Tag Archives: metre-gauge

Railways of Tanzania – Part 3 – Voi, Kenya to Kahe and Moshi, Tanzania

At the Kenyan end of this line it formed a junction with the Mombasa to Nairobi line at Voi. Two articles on this blog feature Voi. The first looks at the line traveling from the coast to Voi and particularly at the length of that line between Mazaras and Voi. That article can be found here. [1] The second looks at the length of that line running from Voi towards Nairobi and particularly at the length of the line between Voi and Ulu. That article can be found here. [2]

The featured image for this article shows a Class 59 Beyer-Garratt locomotive, No. 5902, Ruwenzori Mountains taking on water at Voi Station, (c) EAR&H. [2]

Voi is the largest town in Taita-Taveta County in southern Kenya, in the former Coast Province. It lies at the western edge of the Taru Desert, south and west of the Tsavo East National Park. The Sagala Hills are to the south. [3] It is also a junction station with a branch-line leaving the Nairobi-Mombasa line to head into Tanzania. Stations on that branch-line are Mwatate,  Bura,  Mashoti,  Maktau,  Murka,  Ziwani and  Taveta, all in Kenya. The line connected with the Tanzanian main-line at Moshi/Kahe, close to Mt. Kilimanjaro.

Photographs of the area and the Kenyan main line close to Voi can be seen in the two articles above [1][2]

Voi Metre-gauge Railway Station sits on the North side of Voi River. The Standard-gauge Railway station sits to the South. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Both stations appear on this extract from MapCarta’s mapping. [5]

The line from Voi towards Tanzania was constructed during the hostilities of WW1.

This photograph shows the intense preparations for the campaign in East Africa at Voi Railway Station (c) Public Domain. [4]

The branch line to Moshi/Kahe left the Metre-gauge railway (MGR) between Mombasa and Nairobi to the West of Voi MGR Station.

Just to the Northwest of the level-crossing over the road into Voi from the Mombasa Road (A109), the branch line left the MGR main line. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The two images above look along the MGR mainline from the level-crossing. The image on the left looks back towards Voi MGR station, that on the right looks ahead towards Nairobi. The branch line to Moshi/Kahe cannot be picked out on the image on the right as it is hidden by the bushes/grass ahead. [Google Streetview, July 2024]

A very short distance beyond the junction, the branch line turns away to the Southwest. Its route crosses the Standard-gauge Railway (SGR) at 90°. The crossing point can be seen on the left of the extract from the satellite imagery.

This next extract shows the route of the branch line,. The length in red shows the line of the old railway, sections of it are either buried or have been lifted. At Mombasa Road 9A109) only a short length of track is visible. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Looking along the branch line at the crossing at Mombasa Road (A109): the image on the left looks back Northeast towards the MGR main line. The image on the right looks ahead along the line towards Moshi. [Google Streetview, July 2024]

The route of the old railway is relatively easy to pick out on this extract from Google’s satellite imagery. The line runs alongside a minor road heading Southwest to take up a position adjacent to the A23 road.

Just beyond the bottom-left of this image the line crosses a minor murram road to the North of the A23.

This murram road can be seen at the top-right of the next extract from the satellite imagery. The line can be seen crossing the road in this image from Google Streetview. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
The route of the old railway sits on the Northwest side of the A23 and can be picked out between the two roads shown grey on this satellite image.
In this view looking West from the A23, the line can just about be made out as a straight line running approximately across the centre of the image. [Google Streetview, August 2022]

After some distance running close to the A23, the line begins to diverge from it and then crosses a metalled side road as shown in the images below.

The line and the A23 begin to diverge and the railway crosses a metalled side road close to the A23. The side road is named – Taita-Taveta University Avenue [Google Maps, April 2026]
The level-crossing on Taita-Tavita University Avenue seen from the Northwest. The junction with the A23 can be seen beyond the vehicle in the image. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
The railway and the A23 follow the same corridor as the land drops gradually away. The line is more of a slave to the contours than the road. The railway route enters top-right and leaves the sateelite image just above the bottom-left corner. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The intermittent red line marks the route of the railway. Towards the left of this satellite image, the line bridges the River Voi. [Google Maps, April 2026]

On the left below is a closer look at the Voi River Bridge. [Google Maps, April 2026] On the right is a view along the C104 which appears in the bottom left of the satellite image above.

Looking West on the C104, the railway tracks can be seen either side of the road. [Google Streetview, October 2021]

Running Southwest, the line crosses the C104 in the top corner of the next extract from Google’s satellite imagery below. …

The line crosses the C104 at the top-right of this image and runs diagonally Southwest. It can be seen as a fainter line on the nNorth side of what is recorded by Google as a road. In the bottom left corner the line curves to the South and leaves the image just to the right of the bottom-left corner of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The image on the left below is the next length of the line which runs South to cross the A23 at an ungated crossing. [Google Maps, April 2026] On the right at the top is the closer view of the crossing at the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026] Then below on the right the view North from the A23. [Google Streetview, August 2022] …

The last image at this location shows the railway heading South from the A23. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Just South of the A23, the line curves away from South to head Southwest once again. It can be seen entering this satellite image at the top-right and then runs diagonally across to close to the bottom-left corner of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Perhaps difficult to pickout at certain points on the satellite imagery, the line of the railway has been highlighted by the two red lines. It runs from the top-right of this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery to the bottom-left, running roughly parallel to the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Again, in this next satellite image, the line runs diagonally from top-right to bottom left. The greener lined area in the bottom half of this image will be a sisal plantation. The railway runs between this area and the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Close to Mwatate (which is just off this satellite image to the West (left)), the line turns southwards.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
On this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery, the line passes through Mwatate Railway Station on the right side of the image and then wanders sinuously across the image. The intermittent red lines show the route of the line where the image itself, at this scale, is less clear.
This is a similar area on OpenStreetMap’s mapping. It shows the location of Mwatate Railway station and the town it is named after. The route of the railway is shown as a dotted line. [6] The station is located inside a private sisal farm and not available to the public. [7]
Mwatate Railway Station Building, (c) Chao Tayiana Maina. [7]

The station nameboard, (c) Chao Tayiana Maina. [8]

Following on from the last satellite image this next extract shows the line continuing in a generally westerly direction. It continues to seek the easiest route as so curves around following the contours, entering top-right and leaving the image just above the bottom left corner. [Goggle Maps, April 2026]
Still heading West, the line runs from the bottom-right to the top-left of this satellite image and leaves the image close to the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Continuing West the line follows the A23 but then turns away to the South towards the left of this image. A red line has been added to show the curve of the line, where difficult to distinguish at this scale. It follows the curving grey line to the left edge of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Still heading West, the line curves sinuously across this next extract. It enters adjacent to the grey road just above the bottom-right corner of this image and leaves following the red line at the left of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
After a relatively tight radius curve at the right side of this image, the line runs due West alongside the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Looking Southwest from the A23, the line can be seen across a wide sandy strip before the bushland begins. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Again, intermittent red lines mark the route of the line where it is least obvious. [Google Maps, April 2026]

These ruins sit close to the line and appear to have been built to serve the line. They can just be made out towards the left edge of the satellite image immediately above. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The same building(s) as seen from the A23. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Continuing West, the route of the line is relatively easy to pick out. A couple of red line ensure that the eye follows the correct route. [Google Maps, April 2026]

At a slightly larger scale, this extract shows the line turning to the Northwest. Even at this scale the trace is faint, so intermittent red lines are provided to direct the eye. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Two extracts take the line further Northwest. (left image first, then the right). [Google Maps, April 2026]
A more West-northwest alignment is followed now, with the line once again close to the A23.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
The is the line seen from the A23 at the bottom-right of the satellite image above. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
The railway continues to run relatively close to the A23. [Google Maps, April 2026]
On this next extract the line runs bottom-right to top-left relatively close to the A23.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
And again here, the line runs bottom-right to top-left relatively close to the A23.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
And again here, the line runs bottom-right to top-left relatively close to the A23.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
The line reaches Maktau Railway Station at the top-left of the image.
[Google Maps, April 2026]

The Railway Station sign at Maktau, © Abiri Kenya. [9]

The station sign and the main station building seen from the old railway. [13]

The blue square marks the location of Maktau Railway Station. [12]

The station buildings seen from the A23.
[Google Streetview, April 2024]
Railway line close to Maktau. [21]
The line leave Maktau in a generally westerly directi, on, running parallel to the A6/A23 but a short distance to the South[Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues to head West, the intermittent red lines clarify its path. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line turns further away to the South. [Google Maps, April 2026]
It then returns to its westerly trajectory. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The railway and the road converge over this next length of the line, [Google Maps, April 2026]
Now much closer together, the road and the old railway run parallel to each other. Both are running in a West-southwest direction, [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues to run West-southwest while the road turns to the West. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues West-southwest. [Google Maps, April 2026]
It then turns to the Northwest. [Google Maps, April 2026]
And then sweeps round to the South-southwest. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The general direction of travel is still westerly, but the line turns to the Northwest. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues Northwest. [Google Maps, April 2026]
It then turns back closer to the West. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Road and rail begin to converge once more. [Google Maps, April 2026]
A murram road leaves the A23 and crosses the old railway, then running parallel to if for a distance.
[Google Maps, April 2026]
This extract from Openstreetmap,com’s mapping shows the next length of the railway which, running Northwest, crosses the A6/A23 (on the right of this map extract) and then runs away to the North of the road before turning West, [14]

This satellite image extract shows the point where the railway crosses the modern A6/A23 towards the bottom-right of the image, The line can then be seen heading North to cross a watercourse. Google Maps, April 2026]

Travelling West-northwest the line crosses the route of the Ziwani-Mtito Andei road which seems to have had a variety of alignments over time. Three crossing points are marked. The most westerly of these appears to still be in use today. Two photographs appear below. [15]
The crossing point on the Ziwani-Mtito Andei road. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Two photographs taken on the Ziwani-Mtito Andrei road. That on the left looks back East, that below looks West along the line. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Further West, this is the next length of the line. [16]
And this is the next length of the line, bearing first to the Northwest, then South-southwest, then Northwest again. The line can be seen crossing the E697 road towards the left of this extract. [17]
Little seems to remain of the bridge which once spanned the waterway, shown on the map above.
[Google Maps, April 2026]

Two photographs taken from the E697 level-crossing; that on the left was taken facing East, that below was taken facing West. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Further West again, the line crosses the Taveta-Laset road before running under the A6/A23. The bridge carrying the main road appears in the bottom-left corner of this map extract. [18]

On the left, a view looking back east along the old railway and below the view looking Southwest along the line. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

The bridge carrying the modern A6/A23 across the line of the old railway. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Looking back, East-northeast along the line of the old railway. There appear to no obvious traces of the line, although, admittedly, photographs only look out from the bridge deck and the A23.
[Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking Westsouthwest towards Taveta along the line of the old railway. Again, appear to no obvious traces of the railway. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Taveta as shown on Openstreetmap.com. The Railway Station is marked by the blue square. [11]
The red line shows the route of the old railway through Taveta, [Google Maps, April 2026]
The road crossing at the Northeast end of Taveta Railway Station site. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Looking Northeast from the crossing of the A6 at the Northeast end of the Taveta Railway Station site. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Looking Southwest into the Taveta Railway Station site. While the water tower is visible, the station building is hidden behind the sheds on the right of this image. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Looking Southwest into the Taveta Railway Station site again, this time from just to the Southeast of the rail crossing. While the water tower is still visible, the slight change in the camera location allows the the station building to be seen on the right of this image. [Google Streetview, August 2022]
Taveta Railway Station site as shown on Openstreetmap.com. [11]
The same area on Google’s satellite imagery [Google Maps, April 2026]

Taveta Railway Station Nameboard, (c) Chao Taylana Maina [10]

This next extract from the mapping of Openstreetmap,com shows the line of the old railway running Southwest from Taveta Railway Station (again shown by the blue square), then to the Southeast of Taveta Sisal Airport. []

Two images which are typical of the length of line shown on in the map extract above, The first is on the left the second on the right. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This next extract from Openstreetmap shows the next length of the line. [20]

This sequence of extracts from Google’s satellite imagery shows the line running across the map extract above. The first two, on the left and below show the line in the first quarter of the map from the right. The third image is from a location at the third point from the left. The fourth, fifth and sixth images show locations on the left half of the map. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The last six images are extracts from Google’s satellite imagery which come from the length of the old railway shown on the map extract above, [Google Maps, April 2026]
This next extract from Openstreetmap shows the line travelling Southwest and crossing the Kenya/Tanzania border (the pink line), [22]

The next four satellite images are relatively typical of the route of the railway across the map extract above.

The line can be seen heading from top-right to bottom-left across this satellite image, [Google Maps, April 2026]
Similarly, here, the line runs top-right to bottom-left. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Bridges under the line have in many cases been washed away. The image below shows one such location – here as elsewhere, the railway tracks and metal sleepers span the gap but unsupported.

On the left, railway tracks left spanning a gap where a bridge once sat. Below, the railway crosses the international border. [Google Maps, April 2006]

In Tanzania, the route of the railway line follows the border between Moshi Rural and Mwanga provinces in Tanzania. [23]
Approximately the same area as it appears on satellite imagery in the 21st century. The route of the old railway is marked by the grey line, approximately at the centre of this image, the route of the line crosses a water course. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Another example of a river crossing where the the superstructure of the bridge/culvert has been washed away, [Google Maps, April 2026]

The old railway route can be seen crossing the Whona River in the top-right of this next image, then turning to the West and crossing the T2/B1 on the South side of Ghona and then heading away West and then Southwest. [24]
Approximately the same length of the line as appears on the map extract above. The line follows the grey line across the image from the top-right corner along the South side of Ghona, but where the road turns sharply to the South, the lie continues on the same westerly bearing before curving to the Southwest close to the edge of this image. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Now in Tanzania, no Google Streetview images are available.

The bridge crossing the Whona River still stands. Just to the Southwest of this bridge the railway curves round to the West and passes on the South side of Ghona. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The crossing point on the B1/T2 to the South of the centre of Ghona. Either side of the crossing little is visible of the rails and sleepers of the old railway, but immediately adjacent to the road (on its East side) a short length is visible. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line heads Southwest from Ghona running to the Southeast of Kiterini. [24]
This satellite image covers the first half of the map immediately above. The line continues in a Southwest direction from the top-right of this image to close to the bottom-left where it turns to the West.
[Google Maps, April 2026]

The remainder of the length of the line covered by the Openstreetmap extract above. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line continues Southwest through Ngasinyi. [25]
A similar area shown on Google’s satellite imagery. The line runs from the top-right to close to the bottom-left of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line runs Southwest down to the Usambarabahn (the Tanga Line) at Kahe. [26]
Approximately the same area again, The route of the old railway enters at the top-right apex and runs diagonally on the same bearing to what was a triangular junction with the Tanga Line which runs Northwest across the bottom-left corner of the image. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The route of the Usambarabahn from Tanga to Moshi can be followed here [27]

References

  1. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/05/17/uganda-railways-part-4-mazeras-to-voi/
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/05/21/uganda-railways-part-5-voi-to-ulu/
  3. Wikipedia, Voi; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voi, accessed on 19th May 2018.
  4. https://saltlicksafarilodge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/World-War-I-Brochure.pdf, accessed on 1st April 2026.
  5. https://mapcarta.com/Voi/Map, accessed on 1st April 2026.
  6. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.51233/38.39303, accessed on 2nd April 2026.
  7. https://www.instagram.com/p/B-jmB57gPVW, accessed on 2nd April 2026.
  8. https://www.instagram.com/p/B-jiQbFgYmC, accessed on 2nd April 2026.
  9. https://abiri.home.blog/counties/taita-taveta-county/maktau-railway-station, accessed on, 7th April 2026.
  10. https://www.instagram.com/p/B-oOIVngdsr/?hl=en, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  11. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.39735/37.67017, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  12. maktau, kenya | OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=maktau%2C+kenya&zoom=17&minlon=38.13171029090881&minlat=-3.4121865416126074&maxlon=38.140861988067634&maxlat=-3.40617831612975#map=16/-3.41004/38.13647), accessed on 7th April 2026
  13. https://twendesasa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Maktau-Railway-Station.jpg, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  14. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.39199/37.82813, accessed on 7th April 2026,
  15. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.38513/37.79319, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  16. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.38784/37.76810, accessed on 7th April 2026,
  17. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.37259/37.73797, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  18. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.37162/37.70947, accessed on 7th April 2026.
  19. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.40416/37.65450, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  20. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.42143/37.62313, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  21. https://www.kwaela.co.ke/traders-rue-lost-sales-after-railway-closure, accessed on 2nd April 2026.
  22. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.42756/37.60238, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  23. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.44226/37.56736, accessed on 8th April 2026.
  24. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-3.46495/37.49677, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  25. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.48190/37.46396, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  26. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.49420/37.44452, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  27. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/04/01/railways-of-tanzania-part-2-the-route-of-the-usambara-railway-tanga-to-moshi/

Railways of Tanzania – Part 2 – The Route of the Usambara Railway – Tanga to Moshi

NB: Given the way in which some of the images in this article have been displayed, this article is best read/viewed on a laptop or desktop computer rather than a mobile phone. If you need to read it on a mobile, it may be sensible to read it in landscape rather than portrait view.

The featured image is an early German photograph of a train on the Usambarabahn at a typical station location.Thecsoecific location was not recorded.

There is a description of the route of the Usambara Railway or the Tanga Line on-line on the United Republic of Tanzania website: “As the train departs Tanga, it slowly climbs through the rolling hills and lush forests of the Usambara Mountains, offering breathtaking views of the surrounding countryside. Along the way, the train passes through several small towns and villages, each with its own distinct character and cultural traditions. … One of the highlights of the Tanga Line journey is the crossing of the Pangani River, which is spanned by a impressive steel bridge. This engineering marvel, constructed during the German colonial era, is a testament to the ingenuity and determination of the railway’s builders. … As the train continues its journey inland, it winds through the fertile agricultural regions of the Kilimanjaro and Meru districts, passing by vast coffee and sisal plantations. The final destination, the town of Moshi, is nestled at the base of the majestic Mount Kilimanjaro, the highest freestanding mountain in the world.” [5]

One of the must-see attractions along the Tanga Line is the Lushoto town, a charming community community nestled in the heart of the Usambara Mountains. This picturesque town is known for its traditional architecture, vibrant markets, and stunning views of the surrounding peaks. … Another highlight of the Tanga Line journey is the Amani Nature Reserve, a protected area that is home to a diverse array of plant and animal life. Visitors can explore the reserve’s hiking trails, spot a variety of bird species, and learn about the region’s unique ecosystem. … As you continue your journey, you’ll also have the chance to visit the Vugiri Falls, a stunning waterfall that cascades over the rugged landscape, and the Nduruma River, a popular spot for birdwatching and outdoor recreation.” [5]

Notable cultural and natural attractions close to the line include: the Kilindi Palace, a former royal residence that now serves as a museum showcasing the history and traditions of the Kilindi people; the Magila Monastery, a historic religious site that dates back to the 19th century; various traditional villages; the Mkomazi National Park, a protected area that is home to a diverse array of plant and animal species; the Usambara Mountains, a stunning mountain range that is home to a rich array of endemic plant and animal species; the region’s diverse habitats, from wetlands to forests, provide a rich and varied birdlife for enthusiasts to discover.

In 2018, the Government of Tanzania invested 5.7 billion Tanzanian shillings to rehabilitate the line. As of July 2019, diesel powered cargo trains were leaving Tanga Railway Station again. Passenger transport between Tanga and Arusha was planned to start in September 2019, but has not been commenced as yet. [6]

The line has its terminus in the Port of Tanga. It leaves the Port of Tanga (Hafen von Tanga) to run towards the station. On the satellite image below it can be picked out curving round from the port to the station on Ring Street.

The Port of Tanga is at the top of this extract from Google’s satellite imagery. The station is at the bottom-left of the image on Ring Street. The line can be seen curving between the two. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Tanga Railway Station appears in the bottom-left of this MapCarta image, superimposed in red on the map is the line that ran down to the port. It would appear that the line of the railway has been built over at, at least, one point – buildings of the Malindi Hotel sit over the line of the railway. [14]

An early photograph of the port can be found here. [9] The linked postcard image is annotated, “Vintage illustration after a photograph, Usambara Railway, Usambarabahn, German East Africa, at Tanga, Tanzania, 1890s, 19th Century.”

Tanga Railway Station is on Ring Street, Tanga.

Tanga Railway Station, 1890. This image was shared on the City of Tanga in Tanzania (Tanga Facebook) Facebook Group by Ragini Pattni on 24th December 2025. [2]
The Station at Tanga close to the turn of the 20th century. This image was shared on the City of Tanga in Tanzania (Tanga Facebook) Facebook Group by Ragini Pattni on 24th December 2025. [2]
The Railway Station on Ring Street, Tanga. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The turning triangle immediately to the West of the station at Tanga. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Buildings at the South point of the turning triangle in Tanga. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The roadside elevation of the Railway Station at Tanga. This image was shared on the City of Tanga in Tanzania (Tanga Facebook) Facebook Group by Ragini Pattni on 24th December 2025. [2]
Tanga Railway Station entrance, © Shane, Google Images. [3]
The District Civil Engineer’s Office, Tanzania Railways Corporation, Tanga © Paschal P. Rutayuga. [4]

The significant locations along the first stretch of the Tanga Railway (or the Usambarabahn or Usambara Railway) are highlighted on the adjacent schematic map of the line. [6]

The first location that we can easily establish on the satellite images below is the village/town of Maweni, nearly 11 kilometres from Tanga Railway Station.

Pongwe is only a few kilometres along the line. Again no obvious location can be seen on satellite images for any halt/station. Mkanyageni Halt (Reder’s Halt) is also not obvious on the satellite imagery.

Muheza, a more significant township, has a railway station!

The next sequence of images shows the line heading out into the suburbs of Tanga, alongside the A14 and running to the North of the airport before drifting away to the South of the A14.

This series of satellite images show the railway line heading Southwest out of the city of Tanga. for a distance it ran alongside the A14 [Google Maps, March 2026]

Beyond the city limits, the line continues in a south-westerly direction. For the sake of space a smaller scale is used in the satellite images that follow below. …

Maweni is the first identifiable location which appears on the schematic map of the line, even so, it is not possible from Google Maps to identify the location of any halt/station. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Pongwe is the next identifiable location which appears on the schematic map of the line, it is not possible from Google Maps to identify the location of any halt/station. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line leaves Pongwe and heads Southwest away from the A14. [Google Maps, March 2026]
It turns West from Southwest as it runs into Ngomeni with its Sisalana Cordage Factory, again there is no identifiable location for a railway station. [Google Maps, March 2026]
This next length of the line shows it meandering through the landscape, being bridged by the A14 before returning to run close to the A14 but on its North side. {Google Maps, March 2026]
Still heading generally in a south-westerly direction, the line runs alongside the A14, passes through Lusanga and heads on towards Muheza. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Muheza is a more significant township and it has a clearly identifiable railway station! The location of the station is shown on the larger scale extract from Google’s satellite imagery below. It is close to the point where the A14 turns South away from the line. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Muheza Railway Station sits close to the centre of the town. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Muheza Railway Station, © Issa Mates, April 2021. [Google maps, March 2026]

The station location was caught on camera in the late 19th century. It can be found among a series of photographs held by the Getty Foundation, here. [8] The picture is annotated, “Muheza station on Usambara Railway, Usambarabahn, German East Africa, Tanzania, 1890s, 19th Century.”

Muheza Railway Station as shown on MapCarta. [15]

The next satellite image extract picks up the railway at the western edge of Muheza close to its secondary school and sees it still running generally in a Southwesterly direction. …

The route of the railway can be picked out as a faint lighter line running top-right towards bottom-left of this extract before turning a little closer to Southsouthwest, leaving the extract at its southern edge. Tengeni is not marked on the satellite image at this scale but is the point where the line of the railway crosses a road at around the two-thirds point across the extract. There is no obvious railway halt at this location. Historically it was an important location on the Usambara Railway because it was the point where the 750 mm gauge Sigibahn met the Usambarabahn. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line continues on this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery. It can be seen entering the extract at the top-right apex, turning first towards the south-southwest before meandering towards the A14 at the third point across the image. It then runs parallel to and on the North side of the A14. Leaving the extract, just to the West of the A14. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line, again, enters this extract in the top-right corner a short distance away from the A14. I have not been able to identify the location of the Mambo Leo Halt. The line runs sinuously just to the Northwest of Mshangalikwa and heads away from the A14 to the West. [Google Maps, March 2026]

There is no obvious location along the line for Kihuhwi but there is a possibility that Zannetiberg Halt was close to what is now the Zeneti Medical Centre. which sits just beyond the western side of the extract immediately below.

The line crosses this extract in an East to West direction from the mid-point on the left of this extract to the bottom-left apex. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line enters this extract just to the Northeast of Zeneti Medical centre, crossing the road to the East of the medical centre at a level-crossing. After a short distance heading West, the line turns to runSouth-southwest towards the location of Mianga Primary School. Close to the school, the line curves to the West and leaves the extract from Google’s satellite imagery just above the bottom-left of the image. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Heading West from Mianga the line sweeps left and then right and in doing so joins the line from Dar es Salaam. The line then heads East-northeast, leaving this image at the top-left. The junction is at the centre of this image. [Google Maps, March 2026]

This closer view of the junction is taken from Google Earth. The black lines approximate to the two railway routes but are several metres, at least, out of position. The junction is named on the Schematic map of the line below – Murasi Junction and is recorded as being 65 km from Tanga. [Google Earth, March 2026]

The most notable location at the top of this section of the schmatic map of the line is the railway junction between the line from Tanga and that from Dar es Salaam. – Murasi Junction. Travelling on from Murasi Junction the next location recorded is the town of Mnyusi. [6]

Mnyusi sits at the centre of the satellite image below. The line runs along the Southwest side of the town. There is a significant culvert/bridge carrying the line over the local river.

Mnyusi River Bridge {Google Maps, March 2026]
The town of Mnyusi sits on the Northeast side of the railway line. To the Northwest of the bridge/culvert shown above, there is a passing loop and possibly old station buildings. [Google Maps, March 2026]
A closer view of the passing loop at Mnyusi. There is a group of three structures which might be, or might have been, railway structures. These are shown in closer detail below. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Three buildings align with the railway at Mnyusi and appear to have been station buildings. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Beyond the passing loop the line continues to head Northwest along the Northeast flank of the Pangani River valley, as can be seen on the next satellite image below.

Mnyusi Railway Station, as shown on MapCarta. [16]
The line form Tanga and Dar es Salaam enters this extract from Google’s satellite imagery at the apex at the bottom-right of the image. It runs Northwest to leave the extract centre-top. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Again, the line enters this image at the bottom-right apex and runs Northwest, leaving the image at the top, just to the left of centre. [Google Maps, March 2026]
In this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery the line again enters bottom-right and runs Northwest to a point just below the top of the image. It then swings round to the West. It runs to the North of a small settlement which is known as Old Korogwe and continues West towards Korogwe itself. Two of the locations noted on the schematic route of the line, Magunga Siding and Luengera Halt have been passed without being noticed! [Google Maps, March 2026]

The next extract from the satellite imagery takes the line through Korogwe. The settlement was reached by the line from Tanga around the turn of the 20th century. The construction of the line to the West of Korogwe commenced in 1903. [10]

The line from Tanga approached Korogwe from the East. The railway station

Old-Korogwe Railway Station in May 2022, (c) Vincent Christian. [Google Maps, March 2026] The image below shows the station in the early 20th century. [11]

St. Michael and All Angels Cathedral, Korogwe in 2017. (c) Yohana Joseph Mzuri. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Korogwe is the seat of the Anglican Diocese of Tanga and has a cathedral church dedicated to St. Michael and All Angels. [17] Towards the end of 2025, the Anglican Church of Tanga marked 25 Years as a Diocese and 177 Years of Christianity in the Region.

Another view of St. Michael and All Angels’ Cathedral at Korogwe, (c) Public Domain. The photograph was taken by ‘Acognat’. [18]

Korogwe had a population of 62,032 in 2022. as well as its Cathedral, the town has a teacher training college and a number of secondary schools. [12]

Korogwe Railway Station and the Pangani River as shown by MapCarta. [13]

The town of Korogwe has developed to the West of the railway station. The line curves round the South side of the town.

The railway line runs to the Southeast of the Cathedral and to the South of Korogwe town, crossing the B1 at a level crossing. [Google Maps, March 2026]
In this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery, the line enters on the right, just below the top corner close to Korogwe Girls High School and almost immediately bridges the Pangani River. After crossing the river the line runs West as far as Matondoro Primary Scholl before curving tightly round to the North. [Google Maps 26th March 2026]
The Pangani River Bridge at Korogwe as it appears on MapCarta. [19]

After turning to the North, the line ran along the West side of the Pangani River and began to turn away to the West. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The next extract shows it heading West on the opposite side of the Pangani River to Msambiasi. [Google Maps, March 2026]
An S-curve interupts the westerly direction of the line, before the line passes through the station at Maurui and turns North to cross the Pangani River once again. Then the line takes a position alongside the B1 travelling Northwest. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Maurui Railway Station [Google Maps, March 2026] and MapCarta. [19]

MapCarta shows both Maurui Station and the bridge over the Pangani River. [19]

The Pangani River Bridge. {google Maps, April 2026]
This next extract follows the line Northwest to Makuyuni. The railway sits adjacent to the B1/T2 throughout this length. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Lutindi Railway Station (?) as it appears on modern satellite imagery {Google Maps, March 2026] Nothing is shown at this location on MapCarta, other than the services (Kilimajaro Motorway Fast Food, Korogwe). Despite the presence of a significant small settlement on the Southwest side of the line, Lutindi is some way to the Northeast of the line.

The line continues Northwest alongside the B1/T2 towards Makuyuni. Note the divergence of road and rail at the top of the extract. [Google Maps, March 2026]

As this next extract from the satellite imagery shows, the separation of road and rail is only enough to allow the railway to pass to the West of Kwasunga. It enters this extract at the bottom arrow, and leaves at the top arrow. In between, the line crosses the B1/T2, as shown below. [Google Maps, March 2026]

On this next extract the line enters at the bottom of the image to the East of Kwasunga and heads North through a couple of shallow bends to exit at the centre-top of the image still on the East side of the B1/T2. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Two arrows again assist in locating the pints at which the line enters and exits this satellite image. The town of Makuyuni is at the top of the extract. the line at road cross below the centre of this image. [Google Maps, March 2026]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery focusses on the town of Makuyuni. The railway line can be seen entering the image centre-bottom to the West of the B1/T2. It leaves the image top-left to the West of the road. {google Maps, March 2026]

Makuyuni Railway Station is little more than a single-building halt to the Northwest of the town. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The same location on OpenStreetMap. [20]

From Makuyuni the line continues to follow the same bearing – heading North-northwest towards Moshi. … Population density is higher here and the satellite image shows significant areas of farmland. The line enters the image a little to the West of the B1/T2, it diverges from the road to pass to the West of Maduma before then crossing the road once again close to the flag for Kivilicha Primary School. It runs North from that crossing to pass to the East of the flag for Kwampunda Primary School. [Google Maps, March 2026]

On the next extract from the satellite imagery below, the line can be seen more clearly.

The line enters the image to the immediate East of Kwampunda Primary School and then traverses a well cultivated area before passing through Chekelei where, once agin, the railway crosses the B1/T2.

This next extract shows the line running roughly parallel to the B1/T2 in a North-northwest direction. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line enters this next extract from Google’s satellite imagery immediately to the East of the flag for Mwelya Primary School. It contiues to keep company with the B1/T2, leaving the image to the West of the road. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The town of Mombo appears on this next extract from the satellite imagery. The railway remains to the West of the road but takes much closer order as it runs past the town. It remains close to the road across the remainder of the image.

Across the next extract (below), the railway remains close to the B1/T2, still on its West side. Mombo is a town of relatively significant side. Its population in 2012 was 17,093. That figure increased to 24,080 by the time of the 2022 census. Close to the top of this image road and rail move apart to allow room for Mombo Railway Station. [Google Maps, March 2026]

As this MapCarta image shows Mombo station was large enough to warrant a passing loop on the railway line. [21]
Google satellite imagery also shows a turning triangle at Mombo railway station. The station building is towards the top of this extract on the East side of the line. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Continuing North from Mombo Railway Station the line crosses the B1/T2 once again and skirts the Northeast edge of the Mombo Forest Reserve. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The level-crossing to the West of Mombo. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Leaving the forest reserve behind the line closes in on the B1/T2 once again and runs on its Northeast shoulder. On this map extract the line enters at the bottom-right apex and leaves at the top-left apex. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The railway is still following the road on this next extract from the satellite imagery. [Google Maps, March 2026]
A couple of fields separate road and rail over this next length of the line. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Closer order is resumed across this satellite image extract. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Road and rail run parallel on this next satellite image. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Slightly more interest in this extract from the satellite imagery. Road and rail separate for a short distance before once again resuming closer order! [Google Maps, March 2026]
Road and rail remain close through Mazinde and its railway station. [Google maps, March 2026]

MapCarta shows that Mazinde Railway Station is more like a Halt, just s coupls of buildings and no passing loop or goods yard. [22]

Northwest of Mazinde, road and rail continue close together. [Google Maps, March 2026.

Road and rail remain close through Mkumbura. Mkumbura was the location where the Mkumbara to Neu Hornow Cableway/Ropeway, which operated during the German colonial period, met the Usambarabahn. The story of the Cableway can be found here. [23]

Mkumbura Rail Station as shown by MapCarta. [24]
A much closer view of the location of Mkumbura Railway Station. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line continues North-northwest alongside the B1/T2 as far as a point East of Kwemdimu Secondary School. There the BI/T2 begins to drift away from the railway to the Northwest. The railway leaves this extract from the satellite imagery at the centre-top of the image. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Over these two extracts from Google Maps, the line continues heading North-northwest. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line gradually turns to the North over these two extracts before turning back to the Northwest. The arid landscape appears to be used for Sisal farming. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line then continues to the Northwest across this next extract. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Just a short distance further to the Northwest, the line curves round to head Southwest. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The curve then reverses and the line take close order to the B1/T2 once again. [Google Maps, March 2026]
And the main road soon begins to drift away again. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line runs from the bottom-right corner of this extract to the top-left corner. The road running to its Southwest is the R293 Langoni-Mkomazi Road. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line enters the next extract adjacent to the road in the bottom-right corner of the image and follows the road North. At the top of this extract, the road turns East and crosses the railway. The line leaves the image centre-top. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The level crossing at Mkomazi, [Google Maps, March 2026] and below on OpenStreetMap. [25]

Mkomazi Railway Station sits just to the North of the level-crossing shown on the last 3 images. [Google Maps, March 2026][26]

Beyond Mkomazi Railway Station, the railway loops round through West to South. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line runs South before beginning to curve back through West to North as shown below. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The modern B1/T2 crosses the line by means of a bridge. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line turns through Southwest to West and then North before running Northeast. As it does so it passes through Buiko Railway Station which is shown on the MapCarta extract below. [26][Google Maps, March 2026]

Beyond Buiko, the railway is back near the Pangani River but running at the top of the eastern/northern valley side. [Google Maps, May 2026]

The line can be seen on this extract from Google’s satellite imagery running Northwest, then West and then Northwest again. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line can still be seen running along the northeastern flank of the Pangani River Valley, seeking as far as possible to keep gradients to a minimum, it follows the contours just above the valley. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Taking slightly closer order with the B1/T2, the line continues generally to the Northeast. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The line enters this extract from Google’s satellite imagery in the bottom-right corner of the image and leaves centre-top. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line plots a lonely journey Northnorthwest across these two satellite image extracts. [Google maps, March 2026]

Civilisation of some sort beckons at the top of this next extract. The town is Heraru. Its station sits to the southwest of the town. It is marked by the grey flag on the small image immediately below.

Hedaru Railway Station has a passing loop but otherwise few facilities. [27]

Hedaru Railway Station Building, (c) Beppe Mambretti and shared on Google Maps, May 2021.

As can be seen on this larger extract from Google’s satellite imagery, Hedaru is a relatively significant sized town. The population of Hedaru was 22,972 according to the 2022 national census. [28][Google Maps, March 2026]

Hedaru Station is marked by the red flag on the first of these two images which begin the journey further North and West along the line. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The railway continues to the Northwest, entering this extract in the bottom-right corner and leaving close to the top-left. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line continues Northnorthwest towards Mkanya and Same. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The landscape is quite barren – the occasional school appears on the maps but otherwise only limited evidence of habitation.

The line then passes through what appear to be Sisal plantations that surround Makanya. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Makanya had a population of 12,980 in 2022. [29] Its railway station was at the South East end of the town.

Makanya Railway Station – two loops off the mainline allowed for trains to pass each other. [30][Google Maps, March 2026]

Beyond Makanya the road and railway run together through the Sisal plantations. Google Maps, March 2026]

The railway and road run close together as they continue North. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line is now flanked by two roads which gradually converge until all three run close together past Hembua and Masandare Primary Schools. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line continues North close to the B1/T2 [Google Maps, March 2026]

The journey continues North towards Same. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Same’s population in 2012, was 25,794 inhabitants, in 2022, the number had risen to 34,322. [31] The town is close to the Mkomazi National Park. The railway station is just right of centre towards the top of this satellite image. the majority of the town sits to the North and east of the railway station. [Google Maps, March 2026.

Same in February 2020 (c) Thomas Kimaro. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The two photographs immediately above show Same Railway Station in February 2020.

The station building sits back from the railway tracks with Station Street in between the building and the railway. [Google Maps, March 2026.

These two maps show Same Railway Station in relation to the town of Same. The MapCarta [32] extract on the left shows three lines running through the station. The OpenStreetMap image [33] shows a little more of the town.

The line heads Northwest out of Same. There is about 100 kilometres to go to reach Moshi and [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line is now following the contours to avoid the heaviest gradients. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The B1/T2 is still following the line. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The next town is Lembeni [Google Maps, March 2026]

Careful inspection of the image above shows the line swinging East and then curving round to the West through the town.

Lembeni Bridge and Railway Station [Google Maps, March 2026] [34]

Lembeni Railway Station. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Two views of the rail bridge over the B1/T2 at Lembeni. That on the left was taken by Kassimu Miraji, that above was taken by Allan Kaitila [Google Maps, March 2026

The next extract from the satellite imagery takes the line as far as Kisangara. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Not being able to identify the location of the Railway Halt at Kisangara. One of these two ungated-crossings is as good as any other possible location. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The next location along the line is Mwanga which has no railway station. It does have a bus station! Mbuyuni Halt must have been close to the village. [Google Maps, March 2026]

Kisangiro has its own halt on the railway with a passing loop. [35][Google Maps, March 2026]

Kisangiro Halt was a distance South of the centre of the village at a location where the railway diverged from the road, running West-northwest on the South side of the greener area visible in the top-left of the larger extract above.

The line heads Northwest carful inspection of the image shows it running from South of the greener area and the bottom-right of the image diagonally across the image to the top-left corner. The road runs North. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Again, careful inspection of this image shows the line running from the bottom-right corner to the top-left. In doing so it crosses the

The bridges over the Rivu River appear to be a Warren Truss Girder Bridge and a large concrete culvert which takes a lesser branch of the river. [Google Maps, March 2026]

The next significant location along the railway is the town of Kahe which sits at the top of this extract from Google’s satellite imagery. Kahe Railway Station was a junction station. Southest of Kahe Railway Station, the line to Voi in Kenya diverged from the Usambarabahn! [Google Maps, March 2026]
Kahe Railway Station is centre-left on this satellite image. The line from Kenya enters at the top-right corner of the image and runs diagonally towards the bottom-left.
A similar area on the mapping provided by Openstreetmap.com, which shows the line from Voi meeting the Usambarabahn. [39]
Kahe Railway Station. [36] [Google Maps, March 2026]

The line between Voi and Kahe can be followed here. [40]

We continue North-northwest from Kahe Railway Station. …

Chekereni lies to the Northwest of Kahe and is at the top-left of this next satellite image. This area of Tanzania is noticeably more fertile. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Again, the line runs bottom-right to top-left. [Google Maps, March 2026]
This next extract from Google’s satellite imagery takes us into the suburbs of Moshi. The line enters bottom-right once again. It leaves the top of the image close to the centre. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The railway station in Moshi is a terminus. The line to Arusha heads away to the Southwest. The line from Tanga and Dar-es-Salaam enters from the South. [Google Maps, March 2026]
The lines are much clearer on this extract from the OpenStreetMap mapping. [37]

This extract from MapCarta shows the track layout in the vicinity of Moshi Railway Station. [38]

Tanzania Railways train on the curve South of Moshi Railway Station. This is a luxury train heading Southeast away from Moshi Railway Station, © Ally Kessy, 2020. [Google Maps April 2026]
The Station Sign © カーンオリバー, 2025. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The approach to the passenger facilities at Moshi Railway Station in 2021, © Ally Kessy. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The station forecourt, Moshi Railway Station, © Kisali, 2025. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The rail side elevation of Moshi Railway Station. Note the security fencing between the station building and the rail tracks. © Tanzania Railways, 2022. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The platform elevation of Moshi Railway Station again, © Seva TV, 2018. [Google Maps, April 2026]
A passenger train sits in Moshi Station in 2022, © Michael Emmanuel. [Google Maps, April 2026]

We have reached the end of what was the Usambarabahn. The extension to Arusha came much later. We have also noted, as part of this article, the point where the line between Moshi/Kahe and Voi in Kenya met the Usambarabahn. We will come back to both of those lines on another occasion.

References

  1. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way Volume II: The Story of the Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957.
  2. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ALffLxhDg, accessed on 18th March 2026.
  3. https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&hs=AZD&sca_esv=b05c8d9632b51df6&sxsrf=ANbL-n5vLNTMT9J1cn4sS7VDi8IhkG_BNg%3A1773944351007&q=tanga%20railway%20station%20photos&si=AL3DRZGgcPNmWPDVEk81ds4iaXPEjuNcyuY9Q822zd2Q3wgtDLa9VVF_9x9TK7LuOrzAGGVlybqvwgpMRLdjvIPVO6109T3ngqw96Xr3Qzr3BAwZo0lgWOz-pkCpT8YplwOa9Nc8V9yUN8GP7Lus4LLAZVKs0HHFqg%3D%3D&ved=0CBEQy9gMahcKEwj4td_XyayTAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQCg&ictx=1#ebo=1&lpg=cid:CgIgAQ%3D%3D,ik:CAoSF0NJSE0wb2dLRUlDQWdJREM2Y3IxMmdF, accessed on 19th March 2026.
  4. https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&hs=AZD&sca_esv=b05c8d9632b51df6&sxsrf=ANbL-n5vLNTMT9J1cn4sS7VDi8IhkG_BNg%3A1773944351007&q=tanga%20railway%20station%20photos&si=AL3DRZGgcPNmWPDVEk81ds4iaXPEjuNcyuY9Q822zd2Q3wgtDLa9VVF_9x9TK7LuOrzAGGVlybqvwgpMRLdjvIPVO6109T3ngqw96Xr3Qzr3BAwZo0lgWOz-pkCpT8YplwOa9Nc8V9yUN8GP7Lus4LLAZVKs0HHFqg%3D%3D&ved=0CBEQy9gMahcKEwj4td_XyayTAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQCg&ictx=1#ebo=1&lpg=cid:CgIgAQ%3D%3D,ik:CAoSF0NJSE0wb2dLRUlDQWdJQ2szYi1Pd2dF, accessed on 19th March 2026.
  5. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/tanga-line-a-historic-railway-route-through-northern-tanzania, accessed on 20th March 2026.
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usambara_Railway, accessed on 13th March 2026.
  7. https://maps.app.goo.gl/C952JgVPwCuYSAv98, accessed on 20th March 2026.
  8. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/usambara-railway, accessed on 21st March 2026.
  9. https://imagerenderer.com/images/rendered/share/68974575&domainId=12, accessed on 21st March 2026.
  10. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cableway; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  11. https://africacommons.net/artifacts/3029389/korogwe-station-tanzania-africa-ca/3858567, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korogwe, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  13. https://mapcarta.com/N8806556763/Map, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  14. https://mapcarta.com/N274950072/Map, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  15. https://mapcarta.com/12650936/Map, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  16. https://mapcarta.com/N8807059101/Map, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  17. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/unlocking-the-beauty-and-significance-of-the-cathedral-church-of-st-michael-and-all-angels-in-korogwe-a-closer-look/, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korogwe#/media/File:St._Michael’s_Cathedral,_Korogwe.jpg, accessed on 25th March 2026.
  19. https://mapcarta.com/N8806543490/Map, accessed on 27th March 2026.
  20. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8806556432#map=18/-5.016856/38.327058, accessed on 28th March 2026.
  21. https://mapcarta.com/34359746/Map, accessed on 28th March 2026.
  22. https://mapcarta.com/N8804470889, accessed on 28th March 2026.
  23. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/08/the-mkumbara-to-neu-hornow-cableway-ropeway-usambara-hills-tanganyika
  24. https://mapcarta.com/12650936/Map, accessed on 29th March 2026.
  25. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-4.64654/38.07093, accessed on 29th March 2026.
  26. https://mapcarta.com/34359722/Map, accessed on 29th March 2026.
  27. https://mapcarta.com/34355144, accessed on 30th March 2026.
  28. https://datacommons.org/place/wikidataId/Q20614510, accessed on 30th March 2026.
  29. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20619402, accessed on 30th March 2026.
  30. https://mapcarta.com/12656052, accessed on 30th March 2026.
  31. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/tanzania/cities, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  32. https://mapcarta.com/12646230/Map, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  33. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-4.07147/37.73321, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  34. https://mapcarta.com/12657728, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  35. https://mapcarta.com/N8736426762, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  36. https://mapcarta.com/34355154, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  37. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255602805#map=15/-3.35899/37.34255, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  38. https://mapcarta.com/Moshi, accessed on 31st March 2026.
  39. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-3.49420/37.44452, accessed on 9th April 2026.
  40. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/04/09/railways-of-tanzania-part-3-voi-kenya-to-kahe-and-moshi-tanzania

Les Chemins de Fer du Sud de la France – Ligne du Littoral – St. Raphael – Toulon. (Chemins de Fer de Provence/Alpes-Maritimes No. 94)

This very short post returns to the coastal line between St. Raphael and Toulon.

Two excellent videos scripted in French have been produced by ‘Group Speleo de Vence’. These cover the full length of the line from St. Raphael to Toulon and can be found here [1] and here [2]

These videos make use of historic photographs which have been given a treatment using AI and which has created short vignettes with moving images. Superb!

Just one thing worth noting, however: These are beautiful videos, partly created by AI but many of the profile shots of trains show vehicles that don’t correspond to the coastal line.

References

  1. https://youtu.be/cwyQ7N98F2E
  2. https://youtu.be/uU48b-6SsL0

Railways of Tanzania – Part 1 – The History of the Usambara Railway

Over recent years, I have reported events relating to the railways of Kenya and Uganda but have singularly failed to do so in relation to the railway network in Tanzania. This has probably been because of an abiding interest in the railways associated with what is now referred to as the Northern Corridor (when referring to the Standard Gauge Railway network).

It is time to rectify this situation. …

First, a look at the history of the various lines in Tanzania.

This article focusses on the history of the Usambara Railway (Usambarabahn) in the north of Tanzania.

Apart from two tramways in Zanzibar, [2] Tanzania’s railway history began when the country was known as German East Africa with German colonial lines being developed not long after the first tramway in Zanzibar was built. [1]

There were also a number of primarily plantation or industrial lines in Tanganyika/Tanzania and one in what is now Burundi. More about these lines can be found here. [7]

During World War 1, the German authorities and then the invading British military made significant use of 600 mm gauge lines to support their supply lines. An article focussing on these lines can be found here. [28]

Late in the 19th century, Germany was eager to expand influence and coffee exports, and it planned a railway from the port of Tanga to Lake Tanganyika. [3]

The featured image at the top of this article is a photograph of Njussi Railway Station on the Usambarabahn. It will be beyond copyright now and therefore in the Public Domain. It was shared on the German Colonial Empire Facebook Page on 2nd March 2026. [18]

The Metre-Gauge Usambara Railway

The Eisenbahngesellschaft für Deutsch-Ostafrika (Railway Company for German East Africa) was established in 1891. “Its main line from Tanga into the hinterland was known as the Usambara Railway. For that, and subsequent, main lines in the German colony, the gauge selected was 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre-gauge. In addition, light railways were developed for individual Tanganyikan sisal plantations in narrower gauges, usually 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) gauge.” [1]

The name ‘Usambara’ comes from the mountains through which the railway travelled from the coast. The Usambara Mountains in northeastern Tanzania are a scenic, biodiverse range close to Tanga.

A Map of the Usambara Railway and the plantation areas in Usambaraland as far West as Kürchhoff. [9: p3]

A series of early photographs associated with the Usambarabahn are held on the Getty Images website and can be found here. [31]

M.F. Hill, in his comprehensive history of Tanganyika’s Railways covers the building of the main network in ‘Part II: German Rule and the Building of the Railways: 1891-1914‘ [8: p55-105]

The first plan was for a railway from Dar-es-Salaam to Morogoro, Tabora and Ujiji. A surveyor was commissioned to undertake a preliminary reconnaissance. An Arab revolt put that endeavour on hold. In 1891, a line from Dar-es Salaam to Bagamoyo was surveyed, but nothing came of the planned line. Also in 1891, a meeting of famous African explorers recommended the construction of two lines: considered the most important, was a line from Dar-es-Salaam to Lakes Victoria and Tanganyika; of secondary importance, a line from Tanga to Kilimanjaro. In the end the decision was probably influenced by the fact that the German East Africa Company has acquired vast tracts of land in the Usambaras and started a number of plantations. It seemed that the northern line would be the easiest to build. [8: p61]cf. [11][12]

Tanga Railway Station with a 0-4-4-0 mallet type steam locomotive and passenger train departing inland. The locomotive is a Jung compound mallet steam locomotive of the early 1900s. It has the extended cab. The cowcatchers have been left on. These were later removed but surprisingly, this was not done when they extended the cab. The railway company owned five mallet-type 0-4-4-0 steam locomotives, built in Germany by Arnold Jung in 1900. Additional UE steam locomotives were delivered in 1893 by Vulkan (Stettin) and in 1908-12 by Orenstein & Koppel of Berlin, (c) Public Domain. [21: p8]
0-4-4-0 mallet type steam locomotive (Arnold Jung 414-418/1900) and mixed train at Tanga. This image was shared on the German Colonial Empire Facebook Page on 10th March 2026, (c) Public Domain. [25]

The construction of the Usambara Railway, from Tanga to the hinterland, began in 1893. However, the company building that railway went into bankruptcy after two years. At that stage, only 40 km (25 mi) of track had been completed, as far as Korogwe. The treasury of the colony then took over the project in 1899. Four years later, in 1903, it issued an Order for further construction.” [1] cf. [11][12]

Locomotive No.1 of the metre gauge Usambarabahn. One of a batch built by Arnold Jung 414-418, in 1900. This image was shared on the Narrow Gauge Enthusiasts Facebook Group by Derrick Why on 16th January 2023, © Public Domain. [29]

Hill comments: “In the August of 1891 preparatory work for the building of the line started at Tanga under the direction of Engineer Hermes. He was soon succeeded by Herr Mittelstaedt, who in turn handed over the job to Herr Wunder. All three men were forced by ill-health to leave East Africa after short spells of duty. The incidence of malaria was very high and the frequent illness of European staff, particularly amongst the surveyors, was a serious drag on the progress of construction. The record of the early years of the railway is a poor tribute to German abilities. Admittedly the difficulties were very great, but they were made all the greater by inefficiency, by bad organisation, by inexperienced staff, by an almost complete absence of medical services until 1899, by inadequate personal and general discipline, by a low standard of technical skill and by a lack of plain common-sense.” [8: p62-63] cf. [11][12]

Hill continues: “On 30th May 1893, Chief Engineer Bernhardt arrived at Tanga and laying of the track started, nearly two years after the arrival of the first group of engineers. A year later the line between the port and the railway station was completed and by the end of 1895 railhead was at Muhesa, 40 kilometres from the coast. The official opening of the Tanga-Muhesa section was held on 1st April 1896, although only half of the line was properly ballasted. … The alignment was indifferent, particularly near Ngomeni, where Bernhardt decided on a double switchback to overcome an apparently difficult gradient. This expedient was a great obstacle to the smooth and economic running of traffic for many years. In fact it was entirely unnecessary, and a classic example of the drawbacks of the location method of survey, particularly when employed by surveyors who lacked the perseverance to undertake a reasonably wide reconnaissance. The cost of the line had greatly exceeded the estimate and von Soden’s prediction that the Railway Company would be bankrupt “in the shortest time” unless it were supported by Imperial finance was soon proved to be correct. By the middle of 1895 the Railway Company’s capital was exhausted and construction of the line stopped for a time at Ngomeni (Km. 28). From there to Muhesa the work was financed by advances from the parent company, the Deutsch Ost Afrikanische Gesellschaft, and the Railway Company’s report for 1895 referred to the line as “our creation universally recognised and fully appreciated in the colony as the first great cultural deed.” Unfortunately the Railway Company could raise no more money. It could not even maintain the line already built and there was no prospect of extending it from Muhesa towards Korogwe. On 26th June 1896, the District Commissioner of Tanga, von St. Paul, wrote a depressing report to the acting Governor, von Bennigsen.” [8: p63-64] cf. [11][12]

The line was in a parlous state of repair, the jetty at Tanga had collapsed and no effort had been made to repair it. Repair costs were estimated at 300,000 marks (£15,000 = over £1.7 million in 2026). The rail used was too light for the loads to be carried (31 lb/yard). It was estimated that the completion of the line to Korogwe would cost 2.2 million marks (£110,000 = £12.5 million in 2026).

Finance was eventually forthcoming (1st April 1899), six days later the line was acquired by the German government. Stuttering attempts were made on completing the railway to Korogwe. Thoughts turned to extending the line beyond Korogwe. The Reichstag agreed to the signing of a construction contract for 2,600,000 marks for the line between Korogwe and Mombo.

So, Muhesa had been reached in 1896, Korogwe saw construction recommence in 1903. Progress was made through challenging terrain including dense forests, steep hills, and rivers, employing African laborers under German oversight. “The construction of the railway now went ahead more rapidly as a consequence of employing a firm of contractors with adequate financial and technical resources. The bridge over the Pangani river at Maurui was completed on 11th August 1904, and the Korogwe-Maurui sector was opened to traffic in December. On 17th February 1905, the extension to Mombo was formally opened by Geheimrat Stuhlmann in the presence of Prince Adalbert of Prussia. Thirty-six kilometres of line had been built in a year, an improvement on the very slow progress of previous years but by no means a remarkable achievement. So far it had taken twelve years to build 129 kilometres, whereas construction of the Uganda Railway started in the December of 1895 and the first locomotive ran through to Kisumu, 572 miles from Mombasa, on 20th December 1901.” [8: p72-73] The contractor was Lenz & Co. an established German railway contractor. [11][12]

It seems that at this time (1905) plans to extend the line to Lake Victoria were set aside. Although in November 1913 two plans were promulgated which would, if built, given access to Lake Victoria. Neither came to fruition.

The Usambara Railway (Usambarabahn) in the era of German control. The location is not know, (c) Public Domain. [24]

4-coupled steam locomotive (2-8-0) with separate 4-axle tender in 1000 mm gauge delivered for the Usambara Railway – Orenstein & Koppel Works No. 2701 of May 1908, 300 hp, 1000 mm, 1D, Usambara N° 11. The image comes from a Company advertisement placed in 1911. [30]

With the line reaching Mombo in 1905, an agreement between the Imperial German Government and the contractor Lenz & Co. led to the formation of the ‘Deutsche Kolonial Eisenbahn Bau- und Betriebs Gesselschaft’ (The German Colonial Railway Construction and Administration Company – the DKEBBG) with an initial capital of 4,000,000 marks (£200,000 = in 2026, to over £31 million). This company assumed responsibility for the operation of the Tanga line, paying an annual rent of 152,000 marks, 20,000 marks more than the net profit on the line in 1904. cf. [11][12]

Hill tells us that “an inspection of the Usambara Line during 1907 revealed a number of defects and made it very clear that the rolling stock was not being kept in good repair. … Engine No. 1 which had undergone a major repair in 1906 was again in a very bad state. Engine No. 2 was in the workshops for heavy repairs. The axles of Engine No. 3 were worn out. Engine No. 4 was in fair state, having just come out of the workshops. Engine No. 5 was in urgent need of repairs. Engine No. 6, the ‘Deutschland,’ in spite of recent repairs, again needed attention. Engine No. 7, the ‘Preussen,’ could not be used on the line, but supplied steam for the machines in the workshop. Out of seven engines only two were railworthy, and their excessive use was doing them no good. When the writer of this report travelled from Tanga to Mombo behind Engine No. 1, it had to be repaired at every station and twice had to stop for running repairs between stations.” [8: p73]

That report also stated that “many rails were badly aligned and that Africans were not sufficiently skilled or responsible for this work without European supervision. European trackmen would not give satisfactory service so long as they were allowed to own plantations along the line or to work for plantation owners as well as for the railway. There was no European lavatory at Mombo station and the engine shed at Mombo had been burnt down. In view of ‘the enormous amount of traffic being dealt with at this railhead’, a European station-master should be appointed at Mombo. ‘The Goan at present in charge,’ the report stated, ‘is unsatisfactory because Europeans do not respect his authority. It is said that at Mombo station, when a train arrived, bedlam prevails and only the strongest get any attention.” [8: p73-74]

Construction of an extension, 45 km in length, to Buiko started in July 1907 and was completed in two years at a cost of 4,200,000 marks. By 1910, the annual rent was increased to 246,000 marks. cf. [11][12]

In 1908, it was recommended that the line should be extended to Moshi and that improvements should be made to the harbour at Tanga. A formal contract between the German authorities and the DKEBBG was drawn up. A sum of 12,250,000 marks was made available for the extension, and 1,500,000 marks for the harbour improvements. It was also agreed that the annual rent for the line should be increased to 760,000 marks once the line reached Moshi. [8: p74] cf. [11][12]

Despite construction difficulties, the railhead reached Same by 1st October 1910, and Moshi on 29th September 1911. The 178 km from Buiko to Moshi was built in rather more than 2 years. Hill comments: “The annual rate of construction, 84 kilometres, was by far the highest rate achieved during the slow creep of the line from Tanga. Since Lenz & Co. had been responsible, the standard both of alignment and construction was greatly superior to the section between Tanga and Korogwe. The extension to Moshi was formally opened on 7th February 1912, with an impressive display of pomp and ceremony and a remarkable consumption of wine. About the same time the name of the line was changed from Usambara Bahn to Ost Afrikanische Nordbahn.” [8: p74] cf. [11][12]

The line featured engineering feats such as double hairpin curves between Ngommi and Pongwe, a 23.3-kilometre branch from Tengeni to Sigi with four switchbacks (in 2ft 6in-gauge), while a cable spur linked it to sawmills in 1910, underscoring its role in supporting timber and agricultural exports like coffee, sisal, and rubber from plantations in the Kilimanjaro and Meru regions. [1]

It was not until May 1914 that funds were approved for an extension to Arusha. The Reichstag voted 9,400,000 marks for expenditure during 1914 and 1915 on the extension to Arusha and for further improvements to the harbour at Tanga. Hill says that “the contracts had been signed when the outbreak of war between Germany and Great Britain put an end to the extension of the Nordbahn by the Germans. A contract was also signed for a line from Ngomeni to Bwiti, at the north-east end of the Usambaras, and thence back to the main line at Korogwe. Construction of this line had just started when war broke out.” [8: p75]

Around 1914, one train traveled daily to and from Tanga and Buiko, with a second train running to Moshi and back on two days a week. It took 14 hours and 40 minutes to travel the full distance.” [4]

For a brief period between 4th June 1912 and 12th May 1913, the Usambara Railway was called Nordbahn (Northern Railway). The expansion to Arusha had already been planned and funded, but due to the outbreak of WW I, it was never completed.” [4]

Wettich writing in German in 1910/1911 says: “This, in brief, is the story of the Northern Railway, whose construction delays severely hampered the development of the north. Although no significant difficulties or major engineering structures were required, apart from the jetty in Tanga. The Tanga-Buiko section, a full 174 km long, took 17.5 years to complete, while the British completed their rival project, the much more challenging Uganda Railway, a 940 km long line, from August 1896 to December 1901, that is completed in 5.5 years!” [9: p4]

He goes on to talk of the “connection between the development of Usambara and the advancing railway construction is of particular interest, because in close connection with the railway plans, which were taking on a firmer form, new plantations and new settlements arose. The publications of the Reich Colonial Office are of little help with establishing the position at the time Wettich was preparing his paper. The situation at the time that paper was written is shown in the hand-drawn map entitled “A Map of the Usambara Railway and the plantation areas in Usambaraland as far West as Kürchhoff. [9: p3]” which can be found towards the top of this article. The present situation is essentially shown on the map Fig. 2, whereby reference should be made in particular Wettich draws attention to the plantations of Ambangulu and Korogwe and the Schummewald timber concession of the Wilkens & Wiese company, and that of the timber company for German East Africa which he goes into some detail about later in his paper.” [9: p4]

Between 1912 and 1914 some of the worst effects of poor workmanship on the “Tanga-Korogwe section were remedied, the money being provided from savings on the Buiko-Moshi section. The switchback at Ngomeni was eliminated by means of a comparatively simple realignment. Since 1893 plantations had replaced forest and thick bush and the lie of the land was easy to see. The correct alignment and the folly of the switchback were obvious.” [8: p75]

Hill notes that, “since 1911 the railway administration had been responsible for the 750 mm. Sigi line, (details of which can be found here) [7] and negotiations for its purchase from the Sigi Export Company were in-train when war broke out.” [8: p75]

Other ways of bringing traffic to the railway were developed. A ropeway, 9 kilometres long, ran from Mkumbara to Neu Hornow and climbed the precipitous cliffs and spanned the gorges of the western Usambaras. This ropeway was owned by the firm of Wilkins and Wiese, and designed to carry cedar from the Shume plateau to the railway, an enterprise that was never an economic success. The longest span of the ropeway, 907 metres, was said to be the longest in the world when it was built in the years 1910-1911. This ropeway is covered in another article which can be found here. [9][13]

A road suitable for animal-drawn transport ran from Korogwe to the sanatorium built at Vugiri in the central Usambaras. From Mombo, the first road in German East Africa designed to carry motor traffic ran to Wilhelmstal (Lushoto) and served the plantations established in the central and western Usambaras. This metalled road, built at the remarkably low cost of £700 a kilometre, was an outstanding example of the skill of the German surveyors and engineers and in striking contrast with much indifferent work on the Tanga railway. In 1914 a scheme was under discussion for the Railways Administration to take over motor transport between Mombo and Wilhelmstal. Another road was built to serve eastern Pare, and in the mid-20th century it was still part of the main road from Tanga to Moshi. [8: p75-76]

The route of the railway from Buiko to Same seems strange to Hill. He says: “There is no existing record of the reasons which persuaded the designers of the railway from Buiko to Same to take it along the western rather than the eastern skirt of the Pare mountains. One of the arguments for the extension of the railway beyond Buiko from the eastern side and the climate there is much pleasanter than in the dry country to the west. Maybe the German authorities deemed it advisable to keep the Pare mountains as a barrier between the railway and the frontier of British East Africa. There seems to be no other logical explanation.” [8: p76]

In 1913, the railway employed 562 workers (including 35 Europeans) and operated with 18 locomotives, 31 passenger carriages, and 199 goods [wagons], underscoring its scale as German East Africa’s primary northern artery before wartime disruptions.” [6]

The paper written by Hans Wettich in 1910/11 includes a wealth of information about German East Africa and the Usambarabahn in particular. Before going on to focus on what happened to the line in the First World War and its aftermath it is worth some time spent on looking at what Wettich had to say in his paper.

Developments in the German Protectorate in the areas around the Usambara Railway

Wettich provides us with an interesting digression in the story of the Usambara Railway, examining the performance of a variety of crops introduced into plantations around the line of the railway. Plantation managers first turned to tobacco but discovered quickly that the African soil was light on the necessary nutrients to support more than minor local production. Plantation managers then turned to Coffee which also failed. [9: p4] Wettich goes on to describe a whole series of different cultivation options. The translated text of this part of Wettich’s paper is included at Appendix A to this article. He also provides a couple of paragraphs about industry in the vicinity of the line which are included here in translation in Appendix B.

The Lack of Transport Routes: the Necessity of Private Branch Lines

Wettich considered that the development of the Usambara region was held back by poor transport links: “The greatest difficulty for the development of Usambara is the lack of traffic routes, since apart from the Usambara Railway there are hardly any roads and the timber has to be brought to the Usambara Railway on private branch tracks. However, the rugged mountain slope of West Usambara almost excludes access roads. On the plateau it is possible, though with difficulty, to work on prepared paths with cumbersome Cape wagons or the newer single-axle log wagons, which require 10 to 20 men for harnessing, but here the light railway, the so-called forest railway, will soon be used to an extensive extent to harvest timber, all the more so as the highlands are often flat. Some have proposed that timber should be transported down from the high plateau by means of wooden or stone flumes or by the use of the forest streams allied with dams and rafting according to Alpine and Scandinavian practice. These proposals are not feasible in the vast majority of cases. The route down is too long for flumes (7 to 9 km), and because the massif rises directly from the plain in rugged, steep walls with almost vertical drops up to 1500 m in height!” [9: p13]

The Sigi Railway (Sigibahn)

Writing about the Sigibahn, Wettich says: “The conditions are somewhat more favourable in East Usambara with its gentler mountain slopes, where the Sigi Export Corporation, which is controlled by the German Timber Company for East Africa, succeeded in finding a reasonably favourable route on which it was able to lay a small railway to its concession in East Usambara, The railway is of great interest alongside the Mkumhara-Neu-Hornow branch line.” [9: p13] (see a separate article here [13]), This was because “it shows how a narrow-gauge mountain railway overcomes the great difficulties of the terrain. It has a length of 23.7 km and connects meets the Usambara Railway at Tengeni station. The Company built the line over a length of 17.6 km before the use of switchbacks became necessary.” [9: p13-14] A further switchback was required close to the top of the line. The Sigibahn is covered in more detail in a separate article here. [7] It is perhaps just worth noting here that the cost of the construction work was higher than estimated partly because the actual path of the railway was over 2 kilometres longer than originally surveyed. [9: p15-16]

Wettich mentioned two other branch lines: [9: p16]

  • a 20 km line serving the sawmill in Ambangulu – this appears to be the cable way referred to above between Neu-Hornow and Mkumbara. [13]
  • a planned branch line from Njussi Railway Station – I have not been able to find evidence that this line was built.

The Significance of the Sigibahn

Writing in 1910/11 Wettich said: “Of these railways, the Sigi Railway in particular will be of great importance, because it not only serves to transport timber, but also handles other freight traffic and passenger traffic between the Usambara Railway and East Usambara. In its lower part it cuts through the fertile Bondeiland, in which local cultures of all kinds thrive excellently. Furthermore, it allows the plantations in East Usambara to transport their products, which until now had to be brought to the Usambara Railway on the heads of the natives. In addition, the Sigibahn makes it much easier to visit the extensive cultural facilities of the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani, which can be reached from Sigi station in just under an hour.” [9: p16]

He also noted: “The timetable of the railway is adapted to that of the Usambara Railway and is regulated in such a way that every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday scheduled trains run from Sigi to Tengeni and back. In each direction, the journey time is 2 hours 20 minutes. The railway transports letter and parcel post.” [9: p16]

Both Hill and Wettich provide some statistical information about the value and performance of the Usambarabahn. First, information provided by Wettich. …..

The Operating Results of the Usambara Railway before the First World War.

Results up to 1910

Wettich obtained figures from the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company specifically for the period during which the railway was leased to this company, i.e., for the years 1905 to 1910. The figures are more detailed than those contained in the official memorandum but only cover the period prior to the writing of his paper in 1910/11. The statistics are illustrated in the graphs provided in his paper, below. …

This first graph shows the growth in passenger transport on the Usambara Railway between 1905 and 1910. The three passenger classes are shown, two different vertical scales are used. The first shows the millions of passenger kilometres travelled, which rose from just over 4 million in 1905/6 to close to 9 million in 1909/10. The second shows the number of passengers in each of the three passenger classes. The total number of passengers increased from about 110,000 in 1905/6 to close to 220,000 in 1909/10. [9: p37]

Wettich commented in 1910/11: “As can be seen, passenger traffic has almost doubled since the opening year, but shows only a slight increase for the last three years. The lines for revenue from passenger traffic and for passenger-kilometres travelled correspond to the representation of passenger transport. It is interesting to note that the Usambara Railway charges fees for passenger luggage in the first class, insofar as it exceeds 30 kg. This helps to curb smuggling of rubber bales by first class passengers!” [9: p38]

This second graph shows revenue from passenger and passenger baggage transport between 1905 and 1910 in Rupees. By far the larger proportion of income on the Usambara Railway came from passenger transport, although goods traffic was gradually increasing in absolute terms, if not as a percentage of income. [9: p37]

By 1909/10, freight traffic had increased fourfold compared to the first year of operation. It should be noted that, despite the loss of construction material freight for the new Mombo-Buiko railway line following its opening in the reporting year 1908/09, tonnage traffic only declined slightly. Unfortunately, the various goods are not itemized in the statistics, so the development of individual plantation sectors is difficult to ascertain from the available information. [9: p38]

This third graph shows the quantities of goods carried on the Usambara Railway by three different measures: the value in hundreds of thousands of rupees; the tonne kilometres; and the actual tonnage carried. [9: p37]

This further graph shows the amount of livestock transported on the line by two measures: the income from this traffic in thousands of rupees; and the numbers of livestock, large cattle at the bottom of the graph, small livestock above. [9: p37]

The statistics only listed livestock traffic separately, which, due to local disturbances such as epidemics, feed shortages, drought, etc., showed fluctuating figures, although a steady increase can be observed in the latest two years for which figures were available. The majority of livestock traffic consisted of small livestock, including numerous Maasai sheep in the north of the colony bred for their wool.

This graph shows the overall income for the Usambara Railway between 1905 and 1910. Despite fluctuations in different income streams which can be seen in the graphs above, a pleasing picture of a steady increase in income is evident. [9: p38]

Later Statistical Information

Hill has the benefit of being able to look back from the mid-1950s and after the events of two world wars. He was also able to draw on reports written in the years after Wettich’s paper was written.

In June 1914, Hill tells us, Herr E. Kuhlwein, the Traffic Manager of the Usambarabahn wrote a report to the Imperial Government at Dar es Salaam. He said:

Disregarding the initial years, traffic and income have shown a steady increase from year to year. In the early years traffic conditions were primitive and our capital extremely limited. Today, however, we have a well-regulated enterprise serving the traffic requirements of the country adequately. It is only natural that settlements and plantations in the north of our colony are developing at the same rate as the railway. Shortly beyond Tanga European-owned plantations are found and one follows [another] all the way to Mkumbara (Km. 148). Adjoining this area lies bush country, which offers a great deal of interest to the traveller – wild life, the Usambara mountains and the Pare range. Long before his arrival at Moshi the traveller espies the snow-covered peaks of Kilimanjaro (Kibo m. 6,010 and Mawenzi m. 5,355) in their majestic greatness.” [8: p76]

Herr Kuhlwein continued: “Today the railway boasts, apart from essential installations and official buildings, pleasant houses for its staff, well constructed and suitably equipped for life in the tropics; its own water supply, and a convalescent home situated in beautiful Wilhelmstal. … The rolling stock consists of 18 engines; 25 passenger coaches (the latest type of first-class coach provides all modern comforts) and 205 goods trucks, including mail and luggage vans with a carrying capacity of from 7 to 12 tons. … One passenger and one goods train run on the Tanga-Buiko sector daily in each direction, while a train twice weekly in each direction is still sufficient for the traffic of the Buiko-Moshi sector.” [8: p77]

Traffic staff at present consists of: 36 European officials; 17 Goan officials and artisans; 25 Indian officials and artisans; 46 Native officials and artisans; 400 Native workmen. Construction staff, inclusive of staff employed by the Construction Company itself, consists of: 50 Europeans and 4,000 Native labourers.” [8: p77]

Herr Kuhlwein then quoted the following statistics for the year 1913: [8: p77]

Gross Revenue:  1,182,321 Marks

Approximate expenditure:  700,000 Marks

Passengers:  1st Class: 8,045;  2nd Class: 5,200;  3rd Class: 267,197.

The gross revenue came from: Passenger Traffic, 392,761 marks; Up goods traffic, 458,320 marks; Down goods traffic, 225,958 marks; Livestock, 25,162 marks; and Sundries, 80,000 marks.

The most important items in the goods traffic heading inland were: Piece Goods:  8,656 tons; Indian Rice:  2,400 tons; Sleepers and Rails:  2,000 tons; Firewood:  1,000 tons; Cement:  800 tons; Petrol:  700 tons; Machinery & Parts:  350 tons; Sisal Plants:  260 tons; Honey & Syrup:  230 tons; Imported Timber:  200 tons; Corrugated Iron:  175 tons; Tar:  175 tons; Flour:  100 tons; Sundries:  2,350 tons.

The most important items in the goods traffic heading for the coast were: Sisal: 8,000 tons; Piece Goods: 4,000 tons; Local timber: 1,500 tons; Coffee: 1,000 tons; Rubber: 400 tons; Fruit: 330 tons; Stone: 330 tons; Beans: 270 tons; Hides; 130 tons; Sisal Plants: 120 tons.

Hill points out that traffic heading to the coast involved a large redistribution trade in piece goods and that sisal plants appear to have been moved up and down the line. [8: p78]

Tanga

Hill assessed work undertaken at Tanga Harbour before 1914 and he is not kind in his assessment of work undertaken there: “The new installations at Tanga harbour, for which 1,500,000 marks were voted in 1909, were completed on 15th April 1914, but a design for a new quay wall was an ignominious failure. It was, indeed, a strange and complex design. In 1913 the shore at Tanga was littered with thousands of tons of reinforced concrete piles cast at Mannheim on the Rhine. They had been carried by river barges to Rotterdam and thence shipped to Tanga. The available records provide no answer to the question why these concrete works were not cast at Tanga. Soon after completion, part of the quay wall collapsed, another example of bad design, bad work and a lack of common-sense.” [8: p75]

Wettich noted that Tanga’s importance as a port for the Usambara area grew significantly from 1906. By 1910/11, the turnover at the port had “almost tripled since 1906. Even in 1900, when the Northern Railway was only about 100 km long, a critical report mention[ed] an increase in plantation activity in the northern districts, which led to an increase in the number of workers and a rise in wages. This, however, opened up the possibility of profitable trade extending far into the interior.” [9: p39]

Incidentally he explained that “it should not be forgotten that a strong impetus to establish Tanga as an independent city also stemmed from the plague quarantine of 1906, which closed the coast to trade with Zanzibar and permitted only Tanga to operate as a port for Zanzibar dhows. This virtually eliminated Zanzibar’s transshipment traffic, which had driven up the price of all goods.” [9: p39]

At Tanga, a change in circumstances occurred with steamer connections and shipping infrastructure being improved by Germany, allowing even large ships to call at the port. Wettich reported that “the largest cargo [up to the date of his paper] was taken on by the steamer ‘König‘ of the German East Africa Line in Tanga on 12th July 1910, consisting of 3,000 bales of sisal hemp, 147 sacks of coffee, 266 bales of rubber, and 90 different items of merchandise totalling about 3000 cubic metres.” [9: p39]

In 1910/11, Wettich reported that “The trade statistics in the official memorandum for 1908/09 show that Tanga is … the most important port in the protectorate. While Dar es Salaam recorded total trade valued at 11,818,000 marks in 1908/09, Tanga’s trade value was 10,180,000 marks. However, if one disregards the imports of both cities, which reached an unusually high level in this reporting year due to the import of railway construction materials via Dar es Salaam, while exports reached unusually high levels, Tanga’s exports, valued at 3.5 million Marks, surpassed those of Dar es Salaam, which had a value of 1,150,000 Marks. Compared to the previous year, Tanga’s exports increased by 880,000 Marks, while Dar es Salaam’s decreased by 500,000 Marks. The highest value products exported via Tanga in 1908 were sisal hemp (1.75 million marks), coffee (approximately 800,000 Marks), and synthetic rubber and gutta-percha (420,000 Marks).” [9: p39]

Hill noted in the mid-1950s that “from 1891 to 1914, the capital investment in harbour works at Tanga and on the Nordbahn from Tanga to Moshi was approximately 25,000,000 Marks (£1,125,000), most of which was converted to a 4% loan.” [8: p78]

The Viability of the Usambarabahn before the First World War

Hill then considers the viability of the Usambarabahn in the period prior to the first world war: “Interest charges [on the 4% loan] were about one million Marks a year. During 1913, the gross revenue was 1,182,321 Marks, but running costs were 883,000 Marks, a considerable increase over Herr Kuhlwein’s estimate of 700,000 Marks. On this basis, the excess of revenue over running costs was nearly 300,000 Marks, a great deal less than the rent of 760,000 Marks payable by the Deutsche Kolonial Eisenbahn Bau- und Betriebs Gesellschaft. In turn, the rent was considerably less than the annual charge for interest. Moreover, the running costs made no provision for amortisation and depreciation and there was no Betterment Fund. There was very little justification for the optimism expressed in the Railway Administration Company’s last published report. Of itself, the Nordbahn was never an economic proposition and the capital invested in it could only be justified by the economic development of the countryside which it made possible.” [8: p78]

In the March of 1913 the manager of the Nordbahn was asked to provide an estimate of the future revenue of the line. He pointed out that it depended on the development of the European plantations which provided by far the greater part of the revenue. Increased European settlement was essential if the railway’s finances were ever to be placed on a sound basis. The natives only grew enough for their own needs and there was no prospect of a surplus of native-grown crops for export. The manager suggested that the Governor should remove all native cultivations from alongside the line and that the native lands should not come nearer than 5 kilometres to the railway. ‘Were this land to be cultivated by Europeans,’ he wrote, ‘it would also give passengers a better impression than they gain at present‘.” [8: p78]

Hill commented further that “there [was] doubt that the Nordbahn was an effective stimulant of the development of plantations. The first choice of crops was unfortunate. The Germans never made a success of coffee, and although ceara rubber grew quite well the trees produced a latex which was very low in dry rubber content and could not compete with the hevea plantations of the Far East. During the years of German rule large plantations of ceara rubber were established throughout the length of the coastal belt. Most of these rubber plantations were eventually abandoned and in several instances they were replanted with sisal. For a brief period during the Second World War, when the hevea plantations of the Far East were in enemy hands, it was possible to operate the Tanganyika rubber estates on an economic basis. There [were] still some small plantings of hevea in the Tanga province, but only a very small area of the country [was] climatically suited to rubber.” [8: p78-79]

Hill continues: “After the boom year of 1910 and the subsequent collapse of prices, sisal replaced rubber as the main economic crop along the Nordbahn. Sisal plantations were also established along the Central Railway – the Mittelland Bahn – in the Lindi district and elsewhere along the coast. Tanga has always been the main centre of sisal production. By 1911 there were fifty-four sisal estates in German East Africa, in all 47,625 acres of sisal, of which 19,140 were in bearing. In that year 10,989 tons of fibre, valued at £226,612, were exported. By 1913 the acreage of sisal was 61,878, of which 35,898 acres were in bearing. In 1912, exports of sisal amounted to 16,738 tons valued at £367,961 and in 1913 to 20,835 tons valued at £535.579.” [8: p79]

The Necessity of Rapid Continuation of Construction of the Northern Railway Line

In 1910/11, Wettich was expecting that the Usambarabahn would be extended beyond Moshi towards Lake Victoria. He wrote: “The importance of Tanga and the development of its hinterland will be significantly boosted once the northern railway reaches Lake Victoria at the burgeoning port city of Muansa, as planned. The area to be opened up by this railway is already one of the richest and most densely populated in the colony. The railway would initially cut through the Moshi district, which is already served by the Kilimanjaro road. On Kilimanjaro, coffee of excellent quality and high yield is cultivated on large plantations, and according to the official memorandum, its production value is constantly increasing. Rubber and maize are also grown here. On Mount Meru, livestock farming flourishes, particularly under the management of 37 Boer settlers, who have taken up sheep farming and are now also raising ostriches.” [9: p39-40]

Wettich continued: “The Muansa district is today primarily a major production area, especially for peanuts and small varieties of coffee. The rice production of the districts around Lake Victoria is particularly noteworthy. The official annual report for 1909/10 states: ‘With the expansion of rice cultivation in the regions bordering Lake Victoria, the prospects for an increase in exports are justified; however, it is questionable whether the Uganda Railway can carry enough freight to successfully compete with Indian rice on the coast’. These regions therefore desperately need a new transport route with cheaper freight. This is the Usambara Railway, extended to Lake Victoria, which is significantly shorter than the Uganda Railway and will be able to transport freight from Lake Victoria to the coast much more cheaply. Furthermore, this railway would increase production of cotton, beans, and wild silk. It should also be noted that gold has been discovered in the river sand on the southern shore of Lake Victoria.” [9: p40]

He continued: “If the development of these promising areas is to be pursued, then at the same time emphasis must be placed on reinforcing the superstructure of the initial section of the Usambara Railway, because it currently consists of field railway ballast, 9 m long rails weighing 15.5 kg per linear meter, allowing only 3.3 tons of wheel load. … Competition from the English Uganda Railway absolutely compels the construction of the Northern Railway as quickly as possible. Moreover, it is an undeniable fact that with the commissioning of the Uganda Railway, the English would immediately seize all traffic from the northwest of the German protectorate. As early as 1906, an official report stated that not only the north and northwest, but also the southwest of the German colony were exporting produce via the Uganda Railway, and that this had, in a very short time, brought about an unprecedented development of trade throughout the entire northwest, down to Tabora, The Uganda Railway has seen trade develop where little was envisaged and has also attracted goods previously transported to the coast via Bag-mojo. As recently as1902, Muansa, Bukoba, and Shirati were small inland trading centres whose statistics were not worth recording. In 1906, their turnover is greater than that of Ranga after 20 years of German rule. Trade at Muansa was the largest in the entire protectorate. Although Tanga has now far surpassed Muansa, according to official trade statistics, the flow of trade from the Uganda Railway to the north of the protectorate is still quite significant, as total trade across the inland border amounted to over 4 million Marks in the year 1908/09 for the districts of Moschi, Schirati, Muansa and Bukoba, of which Muansa alone accounted for over 3 million Marks.” [9: p40]

Wettich continued: “The Uganda Railway’s area of ​​influence has expanded even further. It primarily carries mail for eastern Congo and will, once the Cape-Cairo Railway is completed (which already reaches as far as Elizabethville in Katanga, north of Broken Hill in Rhodesia), further expand its reach.” [9: p40-41]

It seems that the German authorities were anticipating the completion of Cecil Rhodes Cape to Cairo railway and a link from it to the Uganda Railway. Had the Cape to Cairo Railway become a reality, the British would have had access to the Katanga Mines, unless the Usambara Railway was to be extended to Lake Victoria in the meantime! Or the German East Africa’s Central Railway has reached Lake Tanganyika. Wettich quoted British reports that not only was the Central Railway about to embark on an extension to Tabora, but that preliminary work on the Tabora-Tanganyika section of the Central Railway has already begun with Holtzmann as the construction company in conjunction with the Regierung project. [9: p41] Regierung projects were large scale German state-contracted (“Regierung” or government-related) infrastructure projects such as the construction of the Reichstag building in Berlin. [10]

Wettich continues: “Possible terminus points for [the Central Railway] are Udjidji, Kigoma, or Kirando. Private proposals favour the Mpapua or Kilimatinde-southern tip of Lake Tanganyika route, but these have less prospects than the Rabora-Kirando line. [The Central Railway] would offer significant advantages over the Cape-Cairo and Uganda railways, particularly with regard to ore transport to the mines in the Katanga region. However, the possible more southerly line would be even more advantageous, especially since it also intersects the coalfields of East Africa and would thus enable the processing of Katanga tin and copper ores between Nyasa and Tanganyika.” [9: p41]

The Current Counteracting Effect (in 1910/11) of the Usambara Railway Against the Influence of the Uganda Railway

Wettich saw a future in which the Usambarabahn would challenge to Uganda Railway in significance. The Uganda Railway had demonstrated the extent to which a railway projected according to commercial principles could boost trade, agriculture, and industry over a wide area, including in Uganda itself, the Uganda Railway resulted in lively development in all areas. [9: p41]

Wettich argued that the completion of the Usambarabahn (Nordbahn) to Lake Victoria would undoubtedly bring similar successes.  He demonstrated in his paper the influence of the existing Usambara Railway on the development of the land. He noted that some time after the extension of the Usambara Railway from Mombo to Buiko and after the start of construction work on the new Buiko-Same line, export traffic on the Usambara Railway had increased by approximately 75%. He notes too, in 1910/11, that a shift in traffic across the border from the Uganda Railway in favour of the Usambara Railway had already begun. [9: p41]

He pointed also to the beneficial effects of railway construction on the terrain alongside the railway through private branch lines, and how engineering could overcome even difficult terrain conditions with railway lines featuring switchbacks and even the 1500 m high slopes of the Usambara massif by means of a cableway. [9: p41]

Wettich concluded his paper by saying: “It is undeniable that the activities of the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company in the north of [German East Africa] are already of the greatest benefit, and that with regard to the Usambara Mountains, the German Timber Company for East Africa has created an excellent transport route with the Sigibahn railway, and furthermore, the firm Adolf Bleichert & Co. in Leipzig, with the Neu-Hornow-Mkumbara cableway, is undoubtedly an engineering work of the first rank, while the company Wilkens & Wiese, with the same project, has created a cultural work of the highest importance. On the one hand, the cableway and the rich timber resources of the Usambara Massif allowed the highlands to be used profitably, but on the other hand farms undertaking agriculture and animal husbandry, supplied the needs of the plantation-growing plain.” [9: p41-42]

As we have already seen, Wettich’s relatively positive assessment of the Usambarabahn was contradicted by Hill who saw, with the benefit of hindsight, a future of increased indebtedness ahead of the railway company as the first world war loomed.

In ‘Permanent Way Volume II‘ Hill went on to describe some of the factors which contributed to the relatively poor performance of the Usambarabahn: “Apart from the more serious mistakes and setbacks, the construction and operation of the Nordbahn produced the comedy of errors that is part and parcel of any pioneer enterprise in Africa.” [8: p79]

He pointed to: intermittent friction between the German administration and the railway authorities with trivial incidents becoming major issues; times when German thoroughness lost a sense of proportion; loss of tax revenue on ivory; petty disputes over the rights of Lenz & Co. to import materials for railway construction without facing customs duty; an inordinate number of minor matters being referred to the Colonial Office in Berlin; minor battles over the duties and capability of Goan engine-drivers and a further possibility of training African staff as engine drivers; poor relations with the Usambara Post; and excessive parsimony which included a failure to ensure that clocks were synchronised and a reluctance to provide effectively lighting for the nighttime use of passenger stock and platforms at stations. [8: p79-83]

The First World War and its Aftermath

The Usambarabahn was a critical asset in German East Africa during World War I. It served as a vital logistical link for German Schutztruppe forces before being captured by British forces in 1916.

Initially British forces sought to take Tanga from the sea. An expeditionary force (Indian Expeditionary Force B) made up, primarily, of Punjabl soldiers under the leadership of General Michael Tighe left Bombay and travelled to Mombasa. The journey took over two weeks. The Punjabi troops had not been to sea before and suffered miserably from sea-sickness. “To a man, they were dispirited, discouraged and wretched.” [19]

It was decided that “the British East Africa force under Brigadier Stewart was to attack at Longido, a post on a mountain north-west of Kilimanjaro, to coincide with the attack on Tanga. The little information that was available about the German troops indicated that the main German Force was at Moshi at the northern end of the Moshi to Tanga railway line. Tanga was thought to be unoccupied by troops. The fact that German troops could be quickly rushed down the railway if Tanga was attacked was largely ignored.” [19]

C. J. Thornhill describes the battle: “On arriving at the German port of Tanga the troopships and HMS Fox anchored outside the harbour and a message was sent to the enemy to the effect that the British meant to bombard the town; but a generous period was given to get the women and children out of danger. This prolonged period of grace proved the undoing of the British and resulted in the cruel butchery in cold blood of many of our men. The German Commander, Von Lettow, took full advantage of every hour. He had only a few men at the time to defend Tanga, but at once set his railway running day and night at high pressure, sending almost every man in the country who could fire a gun to Tanga. … Fortifications and earthworks were thrown up around Tanga and the country mapped out until the defence of the place, where our forces were about to attack, was fully prepared. When the time was up, our men landed in open boats and barges. The Naval Officers and Blue Jackets with their great guns were itching to bombard the place where our men were to land, thus rendering it safe; but not a shot was fired. The troops were massed on the foreshore. They started to advance towards the town and the waiting and entrenched Germans opened fire with machine guns on our men, who calmly returned fire in spite of being mown down like ripe corn. The Germans held their positions, our men were exposed and at a disadvantage; and with heavy losses slowly retired to their boats.” [20] [19: p 13] No supporting fire from HMS Fox was possible as the depth of penetration of British forces was not know. Additionally, “a regiment of Indian troops fled from the battlefield. They had never before faced machine gun fire and were further panicked by swarms of bees from their nests in the trees, who, frightened by the gun fire, indiscriminately attacked the troops both Indian and German. Some men received more than a hundred stings and at a decisive moment even the machine guns of one of von Lettow’s companies were put out of action. The bulk of our forces embarked in the boats and got safely away, but there were not enough vessels to take everybody, as some of the boats were still away bringing in equipment. The poor fellows who had to remain behind desperately kept back the enemy while embarkation slowly took place, but they became weaker and weaker and at last were forced right back to the water and seeing there was no cover, had to surrender. But the blood-thirsty enemy Askaris, finding them helpless, rushed down and butchered them.” [20][19: p13]

After their victory at Tanga, von Lettow’s tactics were to change. “Tanga was one of the very few ‘conventional’ confrontations between the Allies and the Germans. Most of the four year campaign was a prolonged chase of the German troops through some of the most inhospitable country in Africa. The German policy was usually to avoid confrontation and tie up as many allied troops and resources as possible.” [19: p13]

The confrontation at Longido, ultimately, went little better for British forces: “The Germans initially thought that the Allies planned to invade German East Africa from Longido in the north. Many of the German troops were at Longido rather than Tanga. Due to a breakdown in communications these troops had not received the orders to proceed to Tanga, and were strongly positioned on a ridge halfway up a mountain. The British column approached the German lines by night but found itself in a thick mist 1,500 feet above the plain. When the mist lifted a strong German force attacked and was only beaten off after a fierce counter attack by the Punjabis. Unfortunately, however, the firing had stampeded the mule train, which careered back down the slopes leaving the Punjabis without water. Isolated, without prospect of support and with no water under the hot sun the Punjabis decided to withdraw under cover of darkness.” [19: p14]

Initially, after the Battle of Tanga, von Lettow “assembled his men and their scant supplies to attack the Uganda railway in British East Africa (Kenya). Apparently these attacks and the much later ones on Northern Rhodesia were the only times in the First World War that British administered territory was occupied by German troops.” [19: p14] “The story of the failure at Tanga was cabled by General Aitken to London on 5 November 1914. It was a bitter shock to the British Government who until then had displayed little interest in the East African campaign.” [19: p16]

The failure of British amphibious assault at Tanga in November 1914 brought about a change in British tactics. They built a new railway line from Voi (on the Uganda Railway) to Maktau (and later extended it to Kahe) to disrupt the Usambara line’s supply chain and ultimately to support their own offensive.

From December 1914 to February 1916, the British campaign in East Africa was “almost entirely on the defensive against an enemy who was unable to launch a large scale offensive. For 15 months von Lettow … was able to perfect his little army which eventually consisted of some 14,000 soldiers, most of them well trained and well disciplined. Von Lettow was fluent in the Swahili language which earned him the respect and admiration of the Askaris. He appointed black officers and said, and believed, “we are all Africans here”. In one historian’s opinion no other white commander of the era had so keen an appreciation of the black African’s worth not only as a fighting man but as a man. During this 15 month lull in military activity von Lettow had to consider ways and means of maintaining his blockaded economy. Von Lettow was not only an excellent administrator and a talented commander; he was also a brilliant improviser which meant that he was able to rally the people of German East Africa to supply him with all the much needed medicines including quinine which was produced from wood bark by a Biological Institute at Usambara.” [19: p17]

A map of the area of the East Africa Campaign in the First World War. [19: p22]

The British offensive in East Africa took place in February and March 1916.

In November 1915, the British War Cabinet approved the plan of sending South Africans to East Africa to bolster forces there. By early 1916 the situation in East Africa was worsening for the Germans. The Schutztruppe was now reaching its peak strength, 2,712 Europeans, 11,637 Askaris and 2,591 auxiliaries. The bulk of these were placed in the Kilimanjaro area. The South African Lieutenant-General Jan C. Smuts was appointed to take command in British East Africa. The staff found that they might be replaced by Smuts’s henchmen, all “amateur” soldiers. Smuts’ appointment considerably helped recruitment in South Africa. For the Allies, January 1916 marked the arrival of the first South African reinforcements and two Indian battalions from the Western Front. On 19th February 1916, Tighe, was at the quayside in Mombasa to welcome Smuts and within days, confidence had returned to British East Africa. [19: p19]

Smuts, like his opponent von Lettow, was anxious at that time to avoid a stand up fight. He was determined to out manoeuvre von Lettow from every position as quickly and painlessly as possible, without actually defeating him openly in the field. Many of the British officers thought Smuts wrong; they thought that von Lettow should be conquered there and then in one blow, no matter what the cost while the South Africans were still eager and fresh.” [19: p21]

The British first secured Moshi and having done so, General Smuts discovered that the bulk of the Schutztruppe had not moved west but had withdrawn down the Usambara Railway. Smuts ordered an advance through thick bush towards Kahe station, south of Moshi. Although Kahe was von Lettow’s headquarters, when the British arrived there, they found it abandoned. The northern end of the Usambarabahn had been captured and essentially British East Africa was now safe from invasion.

The pattern for the future of the campaign had been set. Von Lettow would slowly retreat, fighting just enough to weary and tax the British, never too much to suffer too many casualties himself, taking every advantage of natural cover, using every ounce of guile and wit that he possessed to keep as large a force of Allied forces in East Africa as possible. Already von Lettow’s 6,000 troops in the northern area had caused a good deal of trouble to the invading force of about 45,000 men.” [19: p29]

In May 1916, British forces under Brigadier-General J.A. Hannyngton pursued von Lettow’s small force down the Usambarabahn towards Tanga. “The railway, had been destroyed by the Germans as they retired, and behind Hannyngton’s column came three hard worked companies of engineers who restored the line as they went. The railway line was re-laid at about two miles a day, a remarkable rate in the circumstances.” [19: p35]

A diversion bridge under construction by the 25th Railway Company: Sappers and Miners 9th July 2016 on the Usambarabahn in German East Africa. The location is not known, (c) Public Domain. [21: p13]

Harry Fecitt comments: “On 14th May reconstruction of the Usambara Railway south of Ruvu commenced; the Germans had demolished the Ruvu bridge but the Corps 7 erected an 18-metre girder bridge on 20th May. From then onwards on the 320 kilometres of track leading to Tanga every bridge had been destroyed. However the demolitions had been hasty and planned ineffectively and the Corps could quickly make track diversions or re-build bridges. In many places the track had been torn up and the fastenings thrown into the bush, in other places the fastenings only had been removed, and elsewhere each alternate rail joint had been blown up. The track was repaired through Lembeni, Same, Makania, Hedaru and ‘German Bridge’ stations, the latter being reached on 20th June. ‘German Bridge’ was the last suitable crossing point over the Pangani River until Maurui is reached 80 kilometres further on. The Germans had started building a bridge here and the British completed the construction.” [21: p6-7 – for the full text of Fecitt’s article , please see Appendix C below]

By September 1916, British and Indian forces had fully captured the Usambarabahn. The Indian Railway Corps worked rapidly to repair the damage, erecting diversions and rebuilding bridges like the one at the Ruvu River to restore functionality for Allied logistics. The line was quickly operational and now connected to the Uganda Railway via the link between Voi and Moshi/Kahe.

The Usambara Railway after the First World War and on into the 21st century

Under the British mandate after World War I, “the railway was integrated into the East African Railways system, with an 86-kilometre extension from Moshi to Arusha completed and opened to traffic on 13th December 1929, enhancing connectivity to Kenya’s Uganda Railway via a link at Voi and boosting trade revenues from £108,000 in 1920 to £704,000 by 1929.” [3][4][5]

The adjacent route map highlights all the significant locations on the Usambara Railway. In the next article in this series we will look at what can be seen of the line in the 21st century.

Following Germany’s defeat in WWI, Britain took control of Tanganyika and the railway, officially managing it under the Tanganyika Railways and Port Services.

We have already noted the connection to Kenya which improved regional logistics. Between the two world wars, the Usambara Railway served as the primary transport corridor for the agricultural and mineral outputs of the Kilimanjaro and Arusha regions, connecting them to the coastal port of Tanga.

Annual revenues: 1920 £108,000; 1921 £157,000; 1922 £197,000; 1923 £223,000; 1924 £238,000; 1925 £333,000; 1926 £388,000; 1927 £461,000;
1928 £581,000; 1929 £704,000; projected
1939 £2,500,000. [22]

The brochure for the opening of the railway to Arusha [22] commented that, “There [were] … areas open to settlers in the ‘Ufiome Triangle’ and Mbulu, and these areas [were] fast becoming settled. There is little doubt that at no distant future these districts will be served by a railway connecting Arusha with the Central Line.” [22: p19]

The bridge over the Tengeru River on the line between Moshi and Arusha. [23]

The brochure goes on to say that Arusha would not remain the railhead for any great period. The Tanganyika Government had “in view a connection with the Central Line, but whether this projected line [would] run via Mbugwe, Kondoa, Irangi and Dodoma or via Mbugwe, Singida and Manyoni, [was] at present not decided. … Gen. Hammond and the General Manager of the Tanganyika Railways recently discussed the projected line with local public bodies who were in favour of the latter route.” [22: p19]

In either case the projected line [would] tap the rich ‘Ufiome Triangle’ and the highlands West of the Rift Valley escarpment. Fifty to Sixty farms [had] been taken up in recent years in the sub-district of Mbulu, both above and below the escarpment.” [22: p19]

There [was] also under consideration a branch from the Moshi-Arusha line to Engare Nairobi on the western slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, and such line it [was] hoped, [would] later be joined with the Kenya and Uganda Railway near Kajiado, thus shortening the north and South route considerably and making direct communication with the Kenya capital.” [22: p19]

Needless to say, neither of these development were ultimately pursued.

Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the line was primarily used to move agricultural produce (such as sisal and coffee) from the Usambara Mountains and Moshi area to the port of Tanga. During this period, the line shifted from a primarily military-geopolitical tool designed for German “Cape-to-Cairo” ambitions into an economic engine for the British colonial administration, particularly linking the Highlands to the coast. Passenger Service during the interwar years was sometimes handled by diesel multiple units (DMUs), a modernization compared to the purely steam-driven German era. The railway also facilitated the arrival and settlement of merchant families, particularly
Asian merchants, who consolidates trade in the interior, establishing themselves at various stations along the line. [23]

After the second world war, the Usambarabahn (Tanga line) in Tanganyika was integrated into the East African Railways (EAR) system. It played a key role in regional commerce, facilitating growth in towns like Arusha by the late 1940s.

In 1964,the line was linked to the Central Line via the Ruvu-Mruazi Link. This connected Tanga to Dar es Salaam facilitating better communication and trade in Tanzania. After the 1977 dissolution of the EAR, line became part of the Tanzania Railways Corporation.

The lines shown in red on this map of Tanzania are the metre-gauge lines of the Tanzania Railways Corporation. The railway shown by an orange line is the 3ft 6in-gauge Tazara Express line connecting Dar es Salaam with Zambia, (c) Jkan997 and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 3.0). [26]

In the 21st century, trains no longer travel as far as Arusha, although the railway company maintains a station in Arusha and still employs a station master there. Perhaps a hope remains that regular services might resume! [27]

References

The references appear immediately after the Appendices (A, B and C) below.

Appendix A: Developments in Farming and Land use in the German Protectorate in the areas around the Usambara Railway

These notes are a partial translation of a section of a paper presented to the German Association for the Promotion of Industryby Hans Wettich in 1911, written, probably, in 1910. [9]

Wettich provides an interesting interlude in the story of the Usambara Railway by examining the performance of a variety of crops introduced into plantations around the line of the railway. Plantation managers first turned to tobacco but discovered quickly that the African soil was light on the necessary nutrients to support more than minor local production. Plantation managers then turned to Coffee which also failed. [9: p4]

Wilkens & Wiese was formed in Tanga on 21st February 1898 with the acquisition of 3000 hectares to be used for a Coffee plantation in Ambangulu in the mountain triangle bordered by Luengera, Pangani and Mkomasi in western Usambara. clearance of the virgin forest commenced but with the intention of keeping as much of the cleared timber as possible for useful projects to limit the capital outlay on the project.

It turned out that, while the Javanese coffee seed developed well, the yield was poor, even with efforts made to improve soils quality. The company survived off the income of the sawmill that it set up to make the best use of cleared timber. The company decided that the plantation, dependent on coffee alone, could not get by. The expenses of the company amounted to 60000 Marks per year, which at a price of 60 Marks/hundredweight of coffee required a minimum harvest of 1000 hundredweight of Coffee. Only in 1907, however, was the harvest more, namely 1350 hundredweight. In 1908, only 350 hundredweight was produced. This improved in 1909 to about 800 hundredweight. It was therefore necessary to look for other more profitable plantation plants and the company gradually reduced the coffee stock from 700,000 trees/bushes to 300,000. [9: p4-5]

The other plantations in the North, with the exception of those in the Kilimanjaro area, also continued coffee cultivation only to a limited extent. Namely only in wind-protected and low-lying locations that allow intensive cultivation through fertilization and the necessary shading. On average, from 1903 to 1907, coffee worth 420,000 to 525,000 Marks was exported annually (330,000 to 500,000 kg per year). Only in 1908/09 was it possible to produce 650,000 kg with a value of 800,000 Marks due to a favorable harvest and good prices. [9: p5]

To increase the profitability of the plantation in Ambangulu, initial trials were conducted with quinine, but these were soon abandoned because the quinine trees suffered from vandalism during the dry season. Then, the Gerber Acacia [14] was cultivated, its bark contains 45% tannins and it allows for practical and inexpensive cultivation, as the tree, coppiced every 6-8 years, resprouts from the root. All areas in Ambangulu unsuitable for coffee cultivation were planted with Gerber Acacia. An additional benefit with these trees was that they provided the necessary wind protection for the coffee plants. On this plantation, 20 hectares were planted with Gerber Acacia, while in the Wilhelmsthal district, a total of 36 hectares were planted on 15 plantations, and 74 hectares were planted on 20 plantations. Wettich commented that, as of 1910, it was still questionable as to whether the Gerber Acacia would prove successful. [9: p5]

Meanwhile, trials conducted by the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani, in East Usambara, had shown that the rubber tree (Manioc Glasiovii) and the Sisal Agave would provide usable plantation plants for Usambara. However, Ambangulu, at an altitude of 1200 m, was too high for rubber cultivation, and the soil was too undulating for the cultivation of sisal agave, as its cultivation is only recommended in the lowlands, since harvesting is difficult due to the spines on the leaves, whose significant weight also necessitates extensive transport equipment. [9: p5]

In order to put their planting company on a more reliable footing, Wilkens & Wiese decided to acquire land in the plain for planting Manioc and Sisal. Therefore, in 1906, the Kosalowe sisal plantation in the Pangani plain, which was in the process of being built, was purchased. It sat a 5 hour journey from Ambangulu.. There, 1,300,000 agaves were planted in three years, which yielded the first harvest as early as 1909. [9: p6]

The importance of Sisal cultivation in German East Africa can be seen in the official memorandum of 1908/09. The value of the hemp export from the Protectorate rose from a little more than 300,000 Marks in 1903 to almost 3 million marks in 1908, despite the fact that the prices in Manila fell from 900 marks per ton in 1907 to 520 marks in 1908 and fell to 480 marks in 1909. [9: p6]

The total export for 1909/10 showed a decrease in value compared to the previous year of about 500,000 marks, but an increase in exports of approximately 1400 tons. The Usambara region exported 2730 tons of hemp in 1907/08, 3873 tons in 1908/09, 5394 tons in 1909/I0. Cost price per ton was at most 300 marks. Even including shipment costs there remained a worthwhile profit of at least 180 marks per ton, even with the low hemp price in 1910. [9: p6]

It is therefore understandable that the sisal cultivation, which in 1906/07 covered 10,553 ha with 31 million heads, grew in 1908/09 to 14,316 ha with 40 million heads, and in 1909/10 to 17,141 ha with 45.25 million heads. Usambara and the district of Wilhelmsthal were part of this effort with their sisal plantations increasing from 2 million agaves and 650 ha in 1907 to 4.75 million agaves and 1490 ha in 1908/09. [9: p6]

In view of this great growth, the management of the Usambara Railway decided to run special Sisal wagons on the line, of which 3 were ordered in 1910. These wagons can be opened and closed in the middle of the roof by a horizontally movable ceiling, so that the wagon compartment can be completely filled with a load. [6]

Other crops were, in 1910, at least for Usambara, still under experimantation. [9: p6]

Cotton, on which great hopes were placed, is worth mentioning, but its cultivation in Usamhara does not seem to have been particularly successful. While its cultivation was spreading as an indigenous crop in the centre and south of the country, it was planted almost exclusively as an intermediate crop between annual Sisal Agaves in the Tanga and Wilhelmsthal districts. This probably explains the decline in crops reported for 1908/09 in the district of Wilhelmsthal, where only 1076 ha were planted in the previous year, while for 1909/10 an increase was recorded in the northern districts. However, the yield was affected by excessively wet weather in 1910/11. [9: p6-7]

Sugar cane wass planted in the Pangani Plain by Indians and Arabs, and it was not until 1909/10 that a European settler began cultivation of sugar cane in the Pangani area. While in 1907/08 exports were as high as 170,000 kg of sugar, in 1909 they fell to 10,000 kg. The official report for 1908/09 attributes this to the fact that the local sugar is being used up by the needs of the plantations in the Usambara region itself, and this decline is therefore a sign of the strong development of this region after the northern railway opened the way to the sea. [7]

With the exception of the north-west districts, rice had only found local importance, as had bananas. Beans, which are grown with great success in southern Uganda,were less important for Usambara. On the other hand, it seemed that the rubber plantations will be destined for greater success, in spite of the fact that the demand for labourers is about twice as great as for a Sisal plantation of the same size. The former reluctance of the planters, especially in the north-eastern districts, has subsided as a result of increased prices on the world market. [9: p7]

Coconut also found its way into the Usambara region. In 1908/09, 26 hectares were already planted with 2580 young coconut palms in the district of Wilhelmsthal. [9: p7]

Woodlands

In addition to the plantation economy, the mountains have gained in importance for Usambara. In a report in the “Deutsche Kolonialzeitung”, the Imperial Chief Forester Eckert estimates the usable areas aroud the Usambara Railway and its extension at about 125,000 ha. There are, however, significantl;y larger forest areas accessible

In any case, significantly larger forest areas were accessible via branch lines. On 1st April 1910, the authorities owned about 382,056 hectares of forest reserves in the entire Protectorate, of which 62,965 hectares were in the Wilhelmsthal-Tanga-Pangani forest district alone. About 39,000 ha of forest reserves were in preparation in these districts in 1910. However, the government only exploited the forests if there were no perceived difficulties such as the Mangrove forests in the Rufidji Delta. Otherwise, the use of forests was leased. The size of the leased fiscal forests in the entire protected area in 1908/09 was 16,000 ha, in which 4480 cubic metres of timber were felled with a levy to the tax authorities of 46,300 Rupees. The government’s own felling, on the other hand, amounted to only 6665 cubic metres. For 1909/10 the leased fiscal forest area was 21200 ha, which produced a levy of 9184 Rupees for the tax authorities. [9: p7]

The Composition of the Holdings

As far as the forests of Usambara were concerned, the trees were of mixed quality. There were are hardwoods, some of which were difficult to use because of their hardness. Easily splitable wood species were already in use by natives, but according to a report by Chief Forestry Officer Dr. Haug, Stuttgart, there are only 2 varieties of industrially viaable coniferous woods. Uniform stands of the same wood species are hardly found. Unusable woods, such as the poisonous Kandela Acacia, often swamp other varieties. [9: p8]

There are some of the hardwoods that can be used for construction in spite of their hardness and are increasingly being sold in the country itself. There are also some woods that are excellently suited for the furniture industry and joinery, including mahogany. This type of wood is planted out in suitable places during reforestation. Planting experiments have also been made in quarries with various types of teak wood, which show favourable success in humid locations, so that it is to be expected that the forests of Usambara will increase in value quite significantly through afforestation with these precious woods. However, teak cultivation in quarries will be abandoned, as most of it is on dry soil and tends to be covered by the existing canopy and so very dry. [9: p8]

For the lowlands, the characteristic wood species is the Mangrove, which is felled because of the rich tannin content of its bark. In 1909/10, for example, the bark harvested by private individuals in the entire Protectorate was 3,506,480 kg! [9: p8]

In the primeval forests found at around 1200 m above sea-level there were some isolated extraordinarily mighty trunks. Also there was Mkweo wood (which grows in long, bright trunks of good strength and it has properties equivalent to American walnut wood), after being taken to the sawmill of Messrs. Wilkens & Wiese in Ambangulu, wood was carried on a 20 km long light railway to the Usambara Railway and via Tanga to Hamburg, where it was sold by a trader in overseas woods, Janson & Pielstick. It had by 1910/11 proved itself excellent for telephone boxes and was used for the interior of the D-train cars, and the cabins and salons of the large ships. Wettich sited work ongoing on a Reichspost steamer and a large steamer of the Hamburg-America Line, currently under construction.

Mkweo was also used in parquet flooring and was exhibited in this form in Brussels. It was noted as having a calm, distinguished tone, Its wood had not, in 1910/11, yet been used for furniture although Mkweo was much cheaper than American walnut. Wettich anticipated that the furniture industry would soon adopt the wood, as its use for railway, ship and telephone purposes guarantees its good properties. The sawmill in Ambangulu, which also cuts the camphor-like smelling yellowish Mkeneneholz, which shows hardly any tendency to crack and is available in dense and large blocks, currently also supplies other timber for private and state institutes and enterprises, furthermore it also supplied Mareka, a magnificent, heavy and hard wood with a very beautiful grain, which Wettich was sure would soon be in use for interior design and as a veneer for furniture. [9: p8-9]

It is worth noting that Mkweo timber (also known as Mbane in Nguru), hard and yellow, was much used locally and exported to Germany where it was used for wagons and shipbuilding, including luxury panelling etc. Supplies were about exhausted by 1945 and it is presumably very scarce now. [15] I have not been able to find further references to Mkeneneholz timber.

The German Timber Company for East Africa of Berlin, harvested at approximately the same altitudes on the banks of the Sigi River, wood of yellow to dark brown colour, which resembled teak but was considerably lighter, hard and strong in colour. The wood was gladly bought by the wagon and shipbuilding industries at a price of 145 marks per cubic metre. The company also supplied grey, occasionally yellowish, single-grained Matamba wood which was used in-country for handicrafts, and the oak-like Kengeholz (yellowish brown) wood. These woods from the Sigi River area were very light and easy to work with with great hardness and strength. [9: p9]

In spite of the country’s own abundance of wood, it had not been possible in the Protectorate (by 1910/11) to completely displace the Nordic pine and spruce wood, which had the advantage of cheapness. On the coast in 1907 a cubic metre cost 64 marks. At that price, even the company Wilkens & Wiese still had to use Norwegian wood for its roof construction work. [9: p9-10]

Significantly more valuable than the stands of the plain and the middle altitudes were the forests of the Usambara plateau, which are located at an altitude of about 2000 m. Here were the Schagai Forest, the Magamba Forest and especially the Schummewald. In these primeval forests there are often scattered numerous cedars, whose trunks sometimes reach a height of 40 to 50 metres and have diameters of up to 2 metres or more. [] The wood is comparatively soft, so that it can be used as pencil wood, all the more so as the American cedar is becoming rarer and of a lower quality according to the trade. Brush handles, long pipe stems and camera bodies for the tropics are further products from it. The most beautifully coloured blocks of the yellow to intense red and polishable, mahagony-like wood would also be adopted by the furniture industry for luxury furniture. To have recognized the value of these forests is the merit of Hermann von Wissmann, who drew Mr. Wiese’s attention to them early on. Today, the government has concluded a number of lease agreements for the use of wood in Usambara, and according to the official report for I909/10 from the Schummewald, about 1240 cubic meters of cedar wood have been used this year. Experimental plantings with the cigar box wood cedar of the Cedrala odorata have also been successfully carried out in Amani, so that the production of this wood for Usambara is also secured. [9: p10-11]

Another precious wood of the Schummewald, which could be used primarily for the furniture industry and handicrafts, was the white, slightly grained Podocarpus wood, [9: p11][17]

Appendix B: The Industrial development of northern German East Africa under the influence of the Usambara Railway, its branch lines and road extensions

These notes are a partial translation of a section of a paper presented to the German Association for the Promotion of Industryby Hans Wettich in 1911, written, probably, in 1910. [9]

As significant progress in the construction of the Usambara Railway occurred, parallel developments prospered. This was particularly noticeable in the area of Kilimanjaro and Mount Meru, where the first section of the Kilimanjaro Road, extending from the railway line for a distance of 134 km, was completed in 1909. Another road ran from Same, an intermediate station on the new Usambara Railway line (350 km), via Moshi to Arusha, which opened up the southwestern slopes of the Pare Mountains and connected to individual settlement areas via access roads. In addition to settler plantations, along these transport routes, native settlements and cultivation occurred.  A road from Mombo to Wilhelmsthal and from there on to the Kwai Domain, Mount Magamba, and the Schumme Forest was also  constructed. [9: p36]

Furthermore, agricultural and mining enterprises in the area of the northern valley were on the rise. Trade and commerce had experienced a significant increase, which was reflected in strong attendances at markets. The upswing was also characterized by the increase in timber harvesting concessions, which in 1909/10 amounted to slightly over 5000 hectares in the three forest districts of Tanga, Panguni, and Wilhelmsthal.

Industrially, the Mukomassi-Wasser-development company was at work. It intended to construct a power plant in the valley of the upper Mukomassi on the Usambara railway. This would, when open, process the rich clay deposits located there into aluminum using electrical means.

In 1908/09, the latest year for which information was available to Wettich, only mining operations existed, such as in the district of Wilhelmsthal for precious minerals and shared prospecting fields. Mica mining fields were put into operation in West Usambara in 1909/10.

Appendix C: The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919

Introduction

In early August 1914 India was tasked with providing Indian Expeditionary Forces (IEFs) ‘B’ and ‘C’ for service in East Africa, and the provision of a Railway Corps was included in the organisation of IEF ‘B’ that was destined for German East Africa (GEA). The 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners, under Majors C.F. Anderson and C.W. Wilkinson, both Royal Engineers, along with the Traffic and Locomotive Reserve of the two companies were mobilised at Sialkot and Quetta. Each company was around 300 men strong; an accompanying Coolie Corps of 300 men was raised mostly from the relatives of the company personnel. The officers were nearly all civilian railway officers of the Indian State Railways or Royal Engineer officers employed under the Indian Railway Board. The skills included survey, construction and operation. Major Anderson was medically repatriated soon after arrival and Lieutenant H.L. Woodhouse, Royal Engineers, then commanded the 25th Railway Company. Sir William Johns CIE was appointed Director of Railways.

The Indian Railway Board provided equipment sufficient for the repair and running of a section of the German East Africa railway. This equipment included 10 miles (16 kilometres) of 50-pound track, a large surplus of sleepers, 15 locomotives, nearly 200 trucks, a large number of pine baulks, a number of 20-foot and 40-foot bridge spans, cranes, pile drivers, machine tools, hand tools of all sorts, survey instruments, tents and office necessities. The companies brought out their own telegraph equipment but this was later handed over to the Indian Telegraph unit that carried out all the telegraph work of the railways and tramways.

Initial Employment in British East Africa

The Railway Corps arrived in two ships at Tanga in GEA where IEF ‘B’ was scheduled to land. Tanga was the Indian Ocean terminal of the German Usambara Railway that ran to Moshi near Mount Kilimanjaro; the British later named this line The Northern Railway. IEF ‘B’ failed to defeat the German force at Tanga and re-embarked; the Railway Corps stayed on its ships throughout the Tanga fight. IEF ‘B’ then steamed up to Kilindini, the port at Mombasa in British East Africa (BEA). Mombasa was the ocean terminal for the British Uganda Railway that ran up to Lake Victoria. IEF ‘B’ disembarked at Kilindini on 9th November 1914 and merged with IEF ‘C’ that had arrived in BEA in September.

A Railway Corps survey party commenced delineating a route for a military railway from Voi on the Uganda Railway westwards towards Moshi in GEA. The Railway Companies took over the defence of the Uganda Railway, sections of which were under threat from enemy raiding parties from GEA. Once all the stores had been landed it was decided to return most of the locomotive and traffic staff and the civilian officers to India, from where they could be easily recalled. In late December the two companies were moved from railway defence to construction work on the Kajiado to Longido road; better use was now made of their technical expertise and qualifications in the construction of roads, fortified posts and water supplies. The 25th Company went to Namanga and Longido and the 26th Company was based at Bissel.

Railway Construction

In February 1915 the decision was made to construct the first 40 miles (65 kilometres) of the one metre-guage military line from Voi towards Moshi in order to connect the military posts at Bura and Maktau. Twenty five miles of track were sent from India, 5 Miles were borrowed from the Uganda Railway, and the Corps already possessed 10 miles. The Railway Board in India continued its excellent support to the Corps by delivering to site the 25 miles of track only seven weeks after receiving the indent in India. The specialists were recalled from India and the companies were moved to Voi; material was moved up from Kilindini.

The construction method used was that one company laid track whilst the other worked ahead building the next bridge. Local labour for bush-cutting and earthworks was recruited from the Wataita tribe with the help of the District Commissioner and a missionary of the Church Missionary Society. The Wataita proved to be intelligent men who were quick learners. The 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers had also landed with IEF ‘B’ and it had recently been employed in prolonging the Coonoor Railway to Ootacamund; when not tasked elsewhere the Pioneers provided useful support to the Corps. As the railhead advanced the Coolie Corps took over the maintenance of the track.

The Voi River was crossed and the first station opened at Mile 6.5 on 16th April. Heavy monsoon rains set in during May delaying the movement forward of supplies as the line needed constant repair and maintenance. On 31st May the bridge and station at Bura were opened at Mile 22. From now on the railway had to carry troops, supplies and water between Voi and Bura as well as construction material. The first section of the line was completed to Maktau on 23rd June. Whilst the railhead was advancing a big effort had been put into making Voi a suitable terminus for the military line. A workshop had been constructed, engines and rolling stock were brought up from Kilindini, a large store yard was established and an armoured train was built.

The armoured train, ‘Simba’, was built in the railway workshops in Nairobi to help counteract German mounted patrols that carried out nuisance raids on the railway between Mackinnon Road and Sultan Hamud, (c) Public Domain. [21: p2]

An unescorted Wataita earthwork gang was fired on by a German patrol and four men were wounded on 9th June; the Wataita were undeterred and asked if they could bring their bows and arrows to the worksite in future. The military line was blown up for the first time five days later, and after that the Germans blew the line every week, usually at around 2000 hours. This suited the repair gangs as they could make overnight repairs before the first morning train was run. The German demolitions were never very effective. On one occasion a train carrying the 130th (King George’s Own) Baluchis (Jacob’s Rifles) was pushing a truck loaded with sepoys’ kits ahead of it when an enemy mine detonated under the truck. A gap 0.75 metres in length was blown out of one of the rails but the complete train successfully passed over the gap and proceeded, with passenger and cargo damage being confined to some of the sepoys’ kits. The Germans had more success when attacking the Uganda Railway as that line often ran through desolate country and could be approached more easily.

A British attack at Mbuyuni, west of Maktau, failed on 14th July and that failure halted extension of the line. During this halt the companies constructed field works and defences and put in crossing stations and sidings on the Uganda Railway. A regular train service was introduced between Voi and Maktau and a Train Control System was installed. A second indent for 30 miles of track was sent to India and it arrived two months later. On November 13th 1915 the Director of Railways was placed in control of the Uganda Railway. This was done in order to ensure intimate cooperation between the Uganda Railway and the military line during the planned British offensive in early 1916. Officers and men of the Railway Corps were posted to the Uganda Railway whose operations were effectively militarised.

Platelaying began again in January 1916 and Mbuyuni, Mile 53.25, was reached on the 25th of that month, the Germans having withdrawn from the location two days earlier without fighting. Thousands of South African, British, Rhodesian, Indian and African troops were now being housed in camps along the military line and the supply of water in railway travelling tanks to these camps was a vital task for the Corps. Some relief was obtained when the engineers ran a pipeline from Bura, where the water was sourced, to Maktau. The British attacked Salaita Hill, west of Mbuyuni, on 12th February but the attack failed, the enemy counter-attacking to the railhead at Lanjoro, Mile 60.

This map illustrates the area of early operations in German East Africa. [21: p5]

Moving into German East Africa

The Germans withdrew from Salaita Hill and moved to defend the Latema-Reata hills just west of Taveta on the GEA and BEA border. The Corps pushed the military line westwards through dense bush, following up the advancing British troops. From drafts arriving from India and from within the existing Railway Companies the 27th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, was formed; the Company Commander was Captain R.E. Gordon, Royal Engineers. This allowed the Corps to continue platelaying in dangerous territory whilst providing its own security. The Lumi River was crossed and Taveta reached, Mile 75, on 23rd March. After a tough fight the Germans had withdrawn from the Latema-Reata position on 12th March, allowing the Corps to lay track over a saddle between the two hills.

The enemy was demolishing the Usambara Railway line as he withdrew down it and once Moshi was in British hands a half-company of the Corps repaired the track from Moshi to the Ruvu River. Meanwhile the railhead was advanced over what was the toughest stretch on the entire military line. The monsoon rains again fell heavily but three rivers were crossed and a dense forest penetrated; the soil was black-cotton and quickly became marsh resulting in platelaying being achieved under water. A junction with the Usambara line was made 20 kilometres below Moshi and 40 kilometres from Taveta on 25th April. This was just in time for the British troops in Moshi who had lost their road from Taveta to the monsoon rains and floods, and who now relied upon supplies arriving by train.

The South African General J.L. Van Deventer was tasked by the British theatre commander, General J.C. Smuts, to advance south-westwards through Arusha and Kondoa Irangi to the German Central Railway line that ran from Dar Es Salaam on the Indian Ocean coast to Lake Tanganyika in the interior. To assist the supply columns supporting the South Africans in getting across a large number of bad drifts on the initial stage of the road the Railway Corps was tasked with pushing a line westwards from Moshi over the Garanga River to Sanja, Mile 21 on this new short line. Sanja was reached by the end of June. At this time the 28th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, arrived from India commanded by Captain. E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, raising the establishment of the Railway Companies to that of a battalion. Lieutenant Colonel C.W. Wilkinson, Royal Engineers, was appointed Commandant of the Railway Battalion which became a unit in the Railway Corps.

Reconstructing the Usambara Railway

On 14th May reconstruction of the Usambara Railway south of Ruvu commenced; the Germans had demolished the Ruvu bridge but the Corps 7 erected an 18-metre girder bridge on 20th May. From then onwards on the 320 kilometres of track leading to Tanga every bridge had been destroyed. However the demolitions had been hasty and planned ineffectively and the Corps could quickly make track diversions or re-build bridges. In many places the track had been torn up and the fastenings thrown into the bush, in other places the fastenings only had been removed, and elsewhere each alternate rail joint had been blown up. The track was repaired through Lembeni, Same, Makania, Hedaru and ‘German Bridge’ stations, the latter being reached on 20th June. ‘German Bridge’ was the last suitable crossing point over the Pangani River until Maurui is reached 80 kilometres further on. The Germans had started building a bridge here and the British completed the construction.

Just beyond ‘German Bridge’ is Buiko, 180 kilometres from Tanga and the mid-point in the line. Mombo station, Mile 75, was opened on 29th June; from here the Germans had built a hand-powered field railway (trolley line) of 60 centimetres gauge to Handeni, 65 kilometres to the south. 25th Railway Company assisted the Royal Engineers in restoring this line as it also had been partially destroyed, and on completion this trolley line was very useful for moving supplies in support of General Smuts’ advance to Morogoro.

Fighting in the Infantry Role

On 4th July, railhead reached the Pangani River near Maurui and by the end of the month had reached Korogwe. However the German theatre commander, Colonel Paul von Lettow, had early in July tasked 500 or more of his troops as a ‘stay behind’ group to harass the British lines of communication in the area between Tanga, Maurui and Handeni. This enemy group successfully made a nuisance of itself by attacking convoys, mining roads, cutting telegraph and telephone lines and sniping from the bush. An attack by 170 German troops with a light gun had been repulsed at Zugunatto Bridge by the Jind Infantry on 13th July; the soldiers from the Princely State of Jind were amongst the best of the British troops. General Smuts ordered his Inspector General of Communications Brigadier General W.F.S. Edwards, a former BEA policeman, to resolve this problem. As Edwards had no spare infantry he decided to use the 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Indian Sappers and Miners, along with a few infantrymen, and reported this to General Smuts who made no comment. But Edwards did not confer with the Director of Railways who badly needed those two companies to stay on the job of railway restoration in order to alleviate supply problems. After dark on 13th July the two companies with 100 Jind Infantry, 50 British other ranks and 100 sepoys, moved out from Korogwe tasked with attacking Segera Hill and Mfumbile. Captain E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, commanded the companies and Lieutenant Colonel Wilkinson commanded the force.

The Railway Companies did well on Segera Hill, getting up to a machine gun, killing the German NCO in charge and capturing the gun in a bayonet assault. The German force withdrew hurriedly but counterattacked next day. The companies were up to their new task and broke the enemy assault. Lt Col Wilkinson now moved across country to deal with an enemy force at Hale, found that it had withdrawn to Kwa Mugwe, moved there and drove the enemy rear-guard away and then repelled another German counter-attack on 19th July. In these operations the machine guns of the accompanying Jind Infantry gave the Railway Companies the supporting firepower that they needed. The companies then returned to their railway duties, having taken a few casualties but doubtless with many war stories to tell. On 18th August Tanga was reached and the port and railway came into use for moving supplies from Kilindini to Korogwe where another 60-centimetre trolley line was constructed towards Handeni. The materials for this line came from abandoned German farms and plantations and the locomotion came from adapted Ford cars used as tractors and operated by the East Africa Motor Transport Corps.

The 600 mm trolley line serving Handeni. [21: p9]
Railway workshops in Nairobi converted many vehicles, including this Vauxhall, to carry supplies on the hastily rep lines in German East Africa. In three months over 300 miles of railway were repaired, enabling locomotives to take once more. [21: p10]

Incidents on the Central Railway

The Royal Navy along with infantry units advancing from Bagamoyo seized Dar Es Salaam, the GEA capital, on 4th September. A reconnaissance of the Central Railway between Morogoro and Dar Es Salaam showed that all bridges were down. Two Railway Companies were shipped to Dar Es Salaam to start repairing the track from that end and the other two were shipped to Bagamoyo; from Bagamoyo they moved overland to the dropped bridges over the Ruwu River which urgently needed reconstruction. The line was repaired for light use to Morogoro and mechanical transport units converted a selection of lorries to rail tractors, allowing the South African Pioneers to run a supply service westwards to Dodoma, 240 kilometres from Morogoro. Each tractor could pull 15 tons of trucks and freight. Further work was needed before the heavier steam trains could use the line but Dodoma was being supplied from Dar Es Salaam by steam trains on 1st January 1917. The South African Water Supply Corps gave constant support to the Railway Corps whenever a water supply point or a pumping station needed to be established, and large numbers of labourers from the South African Native Labour Corps were supplied to support the Corps; unfortunately many of these Africans succumbed to tropical diseases.

The Germans had destroyed many engines and trucks on the line but again their demolition work was unsatisfactory and did not greatly hinder the Corps. Troops from the Belgian Congo, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, had crossed Lake Tanganyika and fought their way to Tabora, where 40 engines and 200 trucks were found basically undamaged. These were shared with the Belgians. The Railway Corps moved its base from BEA to Dar Es Salaam but immediately had to support the engineers restoring the docks there; Corps cranes were used to unload ships and the companies constructed jetties and slipways. In January 1917 Major L.N. Malan, Royal Engineers, took over command of the Railway Battalion from Colonel Wilkinson who became Deputy Director of the Railway Corps.

In April 1917 a branch line was constructed from Dodoma on the Central Railway southwards towards the Ruaha River. 26th, 27th and 28th Railway Companies were involved in the work which lasted until August, when railhead reached Matikira, Mile 28. The country was very difficult to cross and the lack of shipping to bring down sleepers from Kilindini caused delay. As soon as this short line was no longer needed the rails were recovered and used elsewhere.

A bad accident occurred on the Central Railway on 5th May when a re-built bridge at Mkata collapsed at night in heavy rain, due to an original German pier proving to have insufficient foundations. Sixteen gunners from 24th (Hazara) Mountain Battery (Frontier Force) and four Askari from the King’s African Rifles were drowned when their cattle trucks fell into the swollen river. Many other men were badly injured when they were flung against weapons and stores in the trucks. 26th Railway Company was deployed to restore the damaged line.

On 29th August 1917 the station at Kahe, where the military line from Voi joined the Usambara Railway from Moshi, was unexpectedly attacked by enemy troops, causing consternation amongst rear-echelon elements in Nairobi. An enemy raiding party had broken away from the German forces in southern GEA and had advanced northwards across the Central Railway, attacking British and Belgian locations; former German Askari enthusiastically joined the raiders. Elements of the party got up to Lake Victoria and one small group attacked Kahe. Two trains were captured as they approached the station, then looted and burned. Three British officers were taken prisoner, the Station Master was mortally wounded and a number of porters and labourers were killed. Before withdrawing the Germans started one of the two trains and let it run towards Taveta, but an Indian engine driver who had escaped into the bush jumped into one of the two engines on the train and brought it under control. When the train was at a safe distance from Kahe the driver disconnected the carriages and drove the engines to Taveta, where he was given a prompt military award.

A Trolley Line in the Kilwa Area

Moving south the British now developed Kilwa Kisinjane as a port where men and supplies could be landed. Commencing in November 1916 a 60centimetre tramway was built by the Corps from the ocean to Kilwa Kivinje, a distance of 26 kilometres, and then onwards for a further 24 kilometres. The construction material was produced by stripping the trolley lines previously built from Mombo and Korogwe. Motor tractors were again used and a driver company and a supporting maintenance company were formed from mechanical transport personnel; these companies became sub-units in the Railway Corps.

However tropical diseases and ailments such as malignant malaria were now affecting the Corps badly and often far more men of all trades were sick than were at work. Also the driving of tractors on railway lines, especially around curves, was not as easy as many potential drivers thought and de-railings with consequent damage were frequent. Sixty more tractors were ordered from India and 50 more from South Africa; these were all converted Ford cars with bogie trucks in place of the front axle and with heavier back axles and box bodies. The first 16 kilometres of track was duplicated but in broader guage and steam trains ran along it, allowing swifter movement of men from the port to the first camp site where water was available. In July 1917 further construction was authorised at Kilwa and the 60-centimetre line was extended to Lungo, Mile 84, by November. On this line, which had a slight gradient, each box-body tractor pulled two trailers with a total load of up to 2.72 metric tonnes (3 tons).

A typical ‘train’ on a trolley line in what was once German East Africa but which by this time was terrritory occupied by the British. [21: p13]
A typical Ford light railway tractor in use in the occupied German East Africa. [21: p15]

Construction activities at Lindi

A hundred and ten kilometres south of Kilwa more port facilities were developed at Lindi, which had a fine natural harbour. A British force was moving into the interior and needed a railway to follow it. Steam trains were ruled out because shipping was not available to move the necessary materials and rolling stock from Dar Es Salaam and Kilindini, so another 60-centimetre tractor line was started. This was helped by the fact that an existing trolley line led from several former German plantations to a jetty on the river running into Lindi Harbour; it was estimated that 30 kilometres of track could be recovered from the German line.

The 25th Railway Company deployed to Lindi in June and commenced work, following the British advance. Survey work on both the Lindi and Kilwa lines was sometimes interrupted the appearance of both lions, rhinoceros and elephants, and occasionally by the approach of enemy patrols who were engaged and driven off. On 27th August the line was open to Mtua and proved to be very useful in quickly evacuating wounded men as well as in carrying forward supplies. In this month the 27th Railway Company arrived at Lindi, and support was provided by the South African Pioneers and the 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers. Unskilled labour was badly needed and this problem had to be solved by moving down large labour gangs from the Usumbara and Central Railways. A few small steam engines were found on various plantations and put to use on the line. When the tractors from India arrived it was found that their axles had been made from inferior steel and they broke at the rate of two or three a day. This problem was compounded by severe rates of sickness that affected most of the Corps. At the beginning of November only 9 tractors out of 36 were working and only two mechanics were manning the workshops.

Later in the month the Kilwa line was closed down and personnel were redeployed to Lindi where the Corps base was relocated, however the movement of badly needed materials and plant was delayed by shipping shortages. Railhead reached Ndanda, Mile 62, on 27th February 1918 and the decision was made to stop the line there. By then General, as he now was, von Lettow … and his slimmed-down German army were moving deeper into Portuguese East Africa (PEA), now Mozambique.

The Run-down of the Indian Railway Corps in East Africa

By November 1917 the 25th Railway Company was medically unfit for work with its strength at less than 40 fit men, and it was returned to India in March 1918. The 26th and 27th Railway Companies were in a similar condition and in May they also returned to India. 28th Railway Company remained in the field and all recent arrivals and returnees from leave were posted into that company. The Lindi line continued to be used and Army Service Corps men drove supplies from railhead into PEA; sadly many of these European drivers succumbed to tropical diseases and are buried in East Africa. As the East African Force was slimmed down Directorates were abolished and in March Sir William Johns left the theatre after handing over the Railway Corps to Colonel Wilkinson.

Up in Nairobi a tramway 13 kilometres long was constructed from the town to the vast King’s African Rifles (KAR) Depot Camp at Mbagathi; the running of this line was handed over to the KAR. The line from Voi to Tanga was practically on a peace footing and the Central Railway was being converted to commercial use. The arrival of 100 new tractors from South Africa, the increased use of steam traction, and a big improvement in the health of the personnel meant that soon the Lindi line was running very efficiently.

In September, as the Germans in PEA were observed to be moving northwards, the Lindi line was ordered to be extended 30 kilometres to Massasi. The 28th Railway Company which was stood-by to sail for India quickly returned to Ndanda and started the work. Concurrently permission was obtained to raise an African Pioneer Company to replace the 28th Company. Suitable men were recruited from maintenance gangs on the Central Railway and from labour that had worked on the Mbagathi trolley line. The Lindi line reached Massasi in mid-November just as General von Lettow-Vorbeck, still undefeated and then in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, accepted the Armistice terms decided in Europe and agreed to surrender. The 28th Railway Company sailed for India.

The Indian Railway Corps retained responsibility for railways in East Africa until January 1919, when civilian direction and personnel replaced it. The Corps had done an excellent job, tackling the diverse and serious challenges that East Africa presented in a most professional manner. Credit for the performance of the Corps must be attributed to the support provided by the Indian Railways Board and the Corps of Royal Engineers, but above all else to the skill, adaptability and perseverance of the men of the Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners. Shabash!

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Tanzania, accessed on 22nd February 2026.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/02/23/the-tramways-of-zanzibar
  3. https://www.arushanews.co.tz/columns/the-usambara-railway-the-line-that-climbed-the-hills, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  4. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/the-overview-and-history-of-the-usambara-railway-service-german-east-africa, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  5. https://ntz.info/gen/n00514.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  6. https://grokipedia.com/page/usambara_railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  7. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/04/narrow-gauge-industrial-lines-in-tanganyika-tanzania, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  8. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way Volume II: The Story of the Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957.
  9. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cableway; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philipp_Holzmann, accessed on 9th March 2026.
  11. This and the next few references hold a translation of the first four pages of Hans Wettich’s paper (Reference 9 above). it parallels the account in the main text of the article above: “With the advance of the Usambara Railway, the north of the colony of German East Africa has undergone a development that must be of particular interest not only to the engineer, for here the interaction between the natural riches of the country and the engineering art used for development is vividly demonstrated and, on the other hand, between the engineering works carried out and the economic development of the country. “If a picture of this development is to be unrolled here from a technical point of view, taking into account at the same time the means of transport used to open up Usambara, it is first necessary to name the sources from which the sources were drawn. These are notes and information from literature, daily newspapers and African periodicals, official records and reports, but preferably reports and reports originating from the companies and companies involved. Commissioned by the plantation company Wilkins & Wiese, Tanga; the Deutsche Holzgesellschaft für OstaJrika in Berlin, the Deutsche Kolonial-Eisenbahn-Bau- lind Betriebsgesellschaft, Berlin; of the cable car factory of Adolf Bleichert & Co., Leipzig and the timber import company, Ja,l1son & Pielstick, Hamburg, the author had extensive information at his disposal. In addition, there are personal reports from engineers and fitters who were involved in the construction of railways in Usambara, and from officials of some of the companies mentioned who travelled through these regions. … It is a well-known fact that rich colonies are to a certain extent self-determining. Plantations, agriculture or mining enterprises penetrate into the area of political occupation and make do with the most primitive means of transport, for the high-value products of the country also permit high transport costs. Transport routes follow the advancing demands, and the procurement of the capital required for railways and roads presents no difficulty. … Less rich colonies, or those whose wealth cannot be readily recognized, want to be seized first, they want to get roads and railways before plantations can spread on a larger scale, before the exploitation of the country’s treasures can take place. In such cases, the raising of capital for the transport route also entails some difficulties, and the help of the government and the help of the mother country cannot be dispensed with.” [p1-2] “If we look at the development of German East Africa from this point of view, it must be conceded that from the time of the acquisition of the protected area, the government and private entrepreneurs, but unfortunately not the Reichstag, have really taken stock of the situation. If a few slightly enthusiastic circles were able to tell of the fabulous riches of the country, they were generally sober about everything. and initially demanded transport routes that were to be joined by plantations and mining ventures in a colonizing manner.” [p2]
  12. The translation of Hans Wettich’s paper continues by focussing on the Usambara Railway: “Although in the centre and south of the country there was an established relatively large overland traffic between Zanzibar and the great lakes, the North seemed to be the most suitable for the beginning of the colony, because here, only a short distance from the coast and the port of Tanga, was the Usambara region, whose fertility was known and whose high altitude climate seemed to permit the settlement of Europeans. Of course, the government preferred the centrally located Dar es Salaam more as a counterweight to Zanzibar, which had become English, and in order to strengthen Dar es Salaam, settled on a project to construct a Central Railway on the old caravan route via Tabora to Lake Tanganjika. Private capital, however, turned to the North, where a whole number of plantations were established in a short time. This resulted in a project to create a branch line from the coast to the caravan site of Korogwe, being aired before 1888. In 1893, the construction of this first German colonial railway was started by the Eisenbahngesellshaft für Ostafrika (Railway Company of East Africa) under the support of the Ostafrikanischen Gesellschaft (East African Society), and on 1st April 1896 the line from Tanga to Muhesa was opened. Construction had to be stopped at Muhesa due to a lack of further funds. In 1897, the Ostafrikanischen Gesellschaft declared itself unable to continue to support the Eisenbahngesellshaft für Ostafrika in the loss-making operation of the railway, and the government had to step in with a monthly allowance of 6000 Marks and finally take over the railway for the price of 1,300,000 Marks. It is obvious that the operation of the line to Muhesa could not be economical, since no major production area had yet been reached at that point, and that it was necessary to extend the line at least to Korogwe and thus connect it to the busy Usambaraland. Ln 1901, the Reichstag approved the funds for this length of the line, but twice refused the means to continue to Mombo. It was not until 1903 that a budget was set aside for this purpose. The construction of the Korogwe-Mombo railway line was transferred to the company Lenz & Co., of Berlin. As a result of the construction work the railway’s profitability grew, and the government, leased the further construction of the railway and its operation to the German Kolonial-Eisenbahnbau-und Betriebsgesellschaft of Berlin in 1905. From then on, railway construction made stronger progress. In 1910, Buiko was reached with 174 km, and today work is being done on the continuation to Moschi (350 km), whereby already in the 3rd quarter of 1910, according to newspaper reports, a total length of 254 km has been reached.” [p2-4]
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/08/the-mkumbara-to-neu-hornow-cableway-ropeway-usambara-hills-tanganyika
  14. Gerber Acacia (Senegalia catechu) – The Gerber Acacia is a deciduous tree that reaches heights of 6 to 10 metres. Its bark is fissured and cracks into wide strips. The twigs have a downy bark and often bear a few hook-shaped thorns formed from the stipules. … The seeds contain a water-soluble mucilage with a high protein content, which is edible for humans. The leaves are considered good fodder and are primarily fed to goats. The wood makes good firewood and is also used for charcoal production . It is also well-suited as construction timber. The resin is used in tanning and dyeing . Gum arabic can be extracted from the bark. … Some constituents of the Gerber Acacia have astringent properties, so the crystallized resin Khersal is used in Ayurveda for chronic diarrhoea , dysentery , colitis , and leukorrhea , and as a mouthwash for stomatitis (inflammation of the oral mucosa), gingivitis (inflammation of the gums), pharyngitis (inflammation of the throat), and laryngitis (inflammation of the larynx). For this purpose, the heartwood should be dried. For more information see: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber-Akazie, accessed on 11th March 2026.
  15. https://plants.jstor.org/compilation/Beilschmiedia.kweo, accessed on 12th March 2026.
  16. Juniperus procera (known by the common English names African juniper, African pencil-cedar, East African juniper, East African-cedar, and Kenya-cedar) is a coniferous tree native to mountainous areas in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. It is a characteristic tree of the Afromontane flora. It is a medium-sized tree reaching 20–25 metres (66–82 feet) (rarely 40 m or 130 ft) tall, with a trunk up to 1.5–2 m (5–6+1⁄2 ft) diameter and a broadly conical to rounded or irregular crown. For more information, see the relevant Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juniperus_procera, accessed on 14th March 2026.
  17. Podocarpus wood is commonly traded as podo or yellowwood, it is a versatile, light-to-medium-weight softwood derived from various species within the Podocarpaceae family, such as Podocarpus neriifolius and Afrocarpus falcatus. Despite being classified botanically as a softwood, it often behaves like hardwood, prized for its fine texture, straight grain, and yellowish-brown colour. For more information, see the relevant Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrocarpus_falcatus, accessed on 14th March 2026.
  18. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1339164168244702&set=a.594438710970128, accessed on 15th March 2026.
  19. https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Campaign-East-Africa-Copy-for-GWAA-site.pdf, 16th March 2026.
  20. C. J. Thornhill; Taking Tanganyika: Experiences of an Intelligence Officer 1914-1918; Trade Paperback, 2004.
  21. Harry Fecitt; The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919; via https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/The-Indian-Railway-Corps-East-African-Expeditionary-Force_1.pdf, accessed on 16th March 2026.
  22. Arusha: A Brochure of the Northern Province and its Capital Town 1929; 1929, p20, via https://ntz.info/gen/b00297.html, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  23. Christopher Nelson; Photographs of Arusha; 1960, via https://ntz.info/gen/n00514.html, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  24. https://www.arushanews.co.tz/columns/the-usambara-railway-the-line-that-climbed-the-hills, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  25. https://www.facebook.com/GermanColonialEmpire/photos/next-in-our-series-on-the-railways-and-steam-locomotives-of-german-east-africage/1345231510971301, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  26. http://sharemap.org/jkan/railway/Railways%20in%20Tanzania, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  27. https://www.railjournal.com/regions/africa/tanzania-starts-work-on-metre-gauge-project, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  28. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2026/03/16/600-mm-narrow-gauge-lines-used-during-world-war-1-in-east-africa
  29. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CZxhxsgV2, accessed on 17th March 2026.
  30. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:4-5_gekupppelte_Dampflokomotive_mit_separatem_4_achsigen_Tender_in_1000_mm_Spurwerite_geliefert_f%C3%BCr_die_Usambarabahn_%E2%80%93_O%26K_Werks-N%C2%B0_2701_vom_Mai_1908,_300_PS,_1000_mm,_1D,_Usambara_EbN%C2%B0_11_%28cropped%29.jpg, accessed on 18th March 2026.
  31. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/usambara-railway, accessed on 21st March 2026.

Railways of Tanzania – Part 8 – Narrow-Gauge Industrial Lines

The featured image for this article shows a train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

Tanganyika (now part of Tanzania) possessed a dense network of industrial narrow-gauge railways, primarily developed during the German colonial era (German East Africa) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to support plantation agriculture and forestry. While the main lines (Central Line and Usambara Railway) were built to 1,000 mm (metre) gauge, industrial, plantation, and forestry lines often used 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) or 750 mm (2 ft 5 1⁄2 in) gauge. [1]

Following World War I, the British administration deemed many of the 600 mm “light railways” to be economically inefficient compared to the, at the time, more efficient 1,000 mm metre-gauge lines, leading to a shift away from developing these smaller lines. [1]

Early Industrial Narrow Gauge lines included:

1. The Sigi Railway

The Sigi Railway (Sigi-Bahn) was a 23.5 km long, 750 mm gauge line opened in 1911 to transport timber from forests in the Usambara Mountains to the Tanga or Usambara Railway. It featured significant engineering challenges, including four switchbacks to handle steep terrain. [2]

Tanga and the Usambara Hills showing the metre-gauge line. [7: p2]
A closer view with a North point just to the West of North. The metre-gauge line runs diagonally across the map extract. The Sigi-bahn is represented by the dashed line leading to the centre of the hatched area. [7: p3]
A sketch map of the full length of the Sigi-bahn with Tengeni to the left and Sigi to the right. Beneath the German text in this extract, the gradient profile of the line is shown. [7: p15]
These three images divide the length of the Sigi-bahn shown above into three. [7: p15]
A train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

The line ran from Tengeni station (185.9  m above sea level) near Muhesa (now Muheza), located on the Usambara railway, to Sigi (438  m above sea level) in the heavily forested eastern Usambara Mountains, which, until the railway’s construction, were rugged and difficult terrain. The area could only be reached by caravans via forest and mountain trails. This severely limited the transport of goods and merchandise. [3]

A travel group at Tengeni railway station in the Usambara Mountains, with trains of the Sigi Railway and the Usambara Railway in the background. [3]

Tengeni Railway Station. [10]

The Sigi Railway Management Concession of 29th April 1910, was a necessary precondition to the exploitation of the forestry concession held by the Deutsche-Holz-Gesellschaft fuer Ostafrika. The 23.5 km. railway’s operation was bound to the sawmills that provided the bulk of the traffic. [2]

Work began in 1904. The Sigi Export Company, during its ownership, constructed 17.6 km of track. Due to financial difficulties, work had to be interrupted repeatedly. After the German Timber Company for East Africa took over the logging rights to 12,000 hectares, the sawmill, and the railway, it completed the latter. The railway went into full operation on 1st September 1910. [3][4: p96]

The line had gradients of up to 40%, minimum radii of 40 m, and, as already noted, four switchbacks. It climbed 252 metres to the Sigi terminus. [4: p96] The switchbacks enabled a relatively uniform gradient to be achieved. The section of track near Sigi was particularly interesting. Here, the railway described almost complete circles to wind its way up the mountain slopes and featured three of its four switchbacks in a length of less than one kilometre. Where possible, engineering structures were avoided. Nevertheless, numerous smaller bridges had to be built over mountain streams, blasting operations carried out, and dams constructed, particularly along the upper section. The construction of a large steel girder bridge over the Kihuhui River gorge was unavoidable; this bridge had two masonry piers between its abutments. [3]

Between Tengeni and Fanussi, rails weighing only 10 kg/m and measuring 7 metres in length were used. The lower section of the line was ballasted only where absolutely necessary for structural or operational reasons, such as on the curves. In contrast, the upper section was fully ballasted and fitted with rails weighing 15 kg/m. Ballasting the entire line was planned but was not completed before the First World War. The rails rested on iron sleepers with shims. The sleeper design on the lower section was chosen to allow for the replacement of the existing rails with the new, heavier rail profile. The flat fishplates used in the first construction phase were reinforced by the addition of angle fishplates. [3]

The line originated at Tengeni station, 44km from Tanga on the Usambara Railway. The Tengeni station grounds belonged to the state and were leased to the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company. With government approval, this company subleased the land for 30 years, first to the Sigi Export Company Ltd. and later to the German Timber Company for East Africa. The site included several buildings constructed by the Sigi Export Company, the railway’s administration building, a warehouse and goods shed, the engine shed, a carriage shed, and a water tower for supplying locomotives. There were also three houses for European employees, one of whom was a locomotive driver. The sawmill was located directly next to the station. The station building had a tiled roof. It contained a waiting room, an office for the local freight clerk, and a room rented by the Usambara Railway as a ticket office . A larger residential building with a corrugated iron roof served as overnight accommodation for travelers.

Apart from the two termini, there were no train stations or stops. Trains would stop on the open track if necessary. The entire route was equipped with a telephone line for train safety. [3]

In the German era, the operation of the Sigi-bahn was the responsibility of the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (DKEBBG), which had also been operating the Usambara Railway since 1905. The DKEBBG was a subsidiary of Lenz & Co. in Berlin, which built and operated numerous narrow-gauge railways of various track gauges throughout the German Empire. [5]

The choice of a narrower gauge compared to the Usambara Railway meant that all goods had to be transshipped at the connecting station of Tengeni for onward transport. [4: p96] In addition to freight traffic, there was also public passenger traffic, as roads were scarce in the area around Sigi and Amani. Thus, from the beginning, the terminus at Sigi also served the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani. [4: p96]

Given the route, the average travel speed was only about 10 km/h, so a train needed 2 hours and 20 minutes for the entire journey. Trains were usually mixed passenger/goods services , with connections in Tengeni to and from trains on the Usambara Railway. Pure freight trains were also used when needed. The scheduled trains also carried mail and parcels to and from Sigi. Due to their more pleasant climate compared to the lowlands and coastal region, the Usambara Mountains were a popular destination for Europeans living in the colony. Their abundance of game also made them a popular destination for hunters. Therefore, the DKEBBG even offered special trains for tour groups from Tanga to Tengeni with a connection to Sigi. The DKEBBG advertised the journeys on the Sigi Railway:

A special trip to Tengeni for the purpose of touring the Sigi Railway and visiting the Agricultural Institute in Amani would cost 100 Rp. On the Sigi Railway, scheduled trains should be used at the regular fares. (One way 3.50 Rp.). … A trip on the Sigi Railway, with its magnificent views of wild gorges, lush valleys, and dense primeval forests, is one of the most beautiful excursions in German East Africa.” [6]

In passenger transport there was a so-called “European class” (1st class, fare 15 Heller per tariff kilometre = 3.50 Rupees/total distance) and a so-called “native class” (3rd class, fare 2.5 Heller per tariff kilometer = 0.60 Rupees/total distance). With the full commissioning of the line, great expectations were placed on its role in opening up the entire East Usambara region. [7]

The sawmill at the top of the Sigibahn was located directly on the Sigi River, by whose water power it operated. The Sigi River was dammed by a 36 m long dam. The water was channelled via a 150 m long water channel to a water wheel with a double ratio, which drove the various sawing machines. Bringing the wood from the storage area to the saws is done by a trolley. [7: p16]

The up and downs of the Sigi railway after World War I were due to differing opinions with regard to the economics of the line. Operational experience in the 1920s ultimately served to convince the Government of Tanganyika that there could be no place in the Territory’s pattern of communications for the operations of light railways. [2]

Locomotives in Older Literature

According to the few available sources, the Sigi Railway had two wood-fired tank locomotives of different power levels at its disposal for operating the line . The existence of at least one six-coupled locomotive is confirmed by the photograph of a train on the Kihuhui Bridge which is included in this article. [3]

Details regarding the locomotives vary depending on the source.

The locomotives were reportedly built by Orenstein & Koppel in 1904. [5: p6][8: p26] According to another source, the locomotives were built in 1910. [9] The more powerful of the two locomotives had an output of 50 hp, weighed 10.7 ton, had a driving wheel diameter of 580 mm, and a wheelbase of only 1,400 mm. The less powerful locomotive was said to have produced only 40 hp, with otherwise similar dimensions. The 40 hp locomotive could only haul a load of 13–14 t on the inclines. This meant that it was not even capable of pulling the regular, relatively light trains on the line alone, without the assistance of the second locomotive. [3]

According to a third source, the locomotive fleet consisted of one 45 hp and one 60 hp triple-coupled tender locomotive. [3][7: p15]

Locomotives in More Recent Evidence

The more powerful of the two locomotives, however, was clearly a Mallet locomotive of the B’Bn4vt type. A photograph in the collection of the colonial image archive of the University of Frankfurt/Main confirms the error in older literature. The locomotive pictured, with its Kobel chimney and the tender box for timber “attached” to the cab, is unequivocally a Mallet locomotive and not a six-coupled locomotive with a rigid chassis. The photograph is captioned ‘Train of the Sigibahn’. [3]

Between 1902 and 1912, the Orenstein & Koppel company built a large number of Mallets for plantation and narrow-gauge railways worldwide. At least visually, the Sigibahn locomotive is very similar to locomotive number 13 of the Frankfurt Feldbahn Museum (Orenstein & Koppel , B’Bn4vt, 1909/3902, 30 hp, 600 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 4 of the Gending/Java sugar factory, 600 mm gauge) and to the locomotive of the Statfold Barn Railway /England (Orenstein & Koppel, B’Bn4vt, 1905/1473, 60 hp, 762 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 5 of the Pakis Baru/Java sugar factory, 750 mm gauge). [3]

A Mallet locomotive was better suited to the railway’s needs than a six-coupled engine, as it could be fitted with a significantly larger boiler and four cylinders instead of two for increased power. The articulated design of the running gear resulted in good running characteristics, even on the tight curves of the track. [3]

Questions regarding the Sigibahn locomotives remain unanswered. However, it is established that the locomotives bore the operating numbers No. 1 and No. 2. The original bronze number plate of locomotive No. 2, bearing the inscription “Deutsche Holzgesellschaft für Ostafrika No. 2” (German Timber Company for East Africa No. 2) , has been preserved, is part of the collection of the German Historical Museum in Berlin, and is displayed there in the permanent exhibition. [3]

The locomotive plaque for Sigi-Bahn No. 2! © Kleinbahnen, and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA,4.0). [3]

Passenger Coaches and Goods Wagons

The rolling stock was modest. It consisted of only two-axle, semi-open passenger cars [5: p6-7] , two covered and two open two-axle goods wagons, six four-axle stake wagons for timber transport, two firewood wagons, and three track maintenance cars. When there was a large influx of passengers, they were occasionally transported in the two-axle open and covered freight cars. [3]

Despite the steep gradients, all the Sigi-bahn carriages were equipped only with hand brakes. This necessitated the presence of brakemen on the trains . The manufacturers of the carriages and wagons are not known. [3]

And Finally ….

In searching for more information about the Sigi-bahn I have discovered a forum link to a walk along the length of the Sigi-bahn which can be found here. [11]

.

2. Sisal Plantation Railways

Numerous privately owned, 600 mm gauge light railways operated throughout the coastal and Tanga regions, linking sisal estates to factories and main-line stations.

Sisal plantation railways were a crucial component of the German colonial agricultural economy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These networks, often referred to as ‘light railways’, were used to transport harvested sisal leaves from the fields to processing factories and eventually to the Tanga port for export.

Sisal cultivation and associated small-gauge rail systems were introduced in the 1890s, with a significant boost in the very early 20th century. The plantation lines typically branched off from the main Usambara Railway.

The Tanga sisal plantations contributed to over 60% of the country’s GDP at their peak. The history of these railways is deeply linked to the development of the Tanga port and the early industrialization of the region.

A sisal plantation in German East Africa in 1906, ©  Walther Dobbertin (CC BY-SA 3.0 de). [14]

An illustration of one of these lines in use in the 1960s can be seen here. [12]

Sisal production in the country peaked in 1964 with around 250,000 tonnes in production from regions from all over the country such as Tanga, Morogoro, Arusha, Mwanza and Shinyanga. In 1967 following the Arusha Declaration most of the sisal estates were nationalized by the government. This began the downfall of the sisal industry as bureaucracy, over-centralization and lack of experience caused the production to fall rapidly. Furthermore, with the increasing popularity of Synthetic Nylon fibers, drove the world price for sisal down resulting in the foreclosure of many sisal factories. By the end of Ujamaa and President Nyerere’s rule, sisal production had fallen from 235,000 tonnes in 1964 to 32,000 in 1985, less than 15% of the country’s peak.” [14]

Remnants of the 600mm-gauge lines appear in different places in the sisal fields of Tanzania. Two examples can be found on these links – here [13] and here. [15]

.

3. Later Industrial Lines

Later Industrial Narrow Gauge Lines included:

A. The Southern Province Railway

The Southern Province Railway was a short-lived, metre-gauge railway constructed by the Overseas Food Corporation to support the “Groundnut Scheme.” It ran for 212 km from the port of Mtwara to Nachingwea, and including various branch lines was a network of about 275 km of railway, all told. It was abandoned in 1963.

An extract from a photograph of a map of Tanzania’s railways taken by Kiplimo Koech. This photograph was shared by Kiplimo Koech on Facebook on 12th February 2026. [23]

When the British Government “decided to press on with the Groundnuts Scheme in the Southern Province, the railways were faced with the problem of transport to and from the areas of cultivation which were then only vaguely defined. As soon as more was known about the approximate location of the areas to be cultivated around Nachingwea, and the estimated tonnages to be moved between there and the coast, the railways undertook a study of the best way of meeting the requirements at the lowest transport cost. There were three possible sites for port works – Lindi creek, Mikindani and the Mtwara creek which forms part of the port of Mikindani. Reasonably reliable information was available about the route along the Lukuledi valley between the areas to be cultivated and Lindi creek, but very little was known of the topography and soil conditions over about so miles at the coastal end of the most likely route to Mikindani and Mtwara. No sort of survey was practicable at the time, as all routes were impassable due to the rains. Such information as was available indicated that this section would not be easy to build. The limitations of Lindi as a port were fully recognised, but the Administration of the Railways recommended the use of Lindi in the early years of the scheme, leaving the route to Mikindani and Mtwara and the possible sites for port works to be surveyed later when more precise information would be available regarding costs and tonnages to be carried. However, the Ministry of Food decided to send out im-mediately its own mission to consider the site of the port works. The mission, which arrived in the February of 1947, consisted solely of specialists in port operation and construction. They recommended that the port works be in Mtwara creek on the grounds that it offered the best harbour facilities. Little or no account was taken of the extra cost of railway construction, the possible difficulties of the route and the extra time which would be needed for construction. The Ministry of Food, which was solely responsible for financing the new port and railways, accepted the advice of the mission.” [22: p268-269]

The Railways’ Administration had meantime accepted responsibility for the survey and construction of the railway on behalf of the Managing Agents. In view of the importance attached to the Groundnuts Scheme, the Administration decided that the quickest way of providing a route of adequate capacity from the sea was to proceed from Mkwaya at the head of Lindi creek through Ruo – 20 kilometres from Mkwaya – to Nachingwea. The survey began in May, and the first contracts for earthworks were placed before the end of the year. The survey of the line from Mtwara to Ruo was entrusted to Messrs. Paulings, who were later awarded the contract for the construction. The Mkwaya-Ruo-Nachingwea route was opened to traffic on 25th October 1949. Due to physical difficulties, work on the Mtwara-Ruo section proceeded slowly, and due to financial difficulties Messrs. Paulings were released from the contract in the September of 1950. The Mtwara-Ruo section was finally opened on 17th January 1954.” [22: p269]

In addition to the needs of the Groundnuts Scheme, the railways were also concerned with the provision of transport for minerals. In 1947, a siding, about nine miles long, was built from the Mwanza branch to serve the Mwadui mine of Williamson’s Diamonds Limited. The Company met the cost of bridging and earthworks. … In the Mpanda district of the Western Province, a large lead-silver-copper-gold ore body was found, and Uruwira Minerals Ltd. undertook the development of a lead mine. It was decided, in 1946, to investigate the possibility of a branch line from Kaliua on the Central line to Mpanda. After a preliminary survey it was decided to build the line, about 131 miles long. By the end of 1947, 70 miles of the location survey had been completed, and contracts for the earthworks of the first 40 miles had been placed with three local contractors. This line was opened to traffic in the August of 1950.” [22: p269]

In 1947, the goods stock on the Central and Tanga lines was in a normal state of repair and overhauls were up to schedule. Like all other railways, the Tanganyika Railways suffered at the time from a shortage of tyres, springs, couplers and brake spares, but the percentage of wagons withdrawn from service due to this shortage was not abnormal. As soon as a preliminary estimate of the tonnage to be moved in connection with the Groundnuts Scheme was available, it was clear that the factor restricting the Railways’ capacity would be the supply of wagons. Orders were placed immediately in the United Kingdom but, in spite of the priorities obtained, deliveries could not be expected for two to three years. A world-wide search was made for metre-gauge stock to meet the demand during the intervening period – and to some extent as part of the permanent equipment. As a result wagons belonging to the War Office were found at Shaiba, near Basra, and at El Shatt, near Suez. A technical officer was sent to select suitable wagons, and those chosen were shipped as soon as possible. Because of exposure to the weather and pilfering they needed a fair amount of rehabilitation. By concentrating the resources of the Dar es Salaam workshops on the shipments as they arrived, the wagons were quickly put into service. In all, 430 four-wheeled wagons were obtained from Shaiba and El Shatt towards the end of 1947 and early in 1948. Later the purchase of these wagons was criticised as an unnecessarily expensive and unsatisfactory way of meeting a very urgent need. An effective answer is that 414 of the wagons were still giving good service in 1957.” [22: p269-270]

Moreover, these wagons arrived in Dar es Salaam at a most opportune moment. They enabled the ordinary traffic offered, the extraordinary traffic of the Groundnuts Scheme and construction materials to be carried during the very difficult time until the new wagons on order arrived in 1949 and 1950. The strain imposed on the capacity of the port and the Central line was exacerbated by the fact that the import of materials and equipment for the Groundnuts Scheme far exceeded the original estimates.” [22: p270]

As it turned out, the Southern Province Railway was an overambitious scheme. Construction took place between 1948 and 1954 to facilitate the export of groundnuts under the British Overseas Food Corporation’s ambitious post-World War II agricultural initiative. The scheme was intended to produce up to 600,000 tons of peanuts annually on cleared bushland to address food shortages and generate revenue, the project exemplified colonial-era top-down development but collapsed amid unsuitable clay-heavy soils, erratic rainfall, mechanical breakdowns, and overestimation of yields, resulting in total losses of £36 million by 1951. Despite the scheme’s abandonment, the single-track railway—built with 60-lb rails on untreated wooden sleepers—was completed and opened for limited traffic in January 1954, initially subsidized through joint guarantees by the Overseas Food Corporation and the Tanganyika government against predictable operating deficits. Its brief operation underscored the perils of ignoring local ecological realities in favour of imported heavy machinery and rapid mechanized clearing, leaving behind underutilized infrastructure that highlighted systemic flaws in mid-20th century imperial planning rather than delivering sustained economic benefits. [16]

The failure of the Groundnut Scheme should probably have resulted in a decision to abandon the construction of the railway, but the thinking at the time was that the line would promote significant growth in southern Tanganyika. After completion of the line and its branches it was placed under the same management as all the other metre-gauge lines in East Africa, with the East African Railways (EAR). [16]

Rather than being designed with longevity in mind. The network, focused on freight haulage with minimal passenger elements. It spanned key agricultural zones but was engineered for temporary use (for instance, using untreated timber for sleepers rather than steel), reflecting the scheme’s optimistic projections for short-term financial gain, rather than long-term viability! [16]

Initially the railway was steam-powered (series RV/21and NZ/22) but under EAR diesel-power was introduced (series 80 and 81).

East African Railways publicity photograph of No. 2217, circa. 1953. In the late 1940s, two of this 4-8-0 Class (TR NZ Class/EAR Class 22) were transferred to the Southern Province Railway, © Public Domain. [20]
East African Railways publicity photograph of TR No. 252, circa.  1953. These were a 4-8-2 development of the 2-8-2 TR MK class. The eight members of the RV class were built by Vulcan Foundry, in Newton-le-Willows, Lancashire. [21]
Two American outline diesel locomotives at work on the Southern Province Railway in the mid-20th century. [19]

It is at least possible that the prior existence of the Lindi tramway which at one time extended from Lindi to Masasi (in the latter year of WW1 and in the aftermath of the conflict) influenced, even if only subconsciously, the choice of this route and the inland areas it served for the groundnut project it was intended to serve. More information about this earlier trolley line which was powered by Ford tractors can be found elsewhere in this series of articles about the railways of Tanganyika/Tanzania.

The Route of the Southern Province Railway

This schematic route plan is provided by Wikipedia. It shows the main line from Mtwara Harbour to Nachingwea and notes two link lines to the Sisal Plantations at Muta-Narunyu and Karimjee. Two branch lines, one to Masasi, the other to Lindi Creek are also shown. The second of which also provided a link to Lindi Sisal Plantation. [17]

Two bridges over the River Lukuledi are also shown.

Mtwara Port was deepened by the British in 1948-1954. It was functional but underutilized for many years due to poor transport infrastructure. However, in 2010-2011 the increased activity in oil and natural gas exploration caused a surge in activity. It has recently seen major upgrades. The port has a special economic zone attached to it and In December 2015 Alistair Freeports Limited injected $700,000 to upgrade the Export processing zone around the port area. [18]

Mtwara City, Port and Gas Plant. [Google Maps, February 2026]

As we noted earlier, the Port at Mtwara was built towards the end of the construction period as an extension to the original length of line which ran to a port at Lindi. The extension to Mtwara came off the line to Lindi about 27 km from Lindi and ran for about 106 km serving Mikindani and Mtwara.

There is little that I have been able to find online which can be used to confirm the route of the railway. Some assumptions on the alignment of the railway can be made, whether they are warranted or not I cannot tell.

Should further information come to light the remaining paragraphs and images about this line will need to be revised. I can see two possibilities for the route of the old line:

1. The first possibility depends on an assumption that the railway will have been built with an access road alongside it. That access road is likely to have survived and become part of the lasting road network of the Southern Province of Tanzania.

Determining, conclusively, the route of the line would have been helped by the availability of Google Streetview images in the Southern Province of Tanzania. However Google Streetview imagery in Tanzania is primarily focused on key tourist locations and specific, curated, or partnered locations rather than comprehensive nationwide road mapping. Major coverage areas include Gombe National Park, parts of Zanzibar, and the Ngorongoro Crater rim.

The next three images show a possible route of the line between Mtwara and Nachingwea the grey lines are roads T6 running West from Mtwara, the T7 in the East serving Lindi, the T6 from Mingoyo to Nangana and the Nachingwea Road, West of Nangana.

In the West there was a branch line serving Lukuledi and Masasi, the route of which is much less clear.

These three map extracts come from Kartaview. They show the full length of the presumed route of the line from Mtwara to Nachingwea. The branch line to Lindi is also shown. The branch line to Masasi ran through Lukuledi, but its likely route is less easy to establish. [24]

My presumptions about the possible route of the line are called into question by the schematic route plan above which places the junction between the line serving Lindi at a place called Ruo. We will come back to this below.

In the East, close to Mtwara Port the alignment of the railway is very difficult to determine as it has probably been built over.

It is probable that the line from Mtwara Port followed the line of the T6 Northwest along the coast before turning inland adjacent to or on the line of the T6 which runs in a straight line South-southwest as far as its junction with Tanu Avenue. Here the road runs through reverse curves before continuing South-southwest. [24]
As we have already noted, a most likely alignment for the old railway follows the T6 as it travels West, through Mikindani and on towards a  junction at Mingoyo. [24]

Assuming that my assumptions are correct, at Mingoyo the line from Mtwara appears to have met the line to/from Lindi. It appears that trains to Lindi would have progressed without reversing. Trains to Nachingwea would have required the locomotive to run-round its train.

Assuming that the alignment of the T6 and T7 roads roughly follow the line of the old railway, it can be surmised that each train heading West would have required the locomotive to run-round the train. [24]
The coastal town and port of Lindi was the original eastern terminus of the Southern Province Railway which approached the town from the South along the route of the present T7 road shown grey on the map extract. [24]
A similar area as it appears on Google Maps satellite imagery. The line would have approached Lindi from the South on or alongside the T7 road which Google Maps annotates B2, then probably crossing Lindi Town Small Bridge and entering the Port from the South. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge seen from above. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge in the 21st century, © Khalid Sakewa and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [25]

The remainder of the route West to Nachingwea would follow the line suggested, along the T6 and the Nachingwea Road.

2. Given the complications associated with a junction at Mingoyo and the fact that the Wikipedia schematic route diagram indicates that the junction between the Lindi line and the Mtwara line was 14 km further South at Ruo, it is possible that the line from Lindi followed the T7 to Mingoyo and the the T6 to Mkwaya. However, following this route takes the line in the wrong direction to access a junction at Ruo which is some distance away to the Southwest. No bridge is shown over the Lukuledi river on the Lindi branch on the schematic route plan above. However, neither is a bridge shown on the line to/from Mtwara.

If, Ruo was the location of the junction at least one bridge over the Lukuledi would have been necessary, most probably on the line from Lindi.

As is painfully obvious from the paragraphs above, without significantly more information we can only speculate on the actual route of the old line.

.

B. Port of Bujumbura Railway

The Port of Bujumbura Railway whilst now within the neighbouring territory of Burundi, a 600 mm gauge industrial railway ran from 1947 to 1982 within the port area, servicing Lake Tanganyika traffic. Its operator was Office Congolais des Chemins des fer des Grands Lacs (CFL). [26] At the time of its construction, Bujumbura was known as Usumbura. [27].

.

C. Narrow Gauge Railways near Moshi

To the South of Moshi in the North of Tanzania, at Arusha Chini you will find the Sugar Cane Factory of TPC Ltd.

TPC Ltd (Tanganyika Planting Company) is a major sugar producer in Tanzania, established in 1930 and based in Moshi in the Kilimanjaro region. It operates a large integrated sugar estate and is considered a key player in East Africa’s sugar industry, representing about one-third of all sugar produced in Tanzania.

TPC achieved a record production of 116,691 tonnes of sugar during the 2022/23 season. The mill crushes over 1.1 million tonnes of sugarcane annually. [28]

During the harvesting season, this is a very busy network. Milling takes place from the end of June to the end of March, when trains operate 24 hours/day. All cane is brought to the factory by rail. [30]

Sugar production increased from 36,000 tonnes annually in 2000 to 116,700 tonnes in 2023, thanks to significant investments in field and infrastructure upgrades. TPC employs 1,900 permanent and 1,000 seasonal workers, contributing to local employment and community development. [29]

TPC is the only place in East Africa, other than the Gezira Light Railway of Sudan, where narrow gauge locomotives are in use in the 21st century. Two visits are recorded on the internationalsteam.co.uk website (by Thomas Kautzor in 2011, and Geoff Warren in 2013). [30]

The adjacent satellite image shows the location of the TPC Works in relation to Moshi and Kahe. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The green areas directly South of Moshi and around the TPC Works are irrigated areas given over to sugar cane cultivation.

This is a low resolution copy of a drawing photographed by Thomas Kautzor in 2012. It gives an idea of the network of railway associated with the TPC Works.

I have rotated the image so that the North point is close to vertical. Apologies to Thomas for the quality of this reproduction and thanks to him for allowing the reproduction of the image.

A better version of this image can be found on the internationalsteam.co.uk website page. [30] My thanks also to Thomas for allowing me to include a few photographs taken by him further down this article.

This image is again a satellite image but focussed this time more narrowly on the TPC Works. Careful inspection of this image will show some narrow gauge lines with trains travelling on them. For instance there is an almost complete circle of narrow-gauge rails centre-bottom of the image. That line can be seen running North up the West side of the factory and curving round at the top of the image to run down the Northeast side of the plant. The network of lines serving the factory is extensive and the next few satellite images will hopefully give a really good idea of the extent of the system. [Google Maps, April 2026]
This extract covers a small area at the centre-bottom of the last satellite image. A line can be seen leaving the South side of the Works building, running in a tight loop to head North alongside the works. A train of empty wagons can be seen heading North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

To the North, the train of empties is just about entering a series of long marshalling sidings. To the right of the locomotive and entering the works moving South is a line of loaded wagons. [Google Maps, April 2026]

On the right side of the next image below the marshalling sidings run bottom-right up to the top of the image. The line on which the full wagons sit runs parallel to the marshalling sidings. At the very toptowards the right of the image another locomotive can be seen. It seems to have brought train of loaded wagons to the work s and now appears to be running round its train, preparing to push the wagons South towards the loaded wagons on the right of the image.

This photograph shows the line used by loaded sugar cane wagons to approach the unloading bay, (c) Thomas Kautzor and used here with his kind permission. [30]
Having noted the line on the right of this image it is also important to note that a triangular junction leads to a line which heads West. There are clearly two sidings to the South of that line which serve the building just to the left of centre at the bottom of the image. It is not easy to see here, but a line also continues West, leaving the image on the South side of the fields of Sugar Cane. While another line leaves it to run South at the lefthand edge of the image. Inspection of the fields to the West and South of this image shows faint indications of these tracks. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Continuing North along the marshalling sidings, the locomotive noted above can be seen at the bottom of the adjacent image. Another train of loaded wagons can be seen to the left of the trees at the right side of the image.

The various lines can be seen converging as they run to the North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This image shows the next section of the line running North. The loaded train of wagons can be seen bottom-right.

A train of empty wagons appears to be running away from the works. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The image below shows that the train of empties is standing awaiting a locomotive to take it on its journey. Meanwhile another train of loaded wagons can be seen at the top edge of the image, to the North of the triangular rail junction. The line running down the Northeast side of the works can be seen leaving the image below in the bottom-right corner. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Please see the notes above. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Further to the North we can see that there are in fact two trains of loaded wagons sit waiting, in more marshalling sidings, to be taken forward to the factory.

Once the siding converge, a single line heads North away from the Works. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This image shows that line continuing to the North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows a much larger area than the extracts above. The red line running North from the bottom-right of the image shows the railway heading North away from the Works to serve the Northern end of the estate. The scope of the system is beginning to become more obvious as the network seeks to serve the full extent of the estate. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The lines further North. Some sidings appear to exist just to the North of the crossing near Born to Learn.
[Google Maps, April 2026]

The line continues North. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line runs North towards the southern suburbs of Moshi but terminates on Estate land.

A final length of the northern arm of the estate railway. [Google Maps, April 2026]

We return now to the triangular junction at the North end of the site of the Works.

These extracts from Google’s satellite imagery give a sense of the breadth of the network but do not fully cover every line to its fullest extent. A drawing of the network can be found on Thomas Kautzor’s article on internationalsteam.co.uk. [30]

The triangular junction at the North end of the Works is on the left in this satellite image. The line running down the Northeast side of the Works site leaves the junction and heads Southeast, leaving this image at the bottom-right. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues Southeast before turning away from the Works. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line turns to run Est-northeast along side this road. [Google Maps, April 2026]
This image covers a much larger area, the line can be seen curving around as on the last satellite image, in the bottom-left corner of this image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Just to the East of the junctions shown on the last satellite image another rake of loaded wagons can be seen. If a loco is in charge of the train it will be hidden under the tree at the western end of the rake of wagons. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line continues East-northeast to a point just beyond this next extract from the satellite imagery. It possible then turns North for a few hundred metres. [Google Maps, A[pril 2026]

The Sugar Mill has been operated by TPC Ltd since the turn of the millennium. At that time the rail network was in a poor condition. The Company have been gradually improving the network. In 2011, Thomas Kautzor says that there were 65 km of 2ft-gauge track with the intention of a final network of 80km. Kautzor explains the operation: “Empty cane wagons are taken from sidings into the fields for loading on piggy-back trailers pulled by tractors, two wagons per trailer. Trains are made up of 45 wagons and weigh 250 tons full. At the factory, a modern 1-track unloading facility recently replaced the former two tipplers. With the major problem being theft, metal sleepers are being replaced by concrete sleepers and the original rail by heavier 9 metre used rails obtained from TRL, which are then welded into 36 metre sections.” [30]

Kautzor also points out that “A now-disused 14 km metre-gauge branch used to link the factory to the main network at Kahe Junction … on the Tanga – Moshi line,” [30]

The route of the line is no longer shown on digital mapping but it seems as though a road now follows much of its route.

This next series of satellite images follow the line of the metre-gauge branch from the Works to Kahe junction. …

The terminus of the line was just to the Southeast of the main Works building which appears at the left of this image. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The line headed East. [Google Maps, April 2026]
For a short distance it ran just to the South of East. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Before turning to the Northeast. [Google Maps, April 2026]

The line remains on the same bearing until it reached the main line as the next 17 images show. [Google Maps, April 2026]

A slightly smaller scale shows the next length of the old branch line. [Google Maps, April 2026]
The same smaller scale shows the next length of the old branch line. [Google Maps, April 2026]
Back to the larger scale for the junction with the main line to the Southeast of Kahe Railway Station. [Google Maps, April 2026]

Kautzor notes that a third rail was laid along 12 km of the metre-gauge branch to allow the 2ft-gauge sugar cane trains access to the route. He also notes, and has photographed, three-rail points along this length of the line. [30]

A third rail has been added to what is now the redundant metre-gauge branch to the Works from Kahe. The extra rail allows the route to be used by the 2ft-gauge internal railways, (c) Thomas Kautzor and included here with his kind permission. [30]

Locomotives and Rolling Stock

Kautzor says that when the present owners took over the estate, “they found six four-wheel Motor Rail/Simplex T series diesels, built in the mid-1970s and rebuilt by Alan Keef in the mid-1990s (new 6 cylinder Perkins engines, ITL transmissions and AK “K” range axle-mounted drive boxes). The three that were in best condition (N°s. 3, 5 and 6) were rebuilt and are now used for shunting and works trains. A former Alan Keef Ltd. demonstrator (class K.100, Works N°. 48, 10-ton) was also sold to TPC in the mid-1990s, but no trace of it could be found.” [30] Photographs of these older locomotives can be found on the industrialsteam.co.uk website. [30]

For cane trains TPC uses three modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (5895/2004, 6036/2006 and 6376/2009, 16 tonnes, 180 h.p.), which are named after animals: NYATI (Buffalo), SIMBA (Lion) and TEMBO (Elephant). The locomotives are serviced in a modern four-track workshops, just opposite the wagons workshops. There are presently 154 modern cane wagons, which are built in Kenya.” [30]

One of three modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (Works No. 6376 of 2009, 16 tonnes, 180 h.p.). This is named TEMBO (Elephant). (c) Thomas Kautzor and used with his kind permission. [30][32]
Two slightly older modern Schöma CFL180DCLs (Works No. 5895 of 2004, named NYATI (Buffalo) and Works No. 6036, built in 2006, named SIMBA (Lion)) Both are16 tonnes, in weight and 180 h.p., (c) Thomas Kautzor and included here with his kind permission. Larger resolution images can be found on the internationalsteam.co.uk website [30][32]
Typical modern sugar cane wagons in use on the estate, (c) Thomas Kautzor and used with his kind permission. [30]

In November 2025, TPC Limited unveiled a major investment of $52 million (Tanzanian Sh130 billion) aimed at transforming Tanzania’s sugar industry by upgrading the sugarcane value chain and expanding into ethanol and technical alcohol production. The project marks a shift from selling raw molasses to processing it into multiple products that will create jobs, increase government revenue, and strengthen the economy through industrial output, alternative energy, and locally sourced raw materials. [31]

In November 2025, construction of the new facility was 30 per cent complete, with 70 per cent of the required materials already delivered. The project was expected to be completed by December 2026. After commissioning, TPC will produce 16.3 million litres of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ethanol) each year, positioning it among the country’s largest distilleries. The company will also manufacture 400,000 litres of technical alcohol annually for use in energy-saving cooking stoves, helping reduce reliance on firewood and charcoal. The plant will generate 8,000 tonnes of potassium fertiliser from molasses by-products, suitable for chemical-free farming, along with 400,000 litres of carbon dioxide for industrial applications, particularly in beverage factories. [31]

The project also features a new power plant capable of producing six megawatts of electricity, increasing TPC’s supply to TANESCO from the current 2–3 MW to 7 MW. … Its foundation stone will be laid by the Kilimanjaro Regional Commissioner, marking 25 years of cooperation between the Tanzanian government and Sukari Investment Limited under a public-private partnership.

It is worth noting that, “Since 2000, when the government sold 75 per cent of its TPC shares to Sukari Investment, sugar production has increased from 36,000 tonnes to 120,000 tonnes a year. Government revenue from the company has risen from Sh2 billion to Sh97 billion, while sugarcane yield has improved—from 66 tonnes per hectare to 150 tonnes—making TPC one of Africa’s most productive plantations and among the top three globally.” [31]

.

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  2. https://www.africabib.org/rec.php?RID=187591229, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  3. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigibahn, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  4. Franz Baltzer; The Colonial Railways with Special Consideration of Africa; Berlin 1916. Reprint, Leipzig 2008.
  5. Helmut Schroeter; The Railways of the Former German Protectorates of Africa and Their Vehicles = The Vehicles of the German Railways, Volume 7; Frankfurt 1961.
  6. German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (ed.): German East Africa – from the coast to Kilimanjaro with the Usambara Railway; Heinicke, Berlin, 1914.
  7. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cable car; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  8. Helmut Schroeter and Roel Ramaer; The railways in the former German protectorates then and now; Krefeld, 1993.
  9. Roel Ramaer; Gari la Moshi – Steam Locomotives of the East African Railways; Malmo 2009.
  10. https://postimg.cc/dDHY1F8g, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  11. https://bimmelbahn-forum.de/forum/index.php?thread/22289-die-sigibahn-auf-den-spuren-einer-privaten-schmalspurbahn-in-ostafrika, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  12. https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/sisal-leaves-are-taken-by-rail-for-processing-on-a-news-photo/88556860, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  13. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103739156.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sisal_production_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  15. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103738452.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  16. https://grokipedia.com/page/southern_province_railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Province_Railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mtwara_Port, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  19. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/mtwaras-forgotten-rails-a-glimpse-into-tanzanias-industrial-past, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_NZ_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_RV_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  22. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way – Volume II – The Story of Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957, p268-272.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DyhZvKm8J, accessed on 26th February 2026.
  24. https://kartaview.orghttps://kartaview.org, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  25. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg/500px-Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Burundi, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  27. https://www.sinfin.net/railways/world/burundi.html, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  28. https://miwasugar.com/tpc-sets-record-sugar-production-for-2022-23-season, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  29. https://www.tanzaniainvest.com/industry/tpc-limited-molasses-plant-moshi, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  30. https://www.internationalsteam.co.uk/trains/tanzania02.htm, accessed on 16th April 2026.
  31. https://www.chinimandi.com/tanzania-tpc-limited-announces-52-million-investment-to-boost-tanzanias-sugar-and-ethanol-production, accessed on 18th April 2026.
  32. Schoma is a German firm which produces robust locomotives for use in a variety of different contexts. They say of themselves that they manufacture the most robust and durable diesel, hybrid or battery-powered locomotives in the world and are experts for extreme conditions and the most difficult project requirements. … Under the English Channel or through the Alps, in the Underground of London, Athens, New York or Singapore and from America to Australia – Schoma locomotives operate on plantations, in peat bogs and tunnels all over the world. Their website provides full details of their range of locomotives. They also tefurbish their own locomotives for the secondhand market:  https://www.schoema.de/en/locomotives, accessed on 18th April 2026.

February 2026 – Kenya and Uganda Railways – Latest News

I spent 3 weeks in Uganda in February 2026. This short article picks up on local news reports about developments relating to railways in East Africa early in 2026. …. This article follows on from one published early in December 2025 which can be found here. [3]

The featured image above shows one of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) locomotives and its passenger train on the existing network in Kenya. [13]

Uganda

EOI – Uganda – Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan – EAC – Railway Rehabilitation Support Project

On 16th February 2026, the African Development Bank Group reported [1] that, the Government of Uganda had received financing from the African Development Fund (ADF) towards the cost of the EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (Refurbishment of Kampala-Malaba MGR), and intends to apply part of the agreed amount for this Grant to payments under the contract for Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan for the Uganda Railwaiys Corporation.

The overall objective of the assignment is for the Consultant to formulate a comprehensive railway transport master plan for the railway subsector in Uganda, including an international/multimodal transport strategy for Uganda 2026-2040.

Government Pushes to Secure 13 trillion UgX loan for Eastern SGR Line

NilePost reported on 19th February 2026 [2] that Uganda is fast-tracking final financing for the Malaba–Kampala Standard Gauge Railway, with talks underway with the Islamic Development Bank to unlock 13 trillion UgX. The project promises faster, cheaper cargo transport and stronger regional trade links!

High Level Discussions with the Islamic Development Bank

High-level discussions with the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) are seen as a critical step toward ‘financial closure’, which would trigger full-scale construction of the 273-kilometre Eastern Route.

The Minister of State for Works and Transport, Musa Ecweru, hosted an IsDB Appraisal Mission led by Dr. Issahaq Umar Iddrisu, Regional Hub Manager.

Discussions focused on integrating the SGR into a broader 3.9 trillion UgX ($800 million) Country Engagement Framework being finalised by IsDB with Uganda for 2025–2027.

‘This railway is transformative for Uganda and the wider region… time is of the essence; we should close financing early and proceed without delay’, Ecweru told the delegation.

The SGR is a strategic effort to replace Uganda’s century-old Metre Gauge Railway (MGR). Between 2015 and 2023, Uganda partnered with China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC), but Chinese lenders withdrew due to concerns over connectivity with Kenya’s SGR.

In October 2024, Uganda signed an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contract with Turkish firm Yapı Merkezi, drawing on the company’s experience with Tanzania’s SGR.

Subsequently, Uganda sought diversified financing from European export credit agencies and Islamic finance institutions, including IsDB, to fill the multibillion-euro funding gap.

The railway is designed for electric traction, supporting speeds of up to 120 km/h for passengers and 100 km/h for freight. It will carry up to 25 million tonnes of cargo annually, with 40% of the contract value reserved for Ugandan firms.

Currently, transporting a 40-foot container from Mombasa to Kampala costs about 14.6 million UgX ($3,500) by road. Once operational, the SGR is expected to reduce this to 6.3 million UgX ($1,500) while cutting transit times from several days to under 24 hours. Each train will be able to carry 216 containers—the equivalent of 200 trucks—significantly lowering road maintenance costs and carbon emissions.

Over 60 percent of the railway’s right-of-way has been acquired, with nearly 150 kilometres of land secured across Tororo, Butaleja, Namutumba, Luuka, Iganga, Mayuge, Jinja, and Buikwe districts.

Current efforts focus on the densely populated corridors of Mukono, Wakiso, and Kampala. The government has already invested more than 328 billion UgX in compensation and early works to mitigate risks associated with the project for international lenders.

The Malaba–Kampala line is a cornerstone of the Northern Corridor Integration Projects, linking Uganda to Kenya’s SGR and connecting the Great Lakes region—including Rwanda, South Sudan, and the DRC—to the Indian Ocean.

Bilateral talks with Kenya aim to ensure interoperability between Uganda’s European-standard line and Kenya’s Chinese-built tracks, supporting seamless “port-to-door” rail service. Although a change of traction will be required between diesel and electric systems at the international border

Under a ‘Limited Notice to Proceed’, Yapı Merkezi is already setting up sleeper factories and construction camps along the route, preparing for full-scale construction once financing is finalised.

On 20th February 2026, NTV Uganda reported that the Islamic Development Bank had agreed to inject 410 million euros into the Standard Gauge Railway project for the line from Malaba at the Uganda–Kenya border to Kampala. According to the Ministry of Works and Transport, the funding will cover 272 kilometres of the main Standard Gauge Railway corridor, as well as an additional 232 kilometres of lines linking key industrial hubs across the country. [10]

Uganda Railways Corporation Strategic Plan 2025/26 to 2029/30

Uganda Railways produced their strategic plan for the period to 2029/30 in September 2025. [4]

This somewhat out-of-focus plan shows the current metre-gauge network in Uganda. Only the black-dotted length is at present functional. The red-dotted lengths are in various states of disrepair. [4: p11]
Table 1 – Tabulated details of lengths of the railway lines in Uganda. [4: p11]

The Strategic Plan says: “Even with the ongoing efforts to rehabilitate the MGR, much of the railway network remains un-operational, with the few operational sections in poor condition characterised by low handling capacity, limited speeds amid occasional temporary speed restrictions, and low reliability and safety. This has resulted in an over-reliance on road transport in transporting cargo even when rail would be most suited. The impact is the increased costs of transportation that
continues to impact productivity, competitiveness and economic growth of Uganda.” [4]

An example of the current condition of the rail infrastructure is the state (in February 2026) of the line close to Pakwach in the North of Uganda.

Pakwach is on the West bank of the Albert (White) Nile. At its immediate location, a loop in the river means that it flows almost West to East with Pakwach on its North side. At Pakwach, there is a significant bridge over the Albert Nile. The two pictures below show the bridge and can be found on Google Maps (February 2026).

The Nile River Bridge at Pakwach was built primarily for the railway, but it was built wider than necessary for the railway to accommodate road vehicles. The railway track remains along the centre-line of the bridge, © Gankuba Andrew, 2025. [5]

1 hour agoSomali Regional State Distributes 110 Motorcycles to 64 Districts2 hours agoSomalia’s Electoral Body to Resume Voter Card Distribution, 400,000 IDs Uncollected

An aerial view, looking West, of the Nile River Bridge at Pakwach, © Godfrey Natale, 2025. [5]
The bridge seen from the Kampala/Gulu Road. [My photograph, February 2026]

The Pakwach Bridge, built in 1965 and commissioned in 1969, is a crucial, aging structure crossing the Albert Nile to connect Uganda’s West Nile region, South Sudan, and Congo. Currently experiencing structural cracks and flooding issues, it is being redesigned by China Communications Construction Company to support modern, heavy, multi-modal transport.  The replacement structure will be designed to accommodate both road and rail (metre-gauge and standard-gauge), pedestrian walkways and will also be able to accommodate the largest shipping that might use the Albert Nile. The project aims to facilitate the revival of the Pakwach Riverport (which became ineffective due to the poor headroom of the current bridge), and support regional trade. The bridge condition is very poor and at risk of collapse. Temporary measures are currently being considered to sustain vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the period before the new bridge is designed, built and opened. [6][7]

In early February 2026, as part of a visit to the Murchison Falls National Park we travelled alongside remnants of the old railway to the East of Pakwach on the East bank of the Albert Nile.

Pakwach is at the extreme left of this extract from Google Maps satellite imagery. The old railway crossed the Albert Nile on the bridge at the left of the image and curved around to the East. For the first few hundred yards it ran on the North side of the Arua/Gulu Road. [Google Maps, February 2026]

The railway heading for Gulu runs alongside the Gulu/Arua Road on the East bank of the Albert Nile. The pictures immediately below show remnants of the line which once sat on a low embankment between the road and the river. ….

Like elsewhere in Uganda, the metre-gauge line sat on steel sleepers to avoid the risk of termite damage to wooden sleepers. This and other images show that sections of the embankment have been washed away. [My photograph, February 2026]
Another length of the line where the river has washed away a section of the railway embankment when in spare. [My photograph, February 2026]
After running alongside the Arua/Gulu Road for a short distance, the old railway drifted away from the road to the North. Its  line can just be made out on this satellite image. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The line turned further towards North-northeast. Its route can again be picked out starting in the bottom left of this satellite image and running diagonally up the West side of the oil company site on the right of the image. The route of the old railway leaves the image centre-top. An access road to some safari lodges runs immediately to the West of the industrial site and can be seen crossing the line of the old railway, then running alongside it for a short distance before heading away to the North. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The murram road mentioned above turns once again to run parallel to the old railway which itself runs Northeast along the boundary of the petrochemical site. [Google Maps, February 2026]
We drove along the Bwana Tembo Road after leaving the Gulu/Arua Road and crossed the line a few times at the ‘m’ in ‘Tembo’ on the satellite image. The remains of the old railway continue alongside the road (to its Southeast). [Google Maps, February 2026]
We crossed the line at this point (the ‘m’ in ‘Tembo’) three times, the only photograph I have is from before dawn facing South en-route to an early morning safari. [My photograph, February 2026]
In amongst the undergrowth, the metre-gauge track can be made out. This location is perhaps one hundred metres to the Northeast of the road junction, taken looking South-southwest from our safari vehicle on our last day near Murchison Falls. [My photograph, February 2026]
Further Northeast the old line can be seen swinging away to the East before turning to the North. [Google Maps, February 2026]
The flat formation of the old railway can be seen here as it gradually begins to converge with the road. This photograph was taken facing East from the window of the safari vehicle. [My photograph, February 2026]
The road and old railway gradually converge as we travel North across this next satellite image. At the flag marking Tangi Safari Lodge, the two are once again immediately adjacent to each other. [Google Maps, February 2026]
Closer still to the road, this view looks East again. [My photograph, February 2026]
And closer still! [My photograph, February 2026]
This next slide shows the route of the old line turning through 180° to run away to the South. Its curved can be seen to the South of the flag of the MCC Student Centre. [Google Maps, February 2026]
A final photograph of the line, once again very close to the murram road. [My photograph, February 2026]

Hopefully, these few photographs, together with the images from Google Maps have given some impression of the condition of the metre-gauge line close to Pakwach in the 21st century.

Everything that I have seen of the metre-gauge (with the exception of the line between Torroro and Kampala) is reflected in these most recent pictures.

The Strategic Plan itemises the rolling stock that it owns – a total of 1,420 wagons of different types including flatbeds, tanks, covered wagons among others, and spread across the entire network (including Kenya and Tanzania). However, it says, the URC still faces
a big challenge of availability of rolling stock throughout the year with wagon and locomotives availability standing at 40% (505 fit wagons) and 46.5% respectively in the 2023/24 year. “Of the fit wagons, only 35% were flat beds yet they have a higher demand. Table 2 below shows the state of the Corporation’s wagons, plant & machinery as
at the end of December 2024.” [4: p12]

Table 2 – Status of URC Wagons, Plant & Machinery as at December 2024 – The table shows that the URC is operating below average
in terms of operating stock. Therefore, there is a need to improve rolling stock availability through timely maintenance as well and improvement of facilities at the different maintenance
workshops. [4: p12]

The reality is that URC has missed its freight targets by a significant margin over recent years as Table 3 shows.

URC’s performance against targets since 2020. [4: p14]

Table 3 shows that during the period July 2020 – December 2024, the URC network carried a total of 1,150,844 MT against a target of 2,175,170 MT, that is 53%. Of this, 77% were imports while 23% were exports.

Passenger Services

Passenger services were reintroduced under a pilot project in December 2015 as a response
to the increasing traffic congestion in Kampala City due to absence of organized public transport. Currently, the passenger train plies four trips daily between Kampala and Namanve. There was a hiatus of around 12 months in the provision of this service while the metre-gauge line between Kampala and Mukono was refurbished, with services restarting in May 2024. “The 30-minute journey has various halts in Nakawa, at Spedag, Kireka, and Namboole, finally terminating at Namanve with an average ridership of 4000 commuters per day.” [4: p15]

Logistics, Warehousing & Terminals

The URC operates three fully licensed, one-stop centres for warehousing, customs clearance, and UNBS checks: Mukono Inland Container Depot, PortBell and Jinja Piers (with the capacity to handle consolidation and
deconsolidation of cargo). Warehousing includes Gulu Logistics Hub, Mukono ICD,
Kampala Good shed, Mbale Good Shed, and Tororo Good Shed. [4: p16]

Challenges

The URC honestly reports a number of challenges which must be addressed in coming years [4: p34-36]

  • An outdated and inadequate policy, legal and regulatory framework, especially with standards in railway and inland water transport. Particularly, harmonisation of railway policies across the East African region.
  • Dilapidation of railway transport infrastructure and other assets. The larger portion of the existing MGR network remains in a poor state due to ageing of equipment, dilapidation of the network and out of date technology. In addition, the URC’s regional assets including upcountry stations, staff quarters,
    offices are in a poor state, poorly managed and left to the oversight of unknown occupants.
  • An increasing potential demand for passenger services in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area. The need for additional passenger stock in good serviceable condition. The need for new feasible passenger routes.
  • Limited integration with other modes of transport (road, water, air). The need for railway stations to become intermodal hubs is expressed in the strategic plan, but this would require new or replacement stations to be built and there to be a much more structured approach to other transport (boda-boda, matatu and long-distance buses) and a significant improvement in the rail network.
  • Very limited funding being made available for the URC Strategic Plan priorities. The previous plan set funding targets but only 9% of planned expenditure actually occurred! A serous increase in stakeholder funding is a paramount need for the URC’s future.
  • The human resource capacity is limited – at the end of March 2025 the URC had only been able to fill about 56% of its agreed staff structure.
  • Weak data management and reporting frameworks. A lack of a robust monitoring and evaluation system. It is, however, difficult to perceive what could usefully be measured that would produce a meaningful positive impact.
  • Massive encroachment onto URC land and vandalism of railway materials and property. In some regions of the country, encroachers have secured illegal land titles to URC land and illegal developments have taken place. The URC needs to complete a full survey of its property and must implement a land management strategy.
  • Public attitude to the railway is poor, many are unaware of its value, advertising of plans and services is poor, and big battles remain to be fought with those who have encroached on its assets

The situation is dire, the future of the metre-gauge seems to be uncertain and bleak!

The strategic plan sets, what must seem to all involved to be, and unobtainable goal: “A developed, adequate, safe, reliable and efficient multi–modal transport system in Uganda.” [4: p38] The fact that the overall goal is unrealistic means it is difficult to give a great deal of credence to any of the intentions which develop from it.

A more effective goal which did not aim at an unobtainable outcome might produce definite steps forward for the existing rail transport network.

Major societal change would be needed to create any form of intermodal transport system. Road transport is in the hands of a myriad of private business concerns all with their own interests and this appears to be very unlikely to change, especially not within the 5 year time frame of the plan.

Perhaps a more focussed and implementable plan is needed. Perhaps limited to improvements in the maintenance of the rail network itself. Perhaps focussing on passenger capacity on the one route currently available with a demonstrable improvement in commuting time on both road and rail as a result of an improved rail service. Perhaps setting realistic goals for the recovery of illegally occupied land over lengths of the metre-gauge line with a significant possibility of being brought back into effective use.

Recent and Upcoming Railway Tenders

UgandaTenders.com lists tendering opportunities for Railway activity in Uganda. These included:

  • Supply & Commissioning of Ten (10) New Diesel Electric Locomotives and Training of Maintenance & Operation Personnel – the East Africa Community Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (19th December 2025);
  • Rehabilitation of Malaba-jinja and Port Bell-kampala-kyengera Railway Line Sections Including Support Infrastructure (19th January 2026);
  • Drainage Improvement works on Kampala – Mukono Railway Line Section (5th March 2026);
  • Permanent way (Railway line works)(12th March 2026);
  • Consultancy Services to Develop the National Railway Transport Policy in Uganda – EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (12th March 2026); and
  • Consultancy Services for the Development/Preparation of the Railway Transport Master Plan – EAC-Railway Rehabilitation Support Project (12th March 2026).

Kenya

Kenya Railways Blog

In January 2026, the Kenya Railways Blog carried two articles:

A. Statement on Upcoming Railway Developments under the Nairobi Commuter Rail Service to Support AFCON 2027

Following a successful bid to co-host the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2027 alongside Uganda and Tanzania, the Government of Kenya is making preparations to host a successful tournament.

In Kenya, the games will be hosted at Nyayo National Stadium, Talanta Sports City Stadium and Moi International Sports Centre, Kasarani. Nyayo National Stadium is designated as a training centre during the tournament because of its central position.

One of the key initiatives being undertaken includes provision of an effective transport solution that will ensure easy access to and from the venues of the soccer event.

With this in mind, the Government intends to construct a railway station adjacent to Nyayo National Stadium and a railway spur line from the Nairobi Central station through Nyayo National Stadium area, Kibera to Talanta Sports City Stadium Stadium.

Kenya Railways is in the process of evicting any illegal occupiers of its land as it prepares for the construction of the line. All illegal structures and property found on the land within the corridor will be removed without further notice, at the cost of the individual or concern that built a structure or placed property on the land.

B. Successful Testride Signals Readiness of Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe MGR corridor

On 23rd January 2026 it reported that on 19th January 2026 that a successful test ride on the Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe Metre Gauge Railway (MGR) line had taken place, signalling renewed readiness to restore services along the critical corridor.

The exercise confirmed the safety, integrity and operational soundness of the restored infrastructure after months of intensive rehabilitation necessitated by severe washaways caused by unprecedented rains in 2024. Works carried out included embankment stabilisation, bridge strengthening, drainage reconstruction and track realignment to improve the corridor’s resilience to extreme weather conditions.

The Uplands–Longonot–Kijabe MGR line forms a key link within the MGR network, supporting passenger movement from Nairobi to Kisumu and freight movement from the Port of Mombasa to Kenya’s hinterland and regional markets across East and Central Africa. Its restoration reinforces Kenya Railways broader strategy of maintaining an integrated, resilient, and efficient rail system.

As the Corporation prepares for the progressive resumption of services along the corridor, the test ride marks not only a technical achievement, but a renewed commitment to reliability, safety and national development.

Kenya Railways Begins Preparations for Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba SGR Phases 2b and 2c

In an article dated 20th February 2026, Capital FM (Nairobi) reported that Kenya Railways has commenced preparations for the construction of the Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) Phases 2B and 2C.

The railway operator, in partnership with the National Land Commission (NLC), has deployed survey teams to the proposed Kisumu Terminus site, marking the boundaries for Phase 2B.

In a statement, Kenya Railways said the exercise involves identifying project boundaries, confirming affected land parcels, and measuring land sizes to facilitate the gazettement process.

The survey teams are using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology, a modern satellite-based system, to ensure precise and reliable measurements.

The preparatory work marks a key milestone in the expansion of Kenya’s SGR network, which aims to enhance regional connectivity and boost trade along the Nairobi-Kisumu-Malaba corridor. [11]

An SGR locomotive and passenger train on the existing network. [12]

View of Chinese-built Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) in Kenya

In a short publicity article dated 21st February 2026, the Chinese newsagency Xinhua uses pictures to describe travel on the SGR in Kenya on 17th February 2026. It can be found here … [13]

Stretching 472 km from the port city of Mombasa to the capital Nairobi in Kenya, the Chinese-built Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) was launched on 31st May 2017. It is the first new railway built in Kenya since independence and a flagship project of China-Kenya cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative.” [13]

This photo taken on 17th February 2026 shows the Nairobi Terminus of the SGR © Xinhua/Xie Jianfei. [13]

Recent and Upcoming Railway Tenders

A snapshot of current and planned tenders for railway work.

  • Consultancy Services For Design Review And Construction Supervision For The Proposed Construction Of Nairobi Railway City Central Station, Public Realm And Other Associated Infrastructure Works (15th January 2026);
  • Consultancy Services For Design Review And Construction Supervision For The Proposed Standard Gauge Railway From Naivasha \U2013 Kisumu (Phase 2B) (15th January 2026);
  • Proposed Construction Of Limuru Railway
    Station And Associated Facilities (23rd January 2026); and
  • Supply And Delivery Of Rail Fittings And Fasteners For Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) (20th February 2026).

Kenya 2026 Budget Policy Prioritises Rail And Logistics Modernisation

Phillippa Dean of Railways Africa reports [15]that:

Kenya’s 2026 Budget Policy Statement sets out a programme of infrastructure and policy interventions aimed at accelerating economic transformation, lowering the cost of doing business and improving the movement of people and goods. Transport and logistics feature prominently, with rail identified as a key enabler of national competitiveness and regional connectivity.

The Government confirms that it has completed construction of the Miritini MGR Station at the Mombasa Terminus, including a new metre gauge railway link and a railway bridge across the Makupa Causeway. The works are intended to provide seamless first- and last-mile connectivity for Standard Gauge Railway passengers.

As part of efforts to strengthen the transport policy framework, the Government has developed the National E-Mobility Policy to guide the transition to clean and sustainable transport technologies, the National Road Safety Action Plan 2024 to 2025, and the National Logistics and Freight Strategy for horticulture exports.

A comprehensive ten-year infrastructure programme is planned to address existing gaps. This includes dualling 2,500 kilometres of priority highways, surfacing an additional 28,000 kilometres of roads and expanding strategic transport corridors through Public Private Partnerships. Rail development forms part of this wider transport and logistics modernisation agenda.

The extension of the Standard Gauge Railway from Naivasha to Kisumu and onward to Malaba has begun, marking a step towards enhanced regional connectivity. The statement also identifies modernisation of the railway system as a priority within the broader transport and logistics investment framework.

Performance data included in the statement show that the services sector recorded growth of 4.8 percent in the first quarter, 5.5 percent in the second quarter and 5.4 percent in the third quarter of 2025. Within this, the transportation and storage sub-sector expanded by 3.7 percent, 5.4 percent and 5.2 percent respectively, across the same quarters. Growth in the sub-sector was supported by increased activity in road, water and air transport, as well as railway operations.

Transport and logistics investments also extend to the modernisation of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, the building of a new international airport, development at the Ports of Mombasa and Lamu and reforms aimed at restoring the operational and financial stability of Kenya Airways. Additional priorities include completing port berths, establishing logistics hubs and enhancing maritime safety through programmes such as Vijana Baharia.

The statement highlights the scale of public sector exposure within the rail sector. The cumulative on-lent loan portfolio stands at KSh 1,051.1 billion, of which Kenya Railways Corporation accounts for KSh 547.4 billion, representing 52 percent of the total. This concentration reflects a significant exposure within a single entity.

Overall, the Budget Policy Statement frames the modernisation and expansion of transport and logistics infrastructure, including rail, as essential to connecting markets, reducing the cost of doing business and reinforcing Kenya’s position as an aviation and commercial hub for East and Central Africa. [15]

Freight Trains Poised for Return as Kenya Railways Clears Key Rift Valley Corridor

An article carried by Dawan Africa on 19th January 2026 reported that: [16]

After months of silence on the tracks, freight trains are edging closer to a comeback along the vital Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway corridor, offering fresh hope to traders and businesses that rely on rail transport across the region.

Kenya Railways has announced that after heavy rain disruption in April 2024 halted services, the vital Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway is ready for freight trains, promising lower costs and stronger regional trade links once slope protection works are finalised. [16]

Kenya Railways Corporation has confirmed that rehabilitation works on the route, which was severely damaged by heavy rains in April 2024, have been fully completed. The disruption forced a suspension of freight services, cutting off a key link in the transport chain between the coast, western Kenya and neighbouring countries.

In a statement issued on Monday, the corporation said the line has undergone successful test runs, clearing it for safe operations.

Engineers are now finalising slope protection works, a precautionary measure aimed at reinforcing the corridor and preventing future damage, especially during periods of heavy rainfall.

“Rehabilitation works on the Uplands–Kijabe–Longonot railway corridor are now 100% complete, with successful test rides conducted to confirm the safety and operational readiness of the line,” Kenya Railways said. “The only remaining activity is slope protection works, which are being finalised to enhance long-term stability and safety.”

While no specific date has been given for the resumption of freight services, the corporation said preparations are already underway. Once operational, the corridor is expected to play a critical role in easing the movement of goods from the Port of Mombasa to Nyanza and Western Kenya, while also strengthening regional trade links with Uganda, Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan.

The announcement signals renewed momentum in Kenya Railways’ broader recovery efforts following weather-related disruptions. It also comes just weeks after the corporation reinstated the Kisumu Safari Train, which had been grounded for nearly a year.

That service was revived in December to meet increased festive season travel demand to the lakeside city, offering passengers a safer and more affordable alternative during one of the busiest periods of the year. Kenya Railways said the move helped ease pressure caused by last-minute bookings and limited transport options.

With freight trains now set to follow suit, the reopening of the Kijabe corridor is expected to reduce pressure on roads, cut transport costs and restore confidence in rail as a dependable backbone for trade and travel across the region. [16]

A Formal Start to Construction of the SGR Extension

Baringo News reports that on 19th March 2026, President William Ruto is scheduled to launch the extension of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) from Suswa to Western Kenya, culminating at the Kenya–Uganda border. [17]

References

  1. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/eoi-uganda-consultancy-services-development/preparation-railway-transport-master-plan-eac-railway-rehabilitation-support-project, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  2. Muhamadi Matovu; Government Pushes to Secure 13 trillion UgX loan for Eastern SGR Line; Nile Post, 19th February 2026; via https://nilepost.co.ug/news/321483/government-pushes-to-secure-shs13tn-for-eastern-sgr-line, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  3. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/12/08/east-africa-railway-news-november-december-2025
  4. https://urc.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/UGANDA-RAILWAYS-CORPORATION-STRATEGIC-PLAN-2025-2030.pdf, accessed on 19th February 2026.
  5. https://www.google.com/search?q=pakwach+railway+bridge&oq=pakwach+railway+bridge&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRigATIHCAUQIRifBTIHCAYQIRifBTIHCAcQIRifBTIHCAgQIRifBTIHCAkQIRifBTIHCAoQIRifBTIHCAsQIRifBTIHCAwQIRifBTIHCA0QIRifBTIHCA4QIRifBdIBCDgyNzNqMGo0qAIOsAIB8QUKhe7sSbfrtg&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#ebo=0, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  6. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3Dx7OnY4J7P-A%26t%3D1&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAC&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  7. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DGaSzMHwCeJE&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAH&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  8. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DvE6zWiVqrAU%26t%3D176&ved=2ahUKEwj5v9jBsueSAxX_AfsDHe6CDOEQ1fkOegQIBhAM&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2NRWNatNO6rcpgYu80wHyD&ust=1771653710053000, accessed on 20th February 2026.
  9. https://www.ugandatenders.com/products-services/railway-tenders, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  10. https://ntv.co.ug/business/islamic-development-bank-injects-e410-million-into-standard-gauge-railway-project, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  11. https://allafrica.com/stories/202602200111.html, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  12. https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2026/02/kenya-railways-begins-preparations-for-naivasha-kisumu-malaba-sgr-phases-2b-and-2c, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  13. https://english.news.cn/africa/20260221/bc972d7830534c8d8f7007b18e2a39b5/c.html, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  14. https://www.tendersontime.com/kenya-tenders/railway-tenders, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  15. https://www.railwaysafrica.com/news/kenya-2026-budget-policy-prioritises-rail-and-logistics-modernisation, accessed 21st February 2026.
  16. https://www.dawan.africa/news/freight-trains-poised-for-return-as-kenya-railways-clears-key-rift-valley-corridor, accessed on 21st February 2026.
  17. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CWEsPiTbk, accessed on 21st February 2026.

The Nice to Digne-les Bains Line in Provence-Cote d’Azur again. …

The featured image above shows one of the present modern diesel units at the Chemins de Fer du Sud/Chemin de Fer de Provence station in Nice. [4]

I discovered this Video on YouTube recently (October 2025) – it looks at the line in 1973. The commentary is in French. The changes to the line in the 52 years since 1973 have been significant!

2025 News!

A. Stadler to Deliver Hybrid Trains in Southern France

Among other news providers, on 16th April 2025, Railway-News reported that Stadler had signed a contract with Région Sud to supply eight customised hybrid multiple units for Chemins de fer de Provence (CP). The full article can be found here. [2]

The new units will replace older diesel units currently in use on the 150-kilometre route.

Designed for both urban and rural operation, the trains combine battery and biodiesel-powered drive systems. This hybrid configuration is expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by up to 77% compared with conventional diesel vehicles. … A battery charging facility is being constructed in Nice as part of the supporting infrastructure for the new fleet.” [2]

The trains are being manufactured at Stadler’s facility in Bussnang, Switzerland. The vehicles will be delivered and commissioned by 2028. [2]

This image of the new hybrid units comes from l’Editions du Cabri website. [5]
Stadler will deliver eight customised hybrid metre-gauge multiple units, © Stadler. [2]

B. Chemins De Fer de Provence (CP ZOU) and Ligne d’Azur

On 11th August 2025, the Chemins de Fer de Provence confirmed that its urban stops between Nice and Le Chaudan are available with a Lignes d’Azur ticket. In parallel the railway company announced that it was increasing the frequency of its services
between Nice and Colomars, with 4 additional evening round trips on Fridays and Saturdays. Further details can be found here. [3]

C. Nice-Matin: More travelers and more challenges on the Chemins de Fer de Provence

Nice-Matin’s latest article about the Chemins de Fer de Provence published on 5th October 2025. Highlights a significant rise in passenger numbers since July 2023. Since July 2023 and the agreement with Lignes d’Azur making it possible to take the train with the same ticket as for the bus or tram, attendance has increased considerably.

Jean-Paul David, regional councilor and president of the Regional Transport Authority says: “We have counted 450,000 trips in 2022, 500,000 trips in 2024 and we will probably be at 630,000 by the end of the year.“Train frequency has increased to 20 minutes during peak hours!” The full article can be seen here. [6]

D. Work to re-open the line to Digne-les-Bains.

Infrastructure work on the line between Nice and Digne-les-Bains is ongoing. It includes reconstruction of a section of the 2 km Moriez tunnel where a 25 m section about 400 m from the western portal collapsed in February 2019. The job is due to be completed at the end of 2025, paving the way for through rail services from Nice to Digne-les-Bains to be reinstated from early 2026. [7]

The 151 km route has 25 tunnels with a combined length of 11 km and two covered cuttings. The line also features 102 masonry or metal bridges and numerous other structures. Services carry around 500 000 passengers a year. [7]

References

  1. https://youtu.be/ipq6KaLONyo, accessed on 14th October 2025.
  2. https://railway-news.com/stadler-to-deliver-hybrid-trains-in-southern-france, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  3. https://www.cpzou.fr/en/news/cp-zou-with-lignes-dazur, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  4. https://www.seeprovence.com/reviews/train-des-pignes-nice-689015, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  5. https://laboutiqueducabri.fr/les-nouvelles-rames-des-chemins-de-fer-de-provence, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  6. https://www.nicematin.com/societe/transports/plus-de-voyageurs-et-plus-d-enjeux-sur-les-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-10650930, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  7. https://www.railwaygazette.com/passenger/funding-deal-secures-future-of-nice-digne-line/67147.article, accessed on 15th October 2025.

A Tramway in the Valley of the River Roya? (Early 20th Century)

A proposed tramway that did not get built. … The featured image is a  map showing the full length of the proposed line which followed National Route No. 204 in France.

Late in the 19th century before a link from Vievola to the Mediterranean was really on the agenda. Alongside the experimental ‘Train Scotte’, [1: p40][2][3] a “local engineer, M. Chatelanat, proposed building a tramway line between Vievola station … and Ventimiglia. He knew the region well, having just overseen the construction of the rack railway from Monte Carlo to La Turbie. [4] Here is the project he presented in an application filed on 7th February 1899.” … [1: p47]

The submission made by M. Chatelanat began, “The electric tramway for which we are requesting a concession is intended to facilitate the movement of passengers and goods in the Roya Valley through a rapid, convenient, and economical means of communication. Currently, to reach Nice and the other communes of the department, the population of the French part of this valley must either travel more than 60 kilometers along the old Nice-Cuneo road, crossing the foothills of Brouis and Braus, in unsafe conditions due to the steep slopes, the height of the passes, and, in winter, the seasonal inclement weather. Or, since the opening of the national road from Breil to Ventimiglia, travel approximately 30 kilometers and cross two customs lines to join the coastal railway line in Ventimiglia. … Between the coast and Upper Piedmont, especially the province of Cuneo, there is a very intense movement of population every year, but if you want to go by train, you have to make a long detour via Savona, which is long and expensive. The province of Cuneo sends to Nice and the coast some of its products that our region cannot obtain elsewhere. On the other hand, our particular products from the South are in demand and consumed in the upper Po Valley. Facilitating the movement of travelers and this exchange of products between Piedmont and the coast will at the same time allow the French populations of the Roya Valley to come easily and quickly to Nice to stock up and connect with the entire French coast without having to cross the Braus and Brouis passes, such is the goal we are pursuing.” [1: p47]

There were a number of projects of this nature being explored at the time. The tramway between Menton and Sospel is an excellent example. [5][6] Others in the valley of the River Var and in the valley of the River Paillon were also built.

M. Chatelanat continues to explain how up to that time it had not been possible to devise a railway scheme that enable a link between Nice and Cuneo. His proposed tramway was not claimed to be a replacement for the planned railway, but while awaiting the development of the railway scheme, the tramway would “provide great services by greatly reducing the communication difficulties between the two regions.  The project [would] not provide the speed of the railway, it [would] require two transshipments at Ventimiglia and Tende. Nevertheless, the transport of goods [would] be significantly more economical and passengers [would] find facilities and comfort there which [would] undoubtedly give the population satisfaction, if not complete, at least acceptable. The electric tramway, executed at a width of 1 metre with gradients of up to 70 mm/m and curves down to 20 metres in radius [could not] be used for the passage of standard-gauge locomotives and wagons, and therefore [could not] be used in the event of war.” [1: p48]

Concern about possible conflict was paramount in the minds of many and projects were vetted and often vetoed by the military. M. Castelanat went on to explain that power for the section of the line  would be supplied from a hydraulic plant close to Breil-sur-Roya which could easily be put out of action, and if the overhead cables were also removed no use would be possible. He was sure that no advantage would be gained by a future enemy and that “The tramway must therefore be considered a commercial means of communication with no possibility of use in the event of war.” [1: p49]

Castelanat confirmed that electrical operation would mean no problem would be encountered with gradients up to 7% without the need for any regrading of the highway. He planned stations at Breil, Giandola, Saorge, Fontan, and Berghe. The tramway would use National Road No. 204 without any deviations and would cost around 1,400,000 francs. This tramway would, strictly speaking, be only a section of an international line which would have its origin in Ventimiglia and which would go up the valley of the Roya.

A conference including all the statutory interested parties was arranged for 23rd November 1899. Differing views were expressed about whether the tramway could provide a military advantage to the enemy in the case of war. A few months after the conference, on 2nd May 1900, “Chief Engineer Aubé of the Ponts et Chaussées (Roads and Bridges Department) reached the following conclusions: ‘The establishment of the planned electric tramway has lost much of its appeal since the military authorities ceased, with certain reservations, to oppose the construction of the railway from Nice to Sospel and to the Italian border, near Fontan. This line would, in fact, provide the French population of the Roya Valley with the access to Nice they were willing to seek in an economical manner by means of the tramway connecting them to the international station at Ventimiglia‘.” [1: p50]

The effect of the military’s withdrawal of their opposition to the Nice-Sospel-Fontan line was to  render the tramway proposals obsolete. It was 1904 before “an international conference finally approved the construction of the Vievola – Breil – Ventimiglia and Breil – Sospel – Nice railway sections. … [Nevertheless] two tram lines were created [in the area]: one from Menton to Sospel, which operated from 1912 to 1931, [5][6] and a line from Ventimiglia to Bordighera, which operated from 1901 to 1936.” [1: p50]

Instead of the ‘Train Scotte’ and a tramway, from perhaps as early as 1900, but definitely by 1st September 1906, a service connecting with trains was introduced between Vievola station and Ventimiglia. The two images below show the mixture of different vehicles in use. Both focus on the road on the West side of the station building at Vievola.

The public road to the West of Vievola Railway Station building with an interesting range of vehicles preparing to travel to Ventimiglia – stagecoaches, other horse drawn carriages, modern internal combustion engined vehicles. This image was shared on the Ferrovia Internazionale Cuneo-Ventimiglia-Nizza Facebook Group by Mario Zauli on 24th November 2014, © Public Domain. [8]
A postcard view of the same location. The image looks North along the face of the station building. [9]

Banaudo et al provide details of a bus service which started on 1st September 1906. The bus service between Vievola and Ventimiglia provided two buses a day from Vievola to Ventimiglia, the first leaving Vievola at 12:15 and arriving in Ventimiglia at 17:00, the second leaving Vievola at 20:40 and arriving in Ventimiglia at 0:40. The cost of the full journey was 5 lire/person. [1: p52]

The advert in the local paper commented that, “Without making the tedious Bastia-Savona detour, travelers can reach the Nice or western Ligurian coast from Cuneo and nearby towns in just a few hours, take care of their business, and return to their hometowns the same day, if they wish, even finding enough time in Vievola to refuel. Every modern comfort will be available in the station buffet, since, with appropriate consideration, the owner, Mr. Giuseppe Borgogno, has asked the Italian State Railways Administration to expand and repurpose the space for this purpose.” [1: p52]

Banaudo et al share details of services which developed over the next few years with pictures of the various buses in use. [1: p52-56]

Other photographs of these bus services include:

This photograph shows two of these autobuses at San Dalmazzo di Tende. It was shared on the Ferrovia Internazionale Cuneo-Ventimiglia-Nizza Facebook Group by Mario Zauli on 28th April 2022, © Public Domain. [10]

References

  1. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 1: 1858-1928; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  2. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-2
  3. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/miscellaneous-steam-powered-road-vehicles-scotte-steam-road-vehicles
  4. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2017/11/23/monaco-to-la-turbie-rack-railway-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-15
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/02/23/the-sospel-to-menton-tramway-revisited-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-51
  6. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/06/08/the-menton-to-sospel-tramway-revisited-again-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-61
  7. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/43.9593/7.5662&layers=P, accessed on 27th July 2025.
  8. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19YSXYvX1Y, accessed on 27th July 2023.
  9. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=105633, accessed on 26th July 2025.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19KFiXiVc2, accessed on 27th July 2025.

Three Beyer-Garratts in East Africa in the 1950s

The December 1958 issue of The Railway Magazine featured three photographs of Beyer Garrett locomotives at work in East Africa. These were giants of the metre-gauge that grappled with long loads on steep inclines and at times sharply curved track radii. [1]

1. EAR Class ’55’ Garratt No. 5504 at Diva River

Class ’55’ Garratt No. 5504 on the up mixed train at Dura River. [1: p849]

The KUR EC5 class was a class of 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge 4-8-2+2-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built during the latter stages of World War II by Beyer, Peacock & Co. in Gorton, Manchester for the War Department of the United Kingdom. The two members of the class entered service on the Kenya-Uganda Railway (KUR) in 1945. They were part of a batch of 20 locomotives, the rest of which were sent to either India or Burma. [2: p64]

The following year, 1946, four locomotives from that batch were acquired by the Tanganyika Railway (TR) from Burma. They entered service on the TR as the TR GB class. [2: p64]

In 1949, upon the merger of the KUR and the TR to form the East African Railways (EAR), the EC5 and GB classes were combined as the EAR 55 class. In 1952, the EAR acquired five more of the War Department batch of 20 from Burma, where they had been Burma Railways class GD; these five locomotives were then added to the EAR 55 class, bringing the total number of that class to 11 units. [2: p64]

This locomotive was Works No. 7151, War Department No. 74235, War Department India No. 423. It was one of the two that went to Burma Railways (their No. 852) from where it was purchased by Tanganyika Railways in 1946 and became their No. 751. It came to the EAR in 1949 and received the No. 5504. [3]

Sister locomotives in Class 55 can be seen here [7] and here. [8]

Dura River was the last station on the Western Extension before the end of the line at Kasese, Uganda. The River flowed North to South towards Lake George and was crossed by the railway at the Eastern edge of the Queen Elizabeth National Park. Mapping and satellite imagery in the area are not highly detailed – the following images are the best I can provide. …

The mapping which appears on the Google search engine when searching for the National Park. This enlarged extract focuses on the railway bridges which cross the Mubuku and Dura rivers. The line of the railway is shown in grey. [4]
The OpenStreetMap view of the same location, highlighting the bridge over the river. [5]
Google Maps satellite imagery focussed on the same location. The line of trees which sit above the swampy ground mark the line of the railway embankment. [Google Maps, July 2025]
Crossing the Dura River/Swamp. The sign is a Momentum Board, which refers to the opposing gradient being steeper than the ruling gradient. The figures mean that the driver should achieve a speed of 18 mph at a distance of 4 furlongs (8 half furlongs) from the sign. The train’s maximum speed was 25 mph, © Geoffrey Parsons. [6]

2. EAR Class ’58’ Garratt No. 5804 near Kikuyu

Nairobi-Kisumu train near Kikuyu with a ’58’ class Garratt No. 5804, © C. W. Stuart. [1: p849]

The EAR 58 class was a class of 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge, 4-8-4+4-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built by Beyer, Peacock & Co. in Manchester, England, in 1949. [9]

Another view of No. 5804, apparently it was the only one of the class to bear the lettering ‘EAR&H’, all others in the class bore ‘EAR’, © gruntie916 and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0). [10]

The eighteen members of the class were ordered by the Kenya-Uganda Railway (KUR) immediately after World War II, and were a slightly modified, oil-burning version of the KUR’s existing coal-fired EC3 class. By the time the new locomotives were built and entered service, the KUR had been succeeded by the East African Railways (EAR), which designated the coal-fired EC3s as its 57 class, and the new, oil-burning EC3s as its 58 class. [2: p66][9]

No. 5804 was built in 1949 (Works No. 7293) and originally given the KUR No. 92. Its sister locomotive No. 5808 (Works No. 7297, given KUR No. 96 but never carried that number) was the first to enter service with the EAR. [9]

EAR ‘Class 58’ Locomotive No. 5803 (a sister to 5804) is seen here at Changamwe, Kenya, with the Mombasa–Kampala mail train, circa 1950-51. [9]

Other locomotives in the class can be seen here, [11] here, [12] and here. [13]

Kikuyu Station is 20 kilometres or so from Nairobi, during construction of the railway, railway officers established a temporary base in Kikuyu while they supervised work on the laying of the track down at the rift valley escarpment.

Kikuyu Railway Station while construction in the Rift Valley was ongoing, © Public Domain. [14]
Kikuyu Railway Station in modern times, © Shiku Njathi, used with their kind permission. For the intermediate and original sources please see reference [15]

3. EAR Class ’60’ Garratt No. 6021 at Kasese

Daily mixed train, headed by class ’60’ Beyer-Garratt locomotive No. 6021, Sir William Gowers,” about to leave Kasese, terminus of the East African Railways & Harbours Western Extension in Uganda. [1: p849]

The EAR 60 class, also known as the Governor class, was a 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) gauge 4-8-2+2-8-4 Garratt-type articulated steam locomotives built for the East African Railways as a development of the EAR’s existing 56 class. [2: p77]

The 29 members of the 60 class were ordered by the EAR from Beyer, Peacock & Co. The first 12 of them were built by sub-contractors Société Franco-Belge in Raismes (Valenciennes), France, and the rest were built by Beyer, Peacock in Gorton. The class entered service in 1953-54. [2: p77]

Initially, all members of the class carried the name of a Governor (or equivalent) of Kenya, Tanganyika or Uganda, but later all of the Governor nameplates were removed. [2: p77]

No. 6021 was built by Beyer Peacock (Works No. 7663). It was not one of the class built by sub-contractors Société Franco-Belge. It was given the name ‘Sir William Gowers’ when first put into service, losing the name along with other members of the class in the 1960s after independence. …

Sister locomotive, EAR Class 60 locomotive No. 6019 at Tabora Depot in Tanzania, © Basil Roberts and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [16]

Other members of the class can be seen here, [17] here, [18] and here. [19]

Kasese Station only became part of the rail network in Uganda in 1956. The construction costs of the whole line from Kampala were very greatly affected by the difficult nature of the country in the final forty miles before Kasese. Severe problems were presented by the descent of the escarpment, which involves a spiral at one point, while from the foot there is an 18-mile crossing of papyrus swamp through which a causeway had to be built, entailing a vast amount of labour. The extension to Kasese was built primarily to serve the Kilembe copper mines. Construction of the line from Kampala to Kasese took approximately five years. [21]

The station building at Kasese in the 21st century, © Michael Branz and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [20]
An extract from OpenStreetMap’s mapping showing Kasese Railway Station and turning triangle. The station was not the end of the line as it continued a short distance to the Kilembe Mines that it was built to serve. [21]

References

  1. Garratts in East Africa; in The Railway Magazine Volume 104 No. 692, December 1958, p849.
  2. Roel Ramaer; Steam Locomotives of the East African Railways. David & Charles Locomotive Studies; David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1974.
  3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/KUR_EC5_class, accessed on 7th July 2025.
  4. https://www.google.com/search?q=queen+elizabth+yganda&oq=queen+elizabth+yganda&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQABgNGIAEMgkIAhAAGA0YgAQyCAgDEAAYFhgeMggIBBAAGBYYHjIICAUQABgWGB4yCggGEAAYCBgNGB4yCggHEAAYCBgNGB4yCggIEAAYCBgNGB4yCggJEAAYCBgNGB4yCggKEAAYCBgNGB4yCggLEAAYCBgNGB4yCggMEAAYCBgNGB4yCggNEAAYCBgNGB4yCggOEAAYCBgNGB7SAQkxMzQ4NmowajmoAg6wAgHxBe8kU7h2wyh58QXvJFO4dsMoeQ&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#ebo=0, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  5. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/192796#map=19/0.228157/30.289528&layers=P, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  6. http://mccrow.org.uk/EastAfrica/EastAfricanRailways/UgandaBranches.htm, accessed on 1st June 2018.
  7. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/32890286408, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  8. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/48996173961, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAR_58_class, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  10. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Engine_unit_of_East_African_Railways_and_Harbours_Corporation_(EAR%26HC)_58_class_Garratt_locomotive_no_5804.png, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  11. https://www.world-railways.co.uk/general-photo-408, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  12. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/29100559308, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  13. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/47072893354, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  14. https://rogerfarnworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/kikuyu-station.jpg
  15. https://rogerfarnworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/kikuyu-railway-station.jpg included by kind permission of Shiku Njathi. ….. https://inkikuyu.com/a-walk-around-kikuyu/kikuyu-railway-station
  16. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Basil_Roberts_(680730_EAR).jpg, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  17. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/51744782399, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  18. https://www.world-railways.co.uk/general-photo-667, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  19. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124446949@N06/31824271347, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  20. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Kasese_Train_Station.jpg, accessed on 8th July 2025.
  21. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/06/11/uganda-railways-part-21-kampala-to-kasese.

San Sebastian’s Urban Tramway, Funicular and Aerocar, and the ‘Spanish Aerocar’ at Niagara Falls.

Trams

The first tramway in San Sebastian (Donostia in Basque), owned by La Compañía del Tranvía de San Sebastián (TSS), opened on 18th July 1887 as a metre-gauge horse-powered line. “It provided a service from the eastern suburb of Ategorrieta to and from the town centre and beach. The tramway was then extended beyond Ategorrieta to the town of Herrera, including 2.1 km of reserved track and a 100-metre tunnel, avoiding the severe gradients of the Miracruz hill. The single-track-and-loop line eventually reached Rentería in 1890.” [1: p185]

The Compañía del Tranvía de San Sebastián (CTSS) was founded on 28th August 1886 and is one of the oldest businesses in Gipuzkoa. At first, it provided Horse-powered services in the city. [2]

The horse trams, known as ‘motor de sangre’ (literally blood engines), soon showed their limitations and for this reason the heads of the Company studied ways to modernise the transport system.” [2] It hoped to upgrade services by using steam trams but environmental concerns resulted in the local authority refusing the Company’s application. Instead, the Genèva-based Compagnie de l’Industrie Electrique et Mécanique was awarded the contract to build a line across the city. “A partial electric service was inaugurated on 22nd August 1887, and through running between San Sebastián and Rentería became a reality on 30th October. The rolling stock was built in Zaragoza using Thury (later Sécheron) electrical equipment, and consisted originally of motor trams 1-10 capable of hauling two trailers at 24 km/h. Several extensions were added to the tramway system until there were nine numbered services (1-9) all of which started from Alameda in the centre of San Sebastian.” [1: p185]

San Sebastian’s tramways were built to metre-gauge.

On 22nd August 1897, the first electric trams began to circulate between Rentería and Ategorrieta and the electrification of the city was completed on 22nd October of that same year. Donostia became the second city in Spain to have electrical trams (after Bilbao whose first line was up and running in 1896) and the first to electrify all its services (the Basque capital still had horse trams on some lines until 1909). [2]
A tram at the Monte Ulia tramway terminus. [3]
San Sebastian, Gros district and Mount Ulia, circa 1919. [3]

Barry Cross says: “Given the success of the urban tramways, it came as no surprise when the local entrepreneur, Vicente Machimbarena y Gorgoza, applied for the concession to build a 3.09-km ‘railway’ up the side of Monte Ulía, in 1893. The relevant legislation came into effect in 1895 and specified electric traction with overhead supply and the use of a rack to surmount a maximum gradient of 6%. However, when the engineer, Narciso Puig de la Bellacasa, was asked to undertake the initial surveys in 1896, they were for an adhesion line only. It was not until 1900 that sufficient money (ESP 530 000) had been raised to form the company, ‘Ferrocarril de Ulía’. Work on its construction began the same year, and the line opened on 9th July 1902. Although conceived as a railway, the completed metre-gauge line was merely an extension of the town tramways, with which it connected at Ategorrieta. As built, the continuous gradient varied between 4.5 and 5.5%, the only flat section being the mid-point passing loop.” [1: p185]

Cross continues: “The composition of the initial tramcar fleet accurately reflected the line’s tourist nature, since both the three two-axle motor trams and six trailers were of an open crossbench design known as ‘jardineras’. All cars were built in Zaragoza by Carde y Escoriaza, which equipped the motor cars with 2 x 52-kW motors and both rheostatic braking and electromagnetic track brakes. The early success of the line prompted the company to buy a further three motors and six trailers of the same design in 1907.” [1: p185]

The original tram service ran every 30 minutes. This was improved to 15 minutes from 1907. There were no intermediate stops on the climb up Monte Ulia. The tourist tram’s main purpose was to reach the summit.

Aerocar

The ‘Ferrocarril de Ulía’ Company, while paying a 2% dividend in 1904 also increased its capital to ESP 1 million with a view to building “something variously described as a ‘Tranvía Aereo’ and as a ‘Transbordador Funicular’. It opened on 30th September 1907 and proved to be one of the world’s first passenger suspension cableways, similar in concept although not in design to the aerial cableway across the Devil’s Dyke near Brighton, which had been built 13 years earlier. It began near the Monte Ulía tram terminus and rose gently just above the tree-tops to the Peña de las Aguilas, from where visitors could obtain impressive views along the Cantabrican coast.” [1: p186]

A close view of the fragile-looking passenger car of the Tranvia Aereo’. [4]

The next four images are postcard views of the Monte Ulia Aerocar. ….

“The world’s first aerial tram was probably the one built in 1644 by Adam Wiebe. It was used to move soil to build defences. Other mining systems were developed in the 1860s by Hodgson, and Andrew Smith Hallidie. Hallidie went on to perfect a line of mining and people tramways after 1867 in California and Nevada. Leonardo Torres Quevedo built his first aerial cableway in 1887. His first for passengers was this one at San Sebastian Donostia in 1907.” [3] Wikipedia’s Spanish site suggests that the cableway closed in 1912. [4] certainly, “Monte Ulia’s tramway and cableway were to be seriously threatened from 1912 onwards by the creation of rival attractions on Monte Igueldo, the mountain across the bay. Earlier but unrealised schemes had envisaged running a tramway around the base of this impressive mountain on a sort of Marine Drive, and taking it out to sea on a jetty to the island of Santa Clara, where a casino was to be built. However, so ambitious a project never materialised, and it was later decided to build a funicular instead. This would run from Ondarreta to the top of Monte Igueldo and be provided with a connecting tram service via a short branch line from the Venta-Berri Alameda tramway operated by the TSS.” [1: p186]

After 1912, the Monte Ulia line became progressively more unprofitable and closed down in 1916. However the ‘Aerocar’ story does not end in 1916 in San Sebastian. For a little more, please head through this article beyond the next section about a funicular railway. …

The Funicular de Igueldo

Cross tells us that “The main promoter of this new scheme was Emilio Huici, and the engineer in charge of the funicular project was Severiano Goni, who later built the Artxanda funicular in Bilbao. The Swiss firm of Von Roll supplied the electrical and mechanical equipment, leaving it to a local workshop to manufacture the funicular car bodies. Each car had five compartments with 30 seats and room for 20 standing. The line was 312 metres long and climbed 151 metres at gradients between 32 and 58%, making it the steepest of its kind in Spain.” [1: p186]

The funicular opened for business on 25th August 1912, offering visitors to the summit the chance to dine at its restaurant until midnight, or to take “five o’clock tea” on a terrace overlooking San Sebastián. A return trip to the summit cost ESP 0.50, while from 5th September 1912 onwards the mountain enjoyed a through tram service from Alameda to the lower station of the funicular.” [1: p186]

The travelling distance of 320 metres connected Ondarreta Beach at the bottom, with the popular Monte Igueldo Amusement Park at the top, offering spectacular coastal views of La Concha Bay along the way. [3]

The next four images are postcard views of the funicular railway. …

The Spanish Aerocar in North America!

Cross points us to a similar but larger ‘Aerocar’ which was opened in 1915 in North America. It crossed the Whirlpool Rapids on the Canadian side of Niagara Falls. “It was built by the Spanish engineer, Leonardo Torres Quevedo, who, undaunted by the financial failure of his first cableway on Monte Ulía, had been persuaded to build a second. Its success can be measured by the fact that it survives to this very day.” [1: p186]The Canadian has been upgraded several times since 1916 (in 1961, 1967 and 1984).[1] The system uses one car that carries 35 standing passengers over a one-kilometre trip.[2]

The Canadian has been upgraded several times since 1916 (in 1961, 1967 and 1984). The system uses one car that carries 35 standing passengers over a one-kilometre trip. [5]

Three images of the Canadian ‘Spanish Aerocar’ follow below. …

Three images of the Aerocar’. [6]

The ride on the ‘Aerocar’ is featured on the Niagara Parks website. [7]

References

  1. Barry Cross; The Spanish Aerocar; in Light Railway and Modern Tramway, July 1992, p185-186.
  2. https://dbus.eus/en/the-company/background, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  3. https://www.simplonpc.co.uk/SanSebastian.html#trams, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  4. https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tranv%C3%ADa_a%C3%A9reo_del_Monte_Ul%C3%ADa, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whirlpool_Aero_Car, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  6. http://www.ebpm.com/niag/regpix/glry_niag_aero.html, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  7. https://www.niagaraparks.com/visit/attractions/whirlpool-aero-car, accessed on 22nd March 2025.