San Sebastian’s Urban Tramway, Funicular and Aerocar, and the ‘Spanish Aerocar’ at Niagara Falls.

Trams

The first tramway in San Sebastian (Donostia in Basque), owned by La Compañía del Tranvía de San Sebastián (TSS), opened on 18th July 1887 as a metre-gauge horse-powered line. “It provided a service from the eastern suburb of Ategorrieta to and from the town centre and beach. The tramway was then extended beyond Ategorrieta to the town of Herrera, including 2.1 km of reserved track and a 100-metre tunnel, avoiding the severe gradients of the Miracruz hill. The single-track-and-loop line eventually reached Rentería in 1890.” [1: p185]

The Compañía del Tranvía de San Sebastián (CTSS) was founded on 28th August 1886 and is one of the oldest businesses in Gipuzkoa. At first, it provided Horse-powered services in the city. [2]

The horse trams, known as ‘motor de sangre’ (literally blood engines), soon showed their limitations and for this reason the heads of the Company studied ways to modernise the transport system.” [2] It hoped to upgrade services by using steam trams but environmental concerns resulted in the local authority refusing the Company’s application. Instead, the Genèva-based Compagnie de l’Industrie Electrique et Mécanique was awarded the contract to build a line across the city. “A partial electric service was inaugurated on 22nd August 1887, and through running between San Sebastián and Rentería became a reality on 30th October. The rolling stock was built in Zaragoza using Thury (later Sécheron) electrical equipment, and consisted originally of motor trams 1-10 capable of hauling two trailers at 24 km/h. Several extensions were added to the tramway system until there were nine numbered services (1-9) all of which started from Alameda in the centre of San Sebastian.” [1: p185]

San Sebastian’s tramways were built to metre-gauge.

On 22nd August 1897, the first electric trams began to circulate between Rentería and Ategorrieta and the electrification of the city was completed on 22nd October of that same year. Donostia became the second city in Spain to have electrical trams (after Bilbao whose first line was up and running in 1896) and the first to electrify all its services (the Basque capital still had horse trams on some lines until 1909). [2]
A tram at the Monte Ulia tramway terminus. [3]
San Sebastian, Gros district and Mount Ulia, circa 1919. [3]

Barry Cross says: “Given the success of the urban tramways, it came as no surprise when the local entrepreneur, Vicente Machimbarena y Gorgoza, applied for the concession to build a 3.09-km ‘railway’ up the side of Monte Ulía, in 1893. The relevant legislation came into effect in 1895 and specified electric traction with overhead supply and the use of a rack to surmount a maximum gradient of 6%. However, when the engineer, Narciso Puig de la Bellacasa, was asked to undertake the initial surveys in 1896, they were for an adhesion line only. It was not until 1900 that sufficient money (ESP 530 000) had been raised to form the company, ‘Ferrocarril de Ulía’. Work on its construction began the same year, and the line opened on 9th July 1902. Although conceived as a railway, the completed metre-gauge line was merely an extension of the town tramways, with which it connected at Ategorrieta. As built, the continuous gradient varied between 4.5 and 5.5%, the only flat section being the mid-point passing loop.” [1: p185]

Cross continues: “The composition of the initial tramcar fleet accurately reflected the line’s tourist nature, since both the three two-axle motor trams and six trailers were of an open crossbench design known as ‘jardineras’. All cars were built in Zaragoza by Carde y Escoriaza, which equipped the motor cars with 2 x 52-kW motors and both rheostatic braking and electromagnetic track brakes. The early success of the line prompted the company to buy a further three motors and six trailers of the same design in 1907.” [1: p185]

The original tram service ran every 30 minutes. This was improved to 15 minutes from 1907. There were no intermediate stops on the climb up Monte Ulia. The tourist tram’s main purpose was to reach the summit.

Aerocar

The ‘Ferrocarril de Ulía’ Company, while paying a 2% dividend in 1904 also increased its capital to ESP 1 million with a view to building “something variously described as a ‘Tranvía Aereo’ and as a ‘Transbordador Funicular’. It opened on 30th September 1907 and proved to be one of the world’s first passenger suspension cableways, similar in concept although not in design to the aerial cableway across the Devil’s Dyke near Brighton, which had been built 13 years earlier. It began near the Monte Ulía tram terminus and rose gently just above the tree-tops to the Peña de las Aguilas, from where visitors could obtain impressive views along the Cantabrican coast.” [1: p186]

A close view of the fragile-looking passenger car of the Tranvia Aereo’. [4]

The next four images are postcard views of the Monte Ulia Aerocar. ….

“The world’s first aerial tram was probably the one built in 1644 by Adam Wiebe. It was used to move soil to build defences. Other mining systems were developed in the 1860s by Hodgson, and Andrew Smith Hallidie. Hallidie went on to perfect a line of mining and people tramways after 1867 in California and Nevada. Leonardo Torres Quevedo built his first aerial cableway in 1887. His first for passengers was this one at San Sebastian Donostia in 1907.” [3] Wikipedia’s Spanish site suggests that the cableway closed in 1912. [4] certainly, “Monte Ulia’s tramway and cableway were to be seriously threatened from 1912 onwards by the creation of rival attractions on Monte Igueldo, the mountain across the bay. Earlier but unrealised schemes had envisaged running a tramway around the base of this impressive mountain on a sort of Marine Drive, and taking it out to sea on a jetty to the island of Santa Clara, where a casino was to be built. However, so ambitious a project never materialised, and it was later decided to build a funicular instead. This would run from Ondarreta to the top of Monte Igueldo and be provided with a connecting tram service via a short branch line from the Venta-Berri Alameda tramway operated by the TSS.” [1: p186]

After 1912, the Monte Ulia line became progressively more unprofitable and closed down in 1916. However the ‘Aerocar’ story does not end in 1916 in San Sebastian. For a little more, please head through this article beyond the next section about a funicular railway. …

The Funicular de Igueldo

Cross tells us that “The main promoter of this new scheme was Emilio Huici, and the engineer in charge of the funicular project was Severiano Goni, who later built the Artxanda funicular in Bilbao. The Swiss firm of Von Roll supplied the electrical and mechanical equipment, leaving it to a local workshop to manufacture the funicular car bodies. Each car had five compartments with 30 seats and room for 20 standing. The line was 312 metres long and climbed 151 metres at gradients between 32 and 58%, making it the steepest of its kind in Spain.” [1: p186]

The funicular opened for business on 25th August 1912, offering visitors to the summit the chance to dine at its restaurant until midnight, or to take “five o’clock tea” on a terrace overlooking San Sebastián. A return trip to the summit cost ESP 0.50, while from 5th September 1912 onwards the mountain enjoyed a through tram service from Alameda to the lower station of the funicular.” [1: p186]

The travelling distance of 320 metres connected Ondarreta Beach at the bottom, with the popular Monte Igueldo Amusement Park at the top, offering spectacular coastal views of La Concha Bay along the way. [3]

The next four images are postcard views of the funicular railway. …

The Spanish Aerocar in North America!

Cross points us to a similar but larger ‘Aerocar’ which was opened in 1915 in North America. It crossed the Whirlpool Rapids on the Canadian side of Niagara Falls. “It was built by the Spanish engineer, Leonardo Torres Quevedo, who, undaunted by the financial failure of his first cableway on Monte Ulía, had been persuaded to build a second. Its success can be measured by the fact that it survives to this very day.” [1: p186]The Canadian has been upgraded several times since 1916 (in 1961, 1967 and 1984).[1] The system uses one car that carries 35 standing passengers over a one-kilometre trip.[2]

The Canadian has been upgraded several times since 1916 (in 1961, 1967 and 1984). The system uses one car that carries 35 standing passengers over a one-kilometre trip. [5]

Three images of the Canadian ‘Spanish Aerocar’ follow below. …

Three images of the Aerocar’. [6]

The ride on the ‘Aerocar’ is featured on the Niagara Parks website. [7]

References

  1. Barry Cross; The Spanish Aerocar; in Light Railway and Modern Tramway, July 1992, p185-186.
  2. https://dbus.eus/en/the-company/background, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  3. https://www.simplonpc.co.uk/SanSebastian.html#trams, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  4. https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tranv%C3%ADa_a%C3%A9reo_del_Monte_Ul%C3%ADa, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whirlpool_Aero_Car, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  6. http://www.ebpm.com/niag/regpix/glry_niag_aero.html, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  7. https://www.niagaraparks.com/visit/attractions/whirlpool-aero-car, accessed on 22nd March 2025.

Rt. Revd. Eric Treacy MBE LLD

Flicking through a number of old magazines passed to me by a friend here in Telford, I came across a supplement published by The Railway Magazine in December 1990, “Eric Treacy: The Classic Years.” [1]

Treacy’s photographs are now in the National Archive collection at Kew They are ©Crown Copyright and covered by an Open Government Licence which permits copying of images in the collection for non-commercial use. This covers the photographs from the collection which were reproduced in the 1990 supplement.

The Rt. Revd. Eric Treacy MBE, LLD, Lord Bishop of Wakefield from 1968 until 1976, died on Appleby Station on 13th May 1978. He left behind a large collection of railway photographs, taken over more than four decades.

‘Railway photographer. Pastor to railway men. Lover of life and railways’. This memorial plaque can be found at Appleby Railway Station, where he died in 1978, © RuthAS and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 3.0). [2]

In 1932, he was ordained deacon in the Church of England and priest a year later, serving as curate at Liverpool parish church from 1932 to 1934. [4] Wikipedia tells that “he took up railway photography, being inspired by visiting Liverpool Lime Street and getting to know his parishioners who worked on the railway. His photographic work appeared in various magazines during the 1930s.” [3]

His railway photography “was interrupted by the Second World War when he served as Military Chaplain. On 12th March 1940, he was commissioned as Chaplain to the Forces 4th Class (equivalent to captain). [5] On 10th May 1945, it was announced that Treacy had been Mentioned in Despatches ‘in recognition of gallant and distinguished services in North West Europe’. [6] He was promoted to a Chaplain to the Forces 3rd Class (equivalent to major). On 24th January 1946, he was appointed a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE).” [7][3]

In 1946 Treacy published his first book which contained images of L.M.S. locomotives. [8] On demobilisation he became Rector of Keighley and in 1949 was appointed Archdeacon of Halifax. [9] In 1961, he became Bishop of Pontefract [3] and in 1968, Treacy became Bishop of Wakefield. [1: p2]

The Railway Magazine Supplement  comments that Treacy was “a devout man of the church as well as a talented lineside photographer (and frequent footplate passenger!) his atmospheric work never failed to portray his passionate love of railways, quickly establishing him as one of Britain’s foremost railway photographers.” [1: p2]

By 1935, “he was sending work regularly to The Railway Magazine signed ‘Rev E. Treacy, 2 Edge Lane, Liverpool’, showing London Midland & Scottish trains, many of them still worked by former London & North Western Railway locomotives, around that great city. Shap was an early discovery, and he spent many hours walking the fells and awaiting Anglo-Scottish expresses as they slogged their way to the summit. The zenith of his work undoubtedly came with the Stanier Pacifics, and to those who remember, it is virtually impossible to think of Eric Treacy without also the thunderous reminder of a ‘Princess Royal’ or ‘Coronation’ Pacific unleashing its full fury against that formidable climb with 15 bogies and more in tow.” [1: p2]

Lorna Hogger says that “Treacy befriended drivers and firemen in his congregation and often persuaded them to make smoke effects for his pictures. … He took time to plan his photographs days in advance, checking the weather and position of the sun at the time the train was due, and coming to know the locations well. Treacy rarely took unplanned shots, the equipment and large glass negatives being too expensive for acting on impulse.” [8]

Lorna Hogger also tells us that Treacy “joined the Railway Photographic Society in 1935, but unlike many of his peers he described his pictures as ‘emotional rather than technical’, enabling him to create stunning landscapes. This is evident in the photograph below which shows a goods train crossing the Ribblehead Viaduct.” [8]

A goods train crossing the Ribblehead Viaduct, North Yorkshire, c 1950s, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [8]
Embed from Getty Images
WD Class 8F 2-8-0 steam locomotive, circa. 1958, approaching Blea Moor signal box on the Settle and Carlisle line with a freight train of empty anhydrite hopper wagons, in British Railways service. WD locomotives were designed for wartime service overseas during WW2 and were later used on domestic British lines, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [11]
‘The ultimate expression of British steam power and one of Treacy’s crowning glories, came in this classic composition of immaculate Stanier Pacific No. 46230 ‘Duchess of Buccleuch’ bearing the tartan headboard of a down ‘Royal Scot’ powering cleanly towards Beattick Summit. This photograph was sent to the Railway Magazine in March 1957, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [1: p12-13]
Only a handful of ‘Royal Scot’ 4-6-0s remained in their original parallel boiler guide when Treacy took this photograph of No. 46147 ‘The Prince of Wales’s Volunteers (South Lancashire)’ heading a Birmingham to Glasgow train near Beattock, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [1: p21]
Embed from Getty Images
The ‘City of Liverpool’ with a northbound express train. This Coronation Class steam locomotive No 46247 was photographed by Treacy as it left Tebay, Cumbria, on the West Coast Main Line to Scotland. It was built at Crewe Works in 1943 for the London, Midland & Scottish Railway, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [10]

The Railway Magazine Supplement continues: “No less atmospheric were his photographs of departures from major stations: think of Treacy, and sooty masterpieces of ‘Royal Scot’ or ‘Patriot’ 4-6-0s getting to grips with heavy trains at the foot of the deep rock cuttings out of Liverpool Lime Street come to mind, or perhaps an A4 Pacific trying to find its feet at the head of an Edinburgh-bound express at Kings Cross.” [1: p2]

In its original guide as a blue streamliner, ‘Princess Coronation ‘ Pacific No. 6223 ‘Princess Alice’ was photographed at Edge Hill, only a stone’s throw from Treacy’s vicarage in the years between the introduction of the Class and the outbreak of the second world war, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [1: p2]
A4 Pacific No. 60021 ‘Wild Swan’ attached the Harrogate portion to the Leeds portion of the 12.30pm train to London at Leeds Central Station. Treacy sent this photograph to The Railway Magazine in April 1961, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [1: p22]
Embed from Getty Images
Princess Coronation class 4-6-2 steam locomotive No 46244 ‘King George VI’ with the London to Glasgow ‘Royal Scot’ passenger train. Sister engine, the Princess Coronation class 4-6-2 steam locomotive 46231 ‘Duchess of Atholl’, based at Polmadie shed is about to take over for the journey North, © The National Archives, Eric Treacy Collection, reused here under an Open Government Licence. [9]

The Railway Magazine Supplement concludes: “Throughout the transformation of the ‘Big Four’ to British Railways, and into modernisation when diesel locomotives began appearing on major routes, Treacy was there, and his legacy of ‘Deltics’ at Leeds or ‘Peaks’ on trans-Pennine services have all the richness and imagination of his steam photos.” [1: p2]

Photograph albums of Treacy’s work include:

Canon Eric Treacy; My Best Railway Photographs: No.1 L.M.S.; Ian Allan Ltd, London, 1946.

Eric Treacy; Roaming the Northern Rails; Ian Allan Ltd, London, 1976.

Eric Treacy; Roaming the East Coast Main Line; Ian Allan Ltd, London, 1977.

Eric Treacy; Lure of Steam; Ian Allan, London, 1969, 1980.

Eric Treacy; Glory of Steam;  Ian Allan, London, 1981 (reprint?)

G. Freeman Allen; Great Railway Photographs by Eric Treacy; Peerage Books, London, 1982.

P.B. Whitehouse & G. Freeman Allen; Eric Treacy: Railway Photographer; David and Charles, Newton Abbott, 1983.

P.B. Whitehouse & J. Powell; Treacy’s Routes North; 1985.

P.B. Whitehouse & J. Powell; Treacy’s British Rail; 1990.

Eric Treacy; Portrait of Steam; 1991(reprint).

Eric Treacy; The Best of Eric Treacy; Atlantic Transport Publishers, 1994.

David Jenkinson & Patrick Whitehouse; Eric Treacy’s L.M.S.; Oxford Publishing Company, 1988.

References

  1. Eric Treacy: The Classic Years; in The Railway Magazine (supplement), December 1990.
  2. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Railway_Treacy_Plaque_Appleby_14.06.12R_edited-2.jpg, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Treacy, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  4. Crockford’s clerical directory; Church House, London, 1976.
  5. No. 34809; The London Gazette (Supplement). 8th March 1940, p1462.
  6. No. 37072; The London Gazette (Supplement). 8th May 1945, p2456–2464.
  7. No. 37442; The London Gazette (Supplement). 22nd January 1946, p615–625.
  8. https://blog.railwaymuseum.org.uk/eric-treacy-the-right-reverend-railway-photographer, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  9. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90746857, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  10. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90748392, accessed on 22nd March 2025.
  11. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90746931, accessed on 22nd March 2025.

The Caledonian Railway

The featured image above shows a Caledonian Railway West Coast Dining Train hauled by Caledonian Railway 4–6–0 Locomotive No. 49.

Wikipedia tells us that “The Caledonian Railway (CR) was one of the two biggest of the five major Scottish railway companies prior to the 1923 Grouping. It was formed in 1845 with the objective of forming a link between English railways and Glasgow. It progressively extended its network and reached Edinburgh and Aberdeen, with a dense network of branch lines in the area surrounding Glasgow. It was absorbed* into the London, Midland and Scottish Railway in 1923. Many of its principal routes are still used, and the original main line between Carlisle and Glasgow is in use as part of the West Coast Main Line railway (with a modified entry into Glasgow itself).” [3]

* technically the Caley was not ‘absorbed’ but rather ‘amalgamated’ into the LMS.

A Caledonian Railway Express travelling through the Scottish Borders, © Public Domain. [73]

Paul Drew says, “A little after eight o’clock on daylight weekday evenings in the years just before World War I, at Carlisle Citadel Station there was performed a colourful ceremony; it was the arrival from Euston of ‘The 2pm’ the West Coast Anglo-Scottish express par excellence and its making over by the London & North Western Railway (LNWR)to the Caledonian Railway (CR), with a change of engine. The occasion was impressive after sunset too, but the gaslight killed the colours of the locomotives and coaching stock; not only LNW and Caledonian were to be seen, but also Midland, North Eastern, Maryport & Carlisle, North British, and Glasgow & South Western. The seven railways and their several liveries made Carlisle Citadel the epitome of pre-1914 variety and splendour on Britain’s railways. The 2pm was sometimes called ‘The Corridor’ because in the 1890s it was the first West Coast train to include corridor stock.” [1: p4]

Embed from Getty Images
A Dunalastair II Locomotive, northbound with a mixture of the best Caledonian and West Coast joint stock. [86]

He continues: “In would come the 2pm behind an Experiment or, later, a Claughton 4-6-0 in LNWR blackberry black, austere perhaps, with a black tender devoid of identification for everybody should know an LNW engine. The coaches would be lettered WCJS (West Coast Joint Stock) but they would be the latest achievement of LNW design, specially built for the 2pm. The livery would be LNW-cream above the waistline and, below, that indescribable mixture of dark purple and brown; nearby, just for contrast, there might be some Caledonian main-line stock in cream and purple-lake, ruddier than the LNW lower panelling, and wearing the Caledonian coat of arms. (It was far more eloquent heraldry than the groups of shire and city arms favoured by most other companies, signifying among other things the Kingdom and Royal House of Scotland.) The 2pm consisted of seven, or sometimes up to nine, 12-wheel vehicles, with portions for Glasgow Central and Edinburgh Princes Street, which divided at Symington or Strawfrank Junction, or sometimes Carstairs.” [1: p4]

The Caledonian Railway Coat of Arms. [2]

Drew continues his evocative description of a late afternoon and early evening at Carlisle: “The North Western engine would run off into the yard and then would appear a massive eight-wheel Azure-Blue tender bearing on its side the Caledonian arms flanked by the initials CR. Beyond, there would loom into sight the great bulk of one of the Cardean class of inside-cylinder 4-6-0s, perhaps No 903 Cardean itself, a vision of Azure boiler, splashers and cab sides, purple-lake underframes, and scarlet buffer beam, and one of the most powerful and efficient inside-cylinder 4-6-0s, and indeed of any 4-6-0s, of a British railway.” [1: p4]

The CR was the first major railway to adopt a blue livery for its locomotives. The CR adopted the colour in the very early days of the company. Drew tells us that, “the CR’s ‘Azure Blue’ was achieved by mixing white paint at the company’s St Rollox (Glasgow) works with expensive darker blue, to economise; some CR engines painted in the Perth shops were finished in darker blue without the white admixture. Neither livery and especially the lighter has been surpassed by any of the blues essayed by other railways in the later years of steam.” [1: p4]

Embed from Getty Images
Caledonian Railway Class 60 4-6-0 steam locomotive, No 14652, banked by a Caledonian Railway 0-4-4T, No 15163 on the West Coast Main Line in 1935. Travelling into Scotland, the West Coast Main Line faces a formidable climb of ten miles at 1 in 100 from Beattock station to the summit. In steam days nearly all trains were assisted from the rear, as shown in this photograph. The train also appears to consist of ventilated vans and containers for meat traffic. [87]

Drew continues: “Cardean or a sister-engine would be coupled up and, after a blast of the Caley whistle, the miniature foghorn that contrasted so well with the shriller piping of other companies’ locomotives, the express pulled out on its 39.7-mile 44-minute run to Beattock at the foot of the 10-mile Beattock Bank. A stop of only two minutes was allowed at Beattock for buffering up the banking engine and ‘The Corridor’ was off on its next lap to Symington or other point of detachment of the Edinburgh vehicles. Overall timing allowed from Carlisle to Glasgow was 123 minutes, so that the train was due at Central at 22:16, eight hours 16 minutes after leaving Euston, and only one minute after the 84-hour Euston-Glasgow and Kings Cross-Edinburgh timings which the West and East Coast companies had agreed between themselves rather unprogressively after the second series of the so-called Races to the North of 1895.” [1: p4]

Close co-operation between the CR and the LNWR was the order of the day, as was a similar co-operation between The North British Railway and the North Eastern Railway on the east coast of the UK. But Carlisle was the frontier between the two and the Cr was independent of the LNWR in most things.

A general map of the Caledonian Railway network, Public Domain. [4]

In the 1830s and 1840s much thought was given to building a railway from central Scotland to join the growing English railway network. The hilly terrain and sparse population of the Southern Uplands made the choice of route contentious. [5]

Embed from Getty Images
Caledonian Railway 4-6-0 steam locomotive No. 910 on a heavy passenger duty! [90]

Drew tells us that “the Caledonian was conceived as a link between England and central Scotland and Glasgow before the most northerly component of the railways – the Lancaster & Carlisle Railway, eventually amalgamated into the LNWR – was projected. Alone of the four Anglo-Scottish trunk routes proposed in the late 1830s, the CR line from the south. from Carlisle via Annandale and Beattock, forking near Symington for Glasgow and Edinburgh, served both cities equally well. The Annandale route was chosen by that great engineer Joseph Locke. after some hesitation, in preference to the route via Dumfries. Nithsdale and Kilmarnock, which was more or less the alignment of the Glasgow & South Western and could not reach Edinburgh except through industrial Lanarkshire or by a detour through difficult terrain south of Glasgow.” [1: p5]

Wikipedia comments that, “the Caledonian Railway succeeded in opening its line by way of a summit at Beattock in 1847 and 1848. It connected Glasgow and Edinburgh with Carlisle, and there was a branch to connect with another railway to Perth. The approaches to Glasgow were over existing mineral lines, but a superior route was later built.” [5] The Carlisle-Glasgow main line was the Caledonian’s first trunk route. The Caledonian Railway Act received the Royal Assent on 31st July 1845, and the first section was opened from Carlisle to Beattock on 10th September 1847. The two cities of Edinburgh and Glasgow were reached by 15th February 1848. Drew tells us that, “the Glasgow terminus, Buchanan Street, was not opened until the following year. The station first used was Port Dundas, approached over the metals of the Glasgow, Garnkirk & Coatbridge [Railway], which the CR absorbed.” [1:p5]

Wikipedia comments: “Glasgow was reached over the Glasgow, Garnkirk and Coatbridge Railway (successor to the Garnkirk and Glasgow Railway), and the Wishaw and Coltness Railway, which the Caledonian had leased from 1st January 1847 and 1st January 1846 respectively. The Glasgow station was [initially] the Townhead terminus of the Glasgow, Garnkirk and Coatbridge Railway.” [3][8]

Wikipedia continues: “During the process of seeking Parliamentary authorisation, the Caledonian observed that the Clydesdale Junction Railway was being promoted. The Caledonian acquired that line during its construction, and it opened in 1849. It gave an alternative and shorter access to another Glasgow passenger terminal, named South Side, and to the Clyde quays at General Terminus (over the connected General Terminus and Glasgow Harbour Railway). The South Side station was already being used by the Glasgow, Barrhead and Neilston Direct Railway, worked by the Caledonian. One day, they hoped, they might extend that line into Ayrshire. Meanwhile, the line was leased (for 999 years) to the Caledonian in 1849.” [3][8][21][24]

The Caledonian recognised that the Townhead terminus was unsatisfactory and constructed a deviation from Milton Junction to a new Glasgow terminus at Buchanan Street. It opened on 1st November 1849.” [3]

Glasgow Buchanan Street station buildings remained essentially unaltered over the years until their closure to passenger traffic in November 1966 when all remaining services transferred to Queen Street Railway Station.

Glasgow Bauchanan Street Railway Station in 1961. This photograph is taken facing Northeast from Buchanan St. It shows the entrance to the ex-Caledonian terminus,    © Ben Brooksbank and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [6]

Drew comments that the other two routes considered for trunk routes between the central belt of Scotland and the English network were one via the East Coast and the other inland from Newcastle via Hexham. He states that, “by the East Coast route of the North British from Berwick-on-Tweed there was no reasonable alternative to passing through Edinburgh (or through hilly country in its southern suburbs) to get to Glasgow. The fourth projected Anglo-Scottish route was from Newcastle to Edinburgh via Hexham and inland from the eventual East Coast main line; only disjointed branch lines, mostly closed, mark part of its course today.” [1: p5]

The Caledonian’s Edinburgh terminus was originally on Lothian Road. It opened in 1848 and had a single platform which served both arrivals and departures, and a two-road goods shed with a single loading platform. During 1865, the Caledonian was considering how to improve it, and considered making arrangements with the North British Railway to use Waverley Station. The local authority was anxious that there should be a single main station in the city. However the North British was hostile in principle, and the idea came to nothing. [7][8]

Major extension was essential, and “on 2nd May 1870 a new temporary station was opened adjacent to, and to the north of Lothian Road; it was named Princes Street. It was a wooden structure; the Caledonian was short of cash at this time and a more imposing terminal was not affordable. The passenger part of the station now had two platforms.” [7]

During 1890 the wooden terminus building at Princes Street was partly dismantled in preparation for improvement, “when on 16th June a fire broke out, substantially destroying much of the buildings. The new, spacious station accommodation was progressively brought into use in 1893 and 1894; it had nine platforms, and had cost over £250,000. Powers were obtained for building an adjacent hotel, but it was not opened, as the Caledonian Hotel, until December 1903.” [7][8]

The Railway Wonders of the World article about the Caledonian Railway included this image which shows the Glasgow Express about to leave from Princes Street Station in Edinburgh, © Public Domain. [73]

The Caledonian Railway eventually served nearly all the economically important areas of the Lowlands other than the Fife coalfield. It was an outlet to the rest of the UK for trafic from the Northeast – particularly fish. It was in strident competition in and around Glasgow and throughout the central Lowlands with the NBR and GSWR. In Edinburgh, Perth, Dundee and along the coast to Aberdeen it was striving against the NBR, and at Ardrossan it battled against the GSWR. “It had to fight hard for most of its traffic, which comprised coal and other minerals, livestock, distillers’ grain and other agricultural produce; Glasgow and Edinburgh suburban commuters including train and steamer passengers ‘doon the water’ to and from the Clyde coast and islands; Glasgow-Edinburgh and Glasgow-Dundee inter-city passengers; and a high proportion of the Anglo-Scottish freight and passenger traffic because so much of England – for example, the West Riding and the Midlands could be reached equally well by Carlisle and by Berwick.” [1: p7]

Wikipedia comments that “as 1849 drew to a close, the Caledonian Railway had completed its first task: the railway was open from Glasgow and Edinburgh to Carlisle, with through trains running to and from London. Between Glasgow and Edinburgh a competitive service was run, although the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway completed the journey faster. Carlisle Citadel station was in use, jointly owned with the London and North Western Railway. Through trains ran to Stirling and Perth over the Scottish Central Railway line from Greenhill.” [5]

The 10.00am Glasgow to Carlisle Express at Crawford, © Public Domain. [74]

The Caledonian’s trunk line progressed North towards Aberdeen from Peth and a branch was provided from Perth to Dundee. “Joseph Locke played the chief part in planning and co-ordinating the construction of a series of independent concerns which, after rather complex amalgamations, in 1866 took Caledonian trains into Aberdeen on CR tracks. Chief among them were the Scottish Central [Railway] and the Scottish North Eastern [Railway]. … The relatively low cost of construction through Strathmore and complications involving the North British [Railway] in Angus … influenced the main route eastwards from Perth via Glamis and Forfar to meet the North British at Kinnibar Junction. … Dundee was a CR terminus for most CR traffic. East of Dundee (and with a separate passenger terminus in that city) was the Dundee & Arbroath Joint line (CR and NBR). CR Aberdeen trains did not run via Dundee, as they do today after closure of the Strathmore line.” [1: p7]

The Caledonian Railway had intended to lease, or absorb, the Scottish Central Railway (SCR), which obtained its act of Parliament on the same day as the Caledonian. The SCR needed a partner railway to get access to Glasgow and Edinburgh, that was provided by the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway (E&GR). The SCR opened from Greenhill Junction with the E&GR to Perth on 22 May 1848, and the Caledonian opened its branch to reach Greenhill Junction on 7 August 1848. The SCR remained independent for some time, building Perth General station. Because it provided access for a number of railways to Perth, the station was managed by a Joint Committee. The Perth General Station Joint Committee, later the Perth Joint Station Committee, was formed in 1859 to manage Perth railway station, initially consisting of the Scottish Central Railway, North British Railway, Scottish North Eastern Railway, and the Inverness and Perth Junction Railway, later including the Caledonian Railway, North British Railway and Highland Railway. [9][10]

The SCR itself managed to absorb some local railways; the Crieff Junction Railway had opened from Crieff to what later became Gleneagles station in 1856, and it was worked by the SCR and absorbed in 1865. [9]

In 1858 the Dunblane, Doune and Callander Railway was opened in 1858. It achieved considerable significance as the starting point for the Callander and Oban Railway. It was absorbed by the SCR in 1865 immediately before the SCR amalgamated with the Caledonian Railway on 1st August 1865, finally having gained Parliamentary approval to do so. [9]

The Scottish Midland Junction Railway (SMJR) “built a line from Perth to Forfar; at Perth it used the Scottish Central Railway joint station. The main line ran through the fertile area of Strathmore and the SMJR adopted two existing short lines that were on a suitable alignment. They were the Newtyle and Coupar Angus Railway and the Newtyle and Glammiss Railway. Both were unsuccessful adjuncts to the Dundee and Newtyle Railway, built using stone block sleepers and a track gauge of 4 ft 6+1⁄2 in (1,384 mm). The two short lines were modernised and altered to double track using standard gauge. At Forfar the SMJR joined the Arbroath and Forfar Railway, another earlier stone block railway, in this case using the track gauge of 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm). The SMJR opened in 1848.” [3]

The NBR had, for many years, running powers over the CR, from Kinnaber to Aberdeen but was not competitive in the speed to the journey North until the 1890s, after completion of the Forth Bridge. Drew tells us that “railway strategy in Scotland was utterly changed by the failure of the Caledonian in the 1850s to amalgamate with the poverty-stricken 47-mile Edinburgh & Glasgow Railway. (The CR at that time had financial and administrative troubles of its own, which had led it in 1849 to propose operation of the CR system by the LNWR, which Euston turned down flat.) The CR continued to run its own Glasgow-Edinburgh trains over its own route, which remained circuitous at the western end until Glasgow Central was opened in 1879. The Edinburgh & Glasgow was absorbed into the NBR in 1865.” [1: p7] That take-over secured access for the NBR to Glasgow, the Firth of Clyde and much of the central Lowlands.

Drew comments: “The NBR improved the Glasgow Edinburgh passenger services and developed them as both inter-city and Anglo-Scottish trains. Only later did the CR begin to run rival, and in some ways better, Glasgow-Edinburgh expresses over its slightly shorter though more steeply graded line: it was spared, of course, the Cowlairs incline up from the North British Glasgow Queen Street terminus.” [1: p7]

The Aberdeen Railway was “to run north from Guthrie, a few miles northwest of Arbroath. Joining the Arbroath and Forfar Railway (A&FR) there, it obtained access to both termini of that line. It was authorised to lease the A&FR. The Aberdeen Railway may have underestimated the cost of upgrading the A&FR’s stone block track, and it ran out of money building its own main line; its construction was delayed and it encountered political difficulty in Aberdeen itself. It opened in 1850 to Ferryhill, on the southern margin of the city, extending to Guild Street station in 1854. There were branches to Brechin and Montrose.” [3]

From its inception, the Caledonian Railway saw itself as the creator of an extensive network in Scotland, and “it set about gaining control of as many other Scottish railways as possible. It did so not by purchasing them, but by leasing them. This had the advantage that no payment was required at first, only a periodical payment much later. The Caledonian negotiated with the SCR, the SMJR and the Aberdeen Railway and believed it had captured them, but the SCR had other ideas. Much later the Caledonian found that the periodical lease payments were unaffordable, and it was rescued by the legal opinion that the lease agreements had been ultra vires.” [3]

An important development in the history of Scottish railways was the “completion in 1863 of the Perth to Inverness via Forres route of what became soon afterwards the Highland Railway (HR). It gave much better access from the south to the central and northern Highlands and was just in time to enable the Caledonian to profit [from] the rapid growth of tourism in the Highlands. The CR was the chief source of HR passenger and freight traffic from and to the south. During the grouse-shooting and deer stalking seasons the trains between Euston and HR stations [via] the West Coast route, the CR and Perth included many horses and carriages.” [1: p7] These were only replaced by motor vehicles as the Edwardian era developed. The Caledonian encourged the upper class passtimes. “It was indulgent about attaching and detaching horseboxes, carriage flats and motorcar vans at its own stations … Many of the extra West Coast expresses during the season included such vehicles, which caused relatively minor marshalling problems south of Perth.” [1: p7]

At Perth, “long caravans of miscellaneous vehicles were made up and remarshalled. They included not only West and East Coast Joint Stock but also Midland & North British sleeping cars which ran between St Pancras and Inverness via Carlisle, Edinburgh and Perth.” [1: p7]

The Highland main line was mostly only a single track: there was often a motive-power shortage at peak periods, so that trains were often made over late to the CR at Perth. Northbound LNWR trains were often late at Carlisle, perhaps due to difficulties securing sufficient motive power. The LNWR had frequent recurse to double-heading until more powerful locomotives appeared in the early years of the 20th century. The Caledonian often found itself having to make up for the delayes caused by these other companies.

The Caledonian’s own mountainous route – the line from Dunblane via Callander and Crianlarich to Oban – is covered in a separate article which can be found here. [11] The punctuality record on that line was good, “partly because there was competition with the NBR West Highland line from 1898 onwards for traffic to the Western Isles.” [1: p8]

Drew tells us that, “a service which was more inter-city than its name implied, the ‘Grampian Corridor Express’ of 1905, from Glasgow and Edinburgh to Aberdeen, was selected for the allocation of new trainsets of magnificent 12-wheel vehicles. The Grampian ran from Buchanan Street to Perth, where it combined with an Edinburgh Princes Street portion that ran over part of the NBR Edinburgh-Glasgow main line from near Edinburgh to Larbert.” [1: p8] … He also notes the “CR’s regard for its Glasgow-Edinburgh expresses, for which some of the new coaches were 12-wheel non-bogie coaches with elliptical roofs.” [1: p8]

Drew draws attention to: the expansion of the Caledonian’s Clyde shipping services in the late 19th century, with new branches, stations and piers; and the construction of the Caledonian sub-surface lines under the centre of Glasgow (the Glasgow Central Railway. [1: p8]

The Glasgow Central Railway was built by the Caledonian Railway, running in tunnel east to west through the city centre. “It was opened in stages from 1894 and opened up new journey opportunities for passengers and enabled the Caledonian Railway to access docks and industrial locations on the north bank of the River Clyde. An intensive and popular train service was operated, but the long tunnel sections with frequent steam trains were smoky and heartily disliked.” [12] The CR’s line in the centre of the city “paralleled the North British Railway routes in the area, and after nationalisation of the railways the line declined and was closed in stages from 1959 to 1964.” [12]

Drew, writing in 1975, points forward to possible future uses of the closed tunnels [1: p8] and in 1979, “the central part of the route was reopened as an electrically operated passenger railway, the Argyle Line; this was greatly popular and enhanced connecting routes to west and east made this a valuable link through the city once more. The Argyle Line section is in heavy use today, but the other parts remain closed.” [12]

Wikipedia tells us that the Argyle Line “serves the commercial and shopping districts of Glasgow’s central area, and connects towns from West Dunbartonshire to South Lanarkshire. Named for Glasgow’s Argyle Street, the line uses the earlier cut-and-cover tunnel running beneath that thoroughfare. … The term ‘Argyle Line’ is commonly used to describe: the extensive urban passenger train service that connects the towns and suburbs of North Clyde with Motherwell, Larkhall, and Lanark, to the southeast. Of the 48 stations, 4 are in West Dunbartonshire, 4 in East Dunbartonshire, 17 in Glasgow City, 10 in North Lanarkshire, and 13 in South Lanarkshire; and thecentral portion of railway infrastructure encompassing less than 5 miles (8 km).” [12]

The extent of the ‘Argyle Line’. [25]
The eastern portal of Kelvinhaugh Tunnel is located at the western end of the eastbound platform at Exhibition Centre station in 2019. The tunnel is unusual in a number of ways. Firstly, it is nowadays used only by trains travelling in one direction; westbound trains do not pass through a tunnel here. The western end of the tunnel has changed completely, since 1979 emerging near Finnieston West Junction where the line joins the former North British Railway route along the north side of the Clyde. Until 1964 it continued along the old Caledonian Railway route to Dumbarton with a junction inside the tunnel for a line to Maryhill. It was closed to all traffic between 1964 and 1979, © Stephen McKay and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [13]

Drew continues: “Associated with the underground lines was the rebuilding and expansion of Glasgow Central passenger station including a low-level station on the CR underground; widening of the bridge over the Clyde to 20 tracks and creation of what for many years was, and in many ways still is, Britain’s most convenient major passenger terminus, in the heart of the city. Electrification and dieselisation have enabled Central to swallow the traffic (admittedly smaller than before as regards the number of trains) previously dealt with at St Enoch Station on closure by British Rail of the former GSWR terminus.” [1: p8]

The Caledonian Railway Bridge crosses the River Clyde at Broomielaw adjacent to Glasgow Central Station. The first structure built between 1876 and 1878 for the Caledonian Railway Company and opened on 1st August 1879, “was engineered by Blyth and Cunningham and built by Sir William Arrol & Co. It consisted of wrought iron lattice girders linked at the top by a light arched lattice girder, and carried on a cast iron arch over twin piers in the river. The piers are formed of cast iron cylinders sunk to bedrock and filled with concrete, and then extended above the river with Dalbeattie granite.” [14]

The approach span over Clyde Place to the south was 60 feet (18 m) long and over Broomielaw to the north of the river was 90 feet (27 m) long. The navigation spans were 164 feet (50 m), 184 feet (56 m) and 152 feet (46 m) long. The bridge carried four tracks into the new Glasgow Central Station.” [15][18]

The first Caledonian Railway Bridge over the River Clyde (prior to the construction of the new bridge which was completed in 1905). The ship is the Clutha Ferry, © Public Domain. [16]

The second bridge was built between 1899–1905 during the expansion of Central Station, to a design by D. A. Matheson, chief engineer of the Caledonian Railway. Arrol and Co. was the contractor for this bridge as well. [17] “The foundations for the bridge are rectangular sunk caissons, sunk by the compressed air chamber method used on the Forth Bridge to a depth of up to 48 feet (15 m) below the river bed. The central span is 194 feet (59 m) long with Linville truss girders 15 feet 9 inches (4.80 m) deep. The parapet girders are around 10 feet (3.0 m) deep, and suspended on curved brackets. There are a minimum of eight parallel main girders in the width. The spans are of lengths 160 feet (49 m), 200 feet (61 m) and 178 feet (54 m), and the structure contains 11,000 tonnes (11,000 long tons; 12,000 short tons) of steel. [17] The total length of the bridge between the abutments is 702 feet 6 inches (214.12 m).” [18][19]

The bridge varies in width from 35 to 62.5 metres (115 to 205 ft) and carries up to ten tracks. [17][18] It leads immediately into Glasgow Central Station on the north bank of the river. At the time of its opening, it was believed to be the widest railway bridge in existence.” [18][19]

The New Caledonian Railway Bridge over the River Clyde is on the left of this photograph. The bridge on the right is the King George V Bridge, © Richard Webb and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 2.0) [20]
This view of the later bridge is included in the Railway Wonders of the World article about the Caledonian Railway, © Public Domain. [73]
Embed from Getty Images
A Caledonian Railway coke train, Plean, circa. 1910. [89]

The Caledonian’s goods operations were always commercially enterprising. The CR served all of Sctland’s main coalfields, with the exception of that in Fifeshire, and most of the heavy industry in the Glasgow area. “It was linked directly with the ports of Glasgow and its outposts on the Firth of Clyde with Leith (Edinburgh), Dundee and Aberdeen, and it virtually created Grangemouth. The Caledonian led the way in designing and providing for its customers’ new wagons, including high-capacity vehicles, for a variety of consignments. It was an early operator of fast freight trains. One of its major feats was co-operation with the English lines during World War I in moving vast tonnages of coal for warships in Scapa Flow in the Orkneys. The trains ran mostly from South Wales and the CR accepted them at Carlisle and made them over to the Highland at Perth. HR had the hardest task, of working heavy coal trains over its 300 miles of route from Perth via Inverness to Thurso, for shipment to Scapa.” [1: p9]

Although the CR was formed as an inter-city trunk line it coped manfully with other demands. “Local interests in Lanark promoted a branch line to their town, opening in 1855. Coal owners in South Lanarkshire [22] pressed for a railway connection, and the Lesmahagow Railway was formed by them, opening in 1856. It was later absorbed by the Caledonian, but other lines followed in the sparsely populated but mineral-rich area. As new coal mines opened, so new branches were needed, connecting Coalburn, Stonehouse, Strathaven, Muirkirk and Darvel and many other places, with new lines built right up until 1905. When the coal became exhausted in the second half of the 20th century, the railways were progressively closed; passenger traffic had always been light and it too disappeared. Only the passenger traffic to the Lanark and Larkhall branches remain in operation.” [3][8][21]

In North Lanarkshire, the North British Railway was a keen competitor, having taken over the Monkland Railways. The area contained the rapidly-growing iron production area surrounding Coatbridge, and servicing that industry with coal and iron ore, and transport to local and more distant metal processing locations, dominated the Caledonian’s activity in the region. The Rutherglen and Coatbridge line, later linking Airdrie, and the Carfin to Midcalder line were routes with significant passenger traffic. Many lines to coal and iron ore pits further east were built, but serving remote areas the lines closed when the mineral extraction ceased.” [3][8][21]

Busby and East Kilbride: After rail connections became established at Barrhead (we noted above that the CR took a 999 year lease on the Glasgow, Barrhead and Neilston Direct Railway, the Glasgow & South Western Railway also built a branch to Barrhead. [26]) various interests in Bushby demanded a railway connection. This was opened by the CR in 1866. It was extended in 1868 to East Kilbride, although at that time the then small village did not generate much business for the railway. [3][8][21]

Branches South of Carstairs: When the main line was built, no branches were provided in the thinly populated terrain of the Southern Uplands. Subsequently, four independent companies made branches themselves, and the Caledonian built two.
The Symington, Biggar and Broughton Railway was opened in 1860, having been taken over by the Caledonian during construction. It was extended to Peebles in 1864.” [3][21]

The independent Dumfries, Lochmaben and Lockerbie Railway was opened in 1863. It “was encouraged by the Caledonian Railway, giving westward access into Dumfriesshire, and worked by it; the Caledonian acquired the line in 1865.” [3]

The Portpatrick Railway opened “between Castle Douglas and Portpatrick in 1861–62 and the Caledonian Railway worked that railway; it obtained running powers over the G&SWR between Dumfries and Castle Douglas, and at a stroke the Caledonian had penetrated deep into the south-west, and to the ferry service to the north of Ireland, territory that the G&SWR had assumed was its own. The Portpatrick Railway later reformed with the Wigtownshire Railway as the Portpatrick and Wigtownshire Joint Railway; the Caledonian was a one-quarter owner.” [3][27][28]

Wikipedia continues: “The North British Railway opened its branch line to Dolphinton, east of Carstairs, and the Caledonian feared that the next step would be an incursion by the NBR into Caledonian territory, possibly seeking running powers on the main line. To head this off, the Caledonian built its own Dolphinton Branch from Carstairs; it opened in 1867. Dolphinton had a population of 260 and two railways, and traffic was correspondingly meagre, and the line closed in 1945 to passengers and in 1950 to goods.” [3][21]

The independent Solway Junction Railway was opened in 1869, linking iron mines in Cumberland with the Caledonian Railway at Kirtlebridge, crossing the Solway Firth by a 1,940 yd (1,770 m) viaduct; the company worked the line itself. It considerably shortened the route to the Lanarkshire ironworks, and was heavily used at first, but the traffic was depleted by cheap imported iron ore within a decade. The Scottish part of the line was acquired by the Caledonian Railway in 1873, and the whole line in 1895. Serious ice damage and later heavy maintenance costs made the line seriously unprofitable and it was closed in 1921.” [3][29]

After 1880, the Caledonian’s network continued to expand. Wikipedia tells us that, “The Moffat Railway was opened from Beattock on 2nd April 1883. It was just over 1.5 miles (2.4 km) long. It was worked by the Caledonian and absorbed on 11th November 1889. The Caledonian Railway sought to develop both Moffat and Peebles as watering places, and ran The Tinto Express from both places, combining at Symington, to Edinburgh and Glasgow for several years.” [3][21]

The “Leadhills and Wanlockhead Branch was opened as a light railway from Elvanfoot in 1901–02. With challenging gradients to reach Scotland’s highest village in otherwise remote territory, the line scraped a bare living and closed in 1938.” [3][21]

In 1862, “the Greenock and Wemyss Bay Railway was authorised. It was an independent company intending to provide a fast connection from Rothesay on the Isle of Bute; it opened on 13th May 1865 and in August 1893 it amalgamated with the Caledonian Railway, having been operated by the Caledonian Railway since its opening.” [3][8][30: p78]

Wikipedia tells us that in 1889, the CR “opened an extension line from Greenock to Gourock, more conveniently situated than Greenock; this involved the expensive construction of Newton Street Tunnel, the longest in Scotland.” [3][31]

At this time after feeling frustrated with the performance of independent steamer operators, the CR sought powers to operate the vessels directly; this was refused by Parliament. So the company founded the nominally independent Caledonian Steam Packet Company (CSPC) in 1889. “The CSPC expanded its routes and services considerably; following nationalisation of the railways in 1948 it became owned by British Railways, but was divested in 1968 and later became a constituent of Caledonian MacBrayne (CalMac), which remains in state ownership.” [3][32]

Late in the 19th century, the CR began to focus on the development of suburban lines around Glasgow and Paisley. Wikipedia notes that “The Cathcart District Railway was promoted as an independent concern but heavily supported by the Caledonian. It opened in 1886 from Pollokshields to Mount Florida and Cathcart (the eastern arm of the present-day Cathcart Circle Line) in 1886, and was extended via Shawlands to form a loop in 1894. It was worked by the Caledonian, although the company retained its independence until 1923.” [3]

We have already noted the the Glasgow Central Railway which eventually became The ‘Argyle Line’. [3][25] “The Paisley and Barrhead District Railway was incorporated in 1897 and transferred to the Caledonian in 1902; it [linked] Paisley and Barrhead [to] enable a circular service from Glasgow. The line was substantially ready in 1902 but by now street tramways were electrically operated and eminently successful. It was plain that a passenger service would not be viable against tram competition and the intended passenger service was never started.” [3][30]

North of the River Clyde was both heavily populated and highly industrialised. Initiallt it was the preserve of the North British Railway and its satellites, but its importance encouraged the Caledonian to enter the area. “The Lanarkshire and Dumbartonshire Railway [33] was nominally independent, running from near Maryhill to Dumbarton, opening progressively between 1894 and 1896. In 1896 the Caledonian gained access to Loch Lomond with the opening of the Dumbarton and Balloch Joint Railway (originally built by the Caledonian and Dumbartonshire Junction Railway), built jointly with the NBR.” [3][33][36]

In 1888, the Lanarkshire and Ayrshire Railway opened a 6.5-mile (10.5 km) line “from Giffen on the Glasgow, Barrhead and Kilmarnock Joint Railway to Ardrossan. Its purpose was to shorten the route for Caledonian mineral traffic, and it was worked by the Caledonian. In 1903–04 it was extended eastwards to Cathcart and Newton, enabling the heavy mineral trains to avoid the Joint Line and the congested area around Gushetfaulds from the Lanarkshire coalfields to Ardrossan Harbour.” [3][21][34][35] Today, the only operational sections of the line are those between Newton and Neilston. Now two suburban branch lines (Newton to Glasgow Central via Kirkhill and Neilston to Glasgow Central via the Mount Florida side of the Cathcart Circle). Electrified in the early 1960s, these lines carry frequent suburban passenger trains. [35]

Around Edinburgh, an intersting development was the construction of the Granton Harbour Branch which opened in 1861, funded equally by the harbour authorities and the CR. Granton Harbour was a large industrial harbour built by lighthouse engineer, Robert Stevenson. [37]. In 1864, the Leith North Branch from the Granton line at Pilton to Leith was built, opening to passengers in 1879. [38] When, after 1900, “the port authorities built new modern docks to the east of the former Leith docks, and the Caledonian further extended its Leith line to reach the new facilities: the Leith New Lines opened in 1903. It had been planned to open a passenger service on the line, and passenger stations had been built, but tram competition made it clear that an inner suburban passenger railway was unviable and the passenger service was never inaugurated.” [3]

Wikipedia continues: “The Edinburgh main line passed close to numerous mineral workings, and several short branches and connections were made to collieries, iron workings and shale oil plants. The Wilsontown Branch from Auchengray, opened in 1860 was the most significant, and carried a passenger service.” [3] The Wilsontown Branch was a three and three-quarter mile long railway line that served the village of Wilsontown in Lanarkshire and several collieries, running from a bay platform at Auchengray Railway Station to Wilsontown Railway Station, which was the passenger terminus. [39]

The Wishaw and Coltness Railway, ran for approximately 11 miles from Chapel Colliery, at Newmains in North Lanarkshire … to the Monkland and Kirkintilloch Railway near Whifflet, giving a means of transport for minerals around Newmains to market in Glasgow and Edinburgh. built to 4ft 6 in gauge, it had several branches serving pits and ironworks. [40] The line was leased by the CR and re-gauged. In 1869, the line was extended from near Cleland Ironworks “to Midcalder Junction on the Edinburgh main line, passing through Shotts, Fauldhouse and Midcalder. This line connected to many further mines and industrial sites, and gave the Caledonian a passenger route between Glasgow and Edinburgh that competed with the North British Railway’s route through Falkirk.” [3]

The CR’s main line did not connect with a significant industiral area on the Water of Leith Southwest of Edinburgh. To address this, a branch line from Slateford to Balerno opened on 1st August 1874. [41] “The line was successful in encouraging residential building, especially at Colinton, and also leisure excursions: for a time it was known as ‘the picnic line’, but it too succumbed to more convenient transport facilities by road, and it closed to passengers in 1943.” [3]

Speculative residential development encouraged the construction of the Barnton Branch, Barnton was West of Edinburgh. “The branch line opened on 1st March 1894; the terminus was named Cramond Brig at first. The Caledonian intended to make the line into a loop, returning to the city by way of Corstorphine, but this idea was shelved.” [3][8][21]

The Callander & Oban Line was initially an independent company, it had been promised financial support by the Scottish Central Railway (SCR). The Caledonian absorbed the SCR in 1865 and the directors were dismayed at the level of commitment to a difficult construction scheme barely started. Construction took many years, reaching a station serving Killin in 1870 and Oban in 1880. The line ran on a shoestring – finances were always tight and the line was never profitable although it contributed greatly to the development of the town of Oban. A branch serving Killin was opened in 1886, [42] and another to serve Ballachulish, opened in 1903. [3][43] Articles about the Ballachulish Branch can be found here, [44] here, [45] and here. [46]

The western part of the line from Crianlarich to Oban remains open, connected to the ex-NBR West Highland Line, but the remainder has closed. [3][47][48] An article about the Callander & Oban Railway can be found here. [11]

The Strathearn Lines: “the Perth, Almond Valley and Methven Railway opened in 1858 to connect Methven to the SMJR network; it was extended to Crieff when the Crieff & Methven Railway opened in 1866.” [3][49] It eventually became part of the CR network through acquisitions and mergers.

A line was gradually extended along Strathearn from Crieff to Lchearnhead and Balquidder (on the Callander & Oban line, © Afterbrunel and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0). [50]

The upsurge in tourism in Strathearn encouraged many visitors, who used Crieff as a railhead and continued by road. In 1893 the Crieff and Comrie Railway made a short extension into Strathearn, and this encouraged ideas of completing a link right through to the Callander and Oban line. There were wild dreams of Irish cattle imports coming to Perth markets over the route. This became the Lochearnhead, St Fillans and Comrie Railway; due to serious problems raising capital, it took from 1901 to 1905 to open fully. The through traffic never developed and passenger connections at Balquhidder were poor, discouraging through travel.” [3][51]

The CR wanted the extension to Lochearnhead and the Callander and Oban line. “Moreover, it was concerned that the rival North British Railway would build such a line, abstracting much of its traffic in the area. When the Comrie company opened discussions with the Caledonian about selling their line, they found that the Caledonian was willing. In fact its offer was remarkably generous: they would repay the share capital in full, pay off the mortgage loan, and settle MacKay’s claim. This was put to a Special Shareholders’ Meeting on 9th February 1898. The shareholders agreed and the company was vested in the Caledonian Railway by Act of 1st August 1898.” [50][51]

Locomotives of the Caledonian Railway

The Caledonian Railway Locomotive Works were originally at Greenock but moved to St. Rollox, Glasgow, in 1856. Greenock Works and Shed opened in 1841 adjacent to the Greenock terminus of the Glasgow, Paisley & Greenock Railway (GP&GR). [53] The Caledonian Railway leased to GP&GR line in 1846 and at that time the Greenock Shed and Works wer enlarged to accommodate the CR’s needs. [53] The shed remained in use until 1885 when a railway extension from Greenock to Gourock required its removal and rellocation to Greenock Ladyburn Shed. [54]

The class number used for Caledonian Railway engines was the stock number of the first member of the class to reach traffic. Hence earlier/lower numbered classes could well have appeared later in time. … Until the appointment of Dugald Drummond, unlike most other British railways, almost all engines had outside cylinders, and the 0-6-0 arrangement was quite rare, goods engines being of type 2-4-0 or 0-4-2. Passenger engines were normally 2-2-2.” [52][55]

Wikipedia tabulates all of the locomotives used by the Caledonian Railway under the names of the railway’s Chief Mechanical Engineers. The tables can be found here. [52]

Lightmoor Press published two excellent books about locomotives of the Caledonian Railway. The first by David Hamilton – Caledonian Railway Locomotives: The Formative Years – in 2019. [63] The second by H. J. C. Cornwell – Caledonian Railway Locomotives: The Classic Years – in 2020. [64]

The following series of images cover a range of examples of the Caledonian Railway’s motive power:

Caledonian Railway 264 Class 0-4-0ST Locomotive No. 1 (264): designed by Dugald Drummond and built by Neilson and Company in 1885. Later examples were built at St Rollox Works under the direction of John F. McIntosh in 1895, 1900, 1902 and 1908. both Class 264 and Class 611 were very similat 0-4-0ST locomotives. These small shunters remained in long service under the LMS (who gave all Neilson saddle locomotives the power class 0F, shared by many other types) and British Railways, with the last of the class withdrawn in 1962. The two classes, sometimes referred to by the generic term “pugs”, were mainly used as works shunters in the area around Glasgow, Scotland, often running with home-made tenders to improve their small coal capacity. Like most 0-4-0 tanks of the period they had outside cylinders and inside slide valves driven by Stephenson valve gear. A number were later sold into private industry and several even made it as far south as Crewe where they acted as works shunters in British Railways days. None have survived into preservation. … They are easily confused with the earlier 1882-built ex-North British Railway Class Y-9 (NBR Class G), also designed by Dugald Drummond to a similar saddle tank design, although the 264/611 are distinguished by a taller chimney and larger circular windows. Both were originally commissioned from Drummond by Neilson & Co to a standard design and were used by North British, LNER and British Railways. One NBR Y-9 shunter (No. 42 68095) has been preserved at the Bo’ness and Kinneil Railway museum. [76]
Caledonian Railway Class ! 4-4-0T Locomitve No. 4: 12 Class 1 locos were built in1893 and 1894. The last was taken out of service in 1938. These were two-cyliner locos with 5 ft. driving wheels and operated at a maximum boiler pressure of 150 PSI. This is a Caledonia Works design for a modern train simulator. It was designed by John Lambie. [77]
Caledonian Railway Class “123” (L.M.S. ‘1P’) 4-2-2 No.123 (L.M.S. No.14010): built 1886 by Neilson (Works No.3553) specifically for the Edinburgh International Exhibition. Withdrawn 1935. Although officially designed by Dugald Drummond, in reality it was entirely a Neilson design. It ushered in a revival of single-wheeler locomotives. It is seen here at the Museum of Transport, Glasgow, in March 2007, © Hugh Llewelyn and licenced for resuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 2.0). [56]
Caledonian Railway Class 76 2-2-2 Locomotive No. 87 with 8ft. 2in. driving wheels: They were built from 1859 onwards at St. Rollox, Glasgow and served as the main express engine until 1885. The final engine was withdrawn from service in 1901, © Tony Higsett and licenced for resuse un=der a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY 2.0). [57]
Caledonian Railway Class 812 0-6-0 Locomotive No. 828: This series of locomotives were produced whilst John Mcintosh was Chief Mechanical Engineer of the Caledonian Railway (1895-1914). The first 17 locomotives were built at the Caledonian’s St. Rollox works during 1899 (No. 812-828), with a further 12 built there later that year. At the turn of the 20th century, the Caledonian found itself short of suitable engines for mineral traffic and with St. Rollox committed to other work, they turned to three outside contractors (Neilson Reid, Sharp Stewart and Dübs). Bachmann tell us that the first 17 locomotives were used for mixed traffic duties whilst carrying the distinctive Caledonian Blue livery. Some of the engines had Westinghouse pumps and couplings fitted to enable them to be used on passenger services. Under the LMS ownership in 1923, the Westinghouse pumps were removed and the class were painted into Black livery. In 1946, the first locomotive was taken out of service, with the last being withdrawn in 1963. No. 828 was the one engine that survived being scrapped, having previously been earmarked for preservation by the Scottish Locomotive Preservation Trust Fund (now The Caledonian Railway 828 Trust). Originally on display at the Glasgow Museum of Transport, it was restored during 1966 and painted in Caledonian Railway blue with the long-term goal of restoring the locomotive to full working order. In October 1980, it was moved to the Strathspey Railway where it was rebuilt before returning to operational use in 1993, © Hugh Llewelyn and licenced for resuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-SA 2.0). [58]
Caledonian Railway Class 439 0-4-4T Locomotive No. 419 (55189) built in 1907: Caledonian Railway No. 419 at the Embsay & BoltonAbbey Railway in 2021, visiting from the Bo’ness and Kinneil Railway. Built in 1907 for a wider range of work , the engine operated in service for over five decades before being saved because of its significance to the story of railways in Scotland.Early in the 21st century, the locomotive had work undertaken to enable it to steam through the 2020s, primarily at its home line but also on occasion forays elsewhere, © Andrew Simmonds/Embsay & Bolton Abbey Railway. [59]
Caledonian Railway Class 49 4-6-0 Express Locomotive No. 49 of 1903: only 2 of this class of loco were built. They were rebuilt in 1911 with Schmidt superheaters. They were rated 4P and numbered 14750-14751 by the LMS, © Charles Rous-Marten, Public Domain. [60][61]
Caledonian Railway 4-6-0 Class 903 Locomotive, No. 903, Cardean, built 1906: By 1906, experience with the 49 Class had enabled McIntosh to design an improved version, and the installation of new turntables at major engine sheds presaged the arrival of five new locomotives. The first of these, number 903, was named “Cardean” after the country estate of one of the CR directors, and immediately became the company’s new flagship locomotive, with its name becoming a nickname for the whole class. The Caledonian gave the new locomotives a great deal of publicity and “Cardean” thus achieved some fame. Even so, the performance of the 903s was still unremarkable, © Public Domain. [60][62]
Railway Wonders of the World carried this photograph of No. 903 in its article, ‘Famous Expresses – 3
The Crack Caledonian ‘Flyers’ Which Work the Scottish Section of the West Coast Route’, © Public Domain. [74]
Caledonian Railway 0-8-0 Class 600 Locomotive, No. 600: 8 units built by St. Rollox Works in 1901-1903, worked Lanarkshire coal traffic, all scrapped by 1931, being freight locomotives, they did not receive names. They were built with spiral springs & heavy slide valves which were difficult to maintain. The heavy slide valves also had a tendency to make the locomotives go off beat very quickly. It is reported that the class could haul 60 loaded wagons & were introduced together with the 30 ton high capacity bogie wagons fitted
with Westinghouse air brakes. They were reported to be very powerful, perhaps representing the limit to which locomotive engineers could achieve in the UK at that time period. However, few of the Caledonian Railways goods yards could host the trains the 600s were capable of hauling, making them somewhat redundant, © Public Domain. [65]
Caledonian Railway 2-6-0 (Mogul) Class 34 Locomotive No. 35: one of five locomotives in the Class, built at St. Rollox, Glasgow and in service until 1936, © Public Domain. [66]
Caledonian Railway 4-4-0 Class No. 721 ‘Dunalastair I’ No. 723: The increasing weight of express trains in the 1880s and 1890s presented the Caledonian Railway with the problem of having to run inefficient double-headed trains. John F. McIntosh, Chief Engineer from 1895, increased the power of the 4-4-0 locomotives to the maximum possible within physical limitations and technical developments. The key to this was the use of a larger boiler that just fit the loading gauge of the Scottish lines and operated at a pressure of 160 psi. The resulting locomotive was named the Dunalastair class after a prominent Scottish clan. It also formed the basis for Belgian 4-4-0T and 4-4-2T locomotives, of which 424 were built. In 1896, 15 examples of the Class 721 locomotives were built, numbered 721 to 735 and later designated ‘Dunalastair I’. These were followed in 1897, by numbers 766 to 780 as ‘Dunalastair II’, and in 1899/1900 by numbers 887 to 902 as ‘Dunalastair III’. The latter two series were fitted with four-axle tenders to better cope with the longer distances across the Scottish plains. Records exist of the Dunalastair III showing a 52 km route with a 250-ton train at an average speed of 94 km/h. … Between 1904 and 1910, a further 19 units followed as ‘Dunalastair IV’. From 1910 onwards, a total of 21 engines of the classes 139 and 43 were built, which had a superheater ex-works. Opinion differs as to whether these were included within the Dunalastair class or considered a separate class of locomotive. … Over the course of development, the boiler pressure was increased first to 175 and then to 180 psi. When some Series II, III, and IV locomotives were retrofitted with superheaters from 1914 onwards, the boiler pressure was reduced again to 170 psi and larger cylinders were installed. On the LMS, they were given numbers between 14311 and 14439. While all original Dunalastair engines were retired by 1935, the superheated steam engines survived longer. Of a total of four engines acquired by British Railways, the last Dunalastair IV survived until 1958. This photograph was carried by ‘Railway and Locomotive Engineering‘, May 1896, © Public Domain. [67]
Caledonian Railway 4-4-0 Class No. 721 ‘Dunalastair II’ No. 769: Notes relating to this locomotive are immediately above the image which was carried in ‘Locomotive Magazine’, June 1898, © Public Domain. [67]
Caledonian Railway 4-4-0 Classes No. 113 and 72 ‘Dunalastair V’, London, Midland & Scottish Class 3P No. 14493: This locomotive is shown standing at Inverness in August 1948. In 1916, William Pickersgill commissioned 16 Class 72 4-4-0 express locomotives. From 1920, 32 more Class 113 locomotives followed, featuring slightly smaller boilers and larger cylinders. Technically, they could be considered successors to McIntosh’s Dunalastair series, which is why they were unofficially known as “Dunalastair Vs.” Like their predecessors, they had cylinders and controls on the inside of the frame, but a factory-fitted superheater . They reportedly performed well, which extended their service life. All of the Class entered the LMS in 1923 and British Railways in 1948. One was scrapped in 1953 following an accident, and the rest were withdrawn between 1959 and 1962, © Ben Brooksbank and licenced for resuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [67]
British Railways Class 294 0-6-0 Locomotive No. 57361 at Polmadie Depot in August 1948: these locomotives were originally Caledonian Railway Classes 294 and 711. When Dugald Drummond became Chief Engineer of the Caledonian, he introduced a new class of 0-6-0 freight locomotives. He based these locomotives on the Class D locomotives that he built while working for the North British Railway. These locos were were nicknamed ‘Jumbos’ or ‘Standard Goods’. … Drummond’s successors continued to build these locomotives. While the 161 locomotives built from 1883 onwards were designated Class 294, the 83 locomotives built from 1890 onwards by Drummond’s successors are known as Class 711. The latter were fitted with Westinghouse brakes to allow them to be used on passenger trains. All 244 went to the LMS, and the first was not withdrawn until 1946. A total of 238 were acquired by British Railways and withdrawn by 1962, © Ben Brooksbank and licenced for resuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [67]
Caledonian Railway Class No. 492 0-8-0T Locomotive No. 492: Six of this Class of locomotive were built in 1903 and 1904. These engines were described as mineral engines with large cabs with doors fitted. The 2nd axle had flangeless wheels. All members of the Class survived into LMS ownership.They were rated 4F by the LMS at grouping and numbered Nos. 16500-16505, © Public Domain.. [75]
Caledonian Railway Rail-motor Car: This vehicle was used on the Ballachulish Branch between Connel Ferry and North Connel or Benderloch. As can be seen in this image, it was usually accompanied by a two-axle trailer. Further details can be found here, © Public Domain. [68] This vehicle is also noted in the Railway Wonders of the World article about the Caledonian Railway: “At the other end of the varied list of passenger rolling stock is the vehicle working the local traffic over Connel Bridge, a notable cantilever structure with a span of 500 ft across Loch Etive between Connel Ferry and Benderloch, which not only runs frequently on weekdays but makes trips out and home on Sundays – a motor-car that hauls trucks on which are placed the motor-cars in which the owners ride as owners used to ride in their own carriages on the railways in the old times.” [73]

Drew comments that, “all Caledonian locomotives had to work hard. Every route, even Glasgow Central to Edinburgh, had its testing sections, and the Glasgow-Edinburgh expresses stopped relatively frequently to cater for outer-suburban passengers. Apart from the Glasgow-Carlisle main line, most Caledonian express passenger working involved getting away from the numerous stops necessitated by the sparse population. Some of the most exacting work was on the Clyde steamer boat trains, where every second counted in competition with the NBR and GSWR.” [1: p11]

Caledonian Railway Rolling Stock

Carriages: Lightmoor Press has released a book by Mike Williams which covers the passenger rolling-stock of the Caledonian Railway: Mike Williams; Caledonian Railway Carriages; Lightmoor Press, Lydney, 2015. [69] Mike Williams describes the carriages owned and operated by the Caledonian Railway from its opening until the 1923 Grouping, with 250 photographs and over 300 drawings. A well-produced and informative volume commensurate with the usual standard of Lightmoor Press publications.

Lightmoor Press describes the content: “The topics covered include the CR’s reaction to technological developments in railway passenger transport and the increasing attention paid to passenger comfort and convenience. The description of its carriage livery challenges some aspects of ‘received wisdom’ and deals with furnishing and internal décor. General service stock is reviewed to the end of McIntosh’s tenure in 1914, plus the carriages acquired from the West Coast Joint Stock fleet, the Pullman cars and the final designs in the Pickersgill regime. The CR Ambulance Train and other carriages in war-time service are described along with vehicles which were not part of general service stock. Saloons, Invalid carriages, Post Office vehicles, the Prison Van, Inchture horse bus and the Connel Ferry rail motor are all covered, along with some proposed designs that never saw service, including a steam rail motor. Appendices give information about the number of carriages in the fleet, their numbers, carriage orders and building dates and list the available drawings of carriages and components, with their location.” [70]

The Railway Wonders of the World article about the Caledonian Railway includes these paragraphs:

“The passenger work of the Caledonian is of high repute for speed and accommodation. As we have said enough of the West Coast service we will content ourselves here with the Grampian Corridor Express as an example. This train is made up of four varieties of coaches, composite, brake composite, brake third, and third. Each of these is 65 ft long in the body, and 68 ft 6-in over buffers, the width being 9 ft. The under-frames over headstocks are 64 ft 10-in, 44 ft between the bogie centres, and 7 ft 5-in over the sole bars, the wheel base being 56 ft.

In the composite the space between the partitions is 7 ft 4⅝-in in the first class, and 6 ft 4½-in in the third; in the brake composite it is 7 ft in the first class and 6 ft in the third, the brake compartment taking up 12 ft 2¾-in. In the brake third, in which the brake compartment occupies 27 ft 4½-in, it is 6 ft, and in the third it is 6 ft 2⅝-in. The composite seats 30 first-class passengers three aside and 24 third class four aside, the brake composite seats 18 first and 32 third, the brake third seats 40, and the third 72. The composite weighs 38 tons 4 cwt, the brake composite weighs 38 tons 11 cwt, the brake third weighs 35 tons 5 cwt, and the third 36 tons 10 cwt. These details are given to show, among other things, that appearances may be deceptive; in carriages seemingly alike there may be a difference in the knee-space making all the difference in the comfort, though in this case the smallest, 6 ft, is ample for any one of reasonable stature and attitude.

This heavy train – the Grampian – does 30 miles an hour up Dunblane bank, part of which is 1 in 73, for Beattock is not the stiffest gradient on the line, that being the 1 in 40 on the Bonnybridge branch. It is the 10 a.m. out of Buchanan Street and the 9.30 out of Edinburgh joining at Perth, where the restaurant car is put on; and the Glasgow portion weighs over 250 tons. It is not the fastest on the line, that being the 10.5 from Forfar to Perth, 321 miles in 33 minutes, the longest non-stop being the 2.17 a.m. from Carlisle to Perth, 150¾ miles in three hours; but with the exception of the Granite City Express, leaving Glasgow at 5 p.m, it is perhaps the best known.” [73]

Adjacent to the quote abobe, Railway Wonders of the World included this drawing of Copmposite Corridor Coach No. 217, © Public Domain. [73]

Drawings of the Caledonian Railway Coaching Stock can be found on the Caley Coaches Ltd. website. [85] Caley Coaches Ltd. provides drawings and photographs to support its range of kits including for: 57′ Non-corridor coaches; 57′ Semi-corridor coaches; 57′ Corridor coaches; Grampian Stock; 65′ Slip Coaches; Edinburgh & Glasgow Stock; and 4 wheel “Balerno Branch” Coaches.

Carriages being built at St. Rollox Works, Glasgow, © Public Domain. [73]
Caledonian Railways Engineer’s Saloon No. 41. This is a coach with a most complex history. It was built as a West Coast Joint Stock (i.e. LNWR/CR joint) Diagram 41 50’6″ 3rd Class Kitchen Dining Car No.484 at the LNWR’s Wolverton Works in 1893. It was of all-wooden construction with a clerestory roof and two 6-wheeled bogies. After use on the West Coast route, in 1906 it was transferred to the Caledonian Railway and converted to a Composite (1st/3rd Class) Dining Saloon No.41 (Diagram 63). In 1919-20 the CR’s St. Rollox Works completely rebuilt it into an Officers’ Saloon/Buffet Saloon to Diagram 63A with a new steel 48′ underframe lengthening the coach to 51′. The 6-wheeled bogies were replaced by standard Caledonian 8′ 4-wheeled bogies and an arc roof replaced the clerestory. The interior was gutted and two saloons (large and small) fitted, the kitchin being relocated. A corridor connection was fitted at one end only, the other end being fitted with three observation windows. Apparently, it was used both for engineers and, when not so needed, as a buffet car in ordinary service. After absorbtion into the LMS, it was renumbered 15555; then in 1927, the Birmingham Railway & Carriage Co. further rebuilt it into an Engineers Saloon No.45018 with a second corridor connection replacing the observation end and LMS Fowler 9′ 4-wheeled bogies. After Nationalisation, BR(ScR) fitted it with Gresley 8′ bogies in 1955 and, following collision damage, again rebuilt it in 1960 as an Inspection Saloon with an observation end similar to contemporary dmu’s whilst some windows were replaced by BR pattern ones with sliding ventilators. A new interior consisting of a saloon, kitchin and guard’s vestibule was fitted. It’s BR (ScR) was Sc45018M. It was not withdrawn until 1972 – a life of 75 years! It was then preserved and used as an Observation Car. The coachis shown at Bulmers’ Steam Centre in April 1974, © Hugh Llewelyn and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [3]

The adjacent image shows the interior of a third Class Luncheon Car on a West Coast Corridor Express Train of the LNWR and Caledonian Railways. The two railway companies collaborated to create a set of stock which could be used over the full length of the line from London, Euston to Glasgow. This iIllustration was carried in The Illustrated London News on 18th July 1896, © Public Domain. [78]

Wagons and Non-Passenger Coaching Stock: Lightmoor Press has also released a book by Mike Williams which covers the non-passenger rolling-stock of the Caledonian Railway: Mike Williams; Caledonian Railway Wagons and Non-Passenger Caoching Stock; Lightmoor Press, Lydney, 2013. [71]

Mike Williams details the history of the Caledonian Railways wagons from 1847 until the grouping in 1923 when the Company became part of the LMS.

Lightmoor Press says that research for the book is “based on Board minutes and other official sources, whilst over 250 official drawings have been examined. The introduction details the sources of information used and a chapter on the industrial development of Scotland outlines its influence on the size and diversity of the wagon fleet. The types of wagons and numbers in service are tabulated and the financial pressures which hamstrung the modernisation programme begun in the early 1900s are also described. An overview is offered of technical developments, which discusses how two Locomotive Superintendents transformed the wagon fleet. The liveries of wagons and Non-Passenger Coaching Stock are next described, supplemented in each case by the systems used by the Caledonian to allocate running numbers. Photographic evidence and drawings depict a far more complex picture than that presented previously. Eleven chapters then deal with different types of wagons, ranging from those built by the thousand, to small numbers of wagons for special traffic. Building dates are given for each design, whilst design developments are described and supported by photographs and works drawings. Sample running numbers are included for modellers. A further chapter describes the Caledonian’s relationship with the private traders who ran wagons over the system. Appendices list the construction orders undertaken by the company and outside contractors. The surviving works drawings are listed, with their archive references, and the photographs in an official album dating from 1900 are described. A final appendix gives information about drawings for the modeller, supported by specially commissioned drawings of details characteristic of Caledonian wagons. Produced in association with the Caledonian Railway Association.” [72]

These next few images show a few different Caledonian Railway good wagons:

An early 6-ton dumb-buffered open goods wagon, © Public Domain. [79]
A CR 6-ton covered wagon (van) built in 1896, © Public Domain. [79]
A 5-plank open goods wagon of circa. 1910, © Public Domain. [79]
Covered Carriage Truck or Motor Car Van of the Caledonian Railway, diagram 83, No. 138, built 1906. These wagons transported private vehicles on the railway, © Public Domain. [80]
Wagon No. 72000 (diagram 50) was a four-axle wagon for the transport of iron ore and was developed in 1899 by the Caledonian Railway, © Public Domain. [81]
Between 1901 and 1903, the Caledonian Railway acquired over 400 30-ton ore wagons with bogies (Diagram 54), © Public Domain. [82]
In 1903 , twelve 40-ton bogie hopper wagons (Diagram 66) were built in the Caledonian Railway’s own workshops. These wagons originally appeared in production documents as Ballast Wagons . Later, at least for factory photos, they were labeled Coke Wagons. The wagons were fitted with Westinghouse brakes and American Diamond bogies , originally intended for the construction of iron ore wagons to Diagram 54, © Public Domain. [83]
The Caledonian Railway built two bogie low-loader wagons in its own workshops for the transport of flat glass, (Diagram 82). They replaced two smaller two-axle glass trucks built ten years earlier (Diagram 38), which could only be loaded with 15 tons. Theese boie wagons had American Diamond bogies . The cars had three trestles that could be moved or rotated depending on the loading requirements. If necessary, they could also be removed completely. In addition to glass panes, large steel plates and other loads were also carried, © Public Domain. [84]
Embed from Getty Images
Two Caledonian Railway bogie flat wagons loaded with a large steel column and base, in Glasgow, circa. 1910. [88]

To Conclude …

Paul Drew concludes his article with these words: “The Caledonian achieved its zenith in the years 1900-14. There was no activity in which it did not shine; passenger stations such as Glasgow Central, Edinburgh Princes Street, Stirling, Dundee West. and (with the Great North of Scotland) Aberdeen Joint; hotels; signalling, both semaphore and the pioneer electro-pneumatic installation at Glasgow Central; and Pullman cars, which it ran on the Oban line (as observation cars), the Glasgow-Edinburgh service and elsewhere. … [It] undoubtedly justified its claim to be the premier line of Scotland.” [1: p11]

References

  1. Paul Drew; Caledonian Retrospect; in, Brian Stephenson (ed.), Trains Illustrated No. 14, Ian Allan, Walton-on-Thames, 1975, p4-11.
  2. https://www.gwra.co.uk/auctions/caledonian-railway-mounted-crest-company-coat-arms-2019apr-0374.html, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  4. The Railway Year Book for 1920; The Railway Publishing Company Limited, London, 1920.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Caledonian_Railway_(until_1850), accessed on 18th March 2024.
  6. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1931166, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_lines_to_Edinburgh, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  8. David Ross; The Caledonian: Scotland’s Imperial Railway: A History; Catrine: Stenlake Publishing Limited, Catrine, 2014.
  9. https://www.railscot.co.uk/locations/P/Perth, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perth_railway_station_(Scotland), accessed on 18th March 2025.
  11. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2024/12/22/the-callander-and-oban-railway
  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_Central_Railway, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  13. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6200150, accesse on 18th March 2025.
  14. Glasgow, Central Station, Old Approach Viaduct; Canmore, Historic Environment Scotland; via https://canmore.org.uk/site/91763/glasgow-central-station-old-approach-viaduct, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  15. Caledonian Railway Bridge; Gazetteer for Scotland, via https://www.scottish-places.info/features/featurefirst17493.html, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  16. http://www.glasgowhistory.com/glasgow-bridgejamaica-bridge.html, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  17. Glasgow, Central Station, New Approach Viaduct; Canmore. Historic Environment Scotland; via https://canmore.org.uk/site/79857/glasgow-central-station-new-approach-viaduct, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_Bridge, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  19. D. A. Matheson; The New Clyde Bridge of the Caledonian Railway at Glasgow. (Including Appendix and Plates); in The Institution of Civil Engineers, Minutes of the Proceedings, No. 182, (Paper No. 3764) 1910, p4–58; via https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/imotp.1910.16924, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  20. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/628011, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  21. John Thomas revised J. S. Paterson; A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain: Volume 6, Scotland, the Lowlands and the Borders; David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1984.
  22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_branches_in_South_Lanarkshire, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_branches_in_North_Lanarkshire, accessed on 18th March 2025.
  24. C. J. A. Robertson; The Origins of the Scottish Railway System: 1722–1844; John Donald Publishers Ltd, Edinburgh, first edition 1983.
  25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyle_Line, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrhead_Branch, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  27. C. E. J. Fryer; The Portpatrick and Wigtownshire Railways; Oakwood Press, Usk, 1991.
  28. David L. Smith; The Little Railways of South West Scotland; David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1969,
  29. Stuart Edgar and John M. Sinton; The Solway Junction Railway, Oakwood Press, Headington, 1990.
  30. Christopher Awdry; Encyclopaedia of British Railway Companies; Patrick Stephens Ltd., Sparkford,1990.
  31. Chris Hogg and Lynn Patrick; The Glasgow, Cowal and Bute Route Through Time, Amberley Publishing, Stroud, 2014.
  32. https://www.calmac.co.uk/corporate/history, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  33. https://www.west-dunbarton.gov.uk/leisure-parks-events/museums-and-galleries/collections/transport/rail, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  34. John Thomas; Forgotten Railways: Scotland; David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1976.
  35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanarkshire_and_Ayrshire_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  36. https://gracesguide.co.uk/Dumbarton_and_Balloch_Joint_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  37. https://www.nationaltransporttrust.org.uk/heritage-sites/heritage-detail/granton-harbour, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  38. https://www.railscot.co.uk/companies/L/Leith_North_Branch_Caledonian_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  39. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilsontown_railway_station, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  40. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wishaw_and_Coltness_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balerno_line, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  42. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killin_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  43. https://canmore.org.uk/site/23551/ballachulish-station, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  44. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/01/01/the-ballachulish-railway-line-part-1
  45. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/01/02/the-ballachulish-railway-line-part-2
  46. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/01/05/the-ballachulish-railway-line-part-3
  47. John Thomas; The Callander and Oban Railway; David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1966
  48. John Thomas and David Turnock; A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain: Volume 15: North of Scotland; David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1989.
  49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perth,_Almond_Valley_and_Methven_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  50. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crieff_and_Comrie_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  51. Bernard Byrom; The Railways of Upper Strathearn; Oakwood Press, Usk, 2004.
  52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotives_of_the_Caledonian_Railway, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  53. https://www.railscot.co.uk/locations/G/Greenock_Works_and_Shed, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  54. https://www.railscot.co.uk/locations/G/Greenock_Ladyburn_Shed, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  55. E. L. Ahrons; Locomotive and train working in the latter part of the nineteenth century Vol. 3; W Heffer & Sons Ltd, Cambridge, 1952, p18.
  56. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hugh_llewelyn_123_(6325588200).jpg, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  57. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2-2-2_Caledonian_Railway_87.jpg, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  58. https://news.bachmann.co.uk/2018/02/caledonian-railway-812-class-0-6-0, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  59. https://www.embsayboltonabbeyrailway.org.uk/aboutus/caledonian-railway-no-419-55189, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  60. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_49_and_903_Classes, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  61. Charles Rous-Marten; British Locomotives in 1903; in the Bulletin of the International Railway Congress.
  62. R. Essery & D. Jenkinson; An Illustrated History of L.M.S. Locomotives, Volume Three: Absorbed Pre-Group Classes, Northern Division; Oxford Publishing Company, 1986.
  63. David Hamilton; Caledonian Railway Locomotives: The Formative Years; Lightmoor Press Lydney, 2019.
  64. H. J. C. Cornwell; Caledonian Railway Locomotives: The Classic Years; Lightmoor Press, Lydney, 2020.
  65. https://www.reddit.com/r/trains/comments/141q6pl/looking_for_info_on_the_caledonian_railway_600/?rdt=60859, accessed on 19th March 2025.
  66. https://www.hattons.co.uk/directory/vehicledetails/3144935/2_6_0_class_34_cr, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  67. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=-739, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  68. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2024/07/16/the-caledonian-railway-rail-motor-car
  69. Mike Williams; Caledonian Railway Carriages; Lightmoor Press, Lydney, 2015.
  70. https://lightmoor.co.uk/books/caledonian-railway-carriages/l8009, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  71. Mike Williams; Caledonian Railway Wagons and Non-Passenger Caoching Stock; Lightmoor Press, Lydney, 2013.
  72. https://lightmoor.co.uk/books/caledonian-railway-wagons-and-non-passenger-coaching-stock/L9747, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  73. https://www.railwaywondersoftheworld.com/caledonian_railway.html, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  74. https://www.railwaywondersoftheworld.com/famous-expresses3.html, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  75. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_492_Class, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  76. https://locomotive.fandom.com/wiki/Caledonian_Railway_Class_264, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  77. https://caledoniaworks.com/product/cr-class-1, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  78. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/File:Im1894OurRail2-LNWR.jpg, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  79. http://britbahn.wikidot.com/gueterwagen-der-caledonian-railway, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  80. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CR_Motor_Car_Van_diagram_83.jpg, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  81. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR_Erzwagen_Nr._72000, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  82. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR_Erzwagen_54, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  83. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR_Selbstentladewagen_66, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  84. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CR_Glastransportwagen_82, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  85. https://caley.com/coaches.php, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  86. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/dunalastair-2nd-northbound-with-a-mixture-of-the-best-news-photo/90745294, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  87. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90747102, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  88. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90779936, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  89. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90779924, accessed on 20th March 2025.
  90. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/90760769, accessed on 20th March 2025.

The Fox and the Hen – Luke 13: 31-35

(The 2nd Sunday of Lent)

Images of animals are common in fables and fairy stories. They’re not so common in the New Testament. Sheep and Shepherd’s appear now and then, but in today’s Gospel we have two in the space of a few short verses. Two very contrasting images – Herod the fox and Jesus, the mother hen.

Fox and hen are ancient foes, as many a tale tells us.

They often start like this…. “Once upon a time there was a little Red Hen, who lived on a farm all by herself. An old Fox, crafty and sly, had a den in the rocks, on a hill near her house. …” – You may have told tha kind of story to your own children – certainly many parents have.

Are you familiar with the story? If not, there is a version of it at the end of this article…

Fox and hen – cunning evil fox, gentle little clever hen. That’s the pattern. It must ever have been so! For Luke cleverly juxtaposes the two images. Herod, the fox, the creature who eats chicken for supper. Jesus, the mother hen, who desperately loves her silly chicks and does everything she can to protect them.

First the fox: this Herod is not the same Herod who massacred the innocents. This Herod is his son. This Herod only makes a few short appearances in Luke’s gospel, yet he has a pivotal place in it. Luke’s purpose in writing his Gospel is to answer just one question. And it is Herod the fox who asks the question in Luke Chapter 9 – “Who is this man about whom I hear such things?” And, says Luke, … Herod tried to see Jesus.

Luke the evangelist reminds us of the aim and purpose of evangelism -to invite just that question and to encourage that quest.

And Herod is still wondering who Jesus is when towards the end of the Gospel of Luke, Jesus is brought before him at his trial.

We used to give our ancient Kings interesting and descriptive names Edward the Confessor, Ethelred the Unready. This Herod could be given a similar name. Herod the ambivalent, or Herod the undecided. For although he wanted to know more about Jesus he was never ready to act one way or the other. And in Luke 23, he sends Jesus back to Pilate for a final life or death decision.

Luke compares Herod, the cunning fox who stayed in power by careful political manoeuvring, with Jesus. Herod used Jerusalem as his power base, Jesus wept over Jerusalem. Jesus says that he longs for Jerusalem as a mother hen gathers her chicks under her wings in times of trouble.

This is not an image that we focus on so often…. Christ as lamb of God, or as the lion of Judah, resonate with our faith. Jesus the mother hen seems faintly ridiculous – why is that?

We know that God is neither masculine nor feminine – but God cannot be called “it” for the Bible reminds us time and again that God has a personality. Most often male imagery is used to speak about God, but by no means every time. … In our short Gospel reading, God is compared to a mother hen and the feminine image is important. God broods over Jerusalem with a depth of self-sacrificial love. He longs for their safety and eternal security and will do anything to give life to his children.

Perhaps this image of God, of Jesus, as the mother hen seems ridiculous because hens are seemingly brainless, clucking birds They are angular funny birds. It does seem … just ridiculous to compare God to a hen! But perhaps that is the point after all. For the hen destined for the pot is no more or no less helpless than the lamb led to slaughter.

The prophet Isaiah reminds us that the “man of sorrows” had no form or comeliness that we should admire him. Isaiah suggested that if we had seen him suffering we would have hid our faces in embarrassment – “we hid as it were our faces from him.”

Yes, hens are silly little things. But there is a story told of a fast moving grass fire and of a hen caught out in the open with her chicks. As the flames approached the hen could see that she and her brood would never out run the danger and so she gathered her chicks under her wings and settles down as tight to the ground as she can. The flames rapidly passed over the place where she sat and moved on across the grassland. As the ground cooled around her roasted body there was movement under her wings and the young chicks pushed their way out into the open and began to forage for scraps in the scarred landscape.

Luke compares Jesus, the mother hen who would die to protect her chicks, with the political authority of the day, Herod, the Fox, who held onto power by ruthless cunning.

We worship a God who describes himself to us in the person of Jesus, who broods over us, longing for good for us, longing for our security and peace. In our prayers, and as we say the creed together we express our confident trust in that ‘mother-hen’ kind of love that God has for us.

_____________________________________________

The Fox and the Little Red Hen

Once upon a time there was a little Red Hen, who lived on a farm all by herself. An old Fox, crafty and sly, had a den in the rocks, on a hill near her house. Many and many a night this old Fox used to lie awake and think to himself how good that little Red Hen would taste if he could once get her in his big kettle and boil her for dinner. But he couldn’t catch the little Red Hen, because she was too wise for him. Every time she went out to market she locked the door of the house behind her, and as soon as she came in again she locked the door behind her and put the key in her apron pocket, where she kept her scissors and a sugar cookie.

Once upon a time there was a little Red Hen, who lived on a farm all by herself. An old Fox, crafty and sly, had a den in the rocks, on a hill near her house. Many and many a night this old Fox used to lie awake and think to himself how good that little Red Hen would taste if he could once get her in his big kettle and boil her for dinner. But he couldn’t catch the little Red Hen, because she was too wise for him. Every time she went out to market she locked the door of the house behind her, and as soon as she came in again she locked the door behind her and put the key in her apron pocket, where she kept her scissors and a sugar cookie.

At last the old Fox thought up a way to catch the little Red Hen. Early in the morning he said to his old mother, “Have the kettle boiling when I come home tonight, for I’ll be bringing the little Red Hen for supper.” Then he took a big bag and slung it over his shoulder, and walked till he came to the little Red Hen’s house. The little Red Hen was just coming out of her door to pick up a few sticks for kindling wood. So the old Fox hid behind the wood-pile, and as soon as she bent down to get a stick, into the house he slipped, and scurried behind the door. In a minute the little Red Hen came quickly in, and shut the door and locked it. “I’m glad I’m safely in,” she said.

Just as she said it, she turned round, and there stood the ugly old Fox, with his big bag over his shoulder. Whiff! how scared the little Red Hen was! She dropped her apronful of sticks, and flew up to the big beam across the ceiling. There she perched, and she said to the old Fox, down below, “You may as well go home, for you can’t get me.”

“Can’t I, though!” said the Fox. And what do you think he did? He stood on the floor underneath the little Red Hen and twirled round in a circle after his own tail. And as he spun, and spun, and spun, faster, and faster, and faster, the poor little Red Hen got so dizzy watching him that she couldn’t hold on to the perch. She dropped off, and the old Fox picked her up and put her in his bag, slung the bag over his shoulder, and started for home, where the kettle was boiling.

He had a very long way to go, up hill, and the little Red Hen was still so dizzy that she didn’t know where she was. But when the dizziness began to go off, she whisked her little scissors out of her apron pocket, and snip! she cut a little hole in the bag; then she poked her head out and saw where she was, and as soon as they came to a good spot she cut the hole bigger and jumped out herself. There was a great big stone lying there, and the little Red Hen picked it up and put it in the bag as quick as a wink.

Then she ran as fast as she could till she came to her own little farm-house, and she went in and locked the door with the big key. The old Fox went on carrying the stone and never knew the difference. My, but it bumped him well! He was pretty tired when he got home. But he was so pleased to think of the supper he was going to have that he did not mind that at all. As soon as his mother opened the door he said, “Is the kettle boiling?”

“Yes,” said his mother; “have you got the little Red Hen?”

“I have,” said the old Fox. “When I open the bag you hold the cover off the kettle and I’ll shake the bag so that the Hen will fall in, and then you pop the cover on, before she can jump out.”

“All right,” said his mean old mother; and she stood close by the boiling kettle, ready to put the cover on.

The Fox lifted the big, heavy bag up till it was over the open kettle, and gave it a shake. Splash! thump! splash! In went the stone and out came the boiling water, all over the old Fox and the old Fox’s mother! And they were scalded to death. But the little Red Hen lived happily ever after, in her own little farmhouse.

The Llanfyllin Branch – Part 2

In the first article [4] in this short series, we finished the first part of our journey from Oswestry along the Llanfyllin Branch just after passing through Carreghofa Halt with its adjacent combined canal aqueduct and road bridge. Just beyond the bridge we noted the Nantmawr Branch heading away to the North while trains for Llanfyllin ran round a short chord to meet what was the original alignment of the Llanfyllin Branch.

This photograph was taken from the road/canal bridge to the Northwest of Carreghofa Halt. Trains for Llanfyllin took the chord to the left. The Nantmawr Branch heads away to the North. [4]
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1900, published in 1902, shows the relationship of the old and new routes taken by branch trains for and from Llanfyllin. The earlier alignment is shown as dismantled and runs to the North of the later alignment. The chord linking the two is on the left of this extract with the line to Llanfyllin leaving the left side of the extract. [5]
This satellite image picks out the routes of the lines discussed as they appear in the 21st century. Just to the North of Llanymynech, the original line of the Llanfyllin Branch can be made out. A line of trees gives way travelling westwards to field boundaries that follow the route of the old line. To the South of Llanymynech, the more recent alignment is highlighted by field boundaries becoming tree lined as it approaches the location of Carreghofa Halt and then passes under the modern B4398 and the line of the canal.  Immediately to the North of the Canal/Road Bridge the chord connecting the newer line to the older alignment of the Llanfyllin Branch is still described by a line of trees and then by field boundaries. [Google Earth, 28th February 2025]

After leaving the 26-chain chord trains headed due West for Llansantffraid across “a tract of pleasant agricultural countryside.” [3: p635] Within a short distance the Grove Viaduct was reached. It was a 90-yard long viaduct which sat about 7.7 miles from Oswestry.

This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1900, published in 1903, shows the Llanfyllin Branch heading West over Grove Viaduct which is close to the centre of the image. The Afon Vyrnwy can be seen on the left side of the extract. [6]
This satellite image covers approximately the same length of the Llanfyllin Branch as does the 6″ OS map extract above. [Google Earth, March 2025]

A minor road bridged the line to the East of Grove Viaduct. The railway cutting has been infilled but the bridge parapets and the deck under the road remain.

Looking North along the minor road in April 2024. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking East along the old railway from the bridge towards Llanymynech. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking West along the line of the old railway towards Grove Viaduct and Llansantffraid. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
This is how the Grove Viaduct is shown on the 6″ OS map published in 1885 and surveyed during the years before that date. [9]
The location of the Grove Viaduct over the Afon Tanat as it appears on modern satellite imagery. [Google Earth, March 2025]
The line continues towards Llansantffraid. [6]
A similar length of the line as it appears in Google Maps in March 2025. [Google Maps, March 2025]
An aerial image looking Southeast showing Bryn Vyrnwy Holiday Park in the 21st Century. The access road running diagonally across the image follows the line of the old railway. [13]
Looking West across Bryn Vyrnwy Holiday Park – the line of the old railway is paved, running between the two hedges. [13]
Looking Southwest towards the hills the two hedge lines define the extent of the old railway land. [13]
Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain Railway Station was the only passing place on the Branch. It is a large village about 7 miles (11 km) south-west of Oswestry (9.2 miles along the line) and 8 miles (13 km) north of Welshpool. It is at the confluence of the River Vyrnwy and the River Cain. The station can be seen just below the centre of this map extract. [6]

Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain

Jenkins tells us that Llansantffraid Railway Station was “the principal intermediate station on the branch. Its facilities included a single platform for passenger traffic on the up side of the line with a crossing loop immediately to the west, and a gated level-crossing to the east. The well-equipped goods yard included accommodation for coal, minerals, livestock, vehicles, and general merchandise traffic.” [4: p635]

The village of Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain as it appears in Powys Council’s local development plan. [12]
A closer view of the railway on the OS map of 1885 where it crossed what is now the B4393 to the North of the river bridge. [6]
The same location as it appears on the NLS ESRI satellite imagery in the 21st century. [14]
Looking North from the river bridge towards the A495. The old railway crossed the road at the near side of the white walled property on the left of this image. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking East, the line of the old railway is marked by the driveway protected by the green gates. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking West, the old railway ran to the left of the buildings. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Llansanffraid (Llansantffraid) means “Church of Saint Bride” in the Welsh language; ym-Mechain refers to its location in the medieval cantref of Mechain and distinguishes it from other places with the same or similar names. [7]

The name is based on the story of St Bhrid, who is said to have floated across the Irish Sea on a sod of turf, or to have been carried to Scotland by two oystercatchers. The followers of St Bhrid possibly set up new settlements known by the Welsh as Llan Santes Ffraid, Church of (Lady) Saint Bhrid. In recent years the spelling of the village name, with or without a ‘t’, has been a contentious issue (as it has been at Llansantffraid Glyn Ceiriog).” [7]

Approaching the railway station, the old line crossed Lletty Lane on the level.

Looking East from Lletty Lane away from the site of the station. The level crossing location is off to the left of this image. [Google Streetview June 2021]

Jenkins continues: “Llansantffraid was the only crossing place between Llanymynech and Llanfyllin, although it was not [ideal] for passing two passenger trains because the loop was sited beyond the platform. It was nevertheless possible for one passenger train and one freight train to pass here, although the timetable in force in later GWR days ensured that this was not normally necessary. In the 1930s this only took place on Wednesdays when the 9.05 am (WO) passenger service from Llanfyllin to Oswestry passed the 9.12am (WO) light engine from Oswestry to Llanfyllin at 9.27 am.” [3: p635]

The station building at Llansantffraid was a brick-built structure incorporating a two-storey residential portion for the stationmaster and his family. Although, like many Welsh stations, it was of comparatively plain appearance, the facade was enlivened by the provision of a bay window in the house portion, together with elaborate barge-boards and tall ‘ball & spear’ finials at the end of each gable. The stationmaster’s house was to the left (when viewed from the platform), while the booking office was to the right; the house was an L-plan structure with its gabled cross-wing facing the platform and a subsidiary wing that was parallel to the track.” [3: p636]

Llansantffraid Railway Station in the 1960s, © Unknown. This image was shared on the Closed GB Railway Lines Facebook Group by Robin Harrison on 29th June 2024. [10]
Llansantffraid Railway Station, seen from the Southeast adjacent to Lletty Lane, in the 21st century, © Robin Harrison. This image was shared on the Closed GB Railway Lines Facebook Group by Robin Harrison on 29th June 2024. [10]
Llansantffraid Railway Station building as it appears in the 21st century, © Rosser1954 and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CV BY-SA 4.0). [11]

The station site is covered in the video below (© Robin Harrison) which is embedded from youTube:

To the immediate West of the station building, a SPAR convenience store and a small industrial estate are built over the line of the old railway. A little further to the West, what is now the A495 turned South and bridged the line of the railway.

A closer view of the bridge at the West end of the village of Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain as shown on the 1885 6″ OS Map. [15]
The same location in the early 21st century, as it appears on the NLS ESRI satellite imagery. The road (A495) has been widened, the bridge carrying the highway is long-gone. [15]
This more recent satellite image shows a small new estate being built over the line of the old railway to the West of the A495. The route of the railway on the East side of the road is better defined in this image and the road Maes Y Cledrau sits on the line of the railway on the West side of the road. [Google Maps, March 2025]
Looking East from the A495 along the line of the old railway. It passed to the left of the house visible on the right of the image. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking West from the A495 along Maes Y Cledrau. The old railway ran on the left side of the trees on the right of the image. In the distance, the newly built houses sit over the line of the railway. Closer to the camera it centre-line approximated to the kerb line of the road. [Google Streetview, July 2024]

The B4393 ran parallel to the line to the North. The line climbed towards Llanfechain on a gradient of 1 in 75.

The old railway closely followed what became the B4393. The road ran on the North side of the railway. [16]
The same area as it appears on Google Earth satellite imagery in the 21st century. [Google Maps, March 2025]
Looking West along the B4393 the line of the old railway can be identified, delineated by the two hedge lines on the left of this photograph. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The road and railway continued West immediately adjacent to each other. [17]
The same area on 21st century satellite imagery. [Google Maps, March 2025]
Again the old railway formation continues West alongside the B4393. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
On this next extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey a side road to the B4393 crosses the line of the railway. [18]
The same area in the 21st century. [Google Maps, March 2025]
Looking North across the bridge noted above. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking East along the old railway alignment from the road bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking West along the old railway formation from the road bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
This next map extract shows Llanfechain Railway Station. [19]
The same area in the 21st century. Note the way that the old railway turns away to the Southwest after passing through the station. [Google Maps, March 2025]
The station at Llanfechain was a good walk from the centre of the village and not at the closest road crossing to the village. [21]
The facilities at the station were limited, although the main station house was as substantial as that at Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain. The station site was framed by a road bridge. [21]

Llanfechain

Llanfechain was near to 11 miles from Oswestry. Jenkins tells us that “The layout at Llanfechain echoed that at neighbouring Llansantffraid in that there was just one platform on the up side. A small goods yard was able to deal with coal, livestock, and other forms of traffic. … The station building was of ‘Victorian house’ design incorporating residential quarters for the local stationmaster. The presence of a two-storey house portion made these stations appear much bigger than they actually were, the booking office and waiting-rooms being only one portion of the main structure.” [3: p636]

Llanfechain Railway Station looking towards Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain in the early 1960s.  A six-lever ground frame was installed until 1929, but a smaller one sufficed until the goods yard closed on 27th July 1964. A westbound train and 2-6-0 No. 46512 are pictured from the bridge, © D. Wilson shared by John Williams on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 16th October 2024. [23]
Llanfechain Railway Station in the early 21st century, looking towards Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain in the early 1960s, © John Williams, shared by him on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 16th October 2024, and used here with his kind permission.  [23]
A similar view from the road bridge in 2024. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Llanfechain Railway Station looking towards Llanfyllin.The road bridge is partially hidden by the locos steam exhaust. This image was shared on the Disused Stations Facebook Group by Joshua Kendrick on 25th August 2018, © Unknown. [24]
Llanfechain Railway Station building in 1999, seen from the Northeast, now a private house. Llanymynech is some miles away to the left, Llanfyllin similarly some miles off the right side of the image. The hill ahead is Long Hill (286 ft.), © Ben Brooksbank and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [22]
The road bridge and station building (on the right) seen from the Southeast. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Leaving Llanfechain Railway Station “heading south-westwards, the single line climbed steadily through pastoral countryside towards the penultimate stopping place at Bryngwyn” [3: p636] which was a little over 12.5 miles from Oswestry.

Looking West-southwest along the line of the old railway in 2024. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The line headed Southwest as it left Llanfechain. Note the footbridge in the top-right of this map extract, the road bridge just below and to the left of the centre of the image and the accommodation bridge in the bottom-left. [20]
The same area in the 21st century. At the top-right of this image what was once a footbridge over the old railway has been converted into an access road. On both this image and the map extract above another minor road can be seen bridging the line of the old railway just below the centre of the image. The line was in a cutting at this point. [Google Maps, March 2025]
The road bridge seen from the Northwest. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking Northeast along the line of the old railway towards Llanfechain Railway Station. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking Southwest along the line of the old railway. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
In this next 6″ map extract the accommodation bridge noted before, appears top-right and a further bridge bottom-left. The line remained in cutting along this length. [25]
This extract from Google’s satellite imagery covers a similar area to the map extract above..It also shows the bridge noted above which carried another local access road over the old railway. [Google Maps, March 2025]
On this next extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1880s the line begins to turn towards the West, from a southwesterly heading. What becomes the B4393 crosses the line at Bryngwyn Flag Station (a halt at which passengers had to signal the train to stop to collect them). The road curving round the bottom-left corner of the extract was to become the A490. [26]
Much the same length of the line appears on this 21st century satellite image. The A490 can be seen on the bottom-left of this image. [Google Maps, March 2025]
A closer view of the location of Bryngwyn Halt.  The old railway can be seen bridging the old road which had to dog-leg to pass under the line. [26]
Looking Northeast along the line of the old railway from the B4393. The bridge at this location was removed and the road was realigned after the closure of the railway. The level difference between the two is still evident. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Turning through 180°, looking Southwest along the line of the old railway. The realignment of the road required the removal of the bridge abutment and a short length of embankment which once also supported the Bryngwyn Halt. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Bryngwyn Halt

Bryngwyn did not open with the line. Jenkins tells us that “having been opened by the Cambrian Railways as an unstaffed halt in the mid-1860s. The single platform was sited on the down side of the line with access from a nearby road. Interestingly, Bryngwyn was an early example of a ‘request stop’, a semaphore stop-signal being worked by intending travellers. The platform was originally of timber trestle construction with a small open-fronted waiting shelter, although a concrete platform and corrugated-iron shelter were later provided.” [3: p636]

From Bryngwyn the route continued westwards for the final two miles to Llanfyllin. With the A490 road running parallel to the left, the line passed beneath a minor road bridge and, slowing for the final approach to their terminus, branch trains passed an array of parallel sidings before finally coming to rest beside a single-platform station some 8 miles 41 chains from Llanymynech, and 14 miles 48 chains from the start of the through journey from Oswestry.” [3: p636-637]

Over this next stretch of the old railway, the line continues to curve round towards the Northwest. The road that became the A490 runs parallel to the line but to its South. An access track Plas-ywen crossed the line at an un-manned crossing. A little further West the line was bridged by a lane running North from the main road. [27]
Much the same area on modern satellite imagery. [Google Maps, March 2025]
Looking North along the lane which crossed the old line. The railway was in cutting at this location so there are no significant gradients on the approaches to the bridge. The brick parapets of the bridge remain in place. [Google Streetview, Summer 2022]
Looking East, the line of the old railway is camouflaged by tree growth. [Google Streetview, Summer 2022]
Looking West, it is possible to see the old formation with the hedge following the old railway boundary. [Google Streetview, Summer 2022]
The road and railway continued in parallel across this next extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey. The River Cain runs just to the North. [28]
The same area on modern satellite imagery. At the left of both these images a farm access track crosses the line of the old railway. [Google Maps, March 2025]
The old line continued to curve towards the Northwest. [29]
A very similar length of the old railway in the 21st century. The route of the railway can still be seen easily curving to the Northwest on the South side of the River Cain. [Google Maps, March 2025]
The final length of the line which terminated to the Southeast of the centre of Llanfyllin. [30]
The same area of Llanfyllin as it appears on satellite imagery in the 21st century. [Google Maps, March 2025]
The centre of Llanfyllin in the 21st century. [Google Maps, March 2025]

Llanfyllin

Jenkins says that “Llanfyllin was a surprisingly spacious station, and although its track-plan was relatively simple, the goods yard and other facilities were laid out on a generous scale, the distance from the turnout at the eastern end of the run-round loop to the terminal buffer stops being around 34 chains, or slightly less than half a mile. The passenger platform was situated on the down side, and it had a length of around 385ft. The platform was flanked by two long parallel lines, one of which functioned as an engine release road while the other formed a lengthy goods reception line. These two lines were linked by intermediate cross-overs which allowed greater flexibility during shunting operations.” [3: p637]

The goods yard contained two goods sheds, one of these being situated on a loop siding that was laid on a parallel alignment to the passenger station. A long siding for “coal and other forms of wagon-load traffic extended along the rear edge of the goods yard; this siding branched into two shorter sidings at its western end, the second goods shed being served by one of these short spurs. The main goods sidings ended at loading docks at the western extremity of the station, while a further siding to the east of the platform on the down side served a cattle-loading dock. The latter siding was entered by means of headshunt from the engine shed siding, a reverse shunt being necessary before vehicles could be propelled into the cattle dock.” [3: p638]

Nearby the “engine shed was single-road structure with a length of about 50ft, … this normally accommodated just one locomotive. Water was supplied from a stilted metal tank beside the engine shed, this structure being fitted with flexible hoses through which the water could be delivered.” [3: p638]

The station throat at Llanfyllin Railway Station is framed by the road bridge carrying Derwlwyn Lane. This map extract comes from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900, published in 1901. [33]

Llanfyllin

The image above is embedded from the Flickr site of Katerfelto, who comments: “Trains arriving at Llanfyllin passed a ground frame and then passed under a single-span iron bridge which carried Derwlwyn Lane over the line. From the south side could be seen the engine shed and water tower followed by some cattle pens and Llanfyllin signal box, before the single platform and its substantial station building announced the journey’s end.” [34]

Opposite the platform were the goods shed, a warehouse, several buildings and the run-round loop.

The terminal buffers were in a shallow cutting and short approach road led from the station building to the public road.

Jenkins continues: “Llanfyllin station building was similar to the other station buildings on the branch, being a typical ‘Victorian house’ design with a two-storey stationmaster’s house and attached single-storey booking-office wing. The window and door apertures were simple square-headed openings with large-paned window frames, but this otherwise plain brick building was enlivened by the provision of decorative barge-boards and elaborate pointed finials. The front of the booking office was slightly recessed to form a covered waiting area, and this feature contributed further visual interest to this former Oswestry & Newton Railway building.” [3: p638]

Llanfyllin Railway Station on 12th April 1960, © Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [2]

Llanfyllin had a population of around 2,000. Wikipedia tells us that “the community … population in 2021 was 1,586 and the town’s name means church or parish (Llan) of St Myllin (‘m’ frequently mutates to ‘f’ in Welsh).” [30]

This photograph of Llanfyllin Railway Station looking Southeast in the 1950s, © J. S. Gills and held by the People’s Collection Wales. It is made available for reuse under the Creative Archive Licence. [31]
A closer view of the whole station site. [30]
This tightly focussed map extract concentrates on the buildings at Llanfyllin Railway Station. It is taken from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900. [33]
Loco No. 46516 with passenger service from Oswestry just after arriving at Llanfyllin on 21st August 1963, © Roger Joanes and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0). [32]
The same locomotive, No. 46516 ready to leave Llanfyllin on the same day,  21st August 1963, with the return service to Oswestry. The view looks Northwest, © Roger Joanes and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0). [32]

References

  1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llanfyllin_Branch, accessed on 1st February 2025.
  2. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2026003, accessed on 1st February 2025.
  3. Stanley Jenkins; The Llanfyllin Branch; in Steam Days, Red Gauntlet Publications, Bournemouth, October 2023, p626-638.
  4. I have lost the source for this image.
  5. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101593993, accessed on 10th February 2025.
  6. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101593990, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  7. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  8. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1KMki4pmdJ, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/102186773, accessed on 4th March 2025.
  10. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/167YxpWGxD, accessed on 5th March 2025
  11. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_old_Llansantffraid_railway_station,_Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain_,_Powys.jpg, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  12. https://ldp.powys.gov.uk/docfiles/36/Llansantffraid-ym-Mechain_Llansilin_Llanwrtyd%20Wells.pdf, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  13. https://www.brynvyrnwyholidaypark.co.uk/gallery, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.6&lat=52.77628&lon=-3.14809&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=13, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.9&lat=52.77441&lon=-3.15937&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.77603&lon=-3.16426&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  17. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.77677&lon=-3.17426&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.77696&lon=-3.18373&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  19. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.77499&lon=-3.19400&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.77187&lon=-3.20416&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 8th March 2025.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.7&lat=52.77545&lon=-3.19844&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 9th March 2025.
  22. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3755954, accessed on 9th March 2025.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/151C762ruxR, accessed on 9th March 2025.
  24. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FswL16HQF, accessed on 9th March 2025.
  25. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.8&lat=52.76708&lon=-3.21341&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 10th March 2025.
  26. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.8&lat=52.76131&lon=-3.22387&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 10th March 2025.
  27. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.0&lat=52.75866&lon=-3.23443&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 10th March 2025.
  28. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.9&lat=52.75934&lon=-3.24529&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 11th March 2025.
  29. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.9&lat=52.76190&lon=-3.25579&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 11th March 2025.
  30. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llanfyllin, accessed on 11th March 2025.
  31. https://www.peoplescollection.wales/items/881101#?xywh=265%2C254%2C471%2C333, accessed on 11th March 2025.
  32. https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=110691393%40N07&view_all=1&text=Llanfyllin+, accessed on 11th March 2025.
  33. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.3&lat=52.76418&lon=-3.26710&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 12th March 2025.
  34. https://www.flickr.com/photos/gone_with_regret/53044313520/in/photolist-2oPkYnE-2oGuRLo-HGaFzw-HQcV6n-baRKKr-wKqdBa-r9HPNs-6GqtZA-NRwZAY-2dcpUj8-2iWoist-59PNUC-59PNUL-4Rc3rS-PbNEgL-2aqWVUW-4R9YSg-krCAT-4Ra1JK-e66Prj-dzML3o-9ZvLVY-4R7CsP-9ZvP9h-2bNBfRZ-dNbES9-dMAbDZ-dMAbtx-2nVNPHo-4RdXsS-4R7prZ-t3asZr-71x8ue-sZNWsS-2pgGvtQ-9ZsSFe-dMAasZ-258Ctn-9ZsX6n-sZHjDh-6GmoLt-6GqsWW-6Gmq1z-6GqsNS-6GmpGi-6Gmppg-4Ra3vZ-4RbpUA-53cNfq-9ZvHTE, accessed on 12th March 2025.

Temptation (Luke 4:1-13)

I want to invite you to think back with me, first, to the years 2000 and 2005. Two significant events occurred in the life of two different sports people which hit the headlines.

25 years ago in April 2000, South Africans were stunned by allegations that Hansie Cronje, captain of the national cricket team, had taken bribes to fix matches. The very idea that this national hero and role model would contemplate doing something dishonest and corrupt seemed incomprehensible.

When some allegations were confirmed there was a real sense of national mourning. People asked: ‘If someone like Hansie Cronje can do this what hope is there for the rest of us?’ [1]

Cronje’s response on TV, when allegations were confirmed, was to blame the devil for making him accept bribes to fix results.

South Africans saw this as an attempt by Cronje to evade responsibility for his actions. And they were right.

To say, ‘The devil made me do it,’ is to attempt to avoid facing our own internal demons. We are responsible for our own actions … even if we feel that there might be mitigating circumstances.

Around 4 years later, in the winter of 2004/5, Ellen MacArthur came to prominence as one of our most outstanding sports-people. It surprised me, as I was thinking about this article, that it was as long ago as March 2005 that the TV programme about her was shown. Do you remember it? … It was the story of her amazing journey round the Antarctic as part of the Vendée Globe Race. [2]

It was filmed by her using just a few cameras on her yacht. I can still vividly remember my sense of disbelief at the stamina and commitment she showed, the difficulties that she faced and the obstacles that she overcame. You may well not remember the TV programme. … I was bowled over. I saw the speed of the yacht, the height of the waves. I saw her, in one sequence,  hanging by one arm from the mast, 60 ft about the deck in the middle of a storm, trying to mend wind-measuring equipment. The camera showed just how much the yacht was rolling from side to side and at the top of the mast Ellen was alternatively far out over the swell on the port side of the yacht before being thrown across to the starboard side and again far out over the mountainous waves.

At one point in the programme, talking about her early life, Ellen said that she had a dream which she didn’t believe would ever become a reality. Yet, she said, with persistence she had realised that dream. For Ellen, the chance to pit herself against the ultimate sailing challenge was the dream.

Fulfilling the dream required wholehearted commitment to see it through, remaining true to herself and to the values she had embraced.

Martin Luther King Jr. is famous for his sermon on the 28th August 1963 from the steps of the Lincoln memorial in Washington DC. “I have a dream,” he said, “that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” [3]

Just under 5 years later on 4th April 1968 he was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee.  Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream that became the focus of his whole life, and he was martyred for that dream.

Successful people the world-over will tell you that pursuing a dream, to be the best, requires commitment, application and stamina. They will tell you of the sheer slog of hard work involved, the guts and determination that it takes to be the best. And they will tell you too that the feeling which comes after success, like the joy of holding that gold medal, the status that they achieve – makes all the hard work worthwhile. Their dream, their mission achieved, they have every right to feel proud.

On the first Sunday in Lent, we remember that Jesus was tempted. In the Gospel stories, he is engaged in the sternest of tests of his commitment to his mission. The account in Mark is short. In Matthew and Luke we get a much fuller account of the battle he fought. Satan tries, and fails, to turn Jesus away from God’s plan. Satan offers Jesus the easy way out. Both Matthew and Luke talk of three different temptations.

Actually, it is effectively the same temptation in three different forms. … The temptation to set aside God’s plan for his life – to put the dream on hold. This was a temptation which Hansie Cronje could not handle, … it was a temptation that Ellen MacArthur faced and overcame.

Jesus is first tempted to put himself first – to change stones into bread. Then he is tempted to grasp power for himself rather than bring in God’s kingdom. And Satan also tempts Jesus to look for the easy route to draw people to himself, to seek fame rather than suffering and death. To look for the instant, short-term solution, rather than face real and necessary struggles ahead. All of these are temptations to destroy the dream, his mission. Temptations to turn aside from God’s plan.

In each case, it’s God’s plan that Jesus chooses to follow  – a path of self-denial that will lead through the cross to eventual resurrection. God’s plan, God’s dream, is the defeat of the power of death and evil. Unlike Hansie Cronje, Jesus remains committed to the dream, no matter the cost. Much as Ellen MacArthur did, much at Martin Luther King Jr and many Christian martyrs did, Jesus remains focussed on the dream, on God’s dream, God’s plan.

So what is God’s dream? … What are we called to commit to wholeheartedly? … Perhaps the simplest expression of that dream is God’s desire to see the growth of the Kingdom of God on earth. Only you can answer the question about what part in God’s dream, God’s plan for the coming of God’s kingdom is for you. You might, though, have other people’s help in identifying your part in the plan in the coming of the Kingdom. But ultimately remaining true to God’s plan for you and refusing to be drawn away into other things, is what overcoming temptation is all about.

Here, though, are four clear challenges from Luke’s story of the temptations of Jesus. …………..

Priorities: Jesus was tempted to place physical need above spiritual, to live without trusting God, …… to turn stones into bread. ….… We so easily base our security in our jobs, our homes and families, and our money rather than in God. … We need to begin again to experience God’s provision for us, rather than just living off our own resources. … So, here’s a first challenge – to be prepared to make sacrifices in our lifestyle, to make serving God our priority. …. Perhaps as a sign of our commitment to God’s Kingdom this Lent, rather than giving up chocolate we could do something different? … Something positive? …

One option for families might be to use “Count Your Blessings,” a Lent initiative by Action for Children and Christian Aid [2] that encourages people to be grateful for what they have. Their websites have details. Or perhaps we could join with the Stewardship organisation in its 40 Acts of Kindness 2025, ‘Do Lent Generously’ [3] – a movement of thousands of people on a mission to impact their communities by creating moments of radical generosity.

Prayer and Worship: In being tempted to turn stones into bread, Jesus was tempted to turn away from his relationship with God and to become self-reliant. …. How can we together, begin to show our reliance on God? …. By praying and worshipping, together and alone, by expressing together, our need of God’s help. God can & does provide the resources we need to follow the dream. We need both to rely on God, & to be seen to do so. This is a challenge to spend more of ourselves in worship and prayer.

Persistence: In Satan’s encouragement to throw himself off the temple, Jesus was tempted to look for the instant, the short-term solution. To wow people into the kingdom, to impress with magic and illusion. … We can so easily fall into the trap of looking for the stop-gap solution, the one that will only require a little effort now, not a long-term commitment. The easy option. … God’s call is to persistence, to commitment, to seeing things through. This is exemplified in the bible’s word which we translate ‘faith’ – the Greek ‘pisteo’ and is derivatives is a word that means ‘faithfulness’ – it is a word about consistently being true to what we believe, no matter what happens. If we are not careful we read it as being something about screwing ourselves up to believe just a bit more. So we say to ourselves, ‘Strong faith now can move mountains’ when the perspective of the original Greek is that ‘ongoing faithful commitment will move mountains.’ Faithful persistent commitment to God’s call even when it is hard.

Place God’s kingdom above personal advancement: Satan tempted Jesus to worship him. To gain a position of power and influence. God wanted Jesus to walk the way of the cross. … It is so easy, isn’t it to want others to see our commitment, our diligence. To want others to praise us. To want to take the lead. Whereas God, in the example of Jesus, is calling us to a path of humility and possibly even suffering, and if we are to be leaders, then it will be a great cost to ourselves. …..

Ellen MacArthur had a dream – she gave it her wholehearted, persistent commitment, she risked everything to achieve it.  Martin Luther King Jr. was faithful; to God’s call, working for racial justice in America. His commitment to God’s call led to his death. Jesus remained faithful in the midst of temptation. That faithful commitment, even unto death on a Cross, brought about salvation for us and for our world.

Hansie Cronje gave in to the temptations around him. The contrast could not be more sharp. …

We need a dream, God’s dream. We need to listen for his word, watch out for what God is doing and make that our dream. And if we really commit ourselves to that dream, we will grow closer to God, and the dream, through God’s power and strength, can become a reality.

References

  1. https://www.indiatoday.in/sports/cricket/story/2000-ind-vs-sa-series-court-says-some-matches-fixed-attempts-made-to-fix-others-2566577-2024-07-14, accessed on 4th March 2025.
  2. Ellen MacArthur: Sailing through Hell; BBC TV; via https://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/b58e550e1e4540af9433fde579834d47, accessed on 4th March 2025.
  3. https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety, accessed on 5th March 2025.
  4. https://www.christianaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-07/count-your-blessings.pdf, accessed on 5th March 2025.
  5. https://www.stewardship.org.uk/40acts, accessed on 5th March 2025.

What can we do?

How can we respond to the events which took place on Friday 28th February 2025 at the White House? How can we respond to the aggressive behaviour of Trump and Vance? It seems impossible to think of something we could do that will make any difference. Geopolitical events are so far beyond our control. It is so easy to feel depressed and powerless.

Perhaps we could donate to a charity working for the relief of suffering in Ukraine. Perhaps we could look for opportunities to support Ukrainians now living in our own areas. Perhaps there is something more we could do in our own relationships in response to what happened in the Oval Office.

First, let’s think about what happened in the White House on Friday 28th February 2025. …..

An intriguing analysis has been circulating online regarding the psychological aspects of Zelenskyy’s meeting with Trump and Vance. It seems that we witnessed a masterclass in gaslighting, manipulation, and coercion on the part of Trump and his entourage.  This analysis was shared on Facebook by Yuliia Vyshnevska a Ukrainian lawyer living in Oxford (UK). [1]

These are the key points made by Yuliia:

Blaming the victim for their own situation – Trump explicitly tells Zelensky: “You have allowed yourself to be in a very bad position.” This is classic abuser rhetoric—blaming the victim for their suffering. The implication is that Ukraine itself is responsible for being occupied by Russia and for the deaths of its people.

Pressure and coercion into ‘gratitude’ – Vance demands that Zelensky say “thank you.” This is an extremely toxic tactic—forcing the victim to express gratitude for the help they desperately need, only to later accuse them of ingratitude if they attempt to assert their rights.

Manipulating the concept of ‘peace’ – Trump claims that Zelensky is “not ready for peace.” However, what he actually means is Ukraine’s capitulation. This is a classic manipulation technique—substituting the idea of a just peace with the notion of surrender.

Refusing to acknowledge the reality of war – Trump repeatedly insists that Zelensky has “no cards to play” and that “without us, you have nothing.” This is yet another abusive tactic—undermining the victim’s efforts by asserting that they are powerless without the mercy of their ‘saviour.’

Devaluing the victims of war – “If you get a ceasefire, you must accept it so that bullets stop flying and your people stop dying,” Trump says. Yet, he ignores the fact that a ceasefire without guarantees is merely an opportunity for Russia to regroup and strike again.

Dominance tactics – Trump constantly interrupts Zelensky, cutting him off: “No, no, you’ve already said enough,” and “You’re not in a position to dictate to us.” This is deliberate psychological pressure designed to establish a hierarchy in which Zelensky is the subordinate.

Forcing capitulation under the guise of ‘diplomacy’ – Vance asserts that “the path to peace lies through diplomacy.” This is a classic strategy where the aggressor is given the opportunity to continue their aggression unchallenged.

Projection and distortion of reality – Trump declares: “You are playing with the lives of millions of people.” Yet, in reality, it is he who is doing exactly that—shifting responsibility onto Zelensky.

Creating the illusion that Ukraine ‘owes’ the US – Yes, the US is assisting Ukraine, but presenting this aid as “you must obey, or you will receive nothing” is not a partnership—it is financial and military coercion.

Undermining Ukraine’s resistance – Trump states that “if it weren’t for our weapons, this war would have ended in two weeks.” This is an attempt to erase Ukraine’s achievements and portray its efforts as entirely dependent on US support.

Yuliia’s Conclusion …. Trump and his team employed the full spectrum of abusive tactics: gaslighting, victim-blaming, coercion into gratitude, and manipulation of the concepts of peace and diplomacy. This was not a negotiation—it was an attempt to force Zelensky into accepting terms beneficial to the US but potentially fatal for Ukraine.

Our Response?

While we cannot influence relationships in international politics, however, we can choose our own actions and behaviours. Bullying and abusive behaviour can be part of many relationships. This has been brought into high relief by the events in the Oval Office, but we might recognise some of these behaviours either in ourselves or in others that we know. If so, we should seek help to change/overcome those behaviours.

There are already people working in our local communities supporting those suffering abuse or who support those who are regaining their dignity after experiencing shaming or abuse. Others are working to help abusers address their own behaviour. All these are worthy of our support. Some are shown below.

Support for charities working in Ukraine, and for Ukrainians in our local community is a priority. In itself, it is a firm and particular response to what we saw happening in the Oval Office. Some of these charities appear toward the end of this article.

Charities Seeking to End Abuse – Working with Abusers (to change behaviour) and with Those Who Have Been Abused

These charities include:

NAPAC: The National Association for People Abused in Childhood supports adults who have experienced childhood abuse;

Refuge: Supporting those who have experienced abuse;

Karma Nirvana: A specialist charity for victims and survivors of honour-based abuse;

Survivors UK: runs the National Male Survivors Online Helpline – a webchat and SMS service for men, boys and non-binary people who have experienced sexual abuse at any time in their lives;

NSPCC: has been protecting children for over 140 years;

Children 1st: offers a range of services for children, young people and their families who have been affected by physical, sexual or emotional abuse in Scotland. There is a network of local support groups across the country;

The Lucy Faithful Foundation: offers a number of programmes to help people move towards real change and understand their own, or their friend or family member’s, illegal behaviour.

And local charities, such as LEAP which works with Children and Families in the Tameside area of Greater Manchester.

Charities Proving Support to Ukraine and Ukrainians

Among others, these charities and other organisations include:

British Ukrainian Aid: A grassroots charity that believes in the power of civil society and volunteers united by a single goal: to see Ukrainians overcome the hardships of the war and live in dignity and prosperity in independent Ukraine;

United Help Ukraine: Provides humanitarian aid, including clothing, medical supplies, and rehabilitation for wounded soldiers;

UNICEF: Funds non-governmental and volunteer organizations that help civilians, including children, young people, and vulnerable people;

CARE International: Provides emergency food and water to Ukrainian refugees; 

Sunflower of Peace: A non-profit organization that supports the people of Ukraine affected by the Russian military invasion; 

Barnardo’s: Provides a free helpline to support Ukrainian families arriving in the UK; 

British Red Cross: Provides practical and psychosocial support to people displaced from Ukraine who have arrived in the UK;

UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees): Works in Ukraine and neighbouring refugee-hosting countries, providing access to clean water, health care services, cash transfers and other critical support;

UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF): CERF enables humanitarian responders to deliver life-saving assistance whenever and wherever crises strike.

World Food Programme: The world’s largest humanitarian agency – provide life-saving support to the most vulnerable families;

IOM – International Organization for Migration: Aims to Aid Two Million People in Ukraine in 2025 as War and Displacement Continue ;

UN Women: Works with Women and Girls in Ukraine;

The International Rescue Committee: seeks to respond where needed most;

Humanity & Inclusion Ukraine Emergency Appeal — an emergency fund to support disabled and vulnerable people in Ukraine;

Ukraine Charity humanitarian appeal — raising funds to procure medicine and medical equipment. Ukraine Charity is a UK registered charity;

PLAST — Donate to the Ukrainian scouts association to help provide humanitarian, medical and rehabilitation support to scouts and their families during Russia’s invasion;

for PEACE — The forPEACE Ukraine Relief Project works with Ukrainians to deliver targeted medical and humanitarian aid, connecting international financial support with Ukrainian networks, medical professionals, and trusted community organisers on the ground;

Voices of Children Charitable Foundation — since 2015, has provided free psychological assistance to children and their families affected by the war. From the full-scale invasion, the foundation has supported more than 64,000 children and adults. All donations go to individual and group, and online psychological sessions, activities (camps, art therapy, excursions), rehabilitation, and humanitarian aid for children and parents.

Leleka — focusing on the urgent supply of critical medical supplies and protective gear to Ukraine’s defenders and civilians

Razom for Ukraine and Nova Ukraine — US-based emergency appeals;

Rescue Now — this Ukrainian charity evacuates people from war zones and supports the elderly in eastern Ukraine. The Rescue Now team is supporting people in the Kherson region affected by mass flooding following Russia’s destruction of the Kakhovka dam.

References/Notes

  1. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18YrnqBkNM, accessed on 2nd March 2025.

The Mother of All Inventions. …

Why were railways created?

What were the circumstances which brought about their existence?

History does not make it easy to take out one example from a steady continuum of change. …

David Wilson writes: “There have been track or plateways since Roman times. You might say that these could be brought within the term railway and therefore the Romans invented the railway.” [1: p61]

Except there were railways of a sort, at least as far back at 600 BCE, possibly going back even further, maybe as far back as 1000 BCE. The clearest example being the Diolkos Trackway. [2] This was a paved trackway near Corinth in Ancient Greece which enabled boats to be moved overland across the Isthmus of Corinth.

David Wilson continues: “For most people, however, the railways began with the Stockton and Darlington (S&D), though I’m sure many people already appreciate that history is not always what it seems.” [1: p61]

David Wilson tells us that if one wished to take the view that the first ever railway was the first to have been authorised by Parliament, then the first railway was built in Leeds – The Middleton Railway. “The Middleton Railway was given Parliamentary Assent in 1758 and began using steam traction in 1812, two years before the advent of Mr Stephenson’s first locomotive, ‘Blucher’, and 13 years before the opening of the S&D.” [1: p61]

But there is more to consider. … The Lake Lock Rail Road opened in 1798 (arguably the world’s first public railway). It carried coal from the Outwood area to the Aire and Calder navigation canal at Lake Lock near Wakefield. [3][4] The Surrey Iron Railway was the first railway to be authorised by the UK Parliament (21st May 1801).  It was a horse-drawn railway which ran between Wandsworth and Croydon. [5][6][7][8][9] It was followed by The Carmarthenshire Railway or Tramroad (authorised by Act pf Parliament on 3rd June 1802). It was a horse-drawn goods line, located in Southwest Wales, the first public railway first authorised by Act of Parliament in Wales.[3][10][11][12]

The Low Moor Furnace Waggonway was constructed in 1802. It connected Barnby Furnace Colliery to Barnby Basin on the Barnsley Canal. It was replaced in 1809 by The Silkstone Waggonway which operated until 1870. [19][20] The Merthyr Tramroad, between Merthyr Tydfil and Abercynon, also opened in 1802. [5][13][14][15][16][17][18] The Lancaster Canal Tramroad (also known as the Walton Summit Tramway or the Old Tram Road), was completed in 1803. It linked the north and south ends of the Lancaster Canal across the Ribble valley. [21][22]

The first steam locomotive to pull a commercial load on rails was Penydarren (or Pen-y-Darren) was built by Richard Trevithick. It was used to haul iron from Merthyr Tydfil to Abercynon, Wales. The first train carried a load of 10 tons of iron. On one occasion it successfully hauled 25 tons. However, as the weight of the locomotive was about 5 tons the locomotive’s weight broke many of the cast iron plate rails. [5][13][14][15][16][17]

We could go on to mention:

  • The Croydon, Merstham & Godstone Goods Railway opened in 1805; [23]
  • The Sirhowy Tramroad opened in 1805; [24]
  • The Ruabon Brook Tramway (also known as Jessop’s Tramway or the Shropshire Union Tramway) also opened in 1805; [25][26][27][28]
  • The Middlebere Plateway (or Middlebere Tramway) opened on the Isle of Purbeck in 1806; [29][30][31][32]
  • The Monmouthshire Canal Tramway, open by 1806; [33][34]
  • The Oystermouth Railway, opened in 1806; [35][36] and
  • The Doctor’s Tramroad, Treforest which opened in 1809. [37][38][39]
  • The Monmouth Railway authorised by the UK Parliament in 1811. [5][72][73]
  • The Kilmarnock & Troon Railway which opened in 1812. [5][74][75][76][77]
  • The Killingworth Waggonway of which a first stretch opened in 1762 and which was extended in 1802, 1808 and 1820. [78][79][80][81][82][83]
  • The Haytor Granite Railway of 1820 which not only transported granite from Dartmoor as freight but ran on granite rails. [84]

The drawing of the locomotive Blücher (below) was done by Clement E. Stretton, © Public Domain. Blücher was built by George Stephenson for the Killingworth Waggonway. It was the first of a series of locomotives which established his reputation as an engine designer and eventually “Father of the Railways”.

We could list other railways opening before the S&D in 1825. The use of steam power at The Merthyr Tramroad and The Middleton Railway preceded its use on the S&D. A very strong claim to be the most significant development in the early 1800s could be made on behalf of The Middleton Railway. But it is the Stockton & Darlington (S&D) Railway which has caught the imagination and it is the 200th anniversary of the S&D which is being celebrated in 2025 as the beginning of the railway age.

Why is this?

It is clear that the claim to fame of the Stockton and Darlington (S&D) is lessened, at least, by the prior claim of the Middleton Railway both as first to be sanctioned by Parliament and first to make commercial use of steam power. The claims associated with other railways which preceded the S&D also must be significant. However, there is one important and fundamental difference between it and them. David Wilson says that, unlike the Middleton Railway, “the S&D was constructed with a view to carrying other companies’ goods and, to a lesser extent, to carry people.” [1: p61]

In addition, he says, “Bear in mind the distinction between the carriage of goods and people, and between carrying one’s own goods and those of others. In many ways this type of division is what distinguishes the modern concept of the railway as a system for the transport of goods and passengers on a hire and reward basis from the early plateways and railways such as the Middleton, which were not essentially built to carry anything other than goods, typically coal, for their owners.” [1: p61]

Perhaps, though, there are more grounds for the place taken in history by the S&D. Rather than just running between a pithead and a coal wharf on a canal, river or road and serving specific industrial concerns, the S&D also was built by public subscription and linked one town to another.

David Wilson continues: “To arrive at a description of what constitutes a railway we have to enlarge our definition to include not only Parliamentary Sanction, the use of rails or tracks, and the carriage of goods, but also the carriage of the public, the carriage of public goods and that one settlement be joined to another by the laying of a line paid for through the issue of shares. Thus … a railway is a set of tracks laid between two centres of habitation, which carries goods or people for commercial reward and has been authorised by Act of Parliament. It will have been built through the raising of public funds, either through the sale of shares in it or via government spending from the public purse.” [1: p61]

Let’s return to the era before the existence of the steam locomotive, the era of that list of lines highlighted above (and many more).

David Wilson comments: “The growth of the coal mining industry in the later part of the 17th and early 18th century had led to a growth in the plateway systems used to move the coal from the pit head to [a road], canal or river for shipment to the growing cities and the newly built mills. By as early as 1645 there were wagonways taking coal from the Durham coalfields down to the Tyne. By 1800 there were more than 100 miles of these plateways in the Tyneside area alone.” [1: p61]

Similar developments were taking place elsewhere in the UK:

  • The first overground railway line in England may have been a wooden-railed, horse-drawn tramroad which was built at Prescot, near Liverpool, around 1600 and possibly as early as 1594. Owned by Philip Layton, the line carried coal from a pit near Prescot Hall to a terminus about half a mile away. [40]
  • The Wollaton Waggonway in Nottinghamshire was in use by 1604. [5]
  • In East Shropshire and around the Severn Gorge; [41][42] A railway was made at Broseley in Shropshire some time before 1605 to carry coal for James Clifford from his mines down to the River Severn to be loaded onto barges and carried to riverside towns. It is possible that Clifford’s ‘railway’ was in use as early as 1570 and a similar line may well have been constructed by William Brooke near Madeley, again down to the River Severn. [43: p21] By 1775, there were a number of both short and long tramroads in the area around the Severn Gorge.
  • The Tranent to Cockenzie Waggonway was built by the York Buildings Company of London, to transport coal from the Tranent pits to the salt pans at Cockenzie and the Harbour at Port Seton, in Haddingtonshire, now East Lothian. [5][44]
  • The Alloa Wagon Way was constructed in 1768 by the Erskines of Mar in Alloa, to carry coal from the Clackmannanshire coalfields of central Scotland to the Port of Alloa. [45]
  • The Halbeath Railway opened in 1783, from the colliery at Halbeath to the harbour at Inverkeithing. [46][47]
  • The Charnwood Forest Canal, sometimes known as the ‘Forest Line of the Leicester Navigation’ was, under the guidance of William Jessop, using railways to supplement the canal between Nanpantan and Loughborough wharf, Leicestershire by 1789. [5][48]
  • The Butterley Gangroad (or Crich Rail-way) was built by Benjamin Outram in 1793. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]
  • The Earl of Carlisle’s Waggonway opened in 1799 from coal pits owned by George Howard, 6th Earl of Carlisle around Lambley to Brampton, Cumbria. [51][58] There is some confusion over dates. The earliest opening date quoted is 1774, the latest 1799. [59] Dendy Marshall says that it was built in 1775. [60] C.E. Lee says it was constructed in 1798. [59][61]

It is perhaps easy to loose sight of the scale of these industrial undertakings. The rapid expansion of mining, plateways and railways “led to an increase in the numbers of horses in use … and a growth in the amount of horse feed needed. By 1727 The Tanfield Waggonway, in Co. Durham, carried 830 wagon loads of coal daily that’s a lot of horses.” [1: p61][5][62][63] “In 1804, the Middleton Colliery line was carrying 194 loads per day. Each wagon held about 2.5 tons and required the use of one horse and driver.” [1: p61]

A crisis in the use of horses and wagons occurred early in the 19th century with the advent of the Napoleonic Wars. The conflict became a significant drain on both horse and horse feed availability. The resulting inflation in the price of horses and feed lowered the profitability of each wagon load of coal. David Wilson says that, “The more visionary (or greedy, depending on your point of view) pit owners started to search for alternatives to the horse to move their goods to market. They provided their pit engineers with money and materials to experiment with steam power to replace horse power.” [1: p61]

Of course, steam power wasn’t new. Knowledge of the power of steam had been around since before the Common Era in Greek society [64][65][66] and the pits themselves had steam engines for pumping out the water and for lifting coal to the surface, or as winding engines on rope-worked inclines. [66][67] Newcomen’s first engine was installed for pumping in a mine in 1712 at Dudley Castle in Staffordshire. [66][68] What was new was first, the expiry of Boulton & Watt’s patent for a high-pressure steam engine, [5][69] and second, the idea of making the steam engine mobile, thus creating the steam locomotive. What eventually became even more revolutionary was the idea of creating a network of railways to serve the whole country. [1: p61]

We sometimes talk of a ‘perfect storm’ (a particularly violent storm arising from a rare combination of adverse meteorological factors), when we are talking about a series of adverse conditions occurring at the same time – a situation caused by a combination of unfavourable circumstances. The opposite of a ‘perfect storm’ is usually assumed to be a period of calm. However, the true opposite of a perfect storm is the occurrence (co-occurence) of a series of positive factors which combine to produce something significantly valuable. Wilson says that “as with almost anything man-made, there must be certain ingredients present. To bake a cake you need eggs, flour, milk etc. and in creating a railway you need, metalworking skills, engineering expertise, labour, capital and an incentive.” [1: 61]

The early years of the 19th century saw a timely co-incidence of these and other factors:

  • growing shortages of horse and feed coupled to the rising prices of both;
  • poor road conditions;
  • a rapidly developing understanding of engineering – Wilson suggests that this was “as a consequence of the more theoretical works of philosophers such as Newton, Descartes and Leibniz. … Such men have a reputation as creators or exponents of the mechanistic world view. Prior to the works of these men many had thought, and indeed some still do think, that the earth was a living entity. However, the views espoused by Newton, Descartes and Leibniz came to be accepted, the world was made up of dead, lifeless and inert matter, here to benefit mankind;” [1: p62]
  • the availability of skilled and unskilled labour – particularly the ‘navigators’ who were skilled in the techniques of earthworks, tunneling and bridge building – the men who had earlier built the canals. (“These men were to become the skilled labour of the railway construction industry and in turn they passed on their skills to the former farm labourers who were recruited to railway works as the lines progressed along their routes“); [1: p62]
  • developing metalworking skills – “the Darby family, who set up the … Coalbrookdale foundry. had acquired new skills in metalworking from tinkers, in what is now the Netherlands;” [1: p62] After constructing Ironbridge, “the Coalbrookdale ironmasters began to widen their horizons. One of their number, John “Iron Mad” Wilkinson, constructed what was reputedly the first iron barge and, more importantly, … the smiths of Coalbrookdale collaborated with Richard Trevithick in the construction of his locomotive – they cast the cylinder block and the plates for the construction of the boiler;” [1: p62]
  • the increasing availability of financial capital;
  • the increasing birth rate and the better health of the work-force which provided the necessary labour while engineering work was still labour-intensive.

The Availability of Capital

Among the physical factors listed above is an interesting financial factor which will bear some scrutiny. Wilson tells us that “the capital to build the world’s first public railway came, not from the Government, but from the Society of Friends, the Quakers.” [1: p62] He notes too that the Darby family whose Coalbrookdale plant had such a formative influence in the early days of the industrial revolution, were also Quakers. Wilson explains that Quakers were isolated from much of society and public life because of a refusal to sign up to the articles of faith of the established church. However, the same religious views made them sympathetic to works performed for the public good. Various Quaker families began to take an interest in the developing railway sphere. The website quakersintheword.org [70] tells the story of the significant role played in financing railways played by the Quakers.

In 1818 a small group of Quaker businessmen, including Edward Pease and his son Joseph from Darlington, Benjamin Flounders and the banker Jonathan Backhouse, met to discuss the possibility of building a railway from Darlington, passing several collieries, to the port of Stockton.” [70] 

The Act of Parliament required for the work to take place faced significant delays in the parliamentary process. “The delay proved very significant, as in April 1821 Edward met George Stephenson and recruited him as an engineer for the railway. The original intention had been that the coaches would be horse drawn, just like all the others now in existence. However, George convinced Edward that steam engines were the future for railways, and that he could build them. The Pease family then put up much of the capital that enabled Stephenson to establish a company in Newcastle, where he built the locomotives.” [70]

After the opening of the Stockton & Darlington Railway, “the railway network grew under the guidance of Edward’s son Joseph, who opened the Stockton & Middlesbrough branch in 1828. … In 1833 Joseph became the first Quaker to enter Parliament and the railway interests passed to his brother Henry. In 1838, Henry opened the Bishop Auckland & Weardale line, followed by the Middlesbrough and Redcar line in 1846. Henry wanted to traverse the Pennines and in 1854 he started the Darlington & Barnard Castle line, which opened in 1856.” [70]

Quakers were often involved in railway developments in the 19th century, for instance, “in 1824, a group of merchants, including Quaker philanthropist and anti-slavery campaigner James Cropper, went to see the Stockton and Darlington railway.  They soon began building the Liverpool and Manchester railway, which opened in 1830.” [70]

Incidentally, Quakers “were also responsible for two innovations that improved the way these new passenger railways worked – timetables and tickets. James Cropper produced a 12-page timetable for the Liverpool and Manchester railway, probably the first railway timetable ever.  It was the forerunner of Quaker George Bradshaw’s Railway Companion, published in 1839. Bradshaw’s became a household name for anyone using the railways. … The second innovation was the railway ticket. In 1839 Thomas Edmundson, another Quaker, was appointed station master at Milton, on the Newcastle and Carlisle line.  He was unhappy that customers paid their fares directly to him without receiving a receipt.  Consequently he introduced the railway ticket, which came into general use with the creation of the Railway Clearing House in 1842.” [70]

The Birth Rate and Increasing Health of the UK Population

Wilson points us to one more significant factor in the development of railways in the early 19th century. “Seemingly disconnected and irrelevant factors were playing their part. During the period from the end of the civil war (1649) onwards there was a growing awareness of the value of the human being as resource, and a concerted effort was made to increase the birth rate and to cut the death rate. … This did not stem from any rise in humanitarianism but from a recognition that people were worth money. After all, in the 1640s and on into the 19th century, slavery was still common throughout the so-called civilised world, including Britain. Improvements in diet and sanitation increased life exресtancy. It is no coincidence that the first workhouses began to appear around the middle of the 17th century – a reasonably fit and healthy population produced more than a sickly and unfit one.” [1: p62]

By the beginning of the 19th century, the conditions were in place for a major economic expansion. A growing empire and military strength ensured the supply of raw materials and provided a growing market place for the products made from them. An expanding population provided the physical means by which the empire might be held together. Technology provided the ability to carry out the grand design. The workhouses and other reforms had created a disciplined workforce.” [1: p62-63]

By 1850, a quarter of a million workers – a force bigger than the Army and Navy combined – had laid down 3,000 miles of railway line across Britain, connecting people like never before. [71]

And Finally …

Wilson suggests one other, less definable, reason for the dramatic welcome given to steam technology in particular. He suggests that there was a more visceral connection to steam power which predisposed humanity to embrace the technology.

No doubt, the S&D was at the forefront of engineering developments it was “the white heat of technology, the frontier of science.” [1: p63] Wilson asks us to consider that there was (and still is) a connection between “a piece of primitive industrial technology, the steam locomotive and its enduring popularity, and an ancient, and some might say mystical, view of the world.” [1: p63]

Wilson says: “Prior to the advent of the mechanistic world view in which cause and effect, hard science and hard facts are the order of the day, people held to a more animistic philosophy. Miners would pray to the earth before digging it up. … In this more mystic view of the world things were not made of chemicals and atoms, molecules and the force of gravity. They were composed of the four elements – earth, air, fire and water.” [1: p63] He asks us to consider whether “the reason so many people took to the steam engine and the railway when it began was that the steam locomotive has a unique blend of the four elements not only in its construction but in the very forces and requirements necessary for its movement. … [It] is made from the ores of the earth, heated by fire which needs air to burn. The metals from the forge are then tempered by water whilst being shaped on the anvil. In order to make the steam locomotive work, coal, or part of the earth, is consumed along with air in a fire which turns water into steam which in turn brings the locomotive to life.” [1: p63]

We all know that all men, are just little boys at heart. Increasingly women are involved in the preservation movement. There seems to be a deep emotional connection for many of us between the steam beasts of earth, wind, fire and water that reigned over the railway networks for the world for more than a century and a half and our own psyche, something deeply ‘elemental’!

Whatever the cause, the early 19th century saw humanity embrace steam-power and the benefits it brought with open arms and wallets.

References

  1. David Wilson; Mother of Inventions; in the Evening Mail Supplement, 1st June 1993, p61-63.
  2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diolkos, accessed on 2nd March 2025.
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1790s_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  4. https://web.archive.org/web/20100604080339/http://www.stanleyhistoryonline.com/Lake-Lock-Rail-Road.html, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_railway_history, accessed on 7th January 2025.
  6. https://web.archive.org/web/20070523122428/http://www.stephensonloco.fsbusiness.co.uk/surreyiron.htm, accessed on 9th January 2025.
  7.  Dorian Gerhold; The Rise and Fall of the Surrey Iron Railway, 1802–46 (PDF); in Surrey Archaeological Collections, Vol. 95, 2010, p193–210; via https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-379-1/dissemination/pdf/vol_95/surreyac095_193-210_gerhold.pdf, accessed on 6th February 2025.
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1801_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrey_Iron_Railway, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  10. https://coflein.gov.uk/en/site/275707, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  11.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1802_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  12.  M.R. Connop Price; The Llanelly & Mynydd Mawr Railway; Oakwood Press, Oxford, 1992.
  13. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/02/02/the-penydarren-tramroad-south-wales-part-1
  14. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/02/06/the-penydarren-tramroad-south-wales-part-2
  15. https://coflein.gov.uk/en/site/91513, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  16. https://www.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/59/Penydarren.htm, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  17. https://coflein.gov.uk/en/site/91513, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merthyr_Tramroad, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Moor_Ironworks, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  20. Silkstone Waggonway, South Yorkshire: Survey Report (PDF). Vol. 1; Yorkshire Archaeological Trust,  August 2012; via https://web.archive.org/web/20160311113301/http://iadb.co.uk/epip/Silkstone%20Waggonway%20Vol%201%20text%20plates%20figures.pdf, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancaster_Canal_Tramroad, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  22. S. Barritt; The Old Tramroad – Walton Summit to Preston Basin; Carnegie Publishing, Lancaster, 2000.
  23. Paul W. Sowan; The Croyden, Mertsham & Godstone Iron Railway: A Short Chapter in a Long Story; The Bourne Society (LHR45), Croydon, London, 2006, LHR45, p53-69; via https://bournesoc.org.uk/bslivewp/wp-content/uploads/CMG-Iron-Railway-SECURE.pdf, accessed on 9th January 2025.
  24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirhowy_Railway#Sirhowy_Tramroad, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  25. Alan Jowett; Jowett’s Railway Atlas; Patrick Stephens Limited, 1989, p57, 59.
  26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruabon_Brook_Tramway, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  27. Trefynant – Opening of Branch Railway at Trefynant Works; in Wrexham Advertiser, 6th January 1866, p8.
  28. Meeting of the Wrexham District Highways’ Board; in Wrexham Advertiser. 26th January 1867, p5.
  29. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middlebere_Plateway, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  30. R.W. Kidner; The Railways of Purbeck (Third ed.); Oakwood Press, 2000.
  31. Purbeck’s clay railways; in Dorset Life Magazine, January 2007; via https://web.archive.org/web/20070927150728/http://www.dorsetlife.co.uk/articles/ArticlesDetail.asp?ID=599, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  32. Middlebere Plateway; The Purbeck Mineral & Mining Museum; via https://web.archive.org/web/20070928063415/http://www.pmmmg.org/Middlebere.htm, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  33. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monmouthshire_and_Brecon_Canal#Monmouthshire_Canal_Tramway, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  34. https://coflein.gov.uk/en/site/308291, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1807_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  36. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swansea_and_Mumbles_Railway, accessed on 9th January 2025.
  37. https://cof, lein.gov.uk/en/site/407018/?ref=goodoil.news, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  38. https://coflein.gov.uk/en/site/96185, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  39. https://britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/300024912-machine-bridge-also-known-as-pont-y-doctor-pontypridd/photos/147433, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  40. Mark Jones; Lancashire Railways – The History of Steam; Countryside Books, Newbury, 2012 p. 5.
  41. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2022/04/25/ancient-tramroads-near-telford-part-1-tramroads
  42. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2022/04/26/ancient-tramroads-near-telford-part-2-the-coalbrookdale-company-tramroads-shown-on-the-1882-83-6-os-maps-published-in-1887-and-later-surveys
  43. Peter King, The First Shropshire Railways in G. Boyes (ed.), in Early Railways 4: Papers from the 4th International Early Railways Conference 2008, Six Martlets, Sudbury, 2010, p70–84.
  44. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tranent_to_Cockenzie_Waggonway, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  45. An oblique aerial photograph taken facing north shows a general view in 1928 of Alloa, its Town Hall, Marshill and Church Street. The wagon road which was used to transport coal from the Holton area of Sauchie to Alloa harbour. Although the tracks are gone the road still exists from Station Hotel down to South School. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/SPW020247, accessed on 7th January 2025.
  46. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1780s_in_rail_transport, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  47. Mark Poustie; Halbeath Railway; via https://www.railscot.co.uk/articles/Halbeath_Railway/#google_vignette, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  48. https://waterways.org.uk/waterways/discover-the-waterways/charnwood-forest-canal, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  49. Early Years; https://web.archive.org/web/20180120205818/http://www.butterleygangroad.co.uk/bgearlyyears.html, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  50. https://heritagecalling.com/2015/03/17/heritage-highlights-where-is-one-of-the-worlds-oldest-surviving-railway-tunnels, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  51. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1790s_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterley_Gangroad, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  53.  https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1422984?section=official-list-entry, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  54.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-31951751, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  55.  P. Riden; Outram, Benjamin (bap. 1764, d. 1805); in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004; via, https://www.oxforddnb.com/display/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-20959, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  56. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1109195?section=official-list-entry, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  57. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_Horse_locomotive, accessed on 22nd February 2025.
  58. Brian Webb & David A. Gordon; Lord Carlisle’s Railways; Railway Correspondence & Travel Society, 1978.
  59. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brampton_Railway, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  60. C.F. Dendy Marshall; A History of British Railways Down to the Year 1830; Oxford University Press, London. 1938, 1971.
  61. C.E. Lee; The Brampton Railway; in The Railway Magazine, May and June 1942.
  62. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanfield_Railway, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  63. Tanfield Railway; Wear – BBC Home; via https://www.bbc.co.uk/wear/content/articles/2008/05/20/tanfield_main_feature.shtml, accessed on 25th February 2025.
  64. Hero (Heron) of Alexandria, described in detail what is thought to be the first working steam engine. He called it an aeolipile (“wind ball”). His design was a sealed caldron of water was placed over a heat source. As the water boiled, steam rose into the pipes and into the hollow sphere. The steam escaped from two bent outlet tubes on the ball, resulting in rotation of the ball. The principle he used in his design is similar to that of today’s jet propulsion. Hero (Heron) did not consider this invention being useful for everyday applications: he considered his aeolipile invention as a novelty, a remarkable toy. https://www.smith.edu/hsc/museum/ancient_inventions/steamengine2.html, accessed on 3rd March 2025. The same device was also mentioned by Vitruvius in De Architectura about 100 years earlier. [66]
  65. https://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2020/12/ancient-steam-engines.html, accessed on 3rd March 2025.
  66. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_steam_engine, accessed on 3rd March 2025.
  67. In 1712, Thomas Newcomen’s atmospheric engine became the first commercially successful engine using the principle of the piston and cylinder, which was the fundamental type of steam engine used until the early 20th century. The steam engine was used to pump water out of coal mines. [66]
  68. Steven Johnson; The Invention of Air: A story of Science, Faith, Revolution and the Birth of America; Riverhood Books, New York, 2008.
  69. https://mises.org/mises-daily/james-watt-monopolist, accessed on 8th January 2025.
  70. https://www.quakersintheworld.org/quakers-in-action/286/Railways-in-Britain, accessed on 3rd March 2025.
  71. https://www.railwaymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/navvies-workers-who-built-railways, accessed on 3rd March 2025.
  72. https://co-curate.ncl.ac.uk/wylam-wagonway, accessed on 15th January 2025.
  73. https://www.twsitelines.info/smr/1032, accessed on 15th January 2025.
  74. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilmarnock_and_Troon_Railway, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  75. Campbell Highet; The Glasgow and South Western Railway; Oakwood Press, Lingfield, 1965.
  76. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1812_in_rail_transport, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  77. C.J.A. Robertson; The Origins of the Scottish Railway System 1722–1844; John Donald Publishers, Edinburgh, 1983.
  78. https://my.northtyneside.gov.uk/sites/default/files/web-page-related-files/Killingworth%20Moor%20Archaeological%20Assessment.pdf, accessed on 3rd March 2025.
  79. https://co-curate.ncl.ac.uk/blucher, accessed on 15th January 2025.
  80. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killingworth_locomotives
  81. Clement E. Stretton; The Railway World, Volume VI; 1897.
  82. https://co-curate.ncl.ac.uk/killingworth-waggonway, accessed on 15th January 2025.
  83. https://www.northeastheritagelibrary.co.uk/coalsarchive/ww07/killingworth-waggonway, accessed on 15th January 2025.
  84. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haytor_Granite_Tramway, accessed on 27th April 2025

Galatians 3: 23-29 & 4: 1-7 – All One in Christ Jesus

Most biblical scholars agree that the author of the Letter to the Galatians was very probably St. Paul. The main arguments in favour of the authenticity of Galatians include its style and themes, which are common to the core letters of the Pauline corpus. Back in the 1930s, George S. Duncan described its authenticity as “unquestioned. In every line it betrays its origin as a genuine letter of Paul.” [3]

Some scholars “have cast doubts upon its authorship due to stylistic and vocabulary discrepancies with other letters uncontestedly attributed to Paul. These disparities have caused speculations that someone other than Paul may have composed it, yet most biblical scholars uphold Paul as its true author due to strong autobiographical elements in its content and thematic consistency with other Pauline works as evidence of Paul’s authentic authorship of Ephesians.” [4]

It seems reasonable for us to ascribe the authorship of the letter to St. Paul. Although ultimately this is not critical. What matters most of all is the text that we have received.

Paul constructs an argument in Galatians which seems to culminate in the idea that a new covenant, which is built on the foundations of earlier understandings of God’s relationship with his people, has now arrived. A covenant in which we are all included in God’s kingdom by faith through God’s grace alone.

Galatians 3:23 to 4:7 sits at the culmination of this letter.

A couple of things to note:

A. ‘Children’ or ‘Heirs’.

In ancient Rome ‘heirs’ were named in a will. Other children were not named. Heirs received everything from the bequest – both debts and benefits. “In the case of intestacy, Roman inheritance law had no concept of primogeniture and treated male and female children equally. However, in most cases intestacy was avoided by means of a will. Roman law recognised very broad freedom of testation, but wills had to strictly follow correct formulae and phrases in order to be valid. The will had to name an heir. In addition to this, it could name a legal guardian (tutor) for underage children, manumit slaves, and leave legacies to third parties. Over time a separate system of ‘fideicommissa’ (‘trusts’), which allowed greater flexibility, developed alongside the system of wills.” [5]

If a man died intestate, “property went first to ‘sui heredes’ (‘his own heirs’), who were any children of the deceased that had remained under his ‘patria potestas, (‘paternal power’) until his death. [6: p200] There was no assumption of ‘primogeniture’ – all children, male and female, received an equal share of the estate. [6: p201] If there were no children, then agnate relatives in the male line would inherit (i.e. other children of the deceased’s father, paternal grandfather, and so on). [6: p200] If there were none of these, then the ‘Twelve Tables’ [6: p199][7: p505] provided for the property to be inherited by the wider gens, but as the social role of the gens declined after the Early Republican period, this ceased to occur.[6: p200] There was no concept that an intestate property might pass to the state. [6: p200] Children of the deceased who had been emancipated before the deceased’s death or who had passed into the ‘potestas’ of another (through certain kinds of marriage or through adoption by another) were excluded from the succession, as were relatives in the female line (i.e. relatives of the deceased’s mother), and the deceased’s spouse.” [6: p200-201][7: p505]

Most Roman inheritances were, however, not intestate. “Instead, they were governed by a will (‘testamentum’). [7: p500] Some Roman writers speak of producing a will as a duty (‘officium’). [6: p201] Henry Maine in 1861 characterised the Roman approach as a ‘horror of intestacy.’ [6: p201][7: p499] Only a ‘pater familias: (male head of household) could make a will that disposed of a whole estate. [7: p502] But any Roman citizen who had reached the age of majority could make a will for property that they possessed in their own right. Women could make wills through a process of fictional sale (coemptio), until the reign of Hadrian, when they were given the ability to make a will through their tutor (legal guardian). [6: p202][7: p502] Non-Romans (peregrini) and people with intellectual disabilities could not make wills under Roman law. [7: p502] Exiles were not allowed to make wills either and this ban was retrospective; being sent into exile voided any will that the exile had already made. [7: p502] … The will had to name an heir. [6: p202] In addition to this, it could name a legal guardian (tutor) for underage children, manumit slaves, and leave legacies to third parties.” [6: p204]

Failure to name an heir could render a will void. [6: p204] An heir did not have to be a natural child of the deceased. An adopted heir was acceptable. This was often the practice in higher-ranking household as couples were often infertile.

An heir inherited both the deceased’s debts and his possessions. Being a child did not guarantee being an heir.

In verse 26 of Galatians chapter 3, the NIV and NRSV choose to translate a Greek word which means ‘sons’ as ‘children’. A word which carried great weight in the ancient world, ‘the son and heir’, the one who receives everything, is replaced in the NIV and NRSV by one which is about us all being ‘children’. In modern thinking, being one of many children of the father does confer status. But the word ‘children’ fails to carry the great sense of particularity intended by the author of the epistle. The status of ‘son and heir’ was more significant than being a ‘child’. In our thinking about this passage we must give weight to this distinction. Paul intends us to understand that we all (female and male) have the same status as the ‘son and heir’.

The distinction in ancient Rome between ‘son and heir’ and ‘child’ will also have been important to those reading the passage in many eras of civilisation and the history of the church. Particularly so, once the concept of primogeniture  became established in the medieval world. A concept which kept land and estates whole as they were passed from father to eldest son. The eldest son was ‘the heir’, the other children, while usually loved, had a demonstrably secondary status.

Paul intends us to understand that we are all (female and male) co-heirs with Christ, we have the same status, the same entitlements. We have been chosen as ‘heirs’. We are more than ‘children’. In verse 29, Paul uses the word κληρονόμοι (klēronomoi) ‘heirs’ emphasising the point that ‘son’ is different from ‘child’.

Our status ‘in Christ’ is that of heirs to the promise, not just children.

B. Verse 28 – ‘Or’ and ‘And’

In the context that we are all inheritors of everything God has to offer, it may be worth us noting what Paul writes in verse 28. There is a small but perhaps significant change from ‘or’ (οὐδὲ) to ‘and’ (καὶ) in Galatians 3:28. The Greek reads like this:

οὐκ ἔνι Ἰουδαῖος οὐδὲ Ἕλλην, οὐκ ἔνι δοῦλος οὐδὲ ἐλεύθερος, οὐκ ἔνι ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυπάντες γὰρ ὑμεῖς εἷς ἐστε ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ. [1]

The direct translation is shown in interlinear form below:

οὐκ                     ἔνι.        Ἰουδαῖος   οὐδὲ Ἕλλην,   οὐκ           ἔνι      δοῦλος οὐδὲ

Not/neither    there is     Jew        or    Greek not/neither there is    slave     or

ἐλεύθερος,          οὐκ           ἔνι         ἄρσεν  καὶ     θῆλυ       πάντες γὰρ

    free          not/neither    there is   male  and   female       all       for

ὑμεῖς    εἷς   ἐστε   ἐν  Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ.

  you    one    are     in   Christ   Jesus.

The direct translation does not read easily in English. As is usual, this means that the translators have had to decide how best to make the text readable in English. Almost inevitably they have chosen to give greater continuity in their translations. The variety of different translations can be found here. [2]

Many of the translators choose not to recognise the change from ‘or’ (οὐδὲ) to ‘and’ (καὶ). I guess the question must be whether or not Paul meant the change to be significant. Many of the translators think not, and in doing so they prevent most modern readers having the opportunity to engage with the possibility that the difference is significant. Effectively, the translators narrow down the possible interpretation of the text in favour of their own interpretation.

But is that difference significant? Perhaps it is sufficient for us to read that there is no distinction in Christ, that we are all one in Christ. Whether we are Jew or Greek, slave or free, male or female, there is no distinction between us. We are one in Christ, all of us ‘heirs’ of the promise, much more than just children. If that were the case, I would happily go on to argue that these pairings are intended to demonstrate the breadth of God’s inclusive love for everyone.

But, that single καὶ (and) may add to the argument. Two couplets are ‘neither/nor’ but for one couplet Paul choses to use καὶ, why? … This part of our passage, (i.e. οὐκ ἔνι ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυ), seems to allude to Genesis 1:27 (ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυ ἐποίησεν αὐτούς, in the Septuagint) where God first creates a being, Adam, seemingly both male and female, if verse 27 of Genesis chapter 1 is taken literally.

Daniel W. Roberts comments that “Galatians 3:28 is a rare case of a direct quote going relatively unnoticed by scholarship, which is then followed by a one-word allusion to further solidify Paul’s claims concerning unity.” [8: p1] “Paul in Galatians 3:27–28 quotes Genesis 1:27, … this purposeful quotation of Gen 1:27 is meant to couple with an allusion to Genesis 2:24 to articulate further the unity found in Christ.” [8:p3][9]

Roberts goes on to argue for the unity which comes from marriage and which mirrors the unity between Christ and his Church. But there are other interpretations which include feminist, intersex, or queer, etc. perspectives.

If there is a significance to the use of the word καὶ, and there may not be, but if there is, it must delineate a difference between the male/female couplet and the Jew/Greek and slave/free couplets. In Christ there is no longer Jew or Gentile, no longer slave or free, no longer male and female. It must, as Roberts suggests, refer to something else. Particularly, probably, the passage in Genesis.

Are the first two couplets a case of ‘either/or’ while the third is a case of ‘both/and’? Is ‘male and female’ just, for Paul, one category rather than two categories? Just one thing? Perhaps he sees us as being included in God’s blessings because we are human rather than because we are male or female? Perhaps gender/sex is insignificant? I am not sure where this leads us, but perhaps it places our disputes about what it is to be a male or a female in a wider context. Perhaps it is about freedom to be who God has made us to be, rather than having to conform to the either/or of the other categories in Galatians 3: 28. Paul sums this all up with the fact that, whatever he means earlier in the verse, we are all one in Christ Jesus.

References

  1. Galatians 3:28 in Greek, via https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%203%3A28&version=SBLGNT, accessed on 23rd February 2025.
  2. https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Galatians%203%3A28, accessed on 23rd February 2025.
  3. George S. Duncan; The Epistle of Paul to the Galatians; Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1934, p xviii.
  4. https://www.ministryvoice.com/who-wrote-galatians, accessed on 23rd February 2025.
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inheritance_law_in_ancient_Rome, accessed on 26th February 2025.
  6. David Johnston; Succession; in David Johnston, (ed.); The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law; Cambridge University Press, 2015, p199–212.
  7. Eva Jakab; Inheritance; in Paul J. du Plessis (ed.); The Oxford handbook of Roman law and society; Oxford University Press, 2016, p498–510.
  8. Daniel W. Roberts; Male and Female in Galatians 3:28: A Short Biblical Theology of Unity; in Southeastern Theological Review 13.1 (Spring 2022), p1–23; via https://www.sebts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/STRIssue13.1_BenMerkle.pdf , accessed on 26th February 2025.
  9. Roberts comments that Richard Hays’s study is especially significant for the study of Paul’s more subtle uses of the OT, what he calls echoes and allusions. This specific example, not discussed by Hays, arguably passes all seven of his tests for Pauline echoes. (Richard Hays, Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul; Yale University Press, New Haven, p29–32.)

The Llanfyllin Branch and Oswestry to Llanymynech – Part 1 …

The Llanfyllin Branch was featured in an article by Stanley Jenkins in the October 2003 issue of Steam Days magazine. [3]

The immediately adjacent Tanat Valley Light Railway is covered elsewhere on this blog. The articles about that line can be found here [4] and here. [5]

The two lines ran into the hills to the Southwest of Oswestry. The local Cambrian network is shown diagrammatically in the image below.

This schematic map, provided by Wikipedia, shows the local rail network. It shows the Llanfyllin Branch (which was to the South of the Tanat Valley Light Railway) at the bottom-centre of the map, © Public Domain. [1]

Trains on the branch ran from the Welsh border town of Oswestry to Llanfyllin in the Berwyn Mountains. The branch left the Oswestry & Newtown Railway at Llanymynech, where the station nameboard called on passengers for Llanfyllin and Lake Vyrnwy to disembark and change trains. The lake is a nearby beauty spot where there is a reservoir supplying water to Liverpool.

In July 1864, the Oswestry & Newtown Railway joined with other local concerns to form the Cambrian Railways Company with its headquarters at Oswestry.

Llanfyllin’s townfolk formed a company to secure a rail link to the Cambrian network. The Cambrian began to show some interest when ideas of an East-West mainline came to the fore.

A 10-mile branch was agreed from Llanfyllin to Llanymynech which, in the view of the companies which would soon form the Cambrian, would hinder any rival’s attempt to construct a mainline between the Midlands and the Welsh coast.

The modest scheme received Royal Assent on 17th May 1861 and the Act empowered the Oswestry & Newton Railway to build branch lines to Llanfyllin and Kerry. The Llanfyllin Branch was soon pegged out in advance of construction. It presented few engineering challenges as “for much of its length the proposed branch line would follow a comparatively easy course along convenient river valleys, and with few physical obstacles to impede [the] work.” [3: p627]

The line was substantially complete by the early months of 1863, a significant event being the arrival of the locomotive Nant Clwyd at Llanfyllin in March of that year. The railway was opened on 10th April 1863 and branch trains began running through to Oswestry on 17th July 1863.” [3: p627]

The railway “was single track throughout, with intermediate stations at Llansantffraid and also Llanfechain. At Llanymynech the junction was situated to the North of the station, and this necessitated an awkward reversal when trains entered or left the branch. There were no tunnels on the branch, although several overbridges or underbridges were required including a 90-yard viaduct between Llanymynech and Llansantffraid. An additional stopping place was opened at Bryngwyn in the first few months of operation, although this new station was merely a request stop with no provision for goods traffic. The trains travelling eastwards to Oswestry were regarded as up workings, while westbound trains were down services.” [3: p627-628]

The new railway was soon functioning as a typical country branch line with a modest service of around five trains each way.  “Minor changes took place at Llanymynech in 1866 in connection with the opening of the Potteries, Shrewsbury & North Wales Railway, but in the event this undertaking was more or less a total failure. Much later, in 1896, the Llanfyllin branch junction was re-aligned using part of the PS&NW route.” [3: p628]

The Llanfyllin branch found a welcome, unexpected source of heavy freight traffic in the 1880s when Liverpool Corporation obtained powers for the construction of a massive dam at Llanwddyn, about seven miles to the west of Llanfyllin. By this means the surrounding valley was turned into a reservoir known as Lake Vrynwy from which water was supplied to Liverpool via a 75mile-long aqueduct. Materials needed in connection with this gigantic feat of Victorian engineering were delivered by rail to Llanfyllin, which became an important railhead while the reservoir scheme was under construction.” [3: p628]

In 1922, the Cambrian became an integral part of an enlarged GWR as part of the grouping required by the Railways Act of 1921.

Road competition led the GWR to become “a large-scale user of motorised road transport, with railway-owned lorries being employed for local cartage work in urban areas and as ‘country lorries’ for collection and delivery work in rural areas. Certain stations were selected as ‘country lorry centres’, while others were down-graded in various ways so that, by the later 1930s, many smaller stations were handling very little carted freight traffic. Oswestry and Llansantffraid, for example, both became ‘country lorry centres’, and a large rural area was then served by road transport, with GWR vehicles running on regular routes. In this way the railway could fight back against the road-transport operators.” [3: p628]

The GWR was also a pioneer in the use of motorised road passenger services. “By the post-Grouping period the GWR had introduced road feeder services on a very large scale, rural Wales being regarded as an ideal area for the employment of such vehicles. Oswestry emerged as an important centre in the company’s motor-bus network, with services radiating to towns such as Llangollen, Welshpool, and to Llanfair Caereinion. These extensive road services needed a relatively-large allocation of motor vehicles, among the buses working from Oswestry during the 1920s being Burford 30cwt buses Nos. 801, 807, and 861, and Thornycroft 30cwt vehicles Nos. 911 and 936. The GWR buses … worked in close conjunction with the trains as useful feeders for the railway system.” [3: p628] This was an early example of an integrated transport network!

The road depot at Oswestry Railway Station on 7th November 1928. This was, until July 1924, the GWR railway station. After this date all passenger trains used the Cambrian station. Here we see two AEC 3.5 ton high-sided lorries, No. 792 on the left and No. 260 on the right, the latter having been a motor-bus which was fitted with a lorry body in March 1927. Under the canopy of the station it is possible to pick out a Thornycroft single-deck bus, No. 936 and another AEC lorry. Note the various enamel signs and the low Furness Railway wagon attached to the right of the higher GWR one © Public Domain. [6]

To regularise its practice, the GWR obtained new legal powers “under the provisions of the Great Western (Road Transport) Act of 1928. This new legislation enabled the GWR to own, work, and use motor vehicles in its own right, and to enter into arrangements with other parties for the operation of road transport services. By virtue of these powers the railway company at once entered into detailed negotiations with certain road transport companies, and by 1933 all of the GWR motor-bus services had been handed over to ‘associated’ bus companies such as Crosville Motor Services Ltd.” [3: p629]

This arrangement was supposed to lead to greater co-ordination between road and rail transport, but there is no doubt that in many areas the buses began to compete with the railways for what little transport was available in rural areas. The situation in respect of the Oswestry area seems to have been particularly disadvantageous as far as the GWR was concerned in that many buses ran on a Llanymynech-Oswestry-Gobowen axis in open competition with the rail service.” [3: p629]

In some instances Crosville (or the other railway-associated bus companies) assisted the GWR by collecting and delivering parcels traffic, while goods traffic was handled by GWR motor lorries, some of which had been converted from former railway buses. Oswestry-based road motors Nos. 891, 897 and 861 … were adapted for use as lorries between 1926 and 1929. …They retained their old GWR fleet numbers. … Buses were more flexible than the railways, … to mitigate this the GWR opened numerous unstaffed halts. … One of these … was established in 1938 at Carreghofa in the Llanfyllin Branch, near Llanymynech.” [3: p629]

Jenkins tells us that the train services on the branch were similar throughout the years of its operation with five up passenger services to Llanymynech from Llanfyllin each weekday and five down trains. Occasionally these services worked through to Oswestry but, with the exception of the 1.43pm service, such movements were not always timetabled. The reverse workings, often  unadvertised, ran from Gobowen through Oswestry and Llanymynech to Llanfyllin. Wednesdays and Saturdays, market days in Oswestry, were different, with two morning trains running through to Oswestry and two early afternoon trains back to Llanfyllin. There was no Sunday service. A daily branch goods train “generally departed from Llanymynech at 12.25pm and arrived at the terminus at 1.35pm, having called intermediately at Llansantffraid where half an hour was allowed for shunting operations. The return working left Llanfyllin at 2.30pm and, after spending another half an hour at Llansantffraid, … arrived at Llanymynech at 3.42pm.” [3: p629]

Jenkins comments that “the line was worked by short-wheelbase coaching stock for many years, although in GWR days 2-coach ‘B-sets’ and other formations were employed.” [3: p629]

The Cambrian Railway had very few small tank engines which meant that tender engines worked many of their small branch lines. Usually these would be ‘Queen’ class 0-6-0 locomotives. Following the grouping, GWR locos began to appear on the branch lines around Oswestry, particularly Armstrong and Collett 0-4-2Ts. Jenkins tells us that “these newcomers included ‘517’ 0-4-2T No 848 which worked on the branch at various times until its withdrawal in 1945, being out-stationed in the branch sub-shed at various times. The familiar Collett 0-4-2Ts were introduced by the GWR in 1932 as replacements for the veteran ‘517’ class 0-4-2Ts on local passenger services.” [3: p630]

The first examples of the non-auto ’58XX’ locomotives appeared on the branch in the 1930s. Jenkins notes that No. 5816 was sent to Llanfyllin shed as early as August 1933, while by 1947, the resident branch engine was No. 5806. The auto-fitted ’48XX’ class also arrived at Oswestry in the mid-1930s. These locos could also be seen on the Llanfyllin Branch. [3: p630] Dean goods 0-6-0 locos were also seen at times on the branch. Jenkins notes appearances of Nos. 2482 and 2535. No doubt the branch was served by a number of pannier tank (0-6-0PT) locomotives of different classes that were stabled at Oswestry. After nationalisation, by the mid-1950s, a group of Ivatt ‘2MT’ 2-6-0s were allocated to Oswestry and were employed on the branch. “As there was no turntable at the terminus the Ivatt Moguls generally ran tender-first towards Llanfyllin and then returned to Oswestry facing in the right direction. Several Llanfyllin branch services were at this time through trips to Gobowen which continued northwards over the Great Western branch to connect with the Shrewsbury & Chester main line. … At Gobowen it was found that the clearance between the stop block at the end of the down bay platform was insufficient for an Ivatt 2-6-0 running tender-first, and drivers were therefore instructed to enter the bay running chimney-first; this instruction probably explains why the engines normally faced northwards when they were running on the Llanfyllin route!” [3: p631]

The Route

We commence our journey at Oswestry Railway Station. We noted first that from 1860 onwards there were two separate stations in Oswestry – a GWR station and a Cambrian station.

The first 25″ OS map extract below shows the general arrangement of railway facilities in the centre of Oswestry at the turn of the 20th century. The second focusses on the two railway stations.

An extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey revised map of 1900, published in 1901, shows the large Cambrian Loco and Wagon Works which sat Northeast of the town centre. The two lines from the North and East of the town (from Gobowen and Whitchurch) met at the North side of the Works. The GWR line terminated at its station just to the West of the Cambrian’s Works. The Cambrian’s station was a little further to the South. [7]
A closer view of the same 25″ Ordnance Survey shows just how close the two stations were to each other. The Cambrian’s facilities and buildings were on a grander scale than those of the GWR. [7]
Oswestry Railway Station and the Cambrian Railway’s headquarters, looking North in 1860s, © Public Domain. [31]

A series of photographs of the railway station can be found on the Disused Stations website. [32]

Oswestry Railway Station (at the top of this image) and the Cambrian’s Works (nearer the camera) seen in an aerial view looking from the Northeast across Oswestry (EAW056424, 1954). Historic England. [30]

After the grouping in 1922 the GWR set about rationalising their inheritance. The old Cambrian station became the town’s passenger facilities and the GWR station was converted into the hub of an enlarged goods yard. “The Cambrian platforms were extended by 300ft, and a new branch bay was created on the west side of the station on a site that had previously been occupied by a large goods shed. At the same time the main up and down platforms were equipped with new canopies, and electric lighting was installed in place of gas in the goods yard and engine sheds. … Goods facilities were provided on a lavish scale, with sidings at both the north and south ends of the station. The main goods yard, which incorporated the original Great Western terminus, was situated to the north of the passenger station; the former terminus remained largely intact after its conversion to a goods depot, although part of the platform canopy was boxed-in to form a goods loading area.” [3: p632]

Goods facilities extended both to the North and South of the enlarged passenger station. Oswestry engine shed contained six terminal roads and sat to the North of the station complex, between the lines to Whitchurch and Gobowen. Jenkins tells us that a “standard GWR raised coaling plant was erected as part of the post-Grouping improvements, and this replaced an earlier Cambrian coaling stage. The Great Western coal stage was surmounted by a 45,000gallon water tank, while the old 45ft-diameter locomotive turntable was taken up and a new 65ft-diameter GWR one erected.” [3: p632]

The next two map extracts focus on these changes.

The 25″ Ordnance Survey revised in 1924 and published in 1926 shows the revised facilities with the old GWR station now indicated as a Goods station. [8]
This photograph by Ben Brooksbank shows 4-6-0 No. 7815 ‘Fritwell Manor’ on a down stopping train heading towards Welshpool and beyond. The camera is facing Northeast towards Whitchurch and Gobowen, © Ben Brooksbank and licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-SA 2.0). [29]
This closer view shows the location of Oswestry’s six-road engine shed and the track arrangement recorded by the Ordnance Survey at the Northeast end of the Locomotive and Wagon Works. [8]

South of Oswestry, trains for Llanfyllin travelled along the GWR Whitchurch to Aberystwyth main line as far as Llanymynech, passing Llynclys junction where the Tanat Valley Light Railway diverged westwards on its way to Blodwell Junction and Llangynog. Llynclys Railway Station was situated a short distance beyond the junction. It “was a wayside station with a small but substantial station building on the up side and a waiting shelter on the down platform. In architectural terms the station building, with its two-storey stationmaster’s house and single-storey booking-office wing, was very typical of Oswestry & Newton practice. The nearby goods yard contained facilities for coal, livestock, and general merchandise traffic.” [3: p633]

The length of the line from Oswestry to Llanymynech is covered by the next sixteen extracts from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900 and accompanying satellite images and photohgraphs.

A short distance to the South of Oswestry town centre the line passed under Salop Road adjacent to the gates of the town cemetery. [9]
The same location in the 21st century. [Google Earth, February 2025] The line South from Oswestry is single track, it is part of the Cambrian Heritage Railways based at both Llynclys and Oswestry in the restored Oswestry Railway Station. It was formed after the 2009 merger of the Cambrian Railways Society and the Cambrian Railways Trust, it aims to reinstate the infrastructure required to operate trains from Gobowen to Llynclys Junction (for Pant) and to Blodwel. Cambrian Heritage Railways also operates the Cambrian Railways Museum in the Oswestry railway station’s former goods depot. [17]
This schematic map shows the lengths of the line between Gobowen and Welshpool that have been restored as of the end of 2024. [17]

The Cambrian Heritage Railway is extending and repairing track from Llynclys South northwards towards Oswestry to enable trains to run into the former Cambrian Railway headquarters at Oswestry. [17]

Looking North from Salop Road bridge in the first quarter of the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking South from Salop Road bridge in the first quarter of the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The line continued South from the Salop Road bridge. [9]
Further South, the line continued to track South-southeast. [9]
The line passed to the East of the small village of Weston. [10]
The same location in the 21st century. This is Weston Wharf Station on the Cambrian Heritage Railway. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking North from Weston Road in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Weston Wharf Railway Station on the Cambrian Heritage Railways’ line to the South of Oswestry. “Plans to extend the line from Oswestry were reported in January 2016. The work was scheduled to proceed in three stages: phase one from Oswestry to Gasworks Bridge which carries the B4579 Shrewsbury Road over the line, phase two to make Gasworks Bridge passable and phase three to reach Weston Wharf. [24] At Gasworks Bridge, the track had to be lowered to allow trains to pass under the steel girder frame installed to strengthen the bridge. Funding was received from Shropshire Council and Oswestry Town Council.” [25][26][28]

By April 2022 the 2 miles (3.2 km) of track from Oswestry to Western Wharf, which lay abandoned for more than 50 years, had been reinstated. The station was officially opened on 2 April 2022 by Helen Morgan MP and Vince Hunt, Chairman of Shropshire Council. It consists of a single platform, a run-around loop and a siding. Previously, there was no station here, only a goods depot.” [27][28]

Weston Wharf Railway Station development proposals as shown in the Cambrian Heritage Railway’s newsletter in 2019. [27]

Looking South from Weston Road in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The line continues South-southwest [10]
The modern day A483 crosses the line of the railway a little to the South of Weston Wharf. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking North from the A483 in the first quarter of the 21st century. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
Looking South from the A483 in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, July 2024]
The line continued South-southwest. [10]
And passed under one minor road and then over another (just at the bottom edge of this extract. [11]
The first of the two bridges in the 21st century. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking North from the minor road bridge in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking South from the same minor road bridge in the 21st century. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The second of the two bridges in the 21st century. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking South through the bridge spanning Albridge Lane. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking North through the bridge spanning Albridge Lane. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Beyond Albridge Lane Bridge, the line continued Southwest passing under another minor road bridge which carried Church Lane and which can just be seen at the bottom of this extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900. [11]
Church Lane Bridge as it appears on satellite imagery in the 21st century. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking North-northeast from Church Lane Bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking South-southwest from Church Lane Bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
On this next extract, the minor bridge appears at the very top. South of that bridge the village of Llynclys was passed after the Tanat Valley branch left the main line heading West. [12]
The same location as it appears on the ESRI [satellite imagery provided by the National Library of Scotland (NLS). [20]

The Tanat Valley Light Railway is covered by two articles which can be found here [18] and here. [19] The route of the main line and that of the Tanat Valley Light Railway are defined by the lines of trees in the 21st century. The village has extended across the railway line.

Looking North from the B4396 at Llynclys. The building is Llynclys Railway Stationmaster’s House and booking office which are now in private hands. Jenkins describes the station as a “wayside station with a small but substantial station building on the up side and a waiting shelter on the down platform. In architectural terms the station building, with its two-storey stationmaster’s house and single-storey booking-office wing, was very typical of Oswestry & Newton practice. The nearby goods yard contained facilities for coal, livestock, and general merchandise traffic.” [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking South from the B4396 at Llynclys along the preservation line. … Llynclys South Railway Station was built by the preservation railway to replace the original Llynclys Railway Station. [Google Streetview, April 2024]

Llynclys South Railway Station is located just South of the original located Llynclys station, “on the other side of the B4396 road bridge. During the original commercial operation of the line, the site was used for goods handling. … The station was built as an alternative to the original Llynclys station, which has become a private house. Work on the South station began in 2004 and opened to the public in 2005. CHR currently keeps the bulk of its rolling stock here, on a number of sidings, and a new carriage shed is set to be built after having gained planning permission in 2007.” [23]

A photograph of 78xx class 4-6-0 No 7819 ‘Hinton Manor’ running past what was formally Haystacks siding (on the left) and Warehouse siding (right) at Llynclys with a ‘down’ Whitchurch to Aberystwyth service in 1963. Can be found here. This location is now the Cambrian Heritage Railways Llynclys South Station © Andrew Dyke.

More photographs and maps of Llynclys Railway Station can be found on the Disused Stations website. [33]

South of Llynclys trains ran on through Pant to Llanymynech which was nearly 6 miles South of Oswestry.

The old line continues South-southwest from Llynclys Railway Station. [12]
And then ran parallel to and on the West side of the Shropshire Union Canal. Close to the mid-point on the West side of this image the line is bridged by Penygarreg Lane. [13]
The same area in the 21st century as it appears in the NLS ESRI satellite imagery both highlighted by the lines of trees. Penygarreg Lane and bridge can be seen quite easily on this image. The length of the Montgomery Canal (Shropshire Union Canal) in the vicinity of the village of Pant is known as the Shropshire Gap. The Shropshire Union Canal Society is working to renovate the derelict length of the Canal. [21][22]
The view North-northeast from Penygarreg Lane. The bridge forms the end of the heritage line. The view South from the lane is completely blocked by a high Leylandii hedge. This is the Southern limit (in 2025) of the preservation line. [Google Streetview, April 2025]
A little to the South of Penygarreg Lane, Pant Railway Station is at the centre of this next extract from the 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900. [14]
A closer view of the immediate area around the station at Pant is worthwhile. It shows the wharf at the canal side and transshipment facilities for the standard-gauge line. The tramway served Crickheath Quarry. By the 21st century, much of this area has changed significantly. [14]
The same location in the 21st century. A comparison of this satellite image with the map extract immediately above is illuminating. Access to the canal wharf from the West was a shared underbridge. Both the tramway and the road passed under the bridge. The road then turned sharply to the South running parallel to the canal before turning East to cross the bridge over the canal which is still in place in the 31st century. Removal of the railway had meant that a new alignment of the road on the West side of the canal has been possible. [Google Earth, February 2025]
Looking North along the line of the railway towards Llynclys and Oswestry. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking South along the line of the railway towards Llanymynech. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The line continued South towards Llanymynech bridging the Montgomery Canal on a skew bridge. [14]
The location of the bridge over the Montgomery Canal. Well house Lane runs on the South side of the old canal.
The remains of the railway bridge over Wellhouse Lane seen from the Northeast. The northern abutment is hidden by vegetation. The Montgomery Canal, in its overgrown state, is off the right side of this image. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The remains of the railway bridge over Wellhouse Lane seen from the Southwest. The northern abutment is hidden by vegetation (on the left of the road). The Montgomery Canal, in its overgrown state, is further to the left. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
After crossing the Canal and Wellhouse Lane, the line passed through a shallow reverse curve and bridged another lane. [14]

The location of the bridge in the map extract above is shrouded by the tree canopy. A modern satellite image would show very little as does the Streetview image below.

Looking Northwest through the location of the bridge at the centre of the map extract above. The bridge, including its abutments, is no longer present. The road leaving the lane to the left climbs onto the old railway embankment and follows the route of the line for a few hundred metres, giving access to a private dwelling and a sewerage farm. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
The 25″ Ordnance Survey of 1900 shows the original junction between the Cambrian’s Whitchurch to Aberystwyth line and the Llanfyllin Branch to the North of Llanymynech Railway Station. With this junction facing North, trains from and to Llanfyllin were required to undertake and awkward reversal along the main line into Llanymynech Station. The replacement alignment can be seen towards the bottom of this extract. It followed the line of the old extension to the Potteries, Shrewsbury and North Wales Railway (PS&NWR) By the time of this survey the length of the original branch just to the West of this map extract had been abandoned. A short chord (also off the left of this extract) linked the branch to the PSNWR. [15]
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey from before the turn of the 29th century shows the alterations necessary close to the main line. The PS&NWR crossed the line to Newton from Oswestry on the level at a diamond crossing. A new chord was necessary to allow trains access to and from the main line. That chord was placed to the South of the original line (the earthworks of the original line can be seen to the North of the new chord). [35]
The same area shown on Google Maps’ satellite imagery. Station Road crosses the site of the old station at the top-right of this image. The mainline runs South down the right side of the image. The route of the Llanfyllin Branch is marked by the track marked in grey running West from the location of the junction to the A483. [Google Maps, February 2025]
Looking from the West along Station Road (B4398) on its approach to the bridge over the old railway. The railway station was under this bridge. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
Looking West along Station Road from the location of the East abutment of the bridge over Llanymynech Railway Station. [Google Streetview, April 2024]
This extract from the 6″ Ordnance Survey of 1900, published in 1902, shows the relationship of the old and new routes taken by branch trains for and from Llanfyllin. The earlier alignment is shown as dismantled and runs to the North of the later alignment. The chord linking the two is on the left of this extract. The bridge which carried the main road South from Llanymynech over the branch can be seen at the right of this map extract. [16]

Llanymynech Railway Station was the point of departure for Llanfyllin Branch trains from the main line. In early year this required trains serving Llanymynech from Oswestry to undertake a reversal in order to travel along the branch. The same applied to trains from Llanfyllin needing to call at or terminate at Llanymynech.

This was addressed by providing a short chord line from the Llanfyllin Branch to what was once part of the Potteries, Shrewsbury and North Wales Railway (PS&NWR). “This remodelled layout enabled branch trains to serve Llanymynech station without reversing, although the new junction arrangements necessitated the abandonment of a small portion of the original Oswestry & Newton branch. … Further changes ensued in 1911 when a connection was established between the former PS&NW line and the Tanat Valley route at Blodwell Junction. This new line created a useful loop line between the Llanfyllin and Tanat Valley branches, although in the event the two-mile connecting line between Llanymynech and Blodwell Junction had a comparatively short life, and it was closed in the mid-1920s.” [3: p635]

Llanymynech grew as a Victorian village after the opening of the Montgomeryshire Canal in 1797. This length of Canal became part of the Shropshire Union Railways and Canal Company and then part of the LNWR. The Canal was only abandoned after the LNWR became part of the LMS. The Canal was not abandoned until towards the end of the Second World War (1944). Although Llanymynech has a Welsh name it sits on the English side of the border with Offa’s Dyke running through the parish. [3: p635]

The Oswestry & Newton Railway “constructed a simple two-platform station southeast of Llanymynech, plus an adjacent goods yard, to enable shipping of locally quarried limestone, and created products of quick lime and lead. However, under its Act of Parliament, it had agreed not to disturb the operations of the existing local tramways or canals, and hence access across each would either be over (bridge) or under (aqueduct). … The Hoffmann kilns were located on the opposite side of the canal to the chosen station site, and if accessed on the level would have required an aqueduct to be built under the canal. Not having the money to achieve this, the O&NR agreed to junction with the local tramways north of its station at “Rock Siding”. It hence built a bay platform on the northwest side of the station, from which line extended to the “Rock Siding”. To access the Hoffmann kilns, trains would firstly enter the bay, then reverse up the slope to the “Rock Siding”, where they would then change direction again by pulling forward over a bridge to the Hoffmann kilns.” [34]

Llanymynech Railway Station in 1962: An inidentified ex-LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-0 arriving tender first into the station, © Lamberhurst, and authorised for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence %(CC BY-SA 4.0). [37]

Details and more photographs of Llanymynech Railway Station can be found on the Disused Stations website. [36]

Once the chord linking the old Llanfyllin Branch and the PS&NWR had been built and the chord between the main line and the PS&NWR was complete, trains from Oswestry and Llanymynech diverged West off the main line just South of Llanymynech Railway Station.

The Llanfyllin Branch

After running off the main line, trains for Llanfyllin passed under what would become the A483. The bridge appears on both of the last OS Map extracts above.

Looking South along the A483. There is nothing to see, at road level, of the bridge over the old railway. The line ran on the near side of the terrace visible on the right. [Google Streetview, July 2024]

Carreghofa Halt was the first stop on the Branch, it was just a short distance from the mainline close to the chord which served to link the old branch and the PS&NWR line. It was an unstaffed stopping place, opened by the GWR on 11th April 1938, “its facilities comprised a short platform on the down side of the running line. The platform was of earth & cinder construction with revetting of old sleepers. A small wooden shelter was provided for the comfort of waiting travellers, while the simple platform was fenced with tubular metal railings. … Other features of minor interest at Carreghofa included a sleeper-built permanent-way hut to the east of the platform and an unusual overbridge immediately to the west of the halt. The bridge, which crossed the railway on a skewed alignment, was a single-span structure carrying the B4398 road and the Montgomeryshire Canal.” [3: p635]

The location of Carreghofa Halt as it appeared on an OS Map from 1957. The trackbed of the Nantmawr Branch is seen heading North off the extract. The trackbed of the original Llanfyllin Branch runs East-West across the top of the extract. The chord from one to the other leaves the line of the old Nantmawr Branch to the North side of the canal aqueduct/road bridge. [38]
Carreghofa Halt looking Northwest towards the road/canal bridge. This image was shared on the Disused Stations Facebook Group by John Williams on 14th October 2024, © C.C. Green. [39]
A very similar view in the spring of 2024, © John Williams, shared by him on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 14th October 3024, and used here with his kind permission. [39]
Carreghofa Halt looking from the road/canal bridge towards Llanymynech. This image was shared on the Disused Stations Facebook Group by John Williams on 14th October 2024, © A.M.Davies. [39]
A very similar view from the road/canal bridge in the spring of 2024, © John Williams, shared by him on the Disused Stations Facebook Group on 14th October 3024, and used here with his kind permission. [39]

Having passed beneath the road/canal bridge, “trains reached the junction between the Potteries, Shrewsbury & North Wales branch to Nantmawr and the short connection which gave access to the original Llanfyllin route. This 26-chain curve was opened on 27th January 1896 as a means of linking the PS&NW route to the original 1863 branch.” [3: p365][4][5]

A relatively low quality view from the road bridge/canal aqueduct looking Northwest. The stored wagons on the right sit on the Nantmawr Branch. The chord to Llanfyllin heads off to the left. [40]

Now heading pretty much due West the branch sets off for Llansantffraid. We will pick up this next length of the route in the second article in this short series.

References

  1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llanfyllin_Branch, accessed on 1st February 2025.
  2. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2026003, accessed on 1st February 2025.
  3. Stanley Jenkins; The Llanfyllin Branch; in Steam Days, Red Gauntlet Publications, Bournemouth, October 2023, p626-638.
  4. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/09/18/the-tanat-valley-light-railway-and-the-nantmawr-branch-part-1.
  5. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/17/the-tanat-valley-light-railway-and-the-nantmawr-branch-part-2.
  6. http://www.oswestry-borderland-heritage.co.uk/?page=20, accessed on 7th February 2025.
  7. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148177, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  8. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148180, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  9. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148759, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  10. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148795, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  11. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148822, accessed on 8th February 2025
  12. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121148855, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  13. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121149311, accessed on 8th February 2025.
  14. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121149305, accessed on 8th February 2025
  15. https://maps.nls.uk/view/121149329, accessed on 8th February 2025
  16. https://maps.nls.uk/view/101593993, accessed on 10th February 2025.
  17. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian_Heritage_Railways, accessed on 10th February 2025.
  18. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2019/09/18/the-tanat-valley-light-railway-and-the-nantmawr-branch-part-1
  19. https://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/17/the-tanat-valley-light-railway-and-the-nantmawr-branch-part-2
  20. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.0&lat=52.81110&lon=-3.06206&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=8, accessed on 11th February 2025.
  21. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.6&lat=52.79815&lon=-3.06797&layers=168&b=ESRIWorld&o=0, accessed on 11th February 2025.
  22. https://shropshireunion.org.uk/the-shropshire-gap, accessed on 11th February 2025.
  23. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llynclys_South_railway_station, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  24. Shropshire heritage railway to start on extensionhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weston_Wharf_railway_station#cite_note-1; in the Shropshire Star, 3rd January 2016, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  25. Steaming on! Oswestry’s heritage railway project is on track thanks to six-figure cash boost; in the Oswestry & Border Counties Advertizer, 25th January 2018, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  26. Oswestry Group clears the way for Weston Wharf extension, in The Railway Magazine. 13th September 2019, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  27. Weston Station, in On the Weston Front. 2 February 2019
  28. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weston_Wharf_railway_station, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  29. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2510794, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  30. https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/image/EAW056424, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  31. http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/o/oswestry/index.shtml, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  32. http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/o/oswestry/index.shtml, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  33. http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/l/llynclys/index.shtml, accessed on 14th February 2025.
  34. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llanymynech_railway_station, accessed on 15th February 2025.
  35. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16.8&lat=52.77910&lon=-3.08497&layers=257&b=ESRIWorld&o=100, accessed on 15th February 2025.
  36. http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/l/llanymynech/index.shtml, accessed on 15th February 2025.
  37. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ivatt_2-6-0_at_Llanymynech_railway_station_(1962).JPG, accessed on 15th February 2025.
  38. http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/c/carreghofa_halt/index.shtml, accessed on 20th February 2025.
  39. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1KLDf7Svq6, accessed on 21st February 2025.
  40. I failed to keep a record of the source of this image and have not been able to relocate it.