Tag Archives: railway

East Africa Railway News – November/December 2025

A. Uganda to begin construction of its Standard Gauge railway network in April 2026.

In August 2025, Rogers Atukunda wrote of the construction of Uganda’s Standard Gauge railway network commencing in April 2026. His article can be found here. [1]

B. Uganda is to use electric traction for the Kampala to Malaba Standard Gauge Railway Line.

Uganda has recently confirmed that its Standard Gauge line from Malaba/Tororo to Kampala will operate with electric traction to European standards rather than diesel traction to Chinese standards.

The planned regional standard-gauge network includes two lines separating inside the Eastern border of Uganda at Tororo. These then diverge further in the West (at Bihanga) and in the North (at Gulu). The total route length will be 1,724 kilometres subject to change due to design modifications and additional sidings and/or branch lines. [3]

Kabona Esiara of ‘The East African‘ explained in November 2025 that this required detailed negotiations between the railway authorities in Kenya and Uganda. These negotiations commenced in mid-November 2025. [2]

Uganda and Kenya were working on a raft of technical and policy measures to facilitate a seamless SGR system between the two countries as they work in the next few years on parallel finishing of their SGR lines.

Kenya says it will start constructing the Naivasha-Kisumu-Malaba line early in 2026 while construction of Uganda’s Kampala-Malaba should commence in the second quarter of 2026.

Further details can be found here. [2]

C. A series of mis-steps in the development of railways in Kenya and Uganda.

Mary Serumaga, in 2018, said that “the building of standard gauge (SGR) railways in both Uganda and Kenya and the predictable sagas that have ensued are reminiscent of the controversies surrounding the building of the Uganda and Rhodesian Railways in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Both present a framework within which it is possible finally to understand the limited achievements in development in all sectors (and frankly, underdevelopment in many) and regression in Uganda’s primary education, copper mining and agricultural sectors. Both SGR projects are tainted with suspicion of shady procurement which, if taken together with the track records of the implementers, points to corruption. It would be irresponsible to say otherwise.” [4]

The route, design, level of service and all other decisions of the Uganda Railway of 1990 were dictated by potential profits for foreign investors (both public and private) and their local agents, and not by notions of public service and the common good of those who would bear the ultimate cost. Return on investment is not a bad thing but the Imperial government also claimed to be acting in the interests of the indigenous populations. … The difference now is that there is no pretence about whether the railways are serving the interests of the general population. The different financial implications presented by the procurement process itself, the selection of routes and the relative cost of engineering in the different terrains, plus the cost of compensating displaced landowners, provide scope for long-running, energy-depleting corruption scandals. From the outset, there has been a lack of confidence that procurement processes for the necessary services would prioritise the interests of the public over the interests of the contractor and would actively exclude the personal interests of the public servants commissioning the works. This is what is triggering the anxiety surrounding the SGRs.” [4]

Moreover, the choice over whether to upgrade the old railway or to start afresh was not adequately debated publicly. Ditto the options on financing. For the Kenyan SGR, the most costly of the potential routes were reportedly selectively chosen. Several cheaper routes on land allegedly already in possession of the government are said to have been rejected. … There are also questions surrounding passenger service. Do the railways only serve trade or are passengers entitled to this alternative to dangerous road transport?” [4]

Uganda owns one half of the old East African Railway. Together with the Kenyan leg, it was put under a 25-year management contract. The new owners renamed their new toy Rift Valley Railways (RVR). In 2017, after only twelve years, the governments cancelled the contracts in a move the RVR called an illegal takeover. On the Ugandan end, there were allegations of asset-stripping by previous European concessionaires as well as unpaid concession fees and massive salary arrears caused by RVR. If RVR were to successfully sue the government for cancellation of the contract, their compensation would be the first budget overrun. … The government of Uganda then signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2014 with the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC), which had submitted a study. It abandoned those negotiations in favour of a second Chinese entity, the China Harbour Engineering Company. In justifying its action, the government questioned the quality of the CCECC’s study, which it said was cut and pasted from pre-existing feasibility studies (something that could have been avoided by following proper procurement procedures). CCECC insists it was a pre-feasibility study requiring less detail than a full-blown feasibility study. Whatever the case, if CCECC had followed through with its suit for US$8 million in compensation, which would have been another massive blow to the budget at inception. Whatever compensation they have agreed to has not been made public but as matters stand, the budget for the eastern leg of the SGR has gone up from CCECC’s proposed US$4.2 billion to CHEC’s US$6.7 billion.” [4]

The remainder of Mary Serumaga’s article which looks back at colonial construction work and draws parallels with 21st century procurement and construction in East Africa can be found here. [4]

D. President Yoweri Museveni’s State of the Nation Address in June 2025.

In June 2025, President Museveni highlighted significant rail developments, advancing the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) project to link with Kenya and the region, aiming to cut costs and boost trade, while discussing financing for the $2.8 billion Kampala-Malaba SGR and emphasizing participation in the development of the new rail infrastructure. In essence, the 2025 address signalled a push for comprehensive road and railway modernization and expansion, leveraging oil revenues and debt financing to build a robust network for economic transformation. [5] Museveni said, “we are soon finalizing the construction of the 1,443km East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) from Buliisa to Tanga in Tanzania. The construction of the SGR, which I launched last year, is soon starting,” [5] and “the NRM Government has prioritized infrastructure development especially roads, railways and electricity.” [5] In addition, the government will be focusing on revitalizing metre-gauge lines (like Tororo-Gulu, Kampala-Malaba).

E. Kenya – Additional Madaraka Express Trains for the Christmas period.

Kenya Railways announces additional Madaraka Express trains from 8th December 2025, to 5th January 2026, to meet increased festive season demand. The Nairobi-Mombasa train departs Nairobi at 9:40 AM, arriving in Mombasa at 3:35 PM, while the Mombasa-Nairobi train leaves at 4:30 PM, reaching Nairobi at 10:55 pm. [6]

The railway operator said the move comes in response to increased demand during the holiday period, when thousands of Kenyans and tourists journey along the scenic Nairobi-Mombasa route. … ‘We are committed to providing a safe and convenient travel experience, and the additional services will help ease congestion while maintaining punctuality’ reads the notice dated 2nd December.” [7]

References

  1. Rogers Atukunda; Uganda to Begin Construction of Standard Gauge Railway in April 2026; in SoftPower News, https://softpower.ug/uganda-to-begin-construction-of-standard-gauge-railway-in-april-2026, accessed on 24th November 2025
  2. Kabona Esiara; Uganda prefers European standard for SGR, throwing off Kenya; in The East African, 25th November 2025; via https://www.zawya.com/en/world/africa/uganda-prefers-european-standard-for-sgr-throwing-off-kenya-j9zxxa2r, accessed on 24th November 2025.
  3. https://www.sgr.go.ug, accessed on 24th November 2025.
  4. Mary Serumaga; The New Lunatic Express: Lessons not learned from the East African Railway; in The Elephant – African Analysis, Opinion, and Investigation; https://www.theelephant.info/analysis/2018/06/16/the-new-lunatic-express-lessons-not-learned-from-the-east-african-railway; accessed on 7th December 2025.
  5. https://parliamentwatch.ug/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/STATE-OF-THE-NATION-ADDRESS-HE-VERY-FINAL-2025_250605_160027.pdf, accessed on 7th December 2025.
  6. The Kenya Times; https://www.facebook.com/groups/thekenyatimes/posts/1532674321328248, accessed on 8th December 2025.
  7. https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2025-12-02-kenya-railways-adds-extra-madaraka-express-train, accessed on 8th December 2025.

Stockport’s 21st Century Trams and Transport for Greater Manchester’s Plans for the Future.

Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) has indicated that it is considering a plan to extending the already proposed East Finsbury to Stockport extension of the Metrolink tram network. The extension would utilise the underused railway line between Stockport and Denton.

Talk is of utilising tram-train technology on this possible new extension.

An extension to Metrolink could use the under-exploited Denton line, © Transport for Greater Manchester. [1]

Should this proposal be approved it would link Stockport to Tameside and could also provide a link to Manchester Airport

The Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham spoke of bold plans to deliver a decade of growth for Greater Manchester. He said that “developing the Bee Network and delivering better bus, tram and train connections will be fundamental to [that] growth story.” [2]

He continued: “For too long, Denton has been overlooked and by working up the tram-train option to connect Denton and the wider area to the Metrolink is a big step toward unlocking opportunities for local residents and businesses. … We’re committed to extending Metrolink to Stockport and beyond as part of our efforts to connect all our districts to the tram network and delivering a truly integrated transport network for everyone.” [2]

TfGM is already working with Stockport Council to develop a business case for bringing trams to Stockport. The Strategic Outline Case [4] – the first step in the process – is exploring a ‘core’ extension from the existing Metrolink stop at East Didsbury to Stockport town centre. The extension through Denton is not part of those ‘core’ proposals but, “as part of the work on the business case, TfGM is also considering how this may unlock future extensions. One option being worked up includes using tram-train technology – where services can run on both tram and train tracks – to run beyond Stockport town centre along the Denton rail line, connecting the area firmly into the wider Metrolink network including links to Tameside and Manchester Airport.” [2]

Good progress has been made on the first stage of the Stockport Metrolink extension business case, with TfGM now working to complete all required technical work ahead of submission to the Department for Transport in early 2026. Construction on the ‘core’ element of the project could begin by the end of the decade, if approvals and funding are acquired.

Andrew Gwynne, MP for Gorton & Denton, said: “For years I’ve campaigned, alongside the local community, for improved transport links to Denton and across the constituency. I’m delighted that as part of the Metrolink extension plans, TfGM are looking seriously at using the rail line as an option for tram-train services. … Improved connectivity is key to opening up opportunities for our people and communities, and supporting the growth ambitions across the city region.”

Navendu Mishra, MP for Stockport, said: “Since my election to the House of Commons in December 2019, I have been pushing the Government to fund the extension of Manchester’s Metrolink tram network into my constituency of Stockport, and I thank the Secretary of State for Transport, the Chancellor and Transport for Greater Manchester for backing the extension to our town centre. … This will be a significant boost for Stockport’s connectivity and local economy, helping people to get to work, school and healthcare appointments more easily and sustainably as well as unlocking new homes and jobs.” [2]

Leader of Tameside Council, Cllr Eleanor Wills, said: “The options being developed to utilise the Denton rail line to expand Metrolink and better connect Ashton to Manchester Airport via Stockport have the potential to be truly transformational. …  The Ashton Mayoral Development Zone is an exciting and vital opportunity to unlock Ashton’s potential, providing new homes and quality jobs. With even better transport links we can set ourselves up to for good growth for many years to come.” [2]

Leader of Stockport Council, Cllr Mark Roberts, said: “I’ve always said when it comes to MetroLink that it should be ‘Next Stop Stockport not Last Stop Stockport’ to the help deliver the ambition we have -the delivery of Metrolink and improving public transport connectivity across the borough and Greater Manchester is something we can all get behind.” [2]

TfGM says: “With Greater Manchester embarking on a decade of good growth, the city region is committed through the Greater Manchester Strategy to developing a transport system for a global city region – with 90% of people within a five-minute walk of a bus or tram that comes at least every 30 minutes.” [2]

In June 2025, the government awarded Greater Manchester £2.5 billion through Transport for the City Regions funding for a pipeline of projects including a tram line to Stockport and tram-train services connecting Oldham, Rochdale, Heywood and Bury, new Metrolink stops and modern new interchanges. … The £2.5 billion is part of a package of investment Greater Manchester is seeking to deliver its growth ambitions in full – with the city region seeking to work collaboratively with Government on exploring new funding models for major transport and other infrastructure projects. [3]
As of December 2025, Metrolink is the UK’s largest light rail network, with 99 stops connecting seven of the 10 boroughs of Greater Manchester. Record numbers of people are also getting onboard, with 45.6 million trips made in 2024 – up from 33.5m trips in 2022. [2]

The £2.5 billion investment for the Greater Manchester city-region is targetted at enabling the Bee network become fully-electric, zero-emission public transport system by 2030. Local rail lines will be brought into the Bee Network by 2030, fully integrated bike, bus, tram and train travel for the first time outside London. New electric buses, tram lines, tram stops and transport interchanges are among pipeline of projects which will deliver far-reaching benefits across Greater Manchester. Mayor Andy Burnham said that further progress on the next phase of the Bee Network will now be delivered at an unrelenting pace.

Greater Manchester will create an all-electric local public transport network:

“A thousand new EV buses will form a 100% electric fleet serving its communities. Alongside trams powered by renewable energy and e-bikes for hire, it will deliver an emission-free network. This will build on progress already made to cut CO2 emissions and improve air quality.” [3] (Image, © Transport for Greater Manchester.)

Greater Manchester will bring rail into the Bee Network. “Local rail lines will be integrated with the Bee Network, … the move will see major improvements to stations, including making more fully accessible, as well as capped fares.” [3]

Greater Manchester will deliver major projects to drive green growth. “A pipeline of transport projects – including a tram line to Stockport and tram-train services connecting Oldham, Rochdale, Heywood and Bury, new Metrolink stops and modern new interchanges – will support the delivery of thousands of new homes, skilled jobs and green growth.” [3]

Greater Manchester’s current transport strategy is made up of a number of documents, including:

  • Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040.
  • A Five-Year Transport Delivery Plan 2021-2026 (including 10 local implementation plans).
  • Several supporting sub-strategies that all contribute to meeting regional transport ambitions and building the Bee Network.

In 2025, Greater Manchester are currently working on a new strategy – the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2050 – that will replace the current documents. [5]

You can find out more about the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 using these links:

Download the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040. [6]

Download the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040: Executive Summary. [7]

The Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2050 has been promoted by Mayor Andy Burnham. [8]

Plans for a subway network in the city centre could become reality by 2050 if Greater Manchester makes good on ambitions set out within its latest rail strategy. … The 48-page strategy sets out a roadmap for the city region’s rail network, which needs to expand to keep pace with a growing population. … Among the highlights is the intention to develop an underground network by 2050.” [8]

Starting at Piccadilly, where the city wishes to create a subterranean through-station as part of Northern Powerhouse Rail, the underground would provide increased network capacity without significant land take. … Taking Metrolink below ground [could] also minimise the disruption that would be caused if works were to take place at street level and push Manchester towards its target of doubling the number of intercity trips made by rail.” [8]

The ripple effects of taking the network underground include easing the pressure on the Castlefield Corridor, ‘one of the most overburdened rail routes in the country’, according to the strategy.” [8]

The underground plan is just one part of the strategy for the city-region strategy that also includes upgrading stations, introducing tram-train technology on existing rail lines to widen the Metrolink’s reach, and delivering the Northern Arc – a new line between Manchester and Liverpool that would ultimately form part of Northern Powerhouse Rail. Land around rail hubs in the city region, including a huge development opportunity at Piccadilly similar in scale to that at Kings Cross, could support the delivery 75,000 new homes and unlock £90bn in economic uplift across the North West by 2050.

According to Andy Burnham,  “Greater Manchester’s rail network plays a vital role in supporting [its] communities, powering [its] economy, and opening doors to opportunity – but for long has been held back from its true potential. … The way projects and services are planned and delivered is changing, with long needed reform giving the city-region a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape rail for Greater Manchester.” [8]

A year after the rail vision was unveiled a more simplified fare system on the Bee Network was announced. Andy Burnham said: “Simplifying rail fares is a key first step in making train travel easier and more accessible and the key to bringing local rail services into the Bee Network from December 2026. … Greater Manchester has a proud railway heritage, and our vision, developed with the industry, is about ensuring that everyone in our city-region can benefit from better connections, more reliable services, and a transport network that meets the needs of future generations.” [8]

Sitting beneath the city-region strategy is the more local SEMMMS (South-East Manchester Multi-Modal Strategy) which was settled in 2001 and the much later SEMMMS Refresh (2018) which identified measures required to meet future transportation needs in the Southeast of the city region centred on Stockport. These measures included: Metrolink/tram-train routes to Marple, Stockport town centre, the airport and Hazel Grove; segregated bus routes and bus priority schemes; improved rail services and new/ improved rail stations; new roads e.g. A6 to M60 Relief Road; new and improved walking and cycling routes and facilities on and off the highway; improved public realm in the district and local centres; creation of connected neighbourhoods that encourage the use of more sustainable forms of transport; the provision of transportation infrastructure needed to be supported by the introduction of smarter choices to encourage the use of sustainable transport. [9][10][11]

An extract from the TfGM plan for transport, looking forward towards 2040. It is intended that a tram-train service will run North from Stockport through Reddish, Denton and Guide Bridge to Ashton-under-Lyne. A similar service is planned to connect from Manchester Airport through Cheadle to Hazel Grove with a link North into Stockport to connect with the line through Denton. This schematic plan also shows the link from East Didsbury into Stockport. [12]

And finally …

Railway-News.com reported on 10th December 2025 that on 9th December 2025, TfGM Launched a Consultation on Future of Public Transport. The consultation invites people who live, work, travel, visit or study in Greater Manchester to help shape the future of the city region’s travel network by giving their views on the new GM Transport Strategy 2050, as well as the GM Transport Delivery Plan (2027-37). [13]

The proposed Plan will set out a framework “for how the Bee Network might be utilised to help Greater Manchester continue to become the growth capital of the UK through to 2050, whilst also addressing inequality and creating a greener city region.” [13]

The Consultation will run until 9th March 2026.

Backed by 2.5 billion GBP in government funding; TfGM’s plans “aim to deliver a number of transport projects through to the 2030s, resulting in what TfGM intends to be a world-class transport system. They will support both overall economic growth and the delivery of the new £1 billion Greater Manchester Good Growth Fund, which will in turn pump-prime a set of projects, drive growth and generation and ensure equal spending across the city region as a whole.” [13]

Additional development of the Bee Network, as well as a more reliable highways network, are set to underpin the new approach, which aims to better connect communities with locations, jobs and services. (Image, © Transport for Greater Manchester.) [13]

The Bee Network is set to begin incorporating rail services by 2028, with TfGM aiming to provide 90% of the city region with five-minute access to a bus or tram that arrives at least every 30 minutes.” [13]

GM transport strategy and delivery plans include keeping the local transport network safe and reliable via the renewal and maintenance of roads, Metrolink network and rail facilities; simplifying of fares, ticketing, bus services and introduction of new stops and services, as well as interchanges, Metrolink lines and expanded walking, wheeling and cycling networks; and the transformation of all local rail lines by incorporating them into the Bee Network.” [13]

A detailed delivery programme listing schemes is set out in the GM Transport Delivery Plan 2027 – 2037, which is split into three phases, along with works in the regional centre and a wider ongoing set of works across the city region.” [13]

In addition to online feedback; a series of face-to-face drop-in sessions are planned to take place across Greater Manchester. The documents which are available to read online through clicking on these links:

https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050/user_uploads/gm-transport-strategy-2050—–final-consultation-draft.pdf [14]

and

https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050/user_uploads/gm-transport-delivery-plan—–final-consultation-draft.pdf [15]

For an overview of both documents, please click here. [16]

TfGM want to hear from anyone with an interest in the future of transport in Greater Manchester. They outline how you can respond here. [17] The deadline for participation is 9th March 2026.

Returning to where this article started, this is what the consultation draft of the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2050 document says about Stockport:

Stockport town centre: Over the last decade, Stockport Council has spearheaded a £1bn transformation of its town centre. One of the UK’s largest town centre regeneration programmes, it has enabled the town to buck the trend of decline, with successful schemes across leisure, commercial and residential uses. Since 2019 Stockport Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC) has played a powerful role in accelerating this transformation, delivering a residential led masterplan for Stockport Town Centre West. The MDC is a radical new approach to tackling future housing need and the changing role of town centres, delivered through a unique collaboration between the GM Mayor and Stockport Council. It brings together powers devolved to the Greater Manchester Mayor, combined with strong local leadership from Stockport Council and the long-term commitment of the government’s housing agency, Homes England, to deliver an ambitious vision for the future of Stockport town centre. Over the past 6 years in collaboration with its many partner organisations the MDC moved from innovative concept to proven delivery vehicle, with over 170,000 sq. ft. new Grade A offices at Stockport Exchange, 1,200 new homes completed or on site and a state-of-the-art new transport Interchange with two-acre rooftop park. Reflecting this success and the Council’s continued growth ambitions, in 2025 the Council and GMCA agreed to expand the boundary of the MDC to cover the whole of the town centre and doubling its housing target to 8,000 homes by 2040.” [14]

References

  1. https://railway-news.com/tfgm-exploring-plans-to-bring-trams-to-stockport, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  2. https://news.tfgm.com/press-releases/c956a710-e894-49ab-b1de-1b8fb97e7859/underused-denton-rail-line-being-considered-as-part-of-case-to-take-trams-to-stockport, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  3. news.tfgm.com/press-releases/897ce680-87a9-4349-a632-b477b1a8330f/greater-manchester-s-2-5-billion-funding-boost-to-unlock-uk-s-first-fully-integrated-zero-emission-public-transport-network, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  4. A Strategic Outline Case (SOC) is the first part of developing a business case for major infrastructure projects. The two further stages are the Outline Business Case (OBC) followed by the Full Business Case (FBC). In the case of extending Metrolink to Stockport approval is required from the Department for Transport (DfT) to progress through each stage.
  5. https://tfgm.com/strategy, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  6. https://assets.ctfassets.net/nv7y93idf4jq/01xbKQQNW0ZYLzYvcj1z7c/4b6804acd572f00d8d728194ef62bb89/Greater_Manchester_Transport_Strategy_2040_final.pdf, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  7. https://assets.ctfassets.net/nv7y93idf4jq/6tfus0lbLRvTlR64knc3g7/db49b54dc2e8f3dd29416ab560e1a6fe/21-0003_2040_Transport_Strategy_Exec_Summary.pdf, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  8. https://www.placenorthwest.co.uk/burnham-sets-target-of-2050-for-manchester-underground, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  9. http://www.semmms.info, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  10. https://consultation.stockport.gov.uk/policy-performance-and-reform/semmms/supporting_documents/SEMMMS%20Report.pdf, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  11. http://www.semmms.info/wp-content/uploads/SEMMMS-Consultation-Report.pdf, accessed on 4th December 2025.
  12. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/new-metrolink-map-tram-manchester-29510064, accessed on 6th December 2025.
  13. https://railway-news.com/tfgm-launches-consultation-on-future-of-public-transport/?dtt=&email_address=rogerfarnworth@aol.com&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=RN-week50b-2025, accessed on 11th December 2025.
  14. https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050/user_uploads/gm-transport-strategy-2050—–final-consultation-draft.pdf, accessed on 11th December 2025.
  15. https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050/user_uploads/gm-transport-delivery-plan—–final-consultation-draft.pdf, accessed on 11th December 2025.
  16. https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050/user_uploads/gm-transport-strategy-and-delivery-plan-summary—consultation-draft.pdf, accessed on 11th December 2025.
  17. https://www.gmconsult.org/transport/transport2050, accessed on 11th December 2025.

The Nice to Digne-les Bains Line in Provence-Cote d’Azur again. …

The featured image above shows one of the present modern diesel units at the Chemins de Fer du Sud/Chemin de Fer de Provence station in Nice. [4]

I discovered this Video on YouTube recently (October 2025) – it looks at the line in 1973. The commentary is in French. The changes to the line in the 52 years since 1973 have been significant!

2025 News!

A. Stadler to Deliver Hybrid Trains in Southern France

Among other news providers, on 16th April 2025, Railway-News reported that Stadler had signed a contract with Région Sud to supply eight customised hybrid multiple units for Chemins de fer de Provence (CP). The full article can be found here. [2]

The new units will replace older diesel units currently in use on the 150-kilometre route.

Designed for both urban and rural operation, the trains combine battery and biodiesel-powered drive systems. This hybrid configuration is expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by up to 77% compared with conventional diesel vehicles. … A battery charging facility is being constructed in Nice as part of the supporting infrastructure for the new fleet.” [2]

The trains are being manufactured at Stadler’s facility in Bussnang, Switzerland. The vehicles will be delivered and commissioned by 2028. [2]

This image of the new hybrid units comes from l’Editions du Cabri website. [5]
Stadler will deliver eight customised hybrid metre-gauge multiple units, © Stadler. [2]

B. Chemins De Fer de Provence (CP ZOU) and Ligne d’Azur

On 11th August 2025, the Chemins de Fer de Provence confirmed that its urban stops between Nice and Le Chaudan are available with a Lignes d’Azur ticket. In parallel the railway company announced that it was increasing the frequency of its services
between Nice and Colomars, with 4 additional evening round trips on Fridays and Saturdays. Further details can be found here. [3]

C. Nice-Matin: More travelers and more challenges on the Chemins de Fer de Provence

Nice-Matin’s latest article about the Chemins de Fer de Provence published on 5th October 2025. Highlights a significant rise in passenger numbers since July 2023. Since July 2023 and the agreement with Lignes d’Azur making it possible to take the train with the same ticket as for the bus or tram, attendance has increased considerably.

Jean-Paul David, regional councilor and president of the Regional Transport Authority says: “We have counted 450,000 trips in 2022, 500,000 trips in 2024 and we will probably be at 630,000 by the end of the year.“Train frequency has increased to 20 minutes during peak hours!” The full article can be seen here. [6]

D. Work to re-open the line to Digne-les-Bains.

Infrastructure work on the line between Nice and Digne-les-Bains is ongoing. It includes reconstruction of a section of the 2 km Moriez tunnel where a 25 m section about 400 m from the western portal collapsed in February 2019. The job is due to be completed at the end of 2025, paving the way for through rail services from Nice to Digne-les-Bains to be reinstated from early 2026. [7]

The 151 km route has 25 tunnels with a combined length of 11 km and two covered cuttings. The line also features 102 masonry or metal bridges and numerous other structures. Services carry around 500 000 passengers a year. [7]

References

  1. https://youtu.be/ipq6KaLONyo, accessed on 14th October 2025.
  2. https://railway-news.com/stadler-to-deliver-hybrid-trains-in-southern-france, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  3. https://www.cpzou.fr/en/news/cp-zou-with-lignes-dazur, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  4. https://www.seeprovence.com/reviews/train-des-pignes-nice-689015, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  5. https://laboutiqueducabri.fr/les-nouvelles-rames-des-chemins-de-fer-de-provence, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  6. https://www.nicematin.com/societe/transports/plus-de-voyageurs-et-plus-d-enjeux-sur-les-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-10650930, accessed on 15th October 2025.
  7. https://www.railwaygazette.com/passenger/funding-deal-secures-future-of-nice-digne-line/67147.article, accessed on 15th October 2025.

The Nidd Valley Light Railway

The short paragraph immediately below appeared in the February 1952 edition of The Railway Magazine in reply to a question submitted by G. T. Kaye.

The Nidd Valley branch of the former North Eastern Railway (which was closed to passengers on 31st March 1951) terminated at Pateley Bridge, 14 miles from Harrogate. In 1900, a Light Railway Order was obtained for a 2 ft. 6 in. gauge line from Pateley Bridge to Lofthouse-in-Nidderdale, six miles further up the valley, but the promoters had difficulty in finding the necessary capital. At that time, the Bradford Corporation was about to undertake the construction of reservoirs in the Nidd Valley, and a railway was required to carry materials to the sites. The Corporation took over the powers for the light railway, and extended it for a further 6 miles, from Lofthouse to Angram. The railway was laid to the standard-gauge, and was opened to passengers between Pateley Bridge and Lofthouse on 1st May 1907. The remainder of the line did not carry public traffic. The line was worked by two 4-4-0 tank engines and passenger coaches purchased from the Metropolitan Railway. The passenger services were withdrawn on 31st December 1929, and the line was closed completely some months later.” [1: p143]

It appeared close to the back of the magazine in the section called, “The Why and the Wherefore”. It seemed like a good idea to explore what further information there is available about the Nidd Valley Light Railway. …….

The Website ‘WalkingintheYorksireDales.co.uk’ has a page dedicated to the railway which can be found here. [2]

A number of images relating to the line can be found here. [13]

The Oakwood Press published a book by D. J. Croft about the line. [3: p3]

Croft wrote: “The valley of the River Nidd, in the West Riding of Yorkshire, is nearly 55 miles long, beginning at Great Whernside, and ending at Nun Monkton where the Nidd flows into the River Ouse. However, the area known as Nidderdale extends for only about a half of the length, and forms a compact geographical region of its own. Despite this length, and great scenic beauty, it remains to this day one of the forgotten valleys of the Yorkshire Dales.” [3: p3]

The area of Nidderdale can be divided into roughly two equal sec tions, with the market town of Pateley Bridge between the two. The first substantial historical accounts of Nidderdale appeared in Domesday Book of 1086. However, some of the local lead mines were worked in the time of the Brigantes, whilst several surrounding localities suggest Roman occupation.” [3: p3]

Nidderdale has several industries, notably quarrying and lead mining. and a small textile industry. There is also a small slate quarry, a marble quarry, and a long, thin ironstone vein stretching along the valley. Through-out the ages, however, Nidderdale has had prosperity alternating with decline. As the early mining industry began to decline, so textiles became important around the thirteenth century. This too tended to decline by the seventeenth century, and mining became important once more. Unfortunately, the prosperity of the lead mining era passed, and so too did the prosperity of Nidderdale.” [3: p3]

This period of decline lasted until 1862, when the North Eastern Railway opened its line from Harrogate to Pateley Bridge, thus opening this remote valley to the outside world. Prior to this, the only roads out of the dale had been to Grassington, Riponand Kirkby Malzeard, and the only regular connection with the outside world had been the Nidderdale Omnibus, a double-deck horse bus, linking Pateley Bridge with trains of the Leeds & Thirsk Railway at Ripley. This operated from 1st August 1849, until the opening of the railway, and ran twice daily.” [3: p3]

The approach of the 20th century brought a new prosperity to the valley, which was to last for the next thirty years or perhaps a little longer. Thid was the period when the Nidd Valley Light Railway was active.

The story of the line is the story of the thirteen or so miles between Pateley Bridge and the head of the valley, for it was there “that the Nidd Valley Light Railway was conceived, constructed and closed. All this happened within a period of less than forty years.” [3: p3]

The Story of the Line

Wikipedia tells us that the origins of a railway in the upper Nidd Valley “can be traced back to 1887–88, when Bradford Corporation began to investigate the valley as a source for the public water supply. … Alexander Binnie, who was the Waterworks Engineer for Bradford at the time, and Professor Alexander Henry Green, a geologist from Oxford, visited the area, and Green advised Binnie that the valley was suitable for the construction of large dams. The Bradford Corporation Water Act 1890 was obtained on 14th August 1890, authorising the construction of four dams. … A second Act of Parliament was obtained on 27th June 1892, by which time the four reservoirs were Angram, Haden Carr, High Woodale and Gouthwaite. Gouthwaite Reservoir was designed as a compensation reservoir, to maintain flows in the Nidd further down the valley.” [4][5: p76-77]

The first reservoir, Haden Carr, was completed in 1899, together with a 32-mile (51 km) pipeline (the Nidd Aqueduct) to deliver water to Chellow Heights reservoir on the outskirts of Bradford. [4][5: p79] “Gouthwaite reservoir was built … between 1893 and 1901.” [5: p84-85] The activity in the valley attracted attention from outside the region and a company from London, Power & Traction Ltd applied for a Light Railway Order “to construct a line from the terminus of the Nidd Valley Railway at Pateley Bridge to Lofthouse. …  Following a hearing at Harrogate on 9th October 1900, the Light Railway Commissioners awarded an order to Power & Traction for a 2 ft 6 in (762 mm) gauge railway.” [4] Negotiations with Bradford Corporation over a possible £2,000 investment in the scheme ultimately failed. [5: p86]

In 1903, Bradford invited tenders for the construction of Angram Reservoir, and … reached provisional agreement with the Nidd Valley Light Railway Company to purchase the powers awarded to them to build the light railway. … Bradford wanted to ask the Light Railway Commissioners for permission to increase [the track gauge] to 3 ft (914 mm). … They also wanted to ensure that they bought enough land to allow a standard gauge railway to be constructed ‘at any future time’. The North Eastern Railway, owners of the Nidd Valley Railway, argued that it should be standard gauge from the outset, since they were running excursions to Pateley Bridge twice a week, and these could continue over the Nidd Valley Light Railway. It would also remove the necessity of transshipping goods.” [5: p86]

Then next three map extracts show the railway facilities in Pateley Bridge while the Nidd Valley Light Railway was active. …

The Nidd Valley Light Railway Pateley Bridge Carriage and Engine Shed which were to the North of the railway’s terminus. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [9]
The Nidd Valley Light Railway Pateley Bridge Terminus which was connected to the North Eastern Railway Station by a single line which joined the main line before it crossed the High Street on the level. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [9]
The North Easter Railway Station at Pateley Bridge. [9]
The red line approximates t the line of the railway which left Pateley Bridge Station (behind the camera) to cross High Street and run between Pateley Bridge Mills and Millfield Street to connect with The Nidd Valley Light Railway. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
0-6-0ST locomotive ‘Blythe’, with a passenger train at Pateley Bridge. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_529 DS160108), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

A transfer order was eventually granted, “with powers to borrow up to £30,000 to fund the project. In May 1904, the Board of Trade agreed to a change to standard gauge, and borrowing powers were increased to £66,000 in 1908, because of the extra costs of building the wider formation. The document was signed by Winston Churchill, the President of the Board of Trade.” The contractor working on the Anagram reservoir, John Best, “was awarded a contract to build the light railway to Lofthouse for £23,000, and a tramway from Lofthouse to Angram for £5,385.” [5: p86-87]

Then the intrigue began! A contract had been awarded in April 1902 to Holme and King for the construction of a road from Lofthouse to Angram. Bradford Council “had purchased enough land to allow the light railway to be built beside the road, and although Best was awarded a contact for the railway in 1903, it appears that Holme and King built a 3 ft (914 mm) gauge contractor’s railway beside part or all of the road. They had two locomotives on site, both 0-4-0 saddle tanks, one bought second hand some years earlier and moved to the site in spring 1902, after working on several other projects, [5: p87] and the second bought new for delivery to Pateley Bridge. [5: p89] By mid-1904, there was a 6.5-mile (10.5 km) line from Angram, which crossed the River Nidd on a 20-foot (6.1 m) bridge just before it reached Lofthouse.” [4]

So, Best began extending the line towards Pateley Bridge from the River Nidd rather than starting the work again! Wikipedia tells us that “by 13th July 1904, it had reached a level crossing at Sykes Bank, 0.5 miles (0.8 km) below Lofthouse, and work had commenced at several other sites. On that date, a party of 150 members of Bradford City Council, with invited guests, arrived by train at Pateley Bridge, and were transported to Gouthwaite Dam in carriages. Here there was a ceremony in which the Lord Major cut the first sod for the Nidd Valley Light Railway.” [4] The party “proceeded to Sykes Bank, where a train was waiting, which consisted of 15 wagons fitted with makeshift seats, and two locomotives, one of which was Holme and King’s Xit and the other was Best’s Angram. It took about an hour to reach Angram, where there were presentations, and Alderman Holdsworth cut the first sod for the dam. Refreshments were then served and the party returned to Lofthouse by train and to Pateley Bridge by carriage.” [4][5: p90-91]

The narrow gauge had hardly reached Pateley Bridge and Angram begun its regular duties along the line when standard gauge rails began to be laid starting at Lofthouse and working both up and down the line from there. “When the first standard gauge locomotive arrived, it was towed along the road to Sykes Bank by a Foden steam lorry, its flanged wheels making a mess of the road surface. The main line and sidings became mixed gauge for a while, although the third rail was gradually removed from 1906.” [5: p91 & 93] There was a veritable network of rail lines at the Angram Dam site where, as well as a village built for the workers, “the railway terminated in several sidings, which included a locomotive shed. The sidings were at a similar level to the crest of the dam. A branch left the main line and descended to the valley floor, where there was a cement mixing plant and more sidings. This line included a winch-operated incline which descended on a gradient of 1 in 15 (6.7%). Another incline, of 3 ft (914 mm) gauge, ascended the far side of the valley, giving access to Nidd sluice and lodge. A third incline brought rock down to the main line from a quarry, some 2 miles (3.2 km) below the terminus.” [4][5: p93 & 97]

The village of Lofthouse and its railway station as it appears on the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. [6]
0-6-0 side tank steam locomotive ‘Milner’ with a carriage and van at Lofthouse-in-Nidderdale station, ready to leave for Scar House. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_531 DS160110), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]
‘Milner’ crossing the bridge above Lofthouse-in-Nidderdale station and beginning the steep climb alongside the road on the private section to Scar House. It is likely that this was taken soon after the previous photograph. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_523 DS160104), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

At the other end of the Light Railway, “at Pateley Bridge, the Nidd Valley Light Railway station was to the north west of the North Eastern Railway’s Pateley Bridge railway station, close to the River Nidd. The two were connected by a single track which crossed a level crossing. There were a series of sidings immediately after the level crossing, with the station and more sidings beyond that. A carriage shed and a locomotive shed were located a little further along the valley of the Nidd.” [4]

Ramsgill Village was served by a stationary Bouthwaite which sat on the opposite side of the River Nidd. This map extract comes from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907, published in 1909. [7]

Best built two-storey stone buildings for the stations at Pateley Bridge, Wath, Ramsgill and Lofthouse. He built a signal box at Pateley Bridge, with the other stations having ground frames and simple signalling. Operation of the line was controlled by the Tyer’s Electric Train Tablet system, and six machines were ordered at a cost of £360. [5: p101] Both intermediate stations had goods sidings on the eastern side of the main track, while Lofthouse had a passing loop and sidings to the west.” [4]

The Station at Wath sat between the village and the River Nidd. The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/1908 and published in 1909. [8]

Best had a number of locomotives, both 3 ft (914 mm) gauge and standard gauge, which operated over the entire line from Pateley Bridge to Angram during the construction phase. For the opening of the Nidd Valley Light Railway proper, the 6.5 miles (10.5 km) from Pateley Bridge to Lofthouse, Bradford Corporation ordered six open wagons and two brake vans from Hurst Nelson of Motherwell. Locomotives and carriages were obtained second-hand from the Metropolitan Railway in London. These consisted of ten 4-wheeled coaches and two 4-4-0 Beyer Peacock side tank locomotives. All had become surplus to requirements, as electrification of the line had been completed in 1905. The locomotives were fitted with condensing equipment, for working in the tunnels under London, but the price of £1,350 for the pair included removal of this, and the fitting of cabs. All twelve vehicles arrived at Pateley Bridge, with one engine in steam … The locomotives were named ‘Holdsworth’ and ‘Milner’ after two Aldermen who had served Bradford Waterworks since 1898.” [4][5: p101, 102]

An official opening took place on 11th September 1907, when a train consisting of three carriages and the Corporation saloon were hauled by ‘Holdsworth’ from Pateley Bridge to Lofthouse, with stops at Wath and Gouthwaite reservoir. At Lofthouse the engine was replaced by one of Best’s engines, and continued to Angram where luncheon was served in the village reading room.” [4][5: p102, 105]

The two locomotives were much too heavy to comply with the Light Railway Order, which specified a maximum axle loading of 6.5 tons. They weighed 46.6 tons in working order, with 36.7 tons carried by the two driving axles. The Corporation applied for an increase in the axle loading, specifying the weight as “over 42 tons”. Milner, the newest of the two locomotives, dating from 1879, [5: p102] did not perform well, and was replaced by a Hudswell Clarke 0-6-0 side tank, also named Milner in May 1909. The original Milner was sold to the North Wales Granite Company at Conwy in 1914. [5: p102, 111] Following discussions with the Board of Trade in 1906, the Corporation and the North Eastern Railway had obtained permission for three passenger trains per week to pass over the goods yard and sidings at Pateley Bridge, so that excursions could continue up to Lofthouse between June and September only. Despite the agreement, when the first excursion was due to make the journey on 14th September 1907, the NER decided not to allow their stock to pass onto the Nidd Valley Light Railway, nor to allow the Corporation engine and carriages to come to their station, and so the passengers had to walk between the two stations. [5: p110] In order to avoid confusion for parcels traffic, Lofthouse station became Lofthouse-in-Nidderdale on 12th December 1907, and Wath became Wath-in-Nidderdale in February 1908 for similar reasons.” [4][5: p107-108]

Work on Angram reservoir was finally completed in 1916. “Bradford Corporation had already obtained an Act in 1913, allowing them to abandon their plans for a reservoir at High Woodale, and instead to build a much larger one at Scar House. It would submerge the site of Haden Carr reservoir, and the Act allowed them to start construction “when appropriate”. The cost of the new works was estimated at £2,161,500, and although three tenders were received, they decided on 14th May 1920 to build it themselves, using direct labour. Scar village was built between 1920 and 1921, consisting of ten hostels for a total of 640 men, a school, canteen, recreation room, concert hall, mission church and some bungalows.” [4][5: p115]

Scar Village © Nidderdale Museum, courtesy of the RealYorkshireBlog.com. [11]

Plans to electrify the railway using hydro-electric power, were considered in March 1920, but rejected as being too expensive. uneconomic. Holdsworth, was taken out of service in 1866 because it was too heavy for the line, but when no buyers could be found, it was used as a stationary steam supply for another 14 years. There were plans to overhaul Milner, to obtain another lighter engine, and to purchase two railmotor cars. Only one railmotor (‘Hill’) was eventually purchased in 1921. It can be seen in the two images immediately below.

Steam railmotor car ‘Hill’ approaching Wath station on the descent from Ramsgill. It worked the Pateley Bridge to Lofthouse public passenger service. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_522 DS160103), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]
Pateley Bridge locomotive shed and water tower, showing steam railmotor ‘Hill’ beside the shed and 0-6-0 steam locomotive ‘Blythe’ at the entrance. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_521 DS160102), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

From August 1920, work was carried out to improve the line between Lofthouse and Angram. This included easing the alignment on many of the curves, the addition of loops near Lofthouse and at Woodale, just below the Scar House site, and the construction of a 180-yard (160 m) tunnel near Goyden Pot, which was used by up trains only.” [4][5: p119-122]. “The line at Angram was extended to a small quarry in 1921, along the trackbed of Best’s 3 ft (914 mm) gauge line beyond the dam. Stone was extracted for remedial work, caused by wind and wave erosion of the southern bank of the reservoir near the dam.” [4][5: p123]

The entrance at the lower end of Goyden tunnel. The nature of the terrain was challenging, as is evident in this picture, and downhill trains used the original line, which can be seen alongside the road. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_527 DS160107)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

Close to the Scar House dam site, “a network of sidings were constructed, zig-zagging down to the Nidd, and back up the other side of the valley. A double track self-acting incline provided access to the Carle Fell Quarry, to the north of the reservoir, and as the quarry was worked, two further inclines were constructed. One was single track, with a winding engine at the top, and around 1930, an incline worked by locomotives was added. Above the later quarry face, a Simplex petrol locomotive worked on a 2 ft (610 mm) track, removing overburden.” [4][5: p118]

The Scar House dam construction site viewed across the valley from the south. The zigzag tracks linking the site with the quarries and stoneyard can be seen, with a locomotive in steam with three trucks in the centre of the picture. Beyond is the extensive stoneyard. In the foreground is a row of new large pipe sections manufactured by Glenfield & Kennedy Ltd of Kilmarnock, Scotland. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_537 DS160116)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]
A general view of Carle Fell quarry above the Scar House dam construction site, showing several railway tracks with two steam cranes, a locomotive and a number of trucks. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_539 DS160119)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

Power for the works “was generated using water from Angram reservoir, which was discharged into Haden Carr reservoir. A 4,775-foot (1,455 m) pipeline supplied the turbines. This was later supplemented by a steam generating station. [5: p123-124] Two locomotive sheds were built, one near the village and another on the north side of the River Nidd, with a further two at Carle Fell Quarry. All had two tracks. Twelve four-wheeled carriages were bought from the Maryport and Carlisle Railway, to provide transport for the workers and their families from Scar House to Lofthouse, and a two-track carriage shed was built to the east of the main complex.” [4][5: p125]

Scar House dam under construction, showing the full length of the structure viewed from a distance down in the valley. Four steam cranes are seen on top of the dam, and another one below it alongside railway tracks, a truck, a water tank, and a stack of large stone blocks. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_535 DS160114)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

Six locomotives worked in the quarry. Allenby, Beatty, Haig and Trotter were based at the shed at the top of the main self-acting incline, while Ian Hamilton and Stringer were based in a shed at a higher level. Three steam navvies were used to load stone into the railway wagons, and there were nineteen or twenty steam cranes, all of which were self-propelled and ran on the tracks either in the quarry or on top of the dam.” [4][5: p129]

The masons’ yard above the Scar House dam construction site, with 0-4-0 saddle tank steam locomotive ‘Craven’ and a steam crane lifting blocks of stone. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_540 DS160118). Craven does not appear in Bowtell’s list of locomotives above), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]
A wide view of the Scar House dam construction site across the valley from the quarries high up on the north side, showing the dam below and looking across to the buildings of Scar village, where the workers lived. The zigzag rail tracks linking the construction site with the quarries and stoneyard are clearly visible. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_538 DS160117)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]

The main engineering work at Scar House reservoir closed to completion in September 1931 but it was not until July 1935 that filling of the reservoir commenced. “The official opening was on 7th September 1936. Scar House, which gave its name to the reservoir, was demolished. A new Scar House was built, at the foot of the incline from Carle Fell Quarry, which provided a home for the reservoir keeper, and a boardroom for official visits. [5: p130-131] A project to re-route the waters from Armathwaite Gill and Howstean Beck through a tunnel and into the reservoir began in May 1929. A 2 ft (610 mm) gauge line was laid, on which two battery-electric locomotives and twelve wagons ran.” [4][5: p131]

Two 0-6-0ST locomotives ‘Gadie’ and ‘Illingworth’, head a goods train on the line. [12]

Decline

The start of work on Scar House Reservoir led to an overhaul of existing stock. Seven of the original Metropolitan Railway coaches were upholstered and repainted, while the remaining five were used for the workmen.  [The] steam railmotor [Hill] … obtained in 1921, … had previously been owned by the Great Western Railway. It … was fitted with electric lights in 1923. It worked on the public section of the railway, and never travelled beyond Lofthouse. Numerous new and secondhand locomotives were purchased, most for use on construction work, but two, Blythe and Gadie, were fitted with vacuum brakes, and so worked goods trains from Pateley Bridge to Scar House, as well as passenger trains between Scar House and Lofthouse and sometimes Pateley Bridge.” [4][5: p133]

Passenger trains for the residents of Scar village ran on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, the mid-week ones connecting with ‘Hill’ at Lofthouse, and the Saturday ones running through to Pateley Bridge. The 1927 printed timetable showed five trains a day between Pateley Bridge and Lofthouse, but also showed the trains onwards to Scar Village, with a note that these were for exclusive use of residents. Saturday trains were hauled by Blythe or Gadie, but were banked at the rear by another engine above Lofthouse because of the steep gradients.” [4][5: p134]

The ‘Scar House special’, 0-6-0T locomotives ‘Milner’ and ‘Blythe’ with a goods train, banked in the rear by two other locomotives for the steep climb alongside the road towards Scar House. This was possibly a more substantial train than usual as it required 4 locomotives rather than the 3 mentioned above. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_526 DS160106), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]


Traffic returns showed 106,216 journeys by workmen in 1921, and 41,051 by ordinary passengers. The figure for workmen was not declared after 1922, as the accommodation at Scar Village was available. The peak year for journeys was 1923, with 63,020, after which there was a gradual decline, with 24,906 journeys for the final nine months before closure. The line made a total operating loss of £36,435 between 1908 and 1924, and then made a modest profit until 1929. Fares were cut by one third in early 1929, in the face of competition from motor buses, and a decision was taken to close the line in April 1929.” [4][5: p

An approach to the London and North Eastern Railway to take over the railway was unsuccessful, and on 31st December 1929, the railway closed to public passenger and goods services. The sections below and above Lofthouse continued to be run as a private railway. [5: p135] The Saturday train to Pateley Bridge for the residents of Scar Village continued until 1932.” [4][5: p133]

The line to Angram was severed by the works at Scar House in 1933. “By 1936, with construction completed, the railway was lifted, and a sale was held at Pateley Bridge on 1st March 1937, where everything was sold as a single lot. … At its peak, the Scar House reservoir project had employed about 780 men, and the population of Scar Village had been 1,135. By 1936, there were just eight houses occupied, and seven pupils at the school, which closed on 31st January 1938.” [4][5: p130 & 138]

A Journey along the Line

The railway began in Pateley Bridge, close to the River Nidd, with the goods yard just to the north of the B6265 road. The passenger station was a little further north, and is now occupied by a road called ‘The Sidings’.” [4]

The Nidd Valley Light Railway Station, Transshipment Yard and Goods Yard at Pateley Bridge. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [9]
The Nidd Valley Light Railway Station Platform at Pateley Bridge in 1907. This image was shared on the Railways Around Harrogate & Yorkshire Facebook Group on 18th January 2024 by Ian McGregor, (c) Public Domain. [17]
The same area in the 21st century. ‘The Sidings’ is the cul-de-sac directly above the centre-bottom of the image. The new build further to the North is an extension to Millfield Street. [9]
The Sidings. [Google Street view, May 2024]
The extension to Millfield Street. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
The line’s Carriage Shed and Engine Shed sat to the North of the Station. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [9]
The same area in the 21st century. The area of the Carriage and Engine Sheds has now reverted to farmland. [9]

The line headed North “along the east bank of the river, and this section of it now forms part of the Nidderdale Way, a long-distance footpath. Wath station was just to the south of the minor road that crosses Wath Bridge, and had two sidings.” [4]

Wath Railway Station was on the South side of the road between the Corn Mill and Wath Bridge. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [14]
The same area in the 21st century. ESRI satellite imagery provided by the National Library of Scotland. [14]
Looking South from the minor road into the site of Wath Station. The station building is now a private home. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
The line North of the minor road was on a low embankment. [Google Streetview, May 2024]

The footpath leaves the course of the railway before the station, and follows the bank of the river, crossing over the railway trackbed by Gouthwaite Dam.” [4]

The line passed close to the Northeast end of Gouthwaite Dam. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [15]
A very similar area in the 21st century. [Google Maps, October 2025]
Beyond the North end of Gouthwaite Reservoir, the route of the old railway can be seen from the minor road which links Coville House Farm to Bouthwaite. This view looks South from the road. The route of the old line is beyond the drystone wall in a shallow cutting. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Turning through 90° to face West, the end of the cutting can be seen on the left of this image, the line ran on beyond the tree at the right side of the photograph. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Further North along the same minor road, the old railway ran to the left of the drystone wall, between it and the electricity pole. [Google Streetview, May 2024]

The trackbed was close to the shore of the reservoir, and the footpath rejoins it after a deviation to the north west. Ramsgill Station was at Bouthwaite, rather than Ramsgill, just to the south of Bouthwaite Bridge, where the Ramsgill to Bouthwaite road crosses Lul Beck.” [4]

Ramsgill Railway Station at Bouthwaite. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [16]
Approximately the same area as it appears on 21st century satellite imagery. The line can easily be picked out close to the bottom-right of this image, to the West of the minor road. The station area remains quite distinct! The route of the line continues Northwest on the North side of the minor road which enters centre-left. [Google Maps, October. 2025]
The Station Building at Ramsgill Railway Station in Bouthwaite, the main running line was to the right of the building and crossed the road to the right of the camera. [Google Streetview, May 2924]
Looking Northwest from approximately the same place these trees sit on the line of the old railway. Just North of the road, the line bridged the stream running through the village. [Google Streetview, May 2924]

The footpath rejoins the trackbed briefly at Low Sikes, where there was a level crossing over the Ramsgill to Lofthouse road.” [4]

The level crossing adjacent to the River Nidd at Low Sikes. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. [18]
The same location in the 21st century. Note the gap in the drystone wall bottom-right which sits on the line of the old railway. [18]
Looking Southeast along Nidderdale at Low Sikes. The redline approximates to the line of the old railway in the photograph. Foreshortening of the image significantly tightens the curve of the line. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Looking Northwest alongside the River Nidd from Low Sikes. The line ran approximately straight ahead from the sign post in the foreground. [Google Streetview, May 2024]

The next significant location along the line was Lofthouse Station which sat on the South side of the village of Lofthouse, between the road and the river.

Lofthouse Railway Station sat on the Northeast bank of the River Nidd. The railway crossed the River Nidd on a bridge shared with the highway. [6]
A similar area in the 21st century. [6]
Lofthouse Railway Station building in 21st century, seen from the Southeast. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Lofthouse Railway Station building in 21st century, seen from the Northwest. The railway and platform were on the right of the building. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
This road bridge over the River Nidd was once shared with the light railway, the red line shows the route of the line. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Once across the river the line turned sharply to the North to follow the road to Scar House. It followed the West shoulder of the road with the River Nidd off to the East of the road. [Google Streetview, May 2024]

The metalled road is owned by Yorkshire Water but open to the public. The line continued North remaining on the West shoulder of the road.

The entrance at the lower end of Goyden tunnel. The nature of the terrain was challenging, as is evident in this picture, and downhill trains used the original line, which can be seen alongside the road. Humphrey Household collection (1996-7886_527 DS160107)), © National Science Museum and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence. [10]
The same location in the 21st century. This bricked up tunnel was designed to avoid possible accidents. Northbound trains used the tunnel, Southbound trains used the original railway alignment which included a sharp bend just North of this location. [Google Streetview, May 2024]

The bricked up tunnel can be seen about 2 miles (3.2 km) from Lofthouse, where the road and river turn sharply west. There is a picnic spot near the southern portal of the tunnel.” [4]

Beyond Goyden Tunnel the original line (still used by Southbound trains after the tunnel was built) bears sharply to the West. [Google Streetview, May 2024]
Before the tunnel was constructed a short passing loop was provided on the sharp bend. It was not long enough to allow any significant trains to pass but it mitigated the risk of collision! [19]

Images from two different OS sheets surveyed in the late 1920s show the tunnel noted above. [20]

The line from this point on travelled in a westerly direction. Originally the railway ran through the site of Scar House Reservoir as far as Angram Reservoir. Travellers on the railway would have been able to look down and see a small reservoir formed to secure the intake of the pipeline which served Bradford. Its Dam was called the Nidd Intake Dam.

The Nidd Intake Dam and Reservoir. 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1907/08, published in 1908. This reservoir was swamped by the later Scar House Reservoir. [22]
This map extract comes from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1907 which was published in 1910. The Light Railway has been built but there is no sign of construction work on the Angram Reservoir. [23]
A much later OS Map (1956) showing Angram Reservoir with the route of the old railway marked by red dashes. Note that Scar House Reservoir intrudes at the top-right of this map extract. [24]

At Scar Village there is another picnic spot and a car park. The railway followed the most northerly of the two tracks at this point.

A relatively low grade image showing the area close to Scar House Reservoir on which Scar Village was built. The original line of the railway in the track on the northside of the site of the village. The village historical survey report from which this image has been taken provides details (In some depth) of the site of the village and can be found here. [25]

At Scar Village there is [a] picnic spot and a car park. The railway followed the most northerly of the two tracks at this point. Another track down to the weirs follows the course of one of the zig-zag tracks across the valley. A footpath crosses the dam to the north side of the lake, where the incline to the quarry is still clearly visible. Another road, open to the public on foot, follows the trackbed along the southern edge of Scar House Reservoir, to reach Angram dam. The course of the railway is clearly visible on the modern 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey map for almost the entire length of the railway.”[4]

A short video about Scar Village and the work on Scar House Dam. [21]

References

  1. The Why and the Wherefore; in The Railway Magazine, February 1952; Tothill Press, Westminster, London, p142-144.
  2. https://www.walkingintheyorkshiredales.co.uk/Nidd%20Valley%20Light%20Railway.htm, accessed on 8th October 2025.
  3. D. J. Croft; The Nidd Valley Railway, Locomotion Papers No. 55 (Revised); Oakwood Press, 1987.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nidd_Valley_Light_Railway, accessed on 8th October 2025.
  5. Harold Bowtell; Lesser Railways of the Yorkshire Dales; Plateway Press, Gainsborough, 1991.
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=54.15660&lon=-1.84733&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 9th October 2025.
  7. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125631997, accessed on 10th October 2025.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125632021, accessed on 10th October 2025.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=54.09027&lon=-1.76397&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 10th October 2025.
  10. https://blog.railwaymuseum.org.uk/in-pictures-constructing-the-scar-house-dam, accessed on 11th October 2025.
  11. https://www.realyorkshireblog.com/post/the-story-of-scar-house-reservoir-the-pop-up-village-of-scar-and-the-lost-village-of-lodge, accessed on 11th October 2025.
  12. https://chasewaterstuff.wordpress.com/tag/pateley-bridge, accessed on 11th October 2025.
  13. https://transportsofdelight.smugmug.com/RAILWAYS/RALWAYS-EXCLUDED-FROM-THE-1923-GROUPING/NIDD-VALLEY-RAILWAY, accessed on 11th October 2025.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.8&lat=54.10586&lon=-1.77865&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 12th October 2025.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.5&lat=54.11162&lon=-1.78536&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=92, accessed on 12th October 2025.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.1&lat=54.13617&lon=-1.81524&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 12th October 2025.
  17. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7478382078862607&set=gm.1030871587986998&idorvanity=371639250576905, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=54.14957&lon=-1.83232&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=54.18475&lon=-1.85057&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/view/125630530 & https://maps.nls.uk/view/125630539, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  21. https://youtu.be/8K0yOBaESSo, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  22. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=54.18780&lon=-1.90902&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  23. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.2&lat=54.18299&lon=-1.93299&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  24. https://maps.nls.uk/view/189181725, accessed on 13th October 2025.
  25. http://uppernidderdale.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Scar-Village-Historic-Environment-Survey-Report.pdf, accessed on 13th October 2025.

The Railway between Nice, Tende and Cuneo – Part 8 – Drap-Cantaron Railway Station to Nice.

The featured image above is a postcard view of la Trinite-Victor Railway Station in the very early years after the line opened. [20]

In the first seven articles about the line from Cuneo to the sea we covered the length of the line from Cuneo to Breil-sur-Roya and then to Ventimiglia, before beginning to look at the line between Breil-sur-Roya and Nice. These articles can be found here, [9]  here [10] here, [11] here, [12] here, [13] here, [14] and here. [15]

Woven into the text below are a series of stills from a video of the train journey from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice. The video can be seen here. [4]

This article begins the journey from Drap-Cantaron Railway Station.

The length of the line from Darp-Cantaron Railway Station to Nice-Ville Railway Station. [5]
Drap-Cantaron Railway Station, (c) Eugenio Merzagora and licenced for reuse under a Structurae (non commercial use) Licence. [6]

Drap-Canteron Railway Station. [Google Maps, September 2025]

The view South from the cab of a Nice-bound service waiting to depart from Drap-Cantaron Railway Station. [4]
The view from the same train heading South from Drap-Canteron Station. [4]
The bridge over the railway to the South of Drap-Cantaron Station. [4]
Looking North into the site of Drap-Cantaron Railway Station from the road bridge over the line. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The bridge over the line, seen from the Northwest. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
Looking South from the same road bridge. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Tunnel de Serradone (33 metres long), seen from the cab of the Nice-bound train. [4]

Tunnel de Serradone. [23]

The same short tunnel seen from Terre d’Eze. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The view from the cab of the Nice-bound train leaving Tunnel de Serradone. [4]

Looking back along the line towards Drap-Cantaron Station, this is the South portal of Tunnel de Serradone. [23]

A level-crossing and railway house just beyond Tunnel de Serradone. The crossing takes Terre d’Eze across the line. [4]

Looking back Northeast towards Tunnel de Serradone from the level-crossing. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
Looking Southwest at the level-crossing. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Continuing South along the line, this is the North portal of Tunnel du Moulin (83 metres long), seen from the cab of the Nice-bound train. [4]

Tunnel du Moulin. [22]

Immediately beyond Tunnel du Moulin, and with the sun in our eyes, the Nice-bound train passes under Penetrante de Paillon (D2204B). [4]

Looking back towards Tunnel de Moulin from the Penetrante de Paillon. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The line continuing towards Nice after passing under the Penetrante de Paillon. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Looking back under the bridge carry the Pentrante de Paillon towards Tunnel du Moulin. [22]

With the sun in our eyes again, the Nice-bound train crosses the Pont de Paillon, a 95 meter long bridge across the River Paillon. [4]

Pont de Paillon (or Pont de Trinite Victor) seen from the bridge carrying Boulevard Georges Bueno over the river. [Google Streetview, February 2025]
An early photograph of the same bridge which was built in 1928. The bridge has three spans, one 28.7 metres, one 31.6 metres and one 28.7 metres (c) Unknown but probably Public Domain. [7]

Just a short distance further along the line and with the sun once more in our eyes, this cab view shows the bridge carrying Boulevard George Bueno over the railway. [4]

Looking back towards Pont de Paillon from the bridge carrying Boulevard Georges Bueno over the line. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
A strategically place signpost blocks our view Southwest from Boulevard Georges Bueno towards La Trinite Victor railway Station. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

La Trinite-Victor Railway Station as seen from the cab of a Nice-bound service. [4]

The La Trinite-Victor Railway Station. [Google Maps, September 2025]

Old postcard image showing the original buildings at La Trinite-Victor Railway Station, (c) Public Domain. [8]
La Trinite-Victor Railway Station seen from what was the Boulevard National, (c) Editions Gilletta, now Public Domain. [19]
A train heading for Nice arrives at La Trinite-Victor Railway Station, (c) Unknown but probably Public Domain. [20]
La Trinite-Victor Railway Station as seen looking East from Boulevard Anatole France. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

A level-crossing to the South of La Trinite-Victor Station. [4]

The view back towards Lat Tinite-Victor Station from the level-crossing (Road: M2204C). [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The view South towards Nice from the level-crossing. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Continuing Southwest alongside the Paillon the railway runs to the East of the modern road which sits below the flood defences on the East side of the River Paillon. The road is a later addition to the river bank and is protected from the river by a high retaining wall. To its East, the railway sits on a stone embankment. …

A typical example of the stone retaining wall that holds the railway above the immediately surrounding land and the modern road. The retaining wall is pierced by a stone-arched underpass. A number of such underpasses provided for access under the railway when it was first built. [Google Streetview, February 2025]

The next halt, alongside the River Paillon, is L’Ariane La Trinité. …

The Halt at L’Ariane La Trinité, seen from the cab of the Nice-bound train. [4]

The level-crossing just to the West of the halt at L’Ariane La Trinité. [4]

Another view of La Gare de l’Ariane La Trinité can be seen here. [21]

Looking Northeast from the junction of Pont de la Liberté with Boulevard Riba Roussa, the crossing barriers are closed as a train is just about to set off for Nice from the halt at l’Ariane La Trinité. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Looking towards Nice from the level-crossing on Pont de la Liberté. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The line soon passes under the A8 flyover. The sun is still in our eyes as we look out from the cab of the Nice-bound service. The road to the right of the line and at a lower level is the Boulevard Anatole France. [4]

A short distance further along the line towards Nice it bridges the Route de Turin. This view looks West under the railway bridge. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The same bridge seen from the West on the Route de Turin. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The North portal of Tunnel du Bon Voyage (369 metres in length), seen from the cab of the Nice-bound train crossing the bridge over the Route de Turin with the sun low in the sky. [4]

The North portal of Tunnel du Bon Voyage and the adjacent bridge over the Route de Turin. [24]

Tunnel du Bon Voyage. [24]

The view from the cab of the same train as it leaves the South portal of Tunnel du Bon Voyage. [4]

The South portal of Tunnel du Bon Voyage. [Google Earth, September 2025]

A short distance further along the line the railway is crossed on the level by a minor road before it reached Tunnel de Roche. [4]

The Northwest portal of Tunnel de Roche, seen looking East from a minor road. [Google Streetview, December 2010]

A better view of the Northwest portal of Tunnel de Roche, from the level crossing mentioned above. [25]

Tunnel de Roche, 96 metres in length. [25]

The view Southeast from the Southeast portal of Tunnel de Roche. [4]

The Southeast portal of Tunnel de Roche. [Google Earth, September 2025]

Pont Michel seen from the cab of the Nice-bound service. [4]

A glimpse of the line to the North, from the carriageway over Pont Michel in Nice. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

Looking North along the line towards Pont Michel. [Google Earth, September 2025]

Looking South across Pont Michel. The running lines from Breil-sur-Roya are on the left of this image. The other lines are part of Nice Depot. Pont Michael Railway Station is at the bottom of the image. See the notes below about the history of this location. [Google Earth, September 2025]

Pont Michel Railway Station. [4]

The platform on the left was part of the Saint-Roch Railway Station, now closed. [4]

The Saint Roch Railway Station is highlighted in the top-right of this map extract. The line continues towards Nice-Ville bridging a number of roads before crossing the River Paillon again. [26]

The area to the West of Nice-Depot and Saint Roche Station. The line crosses three roads on its way to the riverbank. [Google maps, September 2025]
The first of these structures, seen looking North from Avenue Denis Semeria provides access under the line to Nice-Depot. [Google Streetview, February 2025]
The same bridge, seen from the North (from the access road to Nice-Depot. [Google Streetview, October 2022]

Looking towards Nice-Ville from the cab of the Nice-bound service as it crosses the access road to the Nice-Depot. [4]

A more modern structure now spans the M2204B, Route de Turin. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
A similar aged steel bridge spans Boulevard Jean Baptiste Verany adjacent to the River Paillon. A series of graceful arches make up the railway viaduct across the Paillon. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The Stone-arch viaduct across the River Paillon seen from the Southeast – 3 spans, 127 metres in length. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The same structure seen from the Southwest on Avenue du Maréchal Lyautey. The three arches over the river are clearly visible and the two steel spans at either end of the structure are also visible. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

After crossing the Paillon the line curves to the South and crosses another modern bridge. …

The bridge which carries the railway over Rue de la Gendarmerie, Nice. This photograph is taken facing West on Rue de la Gendarmerie. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

A short distance further along the line it enters Tunnel de Carabacel.

The line of the Tunnel de Carabacel is shown by the red, blue and green dots. It is 663 metres in length. [27]

The Northeast portal of Tunnel de Carabacel. [27]

The Southwest portal of Tunnel de Carabacel, seen through mesh fencing. The two tracks marked with the green arrows are those from Breil-sur-Roya. The yellow arrow marks the track which runs through Tunnel de Cimiez Nord and the orange arrow marks the track which runs through Tunnel de Cimiez Sud. [27]

The view West from the cab of the Nice-bound train after it has left Tunnel de Carabacel. [4]

Looking North along Avenue Desambrois, Nice the old railway bridge is dwarfed by the concrete structures of the motorway! [Google Streetview, July 2025]

Also looking North, this time on Rue de Lépante, Nice, the motorway structures loom over the old railway bridge. [Google Streetview, July 2025]

Looking North along Rue Miron, the motorway bridge seems to be even higher! [Google Streetview, April 2025]

The final structure before the line runs into Nice-Ville Station. This bridge spans Avenue Jean Médecin. [Google Streetview, May 2018]

The sun is in our eyes as we approach Nice-Ville Railway Station. [4]

Nice-Ville Railway Station seen from the cab of the train from Breil-sur-Roya which terminates in Nice. [4]

Nice Railway Station in 1933, © Public Domain. [31]
A 141R (2-8-2) locomotive sits at Nice Railway Station in 1957, © Michel Braun. [31]
At the head of the “Mistral” Paris-Lyon – Nice, BB 25243 is ready to leave Nice for Marseille in June 1976, © JP Rigouard – Publisher: Le Rail Ussellois in Ussel (Corrèze). [31]
TGV No. 842 to Paris-Lyon is preparing to leave Nice Railway Station in 1992, © Georges Martret – Publisher: AMC Côte d’Azur in Roquebrune – Cap-Martin. [31]
The exterior of the Station in Nice in the early years of the 20th century, © Public Domain. [31]
The exterior of Nice Railway Station in the 1990s, from the collection of M. Caron, © Unknown. [31]

Banaudo et al tell us that The first 5 kilometres of the line in the suburbs of Nice were constructed by the Nice-based company Orizet Frères, work began in August 1909. Their work included three tunnels with a total length of 1,127 metres, a bridge over the Paillon, nine metal-decked road underpasses, an overpass, and three level-crossings. Between Nice-Ville and Cimiez Hill, the track-bed of the existing line to Menton had to be be extensively reworked to accommodate the new tracks. [1: p101]

Work on the site of the Saint Roch station commenced in January 1910 and on the Tunnel de Carabacel in May 1910. Work on the tunnel was only undertaken from the Northeast end so as to avoid the need t remove spoil from close to the railway station in Nice. This also meant that the excavated material could be used in constructing the embankment from the tunnel towards the bridge over the Paillon. The river bad of the Paillon was found to be unstable. “Foundations up to 17 m deep had to be dug using compressed air to firmly establish the piers of the three shallow arches made of La Turbie stone. Despite these precautions, ground movements recurred, which an attempt was made to remedy in the fall of 1912 by overloading the Nice-side arch with a mass of gravel bags representing a pressure of 2,500 kg per square metre, while recording devices measured the gradual settlement of the ground.” [1: p103]

The extensive depot at Nice, Saint-Roch. The large engine shed can be seen at the top-left of this image. The Breil-sur-Roya to Nice line runs around the left-hand side of the site (the Southeast), passing very close to the engine shed. [28]
On 12th May 1960, a 141R locomotive (2-8-2 using UK notation) heads towards the steam depot exit, passing the signal cabin. At that time, Nice-Saint-Roch had 47 No. 141Rs, a number that increased to 56 in 1963, then gradually reduced following the progress of electrification. On 1st March 1968, the depot closed its doors to steam traction; the roundhouse was partially demolished in 1967, and completely demolished in 1969. [29]

Nice Saint-Roch locomotive depot soon after opening. [30]

The Nice Depot was built on the site of orange groves. “The Société des Travaux en Ciment Thorrand et Compagnie, … originally from Grenoble and based in Nice, used reinforced concrete to build a 110 m diameter rotunda for forty-eight locomotives, a maintenance workshop for six locomotives, a water tower supplied by the Paillon water table, a fuel park with an 80 m quay served by 4.40 m turntables, several buildings housing apprentices, administrative offices, … refectory, oil mill, lamp room, etc.” [1: p103]

And Finally ……

Nice-Premium reported on 2nd September 2024 that major works were to be undertaken on the railway between Nice and Breil-sur-Roya. [32]

The ambitious regeneration program for the Nice to Breil-sur-Roya railway line began in September 2024 and is due to be completed by 14th December 2025.

The work will cost about 78.1 million euros. It will strengthen the infrastructure, improve the transport service, and guarantee better comfort for travellers.

The work aims to reinforce the many engineering structures and improve the stability of the tracks. This will not only secure the transportation of users but also protect this vital infrastructure against climate hazards. It promises concrete improvements for users. By the end of the work, it’s planned that one TER per hour, per direction, will run between Drap and Breil. As well as two TERs per hour between Nice and Drap. This increase of 46% in transport service will be accompanied by a notable improvement in traveler comfort thanks to the renewal of equipment and modernization of infrastructure. These changes aim to make the service more reliable and regular!

The closure of the line between September 2024 and December 2025 is necessary, particularly to permit a large number of tunnels to be renovated The closure will ensure the efficiency and speed of the work, as opposed to a partial closure which could prolong the timeline.

The total cost of the work amounts to 78.1 million euros, with an additional approximately 8 million euros for the transport substitution system. The Region is contributing 56.5 million euros, with participation from the State, SNCF Réseau, the Nice Côte d’Azur Metropolis, as well as the Communauté d’Agglomération de la Riviera Française and the Communauté de Communes du Pays des Paillons. [32]

More information can be found here. [33]

References

  1. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 1: 1858-1928; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  2. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 2: 1929-1974; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  3. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 3: 1975-1986; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  4. https://youtu.be/rLXAEz-n4mM?si=RLQC31jynGeM_lQR, accessed on 26th August 2025. Permission to use these still images from the YouTube video has been sought.
  5. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne_de_Nice_%C3%A0_Breil-sur-Roya, accessed on 17th September 2025.
  6. https://structurae.net/en/structures/drap-cantaron-station, accessed on 27th September 2025.
  7. https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/aJYAAOSwP5pjDPCA/s-l1600.webp, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  8. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8002, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  9. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/22/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-1.
  10. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-2.
  11. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/06/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-3-vievola-to-st-dalmas-de-tende
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/16/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-4-st-dalmas-de-tende-to-breil-sur-roya
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/25/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-5-breil-sur-roya-to-ventimiglia
  14. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/29/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-6-breil-sur-roya-to-lescarene
  15. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/09/26/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-7-lescarene-to-drap-cantaron-railway-station/
  16. Franco Collida, Max Gallo & Aldo A. Mola; CUNEO-NIZZA History of a Railway; Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo, Cuneo (CN), July 1982.
  17. Franco Collidà; 1845-1979: the Cuneo-Nice line year by year; in Rassegna – Quarterly magazine of the Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo; No. 7, September 1979, pp. 12-18.
  18. Stefano Garzaro & Nico Molino; THE TENDA RAILWAY From Cuneo to Nice, the last great Alpine crossing; Editrice di Storia dei Trasporti, Colleferro (RM), EST, July 1982.
  19. https://www.cparama.com/forum/cartes2015/1438155711-06-La-Trinite-Victor-4.jpg, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  20. https://www.cparama.com/forum/cartes2018/1528437503-ZLa-trinite-victor-06.jpg, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  21. https://www.provence7.com/a-a-z-des-articles/lariane-quartier-village-de-nice/attachment/gare-lariane-la-trinite-1c, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  22. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06149.1.pdf, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  23. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06149.2.pdf, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  24. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06088.7.pdf, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  25. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06088.6.pdf, accessed on 28th September 2025.
  26. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06088.07B.pdf, accessed on 29th September 2025.
  27. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06088.5.pdf, accessed on 29th September 2025.
  28. https://papybricolo.over-blog.com/2020/10/nice-st-roch-l-ancien-depot-des-locomotives.html, accessed on 29th September 2025.
  29. https://www.laviedurail.com/bonnes-feuilles/vif-annees-1960, accessed on 29th September 2025.
  30. https://journals.openedition.org/rhcf/1792, accessed on 29th September 2025.
  31. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=99249, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  32. https://www.nice-premium.com/eur78-million-invested-to-modernize-the-nice-breil-sur-roya-railway-line, accessed on 7th October 2025.
  33. https://www.soletanche-bachy.com/en/soletanche-bachy-france-contributes-to-the-modernization-and-securing-of-the-nice-breil-railway-line, accessed on 7th October 2025.

Granville Colliery and the Lilleshall Company Railways

I was asked to do a talk for the Association of Shrewsbury Railway Modellers in November 2025. These are the notes and images pulled together for that talk. In many cases, the images included have been used in other articles and rather than creating new image files a link to the original image has been provided in these notes. ………

The featured image above is a view of the NCB-built engine shed near Granville Colliery. After the NCB took over the collieries owned by the Lilleshall Company, Granville Colliery supplied coal to Buildwas Power Station and the coal trains were worked by a range of locos down the 1.5 miles to Donnington. Granville Colliery had a decent sized shed and in later years used Austerity 0-6-0ST tanks but in Lilleshall Company days the bigger engines were the ex-TVR and Barry railway engines. This image and the accompanying text were shared by Marcus Keane on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 15th September 2015. [38]

The Lilleshall Company

Sir John Leveson became Earl Gower in 1746. His son Granville Leveson Gower became the second Earl in 1754. They owned limestone quarries and coal mines in Shropshire and had significant land holdings across the country.

Granville Leveson Gower was elected to Parliament in 1744. With the death of his elder brother in 1746, he became known by the courtesy title of Viscount Trentham until he succeeded his father as Earl Gower in 1754. He built the earlier Lilleshall Hall, converting a 17th-century house located in the village of Lilleshall into a country residence around the late 1750s. [1]

He remained active in politics until his retirement later in 1794. In 1786, he was created Marquess of Stafford as a reward for his services. He dies in 1803. [1] He took an active interest in the efficient running of his local estates, including those at Sherrifhales, Lilleshall, Donnington Wood, St Georges, Priorslee, Wombridge and Snedshill. [2]

The second Earl’s brother-in-law was Francis, 3rd Duke of Bridgewater, who was the originator of the Bridgewater Canal which carried coal out of his mines in the Manchester area. Earl Gower was introduced to the brothers Thomas and John Gilbert John Gilbert was instrumental in the construction of the Bridgewater Canal. Along with the Gilbert brothers, the second Earl formed the Lilleshall Partnership in 1764. Initially, it focused on improving the extraction and supply of lime for use in agriculture and as a flux in iron-making. [2]

The Earl had a vested interest in producing and delivering limestone as cheaply as possible.  The Lilleshall Partnership recognised that a better communication system was required between its widely dispersed sites and in 1765 began the construction of a 5.5 mile long canal. It ran from the Earl’s holdings in Donnington Wood to wharves at Pave Lane and was known as the Donnington Wood Tug Boat Canal.

Large scale iron making began in the parish of Lilleshall in 1785 when a blast furnace was operating at Donnington Wood.  The works was started by William Reynolds and Joseph Rathbone. By 1802 there were two furnaces and a third was added in that year.

By 1802, the partnership and its associated companies were dissolved and replaced by The Lilleshall Company which over time developed interests in mechanical engineering, coal mining, iron and steel making and brickworks.  The company was noted for its winding, pumping and blast engines and operated a private railway network.  It also constructed railway locomotives from 1862 to 1888. [2]

In 1880, the Lilleshall Company became a Public company. After the Second World War its mines were nationalised as was the Lilleshall Iron and Steel Co under the Iron and Steel Act but then denationalised in 1954 and sold back to Lilleshall Company. The company’s railways were closed in 1969. [2]

The Mines

The Friends of Granville Country Park tell us that the Lilleshall Company “sank its first deep mine at Waxhill Barracks in 1818 and another the Freehold pit, at about the same time. The Muxton Bridge pit was opened by 1840. There were over 400 acres of coalpits and waste tips in the area in the 1840s.  Their production was running at some 100,000 tons of coal a year with 50,000 tons of iron ore. ” [2]

Map of Muxton Bridge, Waxhill Barracks and Barnyard Collieries. This image was shared by Brian Edwards on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 29th September 2022. It shows the rail network prior to the installation of the cutoff line, Granville Colliery sits off the bottom of this image, (c) Unknown. [14]

Granville Colliery

By 1860, the Granville pit had been sunk and sinking of the Grange (originally the Albert and Alexander) pit began in 1864.  Grange Colliery, Granville Colliery, The Muxton Bridge, Woodhouse and Stafford Collieries were known as the Deepside Mines.” [2]

Granville Colliery was nationalised after the Second World War. It remained under National Coal Board control until closure in 1979. At the time of closure it was employing 560 people. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Sharon Bradburn on 10th July 2018, (c) Unknown. [4]

From the late 19th century, coal mining gradually declined.  The Waxhill barracks colliery ceased production in 1900 and Muxton Bridge soon after.  The Freehold colliery closed in 1928 and only the Grange and Granville collieries survived until nationalisation in 1947.  In 1951 the two were connected underground and from 1952 the Grange served mainly to ventilate the Granville.  In 1979 the Granville colliery, which employed 560 men, was closed.  It was the last coal mine in Shropshire.” [2]

Bob Yate tells us that, “The most prolific of the collieries, [Granville Colliery] supplied the LNWR, GWR and Cambrian Railways with locomotive coal, and latterly also to Ironbridge ‘B’ Power Station. In 1896, there were 177 underground and 67 surface workers. Later the pit had a fairly consistent workforce of around 300 men, but after the closure of the nearby Kemberton colliery in 1967, this grew to 900 men, but shrank again to around 600 in the early 1970s. Meanwhile, the annual output had grown from around 300-350,000 tons to 600,000 tons in the late 1960s.” [25: p16]

An early photograph of Granville Pit, taken from the West in around 1900. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Ray Robinson on 20th May 2024, (c) Unknown. [6]
This extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1881/1882 shows the full length of the Mineral Railway branch from the East side of the map extracts above which show Old Lodge Furnaces. It is worth noting the loop which allowed locomotives to run round their trains just to the West of the Colliery site. [26]
An extract from the ERSI satellite imagery provided by the National Library of Scotland. The two lanes which appear on the map extract above can easily be seen on this satellite image. The line of the old Mineral Railway is also easy to make out. Nothing remains of the old colliery buildings. [27]
This much enlarged extract shows the immediate vicinity of the Granville Colliery in 1881/1882. [26]
A similar extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1901/1902. In 20 years some changes have occurred. The more southerly of the two colliery buildings has been enlarged and the new tramway/tramroad has been provided onto the spoil heap North of the standard-gauge mineral railway terminus, [28]
This map extract comes from the 1925/1927 edition of the 25″ Ordnance Survey. The screens have been built and some modifications to the internal tramway layout have occurred. [19]
The Colliery site on the 1:10,000 Ordnance Survey published in 1954. The tramway to the spoil heap has been relocated and the buildings on site have been altered. [30]
The colliery site on the 1:10,000 Ordnance Survey published in 1967. A complete refurbishment of the buildings above ground has taken place. The screens building is different and the area to the East of the railway has seen significant reconstruction. An internal tramway can now be seen to the South and East of the standard gauge line. [31]
This extract from the same Ordnance Survey sheet of 1967 shows the wider area close to Granville Colliery and the rationalisation which had by then taken place. The line North off this extract heads for the site of Muxtonbridge Colliery where trains to the Donnington Sidings would once have reversed. The line leaving the extract to the West runs on to the rest of the Lilleshall Company’s network. [31]
By 1970, this was the layout of the lines between the mainline at Donnington and the Colliery. This hand-drawn image appears in Bob Yate’s book. [25: p119]

Having looked at maps showing the Granville Colliery site at different points in its history, some photographs will help us better to envisage the site.

The Colliery’s sign close to the A5. This image is a still taken from a B&R Video, “The Jim Clemens Collection No. 2 – Steaming Through Shropshire Part 1.” Grange Lane is on the right side of the image with the A5 behind the camera, © Michael Clemens, and used here with his kind permission. [11]
Granville Colliery prior to modernisation. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Cliff Hewitt on 11th September 2105, (c) Unknown. [15]
Granville Colliery prior to modernisation. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Cliff Hewitt on 11th September 2105, (c) Unknown. [16]
Granville Colliery after modernisation. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Cliff Hewitt on 11th September 2105, (c) Unknown. [17]
Granville Colliery in the late 60s or early 70s. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery facebook Group by Cliff Hewitt on 21st August 2023, (c) Unknown. [5]
Another view of the colliery buildings and winding gear. This image taken soon after closure in 1979 and was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Brian Swanborough on 17th February 2025, (c) Tony Minor. [10]
The Colliery Head gear. Paul Wheeler comments: “To left, the upcast shaft and coal lifting cage. To right, man riding head gear and cage, used predominantly for personnel. Extreme right, is the winding engine house (electric) . The offices, baths and engineering workshops are off the photo to right.” Cliff Hewitt, responding to the Facebook posts says: “Left hand shaft was No 1 shaft always used as down cast shaft, man riding, coal & materials. Right hand shaft was upcast shaft & water shaft till the link underground to the Grange colliery 1952, the Grange then becoming the upcast for the Granville. This photo shows Granville after modernisation the No 2 shaft (on the right of picture) then wound men & materials the No 1 shaft became man riding shaft for men going in & out of the pit during shift time when the No 2 shaft was winding coal or materials. In 1967 a 2300hp winder was installed in the No 2 winder (ex Hampstead winder) then the cages in No 2 shaft had double deck cages & wound at a greater speed. Attached is the painting from the surveyors office [below) left hand No 2 shaft showing the beam engine pump all before modernisation.” This image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 1st October 2017 by Paul Wheeler. [19]
The picture referred to by Cliff Hewitt in his notes above. The image was shared by Cliff Hewitt on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 1st October 2017. [44]

What appears to be a train of empties at the screens at Granville Colliery. [11]

The same location but after the rail link was severed. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Linda Howard on 9th March 2014. [18]
A view of the screens from behind. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by John Wood on 30th January 2015. [43]

Granville Colliery had its own 2ft 3in narrow gauge railway/tramway underground and close to the main shafts, battery powered locomotives were used below ground. …

Under the head gear at Granville Colliery. Coal was lifted up the shaft and run off to left to what appears to be a tippler. From there the coal went down to the screens. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 1st March 2014 by Marcus Keane. [20]
The same lines seen from the opposite direction and from above. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 1st March 2014 by Marcus Keane. [21]
The Tippler is featured in this image, which was shared by John Wood on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 30th January 2015. [22]
Two of the tubs/wagons used underground are seen in this image which was shared by John Wood on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 30th January 2015. [23]

Underground, there was an extensive network of 2ft 3in gauge lines which were initially served by horse power but which were later to see a number of dedicated battery-powered locomotives in use.

Cliff Hewitt shared this image on the Granville Colliery Facebook Page on 11th September 2015. [24]
The underground workshop/garage at Granville Colliery in 1958. Granville had three English Electric battery locos and the garage had battery charging benches on either side of the rails. This image was shared by Cliff Hewitt on 22nd November 2015 on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group. [24]
Granville Colliery had English Electric battery locos, picture is of the loco garage with the 3.3kv battery chargers to the left of frame switchgear to the right & a loco in the background ready for a battery change. This image was shared by Cliff Hewitt as a comment under a post by Ray Pascal, dated 18th November 2015, on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group. [24]
A loco battery changeout. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 18th November 2015 by Cliff Hewitt. [24]

Old Lodge Furnaces

In 1824 the company commissioned two new blast furnaces. They were named the Old Lodge furnaces because of their proximity to the site of an old hunting lodge which was demolished in 1820. In March 1825 the Lilleshall Company paid the Coalbrookdale Company £2,392 for the works.  George Roden, a stonemason from the Nabb, was paid £425 in 1825 and just over £777 in 1826 for erecting loading ramps and the retaining walls. In 1830 the Donnington Wood and the Old Lodge ironworks together produced 15,110 tons. A third furnace was added in 1846 and two more in 1859. New blast beam engines, manufactured by the Lilleshall Company, were installed in 1862 and the height of the furnaces was increased from 50 to 71 feet at about the same time.

Limestone came, via the canal, from the Lilleshall quarries and the coal (coke) and iron stone from the local pits via an extensive system of tramways, some of which, were later converted to standard gauge railways.

The Old Lodge Furnaces produced cold-blast pig iron of the finest quality, but eventually it could not compete with cheaper iron made elsewhere and in 1888 the last of the Old Lodge furnaces was blown out. The furnaces were demolished in 1905 by Thomas Molineaux Jnr, including a tall chimney 140 feet high by 13 feet diameter, known locally as “The Lodge Stack”. In 1956 the stone was reused for St Mathew’s Church. Thereafter the company concentrated all its iron and steel making at Priorslee.

An artist’s impression of what the Old Lodge Furnaces site would have looked like in its heyday. The view is from the Northeast. The canal arm which served the furnaces can be seen entering the sketch from the bottom-right (the North). The image is a little misleading as it shows narrow-boats on the canal when in fact tub-boats would have been used. The tub-boats would have been drawn by horses. The rails shown as a schematic representation of the rails on the site throughout its history and show an engine shed on the North end of the fun of furnaces. [My photograph, 27th July 2023]
This map extract is taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1881/1882. The canal arm enters from the top of the extract and railways/tramways are shown in preponderance, with the furnaces themselves in a row running North-South just above the centre of the extract. The line running off the extract to the East heads towards Granville Colliery. The line running off the extract to the South runs to Dawes Bower and Grange Colliery. Of the lines exiting the extract to the West, one, running Northwest (at the top corner of the lower image) is the old tramway link to Lubstree Wharf. There are also two lines leaving the bottom-left corner of the lower image, the lower line runs towards collieries/shafts local to the furnaces and is probably a tramway at a higher level than the upper of the two lines which is in cutting and is the connection from Old Lodge Furnaces into the wider Mineral Railway network belonging to the Lilleshall Company. [46]
This extract from RailMapOnline.com’s satellite imagery shows the area of the furnaces in the 21st century, a little more of the area immediately to the North than appears on the OS map extract above and less on the East-West axis. The turquoise lines are symbolic representations of the tramway network which preceded the mineral railway which is represented by the purple lines. The two tramway routes leading North out of this and the map extract served, from the left: Meadow Colliery (which appears in the first map extract below); Barn Colliery; Waxhill Barracks and Barracks Colliery; and Muxton Bridge Colliery. (That line, from Muxton Bridge Colliery to the site of Old Lodge Furnaces is illustrated on the map extracts which follow the one covering Meadow Colliery). [47]
A view of Old Lodge Furnaces from the East. [4] (This image was first produced in the ‘London Trade Exchange’ of 2nd January 1875. Some of the tramways are visible, as are the coke ovens in the distance, and the engine house on the right, although the engraver has omitted the chimney beside the engine house.) [25: p11]

The site of the furnaces became the main marshalling are for coal wagons from a number of the collieries, but particularly Granville Colliery

The Lilleshall Company Tramway and Railway Networks

A significant network of tramways and later railways served the Lilleshall Company’s interests in East Shropshire.

Bob Yate provides a sketch of the whole of the Lilleshall Company’s network of railways. This extract from the sketch map shows the length of their railways between the Humber Arm and Granville Colliery. The locations shown on this extract are: 3. Old Lodge Furnaces; 8. The Humber Arm Railway; 9. Lubstree Wharf; 10. The Donnington (LNWR) exchange sidings and the Midland Ironworks; 13. Lodge Trip; 19. Granville Colliery; 20. Barn Pits Colliery; 21. Waxhill Barracks Colliery; 22. Muxton Bridge Colliery; 23. Freehold Colliery; and 24. Shepherd Slag Crushing Plant. Yaye does not record Meadow Colliery which was close to the Donnington Wood Canal to the Southwest of Muxton Bridge Colliery and apparently tramway served until its closure. [2: p38]

The northernmost point on the network of tramways/tramroads was a wharf on the Humber Arm of the Newport Branch of the Shropshire Union Canal. That short branch canal ran from Kynnersley to Lubstree close to The Humbers, a hamlet located to the North of the old LNWR mainline through Donnington and on the North side of Venning Barracks, the present base of the 11th Signal Brigade and Headquarters West Midlands, part of the British Army’s 3rd UK Division. The early tramroad North of the old LNWR line was later replaced by a standard-gauge line. The length of tramroad to the South of the LNWR line was eventually abandoned in favour of a standard gauge line to the East.

The South end of the Humber Arm and the wharf at Lubstree as shown on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1882. [45]
Approximately the same area as shown on the map extract above, as it appears on the RailMapOnline.com satellite imagery. The purple lines are the approximate line of the Mineral Railway that replaced the tramway we will following first. Satellite imagery shows nothing of the Canal Arm to the North of this image. Heading to the North from here, the line of the canal traverses open fields and then Aqueduct plantation. The trees in the plantation obscure any direct evidence of the old canal arm from above and, similarly, the location of its junction with the Shropshire Union Canal Newport Branch. Significant work has taken place at this location to convert derelict buildings to housing. [47]
The modern home created from the goods shed at Lubstree. [48]

As shown on Yate’s sketch plan above, the line ran South towards the LNWR main line, passing under it by means of the bridge. The LNWR line has been replaced by the A518.

This extract from the 1882 25″ Ordnance Survey shows the point at which the LNWR bridged the Lilleshall Company’s tramway/railway. It also shows the old tramway route continuing to the South-southeast and the later standard-gauge mineral railway curving round to the Northeast to run parallel to the LNWR main line. [49]
This RailMapOnline satellite image shows the features noted on map extract above and shows the dramatic changes which have occurred in the immediate vicinity of the old tramway. The tramway route is not followed by RailMapOnline South-southeast of Wellington Road. It runs Southeast towards Old Lodge Furnaces. [47]

After passing under the LNWR main line, the Lilleshall Company’s Mineral Railway turned Northeast to run alongside the LNWR for a short distance.

The mineral railway ran parallel to the LNWR main line. [49]
The Aldi store sits over the line of the old railway. [47]
This map extract shows the mineral railway curving away from the LNWR mainline. There were exchange sidings at this location and lines which accessed a Timber Yard and the Midland Ironworks, both on the East side of the LNWR mainline. [50]
This RailMapOnline satellite image shows that the route of the old mineral railway ties in with the modern field boundary. [47]
On the curve on Donnington Sidings looking East. This is the same train as shown on the next picture. This image was shared by Carole Anne Huselbee on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 14th September 2014. [51]
Donnington Sidings looking Northwest. A rake of empties setting off for Granville Colliery behind an 0-6-0ST locomotive. Wellington Road Crossing is a short distance ahead of the locomotive. This photograph was shared by Carole Anne Huselbee on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 5th October 2014. [52]
This next extract from the 25″Ordnance Survey of 1882 shows the mineral railway heading Southeast and crossing, first, what is now Wellington Road, and then running parallel to the modern Donnington Wood Way and crossing School Road. [49]
The route of the old mineral railway runs parallel to Donnington Wood Way, approximately on the line of the footpath shown on this Google Maps extract. The red flag marker highlights its route. [Google Maps, July 2023]
A closer view of the point where the mineral railway crossed the old Wellington Road. The photograph below shows a locomotive approaching the level-crossing from the Southeast. [47]
Wellington Road Crossing. The photograph below shows a locomotive entering the level-crossing from the Southeast. This picture was shared by Carole Anne Huselbee on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 5th October 2014. [53]
This crossing was located at what was called the Coal Wharf on the old Wellington Road just over & up from the now Ladbrokes Bookies. The line ran from the pit and approached it via what is now a footpath between “The Fields” (a lane to the houses at the bottom of bell rec.) and Donnington Wood Way then across the first gated crossing at the bottom of School Road and on past the end of what is now Van Beeks Motor Spares to the second crossing. The road was wide so gates with supporting heavy caster type wheels allowed them to open seperately. The photograph shows NCB loco No 10 crossing the main Telford to Newport road (A518) at Donnington in 1975 with a trip working from Granville Colliery to the exchange sidings which were just the other side of the road. The MGR hopper wagons would then be moved by a Class 47 to Ironbridge, with run rounds at both Wellington and Madeley Junction. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Peter Bushell on 21st August 2023, The gates in this image are now in use by Telford Steam Railway. (c) Unknown. [7]

Possibly the same locomotive, definitely at the same location as the image above. This image was shared by Phil Neal on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 8th August 2017, (c) Unknown. [12]

An Austerity 0-6-0ST, ‘Granville No. 5’ an industrial saddle tank, is close to Wellington Road Crossing. The building next to it is now ‘Van Beeks’ Motor Factors. The location was known as ‘Coal Wharf Corner’. The photograph was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group © David Clarke. David says that No.5 is in charge of a loaded train which it is pulling into the exchange sidings. He worked as a petrol pump attendant at what is now ‘Van Beeks’. [55]
Locomotive No. 10 (a Hunslet 0-6-0 ) waiting with its train to cross Wellington Road. This photo was shared by Lin Keska on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 2nd May 2017. [54]
A photograph taken at the School Road Crossing, © SimonFP and shared by him in a comment on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 5th August 2023. [56]
Another view of the School Road Crossing. This photo was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Carole Anne Huselbee on 8th September 2014. [57]

An 0-6-0ST pulls a train of empties back from Donnington to Lodge and Granville Colliery. It is seen here crossing School Road. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by Jim Walton on 16th August 2023, (c) Unknown. [13]

From the School Road Crossing the line ran Southeast. Its route is now a public footpath separated from the modern Donnington Wood Way by a hedgeline.

Somewhere Southeast of School Road on 8th September 1969, this view looks Northwest and shows NCB Loco No. 8 hauling empty hopper wagons towards Granville Colliery. This image was shared on Telford Memories Facebook Group by Carole Anne Huselbee on 14th September 2014. [58]

Heading up hill from Donnington towards the Lodge and Granville Colliery. [11]

An 0-6-0ST (possibly No.8) pulls is train of hopper wagons up the direct route from Coal Wharf (Donnington) to Granville Pit (not going via the location of Muxton Bridge Pit) .This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 10th March 2020 by John Wood. [36]
NCB 0-6-0ST No. 8 taking a train of empty hoppers up the line from Donnington. This appears to have been taken on the cutoff link avoiding the need for reversing at Muxonbridge Colliery. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by John Wood on 20th March 2020. [8]
This photograph shows ‘The Colonel’, an 0-6-0ST, running down to the Sidings at Donnington. The image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Clive Sanbrook on 27th March 2020. [32]
A later locomotive crossing the same road. This image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Carole Anne Huselbee on 15th September 2014. [35]

Having climbed up from the exchange sidings trains of empties entered the area of what was once Old Lodge Furnaces.

By 1970, this was the layout of the lines between the mainline at Donnington and the Colliery. This hand-drawn image appears in Bob Yate’s book. [25: p119]
Granville Colliery’s Diesel Loco (NCB No. 2D?) hauling a rake of empty coal hopper wagons on the lines to the West of Granville Colliery. This photo was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Carole Anne Huselbee on 5th October 2014. [33]
The original engine shed. This building was demolished and the NCB built a replacement some distance away. It looks in a poor condition. The loco on the left looks like the 0-6-0 Barclay tank No 11 or one of the large ex Taff Vale locos. The one on the right is an unidentified Saddle Tank. This image was sent to me by David Clarke the author of a book about Telford’s railways, (c) Unknown. [37]
A view of the NCB-built engine shed noted in the image above. After the NCB took over the collieries owned by the Company, Granville Colliery supplied coal to Buildwas Power Station and the coal trains were worked by a range of locos down the 1.5 miles to Donnington. Granville Colliery had a decent sized shed and in later years used Austerity 0-6-0ST tanks but in Lilleshall Company days the bigger engines were the ex-TVR and Barry railway engines. This image and the accompanying text were shared by Marcus Keane on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 15th September 2015. [38]
Possibly locomotive No. 8 on shed. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by John Wood on 20th March 2020. [8]
Another photograph of the NCB engine shed with No. 5 and No. 8 on shed. This image was also sent to me by David Clarke, © A.J.B. Dodd. [37]
No.8 sits outside the engine shed. This image was shared by John Wood on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 27th June 2017. [39]

A poorly focused image of ‘Granville No. 5‘, a Hunslet of 1952 (Works No. 3771), equipped with an oblong Giesl ejector chimney. The line behind the wagon(s) at the right of the image is the line serving the Colliery. The cinefilm was taken on 14th October 1966 by Jim Clemens, © Michael Clemens, and used here with his kind permission. [11]

This view from a location on the spoil heap to the South of the last image shows the later engine shed, built by the NCB, and two locomotives in steam marshalling wagons. The wagons closest to the camera appear to be empties which will probably be pushed towards the colliery screens which are a distance off to the right of this image. The photograph was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Paul Wheeler on 25th May 2018. [34]

The ‘Colonel’, with a train of full wagons having left Granville Colliery and about to marshall its train for onward movement to Donnington Sidings. [11]

‘The Colonel‘ again! ‘The Colonel‘ was named after Colonel Harrison, Chairman of Harrison’s Grove Colliery. He was also Chairman of Cannock & Rugeley Colliery. After a spell at Area Central Workshops – May 1960 to June 1961, ‘The Colonel‘ went back to Grove Colliery then to Coppice Colliery at Heath Hayes for a few months in 1963 before transfer to Granville Colliery in November 1963. This image was shared on the Telford memories Facebook Group by Metsa Vaim EdOrg on 24th October 2020. [41]
Towards the end of steam, this loco is bringing its train South from the Depot towards the location of the engine shed which is off the picture to the left beyond the stored coal. The locomotive is ‘Granville No. 5‘. This image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 15th February 2017 by Lin Keska. [40]
This photograph was taken at a similar location to those above. At the centre of the image is the weighbridge. Granville Colliery itself can be made out on the horizon. The image was shared by John Wood on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group on 30th January 2015. [42]

The Lilleshall network continued to the West and Southwest of Granville Colliery and Lodge Sidings. These next photographs cover the length of the line through Oakengates to Hollingworth Sidings and Stafford and Dark Lane Collieries.

The dotted lines on this sketch map are private railways. The Lilleshall Company’s main line runs from Granville and Grange Collieries in the top-right of the sketch map via Old Lodge Ironworks and Priorslee Furnaces down to Hollinswood. This sketch map was included on the Miner’s Walk website which provides information about the local area. [10]

Grange Colliery, close to Granville Colliery operated independently at first and along with Granville Colliery survived to be nationalised in 1947. In 1951, the two were connected underground and from 1952 Grange Colliery served mainly to ventilate Granville Colliery. [2]

The monochrome photographs included here were taken by a number of different photographers. Where possible permission has been sought to include those photographs in this article. Particularly, there are a significant number of photographs taken by A.J.B. Dodd which appear here which were first found on various Facebook Groups. A number were supplied direct by Mike Dodd, A.J.B. Dodd’s son, who curates the photographs taken by his father. Particular thanks are expressed to Mike Dodd for entering into email correspondence about all of these photographs and for his generous permission to use them in this article. [59]

Grange Colliery as it appears on the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1901, published in 1902. The railway lines shown in the immediate area of the shafts and slag heaps were internal lines unconnected to the wider Lilleshall Company network. A single line ran to Dawes Bower where transshipment to the standard gauge Lilleshall Company network took place. [60]
The same area as shown on the OS map extract above. This image comes from Google Maps. What appears to be a caravan park on the site of the old colliery is Telford Naturist Club. The buildings to the top-right of the image are the Cottage Boarding Kennels and Cattery. [Google Maps, September 2025]
This extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1901 shows the point where the branch-line to Grange Colliery met the main Lilleshall line. The line from Grange Colliery enters bottom-right. At the top-right of this extract two sets of lines are shown. The upper lines run towards Donnington sidings, the lower lines connect to Granville Colliery. The lines leaving the top of the extract are local lines serving the area immediately around what were Old Lodge Furnaces. The line leaving the west (left) edge of the extract is the Lilleshall Company mainline to Priorslee and Hollinswood. As can be seen at the centre of the extract, a loco bringing wagons from Grange Colliery would need to cross the mainline before reversing its wagons onto the mainline and, depending on its destination, then head for Donnington or Hollinswood. The sidings shown on this extract were also used for storing wagons before onward transit to their ultimate destination. [61]
A short distance to the West of the sidings at Lodge, a line running North from Donnington Wood Brick and Tile Works met the Lilleshall Company’s main line at a triangular junction. [62]
Donnington Wood Brick & Tile Works were conveniently sited next to reserves of Clay. The Works had their own internal railway with a Self-acting Inclined Plane. [63]
Donnington Wood Brick & Tile Works seen from the air, from the Northeast. This image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Marcus Keane on 27th March 2019. [64]
A much closer view of the circular Hoffman Kiln taken in 1966. This image was shared by Marcus Keane on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 23rd September 2017. [65]
The location of the Donnington Wood Brick and Tile Works plotted on modern satellite imagery from Google Maps. Properties on Cloisters Way sit directly over the site of the Hoffman Kiln. [Google Maps, December 2023]

West along the main line from the short branch to Donnington Wood Brickworks there were sidings adjacent to Rookery Road. I have not been able to find them on any maps.

This extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey shows the Lilleshall Mainline running South West from the junction which served the Donnington Wood Brick & Tile Works and covers the approximate location of the Rookery Road Sidings. [66]
This RailMapOnline.com satellite image covers the same area as the map extract above. [47]

I have found three photographs taken close to this location.

This view looks East towards the triangular junction serving Donnington Wood Brick Works, (c) A. J. B. Dodd. [59]
An 0-6-0ST Saddle Tank participating in track removal at Rookery Road Sidings. This image was shared on the Granville Colliery Facebook Group by John Wood on 28th June 2020, (c) A. J. B. Dodd. [9]
I believe this photograph was taken from a point close to the bridge over Gower Street. It looks East and shows Rookery Road Sidings in the distance, (c) A. J. B. Dodd. [59]
The bridge over Gower Street is at the bottom left of this extract from the 25″ OS map. [67]
Moss Road/Gower Street Railway Bridge before demolition. This is a photo of a photo which was behind glass, hence the glare. It was shared by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on the Oakengates History Group including surrounding areas Facebook Group on 17th July 2018. [68]
The junction for New Yard Engineering Works was adjacent to Wrockwardine Villa. The engine shed is visible bottom-centre of the extract. One of two bridges which crossed the Lilleshall Company’s Railway appears towards the bottom-left of the image. I believe that this was known as the ‘Tin Bridge’. [69]
A very similar area to that covered on the map extract above. The image comes, again, from RailMapOnline.com’s satellite imagery. Wrockwardine Villa is centre-top in this image. [47]
This is a view looks West along the Lilleshall main line at the junction with the short line to New Yard and its Engine Shed and Workshop. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018 by John Wood, © A.J.B. Dodd. [71]
This view looks Northeast from the line to New Yard at the junction with the Lilleshall Company’s main line. The Locomotives are Andrew Barclay 0-6-0T Lilleshall Company’s Locomotive No. 11 (i think) on the left, one of the Taff Vale Railway 0-6-2Ts in the middle and Lilleshall Company’s Locomotive No. 12 (ex-GWR 0-6-0PT No. 2794) on the right. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018 by John Wood, © A.J.B. Dodd. [71]
A similar view taken during the winter. The locomotives are possibly No. 4, Constance, No 5, and No. 10 a Peckett 0-4-0ST. The definition on the photograph is not good enough to be sure of these identities. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018 by John Wood, © A.J.B. Dodd. [71]
Turning to face South at the same location as the last two images, the Lilleshall Company, New Yard, Engine Sheds, Gower Street, St Georges. … Urban Terrace can be seen in background. The line to the right of the image runs round behind the engine shed and workshop to serve the Works. This picture was shared on the Oakengates History Group including surrounding areas Facebook Group on 15th June 2021 by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley, © A.J.B. Dodd. [70]
New Yard Engineering Works. … Gower Street runs North-South on the right of the map extract New Works buildings faced East onto the road. The locomotive shed can be seen to the top-left of the image. The workshops which stood alongside it were not built by the time of the Ordnance Survey (1901). [72]
Sketch Railway Plan/Map of New Yard Engineering Works, Gower Street, St Georges showing the layout in 1959. The workshops adjacent to the Engine Shed are shown, top-left. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 1st April 2023 by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley. [73]
A aerial postcard image of New Yard Engineering Works, the camera is to the Southeast of the Works and as a result shows, at the top-right, the Engine Shed and Workshop. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on 17th February 2019. [74]
The Lilleshall Company mainline curves to the South through the area known as ‘The Nabb’. Two bridges are shown. The one just visible top-right is the ‘Tin Bridge. Prior to the construction of the standard gauge mineral railway a horse-drawn tramway ran North-South through this location, running down the side of the terraced housing adjacent to the bridge. The second bridge appears bottom-left. It was a more substantial structure. [75]
Former Great Western Railway 1901-built, William Dean-designed, 0-6-0PT No 2794 found a career extension after being sold-off by British Railways in October 1950. In the mid-1950s the 0-6-0PT, now Lilleshall No 12, is working hard up-grade as it passes the ‘tin bridge’ at The Nabb. The locomotive seems to be heading another engine, which is seemingly not in steam, so this is likely to be a move from Priorslee to the nearby locomotive shed at New Works, © A.J.B. Dodd. [76: p179]
A view Northeast, back towards the access to New Yard Engineering Works, from the ‘Tin Bridge’ on The Nabb. This locomotive movement appears to be the same movement as appears in the photograph immediately below. This locomotive may be ‘Alberta’, © A.J.B. Dodd. [59]
Looking South from the ‘Tin Bridge’ this is the same light engine movement as pictured above, probably to the engine shed just a little further along the line to the Northeast. The locomotive closest to the camera appears to be a Peckett loco. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group by John Wood on 28th March 2018, © A.J.B. Dodd. [77]
The Tin Bridge again with Diamond Row above and to the right. This photograph was taken during the Lilleshall Company’s last run on their Mineral line, with the Engine ‘Alberta’ in 1959. The Photo was taken by the late Edgar Meeson, cousin of Frank Meeson. The image was shared in the Oakengates History Group and surrounding areas Facebook Group by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on 27th January 2021. [78]
This is the second of the two bridges which crossed the Lilleshall Main Line in ‘The Nabb’.The picture looks to the Southwest and comes from the Howard Williams Collection and was shared on the Oakengates History Group including surrounding areas Facebook Group on 27th February 2014 by Frank Meeson. [79]

From this location the Lilleshall Company’s line curved round to the South and crossed Station Hill, Oakengates.

Apologies for the quality of this image, it is a significant enlargement of a small section of Image No. EAW013748, held on the Britain From Above website, © Historic England. The Station Hill Crossing is to the bottom right of the image. [80]
Station Hill, Oakengates at the turn of the 20th century. This postcard view looks West across the Lilleshall Company’s line down the hill towards the centre of Oakengates. The crossing keeper’s beehive hut is visible to the left of the road. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 24th October 2018 by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley. [81]

Two further images of the Station Hill Crossing. …

Another view of Station Hill Crossing. The Locomotive is Alberta and is providing an enthusiasts tour of the Lilleshall Company’s network. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018 by John Wood, © A.J.B. Dodd. [71]
Looking South across Station Hill. The beehive keeper’s hut stands across the road from the camera. This image was shared by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 16th May 2021. [82]
The line crossed Station Hill in Oakengates on the level with the old canal running beneath the road. Looking West from the crossing, train crews would have had a glimpse of Oakengates (Market) Railway Station on the LNWR/LMS/BR Coalport Branch. The station appears on the left of this map extract. [83]

South of Station Hill the line ran at a high level above sidings which served Snedshill Ironworks. The next few images are relatively grainy as they are enlargements from aerial images from 1948. …

The Lilleshall main line runs across the top of the first of these images and behind the house at the top-right of the image. Wagons sit in the sidings associated with Snedshill Ironworks. [84]
The house at the top-right of the last image is on the left in this image. The road is Canongate which the Lilleshall main line crosses at level. The parapets of the bridge which supported Canongate over the line serving Snedshill Ironworks is nearer to the camera. Bother these two images come from the same aerial image – Image No. EAW013746 on the Britain From Above website, © Historic England. [84]
A closer view of the Canongate level crossing. This image is an extract from Image No. EAW013747 on the Britain From Above website, © Historic England. [85]
Looking North towards Station Hill. The mineral railway main line enters the image across Station Hill (top-right) and curves away to the right just above centre-right. The lines which run down the centre of the image pass under Canongate and include sidings serving Snedshill Ironworks. The sidings sit over the line of the old canal. The Lilleshall Company’s main line crosses Canongate at a level crossing just off the left of the photograph. The picture is an extract from Image No. EAW013748, held on the Britain From Above website, © Historic England. [86]
This view looks South from Station Hill. The Lilleshall Company’s main line bears to the left and the line down to the sidings at Snedshill Ironworks runs down hill to the right. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018 by John Wood, © A.J.B. Dodd. [59]
On the South side of Canongate, Snedshill Ironworks dominates this map extract. The Shrewsbury to Birmingham main line can be seen entering a tunnel at the bottom-left of this image. Towards the left edge of the extract, the LNWR Coalport Branch runs in cutting crossed by a number of footbridges/access bridges. The Works sidings on the West of the Works terminate on the site, whereas those to the East of the building run off the bottom of the extract to make a junction with the Coalport Branch. The old canal was in use as a reservoir alongside the Works and the Lilleshall Company’s mainline runs alongside that reservoir to its East. [87]

Two further extracts from Image No. EAW013746 taken in 1948 looking East, which show the mineral railway running South passing the Snedshill Ironworks (at the bottom of the first image).

The darker area above the Ironworks is a remaining length of canal with a retaining wall immediately beyond which supports the Lilleshall Company’s main line. [85]
The mineral wagons on this image are in the sidings which can be seen at the bottom of the 25″ map extract of 1901 above. [85]

Two further extracts from EAW013748 of 1948. [86] As already noted that aerial view looks Northwards across Snedshill Ironworks. …

The Lilleshall Company’s main line is on the right side of this image. Canongate can be seen at the top of the image with the reservoir which was once a length of the Shropshire Canal to the South of Canongate alongside the Lilleshall main line. Snedshill Ironworks sidings pass under Canongate and run towards the bottom-left of the image. [86]
The Snedshill Ironworks sidings which pass under Canongate to the East of the Works continue onto this image and head towards a junction with the LNWR Coalport Branch. Visible at the top-left is the end of the sidings/yard which was on the West side of the Ironworks. The white areas on this image are where it was marked for editing, © Historic England. [86]
Another extract from an aerial image which was taken shortly after those above. The wagons on this image are in the same location as those on the image above. This extract from EAW013752 on the Britain From Above website looks over Snedshill Ironworks (bottom-left), with the short length of canal behind them, towards Priorslee. The Lilleshall Company’s mainline enters just below centre-left and runs at an angle towards the top-right of the image. The Greyhound bridge on the old A5 is alongside the level crossing which took the mineral railway across the A5. The Greyhound bridge took the A5 over the LNWR Coalport Branch (in deep cutting) and a feeder line from/to the sidings at the Snedshill Ironworks which met the Coalport Branch just beyond the bridge. [88]
The level crossing at the A5 can be seen close to the centre of this extract from EAW013782 on the Britain From Above website, (© Historic England). The photograph faces South-southeast. Priorslee Brick and Tile Works are immediately to the left of the picture with a corner of the building just edging onto the image. The LNWR Coalport Branch runs up the right side of the image in deep cutting and passes under Greyhound bridge alongside the line from Snedshill Ironworks. Just beyond the bridge, a line turns away to the left and meets the Lilleshall Company’s mainline before leaving the image towards the top-left. Towards the top of the image, in deep shadow, the GWR mainline to Wolverhampton leaves the tunnel and bears away to the top-left. [89]

It is perhaps easier to make out some of these locations on 25″ Ordnance Survey plans.

Lines from Snedshill Ironworks join the Coalport Branch in passing under what became the A5 a little to the South of the Works themselves. The Lilleshall Company mainline crosses the road at level. A short branch runs off towards the Snedshill Brickworks. The GWR line from Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton runs in tunnel from top to bottom of the map extract. [90]
In the 21st century the area covered by the 25″ OS Map extract above has changed considerably. Only the GWR mainline from Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton remains of the lines on the OS Map extract. On this satellite image it is represented by the turquoise line and is running in tunnel. The Greyhound Roundabout has replaced what was the A5 (B5061 in 21st century) bridge over the Coalport Branch. The level crossing shown below, is long gone. The Lilleshall Company buildings have been replaced by Wickes and Aldi! The A442 dual carriageway dominates the area. [47]
A Pecket Loco used by the Lilleshall Co, at the Greyhound Crossroads junction, with the Lilleshall Co. Snedshill Buildings in view. The photograph was taken looking Southeast from the Greyhound bridge. This area is now the Greyhound Island, and Aldi & Wickes now stand on the ground where the buildings in the picture once stood. This image was shared by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 15th May 2018, © A.J.B. Dodd. [91]
The building in the photograph above is at the bottom of this aerial image, just to the right of centre. This is another extract from Image No. EAW013782, © Historic England. The Priorslee Furnaces are top-left of the image and shrouded in smoke. The Lilleshall Company’s mainline curves round from the bottom of the picture, to the right of the Lilleshall Brick and Tileworks buildings to run immediately to the Southwest side of the Furnaces (the side furthest from the camera). [89]
This photograph looks across the roof of the Snedshill Brick and Tile Works towards Priorslee Furnaces. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 24th November 2015 by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley. [92]
Priorslee Furnaces and Steel Works in 1901. The Lilleshall Company’s main line runs diagonally across this map extract from the top-left corner to the bottom-right corner. [93]
Priorslee Furnaces viewed from the Southeast. This image was shared by Paul Wheeler on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 28th November 2017. [94]
An aerial image of the extensive steelworks and slag reduction plant at Priorslee. The blast furnaces were decommissioned in 1958 and the internal system closed. This image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group by Lin Keska on 22nd February 2017. [95]
This postcard view of Priorslee Furnaces was taken in 1899. The rail access to the plant is emphasised by the locomotive and wagons in the foreground. The image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Lin Keska on 27th June 2020. [96]
Two Lilleshall Company locomotives (Peckett 0-4-0ST No.10 and 0-6-2T No. 3 which was once GWR No. 589) in attendance at the demolition of a 98ft high concrete coal bunker at Priorslee Furnaces circa 1936. This work was taking place as part of the demolition of the former steelworks site. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley (courtesy of John Wood) on 1st December 2019. I understand that the original image is held in the Archives of the Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust. [97]
This extract from the 1882 25″ Ordnance Survey shows the area immediately Southeast of Priorslee Furnaces The Lilleshall Company’s main line split in three directions – to the South it runs into Hollinswood Sidings and up to Hollinswood Junction, where it joins the GWR mainline, Southeast it continues towards Stafford Colliery, and Northeast towards Woodhouse and Lawn Collieries. [98]
The remaining length of the Lilleshall Company’s mainline served Stafford Colliery (passing Darklane Colliery on its way East. This extract is taken from the 1901 25″ Ordnance Survey. Hollinswood Junction on the GWR mainline between Shrewsbury and Wolverhampton just sneaks into the bottom-left corner of this map extract. [99]
Hollinswood Sidings and Hollinswood Junction, to the South of Priorslee Furnaces and Steelworks. The GWR line between Shrewsbury and Wolverhampton runs from the top-left to the bottom-right. The LNWR Coalport Branch enters top-left and leaves the map extract to the left of centre at the bottom of the image. The line turning off the GWR mainline to the South served a series industrial undertakings to the East of the old Shropshire Canal. The Lilleshall Company’s sidings enter the map extract centre-top and meet the GWR mainline at Hollinswood Junction. [100]
This is another area of Telford which has seen dramatic change. The GWR line ‘turquoise’ remains, the LNWR Coalport branch (thicker purple) has long gone. As have all the Lilleshall Company’s lines (thinner purple). The M54, the A442, Queensway and Hollinswood Interchange dominate the modern image. [47]
Locomotive 48516 heading what seems to be a train of empty coal wagons and facing towards Wolverhampton. Hollinswood Sidings can be seen beyond the locomotive. The image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Lin Keska on 4th April 2018. [101]

Lilleshall Company Locomotives

The Lilleshall Company operated a number of steam engines which it picked up from various sources and some of which it built itself. The remainder of this article is no more than a glimpse of these locomotives on the Lilleshall Company’s network. The authoritative treatment of the motive power on the Lilleshall Company network is the book by Bob Yate, “The Railways and Locos of the Lilleshall Company.” [25]

Yate tells us that, because the Lilleshall Company’s network was extensive, it needed a considerable number of locomotives to operate it. He continues: “Much of the traffic was heavy, so it comes as no surprise to find that the company turned to acquiring former main line company locomotives for some of their more arduous duties. The total number of locomotives rose from four during the mid-1850s to eight by 1870, down to five by 1875, then six by 1886, increasing to nine in 1900 until 1920 when there were eleven. By the 1930s the number was back down to nine.” [25: p67] After WW2, numbers were reduced to five, and once closure was approaching all five were scrapped and two other locomotives were purchased.

This photo was taken in June 1954 within the Priorslee steelworks complex and shows the blast furnaces in the background. The locomotive is Lilleshall Company No. 12 (ex-GWR 0-6-0PT No. 2794), © F.W. Shuttleworth. This image was shared on the Telford Memories Facebook Group by Marcus Keane on 15th September 2015. The blast furnace did not supply the adjacent rolling mill after 1925. At that time the Bessimer converters were scrapped. The Priorslee Furnaces only made made pig iron for the foundry trade until closure. The Lilleshall Company were forced to cease steel-making from the blast furnace pig-iron by the Iron and Steel Federation who shared out production around the country in the slump following the first world war. [102]
Peckett 0-4-0ST, Lilleshall Locomotive No. 10 at Priorslee, (c) Industrial Railway Society, Ken Cooper collection. This photograph was shared by Andy Rose on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 29th September 2019. [103]
Lilleshall Company No. 6, an 0-6-0ST locomotive, one of a number built by the Lilleshall Company, © A.J.B. Dodd. This photograph was shared by Andy Rose on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 29th September 2019. [103]
Former Barry Railway ‘B1’ Class 0-6-2T No. 60 (also ex-GWR No. 251) which when purchased by the Lilleshall Company was given No. 5, photographer not known. This photograph was shared by Andy Rose on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 29th September 2019. [103]
Lilleshall Company Locomotive No. 4, 0-4-0ST, Constance, © A.J.B. Dodd. This photograph was shared by Andy Rose on the Telford Memories Facebook Group on 29th September 2019. [103]
Lilleshall Company No. 9, an 0-6-0ST locomotive built by Robert Stephenson & Co. Ltd. It was bought by the Lilleshall Company in 1904 and lasted until 1929, (c) F. Jones Collection. This photograph was shared by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 27th November 2017. [104]
Lilleshall built 0-4-0ST, Constance and Andrew Barclay 0-6-0T No. 11 at New Yard Locomotive Shed. The image was shared on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group by Gwyn Thunderwing Hartley on 4th April 2021. [105]
The locomotive closest to the camera is Lilleshall Company Locomotive Alberta (a Barclay 0-4-0ST), possibly close to New Yard Engineering Works. This photograph was shared by John Wood on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018. Alberta was only purchased in October 1956 and was active on the Lilleshall Company’s network until closure, © A.J.B. Dodd. [106]
Lilleshall Company Locomotive No. 12, (ex-GWR No. 2794) 0-6-0PT sits a New Yard. This photograph was shared by John Wood on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 28th June 2020. [107]
Lilleshall Company Locomotive, Prince of Wales (ex-Lever Brothers, Port Sunlight Railway) 0-4-0ST also sits a New Yard This photograph was also shared by John Wood on the Oakengates History Group Facebook Group on 29th March 2018. [107]

National Coal Board Locomotives

With nationalisation, the NCB took over Granville and Grange pits and continued to use the northern length of the Lilleshall Network until closure of Granville Colliery in 1979. Granville Colliery supplied coal to Buildwas Power Station and the coal trains were worked by a range of locos down the 1.5 miles to Donnington. Austerity 0-6-0ST steam locomotives were the most common form of motive power until steam was replaced by diesel locomotives.

Between 1948 and 1964, 77 new “Austerity” 0-6-0ST locomotives were built for the NCB.

NCB Hunslet Austerity 0-6-0ST Granville No. 5 at School Road Crossing. [108]

When steam was replaced by diesel, the NCB deployed Hunslet 0-6-0DH locos at Granville Colliery. Between 1965 and 1989 well over 50 0-6-0DH shunters were built by Hunslet (Leeds) for the British market. More were also built to a variety of gauges for users abroad in South America, Africa, Europe and the Indian subcontinent. The Hunslet 0-6-0DHs were surprisingly powerful for their size, and their short wheelbase enabled them to operate in locations where other locomotives may struggle. [109]

Typical NCB Hunslet 0-6-0DH locomotives. [110]

Models of the Hunslet 0-6-0DH are produced in OO gauge by Revolution Trains and in N gauge by the N Gauge Society.

CAD 3/4 image of Hunslet 0-6-0DH in 00 Gauge. [110]

What can be seen today?

All of the Granville Colliery buildings have been removed.

All that remains of the Old Lodge furnaces after extensive dismantling and site restoration involving raising of the ground levels are parts of the brickwork of the first three furnaces.

The high walls behind the furnaces are the remains of the furnace loading ramps. On the right of the ramp walls hidden in the trees is a retaining wall in front which was the blowing house. Behind the loading ramps were calcining kilns which were added in 1870 to improve the quality of the iron ore. Remains of the Lodge Furnaces, Tug Boat Canal and other buildings  can be seen around Granville Country Park.

The Lilleshall Company Railways have disappeared completely.

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granville_Leveson-Gower,_1st_Marquess_of_Stafford, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  2. https://friendsofgranvillecountrypark.com/industrial-history, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  3. G. F. R. Barker; Leveson-Gower, Granville (1721-1803); in Sydney Lee, (ed.); Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 33; Smith Elder & Co., London, 1893.
  4. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10155810062701925&set=p.10155810062701925&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  5. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=6767846649939199&set=gm.2472504872925859&idorvanity=265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  6. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10226151898004565&set=gm.2654360224740322&idorvanity=265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  7. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1523451488480998&set=gm.2472324666277213&idorvanity=265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  8. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10157888691039890&set=pcb.1477973989045624&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  9. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10158258868359890&set=gm.1573059866203702&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  10. https://theminerswalk.org/snedshill/lilleshall-company-mineral-railway-line, accessed on 7th November 2023.
  11. The Jim Clemens Collection No. 2 – Steaming Through Shropshire Part 1; B&R Videos; and can be seen on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/265906436919058/search/?q=locomotive&locale=en_GB. B & R Video Productions produce a series of DVDs which have primarily been created by converting cine-film. One part of their library is the Jim Clemens Collection. These stills from the video are shared here with permission from Michael Clemens who holds the copyright on his father’s work. Michael is an author in his own right and maintains a website: https://www.michaelclemensrailways.co.uk. On that website there are details of all of the books he as published together with quite a bit of downloadable material including working timetables. His most relevant publication to this current article is: Michael Clemens; The Last Years of Steam in Shropshire and the Severn Valley; Fonthill Media Ltd, Stroud, Gloucestershire, 2017. That book contains two photographs which are similar to two of the images shown above (p67).
  12. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10155597996999231&set=pcb.818336841676012&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  13. https://www.facebook.com/groups/265906436919058/search/?q=steam&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  14. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1177395816142443&set=gm.2220243438152005&idorvanity=265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  15. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=938311406226115&set=pcb.487942181382148&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  16. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=938311412892781&set=pcb.487942181382148&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  17. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=938311356226120&set=pcb.487942181382148&locale=en_GB, accessed on 30th September 2025.
  18. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=780955851917249&set=g.265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  19. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1930020190655315&set=gm.1835369933147668, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  20. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3993423409539&set=g.265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  21. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3993651215234&set=g.265906436919058&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  22. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10153034972544890&set=pcb.396942657148768, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10153034971844890&set=pcb.396942657148768, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  24. https://www.facebook.com/groups/265906436919058/search?q=loco, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  25. Bob Yate; The Railways and Locomotives of the Lilleshall Company; Irwell Press, Clophill, Bedfordshire, 2008.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150280, accessed on 24th July 2023.
  27. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=52.70540&lon=-2.41272&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 12th August 2023.
  28. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=19.0&lat=52.70538&lon=-2.40858&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 12th August 2023.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150286, accessed on 12th August 2023.
  30. https://maps.nls.uk/view/189188889, accessed on 15th August 2023.
  31. https://maps.nls.uk/view/189188886, accessed on 15th August 2023.
  32. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=199914067979251&set=gm.3885749764776331&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  33. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=358725490972160&set=gm.857122790972392&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  34. https://scontent.fbhx4-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/33498907_2064140837243249_3582868989702832128_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=wSw5EVKxUyMAX8qskYR&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-2.fna&oh=00_AfCSF31tNH6WIKLxXWfvuVw838LfrhemIIyqBXv-DanmNg&oe=65040196, accessed on 16th August 2023.
  35. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=350909495087093&set=gm.846879645330040, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  36. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10157888689539890&set=pcb.1477973989045624&locale=en_GB, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  37. David Clarke; The Railways of Telford; Crowood Press, Ramsbury, Wiltshire, 2016.
  38. https://scontent.fbhx4-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/12003317_10201024425808382_8593076314682892494_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=79roHzvVxmgAX9c28mg&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-2.fna&oh=00_AfDbCRsXlWhcbkz6I3Hfylg6ZXes4sfaKhIQFg-AzcyKuA&oe=650431FA, accessed on 16th August 2023.
  39. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10155399978029890&set=pcb.795212197321810, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  40. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1396454793732287&set=pcb.1536206876397310, accessed on 16th August 2023.
  41. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=415854582741549&set=pcb.4828097803874851&locale=en_GB, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  42. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10153034973339890&set=pcb.396942657148768, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  43. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10153034973449890&set=pcb.396942657148768, accessed on 18th August 2023.
  44. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1630154737041775&set=p.1630154737041775&type=3, accessed on 17th August 2023.
  45. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150199, accessed on 20th July 2023.
  46. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150280, accessed on 24th July 2023.
  47. https://www.railmaponline.com/UKIEMap.php, accessed on 21st July 2023.
  48. https://www.barbers-rural.co.uk/property-sales/lubstree-wharf, accessed on 23rd July 2023.
  49. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150235, accessed on 20th July 2023.
  50. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150199, accessed on 20th July 2023.
  51. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=350106448500731&set=gm.845962032088468, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  52. https://www.facebook.com/groups/674238619260811/search/?q=donnington%20sidings, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  53. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=358717190972990&set=gm.857116324306372, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  54. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1479767825400983&set=pcb.1638734829477847, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  55. https://m.facebook.com/groups/674238619260811/permalink/3082152125136103, accessed on 27th July 2023.
  56. https://m.facebook.com/groups/674238619260811/permalink/10092979834053262, accessed on 6th August 2023.
  57. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=347844735393569&set=gm.843475365670468, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  58. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=350260361818673&set=gm.846144078736930, accessed on 13th August 2023.
  59. Many of the photographs taken by A.J.B. Dodd which appear in this article were first found on various Facebook Groups. A number were supplied direct by Mike Dodd, A.J.B. Dodd’s son who curates the photographs taken by his father. Particular thanks are expressed to Mike Dodd for entering into email correspondence about all of these photographs and for his generous permission to use them in this article.
  60. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70068&lon=-2.41423&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  61. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70461&lon=-2.42072&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  62. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70305&lon=-2.42863&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  63. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70097&lon=-2.42826&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  64. https://m.facebook.com/groups/674238619260811/permalink/2779688992049086, accessed on 5th December 2023.
  65. https://scontent.fbhx4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/21761420_10203764899078501_3636312693064153721_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd3046&_nc_ohc=TLTiCmZZExAAX9QiWM3&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-1.fna&oh=00_AfAbhEAgGsk80Y8ua6NY6gjhnURjRZb13stK8S9bW6AjoA&oe=6597E1D8, accessed on 6th December 2023.
  66. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70257&lon=-2.43263&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  67. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70171&lon=-2.43735&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  68. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10155782408243862&set=gm.1710808045681477, accessed on 8th December 2023.
  69. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.70034&lon=-2.44258&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  70. https://scontent.fbhx4-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/201482784_10158311988498862_4566373800303848415_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p180x540&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd3046&_nc_ohc=yHmKg6jHVdcAX_Cs0Fv&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-2.fna&oh=00_AfDnT7hKAayk2GcdynEjVb0-CbVhrKLewE2PkgsvTXFPjg&oe=659A7442, accessed on 8th December 2023.
  71. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10156158070314890&set=pcb.1586941058068177, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  72. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.69896&lon=-2.43963&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  73. https://www.facebook.com/groups/261490703946559/permalink/5921967501232156, accessed on 7th November 2023.
  74. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10156229799958862&set=gm.2010423612386584, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  75. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.69906&lon=-2.44501&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  76. D. Bradshaw and S.C. Jenkins; Rails around Oakengates; in Steam Days No. 283, March 2013, p165-179.
  77. https://scontent.fbhx4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t31.18172-8/29352389_10156155183739890_3408729237109418941_o.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=3ba11c&_nc_ohc=NI9fQJlGVl8AX8MQqOk&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-1.fna&oh=00_AfDMKjsidvIGKui1zGj0rpgAYGJpE596uwZCBljaVGyhTA&oe=65C343AA, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  78. https://m.facebook.com/groups/261490703946559/permalink/3559120847516845, accessed on 4th January 2024.
  79. https://scontent.fbhx4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t31.18172-8/1655808_1425186684388540_656137306_o.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd3046&_nc_ohc=VZiU88xJa_sAX8eqOIg&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-1.fna&oh=00_AfByQtLEzkvqCA7hZqxr4gvZUadwmfRB0hCPQQVgrGsLzQ&oe=659AAC33, accessed on 8th December 2023.
  80. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013748, accessed on 7th January 2024.
  81. https://m.facebook.com/groups/261490703946559/permalink/1846594735436140/, accessed on 6th January 2024.
  82. https://m.facebook.com/groups/261490703946559/permalink/3868350286593898, accessed on 6th January 2024.
  83. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.69531&lon=-2.44638&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  84. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013746, accessed on 6th January 2024.
  85. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013747, accessed on 6th January 2024.
  86. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013748, accessed on 7th January 2024.
  87. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.69185&lon=-2.44694&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  88. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013752, accessed on 7th January 2024.
  89. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW013782, accessed on 7th January 2024.
  90. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=52.68980&lon=-2.44738&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th November 2023.
  91. https://www.facebook.com/groups/261490703946559/permalink/1631467146948901. accessed on 7th November 2023.
  92. https://scontent.fbhx4-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/12249708_10153234847943862_2405376747380940551_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd3046&_nc_ohc=PTpPZUncF0oAX_zR0kT&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-2.fna&oh=00_AfDmxW2EgzwA0skHXQQQicuFeBEC0U9pehtSXasn-aUj7w&oe=65C345CA, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  93. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=52.68525&lon=-2.44187&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  94. https://scontent.fbhx4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t31.18172-8/23926176_1960058820984785_764665039428004773_o.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd3046&_nc_ohc=ZkPn9C3jrwsAX_zb32j&_nc_ht=scontent.fbhx4-1.fna&oh=00_AfAjCyq1hFT5gGcqA3z3JR4rQhMnvTqdrOd-860xljNpxQ&oe=65C3663D, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  95. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1404096642968102&set=gm.1211545145607772, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  96. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2886679371376481&set=pcb.3555775264440451, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  97. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10156905402433862&set=pcb.2505678986194375, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  98. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121150313, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  99. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=52.67930&lon=-2.42607&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  100. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=52.67956&lon=-2.43844&layers=168&b=1, accessed on 8th January 2024.
  101. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1853495224694906&set=pcb.2089170144434311, accessed on 9th January 2024.
  102. https://m.facebook.com/groups/674238619260811/permalink/1059102267441109, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  103. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2438789446357223&set=pcb.3267701209914526, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  104. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10155141661473862&set=oa.1468997059862578https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10156229799958862&set=gm.2010423612386584, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  105. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10158161361783862&set=gm.3745067428922185, accessed on 9th January 2024.
  106. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10156155205514890&set=pcb.1585964188165864https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10156229799958862&set=gm.2010423612386584, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  107. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10158258749094890&set=pcb.2971873616241574https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10156229799958862&set=gm.2010423612386584, accessed on 11th January 2024.
  108. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51177462289_cd07c79ac4_b.jpg, accessed on 2nd October 2025.
  109. https://revolutiontrains.com/category/locomotives/hunslet-0-6-0dh, accessed on 2nd October 2025.
  110. https://revolutiontrains.com/category/locomotives/hunslet-0-6-0dh, accessed on 3rd October 2025.

David Gwyn; The Coming of the Railway: A New Global History, 1750-1850; Yale University Press, London & New Haven, 2023.

The first global history of the epic early days of the iron railway. Yale University Press says, “Railways, in simple wooden or stone form, have existed since prehistory. But from the 1750s onward the introduction of iron rails led to a dramatic technological evolution—one that would truly change the world. … In this rich new history, David Gwyn tells the neglected story of the early iron railway from a global perspective. Driven by a combination of ruthless enterprise, brilliant experimenters, and international cooperation, railway construction began to expand across the world with astonishing rapidity. From Britain to Australia, Russia to America, railways would bind together cities, nations, and entire continents. Rail was a tool of industry and empire as well as, eventually, passenger transport, and developments in technology occurred at breakneck speed—even if the first locomotive in America could muster only 6 mph. … The Coming of the Railway explores these fascinating developments, documenting the early railway’s outsize social, political, and economic impact—carving out the shape of the global economy as we know it today.” [1]

Praise

Positive comments made by various readers/critics, marshalled by Yale University Press. …

“One does not have to be a train-spotter to read it: it tells a crucial story of our social and economic history, and does so with recourse to exceptional scholarship.”—Simon Heffer, The Telegraph. [1]

“Written with great confidence and considerable aplomb, The Coming of the Railway is a must for the train enthusiast.”—Jeremy Black, New Criterion. [1]

“With impressive research and superb prose, Gwyn traces the complex evolution of railway technology, finance, and operating practices. . . . [He] succeeds brilliantly.”—Albert Churella, Technology and Culture. [1]

“The nineteenth century was defined by the railway. In this compelling new book David Gwyn weaves together the disparate strands that led to its emergence as the singular new technology of its age; a monumental study, erudite, authoritative, and full of wider historical insights.”—Sir Neil Cossons, former director of the Science Museum London. [1]

“This book is a real eye-opener for rail enthusiasts and scholars with a detailed and well researched account of the dawn of the railways. The rapid advancement in technology in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the railways brought our society is truly astounding.”—Siddy Holloway, historian and presenter. [1]

“A fresh perspective on the early railway story across time and world space, with a wealth of intriguing details. Gwyn ably demonstrates the role played by overlapping technologies, harmonising under the influence of shaping forces.”—Susan Major, author of Early Victorian Railway Excursions. [1]

“The railways were the most important invention of the nineteenth century, but they only emerged thanks to a series of technological developments. This book documents these in a thorough and revealing way which makes it essential reading for anyone interested in the origins of this great invention.”—Christian Wolmar, author of The Great Railway Revolution. [1]

Review

I found this book to be easy to read and yet deeply scholarly. A superb, informative and enjoyable read! It is not too often that you find a railway history book as readable as a novel.

It seems to me that it is possible that the individual chapters are developed from the text of a series of lectures on early railway history. The readable text is backed up by very comprehensive notes and references. There is also a wide-ranging bibliography.

The chapter headings are:

  1. Trade, transport and coal 1767-1815
  2. ‘Rails best adapted to the road’: cast-iron rails and their alternatives in Britain 1767-1832
  3. Canal feeders, quarry railways and construction sites
  4. ‘Art has supplied the place of horses’: traction 1767-1815
  5. War and peace 1814-1834
  6. ‘Geometrical precision’: wrought-iron rails 1808-1834
  7. ‘Most suitable for hilly countries’: rope and chain haulage 1815-1834
  8. ‘That truly astonishing machine’: locomotives 1815-1834
  9. Coal carriers 1815-1834
  10. Internal communications 1815-1834
  11. The first main lines 1824-1834
  12. Coming of age: the public railway 1830-1834
  13. ‘The new avenues of iron road’ 1834-1850’You can’t hinder the railroad’
  14. ‘You can’t hinder the railroad’

These are intriguing titles for episodes in the development of railways and Gwyn ensures that there is no myopia, no unwarranted focus just on developments in the United Kingdom.

His chapter on Coal Carriers quickly looks beyond the Stockton and Darlington Railway, first to changes in the Northeast and then to Lancashire and Scotland, before looking across the Channel to France and particularly to the railways of Saint Etienne in the Massif Central. He then directs his readers to events in Prussia; to Pennsylvania; and then to Australia!

In fact it was long-lasting developments in the New South Wales coalfield “which ultimately enabled Newcastle in Australia to take over from Newcastle upon Tyne as the largest coal-exporting harbour in the world. [2] The New South Wales coalfield also remained a stronghold of steam traction into the 1980s, just as the wooden way could still be seen in operation on Tyneside many years after the iron road first appeared. Coal-carrying technologies die hard.” [1: p212]

In his chapter on Internal Communications (1815-1832) Gwyn invites his readers to consider two markedly different railways which set the scene for the development of long-distance railways. The Cromford and High Peak Railway in England and the Budweis-Linz horse railway in the Austrian Empire. These two lines had very little in common technically but both sought to connect places at the opposite ends of one jurisdiction. … Long distance railways were seen as feasible: no longer was the ambition solely to connect mines, quarries and factories with navigable water. Railways began to serve rural areas and market towns, and offered a variety of services, including passenger transport.

He highlights the place in that process of development of the tramroads in the Welsh Marches: linking Brecon to the Wye Valley and Kington; and linking Abergavenny to Hereford. Although not in themselves of national significance, they contributed to the growing belief that longer distances could be embraced as rail technology advanced.

In 1810, Thomas Telford surveyed, and William Jessop approved, a proposal for a ‘cast-iron railway’ from Glasgow to Berwick-on-Tweed, over 125 miles in length, the first credible proposal for a railway connecting the east and west coasts of Britain.” [1: p214] “In 1814, the French engineer Pierre-Michel Moisson-Desroches (1785-1865) urged Napoleon to build seven national railways from Paris. In 1817 the radical English schoolteacher, author and publisher Sir Richard Phillips (1767-1840) anticipated double-track railways connecting London with Edinburgh, Glasgow, Holyhead, Milford, Falmouth, Yarmouth, Dover and Portsmouth, drawn either by horses at 10 mph or by Murray-Blenkinsop locomotives at 15. [3: p75-76] By the 1820s these were becoming a serious possibility.” [1: p214]

During 1824 and 1825, 30 schemes for railways were presented to Parliament. The financial crash of 1825 put paid to most of them. The most ambitious would have connected London, Liverpool, Manchester, Birmingham, South Wales and Edinburgh! [4]

There was no failure in imagination, a scheme was proposed, for example, to build a railway from the Chagres River to Panama City. Gwyn explains that this was one of several speculative schemes to link seaports to their hinterlands. It was eventually built as ‘The Panama Canal Railway’, which runs alongside the Panama Canal from near the city of Colón to Panama City, crossing the Chagres River and the Continental Divide, with the primary passenger route running between Panama City and Colón. Incidentally, while a daily passenger service was suspended during the 21st century pandemic, the railway is of historical significance and still operates, sometimes offering special tours for cruise ship passengers. It was conceived to provide a connection between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Like other early railways it was conceived as a grand project. These projects required imagination and demonstrated the potential for railways to unite distant parts of a country, even if they weren’t immediately profitable.

Other proposed schemes mentioned by Gwyn linked: Newcastle to Carlisle; Manchester to Hull; Limerick to Waterford. These speculative schemes created space for the Liverpool and Manchester Railway to be successfully promoted.

However, what was contributed by the Cromford and High Peak Railway in England and the Budweis-Linz horse railway in the Austrian Empire was not so much about imagination as about practicalities. They demonstrated that “a considered scheme did have the potential to attract capital, as well as state support (or to do without it), and to bring together an engineering team capable of creating an iron road to unite distant parts of the country, even though one was not profitable for years and the other struggled to be completed.” [1: p232]

So it was that by the 1820s and early 1830s railways were for the first time being built to meet a needy in regional economic life, rather than purely serving a locality by connecting a mineral region with navigable water.

Gwyn points to three completed schemes designed to connect seaports to their hinterland, carrying passengers as well as goods – the first main lines. Two were in the USA and one in the UK – the Baltimore and Ohio, the Charleston and Hamburg and the Liverpool and Manchester.

The backers of the Liverpool and Manchester had deep pockets  and needed them. The £600,000 that the line cost (£19,355/mile) was twice the cost per mile of the Baltimore and Ohio and twelve times the cost per mile of the Charleston and Hamburg. [5] Interestingly, there was a real imbalance in the contributions made by investors from Manchester and Liverpool. While the Exchequer made £100,000 available as a government loan and Manchester investors contributed £12,000, this from Liverpool provided £488,000! [6][7][8]. The difference in funding allowed the Liverpool and Manchester Railway to be considerably more robust!

Although the Liverpool and Manchester was definitely the first intercity main line railway, the three schemes developed in parallel and were completed only a matter of a few short years apart. Nevertheless, the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway on 15th September 1830 was to be remembered in British and world history. “Previous transport undertakings in the United Kingdom had been inaugurated by local bigwigs, but, on that day of watery sun, Liverpool saw a gathering of continental European nobility such as had not been assembled since the Congress of Vienna rubbing shoulders with the British political elite. Not only was the guest of honour the Prime Minister and war hero, Arthur Wellesley, First Duke of Wellington (1769-1852), but four future British prime ministers were also present, and Sir Henry Brougham, the very embodiment of the ‘philosophic Whig’, was to be Lord Chancellor before the end of the year. Guests of rank, and in some cases of intellect and distinction also, included six earls, two marquises, six viscounts and over twenty other members of the peerage, though only one bishop. Some other guests were people in the public eye, like the writer and actor Fanny Kemble and the polymath Charles Babbage (1791-1871).” [1: p258]

International representation was also strikingly significant with important guests from Russia, Hungary, the United States of America.

Gwyn tells us that it was the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, rather than the Stockton and Darlington Railway, that took centre-stage as an epoch-defining moment. It represented “a shift in scale and ambition that surpassed both the earlier generation of iron railways and all but the longest canals and turnpikes. Not only was it entirely steam-operated, but its locomotives themselves were the design precursors of nearly all that followed. Another step change was the way that passenger facilities were set out and managed; its stations showed the way forward for railway companies in the years to come. Above all, it broke with most predecessor railways in England in that it was built not to carry coal or some other mineral, but to serve the globalised economy of cotton. It connected two great industrial centres, one an ocean-serving port, the other a manufacturing town. Its architecture celebrated what the railway embodied, not only the empirical philosophy which identifies successful solutions to technical problems but also Britain’s role as the ‘mart of nations’.” [1: p260]

In addition to the price per mile of the three first main line railways, Gwyn quotes the cost of others:

  • The Dublin and Kingstown (Dun Laoghaire) cost £60,000 per mile, much more even than the Liverpool and Manchester;
  • The Leicester and Swannington Railway, a mere £7,740.24;
  • The New York and Harlem was the costliest per mile in the USA at $141,333, a consequence of having to build a very solid road using stone sleepers through the middle of a built-up area;
  • Otherwise the most expensive American railway for its route length had been the Pontchartrain in Louisiana, at $72,000 a mile; it was only 4.5 miles long but was double-track throughout and ran through a swamp.
  • The Boston and Lowell cost $70,000;
  • The Mohawk and Hudson, $63,568;
  • The soundly built Baltimore and Ohio cost $38,232;
  • The Tuscambia, Cortland and Decatur, making its way over more than 45 miles of Alabama, along a single line of strap rails, was built for no more than $8,840 per mile!

Gwyn continues to look at the forms of finance which applied in different jurisdictions. …

In the UK, a variety of private finance arrangements were made among these were some railways funded by local subscription, not necessarily by wealthy individuals, some through provincial joint-stock banks and London banking houses. Interestingly “Quaker finance played an important part: Dublin and Kingstown was a Quaker initiative, as the Stockton and Darlington had been. In the north-east of England, where coal ownership and political power had always been virtually synonymous, Joseph Pease’s election to the reformed House of Commons in 1832 meant that the influence of the Society of Friends now extended to parliament.” [1: p270]

In the USA, capital finance was difficult to obtain. Most railroads raised capital through the services of an intermediary selling bonds to the money markets of London. Gwyn points out the significant role of Quakers, particularly through the banking houses of Philadelphia. He suggests that this was a significant factor in that city becoming a railway hub so very early in the development of railways in the USA.

Rail development in the USA in the first half of the 1830s greatly surpassed that in the UK and Europe. Many lines in the USA were  built using wrought-iron straps on timber rails and as a result kept construction costs to a minimum. Whereas most bridges in the UK were built with masonry, brick and steel, in the USA timber was used most often.

The use of horses increased, in absolute terms, in the 1830s. “Horses were used where traffic did not justify locomotives or where mechanical traction was forbidden, such as in built-up areas, either absolutely or during the hours of darkness or through covered bridges. Short-haul movement and shunting was often carried out by horses. … Many well-established railways had no need to convert to locomotive operation if traffic did not increase. The independent carriers who operated the trains on many systems often had neither the means nor the need to use them.” [1: p276][9: p152, 245, 569]

As the 1830s unfolded there were still railways being designed and built with horse-operation in mind examples include – the Ffestiniog in North Wales, the Bratislava-Trnava railway in Hungary. Gwyn notes that while many applications for horse power continued through the middle of the 19th century, the times were very definitely changing, “by mid-century, recognisable national [rail] networks were becoming evident in some countries, connected with seagoing ships carrying textiles and foodstuffs across oceans.” [1: p285] Nothing could be what it once was. Steam power was already, by 1850, dramatically reordering the world!

The European railway network in 1850. … There was a marked difference between England and the rest of Europe in 1850, but that would not last, national networks across Europe would continue developing throughout the century. [1: p293]

In the final chapter of the book- ‘You can’t hinder the railroad’, Gwyn muses on the impact of the coming of the railway. “The coming of the railway was not the least of the many changes that characterised the long and tumultuous period of modernisation we call the ‘Industrial Revolution’, which in turn paralleled convulsive alterations in political order across the world in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The close, often complicated, relationship between mechanical capacity and governmental, military, economic and social developments has formed a theme of this study but what is also evident is that the railway also had a profound imaginative impact.” [1: p315-316]

Charles Dickens, ‘Dombey and Son‘ “famously recalls the building of the London and Birmingham through Camden. Here ‘the first shock of a great earthquake had, just at that period, rent the whole neighbourhood to its centre’, bringing ‘dire disorder’ in its short term but opening a ‘mighty course of civilisation and improvement’. Narrative events reflect Dickens’s ambiguity; the defeated Carker is killed by a train whereas Mr Toodle finds a steady job which he loves as a locomotive stoker, and then driver.” [1: p315]

Gwyn sees that same ambiguity in J.M.W. Turner’s ‘Rain, Steam, and Speed – The Great Western Railway‘.

Thomas Cole’s, painting, ‘Rain in the Catskills‘ seems to portray the railway as an unobtrusive part of the landscape, the wild and the utilitarian coexisting, yet Cole wrote that “the railway made the human body ‘merely a sort of Tender to a Locomotive Car, its appetites & functions wait on a Machine which is merciless & tyrannical’.” [10]

Gwyn affirms that “Speed, dispatch and distance fed the imagination as well as the bank balance.” [1: p318] Victor Hugo was “delighted by the way … speed turned flowers and cornfields into swathes of colour and made nature dance before his eyes.” [1: p318][11]

Ralph Waldo Emerson saw these changes as disturbing – the railroad had seemingly eroded and reordered nature. Yet he was drawn to this new technology. On his way home to the USA in 1833, he “filled an idle hour in Liverpool by visiting the railway, where he ‘saw Rocket and Goliath and Pluto and Firefly and the rest of that vulcanian generation’. He even listened patiently to Jacob Perkins … expounding on his locomotive proposals. [12: p190-191]] When he rode behind a ‘teakettle’ on the Boston and Worcester the following year, like Booth he sensed ‘hitherto uncomputed mechan-ical advantages’. [12: p305] If he deprecated the way the railroad had coarsened the fabric of American life and contributed to its materialism, he nevertheless came to hold bonds or stock in at least six American concerns, affording him the financial security to develop and expound his philosophy of a universe composed of nature and of soul.” [1: p319]

Gwyn goes on to quote Henry David Thoreau and John Ruskin who both loathed and were drawn to this developing technology. He notes that George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) depicts the clash of old and new in the novel Middlemarch.

Gwyn concludes his book with this final paragraph: “For George Eliot … the railway came to Middlemarch at the same time as parliamentary reform and cholera, and she understood that the unknown was rarely welcome. Princes, ecclesiastics and philosophers variously welcomed or feared the coming of the railway, but she also sensed a profound if barely articulate concern that it meant no good to the waggoner or the labourer. All that Caleb Garth can do is persuade Hiram Ford and the smockfrocks that they shall do no more ‘meddling’, because ‘you can’t hinder the railroad’. On that, at least, all came to agree.” [1: p321]

References

  1. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300267891/the-coming-of-the-railway, accessed on 3rd September 2025.
  2. Gwyn tells us that “The shipping of coal from rail-served harbours remains important in the USA, Australia, India and China to this day. Railways retain an advantage over roads carriers, particularly where long overland distances are involved.” [1: p352]
  3. R. Phillips; A Morning’s Walk from London to Kew; J. Adlard, London, 1817.
  4. See for example: P. R. Reynolds; The London & South Wales Railway Scheme of 1824/25; in South West Wales Industrial Archeology Society Bulletin No. 95, p3-7.
  5. In 1830 £1 was worth $4.56. The Liverpool and Manchester cost £600,0000, the Baltimore and Ohio $4,000,000, the Charleston and Hamburg a mere $951,140, though still considerably in excess of the original estimate of $600,000 (D.A. Grinde; Building the South Carolina Railroad; in South Carolina Historical Magazine Vol. 77 No. 2, 1976, p91). Only eight other engineering projects in the United Kingdom had cost more than the Liverpool and Manchester: the Royal Canal in Ireland, the Worcester and Birmingham, the Grand Junction, the Birmingham and Liverpool Junction and the Caledonian canals, Plymouth Breakwater, Sheerness Dockyard and Kingstown Harbour.” (A. W. Skempton {ed.); Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers Volume 1 – 1560-1830; Thomas Telford and Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 2002, p834-6).
  6. R. H. G. Thomas; The Liverpool and Manchester Railway;, Batsford, London, 1980, p29
  7. A. W. Skempton {ed.); Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers Volume 1 – 1560-1830; Thomas Telford and Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 2002, p690.
  8. P. Reynolds; Railway Investment in Manchester in the 1820s; in Journal of the Railway & Canal Historical Society No. 211, 2011, p38-48.
  9. F. C. Gamst; Early American Railroads: Franz Anton Ritter Von Gerstner’s ‘Die innern Communicationen’ (1842-1843); Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1997.
  10. A. Wallach; Thomas Cole’s ‘River in the Catskills’ as Antipastoral‘; in The Art Bulletin, Vol. 84 No. 2, 2002, p334-350. “The Canajoharie and Catskill was an unsuccessful concern and had already closed following a bridge collapse by the time the painting was completed.” [1: p362]
  11. Contre Vaudois: Journal de la Suisse Romande; 16th July 1892, p1-2.
  12. R. W. Emerson; Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Volume 3, 1833-1835; ed. E. W. Forbes & W. E. Forbes, Houghton Mifflin, London and New York, 1910.

The Railway between Nice, Tende and Cuneo – Part 7 – L’Escarene to Drap-Cantaron Railway Station.

The featured image above is a rather grainy image of steam at Drap-Cantaron Railway Station.

In the first six articles about the line from Cuneo to the sea we covered the length of the line from Cuneo to Breil-sur-Roya and then to Ventimiglia. These articles can be found here, [9]  here [10] here, [11] here, [12] here, [13] and here [14]

Woven into the text below are a series of stills from a video of the train journey from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice. The video can be seen here. [4]

This article begins the journey from L’Escarene.

Initially, the line heads Southeast but then gradually turns to the the Southwest through Peille, Peillon and Drap before running into Nice.

The map below shows the two routes which headed from Nice and Ventimiglia North to Cuneo, as they existed prior to the alteration of the border between France and Italy after the Second World War.

The lines Nice to Tende and Ventimiglia to Tende in the period from 1928 to the Second World War, before the annexation, in 1947, of St-Dalmas de Tende and Piene to France. [15]

From l’Escarene to Drap-Cantaron

The line from L’Escarene to Drap/Cantaron. [25]

L’Escarene sits at the head of a long climb from Nice, it was one of the historic staging posts on the old royal road from Nice to Turin. Like Sospel Station, that of l’Escarene has substantial facilities which would allow the reception of military convoys in the event of conflict with neighbouring Italy. [1: p92]

The site of l’Escarene railway station, as shown on Google’s satellite imagery. [Google Maps, September 2025]
L’Escarène Railway Station, seen from the North soon after, or during, construction, © Public Domain. [17]
L’Escarene Railway Station © Public Domain. [17]
L’ Escarene Railway Station, post card image © Unknown. [17]
The station building at l’Escarène. Google Streetview, March 2023]
The underpass, just to the Southeast of l’Escarene railway station, seen from the D2566 to the Southwest. [Google Streetview, March 2023]
The same structure, seen from the Northeast. [Google Streetview, November 2022]
Further to the Southeast, the manmade plateau which created the Station and large Goods facilities is pierced by a tunnel which allows the D2566 to pass under the station site. [Google Streetview, April 2023]
The same structure, seen from the East. [Google Streetview, April 2023]

It is only a very short distance to the abutment of the viaduct that carries the line through l’Escarene.

The D2566 passes West-East under the railway and then curves round to join the D2204 and pass North-South under the West end of the railway viaduct. The Anc. Rte de L’Escarène passes through the first arch of the viaduct. The D2204 passes through the second arch of the viaduct. [Google Maps, September 2025]

Setting off from l’Escarene Railway station, this is the first view of the l’Escarene Viaduct from the cab of a Nice-bound train. The viaduct over the Redebraus has eleven 15 metre arches. [4]

L’Escarene viaduct, seen looking North from the Anc. Rte de l’Escarene. [Google Streetview, November 2022]
The viaduct seen from the North. The D2204 is directly ahead of the camera and to its right the Anc. Rte de l’Escarene climbs through the first arch of the viaduct. [Google Streetview, March 2023]
A train crosses the viaduct at l’Escarène, © Public Domain. [17]
A service from Nice approaches l’Escarene Railway Station across the viaduct, © Public Domain. [17]
The Railway Station and viaduct at l’Escarene, © Public Domain. [16]
A modern train on the viaduct at ‘Escarene, © Unknown. [17]
L’Escarene and its Viaduct, (c) J. P. Chevreau and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0 International). [18]
Viaduc de l’Escarene seen from the town. [Google Streetview, May 2013]

Part way across the viaduct the camera in the cab of the Nice-bound service picks up the metal parapet rails of the viaduct and the short tunnel ahead. [4]

The tunnel at the Southeast end of l’Escarene Viaduct is the Tunnel de Brec (382 metres in length. [19]

The Northwest portal of Brec Tunnel seen from alongside the line. [19]

The same crossing on Google’s satellite imagery. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The view Southeast from the mouth of Brec Tunnel. [4]

Turning through 180, provides us this view of the Southeast portal of Brec Tunnel. [19]

A gated crossing over the line a little further to the Southeast. [4]

The view from Rte de Tres, looking back towards l’Escarene Railway Station. [Google Streetview, November 2022]
From the same location looking Southeast. Notice the bridge over the line. [Google Streetview, November 2022]

The view of the same bridge from the cab of the Nice-bound train. [4]

The bridge carry Rte de Tres over the line. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Looking Northwest along the line from the bridge carrying Rte de Tres over the line. [Google Streetview, November 2022]

The view Southeast from the same bridge. [Google Streetview, November 2022]

The next overbridge carries Rte de l’Eira over the line. [4]

Looking North from the bridge carrying Rte de l’Eira over the line. [Google Streetview, April 2013]

Looking South from the same bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2013]

Southeast, the line enters Tunnel de Ecluse (136 metres in length). Just before this, there is a footpath access under the embankment. [34]

The underbridge mentioned above, seen from the D21. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

The Northwest portal of Tunnel de Ecluse, seen from the cab of a Nice-bound train. [4]

The same tunnel mouth, seen from the lineside. [34]

The view from the cab of the Nice-bound train at the Southeast portal of Tunnel de Ecluse. [4]

Turning to face Westnorthwest, this is the Southeast portal of the Tunnel de Ecluse. [34]

The next feature on the line is a short tunnel – Tunnel d’Euira (63 metres in length). [32]

Tunnel d’Euira is on the right side of this satellite image. [Google Maps, September 2025]

The North portal of Tunnel d’Euira. [32]

The South portal of Tunnel d’Euira and the galleried retaining structure which carries the line from a point very close to the tunnel portal. [32]

From many an angle, you would be forgiven for thinking that the railway crosses a viaduct. It appears, however, that the structure is a galleried retaining structure which creates a platform for the railway to run on while limiting the wight of the structure on the rock face beneath. [Google Maps, September 2025]

This view of the location from a little further ‘South, shows that the trackbed abuts the rockface on the East side of the line. [32]

Looking East from a short length of the D21, the galleried retaining structure, which is almost a viaduct, can be seen. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

The railway continues on a ‘berm’ built out from the East face of the Paillon valley and high above the D21, until it reaches the Ruisseau d’Euira.

This small extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows Le Paillon, the D21 and the railway in parallel. The railway bridge over the Ruisseau d’Euira is on the right of this image. [Google Maps, September 2025]

The Viaduc d’Euira crosses the valley of the Ruisseau d’Euira. The viaduct has one 30 m arch and two 5 m arches. [31]

The Viaduc d’Euira was designed by Paul Sejourne. It is a beautiful masonry arch structure which features a large central semi-circular arch framed by two smaller semi-circular arches piercing the spandrel walls, © Public Domain. [31]
The same viaduct seen in much more recent times from the West side of the Paillon valley. The tunnel mouth is the north portal of the Tunnel de Santa Augusta which is the next structure on the line. [31]

The Tunnel de Santa Augusta (754 metres in length) runs under the Ste-Augusta Chapelle. [30]

The South portal of the Tunnel de Santa Augusta. As can be seen the tunnel runs straight between the two portals, allowing the light from the North portal to be seen from outside the South portal. This photograph was taken alongside the track crossing the Viaduc d’Erbossièra. [30]

The Viaduc d’Erbossièra (205 metres in length). [29]

The Viaduc d’Erbossièra is another of Paul Sejourne’s elegant designs. It comprises 9 semi-circular arches of 8-metre span; a large 36-metre span arch across the Erbossiera torrent/stream and a final arch of 10-metre span. The spandrel walls of the arch, in this case being pierced by three small arches. The portal to the Ste-Augusta Tunnel can be seen on the left of this picture, © Public Domain. [29]
The main span of the viaduct, as seen from the D21 in the valley floor. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

More pictures of this structure, including some early photographs taken during construction can be found here. [29]

A short distance further South the line enters Tunnel de la Verna (197 metres in length). [28]

The North Portal seen from the cab of a Nice-bound service. The sun is low in the sky and the tunnel mouth is in deep shade. [4]

The view from the same train, looking South from the South portal of Tunnel de la Verna. [4]

Turning round to face North, this is the South portal of Tunnel de la Verna. [28]

About a further kilometre to the South the line enters Tunnel de’Ecluse.

Tunnel de l’Ecluse (78 metres in length, sits just to the North of Viaduc de Faquin. [21]

The North portal of Tunnel de l’Ecluse. [21]

The South portal of Tunnel de l’Ecluse and the Viaduc de Faquin. [21]

Viaduc de Faquin. [22]

Viaduct de Faquin as seen on Google’s satellite imagery (seven 11-metre arches). [Google Maps, September 2025]

Viaduct de Faquin soon after construction, seen from the Southwest, © Public Domain. [20]

Viaduct de Faquin seen from the West on Chemin de Sainte Lucie in the valley floor. [Google Streetview, January 2011]

The northern mouth of Tunnel de Coletta, seen from a Nice-bound train. [4]

Viaduct de Faquin, seen from the D53 which crossed the line above the tunnel mouth to the South of the viaduct (Tunnel de Coletta). [Google Streetview, April 2023]

Tunnel de Coletta. [23]

Immediately to the South of Tunnel de Coletta the railway enters Peille Railway Station in Grave de Peille.

The approach to Grave Railway Station, seen from the cab of a Southbound service at the mouth of Tunnel de Coletta. [4]

The southern portal of Tunnel de Coletta, seen from the end of the platform at Peille Railway Station (Grave de Peille), © Eugenio Merzagora and carried on the Structure website. [24]

Le Gare de Peille is situated on the East bank of the River Paillon on a pan artificial plateau which was created as part of the construction of the line from Nice to breil-sur-Roya. [26]

Peille Railway Station is located 6 km from the village of the same name, and serves the La Grave district, where the Vicat company operated a quarry and cement factory from 1924. A branch of the TNL tramway network reached this point from Pont-de-Peille. [1: p92]

The view from the carriage door of a Nice-bound train of Peille Railway Station (La Gare de Peille), © Eugenio Merzagora (2019) and shared on the Structurae Website. [28]

The island platform shelter, La Gare de Peille, seen from the Northwest, © Eugenio Merzagora (2019) and shared on the Structurae Website. [28]

The station building at Peille, seen from the South through the window of a Breil-sur-Roya train, © G CHP, and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 2.5). [34]
A roadside view of the Station building at Peille. [Google Streetview, April 2023]
A Briel-sur-Roya-bound service sits at Peille Railway Station. The train is an “XGC” railcar X 76583/76584, © R. Gibiat (2011) and shared on Le Rail Ussellois (Modern Postcards with Railway and Urban Transport Themes) Website. [36]
1925: Earthworks underway for the PLM Railway Station at La Grave de Peille © Public Domain. This image was shared on the L’Histoire de Menton et ses Alentours Facebook Page by Pierre Richert on 22nd November 2017. [14]
1925: Earthworks underway for the PLM Railway Station at La Grave de Peille © Public Domain. This image was shared on the L’Histoire de Menton et ses Alentours Facebook Page by Pierre Richert on 22nd November 2017. [7]
An early postcard showing the railway station at Peille with the cement works visible in the distance on the right side of the image, © Public Domain. [7]
La Gare de Peille as seen on Google’s satellite imagery. [Google Maps, September 2025]
A narrow underpass under the station site, seen from the West on Chemin de Nogairet at a point adjacent to the lilac flag on the satellite image above. [Google Streetview, April 2023]

At the South end of the Station site the line becomes single track once again adjacent to a house built originally for railway staff. [4]

South of Peille Railway Station the line passes this railway-built home, usually these houses were built for railway employees, either at a nearby station or working on track maintenance. [Google Streetview, April 2013]
The line continues South towards Tunnel de Nogairet. [Google Streetview, April 2013]

Further South the line passes through Tunnel de Nogairet (32 metres in length). [Google Maps, September 2025]

The North portal of Nogairet Tunnel, seen from the cab of a Nice-bound service. [4]

The view South from the cab of the Nice-bound train at the South portal of Nogairet Tunnel.

Turning through 180°, this is the South portal of the Tunnel de Nogairet as seen from the cab a Breil-sur-Roya-bound train in 1995. [37]

And then a short distance further South trains pass through Tunnel de Bouisses.

Tunnel de Bouisses as it appears on Google’s satellite imagery, (107 metres in length). [Google Maps, September 2025]

The North portal of Tunnel de Bouisses, seen from the cab of a Nice-bound train. [4]

Low sun shines on the cab of the same Nice-bound service as it leaves Tunnel de Bouisses and is about to cross the first of two viaducts with the name ‘Bouisses’ (Viaduc de Bouisses No. 2). [4]

Turning through 180°, this low definition view shows the South portal of Tunnel de Bouisses as seen from the cab of a Breil-sur-Roya-bound train in 1995 which is just about to cross Viaduc de Bouisses No. 2. [37]

Viaduc de Bouisses No. 2 (three 6-metre arches), as it appears on Google’s satellite imagery. [Google Maps, September 2025]

A very short distance South-southwest the line crosses Viaduc de Bouisses No. 1. …

Viaduc de Bouisses No. 1 (six 6-metre arches).[Google Maps, September 2025]

In the light of the low sun this is the view South-southwest across Viaduc de Bouisses No. 1 from the cab of the Nice-bound service. [4]

The two Bouisses viaducts seen from across the valley to the West. No. 1 is on the right, No. 2 is on the left, with the portal of Tunnel de Bouisses visible top-left. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

A little further to the South, after running along a trackbed supported by retaining walls trains travelling towards Nice cross the Viaduct de Adrecia, seen here from the cab of the Nice-bound service. [4]

Viaduc de Adrecia (three 6-metre arches). [Google Maps, September 2025]

Viaduc de Adrecia, seen from the D21. [Google Streetview, April 2023]

The line has curved round to the Southeast before it enters Tunnel de Launa, shown here by the red, blue and green dots. Viaduc de Launa sits immediately to the Southeast of the tunnel. [38]

The Northwest portal of Tunnel de Launa (309 metres in length). [4]

This slightly overexposed image shows the view from the cab of the Nice-bound service as it leaves the Tunnel de Launa. The Viaduc de Launa is just beyond the railway house on the left of the image. [4]

The Southeast portal of Tunnel de Launa with a railway house on the right of the image. The viaduct is immediately behind the camera. Note also the level crossing close to the tunnel mouth. [38]

The view East across the railway on Rte du Vieux Village (D121). [Google Streetview, March 2023]
This photograph, taken at the apex of a hairpin bend on Rte du Vieux Village (D121) has the tunnel mouth top-left, the railway house just to the right of centre at the top of the image with the railway in front of it spanning a bridge which carries the road under the railway. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

The bridge carrying the railway over Rte du Vieux Village (D121). [Google Streetview, March 2023]

Viaduc de Launa (100 metres in length – six 12-metre arches over the Galimbert stream) seen from the cab of the Nice-bound train running through the level-crossing. The viaduct was rebuilt during 1992 and 1993 as the first viaduct suffered settlement due to ground movement. [4]

Viaduc de Launa towards the end of the construction contact circa 1928, © Public Domain. [39]
A similar view of the viaduct in the 1970s, © Unknown. [39]
Looking North along the viaduct in the 1970s, © Unknown. [39]
The replacement reinforced concrete viaduct was opened in 1993. This view looks from the West on the D121 which passes under the viaduct.

Both this and the next image of the pedestrian crossing at Chemin de Laghet – a couple of hundred metres further along the line toward Nice – are of poor quality because of bright and low sunlight. [4]

An unmetalled lane (Chemin de Laghet) used to cross the line at this location, now only pedestrian access across the line is permitted. The crossing-keeper’s cottage remains. {Google Streetview, January 2011]
A short distance further Southwest the Chemin du Canton Soubran passes under the line. The structure is only suitable for a cattle creep and pedestrian access. This view looks East toward the structure. the line heads toward Peille Railway Station on the left and to Drap-Cantaron to the right. [Google Streetview, March 2023]
Peillon-Sainte-Thècle Railway Station building forecourt, seen from the South West, © August III Sas (July 2023. [Google Maps, September 2025]

Looking directly into the sun, this is the view from the cab of a Nice-bound service coming to a halt at Peillon-Sainte-Thècle Railway Station. [4]

A better view of Peillon-Sainte-Thècle Railway Station as seen from the East along the platform, © Yann Cochois (September 2023). [Google Maps, September 2025]

Immediately to the West of Peillon-Sainte-Thècle Railway Station, the line crosses Pont de Brauschet (five 9 metre arches), seen here from the South on Avenue de la Gare. [Google Streetview, March 2023]

Pont du Brauschet sits just to the West of Peillon-Sainte-Thècle Railway Station and is marked on this map with a red arrow. It is 70 metres long and is a 5-arch viaduct.

Pont de Brauschet, seen from the cab of a train heading for Nice. [4]

The next structure along the line is Tunnel de Châteauvieux (219 metres in length). This in the East portal of the tunnel. [4]

Tunnel de Châteauvieux is the first of three tunnels which Nice-bound trains now pass through. It is marked by the red, blue and green dots on this image. Immediately to the West of this tunnel are the two side-by-side Viaducs des Mortes. [40]

This is the West portal of Tunnel de Châteauvieux, seen from alongside the line between the tunnel and Viaduc des Mortes. [40]

Just to the West of the Tunnel de Châteauvieux there are 2 viaducts next to each other (Viaducs des Mortes) of which only one is in service; the southern one which gives access to the Tuhet tunnel. The viaduct to the north (which has seven arches) leads to an unfinished tunnel. An accident occurred during the drilling of the original tunnel in 1925. The accident, which caused the death of 3 workers, resulted in the need to drill a new tunnel and, as a result, the construction of another viaduct in 1927 (with five 11 metre arches).  The viaducts are named, Viaducs des Mortes, not because of the accident but because the viaducts bridge a footpath which was used to take deceased inhabitants of Borghéas to the cemetery of the neighbouring village of Drap.

The two viaducts mentioned above. [Google Maps, September 2025]

The two viaducts, seen from the North. The green arrow indicates the operational viaduct, the red arrow, the redundant viaduct. [48]

A view of both of the two viaducts and the Tunnel de Tuhet beyond. [46]

The East portal of Tunnel de Tuhet, seen from the cab of a Nice-bound service on the Viaduc des Mortes. [4]

The Tunnel de Tuhet (346 metres long). [46]

The West portal of the Tunnel de Tuhet. [46]

The East portal of Tunnel de la Ribosse. [47]

Tunnel de la Ribosse. [47]

The West portal of Tunnel de la Ribosse. [47]

A short distance further West, the line passes through Fontanil-Drap High School Halt.

Fontanil-Drap High School Halt seen from the Southeast on Route des Croves. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

At the West end of the station/halt, the Route des Croves passes under the line. The low arch bridge seen from the South. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The same structure seen from the North side of the line. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The next bridge carries the line over Chemin de de l’Ubac. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

The South side of the same structure. [Google Streetview, March 2025]

A short distance further West the line crosses the D2204, the River Paillon and the D2204B. …

The steel girder bridge, Pont des Vernes, which now carries the line over the the D2204, the River Paillon and the D2204B, seen from the Northeast on the D2204. The bridge is made of two spans of 28.64 m and two of 26.09 m, the easternmost span of which crosses the Contes road and what was the Nice-Bendejun tramway line of the TNL. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The same bridge seen from the South on the D2204B. [Google Streetview, March 2025]
The same bridge seen from above. The mouth of Tunnel de Moulin-de-Cantaron is in the top-left of the image. This postcard image was shared on the Comte de Nice et son Histoire Facebook Group by Jean-Paul Bascoul on 19th April 2025, © Public Domain. [50]
Pont des Vernes seen from the middle of the Paillon of its four spans the outer two were 26.1 metres in length and the middle two were each 28.5 metres long, (c) Unknown but probably Public Domain. [52]

Once across the river and adjacent roads the line enters Tunnel de Moulin-de-Cantaron.

The East portal of Tunnel de Moulin-de-Cantaron. [Google Streetview,

Tunnel de Moulin-de-Cantaron. [26]

The Southwest portal of the Tunnel de Moulin-de-Cantaron, seen from the end of the platform at Drap-Cantaron Railway Station, © Eugenio Merzagora and shared on the Structure website. [51]

The railway station at Drap also served the village of Cantaron which was on the opposite bank of the River Paillon. This old postcard image was shared by Roland Coccoli on the Comte de Nice et son Histoire Facebook Group on 22nd January 2016. [5]
A closer view of the Station at Drap. This postcard image was shared on the Comte de Nice et son Histoire Facebook Group by Charles Louis Fevrier on 5th January 2021. [6]

This length of our journey finishes here at Drap-Cantaron Railway Station.

References

  1. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 1: 1858-1928; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  2. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 2: 1929-1974; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  3. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 3: 1975-1986; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  4. https://youtu.be/rLXAEz-n4mM?si=RLQC31jynGeM_lQR, accessed on 26th August 2025. Permission to use these still images from the YouTube video has been sought.
  5. https://m.facebook.com/groups/ciccoli/permalink/1711973335715195, accessed on 15th December 2023.
  6. https://m.facebook.com/groups/ciccoli/permalink/2989582914620891, accessed on 15th December 2023.
  7. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=14570, accessed on 21st December 2023.
  8. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/43.8804/7.4395&layers=P, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  9. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/22/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-1.
  10. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-2.
  11. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/06/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-3-vievola-to-st-dalmas-de-tende
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/16/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-4-st-dalmas-de-tende-to-breil-sur-roya
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/25/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-5-breil-sur-roya-to-ventimiglia
  14. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10212672518585538&set=a.10212672512625389, accessed on 30th August 2025.
  15. Franco Collidà, Max Gallo & Aldo A. Mola; CUNEO-NIZZA History of a Railway; Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo, Cuneo (CN), July 1982.
  16. https://cartorum.fr/carte-postale/204912/lescarene-lescarene-la-gare-et-le-viaduc-ligne-nice-coni, accessed on 30th August 2025.
  17. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=3321#google_vignette, accessed on 30th August 2025
  18. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vue_du_village_de_L%E2%80%99Escar%C3%A8ne_depuis_la_maison_de_retraite.jpg, accessed on 31st August 2025.
  19. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06057.1.pdf, accessed on 31st August 2025.
  20. https://ebay.us/m/yOgnpShttps://ebay.us/m/yOgnpS, accessed on 15th September 2025
  21. https://www.tunnels-ferroviaires.org/fiches/tu06/06091.2.pdf, accessed on 31st August 2025.
  22. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06091.02F.pdf, accessed on 11th September 2025.
  23. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06091.1.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  24. https://structurae.net/en/structures/coletta-tunnel, accessed on 15th September 2025.
  25. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne_de_Nice_%C3%A0_Breil-sur-Roya, accessed on 15th September 2025
  26. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.79305/7.37742&layers=P, accessed on 16th September 2025.
  27. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06031.1.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  28. https://structurae.net/fr/ouvrages/gare-de-peille, accessed on 16th September 2025.
  29. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06091.3.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  30. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06091.02M.pdf, accessed on 11th September 2025.
  31. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06091.4.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  32. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06091.02N.pdf, accessed on 11th September 2025.
  33. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06091.5.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  34. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gare_de_Peille, accessed on 16th September 2025.
  35. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06091.6.pdf, accessed on 10th September 2025.
  36. https://rail-ussellois.fr/carte-postale-train/carte-postale-n-1196-le-rail-ussellois, accessed on 16th September 2025.
  37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5-omGzckp0, accessed on 16th September 2025. Permission to use these still images from the YouTube video has been sought.
  38. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06092.2.pdf, accessed on 17th September 2025.
  39. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/kc06/06092.03J.pdf, accessed on 17th September 2025.
  40. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06092.1.pdf, accessed on 17th September 2025.
  41. Franco Collida, Max Gallo & Aldo A. Mola; CUNEO-NIZZA History of a Railway; Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo, Cuneo (CN), July 1982.
  42. Franco Collidà; 1845-1979: the Cuneo-Nice line year by year; in Rassegna – Quarterly magazine of the Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo; No. 7, September 1979, pp. 12-18.
  43. Stefano Garzaro & Nico Molino; THE TENDA RAILWAY From Cuneo to Nice, the last great Alpine crossing; Editrice di Storia dei Trasporti, Colleferro (RM), EST, July 1982.
  44. SNCF Region de Marseille; Line: Coni – Breil sur Roya – Vintimille. Reconstruction et équipement de la section de ligne située en territoire Français; Imprimerie St-Victor, Marseille (F), 1980.
  45. https://www.archeo-alpi-maritimi.com/viaducduvallon.php, accessed on 18th September 2025.
  46. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06054.2.pdf, accessed on 18th September 2025.
  47. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06054.1.pdf, accessed on 18th September 2025.
  48. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06054.01Z.pdf, accessed on 18th September 2025.
  49. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14KVdcevha1, accessed on 19th September 2025.
  50. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Jr5MoEinB, accessed on 19th September 2025.
  51. https://structurae.net/en/structures/moulin-de-cantaron-tunnel, accessed on 19th September 2025.
  52. https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/cV8AAOSwPONjDPCD/s-l1600.webp, accessed on 28th September 2025.

The Railway between Nice, Tende and Cuneo – Part 6 – Breil-sur-Roya to L’Escarene.

The featured image above shows an unidentified steam locomotive crossing the highly unusual Viaduc de Bevera. The train is heading toward Sospel.

In the first five articles about the line from Cuneo to the sea we covered the length of the line from Cuneo to Breil-sur-Roya and then to Ventimiglia. These articles can be found here, [9]  here [10] here, [11] here, [12] and here [13]

I want to acknowledge that a series of stills from a video of the train journey from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice have been used in this article. The video can be seen here. [4]

This article begins the journey from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice.

South of Breil-sur-Roya a junction allows direct access to Ventimiglia and to Nice. The map below shows the two routes as they existed prior to the alteration of the border between France and Italy after the Second World War.

The lines Nice to Tende and Ventimiglia to Tende in the period from 1928 to the Second World War, before the annexation, in 1947, of St-Dalmas de Tende and Piene to France. [40]

The project was finally agreed by the PLM on 7th January 1907 but various portions of the work would be delayed by disputes relating to the transfer of land. “Acquisitions began in the suburbs of Nice in May 1907, at Saint-Roch … and Roccabiliera, where the PLM had decided to build a vast facility with a goods station, marshalling yard and engine depot to relieve congestion at Nice central station, whose rights of way, enclosed in the urban fabric, could no longer expand. This program for the redesign of Nice’s railway facilities also provided for a 3,610 m connection between the new Saint-Roch station, Riquier station and the port.  In the hinterland, events also began to take shape and in December 1908, a section of engineers set up in Fontan and undertook the first work along the Roya the following January.” [1: p90]

Banaudo et al continue: “In 1909, Chief Engineer Paul Séjourné (1851-1939), then fifty-eight years old and already renowned for his original designs for civil engineering structures, took over the direction of the construction department. The line from Nice to the Italian border would give him the opportunity to exercise his talent in the design of structures that were as daring as they were harmoniously integrated into the landscape.” [1: p90]

In this series of articles, we have already seen Séjourné‘s Scarassoui Viaduct spanning La Roya to the North of Breil-sur-Roya.

The line from Breil-sur-Roya to l’Escarene. [

This article follows the line South from Breil-sur-Roya to l’Escarene in two parts. The first from Breil to Sospel and the second from Sospel to l’Escarene.

1. The Line South from Breil-sur Roya to Sospel

Banaudo et al tell us that, “In December 1912, tranches 8 and 9 were awarded in turn for a length of 10,500 m from Sospel to Breil to the François Mercier company, of Moulins-sur-Allier.  The work included three tunnels with a combined length of 5,307 m, including the Mont Grazian and Caranca structures established at double-track gauge and equipped with defensive devices, as well as seven bridges and viaducts representing twenty-five masonry arches and two metal spans. Among them, the exceptional structure of the Bévéra viaduct. There were also three culverts and three level crossings in this section.” [1: p102-103]

Banaudo et al take up a significant part of Volume 1 of the story of the line with an album of photographs of the construction work on the French side of the border. [2: p152-331] A superb record of the work undertaken.

On the Sospel-Breil section of the line the contract works were gradually completed. By the end of 1921, the Bancao and Caranca tunnels were completed. The Mont Grazian tunnel was finished in 1923. The Bévéra viaduct’s abutments and masonry arch were ready by then and only awaited the delivery of the metalwork of the decking. [1: p141]

The length of the lien from Breil-sur-Roya (top-right) to l’Escarene (bottom-left). [8]

This drawing/map shows the two routes heading South from Breil-sur-Roya. [40]

As with the line immediately to the North of Breil-sur-Roya, the works to the South and Southwest were constructed by the French. Both of the lines heading South from Breil-sur-Roya entered tunnels just a short distance South of Breil.

The first length of the line South of Breil-sur-Roya is common with the line to Ventimiglia. The two lines separate at the Lavina bridge.

A colourised postcard view of Breil-Sur Roya Railway Station looking North through the station site in advance of the official opening in 1928. This colourised image was shared on the Stura-Cuneo Facebook Page on 20th February 2020, (c) Public Domain. [29]
Breil-sur-Roya station during its very early operation (1928-35), before electrification, with numerous passenger carriages standing idle. The passenger building is in the background; in the foreground are the buildings on the second platform, the only ones today significantly reduced in height and length, publisher Frédéric Laugier, (c) Public Domain. [30]
Breil-sur-Roya Railway Station at the height of its development, with electrification completed (1935), with the passenger building, the large freight yard filled with wagons, and the concrete sheds with arched vaults. Those in the background still exist but are used for non-railway purposes. The Breil Ecomuseum is now located on the north side, half-hidden by the foliage of the tree in the foreground. The photograph was taken from the hillside to the Northwest of the station site and faces Southeast, (c) Public Domain. [30]
After the war, the line to Nice was reopened in 1947, but the station, reduced to the simple terminus of a secondary section, was greatly simplified, removing almost all the sidings (the long straight lines of which can still be made out). In the background, the line to Fontan still features the electrification poles (removed from the rest of the station), but it was naturally abandoned and remained there until its reconstruction in the 1970s. In the 21st century, platform 2, which had been removed at the time, has been restored, the buildings on the second platform have been scaled down, and the third platform has been eliminated. The turntable, which still exists, is part of the Ecomusée, publisher Lapie à Saint-Maur, 1955, (c) Public Domain.[31]
Breil-sur-Roya Railway Station in 2013, (c) Gilles Tagadaand licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [32]
The southern end of the railway station site in Breil-sur-Roya. Two lines leave the station heading South-southwest. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The view from the cab of a Nice-bound service waiting to set off from Breil-sur-Roya. [4]

South of the station adjacent parallel bridges cross the Voie de la Première Dfl and Vallon de la Lavina (the Lavina Bridge).

Lavina Bridge seen at rail-level from the cab of the Nice-bound train. [4]

Looking East under the railway bridges (the Lavina Bridge) along Voie de la Première Dfl. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
Looking West under the railway bridges (the Lavina Bridge)along Voie de la Première Dfl. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

A short distance to the South the two lines can be seen to be separating both geographically and in level. This view looks Northeast with the station off to the left. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
The view South from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train. Again, the separation in level is quite marked. [55]

At the same location, this view looks Southeast. Both lines enter  a tunnel just to the South. One tunnel mouth is visible on the left of the image at a lower level. The other tunnel mouth is behind the vegetation on the right of this image. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

The two tunnel mouths seen from the cab of a Nice-bound service. [4]

The two tunnel mouths. On the left, that of Gigne Tunnel, on the right, that of Caranca Tunnel. Left for Ventimiglia, right for Nice! The whole structure is provided with a series of small openings to facilitate the holding of the tunnels in the event of war. [17]

Caranca Tunnel North Portal prior to vegetation growth. The tunnel was built to accommodate double-track to allow for possible future growth in traffic. [20]

The North portal of Caranca Tunnel in the 21st century (915 metres long). [4]

This extract from the OpenStreetMap mapping shows the close correlation of the two different routes over the first fe kilometres. The short red lines are the locations of tunnel mouths. [14]

The route of Caranca Tunnel crosses twice over the Gigne Tunnel which is on the Ventimiglia line. The lines to both Nice and Ventimiglia are shown as dotted lines when in tunnel. [1: p126]

Nice-bound trains exit Caranca Tunnel heading Southeast. This is the view from the cab of a Nice-bound train. [4]

Turning round to face the Tunnel portal, this is the Southeast portal of Caranca Tunnel. [20]

The next tunnel is Tunnel de Bancao (508 metres long). This is the North portal of the tunnel. [4]

The North Portal of Bancao Tunnel is at the higher level. the lower tunnel mouth is that o Sanfurian Tunnel. [19]

The South portal of Bancao Tunnel gives way onto Viaduc Bancao. [19]

The line leaves Bancao Tunnel and immediately crosses Bancao Viaduct. [4]

Bancao Viaduct on the line from Breil-sur-Roya to Ventimiglia is a single span arch close to the D6204 on this extract from OpenStreetMap. The line to the West is the line we are now following from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice which is at a much higher level and its viaduct is a multi-span structure. [15]

Both the Nice line and the Ventimiglia line can be seen in this image. That to Nice is at the higher level. The longer viaduct at the lower level is Viaduc Eboulis. Viaduc Bancao is at the higher level. [18]

An earlier monochrome view of Viaduc Bancao. The viaduct has eight 9 metre arches. [18]

Looking West from the D6204/E74, a small culvert close to the road is dwarfed by the bridge carrying the line to Ventimiglia which in turn is dwarfed by the viaduct carrying the line to Nice. [Google Streetview, April 2008]

Viaduc de Bancao on the Nice to Breil-sur-Roya line appears, in part, at the top of this image.

The two rail lines are still running in parallel, only beginning to separate significantly at the bottom of this extract from Open StreetMap.

The line we are following enters the Mont Grazian Tunnel, bottom right of this OpenStreetMap extract. [16]

Before the Tunnel three structures are crossed – two 10 metre-span arched bridges and then Viaduc d’Arbousset none of the three are marked on this map extract. The Viaduct sits at the point where the line which has been curving round to the South begins to turn to the Southwest, just before entering Mont Grazian Tunnel. [16]

Viaduc d’Arbousset (63 metres long with three 7 metre arches). Ahead the line curves to the right and enters Mont Grazian Tunnel. [4]

The Northeast portal of the Tunnel de Mont Grazian, seen from the cab of a Nice-boud train. [4]

The Mont Grazian Tunnel was built wide enough to accommodate double-track to allow for possible future traffic growth. “It was lined with defensive measures at both ends, a precaution imposed by the major strategic importance of this structure, which connects the Roya and Bévéra valleys.” [1: p94] Details of the defensive measures can be found here. [27]

The Northeast portal of Tunnel de Mont Grazian. This view from above shows the Viaduc d’Arbousset and the high retaining wall on the right of the mouth of the tunnel. [27]

Tunnel de Mont Grazian is 3891 metres in length. [27]

The view Southeast from the cab of the Nice-bound service as it leaves the tunnel mouth. A very short distance beyond the tunnel mouth the line crosses Viaduc de Bassera. [4]

Turning through 180, the Southwest portal of the Tunnel de Mont Grazian. [27]

The Southeast portal of the Mont Grazian Tunnel before the opening of the line in 1928. Viaduc de Bassera is in the foreground. There are detailed differences between the appearance of the tunnel entrance in this view and the photograph of the entrance above. As part of the Maginot strategic defence plan for the SFAM (Alpes Maritimes Fortified Sector) the Southeast portal of Mount Grazian Tunnel had fortified side chambers with loopholes overlooking the tunnel to guard against enemy incursion. More details can be found here. [27]
A different postcard view of the Bassera Viaduct and the tunnel mouth of the Mont Grazian Tunnel. [46]

The Bassera Viaduct is curved with seven 12-metre arches and crosses the Basséra River.

A broader view of the Viaduc de Bassera at the time of its construction, (c) Public Domain. [23]

In this image, Viaduc de Bassera is on the right and Viaduc Cai (over the River Bevera) is on the left. [23]

The two bridges as seen on Google Earth. [Google Earth, August 2025]

The original bridge over the Bevera (Pont de Cai) which was built in time for the opening of the line in 1928. More details can be found here. [24]

A very short distance beyond the end of Viaduc de Bassera, the line crosses the River Bevera on another viaduct – Viaduc Cai. [4]

This extract from OpenStreetMap illustrates the proximity of the two viaducts and Mont Grazian Tunnel. [22]

The Bevera viaduct was of unusual construction. It consisted of four masonry arches, each of 26 ft span, and of two steel girder spans, each 150 ft long. These steel girders are, as can be seen, supported in the centre by a single masonry arch set at right angles to the axis of the bridge, and crossing the gorge. [25]
The Bevera Viaduct was rebuilt in the 1960s. [ID: 355520] Bévera Viaduct (Pont de Caï) (© Eugenio Merzagora, 25 June 2021, Structurae License (non-commercial use). [21]

The Bevera Viaduct was an ingenious design solution to the need to thread the line through the narrow Bevera Gorge to the East of Sospel. Engineer: Paul Séjourné, © Markus Schweiss and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [26]

Due to its proximity to the Italian border, this unused tunnel (marked with a red arrow) was built for strategic reasons as part of the Maginot Plan for the defense of the SFAM (Fortified Sector of the Alpes Maritimes). [28]

It was intended to provide an emergency route in the event that the large neighboring Caï viaduct needed to be destroyed, and to store the metal spans of a replacement viaduct. [28]

Halfway along its length, on the left wall, it has an annex gallery (tunnel window – marked by the yellow arrow) which opens onto the western abutment of the Caï viaduct. More information can be found here. [28]

The Bevera River flows West to East (its confluence with La Roya (Roia) is adjacent to the village of Bevera which sits on the North bank of the Bevera River). Once across the Bevera River on the Cai Viaduct, the line heads up a gradient of 17 mm/m to Sospel Railway Station.

The route of the line between Breil-sur-Roya and Sospel was determined by the military. The military authorities dictated that the line should be routed to ensure that it could “be easily intercepted by the artillery of The Barbonnet fort, above Sospel, in the event of an infiltration attempt from the Roya valley.” [1: p92 & 94]

The Cai or Bevera Viaduct “crosses the river at a very acute angle. [This] inspired an original arrangement by Paul Séjourné: the deck, formed of two metal spans of 45.30 m, framed by four masonry arches of 8 m, rests 30 m above the river on a perpendicular arch of 25 m opening and egg-like in shape, resting transversely on the walls of the gorge.” [1: p94]

The line follows the valley side to the South of the Bevera rising, as we have already noted at a gradient of 17 mm/m. It crosses a minor road by means of a level crossing (Route de Suez).

The level crossing at Route de Suez, seen from above. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The level crossing at Route de Suez seen from the cab of a West-bound train. [4]

The next level crossing on the line is immediately at the East end of Sospel Railway Station site. [Google Maps, August 2025

The same crossing seen from the cab of the Westbound train approaching Sospel Railway Station. [4]

The road crossing of the line (seen from the South) is on the left of this image. The track to the right heads back towards the Viaduc de Cai. A small culvert can be seen alongside the road at this location. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
The road crossing of the line (also seen from the South) is on the right of the image. The track to the left heads into Sospel Railway Station. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

Further West and fully within what was the station site but which in the 21st century is an open plateau of unused land. [4]

The station passing loop seen at its eastern end from the cab of the Westbound train. [4]

The final approach to Sospel railway Station from the East. [4]

Sospel Railway Station. [4]

Sospel Railway Station, seen from above. [Google Maps, August 2025]
The station and forecourt at Sospel, © G CHP and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.5). [29]
A similar view from the early 20th century, of the station building at Sospel. [45]

Sospel Railway Station was to be a station “with substantial facilities which would allow the reception of military convoys in the event of conflict with neighboring Italy.” [1: p92] Arriving on Sospel, trains from Breil-sur-Roya pass through a large flat open area which was designed to accommodate the needs of the military.

The town was, in the middle of the 19th century, the second city of the County of Nice. “The location of Sospel … in … a basin where the Bévéra Valley widens, is very unique. From wherever one arrives from France, one must cross a pass: the Braus pass coming from Nice, the Castillon pass towards Menton, the Brouis pass towards Breil and La Roya, and the Turini pass towards La Bollène and La Vésubie. Towards Italy, the Vescavo Pass road connects Piena and Olivetta, while downstream, the Bévéra flows in impassable gorges where one could only venture on foot.” [1: p101-102]

The year 1912 was quite momentous in the history of Sospel not only was construction work getting underway but on 15th April 1912 the Compagnie des Tramways de Nice et du Littoral (TNL) opened its Menton-Sospel tramway. More about the tramway can be found here, [36] here [37] and here. [38]

Closer to the centre of Sospel, this is the terminus of the Menton-Sospel Tramway. [46]

Banaudo et al comment that “The Gianotti company immediately took advantage of this opportunity to transport the tools and equipment from Nice that would be used for the construction of the Braus tunnel. … In the initial stages of the construction, the Gianotti brothers used a network of portable 0.60 m gauge railways, on which Decauville dump trucks pulled by horses ran.  Later, one-metre gauge tracks were laid, on which steam locomotives pulled larger capacity trains, consisting of Koppel wagons with a load of 6 m³ or wooden-bodied wagons with a capacity of 3 m³. Several locomotives from the contractor were brought to site via the tramway, coupled to a ‘mortrice electrique’ (an electric tram engine) as a safety measure on the steeply graded tramway.” [1: p102]

In the early months of 1913, the Mercier company got to work and obtained permission from the TNL company to open a special branch line at each end of the Menton-Sospel tramway line. The construction site’s supplies then provided the tramway with more than half of its freight traffic. In July 1913, two to three round trips ran daily, and in October, Mercier received 745 tons of materials in Sospel. In May 1914, the Gianotti brothers opened their own branch line in the Careï Valley in Menton, but soon, the saturation of the small freight yard and insufficient equipment forced the TNL to limit shipments to five wagons per day.” [1: p103]

2. Sospel to l’Escarene

The journey from Sospel to l’Escarene takes the line through and under the mountains of the Col de Braus.

The line climbs through a series of embankments and cuttings on a gradient of 9.5 mm/m and enters the Tunnel de Braus.It continues to climb within the tunnel to a high point of 420 metres above sea level. Within the tunnel the gradient then changes to a 2 mm/m downward grade towards l’Escarene. The tunnel was double-track both to aid ventilation and to allow for possible expansion of services if demand required it. At the insistence of the military defensive fortifications surrounded the two tunnel mouths. [1: p92]

Of the 12 tranches of contract work on the French side of the international border, two tranches covered the 9.7 km length between Sospel and l’Escarene – lots 6 and 7. The work was awarded in December 1911 and April 1912 to Jean and Antonin Gianotti. Banaudo et al tell us  that the work included over 6.4 km of tunnel. “As well as a few secondary structures: three culverts, four level crossings, two underpasses and six overpasses, most of which were built using the new reinforced concrete technique.” [1: p101]

After waiting for a Breil-sur-Roya-bound service to clear the line ahead, we set off in a Westerly direction from the station at Sospel.

A Nice to Breil-sur-Roya service arriving at Sospel. [4]

As the Nice-bound train sets off from Sospel Station it crosses Rte d’Erc at a level-crossing. [4]

Rte d’Erc crosses the railway at the West end of the Sospel Station site. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Looking back East towards Sospel Railway Station. [Google streetview, August 2022]
A departure for Nice in 1947. The steam locomotive has just crossed the level-crossing over Rte d’Erc. [47]
A similar view looking back East towards Sospel Railway Station from close to the level crossing featured above. [44]
A view from the railway house which sits beside the level-crossing which shows Sospel Railway Station in very early days! [45]
Looking ahead along the railway towards l’Escarene (on the left of this post and image), the town of Sospel is laid out in front of the camera. In the text of this article we mention the use of concrete on the line. Two bridges of reinforced concrete construction can be seen on the left of this image. [46]
Looking West towards the bridge carrying Mnt des Capuchins over the railway. The station passing loop ends just to the West of the Rte d’Erc level crossing. [Google Streetview, August 2022]

A closer view of the bridge carrying Mnt des Capuchins. [4]

Rte de la Penetrante passes under the railway. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Rte de la Penetrante (D2566A) is crossed by means of a stone arch bridge. This is the North elevation of the structure. [Google Streetview, October 2022]
The South elevation of the same structure. [Google Streetview, October 2022]
Chemin de la Saint-Roch bridges the line a short distance further West. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The bridge carrying Chemin de la Saint-Roch over the line as seen from the cab of a Nice-bound train. [4]

The overbridge carrying Chemin de la Saint-Roch, seen from the North. [Google Streetview, April 2013]
Looking back along the line towards Sospel Railway Station. [39]

The next overbridge carries the D2204 (boulevard de l’Egalite over the line. [4]

Boulevard de l’Egalite (D2204) bridges the line a short distance further West. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Looking Souttheast from Boulevard de l’Egalite towards Sospel Railway Station. [Google Streetview, October 2022]
Looking Northwest from Boulevard de l’Egalite. [Google Streetview, October 2022]

The next structure visible form the cab of the Nice-bound train is an accommodation bridge which carries a driveway to a larger property running Northeast from La Condamine. [4]

An accommodation bridge carries a driveway from La Condamine over the line. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Rte du Moulinet (D2566) passes under the railway. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Just a short distance to the Northwest from the bridge above. The bridge over Rte du Moulinet is seen here from the Northeast. [Google Streetview, August 2021]
The same structure, seen from the Southwest on the D2566. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

A short distance further West the line crosses Rte Sant-Antoine by means of a level-crossing. [4]

Rte Saint-Antoine crosses the line at level a little further to the West. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Looking East from Rte Saint-Antoine towards Sospel. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
Looking West from Rte Saint-Antoine. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

The D2566 crosses the line (heading North-northwest) with the line travelling in a southwesterly direction. [4]

Rte de Moulinet (D2566) crosses the line again. [Google Maps, August 2025]
Looking Northeast from Rte du Moulinet towards Sospel. [Google Streetview, August 2016]
Looking Southeast towards l’Escarene from the same bridge over the line. [Google Streetview, August 2016]

In deep shade, this is the mouth of Tunnel de Braus, seen from the cab of an approaching Nice-bound train.[4]

The same tunnel mouth in better light. [31]

The full length of Tunnel de Braus (5.94 km long), as it appears on OpenStreetMap. [30]
The full length of Tunnel de Braus as it is recorded in the French Inventory of Tunnels. The yellow dot marks the approximate location of a significant water flow intersected by the construction work which required significant remedial works before the construction of the tunnel could proceed. More information and drawings can be found here. [31]

As we have already noted, both the tunnel portals were fortified at the insistence of the military. … Completing the tunnels also required significant additional work to deal with a very high level of water ingress during construction.

The Southwest portal of Tunnel de Braus is flanked to the Southeast by a very high retaining wall and to the Northwest by a water channel created for the Ruisseau de Redebraus. [31]

The Tunnel de Braus was built to accommodate a double-track line to allow for possible future growth in traffic.

This image shows the Southwest tunnel mouth of Tunnel de Braus, an accommodation bridge Southwest of the tunnel portal and a bridge which carries the railway over the Ruisseau de Redebraus [ID: 324493] Col-de-Braus Tunnel western portal (© Eugenio Merzagora, 9 July 2019, Structurae License (non-commercial use)). [33]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows the various structures from above – the river bridge is towards the bottom-left of the image with the tunnel mouth in the top-right. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The view from the cab of the Nice-bound train as it leaves the tunnel behind. [4] The first couple of hundred metres beyond the tunnel portal are within a narrow, damp and dark defile.

The bridge over the Ruisseau de Redebraus. [4]

The Nice-bound train approaches the halt at Touët-de-l’Escarène. [4]

Touët-de-l’Escarène Railway Station (Halt). The village is to the North of the Station. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Touët-de-l’Escarène Railway Station. [4]

Three older images of Touët-de-l’Escarène follow.  Two while the station was under construction. …

Touët-de-l’Escarène Railway Station, seen from the South and under construction, seen from the Southwest.  [49]
Touët-de-l’Escarène also under construction, seen from the West. [49]
Touët-de-l’Escarène, the completed line, seen heading away towards the Tunnel de Mont Grazian. [49]

The line beyond Touët-de-l’Escarène continues West along the North side of the Ruisseau de Redebraus towards the next tunnel. …

The next tunnel is Tunnel de l’Escarène or Tunnel de Coalongia (527 metres in length). [34]

The East portal of the Tunnel de l’Escarène. [4]

The view from the cab of a Nice-bound train as it leaves l’Escarene Tunnel. The points which provide the passing loop at l’Escarene Railway Station sit just outside the tunnel mouth. [4]

The West portal of the Tunnel de l’Escarène. [34]

Within the tunnel the line has begun to turn towards the South and the relatively tight curve continues until between the platforms at Sospel Station the line is on a North-South axis.

The final approach to l’Escarene Railway Station. [4]

L’Escarene Railway Station. [4]

These two images show the Station site from above. The red ring highlights the location of the station turntable which, in the 21st century, is the location of the town’s fire station. [35]]

L’Escarene sits at the top of a long climb from Nice. We will follow the line through to Nice in the next two articles in this series. (The next article can be found here. [5]) Like Sospel, l’Escarene Railway Station had substantial facilities on a wide open plateau designed to allow the reception of military convoys in the event of conflict with neighboring Italy. [1: p92]

References

  1. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 1: 1858-1928; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  2. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 2: 1929-1974; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  3. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 3: 1975-1986; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  4. https://youtu.be/rLXAEz-n4mM?si=RLQC31jynGeM_lQR, accessed on 26th August 2025. Permission to use still images from this video has been sought via YouTube.
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/09/26/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-7-lescarene-to-drap-cantaron-railway-station/
  6. Not used.
  7. Not used.
  8. Not used
  9. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/43.8804/7.4395&layers=P, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  10. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/22/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-1.
  11. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-2.
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/06/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-3-vievola-to-st-dalmas-de-tende
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/16/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-4-st-dalmas-de-tende-to-breil-sur-roya
  14. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/25/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-5-breil-sur-roya-to-ventimiglia
  15. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/43.93077/7.51647&layers=P, accessed on 18th August 2025.
  16. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/43.923820/7.520512&layers=P, accessed on 19th August 2025.
  17. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.91950/7.51623&layers=P, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  18. F. Honore; Le Rail a Travers Les Alpes: De Nice a Coni par la Voie Ferrée; L’Illustration, No. 4470, 3rd November 1928, p499.
  19. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06023.04D.pdf, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  20. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06023.1.pdf, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  21. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06023.2.pdf, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  22. https://structurae.net/en/structures/bevera-viaduct-1962, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  23. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/43.886948/7.487220&layers=P, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  24. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/mx06/06136.03Y.pdf, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  25. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/kc06/06136.04W.pdf, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  26. https://www.railwaywondersoftheworld.com/link-mediterranean.html, accessed on 26th August 2025
  27. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Viaduc_de_Bevera01.jpg, accessed on 26th August 2025
  28. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06136.2.pdf, accessed on 27th August 2025.
  29. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06136.1.pdf, accessed on 27th August 2025.
  30. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gare_de_Sospel.JPG, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  31. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/43.86371/7.40071&layers=P, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  32. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06142.1.pdf, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  33. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/144697687618, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  34. https://structurae.net/en/structures/col-de-braus-tunnel, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  35. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/tu06/06057.2.pdf, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  36. https://www.inventaires-ferroviaires.fr/pt06/06057-02U.pdf, accessed on 28th August 2025.
  37. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2013/12/10/sospel-to-menton-tramway
  38. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/02/23/the-sospel-to-menton-tramway-revisited-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-51
  39. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2018/06/08/the-menton-to-sospel-tramway-revisited-again-chemins-de-fer-de-provence-61
  40. https://ebay.us/m/GvQ7Pv, accessed on 29th August 2025.
  41. Franco Collidà, Max Gallo & Aldo A. Mola; CUNEO-NIZZA History of a Railway; Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo, Cuneo (CN), July 1982.
  42. Franco Collidà; 1845-1979: the Cuneo-Nice line year by year; in Rassegna – Quarterly magazine of the Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo; No. 7, September 1979, pp. 12-18.
  43. Stefano Garzaro & Nico Molino; THE TENDA RAILWAY From Cuneo to Nice, the last great Alpine crossing; Editrice di Storia dei Trasporti, Colleferro (RM), EST, July 1982.
  44. SNCF Region de Marseille; Line: Coni – Breil sur Roya – Vintimille. Reconstruction et équipement de la section de ligne située en territoire Français; Imprimerie St-Victor, Marseille (F), 1980.
  45. https://www.geneanet.org/cartes-postales/view/194490#0, accessed on 29th August 2025.
  46. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=898, accessed on 29th August 2025.
  47. https://www.cparama.com/forum/sospel-t898-20.html, accessed on 29th August 2025.
  48. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=898&start=40, accessed on 29th August 2025.
  49. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=24506 , 29th August 2025.
  50. https://www.cparama.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=24506, 29th August 2025.
  51. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne_de_Nice_%C3%A0_Breil-sur-Roya, 15th September 2025

The Railway between Nice, Tende and Cuneo – Part 5 – Breil-sur-Roya to Ventimiglia

The featured image for this article, above is an FS Series 320 0-6-0 (030 in Italian notation) steam locomotive which was used in the early days of operation on the southern section of the Ventimiglia-Cuneo line, before the North and South sections could be linked. The locomotive depicted is FS3620 and carries a nameplate – ‘Terni’. 201 locomotives of this Class were built between 1904 and 1908. [8]

In the first four articles about the line from Cuneo to the sea we covered the length of the line from Cuneo to Breil-sur-Roya. These articles can be found here, [9]  here [10] here, [11] and here. [12]

I also want to acknowledge the assistance given to me by David Sousa of the Rail Relaxation YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/@RailRelaxation/featured and https://www.railrelaxation.com and particularly his kind permission given to use still images from rail journeys that he has filmed on the Cuneo-Ventimiglia railway line. [35][55]

South of Breil-sur-Roya a junction allows direct access to Ventimiglia and to Nice. The map below shows the two routes as they existed prior to the alteration of the border between France and Italy after the Second World War.

The lines Nice to Tende and Ventimiglia to Tende in the period from 1928 to the Second World War, before the annexation, in 1947, of St-Dalmas de Tende and Piene to France. [40]

This article follows the line South from Breil-sur-Roya to Ventimiglia in two parts: the first as far as Airole and the second from Airole to Ventimiglia. ….

1. The Line South from Breil-sur Roya to Airole

This drawing/map shows the two routes heading South from Breil-sur-Roya. [40]

As with the line immediately to the North of Breil-sur-Roya, the works to the South were constructed by the French. Both of the lines heading South from Breil-sur-Roya entered tunnels just a short distance South of Breil.

Breil-sur-Roya to Piene. [22]
A colourised postcard view of Breil-Sur Roya Railway Station looking North through the station site in advance of the official opening in 1928. This colourised image was shared on the Stura-Cuneo Facebook Page on 20th February 2020, (c) Public Domain. [29]
Breil-sur-Roya station during its very early operation (1928-35), before electrification, with numerous passenger carriages standing idle. The passenger building is in the background; in the foreground are the buildings on the second platform, the only ones today significantly reduced in height and length, publisher Frédéric Laugier, (c) Public Domain. [30]
Breil-sur-Roya Railway Station at the height of its development, with electrification completed (1935), with the passenger building, the large freight yard filled with wagons, and the concrete sheds with arched vaults. Those in the background still exist but are used for non-railway purposes. The Breil Ecomuseum is now located on the north side, half-hidden by the foliage of the tree in the foreground. The photograph was taken from the hillside to the Northwest of the station site and faces Southeast, (c) Public Domain. [30]
After the war, the line to Nice was reopened in 1947, but the station, reduced to the simple terminus of a secondary section, was greatly simplified, removing almost all the sidings (the long straight lines of which can still be made out). In the background, the line to Fontan still features the electrification poles (removed from the rest of the station), but it was naturally abandoned and remained there until its reconstruction in the 1970s. In the 21st century, platform 2, which had been removed at the time, has been restored, the buildings on the second platform have been scaled down, and the third platform has been eliminated. The turntable, which still exists, is part of the Ecomusée, publisher Lapie à Saint-Maur, 1955, (c) Public Domain.[31]
Breil-sur-Roya Railway Station in 2013, (c) Gilles Tagadaand licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [32]
The southern end of the railway station site in Breil-sur-Roya. Two lines leave the station heading South-southwest. [Google Maps, August 2025]

South of the station adjacent parallel bridges cross the Voie de la Première Dfl and Vallon de la Lavina (the Lavina Bridge).

Looking East under the railway bridges (the Lavina Bridge) along Voie de la Première Dfl. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
Looking West under the railway bridges (the Lavina Bridge)along Voie de la Première Dfl. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
This extract from the OpenStreetMap mapping shows the close correlation of the two different routes over the first fe kilometres. The short red lines are the locations of tunnel mouths. [13]
A short distance to the South the two lines can be seen to be separating both geographically and in level. This view looks Northeast with the station off to the left. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
The view South from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train. Again, the separation in level is quite marked. [55]
At the same location, this view looks Southeast. Both lines enter  a tunnel just to the South. One tunnel mouth is visible on the left of the image at a lower level. The other tunnel mouth is behind the vegetation on the right of this image. [Google Streetview, October 2008]
The two tunnel mouths. On the left, that of Gigne Tunnel, on the right, that of Caranca Tunnel. Left for Ventimiglia, right for Nice! [54]

The approach to the junction from Ventimiglia. The line from Nice is at the higher level on the left. [35]

The mouth of Gigne Tunnel (1188 metres in length), seen from the cab of the Ventimiglia-bound service. The tunnel is S-shaped. Trains heading South turn to the East within the tunnel and then, close to the East Portal, begin to turn to the South again. [55][1: p126]

The view North from the North Portal of Gigne Tunnel, seen from the cab of a Northbound train. [35]

The route of this tunnel crosses twice under the Caranca tunnel on the Nice line. [1: p126]

Just beyond the East Portal of Gigne Tunnel the line begins to curve South again. [55]

The East Portal of Gigne Tunnel, seen from the cab of a Northbound train. [35]

The North Portal of Sanfurian Tunnel (260 metres in length) was in deep shade when this image was taken from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train. [55]

The view Northwest from the same portal of Sanfurian Tunnel. [35]

The view South from the mouth of Sanfurian Tunnel. Note the high retaining walls to the right of the image. [55]

The South Portal of Sanfurian Tunnel, seen from the North end of Eboulis Viaduct. This viaduct has eight 18 metre stone arches and nine 7 metre stone arches. [35][1: p126]

The view from the North along the Route de Ventimiglia with the railway viaduct alongside the road. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Eboulis Viaduct facing South. [55]

Eboulis Viaduct looking North, seen from the cab of a Northbound train.  [35]

Eboulis Viaduct before the construction of the road between it and the River Roya. The quality of this image is not perfect but it is still possible to make out the South portal of Snfurian Tunnel towards the right of the image. [49]

The view along the E74/D6204 from the South with the viaduct to the left of the road and the river to the right below the road. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Looking South over Bancao Viaduct. [55]

Looking North along Bancao Viaduct. [35]

Bancao Viaduct on the line from Breil-sur-Roya to Ventimiglia is close to the D6204 on this extract from OpenStreetMap. The line to the West is the line from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice which is at a much higher level. [14]

Looking West from the D6204/E74, a small culvert close to the road is dwarfed by the bridge carrying the line to Ventimiglia which in turn is dwarfed by the viaduct carrying the line to Nice. [Google Streetview, April 2008]

The bridge carrying the line to Ventimiglia is also known as the Bancao Ravine Bridge. [1: p126]

The length of the line South of Bancao Viaduct. The two rail line are still running in parallel, only beginning to separate significantly at the bottom of this extract from Open StreetMap. Cottalorda Tunnel begins towards the bottom of this map extract. [15]

The line can only be seen fleetingly from the road.

It runs in front of the terracotta-coloured building near the centre of this image. Railings at the edge of a retaining wall supporting the line can be seen to the right of the image. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

The North portal of Cottalorda Tunnel (297 metres long). [55]

Turning through 180°, this is the view North at the same location. [35]

Just a glimpse of the tunnel mouth and the associated retaining wall can be seen from the D6204/E74. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

The view South from the southern portal of Cottalorda Tunnel. [55]

The southern portal of Cottalorda Tunnel. [35]

Looking back towards Breil-sur-Roya and the mouth of Cottalorda Tunnel. Note the arcaded retaining wall on the left, typical of the retaining walls on this length of the line. The D6204 runs alongside and below the line to the right. [35]

This next length of the line from the South portal of Cottalorda Tunnel runs immediately adjacent to the E74/D6204. [16]

This smaller image, looks South along the D6204/E74. The railway can be seen adjacent to, but above the road. To the West side of the line, large retaining walls create space for the line on the steeply graded valley side. {Google Streetview, July 2014]

A little further South the Hydroelectric Plant is now visible. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

This View looks North. The building beyond the trees is Breil’s Hydroelectric Power Station (below). [35]

Now just beyond the Power Station , again looking South with a high retaining wall above the railway which sits a few metres above road level on the right. Three arcades carrying the line are followed by the three stone arches of the Riou Viaduct. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Construction work on the Italian length of the line in the lower Roya (Roia) Valley began in Ventimiglia. Banaudo et al have chosen to follow the line from South to North to reflect the way this section of the line was constructed. We continue to follow the line from North to South.

The length of the line from the border at Piena (Piene) to Airole was completed before the first world war but traffic along this part of the line had to wait for completion of the length of the line in French territory. The Italian authorities decided that services would commence only between Ventimiglia and Airole. That length is covered later in this article.

The international border at the time of construction was just to the North of Piena (Piene). That border line remained the same through the interwar years. Services North from Airole via Piena to Breil-sur-Roya had to wait until 1928 and the opening of the full line.

The Riou Viaduct (three 6.25m masonry arches) was the location of the international boundary. Banaudo et all tell us that the point that the line crossed the boundary is marked by the letters I and F engraved in a stone on the deck of the structure. [1: p125]

The Riou Viaduct straddled the centuries old border between Genoa and Savoy which became the border between Italy and France. This view looking South along the D6204/E74 shows the arcade retaining wall (3 bays) followed by the three-arch viaduct. [Google Streetview, July 2014]
This view looks North along the D6204/E74 towards Breil-sur-Roya. The three arches of the Riou Viaduct are on the left of the image. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Immediately to the South of the Riou Viaduct, Piene (Piena) Station was built as a frontier station below the village of Piena-Alta which, Banaudo et al tell us, was for centuries the outpost of the Genoese republic and the border with the States of Savoy. [1: p125-126]

Close to the road border post at Piena-Bassa, the “Italian administration decided to establish a station intended for police and customs control operations. There were three platform faces, a two-story passenger building and a customs clearance hall of the same size for goods, comprising a warehouse, offices and two apartments on the upper floors. The site was hemmed in by the tunnel to the South, the French border to the North, the mountainside to the West, and the Roya River to the East, necessitating the construction of the station, cantilevered over a masonry gallery supported by seven arches, above the SS 20 roadway.” [1: p126]

This photograph was taken in 1925 facing upstream.. It shows Piene (Piena) Railway Station sitting at high level, above the Ventimiglia road, (Collection of J. L. Taylor) (c) Public Domain. [26]

Also facing up stream, this image shows the structures at this location in 2006, (c) Markus Schweiss and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 3.0). [33]

Since the photograph above was taken a netting protection has been applied to the principal buildings at rail level. This photograph taken in 2019 also faces upstream, (c) Eugenio Merzagora/Structurae and made available for reuse under their non-commercial licence. [34]

This view looks South along the D6204/E74. it is taken a couple of hundred metres South of the Riou Viaduct where the road passes what was Piene Railway Station building. The site was tight and in order to accommodate the necessary station buildings, they were built over the road. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

Piene Railway Station (closed) seen from the cab of a Southbound train. [55]

Piene Railway Station (closed) seen from the cab of a Northbound train. [35]

Writing about the length of the line between Ventimiglia and the border at Piena (Piene), Banaudo et al say: “In the lower Roya Valley, the seven tranches of the Ventimiglia – southern border section were successively awarded in 1908, 1910, 1911, 1912, and 1913. Despite the lower altitude, the route was as difficult as on the purely Alpine section of the line, with steep gorges and terrain that offered highly varied resistance to earthworks: unstable marly limestone, very hard black limestone, clayey marl, schist, sandstone, etc. Of the 17,260 m route, nearly half way to be in tunnels, with nineteen structures totaling 8,259 m, fifteen bridges and viaducts representing sixty-four masonry arches, as well as various secondary structures for crossing waterways and rural roads.” [1: p118]

Piene Railway Station to Airole Railway Station. [22]

South of Piene (Piena) a series of structures carry the line over or through the obstacles in its path:

• the Fromentino Tunnel, 645 m long;
• a viaduct with three 10 m arches;
• the Arme Tunnel, 333 m long;
• a viaduct with four 10 m arches;
• the Agrie Tunnel, 820 m long;
• the Fanghetto tunnel, 419 m long, extended by a gallery (the post-WW2 border was established at the North end of this tunnel);
• the Sardinesca Tunnel, 820 m long;
• a single span arch bridge over the Tron valley.

These are all illustrated below.

The North Portal of Fromentino Tunnel (645 metres in length) in shade. [55]

The view from the North portal of Fromentino tunnel. [35]

It is just possible to see the tunnel mouth above, when looking up from the road. [Google Streetview, October 2008]

The view South from the D6204/E74 above the South portal of Fromentino Tunnel. Before reaching the Arme Tunnel, the line crosses a 3-viaduct of three 10 m span arches. The stone parapets of the viaduct can be seen below the top rail of the parapet immediately in front of the camera. [Google Streetview, September 2010]

The view South from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train at the southern portal of Fromentino Tunnel. The viaduct parapets are in the foreground. [55]

Turning round, this is the view of the South Portal of Fromentino Tunnel. [35]

Looking toward the northern portal of Arme Tunnel (333 metres long) which again is in shade. [55]

A view looking north along the railway from the road immediately above the North portal of Arme Tunnel. The parapets of the viaduct can again be seen between the two tunnel mouths. [Google Streetview, September 2010]

A similar view back towards Breil-sur-Roya from the cab of a Northbound service the mouth of Arme Tunnel. [35]

This next length of the line is heading South-southeast. Arme tunnel is at the top of this extract from OpenStreetMap. The line bridges (on a four-arch viaduct) a tributary of La Roya before being swallowed by Agrie Tunnel.

The view South from the mouth of Arme Tunnel. [55]

Turning through 180°, this is the South portal of the Arme Tunnel. [35]

The railway and the bridge are just visible over the edge of the road, looking East. The bridge is a viaduct of four 10 m spans. [Google Streetview, September 2010]

The northern portal of Agrie Tunnel (820 metres in length). [55]

The view from the cab of a Northbound service leaving Agrie Tunnel. [35]

A better view is obtained from the road above the North portal of Agrie Tunnel. This view shows the viaduct mentioned above. [Google Streetview, September 2010]

This is the view from the cab of a Southbound train at the South portal of Agrie Tunnel. The train is travelling at 68 km/hour and the still image from the video is much less distinct. [55]

A similar view but from the road. A metre high wall separates the road and the railway. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Turning through 180°, we see the mouth of the Agrie Tunnel from the cab of the Northbound service. [35]

A similar view from the road. It is at this location that we cross into Italy! The border was adjusted as part of reparations after WW2. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

At high speed the video stills are less distinct. This is the northern mouth of the Fanghetto Tunnel which is in shade. This tunnel is 419 metres in length and trains cross the border between France and Italy as they enter it. [55]

A much more distinct view from the road of the mouth of Fanghetto Tunnel. [Google Streetview, July 2014]

Here, we are looking from Italy into France in this view back towards Breil-sur-Roya from the mouth of the Fanghetto Tunnel. [35]

The southern end of the Fanghetto Tunnel is galleried/arcaded with low level arches letting in light before the tunnel mouth is reached. [55]

The arcades close to the southern mouth of Fanghetto Tunnel seen from the East side of the valley. [Google Streetview, July 2021]

The view along the line from the southern portal of Fanghetto Tunnel. [55]

The southern portal of the Fanghetto Tunnel. [35]

With the Southbound train now travelling at 75 km/hr, small structures (like this accommodation bridge) whizz by and, certainly in this direction with the bridge face in shadow, it is impossible to make out any detail.. [55]

The structure is seen in better light, from the cab of the Northbound service. [35]

The northern mouth of Sardinesca Tunnel (820 metres long) again in shadow and indistinct because of the speed of the train. [55]

Looking back towards Breil-sur-Roya from the cab of a Northbound train at the mouth of the Sardinesca Tunnel. [35]

The view South beyond the southern portal of Sardinesca Tunnel. The parapets of a single span arch bridge are visible close to the camera. [55]

Turning through 180° we get a look at a footbridge over the line just outside Sardinesca Tunnel. [35]

The same footbridge seen from the SS20 road. the arch bridge over the Tron, a tributary of the Roya, can be seen on the left of the image. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

An extract from Google’s satellite imagery showing the same location. Note the tunnel mouth and adjacent footbridge in the top-left quadrant of the photograph. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Next comes the Olivetta-San-Michele Station and the San-Michele Tunnel (133 m long).

A very short distance South of the footbridge is Olivetta San Michele Railway Station. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Olivetta San Michele Station, seen from the cab of the Ventimiglia-bound service. [55]

A better railside view of the station building at Olivetta San Michele, this time from the cab of a Northbound train. [35]

The station building seen looking South from the SS20/E74 road. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The station building seen from the East, (c) Pampuco and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [36]

The view ahead along the line towards Ventimiglia from the cab of the Southbound train as it pulls out of Olivetta San Michele Station. The tunnel ahead is San Michele Tunnel which is 126 metres in length. [55]

A view, looking South from the SS20, of the northern mouth of San Michele Tunnel with an Italian Locomotive heading into the tunnel (I may well need correcting on this) is shown in more detail below… It appears to be a Belgian locomotive (SNCB) No. 7336 with the name, ‘Mexico’. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

This picture it taken just a short distance to the South of the image above. It shows a side-on view of the same locomotive. I would not expect to see this locomotive at this location! [Google Streetview, August 2021]

This is SNCB 7304 – the image is provided by Wikipedia. The family resemblance with 7336 is manifest. The Class 73 locomotives formed the backbone of the SNCB/NMBS shunting locomotive fleet. [20]

Class 73 locomotives were built in three batches: 7301-7335 during 1965–1967, 7336-7375 during 1973-1974 and finally 7373–7395 in 1976–1977. [20]

This is the view North through the station site as seen from the cab of a Northbound service at the North postal of the San Michele Tunnel. [35]

Looking out from the Southeast portal of San Michele Tunnel, the line ahead crosses Roya IV Bridge which is 126 metres in length and then enters Mantici Tunnel which is 604 metres long. [55]

One hundred metres further South and turning through 180°, this is the view across Roya IV Bridge towards the San Michele Tunnel. Note that the road tunnel is just above the railway tunnel, although on a different line. [35]

The view from the road above the Southeast portal of San Michele Tunnel. The mouth of Mantigi Tunnel (604 metres long) can be seen at the end of the railway viaduct. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

A very short distance along the road a somewhat better view of the viaduct. [Google Streetview, August 2021] More views of the viaduct can be seen here, [17] here, [18] and here. [19]

Roya IV Bridge was also known as the San-Michele Viaduct. It was made up of five 15 metre arches. [1: p125]

The Mantigi tunnel has a short section where it is very close the the surface of the ground above, Banaudo et al, tell us that this allowed the provision of a vertical ventilation shaft. [1: p125]

Trains travelling South to Ventimiglia crossed the viaduct and ran on through Mantigi Tunnel. Airole Railway Station was originally on a large plateau beyond the Southeast portal of Mantigi Tunnel.

The original location of Airole Railway Station. The substantial passenger building remains. The walls of one other building can be seen to the Southeast of the passenger facilities. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Banaudo et al tell that “Airole station was located in an olive grove to the North of the village, in the only place where the shallower slope of the left bank of the Roya allowed the construction of a retaining wall to support all the railway infrastructure: the passenger building, three platform tracks and two freight tracks with a goods shed and high platform, as well as a water column for the locomotives.” [1: p121]

The station was built in 1914 and remained operational until, sadly, the station site was abandoned in the 1970s when it was replaced by a single platform halt in the centre of Airole. [25]

At the southern end of Mantigi Tunnel, trains enter a passing loop (Airole Loop), which is all that is left of the original railway station, before entering another tunnel! [55]

Looking back towards Breil-sur-Roya from within the passing loop. Immediately to the North of the loop, Northbound trains plunge into the Mantigi Tunnel. [35]

This excellent photograph of the old station building looks North towards the Mantigi Tunnel, © Giorgio Stagni and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [25]

The station building and the shell of the old goods shed. This is another photograph © Giorgio Stagni and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [37]

Looking North from the cab of a Northbound train approaching the old railway station building. It is evident from both these pictures that there were originally sidings at this location – confirmation that the station facilities at Airole were once quite significant. [35]

At the end of the passing loop trains enter Madonna Tunnel (249 metres long). [55]

Looking back towards Breil-sur-Roya from the portal of Madonna Tunnel. The passing loop is still provided at this location as there is no room at the present Airole Railway Station for more than a single track. [35]

Leaving Madonna Tunnel trains immediately pass under a local road bridge which appears as not much more than a silhouette as eyes get used to the light on leaving the tunnel. [55]

Airole Railway Station seen from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train passing under the accommodation bridge shown above. [55]

The view West from the bridge which carries Via Giacomo Matteotti over the line. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

Turning to face East, this is the present Airole Railway Station as seen from Via Giacomo Matteotti. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

A Northbound train is stationary at Airole Railway Station. This is the view ahead, West towards Olivette San Michele. The road over bridge sits a few metres closer to the station than the mouth of Madonna Tunnel. [35]

A great action shot showing ALn 663 1160 at Airole station, © Giorgio Stagni and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). [38]

Airole to Bevera. [22]

Airole Railway Station seen from the cab of a northbound service entering the station from the East. [35]

A similar view but this time the camera is on Via G. Biancheri which crosses the railway line above the West portal of Airole Tunnel (153 metres in length). [Google Streetview, August 2021]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows the village of Airole which sits over the line. Airole Tunnel curves to the Northeast. Its West Portal is bottom-left in this image, its Northeast portal is top-right. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The view Southwest from the cab of a Ventimiglia-bound train at the Northeast portal of Airole Tunnel. [55]

The Southwest portal of Para Tunnel (754 metres long). [55]

Looking Southwest from Via Luigi Trucchi the Northeast portal of Airole Tunnel can be seen below the village of Airole. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The view from Via Nazionale of the short bridge (Airole Bridge, one 10 metre arch) which sits to the Southwest of the mouth of Para Tunnel. The stonework of the tunnel portal can be seen above and to the right of the viaduct. Para Tunnel is over 747 metres long. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

This is the view back towards Airole Village and Railway Station from the mouth of Para Tunnel. White fencing sits on top of the parapet walls of Airole Bridge. [35]

Para Tunnel curves round to the Southeast. This is the view from the cab of the Southbound train as it exits Para Tunnel and crosses La Para II viaduct (four 10 metre arches). [55]

The viaduct mentioned above can be glimpsed from Via Natzionale. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

This is the view back into the mouth of Para Tunnel. [35]

The Northwest portal of Pian de Para Tunnel. The tunnel is 184 metres long. [55][1: p125]

A view of the Northwest portal of Pian de Para Tunnel from Via Nazionale. There is a single-span arch bridge carrying the line close to the tunnel mouth. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The next length of the line as it appears on OpenStreetMap and annotated with the tunnel names. [21]

The Southeast portal of Pian de Para Tunnel seen from the cab of the Northbound train. [35]

Immediately to the Southeast of the tunnel portal Southbound trains cross La ParaI Viaduct. The Viaduct appears to have three 5 metre spans. This image looks Northeast from Via Nazionale. [1: p125]

The Southeast portal of Pian de Para Tunnel can be seen in the top-left of this image, looking North from a point a little further along Via Nazionale. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The Southbound train is now travelling at over 80 km/hr. This is the portal of the next tunnel on the route – Gambetto Tunnel (173 metres in length. [55] [1: p125]

Turning through 180°, this is the view back towards Airole from the mouth of the Gambetto Tunnel. [35]

Gambetto Tunnel opens out onto the next bridge over La Roya – Roya No. III Bridge. [55] This structure is also known as the Lamberta Viaduct, it is made up of three 14 metre arches and two 10 metre arches. The gallery beyond the bridge is the route of the modern SS20. [1: p125]

Turning through 180°, this is the mouth of the Gambetto Tunnel from the cab of a Northbound service. [35]

With the railway running South-southeast towards Bevera and Ventimiglia, it alternates between tunnels and viaducts switching sides of La Roya (Roia) river. [23]

The Roya No. III bridge is also known as the Lamberta Viaduct. [1: p125]

The Roya No. II bridge is also known as the Colombo Viaduct. [1: p125]

A view of Roya No. III bridge from the bridge carrying Via Nazionale of the Roya to the West of the railway. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The old road, Via Nazionale passes under the five stone arches of La Roya No. III bridge – three 14 metre arches and two 10 metre arches. The concrete gallery allows light into the tunnel carrying the modern SS20/E74. [Google Streetview, September 2011]

A view of La Roya No. III bridge from the Via Nazionala further to the East along the valley. [Google Streetview, September 2011]

Southbound trains then plunge into Lamberta Tunnel which is 750 metres in length. [55]

Turning through 180°, this is the view across Roya III bridge from the mouth of the Lamberta Tunnel. [35]

Leaving Lamberta Tunnel at its southern end, Southbound trains immediately crossed La Roya again on Roya No. II bridge. [55] The bridge is also known as the Colombo Viaduct. [1: p125]

Turning through 180° we see the Lamberta Tunnel Portal. [35]

Once across La Roya on No. II bridge trains ran on into Colombo Tunnel. [55]

Looking back across La Roya from the mouth of the Colombo Tunnel. [35]

Roia (Roya) No. II Bridge, seen from the viaduct carrying the SS20/E74 across the river. The old road down the valley (Via Nazionale) can be seen crossing the river at a lower level. The northern portal of Colombo Railway Tunnel can be seen on the left of this image. [Google Streetview, August 2021]
A similar view, looking West from the Via Nazionale. [Google Streetview, September 2011]
The view from the West of Roia No. II bridge, looking East. The tunnel mouth visible in this photograph is the southern portal of the Lamberta Tunnel. [Google Streetview, September 2011]

Looking South across Roia (Roya) No. 1 bridge (also known as the Bocche Viaduct) from the South portal of Colombo Tunnel. [55]

Roia No. I bridge, seen from the West on Via Nazionale. [Google Streetview, September 2011]
Roia No. I bridge, seen from the East on Via Nazionale. The tunnel mouth visible on the left of the image is the northern portal of Delle Bocche Tunnel. [Google Streetview, September 2011]

The northern tunnel mouth of Delle Bocche Tunnel. [55]

Looking back from the Delle Bocche tunnel mouth across the Roia No. 1 bridge. [35]

Banaudo et al tell us that the length of the Roia (Roya) Valley that we have just traversed is known as the ‘Bocche’, “the wild gorges of the Roya which for a long time represented an abstacle to communications between the Ligurian lands of the Republic of Genova and the Piedmontese domain of the Kingdom of Sardinia. It was only in 1893that the … road from Ventimiglia to Breil was completed … after lengthy construction work hampered by the difficult terrain and the reluctance of the military authorities. The railway tamed this gorge through an uninterrupted succession of tunnels and viaducts.” [1: p121, 125]

Delle Bocche Tunnel (927 metres long) ends at the top of this OpenStreetMap extract. There is a short bridge which carries a length of the line before Southbound trains enter d’Allaveri Tunnel which, although it appears as one tunnel on the map extract is actually two tunnels with a very short open length in between. The Aqueduct illustrated on the map passes under the railway in that opening in pipes, (Pont sur les conduites forcées de la centrale hydroélectrique de Bevera). The first length of the tunnel is named d’Allaveri Tunnel (69 metres long), the second length is known as Serro Soprano Tunnel (245 metres long).

Once beyond these tunnels, Southbound trains have a clear run down to Bevera Railway Station. [24]

Looking South from the South portal of Delle Bocche Tunnel. [55]

Looking back to the North, this is the South portal of Delle Bocche Tunnel. [35]

A glimpse of the line from a local road (Localita Madonetta) at a point a couple of hundred metres South of the South portal of Dell Bocche Tunnel. The camera is facing Northeast. [Google Streetview, November 2011]

A short distance further South the line bridges a shallow valley and crosses a minor access road. This is the East elevation of the Varese Viaduct (three 8 metre arches) seen from Via Comunale di Varase. [Google Streetview, November 2011][1: p121]
The western elevation of the same structure, seen from the Southwest. [Google Streetview, November 2011]

A little further Southwest the line is carried on a low bridge under another minor road. This view looks West from Via Comunale di Varase. [Google Streetview, November 2011]

The same structure seen from the West. [Google Streetview, November 2011]

Continuing South the line is carried alongside the River Roia (Roya) and above Via San Rocco on retaining walls and a series of nine 8 metre arches. The arches comprise one structure known as the Allaveri Viaduct. The North portal of d’Allaveri Tunnel can be glimpsed just to the right of centre in this photograph. [Google Streetview, November 2011]

The North portal of d’Allaveri Tunnel. This and the next tunnel are in the vicinity of the hamlet of Varese and the Bevera Hydroelectric Power Station. [55]

The view North from the cab of a Northbound train at the North portal of d’Allaveri Tunnel. [35]

This extract from Google’s satellite imagery shows the two tunnels at this location and Bevera’s Hydroelectric power plant which is immediately adjacent to the railway. It is the white-roofed building just above the centre of this image.

D’Allaveri Tunnel is the very short tunnel to the North of the Hydroelectric plant (71 metres in length). Serro Soprano Tunnel (244 metres long) extends South from the building to a point near to the bottom of this image.

The grey area at the bottom of the image (surrounding the tunnel mouth) is a series of greenhouses. As shown below.

[Google Streetview, July 2019]

An overexposed photograph showing the view South from the southern portal of d’Allaveri Tunnel. The Aqueduct which carries water under pressure to Bevera’s hydroelectric plant can be seen on the right. The line bridges the penstock on three 5 metre arches before southbound trains enter Serro Soprano Tunnel ahead. [55]

Another over-exposed view, this time facing North at the North portal of Serro Soprano Tunnel. The southern mouth of d’Allaveri Tunnel can be seen ahead.[35]

Looking South towards Bevera at the mouth of Serro Soprano Tunnel. [55]

The South portal of Serro Soprano Tunnel. [35]

An accommodation bridge North of Bevera Railway Station, seen from the cab of the Southbound service. [55]

The accommodation bridge, seen from above. [Google Maps, August 2025]

The same structure seen from the cab of the Northbound train. [35]

As we head South towards Bevera Railway Station, the valley of the Roia widens significantly and we enter the suburbs of Ventimiglia, of which Bevera is one part. Beverea Railway Station was built with a large “classically designed passenger building, two platform faces and and two freight tracks with a goods shed and loading platform.” [1: p121] In the 21st century Bevera is a single platform halt.

A Southbound train approaches Bevera Railway Station. [55]

Bevera Railway Station seen from above. [Google Maps, August 2025]

Bevera Railway Station building and forecourt seen from the Northwest. [Google Streetview, October 2010]
Bevera Station building seen from the South adjacent to a low underpass under the railway. [Google Streetview, July 2019]
A second underpass just a little further to the South. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The Northbound service sits at Bevera Railway Station which is a single platform halt. [35]

The Southbound train, stationary at Bevera Railway Station. [55]

Bevera to Ventimiglia. [22]

Looking North into the Bevera Station site

South of Bevera Railway Station the railway bridges the Bevera River (Torrente).

The bridge over the Bevera Torrente. The river is quite a significant tributary to the Roia (Roya). [Google Maps, August 2025]
The railway bridge over the Bevera, seen from the main road to the East. The viaduct has four16.35 metre arches and spans the Bevera close to its confluence with the Roia. [Google Streetview, August 2021][1: p119]

The same bridge, seen from the Northwest. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The view North along the line from the cab of a Northbound train as it crosses the bridge over the Bevera River. [35]

The line runs on to the South on embankment through the suburbs of Ventimiglia.

The bridge over Via Madeira seen from the East. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The same bridge seen from the West. [Google Streetview, August 2021]

Looking back along the line towards Bevera Railway Station from Pont Bevera (Viadotto Autoporto). [Google Streetview, August 2021]

Facing towards Ventimiglia this image taken from the cab of the Ventimiglia-bound service looks through Pont Bevera (Viadotto Autoporto). [55]

Facing North towards Bevera and looking under Pont Bevera (Viadotto Autoporto). [35]

Looking ahead along the line towards Ventimiglia Railway Station from Pont Bevera (Viadotto Autoporto). [Google Streetview, August 2021]

The North portal of Maneira Tunnel (171 metres in length) is in shadow and difficult to make out from the cab of the ventimiglia-bound train. [55][1: p119]

Turning through 180°, this is the view North from the cab of a Northbound service as it leaves the North portal of Madeira Tunnel. [35]

The view South from the South portal of Maneira Tunnel. [55]

Turning through 180°, this is the South portal seen fr

The line continues on embankment with low height underpasses to provide vehicular access under the line as shown below. [Google Streetview, August 2021]…

In between the second and third underpasses shown above the line passes through d’Isnardi Tunnel (168 metres in length). The North portal is so much in shade that the view from the cab of the Ventimiglia-bound service does not provide any detail. [55] That is the first image below…

The North portal of d’Isnardi Tunnel is so much in shade that no details can be made out from the cab of the Ventimiglia-bound service. [55]

Turning through 180° this is the view North from the North portal of the tunnel. [35]

The view South from the South portal of d’Isnardi Tunnel. [55]

Turning through 180° the South portal is seen from the cab of a Northbound service. [35]

The next few images come from above the level of the line further to the South – the first two from alongside to the West of the line and then from over bridges. ….

The first two of the images above look back along the line and then forward towards Ventimiglia Railway Station from Via Peglia. [Google Streetview, November 2011] The second pair of images look back and forward along the line from the bridge carrying Via Gallardi over the line. [Google Streetview, August 2021] The final par of images look back (across a curve in the line) and then forward along the line from the E80 (close to the toll booths). In the first of this pair of images the bridge carrying Via Gallardi over the line can be seen. [Google Streetview, July 2019]

The next two images show the bridge carrying Via Gallardi over the line. [55][35]…

This next pair of photos show the overbridge which carries the E80. [55][35] …

The next batch of photos continue towards Ventimiglia Railway Station. …

Two further underpasses are shown in the first two images above, the second pair of images are taken from the bridge carrying the SS20 over the line, the first looks back to the West towards the point where the double-track line from Nice begins to run alongside the single-track line from Cuneo. The second looks forward from the same bridge towards Ventimiglia Railway Station. The last two images are underpasses that the 3 lines cross on their way East. [Google Streetview, September 2024]

A cab level view of the diverging tracks seen in the third of the six views in the gallery above. The double-track line heading towards Nice diverges to the left. It is just approximately 6 kilometres to the international border. [35]

The next pair of images show the bridge carrying the SS20 as seen from cabs on services to and from Cuneo. [55][35] The first faces towards Ventimiglia, the second towards Bevera. …

The next three images show the final approach into Ventimiglia Railway Station. [55] …

The middle image above shows a shunter idling in a siding alongside the main running lines – TS D100 Shunter [Vossloh G1000 BB]. The Vossloh G1000 BB is a class of off-centre cab diesel-hydraulic B’B’ 4 axle locomotives built by Vossloh in Kiel since 2002. The class is based upon the standard Vossloh locomotives design, and they are a higher powered development of the Vossloh G800 BB which were produced mainly for the Austrian Federal Railways, with a 1.1 MW (1,500 hp) MTU engine replacing the 0.8 MW (1,100 hp) Caterpillar engine in the G800; as a result the front engine compartment is enlarged, whilst other features: bogie frame and overall dimensions remain the same. [27]

Another view of the TS D100 Shunter [Vossloh G1000 BB], this time from the cab of the Cuneo-bound service. [35]

Looking Northwest from the cab of a Cuneo-bound train about to depart from Ventimiglia Railway Station. [35]

Ventimiglia Railway Station is on a Northwest to Southeast axis. [Google Maps, August 2025]

A postcard view of Ventimiglia taken from the hillside to the Northeast of the Railway Station which features in the foreground of the image. [44]

Ventimiglia Railway Station in very early days, © Public Domain. [28]
The station in the 21st century, seen from approximately the same location. This building was constructed after WW2. [Google Streetview, August 2021]
This satellite image dated 2006 from Google shows: on the left, the abandoned locomotive shed at Ventimiglia; the lighter coloured main station building below the centre of the image; and other railway buildings with red roofs. [45]

Banaudo et al write that “the single track of the Col de Tende line runs alongside the Nice double track for a few hundred metres. [Initially] they crossed the Roya River together on a six-span metal viaduct, which was soon replaced by a new structure with eight 17-metre stone arches. Immediately beyond the bridge, the two routes separate and the Cuneo route climbs up the right bank of the river, at a gradient of 13 mm/m, the valley is still relatively wide. A bundle of three service tracks called Scalo Roia is located to the left of the main track. The Isnardi tunnel (168 m long) and Maneira tunnel (171 m long) precede a four-arch viaduct (with 6-metre arches).” [1: p119] This description assumes that the line is followed West out of Ventimiglia Railway Station.

The earliest rail bridge over the River Roia at Ventimiglia. This single track structure was widened
The early (widened) metal bridge carrying the Nice line and the Cuneo line over the Roia in Ventimiglia, seen from the East, © Public Domain. [28]
The replacement stone arch viaduct. The postcard was posted in 1917. [47]
The same elevation of the bridge in the 21st century, viewed from the next structure downstream. [Google Streetview, July 2021]
The upstream elevation of the same bridge, in 1955. [48]
The upstream elevation of the same bridge, seen from the Northeast. The high-level structure carries the SS20 over the railway line. The upstream elevation of the river bridge is a modern extension to the second bridge which comprised eight 17 metres stone arches. [Google Streetview, July 2021]

Banaudo et al comment that while construction was just beginning between Breil and the southern border, the work begun in 1908 by the Italian companies from the coast was nearing completion. While awaiting the connection to France, the FS decided to operate the Ventimiglia-Airole section (11.970 km), which entered service on 16th May 1914. The service was provided by three round trips, including two local passenger trains and one mixed train, which covered the entire route in about thirty minutes uphill and twenty-five minutes downhill. Traction was provided by three-axle 030 locomotives with separate tenders, Group 320 (formerly the 3600 of the Rete Mediterranea), based to the newly created Savona depot.” [1: p142]

In France, WWI caused the cessation of all work on the line and in the aftermath of the conflict, “the resumption of construction proved very difficult. The PLM’s construction department received only meager allocations from the state, with priority funding being allocated to the recovery of the disaster-stricken regions of the northeast.” [1: p138]

On site, the years of inactivity had allowed serious deterioration, particularly of the tunnels on the unopened line. Following a three-day inspection tour of the entire line, the French decided to begin work once again.

The contractors made a significant investment in manpower and materials at the beginning of 1920 but discovered that rather than dealing with the PLM, the works would be directly funded by the government. The government determined that the budget for the work on French soil would be reduced from 104 to 75 million Francs and indicated that the maximum spend in 1920 would be 17 million Francs. This inevitably led to redundancies and to slower progress of the works. [1: p140]

When the authorities indicated in June 1920, that “only 700,000 Francs of credit remained to complete the year, … the elected officials of the Alpes-Maritimes immediately rushed to Paris to meet with representatives of the Ministry and the PLM management. Following discussions, a new budget was allocated by the State for railway construction. The PLM had a budget of 41 million Francs, 25 of which were allocated to the Nice-Cuneo line. Work could [continue], but the engineers and contractors in charge of it would have to take into account the irregular arrival of funds until the end when organizing their work.” [1: p140]

Work on the Nice to Breil-sur-Roya line and the remaining length of the line between Ventimiglia and Breil ran in parallel. The increased budget meant competition to attract staff was strong and people had to be hired from Italy, Spain, Portugal and Morocco. Stonemasons were in particularly short supply. We will probably see more about what this meant for the work when we follow the line from Breil-sur-Roya to Nice.

Banaudo et al note that in the early 1920s the line was opened between Ventimiglia and Airole for passengers and was used also to supply the French construction site on the length of the line between Breil-sur-Roya and Piena (Piene).

From Breil to the southern border, the [railbed/formation] was passable by 1921 and the final track was immediately laid, while the FS did the same between Airole and Piena on the section removed during the war. On 30th January 1922, the Italian and French rails were finally connected on the Riou bridge, and the Borie company obtained  from then on the authorization to directly route its materials from Nice to Breil by rail.” [1: p142]

Once the line opened fully between Ventimiglia and Cuneo, the line “retained the Ventimiglia-Airole service created before the war, while on the Cuneo San-Dalmazzo-di-Tenda line, the timetable included three daily three-class buses and a seasonal train running on public holidays from July to September. The 58 km journey took 2 hours 30 minutes in the north-south direction and 2 hours 10 to 15 in the opposite direction.  This service included one less return journey than in 1915, because a fast Cuneo Nice bus connection was introduced in 1921 following an agreement between the FS and the Compagnia Generale dei Tramways Piemontesi (CGTP), to avoid the inconvenience of transhipment while waiting for the railway to be fully operational.” [1: p143-146]

In December 1923 it was agreed that on the length of line between the two borders, “all trains … would be hauled by the FS, including maintenance trains; in the event that they had to be exceptionally handled by a French locomotive, the latter would be accompanied by a pilot from the FS. The San-Dalmazzo Piena section would be equipped with Morse-type telegraph devices. The protection signals for Breil station on the Fontan-Saorge and Piène sides would be Italian, but the departure signals for all directions would be the PLM-type. The organization of customs controls between San-Dalmazzo, Fontan-Saorge, Breil and Piena was also [agreed].” [1: p146]

Banaudo et al provide a significant series of photographs of the construction work on the lines between Cuneo, Nice and Ventimiglia which takes up a large proportion of Volume 1 of Les Trains du Col de Tende. The photographs and drawings are predominantly from the French lengths of the line. [1: p152-311] It is a very significant collection of images which stand as a superb tribute to the amazing work of the various contractors employed on the line.

Opening of the line from Cuneo to Ventimiglia to passenger traffic had to wait for the completion of all of the French construction work. “Finally in October 1928 the lines were all completed – the celebrations must have been fantastic events. At last the small towns and villages along the route had access to jobs, schools and universities, cultural activities, hospitals … everything the cities had to offer.” [39]

The next article in this short series will look a the line heading out of Breil-sur-Roya towards Nice. It can be found here. [5]

References

  1. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 1: 1858-1928; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  2. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 2: 1929-1974; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  3. Jose Banaudo, Michel Braun and Gerard de Santos; Les Trains du Col de Tende Volume 3: 1975-1986; FACS Patrimoine Ferroviaire, Les Editions du Cabri, 2018.
  4. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0eumWUFwJCPBGQUUtr3Apx72qr5cUhihwxpcFzDbkms3fta5zRXYZZLUozkAMmeKvl&id=1412933345657144, accessed on 5th December 2023. The Facebook Page, “L’Histoire de Menton et ses Alentours,” is the work of Frank Asfaux, https://www.facebook.com/franckasfaux06, accessed on 4th December 2023.
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/29/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-6-breil-sur-roya-to-lescarene/
  6. Not used.
  7. Not used.
  8. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locomotiva_RM_3620.jpg, accessed on 17th August 2025.
  9. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/22/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-1.
  10. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/07/26/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-2.
  11. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/06/the-railway-from-nice-to-tende-and-cuneo-part-3-vievola-to-st-dalmas-de-tende
  12. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2025/08/16/the-railway-between-nice-tende-and-cuneo-part-4-st-dalmas-de-tende-to-breil-sur-roya
  13. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/43.93077/7.51647&layers=P, accessed on 18th August 2025.
  14. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/43.923820/7.520512&layers=P, accessed on 19th August 2025.
  15. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.91950/7.51623&layers=P, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  16. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.91231/7.51672&layers=P, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  17. https://maps.app.goo.gl/K4hzccr8VUYJHKFY8, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  18. https://maps.app.goo.gl/z72vMryPchvUUfKY9, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  19. https://maps.app.goo.gl/DPvnhXKP5nEfJ4Cs8, accessed on 20th August 2025.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_Railways_Class_73, accessed on 21st August 2025.
  21. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.86646/7.56652&layers=P, accessed on 21st August 2025.
  22. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne_de_Coni_%C3%A0_Vintimille, accessed on 21st August 2025.
  23. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/43.85683/7.57327&layers=P, accessed on 22nd August 2025.
  24. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/43.83408/7.57936&layers=P, accessed on 22nd August 2025.
  25. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Airole_vecchia_staz_ferr.jpg, accessed on 23rd August 2025.
  26. https://www.vermenagna-roya.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/BR-1-I-f-4-gare-pont-fs-de-piene.pdf, accessed on 23rd August 2025.
  27. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vossloh_G1000_BB, accessed on 24th August 2025.
  28. https://www.marklinfan.com/f/pop_printer_friendly.asp?TOPIC_ID=3305, accessed on 24th August 2025.
  29. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=619477608613399&id=156990911528740&set=a.468384633722698, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  30. https://www.stagniweb.it/foto6.asp?File=roya3&Inizio=4&Righe=10&InizioI=1&RigheI=50&Col=5, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  31. https://www.stagniweb.it/cart5/cbreil07.jpg, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  32. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Croisement_entre_une_Caravelle_X-4500_et_un_Minuetto_devant_la_gare_de_Breil-sur-Roya.JPG, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  33. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1948555, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  34. https://structurae.net/en/media/324516-piene-station-and-piene-station-tunnel-nbsp, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  35. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qX8v5gceVU, accessed on 31st July 2025.
  36. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3095820#/media/File:Olivetta_san_michele_train_station.png, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  37. https://www.stagniweb.it/altro2/large4/tend0617.jpg, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  38. https://www.stagniweb.it/foto9/tend8304.jpg, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  39. https://ventimigliaaltawords.com/2013/10/14/all-steamed-up-about-the-ventimiglia-cuneo-rail-link/, accessed on 5th August 2025.
  40. Franco Collidà, Max Gallo & Aldo A. Mola; CUNEO-NIZZA History of a Railway; Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo, Cuneo (CN), July 1982.
  41. Franco Collidà; 1845-1979: the Cuneo-Nice line year by year; in Rassegna – Quarterly magazine of the Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo; No. 7, September 1979, pp. 12-18.
  42. Stefano Garzaro & Nico Molino; THE TENDA RAILWAY From Cuneo to Nice, the last great Alpine crossing; Editrice di Storia dei Trasporti, Colleferro (RM), EST, July 1982.
  43. SNCF Region de Marseille; Line: Coni – Breil sur Roya – Vintimille. Reconstruction et équipement de la section de ligne située en territoire Français; Imprimerie St-Victor, Marseille (F), 1980.
  44. https://www.picclickimg.com/images/g/QSkAAOSw4Ihlu1Ul/s-l1600.jpg, accessed on 25th September 2025.
  45. https://www.marklinfan.net/stazione_ventimiglia.htm, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  46. https://ebay.us/m/Ne0trP, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  47. https://www.geneanet.org/cartes-postales/view/7792915#0, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  48. https://casamaini.altervista.org/ancora-treni, accessed on 25th August 2025.
  49. https://youtu.be/rLXAEz-n4mM?si=RLQC31jynGeM_lQR, accessed on 26th August 2025.
  50. Not used.
  51. Not used.
  52. Not used.
  53. Not used.
  54. F. Honore; Le Rail a Travers Les Alpes: De Nice a Coni par la Voie Ferrée; L’Illustration, No. 4470, 3rd November 1928, p499.
  55. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbzk68KoRj8&t=4533s, accessed on 4th August 2025.