Tag Archives: 600 mm gauge

600 mm Narrow Gauge Lines used during World War 1 in East Africa – Predominantly in what is now Tanzania

600 mm gauge trolley lines (often known as Feldbahnen or “field railways”) played a crucial role in the East African Campaign of World War I, particularly in German East Africa (GEA) where they were used for both industrial and military logistics. These narrow-gauge systems were used to connect coastal areas, plantations, and interior supply depots to the main standard-gauge (1,000 mm) railways, or directly to the frontline.

Numerous privately owned 600 mm gauge Sisal Plantation Railways operated throughout the coastal and Tanga regions of German East Africa. These lines linked the plantations to factories and ultimately to the port at Tanga. During the first world war these were adapted for military use and transported troops, supplies and weapons.

In 1917, the Lukuledi Valley Line, a 600 mm trolley line in the Lukuledi Valley was extensively used to supply the German forces in the south of GEA and to evacuate their casualties to Lindi.

These light railways allowed the German Schutztruppe, led by Lieutenant Colonel von Lettow, to move heavy loads (such as artillery pieces from the sunken cruiser Königsberg) across difficult terrain without relying on limited road infrastructure. The lines often used prefabricated track segments. Trolleys were frequently moved by hand-pushing by local porters or workers, though sometimes small locomotives or tractors were used.

As British forces moved South into German East Africa from early 1916 onwards they were able to make extensive use of these 600mm lines, and built their own 600 mm light railways particularly in the later stages of the campaign as they pushed deeper inland where transport infrastructure was non-existent. The British made use of some small locomotives which had been in use on Sisal plantations before the war but also tractors designed for use on these lines.

A typical tractor in use on one of the 600 mm railways/trolley line. This one was in use on the line serving Handeni. [1: p9]

A number of these 600 mm lines are referred to by Harry Fecitt in an article entitled “The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919” the majority of which is is reproduced in Appendix A below.

Fecitt describes the work of the Indian Railway Corps as part of the advance Southwards into German East Africa by British forces. He notes that from Mombo station as far as Handeni the Germans had built a hand-powered field railway (trolley line) of 600 mm gauge to “Handeni, 65 kilometres to the south. The 25th Railway Company assisted the Royal Engineers in restoring this line as it had been partially destroyed, and on completion this trolley line was very useful for moving supplies in support of General Smuts’ advance to Morogoro.” [1: p8]

He notes also that a similar 600 mm gauge line had been constructed by the Germans from “Korogwe … towards Handeni. The materials for this line came from abandoned German farms and plantations and the locomotion came from adapted Ford cars used as tractors and operated by the East Africa Motor Transport Corps.” [1: p9]

A typical ‘train’ on a trolley line in what was once German East Africa but which by this time was terrritory occupied by the British. [21: p13]

In British hands, these lines were very short-lived. Fecitt talks of the construction by the British of another 600 mm line as they moved South through German East Africa. The British “developed Kilwa Kisinjane as a port where men and supplies could be landed. Commencing in November 1916 a 600 mm tramway was built by the Corps from the ocean to Kilwa Kivinje, a distance of 26 kilometres, and then onwards for a further 24 kilometres. The construction material was produced by stripping the trolley lines previously built from Mombo and Korogwe. Motor tractors were again used and a driver company and a supporting maintenance company were formed from mechanical transport personnel; these companies became sub-units in the Railway Corps.” [1: p13]

Apparently, “the driving of tractors on railway lines, especially around curves, was not as easy as many potential drivers thought and de-railings with consequent damage were frequent. Sixty more tractors were ordered from India and 50 more from South Africa; these were all converted Ford cars with bogie trucks in place of the front axle and with heavier back axles and box bodies. The first 16 kilometres of track was duplicated but in broader gauge and steam trains ran along it, allowing swifter movement of men from the port to the first camp site where water was available. In July 1917 further construction was authorised at Kilwa and the 600 mm line was extended to Lungo, Mile 84, by November. On this line, which had a slight gradient, each box-body tractor pulled two trailers with a total load of up to 2.72 metric tonnes (3 tons).” [1: p13-14]

A typical Ford tractor in use on one of the trolley lines. [1: p15]

Further to the South, and inland from the port at Lindi which was 110 km South of Kilwa, there was an existing trolley line running from a jetty on the Lukuledi River which ran into Lindi Harbour, to former German plantations. The line had also been used by the German military. It was estimated that 30 kilometres of track could be recovered from the German line. A British line was then constructed heading inland from Lindi, using recovered materials where possible, by the 25th Railway Company. “On 27th August the line was open to Mtua and proved to be very useful in quickly evacuating wounded men as well as in carrying forward supplies. In this month, the 27th Railway Company arrived at Lindi, and support was provided by the South African Pioneers and the 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers. Unskilled labour was badly needed and this problem had to be solved by moving down large labour gangs from the Usumbara and Central Railways. A few small steam engines were found on various plantations and put to use on the line. When the tractors from India arrived it was found that their axles had been made from inferior steel and they broke at the rate of two or three a day. This problem was compounded by severe rates of sickness that affected most of the Corps. At the beginning of November only 9 tractors out of 36 were working and only two mechanics were manning the workshops.” [1: p15]

Later in the month the Kilwa line was closed down and personnel were redeployed to Lindi where the Corps base was relocated, however the movement of badly needed materials and plant was delayed by shipping shortages. Railhead reached Ndanda, Mile 62, on 27th February 1918 and the decision was made to stop the line there.” [1: p15]

In November 1917, the Lindi line was still in use, with Army Service Corps men driving supplies from railhead into Portugese East Africa (PEA).

Much further North in Nairobi, a 13 km line was constructed from the town to the vast King’s African Rifles (KAR) Depot Camp at Mbagathi; the running of this line was handed over to the KAR.

In September 1918, “as the Germans in PEA were observed to be moving northwards, the Lindi line was ordered to be extended 30 kilometres to Massasi. The 28th Railway Company which was stood-by to sail for India quickly returned to Ndanda and started the work. Concurrently permission was obtained to raise an African Pioneer Company to replace the 28th Company. Suitable men were recruited from maintenance gangs on the Central Railway and from labour that had worked on the Mbagathi trolley line. The Lindi line reached Massasi in mid-November just as General von Lettow … still undefeated and then in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, accepted the Armistice terms decided in Europe and agreed to surrender. The 28th Railway Company sailed for India.” [1: p16]

References

  1. Harry Fecitt; The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919; via https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/The-Indian-Railway-Corps-East-African-Expeditionary-Force_1.pdf, 16th March 2026.

Appendix A – The Indian Railway Corps East African Expeditionary Force, 1914-1919

Introduction

In early August 1914 India was tasked with providing Indian Expeditionary Forces (IEFs) ‘B’ and ‘C’ for service in East Africa, and the provision of a Railway Corps was included in the organisation of IEF ‘B’ that was destined for German East Africa (GEA). The 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners, under Majors C.F. Anderson and C.W. Wilkinson, both Royal Engineers, along with the Traffic and Locomotive Reserve of the two companies were mobilised at Sialkot and Quetta. Each company was around 300 men strong; an accompanying Coolie Corps of 300 men was raised mostly from the relatives of the company personnel. The officers were nearly all civilian railway officers of the Indian State Railways or Royal Engineer officers employed under the Indian Railway Board. The skills included survey, construction and operation. Major Anderson was medically repatriated soon after arrival and Lieutenant H.L. Woodhouse, Royal Engineers, then commanded the 25th Railway Company. Sir William Johns CIE was appointed Director of Railways.

The Indian Railway Board provided equipment sufficient for the repair and running of a section of the German East Africa railway. This equipment included 10 miles (16 kilometres) of 50-pound track, a large surplus of sleepers, 15 locomotives, nearly 200 trucks, a large number of pine baulks, a number of 20-foot and 40-foot bridge spans, cranes, pile drivers, machine tools, hand tools of all sorts, survey instruments, tents and office necessities. The companies brought out their own telegraph equipment but this was later handed over to the Indian Telegraph unit that carried out all the telegraph work of the railways and tramways.

Initial Employment in British East Africa

The Railway Corps arrived in two ships at Tanga in GEA where IEF ‘B’ was scheduled to land. Tanga was the Indian Ocean terminal of the German Usambara Railway that ran to Moshi near Mount Kilimanjaro; the British later named this line The Northern Railway. IEF ‘B’ failed to defeat the German force at Tanga and re-embarked; the Railway Corps stayed on its ships throughout the Tanga fight. IEF ‘B’ then steamed up to Kilindini, the port at Mombasa in British East Africa (BEA). Mombasa was the ocean terminal for the British Uganda Railway that ran up to Lake Victoria. IEF ‘B’ disembarked at Kilindini on 9th November 1914 and merged with IEF ‘C’ that had arrived in BEA in September.

A Railway Corps survey party commenced delineating a route for a military railway from Voi on the Uganda Railway westwards towards Moshi in GEA. The Railway Companies took over the defence of the Uganda Railway, sections of which were under threat from enemy raiding parties from GEA. Once all the stores had been landed it was decided to return most of the locomotive and traffic staff and the civilian officers to India, from where they could be easily recalled. In late December the two companies were moved from railway defence to construction work on the Kajiado to Longido road; better use was now made of their technical expertise and qualifications in the construction of roads, fortified posts and water supplies. The 25th Company went to Namanga and Longido and the 26th Company was based at Bissel.

Railway Construction

In February 1915 the decision was made to construct the first 40 miles (65 kilometres) of the one metre-guage military line from Voi towards Moshi in order to connect the military posts at Bura and Maktau. Twenty five miles of track were sent from India, 5 Miles were borrowed from the Uganda Railway, and the Corps already possessed 10 miles. The Railway Board in India continued its excellent support to the Corps by delivering to site the 25 miles of track only seven weeks after receiving the indent in India. The specialists were recalled from India and the companies were moved to Voi; material was moved up from Kilindini.

The construction method used was that one company laid track whilst the other worked ahead building the next bridge. Local labour for bush-cutting and earthworks was recruited from the Wataita tribe with the help of the District Commissioner and a missionary of the Church Missionary Society. The Wataita proved to be intelligent men who were quick learners. The 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers had also landed with IEF ‘B’ and it had recently been employed in prolonging the Coonoor Railway to Ootacamund; when not tasked elsewhere the Pioneers provided useful support to the Corps. As the railhead advanced the Coolie Corps took over the maintenance of the track.

The Voi River was crossed and the first station opened at Mile 6.5 on 16th April. Heavy monsoon rains set in during May delaying the movement forward of supplies as the line needed constant repair and maintenance. On 31st May the bridge and station at Bura were opened at Mile 22. From now on the railway had to carry troops, supplies and water between Voi and Bura as well as construction material. The first section of the line was completed to Maktau on 23rd June. Whilst the railhead was advancing a big effort had been put into making Voi a suitable terminus for the military line. A workshop had been constructed, engines and rolling stock were brought up from Kilindini, a large store yard was established and an armoured train was built.

An unescorted Wataita earthwork gang was fired on by a German patrol and four men were wounded on 9th June; the Wataita were undeterred and asked if they could bring their bows and arrows to the worksite in future. The military line was blown up for the first time five days later, and after that the Germans blew the line every week, usually at around 2000 hours. This suited the repair gangs as they could make overnight repairs before the first morning train was run. The German demolitions were never very effective. On one occasion a train carrying the 130th (King George’s Own) Baluchis (Jacob’s Rifles) was pushing a truck loaded with sepoys’ kits ahead of it when an enemy mine detonated under the truck. A gap 0.75 metres in length was blown out of one of the rails but the complete train successfully passed over the gap and proceeded, with passenger and cargo damage being confined to some of the sepoys’ kits. The Germans had more success when attacking the Uganda Railway as that line often ran through desolate country and could be approached more easily.

A British attack at Mbuyuni, west of Maktau, failed on 14th July and that failure halted extension of the line. During this halt the companies constructed field works and defences and put in crossing stations and sidings on the Uganda Railway. A regular train service was introduced between Voi and Maktau and a Train Control System was installed. A second indent for 30 miles of track was sent to India and it arrived two months later. On November 13th 1915 the Director of Railways was placed in control of the Uganda Railway. This was done in order to ensure intimate cooperation between the Uganda Railway and the military line during the planned British offensive in early 1916. Officers and men of the Railway Corps were posted to the Uganda Railway whose operations were effectively militarised.

Platelaying began again in January 1916 and Mbuyuni, Mile 53.25, was reached on the 25th of that month, the Germans having withdrawn from the location two days earlier without fighting. Thousands of South African, British, Rhodesian, Indian and African troops were now being housed in camps along the military line and the supply of water in railway travelling tanks to these camps was a vital task for the Corps. Some relief was obtained when the engineers ran a pipeline from Bura, where the water was sourced, to Maktau. The British attacked Salaita Hill, west of Mbuyuni, on 12th February but the attack failed, the enemy counter-attacking to the railhead at Lanjoro, Mile 60.

This map illustrates the area of early operations in German East Africa. [21: p5]

Moving into German East Africa

The Germans withdrew from Salaita Hill and moved to defend the Latema-Reata hills just west of Taveta on the GEA and BEA border. The Corps pushed the military line westwards through dense bush, following up the advancing British troops. From drafts arriving from India and from within the existing Railway Companies the 27th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, was formed; the Company Commander was Captain R.E. Gordon, Royal Engineers. This allowed the Corps to continue platelaying in dangerous territory whilst providing its own security. The Lumi River was crossed and Taveta reached, Mile 75, on 23rd March. After a tough fight the Germans had withdrawn from the Latema-Reata position on 12th March, allowing the Corps to lay track over a saddle between the two hills.

The enemy was demolishing the Usambara Railway line as he withdrew down it and once Moshi was in British hands a half-company of the Corps repaired the track from Moshi to the Ruvu River. Meanwhile the railhead was advanced over what was the toughest stretch on the entire military line. The monsoon rains again fell heavily but three rivers were crossed and a dense forest penetrated; the soil was black-cotton and quickly became marsh resulting in platelaying being achieved under water. A junction with the Usambara line was made 20 kilometres below Moshi and 40 kilometres from Taveta on 25th April. This was just in time for the British troops in Moshi who had lost their road from Taveta to the monsoon rains and floods, and who now relied upon supplies arriving by train.

The South African General J.L. Van Deventer was tasked by the British theatre commander, General J.C. Smuts, to advance south-westwards through Arusha and Kondoa Irangi to the German Central Railway line that ran from Dar Es Salaam on the Indian Ocean coast to Lake Tanganyika in the interior. To assist the supply columns supporting the South Africans in getting across a large number of bad drifts on the initial stage of the road the Railway Corps was tasked with pushing a line westwards from Moshi over the Garanga River to Sanja, Mile 21 on this new short line. Sanja was reached by the end of June. At this time the 28th Railway Company, Sappers & Miners, arrived from India commanded by Captain. E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, raising the establishment of the Railway Companies to that of a battalion. Lieutenant Colonel C.W. Wilkinson, Royal Engineers, was appointed Commandant of the Railway Battalion which became a unit in the Railway Corps.

Reconstructing the Usambara Railway

On 14th May reconstruction of the Usambara Railway south of Ruvu commenced; the Germans had demolished the Ruvu bridge but the Corps 7 erected an 18-metre girder bridge on 20th May. From then onwards on the 320 kilometres of track leading to Tanga every bridge had been destroyed. However the demolitions had been hasty and planned ineffectively and the Corps could quickly make track diversions or re-build bridges. In many places the track had been torn up and the fastenings thrown into the bush, in other places the fastenings only had been removed, and elsewhere each alternate rail joint had been blown up. The track was repaired through Lembeni, Same, Makania, Hedaru and ‘German Bridge’ stations, the latter being reached on 20th June. ‘German Bridge’ was the last suitable crossing point over the Pangani River until Maurui is reached 80 kilometres further on. The Germans had started building a bridge here and the British completed the construction.

Just beyond ‘German Bridge’ is Buiko, 180 kilometres from Tanga and the mid-point in the line. Mombo station, Mile 75, was opened on 29th June; from here the Germans had built a hand-powered field railway (trolley line) of 60 centimetres gauge to Handeni, 65 kilometres to the south. 25th Railway Company assisted the Royal Engineers in restoring this line as it also had been partially destroyed, and on completion this trolley line was very useful for moving supplies in support of General Smuts’ advance to Morogoro.

Fighting in the Infantry Role

On 4th July, railhead reached the Pangani River near Maurui and by the end of the month had reached Korogwe. However the German theatre commander, Colonel Paul von Lettow, had early in July tasked 500 or more of his troops as a ‘stay behind’ group to harass the British lines of communication in the area between Tanga, Maurui and Handeni. This enemy group successfully made a nuisance of itself by attacking convoys, mining roads, cutting telegraph and telephone lines and sniping from the bush. An attack by 170 German troops with a light gun had been repulsed at Zugunatto Bridge by the Jind Infantry on 13th July; the soldiers from the Princely State of Jind were amongst the best of the British troops. General Smuts ordered his Inspector General of Communications Brigadier General W.F.S. Edwards, a former BEA policeman, to resolve this problem. As Edwards had no spare infantry he decided to use the 25th and 26th Railway Companies, Indian Sappers and Miners, along with a few infantrymen, and reported this to General Smuts who made no comment. But Edwards did not confer with the Director of Railways who badly needed those two companies to stay on the job of railway restoration in order to alleviate supply problems. After dark on 13th July the two companies with 100 Jind Infantry, 50 British other ranks and 100 sepoys, moved out from Korogwe tasked with attacking Segera Hill and Mfumbile. Captain E. St.G. Kirke, Royal Engineers, commanded the companies and Lieutenant Colonel Wilkinson commanded the force.

The Railway Companies did well on Segera Hill, getting up to a machine gun, killing the German NCO in charge and capturing the gun in a bayonet assault. The German force withdrew hurriedly but counterattacked next day. The companies were up to their new task and broke the enemy assault. Lt Col Wilkinson now moved across country to deal with an enemy force at Hale, found that it had withdrawn to Kwa Mugwe, moved there and drove the enemy rear-guard away and then repelled another German counter-attack on 19th July. In these operations the machine guns of the accompanying Jind Infantry gave the Railway Companies the supporting firepower that they needed. The companies then returned to their railway duties, having taken a few casualties but doubtless with many war stories to tell. On 18th August Tanga was reached and the port and railway came into use for moving supplies from Kilindini to Korogwe where another 60-centimetre trolley line was constructed towards Handeni. The materials for this line came from abandoned German farms and plantations and the locomotion came from adapted Ford cars used as tractors and operated by the East Africa Motor Transport Corps.

The 600 mm trolley line serving Handeni. [21: p9]
Railway workshops in Nairobi converted many vehicles, including this Vauxhall, to carry supplies on the hastily rep lines in German East Africa. In three months over 300 miles of railway were repaired, enabling locomotives to take once more. [21: p10]

Incidents on the Central Railway

The Royal Navy along with infantry units advancing from Bagamoyo seized Dar Es Salaam, the GEA capital, on 4th September. A reconnaissance of the Central Railway between Morogoro and Dar Es Salaam showed that all bridges were down. Two Railway Companies were shipped to Dar Es Salaam to start repairing the track from that end and the other two were shipped to Bagamoyo; from Bagamoyo they moved overland to the dropped bridges over the Ruwu River which urgently needed reconstruction. The line was repaired for light use to Morogoro and mechanical transport units converted a selection of lorries to rail tractors, allowing the South African Pioneers to run a supply service westwards to Dodoma, 240 kilometres from Morogoro. Each tractor could pull 15 tons of trucks and freight. Further work was needed before the heavier steam trains could use the line but Dodoma was being supplied from Dar Es Salaam by steam trains on 1st January 1917. The South African Water Supply Corps gave constant support to the Railway Corps whenever a water supply point or a pumping station needed to be established, and large numbers of labourers from the South African Native Labour Corps were supplied to support the Corps; unfortunately many of these Africans succumbed to tropical diseases.

The Germans had destroyed many engines and trucks on the line but again their demolition work was unsatisfactory and did not greatly hinder the Corps. Troops from the Belgian Congo, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, had crossed Lake Tanganyika and fought their way to Tabora, where 40 engines and 200 trucks were found basically undamaged. These were shared with the Belgians. The Railway Corps moved its base from BEA to Dar Es Salaam but immediately had to support the engineers restoring the docks there; Corps cranes were used to unload ships and the companies constructed jetties and slipways. In January 1917 Major L.N. Malan, Royal Engineers, took over command of the Railway Battalion from Colonel Wilkinson who became Deputy Director of the Railway Corps.

In April 1917 a branch line was constructed from Dodoma on the Central Railway southwards towards the Ruaha River. 26th, 27th and 28th Railway Companies were involved in the work which lasted until August, when railhead reached Matikira, Mile 28. The country was very difficult to cross and the lack of shipping to bring down sleepers from Kilindini caused delay. As soon as this short line was no longer needed the rails were recovered and used elsewhere.

A bad accident occurred on the Central Railway on 5th May when a re-built bridge at Mkata collapsed at night in heavy rain, due to an original German pier proving to have insufficient foundations. Sixteen gunners from 24th (Hazara) Mountain Battery (Frontier Force) and four Askari from the King’s African Rifles were drowned when their cattle trucks fell into the swollen river. Many other men were badly injured when they were flung against weapons and stores in the trucks. 26th Railway Company was deployed to restore the damaged line.

On 29th August 1917 the station at Kahe, where the military line from Voi joined the Usambara Railway from Moshi, was unexpectedly attacked by enemy troops, causing consternation amongst rear-echelon elements in Nairobi. An enemy raiding party had broken away from the German forces in southern GEA and had advanced northwards across the Central Railway, attacking British and Belgian locations; former German Askari enthusiastically joined the raiders. Elements of the party got up to Lake Victoria and one small group attacked Kahe. Two trains were captured as they approached the station, then looted and burned. Three British officers were taken prisoner, the Station Master was mortally wounded and a number of porters and labourers were killed. Before withdrawing the Germans started one of the two trains and let it run towards Taveta, but an Indian engine driver who had escaped into the bush jumped into one of the two engines on the train and brought it under control. When the train was at a safe distance from Kahe the driver disconnected the carriages and drove the engines to Taveta, where he was given a prompt military award.

A Trolley Line in the Kilwa Area

Moving south the British now developed Kilwa Kisinjane as a port where men and supplies could be landed. Commencing in November 1916 a 60centimetre tramway was built by the Corps from the ocean to Kilwa Kivinje, a distance of 26 kilometres, and then onwards for a further 24 kilometres. The construction material was produced by stripping the trolley lines previously built from Mombo and Korogwe. Motor tractors were again used and a driver company and a supporting maintenance company were formed from mechanical transport personnel; these companies became sub-units in the Railway Corps.

However tropical diseases and ailments such as malignant malaria were now affecting the Corps badly and often far more men of all trades were sick than were at work. Also the driving of tractors on railway lines, especially around curves, was not as easy as many potential drivers thought and de-railings with consequent damage were frequent. Sixty more tractors were ordered from India and 50 more from South Africa; these were all converted Ford cars with bogie trucks in place of the front axle and with heavier back axles and box bodies. The first 16 kilometres of track was duplicated but in broader guage and steam trains ran along it, allowing swifter movement of men from the port to the first camp site where water was available. In July 1917 further construction was authorised at Kilwa and the 60-centimetre line was extended to Lungo, Mile 84, by November. On this line, which had a slight gradient, each box-body tractor pulled two trailers with a total load of up to 2.72 metric tonnes (3 tons).

A typical ‘train’ on a trolley line in what was once German East Africa but which by this time was terrritory occupied by the British. [21: p13]
A typical Ford light railway tractor in use in the occupied German East Africa. [21: p15]

Construction activities at Lindi

A hundred and ten kilometres south of Kilwa more port facilities were developed at Lindi, which had a fine natural harbour. A British force was moving into the interior and needed a railway to follow it. Steam trains were ruled out because shipping was not available to move the necessary materials and rolling stock from Dar Es Salaam and Kilindini, so another 60-centimetre tractor line was started. This was helped by the fact that an existing trolley line led from several former German plantations to a jetty on the river running into Lindi Harbour; it was estimated that 30 kilometres of track could be recovered from the German line.

The 25th Railway Company deployed to Lindi in June and commenced work, following the British advance. Survey work on both the Lindi and Kilwa lines was sometimes interrupted the appearance of both lions, rhinoceros and elephants, and occasionally by the approach of enemy patrols who were engaged and driven off. On 27th August the line was open to Mtua and proved to be very useful in quickly evacuating wounded men as well as in carrying forward supplies. In this month the 27th Railway Company arrived at Lindi, and support was provided by the South African Pioneers and the 61st (King George’s Own) Pioneers. Unskilled labour was badly needed and this problem had to be solved by moving down large labour gangs from the Usumbara and Central Railways. A few small steam engines were found on various plantations and put to use on the line. When the tractors from India arrived it was found that their axles had been made from inferior steel and they broke at the rate of two or three a day. This problem was compounded by severe rates of sickness that affected most of the Corps. At the beginning of November only 9 tractors out of 36 were working and only two mechanics were manning the workshops.

Later in the month the Kilwa line was closed down and personnel were redeployed to Lindi where the Corps base was relocated, however the movement of badly needed materials and plant was delayed by shipping shortages. Railhead reached Ndanda, Mile 62, on 27th February 1918 and the decision was made to stop the line there. By then General, as he now was, von Lettow … and his slimmed-down German army were moving deeper into Portuguese East Africa (PEA), now Mozambique.

The Run-down of the Indian Railway Corps in East Africa

By November 1917 the 25th Railway Company was medically unfit for work with its strength at less than 40 fit men, and it was returned to India in March 1918. The 26th and 27th Railway Companies were in a similar condition and in May they also returned to India. 28th Railway Company remained in the field and all recent arrivals and returnees from leave were posted into that company. The Lindi line continued to be used and Army Service Corps men drove supplies from railhead into PEA; sadly many of these European drivers succumbed to tropical diseases and are buried in East Africa. As the East African Force was slimmed down Directorates were abolished and in March Sir William Johns left the theatre after handing over the Railway Corps to Colonel Wilkinson.

Up in Nairobi a tramway 13 kilometres long was constructed from the town to the vast King’s African Rifles (KAR) Depot Camp at Mbagathi; the running of this line was handed over to the KAR. The line from Voi to Tanga was practically on a peace footing and the Central Railway was being converted to commercial use. The arrival of 100 new tractors from South Africa, the increased use of steam traction, and a big improvement in the health of the personnel meant that soon the Lindi line was running very efficiently.

In September, as the Germans in PEA were observed to be moving northwards, the Lindi line was ordered to be extended 30 kilometres to Massasi. The 28th Railway Company which was stood-by to sail for India quickly returned to Ndanda and started the work. Concurrently permission was obtained to raise an African Pioneer Company to replace the 28th Company. Suitable men were recruited from maintenance gangs on the Central Railway and from labour that had worked on the Mbagathi trolley line. The Lindi line reached Massasi in mid-November just as General von Lettow-Vorbeck, still undefeated and then in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, accepted the Armistice terms decided in Europe and agreed to surrender. The 28th Railway Company sailed for India.

The Indian Railway Corps retained responsibility for railways in East Africa until January 1919, when civilian direction and personnel replaced it. The Corps had done an excellent job, tackling the diverse and serious challenges that East Africa presented in a most professional manner. Credit for the performance of the Corps must be attributed to the support provided by the Indian Railways Board and the Corps of Royal Engineers, but above all else to the skill, adaptability and perseverance of the men of the Railway Companies, Sappers & Miners. Shabash!

Narrow-Gauge Industrial Lines in Tanganyika/Tanzania

The featured image for this article shows a train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

Tanganyika (now part of Tanzania) possessed a dense network of industrial narrow-gauge railways, primarily developed during the German colonial era (German East Africa) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to support plantation agriculture and forestry. While the main lines (Central Line and Usambara Railway) were built to 1,000 mm (metre) gauge, industrial, plantation, and forestry lines often used 600 mm (1 ft 11 5⁄8 in) or 750 mm (2 ft 5 1⁄2 in) gauge. [1]

Following World War I, the British administration deemed many of the 600 mm “light railways” to be economically inefficient compared to the, at the time, more efficient 1,000 mm metre-gauge lines, leading to a shift away from developing these smaller lines. [1]

Early Industrial Narrow Gauge lines included:

1. The Sigi Railway

The Sigi Railway (Sigi-Bahn) was a 23.5 km long, 750 mm gauge line opened in 1911 to transport timber from forests in the Usambara Mountains to the Tanga or Usambara Railway. It featured significant engineering challenges, including four switchbacks to handle steep terrain. [2]

Tanga and the Usambara Hills showing the metre-gauge line. [7: p2]
A closer view with a North point just to the West of North. The metre-gauge line runs diagonally across the map extract. The Sigi-bahn is represented by the dashed line leading to the centre of the hatched area. [7: p3]
A sketch map of the full length of the Sigi-bahn with Tengeni to the left and Sigi to the right. Beneath the German text in this extract, the gradient profile of the line is shown. [7: p15]
These three images divide the length of the Sigi-bahn shown above into three. [7: p15]
A train on the Kihuhui Bridge on the Sigi Railway in Tanganyika. [3]

The line ran from Tengeni station (185.9  m above sea level) near Muhesa (now Muheza), located on the Usambara railway, to Sigi (438  m above sea level) in the heavily forested eastern Usambara Mountains, which, until the railway’s construction, were rugged and difficult terrain. The area could only be reached by caravans via forest and mountain trails. This severely limited the transport of goods and merchandise. [3]

A travel group at Tengeni railway station in the Usambara Mountains, with trains of the Sigi Railway and the Usambara Railway in the background. [3]

Tengeni Railway Station. [10]

The Sigi Railway Management Concession of 29th April 1910, was a necessary precondition to the exploitation of the forestry concession held by the Deutsche-Holz-Gesellschaft fuer Ostafrika. The 23.5 km. railway’s operation was bound to the sawmills that provided the bulk of the traffic. [2]

Work began in 1904. The Sigi Export Company, during its ownership, constructed 17.6 km of track. Due to financial difficulties, work had to be interrupted repeatedly. After the German Timber Company for East Africa took over the logging rights to 12,000 hectares, the sawmill, and the railway, it completed the latter. The railway went into full operation on 1st September 1910. [3][4: p96]

The line had gradients of up to 40%, minimum radii of 40 m, and, as already noted, four switchbacks. It climbed 252 metres to the Sigi terminus. [4: p96] The switchbacks enabled a relatively uniform gradient to be achieved. The section of track near Sigi was particularly interesting. Here, the railway described almost complete circles to wind its way up the mountain slopes and featured three of its four switchbacks in a length of less than one kilometre. Where possible, engineering structures were avoided. Nevertheless, numerous smaller bridges had to be built over mountain streams, blasting operations carried out, and dams constructed, particularly along the upper section. The construction of a large steel girder bridge over the Kihuhui River gorge was unavoidable; this bridge had two masonry piers between its abutments. [3]

Between Tengeni and Fanussi, rails weighing only 10 kg/m and measuring 7 metres in length were used. The lower section of the line was ballasted only where absolutely necessary for structural or operational reasons, such as on the curves. In contrast, the upper section was fully ballasted and fitted with rails weighing 15 kg/m. Ballasting the entire line was planned but was not completed before the First World War. The rails rested on iron sleepers with shims. The sleeper design on the lower section was chosen to allow for the replacement of the existing rails with the new, heavier rail profile. The flat fishplates used in the first construction phase were reinforced by the addition of angle fishplates. [3]

The line originated at Tengeni station, 44km from Tanga on the Usambara Railway. The Tengeni station grounds belonged to the state and were leased to the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company. With government approval, this company subleased the land for 30 years, first to the Sigi Export Company Ltd. and later to the German Timber Company for East Africa. The site included several buildings constructed by the Sigi Export Company, the railway’s administration building, a warehouse and goods shed, the engine shed, a carriage shed, and a water tower for supplying locomotives. There were also three houses for European employees, one of whom was a locomotive driver. The sawmill was located directly next to the station. The station building had a tiled roof. It contained a waiting room, an office for the local freight clerk, and a room rented by the Usambara Railway as a ticket office . A larger residential building with a corrugated iron roof served as overnight accommodation for travelers.

Apart from the two termini, there were no train stations or stops. Trains would stop on the open track if necessary. The entire route was equipped with a telephone line for train safety. [3]

In the German era, the operation of the Sigi-bahn was the responsibility of the German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (DKEBBG), which had also been operating the Usambara Railway since 1905. The DKEBBG was a subsidiary of Lenz & Co. in Berlin, which built and operated numerous narrow-gauge railways of various track gauges throughout the German Empire. [5]

The choice of a narrower gauge compared to the Usambara Railway meant that all goods had to be transshipped at the connecting station of Tengeni for onward transport. [4: p96] In addition to freight traffic, there was also public passenger traffic, as roads were scarce in the area around Sigi and Amani. Thus, from the beginning, the terminus at Sigi also served the Imperial Biological-Agricultural Institute in Amani. [4: p96]

Given the route, the average travel speed was only about 10 km/h, so a train needed 2 hours and 20 minutes for the entire journey. Trains were usually mixed passenger/goods services , with connections in Tengeni to and from trains on the Usambara Railway. Pure freight trains were also used when needed. The scheduled trains also carried mail and parcels to and from Sigi. Due to their more pleasant climate compared to the lowlands and coastal region, the Usambara Mountains were a popular destination for Europeans living in the colony. Their abundance of game also made them a popular destination for hunters. Therefore, the DKEBBG even offered special trains for tour groups from Tanga to Tengeni with a connection to Sigi. The DKEBBG advertised the journeys on the Sigi Railway:

A special trip to Tengeni for the purpose of touring the Sigi Railway and visiting the Agricultural Institute in Amani would cost 100 Rp. On the Sigi Railway, scheduled trains should be used at the regular fares. (One way 3.50 Rp.). … A trip on the Sigi Railway, with its magnificent views of wild gorges, lush valleys, and dense primeval forests, is one of the most beautiful excursions in German East Africa.” [6]

In passenger transport there was a so-called “European class” (1st class, fare 15 Heller per tariff kilometre = 3.50 Rupees/total distance) and a so-called “native class” (3rd class, fare 2.5 Heller per tariff kilometer = 0.60 Rupees/total distance). With the full commissioning of the line, great expectations were placed on its role in opening up the entire East Usambara region. [7]

The sawmill at the top of the Sigibahn was located directly on the Sigi River, by whose water power it operated. The Sigi River was dammed by a 36 m long dam. The water was channelled via a 150 m long water channel to a water wheel with a double ratio, which drove the various sawing machines. Bringing the wood from the storage area to the saws is done by a trolley. [7: p16]

The up and downs of the Sigi railway after World War I were due to differing opinions with regard to the economics of the line. Operational experience in the 1920s ultimately served to convince the Government of Tanganyika that there could be no place in the Territory’s pattern of communications for the operations of light railways. [2]

Locomotives in Older Literature

According to the few available sources, the Sigi Railway had two wood-fired tank locomotives of different power levels at its disposal for operating the line . The existence of at least one six-coupled locomotive is confirmed by the photograph of a train on the Kihuhui Bridge which is included in this article. [3]

Details regarding the locomotives vary depending on the source.

The locomotives were reportedly built by Orenstein & Koppel in 1904. [5: p6][8: p26] According to another source, the locomotives were built in 1910. [9] The more powerful of the two locomotives had an output of 50 hp, weighed 10.7 ton, had a driving wheel diameter of 580 mm, and a wheelbase of only 1,400 mm. The less powerful locomotive was said to have produced only 40 hp, with otherwise similar dimensions. The 40 hp locomotive could only haul a load of 13–14 t on the inclines. This meant that it was not even capable of pulling the regular, relatively light trains on the line alone, without the assistance of the second locomotive. [3]

According to a third source, the locomotive fleet consisted of one 45 hp and one 60 hp triple-coupled tender locomotive. [3][7: p15]

Locomotives in More Recent Evidence

The more powerful of the two locomotives, however, was clearly a Mallet locomotive of the B’Bn4vt type. A photograph in the collection of the colonial image archive of the University of Frankfurt/Main confirms the error in older literature. The locomotive pictured, with its Kobel chimney and the tender box for timber “attached” to the cab, is unequivocally a Mallet locomotive and not a six-coupled locomotive with a rigid chassis. The photograph is captioned ‘Train of the Sigibahn’. [3]

Between 1902 and 1912, the Orenstein & Koppel company built a large number of Mallets for plantation and narrow-gauge railways worldwide. At least visually, the Sigibahn locomotive is very similar to locomotive number 13 of the Frankfurt Feldbahn Museum (Orenstein & Koppel , B’Bn4vt, 1909/3902, 30 hp, 600 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 4 of the Gending/Java sugar factory, 600 mm gauge) and to the locomotive of the Statfold Barn Railway /England (Orenstein & Koppel, B’Bn4vt, 1905/1473, 60 hp, 762 mm gauge, ex. locomotive 5 of the Pakis Baru/Java sugar factory, 750 mm gauge). [3]

A Mallet locomotive was better suited to the railway’s needs than a six-coupled engine, as it could be fitted with a significantly larger boiler and four cylinders instead of two for increased power. The articulated design of the running gear resulted in good running characteristics, even on the tight curves of the track. [3]

Questions regarding the Sigibahn locomotives remain unanswered. However, it is established that the locomotives bore the operating numbers No. 1 and No. 2. The original bronze number plate of locomotive No. 2, bearing the inscription “Deutsche Holzgesellschaft für Ostafrika No. 2” (German Timber Company for East Africa No. 2) , has been preserved, is part of the collection of the German Historical Museum in Berlin, and is displayed there in the permanent exhibition. [3]

The locomotive plaque for Sigi-Bahn No. 2! © Kleinbahnen, and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA,4.0). [3]

Passenger Coaches and Goods Wagons

The rolling stock was modest. It consisted of only two-axle, semi-open passenger cars [5: p6-7] , two covered and two open two-axle goods wagons, six four-axle stake wagons for timber transport, two firewood wagons, and three track maintenance cars. When there was a large influx of passengers, they were occasionally transported in the two-axle open and covered freight cars. [3]

Despite the steep gradients, all the Sigi-bahn carriages were equipped only with hand brakes. This necessitated the presence of brakemen on the trains . The manufacturers of the carriages and wagons are not known. [3]

And Finally ….

In searching for more information about the Sigi-bahn I have discovered a forum link to a walk along the length of the Sigi-bahn which can be found here. [11]

.

2. Sisal Plantation Railways

Numerous privately owned, 600 mm gauge light railways operated throughout the coastal and Tanga regions, linking sisal estates to factories and main-line stations.

Sisal plantation railways were a crucial component of the German colonial agricultural economy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These networks, often referred to as ‘light railways’, were used to transport harvested sisal leaves from the fields to processing factories and eventually to the Tanga port for export.

Sisal cultivation and associated small-gauge rail systems were introduced in the 1890s, with a significant boost in the very early 20th century. The plantation lines typically branched off from the main Usambara Railway.

The Tanga sisal plantations contributed to over 60% of the country’s GDP at their peak. The history of these railways is deeply linked to the development of the Tanga port and the early industrialization of the region.

A sisal plantation in German East Africa in 1906, ©  Walther Dobbertin (CC BY-SA 3.0 de). [14]

An illustration of one of these lines in use in the 1960s can be seen here. [12]

Sisal production in the country peaked in 1964 with around 250,000 tonnes in production from regions from all over the country such as Tanga, Morogoro, Arusha, Mwanza and Shinyanga. In 1967 following the Arusha Declaration most of the sisal estates were nationalized by the government. This began the downfall of the sisal industry as bureaucracy, over-centralization and lack of experience caused the production to fall rapidly. Furthermore, with the increasing popularity of Synthetic Nylon fibers, drove the world price for sisal down resulting in the foreclosure of many sisal factories. By the end of Ujamaa and President Nyerere’s rule, sisal production had fallen from 235,000 tonnes in 1964 to 32,000 in 1985, less than 15% of the country’s peak.” [14]

Remnants of the 600mm-gauge lines appear in different places in the sisal fields of Tanzania. Two examples can be found on these links – here [13] and here. [15]

.

3. Later Industrial Lines

Later Industrial Narrow Gauge Lines included:

A. The Southern Province Railway

The Southern Province Railway was a short-lived, metre-gauge railway constructed by the Overseas Food Corporation to support the “Groundnut Scheme.” It ran for 212 km from the port of Mtwara to Nachingwea, and including various branch lines was a network of about 275 km of railway, all told. It was abandoned in 1963.

An extract from a photograph of a map of Tanzania’s railways taken by Kiplimo Koech. This photograph was shared by Kiplimo Koech on Facebook on 12th February 2026. [23]

When the British Government “decided to press on with the Groundnuts Scheme in the Southern Province, the railways were faced with the problem of transport to and from the areas of cultivation which were then only vaguely defined. As soon as more was known about the approximate location of the areas to be cultivated around Nachingwea, and the estimated tonnages to be moved between there and the coast, the railways undertook a study of the best way of meeting the requirements at the lowest transport cost. There were three possible sites for port works – Lindi creek, Mikindani and the Mtwara creek which forms part of the port of Mikindani. Reasonably reliable information was available about the route along the Lukuledi valley between the areas to be cultivated and Lindi creek, but very little was known of the topography and soil conditions over about so miles at the coastal end of the most likely route to Mikindani and Mtwara. No sort of survey was practicable at the time, as all routes were impassable due to the rains. Such information as was available indicated that this section would not be easy to build. The limitations of Lindi as a port were fully recognised, but the Administration of the Railways recommended the use of Lindi in the early years of the scheme, leaving the route to Mikindani and Mtwara and the possible sites for port works to be surveyed later when more precise information would be available regarding costs and tonnages to be carried. However, the Ministry of Food decided to send out im-mediately its own mission to consider the site of the port works. The mission, which arrived in the February of 1947, consisted solely of specialists in port operation and construction. They recommended that the port works be in Mtwara creek on the grounds that it offered the best harbour facilities. Little or no account was taken of the extra cost of railway construction, the possible difficulties of the route and the extra time which would be needed for construction. The Ministry of Food, which was solely responsible for financing the new port and railways, accepted the advice of the mission.” [22: p268-269]

The Railways’ Administration had meantime accepted responsibility for the survey and construction of the railway on behalf of the Managing Agents. In view of the importance attached to the Groundnuts Scheme, the Administration decided that the quickest way of providing a route of adequate capacity from the sea was to proceed from Mkwaya at the head of Lindi creek through Ruo – 20 kilometres from Mkwaya – to Nachingwea. The survey began in May, and the first contracts for earthworks were placed before the end of the year. The survey of the line from Mtwara to Ruo was entrusted to Messrs. Paulings, who were later awarded the contract for the construction. The Mkwaya-Ruo-Nachingwea route was opened to traffic on 25th October 1949. Due to physical difficulties, work on the Mtwara-Ruo section proceeded slowly, and due to financial difficulties Messrs. Paulings were released from the contract in the September of 1950. The Mtwara-Ruo section was finally opened on 17th January 1954.” [22: p269]

In addition to the needs of the Groundnuts Scheme, the railways were also concerned with the provision of transport for minerals. In 1947, a siding, about nine miles long, was built from the Mwanza branch to serve the Mwadui mine of Williamson’s Diamonds Limited. The Company met the cost of bridging and earthworks. … In the Mpanda district of the Western Province, a large lead-silver-copper-gold ore body was found, and Uruwira Minerals Ltd. undertook the development of a lead mine. It was decided, in 1946, to investigate the possibility of a branch line from Kaliua on the Central line to Mpanda. After a preliminary survey it was decided to build the line, about 131 miles long. By the end of 1947, 70 miles of the location survey had been completed, and contracts for the earthworks of the first 40 miles had been placed with three local contractors. This line was opened to traffic in the August of 1950.” [22: p269]

In 1947, the goods stock on the Central and Tanga lines was in a normal state of repair and overhauls were up to schedule. Like all other railways, the Tanganyika Railways suffered at the time from a shortage of tyres, springs, couplers and brake spares, but the percentage of wagons withdrawn from service due to this shortage was not abnormal. As soon as a preliminary estimate of the tonnage to be moved in connection with the Groundnuts Scheme was available, it was clear that the factor restricting the Railways’ capacity would be the supply of wagons. Orders were placed immediately in the United Kingdom but, in spite of the priorities obtained, deliveries could not be expected for two to three years. A world-wide search was made for metre-gauge stock to meet the demand during the intervening period – and to some extent as part of the permanent equipment. As a result wagons belonging to the War Office were found at Shaiba, near Basra, and at El Shatt, near Suez. A technical officer was sent to select suitable wagons, and those chosen were shipped as soon as possible. Because of exposure to the weather and pilfering they needed a fair amount of rehabilitation. By concentrating the resources of the Dar es Salaam workshops on the shipments as they arrived, the wagons were quickly put into service. In all, 430 four-wheeled wagons were obtained from Shaiba and El Shatt towards the end of 1947 and early in 1948. Later the purchase of these wagons was criticised as an unnecessarily expensive and unsatisfactory way of meeting a very urgent need. An effective answer is that 414 of the wagons were still giving good service in 1957.” [22: p269-270]

Moreover, these wagons arrived in Dar es Salaam at a most opportune moment. They enabled the ordinary traffic offered, the extraordinary traffic of the Groundnuts Scheme and construction materials to be carried during the very difficult time until the new wagons on order arrived in 1949 and 1950. The strain imposed on the capacity of the port and the Central line was exacerbated by the fact that the import of materials and equipment for the Groundnuts Scheme far exceeded the original estimates.” [22: p270]

As it turned out, the Southern Province Railway was an overambitious scheme. Construction took place between 1948 and 1954 to facilitate the export of groundnuts under the British Overseas Food Corporation’s ambitious post-World War II agricultural initiative. The scheme was intended to produce up to 600,000 tons of peanuts annually on cleared bushland to address food shortages and generate revenue, the project exemplified colonial-era top-down development but collapsed amid unsuitable clay-heavy soils, erratic rainfall, mechanical breakdowns, and overestimation of yields, resulting in total losses of £36 million by 1951. Despite the scheme’s abandonment, the single-track railway—built with 60-lb rails on untreated wooden sleepers—was completed and opened for limited traffic in January 1954, initially subsidized through joint guarantees by the Overseas Food Corporation and the Tanganyika government against predictable operating deficits. Its brief operation underscored the perils of ignoring local ecological realities in favour of imported heavy machinery and rapid mechanized clearing, leaving behind underutilized infrastructure that highlighted systemic flaws in mid-20th century imperial planning rather than delivering sustained economic benefits. [16]

The failure of the Groundnut Scheme should probably have resulted in a decision to abandon the construction of the railway, but the thinking at the time was that the line would promote significant growth in southern Tanganyika. After completion of the line and its branches it was placed under the same management as all the other metre-gauge lines in East Africa, with the East African Railways (EAR). [16]

Rather than being designed with longevity in mind. The network, focused on freight haulage with minimal passenger elements. It spanned key agricultural zones but was engineered for temporary use (for instance, using untreated timber for sleepers rather than steel), reflecting the scheme’s optimistic projections for short-term financial gain, rather than long-term viability! [16]

Initially the railway was steam-powered (series RV/21and NZ/22) but under EAR diesel-power was introduced (series 80 and 81).

East African Railways publicity photograph of No. 2217, circa. 1953. In the late 1940s, two of this 4-8-0 Class (TR NZ Class/EAR Class 22) were transferred to the Southern Province Railway, © Public Domain. [20]
East African Railways publicity photograph of TR No. 252, circa.  1953. These were a 4-8-2 development of the 2-8-2 TR MK class. The eight members of the RV class were built by Vulcan Foundry, in Newton-le-Willows, Lancashire. [21]
Two American outline diesel locomotives at work on the Southern Province Railway in the mid-20th century. [19]

It is at least possible that the prior existence of the Lindi tramway which at one time extended from Lindi to Masasi (in the latter year of WW1 and in the aftermath of the conflict) influenced, even if only subconsciously, the choice of this route and the inland areas it served for the groundnut project it was intended to serve. More information about this earlier trolley line which was powered by Ford tractors can be found elsewhere in this series of articles about the railways of Tanganyika/Tanzania.

The Route of the Southern Province Railway

This schematic route plan is provided by Wikipedia. It shows the main line from Mtwara Harbour to Nachingwea and notes two link lines to the Sisal Plantations at Muta-Narunyu and Karimjee. Two branch lines, one to Masasi, the other to Lindi Creek are also shown. The second of which also provided a link to Lindi Sisal Plantation. [17]

Two bridges over the River Lukuledi are also shown.

Mtwara Port was deepened by the British in 1948-1954. It was functional but underutilized for many years due to poor transport infrastructure. However, in 2010-2011 the increased activity in oil and natural gas exploration caused a surge in activity. It has recently seen major upgrades. The port has a special economic zone attached to it and In December 2015 Alistair Freeports Limited injected $700,000 to upgrade the Export processing zone around the port area. [18]

Mtwara City, Port and Gas Plant. [Google Maps, February 2026]

As we noted earlier, the Port at Mtwara was built towards the end of the construction period as an extension to the original length of line which ran to a port at Lindi. The extension to Mtwara came off the line to Lindi about 27 km from Lindi and ran for about 106 km serving Mikindani and Mtwara.

There is little that I have been able to find online which can be used to confirm the route of the railway. Some assumptions on the alignment of the railway can be made, whether they are warranted or not I cannot tell.

Should further information come to light the remaining paragraphs and images about this line will need to be revised. I can see two possibilities for the route of the old line:

1. The first possibility depends on an assumption that the railway will have been built with an access road alongside it. That access road is likely to have survived and become part of the lasting road network of the Southern Province of Tanzania.

Determining, conclusively, the route of the line would have been helped by the availability of Google Streetview images in the Southern Province of Tanzania. However Google Streetview imagery in Tanzania is primarily focused on key tourist locations and specific, curated, or partnered locations rather than comprehensive nationwide road mapping. Major coverage areas include Gombe National Park, parts of Zanzibar, and the Ngorongoro Crater rim.

The next three images show a possible route of the line between Mtwara and Nachingwea the grey lines are roads T6 running West from Mtwara, the T7 in the East serving Lindi, the T6 from Mingoyo to Nangana and the Nachingwea Road, West of Nangana.

In the West there was a branch line serving Lukuledi and Masasi, the route of which is much less clear.

These three map extracts come from Kartaview. They show the full length of the presumed route of the line from Mtwara to Nachingwea. The branch line to Lindi is also shown. The branch line to Masasi ran through Lukuledi, but its likely route is less easy to establish. [24]

My presumptions about the possible route of the line are called into question by the schematic route plan above which places the junction between the line serving Lindi at a place called Ruo. We will come back to this below.

In the East, close to Mtwara Port the alignment of the railway is very difficult to determine as it has probably been built over.

It is probable that the line from Mtwara Port followed the line of the T6 Northwest along the coast before turning inland adjacent to or on the line of the T6 which runs in a straight line South-southwest as far as its junction with Tanu Avenue. Here the road runs through reverse curves before continuing South-southwest. [24]
As we have already noted, a most likely alignment for the old railway follows the T6 as it travels West, through Mikindani and on towards a  junction at Mingoyo. [24]

Assuming that my assumptions are correct, at Mingoyo the line from Mtwara appears to have met the line to/from Lindi. It appears that trains to Lindi would have progressed without reversing. Trains to Nachingwea would have required the locomotive to run-round its train.

Assuming that the alignment of the T6 and T7 roads roughly follow the line of the old railway, it can be surmised that each train heading West would have required the locomotive to run-round the train. [24]
The coastal town and port of Lindi was the original eastern terminus of the Southern Province Railway which approached the town from the South along the route of the present T7 road shown grey on the map extract. [24]
A similar area as it appears on Google Maps satellite imagery. The line would have approached Lindi from the South on or alongside the T7 road which Google Maps annotates B2, then probably crossing Lindi Town Small Bridge and entering the Port from the South. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge seen from above. [Google Maps, March 2026]
Lindi Town Small Bridge in the 21st century, © Khalid Sakewa and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [25]

The remainder of the route West to Nachingwea would follow the line suggested, along the T6 and the Nachingwea Road.

2. Given the complications associated with a junction at Mingoyo and the fact that the Wikipedia schematic route diagram indicates that the junction between the Lindi line and the Mtwara line was 14 km further South at Ruo, it is possible that the line from Lindi followed the T7 to Mingoyo and the the T6 to Mkwaya. However, following this route takes the line in the wrong direction to access a junction at Ruo which is some distance away to the Southwest. No bridge is shown over the Lukuledi river on the Lindi branch on the schematic route plan above. However, neither is a bridge shown on the line to/from Mtwara.

If, Ruo was the location of the junction at least one bridge over the Lukuledi would have been necessary, most probably on the line from Lindi.

As is painfully obvious from the paragraphs above, without significantly more information we can only speculate on the actual route of the old line.

.

B. Port of Bujumbura Railway: While operating within the neighbouring territory of Burundi, a 600 mm gauge industrial railway ran from 1947 to 1982 within the port area, servicing Lake Tanganyika traffic. Its operator was Office Congolais des Chemins des fer des Grands Lacs (CFL). [26] At the time of its construction, Bujumbura was known as Usumbura. [27]

.

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  2. https://www.africabib.org/rec.php?RID=187591229, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  3. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigibahn, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  4. Franz Baltzer; The Colonial Railways with Special Consideration of Africa; Berlin 1916. Reprint, Leipzig 2008.
  5. Helmut Schroeter; The Railways of the Former German Protectorates of Africa and Their Vehicles = The Vehicles of the German Railways, Volume 7; Frankfurt 1961.
  6. German Colonial Railway Construction and Operating Company (ed.): German East Africa – from the coast to Kilimanjaro with the Usambara Railway; Heinicke, Berlin, 1914.
  7. Hans Wettich; The development of Usambara under the influence of the East African Northern Railway and its private branch lines, with special consideration of the Mkumbara-Neu-Hornow cable car; Simion, Berlin 1911. Reprint from: Proceedings of the Association for the Promotion of Industry 90 (1911), Issue 6; via https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11924, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  8. Helmut Schroeter and Roel Ramaer; The railways in the former German protectorates then and now; Krefeld, 1993.
  9. Roel Ramaer; Gari la Moshi – Steam Locomotives of the East African Railways; Malmo 2009.
  10. https://postimg.cc/dDHY1F8g, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  11. https://bimmelbahn-forum.de/forum/index.php?thread/22289-die-sigibahn-auf-den-spuren-einer-privaten-schmalspurbahn-in-ostafrika, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  12. https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/sisal-leaves-are-taken-by-rail-for-processing-on-a-news-photo/88556860, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  13. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103739156.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sisal_production_in_Tanzania, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  15. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tanzania-tanga-usambara-mountains-sisal-farming-and-industry-dd-ruhinda-103738452.html, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  16. https://grokipedia.com/page/southern_province_railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Province_Railway, accessed on 24th February 2026.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mtwara_Port, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  19. https://unitedrepublicoftanzania.com/economy-of-tanzania/infrastructure-in-tanzania/railway-in-tanzania/mtwaras-forgotten-rails-a-glimpse-into-tanzanias-industrial-past, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_NZ_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR_RV_class, accessed on 25th February 2026.
  22. M.F. Hill; Permanent Way – Volume II – The Story of Tanganyika Railways; East African Railways and Habours, Nairobi, Kenya; Watson & Viney, Aylesbury & Slough, 1957, p268-272.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DyhZvKm8J, accessed on 26th February 2026.
  24. https://kartaview.orghttps://kartaview.org, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  25. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg/500px-Little_Lindi_Town_Bridge.jpg, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Burundi, accessed on 4th March 2026.
  27. https://www.sinfin.net/railways/world/burundi.html, accessed on 4th March 2026.