opened, the tallest in the UK at the time.[123] The Gatwick Express was launched by British Rail, the world’s first non-stop airport-to-city-centre rail service (between the airport and Victoria Station). [13]

1988: On 18th March 1988: The North Terminal was opened by Queen Elizabeth II (including an automated rapid transit system link to the South Terminal). [13]

1991: A second aircraft pier was added to the North Terminal. [13]

1994: The North Terminal international departure lounge and the first phase of the South Terminal international departure lounge opened, at a cost of £30 million. [13]

1998: The main runway was extended for a fourth time, reaching 10,879 ft (3,316 m), to enable longer-range operations with wide-body aircraft. [13]

2000 to 2001: Gatwick’s two terminals were further expanded to add seating, retail space and catering outlets, at a cost of £60 million; this included an extension to the North Terminal departure lounge, completed in 2001. [13]

2005: An extension and refurbishment to the South Terminal’s baggage reclaim hall (doubling it in size) was completed. [13]

May 2005: Pier 6 opened at a cost of £110 million, adding 11 pier-served aircraft stands. The pier is linked to the North Terminal’s main building by the largest air passenger bridge in the world, spanning a taxiway and providing passengers with views of the airport and taxiing aircraft. [13]

May 2008: An extension of the South Terminal’s departure lounge was completed, and a second-floor security search area opened. This terminal is now primarily used by low-cost airlines; many former users moved to the North Terminal.

2010s: On 13th October 2010, a £53 million redevelopment programme for the railway station was announced to provide another platform capable of accommodating 12-car trains, refurbishment of the concourse, and track and signal upgrades. Escalators and lifts were provided for platforms 5 and 6, replacing a staircase to achieve improved circulation. The redevelopment provided improved capacity and flexibility on the Brighton Main Line. The project was jointly financed by Network Rail, who contributed £44.9 million, and Gatwick Airport who provided £7.9 million. Construction was structured so as not to negatively affect the 2012 Summer Paralympics, which was hosted in London. [14]

May 2013: Demolition began of Pier 1, Gatwick Airport’s second-oldest pier (the original 1962 South pier of what is now the South Terminal) for its replacement with a £180 million, two-storey structure with five pier-served aircraft stands and an automated baggage-storage facility, operational by summer 2016. [13]

2014: By 3rd February 2014, completion of the work on the Railway Station was marked by a ceremony officiated by Minister of State for Transport Baroness Kramer, who formally opened the new platform. Constructed by VolkerFitzpatrick, platform 7 is served by a 975-metre (3,199 ft) loop from the down fast line and used by services which formerly used at platform 5. VolkerFitzpatrick were responsible for track and signalling modifications. This has allowed platforms 5 and 6 to be dedicated to Gatwick Express services, thereby eliminating previous conflicts with slower services when they crossed to platforms 1 and 2. The project was finished on schedule and budget, despite extreme weather conditions during the winter of 2013/2014. [14]

In 2014, Baroness Kramer announced that the government had committed £50 million towards further improvements of the railway station. A scheme for further improvements, estimated to cost around £120 million, was announced by Network Rail. [14]

2016: On 1st February 2016, Caroline Ansell, the MP for Eastbourne, officially opened the redeveloped pier 5 of Gatwick’s North Terminal. The redevelopment of pier 5 cost £80 million and forms part of the airport’s £2 billion improvement programme under GIP ownership. Its main feature is an additional second level that separates departing and arriving passenger flows vertically to increase capacity by an additional 30 flights or approximately 2,400 passengers per day. This increase in capacity is achieved by accommodating up to seven large and 12 smaller aircraft (or a combination of both) at the pier’s redesigned aircraft stands to enhance operational flexibility for airlines and passengers and make passenger journeys smoother. [13]

2018: In April 2018, Network Rail submitted a planning application for modernising the railway station; doubling the size of the concourse, widening two platforms, and improving connections to the airport terminal. It was done in partnership with Gatwick Airport authorities, the Coast to Capital local enterprise partnership and the Department for Transport. The expansion is an element of a five-year programme, costed at £1.11 billion, announced by Gatwick Airport in early 2018. [14]

Amongst others, the main projects covered by this £1.11 billion include: a westward extension of the North Terminal’s pier 6, involving the relocation of the A380 stand to pier 5 and related widening and reconfiguration of a taxiway to enable A380 operators to access the new stand at pier 5; a dedicated domestic arrival and baggage reclaim facility in the South Terminal; and connecting the new Boeing hangar with the airfield.

2020s: Construction on the new railway station concourse began in November 2020. The refurbished station opened on 21st November 2023. [14]

The ticket office is staffed for ticket sales and enquiries, supplemented by ticket machines capable of handling online bookings usually available on a round-the-clock basis. Automated teller machines, payphones and e-mail access points are installed on the main concourse. There are coin-operated trolleys for luggage and a left luggage facility. On-site food and drink outlets are present. Toilets are available and baby changing facilities and additional toilets can be found in the adjacent South Terminal. There is no car parking facility. Transport for London’s (TfL) Oyster cards and contactless cards are accepted for travel at the station. [14]

Gatwick South Terminal and Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, September 2026]

References

  1. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW028582, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  2. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW053263, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  3. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EAW050735, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  4. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EAW050736, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  5. https://www.gettyimages.ae/detail/news-photo/an-aerial-view-of-a-new-gatwick-airport-terminal-under-news-photo/2177625739, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  6. Growing Gatwick; in Steam World, Issue 123, September 1997, p32-35.
  7. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103317073, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103317070, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  9. https://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r231/thawes/RAF%20Lyneham/Gatwick1961.jpg, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  10. https://lh4.ggpht.com/_9g9gbl9dTkg/SbKweMEBPhI/AAAAAAAAEO8/Hf5xfy6MvIU/Gatwick%201970.jpg, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  11. https://lh4.ggpht.com/_9g9gbl9dTkg/SRzQ94gQkNI/AAAAAAAAAjY/iZG9r9SwA1U/s800/lgw1-1975.jpg, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  12. https://lh4.ggpht.com/_9g9gbl9dTkg/SRzQ71yot7I/AAAAAAAAAjM/q5HUf9D0ueI/s720/z-LGW-JU%7E1.JPG, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Gatwick_Airport, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  14. https://www.railway-technology.com/projects/gatwickairportstatio, accessed on September 2026.
  15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatwick_Airport_railway_station#History, accessed on 8th September 2026.
  16. https://picryl.com/amp/media/southern-railway-sr-u-1-952-eb1f71, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  17. https://eggythebread.weebly.com/other-local-areas.html, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  18. https://www.british-caledonian.com/Gatwick_Airport_-_The_History_P2.html, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  19. https://kentrail.uk/gatwick_airport.htm, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  20. https://www.railwaymagazine.co.uk/25838/from-the-archive-the-brighton-electrification, accessed on 9th September 2026.

North Kent’s Cement and Other Industrial Railways – Part 1 – The Thames Estuary

The featured image for this article shows locomotives sitting on standard-gauge metals at the BOCM Works at Belvedere. The two 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter locomotives are ‘Sydenham’, built in 1895, Works No. 3567, and ‘Sir Vincent’, built in 1917, Works No. 1917. Behind them is ‘Crabtree’, an 0-4-0 Ruston & Hornsby diesel locomotive. (Hugh Davies) © Public Domain. [4: photo No. 94]

A quick look at the Ordnance Survey maps of the North coast of Kent from the first half of the 20th century will show a veritable cat’s cradle of standard-gauge and narrow-gauge industrial railways. A similar survey of the Medway valley at the same period in the 20th century will show just how many individual Cement Works and other industries once existed there too. This article inevitably will not provide a comprehensive look at all industrial railways in the area.

The Oakwood Press produced two editions (1973, 1990) of a survey of these cement works. The second edition was an enlarged version of the first edition. Page references are to page numbers in the second edition.

The authors divide the various Cement works into three different geographical areas:

  • The Thames Estuary (working West to East)
  • The Medway Estuary
  • The Lower Medway

Part 1 – The Thames Estuary

This article looks at a number of the industrial sites on the southern banks of the River Thames Estuary. Industry along the River Medway will be covered in a future article or articles, as will industries in and around Chatham and to the East of Cliffe, Higham and Chatham.

It must also be noted that the details included in this article are much expanded on and probably also corrected in Robin Waywell’s book, ‘Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent‘ which came into my possession after this article had been completed. [61]

Before looking at the works described by Stoyel & Kidner and others, it is worth at least a glance at Erith situated further West along the River Thames. …

J. Parish & Co. Ltd

J. Parish & Co. was a historical industrial firm based in Erith, Kent, best known for operating the local Erith Loam Quarries and Ballast Wharf on Fraser Road. Established in the early 19th century (around 1805), the company supplied specialized moulding sands, silica sands, and high-quality natural loams to the British foundry and metal-casting industries.

It ran deep loam and sand pits off Fraser Road in Erith, utilizing industrial (4ft 0in) narrow-gauge locomotives to move ballast and sand. Its products (often marketed as the “Erith Range of Sands”) were widely utilized across UK metal foundries for core-making and casting. [8][9]

Hatherill & Hatherill tell us that, “Around 1800 sailing ships brought coal to London from the north east of England and, in 1805, John Parish started supplying ballast to the returning ships. The sand they supplied was quickly recognised in the north east as a rich loamy sand which was very suitable for foundry work. At first it was loaded from a wharf opposite the site of the first railway station, which was opened in 1849 but, in 1842, a new wharf was built which could, in later years, deal with ships of up to 650 tons.” [10: p11]

Horses handled the traffic at the start as the first locomotive, No. 1, did not arrive until 1864, built by Gilles, Wilson & Co., Works No. 185. It was an 0-4-0T with 6 inch cylinders. [10: p11]

Records show two further locomotives in use by Parish. These were: No. 2, an 0-4-0ST, built in 1881 by R. & W. Hawthorn, Works No. 1864 with 10″ cylinders; and No IV, another 0-4-0ST built in 1903 by Hawthorn, Leslie & Co., Works No.2565, with 12″ cylinders. These two locomotives served the quarries for decades, although only No. IV survived until the advent of road-motor vehicle haulage at the Works in 1957. [4, photo No. 75][10: p11]

Parish’s locomotive ‘No. IV’ stands outside the engine shed in the wharf yard. Note the typical primitive end-tip wagons used on the network and beyond them the level-crossing box. (G. A. Bartlett – 1952) © Public Domain. [10: p12]

Parish No. 3 was utilised for a steam excavator built by Grafton of Bedford which was used to remove the overburden from the underlying loam. [10: p11]

This 6″ Ordnance Survey map extract from the early 20th century shows Parish’s rail network connecting the Loam and Ballast Pits (bottom-left) with the Wharf on the River Thames (top-right). West Street can be seen running parallel to the River Bank with just some relatively narrow buildings in between. [11]
The same area in the 21st century. [12]

West Street level-crossing allowed both Parish’s narrow-gauge line and Frazer & Chalmers’ standard-gauge line to access the wharves on the river bank.

Hatherill & Hatherill tell us that, “the crossing was also across the Erith Council Tramway system which ran along the road. There was a level crossing with four gates and a crossing cabin from which the gates were worked. When a train came down from the quarries a ship’s bell on the corner of the cabin was rung and the gates were wound across the road. When, in 1957, the railway was replaced by a fleet of lorries, Parish’s continued to use their level crossing. When the gates were closed across the road lorries went past along the route of the railway. As they were travelling along a private right of way they did not need to be licensed!” [10: p13]

West Street Level-crossing as shown on the early 20th century 6″ Ordnance Survey mapping provided by the NLS. The council’s tramway does not appear on this extract. [11]

The level-crossing on West Street, Erith © Public Domain. [13]

Over the 20th century, as industrial quarrying scaled down and local demands shifted, parts of their former quarry properties and surrounding land transitioned into residential and factory developments.

Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd

The Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd. was a 19th- and 20th-century mineral extraction and industrial company based in Stone, Kent, operating roughly from 1885 until the mid-20th century. It supplied raw Upper Chalk (Seaford Chalk Formation) to nearby cement plants, including works at Greenhithe, Albion, and the Kent Cement Works. These cement works are covered in detail below.

Dylan Moore tells us that “A chalk pit was already in existence at Stone Court Lodge in 1827. The Stone Court estate began shipping chalk from their wharf in 1864. In 1873, the Stone Court Chalk Quarries Company extended the wharf to deep water, and commenced shipping ballast, while looking for cement companies that might use their chalk. In 1879 the Williams Fry and Co. Ltd Albion plant was set up to the west of the wharf, and in 1880, Wilders & Cary’s Shield plant was set up to the east. In 1885 the company was re-launched as the Stone Court Land & Pier Co. Ltd. The Gillingham Portland Cement Co. Ltd set up the Greenhithe plant to the east of Shield in 1889, and in 1890 Rosher & East set up the Artillery plant inland between the quarries and the wharf. By this time, supply to the cement plants was the bulk of its trade, and chalk ceased to be shipped after 1894.” [44]

Dylan Moore provides maps of the various Chalk Pits in North Kent and the Stone Court Land & Pier Co. Ltd map shows two main quarry complexes: [44]

  • Lodge Quarry south of Elizabeth Street, including Johnson’s Hole – these workings were abandoned completely by 1964; and
  • A set of pits to the west on either side of Cotton Lane and to the South of the North Kent railway line – these pits were worked out by 1956.

These two map extracts show the areas eventually exploited by the Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd. Both show the area to the South of the North Kent main line.

The first extract is from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, Lodge Quarry was being expoited at this date. It’s workings would eventually extend South of London Road into what became known as Johnson’s Hole. [45]

Dylan Moore’s map showing the extent of the two quarry areas can be found here. [47]

The area of the Cotton Lane Chalk Pits as it appears on the 25″ 1895 Ordnance Survey published in 1897. At this time only the Lodge Quarry Works are being exploited. The Cotton Lane Pits would sit either side of the lane. which can be seen at the third point in this extract. [46]

British Industrial Callender’s Cables Ltd (BICC Ltd).

BICC Ltd. used a 3ft 6in gauge railway at their cable works at Belvedere, near Erith. The steam locomotives were converted to run on oil fuel.The line was in use by 1900 when the first locomotive arrived. The railway’s purpose was “was to bring pig lead and other materials from their wharf on the River Thames at Belvedere into the works and to move drums of finished cable around the works and yard. From the wharf, cable was exported all over the world.

BICC purchased three new Bagnall 0-4-0ST locomotives: [4: photos No. 91, 92 & 93]

Mighty Atom – built in 1900 by Bagnall, Works No. 1630, had 6″ cylinders

Woto – built in 1924 by Bagnall, Works No. 2133, had 7″ cylinders. Photos 91 and 92 show this locomotive.

Sir Tom – built in 1925 by Bagnall, Works No. 2135, also had 7″ cylinders. Photo No. 93 shows this locomotive which cost £1127 when new.

After the purchase of ‘Mighty Atom’ a second-hand Hunslet 0-4-0ST was purchased and a new 0-4-0ST from the Yorkshire Engine Co. before the last two Bagnalls were bought. [10: p13]

“Both Woto and Sir Tom worked until 1968 when the railway closed, having outlasted by several years … two Ruston diesels! The former were acquired for preservation and are now [1984] stored in Romford.” [4: photo No. 93]

The two Rushton & Hornsby diesel locomotives had been purchased in 1934. [10: p13]

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published 1934 shows BICCs Works at Belvedere. [14]
The same area in the 21st century. [Google Maps, August 2026]

British Oil & Cake Mills (BOCM) Ltd

Was sited close to the BICC Works and had its own standard-gauge rail network which employed a number of steam and diesel locomotives over time.

These locomotives are sitting on standard-gauge metals at the BOCM Works at Belvedere. The two 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter locomotives are ‘Sydenham’, built in 1895, Works No. 3567, and ‘Sir Vincent’, built in 1917, Works No. 1917. Behind them is ‘Crabtree’, an 0-4-0 Ruston & Hornsby diesel locomotive. (Hugh Davies) © Public Domain. [4: photo No. 94]

Crabtree Trust Sidings

The Crabtree Trust exchange sidings were alongside the North Kent Line between Belvedere and Erith. They were on the down side of the line near the former Crabtree Crossing signal box. They once fed a network of industrial lines serving riverside factories and works along what is now Crabtree Manorway These industrial concerns included the BICC Cable Works, the BOCM site, Hercules Powder Co., Doulton’s Pipe Works and British Gypsum’s Works. By the 1980s, the entire complex was disused, overgrown, and eventually cleared.

These sidings consisted of three parallel reception sidings operated on behalf of local industry by BOCM. The locomotives shown on the image above would have been found at work in the sidings. [10: p18]

The Crabtree Trust Sidings are shown on these two extracts from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1933. [15][16]

Further details about this location can be found here. [17]

British Gypsum (Erith Works)

British Plaster Board Ltd. originally opened the waterfront works at Church Manorway, Erith in 1934 to process imported gypsum. Rebranded as British Gypsum in 1964, the historic manufacturing site eventually transitioned into the Saint-Gobain Build Better Academy, operating as its longest-serving training facility for plaster and drywall systems since 1966.

A number of 0-4-0 diesel locomotives were employed at this location at different times, including:

Crabtree – built in 1953 by Ruston & Hornsby, Works No. 338416 (Class 88Ds). [18]

Princess Margaret – built in 1948 by Barclay, Works No. 376. [18][4: photo No. 58]

Possibly also:

Taurus – built in 1951 by Fowler (VF D139, DC 2273)

Prium – built in 1955 by Fowler (VF D293, DC 2566)

The British Plaster Board works which were to become British Gypsum’s Works at Erith. The Crabtree Trust Sidings are off the West side of this 25″ OS map extract from the 1930s. [16]

Dartford Cement Works Ltd. [1: p11]

A short line ran from a wharf on Dartford Creek  to a small works which opened in around 1891 and South to a pit close to the North Kent main line. Stoyel & Kidner indicate that the line was horse-worked and closed in 1911.

Artillery & Albion Cement Co. Ltd. [1: p11]

This was a 19th/early-20th century cement manufacturer located at Stone Court (Stone Marshes). Its operations combined chalk quarried by the Stone Court company and Medway clay, shipping goods via Stone Court pier before eventually being absorbed into a larger cartel operation. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that both Artillery & Albion were adjacent works which were absorbed into the British Portland Cement Manufacturers (BPCM) in 1910 but probably closed by 1913.

A series of works cluster at the top-right of this 6″ map extract, a tramway/railway runs Southwest to Artillery Works and Whiting Works centre-left and chalk pits to the South of the main line. These are all mentioned below. [3]

Three 0-4-0ST locomotives were associated with Artillery and Albion Works:

Stonecourt – had outside cylinders and was sold in about 1915. Nothing else is known about this locomotive.

Artillery – built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 240. It had outside cylinders and was transferred by APCM to Hilton Works at Halling when the works at Stone closed.

Albion – built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 915. It also had outside cylinders and was also transferred by APCM to Hilton Works at Halling when the works at Stone closed.

Shield Works, Greenhithe Works. [1: p11]

The Shield Works were only a short distance to the East of the Albion Works. Greenhithe Works were a little further East.

Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM), took control of Shield Works in 1900. Greenhithe Works was acquired by J.B. White in 1893.

Stone Court Chalk Land & Pier Co. Ltd. [1: p11]

Although not a cement producer, this company was later taken over by APCM. In 1885, this company took over a pier and tramway on Stone March close to the works covered above. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “All [those works] were served by a railway of standard gauge, which also ran south, under the SER and Cotton Lane, to a chalk pit. Just north of the tunnel under the SER there was a whiting works. In 1908, the branch line to the Artillery Works was extended to an exchange siding with the SER North Kent Line When the Kent Works was built to the east, a cutting was made parallel to the SER and south of it, with a connection to the Stone Court line just north of Cotton Lane tunnel, so that material could be worked from the pit to the new works. At about the same time, a further cutting was made south of the SER to enable Stone Court trains to run to new pits to the west. Since this line had to tunnel under Cotton Lane twice and also under Moody’s Lane, at great depth, there were in effect three pits in line. Some chalk from here went to Kent Works; however the layout at Cotton Lane tunnel was such that these trains had to run into the whiting works, reverse into the pit, and then reverse out again to hand the train over to a Kent Works engine. Some time before the last War this was altered so that trains could run straight through. However, a company called the Atlas Stone Company had established itself by 1928 at the bottom of the original pit, being served by Stone Court trains with materials. In 1935, Stone Court Ballast Co. was working gravel pits near the river shore, using high-sided wagons, unlike the small chalk tippers. Much of this went to Atlas Stone, and in the latter years when a square crossing had been laid at Cotton Lane tunnel, this meant that trains from the gravel pits to Atlas Stone crossed the path of chalk trains from the pits to Kent Works, and it is said that ‘traffic lights’ were installed to control the crossing.” [1: p12]

The Company had ten locomotives all of which had outside cylinders, Stoyel & Kidner list them as:

Adamant – an 0-4-0ST built in 1877 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 649, 8″ x 14″ cylinders and 2′ 8″ wheels.

Bulldog – an 0-4-0ST built in 1860 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 13, 8″ x 14″ cylinders and ???? wheels.

Sundridge – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Hughes, Works No. ????, 11″ x ??” cylinders and ???? wheels.

James Godwin – an 0-4-0ST built in 1870 by Shanks, Works No. ????, 10″ x 20″ cylinders and 3′ 1″ wheels.

Quarrier – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 203, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Longreach – an 0-4-0ST built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 236, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Flintfield – an 0-4-0ST built in 1898 by Brush, Works No. 277, 12″ x 20″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

W.H. Liversidge – an 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Brush, Works No. 286, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Lion – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 205, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Iota – an 0-4-0T built in 1892 by Falcon, Works No. 211, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

‘Longreach’ at the Stone Works on 10th October 1946. (B. D. Stoyel), © Public Domain. [1: p13]

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “Sundridge, Quarrier, Longreach, Flintfield and W.H. Liver sidge were supplied new. There is some suggestion that Sundridge was a vertical-boilered locomotive which was scrapped just before the turn of the century, but no confirmation has been found for this. Adamant had previously belonged to the Britannia London Portland Cement Co. at Seacombe, Birkenhead. James Godwin was originally built for the Southampton Dock Co. but came to Stone from the London & St Katherine Dock Co. (their No. 16) some time before 1896. Bulldog and Lion came from the APCM’s Tolhurst Works at Northfleet and lota from their Gibb’s Works at West Thurrock in about 1925. lota was a side-tank with dropped footplate and low vertical clearance.” [1: p14]

“Locomotive Adamant was said to have been scrapped in 1918 and Bulldog at an unknown date. Quarrier, Longreach and W.H. Liversidge were scrapped in 1949 after the railway had been abandoned. Flintfield was lent to the APCM Works at Stone in 1947-1948 and was then sold to the Atlas Stone Co. Ltd for use on their adjoining premises. There is some suggestion that James Godwin was sold to a firm at Portland. Lion was transferred in 1946 to the APCM’s Swanscombe Works and was sold in 1948 to the Atlas Stone Co. Ltd. Iota was loaned to Alpha Cement Ltd, West Thurrock, from 1945 until 1946 when it was sold to the BPCM Works at Penarth, in South Wales.” [1: p14]

‘Iota’ at Stone Court Whiting Works in September 1933. (R. W. Kidner), © Public Domain. [1: p15]

The company’s chalk operations ceased in 1949, its engines were either scrapped or sold to Atlas stone to serve gravel traffic. The company remained in existence until 1974 when its assets were transferred to APCM.

APCM Ltd Kent Works, Stone, Dartford. [1: p 14]

These works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [2]

I.C. Johnson & Co. Ltd., Greenhithe. [1: p26-36]

Please see the article dedicated to this Works which can be found here. [5]

John Tilden & Co., Greenhithe. [1: p36]

A short-lived firm which operated in the 1860s out of Lamb Wharf Chalk Works at Greenhithe. When constructed, the enlarged Johnson’s Wharf covered the area of the old Lamb Wharf.

Stoyel & Kidner say that two locomotives were known to have operated at these Works. Both were Aveling & Porter locomotives, supplied new, chain-driven and recorded at work in November 1865:

Works No. 48, built in 1862, one cylinder (probably 8.5″ x 10″)

Works No. 132, built in 1864, one cylinder (9.25″ x 12″)

Globe Portland Cement & Whiting Co. Ltd., Swanscombe. [1: p37]

C. G. Down tells us that a William Tingley sublet some land to John Cubit Gostling who formed the Globe Portland Cement & Whiting Co. Ltd. Gostling was also owner of a Thames-side Cement Works. Later, in 1895, the works was purchased by John Bazely White & Bros. Ltd., owners of the Swanscombe Works on the Thames. Due to the recession in the industry though, the works was not used much subsequently, and was bought by APCM on 24th August 1900. [6]

Stoyel & Kidner’s research tells a different story. They say that in 1899 the company became the New Globe Cement Chalk & Whiting Co. and then moved to a different site further East. It then became part of BPCM. [1: p37]

It seems as though there is some uncertainty over what happened beyond those dates. It appears to be clear that the site of the Works was closed by the 1920s with the wharf being used for oil storage.

Stoyel & Kidner record five locomotives being used at the site: [1: p37]

Globe (?) – 0-4-0WTG built by Aveling & Paorter

Globe No. 2 – 0-4-0T built in 1897 by Kerr Stuart, Works No. 124.

Globe No. 3 – 0-4-0ST built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 925.

Globe No. 4 – 0-4-0ST built in 1902 by Peckett, Works No. 967.

New Globe – 0-4-0ST built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 889.

The Aveling & Porter locomotive came second-hand, the others were purchased new. It is unclear what happened to the Aveling & Porter. Globe No. 2 may have seen service in France from 1916. Globe and Globe No. 2 may have been transferred to the APCM Works at Grays, Essex. [1: p37]

Though the Works closed in the 1920s, three of the locomotives were seen standing derelict at the site in 1929. Subsequently they were transferred to other Works: Globe No. 3 to BPCM, Greenhithe; Globe No. 4 to APCM, Northfleet (becoming No.5); and New Globe to BPCM, Greenhithe. [1: p37]

J.B. White & Bros Ltd., Swanscombe. [1: p38-49]

These works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [7]

APCM Ltd, Alkerden Clay Pits, Swanscombe. [1: p49]

Operated by the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM) Ltd, the Alkerden Clay Pits in Swanscombe, Kent, opened in 1909 to supply London clay for local cement works like Bevans and Kent. The clay was slurried on-site and pumped to main washmills. The Clay Pits closed in 1943.

A 2ft 8.5in narrow-gauge line served the Clay Pits. The railway gauge may have been dictated by the availability of locomotives, rolling stock and track panels from the Northfleet Works of Knight, Bevan & Sturge which operated on the same gauge. But, the Northfleet Works were not converted to standard-gauge until around 1926.

The pits sat between Watling Street and Alkerden Manor Farm near Swanscombe Wood. But were not deep level excavations, rather they spread over a relatively large area which led to the narrow-gauge rail network wandering over quite a large area and to the need to carry the railway over the line of the A2 on a long girder viaduct.

Stoyel & Kidner indicate that eight locomotives were used on this network of lines: [1: p51]

Swift – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight, Bevan & Sturge (?)

Rapid – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight Bevan & Sturge (?)

Alert – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight Bevan & Sturge (?)

Clinker – 0-4-0ST, built in 1917 by Bagnall, Works No. 2068, outside cylinders (8″ x 12″) with 2′ 0.5″ wheels.

‘Clinker’ at Alkerden Clay Pits in 1934: the track is sinking and the fireman is looking at a wagon ahead of the locomotive which has just jumped the track. (L. T. Catchpole), © Public Domain. [1: p50]
Clinker’s sister locomotive ‘Peter’ (Bagnall Works No. 2067) at work in preservation at Amberley. ‘Peter’ was built as 3 ft (914 mm) gauge locomotive and converted to 2 ft (610 mm) in 1919. Its current boiler certificate expires in 2032, © Peter Skuce and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [19]

Meteor – 0-4-0ST, built in 1893 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1085, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Planet – 0-4-0ST, built in 1902 by Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 631, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Comet – 0-4-0ST, built in 1921 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3506, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Rocket – 0-4-0ST, built in 1930 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3788, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Stoyel & Kidner tells us, “Very little is known about the three vertical boiler locomotives, all of which had been scrapped by 1931. … The Bagnall was obtained from C.J. Wills, Grimsby probably in 1921 when it was converted from 2ft 6 in. gauge. … Meteor, Planet and Comet were transferred in 1928 from Bevan’s Works, Northfleet. Planet was ordered from Chapman & Furneaux and carried their works plates (No. 1215, 1902) but this was the period when the firm was in difficulties, leading to its acquisition by Hawthorn, Leslie & Co. Ltd, and evidently the order was sub-contracted to Hudswell Clarke & Co. Ltd. Rocket was delivered new to the Alkerden pits. Clinker had gone by March 1943 and the remaining four, which were basically of the same design, were scrapped during 1943. The railway was superseded at about that time. Whites obtained clay from Cliffe from 1937.” [1: 51]

The area of Alkerden Clay Pits in the 21st century. The area to the West of the B255 is now occupied by Bluewater Shopping Centre. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Onward Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. Tower Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. Maceroy & Holt (Britannia Works). [1: p51]

These three concerns clustered together on the Northwest side of Robin’s Creek.

The three Cement Works, highlighted above, all appear in this map extract. Robin’s Creek is the Creek shown in the bottom-right corner of the extract. Northfleet Paper Mills was rail served as well. It sat just to the West of the Britannia Cement Works and just off the left edge of this extract. A line serving the Paper Mills can be seen leaving the left edge of this extract a little to the North of London Road. [33]
A similar area in the 21st century. The whole area has been redeveloped and even the major roads have been realigned and renamed. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Stoyel & Kidner say that all the Works were originally supplied with chalk from pits close to the Works but when that option was exhausted land across London Road was exploited. Northfleet Coal & Ballast Co. Ltd. held the wharf on the Thames and handled the transport for all of the companies. The first of those pits were only just the other side of London Road, in fact, just off the bottom corner of the map extract above. [1: p51]

London Road is at the top of this next extract, the tramway from the cement works and the river wharf enters the extract at the top-right. It passes under London Road. The branch leaving the extract on the right runs parallel to the North Kent line on a 1 in 40 gradient to a transhipment point in the sidings at Northfleet Railway Station , the remaining lines serve the chalk pits, one of which tunnels under the main line railway. [33]

On the right side of this extract an engine house sits next to a tramway that served other concerns to the East.

Stoyel & Kidner note that the 1 in 40 gradient between the Works and Chalk Pits and the railway station sidings required double-heading for trains as short as 4 or 5 wagons. [1: p52]

The Northfleet quarries were worked out by 1920 and sold in 1921. [1: p52]

Stoyel & Kidner express surprise at the size of the locomotive fleet that served this series of concerns. They mention that there were two or three different owning companies, but provide a single list of the locomotives used:

Peveril – possibly built in the 1840s at the Edge Hill works of the Grand Junction Railway – purchased second-hand from E. W. Goodenough, Northfleet. Scrapped circa. 1900. [1: p53,54]

Fly – an 0-4-0ST probably built in 1864 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 111 – it had outside cylinders. If correct, this locomotive was sent on test to Ryde Pier Tramway on the Isle of Wight in 1864. Appears to have disappeared in 1919! [1: p53,54]

Fox – an 0-4-0ST built in 1871 by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″), the wheel size is not given. Scrapped in 1930. [1: p53,54]

Loughborough – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (9″ x 15″), the wheel size is not given. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913. [1: p53,54]

Northfleet – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″), the wheel size is not given. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1902/1903.

Kilmarnock – an 0-4-0ST built in 1886 by Barclay, Works No. 282 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 3″ wheels. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913.

Swanscombe – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Barclay, Works No. 699 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 5″ wheels. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913 (later entered preservation at Quainton Road).

W. H. Davies – an 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Brush, Works No. 282 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (??” x ??”) the wheel size is not given. Scrapped in 1957.

Torpedo – an 0-4-0ST built in 1886 by Peckett, Works No. 449, purchased second-hand in 1920 from A. R. Adams, Newport, Monmouthshire – it had outside cylinders (10″ x 14″) and 2′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was previously used in the construction of GWR Wootton Bassett to Patchway line. Scrapped in 1930.

Denis – an 0-6-0ST built in 1902 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 1561, was purchased second-hand from G. Shellabear, Park Royal – it had inside cylinders (12″ x 17″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It had been used by D. Shanks (contractor) with whom it carried the name of Coronation. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Dolphin – another 0-6-0ST built in 1879 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 725, was purchased in 1925 from the Southern Railway at Folkestone Harbour (No. A752), previously it had been rebuilt at the SE&CR’s Ashford Works in 1911 – it had inside cylinders (12″ x 17″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Bradley – an 0-4-0ST built in 1950 by Peckett, Works No. 1938 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (12″ x 20″) and 3′ 0.5″ wheels. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Victory – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Dick & Stevenson Works No. ???, was another second-hand locomotive which came on loan from the Ministry of Supply in 1942 (their No. P234) it had outside cylinders (14″ x ??”) and the wheel size is not given. Prior to coming to Northfleet, it served at MoD Kinnerley. It only remained in Kent until 1943 before moving on to an unknown destination in Yorkshire. [1: p53,54]

Northfleet – another 0-4-0ST built in 1946 by Peckett, Works No. 2080 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (12″ x 20″) and 3′ 0.5″ wheels. Scrapped in 1967.

The New Northfleet Cement Works

This new Works was not constructed until the end of the 1960s and became operational in the 1970s. It was predominantly built on brownfield land which included the sites of: Bevan’s Cement Works (Northfleet); the Crown Portland Cement Plant; and the London Portland Cement Plant.

This plant and the associated sidings is covered in another article about which can be found here. [33]

Knight, Bevan & Sturge Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p54-62]

These Works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [34]

London Portland Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet [1: p62] and Crown Portland Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p62]

London Portland Cement Works were opened in 1868 just to the East of the Bevan Cement Works. There was a short tramway to pits north of the High Street. In 1900 these Works became part of APCM but were closed in 1908.his was one of the constituents of the APCM on the formation of the latter in 1900, but it soon became redundant and was closed in 1908, by which time the tramway had been extended through a tunnel under Granby Road to pits and a brickworks at Calleybank. Stoyel & Kidner state that “Latterly the system seems to have been integrated with that of the Crown Portland Cement Works lying just north-west. When the line serving Bevan’s Works was opened in 1929 to the exchange sidings on the ex-LC&DR near Rosherville, it used part of this old line including the tunnel under Granby Road, as well as part of the route of another earlier tramway which ran from a point just north of the crossing of the LC&D over the SER, via a whiting works and a white lead works, to Red Lion Wharf.” [1: p62]

More details of these Works can be found here [37] and here. [38]

Stoyel & Kidner note two standard gauge locomotives that they are sure were employed in conveying chalk to the works:

These two extracts from different 25″ Ordnance Survey sheets show the full extent of the lines associated with these two works before the turn of the 20th century. [35][36]

Locomotives

Vulcan built by Falcon in 1884, no more is known about this locomotive.

Unnamed – An 0-4-0ST built in 1877 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 651. It had outside cylinders (9″ x 14″) and 2′ 9″ wheels.

Of these two locomotives Stoyel & Kidner say that, “It is probable that Vulcan was supplied new but the Manning Wardle had originally seen service with the contractor William Moss in constructing the line between Peterborough and Seaton for the Midland Railway, at which time it carried the name Stafford. Its ultimate fate is unknown, but the boiler of Vulcan exploded in 1895 and it is likely that it was then scrapped.” [1: p62]

Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p63] and Tolhurst & Sons Ltd., Gravesend. [1: p63]

Dylan Moore tells us that the Red Lion Wharf “was named after the local pub long before the Tolhursts arrived. Tolhurst’s initial business, from 1891, was export of chalk, and cement manufacture did not begin before 1896. There were initially 14 chamber kilns (output 406 tons/week) expanded to 19 around 1901 and to 38 (output 1100 tons/week) in 1907. In 1909, … After 1911 the plant was amalgamated with the Imperial plant. The rating in 1920 was 1000 tons/week. The remaining plant was described in the APCM 1924 schedule. There was no rail link, and all product was despatched by barge. After closure, the site remained derelict for many years before absorption into the Northfleet power station, now also cleared.” [39]

This indistinct extract from the 25″ 1895 Ordnance Survey, published in 1897, shows the Red Lion Wharf, the British White Lead Works, the Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., and the associated chalk pits. The tunnel under London Road is just below the centre of the image. [36]

The Wharf and associated rails. [36]
The Whiting Works and the tunnel under London Road. [36]

The Red Lion Cement Works in 1907 – 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. The Imperial Cement Works are on the left. [41]

Details of the locomotives used on the internal industrial railway serving this and the Imperial Works can be found under the Imperial Cement Works below.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, a tramway was laid in “about 1860 from Red Lion Wharf, Northfleet, to some limekilns near London Road, east of Woodfield Lodge: by 1870 a tunnel had been built under London Road and the tramway was exploiting the chalk land between there and Old London Road.” [1: p63]

Early ownership of the tramway is uncertain, but “in 1896 Tolhurst & Sons Ltd registered the Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd to take over his line, engines, works, etc. The railway was pushed further south-east and linked to the London Chatham & Dover Railway at Perry Street Siding. In 1898 land was sold for the erection of the Imperial Cement Co. Ltd mills, which by agreement had to take its chalk from Tolhurst. This was built partly on land formerly owned by a white lead works. All these works were serviced by Tolhurst’s standard gauge railway. The Red Lion Works was taken over by APCM in 1908 and closed in 1919; however part of the railway was used a few years later for a new entry to Bevans Works. The Imperial Works joined APCM in 1900 and closed in 1908, leading to litigation over the chalk agreement with Tolhurst which did not expire until 1948, ” [1: p63]

Imperial Cement Works

Stoyel & Kidner inform us that Tolhurst sold land “for the erection of the Imperial Cement Co. Ltd mills, which by agreement had to take its chalk from Tolhurst. This was built partly on land formerly owned by a white lead works. All these works were serviced by Tolhurst’s standard gauge railway.” [1: p63] It is clear that the Imperial Works were beholden to Tolhurst for their supply of chalk which Tolhurst’s rail network and locomotive provided first to the Imperial Cement Works and later to APCM/BPCM.

Dylan Moore tells us that there “were initially nine chamber kilns, output 205 t/week. A further 25 kilns were installed in the period 1899-1907 in 4 sets: two sets of 5 each of capacity 150 tons/week, 9 (260 tons/week) and 6 (175 tons/week), giving a final capacity of 940 tons/week. There was no rail link, and all product was despatched by barge. The plant’s operations were amalgamated with those of Red Lion from 1912, and re-assigned to APCM. The plant was described in detail in the APCM 1924 schedule. The kilns were demolished in 1923, and the site remained derelict for many years before absorption into the Northfleet power station, now also cleared.” [40]

Locomotives used across the Red Lion, Tolhurst and Imperial sites

Bulldog – an 0-4-0ST built in 1860 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 13. It had outside cylinders (8″ x 14″). Its wheel size is not quoted. By 1871 this locomotive was in the ownership of j. Durden of Northfleet. It went to Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd.

Wolf – an 0-4-0ST built in 1890 by Falcon, Works No. 120. It had outside cylinders (??” x ??”). No wheel size is quoted, was transferred to Swanscombe Works.

Lion – another 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 205. It had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It went to Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd.

Leopard – another 0-4-0ST built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 239. It had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It was transferred to Crown & Quarry Works, Frindsbury.

Elephant – an 0-4-0ST Brush (Flacon/Henry Hughes), Works No. 287, built in 1899, it had outside cylinders (10′ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. After service at Tolhurst Works the locomotive was transferred to Kent Cement Works, Stone.

Kent Works’ No. 2, Brush Electrical Engineering 0-4-0ST locomotive ‘Elephant’, originally worked at Tolhurst’s cement works in Northfleet before moving to the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM) Kent Works at Stone, photographer F. Jones © Public Domain. [2: photo No. 22]

Tolhurst & Sons Ltd., Gravesend

Stoyel & Kidner also tells us that Tolhurst “had an extensive railway serving its Gravesend works, of 3ft 6 in. gauge, laid down in the 1860s or before; it ran from a wharf between Rosherville Pier and Clifton Marine almost as far as what was later West Street. There were three kilns at various points on the system. It was not extended very much, but when the LCDR arrived in 1886 it had to build four bridges near West Street station over branches of the tramway. The site of the works and quarries was later used by the Imperial Paper Mills. One locomotive was said to have been named Diamond and to have been sold to the Imperial Paper Mills in 1948.” [1: p63]

The site of Tolhurst’s Works at Gravesend as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1897. [42]
The same site as it is shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of the same date. [43]

This site later became home to the Imperial Paper Mills in 1911. The Imperial Paper Mills are covered further below.

Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe

The Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe seem from the air in 1927. The plant was established in the early 20th century alongside the River Thames. It operated for decades before closing in 1992, © Historic England (Britain From Above). [20]

The Empire Paper Mills site and railway network as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938 to 1940, published in 1950. The line leaving this extract in the bottom left connected to the North Kent mainline to the East of Greenhithe Railway Station. The line leaving the extract bottom-right connected to the company’s paper store which sat alongside the A226. [21]

The Empire Paper Mills were owned by the Associated Press (later part of the Reed Paper Group network) as Empire Paper Mills Ltd in 1922. The main line connection to the works was severed in 1965 but the internal network operated until 1990. [23] The plant was sold to Norske Skog in 1991 before its final closure in 1922.

Details of this site can be found here. [25]

David Glasspool tells us that “From the outset the paper mill possessed a 24-inch gauge electrically-powered endless cable railway. This was double-track, linked the main jetty with the mill’s paper store, and upon it ran a fleet of wagons with removable tops. The latter allowed the tops of the wagons to be lowered into the holds of docked ships, filled with materials, and then hoisted back onto the chassis for onward travel within the mill. A series of sidings spurred off this network so static wagons could take refuge and not block the main tracks between the jetty and store. … A second railway network, again comprising a narrow gauge double-track line, ran from the jetty to the mill. This was elevated upon a steel structure and was dedicated to the transportation of coal from ships to the mill’s boiler house. It used a rake of wagons on an electrically-driven cable system, which took coal from a 100-foot-high unloading tower on the jetty and subsequently dumped this into hoppers. ” [25] Both these small networks ceased operating in the 1920s.

The standard-gauge network on the site hosted a number of different locomotives and rolling stock over time. There were three different standard-gauge locomotive ‘eras’ at the works. The line connecting to the paper store was constructed in the late 1920s. It was the last new length added to a network that was fist used in 1906/1907.

Glasspool tells us that in addition to a series of standard-gauge locomotives, “six rail-mounted steam cranes which ran on the standard gauge tracks … were used on the main jetty to unload materials from ships and could also be found handling goods within the main mill complex.

The three different standard-gauge ‘eras’ were:

A. The fireless era 1906-1971

No. 1 – an 0-4-0F (fireless) locomotive built in 1907(listed as 1906 in some sources) by Orenstein & Koppel, Works No. 2499 me this was one of the first O&K fireless engines imported into Britain. In Reed ownership the locomotive carried the fleet number S/10.

No.2 – also an 0-4-0F locomotive, built in 1917 by Andrew Barclay Sons & Co., Works No. 1561. This locomotive was purchased second-hand from the Royal Ordnance Factories. In Reed ownership the locomotive carried the fleet number S/11.

Two fireless locomotives at Empire Mills, Greenhithe. The fireless O&K (S/10) sits at the centre of the image and a Barclay 0-4-0F locomotive sits behind it (this is probably locomotive S/11), © Public Domain (Wikipedia Commons). [24]

Andrew Barclay No. 1471 – another 0-4-0F locomotive, originally built in 1916 for Vickers Ltd to work at the National Filling Factory at Morecambe. It was one of three such locomotives supplied by Andrew Barclay to Vickers to work at Morecambe – Works Nos 1471-3 of which 1472 and 1473 have been preserved. 1471 appears to have operated at the Empire Paper Mills later in its life. [26]

Andrew Barclay No. 1471 on site at Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe in 1968, (c) N. L. Cadge – this low quality image is made available for record/research purposes. [27]

B. Transitional Steam

Nelson – an 0-4-0ST built by Peckett in 1935, Works No. 1880. [4: photo No. 104]. This locomotive was purchased from Aylesford Paper Mill in 1967. Its tenure at Empire Paper Mills was brief. It was scrapped in 1969.

A photograph of this locomotive at Empire Paper Mills can also be seen here. [28]

C. Dieselisation 1968-1971

Diesel traction started to creep onto the scene at Empire Paper Mills in 1968:

No.3 – was a conversion of an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0ST locomotive, Works No. 2167 which was built in 1946. The conversion was undertaken in 1963 and the locomotive arrived at Empire Paper Mills in 1968. It was found to be unreliable and was scrapped in 1971. [29]

Purchase of three further diesel locomotives was to follow:

Paxman – an 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412718 was purchased from a Darwen paper mill in Lancashire in March 1970. The loco was subsequently acquired by the North Downs Steam Railway at Dartford in September 1990, but it has since been scrapped. [23]

Airman – also an 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412716 was purchased from New Northfleet Paper Mills when that works closed in 1971. [29] Although these details are worth further checking as this locomotive appears not to have been based at the New Northfleet Paper Mills. [32]

Batman – another 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412717 was purchased from New Northfleet Paper Mills when that works closed in 1971. [29] David Glasspool suggests that this locomotive was, in fact, a ‘Class 88DS’. [32]

These three Rustons continued to work the yard well into the 1970s after the fireless fleet went. The connection to the North Kent Line was lifted around 1958 and the internal system finally closed with the mill in 1992. [29]

New Northfleet Paper Mills (Bowater’s Thames Mills)

Details of these Mills can be found here. [31]

The standard-gauge railway network at the Northfleet/Thames paper mills utilized fireless 0-4-0 steam locomotives and later diesel shunters to prevent fire hazards from sparks near flammable paper products. The most prominent locomotive associated with the site is an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0F fireless engine built in 1925.

David Glasspool tells us that “A pre-war boom in newspaper circulation saw [W. V. Bowater & Sons] purchase, in May 1914, the site of a redundant dockyard, where it proposed establishing its first paper mill for the production of newsprint. The site was previously known as “Northfleet Dockyard”, this having originally been commissioned in 1788 by one Thomas Pitcher. … The outbreak of war in July 1914 stalled Bowater’s plans for a mill at Northfleet and construction work did not commence until 1924. As part of the scheme, a new company by the name of “Bowater’s Paper Mills Limited” was formed in the previous year. ” [31]

Glasspool continues: “the extensive railway system commissioned at Thames Mills, Northfleet, … was linked to the Southern Railway’s branch line to Gravesend West Street by a ¾-mile-long single track, a junction being formed at Rosherville Sidings. The connection with Thames Mills reused a tunnel through the chalk ridge underneath London Road, originally bored for the railway network of the defunct Red Lion Cement Works. In addition to Thames Mills, the single track also linked the Gravesend West Street branch with the London Portland Cement Works. The latter had been commissioned in 1868 under the name “Messrs. J. C. Gostling & Co”, becoming the “London Portland Cement Company” in 1876 after a takeover. The works were situated on a large site just west of Thames Mills, the two being separated by allotment gardens.” [31]

Fireless locomotives were used here as in the other papermills on the Thames estuary.

New Northfleet Paper Mills in 1946 as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1946, published in 1951. The line leaving the map extract in the bottom-right corner linked the site to the Gravesend Branch to the West of Rosherville Halt at Rosherville Sidings. [30]

As already noted, the mills were built on the site of Northfleet Dockyard which covered an area of 18 acres and ran along the southern edge of the Thames for 960-feet. The first ship launched from here in 1789 and the site grew to incorporate seven shipbuilding slips and a dry dock. The dockyard ceased operations in 1860. The shell of the dockyard, complete with building slips, was still in existence at the time of Bowater’s purchase in 1914. [31]

No. 1 – was Andrew Barclay No. 1876, it was the first locomotive to work on the site. It was an 0-4-0F locomotive built in 1925, arriving at the Works in September 1925. With a hiatus for WW2, when newsprint production ceased in favour of the manufacture of munitions, supplies of pulpwood from Canada and Scandinavia, were unloaded from ships onto the deep water jetty on the Thames. From there, the raw material was conveyed to the mills via the internal railway system. [32]

No. 2 – was also an Andrew Barclay locomotive, Works No. 1962, built in 1928. It too was an 0-4-0F locomotive.

In 1957 as part of significant expansion plans, two newly-built diesel locomotives arrived at Northfleet, both having been manufactured by ‘Ruston & Hornsby’ : Class 165DE; Works No. 416209; and Class 88DS; Works No. 412427. These became, respectively, No. 3 and No. 4. [32]

The Imperial Paper Mills, Gravesend

Details of the site can be found here. [22]

Because of a concern about fire risks, the Imperial Paper Mills ordered two fireless locomotives from German company “Orenstein & Koppel”, the first (Works No. 4708) arriving in time for the mills’ opening in 1911, the second (Works No. 5900) coming in the following year. David Glasspool says that, “These were distinctive locomotives, not only for the fact that they possessed a reservoir and not a boiler, but also given that their pistons were rear-mounted underneath the cab. The latter gave the impression that the chassis had been constructed back-to-front. Orenstein & Koppel had earlier produced a fireless locomotive in 1906 for the Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe, situated 2¾-miles to the west.” [22]

David Glasspool continues: “The first British manufacturer of fireless locomotives was Andrew Barclay Sons & Company, Ltd of Kilmarnock, Scotland, which started producing these engines in 1912. The company built several of these locomotives during World War I when, of course, it was no longer possible to source them from Germany. The Imperial Paper Mills initially ordered two of these from Andrew Barclay, the first (Works No. 1471) arriving in Gravesend in 1916 and the second (Works No. 1496) being delivered in 1917. These engines possessed cylinders of 15-inch diameter, had an 18-inch stroke, and their reservoirs were charged with steam to a pressure of 160lbs per square inch from a static boiler of 165lbs per square inch pressure. The arrangement was of the 0-4-0 type, the wheels being 3-feet in diameter and the wheelbase extending to 6-foot 6-inches.” [22]

NB: Other authorities suggest that No. 1471 was not supplied to Imperial Paper Mills but rather came directly to the Empire Paper Mills after service in Morecambe. Some notes are provided in the section relating to the Empire Paper Mills above.

A final fireless locomotive purchased for the Imperial Paper Mills was Imperial No. 1, an 0-4-0F built in 1956 by Andrew Barclay, Works No 2373. It cost £6,790.

Imperial Paper Mills were sited between the River Thames and the Southern Railway’s Gravesend Branch. These are the Mills as they were mapped in 1946 on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1946, published in 1951. As can be seen, the internal railways were extensive. [30]

Francis & Co. Ltd., Cliffe. [1: p64]

Francis & Co. Ltd., was a 19th- and early 20th-century cement manufacturing firm that operated works and quarries in Cliffe (Cliffe-at-Hoo), Kent. The company operated their original Nine Elms plant near Vauxhall Bridge in central London until it was taken over by the South Western Railway in 1867, when the plant at Cliffe was established. The company also took land at Cliffe Creek and Cliffe Quarry. Dylan Moore tells us that production of cement continued through to the APCM takeover of the company in 1900. “Cement manufacture formally ceased with the … takeover. … The plant continued making whiting, and remained the despatch point for cement. Cement activities ceased in 1921, but whiting manufacture continued into the 1930s. The plant had no landward communications except for the quarry tramway, and all transport was by barge. The wharf continued in use until the 1960s in connection with the supply of clay from the marshes to the Thames plants.” [48]

This old photograph shows the original bottle kilns, connected to a common steel stack, some time after closure, viewed from the Thames. The stack was installed in 1879, following complaints from the neighbouring Cliffe Fort, that the unpleasant fumes were “injurious to the health of the soldiers stationed in the fort”. Rawmix high in salt produced dense white fumes during the middle stage of the burn, (Blue Circle Archive) (c) Public Domain. [48]
The 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1898, shows the original works a little further inland than the later works below. [51]

The Cement Works fall immediately adjacent to the edge on the 25″ Ordnance Survey (Essex) of 1895, published 1897. The Kent sheet of that date is unavailable on the NLS website. … Until 1900, the Works was producing Cement. After the turn of the century the Works functioned as a Whiting works. [50]

Creek Whiting Works in 1907 – 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1908. [49]
Cliffe Quarry sits in a location a little further inland. [52]
Cliffe Works circa. 1920., (Medway Archive Centre) (c) Public Domain. [53]

Initially the quarry and works were served by a canal which was replaced circa. 1871 by a 3ft 8.5in railway. Initially trains were steam-hauled. [55] there was no rail link to the wider rail network in Kent, all the product from the Works and Quarry was despatched by river barge. The Works were acquired by APCM in 1900 and closed in 1920.

Motive power was predominantly provided by Aveling & Porter engines. Although the first locomotive used on site was an 0-4-0TV (vertical boiler) built in 1867 by Chaplin, Works No. 985. This locomotive was supplied through the agency of Wilmshurst & Co., London but was stated as being of 3ft 7.5in. Minor regauging was probably necessary! [1: p64]

Six Aveling & Porter locomotives were used during the life of the Works. Stoyel & Kidner list these as: [1: p64]

  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1873, Works No. 915, one cylinder (8″ x 10″) geared steam locomotive with 3′ 0″ wheels. Believed scrapped on site.
  • a 2-2-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1880, Works No. 1594, one cylinder (8″ x 12″) geared locomotive with 5′ 0″ wheels. Believed scrapped on site.
  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1887, Works No. 2229, two cylinders (5.5″ x 10″) geared locomotive with 3’0″ wheels. This locomotive was not completely new. It arrived on site in 1890. Stoyel & Kidner say that It “had an interesting background. It had been designed and built for work on the Brighton Tramways, but was found unsuitable and was returned to the makers, who rebuilt it in more conventional form. It retained its two high pressure cylinders, however, and in this respect was probably unique amongst Aveling & Porter’s railway locomotives.” [1: p66] Believed scrapped on site.
  • a 2-2-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1880, Works No. 2428, one cylinder (8″ x 12″) geared locomotive with 5′ 0″ wheels. This locomotive was still on site in 1938, standing abandoned in the shed and may have been used for target practice for anti-tank weapons.
  • No. 3, an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1899, Works No. 4360 compound cylinder (8.875″ x 14.125″ x 14″) geared locomotive with 4′ 0″ wheels. This locomotive was sent to Albert Batchelor Ltd. at Halling.
  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1900, Works No. 4537, compound cylinder (8.875″ x 14.125″ x 14″) geared locomotive with 3′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was sent to the BPCM Works at Greenhithe.

And after closure, one of the wagons was adapted by William Herbert Slater circa. 1935. He fitted sails to create a sail-powered mail/supply trolley (“Land Ship”) used for the marshes.

William Slater’s ‘Land Ship’. It was used, according to Stoyel & Kidner to access the shore among other things to dig for worms and inspect the sea defences. Constructed out of a standard 2-foot narrow-gauge ‘Vee’ side-tipping skip wagon. The heavy bucket was removed, but the remaining frame and triangular metal side struts made an ideal foundation to securely brace makeshift wooden masts. [1: p64][56]

This extract from the mapping provided by railmaponline.com shows all of the lines in the immediate area of the Cliffe works and quarry. The railways associated with Francis & Co. Ltd’s operations (above) are the most northerly group of green lines. These were 3ft 8.5in-gauge lines. The later narrow-gauge railways of the Alpha/Thames Works are also shown green. Brown is used to designate the  later standard-gauge branch line. [57]

Alpha Cement Co. Ltd., Cliffe. [1: p65]

Dylan Moore writes that “Alpha called [this plant] Thames Works, but confusingly also referred to it as Rochester Works. In common with all the other Alpha plants, after 1934 it was called Alpha Works by the locals. The company was launched by builders’ merchants Broad and Co., as with British Standard, to escape the dictatorship of the Blue Circle monopoly. Although undoubtedly a very shaky operation, it escaped takeover by Red Triangle, but was bought by Alpha, who, as at other plants, installed calcinators which were subsequently removed by Blue Circle. There was for most of the plant’s history no rail link, and the plant relied largely on river transport. The plant was originally connected to a wharf on Higham Creek at Cliffe Fort, initially by a 1.59 km ropeway used to send out cement and bring in coal. In 1935 this was replaced by a 2 ft gauge tramway leading to a new deep water wharf adjacent to Cliffe Fort. A substantial part of the plant’s output was shipped to Scotland. A short branch rail line was extended to the plant in 1961, with six bulk loading silos, and trains to Uddingston, near Glasgow, began.” [54] 

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that the Works was built in 1912 and acquired by the Alpha Group in 1934. At that time an original ropeway was replaced by a narrow-gauge railway which ran Northwest from the Works to the Jetty. The plant and jetty were isolated from the rail network in Kent until circa. 1960 when a  line was installed which connected with the Grain branch near Lower Higham. [1: p65-66]

The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1939/40, published in 1946, shows the Alpha owned Thames Cement Works as it was before WW2. The railway which served the site and linked it to the River Thames was 2ft-gauge (610mm). [58]

Locomotives

Peldon -The works utilized internal narrow-gauge equipment, including a John Fowler 40 hp ‘Resilient’ class diesel locomotive named Peldon (Works No. 21295 of 1936), which was later preserved at the Amberley Museum. It is powered by a 40hp Fowler Sanders 4 cylinder engine, No. M443, B series. Peldon is now the only working example of a 2ft gauge, Fowler Resilient 4w industrial diesel locomotive. It was built by John Fowler & Co (Leeds) Ltd for the Essex Water Authority for use during the construction of the Abberton Reservoir near Colchester, Essex.

After the Water Authority had no further use for it, the loco was sold, with “Layer”, to the Alpha Cement Company, at Cliffe at Hoo, Kent. It was acquired for preservation by the Brockham Museum Trust, and transferred to Amberley with the Brockham collection in 1982. The locomotive was acquired in a rundown, derelict state, and was restored by volunteers at Amberley, finally re-entering service in 1987. [59]

‘Peldon’ on location at Amberley, (c) kitmasterbloke and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0) . [59]
An unidentified member of the trio of Fowler engines at the Quarry at Cliffe in the late 1960s. This photograph was posted by Dave Willis on the Cliffe at Hoo Historical Society Facebook Page on 1st March 2015. Permission to use in this article has been requested. [60]

Layer (Works No. 21294) – Built in 1936, by Fowlers, this sister locomotive also moved from Abberton to Cliffe. It survived and is preserved at the Leeds Industrial Museum at Armley Mills. [59]

A Third Fowler Locomotive (Works No. 21296): The third Fowler unit of the same batch worked at Cliffe alongside its sisters but did not survive into preservation.

Ruston & Hornsby Fleet – The core backbone of day-to-day operations at Cliffe was a standardized fleet of 4-wheel diesel Ruston & Hornsby 44/48 HP Locomotives: A fleet of these standard class heavy-duty narrow-gauge diesels was purchased new by Alpha Cement to manage the continuous rotation of chalk and clay tipper wagons.

Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 186310) – A 1938-built 4-wheel 2ft-narrow-gauge diesel was recorded as part of the working plant equipment at Cliffe Cement Works.

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/17/kent-cement-works-stone-dartford-kent
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428083, accessed on 19th August 2026.
  4. Andrew Neale; Industrial Railways of the South-East; Middleton Press, Midhurst, West Sussex, 1984.
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/20/i-c-johnson-co-ltd-greenhithe
  6. https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/16/Frindsbury.htm, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/15/swanscombe-cement-works-kent
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_quarrying_and_mining_narrow-gauge_railways, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  9. https://www.industrial-loco.org.uk/LibraryAccessionNo.pdf, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  10. A. & G. Hatherill; Narrow Gauge & Industrial Album; RCL Publications, Gaendolbenmaen, Gwynedd, 2004.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.3&lat=51.48515&lon=0.17001&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.3&lat=51.48515&lon=0.17001&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  13. http://trolleybus.net/subhtml/wse.htm, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101427870, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675619, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675628, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  17. https://kentrail.uk/crabtree_crossing.htm, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  18. https://www.flickr.com/photos/12a_kingmoor_klickr/5817794218, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amberley_Museum_Railway, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  20. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017657, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428077, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  22. https://kentrail.uk/imperial_paper_mills.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  23. https://www.flickr.com/photos/12a_kingmoor_klickr/6675477813, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  24. https://picryl.com/media/empire-paper-mills-fireless-oandk-and-barclay-0-4-0f-locomotive-13d196, accessed on 22nd August 2026
  25. https://kentrail.uk/empire_paper_mills.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  26. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/andrew-barclay-works-no-1473-sir-charles-0-4-0f, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  27. https://433shop.co.uk/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=4303, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  28. https://archive.rcts.org.uk/product/fai3472, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  29. https://kentrail.uk/empire_paper_mills_2.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428119, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  31. https://kentrail.uk/bowaters_northfleet.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  32. https://kentrail.uk/bowaters_northfleet_2.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  33. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/25/the-new-northfleet-cement-works
  34. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/24/bevans-cement-works-northfleet-kent
  35. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191142, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  36. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676174, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  37. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_london_portland.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  38. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_crown_northfleet.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  39. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_red_lion.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  40. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_imperial.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  41. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676171, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428131, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  43. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676174, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  44. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cemkilndoc036.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  45. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428086, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  46. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675988, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  47. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/images/quarry_sc.gif, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  48. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_nine_elms.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  49. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675703, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  50. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191118, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  51. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101456147, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  52. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428185, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  53. https://apps.medway.gov.uk/apps/medwayimages/details.asp?docid=1122958&searchtype=all&pg=1&pga=1&search=Cliffe%20Works, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  54. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_cliffe.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  55. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_quarrying_and_mining_narrow-gauge_railways, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  56. http://www.copsewood.org/ng_rly/sailbogie/sailbogie.htm, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  57. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  58. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676297, accessed on 26th August 2026.
  59. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peldon_-_John_Fowler_Resilient_Class_No._21295-1936_17th_August_2025.jpg, accessed on 26th August 2026.
  60. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153066015379543&set=o.195202080644472&type=3, accessed on 26th August 2026.
  61. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.

The New Northfleet Cement Works, Kent

The featured image for this article is an aerial image looking North across the New Northfleet Cement Works soon after construction was completed in 1970. Careful inspection will show the loop of rail sidings that ran round the core of the works, © Christoph Bull/Gravesend Libraries. [17]

Stoyel & Kidner write “The 1970s saw the final end of a process of rationalising the cement industry which had been going on for nearly a century. By 1880 it had become inefficient and almost suicidally competitive. Each works sought its own supplies of chalk and clay, and there was not enough mineral-bearing land to go round. Also, the adoption of the rotary kiln required a considerable capital investment, this could only be recouped by large-scale production, which in turn required larger reserves of raw materials. The formation of the ‘combine’ in 1900 allowed less favoured works to be shut, with the more favoured receiving rotary kilns. It was this trend, especially in the 1920s, which caused the replacement of narrow gauge by standard gauge lines, and the concentration of the industry into fewer but larger works requiring greater tonnages of raw materials.” [1: p112]

“By the 1930s there were just a few modern works: Kent, Johnsons, Swanscombe, and Bevans in the Thames heartland of the industry, and these served through the 1950s.” [1: p112]

APCM undertook a fundamental review of its UK manufacturing. It “built new, larger, regional works based on the more economic dry process of manufacture. These were at Dunbar, Weardale, Hope, Cauldon and Plymstock.” [1: p112-113]

APCM took a different approach with the works in the Thames Estuary, deciding to replace them with a new very large works based on the wet process of cement manufacture. Alone among the earlier works, Swanscombe was retained to focus on producing special cements. [1: p113]

The new Northfleet plant was not constructed until the beginning of the 1970s and became fully operational by 1972. It was predominantly built on brownfield land which included the sites of: Bevan’s Cement Works (Northfleet); the Crown Portland Cement Plant; and the London Portland Cement Plant. It was necessary as APCM sought to centralise operations in a strive for efficiency.

This somewhat overexposed aerial image shows the immediate site of the Northfleet Cement Work in 1990. (c) Kent County Council & Getmapping.com. [5]

Construction of the then new Northfleet Works commenced in 1968. David Glasspool tells us that, “By this time, in addition to United Kingdom trade, APCM had significant exports, and to supply all interests, the cement plant was to be equipped with six kilns capable of a combined output of four million tonnes of cement a year. Approximately 20% of this was destined for overseas markets: Africa and North America in particular. To feed the works, excavation commenced in Greenhithe to produce a huge chalk pit on former farmland, alongside an existing quarry operation. This subsequently became known as “Western Quarry”: its existing easterly neighbour, which had been in use since the turn of the 20th Century, was also included within the plans. In 1969, the go-ahead was given to deepen this pit (by then known as “Eastern Quarry”) by a further 6.7 metres. This followed in the footsteps of a previous deepening exercise in 1952, which saw the pit floor lowered by 2.4 metres, and would allow new chalk supplies to be reached in anticipation of Northfleet Works’ opening.” [2]

Cement Manufacturing Plants replaced by Northfleet Works included: Bevan’s Works (Northfleet); Cliffe Works (Hoo Peninsula); Holborough Works (Medway); Johnson’s Works (Greenhithe); Kent Works (Stone); Metropolitan Works (Essex); and Wouldham Works (Essex).

Northfleet Cement Works operated from 1970 until its final closure in 2008. Built on older, exhausted lime and ballast sites (including the former Bevan’s Works), it was once the largest cement plant in the world, featuring six massive wet-process rotary kilns. Dylan Moore tells us that, “The site was cleared in 2009-10, and the stacks were finally demolished on 28/3/2010. The western (ex-Johnsons) quarry was redeveloped in the 1990s as the Bluewater Retail Park. The eastern (ex-Swanscombe) quarry awaits redevelopment.” [3]

More information can be found here. [3]

The Northfleet Cement Works relied on a highly advanced, bidirectional double-track rail loop and an extensive marine wharf network. This configuration made it one of the most logistically efficient industrial plants of its time, allowing it to move millions of tons of heavy materials every year without causing bottlenecks. A double-track branch line curved around the perimeter of the cement works. Trains entered the site, offloaded or loaded, and exited back onto the mainline. Dylan Moore says: “An efficient looped rail link was established, accessing the plant through tunnels first driven for quarry access, and this allowed coal and gypsum to be brought in by shuttle trains without the need to re-verse. Up to seven 1500 ton trains of cement could be shipped out per day to a set of mostly newly-constructed depots around the country.” [3]

Locomotives at New Northfleet Cement Works

Shortly after the opening of the New Northfleet Cement Works. It was decided to convert the rotary kilns to coal firing. To do this, works were put in hand to re-open part of the former LCDR West Street branch as far as the yard of the closed Southfleet and Springhead station to allow coal trains entry from the Victoria to Chatham main line at Fawkham junction. … A new road “Foxhounds Way” was also constructed to allow coal lorries access to the works via the Swanscombe – Bean road.

Coal shipments commenced from the Nottinghamshire coal field in December 1970, the usual motive power being Class 45 Peak diesel electric locomotives, a rare visitor to North Kent.

Shunting the coal wagons around the run round loop and head shunt arrangement at Southfleet was the responsibility of the sites resident diesel shunter. [9]

Once the wagons had been relieved of their loads, the coal passed along a series of conveyors where it was stored in storage silos awaiting loading into lorries for onward transit to the Cement Works. … The arrangement lasted until 1976 when the rail spur from the North Kent Line into the cement works from Northfleet station was opened. The site of the tippler closed at that time and the area appears to have reverted to nature. [9]

By 1972, the resident shunter at the Southfleet coal tippler site was a Sentinel 0-4-0 diesel-hydraulic locomotive, housed in a prefabricated engine shed added by Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM). It seems that the tippler was initially fed by a chain system which winched wagons onto the tippler. Perhaps by 1972 this had become too unreliable or time consuming? [10]

It appears that the Sentinel locomotive concerned was Works No. 10248 which was delivered new to APCM’s West Thurrock Works (Thurrock Chalk and Whiting) in 1966. It was designated as fleet No. 2 and initially painted in a lined green livery. It was part of a major dieselisation push to phase out the system’s steam fleet. It handled heavily laden rakes of internal user side-tipper wagons transporting chalk and raw material between the sprawling quarries and the processing works. It was recorded as present there in 1966. [11] Stoyel & Kidner have a different Sentinel undertaking this role, Works No. 10260. [1: p113]

No. 2 appears to have been transferred to Southfleet in 1972. It was tasked with moving British Rail main line coal wagons onto the site’s tippler tracks. It was only needed at Southfleet until 1976 when the tippler was closed. It was then returned to the West Thurrock Works and was recorded back at work there in the 1980s. [11]

From 1976 onwards no privately owned locomotives worked at the New Northfleet Works. instead, mainline rail operations inside and to the plant were handled directly by British Rail locomotives, predominantly Class 33 “Crompton” diesel-electrics, alongside occasional heavier Class 47 or Class 45 “Peak” diesel locomotives working incoming coal (such as MGR block trains from Welbeck Colliery) and gypsum services.

David Glasspool has a photographic record of a number of BR Blue locomotives working at Northfleet including:

  • ‘Crompton’ No. D6577 is seen two-thirds of the way around the merry-go-round loop, awaiting the signal to clear before proceeding under the cement loading silos in May 1971. Movements outbound by rail started from the opening of the Works. Only inbound movements relied initially of short-distance road transport from the Southfleet Tippler and then only until 1976; [2]
  • ‘Crompton’ No. D6577 once again, now at dusk on the same day. The train had completed the loop around the cement works complex and was now on the western side of the site, facing in the direction of the tunnel portal leading back to British Rail metals; [2]
  • A pair of BR Blue Class 33 diesels seen cruising over the bridge which, at that time, carried the North Kent Line over the tracks which led to Northfleet Cement Works. Heading in the westward direction, the two were hauling the Allington to Westbury empties in September 1983; [2]
  • A westward view of Northfleet Cement Sidings in late 1983 showing a Class 33/2 ready to proceed to the cement works with the Mountfield to Northfleet gypsum train. The formation would embark on the tight curve under the North Kent Line, which leads to the loop line of the cement works; [2]

‘Crompton’ locomotives were also recorded double-heading cement trains from Northfleet to Dunstable in the 1970s and 1980s. [12]

Other references to movements to and from Northfleet can be found on the following links:

  • https://www.flickr.com/photos/auchlander/5154760319 – two Class 37 locomotives, 37226 & 37255 (at Shirebrook, taking the Warsop line at Shirebrook Junction, is a train of empty MGRs from Northfleet bound for one of the Mansfield collieries. [13]
  • https://www.flickr.com/photos/28083135@N06/20841871129 – MGR empties returning to the midlands from Northfleet cement works are recorded at Dartford with Class 47 47327 and Class 45 45004 at the helm on 27th September 1979. The Class 47 would be removed at Cricklewood. [14]

The Cessation of Rail Services

David Glasspool tells the story of the gradual demise of Northfleet Cement Works. … “In 1978: APCM was renamed ‘’Blue Circle Industries Limited’’ (BCI). In the following year alone, worldwide sales for the company totalled £527.9 million, exports forming £69.4 million of this total. In addition to this, over 12,150 people were employed within the company, which had assets valued at £770.6 million. Despite these impressive figures, the export market was actually slowing down, and to cut costs and prevent excessive use of chalk, half the number of kilns at the Northfleet Works had been taken out of use by 1980, after a mere decade’s use.” [15]

Costs continued to rise and new energy-efficient plans saw two of the three remaining kilns were modified for ‘’semi-wet’’ operation, as opposed to their existing ‘’wet’’ processing -this reduced energy costs. [15][16]

The economic recession if the early 1990s saw  Northfleet only working with just one kiln. In February 1993, “the works ceased delivering cement from its Northfleet site by rail, and arrival of chalk and coal by this means only lasted until March. The 13th March 1993 marked the final day of rail operation to the site, and both the loop line and sidings went out of use. … Economic upturn saw the re-commissioning of a second kiln at Northfleet in 1994 in response to demand, but this was not enough to bring rail operation back to the site. Two kilns gave the site an annual output of 1.2 million tonnes of cement. It was also in 1994 that excavation ceased at Western Quarry, which by this time had grown to an area of 240 acres. In the pipeline was BCI’s own concept of transforming the redundant site into a modern shopping centre. The plans had received formal government approval, but on 25th June 1994, the exhausted quarry was instead sold to Australian real estate firm ‘’Lend Lease’’. It was this company which eventually undertook the Bluewater Shopping Centre project.” [15]

After Closure of the Works

Cement production at the site did not cease until the early years of the 21st century. The neglected rail infrastructure associated with the plant was too valuable to completely abandon. In 2012, Lafarge and Network Rail spent £13.5 million to restore and upgrade the rail sidings. The site became a vital logistical hub for the Crossrail (Elizabeth Line) construction project. Freight trains transported millions of tons of excavated earth out of London’s new underground tunnels via the North Kent Line, directly into the Northfleet loop.

From there, the material was transferred via an enclosed conveyor belt onto ships at the wharf to be used for an RSPB wetland nature reserve at Wallasea Island. [2][3][4]

The area of the Northfleet Cement Works and Sidings in the 21st century. the newly reconstructed line can be seen on the right side of this OS Map extract. [5]
Construction of the freight railway project at Lafarge’s site in Northfleet. Work was complete in 2012. [6]

Up to five freight trains operated from Westbourne Park on Mondays to Saturdays with up to four trains on Sundays. The first test train successfully completed the inaugural journey in May 2012 ahead of the line’s official opening in June 2012.

Danny Boyle wrote at the time:

“David Simms, Lafarge Cement’s Kent-based land and planning director, said: “Northfleet, until recently the location of the UK’s largest cement works, is a site with a long history of rail use and is key to the sustainable onward distribution of essential construction materials for the built environment. Our involvement with the Crossrail project marks the latest stage in our vision for the 104-acre Northfleet site and delivers on our commitment to sustainable regeneration.”

“Andy Mitchell, Crossrail programme director, added: “The reinstated Northfleet rail link has been successfully commissioned with the operation of the first test locomotive by GB Railfreight. This new rail link will help us minimise lorry use in central London, as well as ensuring the efficient transfer of excavated material to sites where it can be best used for environmental improvement.” [6]

It was estimated at the time that the tunnelling for Crossrail would produce around six million tonnes of material which would be excavated from constructing the 21km twin-bore tunnel. Close to 100% of the excavated material was expected to be clean, uncontaminated and reusable elsewhere. In fact, during the construction of the Crossrail (Elizabeth line) project, a total of approximately 7 million tonnes of material was excavated. Out of this total amount, about 3.4 million tonnes were specifically dug out by the eight giant tunnel boring machines working on the 42 km of new tunnels, with the remainder coming from station boxes, shafts, and caverns.

A total of 3 million tonnes (roughly 3.2 million metric tons) of the excavated material was transported to Wallasea Island.While early project estimates aimed to send up to 4.5 million tonnes, the final amount delivered to the island made up nearly half of the project’s entire 7-million-tonne excavation payload. [7][8]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990. (Page numbers are from the 2nd edition.)
  2. https://kentrail.uk/northfleet_cement_works.htm, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  3. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_northfleet.html, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  4. https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/9410068.lafarge-cement-works-in-northfleet-is-restoring-rail-sidings-at-the-site-which-will-be-used-by-crossrail, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  5. https://webapps.kent.gov.uk/KCC.KLIS.Web.Sites.Public/ViewMap.aspx, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  6. Danny Boyle; First Train Launches New Kent Railway; KentonLine, 15th May 2012; via https://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent-business/county-news/first-train-launches-new-kent-ra-a64448, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  7. https://newsroom.ferrovial.com/en/local-news/one-millionth-tonne-of-earth-removed-from-crossrails-west-london-tunnels, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  8. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/article/2022/06/excavated-crossrail-soil-creates-nature-reserve, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  9. https://www.gres.org.uk/gres-local-history/1231-2, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1730959503584733/posts/27602186059368723, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  11. https://paxton-road.blogspot.com/2022/11/alan-sewells-visits-to-thurrock-chalk.html, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  12. https://www.facebook.com/groups/892735862535042/posts/1057069989434961, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  13. https://www.flickr.com/photos/auchlander/5154760319, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  14. https://www.flickr.com/photos/28083135@N06/20841871129, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  15. https://kentrail.uk/northfleet_cement_works_2.htm, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  16. In brief, ‘’wet’’ operation involves feeding the kilns with raw materials in the form of a slurry, with excess water being removed by the application of heat. However, rising energy costs had made this an expensive process, and it was instead decided to remove the water not by heat, but rather filtration. This operation became known as ‘’semi-wet’’. [15]
  17. https://www.kentonline.co.uk/gravesend/news/500-new-riverside-homes-take-shape-274962, accessed on 25th August 2026.

Bevans Cement Works, Northfleet, Kent

The featured image for this article shows an unidentified 0-4-0ST (Peckett?) in charge of a train at the Washmills associated with Bevan’s Cement Works. After 1926, these were sited to the South of Northfleet and works trains required tunnels under the High Street in order to gain access to the Works. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared here with his kind permission. [10]

Knight, Bevan & Sturge Ltd. was established in 1853 between the River Thames and the centre of Northfleet. Although Thomas Bevan became sole proprietor, the firm continued to operate as Knight, Bevan & Sturge until it became one of the constituent companies of APCM in 1900. [1: p54]

Quarries were opened to the South of Northfleet and a 2ft 8.5in gauge linked them to the Works. Northfleet High Street runs along a ridge of high ground and as a result a tunnel was needed to allow access by rail between the Works and the quarries. [1: p54]

The Narrow Gauge Rail Network

Bevan’s Cement Works pictured from the North in the second half of the 19th century. This engraving is from the collection of the Northfleet History Group, © Public Domain. [7]
An extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1897, showing Bevan’s Cement Works, Northfleet at the end of the 19th century. [8]

This further extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1895 shows the tunnel which took narrow-gauge engines and wagons through the ridge between the Chalk Pits and Bevan’s Works. [8]

One of the four tunnel mouths on the narrow-gauge. All of which are on the map extract above. [11]

Stoyel & Kidner list the locomotives that operated on the narrow-gauge network. [1: p60]

Three locomotives built by Neath Abbey Ironworks are recorded by Stoyel & Kidner as being in use at the Works. [1: p60]

Neath Abbey Ironworks Commenced locomotive building in 1829 to designs of Henry Taylor. The Ironworks ceased manufacturing locomotives in 1880 after having built around 35 locomotives. Henry Taylor was works manager when the firm went out of business. [5][6]

Two of the three Neath-built locomotives were built in 1874, the third was built in 1880, all had 8″ x 16″ cylinders. Stoyel & Kidner could only name the third, Comet.

The next locomotive listed is an unnamed Aveling & Porter, Works No. 952. It was a one cylinder (6″ x 10″) 4 hp 0-4-0WTG engine with 3ft wheels built in 1873.

The other narrow-gauge locomotives were all 0-4-0ST engines:

Meteor – built in 1893 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1085, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Aerolite – built in 1894 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1107, had 8.5″ x 12″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Satellite – built in 1894 by Chapman & Furneaux, Works No. 1182, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Planet – built in 1902 by Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 631, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Rocket – built in 1906 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 2649, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Comet – built in 1921 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3506, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Tolfa – little detail is available about this engine possibly employed by Bevan’s.

Rota – little detail is available about this engine possibly employed by Bevan’s.

Stoyel & Kidner note that all these locomotives were purchased new, two were scrapped circa 1926 when the rail network was re-gauged. Meteor, Planet and Comet were transferred to Alkerden Clay Pits in 1928. [1: p60]

The Standard Gauge Network

The Works were rebuilt in 1925 and a standard-gauge rail network replaced the narrow-gauge one. A new tunnel to the East of the narrow-gauge tunnel was constructed. The new network also connected with the Perry Street sidings of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch. [1: p60]

An extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published 1934, showing Bevan’s Cement Works, Northfleet after reconstruction in the 1920s. The line leaving this extract in the bottom-right corner leads to both the chalk pits and the transfer sidings. [9]
This aerial image shows the new Bevan’s Cement Works was taken on 26/4/1927, viewed from the south. At this time the plant was now the largest in Britain, with much of its product exported, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Catalogue number EPW017642. [2]

Another view of the reconstructed Works, this time from the Northwest, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Catalogue number EPW017640. [3]

The Works seen from the North. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]
The Chalk Pits were sited to the South of Northfleet. Washmills were built in the quarries and trains transported chalk from the quarries via a tunnel (as shown) to Bevan’s Works. Careful inspection of the map extract will show a line leaving to the right. This line connected with the Perry Street siding of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch. [9]
The full length of the line to the Perry Street siding of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch to the Southwest of Rocherville Halt. [9]

Steam navvies were put to work in the quarries and for some time the chalk was transported to the works via the Washmills shown below. Much later, the chalk was slurried to allow it to be pumped to the Works by pipeline. [1: p60]

Chalk was excavated by steam excavator (navvy) and loaded directly into waiting wagon s which would take the chalk to the washmills shown below. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. Gavin Phillips comments that it looks as the steam navvy could be a Ruston No.25 and with only around 8 of those being built, a rare machine by all accounts. [10]

Footage of Steam Navvies at work in one of the chalk pits along the South side of the River Thames can be seen here. [12]

The Washmill plant in the Chalk Pits with a train waiting to depart for the Works, This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]

Closer views of the Washmills. These images were shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and are shared with his kind permission. [10]

The locomotives on the standard gauge system were as follows:

No. 1 – 0-4-0ST built in 1926 by Peckett, Works No. 1701, supplied new but fitted at Northfleet with an ‘Aquastatic’ water softener. It had outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels. It was transferred to the West Thurrock Works of BPCM in 1934. [1: p60,61]

No. 2 – 0-4-0ST built in 1926 by Peckett, Works No. 1899, supplied new but rebuilt with a rear bunker which upset its balance. It was again re uilt in 1946. It had outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels. It went to Kent Works at Stone. [1: p60,61]

No. 3 – 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Peckett, Works No. 759, outside cylinders (12″ x 18″), 2′ 9″ wheels. This locomotive came second-hand from Hilton’s Works, Halling and was transferred to the Crown & Quarry Works at Frindsbury in 1934. [1: p60,61]

No. 4 – 0-4-0ST built in 1900 by Peckett, Works No. 829, outside cylinders (12″ x 18″), 2′ 9″ wheels. This engine came second-hand from Lee’s Works at Halling and was scrapped in 1966. [1: p60,61]

No. 5 – 0-4-0ST built in 1902 by Peckett, Works No. 967, outside cylinders (10″ x 14″), 2′ 6.5″ wheels. This locomotive came second-hand from New Globe Works, Greenhithe in 1933  (their No. 4) and was scrapped in 1966. [1: p60,61]

No. 3 – 0-6-0ST built in 1931 by Avonside, Works No. 2001, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was purchased second-hand via Messrs Cohen in 1934. Previously it worked on the Southampton Docks extension works for the joint contractors Nuttall and Mowlem. It did not last long at Bevan’s. As a six-coupled engine it was not suited to the site. It was broken up in 1951. [1: p60,61]

Duvals – 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Bagnall, Works No. 1583, outside cylinders (10″ x 15″), 2′ 6″ wheels.. This engine came second-hand from Gray’s Chalk Quarries Co. Ltd. in 1951 and was scrapped in 1958. [1: p60,61]

An unnamed 0-4-0ST built in 1940 by Peckett, Works No. 1985, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels, was borrowed from Kent Works in 1945. [1: p61]

An unnamed 0-4-0ST built in 1929 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3719, outside cylinders (15″ x 22″), 3′ 5″ wheels, was borrowed from Swanscombe Works in 1955. [1: p61]

Stoyel & Kinder tell us that the railway was last used in September 1964, being replaced by conveyor-belting. The Works closed in 1970.

It is worth noting that the Works never had a “rail link for product, and used the river for most of its transportation, maintaining the best deep water jetty on the south bank. There was no main line rail link at all until 1915, when the loss of sea-borne coal supply led to a hurried connection of the plant to the Rosherville branch line.” [4]

2ft Narrow Gauge Line on the Riverside Wharf

A 2ft narrow-gauge railway served the Work’s wharves on the River Thames.

This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]

Miscellaneous!

Film of a visit to Bevan’s site during demolition work. This will have been filmed after the closure of the New Northfleet cement Works. ,The remains visible seem to be historic, part of the older Bevan’s Cement Works! [13]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990, p54-62, page numbers are from the 2nd Edition.
  2. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017642, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  3. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017640, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  4. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_bevans.html, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  5. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Neath_Abbey_Iron_Co, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  6. The Engineer 29th January 1937.
  7. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Knight,_Bevan_and_Sturge_cement_works,_Northfleet.jpg, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191142, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428125, accessed in 23rd August 2026.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DmzSjPJqt/, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  11. https://harbourvillage.whatyouthink.co.uk/northfleet, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  12. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JhBrkatvH, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  13. https://youtu.be/yIqmwrx9XQc, accessed on 24th August 2026.