Category Archives: Africa

Railways of Tanzania – Part 1 – The History of the Usambara Railway

Over recent years, I have reported events relating to the railways of Kenya and Uganda but have singularly failed to do so in relation to the railway network in Tanzania. This has probably been because of an abiding interest in the railways associated with what is now referred to as the Northern Corridor (when referring to the Standard Gauge Railway network).

It is time to rectify this situation. …

First, a look at the history of the various lines in Tanzania.

This article focusses on the history of the Usambara Railway (Usambarabahn) in the north of Tanzania.

Apart from two tramways in Zanzibar, [2] Tanzania’s railway history began when the country was known as German East Africa with German colonial lines being developed not long after the first tramway in Zanzibar was built. [1]

There were also a number of primarily plantation or industrial lines in Tanganyika/Tanzania and one in what is now Burundi. More about these lines can be found here. [7]

During World War 1, the German authorities and then the invading British military made significant use of 600 mm gauge lines to support their supply lines. An article focussing on these lines can be found here. [28]

Late in the 19th century, Germany was eager to expand influence and coffee exports, and it planned a railway from the port of Tanga to Lake Tanganyika. [3]

The featured image at the top of this article is a photograph of Njussi Railway Station on the Usambarabahn. It will be beyond copyright now and therefore in the Public Domain. It was shared on the German Colonial Empire Facebook Page on 2nd March 2026. [18]

The Metre-Gauge Usambara Railway

The Eisenbahngesellschaft für Deutsch-Ostafrika (Railway Company for German East Africa) was established in 1891. “Its main line from Tanga into the hinterland was known as the Usambara Railway. For that, and subsequent, main lines in the German colony, the gauge selected was 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre-gauge. In addition, light railways were developed for individual Tanganyikan sisal plantations in narrower gauges, usually 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge.” [1]

The name ‘Usambara’ comes from the mountains through which the railway travelled from the coast. The Usambara Mountains in northeastern Tanzania are a scenic, biodiverse range close to Tanga.

A Map of the Usambara Railway and the plantation areas in Usambaraland as far West as Kürchhoff. [9: p3]

A series of early photographs associated with the Usambarabahn are held on the Getty Images website and can be found here. [31]

M.F. Hill, in his comprehensive history of Tanganyika’s Railways covers the building of the main network in ‘Part II: German Rule and the Building of the Railways: 1891-1914‘ [8: p55-105]

The first plan was for a railway from Dar-es-Salaam to Morogoro, Tabora and Ujiji. A surveyor was commissioned to undertake a preliminary reconnaissance. An Arab revolt put that endeavour on hold. In 1891, a line from Dar-es Salaam to Bagamoyo was surveyed, but nothing came of the planned line. Also in 1891, a meeting of famous African explorers recommended the construction of two lines: considered the most important, was a line from Dar-es-Salaam to Lakes Victoria and Tanganyika; of secondary importance, a line from Tanga to Kilimanjaro. In the end the decision was probably influenced by the fact that the German East Africa Company has acquired vast tracts of land in the Usambaras and started a number of plantations. It seemed that the northern line would be the easiest to build. [8: p61]cf. [11][12]

Tanga Railway Station with a 0-4-4-0 mallet type steam locomotive and passenger train departing inland. The locomotive is a Jung compound mallet steam locomotive of the early 1900s. It has the extended cab. The cowcatchers have been left on. These were later removed but surprisingly, this was not done when they extended the cab. The railway company owned five mallet-type 0-4-4-0 steam locomotives, built in Germany by Arnold Jung in 1900. Additional UE steam locomotives were delivered in 1893 by Vulkan (Stettin) and in 1908-12 by Orenstein & Koppel of Berlin, (c) Public Domain. [21: p8]
0-4-4-0 mallet type steam locomotive (Arnold Jung 414-418/1900) and mixed train at Tanga. This image was shared on the German Colonial Empire Facebook Page on 10th March 2026, (c) Public Domain. [25]

The construction of the Usambara Railway, from Tanga to the hinterland, began in 1893. However, the company building that railway went into bankruptcy after two years. At that stage, only 40 km (25 mi) of track had been completed, as far as Korogwe. The treasury of the colony then took over the project in 1899. Four years later, in 1903, it issued an Order for further construction.” [1] cf. [11][12]

Locomotive No.1 of the metre gauge Usambarabahn. One of a batch built by Arnold Jung 414-418, in 1900. This image was shared on the Narrow Gauge Enthusiasts Facebook Group by Derrick Why on 16th January 2023, © Public Domain. [29]

Hill comments: “In the August of 1891 preparatory work for the building of the line started at Tanga under the direction of Engineer Hermes. He was soon succeeded by Herr Mittelstaedt, who in turn handed over the job to Herr Wunder. All three men were forced by ill-health to leave East Africa after short spells of duty. The incidence of malaria was very high and the frequent illness of European staff, particularly amongst the surveyors, was a serious drag on the progress of construction. The record of the early years of the railway is a poor tribute to German abilities. Admittedly the difficulties were very great, but they were made all the greater by inefficiency, by bad organisation, by inexperienced staff, by an almost complete absence of medical services until 1899, by inadequate personal and general discipline, by a low standard of technical skill and by a lack of plain common-sense.” [8: p62-63] cf. [11][12]

Hill continues: “On 30th May 1893, Chief Engineer Bernhardt arrived at Tanga and laying of the track started, nearly two years after the arrival of the first group of engineers. A year later the line between the port and the railway station was completed and by the end of 1895 railhead was at Muhesa, 40 kilometres from the coast. The official opening of the Tanga-Muhesa section was held on 1st April 1896, although only half of the line was properly ballasted. … The alignment was indifferent, particularly near Ngomeni, where Bernhardt decided on a double switchback to overcome an apparently difficult gradient. This expedient was a great obstacle to the smooth and economic running of traffic for many years. In fact it was entirely unnecessary, and a classic example of the drawbacks of the location method of survey, particularly when employed by surveyors who lacked the perseverance to undertake a reasonably wide reconnaissance. The cost of the line had greatly exceeded the estimate and von Soden’s prediction that the Railway Company would be bankrupt “in the shortest time” unless it were supported by Imperial finance was soon proved to be correct. By the middle of 1895 the Railway Company’s capital was exhausted and construction of the line stopped for a time at Ngomeni (Km. 28). From there to Muhesa the work was financed by advances from the parent company, the Deutsch Ost Afrikanische Gesellschaft, and the Railway Company’s report for 1895 referred to the line as “our creation universally recognised and fully appreciated in the colony as the first great cultural deed.” Unfortunately the Railway Company could raise no more money. It could not even maintain the line already built and there was no prospect of extending it from Muhesa towards Korogwe. On 26th June 1896, the District Commissioner of Tanga, von St. Paul, wrote a depressing report to the acting Governor, von Bennigsen.” [8: p63-64] cf. [11][12]

The line was in a parlous state of repair, the jetty at Tanga had collapsed and no effort had been made to repair it. Repair costs were estimated at 300,000 marks (£15,000 = over £1.7 million in 2026). The rail used was too light for the loads to be carried (31 lb/yard). It was estimated that the completion of the line to Korogwe would cost 2.2 million marks (£110,000 = £12.5 million in 2026).

Finance was eventually forthcoming (1st April 1899), six days later the line was acquired by the German government. Stuttering attempts were made on completing the railway to Korogwe. Thoughts turned to extending the line beyond Korogwe. The Reichstag agreed to the signing of a construction contract for 2,600,000 marks for the line between Korogwe and Mombo.

So, Muhesa had been reached in 1896, Korogwe saw construction recommence in 1903. Progress was made through challenging terrain including dense forests, steep hills, and rivers, employing African laborers under German oversight. “The construction of the railway now went ahead more rapidly as a consequence of employing a firm of contractors with adequate financial and technical resources. The bridge over the Pangani river at Maurui was completed on 11th August 1904, and the Korogwe-Maurui sector was opened to traffic in December. On 17th February 1905, the extension to Mombo was formally opened by Geheimrat Stuhlmann in the presence of Prince Adalbert of Prussia. Thirty-six kilometres of line had been built in a year, an improvement on the very slow progress of previous years but by no means a remarkable achievement. So far it had taken twelve years to build 129 kilometres, whereas construction of the Uganda Railway started in the December of 1895 and the first locomotive ran through to Kisumu, 572 miles from Mombasa, on 20th December 1901.” [8: p72-73] The contractor was Lenz & Co. an established German railway contractor. [11][12]

It seems that at this time (1905) plans to extend the line to Lake Victoria were set aside. Although in November 1913 two plans were promulgated which would, if built, given access to Lake Victoria. Neither came to fruition.

The Usambara Railway (Usambarabahn) in the era of German control. The location is not know, (c) Public Domain. [24]

4-coupled steam locomotive (2-8-0) with separate 4-axle tender in 1000 mm gauge delivered for the Usambara Railway – Orenstein & Koppel Works No. 2701 of May 1908, 300 hp, 1000 mm, 1D, Usambara N° 11. The image comes from a Company advertisement placed in 1911. [30]

With the line reaching Mombo in 1905, an agreement between the Imperial German Government and the contractor Lenz & Co. led to the formation of the ‘Deutsche Kolonial Eisenbahn Bau- und Betriebs Gesselschaft’ (The German Colonial Railway Construction and Administration Company – the DKEBBG) with an initial capital of 4,000,000 marks (£200,000 = in 2026, to over £31 million). This company assumed responsibility for the operation of the Tanga line, paying an annual rent of 152,000 marks, 20,000 marks more than the net profit on the line in 1904. cf. [11][12]

Hill tells us that “an inspection of the Usambara Line during 1907 revealed a number of defects and made it very clear that the rolling stock was not being kept in good repair. … Engine No. 1 which had undergone a major repair in 1906 was again in a very bad state. Engine No. 2 was in the workshops for heavy repairs. The axles of Engine No. 3 were worn out. Engine No. 4 was in fair state, having just come out of the workshops. Engine No. 5 was in urgent need of repairs. Engine No. 6, the ‘Deutschland,’ in spite of recent repairs, again needed attention. Engine No. 7, the ‘Preussen,’ could not be used on the line, but supplied steam for the machines in the workshop. Out of seven engines only two were railworthy, and their excessive use was doing them no good. When the writer of this report travelled from Tanga to Mombo behind Engine No. 1, it had to be repaired at every station and twice had to stop for running repairs between stations.” [8: p73]

That report also stated that “many rails were badly aligned and that Africans were not sufficiently skilled or responsible for this work without European supervision. European trackmen would not give satisfactory service so long as they were allowed to own plantations along the line or to work for plantation owners as well as for the railway. There was no European lavatory at Mombo station and the engine shed at Mombo had been burnt down. In view of ‘the enormous amount of traffic being dealt with at this railhead’, a European station-master should be appointed at Mombo. ‘The Goan at present in charge,’ the report stated, ‘is unsatisfactory because Europeans do not respect his authority. It is said that at Mombo station, when a train arrived, bedlam prevails and only the strongest get any attention.” [8: p73-74]

Construction of an extension, 45 km in length, to Buiko started in July 1907 and was completed in two years at a cost of 4,200,000 marks. By 1910, the annual rent was increased to 246,000 marks. cf. [11][12]

In 1908, it was recommended that the line should be extended to Moshi and that improvements should be made to the harbour at Tanga. A formal contract between the German authorities and the DKEBBG was drawn up. A sum of 12,250,000 marks was made available for the extension, and 1,500,000 marks for the harbour improvements. It was also agreed that the annual rent for the line should be increased to 760,000 marks once the line reached Moshi. [8: p74] cf. [11][12]

Despite construction difficulties, the railhead reached Same by 1st October 1910, and Moshi on 29th September 1911. The 178 km from Buiko to Moshi was built in rather more than 2 years. Hill comments: “The annual rate of construction, 84 kilometres, was by far the highest rate achieved during the slow creep of the line from Tanga. Since Lenz & Co. had been responsible, the standard both of alignment and construction was greatly superior to the section between Tanga and Korogwe. The extension to Moshi was formally opened on 7th February 1912, with an impressive display of pomp and ceremony and a remarkable consumption of wine. About the same time the name of the line was changed from Usambara Bahn to Ost Afrikanische Nordbahn.” [8: p74] cf. [11][12]

The line featured engineering feats such as double hairpin curves between Ngommi and Pongwe, a 23.3-kilometre branch from Tengeni to Sigi with four switchbacks (in 2ft 6in-gauge), while a cable spur linked it to sawmills in 1910, underscoring its role in supporting timber and agricultural exports like coffee, sisal, and rubber from plantations in the Kilimanjaro and Meru regions. [1]

It was not until May 1914 that funds were approved for an extension to Arusha. The Reichstag voted 9,400,000 marks for expenditure during 1914 and 1915 on the extension to Arusha and for further improvements to the harbour at Tanga. Hill says that “the contracts had been signed when the outbreak of war between Germany and Great Britain put an end to the extension of the Nordbahn by the Germans. A contract was also signed for a line from Ngomeni to Bwiti, at the north-east end of the Usambaras, and thence back to the main line at Korogwe. Construction of this line had just started when war broke out.” [8: p75]

Around 1914, one train traveled daily to and from Tanga and Buiko, with a second train running to Moshi and back on two days a week. It took 14 hours and 40 minutes to travel the full distance.” [4]

For a brief period between 4th June 1912 and 12th May 1913, the Usambara Railway was called Nordbahn (Northern Railway). The expansion to Arusha had already been planned and funded, but due to the outbreak of WW I, it was never completed.” [4]

Wettich writing in German in 1910/1911 says: “This, in brief, is the story of the Northern Railway, whose construction delays severely hampered the development of the north. Although no significant difficulties or major engineering structures were required, apart from the jetty in Tanga. The Tanga-Buiko section, a full 174 km long, took 17.5 years to complete, while the British completed their rival project, the much more challenging Uganda Railway, a 940 km long line, from August 1896 to December 1901, that is completed in 5.5 years!” [9: p4]

He goes on to talk of the “connection between the development of Usambara and the advancing railway construction is of particular interest, because in close connection with the railway plans, which were taking on a firmer form, new plantations and new settlements arose. The publications of the Reich Colonial Office are of little help with establishing the position at the time Wettich was preparing his paper. The situation at the time that paper was written is shown in the hand-drawn map entitled “A Map of the Usambara Railway and the plantation areas in Usambaraland as far West as Kürchhoff. [9: p3]” which can be found towards the top of this article. The present situation is essentially shown on the map Fig. 2, whereby reference should be made in particular Wettich draws attention to the plantations of Ambangulu and Korogwe and the Schummewald timber concession of the Wilkens & Wiese company, and that of the timber company for German East Africa which he goes into some detail about later in his paper.” [9: p4]

Between 1912 and 1914 some of the worst effects of poor workmanship on the “Tanga-Korogwe section were remedied, the money being provided from savings on the Buiko-Moshi section. The switchback at Ngomeni was eliminated by means of a comparatively simple realignment. Since 1893 plantations had replaced forest and thick bush and the lie of the land was easy to see. The correct alignment and the folly of the switchback were obvious.” [8: p75]

Hill notes that, “since 1911 the railway administration had been responsible for the 750 mm. Sigi line, (details of which can be found here) [7] and negotiations for its purchase from the Sigi Export Company were in-train when war broke out.” [8: p75]

Other ways of bringing traffic to the railway were developed. A ropeway, 9 kilometres long, ran from Mkumbara to Neu Hornow and climbed the precipitous cliffs and spanned the gorges of the western Usambaras. This ropeway was owned by the firm of Wilkins and Wiese, and designed to carry cedar from the Shume plateau to the railway, an enterprise that was never an economic success. The longest span of the ropeway, 907 metres, was said to be the longest in the world when it was built in the years 1910-1911. This ropeway is covered in another article which can be found here. [9][13]

A road suitable for animal-drawn transport ran from Korogwe to the sanatorium built at Vugiri in the central Usambaras. From Mombo, the first road in German East Africa designed to carry motor traffic ran to Wilhelmstal (Lushoto) and served the plantations established in the central and western Usambaras. This metalled road, built at the remarkably low cost of £700 a kilometre, was an outstanding example of the skill of the German surveyors and engineers and in striking contrast with much indifferent work on the Tanga railway. In 1914 a scheme was under discussion for the Railways Administration to take over motor transport between Mombo and Wilhelmstal. Another road was built to serve eastern Pare, and in the mid-20th century it was still part of the main road from Tanga to Moshi. [8: p75-76]

The route of the railway from Buiko to Same seems strange to Hill. He says: “There is no existing record of the reasons which persuaded the designers of the railway from Buiko to Same to take it along the western rather than the eastern skirt of the Pare mountains. One of the arguments for the extension of the railway beyond Buiko from the eastern side and the climate there is much pleasanter than in the dry country to the west. Maybe the German authorities deemed it advisable to keep the Pare mountains as a barrier between the railway and the frontier of British East Africa. There seems to be no other logical explanation.” [8: p76]

In 1913, the railway employed 562 workers (including 35 Europeans) and operated with 18 locomotives, 31 passenger carriages, and 199 goods [wagons], underscoring its scale as German East Africa’s primary northern artery before wartime disruptions.” [6]

The paper written by Hans Wettich in 1910/11 includes a wealth of information about German East Africa and the Usambarabahn in particular. Before going on to focus on what happened to the line in the First World War and its aftermath it is worth some time spent on looking at what Wettich had to say in his paper.

Developments in the German Protectorate in the areas around the Usambara Railway

Wettich provides us with an interesting digression in the story of the Usambara Railway, examining the performance of a variety of crops introduced into plantations around the line of the railway. Plantation managers first turned to tobacco but discovered quickly that the African soil was light on the necessary nutrients to support more than minor local production. Plantation managers then turned to Coffee which also failed. [9: p4] Wettich goes on to describe a whole series of different cultivation options. The translated text of this part of Wettich’s paper is included at Appendix A to this article. He also provides a couple of paragraphs about industry in the vicinity of the line which are included here in translation in Appendix B.

The Lack of Transport Routes: the Necessity of Private Branch Lines

Wettich considered that the development of the Usambara region was held back by poor transport links: “The greatest difficulty for the development of Usambara is the lack of traffic routes, since apart from the Usambara Railway there are hardly any roads and the timber has to be brought to the Usambara Railway on private branch tracks. However, the rugged mountain slope of West Usambara almost excludes access roads. On the plateau it is possible, though with difficulty, to work on prepared paths with cumbersome Cape wagons or the newer single-axle log wagons, which require 10 to 20 men for harnessing, but here the light railway, the so-called forest railway, will soon be used to an extensive extent to harvest timber, all the more so as the highlands are often flat. Some have proposed that timber should be transported down from the high plateau by means of wooden or stone flumes or by the use of the forest streams allied with dams and rafting according to Alpine and Scandinavian practice. These proposals are not feasible in the vast majority of cases. The route down is too long for flumes (7 to 9 km), and because the massif rises directly from the plain in rugged, steep walls with almost vertical drops up to 1500 m in height!” [9: p13]

The Sigi Railway (Sigibahn)

Writing about the Sigibahn, Wettich says: “The conditions are somewhat more favourable in East Usambara with its gentler mountain slopes, where the Sigi Export Corporation, which is controlled by the German Timber Company for East Africa, succeeded in finding a reasonably favourable route on which it was able to lay a small railway to its concession in East Usambara, The railway is of great interest alongside the Mkumhara-Neu-Hornow branch line.” [9: p13] (see a separate article here [13]), This was because “it shows how a narrow-gauge mountain railway overcomes the great difficulties of the terrain. It has a length of 23.7 km and connects meets the Usambara Railway at Tengeni station. The Company built the line over a length of 17.6 km before the use of switchbacks became necessary.” [9: p13-14] A further switchback was required close to the top of the line. The Sigibahn is covered in more detail in a separate article here. [7] It is perhaps just worth noting here that the cost of the construction work was higher than estimated partly because the actual path of the railway was over 2 kilometres longer than originally surveyed. [9: p15-16]

Wettich mentioned two other branch lines: [9: p16]

  • a 20 km line serving the sawmill in Ambangulu – this appears to be the cable way referred to above between Neu-Hornow and Mkumbara. [13]
  • a planned branch line from Njussi Railway Station – I have not been able to find evidence that this line was built.

The Significance of the Sigibahn

Writing in 1910/11 Wettich said: “Of these railways, the Sigi Railway in particular will be of great importance, because it not only serves to transport timber, but also handles other freight traffic and passenger traffic between the Usambara Railway and East Usambara. In its lower part it cuts through the fertile Bondeiland, in which local cultures of all kinds thrive excellently. Furthermore, it allows the plantations in East Usambara to transport their products, which until now had to be brought to the Usambara Railway on the heads of the natives. In addition, the Sigibahn makes it much easier to visit the extensive cultural facilities of the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani, which can be reached from Sigi station in just under an hour.” [9: p16]

He also noted: “The timetable of the railway is adapted to that of the Usambara Railway and is regulated in such a way that every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday scheduled trains run from Sigi to Tengeni and back. In each direction, the journey time is 2 hours 20 minutes. The railway transports letter and parcel post.” [9: p16]

Both Hill and Wettich provide some statistical information about the value and performance of the Usambarabahn. First, information provided by Wettich. …..

The Operating Results of the Usambara Railway before the First World War.

Results up to 1910

Wettich obtained figures from the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company specifically for the period during which the railway was leased to this company, i.e., for the years 1905 to 1910. The figures are more detailed than those contained in the official memorandum but only cover the period prior to the writing of his paper in 1910/11. The statistics are illustrated in the graphs provided in his paper, below. …

This first graph shows the growth in passenger transport on the Usambara Railway between 1905 and 1910. The three passenger classes are shown, two different vertical scales are used. The first shows the millions of passenger kilometres travelled, which rose from just over 4 million in 1905/6 to close to 9 million in 1909/10. The second shows the number of passengers in each of the three passenger classes. The total number of passengers increased from about 110,000 in 1905/6 to close to 220,000 in 1909/10. [9: p37]

Wettich commented in 1910/11: “As can be seen, passenger traffic has almost doubled since the opening year, but shows only a slight increase for the last three years. The lines for revenue from passenger traffic and for passenger-kilometres travelled correspond to the representation of passenger transport. It is interesting to note that the Usambara Railway charges fees for passenger luggage in the first class, insofar as it exceeds 30 kg. This helps to curb smuggling of rubber bales by first class passengers!” [9: p38]

This second graph shows revenue from passenger and passenger baggage transport between 1905 and 1910 in Rupees. By far the larger proportion of income on the Usambara Railway came from passenger transport, although goods traffic was gradually increasing in absolute terms, if not as a percentage of income. [9: p37]

By 1909/10, freight traffic had increased fourfold compared to the first year of operation. It should be noted that, despite the loss of construction material freight for the new Mombo-Buiko railway line following its opening in the reporting year 1908/09, tonnage traffic only declined slightly. Unfortunately, the various goods are not itemized in the statistics, so the development of individual plantation sectors is difficult to ascertain from the available information. [9: p38]

This third graph shows the quantities of goods carried on the Usambara Railway by three different measures: the value in hundreds of thousands of rupees; the tonne kilometres; and the actual tonnage carried. [9: p37]

This further graph shows the amount of livestock transported on the line by two measures: the income from this traffic in thousands of rupees; and the numbers of livestock, large cattle at the bottom of the graph, small livestock above. [9: p37]

The statistics only listed livestock traffic separately, which, due to local disturbances such as epidemics, feed shortages, drought, etc., showed fluctuating figures, although a steady increase can be observed in the latest two years for which figures were available. The majority of livestock traffic consisted of small livestock, including numerous Maasai sheep in the north of the colony bred for their wool.

This graph shows the overall income for the Usambara Railway between 1905 and 1910. Despite fluctuations in different income streams which can be seen in the graphs above, a pleasing picture of a steady increase in income is evident. [9: p38]

Later Statistical Information

Hill has the benefit of being able to look back from the mid-1950s and after the events of two world wars. He was also able to draw on reports written in the years after Wettich’s paper was written.

In June 1914, Hill tells us, Herr E. Kuhlwein, the Traffic Manager of the Usambarabahn wrote a report to the Imperial Government at Dar es Salaam. He said:

Disregarding the initial years, traffic and income have shown a steady increase from year to year. In the early years traffic conditions were primitive and our capital extremely limited. Today, however, we have a well-regulated enterprise serving the traffic requirements of the country adequately. It is only natural that settlements and plantations in the north of our colony are developing at the same rate as the railway. Shortly beyond Tanga European-owned plantations are found and one follows [another] all the way to Mkumbara (Km. 148). Adjoining this area lies bush country, which offers a great deal of interest to the traveller – wild life, the Usambara mountains and the Pare range. Long before his arrival at Moshi the traveller espies the snow-covered peaks of Kilimanjaro (Kibo m. 6,010 and Mawenzi m. 5,355) in their majestic greatness.” [8: p76]

Herr Kuhlwein continued: “Today the railway boasts, apart from essential installations and official buildings, pleasant houses for its staff, well constructed and suitably equipped for life in the tropics; its own water supply, and a convalescent home situated in beautiful Wilhelmstal. … The rolling stock consists of 18 engines; 25 passenger coaches (the latest type of first-class coach provides all modern comforts) and 205 goods trucks, including mail and luggage vans with a carrying capacity of from 7 to 12 tons. … One passenger and one goods train run on the Tanga-Buiko sector daily in each direction, while a train twice weekly in each direction is still sufficient for the traffic of the Buiko-Moshi sector.” [8: p77]

Traffic staff at present consists of: 36 European officials; 17 Goan officials and artisans; 25 Indian officials and artisans; 46 Native officials and artisans; 400 Native workmen. Construction staff, inclusive of staff employed by the Construction Company itself, consists of: 50 Europeans and 4,000 Native labourers.” [8: p77]

Herr Kuhlwein then quoted the following statistics for the year 1913: [8: p77]

Gross Revenue:  1,182,321 Marks

Approximate expenditure:  700,000 Marks

Passengers:  1st Class: 8,045;  2nd Class: 5,200;  3rd Class: 267,197.

The gross revenue came from: Passenger Traffic, 392,761 marks; Up goods traffic, 458,320 marks; Down goods traffic, 225,958 marks; Livestock, 25,162 marks; and Sundries, 80,000 marks.

The most important items in the goods traffic heading inland were: Piece Goods:  8,656 tons; Indian Rice:  2,400 tons; Sleepers and Rails:  2,000 tons; Firewood:  1,000 tons; Cement:  800 tons; Petrol:  700 tons; Machinery & Parts:  350 tons; Sisal Plants:  260 tons; Honey & Syrup:  230 tons; Imported Timber:  200 tons; Corrugated Iron:  175 tons; Tar:  175 tons; Flour:  100 tons; Sundries:  2,350 tons.

The most important items in the goods traffic heading for the coast were: Sisal: 8,000 tons; Piece Goods: 4,000 tons; Local timber: 1,500 tons; Coffee: 1,000 tons; Rubber: 400 tons; Fruit: 330 tons; Stone: 330 tons; Beans: 270 tons; Hides; 130 tons; Sisal Plants: 120 tons.

Hill points out that traffic heading to the coast involved a large redistribution trade in piece goods and that sisal plants appear to have been moved up and down the line. [8: p78]

Tanga

Hill assessed work undertaken at Tanga Harbour before 1914 and he is not kind in his assessment of work undertaken there: “The new installations at Tanga harbour, for which 1,500,000 marks were voted in 1909, were completed on 15th April 1914, but a design for a new quay wall was an ignominious failure. It was, indeed, a strange and complex design. In 1913 the shore at Tanga was littered with thousands of tons of reinforced concrete piles cast at Mannheim on the Rhine. They had been carried by river barges to Rotterdam and thence shipped to Tanga. The available records provide no answer to the question why these concrete works were not cast at Tanga. Soon after completion, part of the quay wall collapsed, another example of bad design, bad work and a lack of common-sense.” [8: p75]

Wettich noted that Tanga’s importance as a port for the Usambara area grew significantly from 1906. By 1910/11, the turnover at the port had “almost tripled since 1906. Even in 1900, when the Northern Railway was only about 100 km long, a critical report mention[ed] an increase in plantation activity in the northern districts, which led to an increase in the number of workers and a rise in wages. This, however, opened up the possibility of profitable trade extending far into the interior.” [9: p39]

Incidentally he explained that “it should not be forgotten that a strong impetus to establish Tanga as an independent city also stemmed from the plague quarantine of 1906, which closed the coast to trade with Zanzibar and permitted only Tanga to operate as a port for Zanzibar dhows. This virtually eliminated Zanzibar’s transshipment traffic, which had driven up the price of all goods.” [9: p39]

At Tanga, a change in circumstances occurred with steamer connections and shipping infrastructure being improved by Germany, allowing even large ships to call at the port. Wettich reported that “the largest cargo [up to the date of his paper] was taken on by the steamer ‘König‘ of the German East Africa Line in Tanga on 12th July 1910, consisting of 3,000 bales of sisal hemp, 147 sacks of coffee, 266 bales of rubber, and 90 different items of merchandise totalling about 3000 cubic metres.” [9: p39]

In 1910/11, Wettich reported that “The trade statistics in the official memorandum for 1908/09 show that Tanga is … the most important port in the protectorate. While Dar es Salaam recorded total trade valued at 11,818,000 marks in 1908/09, Tanga’s trade value was 10,180,000 marks. However, if one disregards the imports of both cities, which reached an unusually high level in this reporting year due to the import of railway construction materials via Dar es Salaam, while exports reached unusually high levels, Tanga’s exports, valued at 3.5 million Marks, surpassed those of Dar es Salaam, which had a value of 1,150,000 Marks. Compared to the previous year, Tanga’s exports increased by 880,000 Marks, while Dar es Salaam’s decreased by 500,000 Marks. The highest value products exported via Tanga in 1908 were sisal hemp (1.75 million marks), coffee (approximately 800,000 Marks), and synthetic rubber and gutta-percha (420,000 Marks).” [9: p39]

Hill noted in the mid-1950s that “from 1891 to 1914, the capital investment in harbour works at Tanga and on the Nordbahn from Tanga to Moshi was approximately 25,000,000 Marks (£1,125,000), most of which was converted to a 4% loan.” [8: p78]

The Viability of the Usambarabahn before the First World War

Hill then considers the viability of the Usambarabahn in the period prior to the first world war: “Interest charges [on the 4% loan] were about one million Marks a year. During 1913, the gross revenue was 1,182,321 Marks, but running costs were 883,000 Marks, a considerable increase over Herr Kuhlwein’s estimate of 700,000 Marks. On this basis, the excess of revenue over running costs was nearly 300,000 Marks, a great deal less than the rent of 760,000 Marks payable by the Deutsche Kolonial Eisenbahn Bau- und Betriebs Gesellschaft. In turn, the rent was considerably less than the annual charge for interest. Moreover, the running costs made no provision for amortisation and depreciation and there was no Betterment Fund. There was very little justification for the optimism expressed in the Railway Administration Company’s last published report. Of itself, the Nordbahn was never an economic proposition and the capital invested in it could only be justified by the economic development of the countryside which it made possible.” [8: p78]

In the March of 1913 the manager of the Nordbahn was asked to provide an estimate of the future revenue of the line. He pointed out that it depended on the development of the European plantations which provided by far the greater part of the revenue. Increased European settlement was essential if the railway’s finances were ever to be placed on a sound basis. The natives only grew enough for their own needs and there was no prospect of a surplus of native-grown crops for export. The manager suggested that the Governor should remove all native cultivations from alongside the line and that the native lands should not come nearer than 5 kilometres to the railway. ‘Were this land to be cultivated by Europeans,’ he wrote, ‘it would also give passengers a better impression than they gain at present‘.” [8: p78]

Hill commented further that “there [was] doubt that the Nordbahn was an effective stimulant of the development of plantations. The first choice of crops was unfortunate. The Germans never made a success of coffee, and although ceara rubber grew quite well the trees produced a latex which was very low in dry rubber content and could not compete with the hevea plantations of the Far East. During the years of German rule large plantations of ceara rubber were established throughout the length of the coastal belt. Most of these rubber plantations were eventually abandoned and in several instances they were replanted with sisal. For a brief period during the Second World War, when the hevea plantations of the Far East were in enemy hands, it was possible to operate the Tanganyika rubber estates on an economic basis. There [were] still some small plantings of hevea in the Tanga province, but only a very small area of the country [was] climatically suited to rubber.” [8: p78-79]

Hill continues: “After the boom year of 1910 and the subsequent collapse of prices, sisal replaced rubber as the main economic crop along the Nordbahn. Sisal plantations were also established along the Central Railway – the Mittelland Bahn – in the Lindi district and elsewhere along the coast. Tanga has always been the main centre of sisal production. By 1911 there were fifty-four sisal estates in German East Africa, in all 47,625 acres of sisal, of which 19,140 were in bearing. In that year 10,989 tons of fibre, valued at £226,612, were exported. By 1913 the acreage of sisal was 61,878, of which 35,898 acres were in bearing. In 1912, exports of sisal amounted to 16,738 tons valued at £367,961 and in 1913 to 20,835 tons valued at £535.579.” [8: p79]

The Necessity of Rapid Continuation of Construction of the Northern Railway Line

In 1910/11, Wettich was expecting that the Usambarabahn would be extended beyond Moshi towards Lake Victoria. He wrote: “The importance of Tanga and the development of its hinterland will be significantly boosted once the northern railway reaches Lake Victoria at the burgeoning port city of Muansa, as planned. The area to be opened up by this railway is already one of the richest and most densely populated in the colony. The railway would initially cut through the Moshi district, which is already served by the Kilimanjaro road. On Kilimanjaro, coffee of excellent quality and high yield is cultivated on large plantations, and according to the official memorandum, its production value is constantly increasing. Rubber and maize are also grown here. On Mount Meru, livestock farming flourishes, particularly under the management of 37 Boer settlers, who have taken up sheep farming and are now also raising ostriches.” [9: p39-40]

Wettich continued: “The Muansa district is today primarily a major production area, especially for peanuts and small varieties of coffee. The rice production of the districts around Lake Victoria is particularly noteworthy. The official annual report for 1909/10 states: ‘With the expansion of rice cultivation in the regions bordering Lake Victoria, the prospects for an increase in exports are justified; however, it is questionable whether the Uganda Railway can carry enough freight to successfully compete with Indian rice on the coast’. These regions therefore desperately need a new transport route with cheaper freight. This is the Usambara Railway, extended to Lake Victoria, which is significantly shorter than the Uganda Railway and will be able to transport freight from Lake Victoria to the coast much more cheaply. Furthermore, this railway would increase production of cotton, beans, and wild silk. It should also be noted that gold has been discovered in the river sand on the southern shore of Lake Victoria.” [9: p40]

He continued: “If the development of these promising areas is to be pursued, then at the same time emphasis must be placed on reinforcing the superstructure of the initial section of the Usambara Railway, because it currently consists of field railway ballast, 9 m long rails weighing 15.5 kg per linear meter, allowing only 3.3 tons of wheel load. … Competition from the English Uganda Railway absolutely compels the construction of the Northern Railway as quickly as possible. Moreover, it is an undeniable fact that with the commissioning of the Uganda Railway, the English would immediately seize all traffic from the northwest of the German protectorate. As early as 1906, an official report stated that not only the north and northwest, but also the southwest of the German colony were exporting produce via the Uganda Railway, and that this had, in a very short time, brought about an unprecedented development of trade throughout the entire northwest, down to Tabora, The Uganda Railway has seen trade develop where little was envisaged and has also attracted goods previously transported to the coast via Bag-mojo. As recently as1902, Muansa, Bukoba, and Shirati were small inland trading centres whose statistics were not worth recording. In 1906, their turnover is greater than that of Ranga after 20 years of German rule. Trade at Muansa was the largest in the entire protectorate. Although Tanga has now far surpassed Muansa, according to official trade statistics, the flow of trade from the Uganda Railway to the north of the protectorate is still quite significant, as total trade across the inland border amounted to over 4 million Marks in the year 1908/09 for the districts of Moschi, Schirati, Muansa and Bukoba, of which Muansa alone accounted for over 3 million Marks.” [9: p40]

Wettich continued: “The Uganda Railway’s area of ​​influence has expanded even further. It primarily carries mail for eastern Congo and will, once the Cape-Cairo Railway is completed (which already reaches as far as Elizabethville in Katanga, north of Broken Hill in Rhodesia), further expand its reach.” [9: p40-41]

It seems that the German authorities were anticipating the completion of Cecil Rhodes Cape to Cairo railway and a link from it to the Uganda Railway. Had the Cape to Cairo Railway become a reality, the British would have had access to the Katanga Mines, unless the Usambara Railway was to be extended to Lake Victoria in the meantime! Or the German East Africa’s Central Railway has reached Lake Tanganyika. Wettich quoted British reports that not only was the Central Railway about to embark on an extension to Tabora, but that preliminary work on the Tabora-Tanganyika section of the Central Railway has already begun with Holtzmann as the construction company in conjunction with the Regierung project. [9: p41] Regierung projects were large scale German state-contracted (“Regierung” or government-related) infrastructure projects such as the construction of the Reichstag building in Berlin. [10]

Wettich continues: “Possible terminus points for [the Central Railway] are Udjidji, Kigoma, or Kirando. Private proposals favour the Mpapua or Kilimatinde-southern tip of Lake Tanganyika route, but these have less prospects than the Rabora-Kirando line. [The Central Railway] would offer significant advantages over the Cape-Cairo and Uganda railways, particularly with regard to ore transport to the mines in the Katanga region. However, the possible more southerly line would be even more advantageous, especially since it also intersects the coalfields of East Africa and would thus enable the processing of Katanga tin and copper ores between Nyasa and Tanganyika.” [9: p41]

The Current Counteracting Effect (in 1910/11) of the Usambara Railway Against the Influence of the Uganda Railway

Wettich saw a future in which the Usambarabahn would challenge to Uganda Railway in significance. The Uganda Railway had demonstrated the extent to which a railway projected according to commercial principles could boost trade, agriculture, and industry over a wide area, including in Uganda itself, the Uganda Railway resulted in lively development in all areas. [9: p41]

Wettich argued that the completion of the Usambarabahn (Nordbahn) to Lake Victoria would undoubtedly bring similar successes.  He demonstrated in his paper the influence of the existing Usambara Railway on the development of the land. He noted that some time after the extension of the Usambara Railway from Mombo to Buiko and after the start of construction work on the new Buiko-Same line, export traffic on the Usambara Railway had increased by approximately 75%. He notes too, in 1910/11, that a shift in traffic across the border from the Uganda Railway in favour of the Usambara Railway had already begun. [9: p41]

He pointed also to the beneficial effects of railway construction on the terrain alongside the railway through private branch lines, and how engineering could overcome even difficult terrain conditions with railway lines featuring switchbacks and even the 1500 m high slopes of the Usambara massif by means of a cableway. [9: p41]

Wettich concluded his paper by saying: “It is undeniable that the activities of the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company in the north of [German East Africa] are already of the greatest benefit, and that with regard to the Usambara Mountains, the German Timber Company for East Africa has created an excellent transport route with the Sigibahn railway, and furthermore, the firm Adolf Bleichert & Co. in Leipzig, with the Neu-Hornow-Mkumbara cableway, is undoubtedly an engineering work of the first rank, while the company Wilkens & Wiese, with the same project, has created a cultural work of the highest importance. On the one hand, the cableway and the rich timber resources of the Usambara Massif allowed the highlands to be used profitably, but on the other hand farms undertaking agriculture and animal husbandry, supplied the needs of the plantation-growing plain.” [9: p41-42]

As we have already seen, Wettich’s relatively positive assessment of the Usambarabahn was contradicted by Hill who saw, with the benefit of hindsight, a future of increased indebtedness ahead of the railway company as the first world war loomed.

In ‘Permanent Way Volume II‘ Hill went on to describe some of the factors which contributed to the relatively poor performance of the Usambarabahn: “Apart from the more serious mistakes and setbacks, the construction and operation of the Nordbahn produced the comedy of errors that is part and parcel of any pioneer enterprise in Africa.” [8: p79]

He pointed to: intermittent friction between the German administration and the railway authorities with trivial incidents becoming major issues; times when German thoroughness lost a sense of proportion; loss of tax revenue on ivory; petty disputes over the rights of Lenz & Co. to import materials for railway construction without facing customs duty; an inordinate number of minor matters being referred to the Colonial Office in Berlin; minor battles over the duties and capability of Goan engine-drivers and a further possibility of training African staff as engine drivers; poor relations with the Usambara Post; and excessive parsimony which included a failure to ensure that clocks were synchronised and a reluctance to provide effectively lighting for the nighttime use of passenger stock and platforms at stations. [8: p79-83]

The First World War and its Aftermath

The Usambarabahn was a critical asset in German East Africa during World War I. It served as a vital logistical link for German Schutztruppe forces before being captured by British forces in 1916.

Initially British forces sought to take Tanga from the sea. An expeditionary force (Indian Expeditionary Force B) made up, primarily, of Punjabl soldiers under the leadership of General Michael Tighe left Bombay and travelled to Mombasa. The journey took over two weeks. The Punjabi troops had not been to sea before and suffered miserably from sea-sickness. “To a man, they were dispirited, discouraged and wretched.” [19]

It was decided that “the British East Africa force under Brigadier Stewart was to attack at Longido, a post on a mountain north-west of Kilimanjaro, to coincide with the attack on Tanga. The little information that was available about the German troops indicated that the main German Force was at Moshi at the northern end of the Moshi to Tanga railway line. Tanga was thought to be unoccupied by troops. The fact that German troops could be quickly rushed down the railway if Tanga was attacked was largely ignored.” [19]

C. J. Thornhill describes the battle: “On arriving at the German port of Tanga the troopships and HMS Fox anchored outside the harbour and a message was sent to the enemy to the effect that the British meant to bombard the town; but a generous period was given to get the women and children out of danger. This prolonged period of grace proved the undoing of the British and resulted in the cruel butchery in cold blood of many of our men. The German Commander, Von Lettow, took full advantage of every hour. He had only a few men at the time to defend Tanga, but at once set his railway running day and night at high pressure, sending almost every man in the country who could fire a gun to Tanga. … Fortifications and earthworks were thrown up around Tanga and the country mapped out until the defence of the place, where our forces were about to attack, was fully prepared. When the time was up, our men landed in open boats and barges. The Naval Officers and Blue Jackets with their great guns were itching to bombard the place where our men were to land, thus rendering it safe; but not a shot was fired. The troops were massed on the foreshore. They started to advance towards the town and the waiting and entrenched Germans opened fire with machine guns on our men, who calmly returned fire in spite of being mown down like ripe corn. The Germans held their positions, our men were exposed and at a disadvantage; and with heavy losses slowly retired to their boats.” [20] [19: p 13] No supporting fire from HMS Fox was possible as the depth of penetration of British forces was not know. Additionally, “a regiment of Indian troops fled from the battlefield. They had never before faced machine gun fire and were further panicked by swarms of bees from their nests in the trees, who, frightened by the gun fire, indiscriminately attacked the troops both Indian and German. Some men received more than a hundred stings and at a decisive moment even the machine guns of one of von Lettow’s companies were put out of action. The bulk of our forces embarked in the boats and got safely away, but there were not enough vessels to take everybody, as some of the boats were still away bringing in equipment. The poor fellows who had to remain behind desperately kept back the enemy while embarkation slowly took place, but they became weaker and weaker and at last were forced right back to the water and seeing there was no cover, had to surrender. But the blood-thirsty enemy Askaris, finding them helpless, rushed down and butchered them.” [20][19: p13]

After their victory at Tanga, von Lettow’s tactics were to change. “Tanga was one of the very few ‘conventional’ confrontations between the Allies and the Germans. Most of the four year campaign was a prolonged chase of the German troops through some of the most inhospitable country in Africa. The German policy was usually to avoid confrontation and tie up as many allied troops and resources as possible.” [19: p13]

The confrontation at Longido, ultimately, went little better for British forces: “The Germans initially thought that the Allies planned to invade German East Africa from Longido in the north. Many of the German troops were at Longido rather than Tanga. Due to a breakdown in communications these troops had not received the orders to proceed to Tanga, and were strongly positioned on a ridge halfway up a mountain. The British column approached the German lines by night but found itself in a thick mist 1,500 feet above the plain. When the mist lifted a strong German force attacked and was only beaten off after a fierce counter attack by the Punjabis. Unfortunately, however, the firing had stampeded the mule train, which careered back down the slopes leaving the Punjabis without water. Isolated, without prospect of support and with no water under the hot sun the Punjabis decided to withdraw under cover of darkness.” [19: p14]

Initially, after the Battle of Tanga, von Lettow “assembled his men and their scant supplies to attack the Uganda railway in British East Africa (Kenya). Apparently these attacks and the much later ones on Northern Rhodesia were the only times in the First World War that British administered territory was occupied by German troops.” [19: p14] “The story of the failure at Tanga was cabled by General Aitken to London on 5 November 1914. It was a bitter shock to the British Government who until then had displayed little interest in the East African campaign.” [19: p16]

The failure of British amphibious assault at Tanga in November 1914 brought about a change in British tactics. They built a new railway line from Voi (on the Uganda Railway) to Maktau (and later extended it to Kahe) to disrupt the Usambara line’s supply chain and ultimately to support their own offensive.

From December 1914 to February 1916, the British campaign in East Africa was “almost entirely on the defensive against an enemy who was unable to launch a large scale offensive. For 15 months von Lettow … was able to perfect his little army which eventually consisted of some 14,000 soldiers, most of them well trained and well disciplined. Von Lettow was fluent in the Swahili language which earned him the respect and admiration of the Askaris. He appointed black officers and said, and believed, “we are all Africans here”. In one historian’s opinion no other white commander of the era had so keen an appreciation of the black African’s worth not only as a fighting man but as a man. During this 15 month lull in military activity von Lettow had to consider ways and means of maintaining his blockaded economy. Von Lettow was not only an excellent administrator and a talented commander; he was also a brilliant improviser which meant that he was able to rally the people of German East Africa to supply him with all the much needed medicines including quinine which was produced from wood bark by a Biological Institute at Usambara.” [19: p17]

A map of the area of the East Africa Campaign in the First World War. [19: p22]

The British offensive in East Africa took place in February and March 1916.

In November 1915, the British War Cabinet approved the plan of sending South Africans to East Africa to bolster forces there. By early 1916 the situation in East Africa was worsening for the Germans. The Schutztruppe was now reaching its peak strength, 2,712 Europeans, 11,637 Askaris and 2,591 auxiliaries. The bulk of these were placed in the Kilimanjaro area. The South African Lieutenant-General Jan C. Smuts was appointed to take command in British East Africa. The staff found that they might be replaced by Smuts’s henchmen, all “amateur” soldiers. Smuts’ appointment considerably helped recruitment in South Africa. For the Allies, January 1916 marked the arrival of the first South African reinforcements and two Indian battalions from the Western Front. On 19th February 1916, Tighe, was at the quayside in Mombasa to welcome Smuts and within days, confidence had returned to British East Africa. [19: p19]

Smuts, like his opponent von Lettow, was anxious at that time to avoid a stand up fight. He was determined to out manoeuvre von Lettow from every position as quickly and painlessly as possible, without actually defeating him openly in the field. Many of the British officers thought Smuts wrong; they thought that von Lettow should be conquered there and then in one blow, no matter what the cost while the South Africans were still eager and fresh.” [19: p21]

The British first secured Moshi and having done so, General Smuts discovered that the bulk of the Schutztruppe had not moved west but had withdrawn down the Usambara Railway. Smuts ordered an advance through thick bush towards Kahe station, south of Moshi. Although Kahe was von Lettow’s headquarters, when the British arrived there, they found it abandoned. The northern end of the Usambarabahn had been captured and essentially British East Africa was now safe from invasion.

The pattern for the future of the campaign had been set. Von Lettow would slowly retreat, fighting just enough to weary and tax the British, never too much to suffer too many casualties himself, taking every advantage of natural cover, using every ounce of guile and wit that he possessed to keep as large a force of Allied forces in East Africa as possible. Already von Lettow’s 6,000 troops in the northern area had caused a good deal of trouble to the invading force of about 45,000 men.” [19: p29]

In May 1916, British forces under Brigadier-General J.A. Hannyngton pursued von Lettow’s small force down the Usambarabahn towards Tanga. “The railway, had been destroyed by the Germans as they retired, and behind Hannyngton’s column came three hard worked companies of engineers who restored the line as they went. The railway line was re-laid at about two miles a day, a remarkable rate in the circumstances.” [19: p35]

A diversion bridge under construction by the 25th Railway Company: Sappers and Miners 9th July 2016 on the Usambarabahn in German East Africa. The location is not known, (c) Public Domain. [21: p13]

Harry Fecitt comments: “On 14th May reconstruction of the Usambara Railway south of Ruvu commenced; the Germans had demolished the Ruvu bridge but the Corps 7 erected an 18-metre girder bridge on 20th May. From then onwards on the 320 kilometres of track leading to Tanga every bridge had been destroyed. However the demolitions had been hasty and planned ineffectively and the Corps could quickly make track diversions or re-build bridges. In many places the track had been torn up and the fastenings thrown into the bush, in other places the fastenings only had been removed, and elsewhere each alternate rail joint had been blown up. The track was repaired through Lembeni, Same, Makania, Hedaru and ‘German Bridge’ stations, the latter being reached on 20th June. ‘German Bridge’ was the last suitable crossing point over the Pangani River until Maurui is reached 80 kilometres further on. The Germans had started building a bridge here and the British completed the construction.” [21: p6-7 – for the full text of Fecitt’s article , please see Appendix C below]

By September 1916, British and Indian forces had fully captured the Usambarabahn. The Indian Railway Corps worked rapidly to repair the damage, erecting diversions and rebuilding bridges like the one at the Ruvu River to restore functionality for Allied logistics. The line was quickly operational and now connected to the Uganda Railway via the link between Voi and Moshi/Kahe.

The Usambara Railway after the First World War and on into the 21st century

Under the British mandate after World War I, “the railway was integrated into the East African Railways system, with an 86-kilometre extension from Moshi to Arusha completed and opened to traffic on 13th December 1929, enhancing connectivity to Kenya’s Uganda Railway via a link at Voi and boosting trade revenues from £108,000 in 1920 to £704,000 by 1929.” [3][4][5]

The adjacent route map highlights all the significant locations on the Usambara Railway. In the next article in this series we will look at what can be seen of the line in the 21st century.

Following Germany’s defeat in WWI, Britain took control of Tanganyika and the railway, officially managing it under the Tanganyika Railways and Port Services.

We have already noted the connection to Kenya which improved regional logistics. Between the two world wars, the Usambara Railway served as the primary transport corridor for the agricultural and mineral outputs of the Kilimanjaro and Arusha regions, connecting them to the coastal port of Tanga.

Annual revenues: 1920 £108,000; 1921 £157,000; 1922 £197,000; 1923 £223,000; 1924 £238,000; 1925 £333,000; 1926 £388,000; 1927 £461,000;
1928 £581,000; 1929 £704,000; projected
1939 £2,500,000. [22]

The brochure for the opening of the railway to Arusha [22] commented that, “There [were] … areas open to settlers in the ‘Ufiome Triangle’ and Mbulu, and these areas [were] fast becoming settled. There is little doubt that at no distant future these districts will be served by a railway connecting Arusha with the Central Line.” [22: p19]

The bridge over the Tengeru River on the line between Moshi and Arusha. [23]

The brochure goes on to say that Arusha would not remain the railhead for any great period. The Tanganyika Government had “in view a connection with the Central Line, but whether this projected line [would] run via Mbugwe, Kondoa, Irangi and Dodoma or via Mbugwe, Singida and Manyoni, [was] at present not decided. … Gen. Hammond and the General Manager of the Tanganyika Railways recently discussed the projected line with local public bodies who were in favour of the latter route.” [22: p19]

In either case the projected line [would] tap the rich ‘Ufiome Triangle’ and the highlands West of the Rift Valley escarpment. Fifty to Sixty farms [had] been taken up in recent years in the sub-district of Mbulu, both above and below the escarpment.” [22: p19]

There [was] also under consideration a branch from the Moshi-Arusha line to Engare Nairobi on the western slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, and such line it [was] hoped, [would] later be joined with the Kenya and Uganda Railway near Kajiado, thus shortening the north and South route considerably and making direct communication with the Kenya capital.” [22: p19]

Needless to say, neither of these development were ultimately pursued.

Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the line was primarily used to move agricultural produce (such as sisal and coffee) from the Usambara Mountains and Moshi area to the port of Tanga. During this period, the line shifted from a primarily military-geopolitical tool designed for German “Cape-to-Cairo” ambitions into an economic engine for the British colonial administration, particularly linking the Highlands to the coast. Passenger Service during the interwar years was sometimes handled by diesel multiple units (DMUs), a modernization compared to the purely steam-driven German era. The railway also facilitated the arrival and settlement of merchant families, particularly
Asian merchants, who consolidates trade in the interior, establishing themselves at various stations along the line. [23]

After the second world war, the Usambarabahn (Tanga line) in Tanganyika was integrated into the East African Railways (EAR) system. It played a key role in regional commerce, facilitating growth in towns like Arusha by the late 1940s.

In 1964,the line was linked to the Central Line via the Ruvu-Mruazi Link. This connected Tanga to Dar es Salaam facilitating better communication and trade in Tanzania. After the 1977 dissolution of the EAR, line became part of the Tanzania Railways Corporation.

The lines shown in red on this map of Tanzania are the metre-gauge lines of the Tanzania Railways Corporation. The railway shown by an orange line is the 3ft 6in-gauge Tazara Express line connecting Dar es Salaam with Zambia, (c) Jkan997 and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 3.0). [26]

In the 21st century, trains no longer travel as far as Arusha, although the railway company maintains a station in Arusha and still employs a station master there. Perhaps a hope remains that regular services might resume! [27]

References

The references appear immediately after the Appendices (A, B and C) below.

Appendix A: Developments in Farming and Land use in the German Protectorate in the areas around the Usambara Railway

These notes are a partial translation of a section of a paper presented to the German Association for the Promotion of Industryby Hans Wettich in 1911, written, probably, in 1910. [9]

Wettich provides an interesting interlude in the story of the Usambara Railway by examining the performance of a variety of crops introduced into plantations around the line of the railway. Plantation managers first turned to tobacco but discovered quickly that the African soil was light on the necessary nutrients to support more than minor local production. Plantation managers then turned to Coffee which also failed. [9: p4]

Wilkens & Wiese was formed in Tanga on 21st February 1898 with the acquisition of 3000 hectares to be used for a Coffee plantation in Ambangulu in the mountain triangle bordered by Luengera, Pangani and Mkomasi in western Usambara. clearance of the virgin forest commenced but with the intention of keeping as much of the cleared timber as possible for useful projects to limit the capital outlay on the project.

It turned out that, while the Javanese coffee seed developed well, the yield was poor, even with efforts made to improve soils quality. The company survived off the income of the sawmill that it set up to make the best use of cleared timber. The company decided that the plantation, dependent on coffee alone, could not get by. The expenses of the company amounted to 60000 Marks per year, which at a price of 60 Marks/hundredweight of coffee required a minimum harvest of 1000 hundredweight of Coffee. Only in 1907, however, was the harvest more, namely 1350 hundredweight. In 1908, only 350 hundredweight was produced. This improved in 1909 to about 800 hundredweight. It was therefore necessary to look for other more profitable plantation plants and the company gradually reduced the coffee stock from 700,000 trees/bushes to 300,000. [9: p4-5]

The other plantations in the North, with the exception of those in the Kilimanjaro area, also continued coffee cultivation only to a limited extent. Namely only in wind-protected and low-lying locations that allow intensive cultivation through fertilization and the necessary shading. On average, from 1903 to 1907, coffee worth 420,000 to 525,000 Marks was exported annually (330,000 to 500,000 kg per year). Only in 1908/09 was it possible to produce 650,000 kg with a value of 800,000 Marks due to a favorable harvest and good prices. [9: p5]

To increase the profitability of the plantation in Ambangulu, initial trials were conducted with quinine, but these were soon abandoned because the quinine trees suffered from vandalism during the dry season. Then, the Gerber Acacia [14] was cultivated, its bark contains 45% tannins and it allows for practical and inexpensive cultivation, as the tree, coppiced every 6-8 years, resprouts from the root. All areas in Ambangulu unsuitable for coffee cultivation were planted with Gerber Acacia. An additional benefit with these trees was that they provided the necessary wind protection for the coffee plants. On this plantation, 20 hectares were planted with Gerber Acacia, while in the Wilhelmsthal district, a total of 36 hectares were planted on 15 plantations, and 74 hectares were planted on 20 plantations. Wettich commented that, as of 1910, it was still questionable as to whether the Gerber Acacia would prove successful. [9: p5]

Meanwhile, trials conducted by the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani, in East Usambara, had shown that the rubber tree (Manioc Glasiovii) and the Sisal Agave would provide usable plantation plants for Usambara. However, Ambangulu, at an altitude of 1200 m, was too high for rubber cultivation, and the soil was too undulating for the cultivation of sisal agave, as its cultivation is only recommended in the lowlands, since harvesting is difficult due to the spines on the leaves, whose significant weight also necessitates extensive transport equipment. [9: p5]

In order to put their planting company on a more reliable footing, Wilkens & Wiese decided to acquire land in the plain for planting Manioc and Sisal. Therefore, in 1906, the Kosalowe sisal plantation in the Pangani plain, which was in the process of being built, was purchased. It sat a 5 hour journey from Ambangulu.. There, 1,300,000 agaves were planted in three years, which yielded the first harvest as early as 1909. [9: p6]

The importance of Sisal cultivation in German East Africa can be seen in the official memorandum of 1908/09. The value of the hemp export from the Protectorate rose from a little more than 300,000 Marks in 1903 to almost 3 million marks in 1908, despite the fact that the prices in Manila fell from 900 marks per ton in 1907 to 520 marks in 1908 and fell to 480 marks in 1909. [9: p6]

The total export for 1909/10 showed a decrease in value compared to the previous year of about 500,000 marks, but an increase in exports of approximately 1400 tons. The Usambara region exported 2730 tons of hemp in 1907/08, 3873 tons in 1908/09, 5394 tons in 1909/I0. Cost price per ton was at most 300 marks. Even including shipment costs there remained a worthwhile profit of at least 180 marks per ton, even with the low hemp price in 1910. [9: p6]

It is therefore understandable that the sisal cultivation, which in 1906/07 covered 10,553 ha with 31 million heads, grew in 1908/09 to 14,316 ha with 40 million heads, and in 1909/10 to 17,141 ha with 45.25 million heads. Usambara and the district of Wilhelmsthal were part of this effort with their sisal plantations increasing from 2 million agaves and 650 ha in 1907 to 4.75 million agaves and 1490 ha in 1908/09. [9: p6]

In view of this great growth, the management of the Usambara Railway decided to run special Sisal wagons on the line, of which 3 were ordered in 1910. These wagons can be opened and closed in the middle of the roof by a horizontally movable ceiling, so that the wagon compartment can be completely filled with a load. [6]

Other crops were, in 1910, at least for Usambara, still under experimantation. [9: p6]

Cotton, on which great hopes were placed, is worth mentioning, but its cultivation in Usamhara does not seem to have been particularly successful. While its cultivation was spreading as an indigenous crop in the centre and south of the country, it was planted almost exclusively as an intermediate crop between annual Sisal Agaves in the Tanga and Wilhelmsthal districts. This probably explains the decline in crops reported for 1908/09 in the district of Wilhelmsthal, where only 1076 ha were planted in the previous year, while for 1909/10 an increase was recorded in the northern districts. However, the yield was affected by excessively wet weather in 1910/11. [9: p6-7]

Sugar cane wass planted in the Pangani Plain by Indians and Arabs, and it was not until 1909/10 that a European settler began cultivation of sugar cane in the Pangani area. While in 1907/08 exports were as high as 170,000 kg of sugar, in 1909 they fell to 10,000 kg. The official report for 1908/09 attributes this to the fact that the local sugar is being used up by the needs of the plantations in the Usambara region itself, and this decline is therefore a sign of the strong development of this region after the northern railway opened the way to the sea. [7]

With the exception of the north-west districts, rice had only found local importance, as had bananas. Beans, which are grown with great success in southern Uganda,were less important for Usambara. On the other hand, it seemed that the rubber plantations will be destined for greater success, in spite of the fact that the demand for labourers is about twice as great as for a Sisal plantation of the same size. The former reluctance of the planters, especially in the north-eastern districts, has subsided as a result of increased prices on the world market. [9: p7]

Coconut also found its way into the Usambara region. In 1908/09, 26 hectares were already planted with 2580 young coconut palms in the district of Wilhelmsthal. [9: p7]

Woodlands

In addition to the plantation economy, the mountains have gained in importance for Usambara. In a report in the “Deutsche Kolonialzeitung”, the Imperial Chief Forester Eckert estimates the usable areas aroud the Usambara Railway and its extension at about 125,000 ha. There are, however, significantl;y larger forest areas accessible

In any case, significantly larger forest areas were accessible via branch lines. On 1st April 1910, the authorities owned about 382,056 hectares of forest reserves in the entire Protectorate, of which 62,965 hectares were in the Wilhelmsthal-Tanga-Pangani forest district alone. About 39,000 ha of forest reserves were in preparation in these districts in 1910. However, the government only exploited the forests if there were no perceived difficulties such as the Mangrove forests in the Rufidji Delta. Otherwise, the use of forests was leased. The size of the leased fiscal forests in the entire protected area in 1908/09 was 16,000 ha, in which 4480 cubic metres of timber were felled with a levy to the tax authorities of 46,300 Rupees. The government’s own felling, on the other hand, amounted to only 6665 cubic metres. For 1909/10 the leased fiscal forest area was 21200 ha, which produced a levy of 9184 Rupees for the tax authorities. [9: p7]

The Composition of the Holdings

As far as the forests of Usambara were concerned, the trees were of mixed quality. There were are hardwoods, some of which were difficult to use because of their hardness. Easily splitable wood species were already in use by natives, but according to a report by Chief Forestry Officer Dr. Haug, Stuttgart, there are only 2 varieties of industrially viaable coniferous woods. Uniform stands of the same wood species are hardly found. Unusable woods, such as the poisonous Kandela Acacia, often swamp other varieties. [9: p8]

There are some of the hardwoods that can be used for construction in spite of their hardness and are increasingly being sold in the country itself. There are also some woods that are excellently suited for the furniture industry and joinery, including mahogany. This type of wood is planted out in suitable places during reforestation. Planting experiments have also been made in quarries with various types of teak wood, which show favourable success in humid locations, so that it is to be expected that the forests of Usambara will increase in value quite significantly through afforestation with these precious woods. However, teak cultivation in quarries will be abandoned, as most of it is on dry soil and tends to be covered by the existing canopy and so very dry. [9: p8]

For the lowlands, the characteristic wood species is the Mangrove, which is felled because of the rich tannin content of its bark. In 1909/10, for example, the bark harvested by private individuals in the entire Protectorate was 3,506,480 kg! [9: p8]

In the primeval forests found at around 1200 m above sea-level there were some isolated extraordinarily mighty trunks. Also there was Mkweo wood (which grows in long, bright trunks of good strength and it has properties equivalent to American walnut wood), after being taken to the sawmill of Messrs. Wilkens & Wiese in Ambangulu, wood was carried on a 20 km long light railway to the Usambara Railway and via Tanga to Hamburg, where it was sold by a trader in overseas woods, Janson & Pielstick. It had by 1910/11 proved itself excellent for telephone boxes and was used for the interior of the D-train cars, and the cabins and salons of the large ships. Wettich sited work ongoing on a Reichspost steamer and a large steamer of the Hamburg-America Line, currently under construction.

Mkweo was also used in parquet flooring and was exhibited in this form in Brussels. It was noted as having a calm, distinguished tone, Its wood had not, in 1910/11, yet been used for furniture although Mkweo was much cheaper than American walnut. Wettich anticipated that the furniture industry would soon adopt the wood, as its use for railway, ship and telephone purposes guarantees its good properties. The sawmill in Ambangulu, which also cuts the camphor-like smelling yellowish Mkeneneholz, which shows hardly any tendency to crack and is available in dense and large blocks, currently also supplies other timber for private and state institutes and enterprises, furthermore it also supplied Mareka, a magnificent, heavy and hard wood with a very beautiful grain, which Wettich was sure would soon be in use for interior design and as a veneer for furniture. [9: p8-9]

It is worth noting that Mkweo timber (also known as Mbane in Nguru), hard and yellow, was much used locally and exported to Germany where it was used for wagons and shipbuilding, including luxury panelling etc. Supplies were about exhausted by 1945 and it is presumably very scarce now. [15] I have not been able to find further references to Mkeneneholz timber.

The German Timber Company for East Africa of Berlin, harvested at approximately the same altitudes on the banks of the Sigi River, wood of yellow to dark brown colour, which resembled teak but was considerably lighter, hard and strong in colour. The wood was gladly bought by the wagon and shipbuilding industries at a price of 145 marks per cubic metre. The company also supplied grey, occasionally yellowish, single-grained Matamba wood which was used in-country for handicrafts, and the oak-like Kengeholz (yellowish brown) wood. These woods from the Sigi River area were very light and easy to work with with great hardness and strength. [9: p9]

In spite of the country’s own abundance of wood, it had not been possible in the Protectorate (by 1910/11) to completely displace the Nordic pine and spruce wood, which had the advantage of cheapness. On the coast in 1907 a cubic metre cost 64 marks. At that price, even the company Wilkens & Wiese still had to use Norwegian wood for its roof construction work. [9: p9-10]

Significantly more valuable than the stands of the plain and the middle altitudes were the forests of the Usambara plateau, which are located at an altitude of about 2000 m. Here were the Schagai Forest, the Magamba Forest and especially the Schummewald. In these primeval forests there are often scattered numerous cedars, whose trunks sometimes reach a height of 40 to 50 metres and have diameters of up to 2 metres or more. [] The wood is comparatively soft, so that it can be used as pencil wood, all the more so as the American cedar is becoming rarer and of a lower quality according to the trade. Brush handles, long pipe stems and camera bodies for the tropics are further products from it. The most beautifully coloured blocks of the yellow to intense red and polishable, mahagony-like wood would also be adopted by the furniture industry for luxury furniture. To have recognized the value of these forests is the merit of Hermann von Wissmann, who drew Mr. Wiese’s attention to them early on. Today, the government has concluded a number of lease agreements for the use of wood in Usambara, and according to the official report for I909/10 from the Schummewald, about 1240 cubic meters of cedar wood have been used this year. Experimental plantings with the cigar box wood cedar of the Cedrala odorata have also been successfully carried out in Amani, so that the production of this wood for Usambara is also secured. [9: p10-11]

Another precious wood of the Schummewald, which could be used primarily for the furniture industry and handicrafts, was the white, slightly grained Podocarpus wood, [9: p11][17]

Appendix B: The Industrial development of northern German East Africa under the influence of the Usambara Railway, its branch lines and road extensions

These notes are a partial translation of a section of a paper presented to the German Association for the Promotion of Industryby Hans Wettich in 1911, written, probably, in 1910. [9]

As significant progress in the construction of the Usambara Railway occurred, parallel developments prospered. This was particularly noticeable in the area of Kilimanjaro and Mount Meru, where the first section of the Kilimanjaro Road, extending from the railway line for a distance of 134 km, was completed in 1909. Another road ran from Same, an intermediate station on the new Usambara Railway line (350 km), via Moshi to Arusha, which opened up the southwestern slopes of the Pare Mountains and connected to individual settlement areas via access roads. In addition to settler plantations, along these transport routes, native settlements and cultivation occurred.  A road from Mombo to Wilhelmsthal and from there on to the Kwai Domain, Mount Magamba, and the Schumme Forest was also  constructed. [9: p36]

Furthermore, agricultural and mining enterprises in the area of the northern valley were on the rise. Trade and commerce had experienced a significant increase, which was reflected in strong attendances at markets. The upswing was also characterized by the increase in timber harvesting concessions, which in 1909/10 amounted to slightly over 5000 hectares in the three forest districts of Tanga, Panguni, and Wilhelmsthal.

Industrially, the Mukomassi-Wasser-development company was at work. It intended to construct a power plant in the valley of the upper Mukomassi on the Usambara railway. This would, when open, process the rich clay deposits located there into aluminum using electrical means.

In 1908/09, the latest year for which information was available to Wettich, only mining operations existed, such as in the district of Wilhelmsthal for precious minerals and shared prospecting fields. Mica mining fields were put into operation in West Usambara in 1909/10.

Appendix C: The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919

Introduction

In early August 1914 India was tasked with providing Indian Expeditionary Forces (IEFs) ‘B’ and ‘C’ for service in East Africa, and the provision of a Railway Corps was included in the organisation of IEF ‘B’ that was destined for German East Africa (GEA). The 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners, under Majors C.F. Anderson and C.W. Wilkinson, both Royal Engineers, along with the Traffic and Locomotive Reserve of the two companies were mobilised at Sialkot and Quetta. Each company was around 300 men strong; an accompanying Coolie Corps of 300 men was raised mostly from the relatives of the company personnel. The officers were nearly all civilian railway officers of the Indian State Railways or Royal Engineer officers employed under the Indian Railway Board. The skills included survey, construction and operation. Major Anderson was medically repatriated soon after arrival and Lieutenant H.L. Woodhouse, Royal Engineers, then commanded the 25th Railway Company. Sir William Johns CIE was appointed Director of Railways.

The Indian Railway Board provided equipment sufficient for the repair and running of a section of the German East Africa railway. This equipment included 10 miles (16 kilometres) of 50-pound track, a large surplus of sleepers, 15 locomotives, nearly 200 trucks, a large number of pine baulks, a number of 20-foot and 40-foot bridge spans, cranes, pile drivers, machine tools, hand tools of all sorts, survey instruments, tents and office necessities. The companies brought out their own telegraph equipment but this was later handed over to the Indian Telegraph unit that carried out all the telegraph work of the railways and tramways.

Initial Employment in British East Africa

The Railway Corps arrived in two ships at Tanga in GEA where IEF ‘B’ was scheduled to land. Tanga was the Indian Ocean terminal of the German Usambara Railway that ran to Moshi near Mount Kilimanjaro; the British later named this line The Northern Railway. IEF ‘B’ failed to defeat the German force at Tanga and re-embarked; the Railway Corps stayed on its ships throughout the Tanga fight. IEF ‘B’ then steamed up to Kilindini, the port at Mombasa in British East Africa (BEA). Mombasa was the ocean terminal for the British Uganda Railway that ran up to Lake Victoria. IEF ‘B’ disembarked at Kilindini on 9th November 1914 and merged with IEF ‘C’ that had arrived in BEA in September.

A Railway Corps survey party commenced delineating a route for a military railway from Voi on the Uganda Railway westwards towards Moshi in GEA. The Railway Companies took over the defence of the Uganda Railway, sections of which were under threat from enemy raiding parties from GEA. Once all the stores had been landed it was decided to return most of the locomotive and traffic staff and the civilian officers to India, from where they could be easily recalled. In late December the two companies were moved from railway defence to construction work on the Kajiado to Longido road; better use was now made of their technical expertise and qualifications in the construction of roads, fortified posts and water supplies. The 25th Company went to Namanga and Longido and the 26th Company was based at Bissel.

Railway Construction

In February 1915 the decision was made to construct the first 40 miles (65 kilometres) of the one metre-guage military line from Voi towards Moshi in order to connect the military posts at Bura and Maktau. Twenty five miles of track were sent from India, 5 Miles were borrowed from the Uganda Railway, and the Corps already possessed 10 miles. The Railway Board in India continued its excellent support to the Corps by delivering to site the 25 miles of track only seven weeks after receiving the indent in India. The specialists were recalled from India and the companies were moved to Voi; material was moved up from Kilindini.

The construction method used was that one company laid track whilst the other worked ahead building the next bridge. Local labour for bush-cutting and earthworks was recruited from the Wataita tribe with the help of the District Commissioner and a missionary of the Church Missionary Society. The Wataita proved to be intelligent men who were quick learners. The 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers had also landed with IEF ‘B’ and it had recently been employed in prolonging the Coonoor Railway to Ootacamund; when not tasked elsewhere the Pioneers provided useful support to the Corps. As the railhead advanced the Coolie Corps took over the maintenance of the track.

The Voi River was crossed and the first station opened at Mile 6.5 on 16th April. Heavy monsoon rains set in during May delaying the movement forward of supplies as the line needed constant repair and maintenance. On 31st May the bridge and station at Bura were opened at Mile 22. From now on the railway had to carry troops, supplies and water between Voi and Bura as well as construction material. The first section of the line was completed to Maktau on 23rd June. Whilst the railhead was advancing a big effort had been put into making Voi a suitable terminus for the military line. A workshop had been constructed, engines and rolling stock were brought up from Kilindini, a large store yard was established and an armoured train was built.

The armoured train, ‘Simba’, was built in the railway workshops in Nairobi to help counteract German mounted patrols that carried out nuisance raids on the railway between Mackinnon Road and Sultan Hamud, (c) Public Domain. [21: p2]

An unescorted Wataita earthwork gang was fired on by a German patrol and four men were wounded on 9th June; the Wataita were undeterred and asked if they could bring their bows and arrows to the worksite in future. The military line was blown up for the first time five days later, and after that the Germans blew the line every week, usually at around 2000 hours. This suited the repair gangs as they could make overnight repairs before the first morning train was run. The German demolitions were never very effective. On one occasion a train carrying the 130th (King George’s Own) Baluchis (Jacob’s Rifles) was pushing a truck loaded with sepoys’ kits ahead of it when an enemy mine detonated under the truck. A gap 0.75 metres in length was blown out of one of the rails but the complete train successfully passed over the gap and proceeded, with passenger and cargo damage being confined to some of the sepoys’ kits. The Germans had more success when attacking the Uganda Railway as that line often ran through desolate country and could be approached more easily.

A British attack at Mbuyuni, west of Maktau, failed on 14th July and that failure halted extension of the line. During this halt the companies constructed field works and defences and put in crossing stations and sidings on the Uganda Railway. A regular train service was introduced between Voi and Maktau and a Train Control System was installed. A second indent for 30 miles of track was sent to India and it arrived two months later. On November 13th 1915 the Director of Railways was placed in control of the Uganda Railway. This was done in order to ensure intimate cooperation between the Uganda Railway and the military line during the planned British offensive in early 1916. Officers and men of the Railway Corps were posted to the Uganda Railway whose operations were effectively militarised.

Platelaying began again in January 1916 and Mbuyuni, Mile 53.25, was reached on the 25th of that month, the Germans having withdrawn from the location two days earlier without fighting. Thousands of South African, British, Rhodesian, Indian and African troops were now being housed in camps along the military line and the supply of water in railway travelling tanks to these camps was a vital task for the Corps. Some relief was obtained when the engineers ran a pipeline from Bura, where the water was sourced, to Maktau. The British attacked Salaita Hill, west of Mbuyuni, on 12th February but the attack failed, the enemy counter-attacking to the railhead at Lanjoro, Mile 60.

This map illustrates the area of early operations in German East Africa. [21: p5]

Moving into German East Africa

The Germans withdrew from Salaita Hill and moved to defend the Latema-Reata hills just west of Taveta on the GEA and BEA border. The Corps pushed the military line westwards through dense bush, following up the advancing British troops. From drafts arriving from India and from within the existing Railway Companies the 27th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, was formed; the Company Commander was Captain R.E. Gordon, Royal Engineers. This allowed the Corps to continue platelaying in dangerous territory whilst providing its own security. The Lumi River was crossed and Taveta reached, Mile 75, on 23rd March. After a tough fight the Germans had withdrawn from the Latema-Reata position on 12th March, allowing the Corps to lay track over a saddle between the two hills.

The enemy was demolishing the Usambara Railway line as he withdrew down it and once Moshi was in British hands a half-company of the Corps repaired the track from Moshi to the Ruvu River. Meanwhile the railhead was advanced over what was the toughest stretch on the entire military line. The monsoon rains again fell heavily but three rivers were crossed and a dense forest penetrated; the soil was black-cotton and quickly became marsh resulting in platelaying being achieved under water. A junction with the Usambara line was made 20 kilometres below Moshi and 40 kilometres from Taveta on 25th April. This was just in time for the British troops in Moshi who had lost their road from Taveta to the monsoon rains and floods, and who now relied upon supplies arriving by train.

The South African General J.L. Van Deventer was tasked by the British theatre commander, General J.C. Smuts, to advance south-westwards through Arusha and Kondoa Irangi to the German Central Railway line that ran from Dar Es Salaam on the Indian Ocean coast to Lake Tanganyika in the interior. To assist the supply columns supporting the South Africans in getting across a large number of bad drifts on the initial stage of the road the Railway Corps was tasked with pushing a line westwards from Moshi over the Garanga River to Sanja, Mile 21 on this new short line. Sanja was reached by the end of June. At this time the 28th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, arrived from India commanded by Captain. E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, raising the establishment of the Railway Companies to that of a battalion. Lieutenant Colonel C.W. Wilkinson, Royal Engineers, was appointed Commandant of the Railway Battalion which became a unit in the Railway Corps.

Reconstructing the Usambara Railway

On 14th May reconstruction of the Usambara Railway south of Ruvu commenced; the Germans had demolished the Ruvu bridge but the Corps 7 erected an 18-metre girder bridge on 20th May. From then onwards on the 320 kilometres of track leading to Tanga every bridge had been destroyed. However the demolitions had been hasty and planned ineffectively and the Corps could quickly make track diversions or re-build bridges. In many places the track had been torn up and the fastenings thrown into the bush, in other places the fastenings only had been removed, and elsewhere each alternate rail joint had been blown up. The track was repaired through Lembeni, Same, Makania, Hedaru and ‘German Bridge’ stations, the latter being reached on 20th June. ‘German Bridge’ was the last suitable crossing point over the Pangani River until Maurui is reached 80 kilometres further on. The Germans had started building a bridge here and the British completed the construction.

Just beyond ‘German Bridge’ is Buiko, 180 kilometres from Tanga and the mid-point in the line. Mombo station, Mile 75, was opened on 29th June; from here the Germans had built a hand-powered field railway (trolley line) of 60 centimetres gauge to Handeni, 65 kilometres to the south. 25th Railway Company assisted the Royal Engineers in restoring this line as it also had been partially destroyed, and on completion this trolley line was very useful for moving supplies in support of General Smuts’ advance to Morogoro.

Fighting in the Infantry Role

On 4th July, railhead reached the Pangani River near Maurui and by the end of the month had reached Korogwe. However the German theatre commander, Colonel Paul von Lettow, had early in July tasked 500 or more of his troops as a ‘stay behind’ group to harass the British lines of communication in the area between Tanga, Maurui and Handeni. This enemy group successfully made a nuisance of itself by attacking convoys, mining roads, cutting telegraph and telephone lines and sniping from the bush. An attack by 170 German troops with a light gun had been repulsed at Zugunatto Bridge by the Jind Infantry on 13th July; the soldiers from the Princely State of Jind were amongst the best of the British troops. General Smuts ordered his Inspector General of Communications Brigadier General W.F.S. Edwards, a former BEA policeman, to resolve this problem. As Edwards had no spare infantry he decided to use the 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Indian Sappers and Miners, along with a few infantrymen, and reported this to General Smuts who made no comment. But Edwards did not confer with the Director of Railways who badly needed those two companies to stay on the job of railway restoration in order to alleviate supply problems. After dark on 13th July the two companies with 100 Jind Infantry, 50 British other ranks and 100 sepoys, moved out from Korogwe tasked with attacking Segera Hill and Mfumbile. Captain E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, commanded the companies and Lieutenant Colonel Wilkinson commanded the force.

The Railway Companies did well on Segera Hill, getting up to a machine gun, killing the German NCO in charge and capturing the gun in a bayonet assault. The German force withdrew hurriedly but counterattacked next day. The companies were up to their new task and broke the enemy assault. Lt Col Wilkinson now moved across country to deal with an enemy force at Hale, found that it had withdrawn to Kwa Mugwe, moved there and drove the enemy rear-guard away and then repelled another German counter-attack on 19th July. In these operations the machine guns of the accompanying Jind Infantry gave the Railway Companies the supporting firepower that they needed. The companies then returned to their railway duties, having taken a few casualties but doubtless with many war stories to tell. On 18th August Tanga was reached and the port and railway came into use for moving supplies from Kilindini to Korogwe where another 60-centimetre trolley line was constructed towards Handeni. The materials for this line came from abandoned German farms and plantations and the locomotion came from adapted Ford cars used as tractors and operated by the East Africa Motor Transport Corps.

The 600 mm trolley line serving Handeni. [21: p9]
Railway workshops in Nairobi converted many vehicles, including this Vauxhall, to carry supplies on the hastily rep lines in German East Africa. In three months over 300 miles of railway were repaired, enabling locomotives to take once more. [21: p10]

Incidents on the Central Railway

The Royal Navy along with infantry units advancing from Bagamoyo seized Dar Es Salaam, the GEA capital, on 4th September. A reconnaissance of the Central Railway between Morogoro and Dar Es Salaam showed that all bridges were down. Two Railway Companies were shipped to Dar Es Salaam to start repairing the track from that end and the other two were shipped to Bagamoyo; from Bagamoyo they moved overland to the dropped bridges over the Ruwu River which urgently needed reconstruction. The line was repaired for light use to Morogoro and mechanical transport units converted a selection of lorries to rail tractors, allowing the South African Pioneers to run a supply service westwards to Dodoma, 240 kilometres from Morogoro. Each tractor could pull 15 tons of trucks and freight. Further work was needed before the heavier steam trains could use the line but Dodoma was being supplied from Dar Es Salaam by steam trains on 1st January 1917. The South African Water Supply Corps gave constant support to the Railway Corps whenever a water supply point or a pumping station needed to be established, and large numbers of labourers from the South African Native Labour Corps were supplied to support the Corps; unfortunately many of these Africans succumbed to tropical diseases.

The Germans had destroyed many engines and trucks on the line but again their demolition work was unsatisfactory and did not greatly hinder the Corps. Troops from the Belgian Congo, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, had crossed Lake Tanganyika and fought their way to Tabora, where 40 engines and 200 trucks were found basically undamaged. These were shared with the Belgians. The Railway Corps moved its base from BEA to Dar Es Salaam but immediately had to support the engineers restoring the docks there; Corps cranes were used to unload ships and the companies constructed jetties and slipways. In January 1917 Major L.N. Malan, Royal Engineers, took over command of the Railway Battalion from Colonel Wilkinson who became Deputy Director of the Railway Corps.

In April 1917 a branch line was constructed from Dodoma on the Central Railway southwards towards the Ruaha River. 26th, 27th and 28th Railway Companies were involved in the work which lasted until August, when railhead reached Matikira, Mile 28. The country was very difficult to cross and the lack of shipping to bring down sleepers from Kilindini caused delay. As soon as this short line was no longer needed the rails were recovered and used elsewhere.

A bad accident occurred on the Central Railway on 5th May when a re-built bridge at Mkata collapsed at night in heavy rain, due to an original German pier proving to have insufficient foundations. Sixteen gunners from 24th (Hazara) Mountain Battery (Frontier Force) and four Askari from the King’s African Rifles were drowned when their cattle trucks fell into the swollen river. Many other men were badly injured when they were flung against weapons and stores in the trucks. 26th Railway Company was deployed to restore the damaged line.

On 29th August 1917 the station at Kahe, where the military line from Voi joined the Usambara Railway from Moshi, was unexpectedly attacked by enemy troops, causing consternation amongst rear-echelon elements in Nairobi. An enemy raiding party had broken away from the German forces in southern GEA and had advanced northwards across the Central Railway, attacking British and Belgian locations; former German Askari enthusiastically joined the raiders. Elements of the party got up to Lake Victoria and one small group attacked Kahe. Two trains were captured as they approached the station, then looted and burned. Three British officers were taken prisoner, the Station Master was mortally wounded and a number of porters and labourers were killed. Before withdrawing the Germans started one of the two trains and let it run towards Taveta, but an Indian engine driver who had escaped into the bush jumped into one of the two engines on the train and brought it under control. When the train was at a safe distance from Kahe the driver disconnected the carriages and drove the engines to Taveta, where he was given a prompt military award.

A Trolley Line in the Kilwa Area

Moving south the British now developed Kilwa Kisinjane as a port where men and supplies could be landed. Commencing in November 1916 a 60centimetre tramway was built by the Corps from the ocean to Kilwa Kivinje, a distance of 26 kilometres, and then onwards for a further 24 kilometres. The construction material was produced by stripping the trolley lines previously built from Mombo and Korogwe. Motor tractors were again used and a driver company and a supporting maintenance company were formed from mechanical transport personnel; these companies became sub-units in the Railway Corps.

However tropical diseases and ailments such as malignant malaria were now affecting the Corps badly and often far more men of all trades were sick than were at work. Also the driving of tractors on railway lines, especially around curves, was not as easy as many potential drivers thought and de-railings with consequent damage were frequent. Sixty more tractors were ordered from India and 50 more from South Africa; these were all converted Ford cars with bogie trucks in place of the front axle and with heavier back axles and box bodies. The first 16 kilometres of track was duplicated but in broader guage and steam trains ran along it, allowing swifter movement of men from the port to the first camp site where water was available. In July 1917 further construction was authorised at Kilwa and the 60-centimetre line was extended to Lungo, Mile 84, by November. On this line, which had a slight gradient, each box-body tractor pulled two trailers with a total load of up to 2.72 metric tonnes (3 tons).

A typical ‘train’ on a trolley line in what was once German East Africa but which by this time was terrritory occupied by the British. [21: p13]
A typical Ford light railway tractor in use in the occupied German East Africa. [21: p15]

Construction activities at Lindi

A hundred and ten kilometres south of Kilwa more port facilities were developed at Lindi, which had a fine natural harbour. A British force was moving into the interior and needed a railway to follow it. Steam trains were ruled out because shipping was not available to move the necessary materials and rolling stock from Dar Es Salaam and Kilindini, so another 60-centimetre tractor line was started. This was helped by the fact that an existing trolley line led from several former German plantations to a jetty on the river running into Lindi Harbour; it was estimated that 30 kilometres of track could be recovered from the German line.

The 25th Railway Company deployed to Lindi in June and commenced work, following the British advance. Survey work on both the Lindi and Kilwa lines was sometimes interrupted the appearance of both lions, rhinoceros and elephants, and occasionally by the approach of enemy patrols who were engaged and driven off. On 27th August the line was open to Mtua and proved to be very useful in quickly evacuating wounded men as well as in carrying forward supplies. In this month the 27th Railway Company arrived at Lindi, and support was provided by the South African Pioneers and the 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers. Unskilled labour was badly needed and this problem had to be solved by moving down large labour gangs from the Usumbara and Central Railways. A few small steam engines were found on various plantations and put to use on the line. When the tractors from India arrived it was found that their axles had been made from inferior steel and they broke at the rate of two or three a day. This problem was compounded by severe rates of sickness that affected most of the Corps. At the beginning of November only 9 tractors out of 36 were working and only two mechanics were manning the workshops.

Later in the month the Kilwa line was closed down and personnel were redeployed to Lindi where the Corps base was relocated, however the movement of badly needed materials and plant was delayed by shipping shortages. Railhead reached Ndanda, Mile 62, on 27th February 1918 and the decision was made to stop the line there. By then General, as he now was, von Lettow … and his slimmed-down German army were moving deeper into Portuguese East Africa (PEA), now Mozambique.

The Run-down of the Indian Railway Corps in East Africa

By November 1917 the 25th Railway Company was medically unfit for work with its strength at less than 40 fit men, and it was returned to India in March 1918. The 26th and 27th Railway Companies were in a similar condition and in May they also returned to India. 28th Railway Company remained in the field and all recent arrivals and returnees from leave were posted into that company. The Lindi line continued to be used and Army Service Corps men drove supplies from railhead into PEA; sadly many of these European drivers succumbed to tropical diseases and are buried in East Africa. As the East African Force was slimmed down Directorates were abolished and in March Sir William Johns left the theatre after handing over the Railway Corps to Colonel Wilkinson.

Up in Nairobi a tramway 13 kilometres long was constructed from the town to the vast King’s African Rifles (KAR) Depot Camp at Mbagathi; the running of this line was handed over to the KAR. The line from Voi to Tanga was practically on a peace footing and the Central Railway was being converted to commercial use. The arrival of 100 new tractors from South Africa, the increased use of steam traction, and a big improvement in the health of the personnel meant that soon the Lindi line was running very efficiently.

In September, as the Germans in PEA were observed to be moving northwards, the Lindi line was ordered to be extended 30 kilometres to Massasi. The 28th Railway Company which was stood-by to sail for India quickly returned to Ndanda and started the work. Concurrently permission was obtained to raise an African Pioneer Company to replace the 28th Company. Suitable men were recruited from maintenance gangs on the Central Railway and from labour that had worked on the Mbagathi trolley line. The Lindi line reached Massasi in mid-November just as General von Lettow-Vorbeck, still undefeated and then in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, accepted the Armistice terms decided in Europe and agreed to surrender. The 28th Railway Company sailed for India.

The Indian Railway Corps retained responsibility for railways in East Africa until January 1919, when civilian direction and personnel replaced it. The Corps had done an excellent job, tackling the diverse and serious challenges that East Africa presented in a most professional manner. Credit for the performance of the Corps must be attributed to the support provided by the Indian Railways Board and the Corps of Royal Engineers, but above all else to the skill, adaptability and perseverance of the men of the Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners. Shabash!

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Tanzania, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/02/23/the-tramways-of-zanzibar
  3. https://www.arushanews.co.tz/columns/the-usambara-railway-the-line-that-climbed-the-hills, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  4. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/the-overview-and-history-of-the-usambara-railway-service-german-east-africa, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  5. https://ntz.info/gen/n00514.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  6. https://grokipedia.com/page/usambara_railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/04/narrow-gauge-industrial-lines-in-tanganyika-tanzania, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  8. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way Volume II: The Story of the Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957.
  9. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cableway; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philipp_Holzmann, accessed on 9th March 2026.
  11. This and the next few references hold a translation of the first four pages of Hans Wettich’s paper (Reference 9 above). it parallels the account in the main text of the article above: “With the advance of the Usambara Railway, the north of the colony of German East Africa has undergone a development that must be of particular interest not only to the engineer, for here the interaction between the natural riches of the country and the engineering art used for development is vividly demonstrated and, on the other hand, between the engineering works carried out and the economic development of the country. “If a picture of this development is to be unrolled here from a technical point of view, taking into account at the same time the means of transport used to open up Usambara, it is first necessary to name the sources from which the sources were drawn. These are notes and information from literature, daily newspapers and African periodicals, official records and reports, but preferably reports and reports originating from the companies and companies involved. Commissioned by the plantation company Wilkins & Wiese, Tanga; the Deutsche Holzgesellschaft für OstaJrika in Berlin, the Deutsche Kolonial-Eisenbahn-Bau- lind Betriebsgesellschaft, Berlin; of the cable car factory of Adolf Bleichert & Co., Leipzig and the timber import company, Ja,l1son & Pielstick, Hamburg, the author had extensive information at his disposal. In addition, there are personal reports from engineers and fitters who were involved in the construction of railways in Usambara, and from officials of some of the companies mentioned who travelled through these regions. … It is a well-known fact that rich colonies are to a certain extent self-determining. Plantations, agriculture or mining enterprises penetrate into the area of political occupation and make do with the most primitive means of transport, for the high-value products of the country also permit high transport costs. Transport routes follow the advancing demands, and the procurement of the capital required for railways and roads presents no difficulty. … Less rich colonies, or those whose wealth cannot be readily recognized, want to be seized first, they want to get roads and railways before plantations can spread on a larger scale, before the exploitation of the country’s treasures can take place. In such cases, the raising of capital for the transport route also entails some difficulties, and the help of the government and the help of the mother country cannot be dispensed with.” [p1-2] “If we look at the development of German East Africa from this point of view, it must be conceded that from the time of the acquisition of the protected area, the government and private entrepreneurs, but unfortunately not the Reichstag, have really taken stock of the situation. If a few slightly enthusiastic circles were able to tell of the fabulous riches of the country, they were generally sober about everything. and initially demanded transport routes that were to be joined by plantations and mining ventures in a colonizing manner.” [p2]
  12. The translation of Hans Wettich’s paper continues by focussing on the Usambara Railway: “Although in the centre and south of the country there was an established relatively large overland traffic between Zanzibar and the great lakes, the North seemed to be the most suitable for the beginning of the colony, because here, only a short distance from the coast and the port of Tanga, was the Usambara region, whose fertility was known and whose high altitude climate seemed to permit the settlement of Europeans. Of course, the government preferred the centrally located Dar es Salaam more as a counterweight to Zanzibar, which had become English, and in order to strengthen Dar es Salaam, settled on a project to construct a Central Railway on the old caravan route via Tabora to Lake Tanganjika. Private capital, however, turned to the North, where a whole number of plantations were established in a short time. This resulted in a project to create a branch line from the coast to the caravan site of Korogwe, being aired before 1888. In 1893, the construction of this first German colonial railway was started by the Eisenbahngesellshaft für Ostafrika (Railway Company of East Africa) under the support of the Ostafrikanischen Gesellschaft (East African Society), and on 1st April 1896 the line from Tanga to Muhesa was opened. Construction had to be stopped at Muhesa due to a lack of further funds. In 1897, the Ostafrikanischen Gesellschaft declared itself unable to continue to support the Eisenbahngesellshaft für Ostafrika in the loss-making operation of the railway, and the government had to step in with a monthly allowance of 6000 Marks and finally take over the railway for the price of 1,300,000 Marks. It is obvious that the operation of the line to Muhesa could not be economical, since no major production area had yet been reached at that point, and that it was necessary to extend the line at least to Korogwe and thus connect it to the busy Usambaraland. Ln 1901, the Reichstag approved the funds for this length of the line, but twice refused the means to continue to Mombo. It was not until 1903 that a budget was set aside for this purpose. The construction of the Korogwe-Mombo railway line was transferred to the company Lenz & Co., of Berlin. As a result of the construction work the railway’s profitability grew, and the government, leased the further construction of the railway and its operation to the German Kolonial-Eisenbahnbau-und Betriebsgesellschaft of Berlin in 1905. From then on, railway construction made stronger progress. In 1910, Buiko was reached with 174 km, and today work is being done on the continuation to Moschi (350 km), whereby already in the 3rd quarter of 1910, according to newspaper reports, a total length of 254 km has been reached.” [p2-4]
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/08/the-mkumbara-to-neu-hornow-cableway-ropeway-usambara-hills-tanganyika
  14. Gerber Acacia (Senegalia catechu) – The Gerber Acacia is a deciduous tree that reaches heights of 6 to 10 metres. Its bark is fissured and cracks into wide strips. The twigs have a downy bark and often bear a few hook-shaped thorns formed from the stipules. … The seeds contain a water-soluble mucilage with a high protein content, which is edible for humans. The leaves are considered good fodder and are primarily fed to goats. The wood makes good firewood and is also used for charcoal production . It is also well-suited as construction timber. The resin is used in tanning and dyeing . Gum arabic can be extracted from the bark. … Some constituents of the Gerber Acacia have astringent properties, so the crystallized resin Khersal is used in Ayurveda for chronic diarrhoea , dysentery , colitis , and leukorrhea , and as a mouthwash for stomatitis (inflammation of the oral mucosa), gingivitis (inflammation of the gums), pharyngitis (inflammation of the throat), and laryngitis (inflammation of the larynx). For this purpose, the heartwood should be dried. For more information see: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber-Akazie, accessed on 11th March 2026.
  15. https://plants.jstor.org/compilation/Beilschmiedia.kweo, accessed on 12th March 2026.
  16. Juniperus procera (known by the common English names African juniper, African pencil-cedar, East African juniper, East African-cedar, and Kenya-cedar) is a coniferous tree native to mountainous areas in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. It is a characteristic tree of the Afromontane flora. It is a medium-sized tree reaching 20–25 metres (66–82 feet) (rarely 40 m or 130 ft) tall, with a trunk up to 1.5–2 m (5–6+1⁄2 ft) diameter and a broadly conical to rounded or irregular crown. For more information, see the relevant Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juniperus_procera, accessed on 14th March 2026.
  17. Podocarpus wood is commonly traded as podo or yellowwood, it is a versatile, light-to-medium-weight softwood derived from various species within the Podocarpaceae family, such as Podocarpus neriifolius and Afrocarpus falcatus. Despite being classified botanically as a softwood, it often behaves like hardwood, prized for its fine texture, straight grain, and yellowish-brown colour. For more information, see the relevant Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrocarpus_falcatus, accessed on 14th March 2026.
  18. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1339164168244702&set=a.594438710970128, accessed on 15th March 2026.
  19. https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Campaign-East-Africa-Copy-for-GWAA-site.pdf, 16th March 2026.
  20. C. J. Thornhill; Taking Tanganyika: Experiences of an Intelligence Officer 1914-1918; Trade Paperback, 2004.
  21. Harry Fecitt; The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919; via https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/The-Indian-Railway-Corps-East-African-Expeditionary-Force_1.pdf, accessed on 16th March 2026.
  22. Arusha: A Brochure of the Northern Province and its Capital Town 1929; 1929, p20, via https://ntz.info/gen/b00297.html, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  23. Christopher Nelson; Photographs of Arusha; 1960, via https://ntz.info/gen/n00514.html, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  24. https://www.arushanews.co.tz/columns/the-usambara-railway-the-line-that-climbed-the-hills, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  25. https://www.facebook.com/GermanColonialEmpire/photos/next-in-our-series-on-the-railways-and-steam-locomotives-of-german-east-africage/1345231510971301, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  26. http://sharemap.org/jkan/railway/Railways%20in%20Tanzania, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  27. https://www.railjournal.com/regions/africa/tanzania-starts-work-on-metre-gauge-project, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  28. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/16/600-mm-narrow-gauge-lines-used-during-world-war-1-in-east-africa
  29. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CZxhxsgV2, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  30. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:4-5_gekupppelte_Dampflokomotive_mit_separatem_4_achsigen_Tender_in_1000_mm_Spurwerite_geliefert_f%C3%BCr_die_Usambarabahn_%E2%80%93_O%26K_Werks-N%C2%B0_2701_vom_Mai_1908,_300_PS,_1000_mm,_1D,_Usambara_EbN%C2%B0_11_%28cropped%29.jpg, accessed on 18th March 2026.
  31. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/usambara-railway, accessed on 21st March 2026.

Tanzania Railways – Part 10 – The Mkumbara to Neu Hornow Cableway/Ropeway, Usambara Hills, German East Africa/Tanganyika.

The western Usambara Hills were characterised by precipitous cliffs and deep gorges. The provision of a rail link between Mkumbara and Neu Hornow was not considered practical.

A 9 km long ropeway was constructed, under the ownership of “the firm of Wilkens and Wiese, and designed to carry cedar from the Shume plateau to the railway, an enterprise that was never an economic success. The longest span of the ropeway, 907 metres, was said to be the longest in the world when it was built in the years 1910-1911.” [1: p75] Wood was transported via the Goatal/Ngoha Valley in the Schumewald/Shume Forest. [2]

The ropeway was constructed by Adolf Bleichert & Co. a German company primarily active in  cableway construction . It was founded in 1876 by Adolf Bleichert and was headquartered in Leipzig – Gohlis from 1881. [2] More information about Adolf Bleichert & Co. can be found here. [3]

What follows here is a translation of a German language text with the associated images. [4]

Wilkens & Wiese were aware, when negotiating with the German authorities for a concession to harvest timber saplings in the western Usambara hills and particularly the Schumewald forest, of the difficulty of connecting the steep high plateau with the railway in the plain. A railway or road would have been completely out of the question due to the sharp, steep, and heavily forested slopes of the hills. The only option available to them was a cableway to connect the high plateau with the then-planned station of Mkumbara on the Usambara Railway. In anticipation of the expected difficulties, the cableway was ordered from Adolf Bleichert & Co. in Leipzig-Gohlis andwork commenced in the spring of 1910. The location of the cable car and the timber concession of Wilkins & Wiese are shown below: [4: p17]

Site plan of the enterprises of the plantation company Wilkins and Wiese in Vestusambara. [4: p17]

The undertaking faced enormous difficulties due to the steep mountain slope. Furthermore, the rock was crumbly and easily weathered, so landslides often disrupted the work. A shortage of workers, the construction of new roads to transport building materials, and last but not least, Sandfly and Mosquitoes tormented workers and hindered completion throughout. Only through sheer energy and great sacrifice was it possible to complete the work. [4: p17-18]

By 1911, the system shown below was fully operational and transported sawn timber, beams, and logs from the sawmill located on the high plateau at 2000 m above sea level to the Mkumbara railway station on a regular schedule. Its horizontal length is 9.0 km, with a height difference of 1435m between the terminal stations. The greatest difference in elevation of the cableway is 1523 m, as shown in the longitudinal profile below. Due to the extremely unfavourable conditions, the line had to be divided into three sections, the uppermost of which first has to overcome a climb of about 90 metres. Therefore, a traction system had to be provided for all eventualities, which would assist if the gradient became too heavily congested with wagons. The cableway’s capacity was designed for ten tons per hour downhill and one tonne per hour uphill. [4: p18]

A longitudinal profile of the Mkumbara tto Neu Horow Cableway. [4: p18]

The line began at the loading station near the Neu-Hornow Sawmill at an altitude of approximately 2000 m above sea level. At about 1.2 km from the sawmill, it crosses the edge of the plateau. It then descends quite steeply to an altitude of 1290 m, where it turned through a 45° angle. From here, the cableway had to be routed to a breakpoint, where it turned once again seeking suitable locations for the support towers. The line then continued with two spans of more than 300 metres each to another breakpoint, the junction station at an altitude of 770 metres. Then the cableway heads for Mkumbara, crossing the uniquely beautiful Ngoha Valley with a free span of 100 metres. Prior to reaching the bottom station at an altitude of 68 metres, the railway has a tensioning and anchoring station at 660 metres and a double tensioning station at 170 metres. The journey of a load takes about one hour.

The Neu-Hornow sawmill has several standard frame saws on which logs can be cut into beams and processed into lumber. The loading station, shown below, is equipped with fixed hanging rails. In addition to the necessary guide rails for operation, it also has a storage area for empty hangers.

The cableway loading station at the sawmill. [4: p19]


The points at which hangers attach and detach from the cable/rope are visible on the right of the drawing. These points allow the incoming cars to detach automatically from the haul rope, while the outgoing cars automatically reconnect to the haul rope. Patented Bleichert apparatus is used as the attaching device. [4: p19]

The end guide pulley was equipped with two hand brakes, each with a disc diameter of approximately 2 metres, capable of braking 50 horsepower, with one serving as a safety brake. The brakes were only applied when the train was stationary. During operation, an automatic brake regulator controlled the train speed. This regulator (a hydraulic brake), along with the cableway’s drive system, was housed in a separate engine room next to the loading station. There was a 1.6 m³ reservoir on the roof of the loading station and two concrete tanks in front of the engine house, in which water supplies for the summer were collected. [4: p19]

The cableway needed both effective braking and a good quality drive system. Sometimes heavy loads had to climb the first length from the loading station without sufficient weight on the longer descent to balance the load. A higher capacity engine was required so that the cableway would also be used to generate electricity to power the sawmill. so a 50 PS electric motor was installed and performed well. [4: p19-20]

The hydraulic regulator consisted mainly of a capsule structure with a relieved throttle valve, which was driven by a belt from the cableway countershaft. The mechanism drew water from a reservoir and pushed it back into the box through slots of the regulating slide. The regulating slide is fully actuated by a centrifugal force governor, which may also be driven by the drive shaft of the track via a belt. As soon as the revolutions per minute of the countershaft begin to increase, the centrifugal force governor moves the regulating slide into action. [4: p20]

A General view of the Neu-Hornow sawmill. On the left in the foreground is the first support pillar of the cableway; in the middle is the loading station with the building for the drive and brake regulator. To the right of that is the sawmill with a grey timber drying shed. [4: p20]

The frame saw is driven by a Lanz Lokomobile/traction engine. (A Lokomobile was a portable, self-propelled, or towable steam-powered (or sometimes internal combustion) engine used historically to provide power to machinery like threshing machines or sawmills. Mounted on wheels or skids, these versatile, mobile power units were commonly used in agriculture and industry, frequently featuring a steam boiler and a single-cylinder engine.) [5]

Given the extremely difficult road conditions on the mountain, the firm Wilkins & Wiese undoubtedly acted uneconomically in choosing a locomobile as the drive system, because it was foreseeable that it would cause enormous difficulties to transport this large and heavy 10 hp machine up the mountain, and that the profit from saving on assembly costs compared to a stationary engine and boiler system to be transported disassembled would be far outweighed by the extraordinarily high transport costs of the fully assembled locomobile. [4: p21]

The locomobile/traction engine had to be transported 60 km from Mombo, the then terminus of the Usambara Railway, via Wilhelmsthal to Neu-Hornow. Two to three Europeans and 100 labourers worked continuously on the transportation of the traction engine for about seven months. The boiler was mounted on a railway wagon frame, which was then moved forward on a track. The track was then removed behind the wagon and reattached at the front. Depending on the difficulty of the route, distances of 100 to 1000 metres were covered daily.

This image shows the lengths that Wilkins & Weise had to go to, in order to get the locomobile/traction engine into position at Neu Hornow. [4: p21]

This required building roads and bridges, widening and reinforcing existing paths, and blasting rocks. Often the machine hovered over the abyss, in danger of plunging down and destroying months of expensive work. Using animals for transport was impossible because the tsetse fly was native to this area. Since the traction engine also had to provide the power for the initial commissioning of the cableway, the transport of the locomobile to Neu Hornow was a major contributor to delays in commissioning the cableway. [4: p21]

A glimpse into the loading station of the cableway at Neu Hornow. The station, except for the roof, was constructed entirely of iron to protect it from termites. The coupling points for Bleichert’s automatic clamping device, the “Automat,” are clearly visible at the front. This device was operated by the weight of the sling and the load. At the coupling points, the weights were supported during entry and exit by laterally arranged auxiliary rails, on which they ran with small rollers. Depending on whether the coupling rails rise or fall, the weight of the vehicles was raised or lowered, thus opening or closing the clamp. The haul rope was guided in such a way that it was gripped by the smooth coupling mechanism with a sling swivel. The process of coupling and uncoupling is therefore relatively simple: incoming cars require no operation at all, outgoing cars were pushed out of the station by hand and coupled themselves automatically to the haul rope. The coupling and uncoupling process was absolutely safe, and lifting the car’s weight by the auxiliary rails posed no risk of derailment, as the coupling rollers were only lifted by a very small amount and were also guided laterally, while the running gear did not lift off the track. [4: p22]

From the loading station, the track gradually ascended to its highest point. The log wagons, illustrated in the image below, which transported logs up to 14 m long and weighing up to 1000 kg, consisted of two carriages connected by the haulage rope. To increase the clamping force of the lead-weighted coupling mechanism on these steep inclines, stops were provided to the right and left of the suspension of the carriage, against which the suspension bracket was applied to inclines. Under the influence of a load, it acts like a lever on the pull piece of the clamp, thereby achieving a correspondingly increased clamping force, which ceases immediately when the incline decreases, so that the positive characteristics of the automatic coupling device reappear. Among these, the great protection afforded to the haul rope is particularly noteworthy, as the clamping force was not greater than absolutely necessary. The slings were designed with a lightweight construction, yet possessed the required stability during idling and when entering stations due to the use of a counterweight. [4: p22-23]

Timber-wagons on the cableway. [4: p23]

Platform wagons were used for transporting sawn timber down the valley and for transporting various goods up the mountain. These wagons were also used for passenger transport. [4: p23]

The highest point of the line was at 2011 m above sea level, 1591.2 m above the survey base, was reached 1.2 km from Neu-Hornow, 1523 m above the unloading station. To obtain the most favorable line alignment, a simple cut had to be made at the crossing over the edge of the plateau (shown in the image below). This presented no difficulties due to the firm clay layer, but in light of the heavy tropical downpours, special safety measures for the support foundations were required. For this purpose, the line was laid at an angle and equipped with a lateral drainage ditch. Sloping ditches were also dug in front of the supports to divert the water.  The slope of the ground followed the profile of the cableway and accordingly had a gradient of 1:2. [4: p24]

The summit of the line seen approaching from the loading station at Neu Hornow. [4: p24]

Ahead down the line was a gorge-like valley which the cableway panned on its way to the first ‘angle-station’, making use of a 30 metre high support stanchion.

The first angle-station (winkelstation) son the side of a promontory of rock above the gorge mentioned in the last paragraph. In order to accommodate the ‘winkelstation’, excavation was necessary at the top of the promontory. This cause difficulties as the ground proved friable and the easily crumbling and weathering rock fractured in two directions. Repeated collapses significantly delayed the completion of the cableway. Stability was finally achieved by building a significant retaining wall and by concreting the rock fissures. [4: p24-25]

This photograph was taken during construction of the first ‘winkelstation’. the cableway flanked the side of the promontory. ‘The ‘winkelstation’ is under construction to the right of this image. [4: p25]

The ‘winkelstation’ sat immediately above/behind the retaining wall and required some excavation of the rock to create a plateau. A sketch diagram appears below:

Winkelststaion No. 1. The cables of the first length line were tensioned by weights: the fully loaded cable, with 1 ton, the slack cable with 13 tons. The tension weights consisted of iron frames filled with concrete cubes. The cables of second length of the cableway were anchored in the winkelstation. The haul rope of the first line passed over the second line and was guided by deflection and guide rollers in the station. The station does not operate automatically. Automatic operation was omitted to keep costs as low as possible. Accordingly, each rope section had a coupling and attachment cleat, these operated in the same manner as at the loading station. A photograph pf this winkelstation appears below. [4: p26]
A photograph of Winkelstation No. 1. [4: p27]

Beyond Winkelstation No. 1, the railway crosses a short rocky ridge, then continues supported in the middle of two spans of approximately 300 metres each, across several hundred metres of steep gullies to the Willkelstation No. 2, located on the side of another rocky ridge and accessible only via difficult paths. Given the exceptionally unfavorable terrain, the central support between winkelstations I and II had to be maintained at a height of approximately 33 metres.

The section between the two Winkelstations is of particular interest because at the time of construction it was the steepest continuously operating cableway in the world. The location is shown in the image immediately below. Here, the gradient was 41° = 1 in 1.15 or 86 %). However, such inclined lifts with shuttle operation are not uncommon. The Bleichert company stated that this gradient was only surpassed by a few cable cars in the canton of Salzburg and the Wetterhorn lift near Grindelwald. The steepest gradient at the Wetterhorn lift, reaching up to 200%, corresponding to approximately 87°!

The steepest section of the cableway, shortly below Willkelstation No. 1 [4: p28]

Even funicular railways lag behind the Neu-Hornow cableway. The maximum gradient on a funicular railway is 70% on the Virgelbahn near Bolzano, which operates with a reciprocal carriage system.  The photograph below shows just how steep this section of the cableway is.

Over the longer spans, the haul rope had to be guided as far away as possible from the track rope to prevent entanglement in the track rope. Based on these considerations, a support design generally emerged that deviated from the normal design due to the large distance between the haul rope guide and the support shoe.

The steepest section of the cableway: 8 metre-long cedar beams are being transported down the gradient. Despite the gradient, the Bleichert coupling mechanism “Automat” holds the haul rope securely. Therefore, no safety or  multi-coupling devices are required. [4: p29]
The abnormal stanchion at the bottom of the steepest section of the cableway. [4: p30]

In Winkelstation No. 2 (shown diagrammatically below), the track cables of the second section are tensioned by counterweights. To gain the necessary space for the counterweights, a pit had to be blasted. The haul rope from Neu-Hornow terminates at this station. However, it is inextricably linked to the haul rope for the final section to Mkumbara, so that the speed of both ropes is the same.

Winkelstation No. 2. [4: p30]

Handbrake operation for the further descent did not seem reliable enough. It was much more practical to also apply the brake regulator installed in Neu-Hornow to the last section of the cableway. Furthermore, for this last section, with its relatively gentle gradient compared to the higher sections, there was a risk that the haul rope would stop if there was a large uphill load and a poorly occupied downhill section. Therefore, at Winkelstation No. 2, the traction cable of the upper two sections is guided around a pulley on the end guide shaft of the lower traction cable run, thus achieving the necessary positive connection. The traction cable of the upper section then passes over an end guide pulley mounted in a tensioning frame and is tensioned by tightening the tensioning lever due to weight distribution. In this station as well, the wagons are manually guided onto the following sections for the reason already mentioned. Winkelstation No. 2 is shown in the photograph immediately below. The coupling points are visible at the entry and exit points. To find space and support points for the installation, costly blasting and foundation work was also necessary here. [4: p28-29]

Winkelstation No. 2 [4: p31]
This photograph shows, dramatically, the length between Winkelstation No. 2 and Winkelstation No. 1 in the far distance. The longest span between support stanchions on the cableway was 900 metres which was the length closest to Winkelstation No. 2. It appears to good effect in this image! [4: p32]

As far as the terrain allowed, naturally existing support points were utilized. For example, just below Willkelstation No. 2, a support could be erected just before the drop into the Ngoha valley; however, beyond this point, no support was possible before the opposite valley edge, which was 210 m lower and 100 m away.

This photograph looks down the line of the cableway to Mkumbara in the valley bottom. In the foreground, the first and second 300-meter spans between suspension stations I and II are visible. On the left side of the image, the Winkel station II with its white roofs can be seen. From here, the large span across the Ngoha Valley begins, behind which the first tensioning and anchoring station for section III is located. The line then descends further to the plain, intersecting the banks of the hills in front of the Usambara massif twice more, between which the second suspension station, Pangalliebeno, is located on the northern slope. [4: p33]

The railway descends from the first suspension station shown in the above photograph at a gradient of 1 in 3. Cuts had to be made in the affected ridges, the first of which, at support No. 59 (shown below), was particularly troublesome. Supports had to be spaced 10 m apart, and an allowance had to be made for very unstable ground where the substrata was highly fissured and where rockfalls were frequent. Due to the continued disruption, more than 6000 cubic metres of rock had to be moved,

Planed timber planks being carried past the site of the landslide shortly before dropping down the cableway onto the plain. This image gives a good idea of the terrain that the cableway travelled over/through. [4: p34]
The supports/stanchions, as the pictures show, are largely identical. This gave the advantage for the cableway that the individual elements could be interchanged as required. [4: p34]

About 100 metres before the lower terminal station there was a double tensioning station where the suspension cables leading to the lower station were tensioned because the lower terminal station did not offer enough space for the weights.  It was necessary to create pits for the tensioning weights. [4:p31]

From the tensioning station the cableway crossed level ground to reach the terminus in Mkumbara. [4: p32]

The terminal station (shown in plan and section below) was angled, due to the direction of the connecting track to the Usambara railway. The ground below the station was piled shaped to create a loading ramp from which the logs could be easily rolled into the railway wagons on the metre-gauge siding. The unloading of the cableway was carried out in the same way as the loading, using a mobile ‘table’ that was moved under the arriving logs and raised by a simple winch. The sling chains were then released. The table was then tilted towards the ramp, whereupon the logs rolled off in the desired direction. Sawn timber was unloaded by hand. To prevent any delays in railway operations, a siding was provided alongside the main line. [4: p32-33]

The lower terminal station of the cableway at Mkumbara. [4: p35]

Perhaps of interest is the fact that permission to operate the railway telephone was granted only after great difficulties and subject to revocation, because telephone lines longer than 500 m, even if they ran entirely on the owner’s land, were within the protected area of the Tanganyika postal monopoly. [4: p33]

All the railway structures were made of iron to protect against termites, and the telephone poles were made of Mannesmann tubing. [6] This increased the construction costs. Freight costs for shipping and rail transport were within the normal limits appropriate to the size of the project. [4: p33]

In contrast, the costs of transporting the components to the construction site from the then-terminus of the Usambara Railway at Mombo, the execution of the foundation work, and the procurement of cement, water, etc., required considerable expenditure, especially since, neither the cattle-herding Maasai from the surrounding areas were available to work, nor could draft or pack animals be kept due to the tsetse fly. Roads also had to be built almost everywhere for transporting the materials, along which the supports, station components, and building materials were hauled individually by porters, during which many a sack of cement and many a barrel of water leaked quite by accident along the way, thus becoming lighter. The wages were relatively low, amounting to 45 heller or 60 pfennigs per day with free board including rice. The workers’ housing was also inexpensive to build.  They consisted of reed sheds or reed huts, which, at best, were covered with clay. [4: p33-34]

Taking into account all the factors that delayed and complicated construction, it is understandable, despite the low wages paid to the workers, that the total construction costs exceeded those of the actual delivery of mechanical parts for the cableway many times over, and it does not seem implausible that the construction as a whole cost between 1.75 and 2 million marks according to one account, and between 2 and 2.5 million marks according to another. [34]

Writing in the early 20th century, Hand Wettich said, “The question must now be raised whether these considerable costs for a private branch line of 9 km in length will also achieve the desired success, but it can be stated that the system is already well on its way to doing so. In 1909/10, as already mentioned, 1240 cubic metres of cedar wood were exported from Neu-Hornow, and exports are constantly increasing.” [4: p34]

The influence of the timber transport cableway on plantation farming.

The company (Wilkens & Worse), which, like so many others, was only brought into being by the construction of the Usambara Railway, developed in a direction that was hardly expected beforehand. …. For logging, the construction of roads, field railways, and houses, the company Wilkens & Wiese needed to keep a large number of native workers and hauling the timber required the keeping of cattle. As an alternative, earlier in the 20th century, two stallions and ten Norman mares were purchased in Marseille and transported to Africa. Despite the contaminated coastal areas, they arrived safely in the mountains at that time. Initially, some animals died, but the majority began to acclimatize, as evidenced by a number of foals. The success of the stud farm was limited, although the animals were at least protected from the tsetse fly on the heights of western Usambara and otherwise found favourable conditions. The number of horses was insufficient for the needs of the sawmill. Therefore, oxen, the humped cattle of the country, were also raised. [4: p35]

Keeping people and animals forced the plantation society to engage in agriculture on the Usambara plateau. On the protected clearings, maize, turnips, and oats were cultivated. Barley, in particular, yielded exceptionally good harvests, albeit in a small area. Barley was preferable to oats as it was  less susceptible to damage from the numerous buffalo and wild boar of the Schummewald forest, which caused considerable damage to the oat fields. Potatoes yielded up to 100 hundredweight per acre, but the potato harvests were threatened by severe night frosts, which at the time of writing of Wettich’s article had destroyed almost the entire year’s crop. [4: p35-36]

These developments, which came about almost accidentally, provided the possibility that both arable and livestock farming on the plateau could meet needs across German East Africa. In addition, non-food crops might be able to be cultivated – hemp, rubber, tannins, coffee, quinine , cotton, etc. – all these could be transported to the plains via the cableway. Neu Hornow and its cableway seemed to have a very bright future.

The scale that Wilkens & Wiese’s plantation business had reached was demonstrated by the company’s development, which began 13 years before with two Europeans and 100 native-born workers and by 1907 employed 10 to 12 Europeans and about 2,500 native-born workers. The company was started with a maximum capital of 500,000 marks, which gradually grew to 3,500,000 marks (as of 1907). [4: p36]

Just as the firm Wilkens & Wiese secured its business by expanding from timber harvesting, so too other timber companies established or acquired plantations for the same reason. For example, Elie Deutsche Holz-Gesellschaft für Ostafrika (Elie German Timber Company for East Africa) took over the rubber plantation of 3,000 Manihot Glaziovii trees [7] established directly at Sigi by the former Sigi Export Company. The three- to four-year-old trunks were tapped for the first time in 1910. Wettich was unable to comment on the quality of the rubber harvest because it was only at the time en route to Hamburg; however, the company was convinced of a good future for its plantation. [4: p36]

References

  1. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way Volume II: The Story of the Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Harbours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957.
  2. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Bleichert_%26_Co, accessed on 5th March 2025.
  3. https://web.archive.org/web/20081008211723/http://petervb.com/pdf/Clips_-_WireRopeNews.pdf, accessed on 5th March 2026.
  4. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cable car; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  5. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lokomobile.jpg, accessed on 6th March 2026.
  6. Mannesmann tubing refers to high-quality, specialized steel tubes produced by Mannesmann Precision Tubes GmbH and Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH, which are subsidiaries of the Salzgitter Group. The brand is known for pioneering the “Mannesmann process” for creating seamless steel tubes. Products are characterized by high dimensional accuracy, tight wall thickness tolerances, and minimal eccentricity. For more information see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannesmann and https://www.mannesmann-precision-tubes.com, accessed on 8th March 2026.
  7. Manihot Glaziovii is also known as Tree Cassava or Ceara Rubber Tree. It is a species of deciduous flowering plant in the spurge family, Euphorbiaceae, that is native to eastern Brazil. The tree cassava was used as a source of rubber, instead of Hevea brasiliensis throughout the world. The plant is introduced largely in the world, but now it is classified as one of the most highly invasive plants in the world. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manihot_carthaginensis_subsp._glaziovii, accessed on 8th March 2026.

Railways of Tanzania – Part 9 – Narrow-Gauge Industrial Lines

The featured image for this article shows a train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

Tanganyika (now part of Tanzania) possessed a dense network of industrial narrow-gauge railways, primarily developed during the German colonial era (German East Africa) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to support plantation agriculture and forestry. While the main lines (Central Line and Usambara Railway) were built to 1,000 mm (metre) gauge, industrial, plantation, and forestry lines often used 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) or 750 mm (2 ft 5 1⁄2 in) gauge. [1]

Following World War I, the British administration deemed many of the 600 mm “light railways” to be economically inefficient compared to the, at the time, more efficient 1,000 mm metre-gauge lines, leading to a shift away from developing these smaller lines. [1]

Early Industrial Narrow Gauge lines included:

1. The Sigi Railway

The Sigi Railway (Sigi-Bahn) was a 23.5 km long, 750 mm gauge line opened in 1911 to transport timber from forests in the Usambara Mountains to the Tanga or Usambara Railway. It featured significant engineering challenges, including four switchbacks to handle steep terrain. [2]

Tanga and the Usambara Hills showing the metre-gauge line. [7: p2]
A closer view with a North point just to the West of North. The metre-gauge line runs diagonally across the map extract. The Sigi-bahn is represented by the dashed line leading to the centre of the hatched area. [7: p3]
A sketch map of the full length of the Sigi-bahn with Tengeni to the left and Sigi to the right. Beneath the German text in this extract, the gradient profile of the line is shown. [7: p15]
These three images divide the length of the Sigi-bahn shown above into three. [7: p15]
A train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

The line ran from Tengeni station (185.9  m above sea level) near Muhesa (now Muheza), located on the Usambara railway, to Sigi (438  m above sea level) in the heavily forested eastern Usambara Mountains, which, until the railway’s construction, were rugged and difficult terrain. The area could only be reached by caravans via forest and mountain trails. This severely limited the transport of goods and merchandise. [3]

A travel group at Tengeni railway station in the Usambara Mountains, with trains of the Sigi Railway and the Usambara Railway in the background. [3]

Tengeni Railway Station. [10]

The Sigi Railway Management Concession of 29th April 1910, was a necessary precondition to the exploitation of the forestry concession held by the Deutsche-Holz-Gesellschaft fuer Ostafrika. The 23.5 km. railway’s operation was bound to the sawmills that provided the bulk of the traffic. [2]

Work began in 1904. The Sigi Export Company, during its ownership, constructed 17.6 km of track. Due to financial difficulties, work had to be interrupted repeatedly. After the German Timber Company for East Africa took over the logging rights to 12,000 hectares, the sawmill, and the railway, it completed the latter. The railway went into full operation on 1st September 1910. [3][4: p96]

The line had gradients of up to 40%, minimum radii of 40 m, and, as already noted, four switchbacks. It climbed 252 metres to the Sigi terminus. [4: p96] The switchbacks enabled a relatively uniform gradient to be achieved. The section of track near Sigi was particularly interesting. Here, the railway described almost complete circles to wind its way up the mountain slopes and featured three of its four switchbacks in a length of less than one kilometre. Where possible, engineering structures were avoided. Nevertheless, numerous smaller bridges had to be built over mountain streams, blasting operations carried out, and dams constructed, particularly along the upper section. The construction of a large steel girder bridge over the Kihuhui River gorge was unavoidable; this bridge had two masonry piers between its abutments. [3]

Between Tengeni and Fanussi, rails weighing only 10 kg/m and measuring 7 metres in length were used. The lower section of the line was ballasted only where absolutely necessary for structural or operational reasons, such as on the curves. In contrast, the upper section was fully ballasted and fitted with rails weighing 15 kg/m. Ballasting the entire line was planned but was not completed before the First World War. The rails rested on iron sleepers with shims. The sleeper design on the lower section was chosen to allow for the replacement of the existing rails with the new, heavier rail profile. The flat fishplates used in the first construction phase were reinforced by the addition of angle fishplates. [3]

The line originated at Tengeni station, 44km from Tanga on the Usambara Railway. The Tengeni station grounds belonged to the state and were leased to the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company. With government approval, this company subleased the land for 30 years, first to the Sigi Export Company Ltd. and later to the German Timber Company for East Africa. The site included several buildings constructed by the Sigi Export Company, the railway’s administration building, a warehouse and goods shed, the engine shed, a carriage shed, and a water tower for supplying locomotives. There were also three houses for European employees, one of whom was a locomotive driver. The sawmill was located directly next to the station. The station building had a tiled roof. It contained a waiting room, an office for the local freight clerk, and a room rented by the Usambara Railway as a ticket office . A larger residential building with a corrugated iron roof served as overnight accommodation for travelers.

Apart from the two termini, there were no train stations or stops. Trains would stop on the open track if necessary. The entire route was equipped with a telephone line for train safety. [3]

In the German era, the operation of the Sigi-bahn was the responsibility of the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (DKEBBG), which had also been operating the Usambara Railway since 1905. The DKEBBG was a subsidiary of Lenz & Co. in Berlin, which built and operated numerous narrow-gauge railways of various track gauges throughout the German Empire. [5]

The choice of a narrower gauge compared to the Usambara Railway meant that all goods had to be transshipped at the connecting station of Tengeni for onward transport. [4: p96] In addition to freight traffic, there was also public passenger traffic, as roads were scarce in the area around Sigi and Amani. Thus, from the beginning, the terminus at Sigi also served the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani. [4: p96]

Given the route, the average travel speed was only about 10 km/h, so a train needed 2 hours and 20 minutes for the entire journey. Trains were usually mixed passenger/goods services , with connections in Tengeni to and from trains on the Usambara Railway. Pure freight trains were also used when needed. The scheduled trains also carried mail and parcels to and from Sigi. Due to their more pleasant climate compared to the lowlands and coastal region, the Usambara Mountains were a popular destination for Europeans living in the colony. Their abundance of game also made them a popular destination for hunters. Therefore, the DKEBBG even offered special trains for tour groups from Tanga to Tengeni with a connection to Sigi. The DKEBBG advertised the journeys on the Sigi Railway:

A special trip to Tengeni for the purpose of touring the Sigi Railway and visiting the Agricultural Institute in Amani would cost 100 Rp. On the Sigi Railway, scheduled trains should be used at the regular fares. (One way 3.50 Rp.). … A trip on the Sigi Railway, with its magnificent views of wild gorges, lush valleys, and dense primeval forests, is one of the most beautiful excursions in German East Africa.” [6]

In passenger transport there was a so-called “European class” (1st class, fare 15 Heller per tariff kilometre = 3.50 Rupees/total distance) and a so-called “native class” (3rd class, fare 2.5 Heller per tariff kilometer = 0.60 Rupees/total distance). With the full commissioning of the line, great expectations were placed on its role in opening up the entire East Usambara region. [7]

The sawmill at the top of the Sigibahn was located directly on the Sigi River, by whose water power it operated. The Sigi River was dammed by a 36 m long dam. The water was channelled via a 150 m long water channel to a water wheel with a double ratio, which drove the various sawing machines. Bringing the wood from the storage area to the saws is done by a trolley. [7: p16]

The up and downs of the Sigi railway after World War I were due to differing opinions with regard to the economics of the line. Operational experience in the 1920s ultimately served to convince the Government of Tanganyika that there could be no place in the Territory’s pattern of communications for the operations of light railways. [2]

Locomotives in Older Literature

According to the few available sources, the Sigi Railway had two wood-fired tank locomotives of different power levels at its disposal for operating the line . The existence of at least one six-coupled locomotive is confirmed by the photograph of a train on the Kihuhui Bridge which is included in this article. [3]

Details regarding the locomotives vary depending on the source.

The locomotives were reportedly built by Orenstein & Koppel in 1904. [5: p6][8: p26] According to another source, the locomotives were built in 1910. [9] The more powerful of the two locomotives had an output of 50 hp, weighed 10.7 ton, had a driving wheel diameter of 580 mm, and a wheelbase of only 1,400 mm. The less powerful locomotive was said to have produced only 40 hp, with otherwise similar dimensions. The 40 hp locomotive could only haul a load of 13–14 t on the inclines. This meant that it was not even capable of pulling the regular, relatively light trains on the line alone, without the assistance of the second locomotive. [3]

According to a third source, the locomotive fleet consisted of one 45 hp and one 60 hp triple-coupled tender locomotive. [3][7: p15]

Locomotives in More Recent Evidence

The more powerful of the two locomotives, however, was clearly a Mallet locomotive of the B’Bn4vt type. A photograph in the collection of the colonial image archive of the University of Frankfurt/Main confirms the error in older literature. The locomotive pictured, with its Kobel chimney and the tender box for timber “attached” to the cab, is unequivocally a Mallet locomotive and not a six-coupled locomotive with a rigid chassis. The photograph is captioned ‘Train of the Sigibahn’. [3]

Between 1902 and 1912, the Orenstein & Koppel company built a large number of Mallets for plantation and narrow-gauge railways worldwide. At least visually, the Sigibahn locomotive is very similar to locomotive number 13 of the Frankfurt Feldbahn Museum (Orenstein & Koppel , B’Bn4vt, 1909/3902, 30 hp, 600 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 4 of the Gending/Java sugar factory, 600 mm gauge) and to the locomotive of the Statfold Barn Railway /England (Orenstein & Koppel, B’Bn4vt, 1905/1473, 60 hp, 762 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 5 of the Pakis Baru/Java sugar factory, 750 mm gauge). [3]

A Mallet locomotive was better suited to the railway’s needs than a six-coupled engine, as it could be fitted with a significantly larger boiler and four cylinders instead of two for increased power. The articulated design of the running gear resulted in good running characteristics, even on the tight curves of the track. [3]

Questions regarding the Sigibahn locomotives remain unanswered. However, it is established that the locomotives bore the operating numbers No. 1 and No. 2. The original bronze number plate of locomotive No. 2, bearing the inscription “Deutsche Holzgesellschaft für Ostafrika No. 2” (German Timber Company for East Africa No. 2) , has been preserved, is part of the collection of the German Historical Museum in Berlin, and is displayed there in the permanent exhibition. [3]

The locomotive plaque for Sigi-Bahn No. 2! © Kleinbahnen, and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA,4.0). [3]

Passenger Coaches and Goods Wagons

The rolling stock was modest. It consisted of only two-axle, semi-open passenger cars [5: p6-7] , two covered and two open two-axle goods wagons, six four-axle stake wagons for timber transport, two firewood wagons, and three track maintenance cars. When there was a large influx of passengers, they were occasionally transported in the two-axle open and covered freight cars. [3]

Despite the steep gradients, all the Sigi-bahn carriages were equipped only with hand brakes. This necessitated the presence of brakemen on the trains . The manufacturers of the carriages and wagons are not known. [3]

And Finally ….

In searching for more information about the Sigi-bahn I have discovered a forum link to a walk along the length of the Sigi-bahn which can be found here. [11]

.

2. Sisal Plantation Railways

Numerous privately owned, 600 mm gauge light railways operated throughout the coastal and Tanga regions, linking sisal estates to factories and main-line stations.

Sisal plantation railways were a crucial component of the German colonial agricultural economy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These networks, often referred to as ‘light railways’, were used to transport harvested sisal leaves from the fields to processing factories and eventually to the Tanga port for export.

Sisal cultivation and associated small-gauge rail systems were introduced in the 1890s, with a significant boost in the very early 20th century. The plantation lines typically branched off from the main Usambara Railway.

The Tanga sisal plantations contributed to over 60% of the country’s GDP at their peak. The history of these railways is deeply linked to the development of the Tanga port and the early industrialization of the region.

A sisal plantation in German East Africa in 1906, ©  Walther Dobbertin (CC BY-SA 3.0 de). [14]

An illustration of one of these lines in use in the 1960s can be seen here. [12]

Sisal production in the country peaked in 1964 with around 250,000 tonnes in production from regions from all over the country such as Tanga, Morogoro, Arusha, Mwanza and Shinyanga. In 1967 following the Arusha Declaration most of the sisal estates were nationalized by the government. This began the downfall of the sisal industry as bureaucracy, over-centralization and lack of experience caused the production to fall rapidly. Furthermore, with the increasing popularity of Synthetic Nylon fibers, drove the world price for sisal down resulting in the foreclosure of many sisal factories. By the end of Ujamaa and President Nyerere’s rule, sisal production had fallen from 235,000 tonnes in 1964 to 32,000 in 1985, less than 15% of the country’s peak.” [14]

Remnants of the 600mm-gauge lines appear in different places in the sisal fields of Tanzania. Two examples can be found on these links – here [13] and here. [15]

.

3. Later Industrial Lines

Later Industrial Narrow Gauge Lines included:

A. The Southern Province Railway

The Southern Province Railway was a short-lived, metre-gauge railway constructed by the Overseas Food Corporation to support the “Groundnut Scheme.” It ran for 212 km from the port of Mtwara to Nachingwea, and including various branch lines was a network of about 275 km of railway, all told. It was abandoned in 1963.

An extract from a photograph of a map of Tanzania’s railways taken by Kiplimo Koech. This photograph was shared by Kiplimo Koech on Facebook on 12th February 2026. [23]

When the British Government “decided to press on with the Groundnuts Scheme in the Southern Province, the railways were faced with the problem of transport to and from the areas of cultivation which were then only vaguely defined. As soon as more was known about the approximate location of the areas to be cultivated around Nachingwea, and the estimated tonnages to be moved between there and the coast, the railways undertook a study of the best way of meeting the requirements at the lowest transport cost. There were three possible sites for port works – Lindi creek, Mikindani and the Mtwara creek which forms part of the port of Mikindani. Reasonably reliable information was available about the route along the Lukuledi valley between the areas to be cultivated and Lindi creek, but very little was known of the topography and soil conditions over about so miles at the coastal end of the most likely route to Mikindani and Mtwara. No sort of survey was practicable at the time, as all routes were impassable due to the rains. Such information as was available indicated that this section would not be easy to build. The limitations of Lindi as a port were fully recognised, but the Administration of the Railways recommended the use of Lindi in the early years of the scheme, leaving the route to Mikindani and Mtwara and the possible sites for port works to be surveyed later when more precise information would be available regarding costs and tonnages to be carried. However, the Ministry of Food decided to send out im-mediately its own mission to consider the site of the port works. The mission, which arrived in the February of 1947, consisted solely of specialists in port operation and construction. They recommended that the port works be in Mtwara creek on the grounds that it offered the best harbour facilities. Little or no account was taken of the extra cost of railway construction, the possible difficulties of the route and the extra time which would be needed for construction. The Ministry of Food, which was solely responsible for financing the new port and railways, accepted the advice of the mission.” [22: p268-269]

The Railways’ Administration had meantime accepted responsibility for the survey and construction of the railway on behalf of the Managing Agents. In view of the importance attached to the Groundnuts Scheme, the Administration decided that the quickest way of providing a route of adequate capacity from the sea was to proceed from Mkwaya at the head of Lindi creek through Ruo – 20 kilometres from Mkwaya – to Nachingwea. The survey began in May, and the first contracts for earthworks were placed before the end of the year. The survey of the line from Mtwara to Ruo was entrusted to Messrs. Paulings, who were later awarded the contract for the construction. The Mkwaya-Ruo-Nachingwea route was opened to traffic on 25th October 1949. Due to physical difficulties, work on the Mtwara-Ruo section proceeded slowly, and due to financial difficulties Messrs. Paulings were released from the contract in the September of 1950. The Mtwara-Ruo section was finally opened on 17th January 1954.” [22: p269]

In addition to the needs of the Groundnuts Scheme, the railways were also concerned with the provision of transport for minerals. In 1947, a siding, about nine miles long, was built from the Mwanza branch to serve the Mwadui mine of Williamson’s Diamonds Limited. The Company met the cost of bridging and earthworks. … In the Mpanda district of the Western Province, a large lead-silver-copper-gold ore body was found, and Uruwira Minerals Ltd. undertook the development of a lead mine. It was decided, in 1946, to investigate the possibility of a branch line from Kaliua on the Central line to Mpanda. After a preliminary survey it was decided to build the line, about 131 miles long. By the end of 1947, 70 miles of the location survey had been completed, and contracts for the earthworks of the first 40 miles had been placed with three local contractors. This line was opened to traffic in the August of 1950.” [22: p269]

In 1947, the goods stock on the Central and Tanga lines was in a normal state of repair and overhauls were up to schedule. Like all other railways, the Tanganyika Railways suffered at the time from a shortage of tyres, springs, couplers and brake spares, but the percentage of wagons withdrawn from service due to this shortage was not abnormal. As soon as a preliminary estimate of the tonnage to be moved in connection with the Groundnuts Scheme was available, it was clear that the factor restricting the Railways’ capacity would be the supply of wagons. Orders were placed immediately in the United Kingdom but, in spite of the priorities obtained, deliveries could not be expected for two to three years. A world-wide search was made for metre-gauge stock to meet the demand during the intervening period – and to some extent as part of the permanent equipment. As a result wagons belonging to the War Office were found at Shaiba, near Basra, and at El Shatt, near Suez. A technical officer was sent to select suitable wagons, and those chosen were shipped as soon as possible. Because of exposure to the weather and pilfering they needed a fair amount of rehabilitation. By concentrating the resources of the Dar es Salaam workshops on the shipments as they arrived, the wagons were quickly put into service. In all, 430 four-wheeled wagons were obtained from Shaiba and El Shatt towards the end of 1947 and early in 1948. Later the purchase of these wagons was criticised as an unnecessarily expensive and unsatisfactory way of meeting a very urgent need. An effective answer is that 414 of the wagons were still giving good service in 1957.” [22: p269-270]

Moreover, these wagons arrived in Dar es Salaam at a most opportune moment. They enabled the ordinary traffic offered, the extraordinary traffic of the Groundnuts Scheme and construction materials to be carried during the very difficult time until the new wagons on order arrived in 1949 and 1950. The strain imposed on the capacity of the port and the Central line was exacerbated by the fact that the import of materials and equipment for the Groundnuts Scheme far exceeded the original estimates.” [22: p270]

As it turned out, the Southern Province Railway was an overambitious scheme. Construction took place between 1948 and 1954 to facilitate the export of groundnuts under the British Overseas Food Corporation’s ambitious post-World War II agricultural initiative. The scheme was intended to produce up to 600,000 tons of peanuts annually on cleared bushland to address food shortages and generate revenue, the project exemplified colonial-era top-down development but collapsed amid unsuitable clay-heavy soils, erratic rainfall, mechanical breakdowns, and overestimation of yields, resulting in total losses of £36 million by 1951. Despite the scheme’s abandonment, the single-track railway—built with 60-lb rails on untreated wooden sleepers—was completed and opened for limited traffic in January 1954, initially subsidized through joint guarantees by the Overseas Food Corporation and the Tanganyika government against predictable operating deficits. Its brief operation underscored the perils of ignoring local ecological realities in favour of imported heavy machinery and rapid mechanized clearing, leaving behind underutilized infrastructure that highlighted systemic flaws in mid-20th century imperial planning rather than delivering sustained economic benefits. [16]

The failure of the Groundnut Scheme should probably have resulted in a decision to abandon the construction of the railway, but the thinking at the time was that the line would promote significant growth in southern Tanganyika. After completion of the line and its branches it was placed under the same management as all the other metre-gauge lines in East Africa, with the East African Railways (EAR). [16]

Rather than being designed with longevity in mind. The network, focused on freight haulage with minimal passenger elements. It spanned key agricultural zones but was engineered for temporary use (for instance, using untreated timber for sleepers rather than steel), reflecting the scheme’s optimistic projections for short-term financial gain, rather than long-term viability! [16]

Initially the railway was steam-powered (series RV/21and NZ/22) but under EAR diesel-power was introduced (series 80 and 81).

East African Railways publicity photograph of No. 2217, circa. 1953. In the late 1940s, two of this 4-8-0 Class (TR NZ Class/EAR Class 22) were transferred to the Southern Province Railway, © Public Domain. [20]
East African Railways publicity photograph of TR No. 252, circa.  1953. These were a 4-8-2 development of the 2-8-2 TR MK class. The eight members of the RV class were built by Vulcan Foundry, in Newton-le-Willows, Lancashire. [21]
Two American outline diesel locomotives at work on the Southern Province Railway in the mid-20th century. [19]

It is at least possible that the prior existence of the Lindi tramway which at one time extended from Lindi to Masasi (in the latter year of WW1 and in the aftermath of the conflict) influenced, even if only subconsciously, the choice of this route and the inland areas it served for the groundnut project it was intended to serve. More information about this earlier trolley line which was powered by Ford tractors can be found elsewhere in this series of articles about the railways of Tanganyika/Tanzania.

The Route of the Southern Province Railway

This schematic route plan is provided by Wikipedia. It shows the main line from Mtwara Harbour to Nachingwea and notes two link lines to the Sisal Plantations at Muta-Narunyu and Karimjee. Two branch lines, one to Masasi, the other to Lindi Creek are also shown. The second of which also provided a link to Lindi Sisal Plantation. [17]

Two bridges over the River Lukuledi are also shown.

Mtwara Port was deepened by the British in 1948-1954. It was functional but underutilized for many years due to poor transport infrastructure. However, in 2010-2011 the increased activity in oil and natural gas exploration caused a surge in activity. It has recently seen major upgrades. The port has a special economic zone attached to it and In December 2015 Alistair Freeports Limited injected $700,000 to upgrade the Export processing zone around the port area. [18]

Mtwara City, Port and Gas Plant. [Google Maps, February 2026]

As we noted earlier, the Port at Mtwara was built towards the end of the construction period as an extension to the original length of line which ran to a port at Lindi. The extension to Mtwara came off the line to Lindi about 27 km from Lindi and ran for about 106 km serving Mikindani and Mtwara.

There is little that I have been able to find online which can be used to confirm the route of the railway. Some assumptions on the alignment of the railway can be made, whether they are warranted or not I cannot tell.

Should further information come to light the remaining paragraphs and images about this line will need to be revised. I can see two possibilities for the route of the old line:

1. The first possibility depends on an assumption that the railway will have been built with an access road alongside it. That access road is likely to have survived and become part of the lasting road network of the Southern Province of Tanzania.

Determining, conclusively, the route of the line would have been helped by the availability of Google Streetview images in the Southern Province of Tanzania. However Google Streetview imagery in Tanzania is primarily focused on key tourist locations and specific, curated, or partnered locations rather than comprehensive nationwide road mapping. Major coverage areas include Gombe National Park, parts of Zanzibar, and the Ngorongoro Crater rim.

The next three images show a possible route of the line between Mtwara and Nachingwea the grey lines are roads T6 running West from Mtwara, the T7 in the East serving Lindi, the T6 from Mingoyo to Nangana and the Nachingwea Road, West of Nangana.

In the West there was a branch line serving Lukuledi and Masasi, the route of which is much less clear.

These three map extracts come from Kartaview. They show the full length of the presumed route of the line from Mtwara to Nachingwea. The branch line to Lindi is also shown. The branch line to Masasi ran through Lukuledi, but its likely route is less easy to establish. [24]

My presumptions about the possible route of the line are called into question by the schematic route plan above which places the junction between the line serving Lindi at a place called Ruo. We will come back to this below.

In the East, close to Mtwara Port the alignment of the railway is very difficult to determine as it has probably been built over.

It is probable that the line from Mtwara Port followed the line of the T6 Northwest along the coast before turning inland adjacent to or on the line of the T6 which runs in a straight line South-southwest as far as its junction with Tanu Avenue. Here the road runs through reverse curves before continuing South-southwest. [24]
As we have already noted, a most likely alignment for the old railway follows the T6 as it travels West, through Mikindani and on towards a  junction at Mingoyo. [24]

Assuming that my assumptions are correct, at Mingoyo the line from Mtwara appears to have met the line to/from Lindi. It appears that trains to Lindi would have progressed without reversing. Trains to Nachingwea would have required the locomotive to run-round its train.

Assuming that the alignment of the T6 and T7 roads roughly follow the line of the old railway, it can be surmised that each train heading West would have required the locomotive to run-round the train. [24]
The coastal town and port of Lindi was the original eastern terminus of the Southern Province Railway which approached the town from the South along the route of the present T7 road shown grey on the map extract. [24]
A similar area as it appears on Google Maps satellite imagery. The line would have approached Lindi from the South on or alongside the T7 road which Google Maps annotates B2, then probably crossing Lindi Town Small Bridge and entering the Port from the South. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge seen from above. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge in the 21st century, © Khalid Sakewa and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [25]

The remainder of the route West to Nachingwea would follow the line suggested, along the T6 and the Nachingwea Road.

2. Given the complications associated with a junction at Mingoyo and the fact that the Wikipedia schematic route diagram indicates that the junction between the Lindi line and the Mtwara line was 14 km further South at Ruo, it is possible that the line from Lindi followed the T7 to Mingoyo and the the T6 to Mkwaya. However, following this route takes the line in the wrong direction to access a junction at Ruo which is some distance away to the Southwest. No bridge is shown over the Lukuledi river on the Lindi branch on the schematic route plan above. However, neither is a bridge shown on the line to/from Mtwara.

If, Ruo was the location of the junction at least one bridge over the Lukuledi would have been necessary, most probably on the line from Lindi.

As is painfully obvious from the paragraphs above, without significantly more information we can only speculate on the actual route of the old line.

.

B. Port of Bujumbura Railway

The Port of Bujumbura Railway whilst now within the neighbouring territory of Burundi, a 600 mm gauge industrial railway ran from 1947 to 1982 within the port area, servicing Lake Tanganyika traffic. Its operator was Office Congolais des Chemins des fer des Grands Lacs (CFL). [26] At the time of its construction, Bujumbura was known as Usumbura. [27].

.

C. Narrow Gauge Railways near Moshi

To the South of Moshi in the North of Tanzania, at Arusha Chini you will find the Sugar Cane Factory of TPC Ltd.

TPC Ltd (Tanganyika Planting Company) is a major sugar producer in Tanzania, established in 1930 and based in Moshi in the Kilimanjaro region. It operates a large integrated sugar estate and is considered a key player in East Africa’s sugar industry, representing about one-third of all sugar produced in Tanzania.

TPC achieved a record production of 116,691 tonnes of sugar during the 2022/23 season. The mill crushes over 1.1 million tonnes of sugarcane annually. [28]

During the harvesting season, this is a very busy network. Milling takes place from the end of June to the end of March, when trains operate 24 hours/day. All cane is brought to the factory by rail. [30]

Sugar production increased from 36,000 tonnes annually in 2000 to 116,700 tonnes in 2023, thanks to significant investments in field and infrastructure upgrades. TPC employs 1,900 permanent and 1,000 seasonal workers, contributing to local employment and community development. [29]

TPC is the only place in East Africa, other than the Gezira Light Railway of Sudan, where narrow gauge locomotives are in use in the 21st century. Two visits are recorded on the internationalsteam.co.uk website (by Thomas Kautzor in 2011, and Geoff Warren in 2013). [30]

The adjacent satellite image shows the location of the TPC Works in relation to Moshi and Kahe. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The green areas directly South of Moshi and around the TPC Works are irrigated areas given over to sugar cane cultivation.

This is a low resolution copy of a drawing photographed by Thomas Kautzor in 2012. It gives an idea of the network of railway associated with the TPC Works.

I have rotated the image so that the North point is close to vertical. Apologies to Thomas for the quality of this reproduction and thanks to him for allowing the reproduction of the image.

A better version of this image can be found on the internationalsteam.co.uk website page. [30] My thanks also to Thomas for allowing me to include a few photographs taken by him further down this article.

This image is again a satellite image but focussed this time more narrowly on the TPC Works. Careful inspection of this image will show some narrow gauge lines with trains travelling on them. For instance there is an almost complete circle of narrow-gauge rails centre-bottom of the image. That line can be seen running North up the West side of the factory and curving round at the top of the image to run down the Northeast side of the plant. The network of lines serving the factory is extensive and the next few satellite images will hopefully give a really good idea of the extent of the system. [Google Maps, April 2026]
This extract covers a small area at the centre-bottom of the last satellite image. A line can be seen leaving the South side of the Works building, running in a tight loop to head North alongside the works. A train of empty wagons can be seen heading North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

To the North, the train of empties is just about entering a series of long marshalling sidings. To the right of the locomotive and entering the works moving South is a line of loaded wagons. [Google Maps, April 2026]

On the right side of the next image below the marshalling sidings run bottom-right up to the top of the image. The line on which the full wagons sit runs parallel to the marshalling sidings. At the very toptowards the right of the image another locomotive can be seen. It seems to have brought train of loaded wagons to the work s and now appears to be running round its train, preparing to push the wagons South towards the loaded wagons on the right of the image.

This photograph shows the line used by loaded sugar cane wagons to approach the unloading bay, (c) Thomas Kautzor and used here with his kind permission. [30]
Having noted the line on the right of this image it is also important to note that a triangular junction leads to a line which heads West. There are clearly two sidings to the South of that line which serve the building just to the left of centre at the bottom of the image. It is not easy to see here, but a line also continues West, leaving the image on the South side of the fields of Sugar Cane. While another line leaves it to run South at the lefthand edge of the image. Inspection of the fields to the West and South of this image shows faint indications of these tracks. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Continuing North along the marshalling sidings, the locomotive noted above can be seen at the bottom of the adjacent image. Another train of loaded wagons can be seen to the left of the trees at the right side of the image.

The various lines can be seen converging as they run to the North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This image shows the next section of the line running North. The loaded train of wagons can be seen bottom-right.

A train of empty wagons appears to be running away from the works. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The image below shows that the train of empties is standing awaiting a locomotive to take it on its journey. Meanwhile another train of loaded wagons can be seen at the top edge of the image, to the North of the triangular rail junction. The line running down the Northeast side of the works can be seen leaving the image below in the bottom-right corner. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Please see the notes above. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Further to the North we can see that there are in fact two trains of loaded wagons sit waiting, in more marshalling sidings, to be taken forward to the factory.

Once the siding converge, a single line heads North away from the Works. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This image shows that line continuing to the North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows a much larger area than the extracts above. The red line running North from the bottom-right of the image shows the railway heading North away from the Works to serve the Northern end of the estate. The scope of the system is beginning to become more obvious as the network seeks to serve the full extent of the estate. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The lines further North. Some sidings appear to exist just to the North of the crossing near Born to Learn.
[Google Maps, April 2026]

The line continues North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line runs North towards the southern suburbs of Moshi but terminates on Estate land.

A final length of the northern arm of the estate railway. [Google Maps, April 2026]

We return now to the triangular junction at the North end of the site of the Works.

These extracts from Google’s satellite imagery give a sense of the breadth of the network but do not fully cover every line to its fullest extent. A drawing of the network can be found on Thomas Kautzor’s article on internationalsteam.co.uk. [30]

The triangular junction at the North end of the Works is on the left in this satellite image. The line running down the Northeast side of the Works site leaves the junction and heads Southeast, leaving this image at the bottom-right. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues Southeast before turning away from the Works. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line turns to run Est-northeast along side this road. [Google Maps, April 2026]
This image covers a much larger area, the line can be seen curving around as on the last satellite image, in the bottom-left corner of this image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Just to the East of the junctions shown on the last satellite image another rake of loaded wagons can be seen. If a loco is in charge of the train it will be hidden under the tree at the western end of the rake of wagons. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues East-northeast to a point just beyond this next extract from the satellite imagery. It possible then turns North for a few hundred metres. [Google Maps, A[pril 2026]

The Sugar Mill has been operated by TPC Ltd since the turn of the millennium. At that time the rail network was in a poor condition. The Company have been gradually improving the network. In 2011, Thomas Kautzor says that there were 65 km of 2ft-gauge track with the intention of a final network of 80km. Kautzor explains the operation: “Empty cane wagons are taken from sidings into the fields for loading on piggy-back trailers pulled by tractors, two wagons per trailer. Trains are made up of 45 wagons and weigh 250 tons full. At the factory, a modern 1-track unloading facility recently replaced the former two tipplers. With the major problem being theft, metal sleepers are being replaced by concrete sleepers and the original rail by heavier 9 metre used rails obtained from TRL, which are then welded into 36 metre sections.” [30]

Kautzor also points out that “A now-disused 14 km metre-gauge branch used to link the factory to the main network at Kahe Junction … on the Tanga – Moshi line,” [30]

The route of the line is no longer shown on digital mapping but it seems as though a road now follows much of its route.

This next series of satellite images follow the line of the metre-gauge branch from the Works to Kahe junction. …

The terminus of the line was just to the Southeast of the main Works building which appears at the left of this image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line headed East. [Google Maps, April 2026]
For a short distance it ran just to the South of East. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Before turning to the Northeast. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line remains on the same bearing until it reached the main line as the next 17 images show. [Google Maps, April 2026]

A slightly smaller scale shows the next length of the old branch line. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The same smaller scale shows the next length of the old branch line. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Back to the larger scale for the junction with the main line to the Southeast of Kahe Railway Station. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Kautzor notes that a third rail was laid along 12 km of the metre-gauge branch to allow the 2ft-gauge sugar cane trains access to the route. He also notes, and has photographed, three-rail points along this length of the line. [30]

A third rail has been added to what is now the redundant metre-gauge branch to the Works from Kahe. The extra rail allows the route to be used by the 2ft-gauge internal railways, (c) Thomas Kautzor and included here with his kind permission. [30]

Locomotives and Rolling Stock

Kautzor says that when the present owners took over the estate, “they found six four-wheel Motor Rail/Simplex T series diesels, built in the mid-1970s and rebuilt by Alan Keef in the mid-1990s (new 6 cylinder Perkins engines, ITL transmissions and AK “K” range axle-mounted drive boxes). The three that were in best condition (N°s. 3, 5 and 6) were rebuilt and are now used for shunting and works trains. A former Alan Keef Ltd. demonstrator (class K.100, Works N°. 48, 10-ton) was also sold to TPC in the mid-1990s, but no trace of it could be found.” [30] Photographs of these older locomotives can be found on the industrialsteam.co.uk website. [30]

For cane trains TPC uses three modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (5895/2004, 6036/2006 and 6376/2009, 16 tonnes, 180 h.p.), which are named after animals: NYATI (Buffalo), SIMBA (Lion) and TEMBO (Elephant). The locomotives are serviced in a modern four-track workshops, just opposite the wagons workshops. There are presently 154 modern cane wagons, which are built in Kenya.” [30]

One of three modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (Works No. 6376 of 2009, 16 tonnes, 180 h.p.). This is named TEMBO (Elephant). (c) Thomas Kautzor and used with his kind permission. [30][32]
Two slightly older modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (Works No. 5895 of 2004, named NYATI (Buffalo) and Works No. 6036, built in 2006, named SIMBA (Lion)) Both are16 tonnes, in weight and 180 h.p., (c) Thomas Kautzor and included here with his kind permission. Larger resolution images can be found on the internationalsteam.co.uk website [30][32]
Typical modern sugar cane wagons in use on the estate, (c) Thomas Kautzor and used with his kind permission. [30]

In November 2025, TPC Limited unveiled a major investment of $52 million (Tanzanian Sh130 billion) aimed at transforming Tanzania’s sugar industry by upgrading the sugarcane value chain and expanding into ethanol and technical alcohol production. The project marks a shift from selling raw molasses to processing it into multiple products that will create jobs, increase government revenue, and strengthen the economy through industrial output, alternative energy, and locally sourced raw materials. [31]

In November 2025, construction of the new facility was 30 per cent complete, with 70 per cent of the required materials already delivered. The project was expected to be completed by December 2026. After commissioning, TPC will produce 16.3 million litres of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ethanol) each year, positioning it among the country’s largest distilleries. The company will also manufacture 400,000 litres of technical alcohol annually for use in energy-saving cooking stoves, helping reduce reliance on firewood and charcoal. The plant will generate 8,000 tonnes of potassium fertiliser from molasses by-products, suitable for chemical-free farming, along with 400,000 litres of carbon dioxide for industrial applications, particularly in beverage factories. [31]

The project also features a new power plant capable of producing six megawatts of electricity, increasing TPC’s supply to TANESCO from the current 2–3 MW to 7 MW. … Its foundation stone will be laid by the Kilimanjaro Regional Commissioner, marking 25 years of cooperation between the Tanzanian government and Sukari Investment Limited under a public-private partnership.

It is worth noting that, “Since 2000, when the government sold 75 per cent of its TPC shares to Sukari Investment, sugar production has increased from 36,000 tonnes to 120,000 tonnes a year. Government revenue from the company has risen from Sh2 billion to Sh97 billion, while sugarcane yield has improved—from 66 tonnes per hectare to 150 tonnes—making TPC one of Africa’s most productive plantations and among the top three globally.” [31]

.

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  2. https://www.africabib.org/rec.php?RID=187591229, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  3. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigibahn, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  4. Franz Baltzer; The Colonial Railways with Special Consideration of Africa; Berlin 1916. Reprint, Leipzig 2008.
  5. Helmut Schroeter; The Railways of the Former German Protectorates of Africa and Their Vehicles = The Vehicles of the German Railways, Volume 7; Frankfurt 1961.
  6. German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (ed.): German East Africa – from the coast to Kilimanjaro with the Usambara Railway; Heinicke, Berlin, 1914.
  7. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cable car; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  8. Helmut Schroeter and Roel Ramaer; The railways in the former German protectorates then and now; Krefeld, 1993.
  9. Roel Ramaer; Gari la Moshi – Steam Locomotives of the East African Railways; Malmo 2009.
  10. https://postimg.cc/dDHY1F8g, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  11. https://bimmelbahn-forum.de/forum/index.php?thread/22289-die-sigibahn-auf-den-spuren-einer-privaten-schmalspurbahn-in-ostafrika, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  12. https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/sisal-leaves-are-taken-by-rail-for-processing-on-a-news-photo/88556860, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  13. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103739156.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sisal_production_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  15. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103738452.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  16. https://grokipedia.com/page/southern_province_railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Province_Railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mtwara_Port, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  19. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/mtwaras-forgotten-rails-a-glimpse-into-tanzanias-industrial-past, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_NZ_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_RV_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  22. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way – Volume II – The Story of Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957, p268-272.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DyhZvKm8J, accessed on 26th February 2026.
  24. https://kartaview.orghttps://kartaview.org, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  25. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg/500px-Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Burundi, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  27. https://www.sinfin.net/railways/world/burundi.html, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  28. https://miwasugar.com/tpc-sets-record-sugar-production-for-2022-23-season, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  29. https://www.tanzaniainvest.com/industry/tpc-limited-molasses-plant-moshi, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  30. https://www.internationalsteam.co.uk/trains/tanzania02.htm, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  31. https://www.chinimandi.com/tanzania-tpc-limited-announces-52-million-investment-to-boost-tanzanias-sugar-and-ethanol-production, accessed on 18th April 2026.
  32. Schoma is a German firm which produces robust locomotives for use in a variety of different contexts. They say of themselves that they manufacture the most robust and durable diesel, hybrid or battery-powered locomotives in the world and are experts for extreme conditions and the most difficult project requirements. … Under the English Channel or through the Alps, in the Underground of London, Athens, New York or Singapore and from America to Australia – Schoma locomotives operate on plantations, in peat bogs and tunnels all over the world. Their website provides full details of their range of locomotives. They also tefurbish their own locomotives for the secondhand market:  https://www.schoema.de/en/locomotives, accessed on 18th April 2026.

The Tramways of Zanzibar

The featured image shows a horse-drawn/mule-drawn tram in Zanzibar before the turn of the 20th century. [1]

My thanks to Chriss333 on the Rail wire.net forum who assisted with the collation and correction of some of the information in this article. [14]

Zanzibar hosted two early rail systems, with a mule-drawn tramway operating from 1879 to 1888 between Stone Town and Chukwani, which later used a steam locomotive. A second, more notable 7-mile line known as the Bububu Railway ran from 1905 to 1930, connecting Stone Town to Bububu, featuring passenger service and, briefly, electric street lighting. [4]

The First Line (1879–1888): Built by Sultan Barghash bin Said, this, one of the first, tracks in sub-Saharan Africa. The 2ft-gauge line ran from the Sultan’s palace at Stone Town [2] to Chukwani. Initially the two coaches were hauled by mules but in 1881 the Sultan ordered an 0-4-0T locomotive from the English locomotive builders Bagnall (Works No. 334), this was named ‘Sultanee’. The railway saw service until the Sultan died in 1888 when the track and locomotive were scrapped. [4][11]

Car No. 18, The Street Railway Journal (1905), © Public Domain. [4]
Another postcard view of the mule-powered tramway, © Public Domain. [7]

The Bububu Railway – also known as the Zanzibar Railroad Co. (1905–1930) –  In 1905, the American company Arnold Cheyney built a seven-mile, 3ft-gauge line from Zanzibar Town to the village of Bububu. It originated near the Arab Fort in Zanzibar Town, ran along the seafront, passed through the city’s narrow streets, and traveled north along the coast to Bububu. It was notorious for its ability to set fire to property and the surrounding countryside, but it ran for 25 years until it closed in 1930. Within the town, the railway operated on some of the narrowest streets. [4][5]

Running along the coast between Bububu and Stone Town/Zanzibar Town, © Public Domain. [6]
One of the bridges along the line, © Public Domain. [4]
Zanzibar village, creek and railway bridge, ca. 1905, © Public Domain. [4]
The Citizen in Tanzania suggests that this image shows steam on the first of the two tramways. It is not possible to make out the name on the side of the locomotive but it does not seem to be ‘Sultanee’. The coaches also appear to be those used on the later line. [7]

In the early 1920s, the trains ran 6 or 7 times daily. The train was popular among the locals, but a special first class coach was available for the benefit of sightseeing tourists. [4]

Three views of the Bububu Tramway. All three were shared on the Discover Africa Facebook Group by Andrew Zefania on 9th June 2021. The third of these images appears to show the first class tourist coach in front of the engine, © Public Domain. [8]
Another view of the Bububu Railway, © Public Domain. [9]

A number of different locomotives were employed on the line as can be seen in the images below. …

This locomotive is a Porter 0-4-4T which prominently displays its engine number in a roundel on the cab side – No. 1, © Public Domain. [14]
A Porter 0-4-4T in charge of what might be a three-coach train, © Public Domain. [14]

A Porter 0-4-4T in charge of a three-coach train, © Public Domain. [14]
A Porter locomotive running tender first adjacent to the sea. The building prominent at the centre of the postcard image is the Polo Club, © Public Domain. [14]
This photograph is another view of one of the Porter 0-4-4T locomotives at the head of a passenger train in the early years of the 20th century. [13]

It appears that five locomotives were used on the line over the course of its life. Four were Porter locomotives. [16] The first of these was Works No. 3167 which was built in 1905 and owned by Arnold Cheyney & Co. of New York, the company that built the line. The second was Works No. 4092, built in 1907. I am not clear what line numbers these locomotives carried. [14][15] It is possible that they were numbered Nos. 1 & 2.

The Bagnall Locomotive (Works No. 2137) illustrated below. [14][15]

Two further Porter locomotives appear to have been bought early in 1921 and predominantly were is used for freight movements up until 1929/1930. These were Works Nos. 6654 and 6655 and were purchased by Childs & Joseph of Zanzibar. [14][15]

During the railway construction the Americans undertook the task of installing electrical power lines along the track. Wherever the rails were placed, metal poles were installed and power lines strung overhead. By 1906, Stone Town had electric street lights. In 1911, the railway was sold to the government, and by 1922 the passenger service ceased. As roads improved and motor vehicles on the island increased, its popularity diminished. [4]

A single 0-4-2T locomotive, supplied by W.G. Bagnall of Stafford (Works No. 2137) in 1920 provided motive power for passenger services towards the end of th line’s use as a passenger railway. [11][14][15]
Another postcard view showing the Bububu Tramway/Railway. This is the station at Bububu, © Public Domain. [10]

With the improvement works to the port, the railway was used for the haulage of stone which was used to build the port and reclaim the seafront. Today much of the old track bed has been built on however some of the railway’s bridges and embankments remain close to the main road to Bububu. [4]

I have struggled to identify the route of the old railway despite a number of websites/blogs suggesting that remnants of the railway can be seen from the main road to Bububu. The most significant structures may perhaps now be in use by the road or replaced by newer structures carrying the road. I have been unable to locate the structure below, which appears to be seen from the highway:

PastRailwayEmpires identifies this structure as one constructed for the Bububu Railway. The photograph was taken in 2013. Perhaps someone else will be able to identify its location. [12]

References

  1. https://www.instagram.com/p/DU0B_7zE6cb, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  2. Stone Town (also known as Mji Mkongwe (Swahili for ‘old town’), is the old part of Zanzibar City. The newer portion of the city is known as Ng’ambo, Swahili for ‘the other side’. Stone Town is located on the western coast of Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar Archipelago. Former capital of the Zanzibar Sultanate, and flourishing centre of the spice trade as well as the Indian Ocean slave trade in the 19th century, it retained its importance as the main city of Zanzibar during the period of the British protectorate. When Tanganyika and Zanzibar joined each other to form the United Republic of Tanzania, Zanzibar kept a semi-autonomous status, with Stone Town as its local government seat. [3]
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stone_Town&wprov=rarw1, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Zanzibar, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  5. http://www.zanzibar-travel-guide.com/bradt_guide.asp?bradt=1912, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  6. https://zanzibarutalii.blogspot.com/2015_06_18_archive.html, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  7. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/zanzibar/zanzibar-s-forgotten-railway-east-africa-s-first-steam-line-that-vanished-too-soon-5209080, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  8. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17vj5JHtuL, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  9. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/18311347309, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  10. https://omanzanzibar.blogspot.com/2017/03/zanzibar-railway-in-1879.html?m=1, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  11. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/32763584738?fbclid=IwY2xjawQJO5NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA80MDk5NjI2MjMwODU2MDkAAR7Aj-9Aimm9cDPSYK0Fi00tSxkV2RmHVyjURtd5hwvDsFt8Zao-wFb69l-KkQ_aem_NmwnCIcYLO5fHZCd629ACA, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  12. https://www.blipfoto.com/entry/3498612, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  13. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18GBKn6gjc, accessed on 23rd February 2026.
  14. These images were kindly shared with me by Chris333 on the online forum Railwire.net. Discussion with him online resulted in the correction of some errors in the original article, https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=60965.0, March & April 2026.
  15. Kevin Patience; Zanzibar and the Bububu Railway; 1998.
  16. H.K. Porter, Inc. (Porter) manufactured light-duty railroad locomotives in the United States, starting in 1866. The company became the largest producer of industrial locomotives, and built almost eight thousand of them. The last locomotive was built in 1950. The company continues to produce industrial equipment in the 21st century. Porter was known for building locomotives for industrial railways, which were often small enough that they could be operated by one person. Porter built mostly steam locomotives, but also some gas- and diesel- engined locomotives, and some that ran on compressed air. [17]
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.K._Porter,_Inc., accessed on 18th April 2026.

February 2026 – Kenya and Uganda Railways – Latest News

I spent 3 weeks in Uganda in February 2026. This short article picks up on local news reports about developments relating to railways in East Africa early in 2026. …. This article follows on from one published early in December 2025 which can be found here. [3]

The featured image above shows one of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) locomotives and its passenger train on the existing network in Kenya. [13]

Uganda

EOI – Uganda – Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan – EAC – Railway Rehabilitation Support Project

On 16th February 2026, the African Development Bank Group reported [1] that, the Government of Uganda had received financing from the African Development Fund (ADF) towards the cost of the EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (Refurbishment of Kampala-Malaba MGR), and intends to apply part of the agreed amount for this Grant to payments under the contract for Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan for the Uganda Railwaiys Corporation.

The overall objective of the assignment is for the Consultant to formulate a comprehensive railway transport master plan for the railway subsector in Uganda, including an international/multimodal transport strategy for Uganda 2026-2040.

Government Pushes to Secure 13 trillion UgX loan for Eastern SGR Line

NilePost reported on 19th February 2026 [2] that Uganda is fast-tracking final financing for the Malaba–Kampala Standard Gauge Railway, with talks underway with the Islamic Development Bank to unlock 13 trillion UgX. The project promises faster, cheaper cargo transport and stronger regional trade links!

High Level Discussions with the Islamic Development Bank

High-level discussions with the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) are seen as a critical step toward ‘financial closure’, which would trigger full-scale construction of the 273-kilometre Eastern Route.

The Minister of State for Works and Transport, Musa Ecweru, hosted an IsDB Appraisal Mission led by Dr. Issahaq Umar Iddrisu, Regional Hub Manager.

Discussions focused on integrating the SGR into a broader 3.9 trillion UgX ($800 million) Country Engagement Framework being finalised by IsDB with Uganda for 2025–2027.

‘This railway is transformative for Uganda and the wider region… time is of the essence; we should close financing early and proceed without delay’, Ecweru told the delegation.

The SGR is a strategic effort to replace Uganda’s century-old Metre Gauge Railway (MGR). Between 2015 and 2023, Uganda partnered with China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC), but Chinese lenders withdrew due to concerns over connectivity with Kenya’s SGR.

In October 2024, Uganda signed an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contract with Turkish firm Yapı Merkezi, drawing on the company’s experience with Tanzania’s SGR.

Subsequently, Uganda sought diversified financing from European export credit agencies and Islamic finance institutions, including IsDB, to fill the multibillion-euro funding gap.

The railway is designed for electric traction, supporting speeds of up to 120 km/h for passengers and 100 km/h for freight. It will carry up to 25 million tonnes of cargo annually, with 40% of the contract value reserved for Ugandan firms.

Currently, transporting a 40-foot container from Mombasa to Kampala costs about 14.6 million UgX ($3,500) by road. Once operational, the SGR is expected to reduce this to 6.3 million UgX ($1,500) while cutting transit times from several days to under 24 hours. Each train will be able to carry 216 containers—the equivalent of 200 trucks—significantly lowering road maintenance costs and carbon emissions.

Over 60 percent of the railway’s right-of-way has been acquired, with nearly 150 kilometres of land secured across Tororo, Butaleja, Namutumba, Luuka, Iganga, Mayuge, Jinja, and Buikwe districts.

Current efforts focus on the densely populated corridors of Mukono, Wakiso, and Kampala. The government has already invested more than 328 billion UgX in compensation and early works to mitigate risks associated with the project for international lenders.

The Malaba–Kampala line is a cornerstone of the Northern Corridor Integration Projects, linking Uganda to Kenya’s SGR and connecting the Great Lakes region—including Rwanda, South Sudan, and the DRC—to the Indian Ocean.

Bilateral talks with Kenya aim to ensure interoperability between Uganda’s European-standard line and Kenya’s Chinese-built tracks, supporting seamless “port-to-door” rail service. Although a change of traction will be required between diesel and electric systems at the international border

Under a ‘Limited Notice to Proceed’, Yapı Merkezi is already setting up sleeper factories and construction camps along the route, preparing for full-scale construction once financing is finalised.

On 20th February 2026, NTV Uganda reported that the Islamic Development Bank had agreed to inject 410 million euros into the Standard Gauge Railway project for the line from Malaba at the Uganda–Kenya border to Kampala. According to the Ministry of Works and Transport, the funding will cover 272 kilometres of the main Standard Gauge Railway corridor, as well as an additional 232 kilometres of lines linking key industrial hubs across the country. [10]

Uganda Railways Corporation Strategic Plan 2025/26 to 2029/30

Uganda Railways produced their strategic plan for the period to 2029/30 in September 2025. [4]

This somewhat out-of-focus plan shows the current metre-gauge network in Uganda. Only the black-dotted length is at present functional. The red-dotted lengths are in various states of disrepair. [4: p11]
Table 1 – Tabulated details of lengths of the railway lines in Uganda. [4: p11]

The Strategic Plan says: “Even with the ongoing efforts to rehabilitate the MGR, much of the railway network remains un-operational, with the few operational sections in poor condition characterised by low handling capacity, limited speeds amid occasional temporary speed restrictions, and low reliability and safety. This has resulted in an over-reliance on road transport in transporting cargo even when rail would be most suited. The impact is the increased costs of transportation that
continues to impact productivity, competitiveness and economic growth of Uganda.” [4]

An example of the current condition of the rail infrastructure is the state (in February 2026) of the line close to Pakwach in the North of Uganda.

Pakwach is on the West bank of the Albert (White) Nile. At its immediate location, a loop in the river means that it flows almost West to East with Pakwach on its North side. At Pakwach, there is a significant bridge over the Albert Nile. The two pictures below show the bridge and can be found on Google Maps (February 2026).

The Nile River Bridge at Pakwach was built primarily for the railway, but it was built wider than necessary for the railway to accommodate road vehicles. The railway track remains along the centre-line of the bridge, © Gankuba Andrew, 2025. [5]

1 hour agoSomali Regional State Distributes 110 Motorcycles to 64 Districts2 hours agoSomalia’s Electoral Body to Resume Voter Card Distribution, 400,000 IDs Uncollected

An aerial view, looking West, of the Nile River Bridge at Pakwach, © Godfrey Natale, 2025. [5]
The bridge seen from the Kampala/Gulu Road. [My photograph, February 2026]

The Pakwach Bridge, built in 1965 and commissioned in 1969, is a crucial, aging structure crossing the Albert Nile to connect Uganda’s West Nile region, South Sudan, and Congo. Currently experiencing structural cracks and flooding issues, it is being redesigned by China Communications Construction Company to support modern, heavy, multi-modal transport.  The replacement structure will be designed to accommodate both road and rail (metre-gauge and standard-gauge), pedestrian walkways and will also be able to accommodate the largest shipping that might use the Albert Nile. The project aims to facilitate the revival of the Pakwach Riverport (which became ineffective due to the poor headroom of the current bridge), and support regional trade. The bridge condition is very poor and at risk of collapse. Temporary measures are currently being considered to sustain vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the period before the new bridge is designed, built and opened. [6][7]

In early February 2026, as part of a visit to the Murchison Falls National Park we travelled alongside remnants of the old railway to the East of Pakwach on the East bank of the Albert Nile.

Pakwach is at the extreme left of this extract from Google Maps satellite imagery. The old railway crossed the Albert Nile on the bridge at the left of the image and curved around to the East. For the first few hundred yards it ran on the North side of the Arua/Gulu Road. [Google Maps, February 2026]

The railway heading for Gulu runs alongside the Gulu/Arua Road on the East bank of the Albert Nile. The pictures immediately below show remnants of the line which once sat on a low embankment between the road and the river. ….

Like elsewhere in Uganda, the metre-gauge line sat on steel sleepers to avoid the risk of termite damage to wooden sleepers. This and other images show that sections of the embankment have been washed away. [My photograph, February 2026]
Another length of the line where the river has washed away a section of the railway embankment when in spare. [My photograph, February 2026]
After running alongside the Arua/Gulu Road for a short distance, the old railway drifted away from the road to the North. Its  line can just be made out on this satellite image. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The line turned further towards North-northeast. Its route can again be picked out starting in the bottom left of this satellite image and running diagonally up the West side of the oil company site on the right of the image. The route of the old railway leaves the image centre-top. An access road to some safari lodges runs immediately to the West of the industrial site and can be seen crossing the line of the old railway, then running alongside it for a short distance before heading away to the North. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The murram road mentioned above turns once again to run parallel to the old railway which itself runs Northeast along the boundary of the petrochemical site. [Google Maps, February 2026]
We drove along the Bwana Tembo Road after leaving the Gulu/Arua Road and crossed the line a few times at the ‘m’ in ‘Tembo’ on the satellite image. The remains of the old railway continue alongside the road (to its Southeast). [Google Maps, February 2026]
We crossed the line at this point (the ‘m’ in ‘Tembo’) three times, the only photograph I have is from before dawn facing South en-route to an early morning safari. [My photograph, February 2026]
In amongst the undergrowth, the metre-gauge track can be made out. This location is perhaps one hundred metres to the Northeast of the road junction, taken looking South-southwest from our safari vehicle on our last day near Murchison Falls. [My photograph, February 2026]
Further Northeast the old line can be seen swinging away to the East before turning to the North. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The flat formation of the old railway can be seen here as it gradually begins to converge with the road. This photograph was taken facing East from the window of the safari vehicle. [My photograph, February 2026]
The road and old railway gradually converge as we travel North across this next satellite image. At the flag marking Tangi Safari Lodge, the two are once again immediately adjacent to each other. [Google Maps, February 2026]
Closer still to the road, this view looks East again. [My photograph, February 2026]
And closer still! [My photograph, February 2026]
This next slide shows the route of the old line turning through 180° to run away to the South. Its curved can be seen to the South of the flag of the MCC Student Centre. [Google Maps, February 2026]
A final photograph of the line, once again very close to the murram road. [My photograph, February 2026]

Hopefully, these few photographs, together with the images from Google Maps have given some impression of the condition of the metre-gauge line close to Pakwach in the 21st century.

Everything that I have seen of the metre-gauge (with the exception of the line between Torroro and Kampala) is reflected in these most recent pictures.

The Strategic Plan itemises the rolling stock that it owns – a total of 1,420 wagons of different types including flatbeds, tanks, covered wagons among others, and spread across the entire network (including Kenya and Tanzania). However, it says, the URC still faces
a big challenge of availability of rolling stock throughout the year with wagon and locomotives availability standing at 40% (505 fit wagons) and 46.5% respectively in the 2023/24 year. “Of the fit wagons, only 35% were flat beds yet they have a higher demand. Table 2 below shows the state of the Corporation’s wagons, plant & machinery as
at the end of December 2024.” [4: p12]

Table 2 – Status of URC Wagons, Plant & Machinery as at December 2024 – The table shows that the URC is operating below average
in terms of operating stock. Therefore, there is a need to improve rolling stock availability through timely maintenance as well and improvement of facilities at the different maintenance
workshops. [4: p12]

The reality is that URC has missed its freight targets by a significant margin over recent years as Table 3 shows.

URC’s performance against targets since 2020. [4: p14]

Table 3 shows that during the period July 2020 – December 2024, the URC network carried a total of 1,150,844 MT against a target of 2,175,170 MT, that is 53%. Of this, 77% were imports while 23% were exports.

Passenger Services

Passenger services were reintroduced under a pilot project in December 2015 as a response
to the increasing traffic congestion in Kampala City due to absence of organized public transport. Currently, the passenger train plies four trips daily between Kampala and Namanve. There was a hiatus of around 12 months in the provision of this service while the metre-gauge line between Kampala and Mukono was refurbished, with services restarting in May 2024. “The 30-minute journey has various halts in Nakawa, at Spedag, Kireka, and Namboole, finally terminating at Namanve with an average ridership of 4000 commuters per day.” [4: p15]

Logistics, Warehousing & Terminals

The URC operates three fully licensed, one-stop centres for warehousing, customs clearance, and UNBS checks: Mukono Inland Container Depot, PortBell and Jinja Piers (with the capacity to handle consolidation and
deconsolidation of cargo). Warehousing includes Gulu Logistics Hub, Mukono ICD,
Kampala Good shed, Mbale Good Shed, and Tororo Good Shed. [4: p16]

Challenges

The URC honestly reports a number of challenges which must be addressed in coming years [4: p34-36]

  • An outdated and inadequate policy, legal and regulatory framework, especially with standards in railway and inland water transport. Particularly, harmonisation of railway policies across the East African region.
  • Dilapidation of railway transport infrastructure and other assets. The larger portion of the existing MGR network remains in a poor state due to ageing of equipment, dilapidation of the network and out of date technology. In addition, the URC’s regional assets including upcountry stations, staff quarters,
    offices are in a poor state, poorly managed and left to the oversight of unknown occupants.
  • An increasing potential demand for passenger services in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area. The need for additional passenger stock in good serviceable condition. The need for new feasible passenger routes.
  • Limited integration with other modes of transport (road, water, air). The need for railway stations to become intermodal hubs is expressed in the strategic plan, but this would require new or replacement stations to be built and there to be a much more structured approach to other transport (boda-boda, matatu and long-distance buses) and a significant improvement in the rail network.
  • Very limited funding being made available for the URC Strategic Plan priorities. The previous plan set funding targets but only 9% of planned expenditure actually occurred! A serous increase in stakeholder funding is a paramount need for the URC’s future.
  • The human resource capacity is limited – at the end of March 2025 the URC had only been able to fill about 56% of its agreed staff structure.
  • Weak data management and reporting frameworks. A lack of a robust monitoring and evaluation system. It is, however, difficult to perceive what could usefully be measured that would produce a meaningful positive impact.
  • Massive encroachment onto URC land and vandalism of railway materials and property. In some regions of the country, encroachers have secured illegal land titles to URC land and illegal developments have taken place. The URC needs to complete a full survey of its property and must implement a land management strategy.
  • Public attitude to the railway is poor, many are unaware of its value, advertising of plans and services is poor, and big battles remain to be fought with those who have encroached on its assets

The situation is dire, the future of the metre-gauge seems to be uncertain and bleak!

The strategic plan sets, what must seem to all involved to be, and unobtainable goal: “A developed, adequate, safe, reliable and efficient multi–modal transport system in Uganda.” [4: p38] The fact that the overall goal is unrealistic means it is difficult to give a great deal of credence to any of the intentions which develop from it.

A more effective goal which did not aim at an unobtainable outcome might produce definite steps forward for the existing rail transport network.

Major societal change would be needed to create any form of intermodal transport system. Road transport is in the hands of a myriad of private business concerns all with their own interests and this appears to be very unlikely to change, especially not within the 5 year time frame of the plan.

Perhaps a more focussed and implementable plan is needed. Perhaps limited to improvements in the maintenance of the rail network itself. Perhaps focussing on passenger capacity on the one route currently available with a demonstrable improvement in commuting time on both road and rail as a result of an improved rail service. Perhaps setting realistic goals for the recovery of illegally occupied land over lengths of the metre-gauge line with a significant possibility of being brought back into effective use.

Recent and Upcoming Railway Tenders

UgandaTenders.com lists tendering opportunities for Railway activity in Uganda. These included:

  • Supply & Commissioning of Ten (10) New Diesel Electric Locomotives and Training of Maintenance & Operation Personnel – the East Africa Community Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (19th December 2025);
  • Rehabilitation of Malaba-jinja and Port Bell-kampala-kyengera Railway Line Sections Including Support Infrastructure (19th January 2026);
  • Drainage Improvement works on Kampala – Mukono Railway Line Section (5th March 2026);
  • Permanent way (Railway line works)(12th March 2026);
  • Consultancy Services to Develop the National Railway Transport Policy in Uganda – EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (12th March 2026); and
  • Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan – EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (12th March 2026).

Kenya

Kenya Railways Blog

In January 2026, the Kenya Railways Blog carried two articles:

A. Statement on Upcoming Railway Developments under the Nairobi Commuter Rail Service to Support AFCON 2027

Following a successful bid to co-host the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2027 alongside Uganda and Tanzania, the Government of Kenya is making preparations to host a successful tournament.

In Kenya, the games will be hosted at Nyayo National Stadium, Talanta Sports City Stadium and Moi International Sports Centre, Kasarani. Nyayo National Stadium is designated as a training centre during the tournament because of its central position.

One of the key initiatives being undertaken includes provision of an effective transport solution that will ensure easy access to and from the venues of the soccer event.

With this in mind, the Government intends to construct a railway station adjacent to Nyayo National Stadium and a railway spur line from the Nairobi Central station through Nyayo National Stadium area, Kibera to Talanta Sports City Stadium Stadium.

Kenya Railways is in the process of evicting any illegal occupiers of its land as it prepares for the construction of the line. All illegal structures and property found on the land within the corridor will be removed without further notice, at the cost of the individual or concern that built a structure or placed property on the land.

B. Successful Testride Signals Readiness of Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe MGR corridor

On 23rd January 2026 it reported that on 19th January 2026 that a successful test ride on the Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe Metre Gauge Railway (MGR) line had taken place, signalling renewed readiness to restore services along the critical corridor.

The exercise confirmed the safety, integrity and operational soundness of the restored infrastructure after months of intensive rehabilitation necessitated by severe washaways caused by unprecedented rains in 2024. Works carried out included embankment stabilisation, bridge strengthening, drainage reconstruction and track realignment to improve the corridor’s resilience to extreme weather conditions.

The Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe MGR line forms a key link within the MGR network, supporting passenger movement from Nairobi to Kisumu and freight movement from the Port of Mombasa to Kenya’s hinterland and regional markets across East and Central Africa. Its restoration reinforces Kenya Railways broader strategy of maintaining an integrated, resilient, and efficient rail system.

As the Corporation prepares for the progressive resumption of services along the corridor, the test ride marks not only a technical achievement, but a renewed commitment to reliability, safety and national development.

Kenya Railways Begins Preparations for Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba SGR Phases 2b and 2c

In an article dated 20th February 2026, Capital FM (Nairobi) reported that Kenya Railways has commenced preparations for the construction of the Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) Phases 2B and 2C.

The railway operator, in partnership with the National Land Commission (NLC), has deployed survey teams to the proposed Kisumu Terminus site, marking the boundaries for Phase 2B.

In a statement, Kenya Railways said the exercise involves identifying project boundaries, confirming affected land parcels, and measuring land sizes to facilitate the gazettement process.

The survey teams are using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology, a modern satellite-based system, to ensure precise and reliable measurements.

The preparatory work marks a key milestone in the expansion of Kenya’s SGR network, which aims to enhance regional connectivity and boost trade along the Nairobi-Kisumu-Malaba corridor. [11]

An SGR locomotive and passenger train on the existing network. [12]

View of Chinese-built Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) in Kenya

In a short publicity article dated 21st February 2026, the Chinese newsagency Xinhua uses pictures to describe travel on the SGR in Kenya on 17th February 2026. It can be found here … [13]

Stretching 472 km from the port city of Mombasa to the capital Nairobi in Kenya, the Chinese-built Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) was launched on 31st May 2017. It is the first new railway built in Kenya since independence and a flagship project of China-Kenya cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative.” [13]

This photo taken on 17th February 2026 shows the Nairobi Terminus of the SGR © Xinhua/Xie Jianfei. [13]

Recent and Upcoming Railway Tenders

A snapshot of current and planned tenders for railway work.

  • Consultancy Services For Design Review And Construction Supervision For The Proposed Construction Of Nairobi Railway City Central Station, Public Realm And Other Associated Infrastructure Works (15th January 2026);
  • Consultancy Services For Design Review And Construction Supervision For The Proposed Standard Gauge Railway From Naivasha \U2013 Kisumu (Phase 2B) (15th January 2026);
  • Proposed Construction Of Limuru Railway
    Station And Associated Facilities (23rd January 2026); and
  • Supply And Delivery Of Rail Fittings And Fasteners For Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) (20th February 2026).

Kenya 2026 Budget Policy Prioritises Rail And Logistics Modernisation

Phillippa Dean of Railways Africa reports [15]that:

Kenya’s 2026 Budget Policy Statement sets out a programme of infrastructure and policy interventions aimed at accelerating economic transformation, lowering the cost of doing business and improving the movement of people and goods. Transport and logistics feature prominently, with rail identified as a key enabler of national competitiveness and regional connectivity.

The Government confirms that it has completed construction of the Miritini MGR Station at the Mombasa Terminus, including a new metre gauge railway link and a railway bridge across the Makupa Causeway. The works are intended to provide seamless first- and last-mile connectivity for Standard Gauge Railway passengers.

As part of efforts to strengthen the transport policy framework, the Government has developed the National E-Mobility Policy to guide the transition to clean and sustainable transport technologies, the National Road Safety Action Plan 2024 to 2025, and the National Logistics and Freight Strategy for horticulture exports.

A comprehensive ten-year infrastructure programme is planned to address existing gaps. This includes dualling 2,500 kilometres of priority highways, surfacing an additional 28,000 kilometres of roads and expanding strategic transport corridors through Public Private Partnerships. Rail development forms part of this wider transport and logistics modernisation agenda.

The extension of the Standard Gauge Railway from Naivasha to Kisumu and onward to Malaba has begun, marking a step towards enhanced regional connectivity. The statement also identifies modernisation of the railway system as a priority within the broader transport and logistics investment framework.

Performance data included in the statement show that the services sector recorded growth of 4.8 percent in the first quarter, 5.5 percent in the second quarter and 5.4 percent in the third quarter of 2025. Within this, the transportation and storage sub-sector expanded by 3.7 percent, 5.4 percent and 5.2 percent respectively, across the same quarters. Growth in the sub-sector was supported by increased activity in road, water and air transport, as well as railway operations.

Transport and logistics investments also extend to the modernisation of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, the building of a new international airport, development at the Ports of Mombasa and Lamu and reforms aimed at restoring the operational and financial stability of Kenya Airways. Additional priorities include completing port berths, establishing logistics hubs and enhancing maritime safety through programmes such as Vijana Baharia.

The statement highlights the scale of public sector exposure within the rail sector. The cumulative on-lent loan portfolio stands at KSh 1,051.1 billion, of which Kenya Railways Corporation accounts for KSh 547.4 billion, representing 52 percent of the total. This concentration reflects a significant exposure within a single entity.

Overall, the Budget Policy Statement frames the modernisation and expansion of transport and logistics infrastructure, including rail, as essential to connecting markets, reducing the cost of doing business and reinforcing Kenya’s position as an aviation and commercial hub for East and Central Africa. [15]

Freight Trains Poised for Return as Kenya Railways Clears Key Rift Valley Corridor

An article carried by Dawan Africa on 19th January 2026 reported that: [16]

After months of silence on the tracks, freight trains are edging closer to a comeback along the vital Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway corridor, offering fresh hope to traders and businesses that rely on rail transport across the region.

Kenya Railways has announced that after heavy rain disruption in April 2024 halted services, the vital Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway is ready for freight trains, promising lower costs and stronger regional trade links once slope protection works are finalised. [16]

Kenya Railways Corporation has confirmed that rehabilitation works on the route, which was severely damaged by heavy rains in April 2024, have been fully completed. The disruption forced a suspension of freight services, cutting off a key link in the transport chain between the coast, western Kenya and neighbouring countries.

In a statement issued on Monday, the corporation said the line has undergone successful test runs, clearing it for safe operations.

Engineers are now finalising slope protection works, a precautionary measure aimed at reinforcing the corridor and preventing future damage, especially during periods of heavy rainfall.

“Rehabilitation works on the Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway corridor are now 100% complete, with successful test rides conducted to confirm the safety and operational readiness of the line,” Kenya Railways said. “The only remaining activity is slope protection works, which are being finalised to enhance long-term stability and safety.”

While no specific date has been given for the resumption of freight services, the corporation said preparations are already underway. Once operational, the corridor is expected to play a critical role in easing the movement of goods from the Port of Mombasa to Nyanza and Western Kenya, while also strengthening regional trade links with Uganda, Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan.

The announcement signals renewed momentum in Kenya Railways’ broader recovery efforts following weather-related disruptions. It also comes just weeks after the corporation reinstated the Kisumu Safari Train, which had been grounded for nearly a year.

That service was revived in December to meet increased festive season travel demand to the lakeside city, offering passengers a safer and more affordable alternative during one of the busiest periods of the year. Kenya Railways said the move helped ease pressure caused by last-minute bookings and limited transport options.

With freight trains now set to follow suit, the reopening of the Kijabe corridor is expected to reduce pressure on roads, cut transport costs and restore confidence in rail as a dependable backbone for trade and travel across the region. [16]

A Formal Start to Construction of the SGR Extension

Baringo News reports that on 19th March 2026, President William Ruto is scheduled to launch the extension of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) from Suswa to Western Kenya, culminating at the Kenya–Uganda border. [17]

References

  1. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/eoi-uganda-consultancy-services-development/preparation-railway-transport-master-plan-eac-railway-rehabilitation-support-project, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  2. Muhamadi Matovu; Government Pushes to Secure 13 trillion UgX loan for Eastern SGR Line; Nile Post, 19th February 2026; via https://nilepost.co.ug/news/321483/government-pushes-to-secure-shs13tn-for-eastern-sgr-line, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  3. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/12/08/east-africa-railway-news-november-december-2025
  4. https://urc.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/UGANDA-RAILWAYS-CORPORATION-STRATEGIC-PLAN-2025-2030.pdf, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  5. https://www.google.com/search?q=pakwach+railway+bridge&oq=pakwach+railway+bridge&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRigATIHCAUQIRifBTIHCAYQIRifBTIHCAcQIRifBTIHCAgQIRifBTIHCAkQIRifBTIHCAoQIRifBTIHCAsQIRifBTIHCAwQIRifBTIHCA0QIRifBTIHCA4QIRifBdIBCDgyNzNqMGo0qAIOsAIB8QUKhe7sSbfrtg&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#ebo=0, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  6. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3Dx7OnY4J7P-A%26t%3D1&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAC&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  7. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DGaSzMHwCeJE&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAH&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  8. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DvE6zWiVqrAU%26t%3D176&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAM&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  9. https://www.ugandatenders.com/products-services/railway-tenders, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  10. https://ntv.co.ug/business/islamic-development-bank-injects-e410-million-into-standard-gauge-railway-project, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  11. https://allafrica.com/stories/202602200111.html, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  12. https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2026/02/kenya-railways-begins-preparations-for-naivasha-kisumu-malaba-sgr-phases-2b-and-2c, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  13. https://english.news.cn/africa/20260221/bc972d7830534c8d8f7007b18e2a39b5/c.html, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  14. https://www.tendersontime.com/kenya-tenders/railway-tenders, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  15. https://www.railwaysafrica.com/news/kenya-2026-budget-policy-prioritises-rail-and-logistics-modernisation, accessed 21st February 2026.
  16. https://www.dawan.africa/news/freight-trains-poised-for-return-as-kenya-railways-clears-key-rift-valley-corridor, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  17. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CWEsPiTbk, accessed on 21st February 2026.

East Africa Railway News – November/December 2025

A. Uganda to begin construction of its Standard Gauge railway network in April 2026.

In August 2025, Rogers Atukunda wrote of the construction of Uganda’s Standard Gauge railway network commencing in April 2026. His article can be found here. [1]

B. Uganda is to use electric traction for the Kampala to Malaba Standard Gauge Railway Line.

Uganda has recently confirmed that its Standard Gauge line from Malaba/Tororo to Kampala will operate with electric traction to European standards rather than diesel traction to Chinese standards.

The planned regional standard-gauge network includes two lines separating inside the Eastern border of Uganda at Tororo. These then diverge further in the West (at Bihanga) and in the North (at Gulu). The total route length will be 1,724 kilometres subject to change due to design modifications and additional sidings and/or branch lines. [3]

Kabona Esiara of ‘The East African‘ explained in November 2025 that this required detailed negotiations between the railway authorities in Kenya and Uganda. These negotiations commenced in mid-November 2025. [2]

Uganda and Kenya were working on a raft of technical and policy measures to facilitate a seamless SGR system between the two countries as they work in the next few years on parallel finishing of their SGR lines.

Kenya says it will start constructing the Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba line early in 2026 while construction of Uganda’s Kampala-Malaba should commence in the second quarter of 2026.

Further details can be found here. [2]

C. A series of mis-steps in the development of railways in Kenya and Uganda.

Mary Serumaga, in 2018, said that “the building of standard gauge (SGR) railways in both Uganda and Kenya and the predictable sagas that have ensued are reminiscent of the controversies surrounding the building of the Uganda and Rhodesian Railways in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Both present a framework within which it is possible finally to understand the limited achievements in development in all sectors (and frankly, underdevelopment in many) and regression in Uganda’s primary education, copper mining and agricultural sectors. Both SGR projects are tainted with suspicion of shady procurement which, if taken together with the track records of the implementers, points to corruption. It would be irresponsible to say otherwise.” [4]

The route, design, level of service and all other decisions of the Uganda Railway of 1990 were dictated by potential profits for foreign investors (both public and private) and their local agents, and not by notions of public service and the common good of those who would bear the ultimate cost. Return on investment is not a bad thing but the Imperial government also claimed to be acting in the interests of the indigenous populations. … The difference now is that there is no pretence about whether the railways are serving the interests of the general population. The different financial implications presented by the procurement process itself, the selection of routes and the relative cost of engineering in the different terrains, plus the cost of compensating displaced landowners, provide scope for long-running, energy-depleting corruption scandals. From the outset, there has been a lack of confidence that procurement processes for the necessary services would prioritise the interests of the public over the interests of the contractor and would actively exclude the personal interests of the public servants commissioning the works. This is what is triggering the anxiety surrounding the SGRs.” [4]

Moreover, the choice over whether to upgrade the old railway or to start afresh was not adequately debated publicly. Ditto the options on financing. For the Kenyan SGR, the most costly of the potential routes were reportedly selectively chosen. Several cheaper routes on land allegedly already in possession of the government are said to have been rejected. … There are also questions surrounding passenger service. Do the railways only serve trade or are passengers entitled to this alternative to dangerous road transport?” [4]

Uganda owns one half of the old East African Railway. Together with the Kenyan leg, it was put under a 25-year management contract. The new owners renamed their new toy Rift Valley Railways (RVR). In 2017, after only twelve years, the governments cancelled the contracts in a move the RVR called an illegal takeover. On the Ugandan end, there were allegations of asset-stripping by previous European concessionaires as well as unpaid concession fees and massive salary arrears caused by RVR. If RVR were to successfully sue the government for cancellation of the contract, their compensation would be the first budget overrun. … The government of Uganda then signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2014 with the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC), which had submitted a study. It abandoned those negotiations in favour of a second Chinese entity, the China Harbour Engineering Company. In justifying its action, the government questioned the quality of the CCECC’s study, which it said was cut and pasted from pre-existing feasibility studies (something that could have been avoided by following proper procurement procedures). CCECC insists it was a pre-feasibility study requiring less detail than a full-blown feasibility study. Whatever the case, if CCECC had followed through with its suit for US$8 million in compensation, which would have been another massive blow to the budget at inception. Whatever compensation they have agreed to has not been made public but as matters stand, the budget for the eastern leg of the SGR has gone up from CCECC’s proposed US$4.2 billion to CHEC’s US$6.7 billion.” [4]

The remainder of Mary Serumaga’s article which looks back at colonial construction work and draws parallels with 21st century procurement and construction in East Africa can be found here. [4]

D. President Yoweri Museveni’s State of the Nation Address in June 2025.

In June 2025, President Museveni highlighted significant rail developments, advancing the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) project to link with Kenya and the region, aiming to cut costs and boost trade, while discussing financing for the $2.8 billion Kampala-Malaba SGR and emphasizing participation in the development of the new rail infrastructure. In essence, the 2025 address signalled a push for comprehensive road and railway modernization and expansion, leveraging oil revenues and debt financing to build a robust network for economic transformation. [5] Museveni said, “we are soon finalizing the construction of the 1,443km East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) from Buliisa to Tanga in Tanzania. The construction of the SGR, which I launched last year, is soon starting,” [5] and “the NRM Government has prioritized infrastructure development especially roads, railways and electricity.” [5] In addition, the government will be focusing on revitalizing metre-gauge lines (like Tororo-Gulu, Kampala-Malaba).

E. Kenya – Additional Madaraka Express Trains for the Christmas period.

Kenya Railways announces additional Madaraka Express trains from 8th December 2025, to 5th January 2026, to meet increased festive season demand. The Nairobi-Mombasa train departs Nairobi at 9:40 AM, arriving in Mombasa at 3:35 PM, while the Mombasa-Nairobi train leaves at 4:30 PM, reaching Nairobi at 10:55 pm. [6]

The railway operator said the move comes in response to increased demand during the holiday period, when thousands of Kenyans and tourists journey along the scenic Nairobi-Mombasa route. … ‘We are committed to providing a safe and convenient travel experience, and the additional services will help ease congestion while maintaining punctuality’ reads the notice dated 2nd December.” [7]

References

  1. Rogers Atukunda; Uganda to Begin Construction of Standard Gauge Railway in April 2026; in SoftPower News, https://softpower.ug/uganda-to-begin-construction-of-standard-gauge-railway-in-april-2026, accessed on 24th November 2025
  2. Kabona Esiara; Uganda prefers European standard for SGR, throwing off Kenya; in The East African, 25th November 2025; via https://www.zawya.com/en/world/africa/uganda-prefers-european-standard-for-sgr-throwing-off-kenya-j9zxxa2r, accessed on 24th November 2025.
  3. https://www.sgr.go.ug, accessed on 24th November 2025.
  4. Mary Serumaga; The New Lunatic Express: Lessons not learned from the East African Railway; in The Elephant – African Analysis, Opinion, and Investigation; https://www.theelephant.info/analysis/2018/06/16/the-new-lunatic-express-lessons-not-learned-from-the-east-african-railway; accessed on 7th December 2025.
  5. https://parliamentwatch.ug/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/STATE-OF-THE-NATION-ADDRESS-HE-VERY-FINAL-2025_250605_160027.pdf, accessed on 7th December 2025.
  6. The Kenya Times; https://www.facebook.com/groups/thekenyatimes/posts/1532674321328248, accessed on 8th December 2025.
  7. https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2025-12-02-kenya-railways-adds-extra-madaraka-express-train, accessed on 8th December 2025.

Three Beyer-Garratts in East Africa in the 1950s

The December 1958 issue of The Railway Magazine featured three photographs of Beyer Garrett locomotives at work in East Africa. These were giants of the metre-gauge that grappled with long loads on steep inclines and at times sharply curved track radii. [1]

1. EAR Class ’55’ Garratt No. 5504 at Diva River

Class ’55’ Garratt No. 5504 on the up mixed train at Dura River. [1: p849]

The KUR EC5 class was a class of 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge 4-8-2+2-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built during the latter stages of World War II by Beyer, Peacock & Co. in Gorton, Manchester for the War Department of the United Kingdom. The two members of the class entered service on the Kenya-Uganda Railway (KUR) in 1945. They were part of a batch of 20 locomotives, the rest of which were sent to either India or Burma. [2: p64]

The following year, 1946, four locomotives from that batch were acquired by the Tanganyika Railway (TR) from Burma. They entered service on the TR as the TR GB class. [2: p64]

In 1949, upon the merger of the KUR and the TR to form the East African Railways (EAR), the EC5 and GB classes were combined as the EAR 55 class. In 1952, the EAR acquired five more of the War Department batch of 20 from Burma, where they had been Burma Railways class GD; these five locomotives were then added to the EAR 55 class, bringing the total number of that class to 11 units. [2: p64]

This locomotive was Works No. 7151, War Department No. 74235, War Department India No. 423. It was one of the two that went to Burma Railways (their No. 852) from where it was purchased by Tanganyika Railways in 1946 and became their No. 751. It came to the EAR in 1949 and received the No. 5504. [3]

Sister locomotives in Class 55 can be seen here [7] and here. [8]

Dura River was the last station on the Western Extension before the end of the line at Kasese, Uganda. The River flowed North to South towards Lake George and was crossed by the railway at the Eastern edge of the Queen Elizabeth National Park. Mapping and satellite imagery in the area are not highly detailed – the following images are the best I can provide. …

The mapping which appears on the Google search engine when searching for the National Park. This enlarged extract focuses on the railway bridges which cross the Mubuku and Dura rivers. The line of the railway is shown in grey. [4]
The OpenStreetMap view of the same location, highlighting the bridge over the river. [5]
Google Maps satellite imagery focussed on the same location. The line of trees which sit above the swampy ground mark the line of the railway embankment. [Google Maps, July 2025]
Crossing the Dura River/Swamp. The sign is a Momentum Board, which refers to the opposing gradient being steeper than the ruling gradient. The figures mean that the driver should achieve a speed of 18 mph at a distance of 4 furlongs (8 half furlongs) from the sign. The train’s maximum speed was 25 mph, © Geoffrey Parsons. [6]

2. EAR Class ’58’ Garratt No. 5804 near Kikuyu

Nairobi-Kisumu train near Kikuyu with a ’58’ class Garratt No. 5804, © C. W. Stuart. [1: p849]

The EAR 58 class was a class of 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge, 4-8-4+4-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built by Beyer, Peacock & Co. in Manchester, England, in 1949. [9]

Another view of No. 5804, apparently it was the only one of the class to bear the lettering ‘EAR&H’, all others in the class bore ‘EAR’, © gruntie916 and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [10]

The eighteen members of the class were ordered by the Kenya-Uganda Railway (KUR) immediately after World War II, and were a slightly modified, oil-burning version of the KUR’s existing coal-fired EC3 class. By the time the new locomotives were built and entered service, the KUR had been succeeded by the East African Railways (EAR), which designated the coal-fired EC3s as its 57 class, and the new, oil-burning EC3s as its 58 class. [2: p66][9]

No. 5804 was built in 1949 (Works No. 7293) and originally given the KUR No. 92. Its sister locomotive No. 5808 (Works No. 7297, given KUR No. 96 but never carried that number) was the first to enter service with the EAR. [9]

EAR ‘Class 58’ Locomotive No. 5803 (a sister to 5804) is seen here at Changamwe, Kenya, with the Mombasa–Kampala mail train, circa 1950-51. [9]

Other locomotives in the class can be seen here, [11] here, [12] and here. [13]

Kikuyu Station is 20 kilometres or so from Nairobi, during construction of the railway, railway officers established a temporary base in Kikuyu while they supervised work on the laying of the track down at the rift valley escarpment.

Kikuyu Railway Station while construction in the Rift Valley was ongoing, © Public Domain. [14]
Kikuyu Railway Station in modern times, © Shiku Njathi, used with their kind permission. For the intermediate and original sources please see reference [15]

3. EAR Class ’60’ Garratt No. 6021 at Kasese

Daily mixed train, headed by class ’60’ Beyer-Garratt locomotive No. 6021, Sir William Gowers,” about to leave Kasese, terminus of the East African Railways & Harbours Western Extension in Uganda. [1: p849]

The EAR 60 class, also known as the Governor class, was a 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge 4-8-2+2-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built for the East African Railways as a development of the EAR’s existing 56 class. [2: p77]

The 29 members of the 60 class were ordered by the EAR from Beyer, Peacock & Co. The first 12 of them were built by sub-contractors Société Franco-Belge in Raismes (Valenciennes), France, and the rest were built by Beyer, Peacock in Gorton. The class entered service in 1953-54. [2: p77]

Initially, all members of the class carried the name of a Governor (or equivalent) of Kenya, Tanganyika or Uganda, but later all of the Governor nameplates were removed. [2: p77]

No. 6021 was built by Beyer Peacock (Works No. 7663). It was not one of the class built by sub-contractors Société Franco-Belge. It was given the name ‘Sir William Gowers’ when first put into service, losing the name along with other members of the class in the 1960s after independence. …

Sister locomotive, EAR Class 60 locomotive No. 6019 at Tabora Depot in Tanzania, © Basil Roberts and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [16]

Other members of the class can be seen here, [17] here, [18] and here. [19]

Kasese Station only became part of the rail network in Uganda in 1956. The construction costs of the whole line from Kampala were very greatly affected by the difficult nature of the country in the final forty miles before Kasese. Severe problems were presented by the descent of the escarpment, which involves a spiral at one point, while from the foot there is an 18-mile crossing of papyrus swamp through which a causeway had to be built, entailing a vast amount of labour. The extension to Kasese was built primarily to serve the Kilembe copper mines. Construction of the line from Kampala to Kasese took approximately five years. [21]

The station building at Kasese in the 21st century, © Michael Branz and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [20]
An extract from OpenStreetMap’s mapping showing Kasese Railway Station and turning triangle. The station was not the end of the line as it continued a short distance to the Kilembe Mines that it was built to serve. [21]

References

  1. Garratts in East Africa; in The Railway Magazine Volume 104 No. 692, December 1958, p849.
  2. Roel Ramaer; Steam Locomotives of the East African Railways. David & Charles Locomotive Studies; David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1974.
  3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/KUR_EC5_class, accessed on 7th July 2025.
  4. https://www.google.com/search?q=queen+elizabth+yganda&oq=queen+elizabth+yganda&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQABgNGIAEMgkIAhAAGA0YgAQyCAgDEAAYFhgeMggIBBAAGBYYHjIICAUQABgWGB4yCggGEAAYCBgNGB4yCggHEAAYCBgNGB4yCggIEAAYCBgNGB4yCggJEAAYCBgNGB4yCggKEAAYCBgNGB4yCggLEAAYCBgNGB4yCggMEAAYCBgNGB4yCggNEAAYCBgNGB4yCggOEAAYCBgNGB7SAQkxMzQ4NmowajmoAg6wAgHxBe8kU7h2wyh58QXvJFO4dsMoeQ&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#ebo=0, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  5. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/192796#map=19/0.228157/30.289528&layers=P, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  6. http://mccrow.org.uk/EastAfrica/EastAfricanRailways/UgandaBranches.htm, accessed on 1st June 2018.
  7. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/32890286408, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  8. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/48996173961, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAR_58_class, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  10. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Engine_unit_of_East_African_Railways_and_Harbours_Corporation_(EAR%26HC)_58_class_Garratt_locomotive_no_5804.png, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  11. https://www.world-railways.co.uk/general-photo-408, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  12. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/29100559308, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  13. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/47072893354, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  14. https://rogerfarnworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/kikuyu-station.jpg
  15. https://rogerfarnworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/kikuyu-railway-station.jpg included by kind permission of Shiku Njathi. ….. https://inkikuyu.com/a-walk-around-kikuyu/kikuyu-railway-station
  16. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Basil_Roberts_(680730_EAR).jpg, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  17. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/51744782399, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  18. https://www.world-railways.co.uk/general-photo-667, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  19. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/31824271347, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  20. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Kasese_Train_Station.jpg, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  21. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/06/11/uganda-railways-part-21-kampala-to-kasese.

The Railways of Namibia (the former South West Africa) – Part 2 – Windhoek and the Southern Lines

In Part 1, we looked at the railways in the North of Namibia, that article can be found here. [4] This article covers lines which left Windhoek and covered the South of the country.

The Namibian Rail Network, © Htonl and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [11]
A schematic representation of the Namibian network. [11]

Windhoek-Nakop

After the aerial image immediately below, the next three images form a kind of ‘tryptic’ which shows the TransNamib train yard and station at Windhoek. Taken together they show the full site. …

An aerial image showing Windhoek train yard, © Hp Baumeler and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [10]
These three images taken together cover the full Windhoek train yard and station. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The railway line from Windhoek to Nakop is 869 kilometres (540 miles) long. The section between Karasburg and Keetmanshoop was completed in 1909. In 1912, the 500 kilometres (310 miles) connection between Karasburg and Windhoek was completed, and the extension to Upinhton (South Africa) was built in 1915.

  • Windhoek
  • Aris
  • Rehoboth
  • Tses
  • Keetmanshoop
  • Karasburg
  • Nakop (border)
  • Upington

We start our look at the main line to the South, in Windhoek at the South end of the Railway Station site. …

The southern end of Windhoek Railway Station, seen from John Meinert Street. [Google Streetview, 2023]
The line South, from John Meinert Street. [Google Streetview, 2023]
A satellite image showing the railway South of John Meinert Street. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The next length of the line to the South, to a point South of the B6. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The bridge carrying the railway across the B6. [Google Streetview, 2024]

Although it does not look like it as yet, the line South of Windhoek Railway Station climbed relatively steeply as it meandered South. … As we will soon see, the landscape South of Windhoek is different to that to the North of the city.

The line to the South of the B6 curves round the residential area of Schmerenbeck Street. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line then crosses the Gammams River and under David Hosea Meroro Road. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The triangular junction visible in this image gives access to the branch line to Gobabis. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line then passes under the B1. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South from the B1. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Then the line(s) cross the Arebbusch River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The next road to bridge the line is the C26. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view from Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue (C26) back towards Windhoek Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The view South from Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue towards the hills. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line passes under the city’s Western Bypass. [Google Maps, June 2025]
This view looks North-northeast under the Western Bypass towards Windhoek Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking South from the Western Bypass. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line passes once again under the B1 as the hills draw closer. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view South-southeast along the line from the bridge carrying the B1. [Google Streetview, 2022]

The line continues to wind its way into the hills passing under the B1 once again.

The line has deviated away from Birmingham as it finds its own way into the hills. It returns to pass under the modern road again. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view South from the bridge carrying the B1. The line enters a very short tunnel just to the South of the modern road. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The B1 continues to climb as it heads South. The railway takes a different path as it gains height. It crosses over the B1 by means of this bridge. [Google Streetview, 2022]

Some kilometres further along the line it again crosses the B1. This time the road bridges the line. …

Both road and railway continue their journey South. Here their paths cross once again close to Aris Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking back along the line to the North from the bridge carrying the ,B1 over the line. [Google Streetview, 2022]
And from the same bridge looking Southwest into Aris Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2022]

The community of Aris and its railway station are shown in a YouTube video. …

Aria Railway Station. [9]

South of Aris Railway Station,two tracks run in parallel as far as Aris Quarry.

Part of Aris Quarry appears at the bottom left of this satellite image. The other significant part of the Quarry sits to the Southeast on the East side of the B1. [Google Maps, June 2025]
At Aris Quarry Google Maps shows three bogie hopper wagons at a short wharf. [Google Maps, June 2025]T

The line continues South towards Rehoboth. …

Quarry land sits on the East side of the line at the top of this next satellite image. A dry water ourselves can be seen across the image. It is bridged by the line. [Google Streetview, June 2025]
A closer image of the truss girder bridge crossing the dry river bed. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next two satellite images show the line heading further South. …

For a short distance the B2 runs close to the railway. The railway then crosses two more dry watercourses. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view from the B1 at the top of the satellite image immediately above looking West. The railway line can be seen between the road and the mountain. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
The bridge over the first dry river. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The bridge over the second of the two watercourses. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next three satellite images take the line further South, running on its own course with the B1 away to the East. …

Close to the bottom of this image the railway crosses the Oanob River’s watercourse on a causeway with a short trestle bridge
The truss girder bridge over the dry watercourse of the Oanab River. [Google Maps, June 2025]

More satellite images take us further South. The first two of these extracts from Google’s satellite imagery shows the line running past the Omeya Golf and Residential Oasis. More about this relatively recent development can be found here [6] and here. [7]. The second of these is a sales video produced to attract investors and house sales.

Four satellite images take the line South to a point where it once again runs alongside the B!. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking Southwest from the B1 just to the North of its junction with the D1427. The railway can be seen in the background behind the closest trees. [Google Streetview, 2022]

Over the next 3 or 4 kilometres the line and the road run in parallel, with little worthy of note, Before the railway moves away to the West of the road once again. …

The line crosses four dry watercourses before turning towards the East. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Running Southeast the line follows the fourth of the watercourses and passes under the B1. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking North-northwest along the line from the bridge carrying the B1. [Google Streetview, November 2023]
Looking Southeast from the same bridge towards Rehoboth. [Google Streetview, November 2023]

The line wanders its way through the hills to the East of the B1 passing from the Khomas Region of Namibia into the Hardap Region. It runs through a number of small townships close to the Usip River before entering Vogelpan where Rehoboth Railway Station was sited.

Vogelpan and Rehoboth Railway Station. The station was 8km or so to the East of Rehoboth. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Reheboth Railway Station © Norman Axel Kamati, 2021 (Google Maps). [8]
Another view of Reheboth Railway Station in Vogelpan © Norman Axel Kamati, 2021 (Google Maps). [8]

Just a short distance to the South of Vogelpan, the railway turns East to cross the Usip River. ….

Looking East from the C25, the line can be seen curving away to the East and crossing the channel of the Usio River. [Google Streetview, August 2024]

Just to the South of the location of the photograph immediately above, the C25 itself turns East and crosses both the Usip River watercourse and then the railway.

Looking North-northwest from the ungated crossing on the C25, along the railway back towards Vogelpan. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Looking Southwest from the same crossing on the C25, along the railway. [Google Streetview, August 2024]

The railway runs down the East side of the River Usip passed its confluence with the Oanob River. It then continues alongside the Oanob (less than 1 kilometre to the East of the river).

The railway then crossed the Oanob River and a tributary in quick succession. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The first bridge (on the left) crosses the Oanob, the second (on the right, crosses the tributary). [Google Maps, June 2025]

The line then continues, pretty much in a South-southeast direction for some considerable distance with little to remark on. It passes close to Duinevelde on its way South before reaching Kalkrand.

The railway is seen here (from a minor road to the West of the line) approaching Kalkrand from the North. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Kalkrand and its railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Kalkrand Station and passing loop. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Kalkrand Railway Station, © Swen Schindoeski (July 2015). [Google Maps, June 2025][12]

Station sign. [13]

Southeast of Kalkrand the line and the B1 run in parallel. …

Road and rail together head Southeast. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking East from the B1, the railway can be seen on a parallel course. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The dunes of the Kalahari desert appear in the top right of this satellite image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The railway flirts with the edge of the dunes. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The line continues in a generally Southeasterly direction along the edge of the Kalahari Desert before beginning to swing round to the South and heading into rougher terrain where its route is dictated by the contours. …

Sidings some distance to the South of Kalkrand. [Google Maps, June 2025]
These two structures carry the line over watercourses in the hills [Google Maps, June 2025]

Further South and again on flatter terrain the line passes under the C20. …

Looking North-northwest along the line from the bridge carrying the C20. [Google Streetview January 2018]
Looking Southeast along the line from the same bridge. The various storage tanks on the horizon are associated with Agrimark, an agricultural and retail store, part of the Agrimark, Namibia network. Adjacent to it, between the Fish River and the B1 and on the West side of the Fish River is an area of irrigated fields. [Google Streetview, January 2028]
Agrimark’s storage facility heralds the arrival of Southbound strains in the town of Mariental. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking North from an ungated crossing on a minor road North of Mariental. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking South from the same crossing. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Further South, the line bridges a dry watercourse which is a tributary of the Fish River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The bridge in the above satellite image as seen from the B1. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Immediately North of Mariental, the crosses another minor road at an ungated crossing. This view looks North along the line. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking South towards Mariental from the same crossing. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Mariental Township with the Railway Station at the centre of the satellite image. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next two extracts from Google Maps satellite imagery cover the length of the railway station site. …

These two images show the station site at Mariental. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Mariental Station building. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The station building at Mariental seen fromt he Southwest. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Immediately South of Mariental, the B1 and the railway run South side by side. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The railway seen from the B1 to the South of Mariental. [Google Streetview, January 2018]
A series of different culverts and bridges support the line over historic channels most of which are dry. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The next road crossing is that for the C18. It is another ungated crossing and this is the view looking North along the line. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
And this is the view South along the line at the same crossing. [Google Streetview, August 2024]
Looking Northwest from the ungated crossing over the D1068 at Asab. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking Southeast from the D1068 into the station at Asab. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Asab Trading CentreSidings/Station and River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking North from the B1 along the Asab River watercourse with the railway bridge close to the centre of the image. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

The line continues Southeast from Asab. …

The line continues Southeast towards Tses on a shallow embankment with bridge openings for run-off water over dry watercourses. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Tses Township, the B1 and the railway. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Tses Station and Sidings. [Google Earth, June 2025]
Tses River Bridge. [Google Earth, June 2025]
Looking Northeast from the bridge carrying the B1 along the line, back towards Tses. {Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking ahead to the Southwest from the same bridge. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

The line continues in a generally Southwards direction. Again, when hills are encountered it curves its way along the contours to limit gradients. …

Another glimpse of the line from the bridge carrying the B1 across the outfall channel from the Van Rym Dam on the approaches to Keetmanshoop. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

Keetmanshoop is the next significant settlement on the line. …

Keetmanshoop: the B1 enters the satellite image in the top-right and curves round to leave it bottom-centre. The railway station sits at the centre of the image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A closer view of Keetmanshoop Railway Station and its goods facilities. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The original Keetmanshoop Railway Station building, completed in 1906 by the German colonial authorities, [14]
Keetmanshoop Historic Railway Station and (at the bottom of the image) its plinthed locomotive. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Keetmanshoop Historic Railway Station building built to replace the original station building in 1928. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The platform side of the building seen from the Northwest. The building has been restored by the city authorities, © Beat H. Schweizer, 24th May 2006. [15]
The plinthed 4-8-0 Class 7A Locomotive No.1011 at Keetmanshoop. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The same locomotive and tender – a 3/4 rear view. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

4-8-0 Locomotive Class 7A, No. 1011 was built by Neilson & Co, of Glasgow, Scotland, as works no 4930 in 1896, it was brought to Keepmanshoop in 1980 to be plinthed. The first Class 7 locomotives were commissioned by the Cape Government Railways and delivered by Dübs & Co of England in 1892. Follow-up batches were built by Sharp, Stewart & Co, Neilson, Reid & Co, and North British Locomotive Company. They had a wheel arrangement of 4-8-0, coupled wheels of 3’6 3/4″ (1086mm diameter) and Stephenson link valve gear. The engines were originally powered by saturated steam, but many were later reboilered and converted to use superheated steam. Modifications such as larger boilers, increases in cylinder diameters and larger cabs resulted in the reclassification of the locomotives as Class 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E and 7F. More information and photographs can be seen here. [16]

More modern facilities at Keetmanshoop Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A view of these modern facilties from the Southwest on Darn Viljoen. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The yard and turning triangle at Keetmanshoop Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view of the yard from the corner of 3rd Street and 12th Avenue. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

While Keetmanshoop railway Station sits approximately on an East-West alignment is is approached bey means of a sharp curve from the North and trains leaving to the South take a sharp curve to the South within the township.

A sharp curve takes the line from Keetmanshoop Station through more than 90°. This view Northeast from M98 shows the curve leaving the Station. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
This view, also from the M98, shows the line turning further to the South. [Google Streetview, December 2025]
A TransNamib locomotive SAR Class 33-400 close to Keetmanshoop, © Harald Süpfle, cropped by FritzG, made available under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.5). [3]

The line continues to the South. … First five images following the line South and Southwest as far the point where the B4 bridges the line.

A series of five images following the line, first along Railway Street and then at an ungated crossing, all photographs are taken looking Southwest. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The length of line covered by the images above. The B4 crosses the line at the bottom of the image. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Two pictures now taken from the bridge carrying the B4 over the line.

Looking North from the B$ towards Keetmanshoop. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking South along the line ahead. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking Southwest along the line from an ungated crossing to the South side of the B4. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking Southwest along the line from another ungated crossing to the South side of the B4. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The B4 and the railway run parallel, perhaps around 100 metres apart. This photograph shows the line running parallel to the road. Google Streetview, December 2023]
Another view looking Southwest, this time from the ungated crossing which takes the C12 dirt road over the line. [Google Streetview, January 2018]
The last image showed a passing loop to the Southwest of the C12. This satellite image shows the full length of the loop. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The railway turns to the West as it approaches the junction at Seeheim.

A passing loop sits to the East of the junction at Seeheim. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The railway junction at Seeheim. The Seeheim Hotel is a few hundred meters North of the Railway Junction. The line heading Northwest is the branch line to Aus and Lüderitz. The line heading SouthWest is the line to Nakop and South Africa Immediately beyond the junction is crosses the Skaap River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
After curving South from the junction at Seeheim, the line heads South-southeast for some distance. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line only deviates from the South-southeast alignment when natural obstacles dictate, as here crossing a significant dry watercourse. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South along the line from an ungated crossing on the C12/M28. [Google Streetview, 2022]
This view Southeast from the C12/M28 shows the railway running parallel to the road. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
A passing loop – close to Canyon Farm Yard. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South from the ungated crossing on the C12/M28 just to the South of the passing loop (at the bottom of the satellite image above. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Looking South from an ungated minor road crossing adjacent to the C12/M23
Further South, the line is now heading more directly southwards. Here it crosses the Gaab River by means of the Holoog Railway Bridge. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The Holoog Railway Bridge over the dry watercourse of the Gaab River, © Hene (2023). [Google Maps, June 2025]
The Holoog Railway Bridge, seen in this West facing view from the C12/M28. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Looking West from the C12/M28, the railway can be seen running around 100 metres from the road before finding it’s own way through the next belt off hills and then returning to run alongside the riad. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The C12/M28 crosses the line from East to West. This photograph looks South down the line which is running down the flank of an area of higher ground to the East. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Looking East from the C12/M28, the line can be seen running beneath the flank of the higher ground. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The road recrosses the line, West to East, at another ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, 2023]
A side road to the C12/M28, the D298 crosses the line at another ungated crossing. This is the view Southeast from that crossing. [Google Streetview, September 2024]

The railway continues to run parallel to the C12/M28 for some considerable distance. Close to Grunau the C12/M28 meets the B1 which crosses the line at 90°.

Looking East-southeast from the bridge carrying the B1 over the railway, the passing loop at Grunau is just ahead. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The railway station/passing loop at Grunau to the East of the B1. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Grunau Railway Station, (c) Pgallert (2010) and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [17]

East of Grunau, the line runs parallel to the B3 in a southeasterly direction. …

The line bridges the dry watercourse of the Hom River and other watercourses as it head Southeast. [Google Maps, June, 2025]
The Hom River Railway Bridge, seen from the B3 Bridge over the same watercourse. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Two further structures carry the Railway over dry watercourses on the run into Karasburg. [Google Streetview,
The railway enters Karasburg from the North West, curving round to close to a North-South alignment through the railway Station and then sharply curving round to the Northeast as it leaves the town. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view South towards Karasburg Railway Station from the ungated crossing at Hendrik Snyman Street. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Karasburg Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The turning triangle at Karasburg. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Karasburg Railway Station: passenger platform/building (note the painted edge of the platform) and goods shed. The pictures below come from 1914/1915 and show different aspects of Karasburg Railway Station at that time.

Karasburg Railway Station in 1914/1915. [18]
The engine shed in 1914/1915. [18]
Pointwork at Karasburg Railway Station. [18]

As we have already noted the line South of Karasburg Station curves sharply to the Northeast and passing under the M21.

Looking West from the bridge carrying the M21 over the railway at Karasburg. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Looking East from the bridge carrying the M21 over the railway at Karasburg. The curve shown on the last image continues as the railway turns to the Northeast. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
East of Karasburg the line runs Northeast alongside the B3 before head East on the South side of the road. [Google Maps, June 2025]

For some distance the line runs along the South side of the B3. separating from it close to Nuwefontein. The B3 crosses to the East side of the Ham River, with the railway remaining on the West side of the river, before crossing it close to De Villiersputs. Near Grondorner, the line crosses the D237 and bridges a tributary of the Ham River before running alongside the D237 in a Southeasterly direction. After a number of kilometres, the D237 turns away to the South and the line continues in a generally easterly direction.

Meandering to the north and then again to the East the line of the B3 once again and runs on its South side towards Ariamsvlei, the border with South Africa and Nakop, beyond the border in South Africa.

Ariamsvlei Railway Station and marshalling yard. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view East into the site from the B3. Google Streetview, January 2024]
Ariamsvlei turning triangle and border post which is just about 10 kilometers from the border with South Africa. Nakop is beyond the border. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Beyond Ariamsvlei is the border crossing at Nakop and the South African town of Upington.

Windhoek-Gobabis

Next we look at a line which ran East from Winhoek. … The railway line from Windhoek to Gobabis is 228 kilometres (142 miles) long and was completed in 1930. [10]

  • Windhoek (capital – junction)
  • Neudamm
  • Omitara
  • Gobabis (branch railhead)

The line to Gobabis leaves the Windhoek-Nakop line at a triangular junction and headed East.

The Windhoek-Gobabis line leaves the line to Nakop in the Southern suburbs of Windhoek. [Google Maps, June 2025]

These next fourteen satellite images show the line wandering back and forth through the Windhoek suburbs. …

These fourteen extracts from Google’s satellite imagery take the Gobabis line to a point to the East of Sam Nujoma Drive. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South-southwest from Andries de Wet Street along the line of the railway towards Windhoek Railway Station, showing the substantial bridge under construction in 2024. [Google Streetview, 2024]

The journey beyond Andries de Wet Street continues, the next satellite images cover larger areas than the ones above. ….

This sequence of three images takes the line out into open country beyond the Avis River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
[The truss girder bridge which carries the railway over the B6 and the channel of the Avis River. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

The line continues in a generally easterly direction, although the contours of the terrain mean that the railway has to meander back and forth to find the most advantageous route. These next extracts from Google’s satellite imagery show the way that the line picks its way through the landscape. …

This sequence of four extracts from Google’s satellite imagery takes the line as far as Finkenstein. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The railway station close to Finkenstein Estate/Village. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view Southwest from the D1527 along the railway towards Windhoek. Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking Northeast into the railway station site from the D1527. [Google Streetview, January 2025]
A little further to the Northwest on the D1527, this is the view looking Northeast into the goods yard at the station. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

These two images indicate the area of the Finkenstein Estate/Village and current proposals for new housing and a new major road. The location of the railway Station can be seen at the top-left of the satellite image. The lighter swathe of ground curving across the top half of the satellite image is the construction site for the new road. [5][Google Maps, June 2025]

The line continues East from Finkenstein. At the right side of this satellite image the railway passes under the B6. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking Northwest from the B6 along the line towards Finkenstein Station and Windhoek. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking Southeast from the B6 the line is curving to the South. The older road bridge is visible alongside the B6. Not too far ahead, out of shot are the construction works for the road that will replace the B6 as a main artery. [Google Streetview, January 2024.

Almost immediately after passing under the B6, the line begins to swing round from a Southwestern trajectory to the Northeast and then the East before passingunder the B6 again.

Looking Northeast from the bridge carrying the B6 over the line. The line can be seen curving round to the East. [Google Streetview, January 2018]

The line heads generally in an easterly direction and after some kilometeres runs alongside the Seeis River. …

The railway bridges the Seeis River and then runs alongside both the river and the B6. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Stocking close to the South bank of the Seeis River, the line passes to the North of Sonnleiton Village before rejoining the B6 close to Windhoek Airport, and passing to the South of the airport and then running immediately alongside the B6.

The railway seen looking North from the B6. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

Both road and rail pass just to the North of the settlement of Seeis where an old railway station was sited, and then over the River Seeis.

The Seeis River Railway Bridge seen looking North from the B6. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

The video below shows the settlement, its station and its bridge. ….

YouTube video of Seeis and its station and railway bridge. [19]

Beyond Seeis the railway continues alongside the B6 in a Northeasterly direction. The railway then turns further Northwest and leaves the B6, finding its own path towards Gobabis. It crossed the D1535 at an ungated crossing. The D1535 then runs alongside the railway heading Northeast before crossing the railway again at another ungated crossing. Both road and railway cross the Wit Nossob River and run along its North bank, crossing tributaries enroute before passing to the North of the Otjivero Reservoir and Dam.

The Otjivero Reservoir and Dam. The railway runs on the North side of the D1535. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Beyond the Dam, the railway follows the C29 heading East. it pulls away a little to the North to create room for Omitara Railway Station.

Omitara Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Omitara Railway Station, (c) Arche-foto, Burkhart Rüchel, and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 3.0). [20]

Northeast of the station the railway passes under the C29, continuing to run East-northeast and then East, and then Southeast, before returning to run alongside the B6 once again. Following the line on satellite images has become increasingly difficult.

This photograph looks along the line to the East from the ungated crossing over the D1658 at Grunental. As can be seen the line is significantly over grown by grasses. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking East at the ungated crossing over the D1663, the line seems to be disappearing into the sand. {Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking West at the old station site at Witvlei. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking East at the old station site at Witvlei. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Witvlei Railway Station in 2018, (c) Hp.Baumeler and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence, (CC BY-SA 4.0). [21]
Looking back West along the apparently little used line towards Windhoek from the bridge carrying the B6 across the line. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking East from the same bridge, the line is almost indistinguishable from the surrounding grassland. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

The railway continues to the East, with the B6 running parallel to it on the North side.

Looking East along the line at an ungated crossing on a minor road.The B6 can be seen over to the left. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

The line begins to turn to the Southeast before crossing the Black Nossob River. …

Looking Southeast from the C30 along the line towards the Black Nossob River. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
The railway bridge over the Black Nossob River close to Gobabis. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Gobabis: the Black Nossob River, Reservoir and Dams are on the left side of the satellite image. The railway bridge over the Black Nossob can just be picked out in the extreme top left of the image. The railway flanks the reservoir and lake before passing under the B6 and then, after the B6 has turned through 90, under the B6 (Gobabis Bypass).

The 6 images immediately above show the railways approach to Gobabis Railway Station.

Gobabis Railway Station. Its turning triangle can be seen at the right side of this satellite image. A series of sidings are the end of the line, these are just Southeast of the turning triangle. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Gobabis Railway Station Buildings. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Gobabis Railway Station Building, (c) Hp. Baumeler and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [22]
Plinthed at Gobabis Railway station is this 5 man railway inspection car (c) Hp. Baumeler and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [23]
Also plinthed at Gobabis Railway station is this small flatbed wagon, (c) Hp. Baumeler and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [24]

Gobabis is the end of the line. There are plans on the drawing board for a Trans-Kalahari Railway Line which would extend East from the current livestock railhead at Gobabis and may well be electrified. [25][26][27]

Seeheim-Lüderitz

The final length of line to be looked at is that from Seeheim to Lüderitz. The railway line from Seeheim to Lüderitz is 318 kilometres (198 miles) long. The connection between Lüderitz and Aus was completed in 1906, and the extension to Seeheim was completed in 1908. [1] The service between Aus and Lüderitz was decommissioned in 1997, due to poor track condition, and there is no regular passenger service between Seeheim and Aus. … The line to Lüderitz was rehabilitated in the 2010s and was scheduled for reopening in 2017. Test trains ran to Lüderitz in 2014 and Lüderitz Harbour in 2018. [2]

We begin this journey from Seeheim Railway Junction. …

Seeheim Railway Junction. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Just a short distance Northwest along the line from the junction is Seeheim Railway Station.

Seeheim Railway Station in very early days. [30]
The train yard at Seeheim in the 21st century. The Skaap River is just to the South of the Yard. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A short distance beyond the limits of the old railway station the line crosses the Fish River close to its confluence with the Skaap River. This is a very early postcard image of the railway bridge over the river. A modern image of the bridge in the distance on this postcard can be seen here. [29] [30]
The bridges over the Fish River in the 21st century. [Google Maps, June 2025]
After crossing the Fish River the railway follows its North bank. [Google Streetview, June 2025]
It crosses a couple of tributaries before heading away from the river into the hills. [Google Streetview, June 2025]

After some distance winding through the hills, the railway line crosses the D463, bridges a dry watercourse and crosses an open area of sand before again winding its way through more hills, heading Northwest. The next image shows the location of Sandverhaar Railway Station and Bridge.

Sandverhaar Railway Station and Bridge. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Sandverhaar Railway Station, (c) Matthias Bruhin & Hp.Baumeler and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [28]

A little further West the line crosses the dry watercourse of the Gurib River and close to Alte Kalkofen Lodge passes through the site of what was Simplon Railway Station.

The location of Simplon Railway Station with a bridge over a dry water course to its Southeast. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The remains of Simplon railway station, between Seeheim and Goageb on the line to Aus, © Hp.Baumeler and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 4.0). [3]
Luxury passenger train at Simplon (Between Seeheim and Goageb) in 2015. [3]
Luxrailer inspection car passing the location of Simplon station on its way from Seeheim to Aus on 25th April 2017, © Olga Ernst & Hp.Baumeler and Iicenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 4.0). [3]

Immediately to the West of Simplon Station, the line crosses the D462 and then, for a short while runs alongside the B4.

At Goageb, the line passes under the B4 before entering the Railway Station.

Looking Northwest from the first bridge at Goageb carrying the B4 over the line. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

Goageb Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The Station building and water tower at Goageb, seen from the Southwest. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The platform, station building and water tower at Goageb, seen from the Northwest. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The bridge carrying the railway over the Konkiep River, seen from the bridge carrying the B4 over the river. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking back towards the railway’s bridge over the river. [Google Streetview, January 2018]
Looking Northwest from the bridge carrying the B4, along the line of the railway. [Google Streetview, January 2018]

After passing under the B4 the railway turns North-northwest and runs alongside the B4 for a few kilometres before the road turned away toward the North. The railway then turns to the Southwest.

A relatively short passing loop is provided seemingly in the middle of nowhere! [Google Maps, June 2025]

These next few pictures give a sequence of satellite images or views in sequence along the line.

A memorial has been placed at the site of a prisoner of war camp from the First World War to the East of the town of Aus.
The Camp near Aus for German prisoners of war 1915-1919, (c) Public Domain. [31]
Immediately to the South of the Kriegsgefangenen Denkmal, the war memorial, there are a series of sidings/passing loop on the railway as shown here. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A gantry crane, cabins and water tower are present at this location. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

It is only a short distance from this location to the township of Aus. The railway passes, first, under the C13 and then into Aus.

The view Northwest from the C13 towards Aus. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Aus Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking Southeast, this photograph shows the railway line curving round into Aus Railway Station. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The Southeast end of Aus Railway Station site. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The station approach at Aus. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

Northwest of the railway station, the line crosses the C13 again, this time at an ungated crossing.

Looking Southeast from the ungated crossing on the C13 towards Aus Railway Station. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
Looking Northwest along the line from the ungated crossing on the C13 – Aus church is prominent in this photograph. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

West of Aus the railway passes through the hills. The next image looks backthrough those hills towards Aus.

Looking back towards Aus we can see the line meandering through the hills. [Google Streetview, November 2021]
Looking ahead along the railway line from the same location. [Google Streetview, November 2021]

The next station on the line was at Garub. The station is no longer in use.

Garub Railway Station: the station hose and water tower remain standing. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Garub Railway Station building in the early 1900s, (c) Public Domain. [32]
This image of Garub station house and water tower is embedded here from fineartamerica.com. [33]

To the West of Garub the B4 and the railway run in parallel. The line passes through another abandoned stations at Tsaukaib, Haalenburg, Rotkop and Grasplatz.

The abandoned Railway Station at Haalenburg, looking West. [Google Streetview, December 2023]
The abandoned Railway Station at Grasplatz, looking West. [Google Streetview, December 2023]

At Kolmanskop there is an entire derelict mining station which once had its own railway station.

Kolmanskop seen from the B4 with the railway visible in front of the buildings.
Kolmanskop mining village. The diamond mine was to the South of the village. [Google Maps, June 2025]

As well as its railway link to Lüderitz, Kolmanskop was “the terminus of two private narrow-gauge electrified railway lines that served the diamond mining industry further south. One ran 119 kilometres (74 mi) via Pomona to Bogenfels. It was completed in 1913 but destroyed during World War I in 1915 by South African troops. The other railway line, 7 kilometres (4.3 mi) long and completed in 1920, led to Charlottental. Both were powered by a 1.5 megawatts (2,000 hp) power station in Lüderitz, then assumed to be the largest in Africa.” [1][34][35]

New track near Kolmanskop (October 2015), © Hp.Baumeler and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 4.0). [3]
Train near Kolmanskop on the line between Aus and Luderitz in 2019, © LeFnake and approved for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [3]

Kolmanskop is only a short distance from the Atlantic Ocean. The B4 and the railway find their own way down to the coast at Lüderitz.

The railway meanders down to the coast following the contours to keep the gradient to a minimum. On the way it passes through a turning triangle. It not obvious why the turning triangle is located at this point on the railway. However, not far beyond the triangle there are a series of sidings/loops which are shown in the image below.

Goods transfer sidings/loops close to Lüderitz. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Just short of Lüderitz, the Atlantic is on the left of this photograph, the railway on the right. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking West along the railway towards the centre of Lüderitz. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Further along the line and looking North. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
Looking North from the ungated crossing at Bay Street. The platform of the passenger station is just ahead. [Google Streetview, January 2024]

A photograph looking Southwest through the station can be viewed here. [37]

The engine shed and yard in Lüderitz are to the Northeast of the station platforms. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The gates to the port at Lüderitz seen from Hafen Street. [Google Streetview, January 2024]
The Port of Lüderitz. [Google Maps, June 2025]
An aerial view of the port. [36]

References

  1. Klaus Dierks; The South African Period 1915–1989: The Development of the Namibia Railway Network!; via http://www.klausdierks.com/Namibia_Rail/2.htm, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  2. Tuulikki Abraham; Train arrives in Lüderitz on durability test mission; New Era, 2018; via https://neweralive.na/posts/train-arrives-in-luderitz-on-durability-test-mission, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Namibia, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  4. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/06/15/the-railways-of-namibia-the-former-south-west-africa-part-1-windhoek-and-the-northern-lines
  5. https://www.finkensteinmv.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/W1191_Site_master_for_website-oen9lfr11irabf9ih5d5ywkf0ezos7z5v8h2812rwa.jpg, accessed on 16th June 2025.
  6. https://red-i.co.za/blog/news/omeya-retrospective, accessed on 17th June 2025.
  7. https://youtu.be/kU3Azbx02QQ?si=B58UkLsorGZOFsgc, accessed on 17th June 2025.
  8. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bahnhoff+Train+Station/@-23.3127757,17.1866817,15z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x1c0c842ef45c9e77:0x9ed7fe389b92509a!8m2!3d-23.3127647!4d17.1871112!16s%2Fg%2F11c3100fz_?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDYxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D, accessed on 17th June 2025.
  9. https://youtu.be/DznCOqTJamQ?si=2iBDOrJ183D-rymH, accessed on 15th June 2025.
  10. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Train_station_Windhoek_(2018).jpg, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Namibia, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  12. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Kalkrand,+Namibia/@-24.0716993,17.5830623,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sCIHM0ogKEICAgICE1J6t2AE!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2Fgps-cs-s%2FAC9h4npUQSGDDwQIvLU5fxxWX9zrYGbmiPVvc6xdPM2Us4qcAjOM7_E03zIHaZVsE98mB4tU47eLLjJ1tscxxVYOd69AK-7ZK_ZENRG2fzldG9rEHcPKt7wkKGPNXUdlSkG9yeYyEyeSpw%3Dw360-h239-k-no!7i4898!8i3265!4m7!3m6!1s0x1c0db9eeea3654f7:0x8721f44b88612748!8m2!3d-24.0716993!4d17.5830623!10e5!16s%2Fm%2F0j676ky?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDYxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D, accessed on 18th June 2025.
  13. https://futuremedianews.com.na/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/kalkrand.jpg, accessed on 18th June 2025.
  14. https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Keetmanshoop_railway_station, accessed on 19th June 2025.
  15. https://www.bahnbilder.de/bild/namibia~bahnhoefe~keetmanshoop/325921/das-stattliche-bahnhofgebaeude-von-keetmanshoop-erzaehlt.html, accessed on 19th June 2025.
  16. https://steam-locomotives-south-africa.blogspot.com/2008/06/keetmanshoop-namibia-sar-class-7a.html, accessed on 19th June 2025.
  17. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gr%C3%BCnau_Railway_Station.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  18. https://atom.drisa.co.za/index.php/railway-stations?__goaway_challenge=meta-refresh&__goaway_id=0597d9efb35fb17ebd666f84e62967bc&__goaway_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&languages=en&listLimit=100&listPage=2&onlyDirect=1&places=128256&sf_culture=nl&sort=referenceCode&sortDir=desc, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  19. https://youtu.be/bxUa5U9qYhs, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  20. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omitara.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  21. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Witvlei_train_station_(2018).jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025
  22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobabis_railway_station#/media/File:Gobabis_Railway_Station.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobabis_railway_station#/media/File:Gobabis_Railway_Station_Pic3.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobabis_railway_station#/media/File:Gobabis_Railway_Station_Pic2.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  25. https://www.railjournal.com/freight/trans-kalahari-railway-feasibility-study-underway, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  26. https://www.thepwi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Journal-202007-Vol138-Pt3-Namibia-railway-upgrading-works.pdf, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  27. https://namibian.org/news/economics/railway-namibia, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  28. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Train_station_Sandverhaar,_Namibia_(2018).jpg, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  29. https://www.alamy.com/railway-bridge-over-fish-river-seeheim-namibia-riverbed-image557069908.html, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  30. https://www.namibia-accommodation.com/articles/seeheim_namibia, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aus,_Namibia#/media/File:Aus_kriegsgefangenenlager_1915-1919.jpg, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  32. https://namibian.org/news/nature-and-environment/garub-in-the-spotlight, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  33. https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/medium/2/abandoned-garub-railway-station-in-namibia-located-on-the-road-to-luderitz-miroslav-liska.jpg, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  34. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmanskop, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  35. https://www.klausdierks.com/Eisenbahnen/index.html, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  36. https://africaports.co.za/luderitz, accessed on 21st June 2025.
  37. https://www.flickr.com/photos/terry_browne/16510323286, accessed on 21st June 2025.

The Railways of Namibia (the former South West Africa) – Part 1 – Windhoek and the Northern Lines

The Railway Magazine of February 1952 carried an article by Charles E. Lee about railways in what was German South West Africa. This encouraged me to have a look at the history of Namibia’s railways and their condition and extent in the 21st century. The 1952 article also caught my attention because Manchester Diocese (I was a priest in Manchester Diocese before retirement) is linked with the Diocese of Namibia.

The territory was formally colonized by Germany between 1884-1890. It covered an area of 835,100 sq. km. It was a settler colony and had attracted around 3,000 German settlers by 1903, who primarily settled in the central high grounds. [2]

German South West Africa, now known as Namibia, was a German colony from 1884 to 1915. It was not a province within the German Empire but a separate colonial territory. From 1891, the capital was Windhoek, which also serves as the capital of modern-day Namibia. [2]

The arrival of German settlers disrupted the existing socioeconomic balance and led to conflicts, particularly with the Herero and Nama people.

In 1883 Franz Adolf Lüderitz, a merchant from Bremen, Germany, established a trading post in southwest Africa at Angra Pequena, which he renamed Lüderitzbucht. He also acquired the adjacent coastal area, which he named Lüderitzland. These areas were constituted the first German colony under German protection on April 24, 1884. The German occupation subsequently extended inland. By the latter 1880s the German Colonial Company for the South realized that it was incapable of administering the territory, and the German government immediately took over the colony’s administration. As a result of the Zanzibar Treaty (1890) between Germany and Great Britain, German South West Africa acquired the Caprivi Strip (named after the German chancellor Graf Leo von Caprivi), a tract of land 280 miles (450 km) long in the extreme northeast of the territory; the colony thus gained access to the Zambezi River.” [3]

German colonial rule was harsh, leading to insurrections and resistance. “Major Theodor Leutwein, governor of the colony in 1894–1904, suppressed insurrections of the Khoekhoe (1894) and of the Hereros (1896). In 1904, however, the Hereros fomented a far more dangerous rebellion. The German force, at first only 750 strong and supported only by one artillery battery, had to face an army of some 8,000 men equipped with modern weapons. Reinforcements increased the German force, ultimately under the command of General Lothar von Trotha, and resulted in a decisive German victory on the Waterberg River. Further Khoekhoe rebellions were put down in 1904–07.” [3]

German South West Africa was occupied by the South African Union Defence Force in 1915 during World War I, and Germany formally ceded the territory under the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. Its administration was taken over by the Union of South Africa (part of the British Empire) and the territory was administered as South West Africa under a League of Nations mandate. It became independent as Namibia on 21st March 1990. [2]

The Railways

The railways in German South West Africa played a crucial role in the colonial administration and the First World War campaign. The German colonial authorities built a railway network between 1897 and 1914 to enable colonial territorialization and facilitate the extraction of resources. [4]

Charles E. Lee tells that “under the German regime, the first railway in South West Africa was the Northern State Railway (NSR), as it was then called, built to a gauge of 60 cm. (1 ft. 11 in.) between Swakopmund and Windhoek, via Jackalswater and Karibib, a distance of 238 miles. This line was begun in 1897 and was built by a German Military Brigade from Europe. It was first intended to be worked by animal power – Argentine mules or Cape donkeys – but steam traction was soon adopted. The first section (15 miles) was opened to traffic from Swakopmund in January 1898. By the end of that year 68 miles were ballasted and 54 open. In July 1900, the line was opened to Karibib, 121 miles, and the whole railway completed to Windhoek, a further 117 miles, in June, 1902. The curves and gradients were very severe, the gradient out of the Khan River gorge, for instance, being 1 in 19 with curves of 180 ft. radius. The rails weighed about 19 lb. a yard and were laid on iron sleepers. There were iron girder bridges at Khan River, Dorst River, and Kubas. The only good and plentiful water supplies were at Swakopmund and Karibib.” [1: p121]

Wikipedia tells us that there was actually an earlier line than the one Lee talks about. It was a small mining rail line at Cape Cross in 1895. [5] “Soon afterwards, the ox-cart transport system totally collapsed, in the wake of a rinderpest epidemic in 1897. As it was necessary to react quickly to the now extremely precarious transport situation, decisions were made: to build a railway line from the German port of Swakopmund to Windhoek (the Staatsbahn); to use existing, 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge military Feldbahn material; and to entrust a railway brigade with the construction work, which began in September 1897.” [5]

Wikipedia continues: “Construction of the railways connecting with the Staatsbahn was aimed partly at military strategic objectives following the uprising of the Herero and Nama, and partly at economic requirements. … By World War I, the following lines had been developed (listed by the first year of full operation):” [5]

  • 1902: Swakopmund–Windhoek line, 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge, Karibib–Windhoek section re-gauged in 1911 to 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) gauge. [5]
  • 1906: Otavibahn, 600 mm gauge. [5]
  • 1905: Onguati–Karibib branch. [5]
  • 1908: Otavi–Grootfontein branch. [5]
  • 1907: Lüderitzbahn, 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm). [5]
  • 1909: Seeheim–Kalkfontein branch. [5]
  • ca 1911: Kolmannskuppe–Elisabethbucht–Bogenfels, industrial railway of the diamond fields. This 600mm gauge railway was electrified from 1911 (the only electric railway in Namibia’s history).  Diamond mining in the region gradually moved south. The northern part of the line as far as Pomona was abandoned in 1931, and some of its materials were used for the extension of the railway towards Oranjemund. The southern section was operated with diesel traction. This line no longer exists. [5]
  • 1912: Windhoek–Keetmanshoop railway, 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) gauge. [5]
  • 1912: Rehoboth shuttle, 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge (questionable). [6][7][2][5]
  • 1914: Otjiwarongo–Outjo–Okahakana, 600 mm gauge (project started, but not completed due to the war). [5]
The Windhoek–Keetmanshoop railway, circa 1916, © Franz Baltzer, Public Domain. [5]

Lee talks of the formation, by the Otavi Mining & Railway Company, an Anglo-German syndicate owning the copper mines at Otavi and Tsumeb, of a railway: “This company was formed in Berlin in 1900, in accordance with an arrangement between the South-West Afrika Company, the Disconto-Gesellschaft of Berlin, and the Exploration Company. The first intention was to build a 3 ft. 6 in. gauge railway from Port Alexander in Portuguese West Africa to run in a south-easterly direction up the Muende River Valley and via Etosha Pan to the Tsumeb Copper Mines, and later to extend this line to Rhodesia to form a trans-African railway. Eventually it was decided to form a 60 cm. gauge line entirely in German territory connecting Swakopmund with Tsumeb, a distance of 351 miles. Construction was undertaken by Arthur Koppel & Co. and was begun in November 1903, but was delayed by the Herero War, and the work completed on 25th August 1906. This undertaking, called the Otavi Railway, had the distinction of being the longest narrow-gauge railway in the world. Branches were laid subsequently from Otavi to Grootfontein (56 miles) and from Onguati to Karibib on the State Railway (9 miles). The cost is stated to have been about £2,400 a mile, or roundly £1,000,000 in total. The railway was bought by the German Imperial Government in 1910 for £1,250,000, but the management was left in the hands of the company under a 30-year lease, terminable after 10 years.” [1: p121]

This line was well constructed, and well ballasted. It had a ruling gradient of 1 in 66 and minimum curvature of 150 metres. The permanent way consisted of steel rails in 30-ft. lengths, 30 lb. a yard, laid on steel sleepers weighing about 26 lb. each. “From Swakopmund, for a distance of 68 miles, the line rises steadily on a grade of 1 in 66 to Ebony Station, where it reaches an altitude of 3,500 ft. (On the down journey, the last 40 miles into Swakop-mund can be run by gravity.) From Ebony there is a regular fall to Usakos, which is 2,640 ft. above sea level. From Usakos it climbs 690 ft. in 13 miles to Onguati, and continues to rise until it attains its greatest elevation near Kalk-feld, where the summit is 5,200 ft.” [1: p121]

The Otavi Railway, like the State Railway, was built to the 2 ft-gauge, though a difference of 1 centimetre in the wheel gauges is stated to have prevented the free interchange of rolling-stock. The widening to 3 ft. 6 in. of the gauge between Swakopmund and Omaruru had been voted by the German Railway Board, but the work had not been put in hand by the outbreak of the 1914 war. A new branch projected at the same period was the Ovamboland Line, the first aim of which was to provide Ovambo labour for the South. The Landesrat in November 1913, approved a line of 2 ft-gauge, but on earthworks and bridges wide enough for a 3ft. 6in. gauge track, to run from Otjiwarongo (on the Otavi Railways) to Outjo and Okahakana.” [1: p121]

Railways in South West Africa from Swakopmund, mainly German- built, included the 361 miles to Tsumeb, opened in 1906, and the longest narrow-gauge railway in the world. The gauge at the Southern end was widened in 1915. [1: p122]

A sum of £450,000 was allowed for the line from Otjiwarongo to Outjo and Okahakana “in the German Loan Estimates for 1914-15. The first section, including the 55 miles from Otjiwarongo to Amiab Poort, was to cost £250,000. Construction was begun, and the line was laid for 22 miles before the outbreak of hostilities in the first world war.” [1: p123]

Railway developments south of Windhoek, on the 3 ft. 6 in. gauge, made it desirable to convert the earlier 2ft. lines. During 1911, the section from Karibib to Windhoek was converted to 3 ft. 6 in. gauge at a cost of £550,000, with the Bechstein-Koppel Gesellschaft as contractor. The ruling gradient [was] 1 in 66 with a minimum curvature of 656 ft. This work was completed during 1913. The Swakop River at Okahandja [was] spanned by a bridge 350 ft. long, and there [was] a smaller bridge at Otjihavera. About the same time, the coastward section from Karibib to Swakopmund was practically abandoned in favour of the alternative route provided by the Otavi Railway. In fact, the settlers in the Swakop Valley, who asked for a short railway to link them with Swakopmund, were promised in November 1913, that the material from the disused 92 miles of the State line between Swakopmund and Kubas would be used for this purpose, but it was not done.” [1: p123]

An image showing an armoured train in South West Africa during World War I, 1914-1918, can be found here [29] The South African army invaded the German colony of South West Africa in March 1915 overrunning the much smaller German forces.

Wikipedia tells us that, “With the outbreak of World War I, the German Schutztruppe military unit retreated from the coast, and withdrew into the inland. In the process, the Schutztruppe destroyed the Otavibahn, and the old Staatsbahn towards Karibib, as far as Rössing.” [5]

The Staatsbahn was abandoned but this was not the case with the Otavibahn. In 1914, “British troops … moved forward from the British enclave of Walvis Bay, and by the end of 1914 they had built a 37 km (23 mi) long 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) railway to Swakopmund. The Otavibahn was also reconstructed in 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) as far as Usakos, and the section between Usakos and Karibib was realigned. The network north of Usakos remained in 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge; the workshop for both gauges was consolidated in Usakos, and the one in Karibib was closed.” [5]

Lee tells us that by 1917 the Staatsbahn line from Karibib to the coast had ceased to exist. “the line between Karibib and Rossing (95 miles), the 10-mile branch from Jakalswater (built to carry water from the Swakop River at Riet), and the Kubas military line (4.5 miles), were lifted and removed to provide material for Tanganyika and the Union of South Africa.” [1: p123]

Lee goes on to confirm that the Union forces, in the course of their invasion of German South West Africa, “laid a 3 ft. 6 in. line for 100 miles inland from Swakopmund to Kranzberg along the original track of the Otavi line, which the Germans had wrecked in their retreat. This was completed in August, 1915. The construction of a new 12.5-mile section, of the same gauge, from Kranzberg to Karibib, was completed in July 1915, and again connected the Otavi Railway with the [NSR]. Thus, in August 1915, there was continuous communication of uniform gauge for the first time from Swakopmund to points south of Windhoek. As strategic railways had meanwhile linked the Union Railways with those of South-West Africa on 25th June 1915, a through railway of 1,635 miles was provided between Walvis Bay and Cape Town.” [1: p123]

Also during the first world war, a new railway from South Africa was constructed – “as an extension of the De Aar-Prieska Railway – to achieve a secure supply route for … South African troops. In 1916, the line was connected to the German network at Kalkfontein (now Karasburg).” [5]

With the linking of the Kranzberg-Tsumeb 2ft-gauge line to the workshops at Usakos by means of a third rail between Usakos and Kranzberg on the 3-ft. 6-in. gauge track of improved location, the 9-mile section from Karibib to Onguati was no longer of value, and it was uplifted in 1924.” [1: p123]

The former Otavi Railway system [was] therefore represented [in 1952] by about 100 miles of 3 ft. 6 in. line on the coastward section, part of the main railway system of South-West Africa, and 307 miles of 2ft-gauge farther inland. [In 1952, there were] also various private branch lines (some disused) connected with the 2ft section. [In 1952], the present main line of this gauge [was] from Kranzberg to Tsumeb, some 251 miles, on which one train in each direction [was] run two days a week.” [1: p123]

Wikipedia continues: Under South African/British occupation, the following lines were established (listed by first year of full operation): [5][10]

  • 1914: Walvis Bay–Swakopmund in 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm). [5]
  • 1915: Swakopmund–Karibib: Reconstruction in 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm). [5]
  • 1915/1916: (De Aar)–Nakop (border)–Kalkfontein in 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm). [5]
  • 1921: Otjiwaronge–Outjo 600mm gauge (based on German preparations). [5]
  • 1929: Windhoek–Gobabis railway in 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm). [5]
  • From 1958: the Otavibahn north of Usakos was gradually regauged to 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm), with the new line being laid parallel to the existing line, but largely on new foundations; the new line was in operation from 1961. [5]

From August 1915 the Namibian railway network was operated de facto by South African Railways, and this arrangement became official in 1922. … From 1959, steam locomotives were gradually replaced by diesel locomotives, for which an engine-house was built in Windhoek. This made operations very much easier, because water is in short supply in Namibia, and the coal needed to heat the water in the steam locomotives also had to be procured from the Transvaal.” [5]

The Namibian Network in the 21st century

In the 21st century, the rail network of Namibia is operated by TransNamib. As of 2017, the Namibian rail network consisted of 2,687 km of tracks. [11]

The Namibian Rail Network, © Htonl and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [11]
A schematic representation of the Nambian network. [11]

Windhoek-Kranzberg

The railway line from Windhoek to Kranzberg is 210 kilometres (130 miles) long and was completed in 1902. [10]

  • Windhoek (capital – junction)
  • Okahandja
  • Karibib (proposed cement works)
  • Kranzberg (junction Tsumeb v Windhoek)

After the aerial image immediately below, the next three images form a kind of ‘tryptic’ which shows the TransNamib train yard and station at Windhoek. Taken together they show the full site. …

An aerial image showing Windhoek train yard, © Hp Baumeler and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [28]
These three images taken together cover the full Windhoek train yard and station. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The main station building and the TransNamib Museum are located at the Southeast corner of the whole site.

Windhoek Railway Station building with a static locomotive display sitting outside its front entrance. The locomotive was known as ‘Poor Ole Joe’. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Windhoek Railway Station building seen from the South, © Bernhard Dunst and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [40]

Wikipedia tells us that “the station was built in a Cape Dutch-style and is located on Bahnhof Street. An additional northern wing was constructed by South African Railways in 1929 to match the existing style of the building. … The station also houses the small Trans-Namib Railroad Museum which outlines Namibian transport history, particularly that of the railway. Opened on 1st July 1993, the exhibition consists of a wide range of railway equipment, maps and related items which date back to German colonial times. Another part of the exhibition is dedicated to Namibian Airways history and Namibian Maritime history. …  Across from the entrance [to the station] stands the German locomotive ‘Poor Ole Joe’, one half of a South West African Zwillinge, No 154A, the sole surviving specimen of this type of steam locomotive. It was originally shipped to Swakopmund in 1899 and reassembled for the run to Windhoek” [23][24]

0-6-0T locomotive ‘Poor Ole Joe’ sits outside Windhoek Railway Station, © Catatine and made available for reuse under a GNU Free Documentation Licence (GNU FDL). [26]

Namibia Scientific Society posted the following on Facebook on 9th June 2020: Poor Ole Joe is a 600mm-gauge steam locomotive “and was manufactured in 1900 by Henschel & Sohn GmbH, Kassel, Germany, under the serial number 5376. It was put into operation in 1904 and operated on the Swakopmund – Windhoek route. The steam locomotive was taken out of service in 1939 after traveling approximately 371,000 miles.” [25]

There is some uncertainty over the date of fabrication of the locomotive. Perhaps the two years mentioned relate to a date when the locomotive was shipped from the factory and the date of completion of the reassembly in Swakopmund?

Looking North from Robert Mugabe Avenue which crosses the line at the North end of the train yard, the main running line is that on the right. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line continues North through the northern industrial corridor. In this image the line crosses an unwanted crossing with Bavaria Road to the right. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Continuing northwards, the line runs parallel to the access road to the TransNamib Container terminal. On the right of this picture the siding accessing the terminal can be seen leaving the main running line. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The entrance to the TransNamib Holdings Ltd. Windhoek Container Terminal sits adjacent to the line to Okahandja and beyond. [Google Streetview, 2024]
As the line runs out of Windhoek to the North it runs alongside the A1, from where this picture is taken. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Much of the route North is through scrubland with low growing vegetation. Google Streetview, 2024]
Some miles still from Okahandja the line is seen passing under the B1.  [Google Streetview, 2022]
It then crosses the Swakopmund River.. [Google Maps, June 2025]
And crosses the Swakopmund River channel again! [Google Maps, June 2025]
It crosses another, unnamed, road by means of an ungated crossing adjacent to a large abattoir. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Then under the B1 which is carried by this concrete bridge. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Across Willhem Sanders Street [Google Streetview, 2024]
And across a side street of Kahimemua Avenue before arriving at Okahandja Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Okahandja Railway Station and turning triangle. Google Maps, June 2025]
Okahandja Railway Station building in 1903, © Public Domain. [27]
Okahandja Railway Station building in the 21st century, © Louise Kapp and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [27]
Okahandja Railway Station, showing goods wagons opposite the station building in the 21st century, © Louise Kapp and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [27]
Okahandja Goods Shed seen looking West from Voortrekker Road. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Looking towards Karibib from the B1 bridge over the line. [Google Streetview, 2024]
A typical view along the line heading West. [Google Streetview, 2024]
A view Southwest from a dirt road which crosses the line just to the Northeast of a passing loop at Wilheimstal. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
A bridge over a dry riverbed close to Wilheimstal, seen from the North. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking West along the line towards Karibib from the C36. [Google Streetview, October 2024]
Looking ahead along the railway towards Karibib from a minor road. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking ahead towards Karibib from the C33. [Google Streetview, October 2924]
Looking back from Kapapu Road, Karibib, along the railway towards Okahandja and Windhoek. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking Southwest into the site of Karibib Railway Station from Kapapu Road. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
An aerial view of Karibib  in 2017, showing the railway and station on the left © Hp Baumeler and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [31]
Karibib Railway Station in the 1920s, © Unknown , Public Domain. [5]
Karibib Railway Station building. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking back towards Karibib from Kalk Street in its Southwest suburbs. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking Southwest towards Kransberg from  Kalk Street. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking back towards Karibib from an unnamed street further to the Southwest. [Google Streetview, 2024
Looking ahead along the line towards Kransberg and Swakopmund. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line heading on towards Kransberg. A significant length of the B2 runs on the South side of the railway. [Google Streetview, 2004]
Kranzberg Railway Station and turning loop. This is a junction station, the two lines can be seen diverging on the top-right of the image. The more northerly of the two is the line to Tsumeb. The more southerly heads towards Windhoek. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Kranzburg Railway Station, © Pgallert and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [32]

Kranzberg-Walvis Bay

The railway line from Kranzberg to Walvis Bay is 201 kilometres (125 miles) long. The section between Kranzberg and Swakopmund was completed in 1902. In 1914, an extension to Walvis Bay was commissioned; the rails were laid close to the shore of the Atlantic Ocean. In 1980, this extension was replaced by an alternative route behind the dunes that allowed for higher axle load. [10]

  • Kranzberg (junction Tsumeb v Windhoek)
  • Usakos
  • Arandis (crossing loop)
  • Swakopmund
  • Walvis Bay (port)
Looking back Northeast towards Kranzberg Railway Station from the B2. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking Southwest along the railway towards Usakos’, Arandis and Swakopmund. [Google Streetview, 2024]

Key locations along the line to Swakopmund are illustrated below: …

Close to Usakos and looking back East along the line towards Kranzberg. The line turns through 90° with Usakos’ station off the right side of this photograph. A short distance to the East of this location a locomotive turning triangle has been maintained. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Usakos railway station and associated infrastructure. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Usakos in the early 20th century. The line was originally 2ft-gauge. This image was shared on the 2ft Gauge Railways in Colonial Namibia Facebook Group by Pierre de Wet on 22nd January 2024, © Public Domain. [33]
Usakos in the early 20th century. The 2ft-gauge is more clearly evident in this image which was shared on the 2ft Gauge Railways in Colonial Namibia Facebook Group by Pierre de Wet on 22nd January 2024, © Public Domain. [34]
A plinthed steam engine with Usakos’ railway station beyond [Google Streetview, 2024]
Locomotive No. SW40 at Usakos Railway Station. This is a 2’0” gauge Class Hd/NG5 2-8-2 (Henschel works number 10720) built in 1912. The building behind, is the old railway station building which has, since the picture was taken, been demolished. Loco. No.. SW40 had 2 sisters numbered 41 & 42 – together they made up class Hd. These locos retained their numbers under SAR administration, and were withdrawn in 1960 when the narrow gauge was converted to standard Cape gauge. Sister locomotive #41 is plinthed at Otjiwarongo station further to the north. Like many other SWA locos they had dust covers to protect the motion. The carrying wheels were arranged as radial axles. As there were no separate bogie truck, the axle boxes were guided in such a way that the wheels could move radially with respect to the frame. [21][22]
Usakos’ historic railway sheds. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Usakos’ historic water towers. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking Northwest a short distance to the South of Usakos’ railway station. The line heading for Swakopmund sits on embankment and turns to the West after leaving the station.A modern concrete bridge carries the railway over the D1914 road. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Arandis: the marshalling yard is the darker of the two rail routes in this image and shows a number of wagons at rest in the yard. The main line is the lighter strip running from bottom-left to top-right. The line from Usakos and Kranzberg enters top-right, that from Swakopmund enters bottom-left. The line with the darker ballast is a branch line which serves Rossing Uranium Mine, one of the world’s largest open cast Uranium mines. [20][Google Maps, June 2025]

Before having a look at the Rossing Uranium Mine, it is worth a quick diversion Northwest of the station and marshalling yard shown above. The Namibia Institute of Mining & Technology is host to a plinthed display of a locomotive and carriages from the old 2ft-gauge railways of Namibia.

This image shows a complete (but short) 2ft-gauge train at the Namibia Institute of Mining and Technology. [Google Streetview, 2024],

This train was once on display in Windhoek. It was moved to the Namibia Institute of Mining Technology (NIMT) outside Arandis. and restored with the help of Wesbank Transport and AWH Engineering, Rigging and Rentals. The locomotive, is a Henschel Hb 56. The locomotive and its wagons were in use between Usakos and Tsumeb between 1906 and 1959. The South African Railways then donated it to the National Museum in Windhoek and in 1964 it was placed in front of the Alte Feste, but it was too close to the Reiterdenkmal and was moved in 1974 to the southern side. The train consists of the locomotive, a coal wagon, a closed goods wagon, a passenger coach for first and second class and a wagon in which the conductor travelled with the mailbags, milk and cream cans that were picked up along the route. The passenger coach could transport 16 passengers. The first-class passengers could sit on upholstered seats while the second-class passengers sat on plain wooden benches. The two classes were divided by a small washroom. The conductor’s wagon was destroyed in 2007 when it was set alight by a homeless person who slept in the train and made a fire. The boilermaker and carpentry students at NIMT renovated the train. [35]

The locomotive is from the class Hb 0-6-2T. Of the 15 locomotives built by Henschel for the Otavi line between 1905 and 1908, six were absorbed into the SAR. The engines had Allan valve gear and often ran with an auxiliary tender attached which contained both coal and water.” [36]

Rossing Opencast Uranium Mine. [20]
Rossing Opencast Uranium Mine. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The view Northeast towards the passing loop and marshalling yards at Arandis. The Uranium Mine is a few miles off to the right of the picture. Swakopmund is still me miles away behaving Nd the camera. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking ahead towards Swakopmund. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The Swakopmund Railway Station as it appeared in the early 20th century. [37]
The original Swakopmund Railway Station is now a hotel and casino with the modern railway station a short distance to the East. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Swakopmund Railway Station in the 21st century as flagged on Google Maps. It is difficult to make out any railway tracks at this location. The Desert Express was the only passenger service serving Swakopmund and that service was suspended indefinitely in 2020. Freight trains still run into Swakopmund. [Google Streetview, 2024][19]
A train on the Swakopmund-Walvis Bay route, © Diego Delso and approved for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [11]
Track from Swakopmund to Walvis Bay covered by sand
(22°47′17″S 014°35′20″E), © Olga Ernst & Hp.Baumeler and Iicenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 4.0). [11]
Looking Southeast towards the railway station from Railway Street, Walvis Bay. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Walvis Bay Port and Railway Station: rail lines extend out onto the container port area to the left of this satellite image; run along the quay in the centre of the image (flagged ‘Walvis Bay Port); through the area where ships are berthed. A large marshalling yard sits on the Northwest side of the station which is flagged on the right side of this image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A closer view of Walvis Bay Passenger Station and the nearby freight marshalling area. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Walvis Bay Railway Station: track side. This image was shared on LinkedIn by Johan Stewart Laubscher in 2022. [38]
Walvis Bay Railway Station: station approach. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The static enclosed display of an old steam locomotive on the forecourt of Walvis Bay Railway Station. This locomotive is ‘Hope’, a Kerr Stuart locomotive which was built at their works in Stoke on Trent and entered service in what is now Namibia in 1899. [Google Streetview, 2024]

Walvis Bay was a British enclave in German South West Africa. The first narrow gauge railway in the British ruled Cape Colony was in Walvis Bay. Initially projected merely to connect the jetty with the town, the Walvis Bay Railway was opened in 1899 and ran for twelve miles up north to the German border at Plum. [17]

On 6th March 1899 the Agent General for the Cape of Good Hope ordered a “Sirdar” class locomotive named ‘Hope’ which was almost as long in transit to Walvis Bay – where it arrived on 22nd August 1899 on board the British barque Primera – as it had been in the building. Because of the extremely light nature of the track (12 lb. rail with sleepers spaced three feet apart) HOPE was provided with an additional pair of carrying wheels at both ends. Thus the standard 0-4-0T type was converted to a 2-4-2T type. Even so the maximum axle load of ‘Hope’ in working order would be about 1¾ tons, which is considerably more than today’s suggested figure for this category of track of 1 ton 4 cwt. Within six years the railway was virtually moribund and by 1915, ‘Hope’ had been laid aside and forgotten. That was because the Germans preferred to use their own harbour in Swakopmund.” [17][18]

Two works photographs of ‘Hope’: in the one with the valance (wheel cover) raised, one of the smaller carrying wheels can just be made out on the left of the picture. [17][18]

Kranzberg-Otavi

The railway line from Kranzberg to Otavi is 328 kilometres (204 miles) long and was completed in 1906. [10]

  • Kranzberg (junction Tsumeb v Windhoek)
  • Omaruru
  • Kalkfeld (short siding)
  • Otjiwarongo (junction for Outjo)
  • Otavi

Kranzberg Railway Station has already been featured above. The next images show the line from there to Otavi. …

Kranzberg Railway Station. [Google Streetview, June 2025]

The loop allows trains from Windhoek to access the route to Otavi without reversing. That line running towards Otavi sets off from Kranzberg in a Northeasterly direction crossing a series of dry watercourses and gradually taking a more northerly course before encountering the D2315 (a dirt road).

Looking North from the ungated crossing on the D2315. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Less than 100 metres North of the D2315, this is a typical drainage culvert on the line. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Just a little further North is an example of a culvert provided at a dry river/stream bed [Google Streetview, 2024]
And another culverted dry watercourse. Google Streetview, 2024]
A typical length of the permanent way seen looking North from an ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line crosses the dry river bed of the Omaruru River by means of a multi-span truss girder bridge. [Google Maps, June 2025]
On the approach to Omaruru, a dirt road is bridged by the railway. [Google Streetview, 2024]
At Aloe Street ungated crossing, two lines are now visible heading Northeast towards Omaruru Railway Station. The line on the left is a headshunt or storage siding. [Google Streetview, 2024]
This satellite image is centred on the building at Omaruro Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Omaruru Railway Station in its earliest incarnation in 1906. At this time the line to Otavi was 2ft-gauge. The site appears to be littered with railway construction materials, © Public Domain. [30]
The station building has seen better days! This view looks East from Etjo Street. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Leaving Omaruru, the line passes under the C36. [Google Streetview, 2024]
It runs alongside the C33 all the way to Kalkfeld. This view is taken looking North-northwest from the road. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Crossing dry river beds on the journey North. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line passes under the C33 once on the way to Kalkfeld. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Closing in on Kalkfeld there is a passing loop. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Another view of the line from the C33. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Kalkfeld: the C33 and the railway pass North-northeast through the town. There is no passenger station here. [Google Maps, June 2025]
In Kalkfeld two roads cross the line. Here we look North along the line from the first of these ungated crossings, a minor dirt road. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The second ungated crossing takes the D2414 across the line, again we are looking North. [Google Streetview, 2024]

From Kalkfeld the line heads in a generally Northeasterly direction towards Otjiwarongo.

As on the earlier length of the line, we see it crossing a number of dry river beds. [Google Maps , June 2025]

The next five images are a sequence which shows a long passing loop, perhaps halfway towards Otjiwarongo.

A sequence of five images shows a passing loop. The sequence has the Northeast end of the loop in the first of the five images and the Southwest end of the loop in the fifth image, immediately above. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next five images show a sequence of structures over dry river beds

Five bridges spanning dry watercourses. [Google Maps, June 2025]
This photograph is taken from the C33 which has followed the railway Northeast towards Otjiwarongo. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Approaching Otjiwarongo, this photograph faces East-northeast from alongside an ungated crossing around 50 metres Southeast of the C33. [Google Streetview, 2024]
This photograph faces East-northeast along the approach to Otjiwarongo Railway Station. The road from which it is taken is the C38. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Otjiwarongo Railway Station is a junction station with line onward to Otavi and Outjo. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Otjiwarongo Railway Station building. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Otjiwarongo Goods Shed. [Google Streetview, 2024]
In 1912, Henschel built three 2-8-2 tender engines No. 40, No. 41 and No. 42 for the Otavi line for use on the Swakopmund-Karabib section. No. 41 is plinthed outside Otjiwarongo Railway Station. Like many other SWA locos they had dust covers to protect the motion. The carrying wheels were arranged as radial axles. As there were no separate bogie truck, the axle boxes were guided in such a way that the wheels could move radially with respect to the frame. At that time the railway was a 2ft-gauge line [Google Streetview, 2024] More information can be found here. [39]

The line to Otavi continues heading Northeast. …

The line to the Northeast of Otjiwarongo Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
At the bottom-left of the image above the line crosses the C33 at an ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, 2024]
A closer satellite view of the length of the line to the Northeast of the C33. A few sidings serve industries to the South of the line. The road at the centre of the image running North-South is Industria Street. [Google Maps, June 2024]
Looking West from Industria Street. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking Northeast from Industria Street. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The B1 to the Northeast of Otjiwarongo bridges the line. This view looks Southwest towards the railway station. [Google Str
Looking Northeast towards Otavi from the B1. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line runs parallel to the B1 heading Northeast. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking Northeast along the line from an ungated crossing at the D2430. The B1 can just be seen on the left of this image. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
A little further Northeast this photograph, taken from the B1, shows a minor road crossing the railway at an ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
As we travel Northeast, the landscape becomes greener. This another view looking East from the B1 and shows another ungated crossing of a minor road. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
The line passing under the B1. The landscape has changed. The line is running through dense shrubs and small trees. [Google Streetview, 2024]
In Otavi, this is Phyllis Street. It crosses the line at the Southwest end of the station site. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Otavi Railway Station and turning triangle. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Otavi Railway Station building. [Google Streetview, 2024]

It is worth noting here that the original gauge of the line from the coast to Otavi and Tsumeb was originally built to 2ft-gauge. Later it was converted to 3ft 6in gauge. The line was built for the Otavi Mining and Railway Company (Otavi Minen- und Eisenbahn-Gesellschaft or OMEG). The company was founded was a railway and mining company in German Son 6th April 1900 in Berlin with the Disconto-Gesellschaft and the South West Africa Company as major shareholders. [41]

The first locomotives designed for regular service were fifteen 22-tonne 0-6-2T locos built by Arn. Jung. [41][42: p45] Henschel & Sohn built twelve locomotives similar to the Jung design and three 0-6-0T locos. [41][42: p45] Twenty 8-wheel auxiliary tenders carrying 8 cubic metres of water and 3.5 tonnes of coal were built to enable these tank locomotives to complete longer runs. [41][42: p45][43: p65] Henschel & Sohn built three HD class 2-8-2 in 1912 with separate 8-wheel tenders for long-distance running. [42: p47] These locomotives weighed 59 tonnes (including the 26-tonne tender) and remained in service for 50 years as the 2-8-2 type became standard for the railway. [41]

By 1913, train service included 4 express trains, 14 mixed trains, and 29 freight trains each week. [42: p39] Express and mixed trains included a baggage car, a car for African passengers, and a coach for first and second class passengers. [42: p39] The passenger coaches carried concrete ballast in a depressed center section to minimize the possibility of wind tipping a lightly loaded car off the rails. [43] Express trains stopped only at designated stations, but other trains would stop at intermediate points when transport was required. [42: p39] Equipment included: 96 low-side ore gondolas; 55 high-side gondolas; 20 limestone gondolas; 20 boxcars; 12 tank cars; 4 stock cars; 3 passenger coaches; and an executive business car with a kitchen, a bathroom, and an office convertible to a bedroom at night. [41][42: p42][43: p65]

There were also some self-powered steam rail cars with a coal bunker, a mail compartment, 2 compartments for Europeans, and 4 for Africans. [41][42: p36]

Otavi-Grootfontein

The railway line from Otavi to Grootfontein is 91 kilometres (57 miles) long and was completed in 1908. [10]

  • Otavi (junction for Grootfontein)
  • Grootfontein (branch terminus)
Otavi Railway Station, seen from the C39 at the Northeast end of the station site. [Google Streetview, 2024]
From the same location on the C39 a wider view shows the sidings at Otavi Railway Station [Google Streetview, 2024]
Turning through approximately 180° and looking Northeast, the line to Tsumeb runs towards the hills at the left of the image. The line to Grootfontein curves away to the right. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking back towards Otavi Railway Station from the ungated crossing on Josef Buchholz Avenue. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Turning through 180°, this is the view Sputheast from Josef Buchholz Avenue towards Grootfontein. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Heading Southeast out of Otavi the line to Grootfontein passes under the B1. This is the view along the line from the road and bridge. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Out of Otavi, the line soon starts to accompany the B8 in its journey East. This photograph is taken from the B8 and shows an ungated crossing on a minor road. [Google Streetview, 2024]
An ungated crossing provides access from the B8 into Kombat. The road is the D2863. This is the view East at the crossing. [Google Streetview, 2024]

The line turns away from the B8, to the North. As it does so it crosses the D2860 at an ungated crossing.

The line to Grootfontein crosses the D2860 at an ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, 2024]

The line follows the D2860 and then the D2905 before passing under the B8, as it heads for Grootfontein.

An ungated crossing to the South of the D2905. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The view ahead along the line towards Grootfontein from the B8. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The view towards Grootfontein from a minor road ungated crossing. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Much closer to Grootfontein, another view East along the railway. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The fuel depot at Grootfontein. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Grootfontein Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Grootfontein Railway Station in 2007. This image was shared on the African Railway Station Stopping Places Facebook Page In 2012. [46]
Grootfontein Railway Station goods depot in 2007. This image was shared on the African Railway Station Stopping Places Facebook Page In 2012. [47]

Grootfontein railway station is being converted into a logistics hub for business with the DRC and Zambia.

At the moment, trucks from the DRC, Zambia or Namibia travel about 2,500 kilometres from Walvis Bay harbour to Lubumbashi. With the introduction of the Grootfontein hub, these trucks will travel a distance of about 1,400 kilometres. TransNamib is prepared to dedicate four trains a week for this business idea. [44] 

Immediately to the East of the railway station the line turns to the South and is clearly not well used and significantly overgrown in places. [Google Maps, June 2025]
After a few hundred metres the line turns to the East. It can clearly be made out towards the bottom of this satellite image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line continues East and passes under the D2830. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking West from the D2830, a short length of the line can be seen just to the right of the centre of this image. [Google Streetview, 2024]
To the East of the D2380 a series of sidings still exist. [Google Maps, June 2025]
It is harder to make out the sidings in this view. The photograph looks East from the D2380. [Google Streetview, 2024]
These last two satellite images show the extent of the tracks in the industrial area to the East of the D2380. [Google Maps, June 2025]

Otjiwarongo-Outjo

  • Otjiwarongo (junction for Outjo)
  • Outjo (railhead)

Otjiwarongo Railway Station is illustrated above. The railway line from Otjiwarongo to Outjo is 69 kilometres (43 mi) long. The first 26 kilometres (16 mi) were completed under the German colonial administration in 1914/1915; the railway line was named Amboland Railway in reference to the territory of the Ovambo people. The link to Outjo was completed in 1921 under South African rule. [10]

The branch line to Outjo can be seen turning away North from the line to Otavi. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The branch line crossed the C33 at an ungated crossing. This photograph looks South from the C33 towards Otjiwarongo Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Turning through 120°, or perhaps more, standing on the C33, the rails of the line to Outjo disappear into the vegetation. The line has clearly not been used for some time. However, we will see that much of the line to Outjo remains in place and perhaps could be renovated should the need arise. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The line curves round towards the West. On the way it appears often out of the undergrowth. Here, this minor road crosses the old railway and the signs still stand proudly either side of the line, either side of the railway. [Google Streetview, 2924]
The road shown above appears bottom-right of this image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line then heads Southwest for a while before gradually turning through the West to the Northwest. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line appears out of the brush quite often and sometimes for significant distances, as these two. [Google Maps, June 2025]
These two images are typical of what can be seen on satellite imagery. The line appears out of the brush quite often and sometimes for significant distances. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line turns through West to Northwest. [Google Maps, June 2025]
It continues, Northwest. [Google Maps, June 2025]
One passing loop appears out of the undergrowth. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Here it can be seen crossing another minor road. [Google Maps, June 2025]
And then a tarmac road. All crossings are ungated. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next series of six photographs show sidings parallel to the running line. This location is more than just a passing loop but I have not been able to establish whether a specific local industry was the reason for the sidings. The photographs run in sequence Southeast to Northwest. …

The last of six photographs of sidings adjacent to the line to Outjo. [Google Maps, June 2025]

The next sequence of four photographs shows a passing loop on the line. In sequence, these photographs run from the Southeast to the Northwest. …

The last of a series of four satellite images showing a passing loop on the Otjiwarongo to Outjo Railway. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Further to the Northwest the line crosses the Ugab River. [Google Maps, June 2025]
And then the C39 road, after which the line turns to the West and runs into Outjo. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking North from the C39 entering Outjo. A series of rail sidings sit to the North of the running line. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The last photograph looks North from the C39 at the left side of this satellite image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Outjo Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Outjo Railway Station in 1961, © SAR Publicity & Travel Department. [45]
Outjo Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The turning triangle at the end of the line performed the

Otavi-Oshikango

In 2005, a new 89 km section of Northern Railway from Tsumeb to Oshivelo was opened by President Sam Nujoma, as part of the “Northern Extension” of the railway link from Kranzberg to Otavi. Construction on the project’s second phase, a 59 km stretch from Ondangwa to Oshikango on the Angolan border at a cost of about N$329m, was scheduled to be completed by December 2007. Ondangwa Station opened in 2006 for freight.

In phase 3, a 58 km branch from Ondangwa to Oshakati was constructed at an estimated cost of N$220m, for completion in December 2008. For the future a connection from Oshikango to a point near Cassinga is planned on Angola’s southern railway system. [11][13][14]

The Ondangwa-Oshikango line was officially opened by President Hifikepunye Pohamba in July 2012. In order to keep the system operational and safe, provincial governor Usko Nghaamwa implored local residents to stop stealing railroad ties and sections of the wire fence. [11][15]

  • Otavi (junction for Grootfontein)
  • Tsumeb
  • Ondangwa (junction)
  • Oniipa (road bridge)
  • Onjdiva [11][14]
  • Namacunde [11][16]
  • Oshakati
  • Oshikango (Angolan border)
The C39 crossed the railway immediately to the North of Otavi Railway Station. as we have already noted, this view from the ungated crossing shows the branch to Grootfontein heading away to the right and the line North-northeast to Tsumeb heading for the distant hills. [Google Streetview, 2024]

The journey towards Tsumeb runs uneventfully over flat ground surrounded by shrub and small trees, heading North-northeast, until it reaches Ohorongo Cement Works.

An aerial view of the works can be found here. [48] That view looks North across the Works and shows the railway and a dedicated branch to the Works in the background.

Ohorongo Cement Works. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The passing loop and access to the cement works’ private sidings. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The dedicated siding can be seen leaving the main line at the Southwest end of the passing loop. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The siding curves round along the Northeast side of the Works. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The siding ends towards the Northeast corner of thecsite

The railway continues Northeast over largely unremarkable flat terrain, before turning East, encountering one arm of the B1 and then a triangular junction.

Looking back West from the B1 towards Otavi. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
The view East from the B1 towards Tsumeb. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
An early photograph of a 2ft-gauge train close to Tsumeb, © Not supplied, but made available under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [49]
The triangular junction to the West of Tsumeb. The northern arm heads for Oshivelo, Omuthiya, Ondangwa, Oniipa, Onjdiva, Namacunde, Oshakati and Oshikango. The eastern arm to Tsumeb and beyond. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Tsumeb Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Tsumeb freight depot, with the line serving Tsumeb’s large mine passing under the B1. [Google Maps, June 2024]
The turning triangle at Tsumeb sits immediately alongside the B1 to the South of the fright depot. [Google Maps, June 2025]
A diagrammatic representation of the rail network around Tsumeb, © Tabletop and licenced for reuse under a GNU Free Documentation Licence. [52]
Tsumeb Railway Station in 1908 in 2ft-gauge days! © Public Domain. [55]

Encyclopedia Britannica tells us that “In 1851 Sir Francis Galton, a British explorer, made note of copper ore deposits in the vicinity of what later became the town of Tsumeb. An Anglo-German company acquired mining rights for the Tsumeb area in 1903. Southwest of Tsumeb is the site of the final German troop surrender to South African forces in World War I. The town remained a small copper-mining centre until the Tsumeb mine was purchased in 1947 by a largely U.S.-based corporation. It has since been developed as a planned company town (although ownership of the mine has changed hands several times), exploiting mineral deposits that include significant amounts of lead and copper as well as zinc, cadmium, silver, and germanium (a metalloid element used as a semiconductor). An integrated copper and lead smelter treats concentrates from Tsumeb and other mines. Owambo labourers are the chief contract workers.” [50]

The mine, owned by Dundee Precious Metals sits to the East of the B1.

Tsumeb’s Mine is owned (in 2025) by Dundee Precious Metals, [51], a Canadian-based international gold mining company with operations and projects located in Bulgaria, Ecuador, Namibiaand Serbia. . [Google Maps, June 2025]
Rails and building under construction at Tsumeb Mine, © Not supplied, but made available under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [53]
The old smelter at Tsumeb in 1910, © Public Domain and shared by jbdodane on Flickr on 9th April 2014. [54]

The line to the North of Tsumeb left the triangular junction to the West of the town heading first to the West and then to the Northwest and then directly North alongside the D3007, before turning West-northwest again.

Looking Southeast from the B1 towards Tsumeb. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Looking Northwest from the B1 along the line towards Omuthiya. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The ungated crossing at the D3007. [Google Maps, June 2025]

After a few kilometres on a West-northwest heading, the line then turns to the North-northwest and runs parallel to the B1 for some considerable distance.

The B1 and the railway converge and head North-northwest. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line seen from the B1. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The ungated crossing on the D3004. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The view North-northwest along the line from the ungated crossing on the D3001. [Google Streetview, 2022]
The line diverges from the B1 just to the South of the River Owambo. Both the railway and the road cross the river in this satellite image. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Triangle on the South side of the D3610 at Oshivelo. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Oshivelo Railway Station on the North side of the D3610. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South East from an ungated crossing just to the Southeast of Omuthiya Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Looking Northwest from the same ungated crossing into the site of Omuthiya Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2022]
Omuthiya Railway Station. [Google Maps, June 2025]
The line to the Northwest of the station, seen from the South. [Google Streetview, 2024]
A short distance further up the line looking back towards Omuthiya. [Google Streetview, 2024]
A little further Northwest again, this time looking North towards Ondangwa. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking back towards Omuthiya from the ungated crossing on the D3603. [Google Streetview, 2024]
At the same ungated crossing, this photograph is taken looking forward towards Ondangwa. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Two culverts then take the line over the dry channel of the River Gwashigam. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking back Southeast from the bridge carrying the D3622 over the line on the approach to 0ndangwa. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking Northwest from the same bridge towards Ondangwa. [Google Streetview, June 2025]
Looking South-southeast from an ungated minor dirt road crossing closer to Ondangwa Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Looking West-northwest towards Ondangwa. [Google Streetview, 2024]
Ondangwa Railway Station and turning triangle. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking South East from the B1 overbridge into the site of Ondangwa Railway Station. [Google Streetview, 2024]
The view West from the same bridge across the turning triangle, the arm on the right leads to the line heading North towards the Angolan border. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Fuel depots sit alongside the line as it heads North. [Google Maps, June 2025]
Looking North from the bridge carrying the C45 over the railway which is now closing in on the railhead on the Angolan border. [Google Streetview, 2024]

The next three images are a sequence of North-facing photogra

The last photograph on the northern line is a satellite image showing the railhead

The railhead in Oshikango at the Namibia/Angola border. [Google Maps, June 2025]

References

  1. Charles E. Lee; The Longest Narrow-Gauge Railway; in The Railway Magazine, February 1952, Tothill Press, Westminster, London, p121-123.
  2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_South_West_Africa, accessed on 7th June 2025.
  3. https://www.britannica.com/place/German-South-West-Africa, accessed on 7th June 2025.
  4. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_West_African_Jung, accessed on 7th June 2025.
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Namibia, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  6. Helmut Schroeter; Die Eisenbahnen der ehemaligen deutschen Schutzgebiete Afrikas und ihre Fahrzeuge = Die Fahrzeuge der deutschen Eisenbahnen 7 [The Railways of the former German Protectorates in Africa and their Rolling Stock = the Rolling Stock of the German Railways 7]. (in German); Verkehrswissenschaftliche Lehrmittelgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main, 1961.
  7. Helmut Schroeter and Roel Ramaer; Die Eisenbahnen in den einst deutschen Schutzgebieten: Ostafrika, Südwestafrika, Kamerun, Togo und die Schantung-Eisenbahn: damals und heute [German colonial railways: East Africa, Southwest Africa, Cameroon, Togo and the Shantung Railway: then and now] (in German and in English); Röhr-Verlag, Krefeld, 1993.
  8. Brenda Bravenboer and Walter Rusch; The First 100 Years of State Railways in Namibia; TransNamib Museum, Windhoek, 1997.
  9. According to Schroeter; Bravenboer does not mention this line.
  10. Klaus Dierks; The South African Period 1915–1989: The Development of the Namibia Railway Network!; via http://www.klausdierks.com/Namibia_Rail/2.htm, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Namibia, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  12. Not used.
  13. Ministry of Trade & Industry; Northern Railway Extension; via http://www.mti.gov.na/subpage.php?linkNo=72, this link is broken.
  14. Angola- Namibia Link; railwaysafrica.com; via https://web.archive.org/web/20141023100300/http://www.railwaysafrica.com/blog/2014/10/21/angola-namibia-link-3, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  15. Namibia: Community Vandalizes New Railway Line (9th July 2012); New Era; via http://allafrica.com/stories/201207090857.html, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  16. RailwaysAfrica No. 5, 2014, p11, via https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railways_Africa, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  17. https://steam-locomotives-south-africa.blogspot.com/2008/07/walvis-bay-hope-steam-locomotive.html?m=1, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  18. The Industrial Railway Record Issue No. 37, June 1971, p78-85.
  19. https://www.expertafrica.com/namibia/windhoek/desert-express, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  20. https://www.rossing.com, accessed on 8th June 2025.
  21. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usakos_railway_station, accessed on 9th June 2025.
  22. https://steam-locomotives-south-africa.blogspot.com/2007/11/plinthed-class-hd-at-usakos-in-namibia.html?m=1, accessed on 9th June 2025.
  23. Leith Paxton & David Bourne; Locomotives of the South African Railways (1st ed.); Struik, Cape Town, 1985, p117 & 121.
  24. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windhoek_railway_station, accessed on 9th June 2025.
  25. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1De1p8q5Mj/l, accessed on 9th June 2025.
  26. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LocomZwillinge_Windhoek1.JPG, accessed on 9th June 2025.
  27. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okahandja_railway_station, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  28. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Train_station_Windhoek_(2018).jpg, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  29. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/trainload-of-armoured-cars-south-west-africa-world-war-i-news-photo/463970465, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  30. https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7089896#/media/File%3AEisenbahnstation_Omaruru_1906.jpg, a cessed on 10th June 2025.
  31. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karibib_aerial_view.jpg, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  32. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kranzberg_Station.jpg, accessed on 20th June 2025.
  33. https://www.facebook.com/groups/namib2footers/permalink/6730769210360985, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  34. https://www.facebook.com/groups/namib2footers/permalink/6730826530355253, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  35. https://www.namibian.com.na/historic-train-preserved-for-posterity, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  36. https://steam-locomotives-south-africa.blogspot.com/2007/?m=1, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  37. https://www.news24.com/life/travel/go/then-now-swakopmund-railway-station-20240927, accessed on 10th June 2025.
  38. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/johan-stewart-laubscher-53342658_namibia-railinfrastructure-makinghistory-activity-6815601290438037504-swBC?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAFKPlCQBKyM6SVcRIYzuUN4W9XocTSJS0sY, accessed
  39. https://steam-locomotives-south-africa.blogspot.com/2007/11/narrow-gauge-locomotive-plinthed-at.html?m=1, accessed on 11th June 2025.
  40. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windhoek_railway_station, accessed on 11th June 2025.
  41. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otavi_Mining_and_Railway_Company, accessed on 12th June 2025.
  42. Frederic J. Shaw; Little Railways of the World; Howell-North, Berkeley, California, 1958.
  43. Dick Andrews; Extra Narrow Gauge Junction: Otavi Ry., State Northern Ry. in South Africa [sic]; in Narrow Gauge and Short Line Gazette, Volume 16 No. 1, 1991, p63–66.
  44. https://www.namport.com.na/news/428/grootfontein-train-station-new-logistics-hub-for-drc-zambia, accessed on 12th June 2025.
  45. http://atom.drisa.co.za/collections/N_Collection_lo-res/N70462.jpg, accessed on 12th June 2025.
  46. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CBLYcCydW, accessed on 12th June 2025.
  47. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/15abDSmZ7m, accessed on 12th June 2025.
  48. https://maps.app.goo.gl/Ta8Pcutiq8dYKQ1c8?g_st=ac, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  49. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tsumeb_Railway.JPG, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  50. https://www.britannica.com/place/Tsumeb, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  51. https://dundeeprecious.com/about-us/overview, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  52. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Diagram_Tsumeb_railway_station_2007.jpg, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  53. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tsumeb_2.JPG, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  54. https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbdodane/13848969294, accessed on 13th June 2025.
  55. https://picryl.com/media/1908-bahnhof-tsumeb-b561a6, accessed on 13th June 2025.

Sudan – Khartoum Again – The Modern Tramway, Vol. 13 No. 156 – December 1950.

The Modern Tramway reported in December 1950 on the purchase by the Sudan Light & Power Company of the new 4-motor bogie tramcars. The bogies and equipment were being “supplied by the English Electric Company and the underframes and bodies by Charles Roberts and Company Ltd., under sub-contract to the English Electric Company. All motor tramcars and trailers [were to] be fitted with air brakes. As will be seen from the drawing reproduced, the body design [was] a pleasing example of modern British practice. The trailer cars [were] of similar outline.” [1: p270]

One of these tram sets operating in 1958 in Khartoum/Omdurman, © American Geographical Society Library, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Sudan Memory ID:
UWM-1000054. [6]
General Arrangement of the New Motor Car built in 1959 for Khartoum Tramways (Anglo-Egeyptian Sudan) by Charles Roberts & Co. Ltd., Morebury Junction, JCQ-9’50

I published an article about the railways/tramways of Sudan in May 2022. That article can be found here. [7] This present article should be seen as an addendum to that article.

The early electric trams supplied by the English Electric Company were single truck motor trams with 4-wheel trailers, © Public Domain. [2]
A side-view of a tram at the same location. This image was shared on the  صور سودانية تاريخية ونادرة Facebook Page on 7th December 2010, © Public Domain. [3]
Embed from Getty Images
The image is embedded from Getty Images. It is a high-angle view of pedestrians, cars and an EEC tram &n trailer at the tram terminus in Omdurman, Sudan, circa 1955. The tramline connects Omdurman, on the west bank of the River Nile, with Khartoum. (Photo by Three Lions/Hulton Archive/Getty Images). [4]

The Modern Tramway continues:

Electric tramway operation in Khartoum began on 16th January, 1928 when the line from Khartoum North to Omdurman via Khartoum and the White Nile Bridge was opened. The Khartoum Tramways were the first electric tramways in the Sudan and transport in the city and outskirts had been previously provided by two steam tramway lines, which were closed on the opening of the electric line.” [1: p270]

The historic steam-powered tramway in Khartoum employed 0-4-2 steam locomotives to haul lengthy trains. In this image, No 6 (Orenstein & Koppel D 2220 of 1907) is in charge of a tram train at Omdurman Railway Station tram terminus, © Public Domain. [5]

The Modern Tramway describes the electric tramway which replaced the steam-powered trams:

The present rolling stock of the 3ft. 6 n. gauge Khartoum tramways consists of 16 single-truck motor trams, 15 4-wheel trailers, one 4-wheel electric locomotive and 30 goods trucks. All the stock was built by the English Electric Company Ltd. Four passenger services are operated, viz:

  • Khartoum Central Station Omdurman Central Station (5 miles).
  • Khartoum Central Station Khartoum North (3) miles).
  • Omdurman Central Station Abu Rouf (14 miles).
  • Circle (12 miles).” [1: p270]

Headways are 18, 20, 20 and 30 minutes respectively. In addition a freight service is operated between Khartoum railway station and Omdurman. The main Iine begins at Khartoum North (where it made end on junction with a steam tramway to Shabat Reach, a service now operated by motor buses) and shortly turns south to cross the Blue Nile; on gaining the other bank, the line turns east, passing through the main part of Khartoum and running parallel to the Blue Nile. On this section there is the main depot and a large loop which runs round to the Central Station and the back of the city before turning north to rejoin the main line. At Mogren Point, the main line crosses the White Nile and immediately turns north towards Omdurman; this city stretches for 6 miles along the river and during the régime of the Mahdi it became the capital of his empire. The city is memorable for the battle fought outside its walls in 1898 between the followers of the Mahdi and the British. Some distance after turning north, there is another depot at Zaptia, on the western side of the line. At Omdurman Central Station the tramway turns east, back towards the river Nile, which it reaches at Abu Rouf, the final terminus. From this point, there is a ferry service to the terminus of the former steam tramway at Shabat Reach on the other side of the Nile. The tramways are all single-line-and-loop and there are several goods sidings. In 1948, 8,883,851 passengers were carried, whilst goods traffic averages 12,000 tons yearly.” [1: p270-271]

At the time of the inauguration of the electric tramways it was thought that due to the very dry nature of the ground in Khartoum, satisfactory earth points could not be obtained for earthing the track for a track return system. It has since been established that it is possible to provide earth points, and the new trams will operate on the normal single overhead and track return system.” [1: p271]

The Modern Tramway acknowledged the help of the Sudan Light and Power Company Ltd., who provided the information on which these notes are based.

References

  1. Modern British Tramcars for Khartoum; in The Modern Tramway Vol. 13 No. 156, London, December 1950, p270.
  2. https://repozytorium.biblos.pk.edu.pl/redo/resources/28651/file/suwFiles/HassanS_UrbanPlanning.pdf, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  3. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19xqvF71bT, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  4. https://www.gettyimages.fr/photos/bank-of-khartoum , accessed on 18th January 2025
  5. https://boudewijnhuijgens.getarchive.net/amp/topics/rail+transport+in+sudan, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  6. https://www.sudanmemory.org/image/UWM-1000054/1/LOG_0000, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2022/05/31/railways-of-khartoum-part-1-the-3ft-6in-1067mm-gauge.