Category Archives: British Isles – Railways and Tramways

North Kent’s Cement and Other Industrial Railways – Part 2 – The Medway Estuary

The featured image for this article is ex GWR No. 921 pictured at Kingsnorth at Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery and Bitumen Plant on 3rd April 1933. Prior to becoming GWR 921 on absorption in 1924, this locomotive was Powlesland & Mason No.6 (built in 1906 by Brush Electrical, Works No. 314) and operated at Swansea docks. The locomotive arrived at Berry Wiggins from Sugar Beet & Crop Driers Ltd, Eynsham, Oxfordshire in December 1931. It was sold to Leicester Museums and is now (2025) a static exhibit at the Mountsorrel Railway Museum, near Rothley, Leicestershire. This image was shared on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Facebook Group by Roger Gregory on 11th April 2025. [64]

As we noted at the beginning of the first article in this short series, a quick look at the Ordnance Survey maps of the North coast of Kent from the first half of the 20th century show a myriad of standard-gauge and narrow-gauge industrial railways. A similar survey of the Medway valley at the same period in the 20th century shows just how many individual Cement Works and other industries once existed there too. This article inevitably cannot provide a comprehensive look at all industrial railways in the area. Hopefully those covered will be both representative of what was present in the past and hopefully of interest to readers.

The Oakwood Press produced two editions (1973, 1990) of a survey of cement works in Kent. The second edition was an enlarged version of the first edition. Page references are to page numbers in the second edition.

B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner [1] divide the various Cement works into three different geographical areas:

  • The Thames Estuary (working West to East) – this area is covered here; [2]
  • The Medway Estuary
  • The Lower Medway – this are is covered here. [36]

Part 2 – The Medway Estuary

The Medway Estuary as shown by Google Maps. [September 2026]

The Medway Estuary has a rich industrial history rooted in shipbuilding, brickmaking, and cement production, and it now functions as a modern hub for shipping and energy supply.

  • Historic Industries included:
    • Shipbuilding: The Chatham Dockyard served as a primary royal naval shipyard for centuries, driving local employment and heavy engineering. Trenchmanns Wharf on the River Medway has witnessed centuries of maritime activity, from the medieval period through the Industrial Revolution to the present day. [3]
    • Brickfields and Cement Works: During the 19th and early 20th centuries, sites like Horrid Hill and local marshes supported intensive mud-digging, brickmaking, and cement manufacturing. 
    • Traditional Trades: Early uses of the estuary and its banks included grain farming on saltmarsh islands, milling, and paper-making. [5][6]
  • Modern Industry and Economy
    • Energy Supply: The Isle of Grain is home to the UK’s first Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal, operating since 2005. [7]
    • Shipping and Trade: The estuary remains a crucial commercial trading route with active shipping terminals handling diverse raw materials and cargoes. [7]
  • Cultural Sectors:
    • Modern regional regeneration strategies — aligned with the Medway Council — focus heavily on nurturing cultural and creative industries, supported by spaces like the Docking Station at Chatham Historic Dockyard. [8] Balance
    • Conservation: Despite centuries of heavy industrial use, the area supports delicate ecosystems.
    • Designations: The region is protected as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ), with active restoration projects managed by groups like the Medway Swale Estuary Partnership to safeguard vulnerable saltmarshes against erosion. [9][10][11]

This view of circa. 1911-1912 shows the many chimney stacks along the riverside at Frinsbury Peninsula, (see the note about Frindsbury Peninsula Wharves below) Strood’s cement works included Phoenix, Globe, Bridge, Tingeys, Warren, Crown and Beaver Works, © Public Domain. [4]

  • Other wharves on the Medway Estuary included:
    • Cuxton Wharf: Located just downstream from Halling, this wharf served local lime kilns and cement facilities.
    • Frindsbury Peninsula Wharves: The shoreline near Stroud was dominated by a network of wharves feeding the Phoenix, Globe, Bridge, Crown, and Beaver cement works. These are covered in more detail here. [62]
    • Gillingham Riverside Wharves: Positioned further toward the mouth of the river, these wharves handled heavy industrial transport for the Gillingham cement factories.
    • Chatham & Rochester Commercial Wharves which included: Blue Boar Wharf at Rochester Riverside which historically handled heavy freight; Old Gun Wharf in Chatham, dates back to the 17th century when it served as an ordnance depot for the Royal Navy; Sun Wharf & Holborn Wharf which were prominent Chatham wharves located right next to Sun Pier; Bloors Wharf in Rainham which was a heavily utilized commercial shipping point for agricultural and industrial goods.

The list of industries and wharves above are not  intended to be exhaustive, rather they give a strong impression of the industrial nature of the Medway Estuary. Those which follow are also, most probably, not an exhaustive coverage of industrial lines, rather they are examples of industrial sites and their railways/tramways:

The North and West Sides of the Estuary – the Hundred of Hoo and the Isle of Grain

Stoyel & Kidner do not identify any rail-served cement works to the North and West of the Medway Estuary other than those covered in a previous article at Cliffe. [2] There were however other systems, particularly:

103 – Curtis’s and Harvey’s Explosive Factory – Waywell records this industrial site at Lower Hope Point as an explosive’s factory which was opened in 1900 and closed by 1921.

The lines shown purple on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery are all associated with Curtis & Harvey’s Explosive Factory. [14]

As can be seen on the railmaponline.com satellite imagery above, the 2ft-gauge rail network at the site was extensive and the Company employed four 4-wheel battery electric locomotives (or trucks) but their origin and identities are not known. [25: p133]

The majority of the network is picked up on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1908.

An extensive archaeological survey and analysis of the site was undertaken by Rebecca Pullen, Sarah Newsome, Andrew Williams and Wayne D. Cocroft in 2013 for English Heritage. The work extends to two volumes [43][44] and detailed drawings. [46]

The Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway – This railway is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [16]

This railway in its earlier 18″ gauge had a branch between the location of Chattenden Barracks and the village of Hoo. That length of line is covered in the linked article above.

The Chattenden Naval Tramway – this line is covered towards the end of the article about the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway which can also be found on this link. [16]

The Kingsnorth Light Railway – was a 1.75-mile standard-gauge industrial and military line in Kent that connected Sharnal Street Station on the Hundred of Hoo line to a naval airship station and pier on the River Medway. It also served the sites which are shown as power stations on the satellite image below: Damhead Creek Power Station (not a power station at the time) and Kingsnorth Power Station (also not rail served). The full length of the Kingsnorth Light Railway is shown on the railmaponline.com satellite image below. There was also a Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery and Holm & Co.’s Chemical Works at Kingsnorth.

The line shown lilac on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery is the Kingsnorth Light Railway. [14]
At the northern end of the KLR, the line entered a rank of three transfer sidings which sat to the Southeast of the road that became the A228. This extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1909 we can see that the KLR and the transfer sidings were under construction. These sidings were installed as part of the Chattenden Naval Tramway. The Royal Navy permitted shared use with the KLR. Later 6″ and 25″ Ordnance Survey sheets are still in copyright and so are not available on the National Library of Scotland website. [54]
Looking Southeast from the A228 along the Hundred of Hoo Branch. The bridge in the foreground carries the original alignment of the A228. The marshalling sidings and the KLR run parallel to the main line but some distance to the Southwest. The large tree beyond the old road sits on the line of the exchange sidings which extend on to the KLR. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
The blue lines on this extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery mark the Royal Navy lines which also served the KLR. [56]
To the Southeast of Roper’s Green Lane, the  Royal Navy lines feed into the KLR which is shown as a lilac line on railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery. [56]
The blue lines show the Royal Navy lines which also served the KLR. [56]

Looking North along Roper’s Green Lane, the lilac dots are a very approximate indication of the route of the line. [Google Streetview, May 2023]

The next length of the construction site. [55]
A similar length of the line plotted on modern satellite imagery. The road layout in this area is similar to that shown on the map extract above. [56]
Looking back from the old alignment of Stoke Road towards the location of the transfer sidings. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking Southeast from the old alignment of Stoke Road along the line of the KLR. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking back along the line of the old railway from the modern Stoke Road towards the older alignment of Stoke Road which is a short distance beyond the bushes. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Looking Southeast along the line of the KLR which heads towards the taller trees on the horizon. The structure to the right of the centre of the image is the modern Damhead Creek Power Station. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Almost the full remaining length of the construction site in 1906 appears on this extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906. [55]
A similar length of the KLR as appeared under construction in the map extract above. [56]
Looking back along the line of the old railway from Eshcol Road, which ran to the right of the trees on the horizon. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
The entrance to Damhead Creek Power Station from Eshcol Road. The KLR ran ahead towards the poplar tree. [Google Streetview, May 2023]

Heading South the line of the KLR was remote from highways and headed South to the Medway Estuary. It predated the construction of the Kingsnorth Power Station.

Returning North along the route of the KLR to the location of the Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery ……

The location of Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery seen from the Southwest in 1920. At this time, the area was in use by RNAS Kingsnorth. The location of the refinery is marked on the satellite image above as BCA Kingsnorth. Careful inspection of this photograph will show the site was served by two separate rail connections, that furthest from the camera was a branch off the Southern Railway’s Hundred of Hoo line. That nearest to the camera passes through the near end of the refinery site with two branches. The first runs through the site to connect with the branch from the Hundred of Hoo line. the second, to the right of the image is a short siding. This image can be found on the Britain from Above website, Ref. No. EPW000062, (c) Historic England. [46]
The same site but now in 1935. The view across the site is this time from the West. Close to the camera is the Kingsnorth Light Railway. This view can also be seen on the Britain from Above website (Ref. No. EPW047584) (c) Historic England. [65]
The same site but now in 1952. The view across the site is this time from the Northeast. Closer to the camera is the branch from the Hundred of Hoo line. At the top of the picture, the Kingsnorth Light Railway is visible with the two branches mentioned above. This view can also be seen on the Britain from Above website (Ref. No., EAW032066) (c) Historic England. [47]

RNAS Kingsnorth was a First World War Royal Navy air station for airships, initially operating as an experimental and training station, it later moved on to large scale production of airships. It also provided anti-submarine patrols. A number of experimental and prototype blimps were designed and tested there and until 1916, it was the lead airship training establishment in the Royal Naval Air Service. It should not to be confused with RAF Kingsnorth, a separate airfield near Ashford in southern Kent under RAF control before and during World War II. [49]

Wikipedia tells us that, “In 1912 an airship station was procured by the Admiralty to test and evaluate airships with Kingsnorth farm (later RNAS Kingsnorth) chosen as the location in 1913. Miskin, the landowner agreed to surrender his lease on Kingsnorth Farm so that an airship test hangar could be built. A further 81 and a half acres were later purchased from Miskin (Barton Farm) to allow the unrestricted manoeuvring of airships in the test phase. The air station initially received a German built Parseval PL-18 airship and undertook evaluations, where it received the service designation Naval Airship No. 4 (NA4). Kingsnorth also received an Astra Torres airship. Experiments were carried out including an unsuccessful attempt to launch a fighter aircraft from a non-rigid balloon.” [49]

A HMA 3 Astra-Torres Airship in its shed at RNAS Kingsnorth, this is a painting by by Vereker Hamilton – kept as part of the Imperial War museum collection, (c) Public Domain. [50]

RNAS Kingsnorth was commissioned in April 1914 under the control of the Admiralty, first through the Naval Airship Branch, then through the Royal Naval Air Service when the Royal Navy reformed its air branch in July 1914. The RNAS took over the base’s two huge airship sheds and its development and training functions. The first two airships – Astra Torres No. 3 and Parseval No.4 – were used to escort troopships carrying the British Expeditionary Force to France in the summer of 1914. [49]

“RNAS Kingsnorth was involved in the development and flight testing of non-rigid airships, with the SS-class airship (Submarine Scout) being the first type to operate from there, providing anti-submarine defences to the Thames Estuary and southeast coast.[5] The C-Class airship (Coastal Class) type followed, with aircrews trained at the site until the then-named RNAS Cranwell took over this role mid-war. By the start of 1915, there were less than 100 British airmen who could actually fly an airship. It was then decided that RNAS Kingsnorth would be used as a flying training station. Students who had completed the free ballooning courses and ground instruction at RNAS Wormwood Scrubs, would then be passed on to RNAS Kingsnorth for instruction at an operational airship station.” [49]

Testing of the NS-class airship (North Sea) also took place at RNAS Kingsnorth, with successful flight trials first completed in February 1917. By 914, RNAS Kingsnorth was also home to a newly formed Naval Met Service, which provided weather information to airships operating locally over the North Sea. On 1st April 1918 the Royal Flying Corps and the RNAS combined to form the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the station became known as RAF Kingsnorth before decommissioning in 1921. [49]

Holm & Co. Ltd (Kingsnorth Chemical Works) was established to take over the business of a wood pulp agent, manufacturer, merchant importer & dealer in paper-stock which was carried on by A.A. Holm. Alfred, Amundsen Holm was a Norwegian wood-pulp merchant who acquired part of RAF Kingsnorth. The company negotiated with the Admiralty for the lease of the Sharnal Street to Kingsnorth line, the Kingsnorth Light Railway (KLR) as it became known. A licence for running was obtained by Admiralty Deed on 14th August 1924. Holm & Co applied for a light railway order in November 1925 which was turned down in February 1926; a new application was made which was granted in November 1926. On 21st November 1927, the Kingsnorth Light Railway Order was passed. The order permitted the owners to enter into agreements for the construction of junctions between the railway and the railways of the Southern Railway Company. The Admiralty granted the Kingsnorth Light Railway running powers through their sidings at Sharnal Street so that the KLR had access to the Hundred of Hoo branch. [25: p158]

The traffic of Holm & Co was not to be the staple diet of the railway; another firm of chemical manufacturers set up works just to the north east of Holm & Co. This company was Berry Wiggins, who specialised in heavy duty oil and Bitumen products. Their works are covered below. In the early 1930s there was a dispute over the rates that the Berry Wiggins were to pay for the transport of their products. This resulted in Berry Wiggins constructing an independent connection to the Hundred of Hoo Railway which opened in 1932. [25: p1159]

Waywell tells us that the KLR was operated by No.3. a Kerr Stuart 0-4-0ST (Works No. 4227). “For lighter duties a Hardy Petrol shunter (No.3552) was employed. In addition Holm & Co had its own private works line which was 2ft 6in gauge. This line was worked by “Ferret II” Bagnall No. 1853 of 1908. This was a restricted height saddle tank with a dropped cab and footplate. Its vertical height was probably less than six feet. When it was new it saw service at A.C. Beasley’s works at Ratcliffe, Lancashire.” [1: p159]

The KLR met its fate before World War 2, without the traffic of Berry Wiggins there was little to sustain the railway and operations over it slowly petered out as the Holm & Co works was run down. The track was requisitioned and removed by the Royal Engineers in June 1940 as a war time economy, and was sent to Shoeburyness, Chatham & Leysdown.

Ferret II was bought from Blackwell & Son (Engineers) Ltd. in 1925 and was sold or scrapped after April 1936

No. 3 came from Kerr Stuart in 1929 and was sold to the Royal Arsenal Woolwich.

One Hardy locomotive arrived in 1930, a second in 1936. It appears that both were sold or scrapped by the beginning of WWII.

Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery was constructed in 1931 and was the first oil refinery to be built on the Hoo peninsula. It reused a number of buildings that were formerly part of RNAS Kingsnorth including the jetty via which the crude oil was delivered. This was superseded by Bees Ness Jetty which was opened in 1937 and ran for over 2.5km over Stoke Saltings and Stoke Ooze to the deep channel of the Medway. A third jetty called Oakham Ness Jetty was constructed in 1964 to be jointly used with Kingsnorth Power Station. A pipeline ran between the refinery and a small 19th century wharf on Damhead Creek. The Berry Wiggins refinery continued in use until at least 1978 but has since closed and the majority of the site has been demolished. However, a building through which pipes were directed from both the refinery and Bees Ness jetty could still be seen on aerial photographs taken 2007. Bees Ness jetty also survives although it is in a derelict state as does the later Oakham Ness jetty, presumably still in use by Kingsnorth Power Station. This site was mapped from aerial photographs as part of the English Heritage: Hoo Peninsula Landscape Project. [48]

Waywell tells us that, “The refinery used the Kingsnorth Light Railway until 1932 when an independent rail connection was put in east of Beluncle halt, there was also a branch to a wharf on Damhead Creek. Rail traffic ceased [in March] 1972 and the refinery closed in 1977 and was demolished; the site became that of the Kingsnorth Industrial Estate. Later rail traffic in the 1980s was stone for sea defence work which was unloaded and taken away by road transport, and tank cars for cleaning which were tripped to and from Grain refinery. The rail connection to the Hoo Branch was removed in 2002. Berry Wiggins changed its name on 31st December 1979 to K.C.A. Engineering Ltd. E.J. Aldrich Ltd was formed in 1980 and went into voluntary liquidation on 18th April 1986.” [25: p43]

Berry Wiggins Refinery site as it appears on the Ordnance Survey National Grid mapping of 1961-1971, published in 1971. The junction with the Hundred of Hoo line remains, but the Kingsnorth Light Railway which would have crossed the bottom-left corner of this map extract is no longer present. [53]

The first locomotive listed below was built by Brush Electrical and supplied via Powesland & Mason, arriving on site in 1931. [25: p44][60]

Locomotives used at the Berry Wiggins Oil Refinery are listed by Waywell [25: p44] as:

  • Un-named – an 0-4-0ST with outside cylinders built in 1906 by Brush Electrical (Works No. 314) for Powesland & Mason, which arrived on site from Sugar Beet & Crop Driers Ltd, Eynsham, Oxfordshire in December 1931 (prior to that it was GWR No. 921) The loco was sold on to Leicester Museums, Stoneygate, Leicester on 27th February 1968. [25: p44] [60]
  • No.1 – a 4-wheel petrol-mechanical locomotive built by Motor-Rail Ltd (Works No. 4204, built in 1929). This locomotive was supplied new and remained on site until around 1970.
  • No. 2 – another $-wheel petrol-mechanical Locomotive built by Motor-Rail Ltd. (Works No. 3880). This locomotive arrived on site sometime in 1930 but required an overhaul in 1931. It was rebuilt by Motor-Rail in1931 (Works No. 4217). It remained on site until it was sold to the Worcester Locomotive Society, Moreton-on-Lugg, Herefordshire in January 1973. [25: p44]
  • Titan – an 0-4-0DM, diesel mechanical locomotive built in 1951 by Vulcan Foundries (Works No. D140) and supplied by the Drewry Car Company (their No. 2274). Arriving via Wm Cory & Son Ltd. in early 1965, this locomotive remained on site until it was sold to the Kent & East Sussex Railway by 1985.
  • Un-named – another 0-4-0DM built in 1956 by Vulcan Foundries (Works No. D297) and supplied through the Drewry Car Company (their No. 2583) in 1956 to the SEGB before then passing through the hands of Renwick, Wilton & Dobson Ltd. (dealers), Bristol, arriving on site at Berry Wiggins in circa. 1970. This locomotive was sold to the Purfleet Deep Wharf & Storage Co. Ltd. in February 1979. [25: p44]

Kingsnorth Power Station was a dual-fired coal and oil power station. Construction began in 1963 and the power station went live in 1970, although construction continued through until 1973. The four-unit Hinton Heavies station was operated by energy firm E.ON UK, and had a generating capacity of 2,000 megawatts. It was capable of operating on either coal or oil, though in practice oil was used only as a secondary fuel or for startup. It was also capable of co-firing biofuel, up to a maximum of 10% of the station’s fuel mix. A replacement power station, also coal-fired, was considered by owners E.ON, but plans were abandoned. The proposed replacement attracted substantial public protests and criticism, including the 2008 Camp for Climate Action. [52]

Contractors working at Kingsnorth Power Station were, according to Waywell:

  • Peter Lind & Co. Ltd. – who utilised two Ruston & Hornsby 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical locomotives (Works Nos. 195856 & 237929, built in 1939 & 1946 respectively). Both were supplied by Thomas W. Ward by July 1963 and were sent on to Aveley Plant Depot, West Thurrock when no longer needed. [25: p290]
  • John Mowlem & Co. Ltd. – who constructed a new cable tunnel from Kingsnorth Power Station to Chesney Marshes circa. 1973. Two NEI Mining Equipment Ltd., locomotives were used fir this contract but no details are known. [25: p298]

Damhead Creek is a tidal waterway which transitioned from a rural marshy landscape into a heavily industrialised zone. Following the closure in 1921 of RAF Kingsnorth. Damhead Creek became a centre for industrial wood pulping. When Kingsnorth Power Station was built, Damhead Creek was modified to act as the discharge channel for the station’s cooling water.

In the late 1990s, the American firm Energy began construction of 792 MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power facility. The main station buildings were built directly over a marshy extension of the creek known as Damhead Fleet. Construction concluded at the very end of the century, and the plant formally entered service in February 2001. It had been built by Raytheon Engineers and Constructors and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, who provided the gas turbine equipment. On 2nd June 2004, the plant was bought by Scottish Power for £317 million. Then it was purchased and operated by Drax Generation Enterprise Ltd in 2018 before being sold to Vitol’s VPI Holding in December 2020. The plant is not rail-served. [51]

The Isle of Grain

A fuel depot with an attached port was established on the Isle of Grain in 1928.

By 1953, Kent Oil Refinery was established by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in the south of the Isle of Grain. Over ten million tons of crude oil were processed annually. This led to the building of an oil-fired power station at Grain and dual-fuel-capable power station at Kingsnorth (which, in practice, used coal).

The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company became BP. BP closed the refinery on 27th August 1982. Later, the site was taken over by British Gas plc, which used a small part of the site for the storage of liquefied natural gas. [57]

The Isle of Grain Refinery. [Google Maps, September 2026]
The railways serving the Isle of Grain Refinery are shown on this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery in a light peach colour. The lines were all initially under the control of the South Eastern & Chatham Railway, later the Southern Railway.  [14]

From the outset, the refinery could refine 4,000,000 tons of crude oil annually, the majority of which was shipped in from the Middle East. Smaller quantities were also delivered from Libya, Nigeria, Venezuela, and South America. In all, there were twelve jetties for sea vessels: nine of which could accommodate the largest oil tankers of the era (up to 80,000 tons  dead weight). Three jetties served smaller craft of up to 19,000 tons. [58]

The Hoo Peninsula branch provided a passenger service for refinery workers and a single utilitarian prefabricated platform with two faces came into use on 3rd September 1951. Adjacent to the station, David Glasspool tells us, were “four parallel ‘loading’ sidings. Here, pipes were suspended above the tracks on gantries; when tanker wagons were stabled underneath, refined oil could be transferred to them. It would appear likely that these rails were not in use from the outset, instead appearing during the site’s expansion. … The final day of passenger working along the … route, to …  Allhallows-on-Sea and Grain, was on Sunday 3rd December 1961, but the refinery … continued to go from strength to strength. Subsequent expansion between 1956 and 1960 increased the annual refining capacity to …  11,000,000 tons (58 times the capacity of nearby Berry Wiggins).” [58]

By 1983, Grain’s refining apparatus was obsolete. Although refining at the site came to an end, shipments to the site continued, and the site was used for storage. Apparently, the last train carrying oil from the site ran in 1999.

The branch continued to be of value: “container flows had commenced along the route in 1990, with the opening of Thamesport, and the former site of Port Victoria station had become a rail-served gravel works. The future of the western-most section of the branch from Hoo Junction had been secure since 1961; in this year, a spur opened to the Portland Cement Works at Cliffe, this of which itself became a gravel operation from 1969 onwards.” [58]

Locomotives serving at the Isle of Grain Refinery included:

  • Hudswell Clarke 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive ‘Margaret’ (Works No. D1031 – built in 1956) which was delivered new to the refinery in October 1956. It worked on-site until May 1960 before moving on to “Denbigshire to work for Limestone Products. Eight years later the loco made its way to Cheshire to work for W. J. Lee – and then just three years on, in 1971, it was sent to Walsh Transport Services in Darwen, Lancashire, for storage. … In 1987, the loco moved on to Fleetwood Loco Centre, and before its move to [the Ribble Steam Railway], had a significant amount of work carried out to its engine and gearbox.” [59][25: p95]
  • John Fowler & Co. (Leeds) 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive ‘Ormsby’ (Works No. 22077 – built in 1938). Ormsby came to the Kent Refinery from Thurrock Chalk & Whitening Co. Ltd, Essex in December 1951. The locomotive only stayed at the Kent Refinery for a short time, going to Harrisons Limeworks Ltd., Shap, Westmorland by April 1954. [25: p95]
  • Hudswell Clarke – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No.D708 – built in 1951). This locomotive arrived new in 1951 and was sent to M. Lynch & Son Ltd. in April 1971 and from there it went to Wm. Cory & Son Ltd. [25: p95]
  • Hudswell Clarke – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No.D737 – built in 1952). This locomotive arrived new in 1952 and was sent to M. Lynch & Son Ltd. in April 1971 and from there it went to Wm. Cory & Son Ltd. [25: p95]
  • William Bagnall – 0-6-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 3151 – built in 1962). This locomotive came on loan in February 1962 and was sent on to Robert, Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd., Darlington in September of the same year. It was sent later to British Waterways, Sharpness Docks (Marsh 1963). [25: p95]
  • Andrew Barclay – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 412 – built in 1957). It arrived at Kent Oil Refinery from Gavieside Refinery, Midlothian in 1963. It was sent to Ashmores of Dudley Ltd., Commercial Vehicle Dealers in January 1982. [25: p95]
  • Andrew Barclay – 0-4-0 Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 395 – built in 1956). It arrived at Kent Oil Refinery from Thames Matex Ltd., West Thurrock on hire in 1967. It was returned to Thames Matex Ltd in September 1968. [25: p95]
  • No. 0006 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6971, Built in 1968). It arrived new in 1968 and was sold/scrapped in September 1983.
  • WIN 4820-0007 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6972, Built in 1968). It arrived new in 1968 and was sold/scrapped in September 1983.
  • WIN 4820-0005 – Strachan & Henshaw 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical Road-Rail Locomotive (Works No. 7508 – built in 1967).It arrived new and was sold or scrapped in around 1976.
  • Rolls-Royce Ltd, (Sentinel Works Shrewsbury) 4-wheel Diesel-Mechanical Locomotive (Works No. 10260, built in 1966). This locomotive came on hire from Thomas Hill, Rotherham and was returned there on 9th October 1981.
  • WIN 4820-0007 – Thomas Hill supplied 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive, ‘Man of Kent’ (Supplier No. 294V, built in 1981). This locomotive arrived new in 1981 and was sent to the BP Oil Terminal, Hamble, Hampshire in November 1992.
  • WIN 4820-0009 – Thomas Hill supplied 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive, ‘Kentish Maid’ (Supplier No. 295V, built in 1981). This locomotive arrived new in 1981 and was passed on to the Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal by 7th July 1993.
  • No. 24 F35 – Hunslett Engine Co. Ltd. 0-6-0 Diesel Hydraulic Locomotive (Works No. 6950, Built in 1967). This lcomotive came from the BP Oil Terminal at Hamble in 1989 and was passed on to the Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal in 1990.

Isle of Grain Bitumen Terminal – this terminal occupied part of the Kent Oil Refinery site and used the last two locomotives mentioned above (WIN 4820-0009 and No. 24 F35). Both of these locomotives were passed on to Coryton Bulk Oil Terminal, Essex circa. October 1999. [25: p95]

Brickworks on the Hundred of Hoo included:

  • Hoo St. Werburgh Brickworks which had a short tramway and wharf near West Hoo Creek – advertised for two locomotives at different times – in 1914, for a 2ft 6in gauge locomotive and in 1925, for a 2ft gauge petrol tractor. [25: p159]
The Brickworks at Hoo St. Werburgh as they appear on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1938. [61]

This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery shows the various tramways which from time to time were in use associated with the brickworks. The brickworks were on what is not the site of Hoo Marina Park. [14]

Stores on the Hundred of Hoo included:

  • Belvedere Central Stores Depot, No. 20 which was established on Erith Marsh – It had a standard gauge siding which linked to Cory’s Crabtree sidings and an internal 2ft 6in gauge network. The site operated until 1927 when it was transferred to the West Kent Electric Co. …. Three standard-gauge locomotives were used. The first was ex-LB&SCR No. 642 – built at Brighton Works in 1877 and returned to the LB&SCR in 1919. A second, ‘M/M No.5’, a 4-4-2T, was built in 1885 by Neilson & Co., Glasgow (Works No. 3209), supplied by Ridham Salvage Depot in 1921 and sold on to the East Kent Light Railway on 13th April 1923. The third locomotive was No. 424, also a 4-4-2T Beyer-Peacock locomotive (Works No. 2176, built in 1882) which arrived from W. D. Catterick Camp, North Yorkshire in November 1923 and possibly passed to George Cohen, Sons & Co. Ltd by June 1925. …. Two narrow gauge locomotives were employed on the site: ‘Skylark’ was an 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart locomotive (Works No. 802, built in 1902); and ‘M/M No.7‘ was an 0-6-0T William Bagnall locomotive (Works No.1911, built in 1917). Both of these locomotives had a very short life at the site. They arrived on site in February 1921 from CSD Ridham No. 98 and were removed from site by 15th June 1921, being sent to CSD Neasden No. 31. [25: p188]
  • Ridham Central Stores Depot, No. 98 opened on 24th March 1919 and closed on 24th August 1921. The two 2ft 6in gauge locomotives (Skylark and M/M No. 7) were used at Ridham before being sent to Belvedere. [25: p189]

South of Upnor (on the West Bank of the Medway)

Beyond the southern extremity of the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway were Whitewall Cement Works and a series of Cement Works at Frindsbury. …

  • Whitewall Cement Works – these Works are covered in the third article in this series which can be found here. [36]
  • The Crown & Quarry Works at Frindsbury – these Works, and those which preceded them, are covered in the article above and in more detail here. [62]

The Aveling & Porter Invicta Works – These works were on the banks of the Medway in Strood. Most of the company’s output was steam roller, tractors and traction engines. The company did produce some railway locomotives based essentially on traction engine practice. This is not the place for a history of the company and its works but it is worth noting here that the company was rail-served, despatching much of their output by rail. This company produced some unconventional steam engines for use primarily in industry. More information can be found on Wikipedia on this link. [28]

The South and East Sides of the Estuary

Gillingham Portland Cement Works … Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “A cement works was erected at Danes Hill, Gillingham, in 1874, and was acquired in 1893 by John Bazley White & Bros Ltd, from the Gillingham Portland Cement Co. Ltd. Its tramway is said to have been of 3ft 6 in. gauge. The company was taken over by APCM and closed in 1910. The works was reopened in 1920 under different management, but closed at the end of 1935 for two months, after which an Agreement with the Rugby Portland Cement Co. Ltd allowed it to be opened yet again; Rugby purchased it in 1938 and closed it soon afterwards. At this time it is reported that an engine called Excelsior transferred from Batchelors, Halling was still in the works.” [1: p67]

An extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1896, published in 1898. [17]
An extract showing the clay pit and chalk pit associated with Gillingham Cement Works. [18] These three map extracts cover much of the extent of the Gillingham Cement Works and its Chalk and Clay Pits. The site of the works and tramways straddle three different OS Map Sheets!

This final map extract shows the tramways associated with the Gillingham Cement Works which sat to its East. [19]

Queenborough Cement Works and allied industries …. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “The Queenborough Cement Co. Ltd opened in 1882 and by 1896 had a short tramway down to a wharf and creek leading off the River Swale; a siding to the SECR was laid in 1904. The chalk pit also supplied a ceramics manufacturer, A. Johnson & Sons Ltd, established in 1908, which had a narrow gauge tramway.” [1: p67]

The story of these works and the area immediately around Queenborough is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [12]

British Standard Cement Ltd., Rainham …. These were short-lived works opened in 1912, it was operated by the British Standard Cement Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of E. J. & W. Goldsmith Ltd., making branded ‘Capstan’ cement. It was bought in 1928 by the Red Triangle Group and then in 1931 by APCM, closing 1937. A 2ft gauge tramway linked the Works with its Chalk Pit.

The short tramway of the Rainham Works of British Standard Cement in the 1930s; the wharf was reached through Rainham Creek, and the line at the bottom passed under Gillingham Road into the pit. This extract is taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1934. [13]
The Chalk Pit on the adjacent 25″ OS Sheet – surveyed 1931, published 1933.

Stoyel & Kidner describe three locomotives which worked at the location:

  • Baldwin (Works No. 45142) 4-6-0T (unnamed) built in 1917;
  • Bagnall (Works No. 2149) 0-4-0ST ‘Capstan’ built in 1925; and
  • Bagnall (Works No. 2262) 0-4-0ST ‘Capstan II’ built in 1927.

The Baldwin holds a particular place in industrial railway history. Although a number of 2ft-gauge Baldwins from WW1 were sold to public narrow-gauge lines in Britain, only one was purchased for industrial working. No. 45142 was that locomotive. [15: photo 31]

Stoyel & Kidner say that, “The Baldwin locomotive was acquired in 1918 from the War Dept Light Railways (their No. 560) and was rebuilt by W.G. Bagnall Ltd in 1918 before starting work at Rainham. The other two locomotives were supplied new and in 1933 were transferred to the BPCM Ltd’s works at Beeding, Sussex. The Baldwin locomotive remained derelict at the works for some time afterwards and was then presumably scrapped.” [1: p69]

East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd., Gillingham, Sharps Green Cement Works Co. Ltd … The Gillingham address was probably no more than a mailing address. The company owned a small chalk pit just north of the SECR at a place now known as Lower Twydall.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that a “railway ran northwards [from a chalk pit] under the main road at Sharps Green and on to the narrow peninsular forming the end of Bartlett Creek. Here Mr Alfred Castle had a wharf and barges to take chalk to his works at Queenborough; he also owned the quarry and the railway, but the cement works at Horrid Hill at the tip of the peninsular, known as Sharps Green Cement Works, was owned by C.L. Cary and B.P. Cary. It was opened in 1902, and taken over by APCM in 1910, being closed in February 1913.” [1: p69]

Almost the full length of the tramway appears on the map extracts below. The tramway led to a Wharf on the North side of the ‘island’ called Horrid Hill. The tramway does not appear on the next OS sheet to the North, although the Wharf does.

All these map extracts are taken from the same 25″ OS Sheet which was surveyed in 1906, published in 1909. [14]

Stoyel & Kidner note that two Aveling & Porter locomotives were supplied new to East Kent:

  • ‘Venture’ 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter Works No. 4612, built in 1900.
  • ‘Success’ 0-4-0WTG Aveling & Porter Works No. 5082 built in 1902.

‘Venture’ had been sold by 1911 to the Sussex Portland Cement Co. Ltd, Beeding, near Shoreham (acquired by BPCM in 1911), and ‘Success’ was later sold to Queenborough Wharf Co. Ltd.

Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd …. Stoyel & Kinder tell us that a Works was set up in 1850 at Sittingbourne on the East bank of Milton Creek close to the village of Murston by George Smeed which mainly produced bricks, but later also lime and cement. The company Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd was formed in 1876. [1: p69]

The company joined the Red Triangle Group when it formed. The Red Triangle Group was the informal but universal name of the Allied Cement Manufacturers Ltd., which operated seven plants in the UK (British Standard, Dunstable, Ellesmere Port, Harbury, Holborough, Rhee Valley and Sittingbourne). The failed Red Triangle Group became part of APCM in 1931. These works closed in 1970.

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “a railway of 3ft 7½ in. gauge ran from the East Hall clay pits, just west of Tonge Road, to some sheds and then on under Murston Road to the Smeed Dean complex.” [1: p70]

The tramway network associated with Smeed Dean is covered by these next two map extracts.

The tramway network belonging to Smeed Dean & Co. Ltd and its successors as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1896, published in 1897. The cement works can be seen on the first of these two map extracts at the left edge of the image, immediately below Milton Creek. [20]
The 1896 survey as a transparent overlay on a modern satellite image. The two features which remain are Milton Creek in the top left of this image and what was, in 1896, the London, Chatham and Dover Railway, now often referred to as the North Kent Line. a[21]

According to Stoyel & Kidner, locomotives used on this tramway were supplied new but to different designs. [1: p70] The company did not give them names. They were:

  • 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 656) built in 1900;
  • 0-4-0T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 701) built in 1900;
  • 0-4-2T Kerr Stuart (Works No. 811) built in 1903;

Stoyel & Kidner say that, “The two earlier locomotives were scrapped in 1949 when the railway system was discontinued, but the 1903 one remained in storage in its shed until it was finally broken up in 1957.” [1: p70]

Broom Bank Railway …. Stoyel & Kidner tells that this railway was 4ft 3in-gauge opened in 1933, and ran from just North of Smeed Dean cement works. eastwards to East Hall, then North through Mere Court to clay pits near Little Murston. This seems to be much the same route as followed by the northern arm of the Smeed Dean network from earlier in the century. The later OS Map (surveyed in 1938, published in 1946) [22] shows a very similar alignment to that on the map extracts above.

Stoyel & Kidner note the similarity in alignment between the two networks but emphasise the difference in gauge. They note that two locomotives were employed on this line, both of which must have arrived after deployment elsewhere as both we manufactured well before the Broom. bank Railway opened.

  • Wouldham – an 0-4-0ST built in 1920 by Barclay (Works No. 1679); and
  • Venture – another 0-4-0ST built by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1835).

Stoyel & Kidner tell us that “both these locomotives were transferred from the BPCM Works at Wouldham Hall, in 1934 and 1935 respectively, and the rather unusual gauge was no doubt chosen for no better reason than the fact that these locomotives and other rolling stock happened to be available at the time. Venture was scrapped in 1949, but Wouldham lingered on to meet the same fate in 1962. Diesel locomotives were in use by 1956.” [1: p70] They do not provide details of the diesel locomotives used on the line.

APCM Ltd, Highsted, Sittingbourne (Highsted Chalk Pits) …. Stoyel & Kidner tell us that, “Just North of the hamlet of Highsted, there was a group of pits whose railway was unconnected with any other, supplying chalk to the Smeed Dean works latterly through a large-bore pipeline, mixed with water. A pit to the east of Highsted road was opened first, about 1896, served by a narrow gauge railway. Later a larger pit the other side of the road was opened up. and the two were connected by tunnel. The railway was taken up in World War I and replaced in 1927 by a standard gauge line; this was also out of use in 1942-7. After re-opening, a third pit was opened up south of Tunstall Road, entered by a tunnel at the south-east end of the second pit, electrically worked.” [1: p70]

The Highsted Chalk Pit as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1909. [24]
Highsted Chalk Pits in 1938 as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1946. The network of railways was more substantive than shown on this map extract. [26]

The only locomotive recorded at this site was:

Tay – an 0-4-0ST built in 1924 by Barclay (Works No. 1828) and arrived on site in 1927 once the line had been converted to standard-gauge.

The locomotive was bought from the Avonmouth contract of Sir W. Arrol & Co. “In 1942, it was transferred to the BPCM Ltd’s Works at Greenhithe and was almost immediately re-transferred to the APCM Ltd’s Dunstable Works. It remained there until 1946 when it returned to Greenhithe and went back to Highsted in 1947. It remained in the chalk pit here until it was scrapped in 1962.” [1: p71]

Stoyel & Kidner also note that, “The equipment for the electrical working of the third pit came from the G. & T. Earle, Hope Works in Derbyshire; there was a live centre rail taking 250V power from a motor generator. The three locomotives weighed 15 tons. with two 27 hp motors; two were built by Metropolitan-Vickers in 1927 and one in 1935 by Hawthorn Leslie. Trains of seven wagons took 56 tons of chalk from the pit to the old washeries, from which it was piped as slurry. Electric working started in November 1958 and ceased in 1970 when the works closed down.” [1: p71]

There is some discussion about modern explorations of the tunnels associated with these chalk pits here. [23]

Other Cement Works …. There was an F.C. Barron & Co. cement works on the east side of Otterham Creek but Stoyel & Kidner note that there was no evidence of a railway at that location. They also note other Cement Works in the general area which include, “Crown Quay Cement Works (F. Rosher & Co.) Sittingbourne; Dolphin Cement Works (C. Burley Ltd) on Milton Creek; Elmley Cement Works (later Maclean Levett), established about 1854 on Elmley Isle; there are no details of railways.” [1: p71]

Other Rail-Served Industries located in and to the South of the Medway Estuary

Medway Ports Authority on Hoo Ness Island

Waywell notes that while the present location is under the jurisdiction of Medway Ports Authority it has had a series of different owners – originally the Admiralty, then the Ministry of Public Building & Works, then the Department of the Environment (until 1985). A 2ft 6in-gauge tramway ran round the perimeter of the island – at first this was used for the transport and disposal of mud dredged from Chatham Docks, later, when a pipeline replaced the tramway, the tramway was used only for maintenance. That tramway appears to have been replaced by a 2ft-gauge tramway in 1952. [25: p177]

The 2ft 6in-gauge tramway on Hoo Ness Island was replaced in 1952 by a 2ft-gauge tramway. [25: p15]

In 2ft 6in-gauge days (pre 1952) 9 locomotives are recorded as in use by Waywell, in 2ft-gauge days (post 1952) 4 locomotives are recorded. [25: p177]

The full list of these locomotives can be found in Waywell’s book. [25: p177] It is, however, worth noting here that apart from five 4 wheel petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotives (onje of which was rebuilt) the 2ft 6in-gauge locomotives were:

  • Ascension (an 0-4-0T Avonside Engine locomotive (Works No. 1480) built in 1904 arrived here after service on the Chattenden & Upnor Railway by July 1914. It was set aside or scrapped after 6th June 1928. [25: p177]
  • Nipper & Ness (two 0-4-0ST Barclay locomotives (Works Nos. 1895 & 1947) built respectively in 1909 and 1911 were supplied new from the manufacturer. [25: p177]
  • Sirdar (an 0-4-0T Kerr Stuartlocomotive (Works No.749) built in 1903 came to the site after being used in a number of locations. Waywell lists these as “Henry Lovatt & Sons, contractors, [until] 1914, originally Leek & Manifold Valley Light Railway (1902-1904) contract, Staffordshire; (possibly thence Manchester Ship Canal No.9 Dock, Salford (1902-1905) contract, Lancashire).” [25: p177]

After 1952 – one of the 2ft 6in-gauge 4-wheel petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotives was re-gauged to 2ft. Another petrol/paraffin mechanical locomotive was purchased and the two locomotives served together on the island until 1962 when they were sent to the dealers, George Cohen, Sons & Co. Ltd,

In 1962, two 4-wheel diesel mechanical locomotives were employed, remaining on the island until 27th April 1990 and were then sold into preservation.

Chatham Dockyard

This extract from a CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on ‘The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent’ shows the immediate area around Chatham Dockyard. [25: p15]

All of the sites referenced in the top right of this extract from a CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent [25: p15] are covered in a separate article which can be found here. [27]

Two separate locations outside of the dockyard are highlighted in the image above:

P45 – The Royal Engineer’s Museum – it was established in its present location in 1987. It has standard-gauge and 2ft-gauge exhibits but is not within the scope of this article. [25: p372]

C16a – Ball & Gammon Chatham Contract – Ball & Gammon undertook the construction of a branch line from the London, Chatham & Dover Railway (LC&DR) into Chatham Dockyard between 1875 and 1877. Waywell says that the work cost circa £57,000, opening on 16th February 1877. The contractor’s railway may have been 3ft 6in-gauge. One Aveling & Porter locomotive was used on the work: [25: p272]

  • Burnt Oak – 4 wheel WTG (geared transmission), built in 1868 by Aveling & Porter (Works No. 447) arrived from Aveling &Porter in May 1875 possibly after repairs. [25: p272]

168, 170, 174, 252 – Chatham Dockyard – all are covered in a separate article which is reference above. [27]

C55, C63, C148, C156 – Chatham Dockyard Contracts – all are covered in a separate article which is reference above. [27]

P9, P10, P40 – Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust, Chatham Steam Restoration Co., North Downs Steam Railway – all are preservation activities not strictly relevant to this article, all operate or operated within the Dockyard complex. Please see the separate article about the Dockyard. [27]

Rochester

Three locations South of the River Medway are highlighted in the image below which is also an extract from the CAD drawing in Robin Waywell’s book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent. [25: p15]

The River Medway Southwest of the Medway Estuary in Stroud and Rochester. [25: p15]

Three locations are noted by Robin Waywell:

44 – Invicta Works, Aveling & Porter – Most of the company’s output was steam roller, tractors and traction engines. The company did produce some railway locomotives based essentially on traction engine practice. This is not the place for a history of the company and its works but it is worth noting here that the company was rail-served, despatching much of their output by rail. However, the location marked by Waywell [25: p15] appears to be incorrect. The factory was on the Northwest side of the Medway in Strood. More information can be found on Wikipedia on this link. [28]

94 – William Cory’s Coal Wharf – had a travelling crane and extensive railway sidings which were laid in 1909 on land built up with chalk fill. These sidings had a connection to the Rochester-Canterbury line just to the North of Rochester Railway Station. The Wharf closed in 1970 but the site was worked for British Gypsum Ltd (Fridays only) until around 1984.

Cory’s Wharf sits across two 25″Ordnance Survey Sheets as shown here. These extracts are from the 25″ survey of 1932/33, published in 1935. [29][30]

Waywell records a number of standard-gauge locomotives employed at the site: [5: p121-122]

  • Bristol – an 0-6-0ST, built in1901 by Avonside Engine Co. (Works No 1427) arrived new and was sent to Erith Wharf. [5: p121-122]
  • Erith – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1904 by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1638) arrived new and was scrapped or sold by 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Belvedere – a 4-wheel WTG – built by Aveling & Porter (Works No. 3888) in 1897, ex-Erith Wharf in April 1909, sent on to Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • (Jetty) – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1910 by Avonside Engine Co. (Works No. 1578) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex in July 1948 and was sold or scrapped in 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Purfleet – an 0-4-0ST, built in 1919 by Manning Wardle (Works No. 1973) arrived from Erith Wharf in July 1938 and was sent to Purfleet Wharf, Essex by 1950. [5: p121-122]
  • Woolwich – 4wVBT – built in 1927 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.8796) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • Charlton – 4wVBT – built in 1933 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.7060) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by April 1950 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • Belvedere – 4wVBT – built in 1945 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.9365) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by May 1950 and was sent to Thomas Hill, Rotherham in 1957 and thence to Thomas E. Gray Ltd, Burton Latimer, Northamptonshire in May 1958. [5: p122]
  • Greenwich – 4wVBT – built in 1929 by Sentinel, Shrewsbury (Works No.7696) arrived from Gallons Wharf, Essex by January 1952 and scrapped in 1956. [5: p122]
  • R39 – Thalia – an 0-4-0DM – built in 1954 by Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd. (Works No.7816) and supplied via Drewry Car Co. Ltd. (No.2503) in 1954, arrived new and was sent for preservation at the North Downs Steam Railway, Chatham Dockyard on 7th September 1985. [5: p122]
  • Telemon – an 0-4-0DM – built in 1955 by Vulcan Foundry (Works No.D295) and supplied via Drewry Car Co. Ltd. (No.2568) in 1955, arrived new and was sent to Strood Depot in 1973 and thence to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p122][5: p367]

P39 – William Cory & Son Ltd, Cory’s Wharf, Rochester – Waywell separately identifies the preservation activities of the company which, while not strictly relevant here, encompassed the following standard-gauge locomotives: [5: p367]

  • No. 1 – Scottie – an 0-4-0DM, built in1957 by Ruston Hornsby (Works No. 412427) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 13th December 1986 and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 21st December 1987. [5: p367]
  • No. 2 – Burt – an 0-4-0DM, built in1950 by Motor Rail Ltd (Works No. 9019) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 6th December 1986, and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No. 4 – (No. 3) – 0-4-0DH, built in1959 by John Fowler (Leeds) (Works No. 4220008) came from Higham Station site in June 1983 and was sent to Chatham Dockyard, after 5th May 1984 and before 24th November 1984, but returned on 5th May 1987, and was then sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No. 6 – (20287) Princess Margaret – an 0-4-0 DM, built in1948 by Barclays (Works No. 376) arrived from Chatham Dockyard 29th December 1986 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford by June 1987.
  • No. 8 – Octane – an 0-4-0DE, built in 1958 by Yorkshire Engine Co. (Works No.2686) arrived from Esso Ltd, Purfleet, Essex on25th April 1987 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]
  • No.9 – R40 Telemon – (see Telemon above).
  • No. 3 – North Downs – an 0-6-0DT – built in 1955 by Robert Stephenson & Hawthorns Ltd. (Works No.7846) arrived from Chatham Dockyard by June 1987 and was sent to Stone Lodge, Dartford after 3rd January 1988. [5: p367]

Along the South Side of the Estuary

Of the Works noted by Robin Waywell an number have already been covered above. These include:

114 – East Kent Chalk Quarry Co. Ltd., Gillingham, Sharps Green Cement Works Co. Lt. [5: p140]

41 – British Standard Cement Ltd., Rainham. [5: p73]

Another extract from the CAD drawing provided by Robin Waywell in his book on The Industrial Railways & Locomotives of Kent. [25: p15]

Works not already covered include:

87/H40 – Rainham Brickfield – Brickfields operated by Joseph Edward Butcher, located on both sides of Otterham Quay Lane with a tramway between the brickfields and clay pits; in operation by 1867 until at least 1882; later taken over by Eastwoods Ltd. Gauge: 3ft 0in. [5: p118] Adjacent were Otterham Quay Brickworks established by A. J. Knight by 1891 with a tramway to a wharf at Otterham Quay. the works closed after 1913, but certainly by 1924. [5: p389] Records have an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0WTG locomotive (Works No. 1574) of 1879 being delivered new to the Brickworks. [5: p118]

Waywell also identifies companies that seem to have operated later in the 20th century on these sites. These are covered separately below – London & Rochester Trading Co. Ltd (Rainham Brickworks), [25: p173-174, but see the notes below] and Redland Bricks Ltd (Otterham Works). [25: p200, but see notes below]

Otterham Quay Brickworks and Rainham Brickworks straddled Otterham Quay Lane. These are shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [31]

Close by were Falcon Cement Works and Overshore Brickworks, established in the 19th century these works operated Operated under various ownerships—including Burge and Barron, F.C. Barron and Co., and Barrons Cement Co.—before being acquired by the Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (BPCM/Blue Circle) in 1911 and closing permanently in 1913. As can be seen below the company’s wharf and Overshore Brickworks were rail-served but not more widely connected to the rail network. Typically, this would have been a 2ft-gauge line. [32][25: p382]

Falcon Cement Works and Overshore Brickworks. These are shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [33]

119 – Gore Farm Clay Pit, Upchurch – this clay pit had a 2ft-gauge tramway and a wash mill.

120/121 – Lower Halstow Brickworks and Workshops – it appears that the same 2ft-gauge tramway served these locations as well.

Lower Halstow Brickworks appear to have extended over a relatively large area. Here, and extending onto the next OS Sheet to the South, we see the site to the North of Lower Halstow village. [35]

Here we see the most southerly portion of the works on the North side off Lower Halstow village and the village of Lower Halstow, [34]

The map extract below shows the more southerly area of the brickworks sited to the Southwest of the village of Lower Halstow. [34]

The most southerly element of Lower Halstow Brickworks as show on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [34]

The most southerly length of the tramway which ran through Lower Halstow Brickworks, also runs along side Little Gore Woods to claypits to the Southeast of Gore as show on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906, published in 1908. [34]

Gore Farm had two 2ft-gauge locos:

A 4wDM built in 1936 by F. C. Hibberd & Co. (Works No. 2009) which, by July 1958, was resident at Lower Halstow Workshops; [5: p144] and a 4wDM built in 1930 by Orenstein & Koppel (Works No. 4105) possibly supplied by Wm. Jones, Greenwich which was sent on to Bobbing Clay Pits in 1955. [5: p144]

Also worthy of note is another Brickworks and tramway network to the Northwest of Lower Halstow, North of Upchurch, close to Frog Farm and Wetham Green which is shown on the map extract below. [35]

The Brickworks at Wetham Green warrant a short note in Waywell’s lists which is reproduced towards the end of this article. This tramway was horse-worked and never employed locomotives. [35]

Between Lower Halstow Brickworks and Workshops,

, Waywell records nine unnamed 4-wheel locos. These are:

  • 4wWE (overhead wire-powered electric locomotive) – built around 1900 by A. Hurst & Son, Dewsbury, Supplier not known, sent to M. Lynch & Son for scrap in around 1920; [5: p144]
  • 4wPM – built in 1933 by F. C. Hibberd (Works No.1828) – ex Hibberd’s possibly on hire, previously at Orb Works Newport, Monmouthshire, returned to Hibberd’s where it was rebuilt as Works No.2004; [5: p144]
  • 4wPM – built in 1935 by F. C. Hibberd (Works No.1905) – ex Hibberd’s, previously at Middle Level Commissioners, March, scrapped on site; [5: p144]
  • 4wDM – built in1939 by Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 198258), arrived from Orton Brickworks, Cambridgeshire by August 1956, scrapped on site; [5: p144 &145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1936 by F.C. Hibberd (Works No. 2009), arrived new at Gore Farm Pits (noted above) and moved to Lower Halstow Brickworks by July 1958, scrapped in 1967; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1935 by F.C. Hibberd (Works No. 1934) arrived from Barrington Cement Works, Cambs. after August 1953, definitely here by11th August 1956, scrapped on site; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built by Orenstein & Koppel (build date and works number not known) may have been supplied by Wm. Jones Ltd., Greenwich – certainly present by 24th August 1964, probably scrapped on site; [5: p145]
  • 4wDM – built in 1934 by Motor Rail Ltd. (Works No. 5862) arrived from Orchard Farm Clay Pits by April 1966, sent to Allbrook Brickworks, Hampshire by April 1967; [5: p145] and
  • 4wDM – built in 1941 by Motor Rail Ltd. (Works No. 8626) arrived from Orchard Farm Clay Pits by April 1966, scrapped around 1967. [5: p145]

147 – Ibstock Building Products Ltd, Funton Works, Lower Halstow – this brickworks was built in the 1930s. It was used as a War Department Store during WW2. First owned by Newington Bricks Ltd., then by Eastwoods Ltd., then by Redland Bricks Ltd. and then by Ibstock Bricks Ltd. Limited information is available about the locomotives used internally. It seems that there were two different gauges both electrically powered:

3 locos were 4ft-gauge all built locally – 2w-2WE

2 locos were 2ft-gauge, again locally produced, a 4wBE of 1956 and a 2w-2BE of 1979. [5: p162]

Funton Brickworks in the 21st century. [Google Maps, September 2026]

161 – London & Rochester Trading Co. Ltd (Rainham Brickworks) – were a company of barge & ship owners. By 1924 the Company owned 60 sailing barges. By 1930, the Company also operated a brickworks at Otterham Quay. The works had a 2ft-gauge tramway from a pug mill which crossed the Lower Rainham Road to a chalk pit. [25: p173-174]

Whilst I cannot be entirely sure which brickworks Waywell is referencing here, it is possible that he is referring to this short tramway or that shown on the image immediately below. The two tramways and Works are immediately adjacent to each other. [37]

Two separate tramway networks appear on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1938, published in 1946. These appear of the two adjacent extracts from the same OS sheet. [37]

Waywell list three locomotives as having been active at the site. All three were 4-wheel petrol mechanical locomotives built by F. C. Hibberd & Co. Ltd – all were scrapped by April 1948:

  • Works No. 1539 built in 1927
  • Works No. 1598 built in 1928
  • Works No. 1631 built in 1929

194 – Redland Bricks Ltd (Otterham Works) – Alternatively, one of these brickworks may have been operated by Redland Bricks Ltd. Waywell notes a a 2ft-gauge tramway from the Brickfield to Otterham Quay which also had a 2ft-gauge cable operated line. the Site was closed by 1991. two 4-wheel battery electric locomotives built by Redland cam second hand to these works in 1956 (from Fulton) and 1974 (from Warnham). Bother were scrapped by August 1992. [25: p200]

180 – Newington Brickworks – a brickworks located next to the A2 to the West of Sittingbourne. It was listed in directories from 1948 . Initially locomotive worked but superseded by hand-working. [25: p189] Track was 2ft-gauge and the three locomotives were all 4-wheel diesel mechanical locos:

  • Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 182140), built in 1936 and arrived on site from Hoo Brickworks by 22nd July 1948 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe after 2nd August 1954 and by July 1958.
  • Ruston & Hornsby (Works No. 222094), built in 1946 and arrived on site from the War Department, Liphook, Hampshire after 28th March 1957 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe after 2nd August 1954 and by July 1958.
  • Hunslett (Works No. 2449), built 1941, originally War Department and arrived on site from Fred Watkins Ltd. dealer by July 1958 – sent to Cremer Whiting & Co. Ltd., Ospringe around 1962. [25: p189,190]
Newington Brickworks & Tramway only appear on the 25″ OS Sheet of 1906, published in 1908. [40][41]

225 – Motney Hill Sewage Works, Rainham – operated by Rochester, Chatham & Gillingham Joint Sewerage Board until 1st April 1974. The original rail system was 20″-gauge and was replaced in 1952 by a 2ft-gauge system. The rail system finally closed in 1978. [25: p 218] The Wastewater Treatment Works is now operated by Southern Water. [38]

Waywell lists three 20″-gauge locomotives as having been active at the site before 1952. All three were 4-wheel petrol mechanical locomotives built by F. C. Hibberd & Co. Ltd.:

  • Works No. 1690 built in 1930
  • Works No. 1806 built in 1932
  • Works No. 2036 built in 1937

All were disposed of after 1952, apparently two were sent to W. Morris, Bromyard & Linton Light Railway, Herefordshire in 1978. [25: p 218-219]

Waywell lists two 2ft-gauge $-wheel diesel mechanical locomotives built by Motor Rail which arrived new in 1952 and which were both sent on to W. Morris,Bromyard & Linton Light Railway, Herefordshire in 1978. [25: p 218-219] The two locomotives were:

  • Works No. 9676 built in 1952
  • Works No. 9677 built in 1952
Motney Hill Sewage Works as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931, published in 1934. [39]

H62 – Upchurch Brickworks (Wakeley Brothers) – Waywell records these brickworks as being established by 1874 and sat on Poot Lane, Upchurch. The Works had a horse-worked tramway that connected to clay pits near Frog Farm. The Works closed sometime after 1918 and definitely by 1922.

A repeat of an image from earlier in this article: the Upchurch Brickworks at Wetham Green. This tramway was horse-worked and never employed locomotives. [35]

C16 – Ball & Gammon, Gillingham Contract – a contract for construction of a Wharf at Gillingham was let on 15th February 1867 to J. H. Ball & Co., it involved the construction of a wharf at Government expense because expansion of Chatham Dockyard had taken other land adjacent to its site. The contract ran from 1867 to 1872. Two Aveling & Porter locomotives were used on the contract on what were probably 3ft 6In gauge rails: [25: p272]

  • Unnamed – 4-wheel WTG built in 1868 (Works No. 320) came new to the site and was scrapped at the end of the contract.
  • Burnt Oak – 4-wheel WTG built in 1868 (Works No. 447) came new to the site and returned to Aveling & Porter for repairs?

C16a – Ball & Co., Chatham Contract – a contract for the construction of a branch line from the LCDR into Chatham Dockyard. The contract ran from 1875 to 1877 and made used of ‘Burnt Oak‘ after repairs? at Aveling & Porter. [25: p272] This location was noted above when taking a quick look at Chatham Dockyard. [27]

H6 – Darland Brickworks – in operation from 1899, had a narrow gauge tramway which is shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey 1906/1907, published in 1909. No further details are known. [25: p381]

Darland Brickworks Tramway as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1906/1907, published in 1909. [63]

H30 – Court Field Brickworks, Gillingham – were established by 1874 and had a tramway to clay and chalk pits which was probably worked by horses. Thew proprietor’s death in 1903 led to then closure of the works soon after, [25: p387]

References

  1. B. D. Stoyel & R. W. Kidner; The Cement Railways of Kent; The Oakwood Press (LP70], Headington, Oxford, 1973 & 1990.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/08/26/kents-cement-and-other-industrial-railways-part-1
  3. https://www.medway-moorings.co.uk/history, accessed on 7th September 2026.
  4. https://apps.medway.gov.uk/apps/medwayimages/details.asp?pga=160&searchtype=&search=strood&pg=28, accessed on 7th September 2026.
  5. https://petesfavouritethings.blog/2016/04/07/river-medway-industrial-legacy, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Medway, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  7. https://msep.org.uk/the-estuary, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  8. https://www.medway.gov.uk/news/article/1703/medways_creative_vision_institutions_unite_to_nurture_socio-economic_and_cultural_growth)Environmental, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  9. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr5j2grpzmqo), accessed on 9th September 2026.
  10. https://msep.org.uk/the-estuary/), accessed on 9th September 2026.
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medway_Estuary_and_Marshes, accessed on 9th September 2026.
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/17/queenborough-cement-works-and-associated-industries-at-queenborough
  13. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677350, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677344, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  15. Andrew Neale & David Smith; Industrial Railways of the South East; Middleton Press, Midhurst, West Sussex, 1984.
  16. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/26/the-lodge-hill-upnor-railway-chattenden-upnor-railway-and-the-chattenden-naval-tramway-kent
  17. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677182, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677218, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677317, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.4&lat=51.34755&lon=0.75938&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.4&lat=51.34755&lon=0.75938&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=50, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  22. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101429103, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  23. https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/threads/highsted-chalk-pits-kent-jun-2018.113293, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  24. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101429106, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  25. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103678859, accessed on 19th September 2026.
  27. The article on this blog about Chatham Dockyard. …
  28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aveling_and_Porter, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677167, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677206, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  31. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677389, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  32. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/cement_kiln_falcon.html, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  33. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677353, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  34. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677395, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  35. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677359, accessed on 23rd September 2026.
  36. The article on this blog about the Industrial Sites alongside the Lower Medway.
  37. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677383, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  38. https://www.wastebook.co.uk/directory/motney-hillwaste-water-treatment-works-southern-water-services-limited/#google_vignette, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  39. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677350, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  40. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677428, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  41. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE16584, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675694, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  43. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7477/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsVolume1, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  44. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7478/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsVolume2, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  45. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/7479/CurtissandHarveyLtdExplosivesFactoryCliffeandCliffeWoodsMedwayArchaeologicalSurveyandAnalysisoftheFactoryRemainsFullSurveyDrawings, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  46. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW000062, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  47. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EAW032066, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  48. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE100214, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNAS_Kingsnorth, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  50. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vereker_Hamilton_HMA3.jpg, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  51. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damhead_Creek_power_station, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsnorth_power_station, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  53. https://maps.nls.uk/view/189261620, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  54. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676444, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  55. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676462, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  56. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on various dates in September and October 2026.
  57. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Kent_Refinery, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  58. https://kentrail.uk/grain_refinery.htm, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  59. https://ribblesteamrailway.wordpress.com/category/diesel-locos, accessed on 25th October 2026.
  60. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/921-powesland-mason-0-4-0st, accessed on 26th October 2026.
  61. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103676417, accessed on 26th October 2026.
  62. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/10/27/crown-and-quarry-cement-works-frindsbury-peninsula/
  63. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677263, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  64. https://www.facebook.com/groups/163976490369879/posts/8942040572563383, accessed on 28th October 2026.
  65. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW047584, accessed on 29th October 2026.

Crown and Quarry Cement Works, Frindsbury Peninsula

The featured image for this article is a photograph taken by F. Jones of ‘Burham’, a Manning Wardle 0-6-0ST built in 1879 (Works No. 730) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1937 and was returned to Burham in 1938 [15: p55], scrapped in September 1952. [6] This photograph was taken at the Crown & Quarry Works and must therefore be dated in 1938. An internet search to check copyright suggests that many of F. Jones photographs are now treated as Public Domain.

Much of this article is based on work undertaken by Chris Down and published in the Industrial Railway Record, Issue 16, published in 1967 and available in the Industrial Railway Society archive. [6]

To the East of the Peninsula were the Whitewall Cement Works. ….

Whitewall Cement Works – South of the southern end of the Lodge Hill & Upnor Railway was the Whitewall Cement Works which were owned by the Formby Brothers and which were active between 1862 and 1907. After 1907 two attempts were made to resuscitate these works – Whitewall Portland Cement Co. Led. (1914) and Medway Standard Portland Cement Co. Ltd. (1915). Neither company ever traded. Robin Waywell tells us that “the site occupied an area of about 24 acres with the works divided into two plants, No. 1 plant contained a pair of 130hp compound condensing engines and two Lancashire boilers, driving crushing & grinding machinery and had seven bottle and two chamber kilns. No.2 plant contained a pair of 130hp Tangye engines, two Lancashire boilers, driving crushing & grinding machinery and nine bottle and four chamber kilns. The wash mill, slurry mixer and pumps were powered by a 90hp horizontal tandem engine. There was a wharf with a frontage of 750ft with tramways and three 3ton traveling loco cranes for loading & unloading barges. The Whitewall site was very inaccessible and used solely water transport. After World War 2 the plant was demolished and the site cleared it is now partly waste ground.” [5: p388]

Chris Down wrote in the 1960s that, “Formby’s Whitewall Cement Works (closed 1909; auctioned 23rd July 1909) whose derelict site can still be examined; … never had a tramway and, after a 50ft deep overburden of Thanet Sand proved too much for quarrying, the works had chalk barged down from Halling. It was at this time that [a] proposal was put forward to extend [William] Ball’s quarry lines to Whitewall, via [a] new tunnel.” [6]

Down’s mention of William Ball means that it is worth noting the various arrangements which were made and broken over the supply of chalk to the cement works on the peninsula.

Down said in his article, that, “With so much industry within ⅜ mile of the river front, it might be expected that disputes arose. The few that did, however, were due to the complicated arrangements for chalk supply that existed and plagued the area for much of its life.” [6]

Chalk supplies for the Cement Works

The various Cement Works which developed on the West side of the Frindsbury Peninsula (Limehouse Reach) are listed below the hand-drawn map below.

William Tingey opened the Crown Cement Works in around 1851 and held something of a monopoly on the supply of chalk to the other Cement Works. Down says that, Tingey, who controlled physical access to the works, “specified that the works should obtain their chalk from him. He performed his own quarrying in the area of his works and later, when this was exhausted, took to barging chalk down from his Wouldham Quarries (the Rochester Chalk Co. Ltd.), a few miles up−river. But the lessors of the land (the Ecclesiastical Commissioners) seem to have appointed a common quarrier, doubtless imagining that this would be a more efficient arrangement than for the individual owners to quarry themselves.” [6]

By 1863, John Cole, appointed by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners was quarrying on their land and offering chalk to the nearby works.

It seems that Phoenix Cement Works soon broke the terms of its lease and took chalk from Cole. In 1878, Cole died and was succeeded by William Ball; “on 30th December 1879 the Ecclesiastical Commissioners agreed to rent the land to Ball for an annual rental of £100 plus 5d per ton on the chalk quarried. As other works were put up, the complaints grew in number, both about the restrictions imposed by Tingey … and about the chalk prices charged by Ball. It does seem fairly certain that Ball was trying to some extent to drive the manufacturers out of business. He could then put up his own works and manufacture at a much lower cost. But for the depression of the industry in general, and the formation of A.P.C.M. (1900) Ltd., he might even have succeeded.” [6]

Down wrote that, “Ball supplied Phoenix, Globe, Quarry, Beehive and Beaver exclusively and Bridge probably in part. Tingey supplied himself and Bridge, but these arrangements probably altered according to local animosity at the time. At various times, Ball cut off chalk supplies for a number of reasons that were more or less contrived with the object of demonstration his power; equally often, the manufacturers threatened to obtain chalk from up−river quarries unless Ball reduced his prices. Small wonder that the industry was in such a bad state at the end of the century.” [6]

Crown & Quarry Cement Works were on the western shore of the Frindsbury Peninsula. … The Frindsbury Peninsula was South of Upnor and the Whitewall Works. It was rail-served. The schematic map below was included in the article written by Chris Down in Issue 16 of the Industrial Railway Record in 1967. [6] This map shows the Cement Works and their railways prior to their absorption into

Industrial Premises on the Frindsbury Peninsula prior to 1909. This is one of two images showing the railway routes on the Peninsula provided in Chris Down’s article in the Industrial Railway Record. Both these images can be found here, (c) Chris Down. [6]

A series on seven different cement works were present on the peninsula and all seven became part of the APCM (1900) Ltd.: [5: p54]

  • Crown Works (Established ~1851): Founded by William Tingey & Son, operating long-term before merging into Blue Circle operations that lasted until 1963. [6]
  • Phoenix Works (Started 1877): Established by George Burge, closing by 1907. [6]
  • Globe Works (1880): Established as a cement and whiting facility, later absorbed and closed in 1901.
  • Bridge Works (1886): Operated by TC Hooman & Co. between the Globe and Crown sites. [6]
  • Quarry Works (1889): Established in 1889 by William Tingey’s mineral and chalk mining operations. Independent operations largely ceased around November 1907. [6]
  • Beaver Works (1884): The plant was built around 1884 by Burge (or established in 1885). In 1897, the Beaver Cement Works merged with the neighbouring Beehive Cement Works, driven by an acquisition by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company. It eventually became part of the combined Crown & Quarry works through the 1930s. [8]
  • Beehive Works (1890): In 1897, the Works merged with the Beaver Cement Company Works following the latter’s acquisition by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company. [9]

Dylan Moore provides another map of the peninsula which further clarifies the locations of the different Works which can be found here. [7]

As we have already noted, Chalk for the various works came from pits on land owned by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners and from Crown Works own quarry. Chalk quarrying ceased in December 1962, and Crown Works closed in March 1963. The works was rail connected to the North Kent line adjacent to Strood Dock. … An inventory of 1924 listed 1.25 miles of 4ft 8.5in permanent way, with two geared locomotives and 64, 3 ton, chalk wagons. [5: p54]

The earliest railways on the Peninsula were probably 3ft 6in gauge tramways associated with Phoenix Cement Works. These were short horse-worked tramways owned by Joseph Cole. Down has a drawing of these tramways:

The 3ft 6in gauge tramways at Phoenix Works in 1868. It appears that these lines may well have been traced from the Ordnance Survey Sheet (below). These immediately local tramways were no longer present by the end of the 19th century, (c) Chris Down. [6]

The National Library of Scotland (NLS) does not have the earliest 25″ Ordnance Survey for the Peninsula (that published in 1869) on its website. The first image below is an extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1863-1865, published in 1869. Cole’s tramways appear on this map extract inn association with Frindsbury Lime Works.

The Frindsbury Peninsula in 1863/1865 as shown on the 6″ survey undertaken between this dates and published in 1869. Only one Cement Works is  active at this time. It appears not to be Rail-Served in any form. To its North, Frindsbury Lime Works are shown. There appears to be a series of tramways at that location. It is the location of the Phoenix Cement Works on the later mapping, below. [2]

At the end of 1879, Cole was succeeded by William Ball, whose tenancy was renegotiated on a yearly basis. Ball extended Cole’s tramways a little – “to serve the newly erected Globe Works and Bridge Works (reached by a tunnel carrying 3ft 6in gauge rails under Quarry Terrace Road constructed in 1885, the cost being paid by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners).” [6]

Ball sought greater security of tenure in the form of a longer lease. This was resisted for a number of years by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners refused permission for a number of years.

In 1884, Ball was asked to drive a tunnel under Quarry Terrace Road to accommodate a standard-gauge rail line, so that Ball could quarry on the eastern side of the hill and also to allow him to dump arisings on the marshy areas/saltings to the East. The tunnel was around 700ft long and with an adverse 1 in 75 gradient to eastbound trains, and then dropping them at 1 in 200 down to the saltings. By 20th July 1886, the tunnel was finished except for fencing and Ball was paid £1,575 for doing the job. [6]

Down tell us that, “The tunnel immediately opened up new fields of supply for Ball. Within a few years, the standard gauge was extended south to serve the new quarry, Beehive and Beaver Works. While there was probably a transhipment point whereby chalk was tipped into the 3ft 6in gauge wagons (wooden side-tippers holding 55 cwts) serving Phoenix and Globe. Bridge, via its own tunnel, had 3ft 6in gauge quarry lines of its own.” [6]

Down continues: “Soon after completion of the tunnel in 1886, Ball asked for a long lease to enable increased expenditure on locomotives, wagons and tramways, while in June 1890, a review of Ball’s operations stated that he owned three or four steam engines, wagons, tramways, horses and buildings valued at £7,000. … Quite possibly these steam engines were stationary, for Aveling & Porter, the most likely suppliers of locomotives … have no record of deliveries at this time. (Two locomotives, of unknown gauge however, were delivered to I. Ball (Ball’s predecessor?), one in 1868 and the other (named BURNT OAK) in 1869. These were of six and ten nominal horsepower respectively, and were probably used on a coal wharf at Gillingham but may have been transferred to Frindsbury at a later date.)” [6]

On 25th March 1892, Ball was finally granted a long lease. His first locomotive, named ‘Alderman‘, despatched from Aveling & Porter’s Rochester Works on 23rd October 1893 (Works No. 3277, type TC 10), it was a standard gauge 10hp two-cylinder compound 2−2−0 of the traction engine type. … ; the cylinders were 7in (high pressure) and 11½in (low pressure) bore with a common stroke of 12in. ‘Sabina‘, a larger 2−2−0 compound of 20hp and of type TCG, followed on 21st December 1898 (Works number 4248). It was also a standard-gauge locomotive. [6]

Down tells us that, “A plan dated 4th February 1891, shows the layout of the 3ft 6in gauge lines. One branch served Phoenix and another, running between Phoenix and Globe served the latter. Another line went off to serve Bridge. In 1894, the branch to Phoenix was probably abandoned and the line to Globe extended to serve both works.” [6] These tramways are shown on Down’s hand-drawn map of the railway sup to 1909, above.

The earliest available 25″ Ordnance Survey mapping was surveyed in 1895/1896 and published in 1898. A sequence of extracts from that survey appears below.

The tramway network has, by the end of the 19th century, expanded significantly. Bottom left of this first extract , the North end of Joseph Cole’s Ballast Pier can just be made out. A tramway tunnel under the main access road from Parsonage Road to the various Cement Works, can be made out just to the left of the centre of the extract. A tramway which provides access to Frindsbury Peninsula head Northeast in cutting before swinging round to the South. To the left of the image, tramways run through to Cole’s Pier and South towards Phoenix Cement Works. [1]
The full length of Joseph Cole’s Ballast Pier can be seen in the top-left of this next extract and the tramway serving Phoenix Works and its wharf and pier enters the extract at about the third-point from the left. On the far-right of the extract the tramway giving access to the South of the Peninsula can be seen running North to South. Globe Cement Works seems not to have associated tramways. Bridge Cement Works seems to have a short tramway network to its East. [1]
This next extract shows the tramways associated with Bridge Cement Works running Southwest to the High Water Mark. Crown Cement Works is just called a ‘Cement Works’. It appears to have some tramway line between it and the High Water Mark. [1]
Quarry Cement Works and Beaver Cement Works were at the southern end of the Limehouse Reach on the Frindsbury Peninsula. [1]

Down tells us that, “After the APCM takeover in 1900, Ball seems to have continued quarrying much as usual, although there was not the same demand for chalk due to partial closure of some of the works. In 1905, he widened the tunnel to Bridge Works so as to take the standard gauge track from the eastern line. This was to meet APCM’s chalk requirements and cost £135 0s 6d. … It would seem that by 1905, … the 3ft 6in gauge had ceased to be operative, except perhaps the lines to Cole’s and Phoenix Works’s piers. On 3rd December 1909, it was stated that no cement was being made, and this seems to have been the case for three years. APCM had taken to barging down chalk from Halling when any cement was to be made, and Ball’s quarries were inactive. In November 1915, Ball’s lease expired and APCM took over quarrying rights.” [6]

This next series of map extracts come from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. Significant proportions of the tramway network were converted to standard-gauge. Down shows these on his hand-drawn map of the Cement Works and Quarries for the period up to 1909, which can be found earlier in this article. …

At the North end of the Peninsula, very little change had occurred in the decade since the earlier 25″ Ordnance Survey. [3]
Apart from some construction work associated with each cement works and the confirmation of the name of ‘Crown Cement Works’, the most notable change in this next extract is the tramway which reaches West from the tramway line on the right side of the image and which passes in tunnel under the access road to serve Bridge Cement Works. [3]
Tramways continue to serve Quarry Portland Cement Works and Beehive Cement Works, now named. [3]
This final extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909 shows Beaver Cement Works and the South end of the Peninsula. As already noted Beaver and Beehive Cement Works were operated by the Gillingham Portland Cement Company as a single operation. [4]

We know that at the turn of the 20th century, all of the cement works on the Frindsbury Peninsula came under the control of the APCM (1900) Ltd. Inevitably there was some rationalisation of operations on the Peninsula. A single operation was formed out of the different Works along the West side of the Peninsula and that new entity was called the ‘Crown & Quarry Cement Works’.

The next ‘snapshot’ that we have of the Peninsula and its railways/tramways is that provided by the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1932/1933, published in 1935. …

The tramways across the various cement works and quarry/chalk pit sites have been replace by standard-gauge railway lines. Although dated 1932/1933, this survey does not pick up some of the sidings shown by Chris Down on his hand-drawn map of the site below. the dates provided by Down suggest that the Ordnance Survey of the site took place early in 1932. [10]
In 1932, Crown & Quarry Cement Works incorporated element so of other Cement Works. It was rail-served by a standard-gauge branch line, and had a number of tramways within its site. A travelling crane operated along the water-front. [10]
The remaining length of the water-front and the buildings associated with Crown & Quarry Cement Works transgress on to the adjacent OS Map Sheet to the South. [11]
This hand-drawn map summarises the various changes on the Peninsula, perhaps the most significant change alongside the creation of a single Cement Works was the rationalisation of the railways and the commitment to standard gauge rails. Down highlights the different dates that each length of line was in use. The drawing covers the full period from 1909 to the closure of Crown & Quarry Cement Works in the 1960s, (c) Chris Down. [6]
The tramways and railways on the Frindsbury Peninsula from the various different eras are shown mapped onto modern satellite imagery by railmaponlin.com. The background satellite image shows that the whole of the Peninsula has been redeveloped since the closure of the cement works in the 1960s. There would be little value in attempting to trace these old lines through a significantly altered physical environment. [12]

From 1900, APCM had control of the Peninsula. Waywell provides lists of the locomotives used by APCM on the standard-gauge lines on the peninsula. His list relies on work undertaken by Down. [13: p54-55][6]

Locomotives in use at the Crown & Quarry Works

Earlier in this article we have noted two Aveling & Porter Locomotives (owned by William Ball) that worked on the standard gauge lines on the Frindsbury Peninsula in the later years of the 19th century and the early years of the 20th century. There were:

  • Alderman – an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG locomotive built in 1893 (Works No. 3277)
  • Sabina – a second Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG locomotive built in 1898 (Works No. 4248)

Both of these locomotives spent their whole life on the Frindsbury Peninsula. [6]

After the turn of the 20th century, APCM used a series of locomotives on the Peninsula. These were:

  • Unnamed – an Aveling & Porter 2-2-0TG built in 1879 (Works No. 1524) came from Booth’s Works Borstal circa. 1928 and scrapped on site in 1930. [13: p54][6]
  • Stuart – No. 7 – an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0ST built in 1890 (Works No. 681). [13: p54-55]
  • Unnamed – a Dick, Kerr 0-4-0ST built in 1890 which came from Hilton, Anderson Brook’s Works in Grays, Essex and which went to the BPCM Hilton Manor Works, circa 1930. [13: p54-55]
  • Leopard – a Falcon Engine Works 0-4-0ST built in 1896 (Works No. 239) came from BPCM Tolhurst’s Works circa. 1921 and was scrapped circa. 1930. [13: p54-55]
  • Kappa – a Chapman & Furneaux 0-4-0ST built in 1898 (Works No. 1164) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford and was sent to to APCM Swanscombe Works, June 1931. [13: p55][6]
  • George – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1899 (Works No. 759) came from Bevan’s Works, Northfleet in 1934 and was scrapped by A. Arnold of Chatham, September 1960. [13: p55][6]
  • J. G. B. – an Avonside 0-4-0ST built in 1821 (Works No. 1874) came from Thos. W. Ward Ltd., Grays, Essex and was scrapped in August 1964. [13: p55][6]
  • Killarney – a Hudswell Clarke 0-6-0ST built in 1902 (Works No. 611) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1934 and was returned in the same year. [13: p55][6]
  • Burham – a Manning Wardle 0-6-0ST built in 1879 (Works No. 730) came from APCM Burham Works, Aylesford in 1937 and was returned to Burham in 1938 [15: p55], scrapped in September 1952. [6]
  • C. F. S. – a Stephenson Hawthorns 0-4-0ST built in 1952 (Works No. 7742) bought new and sent to Holborough Works on loan in 1954, returned from loan by October 1954, then sent to Alpha Cement Ltd., Shipton-on-Cherwell, Oxon, circa 1963. [13: p55][6]
  • Southfleet – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1928 (Works No. 1746) came from BPCM Johnson’s Branch, Greenhithe, in August 1960 and sent to to Thurrock Chalk & Whiting Co. Ltd., Essex, in June 1964. [13: p55][6]
  • Stone – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1927 (Works No. 1740) came from BPCM Johnson’s Branch, Greenhithe, in November 1962 and sent to APCM Holborough Works, Snodland, circa 1963. [13: p55][6]
  • Longfield – a Peckett 0-4-0ST built in 1928 (Works No. 1747) came on loan from APCM Holborough Quarry, Snodland, in 1962 and returned later in the same year. [13: p55][6]

Chris Downs concludes in the 1960s: “Crown & Quarry Works was closed and tracklifting in the quarry began on 18th April 1963, the navvies being removed by 10th May. Some locomotives were still in use at this time, though, and there were four locomotives in all at the works. ‘J.G.B.‘ was partly dismantled in a shed near the bagging plant, and had been so for a number of months; officially it had been for repair, but this was never carried out. Of the others, ‘Stone‘ … was somewhat out of favour due to badly worn tyres. ‘Southfleet‘ … was in regular use. ‘C.F.S.‘, … was also a regular worker. … By the summer of 1964, the only locomotive left was ‘J.G.B.‘ In August it was towed out of the shed and cut up. Tracklifting was begun in October, being carried out by two men who professed to be self-employed. By 2nd November, the track had been lifted as far as the level crossing, the rails being burned into short lengths and loaded into a small van. The only remaining piece of railway equipment (within the works, on track embedded in concrete) was a wagon frame and wheels loaded with a crane jib.” [6]

References

  1. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677173, accessed on 27th October 2026
  2. https://maps.nls.uk/view/266663224, accessed on 27th October 2026
  3. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677170, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  4. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677209, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  5. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.
  6. C. G. Down; Frindsbury Cement Works; in The Industrial Railway Record, Issue No. 16, 1967, p132-143 & p156; via https://shop.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/16/Frindsbury.htm, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  7. https://www.cementkilns.co.uk/images/1907_det.jpg, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  8. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE17074, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  9. https://heritage.kent.gov.uk/Monument/MKE17076, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677167, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103677206, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  12. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 27th October 2026.
  13. Robin Waywell; Industrial Railways and Locomotives of Kent; Industrial Railway Society, 2016.

North Midland Railway Artwork …. plus … Shady Dealings Before the Formation of the Midland Railway

The featured image for this article is a lithograph created by Samuel Russell of the North Midland Railway Station in Chesterfield. [1][17] For the short note about the shady dealings preceding the formation of the Midland Railway, please see the last paragraphs before the References at the bottom of this article.

The BBC reported on 11th October 2026 that lost artwork of former stations on the North Midland Railway had gone on display at the recently-restored Grade II* listed Wingfield Station.

The artwork was commissioned by Francis Thompson and graced the boardroom of North Midland Railway in Derby, the artworks were removed during a 19th Century refurbishment and stored for more than a century at Derby Loco Works.

When the loco works closed and were cleared in the early 2000s to become Derby College’s Roundhouse Campus, the artworks passed to the Midland Railway Society at the Silk Mill in Derby.

I guess that means that they were not actually lost!  Rather that they were not on public display.

The Midland Railway Society has now refurbished the lithographs and loaned the collection to Wingfield Railway Station. The original metal etchings from 1841 have now been placed on display at Wingfield, the sole survivor from the original 16 stations on the North Midland Railway.

The railway was engineered by George Stephenson and opened in 1840. It linked Derby to Leeds via a main line which followed river valleys. “Along its route, a series of ornate and unique station buildings were designed by architect Francis Thompson – from a palatial 1,000ft frontage with a piazza and fountains at Derby, to a miniature Italianate design at Belper, to Jacobite-style buildings at Ambergate and Chesterfield.” [1]

Thompson commissioned artist Samuel Russell to produce the lithographs. Volunteers who have restored Wingfield Railway Station were delighted that after their restoration they had been offered on loan to the station at Wingfield.

Derby

“One lithograph showcases Derby’s original station, which stood before the gothic building replaced in the 1980s by the current Derby Midland station.” [1]

Derby’s first railway station was said to be the biggest in the world when it opened! [1]

“When it opened in 1840, … Derby was the biggest station in the world. … It was quoted as being the grandest railway station in the world, … it was quite early on in the history of the railways, none of the big London stations had been built at that stage as we know them today.” [1]

Derby Railway Station and the Midland Hotel at the turn of the 20th century. This extract comes from the 25″. Ordnance Survey of 1899, published in 1900. [15]

Derby Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

When the original buildings on the North Midland Railway were built, railway stations were ‘statement’ buildings and were often the highest quality buildings that the new railway companies could afford. They were designed “to impress their passengers as well as their shareholders with the quality of their product.” [1]

They contrast with many of today’s railway stations which are utilitarian in nature, “in those days they were built as signatures and statements.” [1]

However, this practice was not universally well-received as this short paragraph from one critic suggests: “we cannot but deplore the growing evil of expending large sums of money on railway appendages. Instead of cottage buildings, which, for the traffic of most of the intermediate stopping places on this line, would have been amply sufficient, we find the railway literally ornamented with so many beautiful villas, any one of which would grace the sloping lawn of some domain by nature highly favoured.” [2][3]

Belper

Belper’s railway station echoed the design of the railway’s terminus in Derby. [28]

The first station at Belper is shown in the engraving above. It was built south of the Derby Road bridge. The local Strutt family (owners of the cotton mills) opposed routing it closer to the town centre out of fear it would disrupt water supplies and views. The result was an expensive deep cutting running North-South through the town.

In the 1870s, the Goods Station in Belper sat to the South of the town just beyond the Derby Road Bridge. This was the site of the 1840-built station shown in the lithograph above. [19]
The site of the first railway station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]
Another Samuel Russell lithograph. This shows the cutting in Belper, © Public Domain and sourced from the National Trust, Ironbridge Gorge. [13]

The original station was moved to its current town-centre site off King Street because the old location was too inconvenient. As we have already seen, the original site became a goods-only station.

The site of the later station, opened in 1878. This extract is taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1878, published in 1880. [18]
The same location in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]
View of New Street Bridge etc. in Belper, Looking South, another lithograph by Samuel Russell, 1840, © Public Domain and sourced from the National Trust, Ironbridge Gorge. [11]

In the 1960s, Belper Station was slated for closure but plans were halted because local MP and Deputy Prime Minister George Brown refused to close a station in his constituency. By 1973, however, the original King Street station buildings were removed, making way for commercial development (such as a supermarket). The old goods station finally closed down in 1979. [20] The station was refurbished in 2005 and adopted by local community groups in 2012. [21]

The site of Belper Railway Station as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1877/1878, published in 1890. [18]

Derwent Viaduct

On the approach to the next station – Ambergate – a viaduct carried the North Midland Railway over the River Derwent and the Matlock road.

This is Samuel Russell’s lithograph of the viaduct, seen from the North with the Matlock road on the left. [54]

The River Derwent Viaduct at Ambergate. This extract comes from the 1877/1878 25″ Ordnance Survey published in 1880. [25]
The same viaduct in the 21st century: the original viaduct is the most easterly of the two at this location. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Ambergate

Ambergate Railway Station Building which opened in 1840. This is another of Samuel Russell’s lithographs, © Public Domain. [22]

Ambergate Railway Station and associated line in 1878. This extract comes from the 1877/1878 25″ Ordnance Survey published in 1880. The original line is shown passing through a tunnel adjacent to a gravel pit. The original station was roughly at the location where the West to East curve joins the old railway line in the top-right of this map extract. [25]
The same area in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

From Belper, the North Midland Railway ran along the Derwent Valley, along a stretch called Broadholme with four bridges across the river; it continued through Longlands Tunnel, across the River Derwent and Derby Road with a five-arch viaduct. It then entered Hag Wood Tunnel as it turned towards the Amber Valley. The station building was just north of this tunnel.

In 1849, the branch from Ambergate to Rowsley was built by the proposed Manchester, Buxton, Matlock and Midland Junction Railway, with a west to north connection between the lines at the original Ambergate Junction. When a south to west connection was made, for trains from Derby to Rowsley, the station building was rebuilt in 1863 adjacent to the new Ambergate South junction. The original bridge was also widened at its northern end to accommodate the new junction. [24]

In 1867, the Rowsley line had reached New Mills, which meant that the Midland Railway could operate from London to Manchester and Liverpool.

In 1875, Ambergate to Pye Bridge Line was opened from Crich Junction, near Bullbridge, which ran through Butterley to Pye Bridge, near Ironville on the Erewash Valley Line. Much of its business was coal traffic from Nottinghamshire to Manchester and Liverpool, avoiding Derby. [24]

In 1876, a loop was built passing the west side of Hag Wood Tunnel, as a diversion from the original line to a third platform, which allowed for Derby to Sheffield stopping trains. The station was completely rebuilt, with the old building remaining in use as a plans store. This third and final station was a triangular one, making it one of the four triangular stations in the UK, (c) Chevin and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [23][24]

The curved platform at Ambergate Railway Station in 2005, (c) R. Howarth and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [24]

All that is left now is one platform on a single track to Matlock; the original main Derby to Sheffield line passes to the east through Hag Wood (Toadmoor) Tunnel and onwards to Clay Cross and Chesterfield. The original listing of Ambergate station for closure under the Beeching Axe led to its mention in the song “Slow Train” by Flanders and Swann. [24]

The Cromford Canal

A short distance from Ambergate, towards Chesterfield, the next difficulty for the North Midland Railway was the intersection with the Cromford Canal, where the line intersected with the Bullbridge Aqueduct, before it carried on through a station at Wingfield to Stretton.

The canal aqueduct carrying the Cromford Canal over the North Midland Railway, another lithograph by Samuel Russell, © Public Domain. [14]
The location of the Bullbridge Aqueduct on the Cromford Canal as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey around the end of the 19th century. [26]
The same location in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

The Aqueduct was approximately 150 feet long, 9 feet wide, and 6 feet deep in its iron trough section. The canal went out of use in the 20th century and the aqueduct was ultimately demolished in 1968 to accommodate road improvements. [27]

Wingfield

Wingfield’s railway station, wrongly attributed by the BBC article to Belper. [1]

Wingfield Station building was designed in the Grecian style by the architect Francis Edward Thompson and is a remarkable survivor from the very earliest days of the railways.

The station is important as it is: the last surviving North Midland Railway station building; the best surviving work of its architect; and it is the oldest surviving completely original railway station building in the World. The building is simple and symmetric but constructed to the highest quality from hand-carved local Ashover stone beneath pitched roofs made from Welsh slate. The building has large overhanging eaves and concealed, recessed guttering to maintain simplicity of form. [29]

“After opening in 1840, the station remained unaltered throughout its operational life and, after closure in 1967, was let as commercial premises by British Rail until being sold into private ownership in 1977. Over the next 5 decades, the station became neglected and derelict, but crucially was also never altered in any way, meaning all its original features survived. After local campaigning, the listing status of the station was upgraded from Grade 2 to Grade 2 Star in 2015, and compulsory purchase legal action was completed in 2019 by Amber Valley Borough Council. The Council then transferred legal ownership to Derbyshire Historic Buildings Trust, who undertook the restoration of the building and site, which was completed at the end of 2023. The station has been restored as close as possible to its original 1840 opening condition and appearance.” [29]

In September 2024, two local benefactors leased the whole station site and opened as a heritage centre, tearoom, local community amenity, event space and private hire venue. The operation is branded “Wingfield Station 1947” and a limited company Midland Heritage Partners has now been formed as the legal entity to operate the site as a not-for-profit community business. [29]

Chesterfield

Each station, like the Jacobite design at Chesterfield, was a unique design. Chesterfield’s first station building was swept away in works to construct a direct line to Sheffield, which was opened in 1870. Today’s main-line railway station stands roughly on the same site. [1][17]

Chesterfield Railway Station at the end of the 19th century – the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1897/1898 and published in 1898. The station building was built in 1870 to the North of the original station building. The 1840 station was built roughly 200 yards South of the modern Chesterfield Railway Station. Today’s station carpark and the isolated ‘North Midland House’ sit approximately where Thompson’s original station once stood. [16]

Chesterfield Railway Station in the 21st century. Today’s station carpark and the isolated ‘North Midland House’ (just off to the left of this satellite image) sit approximately where Thompson’s original station once stood. The railway was realigned to suit the needs of the 1870s. [Google Maps, October 2026][17]

The modern station approach at Chesterfield, seen from the Northwest. North Midland House is marked by the grey flag towards the right side of the image. The modern station buildings are beyond the tree and the brown sign to the left side of the photograph. The first station building was positioned close to the centre of this image beyond the red car. [Google Streetview, July 2026]

Eckington

Eckington Railway Station as built in 1840 – another lithograph attributed to Samuel Russell, (c) Public Domain. [30]

The original station of 1840, shown above, was reconstructed in 1874 and then renamed Eckington and Renishaw in 1886. It closed to passenger traffic on 1st October 1951.

The location of Eckington Railway Station is marked by the blue flag on the adjacent map extract. [35]

Ecklington Railway Station as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey undertaken between 1874 and 1885, published in 1897. [36]

The location of Ecklington Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Beighton

Beighton station existed on three sites at different times – the first station, built and opened with the line in 1840, was apparently little more than a halt and appears not to have been included in the series of lithographs produced by Samuel Russell.

The first station was located 1 1⁄4 miles (2.0 km) south of Woodhouse Mill, approximately halfway between what is, in the 21st century, Beighton Junction and the overbridge, which still carries passenger trains east–west between Sheffield and Worksop. The location proved to be too far from the village of Beighton, and the station/halt was closed in January 1843. [32]

The approximate location of the later two stations is shown on this CAD drawing. The original station sat on the purple line to the East of the location marked, (c) Chevin and licensed for reuse as ‘Public Domain’. [32]

The blue flag in this image shows the location of the later two stations, the black dot marks the location of the original station. [32]

The original location of Beighton Station/Halt as it appears on the earliest Ordnance Survey that we have access to – the 25″ survey of 1875-1890, published in 1892. [34]

The same location in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

“In 1849, the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (MS&LR) completed its Sheffield to Worksop line, which included a branch from just east of Woodhouse to join the North Midland line at what became known as Beighton Junction. They built Beighton’s second station at a site on their line only, close to, but not on, the junction. … This second station closed temporarily from 1852 to 1854, then continued in use until 1892.” [32]

“In 1892, the MS&LR opened its “Derbyshire Lines” route near Beighton. This would eventually become part of the Great Central Main Line. On 1stNovember 1893, the MS&LR closed Beighton’s second station, and opened its third and final station at a site 132 yards (121 m) north west of the second site, immediately north of the Rotherham Road level crossing.” [32][33: p33]

Masborough

We have already noted that the route followed the river valleys from Derby to Leeds, with minimal gradients and large radii curves. It therefore bypassed Sheffield, but met the Sheffield and Rotherham Railway at Masbrough (Masborough).

Masborough Station was the main railway station for Rotherham between 1840 and 1987! Another of Russell’s lithographs, © Public Domain and sourced from the National Trust, Ironbridge Gorge. [12]
Masborough Railway Station at the beginning of the 20th century. This extract is taken from the 1901/1902 25″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1905. [22]

The site of Masborough Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Masborough Railway Station opened with the North Midland Railway in 1840, as Masbrough. It initially feature only two platforms. The Midland Railway enlarged and rebuilt the station late in the 19th century or early in the 20th century. The new station featured four platforms, a large sandstone building on Platform Four, iron and glass canopies, a fully enclosed footbridge, and wooden waiting rooms. Through the years it saw a number of name changes: Masbrough (1840); Masbrough & Rotherham (1896); Rotherham Masborough (1908); Rotherham (1969); Rotherham Masborough (in the period before closure).

Closure occurred (1987–1988) after the newly renovated Rotherham Central reopened in 1987. Most of the station buildings were demolished in the 1990s. The brick-built station building was converted into an Indian restaurant (historically known as The Orient Express), and while the platforms and through-lines remain active for freight and express trains, it is no longer a public stop.

The remaining station building at Masborough Station. This is nothing like the original 1940s structure. It was built when the Midland Railway considerably enlarged the station. [Google Streetview, August 2022]

Swinton (for Doncaster)

Old Town Station was Swinton’s first passenger station. It opened with the North Midland Railway in 1840 and stood on the same site as the 21st century Interchange. It was built in a classical style by the North Midland Railway. Goods facilities occupied what, in the 21st century, is the station car park.

Swinton, South Yorkshire’s Railway Station built in 1840. This is another lithograph made by Samuel Russell, (c) Public Domain. [37]

Swinton railway Station as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1890, published: 1892. [38]

Swinton Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Swinton Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, August 2024]

Darfield

The original Darfield Station at Cat Hill Tunnel, both of which were swept aside when the line was improved. The photograph comes from the Glynn Waite Collection, © Public Domain. [41]

Two extracts from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1890, published in 1892, show the original Darfield Station and, to the North, Cat Hill Tunnel which were constructed under George Stephenson’s supervision. Further North still was Millhouses Bridge. [42]

George Stephenson’s station and the nearby Cat Hill Tunnel were swept away in the improvements to the railway line at the turn of the 20th century. By 1901, a new station had been built closer to Mill Houses Bridge. As part of the works an additional bridge across Doncaster Road was built alongside the original. This meant that four lines ran North from the new Darfield Station.

A postcard view of Darfield Railway Station, © Public Domain. [40]

This next map extract comes from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1904, published in 1906. It shows the enlarged railway station sited closer to the bridge over Doncaster Road. The tunnel through Cat Hill has been replaced by a deep cutting. [43]

The station has significantly improved facilities, extended platforms and a goods yard.

As will be evident on the satellite image below, none of this infrastructure remains! The line closed permanently to passengers in June 1963, and completely in 1988, due to colliery closures and mining subsidence.

Wkipedia says that, “In 1901, … the new station had typical Midland Railway timber panelled buildings. The new goods lines passed to the east. These had access to three major collieries Grimethorpe, Dearne Valley and Houghton Main – and connected to the GCR and L&Y lines.” [44][45]

The location of the second Darfield Station as it appears on modern satellite imagery. [Google Maps, October 2026]

This photograph taken by Ben Brooksbank shows the North end of the station site close to Mill Houses Bridges in 1992, (c) Ben Brooksbank and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [46]

Barnsley

Samuel Russell completed a lithograph of what was at the time Barnsley Railway Station. It sat close to Cudworth, 2.5 miles from Barnsley. As a result other railways found ways into Barnsley and took the majority of trade as a result. The station was renamed Barnsley for Cudworth in 1854, and later shortened simply to Cudworth in 1870. For decades, the station remained an important junction. It was extended in 1885 for the Hull and Barnsley Railway. In the 1860s/1870s, the Midland Railway built a branch line from Cudworth South Junction into Barnsley, opening Regent Street / Barnsley Court House railway station to give the town a direct Midland connection.

Samuel Russell’s lithograph of Barnsley Station. [47]

Cudworth Railway Station – the original Barnsley Railway Station – as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1890, printed in 1893. [48]

The station site in the 21st century. Little of substance remains – a brick building which is shown below. [Google Maps, October 2026]

The remaining brick structure at Cudworth Railway Station in October 2022, (c) Jim Lucas. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Oakenshaw

There was a station between Barnsley and Oakenshaw – Royston and Notton – but this did not open with the line in 1840 and so was not included in the lithographs produced by Samuel Russell. Oakenshaw did feature and its lithograph appears below.

Oakenshaw (for Wakefield) Railway Station which opened with the North Midland Railway in 1840 and closed in 1861. [39]

Oakenshaw Railway Station was located about two miles south-east of Wakefield. Originally built to serve Wakefield by omnibus, it had suitably ornate buildings, but was closed by the Midland Railway in 1870 when the station at Sandal and Walton was opened instead. [49]

The remains of the old Oakenshaw Railway Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1890, published in 1893. [50]
The same location in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Kirkthorpe Junction

Samuel Russell created a lithograph showing a train on the North Midland Railway at this location. I have not been able to locate a copy of the lithograph online. The lithograph should be included in those on display at Wingfield Railway Station.. [55]

Normanton

I have not been able to locate a lithograph by Samuel Russell of Normanton Railway Station. So here is the next best thing! … Arthur Fitzwilliam Tait created a lithograph in 1845, just five years after the Station opened.

This is the lithograph. It is hand-coloured, printed by Day & Son and is 260 x 355 mm. (10 1/4 x 14 in) in size. It is from ‘Views on the Manchester and Leeds Railway, Drawn from Nature and on Stone by A.F. Tait’. Tait emigrated to America, in 1850, where he became well-known as a wildlife painter, was widely published by Currier & Ives, and was elected a member of the National Academy of Design in New York. [51]

The station was built by George Stephenson as a junction between the Manchester and Leeds, the North Midland, and the York and North Midland railways, making it at one time the most important station in the North of England, such was its role in the transport network serving regional industries. 

Normanton Railway Station in 1890, 50 years after it first opened in 1840. [52]

The original station was opened by the North Midland Railway (NMR) on 30th June 1840 (this was one day before nearby Castleford Railway Station which opened on 1st July 1840) on their main line towards Leeds, creating an interchange station between the North Midland Railway (NMR), the York and North Midland Railway (Y&NMR) and the Manchester and Leeds Railway (M&LR) – establishing the three company junction that is noted above. [53]

Wikipedia goes on to say that “The station lost many of its services in the aftermath of the Beeching Report, with both express and local trains on the NMR main line ceasing to call in 1968 and trains to York ending in 1970, leaving only Hallam Line trains to serve the station. The NMR was closed completely in 1988 south of the former Goose Hill Junction (where it diverged from the M&L line to Wakefield) although part of the route further south remains open to serve a glassworks at Monk Bretton, near Barnsley. This has led to much of the railway infrastructure becoming redundant and being removed – the main buildings have been demolished, the sidings and goods lines lifted, the bay platforms filled in and the main island shortened considerably. The old Station Hotel still stands, but it has been converted into residential apartments.” [53]

Woodlesford

Although Woodlesford Railway Station was one of the original stations on the North Midland Railway, there is no record of Samuel Russell creating a lithograph of the station. Woodlesford appears not to be included in his surviving collection.

Woodlesford Railway Station on the North Midland Railway. [56]
Woodlesford Railway Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1891, published in 1893. [57]
Woodlesford Railway Station in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Leeds

The northern terminus of the North Midland Railway was in Leeds. Situated at Hunslet Lane in Leeds (now the site of Crown Point Retail Park, which opened in 1989). It was designed by Francis Thompson, featuring an iron four-span roof, five track lines, and 300-yard-long platforms. [58]

Three of the lines were used for stabling carriages not in use under the central span, and each outer span had one line with a platform. Turntables were provided at each end and the offices on the western side were fronted by an arcade with an arch surmounted with the arms of Leeds, Sheffield and Derby. It was shared by the Manchester and Leeds Railway, which ran on the NMR tracks from just north of Normanton since Parliament had refused to sanction two lines running side by side. [58]

The station was replaced by the Midland Railway in 1846 by Leeds Wellington railway station[3] and became a goods depot which closed in 1972. [58]

The 1840-built North Midland Railway Station in Leeds which was closed by 1846 becoming the Hunslett Goods Yard – few records seem to have survived. [31]

It is possible that Samuel Russell created a lithograph of the original Leeds Railway Station. I have not been able to locate a copy of the lithograph online. If it exists, the lithograph should be included in those on display at Wingfield Railway Station.. [55]

The same station in use as Hunslet Lane Goods Station under Midland Railway control. [59]

Wikipedia provides this map of the North Midland Railway’s line, © Public Domain. [2]

Not all of the stations shown on the route map were opened with the line. The original intermediate stations were Belper, Amber Gate, Wingfield, Chesterfield, Eckington, Beighton, Masbrough, Swinton, Darfield, Barnsley, Oakenshaw, Normanton and Woodlesford. All were designed by Francis Thompson. [2]

Stephenson’s practice when building the line had the advantage that industrial customers would in most cases, “be transporting their goods downhill from the mines and quarries to the railhead. It should be said, however, that the North Midland was among the first of the new breed of railway conceived as a means of improved passenger travel between the great cities, particularly London, rather than, like the Midland Counties and earlier lines, an adjunct to coal mines and quarries. Indeed, the rise in the coal trade, which was to become so important to the railways, had barely begun and, even a few years later, directors of the Midland Railway were questioning whether the revenue made it a worthwhile market to pursue.” [2]

Stephenson followed his usual practice of following river valleys as far as possible. The people of Sheffield engaged Joseph Locke to argue for them (his belief was that lines should pass through towns, proceeding along hills, if necessary, with bridges, embankments and cuttings. Stephenson and Locke “represented two opposing schools of thought at the time and, in this case, Stephenson had his way.” [2]

By 1870, economics were different, what was once very costly in terms both of construction and operation had become economically feasible. The Midland Railway opened a diversion through Dronfield and Sheffield, which became known to railwaymen as the “New Road”, as opposed to the “Old Road”. [2]

But, the terrain traversed by the old road was more difficult than for the other two railways which served Derby, “requiring 200 bridges and seven tunnels, and an aqueduct for the railway to pass underneath the Cromford Canal. By that time, Stephenson, who was wishing to concentrate in exploiting the coal around Ashby-de-la-Zouch, delegated the responsibility for almost the entire work of its design and construction to his engineer Frederick Swanwick.” [2]

Wikipedia tells us that, “The major bridges were at Oakenshaw, over the Barnsley Canal, and the Calder and Chevet Viaducts. In addition there were massive stone retaining walls for the cutting through Belper and the embankment north of Ambergate. Although the general radius of curves was one mile (1.6 km), gradients were as steep as 1 in 264 and practically the whole length was embanked or in cuttings, when not proceeding through a tunnel. The number of men employed [on the construction] was 8,600, with eighteen pumping engines providing drainage. It was tough work and a number of people died, particularly in the boring of the Clay Cross Tunnel.” [2]

The line was completed to Masbrough on 11th May 1840, [5] and to Leeds on 1st July 1840. [6]

There is a shady story to tell about the life of the North Midland Railway and the behaviour of shareholders, including, principally George Hudson in the years before the Midland Railway was formed by the amalgamation of other companies.

George Hudson and ‘Shady’ Manoeuvring at Board Level

From their inception, there was intense competition between the Birmingham and Derby Junction Railway and the Midland Counties Railway for traffic into London. … Though this did not directly affect the North Midland, it had financial problems of its own. With so many earthworks it had been extremely expensive to build, and its station and other buildings were arguably extravagant. Moreover, by the time it opened, the country had entered an economic depression. In the first two years, dividends were as low as 3.5%, compared with 10% for the London and Birmingham Railway. Economies were put in place but in 1842 the dividend was a mere 1% and shareholders of the North Midland Railway called for a Committee of Enquiry. [2][4]

George Hudson was one of these shareholders, and after a tour of the complete network, he insisted on drastic measures. Against the wishes of the Derby directors, Hudson and others from Lancashire & Yorkshire insisted on halving expenditure. At a meeting on 16th November 1842 in Leeds, Hudson’s group had their way. “On 30th November 1842 at a meeting in Derby, John Walbanke Childers MP, Mr. Pickersgill, Hatton Stansfield, T. B. Pease, F. Carbutt, and Mr. Hall retired from their positions as directors, and W. L. Newton (chairman), A. Titley (deputy-chairman), Mr. Laycock, Mr. Lee, Mr Cox and J. Holdsworth remained. Six of the Committee of Inquiry, P. W. Brancker, J. T. Alston, George Hudson, George Wilson, John Waddingham and William Murgatroyd, forced their way onto the board.” [2][7]

The new directors forced through a number of measures: the closure of Beighton, Killamarsh and Kilnhurst stations from 1st January 1843; boys, instead of men, would work points at junctions; services were reduced, fares raised and a number of carriages were sold. [2]

But things got considerably worse: a quarter of the footplate staff were sacked. The remainder (43 enginemen, stokers and turners) protested over the lower wages, and were sacked as well, on Christmas Eve 1842, without pay in lieu of notice. Hudson “employed in their place, enginemen he described as ‘skilled replacements’ who included in their number a platelayer, a fireman, a stonemason, two had been sacked for drunkenness and one who had been sacked for overturning a train of wagons. [2]

Unsurprisingly, “the result was chaos, with trains running late or erratically, and the remainder of the workforce demoralised. Finally a luggage train, with an elderly driver of only three weeks experience, collided with the rear of a stationary train at Cudworth in fog on 12th January 1843. [8] The inquest sent the … driver, Edward Jenkins, to the York Assizes for trial and criticised the cutbacks. … There was wide publicity about the trial of the driver for manslaughter. The jury at the York Assizes acquitted Jenkins and censured the directors. Meanwhile, the Board of Trade was also extremely critical and the directors made somewhat grudging improvements to working practices.” [2]

“Meanwhile, the situation between the Birmingham & Derby and the Midland Counties was becoming steadily worse. Hudson’s first approach was to the Midland Counties in 1843. He then negotiated a secret amalgamation with the Birmingham and Derby which would remove all the Midland Counties’ trade and, in August, returned to the latter with an ultimatum. Finally, on 22nd September 1843, at a meeting in Derby [a] triple merger was agreed.” [9]

The Midland Railway Consolidation Bill was placed before Parliament, and was passed as the Midland Railway Consolidation Act 1844 (7 & 8 Vict. c. xviii), and from May of that year the Midland Railway came into being. [2][10: p308]

References

  1. Isaac Ashe; Long-lost artworks of former stations go on display; BBC local News, Derbyshire, 11th October 2926; via https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6y93q5gp000o?app-referrer=deep-link, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Midland_Railway, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  3. Francis Whishaw; The Railways of Great Britain and Ireland practically described and illustrated (2nd ed.); John Wesley, London, 1842; (1840 1st ed., Simpkin, Marshall & Co.); via . http://archive.org/stream/railwaysgreatbr00whisgoog#page/n0/mode/1up (requires login details to access).
  4. Railways; Liverpool Mail. England. 30th August 1842; via British Newspaper Archive, https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.com/image-viewer?issue=BL/0001300/18420830&page=0001 (requires login details to access).
  5. Opening of the North Midland Railway; The Evening Chronicle. England. 11th May 1840; via British Newspaper Archive; (requires login details to access).
  6. North Midland Railway. Opening of the Line from Derby to Leeds; Derby Mercury. England. 1st July 1840; via British Newspaper Archive; (requires login details to access).
  7. North Midland Railway; Lincolnshire Chronicle. England. 2nd December 1842; via British Newspaper Archive, https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.com/image-viewer?issue=BL%2F0000354%2F18421202&page=1; (requires login details to access).
  8. Fatal Railway Accident; Yorkshire Gazette. England. 14th January 1843; via British Newspaper Archive, https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.com/image-viewer?issue=BL%2F0000266%2F18430114&page=8; (requires login details to access).
  9. North Midland Railway Company; Derbyshire Courier. England. 23rd September 1843; via British Newspaper Archive, https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.com/image-viewer?issue=BL%2F0000395%2F18430923&page=2, (requires login details to access).
  10. E. G. Barnes;(1969). The Rise of the Midland Railway 1844–1874; Augustus M. Kelley, New York. 1969.
  11. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/north-midland-railway-view-of-new-street-bridge-etc-in-belper-looking-south-338356, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  12. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/masborough-station-338358, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  13. https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/1481296/view, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  14. https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/1481295/view, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114590384, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114587858, accessed on 12th October 2026.
  17. https://derbyshirevch.org/2022/11/chesterfields-railway-stations-a-short-history, accessed on 13th October 2026.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114589343, accessed on 13th October 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114589706, accessed on 13th October 2026.
  20. https://www.derwentvalleymills.org/b14, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belper_railway_station, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  22. https://www.facebook.com/belperandproud/posts/the-original-ambergate-station-opened-in-1840-first-regular-trains-ran-from-may-/1407511364754845, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambergate_railway_station#/media/File:Ambergate_junction.jpg, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambergate_railway_station, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  25. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114589253, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=53.06659&lon=-1.46390&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  27. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullbridge_Aqueduct, accessed ion 14th October 2026.
  28. https://www.grosvenorprints.com/stock_detail.php?ref=57107, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  29. https://www.wingfieldstation1947.co.uk/wingfield-station-1947-1, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  30. https://www.grosvenorprints.com/stock_detail.php?ref=57108, accessed on 14th October 2026.
  31. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=912311838128653&set=gm.34533848262869100&idorvanity=1730959503584733, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beighton_railway_station, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  33. G. Hurst; Great Central East of Sheffield Volume 1; Milepost Publications, Worksop, 1989.
  34. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114586835, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eckington_and_Renishaw_railway_station, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  36. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114587363, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  37. https://www.travelsouthyorkshire.com/en-gb/newsupdates/swintons-four-stations, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  38. https://maps.nls.uk/view/1256500s03, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  39. https://www.wakefieldhistoricalsociety.org.uk/wakefield-history/reports-on-lectures, accessed on 15th October 2026.
  40. https://ebay.io/m/zhvd9o, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  41. https://share.google/0Fzv5THBXRNAyZJXs, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125649228, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  43. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125649231, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  44. B. Pixton; North Midland: Portrait of a Famous Route; Runpast Publishing, 2000.
  45. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darfield_railway_station, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  46. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3402608, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  47. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1614960195255335/posts/5367345266683457, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  48. https://maps.nls.uk/view-full/125649110, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oakenshaw_railway_station, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  50. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125646363, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  51. https://roberthall.pictures/gallery/tait-arthur-fitzwilliam-normanton-station, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  52. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125644705, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  53. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normanton_railway_station, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  54. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/north-midland-railway-bridge-over-the-river-derwent-and-the-matlock-road-near-amber-gate-338353, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  55. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19wEs2uvkt, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  56. https://newwoodlesford.xyz/uncategorized/woodlesford-the-story-of-a-statio, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  57. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125642578, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  58. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_Hunslet_Lane_railway_station, accessed on 24th October 2026.
  59. https://dn710205.ca.archive.org/0/items/dr_101-hunslet-lane–midlane-railway-leeds-c-arriers-warehouses–first-sh-13564004/13564004.jpg, accessed on 24th October 2026.

The Reorganisation of British Railways in the 1960s

Gaining an understanding of what was happening at a particular time and place, or within a specific organisation, can be helped by hearing what those looking on from outside of the organisation or circumstances believed was happening. I read an article entitled Reorganisation of British Railways the February 1961 issue of The Railway Magazine with this in mind. [1]

The article considered government proposals for the future of the nationalised road, rail and water transport undertakings announced in a White Paper published in December 1960. [2]

The Railway Magazine reported that,

“In reaching these conclusions, the Government has been assisted by the advice received from the Special Advisory Group on the British Transport Commission, and full account has been taken of the report on British Railways from the House of Commons Select Committee on Nationalised Industries, and the views of the British Transport Commission and the trade unions.

It is emphasised that the heart of the problem is in the railways. They are a great national enterprise and a vital basic industry. They employ half a million people and represent an investment of nearly £1,600 million, which is growing by more than £100 million each year. A railway system of the right size is an essential element in our transport network and will remain so for as long as can be foreseen. The development of other forms of transport and new techniques have faced British Railways, like the railways in other countries, with problems of competition and adaptation to modern circumstances and public demand. The railways are now in a grave financial plight. They are a long way short (by about £60 million a year) of covering even their running costs. This is quite apart from the problem of meeting their interest charges, whether on the price paid for the undertakings or on the money since borrowed for modernisation and other purposes. These interest charges now total some £75 million a year.

The activities of the British Transport Commission as at present constituted are so large and so diverse that it is virtually impossible, the Government considers, to run them effectively as a single undertaking. The size and difficulties of British Railways have understandably tended to preoccupy the Commission and have undoubtedly affected its outlook over the whole range if its activities.” [1: p98]

The Railway Magazine continues:

“This has been particularly apparent in financial and commercial matters, in the consideration of which there has been a tendency for technical and operating factors to prevail over others. There has also been, as the Select Committee pointed out in its report, a ‘confusion in judging between what is economically right and what is socially desirable‘.

“The commercial capability of the railways is circumscribed by outmoded statutory obligations and restrictions on their trading operations. Mounting deficits, the size of capital debt in relation to the earning capacity of the assets and the increasing burden of interest as modernisation proceeds, present situation detrimental to the morale of management and workers, to financial control, and to hopes of recovery.

“In these circumstances, the Government has decided to replace the British Transport Commission and the existing organisation by a new structure designed to overcome the main defects and dis-advantages of the present organisation; to reconstruct the finances of the Commission and, in particular, those of the railways; and give the various under-takings the maximum practicable freedom of operation in their commercial affairs.

“The Government proposes that each of the main activities of the Commission should be managed by a separate board holding its own assets and responsible for its own capital debt. This should lead to – concentration of effort and to devolution and definition of responsibility, and thus secure more effective management and = foster financial discipline. The object is to provide each board and management with a clearly-defined task within a set field. The administration of such diverse activities as British Railways, ports, waterways, and London Transport, presents special problems, each of which calls for particular qualifications and experience. The boards for British Railways, London Transport, British Transport Docks and British Waterways will each be incorporated under statute with the appropriate duties and powers necessary to the efficient conduct of those undertakings.” [1: p98-99]

So, the British Railways Board would take on the responsibility for the whole national railway undertaking and the capital debt of the railways as a whole. However, the system was set up to be managed by Regional Railway Boards. In practical terms this meant that British Railways Board would handle: national staff and wages negotiations; overall finance & investment; policies for safety, training and research; and the determination of the future size and shape of the rail network.

Fully responsible for the management and operation of the regional railway system, each regional board would be “autonomous in all matters which concern its region alone. They [would] this continue the process of devolution of authority and decentralisation of management. Each Regional Railway Board [would] maintain a regional trading account as a means of assisting it to secure the highest level of efficiency and economy of operation.” [1: p99]

The Railway Magazine described the proposed arrangements relating to: the new London Transport Board and its interaction with the overground network; the distinction between the packet ports and shipping services related to the railways (which would remain under British Railways Board control) and the remaining port and dock facilities which would be under the new statutory Docks Board; the waterways would be managed by the Inland Waterways Authority; a new Holding Company which would assume control of British Road Services, Tilling (Buses) Group, Scottish Omnibuses Group, Hotels, Road Freight Shipping Services, Thomas Cook & Son Ltd and various other holdings.

The Minister of Transport was to coordinate policy between the new boards and the allocation of funds for new investment. The Minister would be assisted by a new ‘ Nationalised Transport Advisory Council which would have no executive functions. The Council was to consist of the chairs of all the new boards and the holding company and others from outside the national transport undertakings, with the Minister as Chair.

The Railway Magazine also highlighted a section of the White Paper devoted to finance. Financial reconstruction was considered essential. This was particularly true for the railways which would require large-scale support from the Exchequer.

The White Paper proposed that: £400 million of the BTC’s capital debt (about one fifth of the total) should be written off; and £800 million should be placed in a suspense account, relieved indefinitely of interest or repayment obligations.

The Railway Magazine also noted that the effect would be to take from the railways, “the whole burden of accumulated losses, and the greater part of the liability relating to their capital value before the beginning of modernisation in 1955, except insofar as, at a later date, the undertaking [might] be able to resume the burden. But these heavy liabilities, though removed from the railways, [would] not have ceased to exist. They [would] only have been transferred to the public in another form as they [would] fall on the Exchequer.” [1: p100]

The proposed financial provisions would relieve the railways of over £40 million annual interest. This capital reorganisation would provide an immediate relief to the railways of over £40 million annual interest. A liability for interest on a reduced capital liability of £400 million (and for any new borrowing for capital expenditure.

The Railway Magazine noted that:

“The Government recognises that the task before the railways is a very formidable one. The railways must try to eliminate their operating loss, now running at about 60 million a year, and to move over the next five years into a position in which they can meet interest charges out of their own revenues. The Government will therefore keep the financial position of the railways under very close scrutiny, and will make a special review of the position at the end of the five years. It is clear that large sums will have to be provided from the Exchequer during the interim period to meet railway deficits, including interest, and increases in railway fares and charges must, where and when appropriate, make their due contribution towards meeting railway costs.

“The Select Committee on Nationalised Industries suggested that uneconomic services which the railways were required to provide on grounds of the national interest or of social needs should be met by specific grant from public funds. This question also affects other nationalised undertakings, and the Government will consider it in that general context and in the light of the Select Committee’s comments. For the time being, railway losses on any such services will in practice be covered by the contributions proposed from public funds.

“In the new circumstances, it [was] not considered reasonable to leave the railways subject to out-of-date restrictions on their commercial activities. present restrictions on the ability of the railways to adjust quickly and adequately their freight charges and passenger fares [were], in the Government’s view, no longer justified in [the then] present competitive conditions. The railways [would] therefore be freed from statutory control over their charges, except for fares in the London Passenger Transport Area where the London Transport Executive and British Railways have a virtual monopoly of public passenger transport. This change [would] substantially reduce the functions of the Transport Tribunal.” [1: p124]

The Government proposals required major legislation. The necessary Bill was to be introduced in the next session of Parliament, but it was not expected that the measures could come fully into effect before the summer of 1962, although the new structures began to take shape under the British Transport Commission.

In the end, the changes outlined in the White Paper took effect on 1st January 1963,  following the passing of the Transport Act 1962. The Act officially dissolved the British Transport Commission (BTC), which had previously managed the railways, canals, and road freight. The British Railways Board formally took over operations on 1st January 1963. This new board and its chairman, Dr. Richard Beeching, subsequently published the Reshaping of British Railways report on 27th March 1963, which set the actual line and station closures into motion. It is clear that the substance of the report was decided prior to the British Railways Board being formed!

An interesting reflection on the circumstances that brought about the changes which affected the railways of Britain in the middle decades of the 20th century was written in 2023 by Gareth Dennis. It was entitled, The Reframing of Beeching’s Legacy.

Dennis re-evaluates the 1963 Beeching Report, arguing that its legacy extends beyond rural closures to lay foundations for modern intercity and containerised freight systems. The Beeching Report both responded to (and precipitated) ongoing network contraction and financial deficit, ultimately shaping efficient long-distance and freight operations while misjudging future suburban rail demand.

References

  1. Reorganisation of British Railways; in The Railway Magazine, Volume 107, No. 718, February 1961, p98-100 & p124.
  2. Reorganisation of the Nationalised Transport Undertakings; H. M. Stationery Office, London, 1960; via https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/MoT_Reorg1960.pdf.
  3. https://garethdennis.medium.com/the-reframing-of-beechings-legacy-70486eb8a0bc, accessed on 23rd October 2026.

Appendix

Timeline: Beeching closures

December 1960: Reorganisation of the Nationalised Transport Undertakings – The White Paper which proposed the splitting of the British Transport Commission into a number of bodies, with the railways being run by the new British Railways Board. It also set financial targets for the railways, which would lead to the Beeching cuts a few years later. This document was written by the Ministry of Transport and published in December 1960 by H. M. Stationery Office. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/MoT_Reorg1960.pdf.

27th March 1963: The Reshaping of British Railways – Part 1: Report – The ‘Beeching Report’ is one of the most notorious government reports of the 20th century. The failure of the modernisation plan to stem BR’s losses led the author, Dr. Beeching, to propose wholesale route closures in an attempt to concentrate resources on the core routes. … Many closures went ahead; some sensible, others far less so. The report often adopted an overly-simplistic analysis of the economics of the routes, failing to recognise how the branches contributed traffic to the core network. The Beeching closures failed in their attempt to eliminate BR’s losses, and led to the belated recognition that the railways serve a social role which should be financially acknowledged. Written by the British Transport Commission, this document was published by H. M. Stationery Office. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BRB_Beech001a.pdf.

27th March 1963: The Reshaping of British Railways – Part 2: Maps – Written by the British Transport Commission, this document was also published by H. M. Stationery Office. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BRB_Beech001b.pdf.

2nd May 1963: The Economics and Social Aspects of the Beeching Plan – The House of Lords Record of a speech given by Lord Stonham, in which he outlines his opposition to large parts of the then-just-published Beeching Report. It was written by Lord Stonham and published by the Parliamentary Archives. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/Hans_Beeching02051963.pdf.

1963: Its Up to YOU! Save your Railways – A pamphlet from the NUR protesting about the proposed Beeching closures and suggesting ways for the public to fight the closure notices.
This document was written and published in 1963 by National Union of Railwaymen. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/NUR_UpToYou1963.pdf.

1963: The Mis-Shaping of British Railways – Part 1: Retort – A typically blunt response by the NUR to the Beeching Report of 1963 It was written and published by the National Union of Railwaymen. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/NUR_Misshaping1963.pdf.

1965: Review of Dr. Beeching’s Report: The Reshaping of British Railways – One of many pamphlets pointing out some of the flaws in the Beeching Report. Attention is drawn to the folly of examining the railways in isolation from other forms of transport and ignoring the contribution to the trunk lines’ traffic made by the branch lines. This document was written by Prof. E. R. Hondelink and published by the Great Central Association. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/GCA_Rep001.pdf.

February 1965: The Development Of The Major Railway Trunk Routes – The second (and lesser-known) ‘Beeching Report’; this one concentrated on stimulating traffic on the core routes rather than branch line closures. This document was written and published in by British Railways Board. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BRB_Beech002.pdf.

February 1965: The Transport Conflict by Dr Beeching – The transcript of a lecture, and two newspaper interviews, given by Dr Beeching as part of his effort to explain the purpose and justification for his about-to-be-published report, “The Development Of The Major Railway Trunk Routes”.  This document was written and published by The Observer. https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/Obs_Beech001.pdf.

The Swansea & Mumbles Railway

The featured image for this article was taken in the days prior to electrification of the railway. A steam-powered service sits at Oystermouth Station before heading on towards Mumbles Pier, © Public Domain. [37]

In mid-September 2026, I picked up a copy of the Souvenir Brochure for the closure of the Swansea and Mumbles Railway which occurred on 5th January 1960. Photographs of the pages of the brochure appear in the Appendix to this article.

Throughout the country, the internal combustion engine was beginning its ascendancy and many in national and local government together with those providing transport had been won over by the arguments which supported the rise of petrol and diesel-powered vehicles. Looking back from the 21st century, we can see that, while there was some value in the arguments put forward, the net effect has been significantly disadvantageous to the built environment and to our ability to get around. We also know now that Internal combustion engines have been heavily polluting and have contributed to the warming of our planet.

The closure of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway is just one example among so many, of decision-makers turning away from trams to buses amid the significant rise in car ownership. The reducing patronage of the line was partly caused by these transitions but it was also essentially a self-fulfilling prophecy. Expenditure on maintenance and renewals was perceived as unnecessary because of the lower demand for the service, this in turn resulted in a further lowering in patronage!

The brochure for the closure of the line talks of the way in which “More and more car owners meant fewer and fewer train passengers and naturally, a subsequent loss of earnings.” [1] It says that, “Not only did the traffic fall but costs increased alarmingly. The railway began to lose money. It had to be subsidised by the rest of the South Wales Transport undertaking; in effect, the bus passenger. Just as steam had ousted the horse, just as electricity had ousted steam, the internal combustion engine was ousting electricity. The 1950’s saw marked developments in the motor bus. It got bigger and better.” [1]

Perhaps inevitably the future horizon began to contract and all decisions were focussed on the here-and-now or the next few years. The result was lower investment and then a very significant cost for upgrading – £350,000. At the end of the 1950s that must have felt like a fortune. The decision was inevitable. The brochure tells us that “With great reluctance, the Directors [of the South Wales Transport Company] decided to close the undertaking and supplant it with services of modern, well-equipped motor buses.” [1]

So ends the story! The brochure finishes with a eulogy and with paragraphs which extol the motor bus as ‘the future’ of public transport:

“Whilst we have recorded briefly in cold facts the important stages in the development of the Mumbles Railway, coupled with that history has been a warm and human relationship between the Railway and the residents of Swansea and Mumbles. Maybe because it was to many a symbol of happiness by the seaside.

“It is little wonder then, when its ultimate fate was announced, that there was a distinct feeling of personal loss.

“In its passing it lays down the mantle of the ‘Oldest Surviving Passenger Railway in the World’ but no one can take from it the proud title of being the ‘First Passenger Railway in the World. We emphasise this as it passes from our everyday scene into the realms of history.
What of the future? The closure of the railway does not mean the end of 155 years of public service. Far from it. That service will still continue with greater ability and efficiency to meet the demands of the traveller, in this modern day and age of 1960. The motor bus knows no boundary.” [1]

In the 21st century, First Cymru operates frequent regular bus services (such as routes 2A and 2B) connecting Swansea city centre directly to Oystermouth and Mumbles. The former railway route along the seafront now forms part of a popular walking and cycling track. Recent council updates to the Mumbles seafront have even embedded smart aluminium strips into the paving as a visual nod to the old Mumbles Railway tracks. Transport planners and local groups occasionally discuss light rail, tram-train, or wider Swansea Bay Metro concepts, but a dedicated rail link returning to Mumbles remains a long-term proposal rather than an active project.

As we look back from the 21st century, aware of the way things are now perceived, it is reasonable to speculate about ‘what might have been’ had significant investment been made on improvement of the tram network rather than it being set aside in favour of the ‘modern bus’!

A consultancy report – Greengauge21: Shaping Tomorrow’s Railways [2] – concluded that a “Swansea Bay Metro could use the same technology that is being developed for tram-style operation into Cardiff Bay to provide access to Swansea city centre from key valley towns such as Pontypridd and Aberdare. … Given where passenger railways started 214 years ago, someone is bound to ask whether the light rail into Swansea city centre could be extended to Mumbles. That is a challenge we leave for others to ponder.” [2]

The History of the Line

The Swansea and Mumbles Railway stakes a claim to be the world’s first passenger railway. [3] It was originally built under an Act of Parliament, the Oystermouth Railway or Tramroad Act 1804, to move limestone from the quarries of Mumbles to Swansea and to the markets beyond, it carried the world’s first fare-paying railway passengers under an agreement effective from 25th March 1807. It later moved from horse power to steam locomotion, and was finally converted to electric power, using the largest tram cars ever built for service in Britain. [3]

At the time of the railway’s closure, it was claimed to have been the world’s longest serving railway, although this distinction has to be qualified because other railways which were used solely for goods traffic (e.g. the Middleton Railway in Leeds, Yorkshire, dating from 1758) had been operating for longer. [4]

Wikipedia tells us that, “There was no road link between Swansea and Oystermouth at the beginning of the 19th century and the original purpose of the railway was to transport coal, iron ore and limestone. Construction seems to have been completed in 1806 and operations began without formal ceremony, using horse-drawn vehicles. As constructed, the line ran from the Brewery Bank adjacent to the Swansea Canal in Swansea, around the wide sweep of Swansea Bay to a terminus at Castle Hill (near the present-day Clements Quarry) in the tiny isolated fishing village of Oystermouth (known as Mumbles). There was also a branch from Blackpill which ran up the Clyne valley for nearly 1 mile (1.6 km) to Ynys Gate which was intended to promote the development of the valley’s coal reserves.” [4]

“In February 1807, approval was given to carry passengers along the line, when one of the original proprietors, Benjamin French, offered to pay the company the sum of twenty pounds in lieu of tolls for the right to do so for twelve months from the following quarter day, 25th March 1807. This is usually cited as the date when the first regular service carrying passengers between Swansea and Oystermouth began, thus giving the railway the claim of being the first passenger railway in the world. Passenger services operated from The Mount, the world’s first recorded railway station. [5: p333] The venture was … a success … The following year, French joined with two others in offering the increased sum of twenty five pounds to continue the arrangement for a further year, but the construction of a turnpike road parallel to the railway in the mid-1820s robbed it of much of its traffic and the passenger service (by that time in the hands of one Simon Llewelyn) ceased in 1826 or 1827, ironically just as events elsewhere in the United Kingdom (particularly in the north east of England) were paving the way for the development of railways as a truly national and international transport system for both goods and passengers.” [4]

“In its early days the line operated in the same manner as the contemporary canals and turnpike roads. Tolls and charges were laid down in the enabling act of Parliament and any trader could use the line on provision of a suitable waggon and after paying the appropriate toll to the owning Company. The railway was laid in the form of a plateway, with the rails being approximately 4 ft (1,219 mm) apart.” [6: p48]

Wikipedia continues: “After cessation of the passenger service the line became derelict and the original company of proprietors virtually moribund. The Clyne valley branch was re-laid in 1841/2 and extended for a further 1 mile (1.6 km) (as a private line) to the Rhydydefaid colliery where George Byng Morris, the son of one of the original proprietors, had started to exploit the coal and iron reserves of the valley. From about 1855, George Byng Morris took the line in hand, re-laid it with edge rails, as a conventional railway, to the standard gauge of 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) and reintroduced a horse-drawn passenger service between Swansea and a terminus at The Dunns in Oystermouth.” [4]

Trials were undertaken in 1877 using “one of Henry Hughes’ patent tramway locomotives, … ‘Pioneer’. These were successful and two further locomotives of the same type were obtained, although a dispute between the Swansea Improvements and Tramway Company (SI&T) (which owned the locomotives) and the line’s then owner, John Dickson (who had come into possession following the death of George Byng Morris) meant that horses continued to operate certain services until 1896.” [4]

More about Hughes’ locomotives can be found here, [7] here, [8] here [9] and here. [10]

At the end of the 19th century, “there was a junction between the Mumbles Railway and the Swansea town tramway system at the Slip, allowing SI&T cars to run through from Swansea town centre to Oystermouth. The nature of the dispute was such that the Swansea & Mumbles company demanded that the SI&T horse cars should follow their own steam-hauled services on the line. In 1889, a new company, the Mumbles Railway and Pier Company, was incorporated to extend the railway beyond Oystermouth to a new pier close to Mumbles Head. The first section, to Southend, was opened in 1893 and the remainder, including the pier, in 1898.” [4]

“The Clyne valley branch continued to be used for coal traffic from Rhydydefaid pit until its closure in 1885 after which the entire branch fell into disuse. In 1896 the promoters of the Gower Light Railway proposed incorporating it into their scheme but nothing came of it. The original branch to Ynys Gate (as authorised in 1804) was relaid in connection with the Clyne Valley slant (opened 1903) and used for coal traffic until the colliery closed in 1915. The extension of 1841/2 remained abandoned until 1920 when a narrow-gauge tramway was laid on its formation to carry coal from Ynys slant to Ynys Gate. This was used only until 1921 when the slant closed. There was then no further traffic on the branch, although the track remained in situ and was still usable as late as 1936 when it is recorded that a diesel locomotive made a trip up the branch as far as Ynys Gate.” [4]

“A somewhat motley collection of steam locomotives was used to maintain services between 1877 and 1929, beginning with the Hughes tramway locomotives mentioned above (which were actually owned by the SI&T and therefore not able to be used on the railway after 1878). Dickson had purchased two saddle tank locomotives of more conventional outline from the Falcon Engine & Car Works (successor to Hughes’s Locomotive and Tramway Engine Works), and two more from Manning Wardle & Co of Leeds in the early 1880s. A further locomotive (originally numbered 5, later 3) came from the Hunslet Engine Company of Leeds in 1885.” [4]

The Swansea and Mumbles Railway Royal Train decked out for a Royal visit to the line on 19th July 1920, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [41]

“When the new Swansea and Mumbles Railway Company took over operations in 1890 it ordered two 0-4-0 saddle tank locomotives from Black, Hawthorn & Co of Gateshead. These were delivered in 1891 and numbered 1 and 2; they worked on the line until after the First World War. Two larger 0-6-0 side tank locomotives were obtained from the Hunslet Engine Company in 1898; numbered 4 and 5, they bore the brunt of the passenger service until well into the 1920s. The nominally independent Mumbles Railway and Pier Company ordered a 0-4-0 saddle tank from the Brush Electrical Engineering Co of Loughborough (successor to the Falcon Engine & Car Works) in 1906 and this carried plates reading “MR & P No. 3” to denote its ownership. Finally, a second-hand Avonside 0-6-0ST was obtained and named Swansea. All were tank locomotives of 0-4-0 or 0-6-0 wheel arrangement. Ownership was vested variously in the Swansea and Mumbles Railway Company or the Mumbles Railway and Pier Company (and sometimes transferred between the two for accounting purposes)[4] and as early as the 1890s there is evidence that the railway was having to hire in locomotives to supplement its own fleet. By the 1920s, locomotives were regularly being hired from a local dealer, Charles Williams of Morriston, and frequently appear in photographs of the railway.” [4]

“The line celebrated its centenary in 1904, producing a special commemorative brochure for the occasion. Two years previously, a notable experiment had been carried out, namely the introduction of battery-powered ‘accumulator’ cars. These were not a success, but one of the cars was retained after the electrical equipment had been stripped out and used to convey parties of visiting dignitaries, including King Edward VII when he and his consort, Queen Alexandra, visited Swansea for the ceremonial cutting of the first sod of the King’s Dock in July 1904. The car was used again for the visit of King Edward’s successor, King George V, in 1920, when he officiated at the opening of the Queen’s Dock.”  [4]

Electrification – “The line was electrified in 1928 at 650 V DC using overhead transmission – giving it the distinction of having used three forms of regular locomotive power over the years (i.e. horse, steam and electricity). Trials began on 6 July 1928 [5] and full electric services were introduced on 2 March 1929, using a fleet of eleven double-deck cars built by the Brush Electrical Engineering Co of Loughborough, in Leicestershire. These were the largest ever built for service in Britain and each could seat 106 passengers. [6] Furthermore, they were frequently operated in pairs, giving a total seating capacity of 212 per train.” [4]

A two car tram train at Oystermouth Station, © Rev. R. W. A. Jones and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [40]

“Two further cars were added later, bringing the fleet strength up to thirteen. A four-wheeled petrol-mechanical locomotive was acquired from Hardy Railmotors of Slough, then in Buckinghamshire, to handle the residual goods traffic on the railway, but this proved to be underpowered and was replaced after a few years by a diesel-mechanical locomotive from John Fowler & Co, of Leeds. The Hardy locomotive was retained for a few years and used for shunting the cars in the depot, which was on the site of the former carriage sheds, adjacent to the Rutland Street terminus, and for inspection of the overhead line equipment, but it had been dismantled by 1954, when parts were used in the construction of a replica horse-drawn car to celebrate the line’s 150th anniversary.” [4]

“In 1958, the South Wales Transport Company (the principal operator of motor bus services in the Swansea town area and predecessor of the modern-day First Cymru company) purchased the railway from the old owning companies (the Swansea and Mumbles Railway Limited, and the Mumbles Railway and Pier Company), having previously been the lessee in succession to the Swansea Improvements and Tramways Company since the 1930s, and the following year went to Parliament with an abandonment bill. Despite vociferous local opposition, the bill became law as the South Wales Transport Act 1959.” [4]

The South Wales Transport Company wasted no time in closing down the line! Their closure brochure/pamphlet is reproduce as Appendix 1 to this article.

There remains a debate about whether the line was a railway or a tramway. This is discussed in Appendix 2 to this article.

The Route

Wikipedia provides this linear route diagram, © Public Domain. [4]

“The railway had a multitude of stopping places over the years, but at the time of electrification in 1929 the officially recognised stations from Swansea to Mumbles (as published in Bradshaw)” [4] were:

  • Rutland Street
  • St Helen’s (frequently known as “The Slip”)
  • Brynmill
  • Ashleigh Road
  • Between Ashleigh Road and Blackpill stations the railway was crossed by the LM&SR Central Wales line from Swansea Victoria to Shrewsbury, at a point close to the LM&SR Mumbles Road station. There was a Mumbles Road name board under the bridge on the Mumbles Railway line, but if this was an official stopping place for Mumbles Railway cars it was not recognised as such by Bradshaw.
  • Blackpill
  • West Cross
  • Norton Road
  • Oystermouth
  • Southend
  • Mumbles Pier
The full length of the tramway from Swansea Harbour Trust to Mumbles Pier. [4]
Trams started their journey along the Swansea & Mumbles Railway in Victoria Road, just outside the frontage of Victoria Railway Station. Trams then headed Southwest alongside the Gas Works along, what is now Oystermouth Road. [11]
Approximately the same length of the tramway is shown here as a turquoise/light blue line running along Victoria Road. [17]
Looking North in the 1920s across the station approach at Victoria Railway Station. Victoria Road runs from behind the building at the top-right of this image towards the bottom-left corner of the image, © Heritage England. [15]
Swansea Victoria Railway Station, seen from Victoria Road, close to the eastern terminus of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway. This image was shared by Matthew Rowley on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 4th June 2022. [13]

Swansea Victoria was “opened to passenger and goods traffic on 14th December 1867. Owned successively by the Llanelly Railway and Dock Company (1867 to 1871), the Swansea and Carmarthen Railways Company (1871 to 1873), the London and North Western Railway Company (L.N.W.R., 1873 to 1922), the London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company (L.M.S., 1923 to 1947) and British Railways (1948 to 1964), it was served by trains to and from Shrewsbury, Crewe, Liverpool, Manchester and York and formed the southern terminus of the Central Wales line, most of which is still operational as the Heart of Wales Line. Victoria closed in June 1964. … The site was subsequently cleared and used for Swansea Leisure Centre.” [12]

Production of gas at Swansea Gas Works dates back to 1841 when Swansea Gas Light Company began making gas by burning coal. The site ceased producing gas in 1922 and the facility was used for gas distribution until 1949 and then as a gas operations centre.

Langdon Road (later Oystermouth Road) on the Southeast side of Swansea Gas Works was the route followed by trams heading for Mumbles on the Swansea & Mumbles Railway, © Historic England. [15]

A few more pictures of the Gas Works site can be found here. [14]

The tramway can be seen here running along Langdon Place (now Oystermouth Road) and to the South of the County Gaol. [13]
A similar length of the route against a 21st century backdrop. HMP Swansea is on the left of this image (the former Swansea Gaol). [17]
Swansea Gaol late in the 19th Century, seen from what was Langdon Place, © Public Domain. [16]
HMP Swansea in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, October 2025]
The next length of the line as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1914, published in 1921. [18]
The same length of the route plotted on 21st century satellite imagery from railmaponline.com. [17]
Looking West along Oystermouth Road in the 21st century. The tramway appears to have run along the line of the Westbound side of the road. Google Streetview, October 2025]
On this next length of the line, the old tramway passed through St. Helen’s Road Station. It had to swing away from the LNWR line which hugged the sea wall to allow room for that line’s Swansea Bay Station. At the same location the line passed the Cricket Ground to its right. This extract is taken from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1896/1897, published in 1900. [19]
A similar area showing the route of the line overlaid on modern satellite imagery. [17]
Looking West along Oystermouth Road as it approaches its junction with Guildhall Road South, the point where the A4067 becomes Mumbles Road. On the left, beyond the barriers, is the present promenade which sits on the line of the old LNWR line. [Google Streetview, October 2025]
Looking East along Oystermouth Road from Mumbles Road with the Bay View Hotel in between Oystermouth Road and Guildhall Road South (the St. Helens Junction) the lines on the far right of the picture are the old LNWR line. The single track line alongside the road is the Swansea & Mumbles Railway, © Public Domain. [24]
Looking East from approximately the same location in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, October 2026]
Looking West along Mumbles Road from approximately the same location as the Streetview image immediately above, close to the old LNWR Swansea Bay Railway Station. The modern promenade widens at this point to accommodate the Railway Station and its yard. [Google Streetview, October 2026]
Another view of St. Helens Junction from the East. The Bay View Hotel is on the left of the image, © Public Domain. [25]
Looking Southwest along the Westbound platform at the LNWR Swansea Bay Railway Station, © Not known but authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [20]

Swansea Bay is a former railway station in Swansea next to Swansea Bay, in South Wales, opened to passenger and goods traffic on 14 December 1867. [21] Owned successively by the Llanelly Railway and Dock Company (1867 to 1871), the Swansea and Carmarthen Railways Company (1871 to 1873), the London and North Western Railway Company (LNWR, 1873 to 1922), the London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company (LMS, 1923 to 1947) and British Railways (1948 to 1964), it was served by trains to and from Shrewsbury, Crewe, Liverpool, Manchester and York and formed the southern terminus of the Central Wales line, most of which is still operational as the Heart of Wales Line. Swansea Bay closed in June 1964, having been listed in the Report on the Reshaping of British Railways (better known as the Beeching Report) the previous year. [22] The former station is near ‘The Slip’ opposite the Bay View Public House. It was adjacent to the Swansea and Mumbles Railway which was closed in 1960, and opposite the Western end of St Helen’s Road, which until the 1930s was the terminus of one of the Town tram lines. [20]

To the West of Swansea Bay Railway Station, the tramway followed the road between Singleton Park and the LNWR line which followed the sea wall. [19]
Again, a similar area showing the route of the line overlaid on modern satellite imagery. [17]

Singleton Park covers approximately 250 acres. An ornamental garden is located in the south, near the entrance to Swansea University, while a walled botanical garden is located in the park centre. On the south-western corner, past the hospital and the university, is a boating lake, as well as a miniature golf course. [23]

Wikipedia tells us that, “The park was originally part of the Vivian family estate. It was purchased by Swansea County Borough Council in 1919 for use as a public park. Park superintendent Daniel Bliss, who was trained at Kew Gardens, conceived of the Singleton Farm botanical gardens and Ornamental Gardens. He was the main driver behind the purchase of the estate. [23]

During the Second World War, the park hosted the Armaments Research Department a detachment of the Woolwich Arsenal under Sir Robert Robertson (1869-1949). While in 1944 over 1500 American soldiers were billeted for training on the beaches prior to landing on Omaha Beach, Normandy. … A Gorsedd stone circle was erected in 1925 for the Eisteddfod held in Singleton Park, Swansea, and was enlarged in 1964. [23]

The Swansea and Mumbles Railway continued Southwest running on the Southeast side of Mumbles Road, with the LNWR line running close to the sea wall. The line’s Sketty Road Station appears on this map extract. [19]
A similar length of the line as it appears on the railmaponline.com satellite imagery. [17]
This next length of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway takes it as far as Mumbles Road Railway Station. [19]
The LNWR line crossed over the Swansea & Mumbles Railway by means of Blackpill Railway Bridge. The station and bridge are at the bottom left of this image and the map extract above. [17]
A coloured Postcard entitled ‘Swansea & Mumbles 1 & 9 Tramcar 1 seen at Asheligh Road in July 1959’, © J. B. Photocards Courtesy of George Waters Collection and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [36]

A hundred metres or so short of the railway bridge a branch line left the main line of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway. This branch line was opened in the first decade of the 19th century and remained in use until as late as the Second World War. … The Clyne Valley Tramway is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [27]

Looking West from Mumbles Road between Glyn Crescent (off to the right of the image) and Derwen Fawr Road (beyond and to the left of the car). The straight blue line is the main line of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway, the curved line approximates to the line of the Clyne Valley Tramway. [Google Streetview, July 2025]

At Mumbles Road Station, the LNWR line crossed over the Swansea & Mumbles Railway and the main coastal road via the Blackpill railway bridge. A Swansea & Mumbles Railway name board was also positioned just under the bridge. The LNWR station featured a goods yard, sidings, and a signal box.

The Blackpill Railway Bridge seen from the South. The LNWR line crossed both the Swansea & Mumbles Railway and the Mumbles Road. Mumbles Road Station on the LNWR line is at high level off to the left of this image. [26]
looking Southwest along Mumbles Road: Blackpill Bridge was approximately at the location of the pelican crossing. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Looking Northeast along Mumbles Road to the location of Blackpill Bridge. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
South of the junction with the Clyne Valley branch the main line of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway passed under Blackpill Bridge and in the hamlet of BlackPill there was a tramstop/station which can be seen on this map extract. Initially, South of the station/tramstop the line continued in the East-side shoulder of Mumbles Road. This arrangement changed in the early years of the 20th century. [19]
At the turn of the 20th century, the tramway had been diverted away from Mumbles Road to follow the coast wall. It appears on that alignment in this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1914, published in 1921. [28]

Railmaponline.com shows both alignments superimposed on modern satellite imagery. [17]

In around 1910, a steam locomotive is in charge of a Mumbles-bound train at Blackpill Station. The track is on the new alignment but the later station building has not been built © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [34]
Blackpill Bridge seen from the South with a Mumbles-bound tram heading towards Black Pill Station, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [31]
Looking North through Blackpill Station with a tram approaching the station. Blackpill Bridge can be seen in the background, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [32]
Blackpill Station and Car No. 11, heading for Mumbles Pier, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND). [33]
Looking South towards what was the location of Blackpill Station. The blue line right of centre in this image is an approximation to the original line of the railway. Over to the left of the image, the blue line which runs behind the low hedge shows the revised alignment noted above. The electricity substation building which sat at the later Blakpill Station remains and can be seen to the left of the main road. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
The view from immediately South of Blackpill Station. The blue line shows the newer alignment of the railway. [Google Streetview, August 2016]

Further South, Railmaponline.com continues to show both alignments superimposed on modern satellite imagery. [17]

looking South just to the South of the junction with Mayals Road: the original alignment of the railway is marked by the blue line. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
The newer alignment of the railway was very close to the sea shore. This view looks South and was provided by the City and County Survey Team. [Google Streetview, April 2026]
The original alignment. [19]
The original alignment again. This extract takes us to the bottom edge of the 6″ OS Sheet. [19]
On the way to Mumbles Head from Swansea’.  Postcard, looking North, of early Mumbles Railway steam passenger train on track alongside Mumbles Road with horse drawn carriage. It was taken between Blackpill and West Cross, close to Liliput, before the realignment occurred at the turn of the 29th century, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND).

The later alignment with significant storage lines at Liliput. This length also takes us to the bottom edge of the OS Sheet. [28]

This extract from railmaponline.com shows the two routes continuing through Liliput. [17]

Looking South close to the location of Liliput Station. The original railway alignment was at the kerb line of Mumbles Road, the newer line was beside the sea. Both are marked by blue lines. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Another South-facing view along the line of the newer route, this image is again provided by the City and County Survey Team. [Google Streetview, April 2026]

The original alignment as far as Norton Road Station. This is an extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1896/1897, published in 1900. [29]

The two alignments meet again at the location of Norton Road Station. By the time of this survey, Norton Road Station appears not to be in use and a station has been provided to the North at West Cross. This extract comes from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1921.[30]

After the realignment of the tramway/railway and before electrification, a steam-powered service heads South towards Norton Road, © Blackpill LHS and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND).

The railmaponline.com extract takes the two lines South as far as Norton Road, where they converge. [17]

Another South-facing view at the Fairwood Road Roundabout with the approximate alignment of the original railway marked in blue. [Google Streetview, August 2025]
The newer alignment continues close to the sea shore. This image is again courtesy of the City and County Survey Team. [Google Streetview, April 2026]
At the location of what was Norton Road Station the two alignments, represented by the two blue lines, are much closer together. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
The original alignment from Norton Road Station, through Oystermouth Station and on towards Southend Station. [29]
This next extract from railmaponline.com covers the same length of the line as shown in the map extract above. [17]
Taken in the days prior to electrification of the railway, this photograph shows a steam-powered service sitting at Oystermouth Station before heading on towards Mumbles Pier, © Public Domain. [37]
Looking Southeast towards Mumbles Pier at the location of Oystermouth Station. [Google Streetview, June 2022]
The final length of the line to Pier Station. [29]
The last length of the tramway/railway took trains/electric trams to Mumbles Pier. Railmaponline.com shows us that there were two further short lengths of tramway, one of which served the Pier and the other, the Lighthouse. [17]
Looking towards the end of the line, this photograph shows the last service on the line in January 1960, © Illustrated London News Group. [39]
Looking back towards Swansea. The footbridge in this view was the photographer’s chosen location for the view immediately above. [39]
A busy train at the terminus of the line close to Mumbles Pier. [38]
Courtesy of the City and County Survey Tam, this is the view along the promenade at Mumbles Beach. The railway ran where the promenade now sits. [Google Streetview, April 2026]
In the area of Knab Rock, the railway drifted inland over a short section. This image is courtesy of the City and County Survey Team. [Google Streetview, April 2026]
For a short distance the railway alignment follows the kerb line of Mumbles Road. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
The alignment then bears left leaving Mumbles Road following what is now the access road to Mumbles Pier. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Mumbles Road has now climbed above the cliffs and the access road to the Pier runs close to sea level along what was the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
The line continued as far as the landward end of Mumbles Pier. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Mumbles pier and former railway station in 2009, (c) Dr. D. Pepper and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [42]
The end of the line: Mumbles Pier is on the left of this image and the lighthouse is beyond the Ferris wheel. Both the pier and the lighthouse at one time had their own short tramways, (c) Kelvin Hill. [Google Streetview, September 2026]

References

  1. The Swansea & Mumbles Railway: Over 155 Years of Service: Souvenir Brochure; The South Wales Transport Company Ltd, 5th January 1960. See the Appendix below.
  2. https://www.greengauge21.net/the-first-passenger-railway-in-the-world-and-whats-needed-next, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/southwest/sites/swansea/pages/mumbles_trainanniv.shtml, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_and_Mumbles_Railway, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  5. Stephen Hughes; The Archaeology of an Early Railway System: The Brecon Forest Tramroads; Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments in Wales, 1990;; via https://books.google.com/books?id=C-pzUWrCU5sC&pg=PA333, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  6. Charles E. Lee; The Swansea & Mumbles Railway; Oakwood Press, Oxford, 1988.
  7. http://www.historywebsite.co.uk/articles/publictransport/steamtrams.htm, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  8. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Hughes%27s_Locomotive_and_Tramway_Engine_Works, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  9. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Henry_Hughes_and_Co, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  10. https://chasewaterstuff.wordpress.com/2010/04/06/industrial-steam-locomotive-manufacturers-2, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102183123, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_Victoria_railway_station, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  13. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JPzG7TisX, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  14. https://ididitthisway.wordpress.com/gas-works-municipal-swansea-oystermouth, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  15. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/wpw006114, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  16. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSbBFvcmGbilYmudWxHABpEKI-TwROoo7eioF8XksC0Dw&s=10, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  17. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102342505, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102183111, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_Bay_railway_station, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  21. Contemporary report in The Cambrian newspaper.
  22. More traffic jams, but we’ve never been better connected; on This is South Wales. 11 December 2009; via https://www.walesonline.co.uk/all-about/swansea, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_Park, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  24. https://wp.me/pPWIG-Tk, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  25. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-railway-st-helens-junction-known-as-the-slip-swansea, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  26. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/swansea-to-pontarddulais-railway-the-railway-bridge-at-blackpill, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  27. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/10/20/the-clyne-valley-tramway-swansea
  28. https://maps.nls.uk/view-full/102342499, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102183393, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102342556, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  31. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-train, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  32. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-train-blackpill, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  33. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-train-at-blackpill-station, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  34. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-railway-steam-engine-and-carriages-at-blackpill-c1910, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  35. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/on-the-way-to-mumbles-head-2, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  36. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/swansea-and-mumbles-railway, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  37. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oystermouth_railway_station, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  38. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/image-of-swansea-bay-taken-from-the-mumbles-pier-featuring-the-mumbles-train, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  39. https://www.swanseascoop.com/p/the-mumbles-railway-last-day, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  40. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/two-car-mumbles-train-leaving-oystermouth, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  41. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/mumbles-railway-used-by-their-majesties-the-king-and-queen-19th-july-1920, accessed on 22nd October 2026.
  42. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1518332, accessed on 22nd October 2026.

Appendix 1

The Swansea & Mumbles Railway: Over 155 Years of Service: Souvenir Brochure

Appendix 2

Railway or Tramway?

“The railway is frequently referred to as a tramway, but the original name of the company of proprietors was the Oystermouth Railway or Tramroad Company, the word tramroad being used in its pre-railway context. The original right of way was unique and it was only after the construction of the turnpike road in the 1820s that the line assumed its roadside character. The introduction of steam locomotion in the 1870s was facilitated by a clause in the original act which authorised the “haling or drawing” of waggons by “men, horses, or otherwise” and owed nothing to the Tramways Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict. c. 78).” [4]

“The passenger rolling stock used in steam days bore little resemblance to conventional railway carriages, employing open-top, “toast-rack” and “knifeboard” seating, and being built by companies more commonly associated with the construction of urban tramcars, such as G.F. Milnes & Co., Starbuck & Falcon, etc. After electrification the resemblance to an urban tramway became more marked with the introduction of the huge Brush-built electric cars and because of the style of operation (the signalling was used only to regulate entry to the passing loops and not to control the actual running of cars). The track was always laid with conventional railway-type rail and not grooved tram-rail and the railway also handled conventional goods wagons (exchanged with the London and North Western Railway (the London, Midland and Scottish Railway after January 1923) at Mumbles Road station and with the Great Western Railway at the Swansea terminus). In the early nineteenth century a tramway was a line for mineral wagons (trams), the term railway being used when edge rails replaced plates. The term tramway did not become almost exclusively associated with urban transport systems until after the passing of the Tramways Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict. c. 78).” [4]

The Clyne Valley Tramway, Swansea

The featured image for this article shows a Powlesland and Mason locomotive (withdrawn 1927) crossing Oystermouth Road, Swansea just outside the gate pillars of the rail entrance to the gas works, probably in the early 1920s. This or similar locomotives would have transported Clyne Valley coal to the gas works. The image was shared on the Industrial Locomotive Enthusiasts Facebook Group by Dave Roberts on 20th August 2026. The photographer is not know, (c) Public Domain. [17]

In the very early 19th century, The Clyne Valley Tramway was built (around 1804–1807) as a branch line extension of the Oystermouth Railway (Swansea & Mumbles Railway) to transport coal and timber out of the Clyne Valley.

The Clyne Valley Mineral Railway. The solid black line is the main line of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway. The dotted line is the LNWR line from Swansea and up the Clyne Valley. [7]

Promoted initially by John Morris I and John Morris II, the tramroad/tramway connected local coal workings—such as early bell pits and the Rhydydefaid pit—down through the valley toward Swansea Bay and local docks.

During the 19th century, the tramway and its branches served a number of industrial sites, including later collieries like Clyne Wood Colliery (opened 1868), ironworks, chemical works, and the Clyne Valley Brickworks.

Industrial operations in the valley wound down by the early 20th century (with lines largely abandoned by the 1920s and tracks lifted around World War II).

“From about 1812 a number of large underground pits were excavated of which at least 5 are known. An arsenic and copper works was opened in 1837; acetic acid works in 1856; and brickworks in 1875. In 1865, the main line came through the valley and at least one colliery was directly connected to it. There was also a horse racing course, which was between Killay and Olchfa and operated between 1866 and 1927.” [1]

The Clyne branch parted from the line to Oystermouth  at Blackpill and “followed a course close to the river as far as a spot referred to in the Act as Ynys – in modern terms about 250 yards to the north of the pond beside the cycle track (NGR SS 61249 91599). The sinuous track that now runs on the level beside the east bank of the river follows the course of the railway. The total length of the branch was about 1,450 yards.” [6]

“The first mention of Clyne Valley coal being carried on the railway comes in March 1812 when the minutes of the railway company (now in the Richard Burton Archives in Swansea University) notes that ‘Mr Morris’ [i.e. John Morris II] had opened a colliery on the line of the tramroad. This colliery can perhaps be identified with the colliery to which the modern name Ynys has been given. In the last quarter of 1812 the first payment by Morris of tolls on ‘Coals from Ynis to sundry parts of Tramroad’ is recorded.  Similar payments were then made every quarter until September 1814. After that, there is no further record of tolls on Ynis coal until entries in the cash book cease early in 1816. This strongly suggests that the colliery was in production for two years only, 1812–14.” [6]

Later, John Morris II, now Sir John,  once again became involved with the line, he “became mortgagee in possession of the railway on 21st December 1819.  For a time the company continued to have the semblance of corporate existence but by 1847 George Byng Morris, the grandson of Sir John, had assumed the role of absolute proprietor.” [6]

The railway and tram tracks, the river, mill leets, canals, collieries, paths, roads and the racecourse in the Clyne Valley. This image is © Blackpill Local History Society and is made available for reuse under. Creative Commons Licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). [2]

The Clyne Valley Community Project tells us that after John Morris II ceased working in 1816 it appears that there was no coal working in the Clyne Valley until 1840. At that time when he transferred all his mineral interests to his second son, George Byng Morris. He re-laid the abandoned Clyne Valley branch line and built an extension to a new pit – his own Rhydydefaid pit. The line along the valley as far as Ynys remained as a legal part of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway (the Oystermouth Railway) but was apparently regarded by everyone as the property of the Morris family!  “The section north from Ynys to Rhydydefaid pit was a new construction that closely followed the course of the river and was truly the private property of George Byng Morris. The re-laid branch with Morris’s extension was complete by 1846 at the latest.” [6]

George Bingo Morris also owned a coal yard at Blackpill which was now conveniently connected to Rhydydefaid pit. The yard probably covered local land sales  but the bulk of the output from Rhydydefaid pit was carried to Swansea on the Swansea & Mumbles Railway and much of the output was used in the town’s gasworks on Oystermouth Road.

Morris extended his new tramway a short distance beyond Rhydydefaid pit. “At this period the coalfield around Dunvant and beyond was starting to be developed on a commercial scale and the new tramway was seen by several promoters as a possible means of getting their coal to Swansea for export or use in the town’s industries. The railway was never actually extended in this way, but when the Llanelly Railway was built in the 1860s a short tunnel, which still exists, was provided through their embankment, and the only reason for this tunnel can have been to accommodate a pre-existing right of way.” [6]

In 1854, the Swansea Coal and Iron Co was formed in London and it took over the running of the pit and the tramway. It arranged for the renewal of the whole Swansea & Mumbles Railway, having it converted from a plateway into an edge rail line to improve access to Swansea docks.

Morris undertook the re-laying of the original Swansea & Mumbles Railway, including the Clyne Valley branch as far as Ynys. “The Coal Company was responsible for the extension from Ynys to Rhydydefaid since this section was regarded as part of the colliery infrastructure.” [6]

Until 1865, the Clyne Valley line was the sole outlet for coal from Rhydydefaid. In 1865, when the Llanelly Railway opened their line through the valley, initially for goods traffic only, a siding to serve Rhydydefaid was put in, perhaps as part of the original construction but certainly by 1876. But, this did not supersede the Clyne Valley branch which remained in use.  “A further source of traffic was added in 1868 when Clyne Wood Colliery, across the river from Rhydydefaid, started to produce Clyne Wood was connected to the Clyne valley branch by means of a bridge across the river and for a year or two sent its coal out by that way.” [6]

The Clyne Valley Tramway/Tramroad: A single horse pulls what appears to be a single wagon along a curved section of the tramway. It is clear that curves were formed by a series of short straight lengths of rail. This image is © Blackpill Local History Society and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). [3]

The Clyne Valley Community Project tells us that by 1870, Philip Richard had control of Rhydydefaid Colliery and by 1878 he had introduced a steam locomotive that worked on both the branch and the mainline of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway. The pit was closed in around 1883 and the Clyne Valley Branch also fell into almost complete disuse. Only the occasional train operated by the Oystermouth Railway Company (the owners of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway) in connection with the local racecourse.

In 1891, Philip Richard opened a new pit, Commercial or Rhydydefaid No. 2, served by a newly built siding off the LNWR line which ran through the woods on a high embankment. Initially, the new pit was not viable but “Richard took a lease of coal under Llanerch and Olchfa which lay between Dunvant Road and Hendrefoilan Road and adjoined his existing taking. This gave him access to an area of more easily worked coal which made the colliery a viable proposition. He re-opened Commercial in 1899.” [6]

He also refurbished the Clyne Valley Branch of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway and began sending coal into Swansea via the Swansea & Mumbles Railway as part of “an agreement made in 1899 between the Swansea Improvements & Tramways Company, by this date owners of the [Swansea & Mumbles] Railway, and Sir Robert Armine Morris and Philip Richard.” [6]

In the early 20th century (1903), the Clyne Valley Slant Colliery was opened. “It was connected to the Clyne Valley branch by a new siding and this was its only railway connection: it had no link to the LNWR. The branch was re-laid in 1904 to the point at which the new siding had been put in, probably with heavier rails to cope with the volume of traffic expected from the new colliery. In 1906, an agreement was made with the Swansea Improvements & Tramways Co.  [(SI&T Co.)]… under which all the coal from the Clyne Valley colliery was to be hauled to Rutland Street by the Tramways Company.” [6]

The Clyne Valley Community Project tells us that a further period of disuse followed the closure of the Clyne Valley Colliery in 1915. “Then in 1919, James Pridmore opened his Ynys Slant close to the former Clyne Wood Colliery. He entered into negotiations with the SI&T Co in the hope that they would extend their branch from its terminus at Ynys to his new slant – in effect, hoping that they would relay the privately-owned extension. Understandably the company was not prepared to do this and Pridmore then laid his own narrow-gauge tramway along the trackbed of the extension to the limit of the SI&T Co line. The company then agreed to send a locomotive up the branch as far as Ynys (i.e. to the limit of their metals) to collect the coal so long as there was a load of at least 50 tons. Pridmore opened a second slant in 1920, the West Glamorgan Slant, close to the point at which the former Clyne Valley Colliery siding had joined the branch, but neither this nor the Ynys slant were successful and both were abandoned in 1921.” [6]

The Clyne Valley Community Project continues: “the last revenue-earning traffic on the branch was in 1921 but the track remained usable and as late as 1936 a diesel locomotive penetrated as far as Ynys Gate, the terminus of the SI&T Co. Presumably, this was simply an exploratory move or one intended to maintain the company’s rights. The track was lifted in part during World War II but some sections still remained into the 1950s.” [6]

Another view of the Clyne Valley Tramway/Tramroad: the line was built of light-sectioned rail, © Blackpill Local History Society and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). [4]

The Route of the Line

The line left the Swansea & Mumbles Railway close to Blackpill Bridge and Mumbles Road Railway Station (LNWR).

Mumbles Road Railway Station is at the bottom-left of this extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1918. Immediately to its East was Blackpill Bridge which carried the LNWR over Mumbles Road. East of the road was a Coal Yard which could be accessed from both the LNWR line and the Swansea & Mumbles Railway. To the North, the Clyne Valley Tramway had a couple of sidings adjacent to its main line. Don’t confuse the two drainage channels North of the Clyne Valley line for further sidings! [8]
The same area in the 21st century. The blue line superimposed on the satellite imagery is the Swansea & Mumbles Railway and its Clyne Valley Branch. The purple line is the route of the LNWR line. This imagery is provided by railmaponline.com. [12]
Looking West from Mumbles Road between Glyn Crescent (off to the right of the image) and Derwen Fawr Road (beyond and to the left of the car). The straight blue line is the main line of the Swansea & Mumbles Railway, the curved line approximates to the line of the Clyne Valley Tramway. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Mumbles Road Station is at the bottom-right of this next extract from the same OS survey. The LNWR line curves up towards the top,-left of this image as it heads into the Clyne Valley. The single-track Clyne Valley Tramway also curves towards the top-left of this image. [8]
The same area in the 21st century. [12]
Looking back along the line of the old tramway from the location of its level crossing on Derwen Fawr Road. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Looking ahead along the line of the old tramway from the same level crossing. [Google Streetview, July 2025]
Only one 25″ Ordnance Survey is available along the next length of the Clyne Valley Tramway. This extract from the 1877 survey, published in 1878, shows the railway and tramway following the Clyne Valley to the Northwest. The tramway seeks to follow the easiest gradients as it winds sinuously up the valley. The LNWR line was much better resourced and was able to afford significant earthworks which eased gradients and allowed a more direct line up the valley. [9]
Approximately the same area as shown on railmaponline.com. [12]

These next few Streetview Images are courtesy of the City & County Survey Team.

Just towards the bottom of the railmaponline.com satellite image above the old tramway route is joined by a cycleway. This photograph looks back Southeast along the line of the old tramway. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
Looking ahead along the route of the old tramway from the same location. The tree cover is dense and the lighting therefore is poor. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
Continuing Northwest, late evening further along the old tramway route and looking Northwest at the location of the clearing shown a little above the centre of the railmaponline.com image above. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
Further Northwest, this time at the point where the purple and blue lines are closest on the railmaponline.com satellite image above. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
The two lines continue North up the valley of the Clyne. Note the Mill Race which separates the two railways. [9]

A similar area to that shown in the map extract above. Note the branch line that railmaponline.com shows heading to the East from the main branch line. This does not appear on the map extract as it was the line which served Ynys Colliery in the earlier 19th century. By the sate of the 1878 Ordnance Survey, the line had been abandoned and removed [12]

The branch served a colliery which is given the name Ynys in the early part of this article. The line shown in this image was the original line of the Clyne Valley Tramway. This length of tramway appears as a stub-end in the first map in this article and as a longer line in the second map near the top of this article. [12]
This photograph shows the location where the branch to Ynys Colliery left the Clyne Valley Tramway. The line to Ynys climbs away to the right, the main drag is directly ahead, © Ian Allen [Google Streetview, January 2022]
A pixelated and out of focus photograph gives a last glimpse ahead along the line of the Clyne Valley Tramway. The City & County Survey Team turned away to the right at this location. [Google Streetview, August 2026]
The two lines continue to follow the Clyne River valley with the Tramway on the East bank of the river. The LNWR line is higher up the West side of the valley. [9]
The same area in the 21st century. [12]
Both lines are now about equidistant from the meandering river course. [9]
The same area in the 21st century. As these pictures show the Clyne Valley is heavily wooded. [12]
Approaching the terminus of the Clyne Valley Tramway it turns relatively sharply to the Southwest, following the East bank of the river fairly closely. [9]
The same area in the 21st century. [12]
Clyne Colliery appears on this extract, fed by an extension to the Clyne Valley Tramway passing under the LNWR line and by means of a headshunt. [9]
A wider area than that shown in the map extract above, shows the remainder of the Clyne Valley Tramway, the LNWR main line and the LNWR branch siding which served Rhydydefaid No. 2 Pit. Rhydydefaid No. 1 Pit sat to the North of the LNWR main line and to the East of the siding serving No. 2 Pit. [12]

A closer view of the area to the Southeast of Killay that was the original terminus of the extension mentioned in the text of this article. Note the Coke Oven, two Engine Houses and the Smithy which remain from Rhydydefaid No. 1 Pit. [9]

The site of Clyne Colliery which was accessed under the LNWR line and then via a headshunt. [9]

The next couple of OS map extracts show the area Southeast of Killay at two later times in history – the turn of the 20th century and immediately before the first world war. …

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1896/1897, published in 1900 shows the same area just before the turn of the 20th century. A long siding from the LNWR main line can be seen. Heading North-northeast to Rhydydefaid No. 2 Pit which was sited just on the next OS Sheet to the North. [10]
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1914, published in 1920 is able to include the colliery (by then disused) because the OS sheet area had changed from the earlier 6″ survey. Note the racecourse on the right side of this image. [11]
Looking West along the forest path which runs between the Racecourse location and that of Rhydydefaid No. 1 Pit: (the camera is at a place to the West of the location of the Grand Stand which appears on the OS Map extract above), a hundred metres or so ahead is the point where the track was crossed by the LNWR siding serving Rhydydefaid No. 2 Pit (Commercial Colliery), (c) Ian Allen. [Google Maps, July 2022]

The next image is a line drawn map of the area South of Killay.

The area Southeast of Killay in the Clyne Valley: showing the brickworks, collieries, railway tracks, river, millrace, roads and the racecourse, the line to Rhydydefaid No. 2 Pit heads North from the brickworks adjacent to the LNWR line. No. 1 Pit was at the concentration of tramway lines to the North of the LNWR line, © Blackpill Local History Society and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). [5]

Rhydydefaid No. 1 Pit

There is very little left of the buildings associated with this colliery which sat at, what was then, the end of the Clyne Valley Tramway. The colliery’s extensive waste tips are to the north of the pit on the south-east side of the railway embankment leading to the later Rhydydefaid No. 2 Pit (known too as Commercial Colliery). No. 1 Pit was sunk early in the 1840s and George Byng Morris started to work the coal and ironstone almost immediately through the Rhydydefed Coal Company and the Rhydydefed Iron Company which were created for this purpose. In order to serve these new workings, he re-laid the original 1804 Clyne valley branch of the Oystermouth Railway and extended it to Rhydydefaid pit in 1841-2, thus almost doubling its length. The history of teh colliery is covered in the general text above, it passed through a number of different hands and spent times in a state of disrepair prior to being refurbished by the next ‘owner’ or ‘leasholder’. Deatils are available on the Clyne Valley Community project website. [13]

That website tells us that, ” Evidence for the closure date of the Rhydydefaid pit is ambiguous. The colliery is listed in the report of the Inspector of Mines for 1882 and in Mining and Mineral Statistics for 1883. It is absent from Mining and Mineral Statistics in 1884 but re-appears in 1885 and 1886: in both years no manager is named which could be taken to indicate that it was inactive. The pit had definitely been abandoned by 1885 since all the plant and machinery was offered for sale in December of that year. The plant included a winding engine and a pumping engine, each with its own boiler; these would have been housed in the two engine houses which were marked on the 6in and 25in Ordnance Survey maps of 1876/7. There were also screens and tipping apparatus, cages, coke ovens (again as shown on the Ordnance Survey maps), a large number of trams, eight railway trucks, rails and a variety of miscellaneous equipment – altogether what one would have expected of a well equipped colliery. With a life of about forty years, its closure must have been due simply to the fact that all the coal that could be worked conveniently or economically had been extracted.” [13]

Within a few years coal was being exploited from Rhydydefaid No 2 Pit (Commercial Colliery).

Rhydydefaid No 2 Pit (Commercial Colliery)

This colliery was built to exploit coal from the area North of the No. 1 Pit. Rhydydefaid No 2 Slant, later known as Commercial Colliery, commenced working in 1891 or at the latest 1892; A railway connection to the new slant was put in from the existing siding off the London & North Western Railway which had been installed to serve Rhydydefaid No 1. The railway is shown on the 2nd edition of the Ordnance Survey 6 inch map (revised 1896) and it is safe to assume that it was in existence by the time the colliery opened. It remains a prominent feature within Clyne Woods.

Remnants of this colliery are described on another page on the Clyne Valley Community project website. [14]

After closure, an area to the West of the site seems to have been used as a clay pit with the embankment was used as a convenient track for transporting clay to the brickworks to the South of the site close to the LNWR main line.

Clyne Wood Colliery

Clyne Wood Colliery is marked on the OS mapping above as ‘Clyne Colliery’. Remnants remain but the principal site appears to have been used for clay extraction by the adjacent Briskworks.

The site and its history are described in detail in a page on the Clyne Valley Community project website. [15]

Work ceased at the pithead in 1870, although underlying minerals may have been extracted via the neighbouring Rhydydefaid pit. In June 1870, the entire plant and materials at the Clyne Wood pithead were offered for sale. “It would appear that the sale was unsuccessful and that the pithead equipment remained in situ for it is all shown in detail on the first edition of the 25 inch Ordnance Survey map (surveyed in 1877/8).” [15]

Underground working probably ceased in about 1883 at the same date as Rhydydefaid itself.

Steam Locomotives

In the 1899 Agreement: to facilitate the reopening of the valley’s coal reserves, an agreement was struck with the Swansea Improvements and Tramways Company (operators of the Swansea and Mumbles line) to convey coal from the Clyne Valley down to the main Swansea wharfs. Because the main line had fully transitioned to steam traction by this era, the regular fleet of Swansea and Mumbles Railway Steam Locomotives worked the branch line to haul the heavy coal trains down the valley. This fleet included a variety of saddle tanks from manufacturers like the Falcon Engine & Car Works, Manning Wardle, and the Hunslet Engine Company. [16]

Steam-hauled coal trains coming down the Clyne Valley branch would arrive at the junction near Blackpill. To transfer the coal to the wider rail network, the locomotives had to back-shunt west towards Oystermouth before running forward through points into the adjacent London and North Western Railway (LNWR) Mumbles Road station goods yard.

Locomotive operations on the branch continued through the peak years of the local coal industry until the local slant mine closed in 1921. The track itself actually remained intact for years afterward, with records showing a final diesel locomotive excursion traveling up the branch as far as Ynys Gate as late as 1936. [16]

References

  1. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/subject/clyne-valley, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  2. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/clyne-valley-industry, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  3. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/clyne-valley-on-the-way-home, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  4. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/clyne-valley-tram-road, accessed on 18th October 2026.
  5. https://www.storyofmumbles.org.uk/catalogue_item/clyne-valley-the-killay-end, accessed on 19th October 2026.
  6. https://clynevalleycommunityproject.uk/history/clyne-valley-branch-railway-and-its-extension, accessed on 19th October 2026.
  7. https://wrrc.org.uk/s&mrrc.php, accessed on 19th October 2026.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135196921, accessed on 20th October 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135196912, accessed on 20th October 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102183111, accessed on 20th October 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102342499, accessed on 20th October 2026.
  12. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 20th October 2026.
  13. https://clynevalleycommunityproject.uk/history/rhydydefaid-no-1-pit, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  14. https://clynevalleycommunityproject.uk/history/commercial-embankment, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  15. https://clynevalleycommunityproject.uk/history/clyne-wood-colliery, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_and_Mumbles_Railway, accessed on 21st October 2026.
  17. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4063548183937656&set=gm.27283315648009263&idorvanity=163976490369879, accessed on 21st October 2026.

Eastbourne Railway Station

The featured image for this article shows a two coach train awaiting departure at Eastbourne Railway Station. It think that the locomotive is an ex-LB&SCR E4 0-6-2T in BR livery. These locomotives were originally numbered 463-503, 507–520, 556–566, and 577-582. The number on the smoke box is not legible in the photograph. The exact locomotive shown in the photograph cannot easily be determined from the image. [21]

When the first railway was projected southwards from London to the Sussex Coast, its promoters had as their objective Brighton, which already was a well-established holiday resort. The eastern extension of this main line served the county town of Lewes, and had reached the western outskirts of St. Leonards by the summer of 1846, but it was not until 14th May 1849, that a 4.5-mile branch was opened from Polegate to serve Eastbourne, which was then little more than a village. The advent of the railway marked the beginning of the growth of Eastbourne as a holiday resort and residential area. At the end of the 1849s, Eastbourne’s population was around 2,500. By 1953, the town was a county borough, with a population of nearly 58,000, and in 2026 the population is around 105,000. [1] It has been suggested that the modern town of Eastbourne “was virtually created by the seventh Duke of Devonshire in the mid-nineteenth century, [but] there is little doubt that the advent of the former London, Brighton & South Coast Railway in 1849 was the influencing factor in promoting,” [3: p723] the growth of the town.

Since the inauguration of the line in 1849, the original modest terminus of the branch was twice superseded by a larger station. The first station was built in 1849, this was rebuilt in 1866 and rebuilt yet again in 1886. [2]

Stones writes: “An Act of 18th June 1846, authorised the London, Brighton & South Coast Railway Company (successors to the Brighton, Lewes & Hastings Railway) to construct two short lines from Polegate, to Eastbourne and Hailsham respectively, and these were completed and officially opened simultaneously on 14th May 1849. Originally, it had been intended that after leaving Polegate, the Eastbourne branch should pass through the village of Willingdon, and terminate in what is today the Old Town of Eastbourne, situated about a mile-and-a-half from the coast. However, because of the undulating nature of this route, and other considerations, it was finally decided to construct the line further to the East, with a terminus at the neighbouring and growing residential hamlet of South-Bourne, half-way between East-Bourne and the sea. As a result the Eastbourne branch, four-and-a-half miles in length, ran south-east from Polegate and traversed the Bourn or Willingdon Level, which forms part of an extensive plain extending to the east from the slopes of the South Downs. Although the terminal station was named ‘Eastbourne’ when the branch was opened in 1849, it was actually in South-Bourne, which was subsequently to disappear in name and become an important part of modern Eastbourne.” [3: p723,725]

Stones tells us that “The first station at Eastbourne was situated to the west of the present terminus; the building was a small modest timber structure measuring 20 ft. by 12 ft. Several years later, the original station and tracks were removed to allow Upperton Road to pass over the site and link up with the main thoroughfare, Terminus Road. The old station building was moved and erected on the west side of the existing goods yard where it was converted into a dwelling house at present known as No. 1, Wharf Road.” [3: p725] In 1953, the building still stood but was over-shadowed by modern buildings.

The original station building in its rebuilt location on Wharf Road, dwarfed by other buildings (Eastbourne Corporation Library) © Public Domain. [3: p724]

Another view of the original station building, this time in its original location close to the end of The Avenue. [4]

The first Eastbourne Station sat close to the end of The Avenue. [5]
The red flag marks the approximate location of the original Eastbourne Station. The road to the Northwest of the flag is ‘The Avenue’, the road junction is with Upperton Road. [Google Maps, August 2026]

Stones tells us that when the line was opened, “two engines were stationed at Eastbourne but one was always kept in reserve. The other worked a shuttle service of local trains between Eastbourne and Hailsham via Polegate, where, at that time, the engine had to run round its train. At the commencement there were few trains, but by 1854 the service had increased to nine trains in each direction on weekdays. Passengers for London, Brighton, and Hastings were obliged to change at Polegate for some years, and this inconvenience proved a constant source of annoyance to Eastbourne residents, who considered that the importance of the town was being relegated by the poor railway facilities provided. This opinion was substantiated by the fact that in Bradshaw’s Monthly Descriptive Railway Guide for June 1857, the timetable did not even mention Eastbourne, and gave Brighton, Newhaven, St. Leonards, and Hastings as the important stations on the coast.” [3: p725]

In 1866, or perhaps as late as 1872, a replacement station was constructed at the corner of Terminus Road and Gildredge Road.

Apparently, the connecting service between Eastbourne and London in 1866 comprised seven trains daily in each direction.

The rebuilt railway station of 1866, photographed from Gildredge Road in 1871 (G & R Lavis), © Public Domain. [3: p724]
The station built in 1866 (or perhaps 1872). as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]
Polegate local train sitting at Eastbourne in 1868, headed by Craven 0-4-2T locomotive No. 230, built at Brighton in 1866 (G.& R. Lavis), © Public Domain. [3: p729]

Improvements to the service to and from London occurred in 1875 when, Stones writes, “several trains running between London and Hastings were provided with through coaches to and from Eastbourne, which were attached or detached at Polegate. At the same time, the 5 pm express from London Bridge to Brighton slipped a portion (first class only at ordinary fare) for Eastbourne at Haywards Heath.” [3: p725-726]

It was not until September 1880 that Eastbourne was finally connected with Tunbridge Wells when a line from Hailsham to Eridge was opened. “On 1st April 1884, a service of two expresses daily in each direction between Charing Cross and Eastbourne was inaugurated. … The new service did not prove a success … and was withdrawn on 31st December 1885” after agreement had been reached between the SER and the LB&SCR for a sharing of traffic receipts. [3: p727]

South Eastern Railway (SER) 2-4-0 locomotive No. 17 on the turntable at Eastbourne shed in 1885 (R. C. Glazebrook), © Public Domain. [3: p726]
Another Craven, this time an 0-6-0 goods locomotive No. 390 on the turntable at Eastbourne shed circa. 1887 (J. Wilks), © Public Domain. [3: p729]
Stroudley “Gladstone” Class 0-4-2 locomotive No. 183, ‘Eastbourne’ built at Brighton in November 1889 sits by the platform at Eastbourne (R. C. Glazebrook), © Public Domain. [3: p730]

By 1904, agreement had finally been reached between the LB&SCR and the LNWR to run through coaches between Liverpool and Brighton and Eastbourne. Stones says, “This popular innovation, which obviated crossing London, soon developed into what was known as the ‘Sunny South Special’, which conveyed through portions from Liverpool (Lime Street), Manchester (London Road) and Birmingham (New Street). Up to the time of grouping this train was composed of LNWR. rolling stock, and included dining-car facilities. The service commenced to run daily (Sundays excepted) in each direction on 23rd July 1904, via Brighton and terminating at Eastbourne.” [3: p728]

At the time Stones was writing in 1953, the service had not been resurrected after the war.

Looking Southwest along the platforms at Eastbourne Station towards the terminus buildings. An EMU units sits on the line between the two platform lines. (H. R. Stones), © Public Domain. [3: p727]
The station seen from the South in 1920, Britain from Above, EPW00075, © Historic England. [15]
A closer view of the passenger facilities and the Goods Shed/Yard in 1920, Britain from Above, EPW000751, © Historic England. [15]

In 1953, Stones described Eastbourne Station: “The present station at Eastbourne consists of two island platforms served by four terminal tracks capable of holding 12-car electric trains. On the east side of the station there is a covered roadway for taxis and other vehicles between platforms 3 and 4, originally known as the arrival side. The platforms lead to a large circulating area around which are located the refreshment and dining rooms, waiting rooms, parcels office, and so on, with the booking hall at the western entrance to the station. During the second world war, the platforms and tracks were severely damaged by bombs on several occasions, and although most of the repairs have been completed, part of the platform awnings are still of a temporary character.” [3: p728]

A 1949 view of Eastbourne Railway Station also taken from Gildredge Road (H. R. Stones), © Public Domain. [3: p724]
This view of the same building was taken from the corner of Terminus Road (Unknown Photographer), © Public Domain. [7]
Passengers queuing for access to the Station platforms along the pavement on Upperton Road (Unknown Photographer), © Public Domain. [7]
The current station building as it appeared on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. This building was completed in 1886. [6]

The present building is essentially that which was built in 1886, designed by F.D. Brick, which had a vaulted canopy and lantern roof, similar to Lewes. “The station had 4 platforms which increased in length over the years. There was also two run around loops between platforms 2 and 3. Over the years one of the runaround loops was lost as platforms 1 and 2 were built wider. On 12th April 1977 platform 4 was shortened from a 12 coach to an 8 coach length to make way for the ring road construction. And was taken out of use and the track lifted during the Eastbourne re-signalling in 1991.” [7]

Eastbourne Station in the 21st century, © Sussex World. [8]

The line into Eastbourne was electrified by July 1935. Stones comments in 1953 that: “the number of trains to and from London (Victoria and London Bridge) has been increased and there is now an hourly service of fast electric trains with Pullman or buffet-car facilities; the journey takes about 1 hour 25 min. The fastest timing maintained during the summer months is by the non-stop all-Pullman train, successor to the former “Eastbourne Sunday Limited” inaugurated by the LB&SCR many years ago. This train, which makes one round trip on Sundays only, covers the down journey in 79 min. With the exception of the steam trains from Eastbourne to Hailsham and Tunbridge Wells, the remaining local passenger services, to and from Brighton and Hastings, are all operated by two- or four-car electric trains.” [3: p728]

The down Eastbourne Pullman passing Polegate (date not known, S. C. Nash), © Public Domain. [3: p729]
Southern Region Class 207 DEMU ‘Thumper’ 1302 seen from Ashford Road, just outside Eastbourne Station when new in 1962. It later became 207002, was then refurbished as 207103, refurbished again as 207203 for Connex, withdrawn and preserved in 2004 but was destroyed in a fire, © Dick Gilbert, and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [12]
Diesel/Electric D6548 at Eastbourne station, 1962
Seen from Ashford Road, just outside Eastbourne station, this is Class 33 Bo-Bo diesel/electric loco D6548. Built in 1961 it was renumbered 33030 in 1973. It survived into preservation. The carriage in the background is interesting. It may be an SECR (or early Southern Railway) car built for boat train services to Dover and Folkestone. These carriages had flat sides, a wooden slatted construction and were “classless” – they were presumably considered comfortable enough to satisfy any class of passenger. When steam was phased out these carriages turned up all over the place, and this one may have been for use on the Heathfield line, © Dick Gilbert and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [12]

Stones continues: “West of the passenger station lie the goods shed and yard, and carriage sidings for both electric and steam rolling stock. A short distance from the terminus on the east side of the line is the coal yard, and, beyond, a siding about a mile in length runs in an easterly direction to serve the local gas and electricity works. This siding was formerly known as the Crumbles Branch as originally the line continued on to that part of the sea-shore called “The Crumbles,” where the LB&SCR installed a shingle ballast plant. Because of the extended use of stone ballast, this was dismantled some years ago and the extension to the coast was taken up. Traffic in and out of the passenger station, goods yard, carriage sidings and locomotive depot is controlled by one signal cabin with a manual frame of 72 levers, which is situated at the entrance to the terminus on the east side of the line.” [3: p728]

Stones writes: “The existing locomotive depot at Eastbourne is located about half a mile from the passenger station on the west side of the line and is connected by a single track running parallel with the up and down main lines. The site on which the depot stands was purchased by the LB&SCR in the early part of the present [20th] century for new carriage and wagon works to replace older and smaller installations at Brighton. However, because of opposition from the local authorities, the scheme was abandoned and the works were eventually constructed at Lancing.” [3: p729-730]

Stones tells us that “The present running shed, which is of the through type, was built in 1911 to replace an earlier and smaller shed of the half-roundhouse type opposite the signal cabin on a site now occupied by the carriage sidings at the station. Since electrification, Eastbourne shed has lost much of its importance and now houses only a few locomotives for goods and shunting services and for the local passenger trains to and from Hailsham and Tunbridge Wells. In recent years, several of the sidings adjoining the shed have been used to stable spare locomotives and those waiting to be broken up. During the war, the shed was severely damaged by air attack.” [3: p730]

In the paragraphs above, Stones has identified a number of interesting features of the station:

  • Goods Shed, Sidings and Coal Yard
  • Carriage Sidings
  • The mile long siding which was once the start of the ‘Crumbles Branch’
  • The Shingles Ballast Plant
  • The history of the engine shed

A. Goods Shed, Sidings and Coal Yard

The following sequence of extracts from 25″ Ordnance Surveys in chronological order, illustrates the changes in the layout of the goods facilities at Eastbourne over time

The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Coal Depot at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]

The Coal depot disappears between 1874 and 1898 and Wharf Road takes its place. The coal wharf might be the original of the name of the road. Holding seems to have been built on the site of the old coal depot. The Goods Shed seems to have been rebuilt a distance from the passenger station and cattle pens have been added to the site.

The rebuilt Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. Note the rebuilt station buildings. [6]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1908, published in 1910. No significant changes appear to have occurred since 1898. [9]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings and the Cattle Pens at Eastbourne Station as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey revised and published in 1925. [10]
The Goods Shed, the immediately adjacent sidings at Eastbourne Station as shown onthe 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published in 1933. [11]

B. Carriage Sidings

In the 21st century, the carriage sidings  provide stabling and overnight parking for Southern Class 377 and Class 442 Electric Multiple Units (EMUs). They include a carriage cleaning road and an engineer’s siding.

The site of the current carriage sidings occupy the historic location of Eastbourne’s early engine sheds (opened in 1849 and later replaced in 1876 and 1911 – see the paragraphs about the engine sheds below). The track layout and sidings were historically controlled by Eastbourne’s Victorian signal box built in 1882. [17]

Eastbourne’s carriage sidings sit at the centre of this map extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/1932, published in 1933. [19]
The carriage sidings in the 21st century: the sidings were extended through what was the site of the old roundhouse engine shed in the middle of the 20th century. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Redundant ‘slam door’ electric units in the carriage sidings outside Eastbourne station, © Stephen Craven and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [18]

C. The Crumbles Branch

A separate article covers this line. It can be found here. [16]

D. The Shingles/Crumbles Ballast Plant

The ballast plant on the Shingles (Crumbles) at Eastbourne was served by the Crumbles Branch. The Crumbles was a vast, desolate expanse of coastal shingle and marshland east of Eastbourne. The LB&SCR recognized the immense value of the site’s heavily compacted beach shingle and negotiated the purchase of large quantities of shingle from the local landowner, the Duke of Devonshire. They installed a dedicated shingle ballast plant directly on the shore to extract, process, and load the aggregate. At its height, the operation was removing roughly 250,000 tons of shingle per year. This material was vital for providing the structural foundation (ballast) for railway tracks across the southeast of England and was even shipped to London for projects like the construction of the Thames Embankment. [20]

By the 1920s and early 1930s, the newly formed Southern Railway began phasing out smooth beach shingle in favour of sharper, more durable angular granite chippings. The ballast plant closed in 1932. Please also look at the dedicated article about the Crumbles Branch, here. [16]

E. The Engine Sheds

By 1874 a roundhouse engine shed and turntable sat alongside the line out of Eastbourne Railway Station. That structure was still in place at the time of the 1908 Ordnance Survey, but had gone by the time of the 1925 Ordnance Survey.

The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1874, published in 1876. [5]
The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1899. [6]
The roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1908, published in 1910. [9]
The location of the roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey revised and published in 1925. [10]
The location of the original roundhouse engine shed at Eastbourne as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1931/32, published in 1933. [11]

The site of the new engine shed at Eastbourne, as it appears on the Ordnance Survey of 1925. It was built to replace the original shed which had sat much closer to the station. This location is to the North of Whitley Road. Note the Crumbles Branch which moves away from the main line and heads North-northeast. [13]

This satellite image is an extract from the ESRI satellite imagery provided by the NLS. The area once occupied by the Engine Shed can be seen with hedges boundaries to the West of the main running lines. The line of the erstwhile Crumbles Branch can also be seen. It is marked by the industrial property boundaries to the East of the main running lines and curving away to the East. [14]

Locomotive Names

Both the LB&SCR. and its successor, the Southern Railway, honoured Eastbourne by allocating several locomotive names directly associated with the town. As early as 1881, William Stroudley gave the name ‘Eastbourne’ to a rebuilt 2-2-2 express locomotive with 6 ft. 6 in. wheels, No. 491. This engine, which was one of six which had been rebuilt and renumbered by Stroudley the same year, was originally designed by J. C. Craven and built by Nasmyth Wilson & Company in 1867, when it was numbered 241. In 1889, three of the famous ‘Gladstone’ class 0-4-2 locomotives Nos. 183 to 185 were named ‘Eastbourne’, ‘Carew D. Gilbert’ (an influential Eastbourne resident and member of a well known local family over part of whose land the railway was constructed), and ‘George A. Wallis’ (the first Mayor of Eastbourne, from 1883 to 1885). These were followed in 1898 by a Stroudley 0-6-2 tank locomotive, No. 469, which was named ‘Beachy Head’. Two of the aforementioned names were subsequently perpetuated by the Southern Railway; a former LB&SCR. Atlantic No. 2424, was named ‘Beachy Head’, and in 1933 ‘Schools’ class 4-4-0 No. 914 received the name ‘Eastbourne’ after the town’s public school.

References

  1. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/unit/10056433/cube/TOT_POP, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastbourne_railway_station, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  3. H. R. Stones; Railway Development at Eastbourne; in The Railway Magazine Volume 99, No. 631, Tothill Press, London, November 1953, p723-730.
  4. https://www.eastbournehistory.org.uk/timeline, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  5. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675456, accessed on 27th August 2026
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675453, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  7. https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC69JC1_sidetracked-eastbourne, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  8. https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/transport/how-to-get-to-airbourne-after-train-derailment-near-lewes-causes-major-disruption-8920816, accessed on 27th August 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675450, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675447, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675444, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  12. https://www.flickr.com/photos/harryclaggers/43482880200/in/photostream, accessed on 28th August 2026.
  13. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675414, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.3&lat=50.78143&lon=0.28531&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 30th August 2026.
  15. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW000751, accessed on 31st August 2026.
  16. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/09/13/the-crumbles-branch-eastbourne
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastbourne_Carriage_Sidings, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  18. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/231770, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/103675444, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  20. https://sremg.org.uk/RlyMag/RailwayDevelopmentsAtEastbourne-2.pdf, accessed on 17th October 2026.
  21. https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/heritage-and-retro/retro/eastbourne-looking-back-11-pictures-of-steam-diesel-and-electric-locomotives-through-the-ages-4985228, accessed on 17th October 2026.

The Penrhyn Quarry Railway – Part 3

This article has been long in gestation! Some of the images were found in later 2022 and early 2023 and permission to use them was sought at that time. Other work intervened and it is only now that the article has reached a stage where publication is right. My thanks to those who gave permission for the use of their images back in early 2023. Their names and copyright is noted in the images or in the test associated with each image. Thank you.

The featured image for this article shows ‘Nesta’ idling in Penrhyn Quarry on 15th April 1952, © Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]

The images in the article are purely a sample of those available on line. Others can be found here, [32] and here, [35]

This image gives an overview of the Quarry, taken from above one of the inclines and looking down on the Red Lion Level. Without being able to see the quarry faces, this picture emphasises the size of the operation,© Copyright Ron Fisher and used by kind permission. [24]

In a press release about its exhibition ‘Slate to Sea’ in 2018, the National Museum of Wales stated that, “In 1882 the Welsh slate trade produced 280,000 tons of slate. This rose to 485,000 tons by 1898. Worldwide slate exports from Welsh ports were enormous and included the West Indies (114 Tonnes) Argentina (404 Tonnes) Channel Islands (580 Tonnes) British South Arica (290 Tonnes) Belgium (431 Tonnes) Germany (41,000 Tonnes) Denmark (3,500 tonnes) and Australia (5,500 tonnes).” [22]

The busy ports serving the slate industry included:

  • Porthmadog: “where initially, slate was carted from Blaenau Ffestiniog down to the quays along the Afon Dwyryd, then boated to Porthmadog for transfer to seagoing vessels. The rapidly expanding cities of England needed high quality roofing slate, which gave rise to railways to transport them to the new port by tramway from the quarries around Ffestiniog and district. The Ffestiniog Railway opened in 1836, followed by the Croesor Tramway in 1864 and the Gorseddau Tramway in 1856, and by 1873 over 116,000 tons (117,800 [tonnes]) were exported through Porthmadog in more than a thousand ships.” [22]
  • Y Felinheli: which was – “transformed by slate quarrying when the Assheton Smiths – the owners of Dinorwic quarry and the Vaynol Estate – built the harbour to export slate transported to the quay by the Dinorwic Railway, a narrow gauge railway (now the Llanberis Lake Railway). They also decided to give Y Felinheli the alternative name of Port Dinorwic at that time.” [22]
  • Caernarfon: “the slate quay at Caernarfon served the development of the Nantlle quarries when new wharves were constructed along the Seiont to cater for the growing output of slate, mostly to be transported to customers by ships. The arrival of the Nantlle Railway in 1826 boosted slate exports from Caernarfon. By 1840 the slate quay become the main focus of Caernarfon’s shipping activity.” [22]
  • Porth Penrhyn: which served the Penrhyn Quarry at Bethesda. Exports are not at 19th century levels but they continue to be an important part of the business of slate. “Exports of crushed slate (aggregate) by Penrhyn Quarry, through Porth Penrhyn to Rotterdam, or ports along the south coast of England, have grown to become a significant proportion of Welsh Slate sales in addition to several containers of roofing slates being shipped every month to Australia alone (taking approximately 45 days).” [22]

“Welsh slate is now covering the roofs of buildings as prestigious as the New South Wales Supreme Court and historic as Unwin’s Stores, both in Sydney Australia, as well as the Arts Centre in earthquake-hit Christchurch, New Zealand 2012. Europe is also a prime destination for Welsh slate with shipments of slate and decorative aggregate within Europe continuing to grow and evolve in particular. In 2017 a total of seven shipments totalling almost 14000 tonnes of slate aggregate were made from Port Penrhyn.” [22]

This article focusses on the transport arrangements within Penrhyn Quarry. Two earlier articles cover the route down to Porth Penrhyn, first on a tramroad and then on a narrow-gauge railway:

https://rogerfarnworth.com/2022/12/29/the-penrhyn-railway-part-1

https://rogerfarnworth.com/2023/01/30/the-penrhyn-quarry-railway-part-2

Penrhyn Quarry utilized a gallery (ponc) system with over 20 to 40 terraces/levels and multiple internal and external inclines and water balances, rather than a single standardized list of named levels like Dinorwic. “About 3000 men worked here by the middle of the 19th century. Working the slate meant developing over 20 galleries or terraces, these climbing the slopes of Y Fronllwyd. Slate that was not good enough to be split and trimmed into roofing slate would be dumped, creating huge tips of waste. As the quarry developed, waterpower was used to raise wagons in innovative lifts (or “tanks” as they were called). As the quarry deepened, pumps were used to lift water from its lowest levels, this then flowing through a tunnel into the Ogwen river.” [31]

James Boyd comments that the Railroad/Tramroad (1801-1879) commenced “high up in the Quarry and over succeeding years its original route(s) through the workings was lost and replaced by others more convenient to the times. Nothing was allowed to prevent the good slate rock from being quarried and if the rail route was hampering the work, it disappeared. The Quarry grew to enormous proportions; up to 90% of material extracted was simply rubbish and was tipped wherever convenient; if this buried the Railroad, so be it. The immediate purpose of the Railroad was to carry quarried materials to Coed-y-Parc where after processing the re-loaded wagons would be assembled into trains for despatch down to the Port. Certain wagons contained materials for processing at Felin-Fawr Mill and when ready, wagons containing such products were introduced into the Railroad traffic at the north end of Coed-y-Parc. From the Quarry there were ultimately two routes northward to Coed-y-Parc; the original one of 1801 climbed southwest from Coed-y-Parc by incline to Ponc-y-Level (Right). (Ponc-y-Level (Right) Incline was built to carry the wagons even higher in 1823.) Thence, by a course running generally anti-clockwise, along Ponc Sling to where at its furthermost end, Sling reached the foot of Ponc-y-Level (Left) Incline. It was here the Railroad may be said to have begun: the 1829 Plan of the [route] simply shows “Quarry Machine” (ie. weighing machine) without surrounding detail.” [15: p43-44]

He continues with further detailed notes on the changing network of rails within the Quarry. The notes above give a flavour of the detail that Boyd was able to record after consulting the many documents available to him in the Quarry archives. [15: p43-44]

By contrast, the PQR was deemed to commence, not within the Quarry, but “at the foot of the Felin-Fawr incline … [which was] completed in August 1874 … It formed part of a first stage in improvements right along the Quarry-Port link, some five years before the old Railroad itself was discontinued. Oddly, the Ordnance Map printers working on the 1886-88 survey for the First Edition of the 25 inch/1 mile the produced the pre-1874 access route and, showing the track already at least eleven years out of date, provided posterity with a false record. From the Incline foot two tracks struck off northwards a differing levels to enable empty wagons to run on to the foot of the Incline by gravity. Beyond the foot the main line began, flanked by various parallel tracks; that to the extreme east being once a siding (post 1912) but having the 1933 Ponc Sling access route branching off it. … The yard ended at its northern edge in a single line passing under Coed-y-Parc road bridge, this being a level crossing with adjacent gatekeepers cottage until 1900.” [15: p53-54]

An extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey published in 1889 which shows the old pre-1874 access line to the Quarry. The slate works at Felin-Fawr appear at the top left of this extract. [16]
This image is an extract from the later survey undertaken close to the turn of the 20th century. The Felin-Fawr Incline is now visible at the bottom of the extract. The old route is still visible curving away East close to Bryn-llys. At the time of the survey, the level crossing at Coed-y-Parc is still in place. The overbridge spanning the Quarry entrance still has to be built. [17]
An enlarged extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey shows the Felin-Fawr Skate Works and the railway sidings in its vicinity. The level crossing referred to above is at the bottom-centre of the enlarged image.
The view of the Felin-Fawr Slate Works site, Penrhyn Quarry workshops. The building at Coed y Parc at the former meeting point between the “main line” of the PQR and the internal quarry railway system. By the time this picture was taken in 1973 the railway had long since been lifted but the buildings remained, © Copyright David Stilwell and included here under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0) [21]
Looking Northwest from the Southeast side of the arch bridge at Coed-y-Parc, carrying a lane (which traversed the site and linked to the B4409) over the PQR. As noted above, just to the South of the bridge the various lines both North and South of the bridge converged onto a few feet if single track line. This can be seen on the first monochrome image below. The route to Porth Penrhyn is ahead of the camera, the bulk of the Quarry, behind the photographer. The two locomotives are ‘Blanche’ (a Hunslet 0-4-0ST built in 1893) and ‘Linda’, (also a Hunslet 0-4-0ST built in 1893). This photo was shared by Geoff Ward on the Narrow Gauge Enthusiasts Facebook Group on 11th March 2017, [1]
The arch bridge in the monochrome image above viewed from high-level above the retaining wall to the Southwest. [Google Streetview]
The view from the Northeast on the lane carried over the PQR on the bridge depicted in the monochrome image above. [Google Streetview]
A view from the Southwest on the same lane with the bridge featured at the centre of the image in November 2022. [Google Streetview]
Looking Southeast from the Felin-Fawr site into the Quarry site. [Google Streetview]
From a similar position on the North side of the road bridge, looking South into the Quarry site. The photographer is not known but the image was recorded in 1959 and shared on Pinterest by Rhys Carden. [20]

The British Listed Buildings Website records this Grade II listed structure as follows: A road bridge over former railway. “Single segmental arch of red brick (including to soffit) with stone keyblock and arch-ring; coursed slate slab spandrels and piers flanking cast-iron parapet topped by ornamental iron balustrade. Abutments of large coursed slabs with band courses and slab retaining and boundary walls to each side, formerly enclosing the entire yard of the Felin Fawr Slate Works.” [19]

“Originally the site of a manned level crossing dating from the opening of the Penrhyn Slate Quarry Steam Engine Railway in 1843, the present bridge was built in 1900 and originally equipped, as were other bridges on the line, with wooden security gates across the arch. This opening was subsequently infilled but was reopened during the 1990s as part of the creation of a footpath along the course of the former railway line.” [19]

This photograph is taken from under the road bridge at Felin Fawr, at the end of the main line, looking towards the sidings at Coed y Parc. The building to the right used to house one of the Baldwin locos, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [5]
A similar view into the Quarry site from the road bridge, © Copyright Michael Bishop. Michael Bishop visited Penrhyn Quarry at Bethesda on the 17th of June 1967. By that date the quarry had finished using rail transport and the remaining locomotives and wagons were being scrapped. Tracklifting of the remaining lines was underway. This image is included here by kind permission of the photographer. [21]
Blanch leaving Penrhyn quarry in 1947 returning the Bangor workers home to Port Penrhyn after an 11 hour shift. This picture is taken looking South at the point where the sidings branch out on the last photograph. The photo was shared by Tony Williams on the History of Bangor Facebook Group on 22nd September 2017. [3]
This photograph shows the top end of the sidings with the Felin-Fawr Incline to Red Lion level off to the right, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [5]
This image shows one of the sidings looking back towards Felin Fawr with the steeple of St Ann’s church in the distance, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [5]
This photo is of the Felin-Fawr Incline up to Red Lion level (the main working level of the quarry), © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [5]

James Boyd suggests that it was always a good idea to turn to the North as you climbed the Felin-Fawr incline. … “Looking northward from halfway up the Felin-Fawr Incline, and viewing this scene below, it might be noted how the arms of the rubbish tips embraced the land on either side. To the left was the long single-line stone shed built in 1903 to house the Workmen’s Train carriages, but marked as ‘Engine Shed’ on the 1912 OS Maps. This definition may be a ‘hang-over’ from the time beginning in 1879 when two main line engines were kept at Felin-Fawr overnight; in earlier times the Workmen’s Train was kept in a shed below the Quarry (and possibly not transferred to this shed immediately it was built in 1903 – the precise date of this transfer is not known). It could be that the two main line engines were squeezed out and down to the Port shed when the Workmen’s Train increased to 13 vehicles, for that train had latterly grown too long for the shed, so the south end was taken down and the carriages poked out of it. Alongside was the 6th milepost. Beyond on the same side was (correctly) a small Engine Shed, which in due course acquired the nickname ‘The Baldwin Shed’, after the purchase of three ex-War Department locomotives from that American builder in 1924 had proved fruitless and they were stored inside. There was a water standpipe for main line engines on the wall outside. In much earlier days the building housed the little private saloon carriage which in later years was kept in the Port Engine Shed.” [15: p54]

Boyd continues: “This yard was always full of stock, lines of slate wagons loaded and waiting the next run to the Port, with empties alongside making their way slowly to be hauled up by the endless chain incline at Felin-Fawr, with perhaps another row of Quarry Flats standing with huge lumps of slab on them, waiting to be run down into the Felin-Fawr Mill in the Coed-y-Parc complex. Other odd wagons found a home there month by month – there was not much spare accommodation elsewhere. Wagon loads of coal waiting to go up into Quarry Departments and the wooden-bodied ‘Fullersite’ wagons could be easily distinguished too. Away to the right might be discerned the course of the abandoned 1843 line … but, ere its grassgrown course had gone many yards, the foot of the waste tips buried it. Beyond and behind this there was a drop of some 20 ft with a supporting wall and, running along near its top the course of the 1933-built link line, a second generation (so to speak) of the 1843 access and intended to bring Sling Level into easy communication with Coed- y-Parc independently of the Felin-Fawr Incline… but doomed to operational failure on account of its sharp curves.” [15: p54]

Boyd continues: “In the distance (and across the middle of the scene), the abutments and road bridge at Coed-y-Parc marked the boundary of the area, the bridge itself with ornamental railings to the road and a pair of wooden gates beneath it; these were shut to prevent unlawful access to the workshop area at all but working hours. Beyond the bridge might be seen the huddled roofs of the mills and workshops and moving to the left, the row of houses bordering the line to the west, formerly the stables (Tai’r-stablau) for the Railroad but now converted into domestic dwellings. It was a rural setting for this early nineteenth century industrial centre, the wooded Ogwen valley stretching away behind the works until the hills beside it merged with those of Anglesey beyond the waters of the Menai. From no point on the Railway itself was such a view obtainable.” [15: p55]

Boyd’s final words about this particular area of the Quarry: “Coming down-incline into the yard, there was formerly an island platform between the running line where the daily Workmen’s Train terminated: during working days, its stock was shunted into the long shed out of the way. Almost under Coed-y-Parc road bridge the line was single for a few yards, only to branch out beyond and make its way, curving slightly to the right and following a tall wall on the left with other lines alongside.” [15: p55]

The Levels, Galleries and Inclines in the Quarry

The very nature of Penrhyn quarry means that much of the site went though a series of changes as new levels were opened up, waste slate was deposited. There are no definitive maps of the quarry galleries and levels beyond what can be seen on Ordnance Survey maps. Almost inevitably, the descriptions of levels, galleries and inclines below cannot be complete or comprehensive.

Penrhyn featured eight water-balance systems used to raise and lower wagons using tanks of water. The most documented water balance was named Sebastopol (built during the Crimean War), which also lent its name to a gallery/level. Each incline had its own drumhouse. Heritage documentation notes eight incline/drumhouse structures within the quarry. Heritage references for these structures are: 60035, 60036, 60055, 60075, 60076, 60090, 60094, and 60136. [37]

Photographs of typical Welsh slate inclines and of a preserved water-balance system at Penrhyn can be seen here. [33]

Levels and Galleries

Red Lion Level: The main working and dressing mill level where the core processing, sawing, splitting, and dressing took place (home to the 1912 electric dressing mills).

Sebastopol Level: Named after the Sebastopol water balance. [32]

Terraced Galleries: Over 20 distinct benched levels climbed the slopes of Y Fronllwyd, with deep sink operations developing later as the pit expanded.

Penrhyn grew into a vast pit featuring up to 29 working galleries (ponciau). A web of traditional rail inclines connected these massive terraces to the main processing sections. Examples include:

George Gallery: this name was used interchangeably with the Sebastopol Level, it was established in the mid-19th century as the quarry bit deeper into the valley floor. [32]

Inclines

Felin Fawr Incline: We have already encountered this incline which was the primary external incline linking the main quarry processing yard to the mainline railway.

Red Lion Incline: Ascended directly up from the lower yards to the Red Lion Level, which was the main working terrace housing the primary dressing mills and locomotive tracks.

Twlldyndwr to Red Lion Counterbalance Incline: A specific track network connecting the Twlldyndwr Gallery (the second major level where waste slate was historically tipped) down to the Red Lion level. [34]

Red Lion to Twlldyndwr Uphaulage Incline: Used for dragging materials up into the higher tiers. [34]

Vertical Water Balance Shaft Lifts

As the pit was dug deeper into the valley floor, standard sloping inclines became less practical. Penrhyn innovated vertical water balance shafts. This system used water weight filled at the top of a cage to pull heavy wagons up from the lower gallery sinks. Penrhyn operated eight water balance systems.

Sebastopol Water Balance: Constructed during the Crimean War, it sits above the main drainage tunnel adjacent to the Sebastopol Level (historically part of the George Gallery). The Sebastopol lift sat higher up the terrace face than the lower Princess May lift, serving as the middle-tier staging platform. It lifted slate up to the Red Lion Level. [36]

Princess May Water Balance: One of the lower survivors, positioned alongside the Princess May Gallery.

Lord Lift: Serviced the upper tier known as the Lord Gallery.

Lady Lift: Positioned directly beneath the Lord Gallery, servicing the Lady Gallery tier.

This photo shows one of the carriages which conveyed workmen from Red Lion level up an incline to the higher levels. It is sitting at the bottom of one of the inclines, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
On this photograph of the Red Lion level an incline can be seen to the left of centre in the top half of the image. Just to the left of the single storey slate building, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
This image shows another incline running up from Red Lion Level, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
One of the personnel carrying incline cars carrying workers from a higher level to the Red Lion Level in August 1961, © Copyright Ron Fisher and used by kind permission. [28]
Looking down the Red Lion Incline towards Red Lion Level. The top of the Incline is spanned by a bridge carrying one of the lines on Twlldyndwr Level, © Copyright Ron Fisher and used by kind permission. [30]

A view looking down the incline to the Red Lion Level can be seen here. [12]

This photograph looks down into the great excavation which is now (in the 21st century) flooded – one of the diesels can be seen on the bottom level. It looks really small, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]

A close view of a quarry face in 1933, © Joan Bowen/Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, can be found here. [12]

A general view of the galleries at Penrhyn Quarry, © Alwyn R. Owens/Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, can be found here. [13]

This photograph shows a fullersite wagon (fullersite was a powder by-product of slate manufacturing used in asphalt for road surfacing and was transported down to the port in sacks carried in this type of wagon), © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
This picture shows a typical wagon used to transport the finished slates to the port, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
This photograph shows a line of slate and fullersite wagons on one the lines leading to the waste tips, © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [6]
This locomotive shown is Penrhyn Quarry Diesel No. 19, a narrow-gauge four-wheeled diesel-mechanical locomotive built by Ruston & Hornsby. Penrhyn Quarry operated a numbered fleet of these rugged little Ruston & Hornsby “class 16/20hp” or “20DL” utility engines to shunt slate wagons around the gallery tracks and workshops. Like most of the quarry’s internal diesel fleet from that era, No. 19 spent its entire working life handling heavy slate trains before the railway operations wound down in the 1960s© Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [7]
sister Ruston & Hornsby locomotive No. 23 © Copyright Barry Fitzpatrick and used by kind permission. [7]

A series of photographs of the diesel fleet which worked at Penrhyn Quarry, © Copyright Michael Bishop can be seen here. [23]

Steam at Penrhyn Quarry

A series of photographs of steam locomotives which worked at Penrhyn Quarry follows below. This does not pretend to be a comprehensive list, rather it illustrates the range of different types of locomotive present on site. … Locomotives included:

De Winton Locomotives: Vertical- and horizontal-boilered 0-4-0 tank engines introduced around 1876 for early steam operations, such as George Henry (built 1877).

Penrhyn Main Line Class (Hunslet): Three iconic 0-4-0 saddle-tank locomotives built between 1882 and 1893: Charles, Linda, and Blanche. Charles was preserved at the Penrhyn Castle Railway Museum, while Linda and Blanche were later transferred to the Ffestiniog Railway.

Penrhyn Port Class (Hunslet): Compact 0-4-0ST engines built in 1883–1885 to handle dock operations at Port Penrhyn, including Gwynedd, Lilian, and Winifred, may have been occasional visitors to the quarry itself.

Other Engines: Hunslet-built Hugh Napier (1904), Kerr Stuart 0-4-2ST engines like Stanhope, and various Andrew Barclay (such as Cegin and Glyder) and Baldwin locomotives acquired over the decades.

Among the locomotives which worked at the quarry were those pictured below.

Vale of Rheidol Railway’s ‘Margaret’ when in use at Penrhyn Quarry, probably before 1950 and possibly on the Red Lion level, © Copyright North Wales Daily Post. The photograph was shared by Peter Blum on the Narrow Gauge Enthusiasts Facebook Group on 23rd September 2022. [10]

Margaret, was built by Hunslet in 1894 (Works No. 605). It was supplied to Penrhyn Quarry to work in the quarry galleries. The engine spent its working life in the quarries, until withdrawal from traffic in 1950. Margaret was once thought to be beyond restoration, due to the engines poor condition. The Vale of Rheidol Railway purchased her in 1999. Some restoration had been undertaken prior to this, though it was far short of completion. The locomotive was stripped back to the frames to establish what had already been done, and by 2004 was a rolling chassis. Progress slowed, as maintenance of the running fleet took priority. A new boiler was delivered in 2007. With the completion of the new workshop in 2014, Margaret’s completion moved up the agenda. In September 2015 Margaret was returned to steam for the first time in 65 years, and has the distinction of being the first locomotive to be completed in the new workshop at the Vale of Rheidol Railway where she continues to be based in 2023. [9]

‘Glyder’ on one of the upper levels at Penrhyn Quarry in August 1961. Glyder, an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0WT of 1931(Works No. 1994) is preserved at Beamish, ©Copyright Ron Fisher and used with his kind permission. [25]

Glyder: Made it’s first appearance at Beamish Museum’s “Old King Coal” event in June 2019 after restoration at that museum. it is an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0WT (Works No.1994) of 1931. This was the first time that the engine had worked in railway operation since 1965.

Terry Pinneger tells us that “Glyder was built for the Durham County Water Board for use at the extensive Burnhope Reservoir development in Weardale in the early 1930’s, where it was given the uninspiring name “Grey”. At the end of the contract in 1938 it was sold to Penrhyn Quarry in North Wales and renamed “Glyder” (after a range of peaks of the same name in Snowdonia). It spent most of it’s working life in Penrhyn Quarry and, when it was withdrawn in 1965, it was sold and exported to the USA along with several other redundant narrow gauge locomotives. Whilst there, it saw no use at all and remained in storage.” [4]

Glyder was one of a number of Penrhyn Locos that were taken to the USA and their story can be found on the Bala Lake Railway Website. [8]

Glyder returned to the UK in 2012 and was gifted, on long term loan, to Beamish Museum for restoration. Back in operation in the 21st century, the loco carries its Penrhyn Quarry livery.

MARCHLYN and GLYDER at Penrhyn April 1962 by Derek Chaplin - Peter Brabham collection
‘Marchlyn’ and ‘Glyder’ at Penrhyn Quarry in April 1962, © Copyright Derek Chaplin. This photo is part of the – Peter Brabham collection and included here with his kind permission. [26]

Marchlyn was built by the Avonside Engine Company of Bristol, in 1933 (Works No. 2067), the loco was exported to the United States in 1965. Whilst there it was exhibited at the Winneepesaukah Amusement Park, Chattanooga and was given the name, ‘Choo Choo. It returned to the UK in 2011 and is now based at the Statfold Barn Railway where it has been fully restored.

‘Cegin’ at Penrhyn Quarry in August 1961. Cegin, an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0WT of 1931 (Works No. 1991) is preserved at the Statfold Barn Railway, ©Copyright Ron Fisher and used with his kind permission. [27]
‘Cegin’ continuing to undertake shunting duties at Penrhyn Quarry in August 1961, ©Copyright Ron Fisher and used with his kind permission. [29]

Cegin is an Andrew Barclay 0-4-0WT of 1931 (Works No. 1991) and is preserved at the Statfold Barn Railway. It is named after the Afon Cegin beside which the Penrhyn Quarry Railway wanders away from Porth Penrhyn. Cegin’s restoration was completed and it was steamed for the first time in 56 years in 2021 for a test run before its debut in traffic at the Statfold Barn Railway’s Enthusiast Weekend on the 12th & 13th of June 2021. [14]

‘Nesta’ idling in Penrhyn Quarry on 15th April 1952,© Copyright Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]
‘Nesta’ in April 1952,© Copyright Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. I understand that Ken passed his camera to a colleague so that he could be seen on the footplate. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]
‘Sybil Mary’ in April 1952, © Copyright Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]
‘Gertrude’ in April 1952,© Copyright Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]
‘Jubillee 1897’ in April 1952, © Copyright Ken Cribb and used with the kind permission of his son Russ Cribb. [Supplied direct to me by Russ Cribb]

A BBC film of the quarry and its locomotives can be found here. [21]

References

  1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/permalink/1595498630462159, accessed on 3rd January 2023.
  2. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.7&lat=53.17627&lon=-4.07369&layers=6&b=1&marker=53.17551,-4.07347, accessed on 4th January 2023.
  3. https://www.facebook.com/groups/417502465072892/permalink/870006909822443, accessed on 4th January 2023.
  4. https://www.flickr.com/photos/23689245@N08/48182319057, accessed on 25th January 2023.
  5. https://www.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/permalink/5162529423759044, accessed on 4th January 2023.
  6. https://m.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/permalink/5170910869587566, accessed on 6th January 2023.
  7. https://m.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/permalink/5180454721966514, accessed on 6th January 2023.
  8. https://bala-lake-railway.co.uk/steam-locos/winifred, accessed on 25th January 2023.
  9. https://www.festipedia.org.uk/wiki/Margaret, accessed on 25th January 2023.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/permalink/8318932161452072, accessed on 7th January 2023.
  11. https://museum.wales/collections/online/object/7bd7fdf4-dd46-3efe-a734-afe9f4182f10/Penrhyn-slate-quarry-photograph/?field0=string&value0=Penrhyn%20quarry&field1=with_images&value1=1&index=2, accessed on 11th October 2026
  12. https://museum.wales/collections/online/object/85510146-8922-307f-9a9c-d7d88ee83d95/Penrhyn-slate-quarry-photograph, accessed on 7th January 2023.
  13. https://museum.wales/collections/online/object/8b9f1bbb-591f-31f0-acb3-6d09adcf9734/Penrhyn-slate-quarry-photograph, accessed on 7th January 2023.
  14. https://www.steamlocomotive.info/vlocomotive.cfm?Display=1602, accessed on 25th January 2023.
  15. J.I.C. Boyd; Narrow Gauge Railways in North Caernarvonshire, Vol.II, The Penrhyn Quarry Railways; The Oakwood Press, Usk, 1985.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101606301, accessed on 8th January 2023.
  17. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.1&lat=53.17639&lon=-4.07285&layers=6&b=1, accessed on 8th January 2023.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.5&lat=53.17696&lon=-4.07383&layers=6&b=1, accessed on 8th January 2023.
  19. https://britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/300004159-pont-coed-y-parc-llandygai#.Y7sboB7LfTg, accessed on 8th January 2023.
  20. https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/65654107043301528, accessed on 8th January 2023.
  21. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EsibytGdm, accessed on 6th October 2026
  22. https://museum.wales/news/1117/SLATE-TO-THE-SEA, accessed on 3rd January 2023.
  23. http://www.penmorfa.com/Slate/Penrhyn-1967-2.htm, accessed on 19th January 2023.
  24. https://flic.kr/p/9vXnYM, accessed on 22nd January 2023.
  25. https://flic.kr/p/9tnR8K, accessed on 22nd January 2023.
  26. https://flic.kr/p/2mX712N, accessed on 25th January 2023.
  27. https://flic.kr/p/9tfGon, accessed on 22nd January 2023.
  28. https://flic.kr/p/9w1pFf accessed on 22nd January 2023.
  29. https://flic.kr/p/9tfRXB, accessed on 24th January 2023.
  30. https://flic.kr/p/9w1p7E, accessed on 23rd January 2023.
  31. https://www.llechi.cymru/slateareas/ogwenvalley, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  32. http://www.penmorfa.com/Slate/GALLERY15.html, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  33. http://www.penmorfa.com/Slate/Inclines.htm, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  34. https://cadwpublic-api.azurewebsites.net/reports/sam/FullReport?lang=&id=4428, accessed on 11th October 2026
  35. https://www.facebook.com/groups/narrowgauge/posts/946635325348496, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  36. http://www.penmorfa.com/Slate/penrhyn.html, accessed on 11th October 2026.
  37. https://www.welshslate.com/download/clientfiles/files/2011_Penrhyn_ES_chp08_Heritage_FINAL.pdf, accessed on 11th October 2026.

The Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway (BP&GVR)

The featured image for this article is a ‘1901’ series 0-6-0PT in charge of a train of low-headroom coaches at Burry Port (H. C. Casserley) © Public Domain. [1: p737]

Kymer’s Canal is the oldest canal in Wales, built near the town of Kidwelly in Carmarthenshire between 1766 and 1768. It was about 3 miles in length, built by Thomas Kymer, a local mine owner to carry anthracite coal from the Pwll y Llygod pits to a new dock (Kidwelly Quay) on the Gwendraeth Fach river for shipping to clients in the wider world.

The channel and dock suffered from severe mud silting over the decades, making navigation dangerous. In Later years, it became part of the larger Kidwelly and Llanelly Canal and Tramroad Company system authorised in 1812. [2][3][4][5][6]

You can still see parts of the historic waterway and walk alongside dry sections in the 21st century. Walking routes link the old canal directly to the Wales Coast Path and the nearby Kidwelly Town Council local heritage sites. [6][7][8]

Bourne tells us that Canal and Tramroad Company authorised in 1812 was, as well as being permitted to undertake maintenance of the Kidwelly Harbour and to improve Kymer’s Canal, authorised to build railways and tramways to supplement the canal or even replace it. [1: p737]

In parallel, in the following decade (1825) the Pembrey Harbour Co. was incorporated to construct a relocated harbour at Pembrey and to build a canal, tramroad or railway to connect with the harbour. The old harbour, which was constructed in 1819 by industrialist George Bowser and partners to ship local coal, suffered from severe silting problems almost immediately. (It was completely abandoned in 1878 after larger ships moved to the newer downstream port). [9]

The new port was constructed to accommodate larger vessels. It was first opened in 1832 but almost immediately suffered from the collapse of a harbour wall and the collapse of the scouring reservoir walls. It was 1836 before the port was to open fully. [9]

To save confusion between the two harbours an amendment to the Act of Parliament was passed in 1835 to change the name of the newer harbour to ‘Burry Port Harbour’, and the town, which had grown up during the construction work, took on the name at the same time. [1: p737][9]

Three decades later, the designation of the Canal & Tramroad Company was, by Act of 30th April 1866, “changed to the Kidwelly & Burry Port Railway Company. This Act authorised railways, partly by canal conversion, from Kidwelly and Burry Port to Llanarthney, with branches. In 1867 [possibly 1868 [9]), the Harbour Company was dissolved and vested into the railway company under the title of the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway Company, and this name remained in use until the railway was absorbed by the Great Western in 1922.” [1: p737]

Bourne continues: “Construction of the railway was completed between Burry Port and Cwmmawr in 1869. The first mineral train ran to Pontyberem in July, and the section between Pontyberem and Cwmmawr was opened later in the year. A branch to Kidwelly was brought into use in July, 1873. Extensions of the line to the east were completed in 1891, partly on the [line] of an old tramway, from Burry Port to a junction with the Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway at Sandy, Llanelly. The proposed railway to Llanarthney did not materialise, although surveys were taken of the route in 1874.” [1: p737]

“In 1898, the railway was approached by local colliery companies with a request that it should operate workmen’s trains from Burry Port and Kidwelly to Cwmmawr.” [1: p737-738]

Despite the fact that the Board of Trade had only passed the railway for freight use, the Company (being in poor financial health) agreed to the use. Initially the requisite coaches were provided by the colliery owners, who contributed 50 shillings/week/coach to cover the railway company’s expenses. The railway company undertook to purchase the coaches when its finances permitted.

Bourne tells us that, “On Llanelly market days it became the practice for the miners’ wives to travel in the workmen’s trains or in the guard’s brake-van of the mineral trains, a charge of sixpence being made in respect of an article belonging to the passenger instead of a fare. When the collieries were closed, free trains were run to enable miners to attend meetings, and to give their families a day by the sea. These trains consisted of colliery wagons, previously cleaned by the miners and provided with benches; ladders were used for entering and leaving the vehicles.” [1: p738]

One of the significant features of the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway was the restricted headroom at many bridges on the line. This was as a result of using the canal route for the route of the railway. The restricted loading gauge necessitated the use of low-headroom coaches on the line. One of these coaches can be seen here at Burry Port Station. Note that the name of the line is marked on what is a GWR carriage. (Photographer – H.C. Casserley), © Public Domain. [1: p739]

After a fatal accident in August 1903, the Company “decided that the reconditioning of the railway for use as a passenger line should be considered without delay. When the improvements were completed, sanction was obtained, under a Light Railway Order, to operate passenger trains between Burry Port, Kidwelly and Pontyberem. The service was brought into operation on 2nd August 1909.” [1: p738-739]

The Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway and associated lines. [1: p738]

A similar diagrammatic representation of the BR&GVR and surrounding railways, (c) Afterbrunel and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [10]

A similar area as it appears on a Railway Clearing House (RCH) map of South Wales. [14]

“The BP&GVR was single line throughout, and consisted of the 12.75 miles from Burry Port to Cwmmawr (the main line), the Kidwelly branch, and shorter branches (used only for freight traffic) from Burry Port to Sandy, Burry Port to Cwm Capel, the junction near Pinged to Trimsaran, and to various collieries. Connections with other railways were maintained at Burry Port, with the Great Western; at Kidwelly, with the Great Western and the Gwendraeth Valley Railway, traffic to and from the GWR passing over 25 chains of the valley line; at Sandy, with the Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway; and at various colliery sidings.” [1: p739]

The Colonel Stephens Society notes that, “The railway was poorly managed in the nineteenth century and often bankrupt. Increasing traffic at the turn of the century and intelligent management transformed it as a business and Holman Fred Stephens was employed as a consultant in 1908 to reconstruct it [and] to legalise its unofficial carrying of passengers. The necessary legislation was obtained in two Light Railway Orders in 1909 and 1911. Stephens supervised re-construction and re-equipment over the years up to 1913 after which he had no further connection.” [11]

“The Burry Port-Cwmmawr section originated from a separate station at Burry Port, alongside the main-line Pembrey & Burry Port Station. When this line was equipped for passenger traffic to Pontyberem, in 1909, stations were erected at Burry Port, Pontyates, and Pontyberem, and halts at Pembrey, Pinged, Trimsaran Road, Pontnewydd, and Ponthenry. Signal boxes or ground frames were provided at Dock Junction (Burry Port), Kidwelly Junction, Pontyates, and Pontyberem, and eighteen single lever ground frames, working siding connections, were installed. The permanent way consisted of flat bottom steel rails, weighing 75 lb. per yard, secured by bolts to the sleepers. The over and under bridges, which existed when the railway was a mineral line, had sufficient theoretical strength for an axle load of 14 tons, the maximum allowed.” [1: p739]

Bourne continues: “Passenger trains commenced running through to Cwmmawr in 1913, under powers granted by a Light Railway Extension Order (1911), the old mineral line having been rerailed throughout. The original passenger terminus at Pontyberem became a crossing station with an additional platform, while Cwmmawr was furnished with a single platform, booking office, waiting room and ground frame. In addition, five ground frames, controlled by the train staff, were added to work various sidings. In 1914, a new crossing place and signalbox, both since removed, were established at Tymawr, between Burry Port and Kidwelly Junction.” [1: p739]

Bourne continues his description of the line:

“The stations were primitive, with platforms of the short earth type 250 or 350 ft. long, and 3 ft. above rail level. They usually consisted of a small corrugated iron hut with one end roughly partitioned off for an office and the other for a waiting room, though at Ponthenry small brick buildings were erected just before the GWR took over. The signals, mostly electrically lit, were of rather ancient pattern; distant signals, gradient boards and mileposts were not provided. Industries on the line 30 years ago included ten collieries producing anthracite coal, one small colliery raising steam coal, a brickworks and a small tin-plate works. Trains coming down the line to Burry Port often consisted of 45 to 60 loaded wagons. Long trains of empties were taken up the valley with one engine and a 15-ton brake-van. The population was connected almost exclusively with the mining industry, so that general goods traffic was light.

The Burry Port-Cwmmawr line was equipped for working with the train staff and one engine in steam between Burry Port and Dock Junction, and electric train staff or token between Dock Junction and Cwmmawr. Crossing facilities are avail-able at Kidwelly Junction, Pontyates, Pontyberem, and Cwmmawr, but at the first and last named two passenger trains could not be crossed. Staffed stations were situated at Burry Port, Trimsaran Road (population 200), Pontyates (2,000), Ponthenry (700), Pontyberem (3,500), Cwmmawr (2,250), and unstaffed halts at Pembrey (1,800), Craiglon (80), Pinged (80) and Glyn Abbey (150). Signalboxes were installed at the crossing stations and at Dock Junction.

There [were] several noticeable curves on the line, including that at Dock Junction. The railway [was] laid alongside the old canal bed for half its distance, consequently gradients [were] not difficult; … but it [rose] from Pontyates to Cwmmawr, on gradients as steep as 1 in 48 and 1 in 40, each for over half-a-mile. Every station and halt [had] long needed a coat of paint and repairs. The track [was] a mass of weeds. Closed pits, with broken buildings and useless pit gear, [bordered] the line.

Until the passenger services were withdrawn on 21st September [1953], there were four trains daily, one a workmen’s train from Burry Port to Cwmmawr, on weekdays only, with an additional train on Saturdays and five services daily in the reverse direction. They consisted of an engine and two coaches, but the 1.45 p.m. Burry Port to Cwmmawr (Saturdays excepted) was formed with two engines and four coaches, to provide stock for the additional return service. Speed was limited to 25 m.p.h., with further restrictions of 15, 10 or 5 m.p.h. at level crossings, and at the sharp reverse curve near Dock Junction. The level crossings, which [were] rather numerous, [were] not provided with gates (except at Pontyates), the railway being quite open to road traffic. No keepers [were] employed, and public users [had] to look after themselves.

The majority of passengers, a number of whom were miners, travelled only short distances, and the total number carried in 1950 was 35,645, with a revenue of £1.499, compared with 83,965 in 1938. Colliery upon colliery [had been] closed from Pontyates to Cwmmawr, and only three [remained in 1953]. Pentremawr, the largest, [had] a daily output of some 55 wagons, and certain passenger trains stopped at the colliery sidings, the majority of workers travelling from Ponthenry and Pontyates, one and two miles distant. Carway Colliery [produced] some 15 wagons of coal daily, and [there] again passenger trains called at the colliery siding, but the train user was irregular and very light, an average of two miners alighted and one joined daily in a sample week. Glynhebog Colliery, at Cwmmawr, closed in November, 1949, [was then] used as an N.C.B. training centre and some passenger trains stopped at the colliery sidings. The railway [served] an area of no great population, and parallel road services [operated] with much greater frequency and convenience than did the trains. So after attempts to recapture passenger traffic for the railway it was decided to withdraw the service.

The freight train service [was] continued, as traffic offered amply [justified] its retention. The tonnage dealt with in 1949 was 243,461, and the output of Pentremawr Colliery [was] to be increased. The services [were] maintained by a daily train from Burry Port to Pontyberem and back, and to the Kidwelly branch and return. There [were] also two freight trains, except on Saturdays, to Cwmmawr and back.” [1: p740]

  • 1923–1924: Owned by Great Mountain Collieries Co. Ltd., employing 121 underground and 32 surface workers (Manager: Jas. Steele) before it was abandoned on May 30, 1924.

With the withdrawal of the passenger service on 21st September 1953, the line was operated on the one engine in steam principle between Kidwelly Junction and Cwmmawr. The crossing gates at the level-crossing at Pontyates were operated by train crew.

An Anthracite train from the Gwendraeth Valley line arriving at Burry Port with former BP&GVR (No. 12) 0-6-0T No. 2165, built in 1913 by Hudswell  Clarke, in charge. [1: p742][16]

Bourne says that electric train staff working between Dock Junction and Kidwelly Junction had to be maintained because of developments in opencast coal workings at Trimaran.

Bourne continues:

“At Cwmmawr, the goods shed siding, the platform road and the line running parallel [were] removed, and the short portion of the line now leading to the platform road [was] slewed to effect connection with the mileage siding; traffic [was] propelled from Pontyberem to Cwmmawr. The passenger track from Dock Junction to [Burry Port] station, together with the loop and three carriage sidings at Burry Port, [were] recovered. Pontyberem and Pontyates parcels offices … remain[ed] open to deal with station-to-station parcels traffic, but the other stations [were] closed and let, and parcels traffic collected and delivered by road vehicles based at Llanelly.

“The Kidwelly Junction-Kidwelly section, from Trimsaran Road to the South Wales main line, slightly east of Kidwelly, [was] worked on the staff and one engine in steam principle. [Operation in the 1950s embraced] the former Gwendraeth Valley Railway, quite a separate undertaking to the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway. The Gwendraeth Valley Railway (GVR) was opened to traffic over the three miles from Kidwelly to Mynydd-y-Garreg in 1871, and worked by the BP&GVR until 1904. The actual BP&GVR branch ran to Kidwelly Quay, via Tycoch Junction with the GVR. With the exception of a miners’ train, long discontinued, operated from Tycoch Halt to Pontyberem, no passenger train had traversed this section. … [By the 1950s, the permanent way [was] in a very rough state, overgrown with grass and weeds, and low-lying and wet near Kidwelly. The rails were of light flanged type, bolted to the sleepers, and no signals were provided. Between Tycoch and Kidwelly Quay, the line was used for an occasional few trucks of coal, despatched in small boats carrying 10 to 20 tons at a time. … [In the 1950s], the track [was] used only by the 8.25 a.m. freight train from Burry Port to Kidwelly; the engine [spent] the day shunting at Kidwelly, and running trips on the Mynydd-y-Garreg branch, conveying stone from the quarry to Stephens Works, Kidwelly, and [returned] from Kidwelly to Burry Port at 5.45 p.m. (3 p.m. on Saturdays). The line between Tycoch and Kidwelly Quay was abandoned about 1934, when the quay was closed.

[In 1953], consideration [had] recently been given to the possible closure of the line between Kidwelly Junction and Kidwelly, but no action [was] taken because of the inability of the local breakdown crane to clear several low bridges between Burry Port and Kidwelly Junction. In these circumstances, the loop line [was] the only means of access to the Cwmmawr branch [by] the crane.” [1: p743]

Bourne’s notes are essentially a ‘snapshot’ of the prevailing conditions in 1952/53. He comments that it was the intention to close the line to through traffic when the scheme relating to the National Coal Board sidings at Coed Bach was completed, but the track would not be broken and would remain available, if required in an emergency.

Bourne continues:

“Reception sidings [were] laid during [1953] on a site near Kidwelly Junction to serve the new opencast coal disposal centre at Coed Bach. The normal daily output of the new washery [was] just over 1,000 tons, all of which were despatched by rail. The new works [were] of a temporary nature, as it [was] expected to clear the 1,116,000 tons of opencast coal in the area by 1956.

“The Burry Port-Sandy Junction line crosses the Great Western main line on the level at Pembrey East. At one time, the line served three small collieries and a small brick works, but traffic was light and mainly that emanating from the collieries. Flanged rails weighing 75 lb. a yard, secured by nut and bolt to the sleepers, were used, and the permanent way generally was in a bad condition and overgrown. Fencing was poor and had disappeared in many places, and the track was used regularly as a footpath to Llanelly. One trip daily each way served the line, conveying approximately 30 wagons to Burry Port and 15 to Llanelly. A colliery locomotive worked over the branch between the New Pool and Crown colliery connections. Stop boards were provided to halt BP&GVR trains and the drivers had to satisfy themselves that the line was not occupied before proceeding slowly.” [1: p743 & p744]

Bourne continues his description of the line and its usage in the early 1950s:

“The portion between Pwll and Sandy [was] no longer used for traffic, or even wagon storage, but [was] still in position. The daily freight train [plied] only between Berry Port and Pwll Brick Works, a distance of under two miles. In connection with the N.C.B. new sinkings at Cynheidre, the former Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr track [would, within [a] few years, be doubled, and, to assemble empties for use at the new colliery, a proposal to lay in sidings on the site of the Sandy branch about one mile from Sandy Junction [was] being considered.

“The Trimsaran branch, which [left] the Cwmmawr line between Pinged Halt and Kidwelly Junction, [was] used for marshalling of coal from the Trimsaran Colliery and for wagon storage. Marshalling [was] performed by the colliery’s own locomotive. The branch [had] a ruling gradient of 1 in 47 for 1.25 miles.

“The track [had] been removed from from the Burry Port-Cwm Capel branch. Trains over this branch were propelled from Burry Port, with the guard riding in the leading vehicle. Trains operated during daylight only. Before the train passed over any of the level crossings on the branch, it came to a stand, and the guard went forward and hand-signalled it over. Frequent whistle sounding while running was the practice, and all shunting operations were performed with the engine at the Burry Port end of the train.

“At Burry Port, a short branch, [closed by 1953], served Gwscwm Colliery sidings, and trains of not more than 20 wagons were propelled from Burry Port. Speed did not exceed 5 m.p.h., and a red light was exhibited on the leading vehicle during the hours of darkness. Other colliery lines included the Carway branch and the Glyn Abbey branch, used for wagon storage.

“The small wet dock at Burry Port [was by 1953] out of use, and the hoists and other equipment [had] been removed. The dock, which covered 64,000 sq. ft., was provided with two hydraulic coal tips and hydraulic capstans for shunting. An electric power station was situated on it for the supply of light to the dock premises.” [1: p744]

Wikipedia tells us that, “From 1953 opencast coal extraction gathered pace in the Gwendraeth Valley, and this coupled with economic factors gradually led to closure of most of the deep mines. By 1961 only the Capel Ifan Colliery at Pontyberem continued deep mining, and that pit ceased to forward coal by rail in 1970.” [10]

“The Sandy branch, connected the BP&GVR to the Llanelly and Mynydd Mawr Railway near Llanelly. At the eastern end it divided into two and curved round to the south; one part joined the Stradey estate line and the other the L&MMR line; with the closure of the Pwll brickworks all traffic between Burry Port and Sandy Gate sidings ceased from 4th October 1962. Sandy Gate sidings were simply located on a short stub now served from Sandy, and that too closed on 22nd December 1963.” [10]

“The Trimsaran branch closed to revenue traffic in 1960, but it was retained for wagon storage until June 1962. Goods traffic to Pwll Brickworks ended on 4th October 1962. Regular traffic to Smart’s Dinas Silica Brickworks at Kidwelly ceased in February 1959, after which the Kidwelly branch was little used, and was closed in October 1965.”

“The section from Kidwelly Junction to Kidwelly closed in October 1965, but reopened after relaying on 19th September 1983.” [10]

“Diesel traction was inaugurated on the BP&GVR section on 4th October 1965. Two D2000 Class (later 03 Class) locomotives were modified to work together in multiple, and soon a third was used to bank the trains up the steep gradients in the rear of the train. On the downhill journey the three locomotives hauled the train.” [10]

“The short section from the New Dynant North ground frame to the Cwmmawr terminus was closed on 1st May 1967, although the coal depot at New Dynant continued to be referred to as Cwmmawr.” [10]

“The Kidwelly branch beyond Coed Bach was re-opened (after relaying the track) on 19th September 1983 and, for the first time, large main line locomotives were able to use this short section of the BP&GVR as far as Coed Bach. The re-opening enabled the original section of line from Burry Port to Kidwelly Junction to be completely closed, from 19th September 1983. The remaining line was now worked in two sections; Kidwelly Yard to Coed Bach and Coed Bach to Cwmmawr (New Dynant). From February 1987 substitute locomotives capable of operating air-braked wagons were introduced on the line.” [10]

The very last train to Cwmmawr ran on Friday 29th March 1996, … closure of this remaining section of the BP&GVR main line took place on 1st April 1996. Coed Bach continued to be fed by road so there was still rail traffic over the short distance from there to Kidwelly Yard. This remaining stub of the BP&GVR, and also of the GVR, finally closed on 23rd March 1998. [10][17]

Locomotives and Rolling Stock

Fairlie Patent 0-4-0 + 0-4-0 steam locomotive ‘Mountainer’ at Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway. The locomotive was originally manufactured for the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway by Fairlie Engine and Rolling Stock Co, of New Cross, London in 1869 and delivered in 1870. It was withdrawn from service in 1891 as ‘worn out’ and scrapped at Burry Port. The boiler shell, minus tubes, remained as a culvert at Burry Port docks, and was apparently still there in 2004, © Public Domain. [12]
Fairlie Patent 0-6-0 + 0-6-0 steam locomotive ‘Victoria’ at Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway. According to the Locomotive Magazine (December 1909) this locomotive was built by Yorkshire Engine Co. in 1873 (Works No. 29), it had been intended for export to Queensland but was re-gauged to standard-gauge and sold to  the BP&GVR. It was later rebuilt at Burry Port in 1896 & then scrapped in 1903. This image was shared on the 19th Century Railway Enthusiasts Facebook Group by David Jackson on 20th September 2021, © Public Domain. [13]
The 0-6-0ST locomotive No. 2196, ‘Gwendraeth’ formerly BP&GVR No. 6, built in September 1906 by the Avonside Engine Company (Works No. 1519) at Burry Port (H. C. Casserley) © Public Domain. [1: p742][15]

Former BP&GVR (No. 12) 0-6-0T No. 2165, built in 1913 by Hudswell Clarke. [1: p742][16]

Further photographs of locomotives from the BP&GVR can be found here. [16] (Most of the images on this link will probably be in the public domain, but rather than showing them in this article they are well collated on the link.)

Bourne says that:

“Fifteen tank engines were taken into GWR stock at the absorption; all were 0-6-0s some with saddle and others with side tanks. BP&GVR Nos. 1-15, they respectively became Nos. 2102, 2162, 2193 to 2196, 2176, 2197, 2163, 2198, and 2164 to 2168, in GWR stock. The named engines were Nos. 1. Ashburnham, 3. Burry Port, 4, Kidwelly, 5, Cym Mawr, 6. Gwendraeth, and 8, Pioneer. A small shed at Burry Port could accommodate ten engines. At one time, the company possessed 31 passenger and 18 goods vehicles; advantage was taken of the free use of other companies’ wagons given under the common user arrangement. The passenger coaches were secondhand vehicles fitted with the vacuum brake, and had third class accommodation only.

“Seven BP&GVR  locomotives still [survived in 1953], Nos. 2162, 2165, 2166, 2168, 2176, 2196 and 2198. No. 2164 was withdrawn in 1929, No. 2163 in 1944, No. 2192 in 1951,  Nos. 2193 and 2197 in 1952, and Nos 2167, 2194 and 2195 in 1953. No. 2195, Cym Mawr, the nameplate of which was removed by the GWR because of a controversy over the spelling, was condemned in March. 1939, but was reprieved during the war, and withdrawn in January [1953].

“Eight locomotives, all 0-6-0 tanks, [were] allocated to Burry Port shed. In 1953, they [consisted] of ‘1600’ Class Nos. 1609, 1613, 1614 and 1644; ‘2021’ Class No. 2081; and ex- BP&GVR Nos. 2162, 2165 and 2198. Engine working [included] the operation of the two ex- BP&GVR lines, two daily freight trips between Burry Port and Llandilo Junction, and one daily trip between Burry Port and Lando R.A.F. Station. The ’16xx’ Class engines worked all the passenger services and also freight trips, and BP&GVR engines and No. 2081 [were] used on goods trains and for yard shunting. The Kidwelly freight [was] operated either by a ’16xx’ engine or BP&GVR. No. 2198.” [1: p744]

As we have noted above, “D2000 Class (later 03 Class) locomotives were deployed on the BP&GVR. The cabs were cut down to pass under the low bridges on the line. The original reason for the use of the 03 Class was the frequent flooding on the line which would interfere with the low-slung auxiliary equipment on the more powerful 08 Class; however in June 1984 the affected section of line was closed and there was no longer an objection to the 08 Class; three locomotives were modified to lower the profile for the low bridges and were designated Class 08/9.” [10]

The Railway Hub has an article about these diesel locomotives which can be found here. [18]

The Route

We start at the most easterly extent of the BP&GVR – at Sandy Junction.

Sandy Junction as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1921. Significant locations which appear on this extract are: the rail-served Llanelly Steel Works (bottom-left); the rail-served Old Castle Iron & Tin Plate Works (bottom-right); the Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway which runs North to South across the right side of the extract; and the single track Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway which leaves the Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway centre-right and runs West on the South side of Pembrey Road/Sandy Road. Note the first passing loop on the single-track line which can be seen at the left of the image. [19]
The same location in the 21st century. The route of the BP&GVR follows the backs of the gardens of the houses on the South side of Sandy Road. [Google Maps, September 2026]
Looking East along the line of the old railway towards the location of the junction with the Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking West along the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
The BP&GVR continues West on the South side of Sandy Road. [19]
The tree-line on the image marks the line of the old railway. [Google Maps, September 2026]
The railway ran very close to the road (now the A484) over a length as shown on the left of this extract. [19]
The same area in the 21st century. The lake is Ffynon Helig and the pathway running to the North of it is close to but to the South of the line of the old railway. [Google Maps, September 2026]
This view looks West along the A484. The fence line marks the boundary between railway land and the highway. The old railway ran West just below the road. Beyond the last house visible here, the road turns away from the line of the railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
The blue line shows the line of the old railway where it crosses the access road from the A484 to Pwll Pavilion. [Google Streetview, September 2026]

Railmaponline.com shows that the BP&GVR mainline left the side of what is now the A484 and crossed what is now the access road to the pavilion before turning Northwest. Two short branch lines at one time left the main line at this location, both shown in blue. There were once brickworks at this location and a colliery (Pwll Colliery) between the road and the railway to the East of Tramway Road. [20]

Pwll Colliery can be seen at the bottom right of this extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1916. The old railway continued Northwest behind the rear fences of properties on what is now the A484.  [21]
The line continued Northwest with a short branch from Crown Colliery joining it from the Southeast. [21]
New Pool colliery was passed on the other side of the line adjacent to a passing loop. The colliery had its own short Tramway. [21]
This railmaponline.com satellite image shows a similar length of the line to that covered by the two map extracts above. [20]
The line continued West. [21]
Another passing loop sat alongside New Lodge Brickworks. [21]
This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery takes us as far West as the passing loop at New Lodge Brickworks. [20]
The 25″ Ordnance Survey shows that the brickworks had a small yard with a dedicated siding. [21]
The 6″ Ordnance Survey from 1878/1879, published in 1889 shows that there was also a colliery at the same site. [22]
The Brickworks/Colliery were located at the top-right of this satellite image – the passing loop and the single siding entering the yard are shown in blue. The colliery’s internal tramway linking to the spoil heap is shown in turquoise. [20]
The Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway (BP&GVR) enters this extract, top-right and appears to cross the GWR main line on the level and continue in a southwesterly direction. Another passing loop appears bottom left. This is an extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1879, published in 1889. [23]
Approximately the same area as shown on the extract above. [20]

Given that the BP&GVR was built on the line of the Kymer’s Canal it is much more likely that, rather then crossing the GWR at level, the BP&GVR passed under the GWR main line making use of the canal tunnel/bridge. As we have already noted, because the railway replaced a canal network, it inherited very low bridge clearances originally meant for horse-drawn canal boats. This forced the railway to use uniquely modified, low-profile steam locomotives with cut-down cabs and boiler fittings to squeeze under the structures.

Glanmor Terrace as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1905, published in 1908. The passing loop has been extended. [24]
Looking Southwest along Glanmor Terrace – The route of the old railway, approximately at the location of the passing loop. The properties to the left of the image were built after the 1879 survey was completed. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Glanmor Terrace and the BP&GVR enter just below the top-right corner of this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1905. The GWR main line runs across the top of the extract and its station is centre-top. To the right of the station the BP&GVR Cwm Capel Branch passes under the GWR main line. A cat’s cradle of sidings serve Burry Port Harbour/Docks and the industry that surrounds them. The BP&GVR station sits to the South of the GWR station [24]
The western half of the dock complex at Burry Port with the BP&GVR leaving the extract in the top-left corner, passing under the GWR main line. [24]
The whole port area at Burry Port as it appears in the 21st century. [25]
A very similar area as covered by the image immediately above. Railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery shows just how dominant the BP&GVR was in the immediate area of the port. The green lines are GWR rails, the blue are BP&GVR and the turquoise are local tramways. [20]
Gwendraeth Station, Burry Port. This old postcard image was shared by Jonathan Sanger on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 8th November 2025, © Public Domain. [48]
Looking Southwest along Ashburnham Road, along the line of the BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, March 2022]
Further West the old line has been tarmacked over to create a single lane section of Ashburnham Road. [Google Streetview, October 2021]
Further still to the West Ashburnham Road sits over the line and it sidings. A distance ahead the old line turned away to the left before swinging back to the right to pass under what is now Ashburnham Road and the GWR main line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
The bridges over the BP&GVR to the West of the docks in Burry Port, as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1921. [26]
The two bridges over the line of the BP&GVR, the route of the old line is marked by the small red dots. [ Google Maps, September 2026]
Again looking West along Ashburnham Road, these are the parapets of the road bridge over the BP&GVR. The GWR overbridge is off through the trees to the right of this image. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

This would seem the appropriate point to pause in our journey along the BP&GVR main line to look at the Cwm Capel Branch.

The Cwm Capel Branch of the BP&GVR

The Cwm Capel branch of the BP&GVR left the port area of Burry Port in a northerly direction, passing under the GWR main line to the East side of the GWR Railway Station. It then crossed Station Road and Parkes Street, and ran North-northeast through, what was in the early 20th century open ground. [26]

The satellite image below [Google Maps, September 2026] shows that the line of BP&GVR is now occupied over this length by a road named ‘Old Tramway’. It appear to run alongside the Nant Dyfatty. Some open ground remains but much has been built over.

Looking South across Station Road towards the railway. This view looks along the line of the old BP&GVR branch line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking North from Station Road along the line of the old BP&GVR branch line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking North from Parkes Street along the line of the old BP&GVR branch line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking North along the old Cwm Capel branch from the top of the modern ‘Old Tramway’ highway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The next length of the Cwm Capel Branch. [26]

The line as far North as Colby Road. [20]
looking South from Colby Road along the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking North along the line of the Cwm Capel Branch. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The next length of the line runs through the area of Achddu Colliery which appears on the 6″ Map extract above. [20]

Small-scale coal workings in the area date back to around 1814. Separate local pits were combined into the unified Achddu Colliery in 1903 by the Achddu Colliery Co. Ltd. Operations were primarily focused on working the Gwscwm Coal Seam/Vein. Coal was transported via the Cwm Capel branch to Burry Port harbour.

The main colliery phase ended in 1917, though minor related local industrial activities and subsequent reopening attempts or re-workings occurred into the late 1920s. [27]

The Cwm Capel Branch of the BP&GVR was once a horse drawn tramway taking coal from Cwm Capel (Kenross) Colliery down to the wharves at Burry Port. More information can be found on the Pembury and Burry Port Heritage Website. [28]

This interpretation board provides details of the tramway and later railway that transported coal from Cwm Capel (Kenross) Colliery down the valley past the site of Achddu Colliery. More information can be found here and on associated webpages. [29]

The remaining length of the Cwm Capel Branch led North to Cwm Capel Colliery. [26]

Cwm Capel Colliery sat at the bottom end of another tramway which followed the Nant Dafatty valley towards its source. [26]

The tramway ran first East and then North towards Rhiw-las Colliery. [30]

These map extracts are piecemeal as the tramway crossed between OS Sheets. [31][32]

Railmaponl;ine.com shows the length of the old tramway that was converted into the Cwm Capel branch of the BP&GVR but not the extended tramway up to Rhiw-las Colliery. [20]

Cwm Capel colliery was first mentioned around 1761, a larger colliery was later developed on the site by George Bowser around 1830. Its expansion by 1840 completely engulfed the site of a medieval chapelry named Capel Cynnor.

Operated by multiple owners over its lifetime, coal was extracted from the Cenrhos and Coed Rhyal coal seams.

The colliery finally closed in 1952, ending nearly 200 years of recorded mining activity in the valley. [29][33]

The BP&VR main line again – just a short length!

We now continue our journey along the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway to the West of Burry Port.

This next length of the BP&GVR main line curves around the Ashburnham Hotel. Before reaching Stanley’s Bridge at the top-left of this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1921, another branch line left the main line and headed North alongside what became Furnace Road. Furnace Road bridged the main line of the BP&GVR which itself continued on to the West passing underneath an Old Tramway at Stanley’s Bridge. [26]

Looking East from the bridge carrying Furnace Road over the line of the BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, April 2025 & March 2009]

Looking West from the bridge carrying Furnace Road over the line of the BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, April 2025 & March 2009]

The old tramway, noted at the left of the map extract above, was not part of the BP&GVR network. It connected Stanley’s Pit to the old Pembury Harbour which was replaced by the facilities at Burry Port. As can be seen above both the GWR and the BP&GVR had to provide bridges to carry the old tramway over their right of way.

The BP&GVR provides the formation level for the National Cycle Route No. 4 which follows the route of the old railway. This tunnel takes the cycle route under Stanley’s tramroad and was provided for the BP&GVR. It sits at the top-left of the map extract above and is marked by the lilac flag on the top-left of the satellite image below, (c) David B. W. Rees (2024). [Google Maps, September 2026]

Google Mpas satellite imagery shows the route of the old railway curving gently round from the Northwest to just South of West. Furnace Road is a more significant highway in the 2st century. [Google Maps, September 2026]
This next satellite image shows a very similar area with railmapsonline.com’s annotation. As before the blue lines are the BP&GVR and the green line marks the route of the GWR main line which is still in use in the 21st century. The old tramway can still be seen on the left of this image and appears on the tramway layer of Railmaponle.com as a turquoise line. [20]

The Furnace Branch

In the satellite image above and on the previous 6″ extract from the 1913 Ordnance Survey a branch line can be seen leaving the BP&GVR to the East of Furnace Road. This branch line was short leading to the furnace that gave the name to the adjacent road.

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance survey of 1913, published in 1921 shows the full length of the short branch. [26]
Railmaponline.xom shows the branch against the backdrop of modern satellite imagery. The site of the furnace is now a modern housing estate. [20]
Looking North along Dwynant towards the site of the furnace. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

In 1810, an attempt was made to establish an iron works called Pembrey Iron Works, probably in the area now known as Furnace in Burry Port, but it didn’t last long and was closed by 1816. The site of it was likely re-developed by the Pembrey Iron and Coal Company in 1824. [34]

The Pembrey Iron and Coal Company was formed by George Bowser and Thomas Gaunt, who leased marshland from Lord Ashburnham to develop local industry. Pembrey Harbour was built in 1819 at Carreg Edwig to export coal from local mines like Gwscwm and Cwm Capel, and to serve the iron foundry. The Pembrey Canal was a two mile canal opened in 1824 to connect the harbour to the Kidwelly and Llanelly canal network, transporting coal and iron ore via horse-drawn barges. Years later, John Stanley took over management of the company (around 1845) as the area’s industrial focus shifted toward nearby Burry Port development and copper smelting. For more information about the tramroad, please click here. [35]

The BP&VR main line again – West of Stanley’s Bridge

Both the B&GVR and the GWR passed to the South of Pembrey. [26]
The line passed under Ashburnham Road (B4311) as it approached the centre of Pembrey and then Dan Lan Road (close to the top-left of this image. [20]
Looking North towards Pembrey on the B4311 – the parapets of the old bridge over the BP&GVR remain, as does the structure below which now spans National Cycleway No. 4. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking East from the bridge carrying Ashburnham Road/ Randal Square (B4311) over the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking West from the bridge carrying the B4311. [Goggle Streetview, October 2021]
The parapets of the bridge carrying the A 484 (Dan Lan Road) over the old railway route. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking Southeast from the bridge carrying the A484 over the old BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking Northwest from the bridge carrying the A484 over the old BP&GVR. The height at which the photograph was taken does not allow the tarmacked formation of the National Cycle way to be seen. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The line turned North, roughly parallel to the GWR, both map extracts are from the same OS Sheet. [26]

Looking Northeast along the minor road which bridges the old railway. These are the rough stone parapets of the bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking Southeast over the wingwall parapet of the same bridge. The tarmac of the cycle way can just be made out. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Vegetation growth by 2025 meant that nothing other than vegetation could be seen over the Northwest parapet by that date. This image from 2009 shows the condition of the cycleway prior to being tarmacked. [Google Streetview, March 2009]

The next 6″ Ordnance Survey sheet from 1913/1914 was not published until 1946. It shows the line heading North and then turning Northeast. [36] Railmaponline has the same details [20]

A closer view of the first crossing location above. [20]

The line crossed the next minor road on the level. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking back South from the old crossing point on the BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, March 2022]

Looking North along the line of the BP&GVR from the same crossing location. The old railway ran to the left of the portable building which is prominent in this photograph. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The next significant location heading North along the old railway is shown here. This bridge is at the top of the map extract above. [20]

The same location as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1914 which was not published until 1946. [36]

The humpback bridge at this location, no longer appears to have its parapets and the span below may well have been filled. There is nothing to see at the location looking either direction along the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The Trimsaran Branch

Just to the South of a bridge over the Gwendraeth Fawr a branch line headed East away from the BP&GVR main line. It is shown on the map extracts and Railmaponlin.com satellite images below.

The main line of the BP&GVR heads North-northeast before turning to the North across the Gwendaeth Fawr. A branch line head East from a point on the South bank of the Gwendraeth Fawr. This branch serves Trimsaran and [36]
The first length of the Trimsaran Branch reaches the village of Trimsaran. [20]

The next length of the Trimsaran Branch as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1914 published in 1946. [36]

The final length of the Trimsaran Branch as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913/1922. [37]

This railmaponline.com satellite image covers the length of the line shown in the two map extracts immediately above which are taken from adjacent OS sheets. [20]

In the Trimsaran valley, small-scale surface mining and bell pits (such as those found near Coed y Clun) date back to the 1600s or earlier to supply local smiths. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, large-scale operations at Trimsaran Colliery grew into a network of drift and slant mines—principally the Caedean (deepest), Waunhir, and Upper Slants (Coal Seams). Employment at the colliery grew from 144 men in 1896 to a peak of over 700 workers by 1931. It produced valuable anthracite and fireclay. The last traditional drift mine closed in 1954, though large-scale open-cast mining operations (operated by firms like Sir John Jackson, Jackson, and Wimpey) continued until 1997. [38]

An ironworks operated around 1900, employing hundreds of local workers. Local brickworks produced durable, hard-fired bricks until 1967, which were used to build garden suburbs and homes throughout Llanelli, Pontyates, and Pontyberem. [39]

The first significant location on the branch was the level-crossing adjacent to Collier’s’ Cottage on what is now the B4317. There is no longer any evidence of the railway at this location. [36]

The same location in the 21st century. [20]

Further East, the line bridged the Afon Morlais twice in quick succession. [36]

The same location in the 21st century. [20]

The road – Bryncaerau (B4308) – to the Northwest of the centre of Trimsaran. [36]

The same location in the 21st century. [20]

Looking Southeast down Bryncaerau, the old railway crossed the road at this location  entering the image a little above bottom-right and running along Swn Y Nant (off the image centre-left. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking West along the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking East along the line of the old railway, along Swn Y Nant. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Trimsaran Ironworks on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1879, published on 1889. [40]
The same area in the 21st century. Photographs of the remains of the Ironworks/Steelworks taken by David B. W. Rees can be found here. [20][41]

The branch line continued East beyond the Steelworks. …

Looking back West towards Swn Y Nant from the location of the steelworks. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking ahead to the East along the line of the railway from the location of the steelworks. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The road crossing over Culla Road (B4317). [36]

The same location in the 21st century. [20]

Culla Road seen looking North from Jenkins Crescent. The line of the old railway is highlighted by the blue line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking back West from Culla Road along the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, December 2021]

Looking East along the line of the railway. [Google Streetview, August 2011]

Trimsaran (Waun-hir) Colliery. The location spans the joint in two OS Sheets. [42]

Trimsaran (Waun-hir) Colliery – this map extract sows the remaining length of the colliery sidings. The line continued on the the East beyond this mine. [37]

This railmaponline.com extract shows the full extent of the colliery sidings imposed on modern satellite imagery. It also shows the locations of some of the earlier tramways/tramroads adjacent to the colliery. [20]
The remaining length of the Trimsaran Branch which served Trimsaran Upper Colliery. [37]
The same length of the old line as shown by railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery. [20]

The BP&VR main line again – North of the Gwendraeth Fawr

A short length of the Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway runs North from the Trimsaran Junction, across the Gwendraeth River (Fawr). [36]

The Kidwelly Junction sits just to the North of the Gwendraeth Fawr. Its location spans the join between two adjacent 25″ OS Sheets. [43]

This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery covers the length of line shown on the two map extracts above. The sidings to the North of Kidwelly Junction served … [20]

From 1953 opencast coal extraction gathered pace in the Gwendraeth Valley, and this coupled with economic factors gradually led to closure of most of the deep mines. By 1961 only the Capel Ifan Colliery at Pontyberem continued deep mining, and that pit ceased to forward coal by rail in 1970. The sidings shown here were associated with the changes which occurred in the 1950s and handled local coal traffic and storage. [20][10]

The Line to Kidwelly

A short branch line connected the BP&GVR to the GWR and the Gwendraeth Valley Railway at Kidwelly.  [44]
The line to meet the GWR was literally quite short. Just these two extracts (this and the one immediately above) from the 25″ Ordnance Survey cover the majority of its length. [45]
The line between Kidwelly Junction and Kidwelly as shown on railmaponline.com. [20]
The railway junctions to the Southeast of Kidwelly. The line leaving the extract, bottom-left serves Kidwelly Quay. The GWR line runs diagonally top to bottom (or vice-versa). The line exiting the extract top-right is the Gwendraeth Valley Railway – a different company ,(not the BP&GVR). [46]
Kidwelly Railway Station is top-left. The other lines are as described above. [20]
The Kidwelly Quay Branch. [47]

Railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery shows the Kidwelly Quay Branch. [20]

Kidwelly Quay and railway terminus. The railway followed the line of the earlier canal. This extract is taken from the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1915. [50]

Kidwelly Quay was originally the transfer point between the barges used on Kymer’s Canal and ocean-going coasters. Kymer’s dock at Kidwelly continued to be used for the export of coal by coasters well into the 20th century. It was used as a rubbish dump during the 1950s, but together with a short section of the canal was restored in the 1980s. A few of the structures of the canal can still be traced in the landscape, and the route of the now closed railway can be followed for most of its length.

Kidwelly Quay in the 21st century. [49]

The BP&GVR Northeast of Kidwelly Junction

The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published on 1915 shows that the line headed Northeast from Kidwelly Junction and passed under what is the B4308 in the 21st century. [51]

The same area as shown on railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery. [20]

Looking Southeast along the B4308 over the line of the railway. The metal bridge parapets remain in place. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking Southwest from the bridge carrying the B4308. Even in this wintertime view, it is impossible to see the formation of the old railway which is hidden by tree-growth. [Google Streetview, December 2021]

The same is true looking Northeast from the bridge carrying the B4308. [Google Streetview, December 2021]

The line continued running Northeast. [52]
The same area as shown by railmaponline.com. [20]
The rails remain at the level-crossing on Capel Teilo Road. This view looks Southeast along the road. [Google Streetview, April 2025.

Looking Southeast as late as 2009, the furniture associated with the level-crossing also remained in place. In both 2009 and 2026, the route of the line was overgrown in both directions from the crossing. [Google Streetview, March 2009]

The Carway Branch/Siding

On this next extract from the 1913 25″ Ordnance Survey the line turns a little further towards the North-northeast and a short siding (Carway Siding) heads East from the line of the BP&GVR. [52]
This railmaponline.com extract shows that the Carway Siding once continued further to the East. [20]

The old tramway/railway bridge over the Gwendraeth Fawr. [Google Maps, October 2026]

The old bridge seen in the 1960s, © Bertram Baxter. [55]

Looking back West along the line of the old railway which in the 21st century is an access road to Pwll-y-llygod Farm. There is nothing to see looking East but dense vegetation, with a golf course beyond. [Google Streetview, April 2026]

This extract from a considerably older 6″ Ordnance Survey shows a significant length of the old Carway Branch – the map extract comes from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1879, published in 1887. [53]
At the time of the 1878/79 Ordnance Survey the Carway Branch extended as far as Carway Old Colliery. The remains of tramways can also be seen on this extract from the 1878/1879 6″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1888. One line links to Carway New Colliery (bottom-right) in this extract to Old Carway Colliery and on to the North to meet the BP&GVR main line/sidings. A second line headed east, leaving the extract top-right. It led only a short distance further east to a group of old small pits to the Northeast of Carway Farm. the location of Carway Old Colliery is now under Glyn Abbey golf-course as can be seen below. [54]
This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery shows the Carway Branch entering from the left and the two tramway routes referred to above. Glyn Abbey Golf-course stretches across the top of the image. [20]

The BP&GVR main line again. …

The line passed close to Pont-newydd, as shown on this extract from the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1913, and the line then curved away to the East. [52]
It ran East following the line of the old canal. [52]
The next significant location along the BP&GVR was a series of sidings introduced early in the 20th century which serve Carway Colliery. By this time the Carway Branch had been truncated and an industrial tramway ran north from Carway Colliery to the screens on sidings owned by the BP&GVR. The tramway can be seen leaving the BP&GVR siding and leaving the map extract at the bottom-right. [56]
This extract from railmaponline’s satellite imagery covers the length of the line shown on the three OS map extracts above. [20]

The Carway Colliery Tramway

Earlier in this article we noted the Carway Branch which in 1879 was the rail link running West from Carway Old Colliery to meet the BP&GVR. By 1913, that line had been curtailed to a short siding connected to the BP&GVR. In its place was a line running from the colliery to screens

As we have noted the industrial tramway ran North/South between Caraway Colliery and its screens. [57][20]

On the adjacent map extract, which shows the Colliery, the route of the old Carway Branch remains fenced/walled off towards the bottom-left, but with the track lifted. The newer private industrial line heads North from the Colliery. [57]

The BP&GVR continuing Northeast. …

We have noted that a loop left the BP&GVR to serve the screens of Carway Colliery. As of 1913, that loop was no more than a series of sidings serving Carway Colliery Screens.

The sidings serving Carway Colliery Screens in
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1948, published in 1953 shows the local network serving Carway Colliery and includes the completion of the loop back to the BP&GVR. This extract shows the line North from the BP&GVR as an abandoned line to an old shaft. [58]
The short siding which connected Pum -cwart Colliery (Pumpquart Colliery) to the BP&GVR via a bridge over the Gwendraeth Fawr. The name refers to a particular coal seam – the Pump-quart seam – a prominent and high-quality vein of anthracite coal heavily mined throughout this region of the South Wales Coalfield. This extract comes from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1879, published in 1888. [54]
The same areas as shown on the three map extracts above. [20]
This is the next length of the line as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1948, published in 1953. [58]
The same area – around the location of Plas-bach Colliery – in the 21st century. [20]
Plas-bach Colliery in the late 19th century. [60]

Plas-bach Colliery sat just to the Southwest of Pontyates. It was opened in 1856 by Roberts and Evans, the colliery featured two shafts, including one measuring 130 metres deep. The colliery extracted coal from three primary seams: the Gwendraeth, Gras, and Pumpquart. The Pumpquart seam was notorious for hazardous outbursts of methane gas and fine coal dust. Despite 20 recorded outbursts between 1920 and 1926, the mine maintained a record of zero fatalities during this period due to strong management and being one of the first in the valley to install underground electric lighting. It was linked both underground and via a surface tramway to the nearby Gwendraeth mine. Employment dropped from 202 workers in 1918 down to 19 men by 1923, and the site officially closed in 1928. So by the date of the 1948 survey it was long closed. [59][60]

The road crossing in Pontyates Th crossing gates were still in place in 2025 as the images below show. The rails also remain in place and can be made out in this image. [Google Maps, October 2026]
Looking Northwest along Heol Llanelli (B4309). The crossing gates either side of the road which becomes Heol Y Meinciau. The rails can be seen running through the road surface just nearer to the camera than the road vehicle. [Google Streetview, May 2025]
Looking Southwest along the line from the level-crossing in Pontyates. [Google Streetview, May 2025]
Looking Northeast along the line. The crossing gate was of a significant width. [Google Streetview, May 2025]

The line to the Northeast of the road crossing as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1913 published in 1915. [61]
The earlier 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1878/1879, published in 1888 shows an incomplete loop with the more southerly arm serving as series of smaller pits. [54]
The same area on modern satellite imagery. [20]
The full length of the tramway recorded on railmaponline. This tramway does not appear on the earliest Ordnance Survey sheet. It does appear on a later Ordnance Survey sheet. As shown below. [20]
The tramway ran between Cae-pontbren Colliery and its screens which sat over the branch from the BP&GVR. This extract is taken from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1903, published in 1907. [62]

Cae-pontbren Colliery operated through various phases between 1887 and 1913. Two initial Shafts were sunk in 1887 to work the Braslyd and Gwendraeth seams, but operations failed and were abandoned in 1896 due to local faulting. A new drift opened in 1900 opposite the New Inn pub to work the Green Vein/Felen seam. By 1907 and 1908, the pit employed around 157 to 160 men. But its life was short. It was finally abandoned in 1913. [63][64]

The main line of the BP&GVR continued in a North-northeast direction and a branch turned East and followed the valley of the Afon Hafren. [20]
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1878/1879, published in 1888 shows the full length of the branch which served Ffou Colliery and had a short siding service Ynys-Hafren Brick Works. However, by the time of the 1903 Ordnance Survey, published in 1905, the link to Ffou Colliery was abandoned. Only that to the Brick works remained. [65]
This extract from railmaponline’s satellite imagery shows the siding and the main branch line and includes the first lengths of associated tramways. [20]
The old branch line crossed the B4317 a short disatnce in front of the camera, possibly at or near to the field agte which appears in this image on the left side of the road. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

Ffou Colliery (also known as Ffoy Colliery) was an historic anthracite mine which sat just east of Pontyates, near the road running from Cynheidre to Pontyates. Historic records from the British Geological Survey note that operations at Ffou encountered specific geological variations, such as a parting in the notable Carway Fawr Vein. The BP&GVR line extended to exchange siding to the Northwest of Fou Colliery. An ‘internal tramway linked the exchange sidings to the Colliery. This length of line appears on the railmaponline satellite image above and again on that immediately below.

Ynys-Hafren Brick Works was active by 1809, originally associated with Cwmgelwr, an area corresponding to land later mapped in the 1840s Tithe Maps. Rai

The tramway connecting Ffou Colliery (bottom-right) with exchange sidings (top-left). [20]
A little to the East of Ffou Colliery another tramway appears on the railmaponline satellite imagery. [20]

This extract shows that the tramway recorded by railmaponline was already abandoned at the time of the 1878/1879 Ordnance Survey. [65]

This extract from railmaponline’s satellite imagery shows two tramways which appear to have been associated with the Ynys-Hafren Brick Works. These do not appear on the 6″ 1878/1879 or 1903 Ordnance Surveys. The shorter tramway does however appear on the 1913 Ordnance Survey. [20]

One of the tramways shown by railmaponline appears on this map extract from the 1913 6″ Ordnance Survey which was published in 1922. The longer of the two tramways does not appear on these Ordnance Survey sheets [66]

However on the next 6″ OS sheet to the North (of 1878/1879) an old tramway is shown linking to T’yn-y-Wern Colliery. [67]

T’yn-y-Wern Colliery was a small operation which clearly was abandoned before 1878.

The BP&GVR main line continued North-northeast towards Pont Henry (Pont Henri). [20]
Pont Henry: the line was in cutting through the village and began to curve to the Northeast after passing under the bridge in the village. Northeast of Pont Henry was Ty’n-y-Waun Colliery. (Pont Henri) [20]

The railway cutting and bridge at Pont Henry as it appears on the 1878/1879 6″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1889. [67]

Looking West across the route of the old railway along Heol Y Pentre, The Incline Inn is just beyond the bridge parapets. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
Looking South-southwest along the old railway from the bridge carrying Heol y Pentre over the line. This vegetation has grown considerably since 2009 and this view is no long easy to see. [Google Streetview, March 2009]
Looking Northwest along the old railway, also in 2009. [Google Streetview, March 2009]
Ty’n-y-Waun Colliery in 1878/1879. [67]
The same location as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1905, published in 1907. The Colliery was by that time known as Ponthenry Colliery. The BP&GVR had by this time been doubled through the site. A short tramway can be seen within the confines of the colliery site. [68]
The same location in 1913 as shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1922. The internal tramway system has developed and crosses the BP&GVR and the river. [69]

Pont Henry Colliery operated from the 1820s/1865 until its final closure in 1936. the colliery had three main slants: Glynhir, Gwendraeth, and Stepney and a central coal washery. It extracted high-quality anthracite from the Gwendraeth, Braslyd, Gras, Pumpquart, Green, and Big Vein seams. Manpower peaked at 833 workers in 1927, producing around 200,000 tons of coal annually in both 1930 and 1935. [70]

The BP&GVR continues Northeast towards the Capel-Ifan Colliery. [20]
Railmaponline shows the track layout at Capel-Ifan Colliery. The BP&GVR ran very close to the pithead. tramways circulated around the site. [20]
Caepel-Ifan Colliery was in the bottom right of this next extract from railmaponline.com. [20]
Capel-Ifan Colliery in 1905. Tramways served the site of the colliery. [68]
Capel-Ifan Colliery in 1913. The BP&GVR sidings are more extensive than in 1905. [69]

The Capel-Ifan Colliery (was also known as Pentremawr Colliery) and sat to the Southwest of Pontyberem, It was a drift mine (slant mine) due to the angle and depth of the anthracite seams. It opened in 1870, the site faced early setbacks from geological faults before opening slants (Capel Ifan Nos. 1–4 and Pentremawr). It was absorbed into the Amalgamated Anthracite Combine in 1927 and nationalized under the National Coal Board (NCB) in 1947. The seams worked were: Gwendraeth, Braslyd, Gras, Trichwart, Pumpquart, and the 8-foot-thick Big Vein seam discovered in 1939. [71]

The line continues to the Northeast through Pontyberem. The tramway shown on the right side of this image served early collieries near Coalbrook. Details of those early collieries are given further down this article. The later Pontyberem Slant Colliery location is at the very right side of this image and to the Northeast of this extract. [20]
Pontyberem in 1878/1879 – the 6″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1889. [67]
The same area in 1905. [68]
And again, … in 1913. [69]
And in 1948. [72]

Before looking at the 6″ OS sheets which cover the Pontyberem collieries, we take a quick look at the line of the old railway through Pontyberem village. …

The line was in cutting through Pontyberem. The first bridge encountered carried Heol Y Pentre over the line. [Google Maps, October 2026].

Looking South along Heol Y Pentre across the bridge carrying the road over the BP&GVR. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The bridge seen looking Southeast from Railway Terrace. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The second bridge carried Heol Y Parc over the railway. The purple lines mark the location of the parapets of the old bridge at this location. [Google Maps, October 2026]

Looking East along Heol Y Parc: the terraced houses faced out across the old railway, with the old road running through the location of the trees to the left of the more modern road and its bridge parapets. {Google Streetview, April 2025]

Looking back West along the railway cutting. [Google Streetview, March 2009]

Looking Northeast beyond the modern bridge parapet, the alignment of the railway cutting is marked by the blue line. [Google Streetview, March 2009]

The BP&GVR to the Northeast of Pontyberem in 1878/1879 – the 6″ Ordnance Survey, published in 1889. [73]
The same area in 1905. [74]
And again, … in 1913. [69]
And in 1948. [72]
The tramway which serves Pontyberem’s early collieries. [20]

Pontyberem Collieries in the late 19th century as they appeared on the 1878/1879 6″ Ordnance Survey which was published in 1888. [73]

Pontyberem Collieries (later Gwendraeth Collieries) were listed in 1878 as consisting of the Pontyberem Five-Quarter pit and the Pontyberem South pit and in 1882 as the Pump Quart Pit and South Pit. [75]

The collieries were first operational as early as 1845. They were operated by the Pontyberem Colliery Company. In 1907, the name was changed to the Gwendraeth Colliery. [75]

Along with the other collieries in the Gwendraeth Valley, this colliery was nationalised in 1947.

Northern Mine Research Society points out that the South Pit was sunk to a depth of 245 ft., and the Gwendraeth/Pumpquart Pit to a depth of 450 ft. Working seams include the Pumpquart, Trichwart, and Big Vein. Employment reached a high of 824 workers in 1927. Final closure took place on 15th October 1949.

The Pontyberem Slants Colliery is marked on the Ordnance Survey sheet of 1948, as closed. [75]

The level-crossing at Furnace Terrace, seen from Station Road. The single track rails can be seen between the crossing gates.[Google Streetview, May 2025]

Looking West, back down the line towards the centre of Pontyberem. [Google Streetview, May 2022]

Looking East into what was the railway station site. [Google Streetview, May 2022]

The BP&GVR continues heading Northeast through the site of the Pontyberem Slants Colliery. this colliery appears at the right side of the Ordnance Survey extracts above. An additional OS extract is provided below which covers the full area of the Colliery. After having passed through the Colliery site, the BP&GVR turned North. [20]
Pontyberem Slants Colliery in 1913. [69]
Looking East across what was once the Pontyberem Slants Colliery! [Google Streetview, May 2025]
On reaching Clyn-hebog Colliery, the mainline began to turn East-northeast. Just before that curve began a short branch headed away to the East of the BP&GVR – that branch line does not appear on the 1905 nor the 1913 Ordnance Surveys. It does, however, appear on the 1878/1879 Ordnance Survey and appears in the first map extract below and is marked as a tramway. [20]
The 1878/1879 Ordnance Survey published in 1888 shows a tramway leaving the main line of the BP&GVR near what were Groes-Faen Chemical works. The tramway appears primarily to have served Dynant Colliery, and perhaps Glyn Bedwast Coal Pit too. Note that the BP&GVR is show running north from this tramway only to a point where it would, in future, bridge/replace the old canal shown on the top-left of the map extract. The absence of the BP&GVR at the top of this map extract (and similarly at the top of the OS map sheet, may indicate that itn was under construction. The next OS sheet to the North shows the line. [73]

Dynant Colliery must have been closed in the late 19th century as it does not appear on later editions of Ordnance Survey mapping. Note, in the railmaponline satellite image above, that for a short distance the modern B4317 follows the route of the old tramway. A more minor road occupied the line of the tramway further to the East.

Looking East along the line of the old tramway which is buried under the B4317. [Google Streetview, May 2025]

The tramway route continues East as the B4317 turns to the North. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

AQ very short distance along the BP&GVR brings us to the location of another colliery – Clyn-hebog Colliery. …

Clyn-hebog Colliery as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, published in 1922. Note the sidings alongside the BP7GVR main line and the standard-gauge line under colliery screens. North of the screens are a series of tramway lines which feed the screens form the pit/slant head and give access to spoils heaps to the West of the screens. There also appears to be a single tramway line which meets the standard-gauge line Northeast of the screens, which presumably allowed for other loads to be moved between the tramway and the railway. Finally, note the tramway which starts alongside the exchange sidings next to the BP&GVR main line and heads Northeast. [69]

The remaining length of the tramway which appeared on the right of the map extract above. It served a small colliery – Clos-uchaf Colliery. [69]

Clos-uchaf Colliery was located at the top right of this extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery. Clyn-hebog Colliery was at the centre of the network of tramways to the left of this image. [20]

Continuing East-northeast the BP&GVR leaves behind the Clyn-hebog Colliery. …

The BP&VR continues Northeast. [20]

Looking North across the line of the railway along the minor road to the left of the image above. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

A penultimate length of the BP&GVR as it appears on the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1878/1879, published in 1889. [76]

Looking West across the line of the old railway along the minor road shown crossing the line to the right side of the satellite image above, and to the right side of the map extract immediately above. [Google Streetview, April 2025]

A final length of the BP&GVR brings it to Pontyfelin. [20]
A similar area to that included in the satellite image above. This extract is taken from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1905, published in 1907. [75]
By the time of the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1913, the scene had changed dramatically! New Dynant Colliery was very active and as a result the rail head and station at Pontyfelin/Cwm-mawr was a busy location. [69]

New Dynant Colliery and Cwm-mawr (Pont-y-felin) sat at the northern railhead of the BP&GVR. New Dynant Colliery was an anthracite coal mine. In the early 1900s it was operated by the New Dynant Anthracite Collieries Co. and later reorganized as New Dynant Anthracite Colliery (1914) Ltd. In 1924, it became part of United Anthracite Collieries Limited (UAC), a group that combined several regional anthracite mines. In 1926, UAC merged with Amalgamated Anthracite Collieries Limited (AAC). It was nationalised in 1947. [77]

‘Cwmmawr for Tumble‘ railway station, (Cwm Mawr railway station or Cwmmawr railway station) was opened in 1913 to timetabled passenger services. It continued to serve the inhabitants of the Cwmmawr area and hinterland between 1913 and 1953; it was one of several basic stations opened on the Burry Port and Gwendraeth Valley Railway. Passenger service ended in September 1953. The line remained open for coal freight until 29th March 1996.

Cwmmawr Railway Station in 1947. Two 0-6-0PT were active in the station, Bourne says that the pannier locomotives are No. 1957 in the sidings, and No. 1967 at the platform on. Burry Port train. I cannot find these two running numbers and wonder whether they are correct. (H. C. Casserley). [1: p741]
Also taken in 1947, this photograph shows the single-platform terminus at Cwmmawr. The photographer stood beyond the small signal box seen in the last image. [1: p741]
The 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1905, published in 1907 shows a tramway running from Pont-y-felin/Cwm Mawr, Northeast to Clos-yr-yn-Colliery.  The tramway is also present on the 6″ 1913 Ordnance Survey (published in 1922). [69]
The same area in the 21st Century. [20]

Clos-yr-yn-Colliery was a small anthracite coal mine that opened in 1903. It was closed/abandoned by 1924/1925. Seams worked included Pumpquart and Trichwart (Triquart). In 1905, the colliery employed 19 men. Numbers were 66 underground and 12 at the surface by 1908, and 125 in total by 1913. From 1914-1922, the colliery was owned by New Dynasty Anthracite Colliery (1914) Ltd. In 1918, it employed about 126 underground and 21 at the surface. Between 1923 and 1924 it was owned by Great Mountain Collieries Co. Ltd. and employed 121 underground and 32 surface workers before it was abandoned on 30th May 1924.

It was truly the end of the line!

References

  1. John Bourne; The Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway; in The Railway Magazine, Volume 99, No. 631, Tothill Press, London, November 1953, p737-744.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidwelly_and_Llanelly_Canal, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  3. https://www.nationaltransporttrust.org.uk/heritage-sites/heritage-detail/kymers-canal, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  4. https://www.facebook.com/TheHistoryOfWales/posts/on-19th-february-1766-thomas-kymer-was-granted-an-act-of-parliament-allowing-him/1201894841302902, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  5. https://kids.kiddle.co/Kidwelly_and_Llanelly_Canal, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  6. https://www.walescoastpath.gov.uk/plan-your-visit/itineraries/circular-walks/carmarthenshire/kidwelly/?lang=en, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  7. https://walescoastpathphotos.com/photo_12364093.html, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  8. https://www.kidwelly.gov.uk/whats-on/local-attractions, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  9. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/home/burry-port-harbour, accessed on 14th September 2026.
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burry_Port_and_Gwendraeth_Valley_Railway, accessed on 16th September 2026
  11. https://colonelstephenssociety.co.uk/the%20colonels%20railways/burry%20port%20%26%20gwendraeth%20valley%20light%20railway, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  12. https://picryl.com/media/fairlie-patent-0-4-0-0-4-0-steam-locomotive-mountaineer-e5080a, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  13. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HRTNeQacK, accessed on 16th September 2026.
  14. https://kesr.org.uk/museum/burry-port-gwendraeth-valley, accessed on 17th September 2026.
  15. https://www.gwra.co.uk/auctions/nameplate-gwendraeth-ex-burry-port-gwendraeth-vall-2024jul-0175.html, accessed on 18th September 2026.
  16. https://transportsofdelight.smugmug.com/RAILWAYS/COLONEL-STEPHENS-RAILWAY-EMPIRE/BURRY-PORT-GWENDRAETH-VALLEY-RAILWAY/i-KXcxzBp/A, accessed on 18th September 2026.
  17. R W Miller; The Burry Port & Gwendreath Valley Railway and its Antecedent Canals: Volume Two: The Railway and Dock; Oakwood Press, Usk, 2009.
  18. https://www.therailwayhub.co.uk/tag/burry-port-and-gwendraeth-valley-railway, accessed on 18th September 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340281, accessed on 18th September 2026.
  20. https://railmaponline.com/uk-and-irish-railways, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193417, accessed on 22nd September 2026.
  22. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102180122, accessed on 27th September 2026.
  23. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102180083, accessed on 27th September 2026.
  24. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102180080, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  25. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.3&lat=51.68334&lon=-4.25061&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 28th September 2026.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102180077, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  27. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/the-boards/the-tramway-board, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  28. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/home/the-tramway, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  29. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/the-boards/the-tramway-board, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view-full/102340281, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  31. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340269, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  32. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340272, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  33. https://heneb.org.uk/hcla/taf-and-tywi-estuary/pembrey-and-burry-port, accessed on 29th September 2026.
  34. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/about-us/the-project, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  35. https://pembreyburryportheritage.co.uk/the-tramroad, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  36. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102349926, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  37. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340272, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  38. https://www.facebook.com/groups/850121445097091/posts/4344755678966966, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  39. https://www.trimsarancc.org.uk/about-trimsaran, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  40. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.7&lat=51.72335&lon=-4.24741&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 30th September 2026.
  41. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Steelworks/@51.7223995,-4.2483364,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sCIHM0ogKEICAgIDawOLyHQ!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2Fgps-cs-s%2FAHRPTWkVgOGBpqUM31Citdq358NmDwd2wX1lhwDaeg7kFjQWEEEoBib304Dd7MinKnmAJJTstXGPfxBIw4Z4io1vcUPFeONiWDemnTeUC2p4l3HKo2auItIhC0WoKm2a1Wa1QqbkAl6Y%3Dw203-h242-k-no!7i2486!8i2965!4m6!3m5!1s0x486ee930adaf3e75:0xf2920998be04ff47!8m2!3d51.723021!4d-4.248041!16s%2Fg%2F11n_xyx83r?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDkyOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  42. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.72334&lon=-4.23641&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  43. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.72933&lon=-4.28075&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  44. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.72921&lon=-4.28666&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  45. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.72934&lon=-4.29910&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  46. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.73152&lon=-4.31079&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  47. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.73200&lon=-4.31633&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 1st October 2026.
  48. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LRbM9XFQr, accessed on 2nd October 2026.
  49. https://www.kidwelly.gov.uk/council-services/kidwelly-quay-and-surrounding-area, accessed on 2nd October 2026.
  50. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193270, accessed on 2nd October 2026.
  51. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193273, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  52. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193276, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  53. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179939, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  54. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179978, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  55. https://rchsimagearchive.org.uk/index.php?album=Railways-Tramroads/Early-Railways/Early-Railways-S-Wales-Borders/Carmarthen%20Bay&image=023278E-Carway.jpg, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  56. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=51.74477&lon=-4.23489&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  57. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193333, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  58. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179969, accessed on 3rd October 2026.
  59. https://www.welshcoalmines.co.uk/Carm/Plasbach.htm, on 4th October 2026.
  60. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontyates, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  61. https://maps.nls.uk/view/135193282, accessed on 6th October 2026.
  62. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179975, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  63. https://nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/swales/llanelli-area/caepontbren-colliery, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  64. https://www.welshcoalmines.co.uk/forum/read.php?2,85659,85689, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  65. https://maps.nls.uk/view-full/102179978, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  66. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340272, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  67. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179759, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  68. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179756, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  69. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102340260, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  70. https://nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/swales/llanelli-area/pont-henry-colliery, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  71. https://nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/swales/llanelli-area/pentremawr-colliery, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  72. https://maps.nls.uk/view-full/102340257, accessed on 7th October 2026.
  73. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179765, accessed on 8th October 2026.
  74. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179762, accessed on 8th October 2026.
  75. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179750, accessed on 8th October 2026.
  76. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102179753, accessed on 8th October 2026.
  77. https://nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/swales/llanelli-area/new-dynant-colliery, accessed on 9th October 2026.

The Narrow Gauge Railway Society Journal

I have enjoyed being a member of the Narrow Gauge Society for a number of years. One of the benefits of membership is the regular mailing.

The Narrow Gauge Railway Society sends out a bimonthly mailing in which ‘Narrow Gauge News’ (a full colour A4 update for readers covering what has been happening across a wide range of different narrow gauge lines in both the UK and around the world) is accompanied by one, sometimes two, more detailed studies of contemporary and more historic narrow gauge lines.

In October 2026, the latest mailing included two other A4 ‘bookazines’. The first being a single issue paper recorded as ‘The Narrow Gauge No. 302’ which focusses on various railways at Crystal Palace, written by R. G. Cash. [1]

‘Narrow Gauge No. 302’ – September 2026. [1]

The inside front cover has a map (a public domain image) of the Festival of Empire and Imperial Exhibition of 1911. …

A map of the 1911 Exhibition at Crystal Palace. Cash notes that this image is not entirely accurate, as the Kearney High-Speed Railway and ‘New London’, although shown, did not appear in the Exhibition. Two stations on the ‘All Red Route’ have been omitted – ‘Canada’ and ‘South Africa and Pageant’. The ‘All Red Route’ was curved rather than straight on the approach to ‘South Africa’, © Public Domain. [7][1: p2]

The ‘All Red Route’ was “a somewhat convoluted circuitous route of over a mile with stations near the principal buildings.” [1: p4]

Cash’s paper describes the track and route of the line. 60lb/yard flat-bottomed rail in 30ft lengths was spiked to wooden sleepers on 12″ of ballast. It is believed that it was a 3ft 6in-gauge railway. Trains ran at one-minute intervals in an anti-clockwise direction at a maximum speed of 4mph. Signals were not used.

Cash notes that the builders of the line “were keen to exploit the capabilities of electric traction and confidently laid out the line with gradients steeper than those on the Manx Electric Railway, which may have given the ride something of a ‘roller-coaster’ character, though the low speed would have mitigated this effect. There were also many … scenes and tableaux … which could be seen from the train. … The railway was reported to be ‘Highly successful’ and one of the most interesting features of the Exhibition.” [1: p6]

Rolling Stock – although built as a railway, rolling stock was typical of the electric tramways of the period.

The Royal Train! A decorated train used by George V on his visit to the site, © Public Domain. [1: p5][9]

‘All Red Route’ tramcars at the Newfoundland Station, possibly the India Station, both buildings were close to the stop. Cash notes that the current collectors can be seen. The cars were paired together, a motor car and a trailer, © Public Domain. [1: p7][10]

Current collectors protruded from the sides of the trucks, one at the rear of the leading wheel of the motor car and one just behind the trailing wheel of the trailer.

Apparently, the All Red Route (including it power plant) cost £90,000 to build (that is over £70,000 per mile). Each train (moti car plus trailer) could carry 80 passengers around the route of the line in between 15 and 20 minutes. [1: p8]

Cash goes on to consider the costs of the Exhibition and what happened to the rolling stock before discussing:

  • Other railways that were on use during the Exhibition/Festival;
  • Pneumatic railways on the site (1864);
  • Electric pioneers (1881 & 1882);
  • Hydraulic pioneers (1891);
  • Looping the Loop! – perhaps the first amusement ride in the UK to invert its riders (1902-1907]
  • Miniature Railways – a 15in-gauge line which circled the drained basin of the Grand Fountain (1910 and not renewed for the 1911 exhibition). There were later proposals for similar lines in the park through the years, at least one of which was used (between 1990 & 1996).

The Narrow Gauge – Number 303

The second ‘bookazine’ is the September edition of ‘The Narrow Gauge’ – No. 303. In 2026, the Narrow Gauge Railway Society celebrates 75 years serving the narrow gauge world since 1951. This is reflected on the front cover of ‘The Narrow Gauge No. 303’. [2]

‘The Narrow Gauge’ No. 303  – September 2026. [2]

This second volume includes:

  • Slaggyford Light Rail – Philip Champion (p3-9);
  • Early Petrol-Electric Railcars in Prussia – David Meller (p10-22);
  • The Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad: Part 1 – Jim Stancliffe (p23-33); and
  • A few shorter items.

Slaggyford Light Rail – Philip Champion tells the story of a privately owned 2ft-gauge railway which sat on an ‘island’ in the South Tyne River which was also the location of a caravan site. First in use in 1978, the line was owned by W. G. Horseman. He sold the line in 1981 to Bob Cant who renamed it ‘Slaggyford Lake Railway’. Cant closed the line in 2001 and much later, after his death, his collection was sold by auction (January 2025). Philip Champion includes in his article, information about the various locomotives and rolling stock used on the railway.

Early Petrol-Electric Railcars in Prussia – David Meller provides a survey of various narrow-gauge lines in Prussia before WW1, with some still active up to and beyond WW2.

Meller first introduces us to The Kleinbahn Pogegen–Schmalleningken (Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway), located in the historic Memelland region of East Prussia, which was a pioneer in using petrol-electric (or benzole-electric) railcars.

A sketch of the route of the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway in a 1926 railway atlas, © Public Domain. [3]

Meller points out that details of these first Petrol-Electric Railcars were provided in an article from the 11th February 1909 edition of Elektritechnische-Zeitschrift which is now available online in the Internet Archive. [4]

Illustrations provided by Miller come directly from that article. …

The interior of the driving cab of a Railcar equipped with a Westinghouse engine of the type used on the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway. [2: p10][4: p124]
A Petrol-Electric Railcar of the Pogegen-Schmalleningken Railway. [2: p12][4: p125]

Meller then turns to the 750mm-gauge Konigsberger Kleinbahn which had three Petrol-Electric Railcars numbered 51, 52 and 53 in its fleet. This line was owned by the same company as the Pogegen-Schmalleningken line (Aktiengesellschaft fur Verkehrswesen – AVG).

In the autumn of 1911, the German electrical giant AEG (Allgemeine Elekricitats-Gesellschaft), the coachbuilder Waggonfabrik L. Steinfurt (based in Königsberg), and the engine manufacturer NAG (Neue Automobil-Gesellschaft) delivered a four-axle prototype railcar to the Königsberger Kleinbahn. Test runs showed that  whole electrical and mechanical equipment performed well, vibration was excessive. This was overcome by moving the power unit away from the passenger accommodation.

The revised vehicle entered service in 1914 and was followed by two more.

This photograph of No. 53 was taken in Königsberg/Königstor, © Public Domain. [5]

Next Meller focusses on the Insterburger Kleinbahn which purchased three of the same design of units used on the Konigsberger Kleinbahn and, interestingly, also numbered the Railcars 51, 52 and 53.

He follows this with a look at the Gleiwitz-Rauden-Ratibor Line which seems to have purchased the final member of a batch of seven Railcars of the type used by the Konigsberger Kleinbahn and Insterburger Kleinbahn. This particular vehicle seems to have travelled around a number of venues before arriving at this line. It appears to have been recorded at the ‘Baltic Exhibition’ in Malmö, Sweden in 1914. Meller believes that it may have been seen at other exhibitions at least including the Weimar Bauhaus international architecture exhibition in 1923 and at Stuttgart in 1924. It was bought by the Gleiwitz line in 1925. But, Meller, says there are particularly concerns about this narrative and it is possible that the story of the seven Railcars is more complex!

The photographs included with the text of Meller’s article can be found along with the original German Schweizerische Bauzeitung article on a German discussion forum, here. [6]

The Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad (C&TSR): Part 1 – Jim Stancliffe writes that this railroad was opened in 1971. It is a tourist line and lays claim to being the longest and highest steam-powered narrow gauge railroad in North America. Stancliffe describes the project to revive the line as “arguably, the most ambitious heritage project of its kind in the world at the time.” [2: p23]

As the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad (D&RGR) network entered terminal decline in the year either side of WW2, many of its narrow gauge routes were abandoned. The main passenger service on the narrow gauge was the ‘San Juan‘ which ran daily each way between Samosa and Durango, but it was withdrawn in 1951. The only remaining passenger service was the ‘Silverton‘, which ran as a mixed train, three times a week, each way between Durango and Silverton. [2: p25]

The D&RGR retained the Silverton Branch as a steam hauled summer tourist attraction until 1980. A buyer was sought and found in 1981. The new owner redeveloped the line as the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SR)

Separately, abandonment of much of the network was pursued by the Railway Company and preservation of a length of the network between Antonio and Chama was considered by New Mexico and then by Colorado. Stancliffe says that, “In July 1970, the states jointly purchased the track and line structures along the 64 mile long route between Antonito and Chama. The purchase included 9 steam locomotives and over 130 freight and works cars. The total cost for the whole package was $547,120. Whilst the purchase included all the yards and buildings at Chama, there were no available facilities at Antonito. These were all still required by the D&RGR.” [2: p27]

Stancliffe goes on to describe the birth of what became the ‘Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad’.

The first train ran on 26th June 1971 but despite the initial air of optimism the deep recession caused by the oil crisis impacted the viability of the Railroad. In parallel there was a need for the two US states to find more effective ways of working together.

Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad train headed by locomotive No. 484, approaching ‘The Narrows’ east of Chama, New Mexico, USA, © Drew Jacksich and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [8]

Various crises followed; the operating company had its contract terminated and another company was appointed. The volunteer organisation which was maintaining stock was removed from the site and eventually a new volunteer organisation was formed – the Friends of the Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad (The Friends).

The new operating company (Kyle Railways) brought about a change in fortune for the C&TSR. In 1987, ridership was a record 38,721 people, and ridership continued to increase throughout the 1990s. In 1995, the total was 59,871. But by the end of the 1996 season, Kyle Railways, gave up their lease. The next lease holders survived in role only until the end of the 1999 season. After the lease was advertised once again, no suitable applicants applied. In February 2000, The Friends made an offer to run the railroad. The friends set up a not-for-profit company: the Rio Grande Railroad Preservation Corporation (RGRPC). This arrangement only lasted until the end of the 2005 season. Further negotiations saw The Friends forming another non-profit to run the day-to-day operations with capital funding for necessary works being the responsibility of the two states. Various factors meant that this new arrangement lasted only until the end of the 2011 season.

No. 484 again in charge of a different consist, © Public Domain. [8]

This seems, throughout Stancliffe’s article, to have been the ongoing experience of those running the railway – periods when reasonable progress was being made with passenger numbers being to rise towards a break even position, and then an incident or problem which set things back.

The late 2010s saw fragile good progress destroyed by COVID and in the 2020s a similar set back saw the restaurant kitchens at the intermediate stop at Osier, and dry weather causing significant damage to water supplies along the line.

C&TSR No. 487 in the Chama Yard, © Wdiehl and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [8]

Stancliffe has set the scene for Part 2 which will follow in a later edition of ‘The Narrow Gauge’.

And finally ….

I hope that this series of notes about the mailing sent out at the end of September 2026 might encourage new interest from non-members in the Narrow Gauge Railway Society.

References

  1. The Narrow Gauge No. 302; the Narrow Gauge Railway Society, September 2026.
  2. The Narrow Gauge No. 303; the Narrow Gauge Railway Society, September 2026.
  3. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleinbahn_Pogegen%E2%80%93Schmalleningken, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  4. https://archive.org/details/elektrotechnisch3019unse/page/123/mode/1up, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  5. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insterburger_Kleinbahnen_51%E2%80%9353#/media/Datei:OEG_VT_53_historische_Aufnahme.png
  6. https://www.drehscheibe-online.de/foren/read.php?17,7259617, accessed on 4th October 2026.
  7. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festival_of_Empire_1911_Map_%28cropped%29.jpg, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbres_and_Toltec_Scenic_Railroad, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  9. https://www.tramwayinfo.com/Tramframe.htm?https://www.tramwayinfo.com/trampostcards/Postc250.htm, accessed on 5th October 2026.
  10. https://jbarchive.co.uk/products/lo-6134-festival-of-empire-all-red-route-railway-crystal-palace, accessed on 5th October 2026.