Tag Archives: Steam tram

The Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway and the Wolverton Works

The featured image for this article shows a Bagnall saddle-tank engine and train of two 100-seat workmen’s cars in L.N.W.R. livery on the Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway.

Wolverton Works

The LNWR works at Wolverton. The tramway crosses this plan on Stratford Road. [13: p19]

An enlarged key to the plan above which details the use of each building on the LNWR Site. [13: p19]

Mainly by reason of the growth of the London North Western Railway works at Wolverton in the late 1870s, and the establishment of McCorquodale’s printing works alongside in 1878, a scheme to link the old market town of Stony Stratford, on Watling Street, with the London & North Western Western Railway station at Wolverton by means of a light railway began to take tangible form in 1882.” [1: p547]

Wolverton Railway Works was established in Wolverton, Buckinghamshire, by the London and Birmingham Railway Company in 1838 at the midpoint of the 112-mile-long (180-kilometre) route from London to Birmingham. The line was developed by Robert Stephenson following the great success of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway line. [2]

The Victorian era new towns of Wolverton and New Bradwell were built to house the workers and service the works. The older towns of Stony Stratford and Newport Pagnell grew substantially too, being joined to it by the Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway and the Wolverton to Newport Pagnell Line (a branch line), respectively. The trams were … hauled by steam locomotives: the tram cars were certainly the largest ever in the UK and possibly the world.” [2]

After a survey of all possible sites for the London and Birmingham Railway works, “Wolverton was chosen due to its co-location alongside the wharfing facilities of the Grand Union Canal, thereby also enabling the railway company to gain an easy agreement to build a viaduct over the canal company’s land at this point.”

In 1837, Edward Bury of Bury Curtis & Kennedy of Liverpool was appointed Locomotive Superintendent of the London to Birmingham railway with his headquarters at Wolverton. However, as Wolverton was simply considered to be a repair shop for the engines his Liverpool firm supplied to run on the line, he left the running of the Works to his Shop Foreman.” [3]

It became necessary for expansion to take place to accommodate, service and repair the increasing amount of rolling stock owned by the Company. “A large engine shed was built, said to be cathedral sized, together with all supporting facilities which also enabled the Works” [3] to produce, locomotives in house.

J E McConnell was appointed Superintendent in 1847. He built his first locomotive in 1849. This was “the prototype of the ‘Bloomer’ class (the wheels and works being more exposed the engines became know as Bloomers after Mrs Amelia Bloomer who was trying to reform ladies dress). During his time at Wolverton he made many innovations such as train heating, failsafe braking, hollow axles, boilers, fireboxes etc. Early in 1851, the first Bloomer engines were running.” [3]

Bloomer was a name used to refer to three similar classes of 2-2-2 express passenger locomotives designed by James McConnell. “A total of seventy-four were built between 1851 and 1862. The classes were similar in design and layout but differed in dimensions.” [4]

A LNWR engine No. 602, a Small Bloomer Class Locomotive. The photograph was taken circa. 1868 at Rugby’s coke sheds. The Class was introduced in 1854, they were inside-cylinder inside-frame single-wheelers with 6′-6″ driving wheels. [4]

In 1859, thirty four engines were transferred from Crewe to Wolverton which involved further expansion of the Works. Under McConnell the Works flourished but unfortunately for him Mr Richard Moon was appointed Chairman of the Company and there was a clash of personalities resulting in McConnell retiring. A year or two after his retirement the engineering works were transferred to Crewe. Before the transfer to Crewe, 165 engines had been built at Wolverton.” [3]

Expansion of the Works again took place during 1864 when Wolverton became the Carriage Works for the LNWR and the manufacturing shops were converted to enable carriages to be built, painted and repaired. In 1869 two Royal Saloons for Queen Victoria were built at Wolverton. Sadly in 1872 the locomotive shop finally closed and Wolverton became exclusively a carriage works until in 1877 it was the largest in Britain.” [3]

Image No. EPW022487 looking West over Wolverton Works in 1928. The Grand Junction Canal runs through the right half of this image, © Historic England. [7]

It seems that the original railway main line through Wolverton crossed land which was needed for the expansion of Wolverton Works. Two previous stations had been situated in the original route of the main line. “The first station was built for the opening of the London and Birmingham Railway on 17th September 1838, on the embankment just north of the canal above Wolverton Park. It proved to be temporary as the railway company purchased an additional 13.5 acres to the south, where they built a larger, more permanent station in 1840, at the east end of Church Street.” [8]

To avoid passing through the Wolverton Carriage Works, a railway main line deviation to the east was opened in August, 1881. The present Wolverton Station was built on the new line.

This rather fuzzy extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1900 shows the extent of the Railway Works at that time. To the West of the Railway Works was the site of McCorquodale’s Printing Works which can just be made out at the left edge of this map extract. The Grand Junction Canal sits between the Works and the Railway Station. [9]

McCorquodale’s Printing Works

McCorquodale’s Printing Works were one of a series of such establishments.  McCorquodales built premises in Wolverton in 1878. The firm specialised in registered envelope manufacture, but undertook many other government and security printing contracts. The “history of the company commenced in 1841. George McCorquodale opened a stationers shop in Liverpool which became the Liverpool Printing and Stationery Company Ltd. The company prospered and five years later George opened the first McCorquodale printing works at Newton-le-Willows in Lancashire, specialising in providing a service to the ever expanding railway network.” [5]

Further factories were opened in Glasgow and London in the 1870s. In Wolverton, men were employed in the railway works but their daughters remained unemployed. “Sir Richard Moon, Chairman of the London & North Western Railway had an idea for solving the problem and contacted his friend George McCorquodale and suggested that he build a printing works in the town. George thought it an admirable suggestion and in 1878 he opened his registered envelope factory – success was immediate. The works rapidly increased in size and diversified into printing books, forms and commercial stationery.” [5]

By 1886, McCorquodales of Wolverton was known as one of the finest printing factories in the country and employed 120 women and 20 men. Most of the girls started work at the age 13 or 14 and were normally employed until they married. Girls were encouraged to remain in the factory as long as possible and a £10 wedding grant was given to those who had completed 10 years service. Until 1909 staff worked a 54 hour week starting at 6am with a half day on Saturday. The company were also quick to provide the best welfare and working facilities in the area, and the staff were provided with dining, reading and recreation rooms. A Good Samaritan Society was started and pension funds paid for holidays and service bonuses.” [5]

McCorquodale’s Printing Works in Wolverton, © Public Domain. [6]
McCorquodale’s Printing Works at the turn of the 20th century. [10]

The Tramway

Lee tells us that in 1882 a special meeting of Stony Stratford ratepayers considered a proposal to apply to the Board of Trade for an Order to sanction a tramway between Wolverton and Stony Stratford. “The ratepayers approved, subject to the track nowhere exceeding 6 ft. in width. A company was formed, apparently by these local interests, and was incorporated on 4th November 1882, as the Wolverton & Stony Stratford Tramways Co. Ltd. The Chairman was Abraham Culverhouse, and the Secretary John George Ventris Field Johnson. The company failed to get under way, and was placed in voluntary liquidation on 3rd September 1883. One of its few corporate acts seems to have been the granting of consent, two days after it went into liquidation, to the registration of a new company with a similar (but not the same) name.” [1: p547]

The Bagnall Saddle Tank on the Tramway, note the protective side skirts and the extended chimney. This monochrome image is an old postcard, © Public Domain. [13: p15]

Meanwhile, a Tramways Order had been promoted by Frederick Charles Winby, a civil engineer and contractor, and this was granted on 16th July 1883. It authorised [a tramway] 2 miles 54 chains [in length], mainly of single line, 4 ft. gauge, from the new Wolverton Station (opened in August, 1881) to the northern end of High Street, Stony Stratford.” [1: p547]

Wolverton to Stony Stratford and beyond

From the new station the tramway ran South along the road built to bridge the diversion line and the Canal at the South end of the site of Wolverton Railway Station. This road had once been a footpath.

The fullest extent of the tramway. [1: p549]

The company promoted by Winby took the name, ‘The Wolverton & Stony Stratford & District Tramways Co. Ltd‘. It acquired all the rights and interests of Winby in the Tramways Order of 1883. Lee tells us that “It had an authorised capital of £20,000 in £1 shares, which was increased to £30,000 on 27th October 1883. The latter fact seems to have been forgotten, although it was duly registered and the requisite stamp duty paid. Indeed, the company had very little regard for the niceties of the Companies Acts, and actually varied its corporate name on the Memorandum and Articles of Association respectively. Thereafter, it could never remember the precise title shown on the certificate of registration, which is the one used above. Winby contracted to build the line, and to take part of the price in shares, but the whole arrangement fell through. The company was dormant until 1886, and only 34 shares were issued.” [1: p548]

C.H. Wikinson, a local contractor that promoted a number of schemes in the area (such as a link between Newport Pagnell and Olney), “entered into a contract with the company on 18th August 1886, to build the line for £13,325, and on 8th September 1886. agreed under an indenture to accept £2,000 in shares. The name of the company was changed on 5th October 1886, to the Wolverton, Stony Stratford & District Light Railways Co. Ltd., and its shares were offered for sale. They were taken up by a large number of local [people], and the work proceeded rapidly.” [1: p548]

Lee continues: “The line as authorised in 1883 received Board of Trade sanction on 20th May 1887, in respect of 2 miles 15 chains single line and 40 chains double. It was built to the 3 ft. 6 in. gauge instead of the 4 ft. originally authorised. Public passenger traffic was begun on 27th May 1887, between the Barley Mow Inn, Stony Stratford, and Wolverton Station, with tramway-type steam locomotives hauling very large covered-top double-deck tramcars. The ordinary fare was 2d., with a special cheap rate for workmen, whereas the horse bus that had previously served the route charged 6d.” [1: p548]

Allan Edwards says: Wolverton “grew rapidly to an austere and symmetrical pattern, its housing owned by the railway company and leased to its employees; it seemed almost to be a northern industrial town misplaced in the agricultural heart of England. Stony Stratford meanwhile declined, becoming largely a dormitory town for its now larger neighbour. … By 1880, hundreds of workmen were walking daily to Wolverton from Stony Stratford and the surrounding villages. An alternative form of transport was a horse bus from Stony Stratford but the fare for this was 6d (22p) for a single journey, a price beyond the wage of the workmen of the now London & North Western Railway Co., or the new McCorquodale’s printing works whose average wage was only 30 shillings per week (£1.50).” [13: p15]

The old bus service did not run to a timetable, only travelling when there were sufficient passengers. “Average bus receipts were between £2 and £3 a week, but the tramway takings rapidly became £45 a week, largely by reason of the use of the line made by employees at the Wolverton carriage Works and at McCorquodale’s. Weekly tickets were issued to them at 1 shilling and entitled them to 4 journeys a day.” [1: p548]

A steam tram service sitting outside the entrance to Wolverton Railway Station. The picture has clearly been posed! © Public Domain. [1: p554]

Another view of the steam tram waiting at Wolverton Railway Station. As these two images show, the passenger facilities were accessed at road level from the bridge over the main line railway, © Public Domain. [23]

Wolverton Railway Station and the terminus of the tramway. The Grand Junction Canal is just to the West of the Railway Station. Wolverton Works extended to the West side of the canal. This and subsequent extracts come from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1900. [11]
The tramway ran along the South side of Wolverton Works. [11]
The tramway continued West along Stratford Road. [11]
The same area is covered by the three map extracts immediately above. [14]
Looking South towards Stratford Road at the roundabout which sits at the same location as the Wolverton & Stony Stratford Tramway terminus. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
Looking West across the bridge over the main line. This carried the tramway over the railway. The location of the Wolverton Works is on the right side of the image. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
The view North from Stratford Road Bridge over the main line railway station. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
The view West along Stratford Road (and hence the route of the old tramway) with the boundary wall of the old Wolverton Works on the right. The building shed to the left was the Market House with a Laundry out of view behind it to the left. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
Further West on Stratford Road, this is the view West along the road from the bridge over what was once the main line. The boundary wall on the right enclosed what, in the 21st century, is the site of a Tesco Superstore but which once was the site of the Wolverton Works. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
The view North along what was the original main line. A Tesco superstore is off the left of this view. The building directly ahead of the camera with the three cream doors is one of the old works buildings which sits on the far side of the canal. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
This extract comes from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1898, published in 1900. At the time of the Survey Wolverton as a town did not extend to the full length of the Works. [12]
A Stony Stratford-bound service sitting outside the main works entrance which is off the image to the left, © Public Domain. [13: p18]
Another view of workmens’ trains outside the Wolverton Works. Allan Edwards says that at the time this photograph was taken, the entire rolling stock of the tramway was sitting outside the Wolverton Works. Closest to the camera is Green Engine No. 2 with two 100-seater tramcars, behind which is No. 1 with an 80-seater tramcar and a 100-seater tramcar.  [1: p551][13: p17]

Wolverton was a railway town built to accommodate the workers. It has since expanded significantly. Much of the old Works site and the railway ‘village’ of terraced housing form a Conservation Area in the 21st century.

Allan Edwards describes the route of the tramway through Wolverton like this: Outside Wolverton Station goods yard there was a turning triangle on a steeply descending section of road and a link into the station goods yard. From this location, trams “climbed steeply on a right-hand curve to the road bridge over the 4-track railway line where tramway passengers could board outside the overline buildings of the LNWR station. The tramway then continued up and over the lines leading into the railway works. … With its track in the centre of the highway the tramway passed the railway workshops, the town of Wolverton being entirely on the left-hand side. Virtually continuous brick walls to the right sealed off first the LNWR works and then McCorquodale’s printing factory. It was nearly three quarters of a mile before the tramway line abruptly left the town behind, moving to the lefthand side of the road.” [13: p17]

McCorquodale’s Printing Works were beyond the western extent of Wolverton’s railway town. [12]
The tramway continued West along Stratford Road. [12]
The area today is much more developed! [14]
Continuing West along Stratford Road following the route of the old tramway. The Tesco Superstore is behind the brick built buildings on the right of this image. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
The old tramway continued along Stratford Road. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
And again, further West on Stratford Road. [Google Streetview, September 2023]

The next three images continue to show Stratford Road running along the South side of the site of Wolverton Works. …

[Google Streetview, September 2023]
[Google Streetview, September 2023]
[Google Streetview, September 2023]

We are now beyond the West end of the Works site. The next three images show Stratford Road heading West towards a modern roundabout at Old Wolverton Road. …

[Google Streetview, September 2023]
[Google Streetview, September 2023]
[Google Streetview, September 2023]

Edwards says that, “The route was almost straight but a fierce hill faced engines travelling towards Wolverton at almost the halfway point of the route where the old road to Wolverton (the remaining buildings of the original hamlet somewhat west of the new industrial town having by this time received the suffix ‘Old’) diverged from the newer, more direct course that the tramway traversed.” [13: p17]

Old Wolverton Road meets Stratford Road at an acute angle. The tramway continued West along Stratford Road. [12]
In the 21st century, Old Wolverton Road has been realigned to meet Stratford Road at a roundabout as part of a western bypass around Wolverton. [14]

The next three Google Streetview images take the route of the tramway across the modern roundabout at the junction between Stratford Road and Old Wolverton Road to the original junction between the two roads. …

[Google Streetview, September 2024]
[Google Streetview, September 2024]
Wolverton Park is to the North of the junction in this Streetview image. [Google Streetview, September 2024]

Lee provides just one paragraph which relates to the route travelled. He tells us that “In its maximum form, the undertaking began at the cattle sidings, Wolverton Station, and ran as a single line in the middle of the road through Wolverton. It then kept to its own track for about a mile, on the south side of the road to a point half a mile before the Wolverton Road joins the main Holyhead Road. The line there crossed over the Wolverton Road to its own track on the north side, but transferred once more to the middle of the public road through Stony Stratford. It thus traversed Wolverton Road to the junction, and turned sharply to the right (north west) along the Holyhead Road, here called High Street, and later Watling Street. At Old Stratford, the Deanshanger extension turned even more sharply to the left from Watling Street, and ran on its own track on the left-hand (south-east) side of the road.” [1: p549]

As we have already seen, Edwards description gives a little more detail: “Shortly before entering Stony Stratford the line abruptly cut across to the opposite side of the road. More than one pioneer motorist was apparently taken unawares by the sudden appearance of a steam tram engine and its trailers across his bows!” [13: p17]

This photograph was taken a few hundred yards from Stony Stratford. Allen Edwards says that the line crossed the road  just ahead of the camera. A sign was provided as a warning, but apparently the sudden movement of the tram across the road surprised many pioneer motorists. [13: p17]
After the junction with Old Wolverton Road Descent to Wolverton Park, the tramway continued West-southwest on Stratford Road. [12]
The road and tramway ran to the South side of Wolverton House. [12]
And continued West-southwest towards Stony Stratford. [12]
This extract from railmaponline.com’s satellite imagery covers much the same length of the Stratford Road as shown in the three OS map extracts immediately above. The A5 dual carriageway is clearly an addition to the landscape. As is the road immediately to its West. [14]
Stratford Road facing Southwest with the modern A5 spanning the route of the old tramway. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
To the West of the A5 Stratford Road crosses Queen Eleanor Street. [Google Streetview, September 2024]

This next smaller map extract brings the line to the edge of the Ordnance Survey map sheet and  shows the beginning of the housing at the eastern edge of Stony Stratford. [12]

Edwards continues his description of the line: “Entering the town the line again took up position in the centre of the road. It had traversed just one mile from Wolverton. After a few hundred yards the road came to a T-junction with Watling Street outside The Forester’s Arms public house.” [13: p17]

This next extract is from the 1923 Ordnance Survey, published in 1925. It shows the tramway heading towards the road junction in Stony Stratford. The tramway depot features in the top left of the extract. [15]
The tramway depot as shown on the 1898 25″ ordnance survey. At this time, an additional access from the depot to Wolverton Road ran along what, in the 21st century, is known as St. Mary’s Avenue. There was a loop behind the depot which turned South-southeast running through the depot building and down to Wolverton Road along St. Mary’s Avenue. [21]
The old tramway runs Southwest towards the road junction in Stony Stratford. Railmaponline.com shows a loop at the location of the tramway depot, but not the detailed track layout in the depot. [14]
Facing towards Stoney Stratford just a couple of hundred yards beyond Queen Eleanor Street. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Continuing down Wolverton Road towards the centre of Stony Stratford. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
St. Mary’s Avenue was one of the access points to the Tram Depot. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The main access to the Tramway Depot. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The LNWR track plan of the tram depot at Stony Stratford. It comprised a large shed for holding the tramcars, and a smaller one for the engines and the repair facilities. As far as is known all the repairs were undertaken in situ, but there were few machine tools available. Also in the depot were coaling and watering arrangements for the engines. [17]
Looking into the Tramway Depot site from the access road. After the tramway closed the building (behind the garage in the foreground, so not visible) was used as a bus depot [Google Streetview, June 2023]
The current building on the site of the tramway depot. [Google Maps, January 2026]
Continuing Southwest down Wolverton Road. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Approaching the Junction with High Street, Stony Stratford. The Forresters Arms is on the right. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
A passing loop occupied the highway with the tramway turning to the Northwest. On this 1898 survey, the tramway is shown terminating just after the 90° turn onto the High Street in Stony  Stratford. [15]
This extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery includes the length of line in the extract above and extends a little to the West. St. Mary & St.Giles Church, which is just beyond the West side of the OS map extract above can be made out towards the left of this image. [14]

The view Northeast along Wolverton Road in Stony Stratford. The depot is behind the housing in the middle distance. To the left of the camera the tramway ran away to the Northwest. The Forresters Arms is on the left side of the photograph. This image was shared on the Stony Stratford Photos Facebook Group by Edward Corney on 20th November 2018. [22]

The same view along Wolverton Road in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, September 2023]
At the Forrester’s Arms, Stony Stratford, this photograph gives a good impression of the length of the large bogie cars. The locomotive was built by Thomas Green & Son in 1887 © Public Domain. [1: p552][25]
Green Engine No. 2 at the Forresters Arms in Stony Stratford with two 100-seater tram cars. [13: p18]
Kraus engine and 44ft., 100-seat bogie tramcar in Stony Stratford about 1888. [1: p552]
The conductor William Newton is just stepping off one of the tramcars at Stony Stratford sometimes after the line came under LMS control at the Grouping’. Note the motor car and the double-decker bus at the kerbside on the left of the image. [13: p16]

Edwards says that at the junction adjacent to the Forresters Arms, “The tramway turned right … to continue northwards beyond The Cock and The Bull hotels for another half mile to terminate outside The Barley Mow public house, the last building in the town.” [13: p17]

Looking Northwest along High Street, Stony Stratford. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The 25″ 1898 Ordnance Survey, published in 1900 does not show the tramway running Northwest along High Street, Stony Stratford. Which suggests that it was removed by the publication date in 1900. We know that the line was active until at least 4th September 1899. [15][1: p549]
The line ran Northwest along High Street, Stony Stratford passing the Rising Sun public house and originally terminating at the Barley Mow Public House opposite the town’s Gas Works. [15]
This extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery shows the length of the route of the old tramway from St. Mary & St. Giles Church (bottom-right) to the River Great Ouse (top-left).  [14]
The Barley Mow Public House was the terminus of the first length of the line and the point at which the extension to Deanshanger started. The length of Watling Street shown on this OS map extract is within the length of the line shown on the last extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery above. [15]
St. Mary’s & St. Giles Church, High Street, Stony Stratford [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Looking Northwest along High Street from just outside the church. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Further Northwest on High Street, looking towards the River Great Ouse. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Heading towards the River Great Ouse along the line of the old tramway. The Stony Stratford by-pass (Queen Eleanor Street) joins the road ahead of the camera.  [Google Streetview, September 2023]

An extension, which opened fully in 1898, continued Northwest from the Barley Mow towards the River Ouse and the County border.

Lee tells us that from the outset, it had been intended to cater also for goods traffic: “this was not begun until March, 1888. A contract was made with the LNWR. to deliver its goods, which was stated to save the main-line railway £500 per annum. With an eye to goods traffic principally, Wilkinson promoted an extension from High Street, Stony Stratford, to Deanshanger, which was sanctioned by Order of 19th July 1887, authorising 2 miles 3 chains of 3 ft. 6 in. gauge. Deanshanger was the location of the Britannia Ironworks, the agricultural implement works of E. & H. Roberts, established in 1820.” [1: p548]

Allan Edwards tells us that, “Leaving The Barley Mow and taking its normal position in the middle of the road the extension travelled straight for almost three quarters of a mile over the embankment that carried the highway across the floodplain of the River Ouse. The river was the county border. Climbing very steeply into the Northamptonshire village of Old Stratford, the line then swung sharp left onto the Buckingham road. A separate depot and workshop for this section of line was established at this corner. … The line then ran parallel to the Buckingham arm of the Grand Junction canal to Deanshanger where it terminated on the village green outside The Fox & Hounds public house. This extension was sanctioned by the Board of Trade on 24th May 1888 and immediately came into public use.” [13: p18]

It seems that a section of 14 chains from the bottom of High Street, across the Great Ouse, to Old Stratford, was built quite quickly and opened later in 1887. “The major portion of the extension was complete at the time a visit to the undertaking was paid by the Civil & Mechanical Engineers Society on Saturday, 12th May 1888, and the party was given a run over the new line. Sanction of the Board of Trade was given on 24th May 1888, to 1 mile 56 chains single and 13 chains double of the Deanshanger extension, and this appears to have been brought into use for public passenger and goods traffic forthwith, extending from Old Stratford to The Green, Deanshanger, near the Fox & Hounds Inn. The intended extension to the Dukes Head Inn was never buiit. From Wolverton to Deanshanger, the through fare was 4d. This section seems to have remained Wilkinson’s property, and to have been leased to the company.” [1: p548]

The road bridge over the River Great Ouse can be seen in the bottom right of this next extract from the 1898 25″ Ordnance Survey. [15]
Only a short distance further Northwest at the junction adjacent to the Swan Inn and Smithy in Old Stratford, the tramway extension turned left and soon found itself following the Buckingham Branch of the Grand Junction Canal. [15]
This extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery covers the same length of the old line as the two extracts from the OS mapping immediately above. [14]
The Tramway route crossed the River Great Ouse on the road bridge. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The Tramway turned left at the junction in Old Stratford onto what in the 21st century is called Deanshanger Road. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
Heading South-southwest along Deanshanger Road, along what was the route of the extension to the tramway to Deanshanger. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The tramway continued South-southwest alongside the canal. [15]
And again the tramway route followed the Buckingham Branch of the Grand Junction Canal.  [15]
The tramway continued South-southwest as the canal turned away towards the West. [15]
This extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery covers the majority of the length of the line as shown on the three OS map extracts immediately above. [14]
Deanshanger Road facing South. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
A relatively tight curve appears to have taken the tramway onto the road to Deanshanger. However, the research that was done to prepare the railmaponline.com representation of the line suggests that the line left the highway and ran on its own formation for a few hundred yards.  [18]
This extract from the railmaponline.com satellite imagery takes the line as far as the OS map extract above. The route of the old line is shown in this image following the Buckingham Branch of the Grand Junction Canal. A modern public footpath/cycleway is shown taking a tighter curve. Could the alignment of the footpath/cycleway be that of the old tramway? [14]
The modern Deanshanger Road joins the A422 as it heads South. The route of the old tramway is probably followed by the tarmac footpath to the left of the no entry sign. It follows the line of the old road. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
The footpath shown on the right of this image matches the line of the old tramway. [Google Streetview, September 2024]
If the footpath/cycleway is on the line of the old tramway, then the bridge over roundabout is on the line of the old tramway. [Google Streetview, July 2018]
Running parallel to the canal but a distance to the South, the tramway/road headed towards Deanshanger. [18]
Continuing to the West on the South side of Northfield’s farm and the Buckingham Branch of the Grand Junction Canal the edge of the Ordnance Survey map sheet is reached before the road entered Deanshanger. [18]
This final extract from the Ordnance Survey mapping of the turn of the 20th century shows the settlement of Deanshanger with its Iron Works. The tramway terminated adjacent to the Fox & Hounds Inn, the intended extension to the Dukes Head Inn in the bottom-left of this map extract. [19]
The remaining length of the tramway as shown on the railmaponline.com satellite imagery. [14]
Heading West along the line of the old tramway on Stratford Road. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Further West on Stratford Road. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
Approaching The Green, Deanshanger where the tramway terminated. [Google Streetview, May 2023]
The line beyond the Fox & Hounds was not built. It was also intended to link the Iron Works to the tramway as shown here. This short link was also never built. Britannia Iron Works was owned by E.H. Roberts. The Iron Works was always satisfied with using the canal for exporting its finished products and could not be persuaded to use the tramway. [20]
Krauss Engine and 50-seater tramcar at the Green, Deanshanger, in 1888. [1: p550]

Operation

Edwards tells us that “On Friday 17th May 1887 prior to the Whitsuntide holiday horses pulled the first tram from Wolverton station goods yard to Stony Stratford tram depot. On board were Charles Aveline (the Managing Director) and other officials of the tram company. For the return journey the horses were replaced by one of the two Krauss tram engines. Local school children were given free tickets.” [13: p17]

By 1st September 1887, Lee tells us, “the issued capital was no less than £20,000, which must be regarded as a gross over-capitalisation. Nevertheless, the nominal capital was increased on 21st June 1889, by £5,000, stated to be beyond £20,000, as the nominal increase of 1883 had been forgotten, and additional stamp duty was paid. A further change of name was also made at this period, and became effective on 26th July 1889, whereby the legal title became the ‘Wolverton, Stony Stratford & District Tramroads Co. Ltd.’ Shortly afterwards, the company declared itself insolvent, and went into voluntary liquidation on 4th September 1889. This was not acceptable to the creditors, and by Court Order of 26th October the winding up was made compulsory, and subject to the Court. The undertaking was placed in the hands of the official liquidator on 17th December, and the line was closed. Much of it was never reopened.” [1: p549]

The original portion, between Wolverton and Stony Stratford, was purchased by a syndicate of Bedford businessmen who reopened the Wolverton to Stony Stratford section in November 1891 and it was known as the ‘Wolverton, Stony Stratford District New Tramway’ and this was formally incorporated  on 15th September 1893 with a capital of £5000 in £100 shares. The nominal capital was increased by £3000 (30 shares) at the end of January 1907. It ran until liquidation in 1919. The Deanshanger extension never re-opened. [16][1: p551]

Lee continues: “For many years the Stony Stratford terminus was at the Cock Hotel, but by 1910 the line was curtailed to a few yards in High Street, and in 1919 the terminus was at the Foresters Arms. After the first world war, the line was rapidly approaching derelict condition, and the company’s financial difficulties compelled it to go into liquidation on 17th July 1919; George Henry Margrave (then Secretary and Manager) was appointed liquidator. The local authorities refused to take over the line, and it seemed that the service would be finally abandoned, despite the fact that it had been conveying some 700 workmen daily, principally employees of the Wolverton Carriage Works and of the printing works of McCorquodale & Co. Ltd.” [1: p551]

Grace’s Guide continues: “In the early 1920s the line was taken over by the London and North Western Railway (LNWR) who purchased a new W. G. Bagnall tram locomotive. After the LNWR was merged into the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) the line was soon closed, in 1926.” [16]

After purchase by the LNWR, the tramway was completely re-laid with concrete placed beneath the rails to strengthen them. Lee tells us that “under LNWR management the staff consisted of three drivers, three conductors, one fitter, one bricklayer and two labourers.” [1: p551]

Under LNWR management prior to the ‘grouping’, the surviving rolling stock “comprised three small four-wheel locomotives, five bogie double-deck cars, and two 10-ton coke trucks. The passengers continued to be principally Stony Stratford men employed at the Railway Works or at McCorquodale’s in Wolverton. They then numbered about 600 daily, of whom some 550 were weekly season-ticket holders. Although the number of men employed at the works increased as time went on, the working loss to the L.N.W.R. increased also, on account of the competition of motorbuses which gave a quicker service. In 1926, no fewer than 12 of these vehicles plied between Wolverton and Stony Stratford, and the trams, with their speed limit of 8 m.p.h. were almost deserted. Schemes of electrification were considered by the railway company (by now the L.M.S.R.), but they all proved too costly, and the climax came with the General Strike of that year, when on 4th May the service was suspended, never to be resumed. Latterly, the services (which, according to the railway company’s timetable, were run “subject to the condition of roads and other circumstances permitting”) had comprised about 14 trips each way, with one or two additional on Saturdays. There were three cars in each direction on Sundays. The journey time was 15 minutes. The official abandonment was announced on 19th May 1926, and it was stated that the company had been losing £2,000 a year on the service. Latterly the total takings were only about £30 a week. [1: p553]

The LMS negotiated with Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) which took over the track in 1927 with the Ministry of Transport’s consent. BCC immediately began lifting the track and reconstructing the road surface. Work began in June 1927, by November 1927 the length between Watling Street and Clarence Road in Stony Stratford was completed. The section between Clarence Road and McCorquodale’s Printing Works was addressed between October 1933 and June 1934.

Rolling Stock – Locomotives

Lee tells us that, “the original locomotives consisted of two German engines supplied by Krauss & Company of Munich to a standard design then used in many continental cities for steam tramways. Some accounts of the line have stated that three, and even four, engines were provided at first, but the Board of Trade Returns to 30th June 1887, show only two, and others (if any) were presumably on loan. They had outside cylinders 8 in. in diameter by 12 in. stroke, wheels 2 ft. 6 in. in diameter, and a 5 ft. wheelbase. The working pressure was 175 lb. per sq. in. and they were non-condensing. Stephenson valve gear was used.” [1: p553]

The Krauss locomotive and a 20-seat open-sided tramcar on an inspection trip in May 1988. The location of the photograph is not known. The tramcar was not used after 1889 and remained in Stony Stratford tram depot for many years, © Public Domain. [1: p550]
One of the Krauss locomotives is posed outside Wolverton Works,© Public Domain. [29]
Another view of one of the Krauss tramway locomotives, this time in Stony Stratford close to the Forresters Arms, © Public Domain. [30]

Edwards tells us that these Krauss locomotives, “with their distinctively European canopies and massive oil lights, soon earned the tramway the nickname ‘the little German‘.” [13: p17]

These Krauss locomotives were similar to tram locomotives sent to the Chiemseebahn in the same year, but smaller. They were rated at 40 hp and were governed to run no faster than 10 mph (16 km/h). Board of Trade regulations also required that the running gear had to be shrouded, steam exhaust had to be directed into condensers to avoid visible steam, smoke as well had to be invisible and had to be almost noiseless. [24]

This is one of the Krauss 0-4-0 metre-gauge tram locomotives built for the Chiemseebahn in the same year as those built for the Wolverton & Stony Stratford Tramway – this is Works No. 1813 of 1887. It is in excellent condition in the 21st century, operable and in frequent service. It is unique – in that this is the only example still working in regular commercial service on the line for which it was supplied. A diesel-powered replica now helps out. [25]

Sadly, unlike the locomotives sent to the Chiemseebahn, the Krauss locomotives supplied to the Wolverton & Stony Stratford Tramway “were found to be unable to handle the heavy passenger rolling stock, and two, more powerful, engines were supplied in 1887 by Thomas Green & Son of Leeds, designed to haul two large passenger cars fully loaded. These had 9 in. cylinders by 14 in. stroke, 2 ft. 6 in. wheels, and a 5 ft. wheelbase; the working pressure was 175 lb. These engines were of the tramway type with atmospheric condensers on the roof. The total loaded weight was 9-9.5 tons. A further locomotive was secured in 1900 from the Brush Electrical Engineering Co. Ltd., Falcon Works, Loughborough, which was generally similar to the Green engines, and had inside cylinders 7.5 in. in diameter by 12 in. stroke. This also worked at 175 lb. pressure and had an atmospheric condenser.” [1: p553]

Thomas Green commenced building tramway locomotives in 1882. [27] These locomotives were initially of the Wilkinson’s patent, built under licence. This design used a vertical boiler and a vertically mounted engine which drove one set of wheels through gears. The second pair of wheels was driven through coupling rods. The exhaust passed through a chamber in the firebox to provide reheat, which in principle would make the steam invisible. The speed governor was an “Allen” paddle type which acted on the reversing gear. [26]

Thirty-nine Wilkinson type trams were delivered before Green’s developed their own design using a horizontal boiler, inclined cylinders and Joy valve gear. These tram engines first appeared in August 1885. The machine quickly evolved such that Green’s tram engines became one of the market leaders. [26][27] It was Green’s own design of tram engine that was supplied to the Wolverton & Stony Stratford Tramway.

An advert for Thomas Green & Son Ltd. steam tramway engines, © Public Domain. [27]
A typical Thomas Green steam tram locomotive, one of 14 supplied to Blackburn Corporation Tramways Company in 1887, © Public Domain. [28]
One of the Thomas Green tramway locomotives about to set off for Wolverton from outside the Forresters Arms in Stony Stratford with two of the 44ft carriages in its train, © Public Domain. [31]

Lee continues: “After the acquisition of the line by the LNWR., a four-coupled saddle-tank engine was secured, in 1921, from W. G. Bagnall Limited of Stafford. Excepting that the motion was boxed in, this locomotive was of conventional railway design, without the tramway type casing over the upper works. Outside cylinders were 10 in. in diameter by 15 in. stroke the coupled wheels 2 ft. 9.25 in. in diameter, and the wheelbase 5 ft. The working pressure was only 150 lb. The saddle tank carried 300 gal. of water and the side bunkers had a capacity of 18 cu. ft. The total weight in working order was 16 tons. This engine was finished in standard LNWR. livery. As the standard chimney was found to be too short for the comfort of upper deck passengers, an ugly stove-pipe extension was added.” [1: p553]

Drawings of the Bagnall and the Green locomotives, © Public Domain. [34]

Other Rolling Stock – Passenger Carriages

The passenger rolling stock consisted of large double-deck covered-top tramway cars which were mounted on bogies; “there were at first five in all, built by the Midland Carriage & Wagon Company, then of Shrewsbury, and these lasted throughout the life of the undertaking. The three of the largest type each seated 100 and were 44 ft. long and 5 ft. 9 in. wide; they were intended for the workmen and were said to be the largest tramway vehicles in the country. ” [1: p554]

A drawing of carriages No. 1, 2 and 3, © Public Domain. [34]
One of the 44ft long 100-seat carriages sits outside the Forresters Arms in Stony Stratford in 1903. One of the Thomas Green locomotives is about to take it to Wolverton, © Public Domain. [32]

Edwards comments that the 44ft long 100-seat tramcars were the largest “to run in this country until the Swansea and Mumbles Railway built their gigantic electric cars many years later. The coaches had two inward-facing benches on the lower deck and a single continuous slatted bench on the upper deck where passengers faced outwards. The upper sides were open to the elements apart from waist-high decency boards above which were fitted canvas blinds.” [13: p18]

A colourised postcard view of one of the 44ft tramway carriages outside the Forresters Arms in Stony Stratford. The view is unusually posed as many photographs chose to focus on a locomotive rather than a carriage! © Public Domain. [32]

Edwards continues: “Capstan-operated brakes were fitted on each end platform, the locomotives also being equipped to operate the trailer braking by pull-rods and chains. The couplings of these cars were attached to the bogie centres. Originally the illumination was provided by oil lamps but acetylene lighting was later installed to be replaced again by conventional Pinsch gas lighting after the takeover of the line by the LNWR.” [13: p18]

Three carriages in this train, pulled by one of the Thomas Green locomotives. The train is somewhere between Stony Stratford and Wolverton, © Public Domain. [33]

Lees says that “Another car, upholstered, accommodated 80 passengers and was 38 ft. long and 6 ft. wide; and one [which] seated only 50 passengers, was 24 ft. 6 in. long, and 5 ft. 9 in. wide.” [1: p554]

A drawing of the shorter carriage (24 ft. 6in. long), © Public Domain. [34]

Edwards mentions that the 80-seat tramcar had “neither decency boards or blinds on the upper deck as first built and, most unusually and inconveniently, internal landings to the staircases from the platforms. Decency boards and blinds were added later.” [13: p18]

The 50-seat tramcar “was the only one to be fitted with upholstered seating. One presumes that it was intended for use at times when the workmen would not be travelling. None of the tramcars carried external numbers and all of those mentioned were to last the lifetime of the undertaking.” [13: p18]

“A sixth car is shown in the Board of Trade Returns for the year ended 30th June 1888, and continued to feature until 1911. This was a small single-deck open-sided vehicle with curtains, seating 20 passengers, which does not appear to have been used after the closure of the line in 1889. For many years it remained in the depot at Stony Stratford.” [1: p554]

Other Rolling Stock – Goods

In its early years the undertaking had a number of parcel vans and small goods wagons, as well as 10-ton coal and coke trucks, 24 ft. long, also built by the Midland Carriage & Wagon Company. Eight goods trucks were shown in the return to the Board of Trade for 30th June 1888, at the time goods traffic was begun. It seems that goods traffic declined quite early in the history of the undertaking and all the parcel vans and most of the wagons were sold for scrap. Two of the wagons were of interest in having wheels with adjustable flanges so as to be capable of operating either on rail or road. The flanges were in sections and so arranged that they could be withdrawn inside the tread surface. When the train reached the Cock Hotel, they were, hauled off the line by horses to effect delivery at the door of the consignee. Two horses are shown in the company’s stock in 1888 and 1889. In its later years, the traffic was wholly passenger, apart from the carriage of mails.” [1: p554]

And finally

Grace’s Guide says that, “The line was unusual for a British street tramway being entirely worked by steam locomotives; indeed it was the last steam worked street tramway in the United Kingdom.” [16]

References

  1. Charles E. Lee; The Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway; in The Railway Magazine, Volume 98 No. 616; Tothill Press, London, August 1952, p547-554.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverton_railway_works, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  3. https://www.mkheritage.co.uk/mkm/wolvwork1.html, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LNWR_Bloomer_Class, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  5. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/archive/mkm/mccorq.html, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  6. https://wp.me/p178VP-fO, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  7. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EPW022487, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverton_railway_station, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.1&lat=52.06498&lon=-0.81119&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.5&lat=52.06314&lon=-0.81803&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 17th January 2026.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/104180609, accessed on 18th January 2026.
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114481013, accessed on 20th January 2026.
  13. Allan Edwards; The Stony Stratford Tramway;  in BackTrack Magazine Volume 3 No. 1; Atlantic Publishers, Spring 1989, p,15-20; via https://quavid.wordpress.com/about/the-wolverton-stony-stratford-tranway-2, accessed on 21st January 2026.
  14. https://railmaponline.com/UKIEMap.php, accessed on 21st January 2026.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114481007, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  16. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Wolverton_and_Stony_Stratford_Tramway, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  17. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/archive/mkm/workshop.html, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114481031, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/114481019, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  20. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/os/doc/tran/tra.html, accessed on 23rd January 2026.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.1&lat=52.05759&lon=-0.84939&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 24th January 2026.
  22. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17s7yE5aBp, accessed on 24th January 2026.
  23. https://www.livingarchive.org.uk/content/catalogue_item/the-sylvia-mead-collection/pq-views-of-new-old-bradwell/steam-tram-at-wolverton-station-with-goodmans-horse-drawn-cart-beside-it, accessed on 24th January 2026.
  24. https://www.steamlocomotive.com/locobase.php?country=Great_Britain&wheel=0-4-0&railroad=wsst, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  25. https://www.internationalsteam.co.uk/trams/steamtram05.htm#23, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Green_%26_Son, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  27. https://www.leedsengine.info/leeds/histtram.asp, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  28. https://www.lthlibrary.org.uk/library/PDF-217-2.pdf, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  29. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/archive/mkm/rou05-works.html, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  30. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/archive/mkm/history.html, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  31. https://ebay.us/m/dJ6aZw, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  32. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/archive/mkm/stonystratford/docs/tram.html, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  33. https://wolvertonpast.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-wolverton-and-stony-stratford-tram.html?view=timeslide&m=1, accessed on 26th January 2026.
  34. https://www.mkheritage.org.uk/os/doc/tran/tra.html, accessed on 26th January 2026.

The Giants’ Causeway and Portrush Tramway – The Modern Tramway, Vol. 13 No. 153

In the Summer of 2024, my wife and I visited Giants’ Causeway as part of a few days meandering along the North coast of Ireland. When reading a series of older copies of the Modern Tramway, I came across an article written in 1950. … The Modern Tramway of September 1950 featured an article by D. G. Evans about one of the very early electric tramways – The Giants’ Causeway and Portrush Tramway. His article is quoted in full in this article.

Wikipedia tells us that The Giants’ Causeway, Portrush, & Bush Valley Railway & Tramway was a “pioneering 3 ft (914 mm) narrow gauge electric railway operating between Portrush and the Giant’s Causeway on the coast of County Antrim, Northern Ireland. The line, 9 1⁄4 miles (14.9 km) long, was hailed at its opening as ‘the first long electric tramway in the world’. [2] The Giant’s Causeway and Bushmills Railway today operates diesel and steam tourist trains over part of the Tramway’s former course.” [3]

The Giants’ Causeway, Portrush, & Bush Valley Railway & Tramway. [24]

Writing in 1950, Evans says that:

“The recent decision of the shareholders to close down the Giant’s Causeway tramway was sad news to those who knew the line and can recall the pleasure of breezy rides along the cliff tops in the qua’nt cars that had seen but little change since their first day of operation. The line was the first tramway in the United Kingdom to be operated by electricity and the current was produced by a hydro- electric power station at Walkmills, one mile from the Bushmills terminus. A waterfall on the river Bush was the source of the hydro-electric power.

Opened from Portrush station to Bushmills in January, 1883, the line was extended to the ultimate terminus at Giant’s Causeway in 1887. The original current collection was from a side conductor rail 17in. above ground and 22in. from the inside running rail. This method was of course unsuited to a street tramway and the portion of the line which ran in the centre of the street through the town of Portrush was therefore worked by steam tram engines of the usual vertical boiler pattern. This method of operation of the first half-mile of the tramway persisted until 1899, when a change over to the overhead trolley system was made. From that date until 1915 the steam tram engines were retained for use during the peak traffic periods in the summer at which time the original power station proved inadequate for the needs of the system.” [1: p185]

The Giants’ Causeway, Portrush, & Bush Valley Railway & Tramway Company. [1: p 185]
The Portrush Railway Station in the 1890s. The tramway terminus is in the foreground and on the left of this image, © W. Lawrence, Public Domain. [4]
A similar view in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, July 2023]

Wikipedia gives some of the background to the opening of the line: “The Giant’s Causeway Tramway came about through the enthusiasm of William Atcheson Traill, M.A.Ing., of Ballylough (1844–1934), together with his brother Dr Anthony Traill, who between them undertook most of the promotion and fundraising for the line. W.A. Traill was a man with not only an interest in railways but also a keen interest in technological developments in engineering. The Act of Parliament incorporating ‘The Giant’s Causeway, Portrush, and Bush Valley Railway and Tramway Company’ was passed on 26th August 1880. It authorised a tramway from Portrush to Bushmills and a railway from there to join the Ballycastle Railway (also 3 ft. gauge) at Dervock. The only section of the railway never built was a short spur at Dervock. [5] The Dervock section was abandoned by an 1885 Act, which authorised extension from Bushmills to the Causeway.” [3][6]

At the Berlin Trade Fair of 1879 Siemens was demonstrating the first railway electrification system and it was that which led the British branch of the firm to be commissioned to incorporate this new technology into the Giant’s Causeway Tramway venture. Sir William Siemens (1823–83) was briefly a Director and Siemens Brothers of London were appointed electrical engineers to the company, their representative being Dr Edward Hopkinson, who later went on to work on the Bessbrook and Newry Tramway and the City & South London Railway. Surveying and civil engineering work was carried out by Edward Price, son of the eminent Irish civil engineer James Price.” [3]

The line was the world’s first to be powered by hydroelectricity, something that was later developed at Bessbrook and in Switzerland. Traill built a generating station at Walkmill Falls (24 feet (7.3 m)) head), near Bushmills, installing 104 horsepower (78 kW) Alcott water turbines to produce up to 250 volts at 100 amps of electrical power for his line. Later 160 horsepower (120 kW) turbines were installed. [8] This building, although without its equipment, is still in existence.” [3]

The hydroelectric scheme at Walkmills, © Unknown. [25]
A diagrammatic representation of the hydro electric scheme as included in The Engineer, Vol. 56, 1883,© Public Domain. [25]

Because of legal problems over water rights, erection of the Walkmills turbines was delayed and when the first section of the tramway, from Portrush to Bushmills, was opened on 29th January 1883 some of the timetabled passenger traffic was handled by steam tram engines which were in any case necessary on the town section in Portrush where it was impossible to provide electric power since this was originally fed to the trains via an elevated third rail which ran alongside the line. Therefore, a 25 horsepower (19 kW) steam generator was installed at the Portrush depot, [9] (by 1936 replaced by a 550 volt diesel generator for the Portrush-Dunluce section).” [3]

The tramway at Portrush – a steam tram can be seen on the right ▶️ f this week mage, © Public Domain. [18]

“The ceremonial opening, using electric traction, took place on 28th September 1883 although a full scheduled electric service did not begin until 5th November and steam locomotives remained available for use until at least 1926.” [3] In 1897, of the annual mileage travelled, “17,797 miles (28,641 km) were steam operated and 4,721 miles (7,598 km) electric. In 1901 the figures were 7,423 miles (11,946 km) and 23,550 miles (37,900 km) respectively. Very little use of steam was made after 1916.” [3]

Evans tells us that:

In 1915, the Portrush power plant was installed and the two remaining steam engines were kept as stand-by equipment for use in the event of electricity failures. They were finally sold in 1930 to a public works contractor.

The voltage was 550 d.c., the Portrush plant supplying the Portrush-Dunluce section and the original station outside Bushmills the remainder of the line. Laid to the 3ft. gauge, the line was 7.5 miles in length, single track throughout with loops at irregular intervals.

The loops were normally run through on the landward line, the other line being used only when it was necessary to pass another car. All points (except those at the Portrush terminus which were tramway section) were of light railway type, controlled by dolly-weighted point levers which normally held the rails set for the direct (or landward) line.” [1: p185]

Wikipedia tells us that “the section from Bushmills to the Giants’ Causeway opened on 1st July 1887. In 1895, a cyclist died of electric shock after coming into contact with the conductor rail. At the subsequent inquiry it was revealed that the line voltage varied from an average of 290 V up to 360 V, and the company agreed to a temporary reduction in the voltage, which limited the number of services that could be electrically worked. The third rail was replaced by overhead electric wire using side poles from 26th July 1899, apparently initially at 250 V. Voltage drop remained a problem and the tram was the subject of a song by the Irish Rovers which comments on its slow speed. The song was written by Hugh Speers of Bushmills. [10] After upgrading of the Bushmills generating station in 1907 it was possible to produce a 550 V output.” [3]

Evans continues:

As the wiring was double and followed the rails through the gantry type standards at loops, it followed that the trolley pole had to be changed from the wire normally used (the landward wire) to the seaward wire when a loop was to be used pass another tram. The writer has often seen this trolley changing performed whilst the cars her were at full speed on a downward grade and has marvelled at the dexterity with which the trolley wheel was placed on the opposite wire. The operation was also seen when the cars were descending the long hill outside Portrush. It seemed usual to lower the trolley bo boom west of White Rocks loop to the Holyrood Hotel. and coast from a point just West of White Rocks loop to the Holyrood Hotel.

The Portrush terminus was outside the N.C.C. (formerly B. & N.C.R.) station and consisted of a run-round loop and lay-by siding in Eglinton Street. At one time there was a short branch which diverged just beyond the loop and ran down to the Harbour, but this was taken up about 1893.” [1: p185-186]

The main line station at Portrush appears in this map extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey revised 1931 and published in 1934. The tramway terminus can be seen in Eglington Street. A harbour tramway can be seen on the West side of the Station. The Giants’ Causeway tramway ran North on Eglington Street before turning sharply to the right.[19]
The sharp turn to the right can be seen at the bottom of this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey. This is a different map sheet to the one above, also revised in 1931 but published in 1935. The tramway ran Southeast on Causeway Street. [20]
The area of Portrush covered by the map extracts above, as it appears on 21st century satellite imagery. The station is on the left, alongside Eglington Street, Causeway Street runs Southeast from close to the top-centre of the image. [Google Maps, January 2025]
Eglington Street looking North with the railway station on the left and a tram in the centre of the image, © Public Domain. [21]
Looking North along Eglington Street with the railway station on the left. [Google Streetview, July 2023]
The tramway turned sharply to the right at the junction shown in this photograph. The road beyond the memorial and leaving the right side of the image, is Causeway Street which the tramway followed out of town. [Google Streetview, July 2023]
A tram negotiating the tight curve close to the Methodist Church in Portrush, © Unknown. [21]
A very similar view in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, July 2023]
Looking Southeast along Causeway Street in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, July 2023]
Causeway Street led out of Portrush to the Southeast. The Gas Works sat on the North side of the tramway with the tramway depot just to the East. The depot was provided with two connections to the tramway. [19]
Looking North from Causeway Street at the tram depot building, © Public Domain. [21]

Evans continues:

For a short distance, the line ran due north before turning in a 75-degree curve into Causeway Street. The single track was of tramway section rails as far as the outskirts of the town. From a point near the depot the line was laid on flat-bottom light railway track on the seaward side of the Portrush-Bushmills road. The depot consisted of a dead end road with a permanent way yard at one side. The auxiliary power station was also here. This power station had a modern diesel plant installed in latter years.

After leaving the depot the line ran through open country on its roadside reservation. Climbing steadily, it passed the famous Royal Links and at White Rocks gained the cliff tops. Onward to Dunluce, the trams ran close to the sea and in places the cliffs fell almost sheer from the trackside. There can be no doubt that the tramway, with its open toast-rack cars, was the best means of appreciating this wild and rugged coast.” [1: p186]

The tramway depot can be seen on the left side of this extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey revised in 1931 and published in 1934. Top-right of the extract the tramway is back very close to the coast. [19]
White Rocks and the coast are just to the North of the edge of the map sheet. [22]
The junction on the left of the map extract is shown in this view which looks Northeast towards the sea. [Google Streetview, September 2022]
The tramway ran East along the coast and the White Rocks.[20]
Beyond the White Rocks it ran a little further from the cliff edge passing on the landward side of Dunluce Castle and Dunluce House and then on the seaward side of Gallows Hill. [20]
A steam-powered tram runs towards the Causeway and is seen here passing Dunluce Castle in 1890, © W. Lawrence, Public Domain. [3]

Evans continues, again:

Before reaching Dunluce, the tramway climbed to its highest point at Clooney Hill. This section, nearly 200ft, above the sea, abounded in sharp curves, gradients of 1 in 40 and even a short stretch of 1 in 30.

Beyond Dunluce, the line ran inland for a short distance below Gallows Hill, reaching the coast again at its most spectacular point. Here one could gaze down 140ft. to the foam-covered rocks below. From this point the line again ran inland and after three more passing loops reached Bushmills, a village known for its whisky. Bushmills had a light railway station provided with waiting room, luggage office and lavatories.” [1: p,186-187]

The tramway dropped back to the cliff edge at Gortnabane Cove and Peggy’s  Hole before turning inland. [20]
Gortnabane Cove and Peggy’s Hole as they appear on Google Maps. [Google Maps, January 2025]
The view out to sea from the sharp bend on the A2 which appears on the satellite image above. The tramway ran along this section of road. [Google Streetview, September 2022]
Turning away from the coast the tramway headed for Bushmills. This is the next 6″ OS Sheet to the East. It was revised in 1921 and published in 1935. [23]
A close up of the station at Bushmills (bottom-right). The branch to the Giants’ Causeway runs away North at the West end of the station site. The road to the South side of the station became the A2. [23]
The same location in the 21st century. The station occupied the area between the A2 and Ballaghmore Road. The tramway serving the Giants’ Causeway headed away to the North on a curve just to the West of the station building which is now a private home. The building show under the lilac flag for a Red Phone Box straddles the line of the old tramway. The tramway then crossed Ballaghmore Road before turning the Northwest to run adjacent to the road. [Google Maps, January 2025]
A tram on the curve heading off to the left of the door image for Giants’ Causeway, the original station was located off to the right of this image alongside the modern A2, © Public Domain. [21]
The location of the old Bushmills Tram Station. The station buildings are now a private home. [Google Streetview, June 2023]

Evans continues:

At one side of the station yard is a small tram shed with accommodation for two cars. The line to the car shed is of interest in that it was to have formed the beginning of an extension to Dervock on the 3ft. gauge Ballycastle Railway. It was with a view to through running with the latter railway that the narrow gauge was adopted for the electric line. The owners wisely decided that an extension to the Causeway would probably be more remunerative.

From Bushmills the line was completely private right-of-way and negotiated cuttings and embankments of railway proportions. After passing a loop, the Bushfoot Golf Links request halt was reached. Soon after this, the line crossed the Bush river by the impressive Victoria Jubilee Bridge, a three-span structure so named because it was erected in 1887.” [1: p187]

Looking North from Ballaghmore Road along the line of the old tramway. A modern standard gauge tourist line makes use of the formation of the old tramway from this level caution to its old terminus close to the Giants’ Causeway. The station platform for this modern railway can be seen on the right side of this image.  The tourist line was still in operation in December 2024. [Google Streetview, June 2023]
The line North of Bushmills ran on an independent formation over private land. For a distance it ran on the Northeast side of Ballaghmore Road before turning to the Northeast. It ran on the Northwest side of Bush River to the Victoria Jubilee Bridge. This is the 6″ Ordnance Survey again, revised in 1921 and published in 2935. [23]
The line ahead, at the end of the modern station car park. A footpath closely follows the line of the railway. [Google Streetview, June 2023]
For a few hundred metres the line runs parallel to Ballaghmore Road. It then turns away to the Northeast running across open country. [Google Streetview, June 2023]
The Victoria Jubilee Bridge was a fine lattice girder structure, carried on masonry piers, the centre span was 70 feet long and about 25 feet above the river. The extension to the Causeway opened in 1887 and as this was Queen Victoria’s golden jubilee year, Mr Traill named the bridge ‘The Victoria Jubilee Bridge’. It was constructed by P & W MacLennan at their Clutha Iron Works in Glasgow, the bridge withstood the test of time facing as it did Atlantic storms and sea spray.  It was finally demolished by the army in the 1970’s and replaced by a footbridge – now since itself replaced – by a new railway bridge for the heritage railway,© Public Domain. [21]
The relatively new replacement bridge over the River Bush as it appears on Google Earth (3D). The heritage line has a passing loop  on the North side of the river. [Google Earth, January 2025]
The 11.30am on 14th August 2012 from Bushmills passing the little-used (and rusty) Bushfoot Golf Links loop bound for the Causeway. This section, close to the public path and Bushfoot golf course is passed at walking pace, © Albert Bridge and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [26]

And, Evans again:

On the other side of the bridge the line passed through sandhills and rabbit warrens, reaching the coast again and following it for a short distance before finally turning inland for the last time. There were two loops between the Victoria Bridge and the terminus; the layout at this latter point consisted of a run-round loop and a siding. The passenger accommodation was unpretentious, consisting merely of a shelter. The tourist had still almost a mile to walk before reaching the Causeway itself, and here, as is usual in such places, he has to pay for admission.” [1: p187]

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey shows the remaining length of the line. The terminus is shown in the top-right of the image. [23]

Discover Portrush describes the last part of the journey, thus: “the tram would run behind Black Rock Strand for about half a mile before turning right and climbing towards the Causeway Terminal. On the left passengers would see Runkerry House, a fine red sandstone house constructed in a striking location. Then part of the McNaughten Estate, occupied by two unmarried McNaughten ladies – later it became a home for the elderly after being passed to the government in lieu of death duties. Later still, it became an outward bound centre and is now divided into apartments.” [21]

An enlarged detail from the OS map above showing the Causeway terminus of the line. [23]
The terminus of the modern preservation line sits on the site of the old terminus. It has a slightly more significant footprint! [28]
A number of carriages/trailers standing at the Causeway Hotel terminus of the line, © W. Lawrence, Public Domain. [7]
Another view of the terminus. The unique tramway terminal building was constructed of corrugated iron (known locally as ‘wriggly tin’) and served as both booking office and waiting room. It had a steeply pitched roof curving up to a sharp point when viewed on the gable and had been purchased in and brought from Switzerland at a cost of £400, © Public Domain. [21]

The next three views show the modern preservation line’s buildings in the early 21st century.

The first of these three views shows the approach to the stationary from the Southwest.vThe second is a panorama of the station site and the third looks into the Station site from the East. [Google Streetview, September 2011]

Operation

Evans describes the operation of the original line:

The somewhat tortuous route along the cliff tops gave the line a reputation for scenery rather than speed, but high speeds were frequently attained on the long falling gradient between White Rocks and the Portrush depot.

When the full summer service was operating, the lengthy sections between passing loops rendered operation difficult, and, as some of the loops were not visible from each other, boy signallers were employed. These boys were supplied with white and red flags which they would display to the drivers from a convenient vantage point, the red flag calling on an eastbound car and the white a westbound

The small shed at Bushmills was used by the morning tram from the village which left, with a load of school children and others, to journey into Portrush before the main service started from the depot The winter service was extremely meagre and did not continue beyond Bushmills out to the Causeway unless three or more passengers booked through to that point. During the summer peaks five sets (of one motor car and two trailers) were often in operation at one time.” [1: p187-188]

Wikipedia tells us that “Traill, a former geological surveyor, expected a considerable mineral traffic between quarries along the line and Portrush harbour, and there was originally a goods branch into the main square of Bushmills. However, this traffic fell away, the narrow gauge harbour branch being taken up when the Northern Counties station was opened in 1893, [11] and for most of its life the line primarily served tourists visiting the Causeway. From 1925/26 the line was closed down during each winter.” [3]

Increased patronage, partly from military traffic, during World War II meant a brief revival of winter services, but receipts were becoming inadequate to support maintenance of the company’s ageing assets, and the line did not reopen after the end of the 1949 season (last day of regular service 30th September 1949), [12] and was subsequently dismantled.” [3]

Rolling Stock

The original power on the line was a series of four steam locomotives built by Wilkinsons. This is their Steam Tramway Locomotive ‘Dunluce Castle’ (No. 3) which served on the line until well into the first half of the 20th century. Delays to the construction of the hydroelectric plant meant that in the first instance steam needed to be used on the tramway Indeed, the need for steam remained significant in to the 29th century as water use for generating sufficient electricity to meet demand could not be fully guaranteed, © Public Domain. [21]

Evans provides details of the rolling-stock used on the line:

The steam locomotives were Nos. 1 and 2 (1883) (scrapped 1910 and 1899 respectively), Nos. 3 and 4 (sold 1930).

The electric stock was all single deck, single truck:

Nos. 1, 2, 10 (closed trailers with end platforms).

Nos. 4-7, 11, 13, 15, 16 and 19 (toast-rack trailers with canopies).

No. 9 (vestibuled motor-car 2 x 20 h.p. B.T.H. motors. Peckham truck),

Nos. 20-23 (toast-rack motor-cars with canopies, originally completely open).

No. 24 (vestibuled motor-car, Peckham pendulum truck, originally double deck 3ft 6in. gauge car and purchased as such from Dunfermline and District Traction Co., August, 1937. It had longitudinal cushioned seats).” [1: p188]

A typical consist on a loop on the tramway, © J. H. Meredith, most probably now Public Domain. [1: p188]

Wikipedia expands somewhat on the rolling-stock record provided by Evans: “the original cars were built by the Midland Railway Carriage and Wagon Company and were later followed by 5 examples from GEC, each with 2 x 20 horsepower (15 kW) British Thomson-Houston motors, and also a Peckham car. There were a maximum of six electric power cars owned at any one time, all being single-truck, single-deck vehicles with both enclosed and “toast rack” examples; typically these would haul several 4-wheel “toast rack” trailers, of which there were 15. There were four steam tram engines, ordered from Wilkinson of Wigan. They had vertical boilers, weighed 7 tons and burnt coke. No.2 was scrapped in 1899, No.1 converted to a ballast wagon in 1910 and Nos. 3 (Dunluce Castle) and 4 (Brian Boroihme) were sold in 1930 for the River Bann Navigation works near Portstewart.” [3][11]

In 1938 a final electric tram was added to the stock as number 24. This vehicle was formerly a double deck Dunfermline and District Tramways car which was both re-gauged and extensively modified to become a single decker with enclosed ends for the Giants Causeway route.” [3][14]

The modified Dunfermline tram which was given the number 24. It was once a double-deck tram and ran originally on a different gauge. [21]

A power car and trailer are restored at the Ulster Folk and Transport Museum, Cultra and another power car is in the care of the National Transport Museum of Ireland at Howth.” [3]

A motorised tramcar on display at Cultural, © Milepost98 and licenced for use here under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [15]
A trailer car on display at Cultural, © Milepost98 and licenced for use here under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [16]

Full details of the steam locomotives can be found here. [17]

Evans concludes:

“The disappearance of this historic tramway, which changed so little in its 66 years of operation, yet provided a useful amenity, and an attraction for tourists, will be mourned by many and the line will be greatly missed by holidaymakers who have in previous years enjoyed rides along its scenic coastal route.” [1: p188]

The editor of The Modern Tramway commented: “We understand that a conference of local authorities is being held to urge the Government to subsidise the Giants Causeway line to the amount of £2,000 a year, so that it may be carried on as a tourist attraction. This is a move that commands our support, but we submit that the modernisation of the line might after a while actually render the subsidy unnecessary.” [1: p188]

Preservation

The Giants’ Causeway and Bushmills Railway was later constructed over the final two miles (3.2 km) of the Tramway and carried its first passengers at Easter 2002. Trains were running at least until the end of 2024. [3][13]

The Giant’s Causeway and Bushmills Railway (GC&BR) is a 3 ft (914 mm) narrow gauge heritage railway operating between the Giant’s Causeway and Bushmills. It “uses equipment originally assembled by Lord O’Neill for a tourist line at Shane’s Castle, Country Antrim, which closed in 1994. The idea of using this to revive part of the Tramway was largely conceived and promoted by David Laing. The Giant’s Causeway and Bushmills Railway Company is a not-for-profit organisation with charitable status. Clearance of the trackbed commenced at the end of 1999 and the railway carried its first passengers at Easter 2002.” [27]

On 10th July 2010 the railway took delivery of a specially customised 4 coach diesel multiple unit capable of accommodating up to 90 passengers. Manufactured by Severn Lamb UK Ltd., it was designed to enhance the visitor experience to the North Antrim Coast and to recreate, in so far as was possible, the passenger experience of the original hydro electric tram. Commissioning of the new rolling stock by the manufacturers began on Monday 12 July with the inaugural journey three days later. The DMU is powered by a Kubota V3600-E3 engine and shares the line with the previous steam rolling stock. All vehicles run on bogies. The power vehicle is on the Causeway side and is shorter (4 windows) than the three trailers (5 windows).” [27]

Rolling Stock

In addition to the 4-coach DMU, the line has three locomotives and a number of coaches.

The Locomotives owned by the preservation line. [27]

References

  1. D. G. Evans; The Giants’ Causeway and Portrush Tramway; in The Modern Tramway Vol. 13 No. 153, London, September 1950, p185-188.
  2. Railway Times; 22nd September 1883. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant%27s_Causeway_Tramway, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  4. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrush_Rly_Station,_1890s.jpg, accessed on 16th January 2025.
  5. Railway Magazine. May 1936. p. 355. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  6. Railway Magazine. May 1936. p. 360. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  7. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giant%27s_Causeway_tram,_Causeway_Hotel.jpg, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  8. Railway Magazine. May 1936. p. 359. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  9. Railway Magazine. May 1936. p. 356. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  10. David Hammond; The Singer’s House. Greenhays GR702, 1980, sleeve note.
  11. Railway Magazine. May 1936. p. 361. (Cited by the article at Reference No. 3)
  12. Irish Railway Record Society Journal, no. 9; Smmer 1951, p140.
  13. https://m.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=100063607388865, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  14. https://discoverportrush.com/buildings/transport-travel/giants-causeway-tramway, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  15. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cultra_a7.jpg, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  16. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cultra_a12.jpg, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  17. http://www.trainweb.org/i3/lbld_wi.htm#loco_wi_c, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  18. https://itoldya420.getarchive.net/amp/media/the-giants-causeway-tram-at-portrush-in-built-up-areas-was-initially-the-steam-6740ac, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/view/247678121, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/view/247678106, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  21. https://discoverportrush.com/buildings/transport-travel/giants-causeway-tramway, accessed on 17th January 2025.
  22. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.5&lat=55.20428&lon=-6.60729&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  23. https://maps.nls.uk/view/247678112, accessed on 28th January 2025.
  24. https://www.mediastorehouse.co.uk/fine-art-finder/artists/english-school/new-electric-tramway-portrush-bushmills-23543986.html, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  25. https://www.ulstertransportmuseum.org/collections/causeway-tram, accessed on 18th January 2025.
  26. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3083952, accessed on 19th January 2025.
  27. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant%27s_Causeway_and_Bushmills_Railway, accessed on 19th January 2025.
  28. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.0&lat=55.23149&lon=-6.51811&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 19th January 2025.

‘Modern Tramway’ in the early- to mid-1960s – February 1963 – The Strange Tale of No. 2

As part of a batch of magazines from the 1950s and 1960s I picked up a number of editions of ‘Modern Tramway’ from 1963 into 1964. ‘The Modern Tramway’ was the journal of the Light Railway Transport League (LRTL). By 1963 it had dropped the ‘The’ and was published jointly by Ian Allan and the LRTL. Its formal title was ‘Modern Tramway and Light Railway Review’.

The February 1963 edition of the journal was priced at 2s 6d.

Among a number of articles in the journal was a piece by G. Hyde, The Strange Tale of No. 2.

This No. 2 was Beyer Peacock steam tram engine No. 2. It is shown in the featured image above in which it is seen at Beyer Peacock’s works in Gorton, Manchester. [2]

It was originally built to a Wilkinson patent for the New South Wales Government tramways in 1885 and shipped to Australia in April of that year. It made several trial runs on the Redfern Station line of the Sydney steam tramways, but it evidently did not compare favourably with the Baldwin locomotives then in use there. Hyde says that, “It was reputed to have a heavy fuel consumption. and Beyer Peacock’s received complaints about the difficulties in maintaining a sufficient head of steam, but the engine hardly had a fair trial as only short runs were made with it, and the drivers’ inexperience may have contributed to its shortcomings. The trials were invariably carried out after midnight so no photographs were taken of the engine in service; neither was it ever incorporated into the Sydney tramway stock, consequently it never had a fleet number. Whilst in Australia it was referred to as ‘John Bull’.” [1: p48]

After its short unsuccessful trials in Sydney, John Bull was shipped to the small port of Wollongong and worked the isolated Wollongong-Clifton section of the New South Wales Government railways. It stayed there until the section was connected to the main coastal line in 1886.

Hyde commented that at this point “John Bull” disappeared. “Nothing further is known about it until it turned up again at Manchester in 1890, when it featured in Beyer Peacock’s stock list as yard engine No. 2. The mystery of this missing four years is heightened by the fact that Beyer Peacock’s records refer to the engine as having been salvaged, and returned to their works. This led to the rumour which persists in the Gorton works that No. 2 fell into the sea at one point during its travels round the world.” [1: p48]

In 1890 the loco was modified, the duplicate controls were removed, as also were the wheel curtains, then railway type buffers and drawgear were fitted.

In 1915 a steam brake was fitted, then in 1930 a new boiler was installed and in 1958 a new steam dryer was fitted. It was ultimately withdrawn from service in early 1959.

Hyde asserted that No. 2 was “certainly the biggest tramway engine ever built to Wilkinson’s patent, and was one of the most powerful steam tramway engines ever to be built in this country Its gross working weight of 16 tons compares with the 12 tons of the heavy 83-86 class Wilkinson engines of the Manchester, Bury, Rochdale & Oldham tramway, one of which is being kept by the British Transport Commission.” [1: p49]

Hyde provided detailed information about No. 2. … It had two simple cylinders, 9.5 in. diameter by 12 in. stroke. The crank axle had a pinion in the centre with 20 teeth geared to a spur wheel on the driving axle having 33 teeth, thus having a ratio of 1.65 to 1. It was fitted with a Stephenson type link motion. The four coupled driving wheels were of 30 in. diameter, with a wheelbase of 6 ft. 8 in. The water capacity was 225 gallons and there was a fuel space of 11 cubic feet. The vertical boiler was of the Field type, and had 121 tubes, each with an outside diameter of 2.13 in. The tubes, which project down into the firebox, were between 19 and 27 inches long, and had fitted concentric open-ended internal tubes known as circulating tubes. The working pressure is 150 lb. per sq. in., and the total heating area was about 184 sq. ft. with a total fire grate area of 10.8 sq. ft. The engine has an overall length of 13 ft 6 in. and an overall width of 7 ft.

“For close on 70 years, No. 2 trundled round the Gorton works of Beyer Peacock’s being affectionately known there as Old Coffeepot,” and it is hoped that it will now see many more years of active life at the Crich Tramway Museum. In the erecting shops at Beyer Peacock’s the wheels were re-tyred and the new tyres turned down to tramway standards. Then, after boiler inspection and insurance formalities had been completed, it was despatched to join the T.M.S. fleet at Crich as the only working British steam tram engine.” [1: p49]

Hyde noted that “Project Steam Tram” would involve the Tramway Museum Society in some heavy capital outlay, and that the Society was appealing to tramway enthusiasts to take an interest in the project and support it with donations. [1: p49-50]

More recent research has filled in some of the unknowns which Hyde commented on in 1963. It was Beyer Peacock Works No. 2464 and carried an operational number of 47 in Australia. In the missing years the locomotive is thought to have spent time working in Illawarra between 1887 and 1888 prior to returning to the UK in 1889. That it was at Illawarra may be a reference to its work on the Wollongong-Clifton section of the New South Wales Government railways. If so then it remained in New South Wales longer than the article in ‘Modern Tramway‘ suggested. [2][3]

As a works shunter, the tram operated in the firm’s large works complex towing huge Beyer-Garrett locomotives from one shed to another.

No. 2 in 1962 at Gorton Works just prior to its journey to the Crich Tramway Museum, © Crich TMS Archives. [3]

After arriving at Crich in 1962, No. 2 “was operated under steam for some years from 1966. A period of off-site storage between 1971 and 1978 was followed by a return to steam in the 1980s, during which it even performed on the Santa specials. However, the work involved in firing it up, supplying it with coal and clearing away the ash helped to explain why steam traction gave way to electricity on Britain’s tramways in the early years of the twentieth century.” [3]

Beyer Peacock steam tram No. 2, New South Wales Government Steam Tram No. 47 at the Crich Tramway Village, © John Huddlestone and shared by him on The Tramway and Light Railway Society Facebook Group on 15th May 2022. [4]

Crich Tramway Museum’s website tells us that, “because it was destined for export and as it was expected to be pulling much heavier loads it was much larger than those built for the home market. With 30 inch driving wheels and weighing almost 16 tons it was a true giant of a tram engine, though it did boast a number of features in common with other road-going locomotives including the fully enclosed wheels and a mechanism – in this case a “Wilkinson Patent” exhaust superheater – that was designed to reduce the amount of smoke emitted.” [3]

References

  1. G. Hyde; The Strange Tale of No. 2; in Modern Tramway Volume 26 No. 302, LRTL  and Ian Allan, Hampton Court, Surrey; February 1963, p48-50.
  2. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/beyer-peacock-company-works-no-2464-no-47-john-bull-0-4-0vb-tram, accessed on 26th July 2023.
  3. https://www.tramway.co.uk/trams/new-south-wales-47, accessed on 26th July 2023.
  4. https://m.facebook.com/groups/www.tlrs.info/permalink/557174155756970, accessed on 26th July 2023.