Category Archives: British Isles – Railways and Tramways

North Kent’s Cement and Other Industrial Railways – Part 1

The featured image for this article shows locomotives sitting on standard-gauge metals at the BOCM Works at Belvedere. The two 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter locomotives are ‘Sydenham’, built in 1895, Works No. 3567, and ‘Sir Vincent’, built in 1917, Works No. 1917. Behind them is ‘Crabtree’, an 0-4-0 Ruston & Hornsby diesel locomotive. (Hugh Davies) © Public Domain. [4: photo No. 94]

A quick look at the Ordnance Survey maps of the North coast of Kent from the first half of the 20th century will show a veritable cat’s cradle of standard-gauge and narrow-gauge industrial railways. A similar survey of the Medway valley at the same period in the 20th century will show just how many individual Cement Works and other industries once existed there too. This article inevitably will not provide a comprehensive look at all industrial railways in the area.

The Oakwood Press produced two editions (1973, 1990) of a survey of these cement works. The second edition was an enlarged version of the first edition. Page references are to page numbers in the second edition.

The authors divide the various Cement works into three different geographical areas:

  • The Thames Estuary (working West to East)
  • The Medway Estuary
  • The Lower Medway

Part 1 – The Thames Estuary

This article looks at a number of the industrial sites on the southern banks of the River Thames Estuary. Industry along the River Medway will be covered in a future article.

Before looking at the works described by Stoyel & Kidner and others, it is worth at least a glance at Erith situated further West along the River Thames. …

J. Parish & Co. Ltd

J. Parish & Co. was a historical industrial firm based in Erith, Kent, best known for operating the local Erith Loam Quarries and Ballast Wharf on Fraser Road. Established in the early 19th century (around 1805), the company supplied specialized moulding sands, silica sands, and high-quality natural loams to the British foundry and metal-casting industries.

It ran deep loam and sand pits off Fraser Road in Erith, utilizing industrial (4ft 0in) narrow-gauge locomotives to move ballast and sand. Its products (often marketed as the “Erith Range of Sands”) were widely utilized across UK metal foundries for core-making and casting. [8][9]

Hatherill & Hatherill tell us that, “Around 1800 sailing ships brought coal to London from the north east of England and, in 1805, John Parish started supplying ballast to the returning ships. The sand they supplied was quickly recognised in the north east as a rich loamy sand which was very suitable for foundry work. At first it was loaded from a wharf opposite the site of the first railway station, which was opened in 1849 but, in 1842, a new wharf was built which could, in later years, deal with ships of up to 650 tons.” [10: p11]

Horses handled the traffic at the start as the first locomotive, No. 1, did not arrive until 1864, built by Gilles, Wilson & Co., Works No. 185. It was an 0-4-0T with 6 inch cylinders. [10: p11]

Records show two further locomotives in use by Parish. These were: No. 2, an 0-4-0ST, built in 1881 by R. & W. Hawthorn, Works No. 1864 with 10″ cylinders; and No IV, another 0-4-0ST built in 1903 by Hawthorn, Leslie & Co., Works No.2565, with 12″ cylinders. These two locomotives served the quarries for decades, although only No. IV survived until the advent of road-motor vehicle haulage at the Works in 1957. [4, photo No. 75][10: p11]

Parish’s locomotive ‘No. IV’ stands outside the engine shed in the wharf yard. Note the typical primitive end-tip wagons used on the network and beyond them the level-crossing box. (G. A. Bartlett – 1952) © Public Domain. [10: p12]

Parish No. 3 was utilised for a steam excavator built by Grafton of Bedford which was used to remove the overburden from the underlying loam. [10: p11]

This 6″ Ordnance Survey map extract from the early 20th century shows Parish’s rail network connecting the Loam and Ballast Pits (bottom-left) with the Wharf on the River Thames (top-right). West Street can be seen running parallel to the River Bank with just some relatively narrow buildings in between. [11]
The same area in the 21st century. [12]

West Street level-crossing allowed both Parish’s narrow-gauge line and Frazer & Chalmers’ standard-gauge line to access the wharves on the river bank.

Hatherill & Hatherill tell us that, “the crossing was also across the Erith Council Tramway system which ran along the road. There was a level crossing with four gates and a crossing cabin from which the gates were worked. When a train came down from the quarries a ship’s bell on the corner of the cabin was rung and the gates were wound across the road. When, in 1957, the railway was replaced by a fleet of lorries, Parish’s continued to use their level crossing. When the gates were closed across the road lorries went past along the route of the railway. As they were travelling along a private right of way they did not need to be licensed!” [10: p13]

West Street Level-crossing as shown on the early 29th century 6″ Ordnance Survey mapping provided by the NLS. The council’s tramway does not appear on this extract. [11]

The level-crossing on West Street, Erith © Public Domain. [13]

Over the 20th century, as industrial quarrying scaled down and local demands shifted, parts of their former quarry properties and surrounding land transitioned into residential and factory developments.

Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd

The Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd. was a 19th- and 20th-century mineral extraction and industrial company based in Stone, Kent, operating roughly from 1885 until the mid-20th century. It supplied raw Upper Chalk (Seaford Chalk Formation) to nearby cement plants, including works at Greenhithe, Albion, and the Kent Cement Works. These cement works are covered in detail below.

Dylan Moore tells us that “A chalk pit was already in existence at Stone Court Lodge in 1827. The Stone Court estate began shipping chalk from their wharf in 1864. In 1873, the Stone Court Chalk Quarries Company extended the wharf to deep water, and commenced shipping ballast, while looking for cement companies that might use their chalk. In 1879 the Williams Fry and Co. Ltd Albion plant was set up to the west of the wharf, and in 1880, Wilders & Cary’s Shield plant was set up to the east. In 1885 the company was re-launched as the Stone Court Land & Pier Co. Ltd. The Gillingham Portland Cement Co. Ltd set up the Greenhithe plant to the east of Shield in 1889, and in 1890 Rosher & East set up the Artillery plant inland between the quarries and the wharf. By this time, supply to the cement plants was the bulk of its trade, and chalk ceased to be shipped after 1894.” [44]

Dylan Moore provides maps of the various Chalk Pits in North Kent and the Stone Court Land & Pier Co. Ltd map shows two main quarry complexes: [44]

  • Lodge Quarry south of Elizabeth Street, including Johnson’s Hole – these workings were abandoned completely by 1964; and
  • A set of pits to the west on either side of Cotton Lane and to the South of the North Kent railway line – these pits were worked out by 1956.

These two map extracts show the areas eventually exploited by the Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd. Both show the area to the South of the North Kent main line.

The first extract is from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, Lodge Quarry was being expoited at this date. It’s workings would eventually extend South of London Road into what became known as Johnson’s Hole. [45]

Dylan Moore’s map showing the extent of the two quarry areas can be found here. [47]

The area of the Cotton Lane Chalk Pits as it appears on the 25″ 1895 Ordnance Survey published in 1897. At this time only the Lodge Quarry Works are being exploited. The Cotton Lane Pits would sit either side of the lane. which can be seen at the third point in this extract. [46]

British Industrial Callender’s Cables Ltd (BICC Ltd).

BICC Ltd. used a 3ft 6in gauge railway at their cable works at Belvedere, near Erith. The steam locomotives were converted to run on oil fuel.The line was in use by 1900 when the first locomotive arrived. The railway’s purpose was “was to bring pig lead and other materials from their wharf on the River Thames at Belvedere into the works and to move drums of finished cable around the works and yard. From the wharf, cable was exported all over the world.

BICC purchased three new Bagnall 0-4-0ST locomotives: [4: photos No. 91, 92 & 93]

Mighty Atom – built in 1900 by Bagnall, Works No. 1630, had 6″ cylinders

Woto – built in 1924 by Bagnall, Works No. 2133, had 7″ cylinders. Photos 91 and 92 show this locomotive.

Sir Tom – built in 1925 by Bagnall, Works No. 2135, also had 7″ cylinders. Photo No. 93 shows this locomotive which cost £1127 when new.

After the purchase of ‘Mighty Atom’ a second-hand Hunslet 0-4-0ST was purchased and a new 0-4-0ST from the Yorkshire Engine Co. before the last two Bagnalls were bought. [10: p13]

Both Woto and Sir Tom worked until 1968 when the railway closed, having outlasted by several years … two Ruston diesels! The former were acquired for preservation and are now [1984] stored in Romford.” [4: photo No. 93]

The two Rushton & Hornsby diesel locomotives had been purchased in 1934. [10: p13]

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published 1934 shows BICCs Works at Belvedere. [14]
The same area in the 21st century. [Google Maps, August 2026]

British Oil & Cake Mills (BOCM) Ltd

Was sited close to the BICC Works and had its own standard-gauge rail network which employed a number of steam and diesel locomotives over time.

These locomotives are sitting on standard-gauge metals at the BOCM Works at Belvedere. The two 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter locomotives are ‘Sydenham’, built in 1895, Works No. 3567, and ‘Sir Vincent’, built in 1917, Works No. 1917. Behind them is ‘Crabtree’, an 0-4-0 Ruston & Hornsby diesel locomotive. (Hugh Davies) © Public Domain. [4: photo No. 94]

Crabtree Trust Sidings

The Crabtree Trust exchange sidings were alongside the North Kent Line between Belvedere and Erith. They were on the down side of the line near the former Crabtree Crossing signal box. They once fed a network of industrial lines serving riverside factories and works along what is now Crabtree Manorway These industrial concerns included the BICC Cable Works, the BOCM site, Hercules Powder Co., Doulton’s Pipe Works and British Gypsum’s Works. By the 1980s, the entire complex was disused, overgrown, and eventually cleared.

These sidings consisted of three parallel reception sidings operated on behalf of local industry by BOCM. The locomotives shown on the image above would have been found at work in the sidings. [10: p18]

The Crabtree Trust Sidings are shown on these two extracts from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1933. [15][16]

Further details about this location can be found here. [17]

British Gypsum (Erith Works)

British Plaster Board Ltd. originally opened the waterfront works at Church Manorway, Erith in 1934 to process imported gypsum. Rebranded as British Gypsum in 1964, the historic manufacturing site eventually transitioned into the Saint-Gobain Build Better Academy, operating as its longest-serving training facility for plaster and drywall systems since 1966.

A number of 0-4-0 diesel locomotives were employed at this location at different times, including:

Crabtree – built in 1953 by Ruston & Hornsby, Works No. 338416 (Class 88Ds). [18]

Princess Margaret – built in 1948 by Barclay, Works No. 376. [18][4: photo No. 58]

Possibly also:

Taurus – built in 1951 by Fowler (VF D139, DC 2273)

Prium – built in 1955 by Fowler (VF D293, DC 2566)

The British Plaster Board works which were to become British Gypsum’s Works at Erith. The Crabtree Trust Sidings are off the West side of this 25″ OS map extract from the 1930s. [16]

Dartford Cement Works Ltd. [1: p11]

A short line ran from a wharf on Dartford Creek  to a small works which opened in around 1891 and South to a pit close to the North Kent main line. Stoyel & Kidner indicate that the line was horse-worked and closed in 1911.

Artillery & Albion Cement Co. Ltd. [1: p11]

This was a 19th/early-20th century cement manufacturer located at Stone Court (Stone Marshes). Its operations combined chalk quarried by the Stone Court company and Medway clay, shipping goods via Stone Court pier before eventually being absorbed into a larger cartel operation. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that both Artillery & Albion were adjacent works which were absorbed into the British Portland Cement Manufacturers (BPCM) in 1910 but probably closed by 1913.

A series of works cluster at the top-right of this 6″ map extract, a tramway/railway runs Southwest to Artillery Works and Whiting Works centre-left and chalk pits to the South of the main line. These are all mentioned below. [3]

Three 0-4-0ST locomotives were associated with Artillery and Albion Works:

Stonecourt – had outside cylinders and was sold in about 1915. Nothing else is known about this locomotive.

Artillery – built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 240. It had outside cylinders and was transferred by APCM to Hilton Works at Halling when the works at Stone closed.

Albion – built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 915. It also had outside cylinders and was also transferred by APCM to Hilton Works at Halling when the works at Stone closed.

Shield Works, Greenhithe Works. [1: p11]

The Shield Works were only a short distance to the East of the Albion Works. Greenhithe Works were a little further East.

Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM), took control of Shield Works in 1900. Greenhithe Works was acquired by J.B. White in 1893.

Stone Court Chalk Land & Pier Co. Ltd. [1: p11]

Although not a cement producer, this company was later taken over by APCM. In 1885, this company took over a pier and tramway on Stone March close to the works covered above. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “All [those works] were served by a railway of standard gauge, which also ran south, under the SER and Cotton Lane, to a chalk pit. Just north of the tunnel under the SER there was a whiting works. In 1908, the branch line to the Artillery Works was extended to an exchange siding with the SER North Kent Line When the Kent Works was built to the east, a cutting was made parallel to the SER and south of it, with a connection to the Stone Court line just north of Cotton Lane tunnel, so that material could be worked from the pit to the new works. At about the same time, a further cutting was made south of the SER to enable Stone Court trains to run to new pits to the west. Since this line had to tunnel under Cotton Lane twice and also under Moody’s Lane, at great depth, there were in effect three pits in line. Some chalk from here went to Kent Works; however the layout at Cotton Lane tunnel was such that these trains had to run into the whiting works, reverse into the pit, and then reverse out again to hand the train over to a Kent Works engine. Some time before the last War this was altered so that trains could run straight through. However, a company called the Atlas Stone Company had established itself by 1928 at the bottom of the original pit, being served by Stone Court trains with materials. In 1935, Stone Court Ballast Co. was working gravel pits near the river shore, using high-sided wagons, unlike the small chalk tippers. Much of this went to Atlas Stone, and in the latter years when a square crossing had been laid at Cotton Lane tunnel, this meant that trains from the gravel pits to Atlas Stone crossed the path of chalk trains from the pits to Kent Works, and it is said that ‘traffic lights’ were installed to control the crossing.” [1: p12]

The Company had ten locomotives all of which had outside cylinders, Stoyel & Kidner list them as:

Adamant – an 0-4-0ST built in 1877 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 649, 8″ x 14″ cylinders and 2′ 8″ wheels.

Bulldog – an 0-4-0ST built in 1860 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 13, 8″ x 14″ cylinders and ???? wheels.

Sundridge – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Hughes, Works No. ????, 11″ x ??” cylinders and ???? wheels.

James Godwin – an 0-4-0ST built in 1870 by Shanks, Works No. ????, 10″ x 20″ cylinders and 3′ 1″ wheels.

Quarrier – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 203, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Longreach – an 0-4-0ST built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 236, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Flintfield – an 0-4-0ST built in 1898 by Brush, Works No. 277, 12″ x 20″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

W.H. Liversidge – an 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Brush, Works No. 286, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Lion – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 205, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Iota – an 0-4-0T built in 1892 by Falcon, Works No. 211, 11″ x 18″ cylinders and 3′ 0″ wheels.

‘Longreach’ at the Stone Works on 10th October 1946. (B. D. Stoyel), © Public Domain. [1: p13]

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “Sundridge, Quarrier, Longreach, Flintfield and W.H. Liver sidge were supplied new. There is some suggestion that Sundridge was a vertical-boilered locomotive which was scrapped just before the turn of the century, but no confirmation has been found for this. Adamant had previously belonged to the Britannia London Portland Cement Co. at Seacombe, Birkenhead. James Godwin was originally built for the Southampton Dock Co. but came to Stone from the London & St Katherine Dock Co. (their No. 16) some time before 1896. Bulldog and Lion came from the APCM’s Tolhurst Works at Northfleet and lota from their Gibb’s Works at West Thurrock in about 1925. lota was a side-tank with dropped footplate and low vertical clearance.” [1: p14]

Locomotive Adamant was said to have been scrapped in 1918 and Bulldog at an unknown date. Quarrier, Longreach and W.H. Liversidge were scrapped in 1949 after the railway had been abandoned. Flintfield was lent to the APCM Works at Stone in 1947-1948 and was then sold to the Atlas Stone Co. Ltd for use on their adjoining premises. There is some suggestion that James Godwin was sold to a firm at Portland. Lion was transferred in 1946 to the APCM’s Swanscombe Works and was sold in 1948 to the Atlas Stone Co. Ltd. Iota was loaned to Alpha Cement Ltd, West Thurrock, from 1945 until 1946 when it was sold to the BPCM Works at Penarth, in South Wales.” [1: p14]

‘Iota’ at Stone Court Whiting Works in September 1933. (R. W. Kidner), © Public Domain. [1: p15]

The company’s chalk operations ceased in 1949, its engines were either scrapped or sold to Atlas stone to serve gravel traffic. The company remained in existence until 1974 when its assets were transferred to APCM.

APCM Ltd Kent Works, Stone, Dartford. [1: p 14]

These works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [2]

I.C. Johnson & Co. Ltd., Greenhithe. [1: p26-36]

Please see the article dedicated to this Works which can be found here. [5]

John Tilden & Co., Greenhithe. [1: p36]

A short-lived firm which operated in the 1860s out of Lamb Wharf Chalk Works at Greenhithe. When constructed, the enlarged Johnson’s Wharf covered the area of the old Lamb Wharf.

Stoyel & Kidner say that two locomotives were known to have operated at these Works. Both were Aveling & Porter locomotives, supplied new, chain-driven and recorded at work in November 1865:

Works No. 48, built in 1862, one cylinder (probably 8.5″ x 10″)

Works No. 132, built in 1864, one cylinder (9.25″ x 12″)

Globe Portland Cement & Whiting Co. Ltd., Swanscombe. [1: p37]

C. G. Down tells us that a William Tingley sublet some land to John Cubit Gostling who formed the Globe Portland Cement & Whiting Co. Ltd. Gostling was also owner of a Thames-side Cement Works. Later, in 1895, the works was purchased by John Bazely White & Bros. Ltd., owners of the Swanscombe Works on the Thames. Due to the recession in the industry though, the works was not used much subsequently, and was bought by APCM on 24th August 1900. [6]

Stoyel & Kidner’s research tells a different story. They say that in 1899 the company became the New Globe Cement Chalk & Whiting Co. and then moved to a different site further East. It then became part of BPCM. [1: p37]

It seems as though there is some uncertainty over what happened beyond those dates. It appears to be clear that the site of the Works was closed by the 1920s with the wharf being used for oil storage.

Stoyel & Kidner record five locomotives being used at the site: [1: p37]

Globe (?) – 0-4-0WTG built by Aveling & Paorter

Globe No. 2 – 0-4-0T built in 1897 by Kerr Stuart, Works No. 124.

Globe No. 3 – 0-4-0ST built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 925.

Globe No. 4 – 0-4-0ST built in 1902 by Peckett, Works No. 967.

New Globe – 0-4-0ST built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 889.

The Aveling & Porter locomotive came second-hand, the others were purchased new. It is unclear what happened to the Aveling & Porter. Globe No. 2 may have seen service in France from 1916. Globe and Globe No. 2 may have been transferred to the APCM Works at Grays, Essex. [1: p37]

Though the Works closed in the 1920s, three of the locomotives were seen standing derelict at the site in 1929. Subsequently they were transferred to other Works: Globe No. 3 to BPCM, Greenhithe; Globe No. 4 to APCM, Northfleet (becoming No.5); and New Globe to BPCM, Greenhithe. [1: p37]

J.B. White & Bros Ltd., Swanscombe. [1: p38-49]

These works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [7]

APCM Ltd, Alkerden Clay Pits, Swanscombe. [1: p49]

Operated by the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM) Ltd, the Alkerden Clay Pits in Swanscombe, Kent, opened in 1909 to supply London clay for local cement works like Bevans and Kent. The clay was slurried on-site and pumped to main washmills. The Clay Pits closed in 1943.

A 2ft 8.5in narrow-gauge line served the Clay Pits. The railway gauge may have been dictated by the availability of locomotives, rolling stock and track panels from the Northfleet Works of Knight, Bevan & Sturge which operated on the same gauge. But, the Northfleet Works were not converted to standard-gauge until around 1926.

The pits sat between Watling Street and Alkerden Manor Farm near Swanscombe Wood. But were not deep level excavations, rather they spread over a relatively large area which led to the narrow-gauge rail network wandering over quite a large area and to the need to carry the railway over the line of the A2 on a long girder viaduct.

Stoyel & Kidner indicate that eight locomotives were used on this network of lines: [1: p51]

Swift – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight, Bevan & Sturge (?)

Rapid – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight Bevan & Sturge (?)

Alert – 0-4-0TV, built by Knight Bevan & Sturge (?)

Clinker – 0-4-0ST, built in 1917 by Bagnall, Works No. 2068, outside cylinders (8″ x 12″) with 2′ 0.5″ wheels.

‘Clinker’ at Alkerden Clay Pits in 1934: the track is sinking and the fireman is looking at a wagon ahead of the locomotive which has just jumped the track. (L. T. Catchpole), © Public Domain. [1: p50]
Clinker’s sister locomotive ‘Peter’ (Bagnall Works No. 2067) at work in preservation at Amberley. ‘Peter’ was built as 3 ft (914 mm) gauge locomotive and converted to 2 ft (610 mm) in 1919. Its current boiler certificate expires in 2032, © Peter Skuce and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [19]

Meteor – 0-4-0ST, built in 1893 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1085, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Planet – 0-4-0ST, built in 1902 by Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 631, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Comet – 0-4-0ST, built in 1921 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3506, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Rocket – 0-4-0ST, built in 1930 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3788, outside cylinders (8.5″ x 16″) with 2′ 6″ wheels.

Stoyel & Kidner tells us, “Very little is known about the three vertical boiler locomotives, all of which had been scrapped by 1931. … The Bagnall was obtained from C.J. Wills, Grimsby probably in 1921 when it was converted from 2ft 6 in. gauge. … Meteor, Planet and Comet were transferred in 1928 from Bevan’s Works, Northfleet. Planet was ordered from Chapman & Furneaux and carried their works plates (No. 1215, 1902) but this was the period when the firm was in difficulties, leading to its acquisition by Hawthorn, Leslie & Co. Ltd, and evidently the order was sub-contracted to Hudswell Clarke & Co. Ltd. Rocket was delivered new to the Alkerden pits. Clinker had gone by March 1943 and the remaining four, which were basically of the same design, were scrapped during 1943. The railway was superseded at about that time. Whites obtained clay from Cliffe from 1937.” [1: 51]

The area of Alkerden Clay Pits in the 21st century. The area to the West of the B255 is now occupied by Bluewater Shopping Centre. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Onward Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. Tower Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. Maceroy & Holt (Britannia Works). [1: p51]

These three concerns clustered together on the Northwest side of Robin’s Creek.

The three Cement Works, highlighted above, all appear in this map extract. Robin’s Creek is the Creek shown in the bottom-right corner of the extract. Northfleet Paper Mills was rail served as well. It sat just to the West of the Britannia Cement Works and just off the left edge of this extract. A line serving the Paper Mills can be seen leaving the left edge of this extract a little to the North of London Road. [33]
A similar area in the 21st century. The whole area has been redeveloped and even the major roads have been realigned and renamed. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Stoyel & Kidner say that all the Works were originally supplied with chalk from pits close to the Works but when that option was exhausted land across London Road was exploited. Northfleet Coal & Ballast Co. Ltd. held the wharf on the Thames and handled the transport for all of the companies. The first of those pits were only just the other side of London Road, in fact, just off the bottom corner of the map extract above. [1: p51]

London Road is at the top of this next extract, the tramway from the cement works and the river wharf enters the extract at the top-right. It passes under London Road. The branch leaving the extract on the right runs parallel to the North Kent line on a 1 in 40 gradient to a transhipment point in the sidings at Northfleet Railway Station , the remaining lines serve the chalk pits, one of which tunnels under the main line railway. [33]

On the right side of this extract an engine house sits next to a tramway that served other concerns to the East.

Stoyel & Kidner note that the 1 in 40 gradient between the Works and Chalk Pits and the railway station sidings required double-heading for trains as short as 4 or 5 wagons. [1: p52]

The Northfleet quarries were worked out by 1920 and sold in 1921. [1: p52]

Stoyel & Kidner express surprise at the size of the locomotive fleet that served this series of concerns. They mention that there were two or three different owning companies, but provide a single list of the locomotives used:

Peveril – possibly built in the 1840s at the Edge Hill works of the Grand Junction Railway – purchased second-hand from E. W. Goodenough, Northfleet. Scrapped circa. 1900. [1: p53,54]

Fly – an 0-4-0ST probably built in 1864 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 111 – it had outside cylinders. If correct, this locomotive was sent on test to Ryde Pier Tramway on the Isle of Wight in 1864. Appears to have disappeared in 1919! [1: p53,54]

Fox – an 0-4-0ST built in 1871 by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″), the wheel size is not given. Scrapped in 1930. [1: p53,54]

Loughborough – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (9″ x 15″), the wheel size is not given. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913. [1: p53,54]

Northfleet – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Henry Hughes and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″), the wheel size is not given. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1902/1903.

Kilmarnock – an 0-4-0ST built in 1886 by Barclay, Works No. 282 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 3″ wheels. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913.

Swanscombe – an 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Barclay, Works No. 699 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 5″ wheels. Transferred to West Thurrock circa. 1913 (later entered preservation at Quainton Road).

W. H. Davies – an 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Brush, Works No. 282 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (??” x ??”) the wheel size is not given. Scrapped in 1957.

Torpedo – an 0-4-0ST built in 1886 by Peckett, Works No. 449, purchased second-hand in 1920 from A. R. Adams, Newport, Monmouthshire – it had outside cylinders (10″ x 14″) and 2′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was previously used in the construction of GWR Wootton Bassett to Patchway line. Scrapped in 1930.

Denis – an 0-6-0ST built in 1902 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 1561, was purchased second-hand from G. Shellabear, Park Royal – it had inside cylinders (12″ x 17″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It had been used by D. Shanks (contractor) with whom it carried the name of Coronation. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Dolphin – another 0-6-0ST built in 1879 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 725, was purchased in 1925 from the Southern Railway at Folkestone Harbour (No. A752), previously it had been rebuilt at the SE&CR’s Ashford Works in 1911 – it had inside cylinders (12″ x 17″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Bradley – an 0-4-0ST built in 1950 by Peckett, Works No. 1938 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (12″ x 20″) and 3′ 0.5″ wheels. Scrapped circa. 1945.

Victory – an 0-4-0ST built in ???? by Dick & Stevenson Works No. ???, was another second-hand locomotive which came on loan from the Ministry of Supply in 1942 (their No. P234) it had outside cylinders (14″ x ??”) and the wheel size is not given. Prior to coming to Northfleet, it served at MoD Kinnerley. It only remained in Kent until 1943 before moving on to an unknown destination in Yorkshire. [1: p53,54]

Northfleet – another 0-4-0ST built in 1946 by Peckett, Works No. 2080 and purchased new – it had outside cylinders (12″ x 20″) and 3′ 0.5″ wheels. Scrapped in 1967.

The New Northfleet Cement Works

This new Works was not constructed until the end of the 1960s and became operational in the 1970s. It was predominantly built on brownfield land which included the sites of: Bevan’s Cement Works (Northfleet); the Crown Portland Cement Plant; and the London Portland Cement Plant.

This plant and the associated sidings is covered in another article about which can be found here. [33]

Knight, Bevan & Sturge Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p54-62]

These Works are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [34]

London Portland Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet [1: p62] and Crown Portland Cement Co. Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p62]

London Portland Cement Works were opened in 1868 just to the East of the Bevan Cement Works. There was a short tramway to pits north of the High Street. In 1900 these Works became part of APCM but were closed in 1908.his was one of the constituents of the APCM on the formation of the latter in 1900, but it soon became redundant and was closed in 1908, by which time the tramway had been extended through a tunnel under Granby Road to pits and a brickworks at Calleybank. Stoyel & Kidner state that “Latterly the system seems to have been integrated with that of the Crown Portland Cement Works lying just north-west. When the line serving Bevan’s Works was opened in 1929 to the exchange sidings on the ex-LC&DR near Rosherville, it used part of this old line including the tunnel under Granby Road, as well as part of the route of another earlier tramway which ran from a point just north of the crossing of the LC&D over the SER, via a whiting works and a white lead works, to Red Lion Wharf.” [1: p62]

More details of these Works can be found here [37] and here. [38]

Stoyel & Kidner note two standard gauge locomotives that they are sure were employed in conveying chalk to the works:

These two extracts from different 25″ Ordnance Survey sheets show the full extent of the lines associated with these two works before the turn of the 20th century. [35][36]

Locomotives

Vulcan built by Falcon in 1884, no more is known about this locomotive.

Unnamed – An 0-4-0ST built in 1877 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 651. It had outside cylinders (9″ x 14″) and 2′ 9″ wheels.

Of these two locomotives Stoyel & Kidner say that, “It is probable that Vulcan was supplied new but the Manning Wardle had originally seen service with the contractor William Moss in constructing the line between Peterborough and Seaton for the Midland Railway, at which time it carried the name Stafford. Its ultimate fate is unknown, but the boiler of Vulcan exploded in 1895 and it is likely that it was then scrapped.” [1: p62]

Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., Northfleet. [1: p63] and Tolhurst & Sons Ltd., Gravesend. [1: p63]

Dylan Moore tells us that the Red Lion Wharf “was named after the local pub long before the Tolhursts arrived. Tolhurst’s initial business, from 1891, was export of chalk, and cement manufacture did not begin before 1896. There were initially 14 chamber kilns (output 406 tons/week) expanded to 19 around 1901 and to 38 (output 1100 tons/week) in 1907. In 1909, … After 1911 the plant was amalgamated with the Imperial plant. The rating in 1920 was 1000 tons/week. The remaining plant was described in the APCM 1924 schedule. There was no rail link, and all product was despatched by barge. After closure, the site remained derelict for many years before absorption into the Northfleet power station, now also cleared.” [39]

This indistinct extract from the 25″ 1895 Ordnance Survey, published in 1897, shows the Red Lion Wharf, the British White Lead Works, the Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., and the associated chalk pits. The tunnel under London Road is just below the centre of the image. [36]

The Wharf and associated rails. [36]
The Whiting Works and the tunnel under London Road. [36]

The Red Lion Cement Works in 1907 – 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. The Imperial Cement Works are on the left. [41]

Details of the locomotives used on the internal industrial railway serving this and the Imperial Works can be found under the Imperial Cement Works below.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, a tramway was laid in “about 1860 from Red Lion Wharf, Northfleet, to some limekilns near London Road, east of Woodfield Lodge: by 1870 a tunnel had been built under London Road and the tramway was exploiting the chalk land between there and Old London Road.” [1: p63]

Early ownership of the tramway is uncertain, but “in 1896 Tolhurst & Sons Ltd registered the Red Lion Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd to take over his line, engines, works, etc. The railway was pushed further south-east and linked to the London Chatham & Dover Railway at Perry Street Siding. In 1898 land was sold for the erection of the Imperial Cement Co. Ltd mills, which by agreement had to take its chalk from Tolhurst. This was built partly on land formerly owned by a white lead works. All these works were serviced by Tolhurst’s standard gauge railway. The Red Lion Works was taken over by APCM in 1908 and closed in 1919; however part of the railway was used a few years later for a new entry to Bevans Works. The Imperial Works joined APCM in 1900 and closed in 1908, leading to litigation over the chalk agreement with Tolhurst which did not expire until 1948, ” [1: p63]

Imperial Cement Works

Stoyel & Kidner inform us that Tolhurst sold land “for the erection of the Imperial Cement Co. Ltd mills, which by agreement had to take its chalk from Tolhurst. This was built partly on land formerly owned by a white lead works. All these works were serviced by Tolhurst’s standard gauge railway.” [1: p63] It is clear that the Imperial Works were beholden to Tolhurst for their supply of chalk which Tolhurst’s rail network and locomotive provided first to the Imperial Cement Works and later to APCM/BPCM.

Dylan Moore tells us that there “were initially nine chamber kilns, output 205 t/week. A further 25 kilns were installed in the period 1899-1907 in 4 sets: two sets of 5 each of capacity 150 tons/week, 9 (260 tons/week) and 6 (175 tons/week), giving a final capacity of 940 tons/week. There was no rail link, and all product was despatched by barge. The plant’s operations were amalgamated with those of Red Lion from 1912, and re-assigned to APCM. The plant was described in detail in the APCM 1924 schedule. The kilns were demolished in 1923, and the site remained derelict for many years before absorption into the Northfleet power station, now also cleared.” [40]

Locomotives used across the Red Lion, Tolhurst and Imperial sites

Bulldog – an 0-4-0ST built in 1860 by Manning Wardle, Works No. 13. It had outside cylinders (8″ x 14″). Its wheel size is not quoted. By 1871 this locomotive was in the ownership of j. Durden of Northfleet. It went to Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd.

Wolf – an 0-4-0ST built in 1890 by Falcon, Works No. 120. It had outside cylinders (??” x ??”). No wheel size is quoted, was transferred to Swanscombe Works.

Lion – another 0-4-0ST built in 1891 by Falcon, Works No. 205. It had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It went to Stone Court Chalk, Land & Pier Co. Ltd.

Leopard – another 0-4-0ST built in 1896 by Falcon, Works No. 239. It had outside cylinders (11″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. It was transferred to Crown & Quarry Works, Frindsbury.

Elephant – an 0-4-0ST Brush (Flacon/Henry Hughes), Works No. 287, built in 1899, it had outside cylinders (10′ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. After service at Tolhurst Works the locomotive was transferred to Kent Cement Works, Stone.

Kent Works’ No. 2, Brush Electrical Engineering 0-4-0ST locomotive ‘Elephant’, originally worked at Tolhurst’s cement works in Northfleet before moving to the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM) Kent Works at Stone, photographer F. Jones © Public Domain. [2: photo No. 22]

Tolhurst & Sons Ltd., Gravesend

Stoyel & Kidner also tells us that Tolhurst “had an extensive railway serving its Gravesend works, of 3ft 6 in. gauge, laid down in the 1860s or before; it ran from a wharf between Rosherville Pier and Clifton Marine almost as far as what was later West Street. There were three kilns at various points on the system. It was not extended very much, but when the LCDR arrived in 1886 it had to build four bridges near West Street station over branches of the tramway. The site of the works and quarries was later used by the Imperial Paper Mills. One locomotive was said to have been named Diamond and to have been sold to the Imperial Paper Mills in 1948.” [1: p63]

The site of Tolhurst’s Works at Gravesend as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1897. [42]
The same site as it is shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of the same date. [43]

This site later became home to the Imperial Paper Mills in 1911. The Imperial Paper Mills are covered further below.

Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe

The Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe seem from the air in 1927. The plant was established in the early 20th century alongside the River Thames. It operated for decades before closing in 1992, © Historic England (Britain From Above). [20]

The Empire Paper Mills site and railway network as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938 to 1940, published in 1950. The line leaving this extract in the bottom left connected to the North Kent mainline to the East of Greenhithe Railway Station. The line leaving the extract bottom-right connected to the company’s paper store which sat alongside the A226. [21]

The Empire Paper Mills were owned by the Associated Press (later part of the Reed Paper Group network) as Empire Paper Mills Ltd in 1922. The main line connection to the works was severed in 1965 but the internal network operated until 1990. [23] The plant was sold to Norske Skog in 1991 before its final closure in 1922.

Details of this site can be found here. [25]

David Glasspool tells us that “From the outset the paper mill possessed a 24-inch gauge electrically-powered endless cable railway. This was double-track, linked the main jetty with the mill’s paper store, and upon it ran a fleet of wagons with removable tops. The latter allowed the tops of the wagons to be lowered into the holds of docked ships, filled with materials, and then hoisted back onto the chassis for onward travel within the mill. A series of sidings spurred off this network so static wagons could take refuge and not block the main tracks between the jetty and store. … A second railway network, again comprising a narrow gauge double-track line, ran from the jetty to the mill. This was elevated upon a steel structure and was dedicated to the transportation of coal from ships to the mill’s boiler house. It used a rake of wagons on an electrically-driven cable system, which took coal from a 100-foot-high unloading tower on the jetty and subsequently dumped this into hoppers. ” [25] Both these small networks ceased operating in the 1920s.

The standard-gauge network on the site hosted a number of different locomotives and rolling stock over time. There were three different standard-gauge locomotive ‘eras’ at the works. The line connecting to the paper store was constructed in the late 1920s. It was the last new length added to a network that was fist used in 1906/1907.

Glasspool tells us that in addition to a series of standard-gauge locomotives, “six rail-mounted steam cranes which ran on the standard gauge tracks … were used on the main jetty to unload materials from ships and could also be found handling goods within the main mill complex.

The three different standard-gauge ‘eras’ were:

A. The fireless era 1906-1971

No. 1 – an 0-4-0F (fireless) locomotive built in 1907(listed as 1906 in some sources) by Orenstein & Koppel, Works No. 2499 me this was one of the first O&K fireless engines imported into Britain. In Reed ownership the locomotive carried the fleet number S/10.

No.2 – also an 0-4-0F locomotive, built in 1917 by Andrew Barclay Sons & Co., Works No. 1561. This locomotive was purchased second-hand from the Royal Ordnance Factories. In Reed ownership the locomotive carried the fleet number S/11.

Two fireless locomotives at Empire Mills, Greenhithe. The fireless O&K (S/10) sits at the centre of the image and a Barclay 0-4-0F locomotive sits behind it (this is probably locomotive S/11), © Public Domain (Wikipedia Commons). [24]

Andrew Barclay No. 1471 – another 0-4-0F locomotive, originally built in 1916 for Vickers Ltd to work at the National Filling Factory at Morecambe. It was one of three such locomotives supplied by Andrew Barclay to Vickers to work at Morecambe – Works Nos 1471-3 of which 1472 and 1473 have been preserved. 1471 appears to have operated at the Empire Paper Mills later in its life. [26]

Andrew Barclay No. 1471 on site at Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe in 1968, (c) N. L. Cadge – this low quality image is made available for record/research purposes. [27]

B. Transitional Steam

Nelson – an 0-4-0ST built by Peckett in 1935, Works No. 1880. [4: photo No. 104]. This locomotive was purchased from Aylesford Paper Mill in 1967. Its tenure at Empire Paper Mills was brief. It was scrapped in 1969.

A photograph of this locomotive at Empire Paper Mills can also be seen here. [28]

C. Dieselisation 1968-1971

Diesel traction started to creep onto the scene at Empire Paper Mills in 1968:

No.3 – was a conversion of an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0ST locomotive, Works No. 2167 which was built in 1946. The conversion was undertaken in 1963 and the locomotive arrived at Empire Paper Mills in 1968. It was found to be unreliable and was scrapped in 1971. [29]

Purchase of three further diesel locomotives was to follow:

Paxman – an 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412718 was purchased from a Darwen paper mill in Lancashire in March 1970. The loco was subsequently acquired by the North Downs Steam Railway at Dartford in September 1990, but it has since been scrapped. [23]

Airman – also an 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412716 was purchased from New Northfleet Paper Mills when that works closed in 1971. [29] Although these details are worth further checking as this locomotive appears not to have been based at the New Northfleet Paper Mills. [32]

Batman – another 0-4-0 diesel-electric built in 1958 by Ruston & Hornsby, ‘200DE’ Class, Works No. 412717 was purchased from New Northfleet Paper Mills when that works closed in 1971. [29] David Glasspool suggests that this locomotive was, in fact, a ‘Class 88DS’. [32]

These three Rustons continued to work the yard well into the 1970s after the fireless fleet went. The connection to the North Kent Line was lifted around 1958 and the internal system finally closed with the mill in 1992. [29]

New Northfleet Paper Mills (Bowater’s Thames Mills)

Details of these Mills can be found here. [31]

The standard-gauge railway network at the Northfleet/Thames paper mills utilized fireless 0-4-0 steam locomotives and later diesel shunters to prevent fire hazards from sparks near flammable paper products. The most prominent locomotive associated with the site is an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0F fireless engine built in 1925.

David Glasspool tells us that “A pre-war boom in newspaper circulation saw [W. V. Bowater & Sons] purchase, in May 1914, the site of a redundant dockyard, where it proposed establishing its first paper mill for the production of newsprint. The site was previously known as “Northfleet Dockyard”, this having originally been commissioned in 1788 by one Thomas Pitcher. … The outbreak of war in July 1914 stalled Bowater’s plans for a mill at Northfleet and construction work did not commence until 1924. As part of the scheme, a new company by the name of “Bowater’s Paper Mills Limited” was formed in the previous year. ” [31]

Glasspool continues: “the extensive railway system commissioned at Thames Mills, Northfleet, … was linked to the Southern Railway’s branch line to Gravesend West Street by a ¾-mile-long single track, a junction being formed at Rosherville Sidings. The connection with Thames Mills reused a tunnel through the chalk ridge underneath London Road, originally bored for the railway network of the defunct Red Lion Cement Works. In addition to Thames Mills, the single track also linked the Gravesend West Street branch with the London Portland Cement Works. The latter had been commissioned in 1868 under the name “Messrs. J. C. Gostling & Co”, becoming the “London Portland Cement Company” in 1876 after a takeover. The works were situated on a large site just west of Thames Mills, the two being separated by allotment gardens.” [31]

Fireless locomotives were used here as in the other papermills on the Thames estuary.

New Northfleet Paper Mills in 1946 as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1946, published in 1951. The line leaving the map extract in the bottom-right corner linked the site to the Gravesend Branch to the West of Rosherville Halt at Rosherville Sidings. [30]

As already noted, the mills were built on the site of Northfleet Dockyard which covered an area of 18 acres and ran along the southern edge of the Thames for 960-feet. The first ship launched from here in 1789 and the site grew to incorporate seven shipbuilding slips and a dry dock. The dockyard ceased operations in 1860. The shell of the dockyard, complete with building slips, was still in existence at the time of Bowater’s purchase in 1914. [31]

No. 1 – was Andrew Barclay No. 1876, it was the first locomotive to work on the site. It was an 0-4-0F locomotive built in 1925, arriving at the Works in September 1925. With a hiatus for WW2, when newsprint production ceased in favour of the manufacture of munitions, supplies of pulpwood from Canada and Scandinavia, were unloaded from ships onto the deep water jetty on the Thames. From there, the raw material was conveyed to the mills via the internal railway system. [32]

No. 2 – was also an Andrew Barclay locomotive, Works No. 1962, built in 1928. It too was an 0-4-0F locomotive.

In 1957 as part of significant expansion plans, two newly-built diesel locomotives arrived at Northfleet, both having been manufactured by ‘Ruston & Hornsby’ : Class 165DE; Works No. 416209; and Class 88DS; Works No. 412427. These became, respectively, No. 3 and No. 4. [32]

The Imperial Paper Mills, Gravesend

Details of the site can be found here. [22]

Because of a concern about fire risks, the Imperial Paper Mills ordered two fireless locomotives from German company “Orenstein & Koppel”, the first (Works No. 4708) arriving in time for the mills’ opening in 1911, the second (Works No. 5900) coming in the following year. David Glasspool says that, “These were distinctive locomotives, not only for the fact that they possessed a reservoir and not a boiler, but also given that their pistons were rear-mounted underneath the cab. The latter gave the impression that the chassis had been constructed back-to-front. Orenstein & Koppel had earlier produced a fireless locomotive in 1906 for the Empire Paper Mills, Greenhithe, situated 2¾-miles to the west.” [22]

David Glasspool continues: “The first British manufacturer of fireless locomotives was Andrew Barclay Sons & Company, Ltd of Kilmarnock, Scotland, which started producing these engines in 1912. The company built several of these locomotives during World War I when, of course, it was no longer possible to source them from Germany. The Imperial Paper Mills initially ordered two of these from Andrew Barclay, the first (Works No. 1471) arriving in Gravesend in 1916 and the second (Works No. 1496) being delivered in 1917. These engines possessed cylinders of 15-inch diameter, had an 18-inch stroke, and their reservoirs were charged with steam to a pressure of 160lbs per square inch from a static boiler of 165lbs per square inch pressure. The arrangement was of the 0-4-0 type, the wheels being 3-feet in diameter and the wheelbase extending to 6-foot 6-inches.” [22]

NB: Other authorities suggest that No. 1471 was not supplied to Imperial Paper Mills but rather came directly to the Empire Paper Mills after service in Morecambe. Some notes are provided in the section relating to the Empire Paper Mills above.

A final fireless locomotive purchased for the Imperial Paper Mills was Imperial No. 1, an 0-4-0F built in 1956 by Andrew Barclay, Works No 2373. It cost £6,790.

Imperial Paper Mills were sited between the River Thames and the Southern Railway’s Gravesend Branch. These are the Mills as they were mapped in 1946 on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1946, published in 1951. As can be seen, the internal railways were extensive. [30]

Francis & Co. Ltd., Cliffe. [1: p64]

Francis & Co. Ltd., was a 19th- and early 20th-century cement manufacturing firm that operated works and quarries in Cliffe (Cliffe-at-Hoo), Kent. The company operated their original Nine Elms plant near Vauxhall Bridge in central London until it was taken over by the South Western Railway in 1867, when the plant at Cliffe was established. The company also took land at Cliffe Creek and Cliffe Quarry. Dylan Moore tells us that production of cement continued through to the APCM takeover of the company in 1900. “Cement manufacture formally ceased with the … takeover. … The plant continued making whiting, and remained the despatch point for cement. Cement activities ceased in 1921, but whiting manufacture continued into the 1930s. The plant had no landward communications except for the quarry tramway, and all transport was by barge. The wharf continued in use until the 1960s in connection with the supply of clay from the marshes to the Thames plants.” [48]

This old photograph shows the original bottle kilns, connected to a common steel stack, some time after closure, viewed from the Thames. The stack was installed in 1879, following complaints from the neighbouring Cliffe Fort, that the unpleasant fumes were “injurious to the health of the soldiers stationed in the fort”. Rawmix high in salt produced dense white fumes during the middle stage of the burn, (Blue Circle Archive) (c) Public Domain. [48]
The 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1898, shows the original works a little further inland than the later works below. [51]

The Cement Works fall immediately adjacent to the edge on the 25″ Ordnance Survey (Essex) of 1895, published 1897. The Kent sheet of that date is unavailable on the NLS website. … Until 1900, the Works was producing Cement. After the turn of the century the Works functioned as a Whiting works. [50]

Creek Whiting Works in 1907 – 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1908. [49]
Cliffe Quarry sits in a location a little further inland. [52]
Cliffe Works circa. 1920., (Medway Archive Centre) (c) Public Domain. [53]

Initially the quarry and works were served by a canal which was replaced circa. 1871 by a 3ft 8.5in railway. Initially trains were steam-hauled. [55] there was no rail link to the wider rail network in Kent, all the product from the Works and Quarry was despatched by river barge. The Works were acquired by APCM in 1900 and closed in 1920.

Motive power was predominantly provided by Aveling & Porter engines. Although the first locomotive used on site was an 0-4-0TV (vertical boiler) built in 1867 by Chaplin, Works No. 985. This locomotive was supplied through the agency of Wilmshurst & Co., London but was stated as being of 3ft 7.5in. Minor regauging was probably necessary! [1: p64]

Six Aveling & Porter locomotives were used during the life of the Works. Stoyel & Kidner list these as: [1: p64]

  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1873, Works No. 915, one cylinder (8″ x 10″) geared steam locomotive with 3′ 0″ wheels. Believed scrapped on site.
  • a 2-2-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1880, Works No. 1594, one cylinder (8″ x 12″) geared locomotive with 5′ 0″ wheels. Believed scrapped on site.
  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1887, Works No. 2229, two cylinders (5.5″ x 10″) geared locomotive with 3’0″ wheels. This locomotive was not completely new. It arrived on site in 1890. Stoyel & Kidner say that It “had an interesting background. It had been designed and built for work on the Brighton Tramways, but was found unsuitable and was returned to the makers, who rebuilt it in more conventional form. It retained its two high pressure cylinders, however, and in this respect was probably unique amongst Aveling & Porter’s railway locomotives.” [1: p66] Believed scrapped on site.
  • a 2-2-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1880, Works No. 2428, one cylinder (8″ x 12″) geared locomotive with 5′ 0″ wheels. This locomotive was still on site in 1938, standing abandoned in the shed and may have been used for target practice for anti-tank weapons.
  • No. 3, an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1899, Works No. 4360 compound cylinder (8.875″ x 14.125″ x 14″) geared locomotive with 4′ 0″ wheels. This locomotive was sent to Albert Batchelor Ltd. at Halling.
  • an 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter built in 1900, Works No. 4537, compound cylinder (8.875″ x 14.125″ x 14″) geared locomotive with 3′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was sent to the BPCM Works at Greenhithe.

And after closure, one of the wagons was adapted by William Herbert Slater circa. 1935. He fitted sails to create a sail-powered mail/supply trolley (“Land Ship”) used for the marshes.

William Slater’s ‘Land Ship’. It was used, according to Stoyel & Kidner to access the shore among other things to dig for worms and inspect the sea defences. Constructed out of a standard 2-foot narrow-gauge ‘Vee’ side-tipping skip wagon. The heavy bucket was removed, but the remaining frame and triangular metal side struts made an ideal foundation to securely brace makeshift wooden masts. [1: p64][56]

This extract from the mapping provided by railmaponline.com shows all of the lines in the immediate area of the Cliffe works and quarry. The railways associated with Francis & Co. Ltd’s operations (above) are the most northerly group of green lines. These were 3ft 8.5in-gauge lines. The later narrow-gauge railways of the Alpha/Thames Works are also shown green. Brown is used to designate the  later standard-gauge branch line. [57]

Alpha Cement Co. Ltd., Cliffe. [1: p65]

Dylan Moore writes that “Alpha called [this plant] Thames Works, but confusingly also referred to it as Rochester Works. In common with all the other Alpha plants, after 1934 it was called Alpha Works by the locals. The company was launched by builders’ merchants Broad and Co., as with British Standard, to escape the dictatorship of the Blue Circle monopoly. Although undoubtedly a very shaky operation, it escaped takeover by Red Triangle, but was bought by Alpha, who, as at other plants, installed calcinators which were subsequently removed by Blue Circle. There was for most of the plant’s history no rail link, and the plant relied largely on river transport. The plant was originally connected to a wharf on Higham Creek at Cliffe Fort, initially by a 1.59 km ropeway used to send out cement and bring in coal. In 1935 this was replaced by a 2 ft gauge tramway leading to a new deep water wharf adjacent to Cliffe Fort. A substantial part of the plant’s output was shipped to Scotland. A short branch rail line was extended to the plant in 1961, with six bulk loading silos, and trains to Uddingston, near Glasgow, began.” [54] 

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that the Works was built in 1912 and acquired by the Alpha Group in 1934. At that time an original ropeway was replaced by a narrow-gauge railway which ran Northwest from the Works to the Jetty. The plant and jetty were isolated from the rail network in Kent until circa. 1960 when a  line was installed which connected with the Grain branch near Lower Higham. [1: p65-66]

The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1939/40, published in 1946, shows the Alpha owned Thames Cement Works as it was before WW2. The railway which served the site and linked it to the River Thames was 2ft-gauge (610mm). [58]

Locomotives

Peldon -The works utilized internal narrow-gauge equipment, including a John Fowler 40 hp ‘Resilient’ class diesel locomotive named Peldon (Works No. 21295 of 1936), which was later preserved at the Amberley Museum. It is powered by a 40hp Fowler Sanders 4 cylinder engine, No. M443, B series. Peldon is now the only working example of a 2ft gauge, Fowler Resilient 4w industrial diesel locomotive. It was built by John Fowler & Co (Leeds) Ltd for the Essex Water Authority for use during the construction of the Abberton Reservoir near Colchester, Essex.

After the Water Authority had no further use for it, the loco was sold, with “Layer”, to the Alpha Cement Company, at Cliffe at Hoo, Kent. It was acquired for preservation by the Brockham Museum Trust, and transferred to Amberley with the Brockham collection in 1982. The locomotive was acquired in a rundown, derelict state, and was restored by volunteers at Amberley, finally re-entering service in 1987. [59]

‘Peldon’ on location at Amberley, (c) kitmasterbloke and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0) . [59]
An unidentified member of the trio of Fowler engines at the Quarry at Cliffe in the late 1960s. This photograph was posted by Dave Willis on the Cliffe at Hoo Historical Society Facebook Page on 1st March 2015. Permission to use in this article has been requested. [60]

Layer (Works No. 21294) – Built in 1936, by Fowlers, this sister locomotive also moved from Abberton to Cliffe. It survived and is preserved at the Leeds Industrial Museum at Armley Mills. [59]

A Third Fowler Locomotive (Works No. 21296): The third Fowler unit of the same batch worked at Cliffe alongside its sisters but did not survive into preservation.

Ruston & Hornsby Fleet – The core backbone of day-to-day operations at Cliffe was a standardized fleet of 4-wheel diesel Ruston & Hornsby 44/48 HP Locomotives: A fleet of these standard class heavy-duty narrow-gauge diesels was purchased new by Alpha Cement to manage the continuous rotation of chalk and clay tipper wagons.

Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 186310) – A 1938-built 4-wheel 2ft-narrow-gauge diesel was recorded as part of the working plant equipment at Cliffe Cement Works.

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/17/kent-cement-works-stone-dartford-kent
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428083, accessed on 19th August 2026.
  4. Andrew Neale; Industrial Railways of the South-East; Middleton Press, Midhurst, West Sussex, 1984.
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/20/i-c-johnson-co-ltd-greenhithe
  6. https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/16/Frindsbury.htm, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/15/swanscombe-cement-works-kent
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_quarrying_and_mining_narrow-gauge_railways, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  9. https://www.industrial-loco.org.uk/LibraryAccessionNo.pdf, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  10. A. & G. Hatherill; Narrow Gauge & Industrial Album; RCL Publications, Gaendolbenmaen, Gwynedd, 2004.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.3&lat=51.48515&lon=0.17001&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.3&lat=51.48515&lon=0.17001&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  13. http://trolleybus.net/subhtml/wse.htm, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101427870, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675619, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675628, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  17. https://kentrail.uk/crabtree_crossing.htm, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  18. https://www.flickr.com/photos/12a_kingmoor_klickr/5817794218, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amberley_Museum_Railway, accessed on 21st August 2026.
  20. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017657, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428077, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  22. https://kentrail.uk/imperial_paper_mills.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  23. https://www.flickr.com/photos/12a_kingmoor_klickr/6675477813, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  24. https://picryl.com/media/empire-paper-mills-fireless-oandk-and-barclay-0-4-0f-locomotive-13d196, accessed on 22nd August 2026
  25. https://kentrail.uk/empire_paper_mills.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  26. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/andrew-barclay-works-no-1473-sir-charles-0-4-0f, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  27. https://433shop.co.uk/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=4303, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  28. https://archive.rcts.org.uk/product/fai3472, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  29. https://kentrail.uk/empire_paper_mills_2.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428119, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  31. https://kentrail.uk/bowaters_northfleet.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  32. https://kentrail.uk/bowaters_northfleet_2.htm, accessed on 22nd August 2026.
  33. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/25/the-new-northfleet-cement-works
  34. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/24/bevans-cement-works-northfleet-kent
  35. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191142, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  36. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676174, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  37. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_london_portland.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  38. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_crown_northfleet.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  39. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_red_lion.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  40. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_imperial.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  41. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676171, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428131, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  43. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676174, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  44. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cemkilndoc036.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  45. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428086, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  46. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675988, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  47. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/images/quarry_sc.gif, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  48. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_nine_elms.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  49. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675703, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  50. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191118, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  51. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101456147, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  52. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428185, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  53. https://apps.medway.gov.uk/apps/medwayimages/details.asp?docid=1122958&searchtype=all&pg=1&pga=1&search=Cliffe%20Works, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  54. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_cliffe.html, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  55. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_quarrying_and_mining_narrow-gauge_railways, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  56. http://www.copsewood.org/ng_rly/sailbogie/sailbogie.htm, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  57. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 25th August 2026.
  58. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676297, accessed on 26th August 2026.
  59. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peldon_-_John_Fowler_Resilient_Class_No._21295-1936_17th_August_2025.jpg, accessed on 26th August 2026.
  60. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153066015379543&set=o.195202080644472&type=3, accessed on 26th August 2026.

The New Northfleet Cement Works, Kent

The featured image for this article is an aerial image looking North across the New Northfleet Cement Works soon after construction was completed in 1970. Careful inspection will show the loop of rail sidings that ran round the core of the works, © Christoph Bull/Gravesend Libraries. [17]

Stoyel & Kidner write “The 1970s saw the final end of a process of rationalising the cement industry which had been going on for nearly a century. By 1880 it had become inefficient and almost suicidally competitive. Each works sought its own supplies of chalk and clay, and there was not enough mineral-bearing land to go round. Also, the adoption of the rotary kiln required a considerable capital investment, this could only be recouped by large-scale production, which in turn required larger reserves of raw materials. The formation of the ‘combine’ in 1900 allowed less favoured works to be shut, with the more favoured receiving rotary kilns. It was this trend, especially in the 1920s, which caused the replacement of narrow gauge by standard gauge lines, and the concentration of the industry into fewer but larger works requiring greater tonnages of raw materials.” [1: p112]

By the 1930s there were just a few modern works: Kent, Johnsons, Swanscombe, and Bevans in the Thames heartland of the industry, and these served through the 1950s.” [1: p112]

APCM undertook a fundamental review of its UK manufacturing. It “built new, larger, regional works based on the more economic dry process of manufacture. These were at Dunbar, Weardale, Hope, Cauldon and Plymstock.” [1: p112-113]

APCM took a different approach with the works in the Thames Estuary, deciding to replace them with a new very large works based on the wet process of cement manufacture. Alone among the earlier works, Swanscombe was retained to focus on producing special cements. [1: p113]

The new Northfleet plant was not constructed until the beginning of the 1970s and became fully operational by 1972. It was predominantly built on brownfield land which included the sites of: Bevan’s Cement Works (Northfleet); the Crown Portland Cement Plant; and the London Portland Cement Plant. It was necessary as APCM sought to centralise operations in a strive for efficiency.

This somewhat overexposed aerial image shows the immediate site of the Northfleet Cement Work in 1990. (c) Kent County Council & Getmapping.com. [5]

Construction of the then new Northfleet Works commenced in 1968. David Glasspool tells us that, “By this time, in addition to United Kingdom trade, APCM had significant exports, and to supply all interests, the cement plant was to be equipped with six kilns capable of a combined output of four million tonnes of cement a year. Approximately 20% of this was destined for overseas markets: Africa and North America in particular. To feed the works, excavation commenced in Greenhithe to produce a huge chalk pit on former farmland, alongside an existing quarry operation. This subsequently became known as “Western Quarry”: its existing easterly neighbour, which had been in use since the turn of the 20th Century, was also included within the plans. In 1969, the go-ahead was given to deepen this pit (by then known as “Eastern Quarry”) by a further 6.7 metres. This followed in the footsteps of a previous deepening exercise in 1952, which saw the pit floor lowered by 2.4 metres, and would allow new chalk supplies to be reached in anticipation of Northfleet Works’ opening.” [2]

Cement Manufacturing Plants replaced by Northfleet Works included: Bevan’s Works (Northfleet); Cliffe Works (Hoo Peninsula); Holborough Works (Medway); Johnson’s Works (Greenhithe); Kent Works (Stone); Metropolitan Works (Essex); and Wouldham Works (Essex).

Northfleet Cement Works operated from 1970 until its final closure in 2008. Built on older, exhausted lime and ballast sites (including the former Bevan’s Works), it was once the largest cement plant in the world, featuring six massive wet-process rotary kilns. Dylan Moore tells us that, “The site was cleared in 2009-10, and the stacks were finally demolished on 28/3/2010. The western (ex-Johnsons) quarry was redeveloped in the 1990s as the Bluewater Retail Park. The eastern (ex-Swanscombe) quarry awaits redevelopment.” [3]

More information can be found here. [3]

The Northfleet Cement Works relied on a highly advanced, bidirectional double-track rail loop and an extensive marine wharf network. This configuration made it one of the most logistically efficient industrial plants of its time, allowing it to move millions of tons of heavy materials every year without causing bottlenecks. A double-track branch line curved around the perimeter of the cement works. Trains entered the site, offloaded or loaded, and exited back onto the mainline. Dylan Moore says: “An efficient looped rail link was established, accessing the plant through tunnels first driven for quarry access, and this allowed coal and gypsum to be brought in by shuttle trains without the need to re-verse. Up to seven 1500 ton trains of cement could be shipped out per day to a set of mostly newly-constructed depots around the country.” [3]

Locomotives at New Northfleet Cement Works

Shortly after the opening of the New Northfleet Cement Works. It was decided to convert the rotary kilns to coal firing. To do this, works were put in hand to re-open part of the former LCDR West Street branch as far as the yard of the closed Southfleet and Springhead station to allow coal trains entry from the Victoria to Chatham main line at Fawkham junction. … A new road “Foxhounds Way” was also constructed to allow coal lorries access to the works via the Swanscombe – Bean road.

Coal shipments commenced from the Nottinghamshire coal field in December 1970, the usual motive power being Class 45 Peak diesel electric locomotives, a rare visitor to North Kent.

Shunting the coal wagons around the run round loop and head shunt arrangement at Southfleet was the responsibility of the sites resident diesel shunter. [9]

Once the wagons had been relieved of their loads, the coal passed along a series of conveyors where it was stored in storage silos awaiting loading into lorries for onward transit to the Cement Works. … The arrangement lasted until 1976 when the rail spur from the North Kent Line into the cement works from Northfleet station was opened. The site of the tippler closed at that time and the area appears to have reverted to nature. [9]

By 1972, the resident shunter at the Southfleet coal tippler site was a Sentinel 0-4-0 diesel-hydraulic locomotive, housed in a prefabricated engine shed added by Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM). It seems that the tippler was initially fed by a chain system which winched wagons onto the tippler. Perhaps by 1972 this had become too unreliable or time consuming? [10]

It appears that the Sentinel locomotive concerned was Works No. 10248 which was delivered new to APCM’s West Thurrock Works (Thurrock Chalk and Whiting) in 1966. It was designated as fleet No. 2 and initially painted in a lined green livery. It was part of a major dieselisation push to phase out the system’s steam fleet. It handled heavily laden rakes of internal user side-tipper wagons transporting chalk and raw material between the sprawling quarries and the processing works. It was recorded as present there in 1966. [11] Stoyel & Kidner have a different Sentinel undertaking this role, Works No. 10260. [1: p113]

No. 2 appears to have been transferred to Southfleet in 1972. It was tasked with moving British Rail main line coal wagons onto the site’s tippler tracks. It was only needed at Southfleet until 1976 when the tippler was closed. It was then returned to the West Thurrock Works and was recorded back at work there in the 1980s. [11]

From 1976 onwards no privately owned locomotives worked at the New Northfleet Works. instead, mainline rail operations inside and to the plant were handled directly by British Rail locomotives, predominantly Class 33 “Crompton” diesel-electrics, alongside occasional heavier Class 47 or Class 45 “Peak” diesel locomotives working incoming coal (such as MGR block trains from Welbeck Colliery) and gypsum services.

David Glasspool has a photographic record of a number of BR Blue locomotives working at Northfleet including:

  • ‘Crompton’ No. D6577 is seen two-thirds of the way around the merry-go-round loop, awaiting the signal to clear before proceeding under the cement loading silos in May 1971. Movements outbound by rail started from the opening of the Works. Only inbound movements relied initially of short-distance road transport from the Southfleet Tippler and then only until 1976; [2]
  • ‘Crompton’ No. D6577 once again, now at dusk on the same day. The train had completed the loop around the cement works complex and was now on the western side of the site, facing in the direction of the tunnel portal leading back to British Rail metals; [2]
  • A pair of BR Blue Class 33 diesels seen cruising over the bridge which, at that time, carried the North Kent Line over the tracks which led to Northfleet Cement Works. Heading in the westward direction, the two were hauling the Allington to Westbury empties in September 1983; [2]
  • A westward view of Northfleet Cement Sidings in late 1983 showing a Class 33/2 ready to proceed to the cement works with the Mountfield to Northfleet gypsum train. The formation would embark on the tight curve under the North Kent Line, which leads to the loop line of the cement works; [2]

‘Crompton’ locomotives were also recorded double-heading cement trains from Northfleet to Dunstable in the 1970s and 1980s. [12]

Other references to movements to and from Northfleet can be found on the following links:

  • https://www.flickr.com/photos/auchlander/5154760319 – two Class 37 locomotives, 37226 & 37255 (at Shirebrook, taking the Warsop line at Shirebrook Junction, is a train of empty MGRs from Northfleet bound for one of the Mansfield collieries. [13]
  • https://www.flickr.com/photos/28083135@N06/20841871129 – MGR empties returning to the midlands from Northfleet cement works are recorded at Dartford with Class 47 47327 and Class 45 45004 at the helm on 27th September 1979. The Class 47 would be removed at Cricklewood. [14]

The Cessation of Rail Services

David Glasspool tells the story of the gradual demise of Northfleet Cement Works. … “In 1978: APCM was renamed ‘’Blue Circle Industries Limited’’ (BCI). In the following year alone, worldwide sales for the company totalled £527.9 million, exports forming £69.4 million of this total. In addition to this, over 12,150 people were employed within the company, which had assets valued at £770.6 million. Despite these impressive figures, the export market was actually slowing down, and to cut costs and prevent excessive use of chalk, half the number of kilns at the Northfleet Works had been taken out of use by 1980, after a mere decade’s use.” [15]

Costs continued to rise and new energy-efficient plans saw two of the three remaining kilns were modified for ‘’semi-wet’’ operation, as opposed to their existing ‘’wet’’ processing -this reduced energy costs. [15][16]

The economic recession if the early 1990s saw  Northfleet only working with just one kiln. In February 1993, “the works ceased delivering cement from its Northfleet site by rail, and arrival of chalk and coal by this means only lasted until March. The 13th March 1993 marked the final day of rail operation to the site, and both the loop line and sidings went out of use. … Economic upturn saw the re-commissioning of a second kiln at Northfleet in 1994 in response to demand, but this was not enough to bring rail operation back to the site. Two kilns gave the site an annual output of 1.2 million tonnes of cement. It was also in 1994 that excavation ceased at Western Quarry, which by this time had grown to an area of 240 acres. In the pipeline was BCI’s own concept of transforming the redundant site into a modern shopping centre. The plans had received formal government approval, but on 25th June 1994, the exhausted quarry was instead sold to Australian real estate firm ‘’Lend Lease’’. It was this company which eventually undertook the Bluewater Shopping Centre project.” [15]

After Closure of the Works

Cement production at the site did not cease until the early years of the 21st century. The neglected rail infrastructure associated with the plant was too valuable to completely abandon. In 2012, Lafarge and Network Rail spent £13.5 million to restore and upgrade the rail sidings. The site became a vital logistical hub for the Crossrail (Elizabeth Line) construction project. Freight trains transported millions of tons of excavated earth out of London’s new underground tunnels via the North Kent Line, directly into the Northfleet loop.

From there, the material was transferred via an enclosed conveyor belt onto ships at the wharf to be used for an RSPB wetland nature reserve at Wallasea Island. [2][3][4]

The area of the Northfleet Cement Works and Sidings in the 21st century. the newly reconstructed line can be seen on the right side of this OS Map extract. [5]
Construction of the freight railway project at Lafarge’s site in Northfleet. Work was complete in 2012. [6]

Up to five freight trains operated from Westbourne Park on Mondays to Saturdays with up to four trains on Sundays. The first test train successfully completed the inaugural journey in May 2012 ahead of the line’s official opening in June 2012.

Danny Boyle wrote at the time:

“David Simms, Lafarge Cement’s Kent-based land and planning director, said: “Northfleet, until recently the location of the UK’s largest cement works, is a site with a long history of rail use and is key to the sustainable onward distribution of essential construction materials for the built environment. Our involvement with the Crossrail project marks the latest stage in our vision for the 104-acre Northfleet site and delivers on our commitment to sustainable regeneration.”

“Andy Mitchell, Crossrail programme director, added: “The reinstated Northfleet rail link has been successfully commissioned with the operation of the first test locomotive by GB Railfreight. This new rail link will help us minimise lorry use in central London, as well as ensuring the efficient transfer of excavated material to sites where it can be best used for environmental improvement.” [6]

It was estimated at the time that the tunnelling for Crossrail would produce around six million tonnes of material which would be excavated from constructing the 21km twin-bore tunnel. Close to 100% of the excavated material was expected to be clean, uncontaminated and reusable elsewhere. In fact, during the construction of the Crossrail (Elizabeth line) project, a total of approximately 7 million tonnes of material was excavated. Out of this total amount, about 3.4 million tonnes were specifically dug out by the eight giant tunnel boring machines working on the 42 km of new tunnels, with the remainder coming from station boxes, shafts, and caverns.

A total of 3 million tonnes (roughly 3.2 million metric tons) of the excavated material was transported to Wallasea Island.While early project estimates aimed to send up to 4.5 million tonnes, the final amount delivered to the island made up nearly half of the project’s entire 7-million-tonne excavation payload. [7][8]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990. (Page numbers are from the 2nd edition.)
  2. https://kentrail.uk/northfleet_cement_works.htm, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  3. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_northfleet.html, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  4. https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/9410068.lafarge-cement-works-in-northfleet-is-restoring-rail-sidings-at-the-site-which-will-be-used-by-crossrail, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  5. https://webapps.kent.gov.uk/KCC.KLIS.Web.Sites.Public/ViewMap.aspx, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  6. Danny Boyle; First Train Launches New Kent Railway; KentonLine, 15th May 2012; via https://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent-business/county-news/first-train-launches-new-kent-ra-a64448, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  7. https://newsroom.ferrovial.com/en/local-news/one-millionth-tonne-of-earth-removed-from-crossrails-west-london-tunnels, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  8. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/article/2022/06/excavated-crossrail-soil-creates-nature-reserve, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  9. https://www.gres.org.uk/gres-local-history/1231-2, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1730959503584733/posts/27602186059368723, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  11. https://paxton-road.blogspot.com/2022/11/alan-sewells-visits-to-thurrock-chalk.html, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  12. https://www.facebook.com/groups/892735862535042/posts/1057069989434961, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  13. https://www.flickr.com/photos/auchlander/5154760319, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  14. https://www.flickr.com/photos/28083135@N06/20841871129, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  15. https://kentrail.uk/northfleet_cement_works_2.htm, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  16. In brief, ‘’wet’’ operation involves feeding the kilns with raw materials in the form of a slurry, with excess water being removed by the application of heat. However, rising energy costs had made this an expensive process, and it was instead decided to remove the water not by heat, but rather filtration. This operation became known as ‘’semi-wet’’. [15]
  17. https://www.kentonline.co.uk/gravesend/news/500-new-riverside-homes-take-shape-274962, accessed on 25th August 2026.

Bevans Cement Works, Northfleet, Kent

The featured image for this article shows an unidentified 0-4-0ST (Peckett?) in charge of a train at the Washmills associated with Bevan’s Cement Works. After 1926, these were sited to the South of Northfleet and works trains required tunnels under the High Street in order to gain access to the Works. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared here with his kind permission. [10]

Knight, Bevan & Sturge Ltd. was established in 1853 between the River Thames and the centre of Northfleet. Although Thomas Bevan became sole proprietor, the firm continued to operate as Knight, Bevan & Sturge until it became one of the constituent companies of APCM in 1900. [1: p54]

Quarries were opened to the South of Northfleet and a 2ft 8.5in gauge linked them to the Works. Northfleet High Street runs along a ridge of high ground and as a result a tunnel was needed to allow access by rail between the Works and the quarries. [1: p54]

The Narrow Gauge Rail Network

Bevan’s Cement Works pictured from the North in the second half of the 19th century. This engraving is from the collection of the Northfleet History Group, © Public Domain. [7]
An extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published 1897, showing Bevan’s Cement Works, Northfleet at the end of the 19th century. [8]

This further extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1895 shows the tunnel which took narrow-gauge engines and wagons through the ridge between the Chalk Pits and Bevan’s Works. [8]

One of the four tunnel mouths on the narrow-gauge. All of which are on the map extract above. [11]

Stoyel & Kidner list the locomotives that operated on the narrow-gauge network. [1: p60]

Three locomotives built by Neath Abbey Ironworks are recorded by Stoyel & Kidner as being in use at the Works. [1: p60]

Neath Abbey Ironworks Commenced locomotive building in 1829 to designs of Henry Taylor. The Ironworks ceased manufacturing locomotives in 1880 after having built around 35 locomotives. Henry Taylor was works manager when the firm went out of business. [5][6]

Two of the three Neath-built locomotives were built in 1874, the third was built in 1880, all had 8″ x 16″ cylinders. Stoyel & Kidner could only name the third, Comet.

The next locomotive listed is an unnamed Aveling & Porter, Works No. 952. It was a one cylinder (6″ x 10″) 4 hp 0-4-0WTG engine with 3ft wheels built in 1873.

The other narrow-gauge locomotives were all 0-4-0ST engines:

Meteor – built in 1893 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1085, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Aerolite – built in 1894 by Black Hawthorn, Works No. 1107, had 8.5″ x 12″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Satellite – built in 1894 by Chapman & Furneaux, Works No. 1182, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Planet – built in 1902 by Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 631, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Rocket – built in 1906 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 2649, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Comet – built in 1921 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3506, had 8.5″ x 16″ outside cylinders and 2′ 6″ wheels.

Tolfa – little detail is available about this engine possibly employed by Bevan’s.

Rota – little detail is available about this engine possibly employed by Bevan’s.

Stoyel & Kidner note that all these locomotives were purchased new, two were scrapped circa 1926 when the rail network was re-gauged. Meteor, Planet and Comet were transferred to Alkerden Clay Pits in 1928. [1: p60]

The Standard Gauge Network

The Works were rebuilt in 1925 and a standard-gauge rail network replaced the narrow-gauge one. A new tunnel to the East of the narrow-gauge tunnel was constructed. The new network also connected with the Perry Street sidings of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch. [1: p60]

An extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published 1934, showing Bevan’s Cement Works, Northfleet after reconstruction in the 1920s. The line leaving this extract in the bottom-right corner leads to both the chalk pits and the transfer sidings. [9]
This aerial image shows the new Bevan’s Cement Works was taken on 26/4/1927, viewed from the south. At this time the plant was now the largest in Britain, with much of its product exported, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Catalogue number EPW017642. [2]

Another view of the reconstructed Works, this time from the Northwest, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Catalogue number EPW017640. [3]

The Works seen from the North. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]
The Chalk Pits were sited to the South of Northfleet. Washmills were built in the quarries and trains transported chalk from the quarries via a tunnel (as shown) to Bevan’s Works. Careful inspection of the map extract will show a line leaving to the right. This line connected with the Perry Street siding of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch. [9]
The full length of the line to the Perry Street siding of the former LCDR Gravesend West branch to the Southwest of Rocherville Halt. [9]

Steam navvies were put to work in the quarries and for some time the chalk was transported to the works via the Washmills shown below. Much later, the chalk was slurried to allow it to be pumped to the Works by pipeline. [1: p60]

Chalk was excavated by steam excavator (navvy) and loaded directly into waiting wagon s which would take the chalk to the washmills shown below. This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. Gavin Phillips comments that it looks as the steam navvy could be a Ruston No.25 and with only around 8 of those being built, a rare machine by all accounts. [10]

Footage of Steam Navvies at work in one of the chalk pits along the South side of the River Thames can be seen here. [12]

The Washmill plant in the Chalk Pits with a train waiting to depart for the Works, This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]

Closer views of the Washmills. These images were shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and are shared with his kind permission. [10]

The locomotives on the standard gauge system were as follows:

No. 1 – 0-4-0ST built in 1926 by Peckett, Works No. 1701, supplied new but fitted at Northfleet with an ‘Aquastatic’ water softener. It had outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels. It was transferred to the West Thurrock Works of BPCM in 1934. [1: p60,61]

No. 2 – 0-4-0ST built in 1926 by Peckett, Works No. 1899, supplied new but rebuilt with a rear bunker which upset its balance. It was again re uilt in 1946. It had outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels. It went to Kent Works at Stone. [1: p60,61]

No. 3 – 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Peckett, Works No. 759, outside cylinders (12″ x 18″), 2′ 9″ wheels. This locomotive came second-hand from Hilton’s Works, Halling and was transferred to the Crown & Quarry Works at Frindsbury in 1934. [1: p60,61]

No. 4 – 0-4-0ST built in 1900 by Peckett, Works No. 829, outside cylinders (12″ x 18″), 2′ 9″ wheels. This engine came second-hand from Lee’s Works at Halling and was scrapped in 1966. [1: p60,61]

No. 5 – 0-4-0ST built in 1902 by Peckett, Works No. 967, outside cylinders (10″ x 14″), 2′ 6.5″ wheels. This locomotive came second-hand from New Globe Works, Greenhithe in 1933  (their No. 4) and was scrapped in 1966. [1: p60,61]

No. 3 – 0-6-0ST built in 1931 by Avonside, Works No. 2001, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 6″ wheels. This locomotive was purchased second-hand via Messrs Cohen in 1934. Previously it worked on the Southampton Docks extension works for the joint contractors Nuttall and Mowlem. It did not last long at Bevan’s. As a six-coupled engine it was not suited to the site. It was broken up in 1951. [1: p60,61]

Duvals – 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Bagnall, Works No. 1583, outside cylinders (10″ x 15″), 2′ 6″ wheels.. This engine came second-hand from Gray’s Chalk Quarries Co. Ltd. in 1951 and was scrapped in 1958. [1: p60,61]

An unnamed 0-4-0ST built in 1940 by Peckett, Works No. 1985, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels, was borrowed from Kent Works in 1945. [1: p61]

An unnamed 0-4-0ST built in 1929 by Hawthorn Leslie, Works No. 3719, outside cylinders (15″ x 22″), 3′ 5″ wheels, was borrowed from Swanscombe Works in 1955. [1: p61]

Stoyel & Kinder tell us that the railway was last used in September 1964, being replaced by conveyor-belting. The Works closed in 1970.

It is worth noting that the Works never had a “rail link for product, and used the river for most of its transportation, maintaining the best deep water jetty on the south bank. There was no main line rail link at all until 1915, when the loss of sea-borne coal supply led to a hurried connection of the plant to the Rosherville branch line.” [4]

2ft Narrow Gauge Line on the Riverside Wharf

A 2ft narrow-gauge railway served the Work’s wharves on the River Thames.

This image was shared by Andy Howdle on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Page Facebook Group on 28th August 2025 and is shared with his kind permission. [10]

Miscellaneous!

Film of a visit to Bevan’s site during demolition work. This will have been filmed after the closure of the New Northfleet cement Works. ,The remains visible seem to be historic, part of the older Bevan’s Cement Works! [13]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990, p54-62, page numbers are from the 2nd Edition.
  2. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017642, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  3. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017640, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  4. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_bevans.html, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  5. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Neath_Abbey_Iron_Co, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  6. The Engineer 29th January 1937.
  7. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Knight,_Bevan_and_Sturge_cement_works,_Northfleet.jpg, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104191142, accessed on 23rd August 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428125, accessed in 23rd August 2026.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DmzSjPJqt/, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  11. https://harbourvillage.whatyouthink.co.uk/northfleet, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  12. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JhBrkatvH, accessed on 24th August 2026.
  13. https://youtu.be/yIqmwrx9XQc, accessed on 24th August 2026.

I. C. Johnson & Co. Ltd, Greenhithe, Kent

The featured image for this article is the narrow-gauge Aveling & Porter geared engine which came to Johnson’s Works from Cliffe Works. To make the move, the gauge of the locomotive had to be increased by one inch. The locomotive is seen here in a derelict state in September 1932. (G. Alliez) © Public Domain. [1: p34]

In 1872, I. C. Johnson took over a quarry and tramway at Greenhithe which was used to provide ballast for ships returning to the Gar East without cargo. Stoyel & Kidner say that “The tramway ran from the quarry, approximately where the works was later built, under the South Eastern Railway to a pier. The Johnsons’ Works was opened in 1877; as I. C. Johnson did not purchase any locomotives, as far as is known, until 1891, he must have used those of his predecessor, but it is not known what they were, except that the gauge was presumably that used later, 3ft 9½ in.” [1: p26]

Stoyel & Kidner continue:

“The original chalk quarries were just to the south of the works, with another to the west towards Stone church, but when these were exhausted it was necessary to tunnel under the Dartford-Gravesend road to open up new ones. These finally reached as far as the A2 London-Dover road, being worked on two levels; the top level was closed in 1952 and the lower level ultimately reached a depth of 200 ft.

“The first step in modernising the works was taken in about 1903 when a rotary kiln was introduced. At about this time a line was laid to rise steeply to an exchange siding on the SE&C Railway to the west of the works. The Company joined BPCM in 1911. Then in about 1926 the works was closed for a time to enable it to be completely modernised and in the process of this reorganization standard gauge track was laid, as a temporary measure some of the line being dual gauge with three rails until the narrow gauge system was finally abandoned in about 1927. In 1928, one of the two lines running from the works to the pier was electrified on the overhead system, worked by motored bogie hopper wagons. These worked on 250V overhead supply, and carried a 25-ton load at 7 mph. They were built by English Electric (738-40) in 1928.

“The modernised works included eight new concrete silos 96 ft high, and a new concrete packing shed on the jetty, which had an extension built out into the river so that larger ships could berth there. The three hopper wagons (two in use, one spare) acted as a link between silo and packing shed, running under the former to load up, and unloading at the jetty by means of compressed air and screw conveyors. They were remarkably silent-running.” [1: p26]

The Kent Works deep-water wharf and works in on the left; to the right is Johnson’s Works wharf, with the works itself south of the railway. Note the line along the water’s edge which joined the two systems, and was the reason why Kent Works’ engines were frequently noted inside Johnson’s Works. [1: p21]
I. C. Johnson’s Portland Cement Works sit at the centre of this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1910. One significant chalk pit sits t the West of the Works (at the left of this map extract). The company’s wharf on the River Thames is shown in an enlarged extract from the OS map below. Also shown below is the tunnel which connected the Works to the Chalk Pit to the South of London Road. [3]

Johnson’s Wharf and Dolphin’s Wharf both seem to serve I. C. Johnson’s Works. A bridge carries the North Kent main line over the lines connecting the wharves with Johnson’s Works. [3]

The site of Johnson’s Wharf in the 21st century (as shown on the ESRI satellite imagery provided by the National Library of Scotland (NLS)). The site is now used by Heidelberg Materials Aggregates – Greenhithe. [4]
This extract from the ESRI satellite imagery shows the North Kent main line running across the bottom of the extract. Just to the left of centre was the location of the bridge carrying the line over I. C. Johnson’s industrial network. [5]
The bridge which carried the North Kent main line over Johnson’s lines was built by the South Eastern Railway in 1860. Here, ‘Goliath’, which was rebuilt as a standard-gauge locomotive sits close to the bridge. (R. D. Kidner) © Public Domain. [1: p32]

The bridge which carried the North Kent main line over Johnson’s industrial lines is still in position and continues to carry the main line in the 21st century! [Google Earth 3-D view, August 2026]

This second enlarged extract shows the tunnel passing under London Road (A2). [3]

The approximate line of the tunnel on the map extract is shown on this satellite image by the read line. [6]

The Chalk Pits were extended further to the South as time went by. This extract is from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938 to 1940 which was published in 1950. Modern development has substantially replaced the old chalk pit workings. [7]

Clay first came by barge down the Medway, then from various local sites. Some was dredged from the Thames, some came from a BCPM claypit at Bean, some from the APCM pits at Alkerden.

Johnson’s closed in 1970.

Locomotives

Locomotives on the early narrow-gauge railway (3′ 9.5″), all new unless noted otherwise: [1: p30]

Elephant – an 0-4-0ST – no details available.

Cement – an 0-4-0T built in 1891 by Bagnall, Works No. 1344, outside cylinders (9″ x 14″), 2′ 9.5″ wheels.

Samson – an 0-4-0T built in 1892 by Bagnall, Works No. 1417, outside cylinders (9″ x 14″), 2′ 7″

Clinker – 0-4-0ST built in 1897 Falcon, Works No. 249, outside cylinders (?? x ??), ???? wheels.

Mammoth – 0-4-0ST built in 1899 by Bagnall, Works No. 1582, outside cylinders (10″ x 15″), 2′ 9.25″ wheels.

Leviathan – 0-4-0ST built in 1900 by Bagnall, Works No. 1609, outside cylinders (10″ x 15″), 2′ 9.25″ wheels.

(Not named) – 0-4-0WTG built in 1900 by Aveling & Porter, Works No. 4537, compound cylinders (8.5″ x 14.125″ x 14″), 3′ 6″ wheels. Transferred from the APCM works at Cliffe in 1920.

Pictured together here, are two of the narrow-gauge (3ft 9.5in) locomotives employed by I. C. Johnson at the Cement Works – Bagnall 0-4-0ST ‘Leviathan’ and the unnamed Aveling & Porter geared locomotive. This photograph was taken on 2nd July 1932, by which time both locomotives were out-of-use and had been set aside (Galliez courtesy of B. D. Stoyel), © Public Domain. [2: photo No. 24]

Goliath – 0-4-0ST built in 1921 by Barclay, Works No. 1741, outside cylinders (12″ x 20″), ???? wheels.

New Elephant – 0-4-0ST built in 1924 by Bagnall, Works No. 2258, outside cylinders (10″ x 15″), 2′ 9.25″ wheels.

In 1927, with standard-gauge track now in place, new locomotives were required: [1: p30]

Stone – 0-4-0ST built in 1927 by Peckett, Works No. 1740, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels.

Darenth – 0-4-0ST built in 1927 by Peckett, Works No. 1741, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels.

Greenhithe – 0-4-0ST built in 1927 by Peckett, Works No. 1742, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels.

Southfleet – 0-4-0ST built in 1928 by Peckett, Works No. 1746, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels.

Longfield – 0-4-0ST built in 1928 by Peckett, Works No. 1747, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″), 3′ 2.5″ wheels.

The first three were supplied with low cabs and boiler mountings, so as to clear the tunnels, being classified as ‘Type W 6 Special’ by Peckett. The last two Pecketts were not cut down when delivered. They were however rebuilt at the works many years later to a similarly reduced height.

“In addition to these new locomotives the narrow gauge locomotives Goliath and New Elephant were rebuilt to 4ft 8½ in. gauge in 1927 by the makers and by the cement works respectively, and the following were transferred from other works:” [1: p30]

New Globe – 0-4-0ST, built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 889, outside cylinders (14″ x 22″) and 2′ 6.5″ wheels, from Globe Whiting Co., Greenhithe in 1929.

Peckett locomotives were dominant in the standard-gauge fleet at Johnson’s Works – most were new but, among other second-hand engines ‘New Globe’ was a transfer from Globe Cement Works nearby, (F. Jones), © Public Domain. [2: photo No. 25]

Globe No. 3 – 0-4-0ST, built in 1901 by Peckett, Works No. 925, outside cylinders (8″ x 12″) and 2′ 3″ wheels, from Globe Whiting Co., Greenhithe in 1930.

Thames – 0-4-0ST, built in 1899 by Bagnall, Works No. 1588, Outside cylinders (12″ x 18″) and 3′ 0.5″ wheels, from Trechmann & Weekes Works, Halling in 1935 (regauged from 4 ft 2 in.)

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “Johnsons clay-pit at Bean was worked by two Simplex petrol engines and two Planet diesels; later by five Rustons diesels (175137, 182147, 194769, 195850/1); however they were often switched to other works and not always on site.” [1: p30]

Of the narrow gauge engines, Elephant and Samson had disappeared by 1932, the Aveling was scrapped in 1934 and Clinker, Mammoth and Leviathan a year or two afterwards. Cement was not scrapped until after the war, although it had been derelict since 1927.” [1: p30,36]

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “The standard gauge locomotives gradually became redundant during the post-war period until completely superseded by diesel locomotives. They [were] accordingly … hired or loaned out to other works, or otherwise disposed of, as follows:” [1: p36]

Stone: Transferred to Frindsbury Works in 1962.

Darenth: Hired to Purfleet Wharf & Saw Mills Ltd in 1940-1945. Loaned to Kent Works, Stone, in 1947. Scrapped in 1963.

Greenhithe: Hired to Samuel Williams & Son Ltd, Dagenham Dock, in 1945. Transferred to Hessle Quarry, Yorkshire, in 1962.

Southfleet: Transferred to Frindsbury Works in 1960.

Longfield: Transferred to Holborough Works in 1960.

Goliath: Transferred to Grays Works in 1960.

New Elephant: Scrapped in 1960.

New Globe: Scrapped in 1960.

Globe No. 3: Scrapped in 1948.

Thames: Disappeared some time after the last war, no doubt scrapped: the cab and saddle tank were still visible in March 1952.

Additionally, Stoyel & Kidner tell us that one other locomotive spent time at Johnson’s in 1942 having come from the APCM chalk pit at Highsted, before being loaned to their Dunstable Works. In 1946, it returned to Greenhithe and in 1947 was returned to Highsted. This locomotive was:

Tay: an 0-4-0ST built in 1924 by Barclay, Works No. 1828, outside cylinders (12″ x 20″) and with 3′ 2″ wheels. [1: p36]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990.
  2. Andrew Neale; Industrial Railways of the South-East; Middleton Press, Midhurst, West Sussex, 1984.
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428083, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  4. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.45402&lon=0.27470&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  5. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=19.0&lat=51.45119&lon=0.27431&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.44780&lon=0.27553&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 20th August 2026.
  7. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428077, accessed on 20th August 2026.

Kent Cement Works, Stone, Dartford, Kent

The featured image for this article is Manning-Wardle Works No.1601 (1903) ‘Matthew Murray’, Class L 0-6-0ST. Built for P. & W. Anderson & Co. for the construction of Kent Portland Cement Works, Stone, Kent. Sold to Kent Portland Cement Co. Ltd and later Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd, Stone, where it worked the chalk quarry and kiln system from 1922 until withdrawn in 1967. While working at the Kent Portland Cement Works the locomotive was named ‘Arthur’. It is photographed at the Middleton Railway, Leeds, where it is preserved. This locomotive is the last surviving example of its class, © THTRail2013 and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [6]

Kent Works was built between 1919 and 1922. It had an extensive 4ft 3in railway “which ran inland to large chalk pits, connected with the lines of the Stone Court Chalk and Ballast Co. and … to Johnson’s Works next door.” [1: p4]

Kent Works seen from the Northeast, Charles Street can be seen on the extreme left of this image, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection (1927). Britain from Above reference number EPW017653. [4]
Kent Works seen from the Southwest, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection (1939). Britain from Above reference number EPW060570. [5]
The Kent Works deep-water wharf and works in on the left; to the right is Johnson’s Works wharf, with the works itself south of the railway. Note the line along the water’s edge which joined the two systems, and was the reason why Kent Works’ engines were frequently noted inside Johnson’s Works. [3: p21]

According to Stoyel & Kidner the Kent Works were built between 1919 and 1922 by contractors P. & W. Anderson for the Kent Portland Cement Co. Ltd, “but only a year after its completion the company was acquired by APCM. It is situated on the Thames foreshore about ½ mile north-east of Stone Crossing Halt between the railway (and road) and the river, where there was a jetty. There were extensive store areas and sidings between the main works and the SR exchange siding immediately west of Stone Crossing Halt.” [3: p14]

It is probable that chalk was originally taken from the pit south of Cotton Lane; however by 1930 a large pit east of this, south of Elizabeth Street, was being worked. … This was progressively opened out down to London Road, and finally a tunnel under that road reached the southernmost pit.” [3: p14]

The method of working a face was to lay a double track approaching it, singling at the actual face. As the engine hauled away the full wagons, the empty train would be propelled under the excavator, thus losing no time. The six-coupled engines could take some 16 wagons, loaded to about 3-4 yards each; though with a split-level face the gradient to the top level was sometimes severe, it was always in favour of the loaded trains.” [3: p14]

In 1963, a cutting was built to connect the pit with that of Johnson’s Branch: there had always been a certain amount of interchange between the two works by a line along the bank of the river.” [3: p14]

Apparently “there was a well-built locomotive shed on the western edge of the works area.” [3: p19]

Kent Portland Cement Works as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1946. Note the location of Charles Street to the North of the Main Line Railway. [8]
Approximately the same area as it appears on 21st century satellite imagery. There is no remaining sign of the Kent Works. Charles Street still sits where it did during WW2. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Looking East along Charles Street from close to the roundabout junction with Crossways Boulevard. [Google Streetview, May 2018]

Looking East again along the extension to Charles Street to the East of the modern green open space. [Google Streetview, May 2018]

Locomotives

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that the company purchased its first locomotives second-hand from the contractor that built the works. These were:

Stone 0-6-0ST Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 298, built in 1888, it had inside cylinders (12″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels.

Toronto 0-4-0ST Hudswell Clarke, Works No. 571, built in 1900, it had outside cylinders (10″ x 16″) and 2′ 9″ wheels.

It is the end of the line for these two different Hudswell Clarke 0-4-0ST locomotives. Note the different cab roof details. On the left of this image is ‘Toronto’ HC Works No.5710f 1900 and on the right is ‘Stone’ HC Works No. 298 of 1888, (c) Public Domain – photographer F. Jones. [25: photo No. 20]

Arthur 0-6-0ST Manning Wardle, Works No. 1601, built in 1903, it had inside cylinders (12″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. Arthur continued in use at the works until 1967 [2: photo No. 23] and has survived into preservation, residing at The Middleton Railway in Leeds, although under a different name.

Manning-Wardle Works No.1601 (1903) ‘Matthew Murray’, Class L 0-6-0ST. Built for P. & W. Anderson & Co. for the construction of Kent Portland Cement Works, Stone, Kent. Sold to Kent Portland Cement Co. Ltd and later Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd, Stone, where it worked the chalk quarry and kiln system from 1922 until withdrawn in 1967. Photographed at the Middleton Railway, Leeds, where it is preserved. This locomotive is the last surviving example of its class, © THTRail2013 and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [6]

Apex 0-6-0ST Manning Wardle, Works No. 1657, built in 1905, it had inside cylinders (12″ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. [3: p19] ‘Apex’ was not as fortunate as ‘Arthur’, it only survived in use until 1960 and was scrapped in that year.

They were soon supplemented by other second-hand locomotives transferred from other works owned by APCM.

Hilton 0-4-0ST Peckett, Works No. 633, built in 1896, it had outside cylinders (12″ x 18″) and 2′ 9″ wheels. ‘Hilton’ came from Hilton Works, Halling. I have not been able to find a photograph of No. 633, Hilton. However, Peckett Works No.614 ‘Bear’ was also built in1896, and was of the same W4 class as Works No. 633, with the characteristic open-backed cab.

No. 614 ‘Bear’ at Sittingbourne & Kemsley Light Railway 10th October 2023, The locomotives was moved to the Buckinghamshire Railway Centre, in March 2024 for initial cosmetic repair, followed, in due course as time and resources permit, by restoration to operating condition, (c) photographer not known. [7]


Elephant 0-4-0ST Brush (Flacon/Henry Hughes), Works No. 287, built in 1899, it had outside cylinders (10′ x 18″) and 3′ 0″ wheels. This came from Tolhurst Works, Northfleet.

Kent Works’ No. 2, Brush Electrical Engineering 0-4-0ST locomotive ‘Elephant’, originally worked at Tolhurst’s cement works in Northfleet before moving to the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (APCM) Kent Works at Stone, photographer F. Jones © Public Domain. [2: photo No. 22]

Clarence – an 0-4-0ST Andrew Barclay & Sons, Works No. ???, built in ????, had outside cylinders (10″ x 18″) and 3′ 3″ wheels. This came from Hilton Works, Grays. [3: p19]

Wouldham – Hatherill & Hatherill tell us that ‘Wouldham’, an 0-4-0ST Andrew Barclay & Sons, Works No. 1679 arrived at Kent Works in 1920. They provide the works drawing below which indicates that the cylinder size matches that of ‘Clarence’. It is possible that ‘Wouldham’ was renamed ‘Clarence’ on arrival at Kent Works.

The General Arrangement drawing for the 4ft 3in-gauge ‘Wouldham’, Andrew Barclay No. 1679 of 1920, © Public Domain. [1: p5]

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that Kent Cement Works rebuilt Elephant and Apex in 1927 and Clarence in 1928. Stone was rebuilt by its makers in 1909.

Two new locomotives were the next to be purchased:

0-4-0ST Peckett, Works No. 1804, built 1935 (outside cylinders, 14″ x 22″ and 3′ 2½” wheels)

0-4-0ST Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns, Works No. 7336, built 1947 (outside cylinders, 14″ x 22″ and 3′ 8″ wheels)

After the war another 0-4-0ST Peckett was acquired second-hand from the Woolwich Arsenal. It was Works No. 1985, built in 1940 (outside cylinders 14″ x 20″).

Cab roofs of the second-hand locomotives had to be adapted after arrival to suit the tunnels on site.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “Stone and Toronto were scrapped in 1950 and in 1953 running numbers were allotted to the remaining locomotives as follows:

No. 1 Clarence; No. 2 Elephant; No. 3 Arthur; No. 4 Apex; No. 5 Hilton; No. 6 Peckett 1804; No. 7 Peckett 1985; No. 8 R.S.H. 7336.”

And finally, No. 2 at Northfleet Works was subsequently transferred to Stone, it became No. 9, it was an 0-4-0ST Peckett, Works No. 1702, built in 1926 (outside cylinders 14″ x 22″ and 3′ 2″. [3: p19]

Peckett & Sons Ltd. No. 1985 of 1940 was acquired after WW2 from Woolwich Arsenal and became Kent Works No. 7 Although a standard 0-4-0ST Peckett design (Class W6) with 14″ cylinders. Its appearance was changed by a lowering of the cab roof at the eaves to give clearance in the tunnels.

Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns (RSH) No. 7336 of 1947 became Kent Works Locomotive No. 8. This design of 16″ cylinder 0-4-0ST locomotives was used at several of the cement works in Kent. Like the Peckett design, these engines needed the eaves of the cab roof lowering to give clearance in the Works’ tunnels.

References

  1. A & G Hatherill; Narrow Gauge & Industrial Album; RCL Publications, Gaendolbenmaen, Gwynedd, 2004.
  2. Andrew Neale/Chalk Pits Museum; Industrial Railways of the South-East; Middleton Press, 1984.
  3. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990.
  4. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw017653, accessed on 16th August 2026.
  5. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/epw060570, accessed on 16th August 2026.
  6. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Matthew_Murray_at_Middleton_Park.jpg, accessed on 16th August 2026.
  7. https://www.brc-stockbook.co.uk/614.htm, accessed on 17th August 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428080, accessed on 17th August 2026.

Swanscombe Cement Works, Kent

The featured image for this article is Aveling & Porter 0-4-0WTG Reliance seen at Swanscombe in 1921. Only one end of the axles was geared. This is the non-geared side of the locomotive. Swanscombe Works employed a range of unusual industrial locomotives! (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p48]

Possibly as early as 1825, an extensive horse-drawn tramway network served the works.

The tramway was laid to 3ft 5.5in. “The gauge was measured to the outside of the railheads as the wheels had flanges outside of the rails. … They were the earliest railways in the area. … It is said that outside flanges were used so that the space between the rails could be built up into a firm level path for the horses. Fallen lumps of chalk could then be easily kicked clear of the rails.” [1: p4]

The works lay to the north of the London Road and the tramway ran due north for 1000 yards to Bell Wharf. There was a whiting works to the west of the main works with a tramway to the pits near the cricket ground. The main pits were between the London Road and the South Eastern Railway. Some time before 1898 the tramway burrowed under the South Eastern Railway in a tunnel at Craylands and pits were opened south of the railway later extending for a considerable distance. There was a transhipment siding on the South Eastern Railway at Craylands during the time of the narrow gauge.” [30: p38,42]

“Steam locomotives were introduced in 1875, built by a variety of builders. “There were engines by Lewin of Poole, HE Taylor of Chester, Kilmarnock Engineering Co. and … Aveling and Porter of Rochester. By 1927, these charming workhorses were becoming increasingly difficult to maintain and so, with the need to increase production, the railway was re-laid to standard gauge and new locomotives purchased.” [1: p4]

Initially the industry was made up of a series of independent companies. These companies joined in 1900 to form ‘The Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers’ (APCM), often referred to within the industry as ‘The Combine’. After 1900 the various works continued to be known by their original names.

The modernisation of the railways at Swanscombe Works was completed by 1929. … The Works shifted to a busy, efficient standard-gauge system connecting the chalk pits, main plant, river Thames jetty, and British Rail interchange.

When the standard gauge line was built a single track ran down from the exchange sidings on a steep and curving route to the works. The standard gauge ‘main line’ ran through the tunnel under Craylands, then turned more westerly than the old line, and passed under a footbridge across old workings, through a tunnel under a lane, then another tunnel under Alkerden Lane, and into a very large pit running almost down to Watling Street, a distance of 14 miles from the Works.” [30: p42]

The Works were among the most important cement production facilities in the country. Extensive railway infrastructure was required to handle raw materials and finished cement, resulting in a complex network of sidings, exchange lines, and industrial locomotives. Rail traffic included limestone and chalk movements, internal works shunting, and outward cement trains connecting with the wider British Rail network. By the late 1960s and early 1970s, the site reflected wider changes across the UK rail system. [11]

A sketch of the area around Swanscombe Works. The pier on the Thames, the Works and the quarries were on a North-South axis. This sketch is an extract from a broader sketch of the various Cement Works on the South side of the River Thames. [30: p10]

The series of map extracts and photographs below illustrate the development of the Works over the years.

Map of Works in 1864

The First Edition OS 1:2500 County Series Kent X.1 map surveyed 1864 (British Library), modified to National grid format. The plant in 1864 was in course of rapid expansion, still using the wet process static kilns originated by Frost. Chalk quarrying, initially north of the road, had spread to the area between the road and the railway, connected by a 4 m wide tunnel under the road – the first of five eventually dug. [

Map of Works in 1895

This pair of Ordnance Survey Map extracts are taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1895, published in 1897. [7]

Map of Works in 1915/1916

These two map extracts are intended to be read together. They show the extent of the Swanscombe Cement Works and the pier on the River Thames as they appear on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1915/1916, although not published until 1923. [3]
Swanscombe Works from the Southwest in April 1927, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Britain from Above reference number EPW017658. [28]

Map of Works in 1934

These two map extracts are also intended to be read together. They show the extent of the Swanscombe Cement Works and the pier on the River Thames as they appear on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/1932, published in 1934. [4]
The Works seen from the West in February 1939, © Historic England – NMR Aerofilms Collection. Britain from Above reference number EPW060599. [29]

Map of Works 1938-1940

These three 6″ Ordnance Survey map extracts of 1938-1940 and published in 1950-1951 belong together. The top two overlap marginally North to South. [5] The third extract sits alongside the second – to its left. It comes from a different OS Sheet and shows the Works line extending to Chalk Pits near Knockhall and Alkerden Manor Farm. [6]

Swanscombe Cement Works began operations in 1825, when James Frost commenced making his “British Cement” using wet process bottle kilns. The plant was acquired by Francis and White in 1833 and made the same product. The partnership was dissolved in 1836 and John Bazley White and Sons commenced as a business in 1837, making both Roman and Frost’s cements at the Swanscombe site. [8]

Map of the Railway Network in 1965

Note that the Northpoint for this plan is turned through about 120 degrees. The Thames jetty is off the left of the plan. The chalk Pit Workings are off to the bottom-right. [12]

In 1965, the Works had seven 0−4−0STs to work the considerable traffic – six built by Hawthorn Leslie (four in 1928, one in 1929 and one in 1935) and the last by Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns in 1948. All seven were painted green with the running number on each side of the tank. There were no diesels. One was tried but it could not manage the poor track and was continually “sitting down”. There is no prospect of having any until money can be spared for relaying several miles of track. [12] A number of other locomotives were used at different times after 1929.

The five identical Hawthorn Leslie 0-4-0ST engines were delivered in 1928, followed by a sixth in 1935. They weighed 25 tons, featured 16in x 24in outside cylinders, and had a tractive effort of 21,425 lbf. [13]

The works can be divided into three areas. The first two are old chalkpits, dug each side of the main road, while the third contains the line to the workings. The first area is bisected by a private road with the cement works proper on one side. On the other side is the single road engine shed and works, and also an awning over one track where engines stand when not in use. A single line runs past the works, and across the marshy countryside to the jetty on the river Thames. [12]

Another line runs across the road and winds its way around the main works until entering a tunnel under the main road. This brings it to the second old pit, where are situated two unloading tips for arriving trains. As can be seen from the map, a connection to British Railways struggles up and round the side of the pit. (Sand all over the rails shows the severity of the climb.) On the opposite side of the pit, another single line dips downwards into a tunnel under BR, a road and the connecting line, and emerges into a long, deep and wide cutting. There are two passing loops on the way to the workings, of which one has watering facilities, and another tunnel, and a high footbridge.” [12]

Chris Down, writing in 1965, continues:

“At the middle pit, an arriving train runs above one of the two tips, and backs down on to the tip. When the end wagon is on the tip, the wagons are braked, and the locomotive is uncoupled so that it can go up to the end of the line to obtain coal and water.

“The tips are similar to mechanical coaling plants on B.R. and deal with one wagon at a time. As each wagon is unloaded, it runs along the siding by gravity, until the train is reformed at the other end of the loop. The locomotive then comes back and couples onto the same end as before. The next train brings the single line tablet which is hung on a hook on a post. The first train collects the tablet and then goes down to the workings, the locomotive propelling the wagons.

“I spent some time around the footbridge, photographing the trains which passed at frequent intervals. The maximum speed was about 20m.p.h., but trains lurched terribly, due to the poor track. When the track deteriorates so much as to necessitate its replacement, diesels will doubtless be purchased. From the opinion of many of the men to whom I spoke, however, steam should retain its supremacy for some time to come.” [12]

Satellite Image the Area of the Works of 2026

Swanscombe cement works operated for nearly 165 years, one of the longest-lived cement works in the world and, for many decades, … one of the largest. For a hundred years from about 1826 until 1929 it employed a unique narrow gauge railway using outside-flanged wheels, with over thirty steam locomotives, many also unique. When modernised in the 1927-29 period, its new standard gauge railway was one of the busiest and most efficient in the industry.” [9]

Details of locomotives employed at the Works can be found below.

Production at Swanscombe Works measured in tonnes per year. [8]

Comparing 1915/1916 to the 21st century

A few images follow which compare locations on the Swanscombe Works network with modern satellite imagery. The plans and satellite images are supplemented, where available, with photographs from close to ground level.

Bell Wharf at the North end of the company’s rail network, as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1915/1916 published in 1923. [33]

The Wharf as it appears on the ESRI satellite imagery provided by the national Library of Scotland (NLS) [34]

The approach to the Jetty along the line of the old railway. This view looks North towards the jetty. [Google Streetview, August 2025]

The jetty seen from the South. [Google Streetview, August 2025]

Looking South across the marshes from the jetty towards the location of Swanscombe Works. [Google Streetview, August 2025]

The Cement Works in 1915/1916. A road can bee seen leaving London Road at the bottom-left of this map extract and running towards Manor Way Farm through the centre of the site. [33]

In the 21st century, the outline of the Cement Works site is still visible. A variety of primarily transport related companies use the site. Manor Way now runs from the bottom-right across the centre of the old cement works site and the area is known as Manor Way Business Park. [34]

This aerial view looks across the cement works from the Southeast. The junction between Manor Way and London Road is flagged in the top-left. This photograph was taken in 1939, Image No. EPW060594 © Historic England. [35]

Looking Northeast along Manor Way in the 21st century. The majority of buildings which were present when the Cement Works was in operation have been removed. [Google Streetview, October 2024]

Narrow Gauge Locomotives before 1929

Although records are sketchy, Stoyel and Kidner give details of nearly 30 narrow-gauge locomotives which served at Swanscombe, all of which had wheels with outside flanges. These included:

Aveling & Porter supplied a total of eight 3ft 5.5in, outside-gauge, geared tramway engines to Swanscombe Works. These were all scrapped by 1929 after the standard-gauge works lines were built.

A blueprint for the Aveling & Porter locomotives, note, bottom-left, the outside-flanged wheels, © Public Domain. [1: p7]

The Aveling & Porter locomotives, according to Stoyel & Kidner, were built between 1896 and 1909 – all were 0-4-0WTG locomotives;

Goliath, Works No. 3680, a single-cylinder (8″ x 12″)

Jubilee, Works No. 3978, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft diameter wheels.

Samson, Works No. 4176, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Galley Hill, Works No. 4469, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Barnfield, Works No. 4501, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Progress, Works No. 6040, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Enterprise, Works No.6419, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Reliance, Works No. 6828, compound cylinders (9″ x 14.5″ x 14″), 3ft 6in diameter wheels.

Progress photographed at Swanscombe in 1921. The geared wheels can easily be seen. Note the long front overhang (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p48]
Reliance seen at Swanscombe on the same occasion. Only one side of the four-coupled axles was geared. This is the non-geared side of the locomotive, (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p48]

S. Lewin of Poole – Only a small number of locomotives were built by this company, including: an 0-4-0 locomotive of 1875, for the 1 ft 10 in (559 mm) gauge Cornish Hush Mine, Howden Burn; 0-4-0 Ant and Bee, for the 20 in (508 mm) gauge Great Laxey Mine Railway, Isle of Man; an 0-4-0ST for Seaham Harbour, County Durham; an 0-4-0 steam tram engine for Guernsey Railway; an 0-4-0 with rear tank, 3 ft 5 1⁄2 in (1,055 mm) gauge, outside flanged, (photographed below at) Swanscombe Cement Works; and an 0-4-0 Tiny, a 3 ft 9 in (1,143 mm) gauge loco for the Fayle’s Tramway on the Isle of Purbeck. [23][24]

0-4-0WT ‘Erith’ at Swanscombe Works. This shows the outside-flange wheels and the circular section connecting rod quite clearly. The name ERITH is in the centre of the cabside plate above the date 1875 (although the latter is a little indistinct): in the outer band SWANSCOMBE WORKS appears at the top, with REBUILT off centre at the bottom; one would have expected the year of rebuilding to follow, but a powerful glass reveals no raised lettering. ERITH is said to have been rebuilt in 1920 and it seems a distinct possibility that this date may have been stamped on the plate. This image is embedded here directly from the Industrial Railway Society webpage, but it is also shown in Stoyel and Kidner’s book, © Public Domain. [21][22][30: p38]

S. Lewin only made a few locomotives. Erithhad the eccentrics on the front axle and the valves were on top of the steeply-inclined cylinders, the spindles being actuated by Stephenson link motion. Erith was rebuilt at Swanscombe Works in 1920 with the help of fitters from the Dorset Iron Foundry.” [30: p45]

De Winton supplied one vertical-bolier 0-4-0WT locomotive, Revolution, it had two 6″ x 10″ cylinders and 1ft 7in diameter wheels.

De Winton vertical-bolier 0-4-0WT locomotive, Revolution, built in 1881, seen at Swanscombe in 1921, (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p47]

It is possible that Revolution “came second-hand in about 1890 and possibly from the Bute Works Supply Co. Cardiff, who were advertising a similar locomotive for sale in 1893.” [30: p45]

H. E. Taylor of Chester supplied six 0-4-0 side tank locomotives to Swanscombe Works between 1877 and 1882.

Stoyel & Kidner provide details of these locomotives:

Swanscombe, 0-4-0ST, 1879, outside cylinders other details not known.

Iron Horse, 0-4-0ST, 1882, outside cylinders (9.5″ x 18″), 2ft 6in wheels.

Dead Horse, 0-4-0ST, 1882, outside cylinders other details not known.

Millbank, 0-4-0ST, 1879, outside cylinders other details not known.

Liverpool, 0-4-0ST, 1879, outside cylinders other details not known.

Chester, 0-4-0ST, 1877, outside cylinders other details not known.

Iron Horse, one of the H. E. Taylor-built 0-4-0ST as work at Swanscombe (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p40]
This image, dating from May 1910, shows the locomotive ‘Millbank’ of 1879 standing at the Works. The outside flanges to the wheels can be seen easily. Apparently, narrow-gauge engines  at Swanscombe were not usually fitted with cabs, © Public Domain. [1: p5]

William Wilkinson & Co. built around sixty locomotives. Wilkinson’s also contracted out the manufacture of tram locomotives to Beyer, Peacock and Co, Black, Hawthorn and Co and Thomas Green and Son. Altogether 207 engines were built to Wilkinson’s patent. The Plymouth & Devonport Tramways steam locomotives were assembled at Wilkinson’s works in Wigan, the vertical boiler in each of these locomotives was made by the Steel Company of Scotland. Small bore cylinders acted upon a crankshaft that was in turn connected to the four, coupled wheels by means of cog-wheel gears. The axles, wheels and nearly all the working parts of the engine were made of Sieman-Martin’s best quality steel and all the brass workings were of phosphor bronze. The exhaust steam was superheated in the firebox before escaping to the atmosphere through the chimney. The fuel was coke and the emission of smoke was described as ‘scarcely perceptible’. The Plymouth locomotives were apparently from Wilkinson’s own works. They cost between £600 each for the non-condensing version and £1,100 for those fitted with the condensing apparatus. [26]

A number of the Wilkinson steam trams purchased by the Plymouth & Devonport Tramways for their abortive experiment with steam trams were bought by the Swanscombe Works in the late 1880s/early 1890s. [25]

A typical Wilkinson’s Steam Tram – this one was used on the Wigan network close to Wilkinson’s Works. It was built in 1886. These engines must have been an unusual sight working on an industrial railway! [27]

Wilkinson also supplied a single vertical-boiler locomotive to Swanscombe Works. It was built in 1884.

Wilkinson-built 0-4-0WT locomotive, Devonport, of 1884, seen here at Swanscombe in 1921, (Locomotive Publishing Co.), © Public Domain. [30: p47]

Kilmarnock Engineering Co. supplied five 0-4-0ST 3ft 5.5in outside-gauge locomotives to Swanscombe Works in 1920 and 1925. Kilmarnock Engineering Co. were not prolific engine builders. These five were some of a very few locomotives built by the Company.

These sturdy 0-4-0ST locomotives undertook most of the chalk haulage for Swanscombe Works in the 1920s. When the railway was modernised and the gauge changed the locomotives were scrapped. [1: p6]
‘Hustler’ was one of this batch of locomotives from Kilmarnock Engineering Co., (c) Public Domain. (Kenn Nunn Collection/LCGB). [25: photo No. 26]

J. B. White & Bros, owners of the Swanscombe works, appear to have constructed at least one locomotive in use on their own site, Gravesend, another 0-4-0WT. It is also possible that a number of other locomotives used on the site were rebuilt there at various times. [30: p45]

Bagnall – one locomotive, Rede, an 0-4-0ST built in 1894, was built by Bagnall (Works No. 1413) and came second-hand in 1921. [30: p45]

Hudswell Clarke – one locomotive, Spry, another 0-4-0ST, was built by Hudswell Clarke and arrived at Swanscombe in 1923. [30: p45]

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “on a visit to the works in December 1929, 12 narrow gauge locomotives were seen on a length of track awaiting scrapping. The old 3-road engine shed was rebuilt as a two-road standard gauge shed. … On the modernisation of the railway system in 1929 all the remaining narrow gauge locomotives were scrapped that year or in 1930, and it is thought that very few of them had been scrapped at an earlier date, although Plymouth and Devonport are said to have been broken up in 1922, and Swanscombe by 1920. The second-hand engines would have had their gauge altered on arrival.” [30: p45]

The narrow gauge wooden tipper wagons, “were shunted in 1929 into the passing loops half way down the tramway to the river, and remained there for many years. There were also a few left in an old pit south of Ingress Gardens.” [30: p45]

Standard Gauge Locomotives after 1929

When preparations were made in 1928 for replacing the narrow gauge system by one laid to the 4ft 8½ in. gauge, an order was placed for a series of powerful new locomotives for the purpose. Pending their delivery three old locomotives were transferred from other works but they were usually employed two at a time in removing the overburden prior to quarrying, on track which had no physical connection with the remainder of the system.” [30: p45]

Those early standard-gauge arrivals were from two manufacturers:

Falcon – Henry Hughes and Company was based at Falcon Works. The firm experienced financial difficulties in the late 1870s/early 1880s. It was restructured as the Falcon Railway Plant Works in 1883 under the control of Norman Scott Russell. [31]

The factory remained busy with both railway and tramway locomotives and rolling stock. Among these were tank locomotives for Ireland, Spain and the Azores. Some were subcontracts from other firms, such as Kerr, Stuart and Co, at that time in Glasgow. [32]

The two Falcon locomotives came to Swanscombe second-hand, they were Works Nos 120 and 150 and were named Wolf and Delta. Delta was one of a number originally supplied to Gibbs Works, Essex. It had a dropped cab for passage through low tunnels. [30: p43, 45]

Delta sits steaming gently between duties at Swanscombe (G. Alliez), © Public Domain. [30: p43]

Falcon also provided a later second-hand arrival,  Lion, (Works No. 205?) which was transferred from Stone Court in 1946. [30: p41, 45]

Manning WardleGuernsey, a 0-4-0ST, Works No. 1241 of 1892 came second-hand to Swanscombe at the end of the 1920s.

Hawthorn Leslie supplied five identical standard-gauge 0-4-0ST locomotives to Swanscombe Works in 1928. [1: p6] These locomotives were constructed with two outside cylinders of 16in x 24in, 3ft 3in diameter driving wheels and a weight of 25 tons and a tractive effort of 21.425 lbf. [13] A single further engine (No. 6) was supplied in 1935.

  • No. 1 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3715. [13]
  • No. 2 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3716. [16]
  • No. 3 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3717. [15]
  • No. 4 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3718. [14]
  • No. 5 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3719. [17][25]
  • No. 6 was Hawthorn Leslie Works No. 3860. [18]
No. 5 was one of the fleet of standard-gauge Hawthorn Leslie Locomotives. It is seen here working the exchange sidings at Swanscombe, (c) Public Domain, (Andrew Neale Collection). [25: photo No. 27]
This image is embedded here directly from the Middleton Railway Website, it shows Hawthorn-Leslie No. 3860 Swanscombe ‘No.6’ which was gifted to the Middleton Railway in 1971 once the APCM turned away from steam- to diesel-power. [19]

Chapman & FurneauxKappa, another 0-4-0ST, built by Chapman & Furneaux (successors to Black, Hawthorn & Co) Works No. 1164 (of 1898) arrived at Swanscombe in the 1930s. [30: p45]

Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns supplied one slightly larger standard-gauge locomotive to Swanscombe Works – 0-4-0ST No. 7, RSH No. 7405 of 1948. [1: p6]

Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns No, 7405, Swanscombe Works No. 7, 0-4-0ST of 1948. Seen here close to the tunnel mouth at the Swanscombe works in 1968, © copyright Alan Murray-Rust and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [20]

Miscellaneous

Some historic footage of the Swanscombe Works and quarries can be found here. [2]

References

  1. A & G Hatherill; Narrow Gauge & Industrial Album; RCL Publications, Gaendolbenmaen, Gwynedd, 2004.
  2. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18Lm6U8N5w, accessed on 9th August 2026.
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102342323, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  4. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428125, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  5. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428119, accessed on 10th August 2026
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101428077, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  7. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676144, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  8. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_swanscombe.html, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  9. https://irsshop.co.uk/swanscombe, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  10. C. Down; Swanscombe Cement Works and its Railways; Industrial Locomotive Society, Whitchurch, Shropshire, 2022.
  11. https://www.gres.org.uk/members-layouts-apcm-swanscombe-works, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  12. C. Down; Christmas at Swanscombe; Industrial Railway Society, 1965; via https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/12/christmas_at_swanscombe.htm, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  13. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/hawthorn-leslie-works-no-3715-associated-portland-cement-at-swanscombe-no-1-0-4-0st, accessed on 10th August 2026.
  14. https://www.railwaymagazine.co.uk/4710/new-face-at-quainton-as-it-bags-ex-swanscombe-hawthorn-no-4, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  15. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/hawthorn-leslie-works-no-3717-associated-portland-cement-at-swanscombe-no-3-0-4-0st, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  16. https://www.gwra.co.uk/auctions/worksplate-r-w-hawthorn-leslie-co-ltd-engineers-ne-2023jul-0296.html, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  17. Swanscombe No. 5 did not survive into preservation.
  18. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/hawthorn-leslie-works-no-3860-associated-portland-cement-at-swanscombe-no-6-0-4-0st, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  19. https://middletonrailway.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/3860-1536×1152.jpg, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  20. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10224531389586054&set=gm.5187090374725107&idorvanity=163976490369879, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  21. https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/36/Lewin.jpg, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  22. https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/36/Letters_36.htm, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Lewin, accessed on 11th August 2026.
  24. The industrial Locomotive Society; Steam on the Narrow Gauge. A Collection; David Charles, 1965.
  25. Andrew Neale/Chalk Pits Museum; Industrial Railways of the South-East; Middleton Press, 1984.
  26. Brian Moseley; When Plymouth had Steam Trams; Old Plymouth Society, December 2012; via https://oldplymouthsociety.net/when-plymouth-had-steam-trams, accessed on 13th August 2026.
  27. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/File:Im1955EnV199-p834.jpg, accessed on 13th August 2026.
  28. http://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EPW017658, accessed on 13th August 2026.
  29. http://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EPW060599, accessed on 13th August 2026.
  30. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kinder; The Cement Railways of Kent; Oakwood Press, Headington, Oxford, 1973, 1990.
  31. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/people/cp20744/henry-hughes-and-company, accessed on 15th August 2026.
  32. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Falcon_Engine_and_Car_Works, accessed on 15th August 2026.
  33. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=51.46122&lon=0.30214&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 16th August 2026.
  34. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=51.46122&lon=0.30214&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 16th August 2026.
  35. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW060594, accessed on 16th August 2026.

The Railways of Herefordshire and the Southern Marches

This is the second book written by Heather Hurley which focuses on railway history. The first concentrated or the early tramways/tramroads of the Wye valley. [2] A short review of that earlier book can be found here. [3]

In this latest publication, Heather Hurley provides a social history of the lines which served the area between Ludlow in the North and Chepstow in the South – the area shown in the map below.

The area covered by the book. [1: pvii]

Given the essentially rural nature of the Southern Marches, it is sometimes easy to forget the industries which existed in the area and the manifest need, in the 19th century, for the railway connections which developed over time.

This book is an obvious successor to Hurley’s earlier study of the Tramways in the Wye valley. It is “written by a local historian, not a railway enthusiast, who has delved through the archives of 18 railway companies: two were abandoned from the start, four remained open, with another partly restored as a heritage line. Apart from the documentary research, a great deal of fieldwork was undertaken [by Hurley] in the counties of Herefordshire, Gloucestershire, Monmouthshire, Brecknockshire and Radnorshire, in order to provide important visual information.” [1: pix]

Hurley’s account, “follows the challenges, disappointments, financial gains and losses throughout a period of railway mania and beyond. The account has been thoroughly researched, drawing on Acts of Parliament and tables of tolls, company minutes and accounts, plans and maps, newspapers, journals and books, with contemporary and modern photographs to illustrate the railways, trains and people involved, the enormous task of construction, opening celebrations, and the history of each line until its fate was decided.” [1: pix]

The different individual railways have been well recorded in many publications, but this is the first book to give an overview of the relatively haphazard development of the railway network in the southern marches. It highlights the incredible social significance of the developing rail network during the 19th century and chronicles their impact on the industries, local economies and growing population during the nineteenth century.

Hurley does not claim to be a railway historian, but she has collated, “A richly detailed and illustrated account of the railways formed between 1845 and 1900 across Herefordshire, Gloucestershire, Monmouthshire, Brecknockshire and Radnorshire. Unpicking an often haphazard network, the book traces the lines and infrastructure, the stations, bridges and tunnels, the investors, engineers and navvies, and the charismatic steam locomotives that criss-crossed the region up until the 1960s.” [1: back cover]

Preliminary chapters look at:

  • the history of the Welsh Marches, their industries and communications. The earlier tramways in the area are dealt with in Hurley’s earlier book. [2] Although reference is made in this book to both the Leominster Canal of 1791 and the earlier long-distance tramways.
  • the arrival of steam powered railways, including: locomotives, wagons and coaching stock; and the work and life of the navvies that built the lines.

Succinct chapters deal with the development, acts of parliament and incorporation, construction, life, eventual demise of most of the railway companies and lines covered, and present day remains (mainly buildings, bridges and sections of the line):

  • The South Wales Railway and The Monmouth & Hereford Railway.
  • The Newport, Abergavenny & Hereford Railway.
  • The Shrewsbury & Hereford Railway.
  • The Hereford, Ross & Gloucester Railway.
  • The Worcester & Hereford Railway.
  • The Coleford, Monmouth, Usk & Pontypool Railway and The Coleford Railway.
  • The Leominster & Kingston Railway and The Kingston & Eardisley Railway.
  • The Hereford, Hay & Brecon Railway.
  • The Ross & Monmouth Railway.
  • The Wye Valley Railway.
  • The Mitcheldean Road & Forest of Dean Junction Railway.
  • The Newent Railway and the Ross & Ledbury Railway.
  • The Golden Valley Railway.
  • The Severn & Wye Railway.

Clearly there is insufficient space in a volume of this nature for detailed descriptions and historical investigations, nonetheless this book is an excellent introduction to the railways of the Southern Marches and a good starting point for any reader wanting to study any of these railways.

It is a well-written and well illustrated social history of the railways of the Southern Marches.

I noticed only a couple of minor points worth questioning in the whole volume:

  • The Worcester Mile is mentioned [1: p53] as providing a direct route from South to North from Barrs Court Station. I believe that the Worcester Mile ran South to North from Barton Station. [4]
  • Colonel Rich [1: p156] is noted as ‘the chief Great Western Railway engineer’. In fact, Colonel Frederick Henry Rich (8th March 1824 – 22nd August 1904) was a British soldier, who served with the Royal Engineers and was initially seconded to the Board of Trade as an Inspector of Railways in 1861. He continued in this role after his retirement from the Royal Engineers, serving as Chief Inspecting Officer of the Railway Inspectorate between 1885 and 1889. It was normal for the Board of Trade to inspect newly constructed railways prior to their opening for public use. [5]

References

  1. Heather Hurley; The Railways of Herefordshire and the Southern Marches; Logaston Press, Eardisley, 2026.
  2. Heather Hurley; Horse-drawn Tramways of the Wye Valley; Logaston Press, Eardisley, 2022.
  3. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2023/01/02/horse-drawn-tramways-of-the-wye-valley.
  4. https://htt.herefordshire.gov.uk/her-search/monuments-search/search/Monument?ID=30846, accessed on 27th July 2026.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Henry_Rich, accessed on 27th July 2026.

Aberystwyth Cliff Railway

After Easter 2026, we spent a few days at Borth on Cardigan Bay, North of Aberystwyth. We took the opportunity to visit Aberystwyth and to travel on the Cliff Railway.

Aberystwyth Cliff Railway is the longest electrically operated cliff railway in the UK. It sits at the North end of Aberystwyth’s promenade. Constitution Hill provides views over the town and Cardigan Bay. On a really good day, as many as twenty-six mountain peaks can be seen from the summit. [1]

Aberystwyth Cliff Railway, © DavidTDC3377 and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [5]

Aberystwyth Cliff Railway has been transporting visitors to the summit of Constitution Hill since 1st August 1896. It is a 778 feet (237m) long funicular railway, and is the second longest funicular railway in the British Isles after the Lynton and Lynmouth Cliff Railway. Since November 1987, the Aberystwyth Cliff Railway has been a Grade II listed structure. [1][2]

The Cliff Railway as seen on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1904, published in 1906. [3]

For the first 25 years of its life the railway operated via a water balance system. Electrification occurred in 1921.

The cars have a maximum capacity of 30 passengers, permanently connected via a continuous cable. The original water balance system used a Worthington Corporation compound steam engine water pump housed in the lower station to move water to the upper station. Each passenger car had a tank in its chassis that could hold 4 tonnes of water. Water was added to the tank of the top car, which descended under gravity, hauling the lighter lower car on the parallel track to the top station. [5]

The railway is straight, ascending about 430 feet (130 m) over a horizontal distance of 778 feet (237 m), a maximum gradient of more than 1 in 2 (50%). The 4 ft 10 in (1,473 mm), slightly broader than standard gauge, and laid on timber sleepers. [5]

The unique design of the undulating track and tilted carriages is the work of George Croydon Marks. A man who played a key role in several projects during the golden age of funicular construction. He would later make his name in politics as Lord Marks, the liberal peer.” [1]

As we have already noted the railway was electrified using a 41 kW ATB AG [de] Morley DC motor in 1921. In 1934, after changes to the town’s electricity supply, a mercury arc rectifier and transformer were installed in the lower station to provide a 440V DC power output. The cars are moved using a high-tensile steel cable attached to both vehicles. It passes around a drum, mounted on a vertical axis between the tracks at the top. The motor drives the drum controlled by an automated cut-off which stops the motor and the cars when required. [5]

The carriages are brought to the summit at a stately 4 miles per hour. They are powered by a powerful motor and high-tensile steel cables supported by a sophisticated electronic safety system. At the midpoint of the journey, the railway ventures through a deep cutting, where 12,000 tons of rock was excavated to allow the winding footpath to cross via a series of bridges overhead.” [1]

Its twin carriages are named Lord Geraint and Lord Marks. [6]

The Cliff Railway as seen on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1948, published in 1953. [4]

Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the cliff railway was popular with visitors but during and after the Second World War, passenger numbers declined significantly. In 1948, seeking to revive its fortunes, the Aberystwyth Pier Company bought it and carried out repairs and upgrades. The new owners were unable to increase passenger numbers.” [5]

In 1976, a fault developed in the railways breaking system and it was closed briefly.  In the late 1970s, “a local mining company acquired a majority stake and formed the Aberystwyth Cliff Railway Company to operate it. In 1978 a new electrical system was installed which is used to the present day. It takes its power from and returns surplus energy to the National Grid.” [5]

More recent key dates:

  • 1987 – recognised as Grade II listed structure.
  • 1998 – purchased by Constitution Hill Ltd.
  • 2005 – upper station refurbished (with café and gift shop).
  • 2014 – roof repairs undertaken and ramps and other adaptations made to improve accessibility –  better protection from the elements, a small car park at the station (very small!), wheelchair and guide dog friendly trains, a passenger lift providing wheelchair access from the train to the summit, and once there, wheelchair friendly pathways across the site. [1]
The bottom station of Aberystwyth Cliff Railway “Rheilffordd y Graig”, © Aberdare Blog and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [5]
This view is taken near to the passing point with an empty descending car, © OLU and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [5]
A car near the upper station of the railway, circa 1985, © Manfred Heyde and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [5]
Aberystwyth Cliff Railway. [7]

References

  1. https://aberystwythcliffrailway.co.uk, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberystwyth_Cliff_Railway, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101607745, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  4. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101607739, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberystwyth_Cliff_Railway, accessed on 11th July 2026.
  6. Martin Easdown; Cliff Railways, Lifts and Funiculars; Amberley Publishing, 2018.
  7. https://youtu.be/QSFQPJb2Wyo?is=O-HzG1VqndIdBszH, accessed on 11th July 2026.

Railways and Religion

The featured image for this article is a stained glass window in Emneth Parish Church which is a memorial to Revd. Wilbert Vere Awdry who served as the incumbent of the parish from 1953 to 1965. [9]

In his book ‘The World the Railways Made’, in a chapter entitled ‘The Habits the Railways Changed’, and after a discussion of the dramatic effect the railways had on the consumption of different foodstuffs, Nicholas Faith talks of the food the railways carried not only being physical:

“It was also spiritual, enabling pilgrims to travel far more easily. But there were natural hesitations before God-fearing folk were prepared to use such an obviously secular phenomenon. The Russian bishops, for instance, were afraid that ‘pilgrims would come to the monastery [Sergiev Posad (now Zagorsk), site of the sacred Troitsk monastery] in railway cars, in which all sorts of tales can be heard, and often dirty stories, whereas now they come on foot and each step is a feat pleasing to God’. Despite this reluctance, the Metropolitan himself opened the line from Moscow to the holy spot, and by the time the Trans-Siberian was opened, the church was happy to commission a splendid ‘church car’ to minister to the congregations en route. [2]

“The pattern was repeated with different religions throughout the world. The first railway in what was then called Persia was a narrow-gauge line which ran six miles from Tehran to a shrine in the village of Shah Abdul Azim. [3] In Japan at least two railways served important shrines, at Ise and a special line from Oji to the temples at Nara. By the 1890s there was a convenient stop for pilgrims to pay their homage to Mount Fuji.

“Some of the promoters of the first railways in India had hoped to spread Christianity, others were afraid that pilgrims would not use them to travel to their sacred shrines. According to Herbert Spencer, Robert Stephenson referred the matter ‘to the Dhurma Subha of Calcutta, the great sanhedrin of orthodox Hindoos, who, after consulting the sacred texts and the learned pundits, delivered it as their opinion that the devotee might ride in a railway carriage to the various shrines without diminishing the merit of the pilgrimage.’ The result was an amazing growth in pilgrimages, to the mutual advantage of the ‘Hindoos’ and the railway companies. (Quarterly Review, 1868).

“Railways could also be used for secular worship. As late as 1968 the pious Chinese built a railway sixty miles from Hangsha, the capital of Hunan province, to Shao-sha, the birthplace of Mao-Tse-Tung. Over the next decade, before the cult of Mao’s personality waned, three million passengers took the leisurely four-hour journey every year.

“Railways were obviously most suitable for mass religious movements and so concentrated attention on a small number of famous shrines, leading to the neglect of older sites. The most obvious beneficiary was Lourdes, which can truthfully be described as ‘The Shrine the Railway Made’. [cf. 19]

“Bernadette Soubirous’ visions had started in the late 1850s, before the route of the line from Bayonne to Toulouse had been decided. So the town council seized with both hands the opportunity to ensure that the line passed by Lourdes.

In October 1862, the council agreed to compensate any land-owners who suffered, even from the railways’ surveys. In May 1863, councillors asked the railway to site its station as close as possible to the centre of town and complied with every one of the company’s requests. They admitted the navvies and railway workers to the local hospital and ignored their riotous behaviour.

“Their reward came in 1866 with the simultaneous opening of the grotto and the railway from Tarbes, which connected with trains to Bordeaux and far-off Paris. Between 1870 and 1878 a total of 958 pilgrimages to Bernadette’s shrine brought 661,000 pilgrims to Lourdes, 100,000 of them on a single day, 3rd July 1876, to rejoice in the newly-proclaimed doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and affirm the idea of la France Catholique.

“At much the same time similar ideas were being spread throughout France by another railway-based religious order, the Assumptionists, who exploited the railways to assemble mass rallies, largely of the most humble of folk. The Assumptionists were a strange, and in their time highly important, sect, founded by the scion of a rich land-owning family, who acquired considerable political influence through their ability to mount mass rallies.

“But the railway’s most dramatic influence was not on Christianity, but on Islam. Throughout the 19th century increasing numbers of pilgrims had made the difficult and dangerous journey to Mecca. In September 1900, Sultan Abdul Hamid proposed to build a railway to Mecca as a pious gesture on the twenty-fifth anniversary of his accession to the Ottoman throne. The idea was immediately greeted as an important affirmation of Muslim values.

“The Sultan naturally insisted on building a purely Muslim railway. He decreed that, ‘only Muslim workers and Muslim materials ought to be employed; timber from the vast forests of Anatolia and Macedonia; ballast from the country being crossed, rails and wagons from the Imperial workshops; engineering regiments would provide the workforce, the schools of Constantinople the engineers and the foremen.’ [4]

“In the event, much of the material had to be bought in Europe, together with some skilled labour, supervised by the German engineer who had built most of the railways in the Levant. The combination of ferocious piety, the Sultan’s will-power and German organising ability ensured that this railway, nearly a thousand miles in length, was built within eight years.

“Meissner Pasha, the German chief engineer, was simply given the two terminals, Damascus and Mecca, and told to connect them by rail as best he could. He was a genius. He had to handle a huge construction force composed of a dozen nationalities. The line was built across some of the bleakest, hottest, most implacable terrain in the world, without natural resources of any kind. His worst problem was with the Bedouin, furious at being deprived of the pilgrims who had been their prey, ruffians eventually hunted down by an implacably efficient Turkish general, Kaisim Pasha.

“Meissner was not allowed to complete his work. Neither he, nor any other infidel, was allowed to venture beyond Medina Saleh, the 587th mile-post on the line. Fortunately he had trained up a highly-accomplished Turkish engineer, Muktar Bey, who brought the line into Medina in August, 1908. But then the Bedouin took their revenge, wiping out a whole construction camp, and thus scotching any idea of building the railway the final 300 miles to Mecca itself. Unfortunately the line ran for a mere eight years, until T. E. Lawrence blew it up. Since then it has lain abandoned, the break-up of the Ottoman Empire signalling the end of any hope of cooperation between the peoples along the lines.

“In Anglo-Saxon countries deep religious faith produced, not railways, but strong hostility to the very idea of running them on the Sabbath, as a serious challenge to the fundamental Sabbatarianism which was as much a feature of the age as the railways themselves.

“The famous Versailles accident of 1842 was naturally exploited by the Sabbatarians as an awful lesson meted out to the Godless foreign travellers who had dared desecrate the day. After an equally appalling accident in Clayton tunnel just outside Brighton twenty years later ‘plenty of people rushed about proclaiming the accidents as a judgment of God.’ In between times the railways’ Sunday excursions were denounced as ‘trips to Hell at 7s 6d.’ [5]

“But it was not the excursionists (who included such devout souls as Thomas Cook) who forced the railway companies to break the Sabbath. According to Michael Robbins in The Railway Age, it was the absolute need for mail trains to run on a Sunday which broke the resistance of the Sabbatarians in both Scotland and Wales. They were never as powerful as was made out, and most clerics probably reacted like Dr Grantley in Trollope’s Barchester Towers: ‘If you can withdraw all the passengers the company I dare say will withdraw the trains. It is merely a question of dividends’.

“Nevertheless the argument rumbled on. In 1883 the inhabitants of a small Highland village managed to prevent a load of fish from leaving on the Sabbath and were greeted as heroes when they returned from serving the jail sentence to which they were sent-enced. Six years later ‘the anti-Sunday Travel Union’ had 58 branches with some 8,000 adherents. Partly owing to its activities, trains on suburban lines normally ceased running on Sundays during the hours of Divine service.

“Similar battles were fought in the United States. In Galesburg, the railroad was the blunt instrument which broke the power of the Sabbatarians. The first Sunday train was boarded by the impressive figure of President Blanchard of Knox College, who was told to go to Hell when he ordered the engineer to take the engine back to the roundhouse. And that, wrote Ernest Elmo Calkins, was the end of the powerof ‘the little group of pious men who had founded Galesburg to be a Christian town after their own ideal’. [6]

In South Africa, the Reverend Van Lingen managed to prevent any Sunday trains from desecrating the Sabbath at the settlement of Paarl. After denouncing the railway from the pulpit, he founded a Sunday stage coach service for passengers from Cape Town which successfully kept the railway at bay for half a century.

“There was, and remains, a strong counter-current, a positive railway-worship among clergymen of the Church of England. Bishop Eric Treacy and Canon Roger Lloyd were famous railway writers; Canon Reginald Fellows wrote a history of Bradshaw, founding father of railway timetables (which Archbishop William Temple was reputed to know by heart); and more recently the Reverend Wilbert Awdry made a fortune by recounting the adventures of Thomas the Tank Engine and his friends.” [1: p266-270]

The Rt. Revd. Eric Tracy, Bishop of Wakefield at Christ Church Halifax in 1971, after a wedding, © R. J. Stott and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [25]

On 13th May 1978, Treacy died from a heart attack on Appleby Station on the Settle-Carlisle Railway whilst waiting for a railtour hauled by BR 92220 Evening Star. A slate plaque is displayed on the main station building in his memory, © RuthAS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 3.0). [25]

In 1979 LMS Stanier Class 5 4-6-0 number 45428 was named Eric Treacy. It is now preserved on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway. The Treacy Collection of 12,000 photographs forms part of the National Railway Museum’s archive of over 1.4 million images. [25]

In the 19th century, the rapid expansion of railways in the UK was met with both profound spiritual revival and fierce religious resistance. While some religious leaders initially condemned trains as ‘rank infidelity’ and decried Sunday travel, railways ultimately revolutionized religious life, opening up previously remote pilgrimage sites like Glastonbury to the masses.

The massive influx of migrant workers, known as ‘navvies’, who built the complex rail lines had squalid living conditions. In response, religious groups established dedicated missions. In the Western Dales, the construction of the Settle-Carlisle line and West Coast Mainline left behind a trail of small chapels, churches, and meeting houses dedicated to these workers. [11][12]

The Railway Mission, founded in 1881, continues to provide support and solace to everyone associated with the railways. [21]

The Railway Mission was founded in 1881. It was a Christian philanthropic organization designed to combat the ‘sinful behaviour’ of railway workers. It provided spiritual guidance, reading rooms, and temperance advocacy to railway employees. [13][14]

Spiritual Metaphors: The advent of steam engines gave birth to rich new religious vocabulary. Preachers and poets of the era often invoked railways as metaphors for salvation. In popular broadsides like ‘The Spiritual Railway’, repentance was the ‘station’, the Word of God was the ‘first engineer’, and Faith was the passenger train! [15]

Nikolaus Pevsner transcribed the following lines from a memorial in the cloister of Ely Cathedral to two victims of an accident on the Norwich to Ely railway line in 1845. Pevsner finds it “eminently characteristic of the earnestness with which this new triumph of human ingenuity was still regarded.” [9]

The line to Heaven by Christ was made,
With heavenly truth the Rails are laid,
From Earth to Heaven the Line extends,
To Life Eternal where it ends.
Repentance is the Station then,
Where Passengers are taken in ;
No Fee for them is there to pay,
For Jesus is himself the way.
God’s Word is the first Engineer,
It points the way to Heaven so clear,
Through tunnels dark and dreary here.
It does the way to Glory steer.
God’s Love the fire, his Truth the Steam,
Which drives the Engine and the Train;
All you who would to Glory ride,
Must come to Christ, in him abide.
In First, and Second, and Third Class,
Repentance, Faith, and Holiness,
You must the way to Glory gain,
Or you with Christ will not remain.
Come then poor Sinners, now’s the time,
At any Station on the Line,
If you’ll repent, and turn from sin,
The Train will stop and take you in
.” [10]

Dedicated Chapels in entirely new settlements, such as Tebay in Cumbria, sprang up around major railway junctions. The influx of workers forced the Church of England and Nonconformists to erect new places of worship (like the 1885 Methodist chapel in Tebay) specifically to serve the growing railway community. [16]

Tebay Methodist Chapel built in 1885 to serve the railway community. [Google Streetview, September 2024]

Michael Ainsworth wrote an article in 2015 which reflected on Railways, Clergy, Religion and the Law. [17] In it he said:

The coming of the railways in the 19th century excited deep passions among churchmen, as many novels of the time illustrate. The manner in which building was legally driven through, line-by-line, has been exhaustively documented. For some the speed, the smoke, the ‘blot on the landscape’, were unnatural and diabolical – particularly when Sunday trains broke the sabbath commandment. The vast church of St Bartholomew Brighton was built on a commanding site, and allegedly on the dimensions of Noah’s Ark, as a witness to those travelling down for ‘dirty weekends’. However, one of the most ‘proper’ films ever, Brief Encounter, takes place in a railway station … at Carnforth,” [17]

Clergy joined with landowners in resisting encroachment. (They had limited success – note, for example, how the line curves round Sacred Trinity Church in Salford.) The perils of rail travel were brought home early by the first railway fatality, in 1830, of William Huskisson MP at the opening of the Liverpool to Manchester line: a memorial at the site, still clearly visible on the line over Chat Moss, was erected in 1913. The dangers were confirmed by the Tay Bridge disaster of 1879 which evoked what has been widely hailed as the worst poem in the English language (but curiously enjoyable) by William McGonagall.” [17]

But others hailed railways as a godsend and a sign of divinely-blessed progress (despite blighting the urban landscape) … By the latter part of the century, they had certainly revolutionised episcopal ministry. The late 19th-century renewal of enthusiasm for confirmation would not have been possible without the railways. For example, of James Fraser, Bishop of Manchester 1870-85, it was written he spent the week travelling through his diocese, so that there were few days in which he was not somewhere on the railways.” [17]

James Fraser, Bishop of Manchester, 1870-1885, consecrated 99 new parish churches across Manchester Diocese.. He was a frequent railway passenger. [24]

Michael Ainsworth moved on to reflect on clergy interest in railways (model, real or fictional). He said:

“Among clergy who have been ‘keen on railways’, perhaps Eric Treacy, Bishop of Wakefield from 1968-76, significantly described in his Google entry as railway photographer and Anglican bishop, in that order, was pre-eminent. He died in 1978 on Appleby station awaiting a rail-tour arrival. One of the few lapses in Alan Bennett’s chronicling of northern life is in his … Bed Among the Lentils where ‘Mrs Vicar’, the alcoholic wife of a Leeds incumbent (in the diocese of Ripon, as it then was) entertains the bishop who leaves on the pretext of having to bless a steam engine in Keighley (then in another diocese: Bradford, as it then was). However both – plus Treacy’s diocese of Wakefield – are now within the diocese of West Yorkshire and the Dales, aka Leeds (whichever it has decided to call itself), so no harm is done. Appleby remains in Carlisle diocese.

“It has often been said that the reason why some clergy – probably male rather than female – and others, including church musicians, are keen on railways is because they are reassuringly ‘closed systems’, and Awdry’s setting of his railways on the Isle of Sodor confirms this. Lines and boundaries are set, detailed timetables can be pored over, structures are clear: a joy for those who run model railways in their attics for their own pleasure, or larger versions in their gardens to raise funds – both, according to various reports, threatened from time to time by health and safety regulations.

“This joy is less pronounced now that the real railways have been franchised and fragmented. Responsibility for trains, track, signalling, stations and all else is dispersed among many bodies – providing more benefit to lawyers than to passengers, or ‘customers’. Connections, where they exist at all, cannot be held because they will incur a fine for stopping too long in the station. Problems are always someone else’s fault.” [17]

In their book, ‘The Railway Station: A Social History‘, Jeffrey Richards & John M. McKenzie also make connections between Religion, the Clergy and the Railway (particularly the Railway Station):

“Many … have come to the conclusion that the role and atmosphere of the station large and small is essentially ecclesiastical. G. K. Chesterton, a self-confessed station saunterer, celebrated the station as a temple of tradition, a comforting source of continuity in a world increasingly dedicated to change:

“The only way of catching a train I have ever discovered is to miss the train before. Do this, and you will find in a railway station much of the quietude and consolation of a cathedral. It has many of the characteristics of a great ecclesiastical building; it has vast arches, void spaces, coloured lights, and above all, it has recurrence of ritual. It is dedicated to the celebration of water and fire, the two prime elements of all human ceremonial. Lastly, a station resembles the old religions rather than the new religions in this point, that people go to it. In connection with this it should also be remembered that all popular places, all sites actually used by the people, tend to retain the best routine of antiquity very much more than any localities or machines used by any privileged class. Things are not altered so quickly or coarsely by common people as they are by fashionable people. … If you wish to find the past preserved, follow the million feet of the crowd. At the worst the uneducated only wear down old things by sheer walking. But the educated kick them down out of sheer culture. I feel this profoundly as I wander about the empty railway station, where I have no business of any kind. I have extracted a vast number of chocolates from automatic machines; I have obtained cigarettes, toffee, scent, and other things that I dislike by the same machinery; I have weighed myself with sublime results; and this sense not only of the healthiness of popular things, but of their essential antiquity and permanence is still in possession of my mind.” [26: p11-12][27: p219-224]

Richards & Mackenzie note that a similar sense of ecclesiastical peace was detected by Karel Čapek in Czech country stations:

“There are little stations threaded on the lines like beads on a rosary; they stand in the solitude like places of pilgrimage, far from the profane noises of the world; they are the real chapels dedicated to the silent ceremony of Waiting. They are led to as a rule by a country lane with a straggling row of trees; the longer it is the more profound and lasting is the silence which embraces the pilgrim who comes to the station to wait. … We who are waiting, shuffle from one foot to the other and cough under our breath like worshippers in a chapel; we are dressed in clean clothes and depressed in a Sunday sort of way. … ‘Mummy!’ says the piping voice of a little girl. ‘Be quiet’, her mother reproves her in a whisper. ‘Mummy, when will the train come?’ Be quiet, little girl, we have to wait for the train to come. If you aren’t as good as if you were in church, the train won’t come, and we shan’t go away in it to the ends of the earth.” [28: p99-101]

Ricahrds & Mackenzie comment that it is appropriate that Canon Roger Lloyd spoke of the quietude of Marylebone Station:

“It is essentially peaceful and when some rather fussy penitent told his father confessor that he could find nowhere in London where he could meditate in quiet and peace, he was astonished to hear the caustic answer: ‘Have you tried Marylebone, my son?'” [29: p99]

Richards & Mackenzie argue that it is possible to extend the metaphor ad infinitum:

“For if the station is seen as cathedral or chapel, it can also be seen to possess in its heyday a Bible every bit as imposing and sometimes even as impenetrable as the Authorized Version (Bradshaw), incense (steam), and liturgical chanting (‘The train now standing at platform 3 is …’, ‘Close the doors and stand clear’, ‘All change’). In some countries nature imitates art and makes this fancy reality. In Tsarist Russia, icons were often placed in railway-station waiting-rooms and in Greece there were shrines at stations where the traveller could light candles to protect him on his journey. The ceiling of the Great Hall at the old Euston Station was deliberately modelled on that of the church of St. Peter extra muros in Rome.” [26: p12-13]

So, they go on to note that:

“Somehow sensing this connection, clerics have been drawn as if by a magnet to the rails. Bishop Eric Treacy of Wakefield, who had an engine named after him, was a tireless photographer of and writer about railways. Similarly prolific and passionate in their dedication were Canon Roger Lloyd, author of, among other works, The Fascination of Railways, Canon Reginald Fellows, researcher into the history of Bradshaw, Canon Victor Whitechurch, creator of the fictional railway detective Thorpe Hazell, and Revd Wilbert Awdrey, author of the much-loved children’s books about Thomas the Tank Engine and his friends. Archbishop William Temple when headmaster of Repton had a complete mental recall of Bradshaw and would set as an imposition for an errant boy the best way of travelling from Great Yarmouth to Exeter or Penrith to Ipswich without touching London, complete with changes and times. He would then correct it from memory. It was therefore entirely fitting that, in the celebrated Ealing comedy about the last age of steam, The Titfield Thunderbolt should be driven by the local vicar and fired by a visiting bishop.” [26: p13]

Richards & Mackenzie also talk of trainspotters taking up their hallowed places at the end of station platforms and holding well-thumbed copies of the Ian Allan Guide: “the Bible of their cult.” [26: p13]

They reflect too on the use of railways on pilgrimages, particularly in India:

“The religious metaphor is never very far from the pen of the writer on railways and stations. But railways have also had a powerful literal effect upon religious movements around the world. Stations everywhere took on the role of the Tabard Inn at Southwark, where Chaucer’s pilgrims assembled for their journey to Canterbury. Muslims flocked to the stations of Russian Central Asia, up-country India, Malaya, and North Africa to commence their long journeys to Mecca. The leaders of Eastern religions which had resisted the appearance of the railway, as in China and Japan, soon found that their co-religionists swiftly took to the rails to visit temples and shrines. The stations of the South African Boer Republics, themselves huge concessions to the modern world which the Boers would originally much rather have done without, took on some of the dour, flinty character of Dutch Reformed Calvinism.

“But it was in India that the railways produced their most dramatic religious effect. Hinduism is one of the most mobile of all religions and Hindus found in the railways a hitherto unimaginable opportunity to travel to shrines, pilgrim centres, and important ceremonies. The Murray’s Handbooks to India are punctuated with references to stations much used by pilgrims. In 1906, the Chief Superintendent of the East India Railway provided readers of the Railway Magazine with a graphic description of a pilgrimage to Allahabad. [26: p172-174][32: p326-328] Every twelve years, a ceremony known as the Kumbh mela took place at the confluence of the Jumna (Yamuna) and Ganges rivers just outside Allahabad. The ceremonies lasted for a month and millions attended, many coming only for a few days.

For the duration of the mela as many as twenty pilgrim trains a day, each carrying a thousand passengers, might be brought into Allahabad in addition to the normal traffic. It was necessary to use all the Allahabad stations, Naini, Kotaparcha, Kyogunge, Allengunge, as well as the Main and Fort stations to distribute the tremendous pressure of passengers. Temporary booking-offices, thatched and constructed of railway sleepers, were built near the site of the mela itself to sell tickets to returning pilgrims. At the station barriers, barricades and pens had to be constructed to separate ‘up’ from ‘down’ passengers and avoid crushing and injury. Most of the special pilgrim ‘rakes’ were made of goods wagons with a mat on the floor to sit on, and an oil lamp hung from the roof for illumination. Superintendent Huddleston assured his readers that pilgrims found this accommodation perfectly comfortable and never made any complaints. Pilgrims, he went on, were the most patient of passengers. But even they had been known to take direct action when driven to desperation. Some years earlier a train carrying pilgrims had been so seriously held up that its journey had taken twenty-four hours rather than seven or eight. Towards the end of the journey the pilgrims discovered that their train had been shunted into a siding at a station in order to give precedence to the mail train:

“They thought it time to take action on their own account. Several of them thereupon left their carriages and placed their heads on the rails vowing that, rather than allow another train to pass by they would sacrifice their lives. After this demonstration it is needless to say which train got away first, but, of course, there was an outcry because the Mail ran late!” [32: p328]

Sometimes the lack of co-ordination among the different Indian railway companies made things difficult for pilgrims. There were, for example, no through trains from the East India Railway to the Oudh and Rohilkan railway, and pilgrims together with other travellers had all to change trains at Moghalsarai junction, a mere ten miles from the great pilgrim city of Benares (now Varanasi). Huddleston described the scene:

“During pilgrim rushes, surging, struggling crowds filled the platforms and the waiting halls, and while the masses changed from one train to another the station was a Babel. The delays between connecting trains often being considerable, it is needless to remark that the position was one of intolerable discomfort, though it was accepted by both passengers and railway staff as part of the day’s work.” [32: p501-502]

Through trains were eventually provided, and ‘the convenience to pilgrims and relief to Moghalsarai station is immense’.

The complexities of the arrangements made for pilgrimages is borne out in a number of ways. The Government Health Department sent men to examine pilgrims alighting from trains. Their job was to watch out for cases of smallpox and cholera. The railway also had its own medical department, which attempted to take action when cases of plague, small-pox, or cholera were reported:

“During the mela a slight outbreak of cholera occurred at a small station called Manickpore on the Jubbulpore line. The company’s doctor was on the spot in no time, attended the patients, examined the sanitary arrangements, disinfected and closed the station well, and arranged for tanks of pure water to be conveyed from 62 miles away.” [32: p425-426]

The traffic arrangements for the Kumbh Mela in 1906 were entrusted to the same officer who had made all the arrangements for the Great Delhi Durbar organized by the Viceroy Curzon in 1904. He was provided with 450 employees to help. The earnings from the pilgrims, who travelled at very low fares, amounted to £53,500 in 27 days. Superintendent Huddleston noted with evident self-satisfaction that ‘everything worked without a hitch, and there was not a single accident of any kind’. [26: p172-174]

‘The Railway Age’, according to Richards & Mackenzie had many faults. But:

“But it was an age which saw the slow, sure, and steady progress of social improvement and it was an age of hope, of optimistic belief in the future, unashamed aspiration for better days and better conditions in the world. The great stations stand, if they do still stand, as towering monuments to that belief, public meeting-places where faith in the perfectibility of man by his own ingenuity and the blessing of a divine providence was daily affirmed. In this respect, the oft-quoted cathedral metaphor is not inapt. Stations were cathedrals of the new technology. They were also places of hope, faith, and inextinguishable humanity, embodiments of that spirit that Charles MacKay captured so well in his poem ‘Railways 1846’. [26: p17]

John MacKay’s poem reads:

‘Railways 1846’ by John MacKay. [30: p69]

For a more about Clergy and Railways, please click here. [7]

It is also worth listening to Railway Mania Podcast Episode 19 to gain an understanding of the way in which Christian non-conformists in the UK were so instrumental in the development of the railways in the UK. [8]

Railway Chaplains

As we have already noted, The Railway Mission is a British mission devoted to the rail industry. It was founded in 1881 based in mission halls, and now operates a chaplaincy service across the rail network in the UK.

In the early days of the Railway Mission there were a number of mission halls at railway stations throughout the country. These days Railway Chaplains cover hundreds of miles by train. Lorraine Worsley-Carter points to one of these chaplains – Revd. Mike Roberts: “Mike works under the auspices of the Railway Mission. He covers a vast area in the North West from Stafford to Carlisle, Blackpool to the Pennines. This includes 11 Passenger and Freight Operators; Network Rail; 11 depots; over a hundred stations and 50 signal boxes. He is also a chaplain to the British Transport Police.” [20]

The Railway Mission is committed to making a real difference to the lives of people in the “railway family.” [21] The Railway Mission says this about its work on the railways:

“Every day, rail colleagues keep passengers and freight moving safely. When something difficult happens a fatality, a serious incident, an assault, a sudden death in the team – it is people who carry it home. … Railway Mission chaplains are present across the network. We offer calm, confidential pastoral support in the moment, and we stay alongside staff and managers as they take the next steps. Sometimes that is a quiet conversation at a depot or station. Sometimes it helps a manager hold a team together after devastating news. … In 2025, our chaplains recorded 9,157 support interactions across the industry. 23.5% were requested by a manager or director, a sign that chaplaincy is valued not only for individual care, but also for coordinated, time-critical support after incidents. …

“Independent social value work using RSSB’s Rail Social Value Tool has estimated that for every £1 invested in Railway Mission chaplaincy, around £3.13 of social value is generated. That is why partner support matters. It keeps chaplains present where and when staff need them most.” [22]

Lorraine Worsley-Carter says: “The introduction of railway chaplains in the United Kingdom has been a significant development in the provision of spiritual and emotional support to both railway employees and passengers. These dedicated individuals serve a crucial role in an industry that operates around the clock, often under stressful and challenging conditions. … One of the primary attributes of railway chaplains is their ability to provide emotional support to railway employees. Working in the railway industry can be physically and mentally demanding, with long hours and often unpredictable schedules. Railway chaplains offer a listening ear and a supportive presence, helping employees cope with the stresses and challenges of their jobs. They provide a safe space for employees to discuss their concerns, anxieties, and personal issues, which can have a positive impact on mental health and job satisfaction.” [20]

What About Patron Saints?

Some are highlighted by John Bull (inspired by writer Anne Thériault). [18] Here they are!

  1. Saint Christopher – Patron Saint of Travellers – St Christopher’s sainthood is based on his, allegedly, having carried the baby Jesus across a river. As such he is the generic Patron Saint for travellers. He is also Saint Patron of Truck Drivers!
  2. Saint Montague – Patron Saint of Railways – Montague was the abbot of a monastery, but died when he was hit by a locomotive. This is likely another of the Catholic Church’s canonisations to keep up with new transport technologies.
  3. Saint Galthus – Patron Saint of Steam Engines – Saint Galthus is the patron of steam engines. Having run the Pope’s private rail line, he was martyred by a faulty boiler. His body was found to be incorruptible after death and he was duly canonized. Although, it is said his Pope just really loved trains.

4. Saint Catherine of Alexandria – Patron Saint of Railway Workers – Catherine was a 4th century martyr, was well educated, and is also the patron saint of philosophers and preachers. It is not clear why she was anointed Patron Saint of Railway Workers, although the social media posts of some railway workers do point to a degree of philosophising and preaching! [18]

Painting by Caravaggio (1598–99) in the Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum in Madrid. [31]

According to John Bull there are other patron saints who can be considered as being closely allied to railways. [18] Here are a few:

  • St Dominic de la Calzada – Patron Saint of Civil Engineers – worked on building bridges and paved causeways to help pilgrims in Spain – calzada means causeway in Spanish. [18]
  • St Bénézet – Patron Saint of Bridge Builders – Bénézet saw a vision during the eclipse of 1177 that propelled him to build a bridge over the River Rhône at Avignon. He built the bridge single-handedly, as church and civil authorities refused to help him, thus becoming an early advocate for community based transport planning. [18]
  • Saint Barbara – Patron Saint of Tunnellers (and Mining Engineers) – Saint Barbara, has often been invoked to protect diggers and mine engineers in such dangerous work, and so is also the patron saint of miners. And by extension the patron saint of railway tunnels and tunnellers. To this day, tunnels under construction often have a small alcove in which a small statue of her is placed, for her divine protection. The medieval miners also named digging equipment after women in her honour, and this tradition is still followed to the present – tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are still given female names! [18]

In addition to religious saints, John Bull also provides some suggestions for ‘Secular Saints’, including these. [18]

  • Thomas Rammell – Patron Saint of Pneumatic Railways – Engineer Thomas Rammell had a single-minded obsession with pneumatic railways, beginning with his London Pneumatic Despatch Railway … Although this seems more like a case for Saint Jude, the Patron Saint of Hopeless Causes.
  • Antonio Gaudí – Patron Saint of Trams – Architect Antonio Gaudí was struck & killed by a tram right next to his under-construction La Sagrada Familia Basílica. Unfortunately he looked quite dishevelled, so passersby thought he was a vaigrant and he didn’t get the medical help that could have saved his life.
  • Saint Harriet – Patron Saint of the Underground Railroad – some Anglicans consider Harriet Tubman a saint, as she was the conductor of the Underground Railroad in the US. Whilst not a physical railroad, but more a concept, Harriet deserves inclusion.

And finally … Having Faith in the Rail Industry (A Muslim Perspective)

CPMS-Egis Scheme Project Manager Farah Sajwani on the challenges to make the railways inclusive to all religions. As a Middle Eastern Muslim Farah Sajwani never thought she’d be working in the railway for a company in England. Farah’s journey into the industry began when she left Oman to pursue an undergraduate degree in chemical engineering in Australia. She then moved to Manchester, where she completed her postgraduate degree in engineering project management. It was from here that she moved to London and joined the graduate scheme at CPMS-Egis where she has been for nearly three years. [June 2021]

This is an article from RailDirector magazine: [23: p46-47]

Landing a job in a railway-focused company was very exciting, yet overwhelming, as I came from a country that did not have a railway,” said Farah. “I was a little apprehensive at first as I was concerned about being credible and having a successful career there, not knowing much about rail, but everyone has been very welcoming and helpful and I’m really enjoying it. Another pleasant surprise was getting a graduate placement in a company that is understanding and inclusive of other cultures and religions. I’d often heard friends saying that the working environment can be tough and that people from a different ethnicity, religion, education and national origin can sometimes feel left out in the workplace, but I have been fortunate at CPMS-Egis. I have felt included from the outset of my placement and am now Scheme Project Manager. I am also actively involved in the company’s EDI and Community Kindness Groups.”

In February [2021], Farah was invited by Women in Rail (WR) to join the Equality Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Charter Working Group created by Women in Rail (WR) and the Railway Industry Association (RIA) following its launch last November. “I’ve joined the Charter Working Group because I want to make a difference and help organisations understand better how to attract a more diverse workforce and be more inclusive,” she said. “I think every person, regardless of their ethnicity, religious beliefs and background should be able to contribute equally to the growth and wellbeing of the organisation they work for, thrive in their job and realise their full potential.”

The EDI Charter has already been signed by more than 160 organisations which demonstrate the industry’s commitment to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda. The EDI Charter Working Group comprises young professionals in rail chosen by WR and RIA on the basis of their personal commitment and qualities and the fact that they represent a spectrum of the backgrounds, ages, genders and identities and various grades, roles and companies within the UK rail industry at this particular point in time.

Being part of the working group is the opportunity to share my experiences and to help organisations understand better what may be holding them back from attracting a diverse workforce and being more inclusive,” she said. “It is also a way for me to be the voice of the people who share my background who may be facing challenges in the workplace but are not able or prepared to speak out. Each member of the group brings a different perspective on EDI and the challenges to inclusion so the group is not only about sharing my experiences, explaining how companies can be more inclusive of Muslim women, but also about learning about others, listening to their experiences, their challenges, and understanding how I can myself help foster better inclusion in the workplace and the railway.”

Farah is using her voice to inform the industry about what can be done to encourage more Muslims into the rail sector. Like nearly all industries in the UK, Muslims face universal barriers to employment, with prejudice believed to be a contributor as to why unemployment rates are more than double that of any other community. … “I am keen to use my voice to raise awareness to the need to create more flexibility around the working environment in the railways for people like me,” she said. “For instance, as a Muslim, I don’t celebrate Christmas and I don’t do anything special on Boxing Day, yet as an employee, it is automatically assumed that I will take those days off because it is a bank holiday. It would be good to be able to work those days and use that credit to take time off on the days I celebrate my religion such as Eid-al Fitr (Festival of Breaking the Fast) which follows Ramadan (a month of fasting).”

Again, with Ramadan it would be good if organisations could make people more aware that they have colleagues fasting and ask them to be a little bit more understanding. I have found my colleagues at CPMS-Egis to be really supportive, but I am aware that it is not always the case for other Muslim people. … In the long term, it would be good to see employers make prayer space available for everyone. I pray five times a day so it would be nice to have a personal space to do this, but this space could also be used as a meditation room for individuals or just somewhere where anyone who needs to take a moment can decompress, … I am pregnant at the moment and flexibility is important to me, to go to hospital appointments for instance. As long as I am doing my job right and making up the working hours, that should be the main focus.”

It is these sorts of ideas that Farah hopes to promote and move forward as part of her role in the working group of the EDI Charter. “When I first joined the rail industry, I did feel a little awkward when I was taking time off to celebrate my faith and during Ramadan when I was fasting,” she said. “Organisations could look at offering more flexible hours for employees during these times, because for example I don’t take a lunch break when fasting. … A lot of it comes down to raising awareness, which is a priority for me with the EDI Charter Working Group. Inclusion is not a case of one size fits all and what works for one organisation. might not work for another. Employers need to connect with their employees, open the discussion and both need to work together to make it work for them.”

Our role as the EDI Charter Working Group is about understanding our respective challenges and come up with ideas and suggestions as to how employers can address them so they can attract a more diverse workforce and create better inclusion. … I have really enjoyed my time in the rail industry so far and I really want to play my part in making sure I help everyone feel included, whilst at the same time encouraging others to join the industry. … Based on my overall experiences so far, I would recommend the rail industry to everyone and I would encourage everyone to speak up if they face challenges. … There are lots of opportunities to work in the railways. You just need to understand the industry and make sure the industry understands you.” [23: p46-47]

References

  1. Nicholas Faith; The World the Railways Made; Pimlico, London, 1990, 1994, p259-270.
  2. J. N. Westwood; A History of Russian Railways, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1964.
  3. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/23/railways-in-iran-part-1-tehran-to-rey-1888.
  4. Eleuthere Eléfteriades; Les Chemins de Fer en Syrie et au Liban; Beirut, 1944.
  5. Jack Simmons; The Railway in Town and Country 1839-1914; David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1986.
  6. Earnest Elmo Calkins; They Broke the Prairie; UI Press, Illinois, 1989.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/11/14/clergy-and-railways.
  8. https://youtu.be/9VeRcXnPGCc?is=wYW6d7pU_9LPEOrw, accessed on 4th July 2026.
  9. https://lawandreligionuk.com/2016/04/18/thoughts-on-railways-clergy-religion-and-the-law, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  10. Nikolaus Pevsner; The Buildings of England: Cambridgeshire; Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1954, p365.
  11. https://www.methodistheritage.org.uk/visit/railways-and-religion-western-dales, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  12. https://cockermouthhistory.uk/religion/railways-and-religion, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  13. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/21510/1/Mallery_2018_PhD_CrossingTheLine.pdf, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  14. https://railwaymission.org/home/messages-of-hope, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  15. https://songsfromtheageofsteam.uk/fantasy-metaphor/religion-temperance/107-fantasy-metaphor/religion-temperance/2287-bar396, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  16. https://www.ctfc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/railways-and-religion.pdf, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  17. Michael Ainsworth; Thoughts on railways, clergy, religion and the law; in Law & Religion UK, 17th April 2015; via https://www.lawandreligionuk.com/2016/04/17, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  18. John Bull; Let’s Get Metaphysical – Patron Saints of Railways & other Transport Modes; 19th December 2024; via https://londonreconnections.com/lets-get-metaphysical-patron-saints-of-railways-other-transport-modes, accessed on 9th July 2026.
  19. John Eade; The Changing Role of Railways in the Life of a European Pilgrimage Shrine; via Researchgate; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289637979_THE_CHANGING_ROLE_OF_RAILWAYS_IN_THE_LIFE_OF_A_EUROPEAN_PILGRIMAGE_SHRINE, accessed on 9th July 2026. This paper examines the changing role of the railway in the development of one of the most important Roman Catholic shrines – Lourdes in France. During the second half of the nineteenth and the first half of the twentieth century, trains were vital in establishing Lourdes’ position as a major national and international shrine. Although the expansion of car ownership and tourism after the Second World War have vastly increased, the numbers visiting the shrine, the importance of the railway has declined. This paper examines the changing role played by the railway in the shrine’s development, the declining importance of organised pilgrimage groups and the growth of individual choice and the flexibility provided by diverse modes of transport. It concludes with a consideration of the relevance of this case study to the study of pilgrimage and tourism in Europe and beyond.
  20. Lorraine Worsley-Carter; Finding the RIght Track with a Railway Chaplain; via https://quayslife.com/people/finding-the-right-track-with-a-railway-chaplain, accessed on 9th July 2026.
  21. https://railwaymission.org, accessed on 9th July 2026.
  22. https://railwaymission.org/onewebmedia/Railway_Mission_Chaplaincy_Support_Report_2025%20%28v18%29.pdf, accessed on 9th July 2026.
  23. https://issuu.com/raildirector/docs/001-080_rdjune2021/46?ff, accessed on 9th July 2026.
  24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Fraser_(bishop), accessed on 10th July 2026.
  25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Treacy, accessed on 10th July 2026.
  26. Jeffrey Richards & John M. Mackenzie; The Railway Station: A Social History; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.
  27. G. K. Chesterton; Tremendous Trifles; Methuen, London, 1909.
  28. Karel Čapek; Intimate Things; George Allen & Unwin, London, 1935.
  29. Roger Lloyd; The Fascination of Railways; George Allen & Unwin, London, 1951.
  30. Samuel Carr (ed.); The Poetry of Railways; Batsford, London, 1978.
  31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_of_Alexandria, accessed on 11th July 2026.
  32. The Railway Magazine Volume 18, 1906, p326-328.

Ex-Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) 0-8-0 Locomotive in LMS Days at Liverpool, Bank Hall Locomotive Shed – 1937

The featured image for this short article is a relatively poor/grainy photograph taken on Sunday 25th July 1937 at Liverpool Bank Hall Engine Shed. Prominent in the photograph and identified by the photographer, is ex-L&YR 0-8-0 7F Locomotive No. 12981. In the background LMS 4-6-0 No. 5229 can be glimpsed. [Unknown Photographer]

In June 2026, I was given an image printed on a postcard in 1937. The photograph was taken at Liverpool Bank Hall Engine Shed (Code 27A) which was in north Liverpool, located just off Stanley Road in Kirkdale/Bootle. This is a ‘down-the-rabbit-hole’ kind of article in which I follow my nose from the photograph above and see where that leads. ….

Also seen at Liverpool Bank Hall Locomotive Shed (27A) was No. 12782, another ex-L&YR 0-8-0 locomotive. No. 12782 is one of the survivors of a once numerous class of L&Y Aspinall Class 30 0-8-0 6Fs dating from 1901. It was withdrawn in 9/50, almost the last of its Class. Note the most obvious difference from No. 12981, the cab. This photograph was taken on 20th June 1948, (c) Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0). [1]
Another view of Locomotive No. 12782 at Bank Hall. On the same road is ex-L&Y 1F 0-6-0T LMS No. 11535, fitted with dumb buffers and swinging spark-arrestor for working in the Docks, (c) Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0). [2]

Bank Hall Shed was and L&YR shed which was later operated by the LMS and later British Railways, it housed L&YR ‘Pug’ 0-4-0Ts for dock shunting, Class 02 shunters like D2852, and Stanier Class 5s for Liverpool Exchange passenger services.

Ex L&YR ‘Pug’ 0-4-0T locomotive – LMS No. 11246 at Liverpool Bank Hall Locomotive Shed on 20th June 1948, (c) Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0). [3]

Records available online give details of the locomotives on Bank Hall Shed on Sunday 7th March 1937, Sunday 27th February 1938 and Sunday 7th September 1941 do not show No. 12981 as being on shed. This is not conclusive evidence that No. 12981 was not allocated to Bank Hall as it may, in each case, have been out on duty. However, No. 12981 is recorded as being on shed on Saturday 3rd October 1942. [4]

No. 12981 was one of a number of L&YR 0-8-0 locomotives transferred to the LMS at the grouping. L&YR Class 30 locomotives were classified by the LMS as 6F locomotives there are a couple of images of one of these locomotives above. No. 12981 was a L&YR Class 31 locomotive. This class were given a power-rating of 7F by the LMS. “The class was designed by George Hughes and introduced in 1912. The class comprised 115 new locomotives (the 1546 Class, built 1912–21) and 40 rebuilt from two other classes: the 91 Class (built 1900–08) and the 9 Class (built 1918).” [5][6][7][8]

A LMS (ex-L&YR) 7F 0-8-0 at Normanton Shed in 1947. This is No. 12928, built by Hughes c. 1920, withdrawn in September 1947 – soon after this photograph was taken. Note the style of cab on this locomotive matches the cabs on the Class 30 locomotives. (c) Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license 2.0 (CC BY-SA 2.0). [9]

This image was for sale on eBay. It shows the same cab as the featured image for this article above. The vendor describes the locomotive as LMS ex-L&YR Class 91 Loco. No. 1440 (LMS 12981). It appears that No. 12981 was a locomotive rebuilt at Horwich from a Class 91 Locomotive built between 1900 and 1908. [10]

This is also a Class 91 0-8-0 – it has the same cab as the Class 30 locomotives. [11]

Another image for sale on eBay shows another Class 31 – No. 12856. This has the same cab detail as the Class 30 locomotives. [12]

An ex-works photograph of L&YR locomotive No. 1427 which was one of the L&YR’s Class 91 locomotives. It became No. 12990 in LMS days. Note that the cab is the same as No. 12981. Given that this is an ex-works image, it is clear that this batch of locomotives were given a different of cab compared with their cousins. [13]

Bank Hall Locomotive Shed was situated off Stanley Road close to the Kirkdale tunnels. The depot was opened in 1865 and closed in 1966. At the time of closure it had two sheds – a brick-built 8-road dead-ended shed and a brick built shed with 4 through roads and 4 dead-end roads. The next two map extracts are taken from the 1st Edition 25″ Ordnance Survey. Two sheets cover the area of the Bank Hall Sheds. The locomotive depot sat to the East of the Liverpool, Crosby and Southport line and Northwest of North Docks Branch (through Kirkdale Railway Station) which were in turn alongside the Cheshire Lines Railway.

One of the two sheds at Bank Hall Locomotive Depot can be seen at the bottom left of this map extract. Immediately North of the shed is Atlantic Docks Junction (LNWR) which was established on 5th September 1881 It was the point at which the Alexandra Dock branch diverted from the original Bootle branch just east of the Canada Dock Tunnel. Stanley Road is at the bottom left of the extract, with tram lines heading North and South along it. A tramway depot is just to the North of this map extract. Northeast of Kirkdale Station which sits in the top right of this map extract. The North Docks Branch (L&YR) and the Cheshire Lines Railway (CLC) enter Kirkdale tunnels and underground separate with the CLC lines heading Northeast towards Walton-on-the-Hill Railway Station. Two turntables can be seen within the curtilage of locomotive depot. [14]
The second of the two engine sheds can be see centre-top of this map extract. Bankhall station can be seen top-left with the Liverpool, Crosby and Southport line curving away to the Northwest. The 4 through roads sit on the west side of the shed. the four dead-end roads enter from the North end of the shed. A multiplicity of marshalling sidings sit to the East of the depot. Stanley Road with its tramway are to the West of the locomotive sheds. [15]

This map extract shows the depot in 1906. The OS Sheet was surveyed in 1906 and published in 1908. There are no obvious differences from the map extracts above. The next edition of the OS mapping of 1924/25 shows no further change from this map extract. [16]

The same location in the 21st century. The site is occupied by Kirkdale Traction Maintenance Depot. It is home to Mersey Rail’s 777 fleet of trains and the engineers workshop for the old 507/8s. [Google Maps, July 2026]

In 1903, the Mersey Railway was electrified; this was the world’s first full electrification of a steam railway. It was followed by the electrification of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway line from the Liverpool Exchange railway station to Southport railway station three years later. In 1937, electrification of the Wirral Railway lines to New Brighton railway station and West Kirby railway station enabled service into Liverpool via the Mersey Railway Tunnel. Bank Hall continued to serve and stable steam locomotives, by the 1937, it had one of the large reinforced concrete coaling stages. Shed Bash UK provides details of locomotives stabled/allocated to Bank Hall MPD in the period from 1937 to 1966 when it closed. [4]

Memories of Bank Hall Sheds (27A) in the period 1960-1966 can be found here. [17]

After 1966, with Bank Hall MPD closed remaining steam-powered services were supported from elsewhere and 1968 waw the last of regular steam use in the country.

Between 1966 and 1980, the Mersey Railway became part of the Merseyrail network which was radically transformed from a fragmented group of suburban lines into a unified, metro-style urban transit system. This era saw the introduction of the Merseyrail brand, the construction of the underground city centre tunnels, and the replacement of aging pre-war rolling stock with modern electric trains. Merseyrail made use of the older Class 502 EMU units until 1980.

The British Rail Class 502 was a n EMU originally built by the LMS at its Derby Works. Introduced in 1940 and withdrawn by 1980, they spent the whole of their working lives on the electrified railway lines north of Liverpool. Their original livery was LMS maroon. [20]

In the 21st century, modern traction on Mersey Rail includes the older Class 507/8 EMUs and the more modern Class 777 EMUs. These are maintained on the site of the old MPD at Bank Hall.

The British Rail Class 507 electric multiple unit (EMU) passenger trains were built by British Rail Engineering Limited at Holgate Road carriage works in two batches from 1978 to 1980. They are a variant of British Rail’s standard 1972 design for suburban EMUs which eventually encompassed 755 vehicles over five classes (Class 313, 314, 315, 507 and 508), (c) Vanmanyo and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [18]

The British Rail Class 777 METRO is a class of electric multiple unit passenger trains delivered by the Swiss rolling stock manufacturer Stadler Rail, being used on the Merseyrail network, (c) Rodhullandemu (2021) and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [19]

References

  1. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2606508, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  2. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2217586, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  3. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2224499, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  4. https://shedbashuk.blogspot.com/2013/01/bank-hall-1954-1964.html, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%26YR_Class_31, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  6. H. C. Casserley & S. W. Johnston; Locomotives at the Grouping, No.3, LMS; Ian Allan, Shepperton, 1966, p130.
  7. John Marshall; The Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway, Volume 3; David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1972 p186–8, p260–2, p266, p267–9.
  8. Eric Mason; The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway in the Twentieth Century; Ian Allan, Shepperton: 1975 [1954], p147–9, p152–6.
  9. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2785803, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  10. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/362614969179, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  11. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/192886948146, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  12. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/362613433191, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  13. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/334283762825, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/126523040, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/126523070, accessed on 7th July 2026.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=53.43776&lon=-2.98547&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  17. https://www.derbysulzers.com/birkenhead.html, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  18. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/507021_Bidston.jpg, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  19. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:777010_at_Hooton_Station_20210728-1.jpg, accessed on 8th July 2026.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_502#/media/File:Sandhills_1979001_1.jpg, accessed on 8th July 2026.